Attention. You're listening to the top huff radio show, America's home for a
conservative not bitter talk radio. The advised the content of this program has been
documented to prevent and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean
to the right. Here's your conservative but not Bitter host Tod Huff. Well,
my friends, OZ says, I sound better today than yesterday. I
don't know. In my head when you're kind of congested, it's hard to
tell, but I am again still dealing with this voice situation. Thank you
for your patience and your understanding. If you don't listen to this program,
if this is new, I normally don't sound like this. This is some
sort of a cold sign. I don't know, just congestion. I deal
with it every year. This year it's hit us a little bit later than
usual and normally hits earlier in the fall. Anyway, should you want to
be part of today's conversation, I invite you to email Todd at totefshow dot
com. You can also text three to one seven two one zero two eight
three zero. Make sure you include the appropriate amount of adoration and praise,
which I would tell you for those of you who are new listeners. That's
about ten to fifteen percent more adoration and praise than you believe is necessary and
appropriate. Make it count. It's a once in a lifetime opportunity, and
I don't like to see blown opportunities. I've seen some, Boy, have
I seen some. I've seen some humdingers that have come through with the vast,
vast majority of you, certainly make it count and it is a pleasure
to be here today. So James Comer, Republican in the House of Representatives,
chair of the House Oversight Committee, has released some I'm going to say,
more evidence, more evidence that an impeachment inquiry into President Biden is absolutely
justifiable. Now, the Left is going to deny this as they have.
The Democrats are going to deny this as they have. The media is going
to deny this as they have, and that as they will continue to do.
But let me say this. Let me say this, and I want
to get into the quote unquote evidence. But my friends, by virtue of
responding to the stated evidence, which James Comer spoke about earlier earlier in the
week on Monday, because of by simply virus responding and trying to give an
explanation for the evidence. Let me finally and officially, let me finally and
officially tell you that we can put the old argument that says there is no
evidence to bed because by virtue of responding to the evidence, they are trying
to give an explanation for the evidence, which they are completely They are completely
free to do. In fact, I would expect them to do it.
But in order to give an explanation for evidence, what first must exist is
evidence. I don't want to make this too complicated. There's some radical leftists
who can't tell the difference between a man and a woman, who doesn't know
how to balance numbers. Take it easier mine. We can be buddies.
I'm just having a little bit of fun. But I know that this thinking
like this can be a little bit using logic is not something that the left
is known for. I appeal to them logically, I do, and I
don't hate him. We're conservative, not bitter g was. It's not about
that at all. We will have some fun, we will mock the ridiculousness
of this whole thing. But this whole notion that says there is no evidence.
If there was no evidence, there would be no explanation of evidence.
Now you can say, oh, that's not an explanation of evidence, Todd.
What that is is an explanation of why that still isn't evidence. And
we'll get specifically into what I'm talking about here in a moment. But that's
not exactly how that works. For example, for example, if Comer had
said he has evidence that Hunter Biden had been to Mars, and you know,
said that I don't know Hunter Biden bought a plane ticket, you wouldn't
have to explain. You wouldn't have to defend how plane tickets state clearly that
planes don't go to Mars, but you wouldn't have to give an explanation another
explanation as to why, as to why that could not happen. That should
suffice on its face. So you have to give an answer. You have
to give a reason. You have to give a defense, not just laugh
it off as that's preposterous. If there is actual evidence, and that's what
we're dealing with here, that's what we're dealing with here. When we look
at the evidence and there's evidence that the Biden family was acting as a crime
family potentially may still be who knows, and that President by Joe Biden is
actually President Joe Bribery. Those are the allegations, and there is evidence to
suggest that the left, the media, everybody, by the way, this
needs to go through a process. For me, I think that it's damning.
