To turur Hey. Welcome, welcome. This Tuesday, the fifteenth of the
year, two thousand twenty- four, we are here in peace, in
all peace. It' s a space just like these super boring programs are.
We' re in a space of sunshine, not true. Welcome,
welcome, Dr Amen Hi, good two. Fifteen today, five, five,
fourth, but you said fifteen, luvita we sold to say yes.
I said fifteen, so I' m looking at it. Five, I
said whoever. I' m sorry, he doesn' t bring a stick
there or anything, but I don' t swear to you, but it
' s okay here. Guille Tuesday, fifteen, no, guilles Tuesday.
Five, forgive me, forgive him I said and I' m reading it.
Forgive me, all of you, forgive me, and hear me welcome,
Ephraim Marin, in another of the thousands of universes of blotches. Fifteen.
Sure, sure, sure. Thank you for understanding me obvious. Thanks
to all those who are connected on Facebook, thanks to all those who are
connected on YouTube, thanks to all those who are members of the channel,
those who are subscribers of the channel, those who are visiting and, of
course, everyone who listens to us Spreaker, Spotify, iTunes, Amazon Music,
l gun. I' ll tell you something. Yesterday, program one
about the Oscars was released, about the Oscar Awards. It' s really
very, very interesting, because Felipe Plata is a huge context about this delivery.
We' re not gonna do the sock award or not, but don
' t go. I know that all awards are important, but we would
take a lot of programs to talk about each award in specific, because if
you listen to Philip speak, you will understand the context he gives of each
of the, for example, nominees. So, today for members is already
ready in part two of the Oscar and Ratty Awards. I' ll put
it on for tomorrow. I already put it open to the public where the
actors and actresses of cast, which is very, very interesting categories, will
like it very much, really and already, well, so I will do
them. They' re really going to be entertained. There is also the
second part of the Queen victory for the public, Victoria one, Victory two
and already the news of the week let' s also see our recommendations,
the news of the weeks that tomorrow we have broken souls live. I'
m going to try to get us to make a previous for members first and
then we connect live for absolutely everyone. But tomorrow we meet to see broken
souls live, because they know it' s a topic, it' s
a case program that has a lot of meat. So it sounds horrible,
that on soul routes, that it' s crime, that is, it
has a lot of meat, it sounds very sadistic. But that' s
not what I mean, I mean it' s a story. I mean,
it' s got a lot of history. The case of pink derec
is still alive, but we' re going to talk about it. We
are also going to discuss what has come out, what I have heard,
what we have written, of course. But so that' s the warnings
we have to the Community. I show up the father when he' s
going to give the blessing, be it Colman, when I was a little
girl. We were going to Mass, as he gives us the blessing.
Before them I have to say that the catechism and that and then, already
bless me. But, thank you because we' re going to start today,
because today we have a new section here and we' ve never started
a section, because we' re always serious, serious and we' ve
already been told that we just changed to the study of history in history,
and ah pure chacoteo and here pure seriousness. But, well, today we
' re starting a new section. But first let' s talk about Caril
Leon. What Karin León did, because Cary León made another statement in Guatemala.
What did he say to see me tell me, who wants to tell
me more, I' m leaving it Ephraim, you know you work,
we' re connected. He was in the Midli and then he said this
phrase that all the time we Mexicans say to the cry of war and the
Mexicans who brute sold terible rrios. That deserves likes. That deserves likes.
She said this phrase that we live with her well. Mexicans every day I
left Guatemala to enter Guatemala or say no in Guatemala and notice that I learned
that very recently Twitter. One day I put that phrase and they wrote me
followers of Guatemala and I understood them perfectly, but I said no. It
' s not an offense to me, but it is, because they were
telling me. You' re saying my country is bad. Oh, well,
if you' re right, then I stopped using it. La.
I stopped using completely, but because there are things that didn' t look
bad before, but now it' s politically correct. And if they'
re telling you, then you stop saying it, there it is, look,
there it is. This is a DNA note. Quarantine and Carin León
enraged his Guatemalan fas. Almost half way through the song Medley Cumbias Norteñas talks
about Guatemala, Carina added a play of words that is usually used in Mexico
with the name of the Central American country to refer to a situation that develops
from bad to worse is good, no longer talk to me about it already
I left Guatemala and entered water worse you, I left Guatemala in theago you
see. That is the verse that is repeated twice throughout the Interpreter' s
song. That' s not good, it' s just that you have
to be a child, too. It was good to do things. Efrain
hears me poor faith. When Popocatepetl, if you remember, you topped the
song. It had to stop the promotion, because it was when this was
about the ashes, the evacuation of the people and all that and the label
said stop the promotion of the song is an offense at this point. So
if you go over there, Cai doesn' t count that expecting this exact
letter. I totally agree. So, exactly, it' s as if
you go to a place where there are fires and you start the firefighters coming,
you see everything there, because I don' t have another one.
