Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Night Show.
As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Tuesday, the thirtieth of April. Here
of our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, today we're going to take
a look at something that I quite enjoy. It's my birthday, so we're
going to take a look at so self driving fails. It's a little bit
of schadenfreude because I hate these things. I know what their purpose is,
and so it's good to see these things fail. Wilson going to be joined
in the third hour by Alex Newman, who you've heard me quote many times
saying the schools are burning building, get your child out, and then work
with your neighbors to try to put the fire out before it burns down your
neighborhood. He's written a book encapsulating all of this, showing the history of
this gradual, iterative government takeover, deliberate. It's by design. None of
this stuff is happening because the people don't know any better. Yeah, a
lot of people being taken advantage of it. The people who are doing this
know precisely what they're doing. He'll be joining us in the third hour we'll
be right back. Well, for the most part, I think we're gonna
stick to some lighter stuff today. We will be talking about war though,
and it's uh, you know, We've got a wartime speaker very excited about
the possibility. This is his moment to make history and to make money while
the sun is shining. Until he nukes there. I don't know what he's
gonna do with his money, Mike Johnson, when he starts at nuclear war,
it's him and the bunker counting his gold coins or green backs or whatever.
If he's smart, he won't have him in greenbacks, that's for sure.
But we have Adam Schiff, who is running for to replace Diane Feinstein,
who reminded us that even the powerful people die. It's remind her of
Diane, who thought that she would never die. She was never going to
let hold Lego of her hold on power. And so Adam shift his campaign.
He went to San Francisco and the local news showed him at a meeting
with everybody in suits and he was in casual attire. He had on a
vest to keep himself warm, because I mean, we're talking about San Francisco.
As Mark Twain said, the coldest winter he ever had was a summer
in San Francisco. So he's got his vest on, but his luggage was
stolen and they got his suit and his tie. These broke into the car
of a Senate candidate, Adam Schiff in San Francisco for an event, forcing
a change of plans, specifically his attire for the events. He was dressed
more casually than his guests, who were all in suits and times. And
so when told this the Cariac, she said, maybe it was some San
fran tranny who got his clothes and kind of a reverse of Sam Britton who
used to steal women's clothes. Maybe there's some some other twisted san Frani who
San Frani tranny who wants to get Adam Shift's close. I don't know,
but we're talking about San Francisco. Can't rule anything out as a matter of
fact. You know, when I was just going through I go through all
kinds of news and websites, and I saw this thread from a guy who
was talking about his substack is thinking about Western civilization. He talks about different
aspects of Western civilization and we typically don't think about and this particular one was
about Roman roads. How were they constructed? Why did they last so long?
We still have bridges that the Romans built over large spans of water that
haven't fallen down. I guess nobody could get a barge into the river or
something. But these roads are still there. As you said, all roads
lead m Well, it's because they were building roads as part of their civilization.
And I thought about it. I thought, what would be left of
our civilization. There's going to be some plastic bottles or something like that,
if that's even left. He said, there was fifty thousand miles of paved
roads throughout the Roman Empire. And so I looked up to see how much
we have in terms of interstate system. We have forty thousand miles. Of
course, that's just over the United States. But again Europe is pretty small
compared to the United States. You overlay it, and so the Roman Empire
was more extensive than Europe. And these roads go out all the way into
the Middle East, of course, but the interstate system as well as Roman
roads were built, as well as the German autobond. All three of those
were really built primarily for military purposes, to be able to move equipment very
quickly. That's why Hitler did It's why the Romans did it. Eisenhower saw
that, and he had an experience where we had to move a convoy up
in the northeast and said, this is crazy. We're not even going to
be able to move through our own country. So when he became president,
he built the interstate system, and they built it fairly quickly. When they've
got military motivation, seems like they can get things done pretty quickly. But
we can't do that anymore, can we. I mean, it's amazing when
you look at at Biden and you look at Booty gay All, there's not
any will to do any of this stuff. They don't even want to pave
the potholes anymore. Even in most Republican states. Tennessee is about the best
place I've seen in terms of keeping up with roads. But most of them
don't even care to maintain the roads. And they certainly aren't expanding the roads.
As they expand the number of people who move into any given city like
Austin, for example, you know, constantly you're looking at neighborhoods springing up,
apartment complex is springing up, but never any expansion of the roads.
Now, of course, they can't widen them anymore because they're locked in.
But always in these futuristic sci fi movies, they would always show the road
systems of the future as multi level or even flying cars flying at multiple levels.
But they would at least have different roads at different levels because they're building
buildings up, so they'll have to build the roads up. No, they
don't do that anymore. And again it's because the plan is for you not
to be able to move, So that's the other part of the military thing.
They want to make sure that we can't move, that we're not mobile.
That's one of the first things you do with your enemy. You make
sure that their communications are shut down, which is what they're working on very
hard now with the information disinformation stuff. They want to make sure they have
disrupted our communications. They will listen to our communications and spy on us and
catalog what we have to say until they're ready to turn it off. And
the same thing is true of our transportation. And so a country that doesn't
have the will to build families, that doesn't have the will to build infrastructure,
is a dying country. America is a dying country. We are a
cut flower society. Oh isn't that nice? It looks so nice, but
it's there in the bottle and is dying and the leaves are going to fall
off. When we look at what our road system is like, really is
engineered for crony capitalism not to last for thousands of years. It's engineered for
crony capitalism to need constant maintenance and to constantly spend money on their friends,
because it's all about graft and patronage. Well, let's talk about the free
speech aspect of all this, And of course we're seeing in Brazil, we're
saying in Europe, we're seeing in Australia, various countries are now asserting that
they need to have control of not only free speech in their country, they
need to be able to shut down free speech in their country, but they
need to be able to shut down free speech around the world. And so
you have the EU, Australia, Brazil all demanding that they control social media,
specifically Twitter. Because Elon Musk is making a name for himself in terms
of opposing them. I just I have a you know, we look at
what he does and it really is a mixed bag. And when you look
at his background, there's a lot of rally really bad red flags. But
nevertheless, just focusing on this, we have the Australian Prime Minister is calling
for a ban on memes. He said, I know today on the way
up here, they remove various sites, various sites removed very sites that had
they images of me where his head was superimposed on other people. Yeah,
it's called mockery, it's called satire. And these petty dictators don't get that
that's the sort of thing that's going on on social media, that social media
has responsibility to do the right thing here. Well, pal, you've got
a responsibility to protect our God given rights. That's the purpose that we have
of governments, and we need to remind ourselves that when governments become destructive of
those God given inalienable rights, that it is the right and the duty of
the people to alter or to abolish that government. Australia has what they call
an e Safety Commissioner. It's about their safety, frankly, not about your
safety, just like national security is about their security. It's not about your
security. They're putting all of us in danger with national security at the Pentagon
Safety Commissioner, of course, a bureaucrat who does regulation without representation. Who
does regulation without authority? Most likely? I don't know what their laws are
here, but you know, we do the same thing here in America,
and there is no authority for this, just like there's no authority for anything
that Trump did in twenty twenty with the lockdowns and the rest of that stuff.
These people defied authority. They defied the constitution that gives them their authority,
the constitution they swore to U Pold. So he's ordered this. Australian
dictator has ordered both X and META to remove footage of the stabbing of that
bishop there in Sydney, whereas the bishop says he doesn't want it removed.
He came back out. He's got a patch over his eye. I don't
know. There's no information about the extent of his injuries, but he came
out. He says. No, he says, I honor the people who
fought for our freedom. And he said, and they fought far freedom,
and you better not take that away. Musk said, No, president,
prime minister or judge has authority over all of earth. This platform adheres to
the laws of countries in those countries, but it would be improper to extend
one country's rulings to other countries. If he wants to censor things in other
countries, he should bring a legal legal action to bear in those countries.
And so this little dictator whose name is Albanese, wants to see memes removed.
And as his article says, of course that that that meant that there
were millions more memes made of him. And so you know, when we
look at these guys, here's what he had to say, I'll play play
for you. This guy is a prime example of how we have the worst
and the weakest among us as our leaders. What a judgment from God that
we were led by people like this. Platforms have a responsibility to make sure
that misinformation isn't got out there. I noticed today, for example, on
the way up here, they've removed various sites that were up containing fake images
of myself superimposed on other people. That's the sort of thing that is has
had on other people or chickens. Media. Social media has a responsibility to
do the right thing here. Yeah. Yeah, by the way, here's
the picture of him as the chicken that I put up, and see what's
talking about it. They've got pictures of me with my head on other people
or other chickens. For example, on this as afc an Australian fry chicken
totally spineless chicken. He's got a guy in a chicken suit and the head
is this particular guy. And other memes out there. Anthony Albani is Australian
MP and censorship nanny. Do not make fun of me and my clown car.
Yeah, it is exactly what people are looking for. By the way,
you know, here's why they are so adamant about having control of censorship.
It isn't that he's really upset about people putting his head on you know,
picture of somebody in a chicken costume. It's because of this kind of
stuff. Remember this, Remember the Australian lockdowns. Remember the brutality of the
police shoving people down, beating them with their masks. You're not wearing a
mask. Yeah, that's what they don't want you to see. They don't
want you to remember this. That's why I'm reminding you of this. Look
at this mob, mob of angry women with bully clubs and masks picking on
a middle aged woman, knocking her to the ground. She's injured on the
ground because they shoved her down. Yeah, That's what they don't want you
to see, isn't it. We know exactly what they have done. They
think we don't know, but we do. We know who these people are,
We know what they want. Their purpose is to dictate what you see
and what you know. But we know already, you know, just like
the song, what was a guy who's name I can't remember his name?
