This is Dan Caples and welcome to today's online podcast edition of The Dan Caplis
Show. Please be sure to give us a five star rating if you'd be
so kind, and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. America right now and across the party
lines, to a certain extent, is pushing back against this, that this
clear miscarriage of justice, his clear abuse of process, That this clear corruption
not in the legal prosecutable sense, but in the moral sense of our sacred
what should be sacred justice system, in the wrongful conviction of Donald Trump,
and as predicted, we see that unfolding in many ways. I want to
update you on a few of those eight y five four zero five eight two
five to five, the number techs DAN five seven seven thirty nine, much
more on the agenda as well, locally and nationally. But two hundred million,
now is what the Trump campaign is claiming has been raised since this conviction.
Think of that for context, Biden, this juggernaut right fundraising juggernaut raised
about fifty million in April, so just since this wrongful conviction on Thursday,
two hundred million raised seventy million in small donations. Now, the legal definition
of small donations is two hundred dollars or less than. Obviously, you wish
that two hundred million. You wish that had been two hundred million one dollar
donations, right, because that shows a level of commitment from more people.
And you get two hundred million votes, you're probably gonna win, right,
right. So yeah, but the key is seventy million of that in small
donations. And I think there's real significance in the other one hundred and thirty
coming from the billionaire types, in the depocketed types, because you know you're
going to need some of that too. And one point I've been hammering,
and David Sacks, I believe it was, who said this, one of
the billionaires who stepped up after Trump was wrongfully convicted, stepped up and said,
wait a second, there's only one issue now in November, this election
is boiled down to one question, do you want America to become a banana
Republic or not? And that's the point I've been making before that because it's
so vital, right, it's so vital. Because now that now that that's
if not the key issue, a key issue come November five, you open
up this entire other bucket of voters who were never going to vote for Trump.
They don't even like them, but now they're going to cast a ballot
for Donald Trump. Not because they want to vote for him, but electing
him is the only way to stop the left and stop us from becoming a
banana republic. So you see this unfolding in very tangible ways now in terms
of dollars, for example. And I expect we're going to see polls bounce
around a little bit for the first two or three weeks, etc. But
then it's going to settle back down to this in part. And this is
this Governor Doug Bergham from North Dakota, who is being talked about as a
VP choice. I predict you won't be, but he's an impressive guy in
lots of ways. If they were running for president and changing those business records
to obscure donations to their own campaign, you know what I'm saying, This
isn't just filing error. Well, I hear what you're saying, but most
Americans cannot explain it. Many of the legal act many of your legal experts
that stood on the curb outside the courthouse for sex years can't for six weeks
can't explain it. So Americans are going to come back to the issues that
affect them because this trial outcome doesn't affect them. Their inflation affects it does.
Yeah, so voter obviously, come on, voters are going to vote
their self interest. And I don't mean that in the narrow selfish kind of
way. It's just like, come on, what do you care about most
of your life? You'd probably say your children, right, you care about
your spouse. I mean, obviously people care about their faith. But people
are going to vote their self interest overall, So they're going to come back
to I used the example last week. Your house is on fire. You
look outside. You got one guy. He has a sign on says convicted,
and he's got this big old fire hose and it's tied to this hydrant
and it's just gurgling over with water pressure. And you know he's going to
be able to save you and your family trapped on the third floor. He
got this other, puny little guy. He's got a sign on that says
not convicted felon, but probably should be, and he's got this little bucket
of water. I mean, who you're going to vote for? There?
Right, and America is in that situation right now. Plus, I think
the vast majority of people understand that this is a bogus conviction by normal American
justice system standard save five five for zero five eight two five five the number.
I want to get to text. But let's start with Dean in Florida.
You're on the Dan Kapla Show. Welcome Dean, Hey, Thank Dan.
One day, I want to talk about Fauci. It seems like the
Democrats just love to protect their own. They will never own up to any
mistake. Uh you know, they'll they do turn on each other and when
they make a mistake, which is how upposed to be. That's all.
And then I wanted to get back to the Trump. I mean, it
seems to me like the judge and Brag they colluded. I mean they had
to have gotten together and put this game plan together on how to convict Trump.