The yuri one. They don' t remember. When the tremor I didn
' t even count that the heart earthquake. So yes, so that earthquake
you have to remember what it is to the truth is that sometimes if we
water it to see came out a video of Aunt Sandra on Twitter, where
they talk about that drivers who are Castilian rock in character of Rubin. I
don' t know if they saw him, that he goes out for Stan
and John Joseph or me. Well, we did see it. You sent
it to me. I think it' s good. I saw him with
Aunt Sandra. Well, he doesn' t matter. The fact is that
they are saying that there is a missing, that there is a no,
there is a driver to come the joy that is sick and they say good,
for among the seventeen there is, for it will not be noticed.
Then everyone clearly said they' re making fun of Ricardo Cáceres' heart attack.
But I didn' t see them laughing at Ricardo Cáceres' s heart
attack on the one hand, on the other, because it' s a
very black humor joke, but it' s done knowing that Ricardo Cáceres is
already out of danger. Not that' s one and two later, Juan
José ran away and ful as if not. I don' t think it
was a joke, too. It wasn' t a mockery of the heart
attack. But, on the other hand, Juan José Ulloa tells him clearly
is a quate that will not be noticed. It' s like a common
x, and it tells another driver to tell me about it, and it
' s like a Juanito like you denoising his own partner. But in turn
let' s not say that Juan José Huyo is the star of telling me.
Now Ricardo, as he wants, I' m selling. But he
wasn' t just selling. Take to the section of shows with Flor Rubin
come the joy, that is, because it has more than Juan José or
I, then yes, not totally doctor. Now we let you talk medically.
Yeah, sorry. I apologize because I' m having very ugly Internet
flaws and well, I got out and I came back I hope I don
' t get on because I' m failing this. But I thought they
probably already said it. I don' t know, it' s not
that he' s making fun of what happened to Ricardo, but it'
s the program in general and somehow, of Ricardo himself in his role as
a driver. What do you see not thinking, because it does not bite
the tongue, because also today there are many and you neither did I know
some who are at that moment commenting on that note. I was not even
aware that they were already participating and frankly, what strikes me Peter Fraín and
dear friends who see us is, why do you talk about a program of
what you consider your direct competition, which is that other morning program. To
talk that way, I think you' re a little bit worse, that
' s many times what you' ve done in those programs, to completely
ignore the existence of other mornings, other drivers and their competition in general doesn
' t exist for them and suddenly talk about it and say such a person
happened to you this program, this one and then ah but it doesn'
t matter, because there are a lot of them and you won' t
notice this because I don' t know if black humor, like your tit
or a bad chint says. I felt very bad joke. It' s
a very good one, but that' s where there' s a mockery
about Ricardo Cáceres' heart attack. I don' t think so. That
' s right, I didn' t find it, which is a terrible
joke. So, this joke was made a tell me, as it happens
at 1: 00 p m, but it doesn' t matter anyway.