It's been damning for a long time. They've known that it's been damning
for a long time. That's why. That's why they did not give That's
why they did not give well during the twenty twenty election, That's why they
pulled That's why they didn't want to give Twitter and everyone else on those platforms
access to that story, the Hunter Biden laptop story. They wanted to keep
that suppressed in the most basic for the most basic of reasons, because any
negative publicity for anyone named Biden or any Democrat, anything like that could potentially
hurt them. So been in a more specific sense, In a more specific
sense, there's a lot of information, specific information in these allegations. If
you've read Miranda Divine's Laptop from Hell, which I encourage you to do,
encourage you to check out the book, buy it whatever and read it,
read it for yourself. We're just scratching the surface here. There's a lot
of potentially nefarious things, allegedly nefarious things happening, and this absolutely justifies and
impeachment hearing. Now, as I've said before, and I'll say again,
I am one about political against excuse me, not about against. Let me
make that clear. Let me back that up. I am one hundred percent
against political retribution. I'm not I'm not for that. I know some of
you are. Make them pay. That's look, Vengeance's mind, declares the
Lord. We should do what's right. We should be tough, we should
fight, we should stand for truth. If justice demands, if evidence demands
that an investigation into an impeachment inquiry is justifiable, then so be it.
And I believe that that is clearly unequivocally where we are here at the end
of twenty twenty three election year or not. This is not to me and
this I know that the left will not believe this, but in my estimation,
this has zero My motivation for this has absolutely nothing to do with political
wins. My reason for thinking they should pursue this has everything to do with
truth and justice. We cannot, under any circumstances allow this sort of thing
to happen in our federal government. This shouldn't be allowed to happen at any
level of government. If someone is peddling favors in return for money, kickbacks,
paybacks, whatever, some sort of benefit that should not happen. That
cannot be allowed to happen for a myriad of reasons. One of those could
be potentially you become potentially vulnerable to blackmail. Right if they've got the goods
on you now, they can really crank up the pressure. We're going to
release these files to the media if you don't do what we say. The
other is, your job, as an elected well president of the United States,
an elected member of Congress, is to represent the people who elect you.
Is to make decisions on their behalf for their benefit, for their good.
And you can't be said to be doing that if your primary motivation is
how much money do I get in some account, how much do I personally
enrich myself through the process. That is absolutely not the way that this should
work. It has to be stopped. It cannot be allowed to continue.
And I don't care whoever's involved in this. Remember again, when Trump is
When Trump was president of the United States, they didn't even want Trump having
anything to do with the neg existing legitimate business right they didn't want him to
have anything to do with that. They wanted him to put everything in a
blind trust that ideally they wanted him to sell everything. I mean, the
only president that I know of in modern history that's walked into Washington, d
c. With more money than what he left with, which is a problem
in and of itself, which again highlights the bigger problem that we're talking about
here, which is paid a place sort of stuff. So this is kind
of the layout of where we find ourselves the blueprint. We've got evidence.
The Left is responding to the evidence thereby acknowledging that there is evidence. We
have a process that's been undertaken thus far that says we have enough to begin
an official inquiry into an impeachment of President Joe bribery allegedly, and so that
is what should happen. Now. There are some that are afraid of this
because they're afraid that this is going to be used again. And this is
the way. It actually speaks to the larger problem of what's going on,
the problems that we have with what I call the seven pillars of propaganda,
which include the media, which includes the government, which includes woke business,
which includes entertainment. All these folks come together to defend the left and to
attack the right, to defend the Democrats and to protect to attack the Republicans
and to protect defend the Democrats, and this sort of thing has to stop.
We cannot make decisions on what we should do based on that alone.
Leadership requires doing the right thing, even even if it seems to be unpopular
at the moment. Leaders true leaders do what's right and they communicate it.
True leaders inspire people to follow them, and part of that is commune unication.
Part of that is having the character to see through the next things that
need to be done. Those are all things that need to happen in this
particular case. So timeouts in order. When we get back. When we
get back, I'm wanna play this SoundBite from Representative Comer, and we're gonna
talk specifically about the left's response. We're gonna talk about the allegations. We're
gonna talk about where we go from here, and I've got other things in
the stack as well. So quick time out is in order. My friends,
you're listening here to conservative not better talk. I am your host with
half my voice tied behind my back, just to make it fair back in
just a minute, my friends, and welcome back, my friends. So
I'm gonna play this clip. This is this is representative James Comer, who
is laying out in a short little video clip here which I've got the audio
for, laying out the quote unquote evidence that exists, pretending to Hunter Biden.