Now? Is that Richmond? North of Richmond? He says. They think
we don't know, but we do. We do. We know exactly what
they want, and we know. You know what all these rich men north
of Richmond. You know one of the new members of the club, Michael
Johnson, He's one of the new rich men north of Richmond. He just
made twenty million dollars in one quarter, and he's completely owned by that.
Their accusations indict them with unerring precision, as they always accuse the other side
of that which they are guilty of. It's a Brownstone article, absolutely right.
You know what I mentioned this yesterday? Trump coming out saying RFK Junior
is a Democrat plant. Well, Trump is a Democrat. He is a
Democrat who is planted by the globalist Just take a look at what he did
in twenty twenty. Folks, he did everything that they wanted. He did
it in sync with everybody else. No difference between Trump and Trudeau. How
could that be? Trump is an anti globalist, He's a nationalist. He
hates those guys at Davos that he hung out with. He hates those people's
Democrats, like Clinton's and that he used to party with. All the time,
they're gearing up for the next attack. It'll be on a new axis,
and more likely a set of axes, because that's the game. These
protests that are happening right now in the colleges. As many people pointed out,
I talked about how Soros is funny them. A lot of people point
out it's very much AstroTurf in a lot of different ways. Looks like they
are very well organized, very vitriolic. How will they use those Well,
they might use it to say we've got to have more hate crime laws.
Right, That's what we've seen over and over again, people virtue signaling to
the foreign government of Israel, whether it's DeSantis or Christinome. Now you've got
bills that have been introduced, As I pointed out, oh, we're going
to have to shut down your free speech because you might say something negative about
a foreign government. That's a different way of doing it, isn't it.
You know, we've got Australia, Brazil, the EU out there saying we're
going to tell you what you can put up. Remember when Elon Musk bought
Twitter. Yeah, that guy, Theory Breton. I call him conspiracy theory.
His name is t h i e r r Y, but it's pronounced
theory. So mister conspiracy theory the EU. So we got this new thing,
the DSA, and when it takes effect, you're going to do what
we tell you to do in and Musk is bowing to him, Yes,
yes, yes, I will. Okay. Well, they want to tell
everybody what to do. They want to control speech worldwide. Brazil wants to
do the same thing. Australia wants to do same thing. Israel is a
little bit more cunning. They're going to do it through our congressman in order
to protect them, and of course on the back end, they will throw
all kinds of cash at our congressman. And as Trump said, you know
they own Congress and rightfully, so that's what he said. Well, they're
getting up to do it again. Signs are all there. The way to
stop it is to call it out now, And so there's this article on
Brownstone says it's much harder for a magician to do a trick if Penn and
Teller is sitting in the audience calling out the methods right beforehand. It renders
the whole thing transparent and silly. This is why they've got to shut down
social media. And it's why he cares so much that people put his head
on a chicken suit, because ridicule is the most effective weapon. It really
is. There's no defense against it, saw Alensky said, and his rules
for radical he said, satire is the most effective weapon because there's no defense
against it. That's why they're going after memes. Come on, you can't
take a joke. No, they understand the power of a joke. They
want our speech, our memes, our ability to build and support community.
But they're not seeking to suppress us because we are powerless. He says,
well, that's very true, but we need to understand where is our power.
Is our power in our numbers? Is it because we're strong and big
in numbers? Well, that is one aspect of it. You know,
they don't want they don't want communication because they don't want people to figure out
what they have done to us, and so that's part of it. But
I think it'd be foolish for us to trust in our numbers, just like
it's foolish for them to trust in their weapons. It's foolish for them to
trust in their money. We see how frail their financial system is, and
of course they're working to destroy it as well. We see how their weapons
are. Even though they spent an amazing amount of money on them, you're
still seeing these expensive weapons systems being taken out by asymmetric warfare, very very
cheap strikes against those I think we have to be careful that we don't trust
any of that stuff, that we don't trust our money, that we don't
trust our numbers or are anything that we have as well. Well. He
need to trust is God. So along those lines, I saw this clip
from one of the Prosperity Gospel TV evangelists who's made an obscene amount of money.
This guy's Jesse du plant Is, and I had never paid any attention
to these people. I saw this clip and I went back to look at
what he had. He said, Yeah, all these people making fun of
my plane, making fun of my house. He's got a fifty four million
dollar private jet. He's got a fifty million dollar house. Travis, pull
up the pictures of his house there. It's like thirty or forty thousand square
feet. It dwarfs everything else around him. And he's sitting there boasting about
just how much he has. Look at that, there's an aerial picture of
this sprawling mansion. What does he need that for? And look at how
it dwarfs all these other houses around there. He is so proud of that.
Listen to what he has to say, because it actually it's pretty amazing
he is. And it's amazing to see that somebody who is this effective and
has been operating for so long as a pastor and made so much money,
is so absolutely ignorant about what he's reading in the Psalms. He doesn't even
understand that it applies to him until his wife points it out. Yeah,
inadvertently, here he is bragging about what he owns. Be not vow free
when one is made rich, when the glory of his house is increased,
is increased. Yeah, he likes read that and get pull that up and
amplified Verse sixteen of Psalms, chapter forty nine. If you can do that,
let me read it. What she's getting it be now vow afraid.
Be not thou afraid when one is made rich, when the glory of his
house is well versed in this stuff as trumps is increased. Read that,
well, it's amplified, says it, be not afraid when an ungodly one
is made rich, true in the wealth and glory of his house are increased,
and goes on. For when he dies, he will carry nothing away.
The story will not decision. See, God don't care if someone's ungodly
to be rich. Yeah, we just it can be anything I want.
I just got to be rich. Before that, he was bragging about his
house and then saying, it's all these people who are so upset about this
money. They're not afraid of him. Many people, And the reason I
mentioned this is because many people are afraid of the wealthy, powerful governments,
or they're afraid of the wealthy and powerful technocrats and billionaires and the CEOs these
multinational corporations. But you know they that's what they trust in those is this
guy trusts in And I was truly amazed. I mean it was it was
like a trump one Corinthians moment, and that's just a shibleethe. I mean,
you know they actually do in the UK. They actually say one Corinthians
instead of First Corinthians like we say here. But everybody looking at that.
Oh, he's never he's never set in church to hear this. It's a
shibaleth, right, but the but you know these guys have This guy has
made hundreds of millions of dollars shearing the sheep, and he's never even read
this stuff and he doesn't even know what it's talking about. And so this
whole song forty nine is to say, don't fear these rich and powerful people.
Why don't be afraid of the rich when glory of his house has increased,
For when he dies, he'll carry nothing away from him. His glory
shall not descend after him. But while he lives he blesses himself or men,
praise you when you do well for yourself, he shall go to the
generation of his fathers, and they shall never see light. A man who
is honor, who is who is an honor yet does not understand, is
like a beast that perishes. That's him. He doesn't understand, and he
says, go the amplify amplified byble one, so you know it'll put a
lot of synonyms and stuff like that after some words, and so it puts
in there. Don't be afraid when one and that puts in there. Ungodly
is like she looked at it and that clip they zoomed in on her eyes
where she goes like, oh, you're describing yourself as part of the ungodly.
Well, we're going to take a little break here, and I wanted
to play for you something that was That is a song that actually just a
little bit of this song, something that actually addresses this very thing and the
fact that we don't need to fear these people. Yes, they are afraid
of us, and that tells us that we are not powerless, but we
also need to know that our power is not in and of ourselves, or
we become no different than them. No need to fear when times a trouble
come, opressions, storm, speak, scopy your door, No need to
fear, No need to fear. Do't even seem so strong their pride and
how is not far? Long? You still my soul and trust in God
and place in to her said so far madever fair handy in the moaning if
you see his face, not me to fear Elvis, the Beatles and the
Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the Oldies channel at APS radio dot
com is a listening to the David Night Show. Well, I'll tell you
you where our numbers can be very effective and where it can make a difference.
And I've seen it and I think that, yeah, things have changed,
but I don't think they've changed so much that we still can't have an
effect if we do an organized contact of our state representatives, not Congress.
Forget about Congress. You're pushing on a rope with that. Nothing is going
to happen in Washington. They're done. You're not going to have any effect
in Washington. But Jay and Jessica sent this to me, and I think
this is a great way. This is a model letter to send out to
people in state representatives and to have legislation to push back on this model State
Emergency Health Powers Act. Thing that I've talked about for so long. You
know that was what they were manipulating Congress to do, had Dark Winter simulation.
Many of them knew about it. Biden knew about it two months before
nine to eleven one week after nine to eleven, they had the false flag
anthrax attack, and they were still pushing the idea that this is a bioweapon
attack from Iraq and things like that. And then two months after that,
they had this model legislation sent out to all the different states and more than
thirty some odd states and acted the majority of what they wanted them to do.
And then they practiced the germ game for another twenty years, and then
under Trump they rolled all this stuff out and told the governors if you and
they'd given themselves remember the legal power with that Model State Health Emergency Powers Act,
and so they had given themselves a legal power to do something about it.