We know perfectly well that the program today has many drivers, that it has
had many in other times and that these programs are so. But that'
s how Ephraim happens, because telling me already seems more like the whole filling
program, and truth a little bit and forgiveness, that is to say suddenly
you say and this program where it goes, towards where it goes? Still
on Saturdays with Paul like where he wants to wobble for good is that tell
me what you call it is not today, but the other one is true
I' m wrong. Don' t imagine how bad they are that they
' re already common to you, that you don' t even know it
anymore, but it' s okay. It' s okay, because you
don' t know what' s wrong with him, what' s wrong
with him, isn' t even ours. Mind the joy with all the
Basque that we do remind everyone that, indeed, telling me is no longer
a program that is on anyone' s radar. I don' t think
so, but I don' t think so. I don' t think
it' s on anyone' s radar. Well, let' s hear
it. We' re going to change the subject, because yesterday we were
all waiting for this one to appear because this happened to see the sentence appear
or if they ratified or what happened if he got out of jail. Reader
Parra and first Dani, Dani takes out this very optimistic video. I want
to see my dad out here, too. Yeah, I' m really
sorry, I feel like it' s done, it' s already done
right like that, yeah, yeah, that' s a live thing that
we already think is when I go out to my dad if he' s
not an ifist with tamales, we' re minted smooth. That would be
for the best. They like the plan where we could say it. Well,
that' s how Dani was celebrating or ahead of time celebrating, because
I think we all thought about it. The truth is that I thought so
too, because this had already come very far. Not for my taste,
for my taste, because, according to what they have said, there is
no convincing evidence or anything like that. And, well, in the end,
at the end this is given, the notice comes to him, as
he told us gerarda here, to daniela a parra, well, to the
lawyer and then they warn daniel the vine and already since his countenance has changed
and all the same good night hear, well, we didn' t expect
anything, and yet they managed to disappoint us and they are going to re
- dict my dad on the 15th of March. They gave us a new
hearing for March 15. We didn' t expect anything, but we knew
we were against a corrupt system and apparently nothing makes sense. Nothing' s
made sense since the trial started. Nothing made sense in two years, eight
months ago. There' s no point in this happening. But, well,
that' s what happened. We' ve just been notified, because
nothing I just wanted to tell you. I' m angry, I'
m disappointed, I' m frustrated, but I' ve always said it
as far as I can tell we knew this court was chocolate, as many
people had already told us, and it turned out to be yes. Then,
well, there it is, they give desperate, well, frustrated,
disappointed. And this, don' t really go away for the purpose of
this is no one' s exclusive. This has been published by the same
stakeholders, because all the information regarding Hector Parra' s new sentence that sexual
abuse was now added to the Esa had been removed in the first sentence.
Now they' re putting it back on. So, he' s gonna
be older. That was leaked by Alexa Parra on her social networks. That
' s nobody' s exclusive, and no one was investigated. No,
that was leaked by Alexa Parra herself on her social networks, on her Instagram
stories. There you can see them and it' s sad. You know
what the joke is here, that it' s one is two sisters confronted
by an improba. It' s how I' ll tell you a possible,
possible, but unlikely. I don' t know if I' m
implying things could have happened, but it' s pretty unlikely that it happened.
Daniel Parra will know the evidence he brings to his father. And,
on the other hand, because according to annexation and evidence, but I insist,
uh, I' m not saying that one is guilty or not guilty.
The point here is that it has been a very manoeuvring case involving people
who did not have to enter. People who didn' t have to put
their hand in have their hands. What Sergio Mayer had to do, speaking
for no one, giving lectures of nothing, why, why I think it
' s a big feat in this case. I don' t know what
you think, Ephraim, if you want to start, I know which girls
didn' t understand. What happens to the head if there were lies here
to see so much pain and what will happen to the head of those who
lied. I mean, it' s what I can' t understand,
because and I can' t understand me, he' ll tell us more
how this little girl has, that strength, because they' ve done everything
to break her soul, ah soul broken and so didn' t have a
bad dad who hasn' t broken her soul, even though he' s
been told everything to break her soul. And that' s what I don
' t and you have to respect this, send her all the light,
all the strength, because she' s out fighting with faith That is,
we saw her face full of optimism and then we faced a system that doesn
' t work, because, then, if there are laws, but because
they are already contentillo, it must be very hard. I don' t
know what you think about what she said wrong, yes, she was giving
me a lot of attention, especially the turn that according to what Alexa publishes,
because in fact, she' s the one who publishes this about what
she gave. Yesterday I was notified of the judge' s decision confirms the
production and said that he never had to be acquitted for the other crime and
that he is now convicted for both and that she says on March 15 will
be the hearing for how many years he is increased, increasing him for both
crimes. She' s giving, as a matter of fact, that besides
everything, it' s now going to be counterproductive to have exactly requested this
new hearing, this exact hearing. There he is on appeal. This is
Alexa, the one who publishes it. Otherwise, they' re not going
to shine the opposite, because if it' s Alexa, who publishes this
doesn' t, it doesn' t publish it. Dani Forgiveness Anua is
there, but go on. Indeed, it says so by saying that God
does justice, because indeed, that is what would have to happen. Then
it draws attention because while I do not bring the knowledge of how this type
of procedure is handled, it is striking that the intention was to review whether
this man could be innocent because of all the errors Daniela points out or argues
about the procedure. I was to blame and see what else finds you that
sinks you further. I mean, this strikes me very much at what point
it takes a turn that this certainly seems more justice looks like revenge. And,
well, nobody was in there No one knows for sure. But what
you can see and how you say it is observable behavior. What we see
is anger or anger from a person seeking revenge against an ex- husband who
left her, because that' s how it happened. And I don'
t say or insist, I don' t put my hands in the fire
for anyone. But when there is a reasonable doubt, when you did that
for bad people who had nothing to do, because of influence, there can
be suspicion that there may have been a mishandling, because that makes there is
a reasonable doubt about this case, emfraín forgiveness is that the victims must be
believed and will tell them one thing. Clearly, in this case I believe
the victim that I probably don' t know who he says is the exact
victim. You don' t hear it' s a topic, but here
' s the case. Is the case here the thing? It' s
very easy. You may think he is most likely guilty, most accurate to
be innocent. That' s for sure. I insist, when there is
reasonable doubt, it is better to leave a guilty person free than an innocent
person in prison. That' s for sure, that' s for sure,
you can' t. What you can' t do is put an
innocent man in jail. When there' s a reasonable doubt. That'
s what' s serious about this case. That there' s no certainty.