I want to as it pertains to Hunter Biden, to Joe Biden,
and that's ultimately, Look for those who claim that this is just about Hunter
Biden and Biden's family and Republicans going after his son and his brother, there
is a reason for this. This isn't a target them, This isn't a
phishing expedition. This is absolutely and unequivocally something that raises a lot of red
flags. Now maybe there's answers for this stuff. I find that very hard
to believe, just based upon what we know at this point. But they
should have absolutely have a chance to repet this. I'm not ready to make
any formal declarations. I have not once said Biden should be removed from office.
But I'm perplexed. I'm perplexed by those who don't seem to be bothered
by this, just as I'm not prepared look I don't want Biden in the
White House, but I don't want him there for legitimate well. I want
his quote unquote removal, whether that means just by losing the twenty twenty four
election or whatever. I want it to be justified. I want it to
be right. I want it to be you know, something that happens based
upon the processes, the system. I don't just want him ounta no matter
what that is. That has never appealed to me, the sense that I
think a lot of people who are conservatives have for justice as strong. We
know, we know that if we simply get what we want through any means
necessary, that that will have negative repercussions. That has no interest to me.
I have no interest in cutting corners in my personal life. Yes,
sometimes I wish things would happen quicker, but I have no interest in cutting
corners. I have no interest in compromising integrity or doing something that I don't
feel good about that I think is not the best way to not not the
you know the most, the best character move or whatever. And the vast
majority of you are like that as well. Right, we don't we don't
want that, but we also do not want our side to be totally and
completely sissified. We don't want that. When the time calls, when the
circumstances call for action, action needs to be taken. And that's where we
are. It is a time to act and to move into this force normal
impeachment inquiry of President Joseph Robinette's bribery. So here is James Comer kind of
laying out this is a couple of minutes here, but I want you to
listen to this in a short video, giving evidence, if you will,
giving evidence of actions events that explain why a need for an impeachment inquiry is
necessary. So here he is explaining some of that rationale evidence and thinking.
Today, the House Oversight Committee is releasing subpoena bank records that show Hunter Biden's
business entity, a wasco PC, made direct monthly payments to Joe Biden.
This wasn't a payment from Hunter Biden's personal account, but an account for his
corporation that received payment from China and other shady corners of the world. At
this moment, Hunter Biden is under an investigation by the Department of Justice for
using a wasco PC for tax evasion and other serious crimes, and based on
whistleblower testimony. We know the Justice Department made a concerted effort to prevent investigators
from asking questions about Joe Biden. I wonder why. The more we learn,
it appears the Justice Department was trying to cover up for the Bidens.
Okay, now that's the shorter clip. There was a longer one than I
have in the stack of stuff. That's a couple of minutes. Regardless.
That's the evidence that they've released recently, which is direct payments from Hunter Biden's
business A wasco PCs directly into an account owned by President Joseph Robin at bribery.
Now, there were three payments of what is it thirteen hundred and eighty
dollars or some such or some such thing. The total was around five thousand
dollars. And apparently, apparently that what the left is saying, the Democrat
Party is saying, is that this is just Hunter Biden paying his dad back
for a truck that he helped purchase. Which let's stop that for just a
moment. Number one. Number one aasco PC is the corporation. Why would
why would the corporation be the one that's paying the money back for the truck.
Was this a business expense, by the way, if it was a
personal loan, I don't know. I had oz look to see if Hunter
Biden owned a wasco PC himself or if he had partners. If he had
partners, was this an llc Anes corporation? Because there could be problems on
that front depending on what the setup is as far as the corporation is as
well. But the lefts out there saying, look, he's just paying his
dad back for helping him buy a truck. But my first question is why
does Hunter Biden, who looks like from the evidence we've seen on his laptop,
spends more money in hookers and drugs than the average American makes in years,
earns in years. I mean, I don't know if you've read again,
if you've not read the book Laptop from Hell. I feel like there's
a bit of a disadvantage that you're adding this discussion because there's so much information
to understand. There was so much depravity. There was so much I mean
alleged purchases of well ladies of the night and drugs. I mean, that's
allegedly what it appears to be the case. Again, this stuff may all
come out in the courts, and there's different answers or whatever, but the
bottom line is why does Hunter Biden need to borrow five grand? Five grand?