Isn't there laws against that? Oh? Sure? Listen if and I
don't believe that kind of collusion occurred here. If you were saying that Bragg
and the judge met and they said, Okay, this is how we're going
to get Trump, Uh yeah, you bet, that would be legal.
Everybody there could go to jail get inspired. I don't believe that occurred.
No, I don't believe a pretty good game plan. Well, listen,
I think what you had. I think you had a court and a DA
that were similarly inclined. I think you had a court. Obviously, this
judge, while it was only thirty five dollars, it's the principle that matters.
The judge had given to an anti Trump organization. There's no way,
in my opinion, at that point that any judge should should be here in
that case. If it had been a judge who had given thirty five dollars
to a pro Trump group, that judge should not be hearing that case.
Then, on top of that, this was a situation where the court's daughter,
you know, was working for a company that made lots and lots and
lots of money from Democrat activist group. And so again, if if this
had been a pro Trump judge who had the same kind of family relations,
nobody would want that judge on the trial. And so so, No,
I don't think there's attorney well, attorney with days is sustaining it or I
mean, it's just a it was so lopsided, it's not even like a
fair trial. Well but but but Dean, understand this. I mean,
to the extent Jonathan Turley has done brilliant work on this. Andy McCarthy has
done brilliant work on this. And both of those guys were there. I
wasn't even there. Both of those guys were there. And so, but
understand this that the way things work, the way things work in the process,
that appearance, that that appearance of bias will help Trump greatly unappeal because
I've getten some blowback in the background there. Dean, thank you for your
call, that'll help them greatly on appeal. Because I believe after forty years
of doing this, and I'm not an appellate specialist, but I'm certainly familiar
with the Pellet law, and I've attended those hearings in my own cases and
cases that I've covered for national media, and I believe that. First of
all, I believe that the vast majority of judges across Colorado and the country
try very very hard to get it right and work very hard to do so,
regardless of political leanings. Second, at the appellate level, I think
that, yeah, you're looking at individual legal issues because that's what appell court
judges and justices address, but I think that judges are also looking at the
totality, They're looking at the overall. They're they're trusting their own intuition to
a certain extent, the whole greater than the sum of the parts. Was
this fair? Was this whole blanket thing fair? And I think all of
these very fair criticisms of the court in New York, etc. Just lay
the groundwork for it being much easier for Trump to overturn this on appeal,
because I think the vast majority of folks looking at this, whether they're pelic
court justices or not, are going to say, you know, this thing
doesn't feel right. It just doesn't feel like this was a level playing field
for Trump. Then you get into some of the individual issues and rulings,
such as the fact that the original indictment didn't even specify what the crime was,
that the alleged falsification of business records was designed to cover up. I
mean stuff like that. I've never been more sure of anything in the law
that Trump's going to win. But as the left knows, it's going to
be after election day, he will not die convicted. Fellon Donald Trump in
the meantime, that label will be helpful to him politically because people know what's
really going on here. At least the people will decide this election know what's
really going on here. And the choice now is do we want to be
a banana Republic or not? Eight five five for zero five eight two five
five. And this is why I said the day before the conviction that a
conviction would help Trump more politically. I wish he hadn't been convicted. He
shouldn't have been, but it'll help more politically because if he'd been acquitted,
Yeah, nice, sugar high, you raise some money? How much money?
I'll as grind this when we come back, and you text me as
well DN five seven seven three nine. How much money do you think Trump
raises if it had been an acquittal rather than a conviction. And if it
had been an acquittal, and I wish it was, then yeah, you've
got this rash. It's rocket fuel for his campaign, no doubt. But
now there's nothing left for the voter to do. Now. What's left for
the voter to do is the voter's the only one who can stop America from
becoming a banana Republic by thoroughly rejecting this tactic of going out now and getting
these wrongful convictions of political opponents. Only the voter can stop it. Only
the voter can save America. That's the biggest reason this is going to help
Trump so much. Eight five ur zero five A two five five the number
when we come back. A whole bunch of stuff I want to get into
on top of that, including Caitlin Clark is what happened to her over the
weekend on the basketball court? Racial? Is is it because she's straight?