Trump gave them the money and that's how we got that. Now that
needs to be rolled back. And quite frankly, you know, if we
had a massive letter writing campaign, we might be able to do something along
those lines. And I say that because when I was in North Carolina I've
mentioned this before, it really did astound me because I'm pretty cynical about these
people changing anything. And yet we had the Teachers' Union wanted to stomp out
homeschooling, which was just beginning. It was in its infancy and there weren't
that many of us in North Carolina, and so the very powerful teachers union
in a state where all of the state government was controlled by Democrats, decided
that they were going to stomp out homeschooling. That was the time they had
control of everything and it was just starting. And so the homeschoolers got together
and did this massive letter writing campaign to them and scared them because they don't
typically get people communicating with them, and we were able to beat that back
with a letter writing campaign. Do you think we might be able to do
that? It certainly is worth a chance at that, isn't it? To
stop this Model State Emergency Health Powers Act, we need to do something.
So that's a great idea, Thank you, Jane, Jessica. We need
to do something with that. But let's talk about the war. This is
something that we don't have a great deal of effect about except to pray about
it, and that has an effect. God can turn the hearts of these
leaders like diverting water, and he can move them if necessary. And so
that's really the only thing that we've got. People say, well, I
haven't got anything but left but a prayer. Well, that's the most effective
thing that you can do with most things, even with small problems in your
life, but certainly when that's something that is out of your reach. And
when we look at what is happening here, this frail, corrupt, dying,
cut flower American empire that we have has now lost three Reaper drones,
each of them costing thirty million dollars. This is even worse than the one
Abrams tanks that are being taken out in Ukraine with five hundred These ten million
dollar tanks being taken out with five hundred dollars drums. Well, here we
have Yemen, the hoodies and the blowfish, but the uh, this third
world country that we sided with a Saudis and decided that we would get involved
in their war. I'm not saying who's right, the head shop in Saudis
or the Marxist Iranian hoodies. As far as I'm concerned, I look at
it, I don't I don't have a dog in that fight, quite frankly,
but we put our dogs in the fight, and we got there on
the side of the Saudis and continued to try to and very effectively starved that
country, bombed that country. And you think that a third world country that
we'd been starving and bombing for quite some time, would not be able to
do this kind of stuff. And yet they are a big threat to shipping.
Now they're able to hit a British ship, They're able to take down
three of these Reaper drones. The war has killed three hundred and seventy seven
thousand people. They're in Yemen, with more than half of them dying from
starvation from our sanctions are lockdowns, if you will, right, And I
said that from the very beginning too. I said, how dare Donald Trump
tell us that we are non essential? How dare him do sanctions on his
own people? That globalist trader I saw a double haters is what they call
people who won't vote for Trump or Biden or and they mentioned RFK. It's
like, well, wait a minute, that's three. It's like mine bivon.
You know, we have two main weapons in the names of three,
I mean three main weapons in the Spanish inquisition. Well we get triple haters.
I'm not voting for any of those guys, but because you know,
they both of them put sanctions on us, sanctions on us, that's what
those lockdowns were. They're economic sanctions that they put on US. So the
United States has dropped a billion dollars over billion dollars in ammunition, bombs and
things like that on Yemen. We have starved about one hundred and eighty thousand
of them to death. The Hoodies said that they hit a British owned oil
tanker with missiles the Andromeda Star. They began targeting British and American commercial shipping
after the US and the UK started bombing Yemen on January twelfth. The YM
and A group initially said it only targeted Israeli linked shipping to protest the siege
on Gaza, but then we get involved in it, so now they're shooting
any US and UK things that they've hit a British shift. Hundreds of US
and British missile strikes on Yemen have done nothing to deter the Hoodies. Who
these maybe I don't know who insists the campaign will only stop once there's a
cease firing Gaza, But the US is back. A brutal Saudi UAE United
Air Emirates in the Saudis had a war against the Hoodies from twenty fifteen.
It began with Obama and then it continued. It went from twenty fifteen to
twenty twenty two, and so out of those seven years, four of them
were under Trump, mister peacemaker. Yeah, involved heavy air strikes and blockades,
and the Hoodies only became more of a capable fighting force during that time.
Wow. So it seems like it's another one of these wars that we
get in asymmetric that doesn't seem to be working too well. Yeah. I
mentioned the in one Abrams tanks that are being taken out in Ukraine. Russia
released footage yesterday showing it's kind of a trophy footage showing them taking out an
one Abrams tank and then showing them towing the destroyed tank because they're going to
take it to Moscow and put it on display. They are going to be
doing that with a lot of destroyed equipment. There you go, there's the
video. People can see that happening. There. You can leave that up
all TALKA video apparently filmed from a drone shows the Abrams tank being hit on
the side, with a large pillar of fire immediately erupting from the top of
the vehicle. Three Ukrainian crew members are seen exiting the burning tank and crawling
away from the danger zone. The Abrams crew is normally four. It's unclear
what happened to the remaining service member. I don't think it's unclear at all.
A clip of the tank then being towed to the rear. A Russian
group spokesperson they call it the Center Group, Alexander Savchuk, said the US
made armor would be displayed at a major trophy show in Moscow, which will
also feature dozens of other Western made heavy vehicles captured during the conflict. The
USS sent Ukraine a total of thirty one M one Abrams tanks, according to
New York Times. As of late April, Moscow has taken out at least
five, with three more moderately damaged, most reportedly hit by Russian Kamikazi drones.
Well, I don't know how what moderately damaged means, but if it's
out of commission because they've got to repair this thing, that means they've taken
out a quarter of them in a short period of time. As I said
at the very beginning, well you got vaunted, expensive tanks, but they'll
burn just like all the rest of them do. And of course there's now
a lot of back and forth in the media, people posting Russian losses,
Russians posting Ukrainian losses. The Washington Post actually talked about Ukrainian losses. They
said, Ukraine is running out of troops for the US to train. Now
you have the Sun, which is owned by the Murdoch family. Rupert Murdoch
and the Fox people. They put out a their casually list for Russians and
that was put out by Drudge and the mainstream media. What they were saying
was that Moscow has lost four hundred thousand troops, three thousand tanks, five
hundred aircraft, et cetera. The thing that I thought was most interesting about
the Rupert Murdoch article, the Murdoch group or whatever you want to call was
the fact that they said, well, we think that Russia's only got enough
for two more years, So then what you're going to continue to fight them
and you think that you can take this out. Chris Christie was saying,
Hey, you know, we've taken out half of the Russian equipment, so
we need to keep this up. This is a good investment for us.
We're using the Ukrainians are fighting and dying for US while we can destroy Russian
military For what purpose? What's the purpose why did they do the coup in
Ukrainian? Why did they have a civil war where they shelled civilian population for
eight years? And why do they keep pressing and pressing and pressing to take
out Russia. It's because of their geopolitical goals. That's what they're pushing us
into. And so what happens when you take out the last Russian tank and
they still got nuclear weapons? Then what do you do? As a matter
of fact, there is a lot of push about Biden saying, well,
I'm going to sign this agreement with the Ukraine to keep us involved in this
war for ten years. Ten years. They're not interested in coming to any
peace agreements. They don't want to stop any of this. They're perfectly fine
to kill Russians in Ukrainians. You know, when you look at what kind
of law is this is tremendous, right, four hundred fifty thousand soldiers.
Nevertheless, what did the Russians take in World War Two? As gerald Slini
had said from the very beginning, say do you think you're going to beat
these people? Look at how they absorbed all this stuff, and you know,
you can go back to the Napoleonic Wars. But more recently, in
the memory of most Russians there in World War Two, when Hitler attack,
they had eight point six million military casualties, thirteen point seven million civilian casualties,
twenty four million I'm sorry, twenty one million all together. And the
total population of Ukraine is thirty seven million. How's this thing going to work
out? As retired military Colonel Douglas McGregor said, this is obviously from the
very beginning. This is like saying that you've got a war between Mexico and
America and you're going to bet on Mexico. I mean, just the sheer
size of the economy. And when you look at this and say, well,
they've only got two more years of weapons. They're out producing the US
and Europe in terms of munitions, in terms of shells and things like that,
this is absolutely insane. It truly, as a Washington Post said,
we are seeing a depletion of the personnel pipeline on the Ukrainian side. Selenski
insisted in February that this forces had suffered only thirty one thousand fatalities in two
years of fighting. American and Ukrainian officials know this figure is a gross understatement.
Says the Washington Post. But they admitted that Zelensky must find a way
to inspire more Ukrainian men to come to the front line, so said one
US source. So it's okay if you lie. I mean, this is
wartime. Truth is the first casualty. So yeah, he's gonna lie about
casualties. A Ukrainian lawmaker said, we see so many deaths, so many
wounded. If they go troops want to know how long will they be there?
Until you die? Until your country is destroyed? As Alexey Arrestovich pointed
out, he said in three years, and was in three years, he
said in twenty nineteen, after the Zelensky got elected on a platform of peace,
he said, well, he was the representative to the peace talks and
they're report rassing. So is there any chance and he goes, not a
chance, No chance for peace. He says, a matter of fact,
it's going to get worse, and in three years, in twenty twenty two,
we will be in aided by the Russians. Oh, this is horrible,
she said. He goes, Oh, the country will be havocked,
There'll be nothing left. She said, that's horrible, he said, but
the good news as we get to get into NATO. And so he was
somebody who was just cold blooded candor. I mean, he didn't even try
to sugarcoat anything. He got kicked out of this administration when there were some
Kruis missiles from the Russians that veered into a civilian building, and he told
the truth about that too. He said, yeah, they weren't targeting the
building. They were hit by ground fire and then they veered off course and
went into that building. So they fired him because they had a narrative out
there saying the Russians are targeting civilian buildings like the Zelenski administration had done and
don Bass in other areas. So they kicked him out, but he's back.