And it looks like he was paying this in hotel rooms for the weekend
or week or whatever. And you can see this in some of the evidence
is in the Laptop from Hell, which came out almost what three years ago?
A little over three years ago? Now, well, not the book,
the initial story, the initial story, which of course led into what
was the book anyway? Why does he need that much money? Why does
he need to borrow money from his dad? And then why is it coming
back through the business. Also, the evolution of how the left defends its
own is interesting because remember we were told that Biden knew nothing about Hunter's business,
never talked about Hunter's business, barely knew Hunter had a business business?
What business? Right? That was the initial defense. And this is how
the left does it, I'm telling and it's I'm honestly, this is how
dishonest politicians of both sides do this. The first is to deny, deny,
and then when there's so much overwhelming evidence that Joe Biden knew, including
testimony from other individuals, that Joe Biden knew Hunter had a business, that
Joe Biden was talking with people that were business associates and customers alleged customers or
whatever alleged prospects of Hunter Biden's business. It became obvious that they couldn't go
down that road anymore. Then it was there was no you know, can
nection financially? Well, now we have, we have documents to prove that
there was. Now what's the next one. The next one's going to be
well, this was just the legitimate payback of a loan, to which I
say, why is Hunter Biden borrowing five grand or whatever forty's that come out
to it was low four thousands, forty one. Why does Hunter Biden need
to borrow one hundred and forty one dollars from his father? Why? Why
is he paying that back through his business? Why? See, this is
evidence. This is what evidence looks like. Evidence says, these are the
things that we found that look suspicious, that seem to need to have answers.
And then the person who is charged or not in this case, charged
yet, But the person who is being questioning or being questioned, I should
say, can respond to the evidence. Maybe there's an explanation to the evidence,
and that's what we're that's what they're doing now. But by virtue of
giving explanations, they're showing that there is evidence. By virtue of giving explanations,
they are agreeing that there is evidence. It's not proof, it's evidence.
There may be explanations for the evidence that have nothing to do with the
guilt whatsoever. In fact, that's the very purpose I've shared with you before.
I was a juror a on a trial years ago involved the tragic,
awful, horrific death of a five year old boy, and they provided evidence.
The defense's job was to say, there's an explanation other than this proves
my client was guilty of committing the crime that he's charged with. That's the
entire process. And the evidence was presented, and the reconsidered the evidence,
and the jury made a decision as to whether or not there was any other
explanation for the evidence that was, you know, that was somewhat reasonable.
That's where this idea of reasonable doubt comes in. Beyond any reasonable doubt,
the only explanation for all that evidence is X. That's what is supposed to
happen. This is evidence. They are responding and giving answers to the evidence,
explanations for the evidence, right, wrong, and diifferent at this point.
But the reason they are doing that is because there is actual evidence,
enough evidence, in fact, enough evidence, in fact that James Comer,
the House Republicans, and any House member for that matter who cares about justice
would actually vote to support an impeachment inquiry if you really want to worry about
the politics of this. The politics of this are those on the Democrat side
or possibly the Republican side, that are not going to vote to begin the
impeachment inquiry process because they're afraid of the political consequences. That's the real political
problem here now. I also have a problem for those that are prepared to
impeach Joe Biden. Whatever comes up. They don't care what it is,
and it's an excuse. I don't condone that either. That's not a good
representative of my friends. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. That's someone who will
actually cause more problem for this country, even if they're doing the right thing
in this case, if their motivation is to just get him at all costs,
that is not what we want in politics. I know that that's not
a popular sentiment with some of you. I'm not saying not to fight.
I'm not saying not to be tough. I'm not saying to stop pursuing justice.
I'm actually saying to do all those things. What I am saying is
that character counts, and if we're going to restore this, it's not just
that we have to defeat the Left. We have to restore her character in
these high offices of political power in this country. Timeouts in order to my
friends, sits back in just a minute. Welcome back, my friends.