There is no certainty, it is absolute and I insist there were handlings
and in these handlings all the certainty is lost, all the security. So,
yes, it' s very likely and very possible that they' re
getting in or having an innocent locked up in jail. That we can give
him a vote of intent, says Shane Ruiz. We can give the victim
a boat of confidence. Of course it is, and I think I'
ve repeated it a million times. I don' t say yes or no,
whether he' s guilty or not. The thing is, there'
s doubt, there' s doubt, and when there' s doubt,
you can' t risk putting a person in jail being innocent. And here
this is full of doubts, filled with so, driving, because of strange
hands that put things there. Sorry, Ephraim, the two girls are victims.
It' s not the two girls who are victims, but not what
we' re hearing they' re victims of. I see an angry mom
here alienating a girl by forcing her because there' s the audios. Bringing
this to the magazine, I mean, you' re wrong, it'
s just logical. I mean, I didn' t see the attitude here
I' m sure it tastes better Lupita, too, you worked with a
mom' s kids protecting her daughter by cloak and sword. We didn'
t see lectures, some weird things, which isn' t the usual behavior
in a mom protecting a kid who was a victim of forgiveness. Yes,
it seemed to me an extremely narcissistic attitude on Jinny Hofman' s part.
Personally. It' s my appreciation. My appreciation, but in the same
way that we suggest that we give the benefit of the doubt, Alexa,
because we also have to give the benefit of the doubt to Daniela and Hector
Parra. Also everyone deserves and the same ja deserves for the benefit. Not
then, why we' re going to give the certainty and we' re
going to say, that is, the fact that a judge says it just
makes a little bit of a matter of grief. I' m not in
favour of the first death, but the cots have always seemed to me that
the damned might be in error. A person who until the moment of his
last second says I am innocent, because star making a very serious mistake.
Not good. This doesn' t come as far as you can imagine,
this won' t go that far, but it is. You' re
taking a man ten years out of his life. You' re taking a
woman away from her father for ten years. On the other hand, yes,
indeed, on the assumption that Jinny was a manipulative with her daughter,
she has taken her and taken her daughter from her father and has taken her
sister away. He' s taken a family from him. Not like that,
and I think it' s not that strong, too strong. Mel
' s got a delay. So if we stay silent, it' s
not because we' re responsible. Okay, sorry. Yeah, I think
so. Here I am listening, yes, now, now. I was
going to listen to you that all these irregularities are precisely the ones that have
generated this vote of confidence or that possibility, precisely that this gentleman can prove
an innocence that he has pointed out from the beginning and that has had no
effect on his process, because the matter is that from the first day he
was arrested according to the lawyers or the lawyer who defends him today, but
other lawyers have pointed out that he was arrested illegally and from the moment he
was arrested, he was deprived of his liberty, receiving the treatment that you
pointed out from a guilty person. Therefore, the vote of confidence or credibility,
for it has been given to the today considered victim, who is alexa,
because the lord stopped it was heard to her and he is deprived of
liberty the one who is trying to celebrate and give him that same thing in
which he is in prison and the daughter who supports him. That' s
the difference. So, in this case we do not know the truth,
as we have pointed out so many opportunities, but the point is that they
are not equal, because he has already been condemned, imprisoned and so on.