According to the Russian Defense Ministry, Ukraine lost more than one hundred and
sixty ths troops during last summer's counter offensive out of nearly a half million during
the entire conflict to date. Zelensky's former presidential advisor Alexey Arrestovich has claimed that
Ukraine has lost up to three hundred thousand men so far. I would go
with that figure. Now, he may be a cold blooded killer, he
may have absolutely no regard for his own people, but he'll tell you the
unvarnished truth. He really doesn't care. So Biden is trying to prevent a
future president, who would that be Trump, from ending the Ukraine War by
putting in place a ten year agreement. Okay, well, let's understand that
these agreements, just like the Paris Climate Accord or these other things, if
they're not ratified by the Senate, they're not worth the paper they're written on,
and any president could remove that. However, this will be effective if
Trump becomes president because Trump will cow back and he will not do anything about
it. That will be his excuse. That'll be Trump's excuse not to take
on the military industrial complex, That'll be Trump's excuse not to take on NATO.
He'll whine and complain about how unfair it is and how they tied his
hands and all the rest of this pure Bolshevik stuff that he threw at us
in the first term. But he won't do a thing. And we know
because we've seen all this stuff before. We've seen it with a Paris Accord,
we've seen it with DAKA, for example, DACA, an executive order
from the Obama administration. His head of Homeland Security said that she was not
going to enforce the law. That's what it means, deferred arrival, deferred
action on childhood arrivals. I'm going to defer enforcing the law. Well,
you don't have the authority to do that, so is an invalid executive order
to begin with. But it was simply an order from the previous president,
and Trump could easily have done Instead, he said, well me, let
me ask the courts if I can do this, and he played that game
and the court said no, you can't do it. Oh okay, well
my hands are tired. I can't do it. That's what he'll do with
this as well. This is not going to change between Trump and Biden,
regardless of who gets there. This tenure agreement is not to bind Trump to
anything. It is to give him an alibi to do nothing. Folks,
they're on the same team. They're controlled by the same people. Yes,
there are factions competing. You know, it's a game of thrones. They
very much want to get the other guy out and they want to get in.
And the same thing is true of their masters and the CIA. There
are you know, the CIA is not monolithic. You got people like Brennan
and Clapper and that Milk on one side, and on the other side,
you've got people like Steve A. Chennik and Jack B. Soviet and you
know others that are not very well seen. You've got people in the intelligence
community that are hard right, just like you've got people who are hard left.
And so you know, those are some of the ones that we've seen
that are out there in the media pushing disinformation. So Trump will do nothing.
So this is an agreement that would last for ten years. Remember earlier
I said, you know, they're saying, well, I think Russia's going
to be out of conventional arms in two years. Well, then what nuclear
arms? Is that? What happens is that the plan You're going to go
for ten years in this war and no nukes in that amount of time.
Is that what we're supposed to believe? So Biden indicated that it will likely
include agreements on long term support centering on military hardware and joint arms production.
So yeah, Trump is not going to get out of that. That'll be
his excuse. The Wall Street Journal said the goal is last year said the
goal is to make sure that Ukraine will be strong enough in the future to
deter Russia from attacking it again. More immediately. Ukraine's Western allies hope to
discourage the Kremlin from thinking that it can wait out the Biden administration for a
potentially more sympathetic successor at a White House. And so again we're going to
have him pretend that he can't do anything at all about this. The US
and the UK are pushing for total war on all fronts, says a political
analyst at RTEA. And I think we can see that if they're not interested
in peace talks, if they shut them down, if they never mention it,
and on all fronts. What he means is whether you're talking about Iran
and Israel, or whether you're talking about China and Taiwan, or whether you're
talking about Russia and Ukraine, we want to be involved in all of those.
US House Speaker Mike Johnson did a complete one eighty on Ukraine. He
proclaimed himself to be a Reagan Republican. No, he's a quizzling Republican.
Look, I regard myself as a as a wartime speaker. I mean,
in a literal sense, we are. I knew that when I took the
gabble, I didn't anticipate that this would be an easy path. Former speaker
Knuke Gingrich posted a couple of days ago on his social media that this is
the hardest challenge it's faced to speaker probably in the history of the country and
the moment we're in right now. He said, arguably maybe comparable to the
Civil War, but maybe worse. Yeah, well maybe worse, but an
ay lock, we can make it worse. Right, So, what's going
to happen if let's say there's an MP. That's the easy thing, easy
thing for anybody to do. It really is. You know, close only
counts, as they say in horseshoes and nuclear war, but you don't even
have to be close with an AMP. It it's exploded in the atmosphere.
Well, here, here's a few dozen things here that might happen. Twenty
four are things that will occur if a country is hit with an EMP.
I'll just read the different things off real quickly. Here. Number one,
no electricity, a supply chain breakdown, transportation service is disrupted, data loss,
medical services impacted, infrastructure breakdown, communication services shut down, vehicles shutting
down because of the electronics inside of them, ATMs and banks closing fires,
a lot of power fires because of backup. No water, confusion and chaos,
a loss of jobs, possible economic collapse, no heating or cooling.
There we go, green at last, Green at last. Just see that
these people there, we'll look at this. We've finally got our green.
Dystopia here, Intruders and looting, medication shortage, medication time here, Nurse
Ratchet, you aren't no harvest, no harvest again, famine, stock market
crash, empty grocery shelves, impassable roads even if you've got a working car,
no septic system. Planes may be grounded. Oh you can bet on
that that'll be a and then long term effects. But hey, you know,
Michael Johnson is up for this because he's a wartime speaker. Aren't we
blessed to be led by such a wise man, such a wise man of
integrity as Michael Johnson, a wartime speaker to take us into war. Elvis
the Beetle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown find them on the Oldies channel at
apsradio dot com. You're listening to the David Knight Show. I wanted to.
I've got a lot of birthday wishes from people, so thank you very
much for that. As a matter of fact, on rock Fan Dougal Lug,
thank you for the tip, says, Happy birthday, David. Have
a drink on me, well, thank you very much. Well, for
ten dollars, I can get a lot of coffee. I think with that
keep me awake here, Gregory Dish, thank you very much, he says,
keeping the gas needle up for the month. I think it's better late
than never. Well, thank you appreciate that. Yeah, I started marshaling
the troops a bit late this month, even with the all of the extraordinary
generosity of people on Friday, and the matching funds from Fate were at about
seven eighths and so I really do appreciate that. Thank you very much.
And Guard Goldsmith on Rockfin Thank you, Guard, he said it, Tippy
says, Happy birthday, David. He said, you offer the gift of
Christ and wisdom are truly gift. Well, thank you have a great day
and thank you for everything. Well, thank you, Guard. I got
your book he found in a used bookstore. He found a book about Brazil
that I've referenced so many times because it's this dark satire which unfortunately seems to
be a blueprint for all the rest of these things. Where you're talking about
nineteen eighty four or Brave New World, and it was kind of a Monty
Python take on that. But from the swat teams to the rest of the
stuff that's happening, it certainly looks like a blueprint. And he said he
found a book on it and sent that to me. So thank you.
Guard, appreciate that very much. And Eric on rock Finn, thank you
so much for that. I appreciate that well. As I said, this
is my birthday, so I wanted to do some things that maybe you're not
right on the center of all of this, just oh yeah, got it,
Thank you, Yeah, this is the book. Thank you. Guard
appreciate that. The Battle of Brazil the real story of his victory over Hollywood,
and I remember when that happened. Karen and I went to see it.
They did not like the fact that he didn't follow the happy ending script
for Hollywood, and I think I did hurt him in terms of box office.
But he had a movie that he wanted to do. He had an
idea for it, and they tried to block it. He held a screening
and had a bunch of film critics that he showed the film to and they
voted it the best picture of the year and a battle over over what was
happening, and so we got to release that version. Undeterred, they still
went back and they edited a Vision version of it which is called Love Conquers
the Love Conquers All version of it. So it just you know, it
was all just a bad dream and everything is a happy ending and that type
of deal. So yeah, it's interesting what happened with it. But anyway,
thank you, guard I appreciate that. And as I said, we're
going to take a little bit of time here to take a look at some
of the tech follies that are out there, because when we look at these
technocratic overlords, it's good to remind ourselves that they are human just like us.
They have feet of clay, just like us. They fail at it
much a lot of this stuff, and if God doesn't want them to succeed,
they won't succeed. They trust in their chariots and the horses, and
the reaper drones and their m one Abrams tanks, but God can take those
things away. Apple is slashing their Vision pro shipment productions by fifty percent as
demand for the thirty five hundred dollars headset craters who would have thought it.
From the very beginning of this I saw this thing and I went hysterical laughing
because I remembered Ernie Kovacs and very popular in the early, very very early
days of television, the very very early days of me. I watched him
when I was preschool even, and I remember he had this character that looked
very much like an Apple VR headset. He was so ahead of his time.
He made fun of this guy, a poet character that he created.
They called it the Percy dove Tonsils And he's got his hair slicked down,
and he's got glasses on that have eyes painted on them, and so they're
kind of projected and lifted off. It looks like they're magnified, but they're
actually kind of in front of him. And I was absolutely amazed at that
when I was a toddler watching it. It's like, how did he do
that? You know, look at those eyes And that's what you see with
the Apple Vision headset. It's taking pictures of your face all the time and
tracking your eyes and doing all this stuff, and then it projects your eyes
onto the vision pro thing. The problem is that the vision is a few
inches away from your face, so these these eyes are projected out there like
Percy dove tonsils. Here's what he'd give you an idea. And by the
way, when you listen to him, he sounds like Milton from the Offices
while he does his character. So it's like he's wearing a VR headset,
an Apple VR headset from sixty years sixty five or more years ago. He's
got an Apple vr headset and he's doing a Milton impersonation from the office.