What do you think is going on there? You're on the Dan Kapla Show
and now back to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast. People also say, can
you bring the country together? And the answer is yes, success will bring
the country together, because I amen, I want to hear you say that
a hundred times a day between now and election day. Success will bring the
country together. We need to hear that from the president over and over again.
And then he went on in that clip to talk about all the success
he had had and he did and the country was coming together, not in
a big kumbayah, oh there's a lefty let me go hug him kind of
way, but the country was coming together. If not for COVID, Trump
obviously would have won in a landslide. So that is I mean there are
two ways this three ways this country comes together, right, I mean some
kind of profound divine intervention, which is always a distinct pot usibility. That's
how this country was created to begin with. Don't believe me. Ask the
founders right the last line of the Declaration of Independence, you know where they
just said it. Hey, we're doing this crazy thing right, which is
likely to fail, and we're all likely to end up getting hung by the
British. But we're doing all this because we rely on divine providence. So
it comes together. This country comes together in one of three different ways,
right, some type of divine intervention, some type of in a good positive
sense, transformative leader. And I believe there's a very good chance that kind
of leader is going to come down the pike or through success through the country
as a whole. Never everybody, but enough a solid majority of the country
saying you know what, I don't really like that solb in office. I
don't like his or her party or whatever, but the country's doing so well.
That stuff works, that conservative stuff works, and that's what brings the
country together enough that we can get past this toxic, dangerous polarization. And
Donald Trump was on track to accomplish that when COVID hit, and Donald Trump
is in a position to accomplish that again in a second term. There's no
guarantee it would happen, but there is an infinitely better chance that it would
happen then with the Democrat. And by the way, it's probably time for
us to talk about this again because we waste so much time and it's so
silly talking about Joe Biden and talking about Trump versus Biden, etc. And
I understand at the moment it's nominally relevant because Biden is the presumptive nominee,
but we all know Joe Biden is not going to be the Democrat candidate and
election Day, so as we talk about this fallout from this wrongful conviction,
you know, it really is one dimensional and just playing stupid for us to
talk about it in terms of Biden. We have to be talking about what
it's going to mean on election Day when Trump is facing that Democrat nominee,
whoever he or she may be. And obviously the answer to that question is
different depending upon who the nominee is. Eight five five four zero five A
two to five to five the number text d A N five seven seven three
nine. I know right now, the presumption is that the DEM nominee would
be Jared Polis, Right, Isn't that the presumption in the police household?
Ryan? I thought it was in front of an audience of one maybe yeah,
right and yeah, I won't good time, right, but anyway,
uh yes, So at this point, right that this smart money would be
that the DEM nominee is either going to be Newsome or they're going to be
stuck with Kamala Harris and then two vastly different scenarios. They're right, but
I'm just putting it out there. Let's let's just start being a little more
accurate and talking in terms of of what's really going to be the situation on
election day, and that is not going to be Joe Biden. Let's go
down to Beautiful Publo. We'll start with Roger. You're on the Dan cap
A Show. Welcome, Roger. Oh, Roger, I want to give
you this little news bullet and popping up on CNN right now, breaking news
Georgia case now unlikely to go to trial before election after court set's October hearing
to consider removing da Fannie Willis, So think about this scenario, as perverted
as the left is right now when it comes to our justice system. This
scenario that President Trump wins the second term, which is likely at this point,
and then these lefti's don't stop and Fannie Willis puts him on trial anyway
down in Georgia and convicts him and sentences in jail in Georgia. I mean,
keep in mind that possibility. Because the left right now is many of
them not all so consumed with hate and so one caring about America obviously that
you cannot rule that scenario out. Go ahead, my friend, Dan,
how do you doing, buddy? Good? And don't mean to imply that
they could legitimately convict him in Georgia For the reasons I've stated before, These
are, in my view, bogus charges against Trump, and he he is
not guilty of a crime in Georgia. But that didn't stop what happened in
New York from happening. Go ahead, Dan, how are you doing,
buddy? Living the dream? Still? It's been a while since we talk.
Yes, I got a I had some hope going into the New York
City tlge. I didn't go to law school, but that was bogus.