Then it is huaal that they are asking for the opportunity for the evidence
they claim to have provided to be considered in a way that was not previously
considered. That is why we are not talking about two who are standing in
the same place and we will see, as a public opinion, that we
choose this yes, this one not, because he is already in exact prison
and she has a sentence look. What it says to generate, because from
before they wanted to make a documentary with the gray victim you are already fit,
because why make a documentary. That on the one hand, but on
the other hand, they remember this documentary that we talked about this able girl
We made some more broken than what this girl' s name is who just
got out of jail for having finished her mother, that jip s i cy
Gipsy Rose. Gipsy Rose was manipulated. To the degree of feeding herself by
probe, to the degree of not standing from a wheelchair, to the degree
of altering her voice, to the degree of allowing her teeth to be hurt,
to the degree of believing herself that she had cancer, when she did
not have it at that level, was manipulated. Graciey rose, that is,
on that level. Now you assume that no other children can be manipulated
upon the parents, men of course who can manipulate. But it is the
mother who exercises power from birth, over behavior, the psychela, all of
a child, of course, of course she can manipulate it and the terrible
one. Terrible. That' s why there are no equal circumstances here.
Like Dr Amela said. This isn' t the same here. You are
not equal, this has not been even, Ephraim, no, and the
strength of the mother to manipulate, that is, we have to understand that
our mother is not also for us to reaffirm it. It is a reflection
and an extension of us. No, and that' s where we seek
safety, containment, and it has a lot to do with self- esteem.
So if your mom tells you it' s green and you' re
on this typical roll with her, even though you see it' s red,
it' s green, exact, exact. That' s called the
manifesta. That' s what I' m about to see. Imagine if
there are husbands, teachers, spiritual guides who are capable of manipur You know
if this child cannot be manipulated, of course. Of course, so I,
the truth would throw me away. Don' t worry. You come
in and room at the time you want, look, says Laura Torres.
It says. The issue of Héctor Parra should be analyzed from the legal point
of view and not from the place of a daughter who helps her father.
This person committed the crimes and there is evidence. But they also say Laura,
and Daniela has said that the evidence she has in favor of her father
has not been accepted. How to say that the events occurred in a house
he never lived in, for example, That is one of the evidence that
was not accepted. So, from the legal point of view, of course
I do understand it perfectly. The problem is that all the evidence is actually
accepted. No, no, I don' t know, not one.
There is no doubt about the laws, there is doubt about the exercise of
the laws, of that, that is what is being doubted, no,
not about the laws that are right or wrong, whether there is evidence or
not, because it has nothing to do with it here. The question is
how the authorities have been manipulated and who has put their hand and who,
being a Member and who has finally raised all that kind of things that they
do. Let this be so, it says how funny that they say that
daniel is manipulated by their dad anymore they don' t know what to invent.
No, I don' t think I, frankly, don' t
think Daniela is manipulated by her father. I think so. They don'
t live under the same roof. They didn' t live under the same
roof, because Daniela lived with her own mother, so there wasn' t
this hole where Hector Parra could be manipulating her daughter, because maybe she would
have alienated her. He had alienated them both against each other, against his
mother. And it' s not like that. On the other hand,
I believe, on the contrary, as they have described, the relationship they
had, that it was a relationship to go out, to play, to
have fun and Daniela' s own mother. He said it. The one
who took responsibility for the obligations was the mom and going out with her dad
was going out for fun. Then. I don' t think there was
any kind of alienation from Hector to Daniela. I don' t think he
wanted to say anything, and what' s important is exactly what' s
said. For example, he' s guilty and there' s evidence that
he' s guilty, because this is what he told you, because we
haven' t gotten the file, we haven' t seen it, and
we wouldn' t have the right to have that hold on our hands.
And, likewise, those who have doubts, at least it is not that
most people are sure that the Lord is innocent, but they have immense doubts
about everything that has been written in these last few minutes and because Daniela Parra
also expresses that there is evidence that shows otherwise, that shows innocence and that
those evidence was not recognized or valued with justice. And we don' t
know about those tests either because we don' t have them the same in
our power. This is the reason to say yes there is evidence that he
is guilty, well, because they are telling us and because, indeed,
the authority considered it so. But this part that defends says there is evidence
that needs to be used also without being there. This is what hasn'
t happened. And, on the other hand, the doubt that I believe
many people have also expressed the responsibility that in this case the mother, which
is Jenny Hoffman, would have, since she says she knew it a long
time ago. He reveals it later, many years later, making sure it
was so that his daughter would be of age and could say it for herself.