Why pity the abtainer deemed to be quite a bit mifty, Yeah, and
so he pities the obtainer because he's sitting there drinking. Of course. The
other character that this Apple head set reminds me of is the movie Steve Martin
The Jerk, and he comes up with this invention and he becomes a millionaire
overnight. But then they find out a glasses, a special glasses are actually
making everybody cross eyed, and so then everybody in the world sues him and
he becomes a pauper overnight. But this is what this is the Apple Vision
adset. Now, meanwhile, we have when you look at the transhumanists kind
of on a serious side, and you look at the guy Nicola Tesla who
is just worshiped by everybody. You know. Of course, Elam Musk named
his car company if took his last name. I mentioned for the longest time.
You know, he had Edison stole his inventions, and then final insult
is Musk stole his name posthumously. But you had another car company that came
out that actually took his first name to reference him. So these technologists really
do love Tesla, who was ahead of himself in so many amazing different ways.
But one of the things he's not really talked about with Tesla, except
it was a it's been a thread on substack by a guy named matt Eric
E. H R. E T. And he's got a series of articles
on substack the occult Nicola Tesla, and he's looking at his philosophical beliefs and
they were very occultic by his own profession. It's a bit of a huckster
showman, you know, manipulating the crowds to believe in things that were not
really happening there as well. This is from Expose a News. Ronda Wilson
commented on his accolumis. She said many people have played important roles in contributing
to the emergence of AI. Over the years, few have been credited as
being the father of AI. Matt Ritt believes those who credit Tesla as the
father of AI to be more correct. He had a very particular relationship with
robots. Explicitly considered these to be beings which he called his tell almata,
to be nothing less than a new species that he himself had evolved. As
a matter of fact, I think he was referring to them as tell automata
before the term robot came out. Robot was from a play that was written
by some chech author and it was the check word for slave. But he's
calling them tell automata is a use of the term to say that I have
evolved when describing what he treated as a new species should make anyone aware the
religious culture transhumanism more than a little bit uncomfortable. As a matter of fact,
this is something that he shares with all the people who talk about AI,
as I have talked many times about Hugo to Garrison, he and other
researchers who are secular atheist materialists will say we are creating a godlike intelligence here
with artificial intelligence. The question is is it going to kill us, and
if it is going to kill us, should we continue if there's a risk
that is going to kill us? That type of thing. So they really
do think that they are creating some kind of godlike intelligence. That's the term
that many of them use. And yet even though they think that there's a
pretty good possibility that that God likes intelligence might turn on them and turn on
all of us and squashes like a bug, they are determined as a group,
the vast majority of them, when he asked them that question, they're
determined to move ahead. And I guess it's because if you create the godlike
intelligence, even if it destroys you, well, then I mean that you're
you're godlike, right, And that's what it's all really about, isn't it.
Yeah? From the Garden of Eden on, it's like, you'll become
like God. You'll live forever. We'll live forever somehow, even if it's
my creation that is there, or maybe I can transfer myself. The ultra
materialist idea, going to transfer yourself into some machine or to some robot as
a cyborg or something like that. They don't even have any idea what they
are. You know, they're so materialistic. They think that the mind and
the soul and the spirit and all the rest of this stuff is something that
just kind of spontaneously happens when you get the brain exactly right. So they
keep trying to make a more exact copy of the brain. They have no
idea. These people, Well, like I said too, zultanis Fan,
I said, so you're transhumanist. I said, so you're going to transfer
what into a machine as a cyborg? What are you? Do you have
any idea? And why do you think that? What evidence do you have
for any of that? And so In the Occult Nicola Tesla series, Matt
Eric gives a narrative of Tesla's life and the dark forces, the occultic forces
beneath it. And I would say that that also applies to Elon Musk.
When you look at it, he says. You know, when you look
at Ai, he said, a dispute has raged over what it is.
So they've got two camps. One of them is just looking at it as
a regular technological progression. It's going to be an extension of automation and computing,
and it will be in the service of human needs, but it will
not be capable of replacing human creative reasonings. So that's one group of people,
one camp, one line of thought, the other line of thought,
he said, there's a lot more mystical, Darwinian occultic. It's more religiously
inclined. And these are people who we talk about as being transhumanists. They
tend to treat artificial intelligence like Elon mus said, we're going to summon the
demon, right, they tend to treat it as some kind of a supernatural,
demonic Darwinian force beyond human control, with free will, with intentions that
compels humanity towards its own extinction. And I think that's kind of interesting because
that's what I see from these people who are secular atheists, whether they embrace
that or not. And so the people who would embrace that are people like
Ray Kurzweil, Euvil Harari, people who, by the way, seem to
have a real contempt for the human race. And also in that group is
Elon Musk, big believer in transhumanism, a big believer in the technocracy.
And when you look at the kinds of technology that they put in there,
the transhumanism transferring our conscience into something else that they think. These are people
who focus on things like neural chips and brain computer interfaces and mRNA biotech,
because Musk has done that. You know, he was there at the very
beginning with his mRNA stuff, Crisper babies, virtual reality, all the rest
of this stuff you are that is, that is all there. And you
know when you look at Elon Musk, he talks about summoning the demons and
things like that. He's very much like Bill Maher who said about abortion,
he said, well, yeah, it is kind of like, isn't it.
And I'm okay with that. And these people are saying, well,
it is kind of like the end of the human race, and it is
this superpower, this god like intelligence. I'm okay with that really. And
then on the other side you've got people like Ted Kaczynski, the unibomber,
who you know, it's kind of like the Sarah Connor is trying to take
out these different powers there. Tesla had a very particular relationship with robots,
says matt Ertt. He considered these to be beings he called his tele automata
that he had evolved. This Not only did Tesla believe that he'd evolved a
new soul less being, as he believed himself to be. He believed he
didn't have a soul and know what he is. But he also believed that
this new specie would provide a total understanding of the machine known as humans.
Very smart guy, But God has chosen the foolish things of this world to
and found the wise, hasn't he? Perhaps most jarring is a Tesla.
Sassi believe this new specie would help future social engineers better understand how the human
machine could be more effectively programmed. So even though a lot of people will
say Boston mathematician John McCarthy was the father of all of this, or you
know, some other individuals Alan Turing and some others are are that, but
this person says, well, I think really when you look at Tesla,
I think he is probably the best example, the one who has the most
involvement in this in terms of moving it forward. You know, some people
say Von Newman, who did games and other things like that, but I
think you could make a case of any when you look at his first machine,
it was remote controlled, and then he would put this thing up and
it was this floating thing that was in a vat and it kind of looked
like a floating piece of metal, and he would ask the audience to ask
it mathematical questions, and then he would give the answers, and they couldn't
figure out how this is happening. Because he had an assistant who had a
remote control in his pocket. They'd never seen anything like a remote control.
So he's very advanced. He's got a remote control in eighteen ninety eight,
and yet you know a lot of it's a black box with flashing lights,
and he's fooling the people there. And this author draws the comparison to Elon
Musk having a human dressed in a robot suit. Or you could talk about
the cyber trucks. That would be another example of this. In a nineteen
hundred article, Tesla wrote of his new evolved machine, he said, the
art that I have evolved does not contemplate merely to change the direction of a
moving vessel. It affords a means because that's what he had, was this
thing in a tank and he could move it around, or he could answer
mathematical questions of the flashing light. It affords means of absolutely controlling in every
respect the innumerable transitory movements, as well as the operations of all internal organs,
and so again he reduces man to nothing other than the material stuff that
he can observe, a very naive approach. Actually, so, he says,
Remember that Tesla believes in all humans, including himself, are automatons,
meaning that he believes that future creator alpha machines like him will inevitably act as
a master race the higher automata to the lower automata that will be programmed.
On this point, Tesla directly stated, I am proving constantly, by every
thought and act of mine that I am nothing more than an automaton responding to
external stimuli and passing through an infinite infinitude of different existences from cradle to grave.
Well, in that regard, he doesn't mention this in this article,
but in that regard I see him as connected to BF Skinner, who believed
that we were simply automata or whatever that could be programmed with different training things,
just like any animal could. And of course BF Skinner came up with
masterful tactics to program animals. Rather than punish him them if they got the
wrong thing, he gave them positive operant conditioning to get dolphins and all kinds
of lesser intelligent animals to be able to train them with tricks in that type
of thing. But he was very adamant. BF. Skinner was very adamant
that we don't have freedom and we don't have dignity, that human beings are
nothing more than animals or robots. And you know, when we look at
this, I guess many of us would be tempted to say that based on
what we saw in twenty twenty, where they took away our freedom with lockdowns,
they took away our dignity with masks, but many of us never went
for that. And there's something else that is involved here. Yes, each
and every one of us has a materialistic, animalistic side that can be manipulated,
and the people who do not choose to do something with their spirit can
have their mind and body controlled by these people. But we're not like that.