Okay, you're not alone. I got a I got a bad feeling about
is this judge is just aching to play him in prison. Okay, did
you, Roger, did you see President Trump's response to that this weekend when
he said, I'm not going to beg I'm not going to beg to stay
out of prison. I love that response. Yeah, yeah, and I
applauded him for that. But I got a I got a bad feeling about
this that his appeal in New York State will not hold up because it's all
blue and we all hate Trump to the bone. Yet but but my friend,
remember this bizarre that, this bizarre what was it five hundred million dollars
fine against Trump? I mean, first of all, that whole thing should
have been tossed out. But at least the appellate court cut it by a
few hundred million and allowed Trump wasn't allowed to post a bond, So there
is some hope there. I think there are also some constitutional issues that that
could go beyond the New York system. I'm hoping they show a brain during
all this, you know what I mean, Yeah, hoping they show that
they got half a burden and Roger, I got a bell now. But
great to hear from you, my friend. And again, another reason I
have confidence is because you have these multiple appellate levels, and then you have
some constitutional due process issues you know that arise as well. I mean in
our federal constitution, you know, so ultimately you've got enough possible levels of
appeal that in a case where in my opinion and my view of this,
you know, there there is so much error that eventually it's hard to even
imagine a scenario where this conviction could stick day five to five four zero five
eight two five five textdam five seven seven three nine And as Andy McCarthy says,
I think you know, the left has known him that for a long
time, but they don't care. They just wanted a conviction before election day.
Hopefully try to get Trump jailed. And and again I love what Trump
said over the weekend. I'm not going to beg this judge to keep me
on a jail. I think one of the more interesting things, and I
wish it would be televised, will be the sentence scene of President Trump following
this wrongful conviction just days before the GOP Convention. I wish that would be
televised because Trump will have a right to speak at that sentencing and it'll be
fascinating to see what he says. But I love his attitude that he's not
going to beg to stay out of jail. And Ryan, what do you
think the chances are that this trial court sentences him and actually puts him in
jail. He may sentence him to jail time and suspended. He may order
some home detention. Whatever he does, I fully expect to be stayed pending
appeal, meaning it'll be put off into the future pending appeal. My question
would be do they want him to win? Because he will absolutely win if
they go ahead and do that. Yeah, one of the many reasons I'm
very confident he will. They will not attempt to put him in jail.
Now eight y five for zero five A two five five text d A N
five seven seven three nine. Do you think President Biden wants Hunter Biden convicted
in the trial that started today? You're on the Dan Capless Show. You're
listening to the Dan Kapliss Show podcast. There he's tuned. But what's that
all about? What's the hidden meaning? The deeper point? Just at Atlantis.
Morris set tended to write a lot in ironic and that was one of
her songs, Like contradictions. Okay, I knew it was deep in some
way, and so deep. I still don't understand it. She and I
are the same agent. She just turned the big five. Oh hmm hmmm.
She's a couple months older than me, though. Wow, I cannot
believe that you're going to be fifty. Yeah, really, it's coming up.
Honestly, if I met you on the street, i'd put you at
thirty. Yeah. Wow, I need you to be my hype man,
gonna bring you along. Yeah. No, No, it doesn't take any
hype, doesn't take anype at all. It's just a fact hype. This
was some hype. See what do you think President Trump should do next in
order to ensure victory in November. We'll be talking about that more tomorrow.
But I think these first few days are critical. And this was Sean Strickland.
You want to fight a UFC fight over the weekend. This was in
New Jersey and Trump was there and it was raucous and it was awesome,
and I was so glad to see Trump there because this is a critical demo
for him, right, And this whole UFC thing is a way to reach
younger people and more diverse people. It's a beautiful thing, and it has
to really terrify the left, particularly as they try to decide who their nomine
he is going to be for November. But anyway, what do you think
he should be doing right now? Because you know, there's prime time right
Like when I try a case, you know, I find yours to always
be very attentive and hard working. But you know, and you know how
it is in your own life, no matter what you do for a living,
you know, in your personal life, you know, in your relationships,
there's that prime time. There are those moments where people are most dialed
in and most receptive, and so many people are dialed into President Trump right
now. What do you want to see him doing in the first week?