However, he has spoken to you about possible complicity and I have not
all that sometimes they have given us comments where they tell us no, that
it is not so, because Jimmy stopped sending alexta with the father the moment
he found out about it and, according to the information that we do know,
that is not so. She kept going to see the age sa being
pointed out and I listened to the lawyer at the time. That was last
week, not this occasion. When he had recently given them the date of
resolution on this hearing, they asked him a great deal. Without it there
will be a counter- claim that then Jimmy was also responsible and she pointed
out very promptly that in this case that in criminal matters it is not a
counter- claim, but that a direct and specific complaint should be made about
this person. Then, this other part would also remain pending. No,
then what is going to happen then in relation, I do, I can
tell you that many times the manipulated people there is a day that wakes up,
There is a day that you light that little light of conscience and wake
up who is the manipulated hear. And our section today, because it says
here you know they' re super serious. They' re always your super
serious. We' re all at peace here, but you' re right.
Peace can also be happy. Sure or, of course, everything can
be fun and then it occurred to him. I will blame you, Ephraim
and Mel I would be incapable. I' d be incapable. A section
that when they gave me the note and I said ah so, look.
It' s like I' m Charles Manson defending Ted Bondy and I said
well, not like the jock defending the penguin. Yeah, and it'
s kind of like that. He goes, he goes, because it turns
out that you will remember that we have seen. We saw it because we
all saw it. We all saw it. We saw Emilio Fernández, son
of El pirru, former husband of Marianne, widower of Mariana Levy, ex
- husband of Ana Barbara. We saw Emilio say that the house his father
had left, his house in Cuernavaca, full of debts, because he had
never paid the property because he had never taken over, because he had no
money. Grandma had just died and he was alone, he had no one
to be with. He wanted to sell some notes from Ana Barbara. Ana
Barbara, I don' t want to receive him because he didn' t
comply with the rules of his house. And well, there was the emillo
saying so flatly. No, my dad said it because we heard it or
tell me. Don' t tell me you don' t. But he
said that practically his father had never seen for them, had never looked after
them and that he lived alone in that house and owed more than a million
pesos of prediales. That' s what he said. And then, now
that Ana Barbara is coming, because the poor woman of Navarre, because they
already bring her to the target, then the brother that if the songs that
if they are mine and Yana Barba said go with the lawyer and then then
some of them leave Emilio to say that the boyfriend or husband or whatever of
Ana Barbara has treated the other children badly and that because everyone has already gone
with his dad and that which we don' t care about, the dads
or anything. But the thing is, this man has done, he'
s got Na Barbara manipulated and done good. So that accuses Emilio, that
' s what he said no. I also don' t know it'
s true, it' s false, it' s rapping, but it
' s what they say and it' s the arguende that started and yes
there is that he did say no, and then the pirru whom his own
son accused of irresponsible, his own son accused of irresponsible? He writes for
a program and says I' ve decided to give this statement. This is
the first- hand programme exclusively for Mr Infante, with whom I have had
profound differences in the past, but I believe that he is exercising his profession
in a more sensible way and lasts a lot of peace. I think you
' re now documenting research into a note, because you know the extent to
which they can have the damage they can do, so I think it'
s your mission now to get to the bottom of the stories. Well,
before the recent statements that hurt my children, I want to tell you first
that as long as I live, you will never be alone and helpless,
so I will support you in every way. Up to the last consequences and
I' m even going to plot. That tells us it is regrettable and
very unfortunate that through an alleged lawsuit of a third party, of a lawyer,
who represent barbarous couple who try to intimidate and threaten. If there'
s the family thing. This, then, I hope, will be fixed,
but the part where the pirro says he exercises his profession in a sensible,
mature and much more measured way in his claims. I think he now
documents and investigates before making himself known, because he knows the ay not what
tenderness. I really did if I saw Charles Manson defense, I didn'
t give you matching goody, do the math. I don' t know
what you think, but it was in all peace this section is going to
need a cortinilla and everything it takes away I mean. They said I don
' t need to see. Please, they said it was the guaso that
good, depending on the guato or the other way around and then what else
was Ephraim, that was the tano, the dracula, defending Bachor and Abaxa.
That, I mean, really is something that pulls laughs at the absurd,
but it also gives a lot of surprise. I mean, I wonder
what happened there. Something happened because he himself says that they did not talk
for many years, that they have had terrible differences, but that the pirrou
decides to give this statement first to Gustavo Gimante, because now he realizes that
he is doing, in short, an involuted work. Martia lamiadosa, is
a Martian pious, is the unifier of families. He' s what makes
families mean, so he' s suti. He' s a social fighter,
he' s like involuntary sarcasm. Or I don' t know what
this is, because here we' ve said it many times and the audience
agrees because they see it and listen to it. And all the more,
if something doesn' t have the journalist quoted in any of that that says
there, then like why does the pirro choose him who, on the other
hand, says that as long as he lives, his children won' t
be alone or helpless or something. When, indeed, his son José Emilio,
revealed that he was with this bronc of the house alone there and the
father who Tirru said yes, he already locked you with his nails as he
wants, he is already of age and I do not know who, that
is, in which universe any of those two fragments of the statement makes sense.