We are in tumultuous times. We are in the approaching the official start of
winter. Although I've been told the meteorological months of winter are December, January,
and February. Of course winter doesn't actually begin to what the Winter Solstice
honor about December twenty first, right before Christmas is celebrated. But so we've
got, for those of us that live in places where we're susceptible to winter
store heavy snow, blizzards, ice storms, we've got that to contend with.
Potentially, I hope not, but it's always a potential threat. Power
outages, other natural disasters and storms can happen anytime of the year, and
that can be different types, of course, depending upon where you live.
Florida gets the hurricanes, some places get massive spring storms, tornadoes, that
sort of stuff. And then of course we've got problems created by the government
which are sometimes too numerous to even count, that could impact supply chains,
that could impact any number of things, inflation, the prices of goods,
the prices of food, and so it pays to be prepared, is what
it comes down to. It pays to be prepared. You're not paranoid if
you're prepared. Preparation is actually a good thing. Being prepared for very difficult,
challenging, tough times is a good thing. It is a wise thing.
Of course, as with anything, it can be taken to extremes,
taken way too far, and taken takes over, can take over lives completely.
But being prepared is a good thing. So if you want to be
prepared in the event of some natural disaster, power outage, food shortage,
what have you, head on over to four patriots dot com. That's the
number, four Patriots with an s dot com and you can get there.
Stackable storage totes of food. These come in packets that include breakfast, lunch,
and dinner options. They are stackable storage toats, so they're easy to
store. They don't take up a ton of space. There's a lot of
stuff in these things, but they can be stacked and not take up a
huge amount of space. They last twenty five years. It's a three month
food supply. Go to four patriots dot com to check that out. Use
promo code huff my last name to save ten percent on your first order for
Patriots dot com promo code huff. So that's where we stand. Going back
to what we were talking about last segment, that's where we stand with impeachment.
That's where we stand with evidence. We've got the left who is saying,
look, this proves nothing. This. If this is the most you've
got, then this is a big nothing burger, a swing and a miss,
and all of that. Now I happened to because I've read the book,
and I've read a lot of this. Many of you have as well.
There's a whole lot here, There's a whole lot to unpack. I'm
also old enough to remember. I'm also old enough to remember back in the
days when Bill Clinton, when the the proverbial news was tightening around Bill Clinton
and his presidency with Monica Lewinsky, remember I remember answers to questions such as,
it all depends on what your definition of is is. For those of
you that have studied that, or who were alive during that time and were
old enough to care and or pay attention, you remember that when he was
asked during his testimony, if what was it is? I forget the exact
question, but it was it was really pegging him down to this behavior and
so forth. And of course his answer was, it depends on your definition
of his what depends what is is spoken like a true sophist. But of
course this passed about. And that's another thing. Back in those days,
there were articles galore of how lying was a sign of great leadership, was
necessary from time to time, how important it was. It's remarkable how these
how the left will will again prop up there people their team and then go
in guns of blazon without any regard for truth or reality when attacking the other
side. I don't want to do that. There's a lot of evidence that
Joseph Robinett bribery is There's some there is a likely, there is some degree
of a likelihood, there is some degree of possibility that he's involved in some
very sketchy stuff has been involved in very sketchy stuff with his son Hunter.
There is evidence that demands a verdict. To steal from the title of Josh
mcdow's book from years ago, evidence this evidence demands a verdict. There's enough
evidence to where we need Congress to make a decision. Now, that doesn't
mean that he's in peace and it goes to the Senate for his removal from
office, but it does mean there's enough evidence to ward. The American people
need to know if what has been alleged to have happened happened, because it
absolutely positively never should be allowed to happen, regardless of the person's political party,
political affiliation, whether they're a leftist, a libertarian, centrists, whatever,
it makes no difference to me. Under no circumstances should we allow what
is alleged to have possibly happened with Vice President at the time bribery. There's
no way we should allow that to happen. That cannot be allowed to happen
in this nation. That simply cannot be that this should go without being said.
And by the way, why do I call him president bribery. There's
a reason for this. I just said. I'm not saying that he's guilty
of this, but yet I call him vice president or president now Bribery.