But anyway, here was the encouraging reaction at UFC, the Trump you the
man broing to the damn travesty what they're doing now. I'll be donating here,
my man. Let's get it done, get it done, god like
second lady, gentlemen. Yeah, and they say two hundred million race since
last Thursday's conviction, seventy million of it small money, I meaning under two
hundred dollars contributions. Great to see. So that's that's fascinating though when you
think about smaller contributions, because the day of the conviction, I donated five
hundred. I would not have thought of that as like you think of large
contributions. You think of these moneymen, these billionaire types. But I think
it so if they're saying seventy million small money mean two hundred or less,
I would think that you probably had one hundred million or more that came from
people who were, you know, real wealthy folks. And I love that
because again, it just shows the enthusiasm. And they talk about this enthusiasm
gap, this enthusiasm gap between Trump and Biden, which is a beautiful thing
to see, right, But I think we also because you always have to
be clear eyed about the threats in the landscape, you have to be clear
eyed about the strengths of your opponent, in this case the Democratic Party,
not Joe Biden. But you've got this enormous enthusiasm for President Trump, which
is now off the scale among his you know, supporters and people like me.
You are going to vote for him? Anyway. But we have to
be realistic about the fact that there is intensity and enthusiasm not for Biden or
the Democrat nominee, but to vote against Trump. We have to be realistic
about the fact, even though we don't agree with it, that it is
out there, and it is out there in a large enough dose to be
a threat on election day. So if you're advising President Trump, aren't you
telling him that, Hey, between now an election day, you need to
be doing everything you can to soften those folks, to drain that group of
some of their enthusiasm for voting against you, while not losing the enthusiasm of
your supporters. I think there's an awful lot opportunity there because the enthusiasm for
Trump among those who are going to vote from anyway is so high. I
think it's almost impossible to lose that. So I think that gives him more
room to move in terms of trying to lessen the enthusiasm of those voting against
him and if nothing else, just just get him to stay home. So
that's why I want to go to this clip, and I think this should
be his refrain throughout the campaign. You don't have to give up the fun
stuff. You don't have to give up the edge. But this needs to
be you know, he's a master brander. This needs to be his branding,
you know, bringing us together. You know, people also say,
can you bring the country together? And the answer is yes, success will
bring the country together because I had it together. See that is such a
great point. Now, a lot of people would disagree that the country had
come together under Trump. It was well on its way, and if it
hadn't been for COVID, I think it would have come together to a significant
extent after he's reelected. But success can bring the country together, as we
talked about earlier, and I think he needs to just keep talking about that
together and as I will bring us together, I'll bring us together through success,
because that's also credible. If he got up there and tried to say
I'll bring us together through force of my personality, it wouldn't be credible and
it would hurt his brand as a truth teller and somebody who's authentic. And
when I say truth teller, I understand. Every now and then Trump tells
a whopper, right, just something about you know where you just have to
laugh and you wonder, is it part of a comedy routine. Right,
he'll come out and say something like I've never lost to this or I've never
lost to that. But Trump has an authenticity that helped him win in sixteen
and is helping him now. And if he was to come out and say
that, oh, yeah, yeah, no, no, I'll bring us
together just because I'm me and people love me, nobody's going to buy that.
But it rings true. If you say I'm going to bring us together
through success, We're going to be so successful this nation will come together a
lot more. I hope he keeps talking like that because that will also help
drain. You don't have to drain all the enthusiasm of that block that's enthusiastic
about voting against you. They don't give a darn about Biden. They probably
don't even like them. They're not enthusiastic about him or the Democrat nominee.
They're enthusiastic about voting against you. I think that approach, which is credible,
helps drain that. Let me get to some text to a dam five
seven seven three nine, Dan, if you actually listened to the rambling nonsense
that Trump utter is trying to keep the focus on himself, he as well
as Biden are not firing on all cylinders. I disagree with that. Listen,
Donald Trump is as Donald Trump and the A plus Trump since the conviction
that he was in the weeks leading up to the conviction. No, I
think that just shows that he's human and that obviously, you get convicted of
thirty four felonies, no matter how bogus it is, etc. No matter
who you are, let alone a former president who's done so much for the
country and could have just ended your life and the ultimate luxury instead stepped up
to serve. Yeah, he's human and I think he's shown that humanity,
you know, since this wrongful conviction. And has he been as sharp,
Has he been as on target all the time as he was in the week's
leading up. No, but he is still benefiting in the ways we've discussed.