I mean, that' s why it really surprises and draws attention powerfully
And what' s most striking is the conviction with which the kid gets it
He hears it, but you know it' s funny, it' s
like it' s like you want someone we' re going to not know
this one, because I don' t know that I don' t know
if they find out who was good. Of course, I guess most of
them are Ferdinando Marcos or his wife was Imelda Marcos. They were a dictator
for a dictator in the Philippines who his wife, when we were taken back,
had more than 3, 000 pairs of shoes. Not then is it
as if he went out to defend them, as if they had gone out
to defend the seagull when he showed us his white house. I mean,
explain to me, explain to me no, I mean, how to explain
a little bit to me, no, but I don' t know for
the best. Yeah, I' m wrong. And he' s a
social fighter. Is he a social fighter? Yeah, I' m worried
because this social fighter really thinks he' s ethical, that is, he
does believe it Maybe he' s misdefined. Ethics may have never read Aristotle.
I think not, because and you see it dates his speech and that
' s it and what a barbarous then we' re going to ask a
representative in this world backwards hear to me that he draws my attention is this,
Mr Pirru That, because there is to see. Not we' re
not talking about your family, because all families have problems. We' ve
said it a million times. There are two types of family, the dysfunctional
ones and those who believe they are not. Those are the two types of
family that exist. No more. So, well, all families, absolutely
all families, have problems. Everything that comes out of me jumps me.
It is that this man, whose son has now openly denounced him also in
trees, a flag of the great father of a defense, is that they
notice what a contradiction or what contradiction. No, on the one hand,
we have a girl defending a imprisoned father, on the other hand, but
a girl who, because she blindly trusts her father and, on the other
hand, a father defending her son whose son does not trust him, does
not trust because in fact, notice that there is a very remarkable situation here
and it is true that people can some, of course, not all,
but some people can develop a rather intelligent and manipulative use of language in their
casto, a rather brilliant management of the rentorist and can deceive people not just
by word. One would have to believe someone, but when you have been
before the public light for a long time and there have been actions that have
repercussions and that are visible to others, that is the famous observable behavior,
for then the word is already doubted and that is where we can detect phenomena
such as incongruity. And so that' s why we don' t believe
people who have all known that they have acted differently from what they suddenly come
out of nowhere and say. And in the case of like- dollous infant,
because more than a lot of people, because maybe I did one thing
and a few months later he totally says the opposite. That' s what
attracts attention. But what strikes me is that I saw an interview that José
Emilio Fernández gave on the channel of Inés Moreno, where he speaks lupita of
a sensible one and sees that he is a child who must surely have many
problems because of everything he has lived. He must be immature, because he
is barely nineteen and surely has no emotional armament that would have provided him with
any other kind of circumstance than the one that touched him. And as soon
as he' s training at the training center, there in Televisa and he
' s already driving and so on. But it really draws attention to the
way he talks, because, far from falling into this and saying yes,
you see how my dad will defend us, he does something very subtle,
very very careful plus, he has a great vocabulary to be a young boy
who is just telling you to start studying. Besides, it' s not
like he' s in college, he' s training to be an actor,
a driver, and so on, and I' m not saying it
' s any less. It' s just another way. Let' s
say formation, another orientation towards histrionics. And all this he handles with vocabulary,
He handles the ideas very well and says to him he holds what he
says if he considers that there is abuse in that family, but he also
thinks it' s great that the dad has decided to act and take the
other little brother with him, because he thinks that whatever he wants from his
dad and he' s going to be better. But when they ask him
and you, you, when you' re recognising your dad because I know
they' re distanced and he took a look. I don' t think
that' s the moment. I hope he gets here. I think if
he looks at you for something, he' ll also say if my dad
wants to find me, then he' ll look for me like he'
s saying maybe. I' ve looked enough for him and he didn'
t want to. I don' t know, but what I' m
going to do is it' s not feigned. Right now, yes,
no. He says how nice what my dad wrote he recognized it. Write
very well how good it is that you take care of my brother. But
I' m already doing my thing, I' m already doing my thing,
I' m studying. I' m fine, and if you get
it and so much is over I liked what he said in that interview.