We don't have to be like that. That is not the way that
we have to live. There is no control they exercise over us if we're
connected to God, and that is not going to be the way that we
are going to live. And we ought to be confident about that. But
they are working very hard to completely alter society. This has been going on
for a very long time. The universal basic income that Trump moved the Overton
window too, with his sanctions, his lockdowns, his stimulus checks, and
all the rest of this stuff they've been talking to I've been talking about that
for years, and you go back into the mid two thousands in South Korea
was talking about how what percentage of different professions were going to lose their job
to artificial intelligence, or to robotics, or a combination of those two things.
Interestingly enough, even before chat GPT, they decided that it was going
to be white collar jobs like doctors and lawyers that were going to have the
highest unemployment. They're going to lose something like seventy something percent, whereas people
working in factories is going to be fifty percent unemployment for them. That's the
future that they're trying to design for us. And when we look at what
Gavin Newsom is doing in California, I said from the very beginning, yes,
people look at the economic consequences and the folly of minimum wage, but
I said, there's somethinghing else happening here. This is not simply another Democrat
naively trying to give everybody a sugar high with a temporary increase in their wages
until the effects kick in and the prices of everything go up. He only
did it to fast food chains, to large fast food chains, And I
said at the time that the purpose was so that these people would bring in
robots. Now here's a robot. This one is coming out of China.
It is doing all kinds of kitchen tests there. It is flipping pancakes,
doing a really good job of that, cooking, slicing, dicing, all
the rest of the stuff, serving people, opening up bottles, and all
the rest of this stuff. I said at the time, and I still
believe even more so now that for him to move against simply the fast food
restaurants was a way to financially incentivize them to replace people with robots. Because
he's got a lot of tech companies in California. They will always tell you
that they're there for the working man, they're there for the middle class.
No they're not. They're there for the elites. And the elites that he's
there for are going to be the people in Silicon Valley producing AI and robotics.
Here it is folding a shirt. It's gonna smooth it out. Oh,
isn't that nice? Don't you want to have one of these in your
home. Well, actually, no, here it is building a wooden stool
there. It's great watering your flowers for you, plugging in your lamp,
vacuuming. Truly is amazing. Now that is out of China, not out
of Silicon Valley. But of course I think that is why Gavin Newsom gave
a big race. Oh by the way, look at this now. It
says down there that has moved that clock down a little bit for me,
Travis. It says that there is no teleoperation. Here's teleoperation. It's following
the moves of this guy. Now, what it may be doing is watching
him instead of having him wired up, which is the way they used to
way Disney used to hear he is writing Chinese characters. That's the way that
Disney used to train, you know, the Hall of Presidents and stuff like
that. They would have somebody that was all wired up and it would memorize
those movements that might have been It still had that there, so it may
have been looking visually at him and you know, doing the Harpo Marx Lucille
ball thing. You know, we move the hands in different ways anyway.
And Tesla's nineteen thirty seven remarks to George Sylvester Vreck. He said, what
we call soul or spirit, there's nothing more than the sum of the functioning
of the body. When this functioning ceases, the soul or the spirit ceases.
Likewise, well where'd it come from? Where'd it come from? You
know, if it's something that just spontaneously happened, why does it go away?
You know, what is that spark of life? They can't answer that.
I mean, all of the stuff is still there. I've used the
analogy about evolution many times as well. So I got a mosquito on my
hand, I smash it. Well, all the components are still there.
You know, you got all of the different components to make a mosquito right
there. How did it get assembled? You know, we're supposedly we came
from a goo. Well, how did that happen? And why isn't that
mosquito going to itself reassemble into a mosquito? What is it that is a
spark of life? They don't have any answer for that. The Bible does.
And if you stop and think about how everything is designed, isn't it
amazing that somebody is smart as Tesla can't see the design in the universe.
Can't see the design in the body that he can look at a car,
for example, something far more similar, just think that that evolved. Would
he ever say that, of course not. He's blinded by his rejection of
God. He would never have looked at a complication. So they didn't have
cars at that point in time. I guess maybe Mercedes had done a horseless
charriage or something. But he would never look at a complicated machine and just
say that just happened. Nobody built that. And yet he would look at
the human body, or an animal's body, or the celestial bodies, and
he would think that that all just happened by chance. That's foolish. The
fool has said in his heart there is no God. So his philosophy of
robotics, his disdain for free will, just like B. F. Skinner
hated freedom, hated dignity, his transhumanist proclivities are all deep causes for concern.
And we see that in all these people. You see it. Musk
worships this guy. Musk's grandfather was tied to technocrat. He loved the technocracy,
tried to overthrow the Canadian government and instill a technocracy. He got off
from the charges and then he went to South Africa. But that's where Musk
comes from. And even his profile picture is a Baphomet costume with a you
know, upside down cross on it and all this other satanic symbol. I
mean, you have to look at that with Elon Musk and you have to
say, like the guy in the British skit to the other German soldier,
you know they're Nazis, and he said, Hans, are we the bad
guys? Way? We've got skulls on our uniforms and anything. That's so
you look at Elon Musk and you have to ask that question. So,
you know, the nothing to be concerned about, right, And yet we
do have a startup that is now using artificial intelligence to edit human DNA.
Oh, they want to create the world's first open source AI generated DNA gene
editor. What happens when it hallucinates? And the idea behind that, this
Berkeley based startup called pro Fluent says that they want to make it more available.
They want to, you know, let everybody have a chance at editing
human DNA and other DNA. So what could possibly go wrong with that?
Right? Let's democratize this. Let's let everybody a chance to alter the code
that God has put in because you know, hey, we know so much
better than God what things should look like. They have new editors that are
based on Crisper, but they are going to open it up to everybody.
And the rationale for all this. You look at this and say, why
would anybody do that? What is the point? Well, it's there to
ward off disease and other pathogens. There we go, more tech biotear,
that's what we're talking about. Pro Fluent Claims have already used one of these
AI generated gene editors. They call it open cris Spur one to edit human
DNA company says it's the world's first open source AI generated gene editor. We
want to spur innovation. They want to spur innovation and living things and democratization
and gene editing. Let everybody do it. Yeah, we all should have
one of these little labs in our you know, in our home, where
we can sit there and start modifying living things to find out what happens with
the goal of pulling us, pulling the future forward, pulling the future forward,
experts told The New York Times, what's really holding back the field of
gene editing. Is a number of pre clinical studies to show if these edits
are safe and effective. Who cares? Howre we just determined. They don't
care about that. They don't care about safety, your efficacy. The more
dangerous, the better. Let's go faster and faster. Let's pull the future
forward at warp speed. That's what we want. We want to go into
the future faster. Korea, neuroscientists are using artificial intelligence to decode people's dreams,
and they're spontaneous thoughts. You see your DNA, your thoughts, your
dreams. Nothing is hidden from these people. They want to know everything about
you. They want to be like God, right, because God is omniscient,
He knows everything about everybody, is always present everywhere, just like Big
Brother, and he's all powerful, omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient. That's they
want to be God, these tyrants. They demonstrate the possibility of using functional
MRI, magnetic resonance imagy, and machine learning algorithms to predict subjective feelings in
people's thoughts while reading stories. Because spontaneous thought typically occurs without any constraint or
consciousness, researching it poses a challenge even simply asking individuals what they're currently thinking
can change the nature of their thoughts. It's kind of like the Heisenberg principle.
You know, you go in and you observe something. Well, now
you've changed it, you know, quantum mechanics and stuff us what's happening with
us? So it makes it really difficult for them to figure out what you're
thinking. Why do they want to do this? Why do governments again?
Because they want to be like God? Because they want to be toutlitarian tyrants.
Participants engage in a one on one interview to craft personalized narrative stimuli reflecting
on their past experiences and emotions. While participants read their stories inside the MRI
scanner, their brain activity was recorded. What was this remind you of?
It reminds me of Blade Runner, where they get that guy there for an
interview and he says, so you're you're in the desert and there's a tortoise
and you turn it over and it's back and it can't get over, and
it's kicking there in the sun. It's miserable. Why don't you help it?
What are you talking about? What is a tortoise? I don't know,
Well, it's that turtle. It's a turtle, you know, it's
a replicant guy that is getting that interview. That's the kind of stuff that
they're doing. Everybody is a test subject for these people. It truly is
amazing, and yet they are not concerned about any of the consequences. The
study holds significance as we decoded the emotional state associated with general thoughts rather than
targeting emotions limited to specific tasks. And again, why do they want to
know your thoughts? Well, because we're talking about government, and government needs
to know everything everything about us while they keep everything from us. We just
recently had in Tennessee a law to and of course in New Hampshire as well,
and I think there's a couple of other places where they have put this
up said, if you're going to spray anything in the atmosphere anything, you
need to tell us or we're going to hit you with big fines. And
so you had a lot of these people who had always been saying, well,
you know, geoengineering and kim Trail's that's all just a conspiracy theory.
And some people were mocking Tennessee. Look at these people in Tennessee. They're
thinking all this stuff's happened in New Hampshire, and yet now you've got a
scientist who is slamming the politicians for banning the geo engineering experiments. See it
goes immediately from conspiracy theory to you're getting in the way of our scientific experiments.
They admit it and say it was a good thing. And an editorial
for mit Tech Review, Cornell's Danielle Visione got that vision thing. Wrote that
even as researchers and governments begin studying and sometimes conducting early stage tests, various
jew and daring prospects often seed the clouds to spur on rain, to dry
out the stratus sphere, or to reflect sunlight away from the ground below.