People can see this for what it is. They don't want to be
and a republic, and he's just going to get sharper from here. Biden.
In the meantime, you can tell that's not intellectually honest from the text
or Biden obviously has not been competent for a long time. I mean he
has moments, right, but overall he's not been competent, and he's just
getting worse. Dan, why did you say the statutes of a statute of
limitations had run, meaning expired. That's on the misdemeanor false book keeping entry
charges and they were on I think they were on maybe a five year clock,
but they had expired in twenty nineteen. The only way they were able
to bring them back from the dead was to link them with this bogus claim
that Trump had violated federal election finance laws state finance laws I believe as well,
And that's how they were able to bring it back. Dan. Even
the Colorado voting system will not allow for a fair election because any public services
providing to illegals allows them to register to vote. So we have lots of
people even in the Colorado system that shouldn't be voting. Respectfully, disagree,
Texture and if I'm wrong, somebody please just show me I'm wrong here.
The fact that somebody is able to register for saying electric bill or gas service,
etc. It just does not qualify somebody to go vote in Colorado.
I don't believe it qualifies them to register to vote. If I'm wrong about
that, please do point that out. By the way, fascinating peace today,
and we'll try to spend more time on it. That Biden has secretly
basically suspended the asylum process for three hundred and fifty thousand people, very quietly
done. That I'm over simplifying it at the moment, but allegations out there
right now that he's taken three hundred and fifty thousand people who entered I legally
and basically put the legal process on hold for them so they can just wander
the country without at this point any type of fear or repercussion, at least
for now. Now. That doesn't mean they'd be eligible to vote. But
Texter, so I don't believe that's accurate. Please do correct me if I'm
wrong. I understand the concern that folks have about folks here illegally who may
then try to vote. I understand the concern folks have, and I don't
criticize that concern. You know, I don't think it's happening in large numbers,
but I understand the concern that it might one is too many. I
get that too. But I also, as I pointed out on air,
remember when you had the whole group of folks who had come here illegally then
make all the demands on Denver Mayor Mike Johnston. And I said at the
time, Hey, they're just acting like voters because I think those folks understand
completely why the Democrats invited him here, Let him into the country, allow
them to stay, take care of them, because the Democrats view them as
future voters. And I think, you know, is it possible that in
the minds of some they believe that they're able to vote right now? I
could see where maybe that confusion would exist because of the way the left has
courted them. But certainly the left use them as future voters. Eight five
five for zero five A two five five the number you're on the Dan Capla
Show. And now back to the Dan Kaplass Show podcast. Just now,
I think the second or third time on this show when I've co hosted that
we have talked about women's basketball, and it is because of Caitlyn Clark.
So the WNBA has been a failure forever. It just has been. You
can like the product, you can dislike. Bias carried it. They don't
make money. They have not turned a profit ever, and you look at
the interest at the college level. Now at the WNBA level in Caitlin Clark,
the jersey sales, the ticket sales, the TV ratings. This league
would be suicidal to not protect its most valuable asset in the history of the
league and letting her get like shoved around like this is embarrassing, that should
not be allowed to stand. And then notice the woman who checked her to
the floor then wouldn't talk about it. It's like, oh, next question,
No, I'm sorry, you just flager fouled the league's star. Yeah,
you don't get to say, no comment. Well, you know a
lot of people making this out to be racial because Kitlyn Clark, if you
don't follow women's basketball, Caitlyn Clark is white, and the woman who not
woman who knocked her to the floor is black. And then this Angel Reese,
who had been a great college player and arrival of Clark's from the college
days, cheered on the move and congratulated the one who thuggishly knocked Caitlyn Clark
down. So a lot of people trying to say it's racial, A lot
of people trying to say it has something to do with with, you know,
whether somebody's gay or straight. Caitlyn Clark being straight. I don't see
it that way at all. And Ryan, tell me if you think I'm
missing something, I don't see it that way at all. I think this
is as old as time. I think it's biblical and nature. I think
it's just raw jealousy. I think they are just profoundly jealous of Caitlyn Clark
and the big dollar endorsement deals and all of the love and adoration that she
I don't think it has to do with race. I don't think it has
to do with whether somebody's gay or straight, or who they sleep with.