I thought, it seemed centered. And I think it' s okay,
because he' s probably gonna have a beer or something to do with this
race and he can make it clear that he' s gonna make it through,
so he can make it through. Ephraim, no, for what do
I say to my dog- faced pirro, for it is that ah no
what face of dog, not because they liked forgiveness. It' s just
that he' s the person who cheats on you, he' s very
smart and knows how to take information to the most ethical places in the world.
So, since then no words, girl, I get a circus.
I don' t understand why this gentleman liked to generate circus through his children
so much. It really bothers me that your dad does that beyond Gustavo adol
I was all that, because he doesn' t like to make five and
then they put him in the tent because he' s so, so,
so, are they so so? Tan? Tal? It' s one,
but it' s an exact shame. They put the tent on him
because to see you destroy a family, like it happened with Alejandra, with
his daughter, Well then and ended one, truth be told, frankly shattered,
with differences, irreconcilable and so on. But here they are worth getting
alone, vain, they get very very very, very amazing, the truth
very yes, very very very. I don' t know what they think
and what they want to conclude this beautiful program with all peace we' re
in every step of the way that I' ve been watching and meditating,
two hundred pardons, what you' re going to talk about and now you
' re not. I was good at chatting and I saw a comment and
you tell me I went somewhere else. But then nothing, which is always
the issue with the parents. The parents are here to protect the children and
here is another dad who, as my companions said, likes the circus,
they put the tent on him and instead of being a dad he starts to
be an exact clown and with shoes off, your shoes with another clown also
Basler, because yes I am also seeing for some comments. I told him
he' s not very much in favor of José Emilio and he looks like
he' s a covert. I don' t know what, because maybe
I do, but I do have a particular inclination to want young people to
have a chance to straighten out whatever they have done at their young age and
get out as well as possible. They inspire me you know, inspire me
hope, inspire me with passion even to think that someone has to take care
of, someone has to take care of the children, young people and guide
them properly. Maybe land does, that' s right. Perhaps it is
true that José Emilio wants to look good. Maybe if you want them to
start looking at you to see if that makes you famous, because in the
end you' re going to start an artistic career. Maybe so, but
that doesn' t seem so terrible to me, it doesn' t seem
evil or harmful to anyone, because, as you like, he' s
trying to get through exactly what he has with what they gave him and what
they taught him. So if you do a little bit, I don'
t think that' s so bad out there. But I write a little
boy who shouldn' t have had a good time, really lost his mother
when she was a baby and didn' t even know her, a dad
as inconsistent, as inconsistent as this, a mom who was his mom,
but then not one who goes, that is, it' s not simple,
no forgiveness, no, it' s not that easy. He'
s a kid who lost his mother eight months after he was born. It
' s a but he doesn' t have a responsibility under him. He
' s nobody' s father. He has to be responsible for himself what
you do as you say by going out on his own. Okay, yeah,
yeah, he has to give you a media tour and do, well,
yeah, because that' s what he' s looking for. He
' s at the training school of Televisa being. Then, yes, yes,
you need to. On the other hand, his father, for no,
his father was exhibited by his own son. But, well, I
hope, you will settle family matters and hopefully this will come to a good
end. In the end, they are family and everything that families are always
rescueable is very rescueable. And, well, I hope they keep coming closer
to benefactors and social fighters. Thank you very much, dear Dr Amel,
thank you and forgive the accidental start, but I think this was composed a
little bit later. How good, my dear, Ephraim, remember that this
thing about us leaving, going out, going in is the shadow of the
eclipse that is coming. Ah yes, the eclipse is coming. Besides,
or I' m coming back lourdes I swear I' m not doubted it
went a little ris was a little free and they stayed eyes preserved, but
not many thanks to all of us for having accompanied us and we' ll
see you soon tomorrow here in peace, but you can go see Queen Victoria,
chapter one and two. You can tomorrow live by Broken Souls with a
very interesting theme, a self- widow, but which has a lot of
history. It happened here in Mexico, in a thousand nine hundred and sixty
- one. It was a very famous case, so famous that you look
at Mexican society as a whole. It happened there in Polanco, but we
' re going to tell them tomorrow and go see the OSCARS programs, go
see the problems of the Oscars, which are quite entertaining and with a lot,
a lot of content. I' ll be back soon, I promise
the Guadeloupe Valley, and we' ll leave like this later, boys bye
bye. Thank you all. They' re on radio too and YouTube and
Facebook and everyone thanks