But there's a reason for this. The reason is they the media ignore this.
They the media will not. They act as though there's no evidence.
They act as though that it's just about embarrassing President Biden because of his son
Hunter and attacking the health mental health of Hunter because of tough times he lost
his brother. That is nothing at all to do with any of this.
It has to do with whether or not the statement and the name president Bribery
is truthful. Now, I'm not lying to you. I'm just simply putting
it out there to say, let's get a verdict on this. That's why
I say this. There's enough evidence to where that needs to be considered,
and so they don't want to talk about it for obvious reasons. We do
want this to be investigated. I want Republicans that are hesitant about pursuing this
to have a little bit of a fire lit under their hind end. That's
what I want, not because of retribution, not because of vengeance, not
because of wanting to get even or get back or make them pay or make
them hurt. I they can keep all of that some of them are up
late at night because they cannot stand President Trump. They don't want him to
be walking around freely. They don't want him in any type of clothing besides
his orange jumpsuits, not to be confused with Hillary Clinton's orange pantsuit. But
he this. That is not how this should be handled. Personal motivations.
Vengeance should just simply be justice. It should simply be justice. Let's get
a verdict on whether or not the nickname President Bribery should stay or not.
Let's get a Let's get a verdict on that. And the only way to
do that is for the evidence to have a hearing and to get moving on
this stuff. So timeouts in order. Friends, sit tight. Back in
a minute. Welcome back, my friends. So there's of course other things
going on in politics in the news of the day. We don't have a
lot of time. By the way, it's always on the website tteff show
dot com. Just look at the stack of stuff, which is shorter today
than usual, but past few days have been pretty long. So ttefshow dot
com. Just go to the stack of stuff for today and you'll see some
of the stuff that's there that we might get to the rest of the week,
we might not get to just given the parameters of what we're dealing with
here each and every day. I want to look here in the time we
have remaining, which is not much. But this is an article that posted
at NewsBusters dot org. This article was referencing a story in The Atlantic.
In the Atlantic, which of course is as most media outlets, well even
I think even in comparison to most media outlets, this is left of those
folks, But the leftist Atlantic. According to this article I'm reading here,
written by Joseph Vasquez on a couple of days ago on Monday, the leftist
Atlantic actually victim blamed Americans for crushing high prices they're experiencing. In the same
breath, the outlet build President Joe Biden's ridiculously bad economy as the cat's pajamas.
As this piece rights, inflation is your fault. Read the condescen condescending
headlined by Atlantic staff writer Annie Lowry. She opted for just talking down on
to the plebeians by simply chalking up americans misery to consumer overspending. So basically,
the Atlantic, the leftist there they know, folks, this election for
the Democrats to succeed for the Democrats to succeed. It cannot be I've said
this for a long time. You know this, you know this. It
cannot be about kitchen table politics. It cannot be about the economy. It
cannot be about the border. It cannot be about whether or not someone's life
was better prior to President Bribery taking office. It can't be about any of
those things if you're a Democrat, because you will get thumped in the twenty
twenty four campaign. So it has to be about Trump being an existential threat.
Thank you to folks like Liz Chaney for helping to carry the proverbial water
of the left here. Trump is an existential threat to our democracy. Actually,
she said constitutional republic, So good for her at least getting that right.
But inflation is not the fault of people spending money, my friends.
As Milton Friedman taught, the only reason that there is inflation is because government
produced more money than economic output. Justified. It is that simple. Inflation
is the responsibility and the fault of the federal government, specifically, pure and
simple, not consumers. Quick time, Well, I guess it's the consumer's
fault who voted for this crap anyway, got to take a break back in
a minute, Welcome back to my friends. Not a lot of time here
today before we wrap up, but I will say this. I will say
this to go back to the impeachment discussions. It is time for the House
of Representatives to begin that process, unquestioned, undoubtedly, absolutely, positively,
unequivocally, that is what needs to happen. That's what needs to happen.
Regaining control of this country, watching this country and the republic it once was
become revitalized, is going to be a tough, arduous process. But step
by step, by friends, I've got to go. The music's telling me
it's time to wrap up. Have a great day. STG.