I think it's just jealousy. And I'm gonna take a step further. Dan,
you might not go there, but I'm going to because this reminds me
a lot of a situation I encountered with a young woman who I really looked
up to. She was two grades older than me. Her name was Andrea
Kimball. She was an all state basketball player. She ended up going to
Western Michigan out of our little podunk grass Lake High School, but she transferred
before graduating from grass Lake because there was so much cattiness on the team that
resented her that they didn't want to pass her the ball. And I'm sorry,
I think this is more prevalent in women's athletics than men's. I don't
think that a Caitlin Clark type player on the men's side would receive this kind
of treatment, not remotely, not close. And I've seen this too when
I'm talking to a fellow colleagues of mine who were female athletes in a team
sports setting. For whatever reason, it's a lot harder, I think,
to get them to all pull in the same direction to sacrifice for the good
of the team. And I just didn't experience that in my boys sports in
high school. Yeah, and again, I just think it's jealousy here.
And I understand you're stereotyping your gender stereotype. And he's saying it's cattiness.
It is. And I played with a major league baseball player, by the
way, a guy that would end up in the major leagues, and you
know, he was cocky and eric again, and he had a lot of
scouts coming out to see him. And would I have rather been into his
shoes? Yeah, but I wanted to win. That was more important to
me. So I'm just saying that's my experience. Well, but but what
Ryan Schuling is is saying, and I'm not trying to shame before it or
anything. I respect you coming forward with your opinion, but what you're saying
is that you just think it's a What we're seeing with the roughing up of
Caitlin Clark is a cattiness. Yes, that's just you Ryan Schuling are contending
is part of of the female gender. I think that it's harder to coach.
Bill Amber was successful at it with the Detroit Shock, but it's a
unique challenge. I think women are different than men. I think they're wired
differently in this regard. I really do. And that's what I witnessed,
that's what I've exc experience myself. Yeah, and listen, I'm not trying
to be woke or politically correct or politically woke or any of that stuff.
I just respectfully disagree. I don't think it has anything to do with that,
and and I would apply that on multiple levels, from you know,
work stuff to other stuff. I just don't see it that way, my
friend, I think this is jealousy. Now. I do think there should
be an enforcer. And what really concerned me is that nobody on Caitlin Clark's
team knocked the floor with that, with that girl who had knocked her down,
right, you know, where's the enforcer? And and that's what I
want to see from Caitlin Clark's team. I don't want to see anybody,
you know, scheduled for a funeral or anybody seriously injured. But I want
to see somebody from Kaitlin and Clark's team the next time somebody knocks her down.
You know, don't hurt, but do do retaliate within the bounds of
the sport, you know, do retaliate. I mean, you've got to
protect your your teammates. Eight five five or zero five two five five?
Dinn Are you going to talk about the cops killed in New York by an
illegal? Says a Texter. Thank god those officers are still with us.
Here's the Fox story. Illegal immigrant from Venezuela shoots two New York City police
officers during footchase, and Queen's authorities say, and so just before one five
am this morning, those officers still alive, both are expected to recover.
Let's pray for those officers. But in terms of ammunition, that hey,
it's it's national suicide to not have a border. This this is, yes,
another very very important exhibit, but we have so many other exhibits as
well. You just can't have a nation like that. If you don't have
borders, you don't have a nation. America gets that. Biden's efforts now
to try to pretend like you're serious about the border, they're going to convince
anybody. Brian, tremendous job, my friend as always, Kelly, great
work. Tremendous Aura as well. Behind the glass Texters. If we didn't
get to you today, A lot of these are Evergreen Oultre try to get
them back on air tomorrow. Please join us at four on the dan Kaplo shop