Some critics are calling to shut these experiments down. Well than a decade,
I was talking about the fact they had annual Jew engineering think where they were
talking about the best ways to do it, or they were their big concern
was who gets to set the thermostat? You know, the Russians may want
it warmer, people in southern hemisry southern climates may want it colder. That
type of thing. Who gets to set the thermostat? As Vigioni notes,
politicians have already begun banning Joe engineering experiments. Mexico did it. More recently,
Tennessee's governor signed the bill into law that bars it under the pretense of
so called kim trails. Yeah, these people mocked it, and now they're
whining that were stopping what they said was not existing. It turns out that
as you look at some of the stuff that was not existing. I've played
the clips for you of Sora, the chat GPT video creator, and some
very creative stuff that was done, and yet one of the most interesting demos
it was there, turns out it was highly edited by humans. It wasn't
completely generated by this chat GPT stuff. I love the comment here from the
author of this article, as the saying goes, never trust a tech demo.
Why because the technology people are going to be lying to you. And
that apparently is the case with Sam Altman and the people that work with and
for him. At least one of these viral Sora clips, a roughly two
minute video that was titled Airhead, which is so impressive that we blogged about
it at the time, had a bit more human mitigation than OpenAI initially suggested,
and one person exposed on Twitter I remember that airhead video that made with
Sora. Turns out it he used a ton of rotoscoping and manual visual special
effects. A head would pop back on and the balloon collars would keep changing
from generation to generation. But they were doing that manually manually. Tesla.
By the way, you look at the downturn that's happened in evs, this
is one person. Nico Marillo, a dedicated Tesla employee. Last year,
the production supervisor did not go home. Instead, he slept inside his car
in the factory parking lot and he ate microwave meals just so that he could
help meet production goals. And he's just been fired, summarily fire, he
said, in spite of all that. Earlier this month, he wrote in
a LinkedIn post that he got lid off, along with ten percent of Tesla
employees, about fourteen thousand workers worldwide. He was a resident in California.
He wrote how he had logged onto his company account April of fifteenth and found
that it was deactivated. He thought, well, this is a tech issue.
He didn't even know right. Nobody talked about this, Nobody from human
resources, because you know, Elon Musk likes robots, not humans so much,
I guess. So he drove to the Fremont factory, but on the
way there he received an unsettling email while driving his Tesla vehicle on autopilot,
informing him that your position has been eliminated by restructuring. Well, I guess
that's good that he had autopilot so he can sit there and read email and
not drive his car into the ditch. Sometimes autopilot does that. Anyway,
after trying to get in to the factory, he was turned away by security.
He told him that he was laid off. He said, I set
in my car in disbelief. It worked for Tesla since twenty nineteen. Tesla
employee and comments had similar experience sleeping at the company factory. I started as
a production associate after putting in the work and learning different positions and skills and
different departments across three different factories, sacrificing sleep, staying in my car in
the parking lot, showering, heating up dinners, and the microwave. Similar
to you, I got a position as a has waste tech. Same day
I started that position, I got an email that my position had been terminated.
Well, you know, that's the way it works. These guys,
whether you're talking about Elon Musk firing these people, you're talking about Jeff Bezos
pushing his employee so hard that they've got to have a bottle with them at
their station because they don't have time to go to the bathroom. Or I
had a friend who actually worked for Steve Jobs at Apple. He was a
he was a Macintosh fanatics. The two of us met along those lines,
and he was at an apartment complex. He put up a sign of the
mac and says, you know what one of these are, give me a
call. And he and I were really into programming these things. And so
he got a job as an Apple tech and it was up in Pittsburgh for
a while, and then they took him to the corporate offices and it was
one of the systems seven operating systems I think. Anyway, he was one
of the top three guys. And he did that for a couple of years,
and he was so burned out at the end of that time that he
resigned and he walked the appllition trail for the better part of a year.
A lot of pressure, and these guys don't care, right, they don't
treat people as human beings. These are the people who want to control the
world and will use you know, it's a partnership that they've got, a
public private partnership they have with these NGOs, the World Economic Forum in the
UN and all these different government figureheads like Trump and Biden. You know,
they empower these types of people. And it is this symbiotic relationship of parasites
to prey on us. That's what it is. And so then let's take
a look at this video here. This is a robo taxi in India,
and the company that put this together is actually bragging about they think this is
a good job of driving. It is very chaotic. There is very narrow
roads, dirt roads, holes in the roads. You got people all over
the place driving and you know, typically people is a difficult thing to drive
in. There's no rules and there's no lines and all the rest of this
stuff. He says, if you're able to do this here, you can
do it anywhere, you know, like New York, New York. If
I can make it there, I can make it anywhere. Well, if
we can have a robotaxi that can drive in this kind of environment in India,
then I guess you can do it anywhere. Here he is now he's
supposed to be on the left side of the road. Oh, he just
realized that. I guess he's all these people are having to break for him,
right. This is the self driving car, and if it wasn't for
all the humans in the other car, there would be an accident because they're
the ones that are making the quick reaction responses to this thing. It's running
people off the road. It's coming out to them head on. Look at
this, This has to pull off to the side off the road. Beep
the horn at him, and the traffic is backing up behind this car.
There's a motorcycle managed to get around this guy. Look at that almost at
a head on collision with that one. Truly is when you look at this
and they think that this is this is a win. He was all the
way over to the wrong side of road. Anyway as they call it,
they say, it is way mow terrifying. Like the self driving taxi,
an Indian startup company that is there sway yacht robots driving through absolute chaos and
a suburban unstructured roads in India nearly sideswipe that car and making the chaos even
worse. The white suv isn't afraid to veer into the path of oncoming traffic.
Is it doing that out of fearlessness or is it doing that because it's
not driving very well forcing the other drivers to swerve around it. But to
the company, that terrifying behavior is entirely intentional. There's no traffic rules to
bide by on this road other than to perform a left sided avoidance. In
other words, they're driving on the left side of the road to try not
hit anything head on. Is it an impressive feat of engineering or is it
a disaster waiting to happen? I guess that is the key. I think
a lot of those drivers who are breaking hard and honking, they may think
that it was a disaster about ready to happen. Unrumble uh sam jam blam.
Thank you very much for the for the tip. Says happy birthday,
Thank you, and Delta Mike thank you as well, also says happy birthday.
Says grace and peace. Yeah, as a matter of fact, let's
play that. Let's we'll take a quick break and we'll come back with what
I call grace and sometimes your day needs a little smoothing. Check out the
Jazz channel at APS radio dot com and the APS Radio app and leave the
stress behind. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, while we
were looking at these the way more terrifying robotaxis that they have in India,
Ford loses one point three billion dollars on electric vehicles in the first quarter of
twenty twenty four. By the way, while we're talking about automated cars,
somebody put up a video of one of the way more cars in San Francisco
driving on the wrong side of the road, adamantly doing it in order to
pass up some people who were on some of the these big wheel things that
you stand on and lean and it wasn't moving fast enough for this slow moving
robocar. But when you look at forward lost one point three billion, and
I had somebody correct me on, you know, a couple of different things.
I've been really swapping out millions and billions and trillions, and they corrected
me on that. We'll get to that and just a moment we talk about
money. But yeah, this is with the b one point three billion.
They're losing one hundred and thirty two thousand dollars on each electric vehicle that they
sell. How do you do that. I mean, the electric vehicles are
incredibly expensive to start with. What are they going to do sell these trucks,
these pickup trucks for a quarter of a million dollars in order to make
a profit on them. So and it really hasn't The blood letting really hasn't
started yet because China is so efficient, because they've got slave weight labor,
but especially because they've got a big advantage in the cost of energy and that's
a big deal with manufacturing, and because they have access to the raw materials
and other things like that. They're starting to cut the prices in a price
war on this stuff. So it's only going to get worse. Price warn't
is now just now starting. Americans don't want evs at the levels of Biden's
climate hysteria requires, says Andy Pudzeiter on x Ford's EV quarter one losses soward
to one point three billion are ridiculous. One hundred thirty two thousand loss per
EV sold. All of Ford's profits came from internal combustion engine vehicle cells.
Collectivist policies destroy prosperity, and they do it by design. This is their
intention. They meant to do this. Another person says, well, this
does not appear to be sustainable, and they don't want to sustain the private
ownership of cars. They pointed out in this article on what's up with that?
They said, not too many people know that Henry Ford and Thomas Edison
were good friends and they worked together to develop an electric automobile back in the
day. But you know the problem is, they're not Henry Ford and Thomas
Edison. We're not nearly as smart as Biden and Kerry and Pete Bouotyguay,
they're so much smarter than those guys. They're going to be able to fix
this, all right. So the problem with Henry Ford and Thomas Edisen they
were just engineers. These guys are politicians, and they know that you can
just make things appear out of nowhere. I mean, they do it with
their money all the time, don't they. And so they can just write
rules and regulations and presto digito, people like Henry Ford and Thomas Citizen make
this into reality. So you know, when you look at that that video
what happened to the electric car, It's amazing how that thing went around.
I had so many people showing that video to me recommending that video to me
fifteen twenty years ago. It was kind of like the Uncle Tom's Cabin of
electric vehicles. It was a thing that motivated everybody. You know, oh,
we got to have electric cars. It's a conspiracy to get rid of
the electric cars. Well, here's what failed with Henry Ford and Thomas Edison
when they worked together to create an electric car. Edison's batteries were found to
have very high internal resistance and were thus incapable of powering an electric car under
most circumstances. It was the battery that killed the electric car, same things
coming it today. Heavier lead acid batteries, which would have made the car
two ponderous, were substituted behind Henry Ford's back, and when he found out,
he went ballistic and he shut the project down. So again, their
batteries didn't work. They tried to fake it with the kind of batteries that
have been used always now in internal combustion engines, lead acid batteries. Ford
invested one and a half million dollars in the electric car project. He nearly
bought one hundred thousand batteries from medicine before the project fell apart. Well,
he was lucky because you know, even if this is before the Federal Reserve
killed like ninety nine percent of the purchasing power of the dollars. So let's
multiply it by one hundred times, right, So let's say one hundred and
fifty million dollars. He still only lost about a tenth of what Ford Motor
Company lost on evs. So he lucked out. He, you know,
is much smarter than the people running forward today. Well we have cheaper teslas.
Well, China says, you ain't seen nothing yet. They're getting ready
to start a blood war, and so all these people who you know,
you know, I'm not a Trump fan, but all of this nonsense.
When he said it's going to be, you know, blood bath, he's
talking about this talking about the fact that there's absolutely no way that we can
compete with the Chinese on these electric vehicles because of Paris, because of the
Paris Climate Accord, the cheap power that has been given to them their advantage.
We're not even going to be allowed enough power under the Paris Climate Accord,
which Trump left in. We are not going to have enough power to
even run our own evs, let alone manufacture them. We're not even going
to be able to run what we've got. They're going to use your car.
If you get an EV, they're going to use it as an extra
battery. Sorry, you can't drive it. We've got to suck the juice
out of it. Hook it up, that type of thing. Tesla chief
executive Ilama said last week that it is accelrating the launch of more affordable models
ahead of the original plan to do it in late twenty twenty five. So
they're working with the Chinese. They're going to perhaps move their production there.
Maybe that's why he's laying off the people who have been so dedicated sleeping in
their cars, working around the clock. Now they're going to be replaced with
Chinese cheap labor. And so again, as I mentioned earlier, the self
driving Waymo that was spotted going down the wrong side of the street in San
Francisco, I wonder if, like you know, Jeff Bezos and as Amazon
stores, they had to just walk out grocery stores, just grab stuff and
just walk out. We'll send you the bill. And supposedly it was artificial
intelligence. It was recognizing everything they had and going to total that at recognizing
them, recognizing with it, and it turns out it was a thousand people
in India watching and writing down the products that people were buying. So maybe
this self driving Waymo. You know, you saw that picture that one struggling
through the streets. And of course in India they drive on the wrong side
of the road like the British do. We drive on the right side of
the road. They drive on the wrong side of the road. They drive
on the left side. And so maybe it was being driven by some people
in India. This WAYMO in San Francisco, maybe being driven remotely by people
in India who still think that they're on the other side of the road.
Footage shows a vehicle passing a group of electric powered unicyclists and scooters. Yeah,
they had lights all over the unicycles and their helmets. Try to overtake
the unicyclist by driving entirely on the left side of the road and staying there.
Fortunately, one of the group of unicyclists managed to get the vehicle to
stop by getting in front of it and stopping himself. Yeah, you want
to drive in San Francisco, you got Waymo taxis, unicyclists with lights all
over their heads, and all the rest of the stuff. Would human driver
really take over the entire opposing lane instead of simply slowing down or pulling over,
the guy literally stops in front of it and gestures it back into the
lane. Well, he's got a lot more confidence in that technology than I
do. Makes me wonder if the Waimo would have continued on the wrong side
of the road if this guy hadn't stopped in front of it to get to
stop driving on the wrong side of the road. Well, again, you
think that that thing is going to recognize you. We've already had a lot
of accidents where it has. It ran over a dog, it collided with
a cyclist, and all the rest of this stuff. So it was in
some hot water with the California DMV. But we were always told these things
are not going to have accidents because it's a collective mind, and whenever something
happens with one of these machines, they all learn at the same time.
Is that why they all went to one intersection and stopped blocked that intersection?
Is that why they freeze up on the side of the road. I think
we've been sold a bill of goods. I think this is pretty much in
the category of what Tesla was doing in eighteen ninety eight with these other people.
And that's not the only place where they've sold us a bill of goods.
Electrical grid operators are sounding the alarm over these new EPA rules this week.
Four new rules, four new dictates from the EPA. There's not going
to be any juice for your ev You can't cut loose without that juice.
And they're going to take down these the power supplies. They're going to take
down the grid. You know, Biden is busy telling everybody that everything's got
to be electrified and everything that's got to be on the grid while he is
destroying the grid. Electric grid operators are sounding alarm bells everywhere over these new
EPA rules. They said, there's different grids in the United States. There's
the PJAM Grid thirteen states, the MISO fifteen states, KSO which is California,
Urkott, and Texas, adding North Carolina and Tennessee thirty two states now
impacted by grid operators telling us that they're running out of electricity. Why is
that because you got things like the TVA here in Tennessee shutting down conventional power
plants and Texas they were doing it the entire time I was there, And
then they're putting up these so called renewables which have to have a battery energy
storage site, which is unbelievably expensive, still doesn't match the load, and
is a fire haserd an amazing fire hasard. California is importing thirty four percent
of its electricity to tell people, you know, we got clean area,
because we're not going to generate it here, We're going to bring it in
from some other place. Because the same thing that other people are doing with
Paris, say, we're going to manufacture everything in China and India and they
can have as dirty power plants as they wish. We don't care. We
won't see it. It'll be out of sign. They had said, seventy
five percent variation in daily wind volume or speed for power generation. This stuff
is varying by seventy five percent. What makes up that difference? Oh,
well, we're going to have these massive battery storage sites, no problem,
the Manhattan Contrarian says. In myself does aated role critiquing various schemes for total
transformation of the world's energy system. I get to review large amounts of poor,
shoddy, and incompetent work. He so start with the fact that the
so called smartest people are filled with arrogance and hubris, but are not actually
very smart. Add that many enumerate politics and English majors have flooded into a
field that cries out for engineering calculations, but in a field rife with bad,
worse, and still worse and even dangerously in competent work. I don't
know if I've ever seen anything is shockingly inept as a report just out from
the International Energy Agency about batteries, the big battery systems the worst thing he's
seen. If I'd been given the assignment by the North Koreans to write a
report to somehow induce the West to self destruct, I don't know how I
could have done it any better. And that's early what we're talking about here.
They really want us to self destorying. The thesis of the report is
that batteries, and particularly lithium ion batteries, are the key to the impending
energy transition, and they need to be scaled up massively and immediately, with
whatever amount of government subsidies and handouts that takes. That's what all this stuff
is about. It truly is amazing. Well, I'm going to take a
quick break here. Let me thank some of the people who have left tips.
On rock Fan James, thank you very much. On Rumble four,
Can Gold says thank you for the tip. He says, happy birthday,
David. Well, thank you. Thank you for sharing your knowledge on a
daily basis. Well, thank you for sharing your time here and for sharing
with us. Thank you so much. Rumble A woots, thank you for
the tip. Happy birthday, David was a great day in Florida in nineteen
fifty five. My father was also born. Well we share the same birthday
exactly. How about that, and in Florida as well. That's cool.
Staying side note, John von Newman became a Christian near the end of his
life. Wow, well that's good. I wonder if he what he would
think transhumanism. I think he would probably uh not be too impressed with it
at all. We'll be right back. Tell Alexa to add the APS radio
skill and have access to the best channels anywhere, from country to blues,
classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
Get details at apsradio dot com. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Karen came in, darn the braks. He just said to a woozy,
said, my dad was also born in the same day in nineteen fifty
five, also in Florida. She said, you have said, Luke,
I am your father, who knows well. This is a letter correcting me
email and I appreciate it. When I get something wrong, folks, please
do let me know. This is from Sam. He says, you've been
saying the US debt level was ten billion in two thousand and eight. It
was actually ten trillion, nine billion. Now, of course it's almost thirty
five trillion, which is bad enough, but it is three and a half
times bigger. But again, I'm getting older, I guess. I guess
my response would be, come on, man, it works for Biden.
But as you get older, I guess things, you know, decimal points
start floating around. I've done this a couple of times in the last couple
of weeks. As I was talking about Mike Johnson and I was talking about
the budget and all the rest of this stuff, I started saying, he
got in twenty billion dollars. It hasn't gotten that bad yet, you know,
twenty million dollars in three months. Pretty good pay, isn't it.
What's he being paid to do? Well? We know that he's being paid
to betray us. Really, but let's talk a bit about money. The
Chinese have grabbed gold by the throat as capital flight accelerates. This is from
John Reid, who use that term grabbing it by the throat a fed that
seemed to be willing to support spending with rate cuts that was wholly unnecessary based
on the data they are so dependent on to prompt fear of policy ra so
Bloomberg reports. Juicing the rally is unrelenting Chinese demand on gold, as retail
shoppers, fund investors, futures traders, and even the central bank looked to
billion as a store of value at uncertain times. China and India have typically
vied over the title of the world's biggest buyer of gold, but that shifted
last year as Chinese consumption of jewelry, of bars, and of coins swelled
to record levels. Chinese bar and coin investments surged twenty eight percent, jewelry
went up ten percent. Interesting, And you know, I looked at that
and I thought, how much is a bar of gold worth? Because you
know, Bob Menendez, the crooked senator in New Jersey who's already nearly been
convicted once, but he had Lindsey Graham show up to be a character witness.
That's almost like having George Santo's show up to be a character witness for
you. And many different ways we could draw many different parallels between George Sentos
and Lindsay Graham. George Sentos, by the way, is now resurrecting his
is a drag queen persona and you can pay him for pictures of himself as
a drag queen. You know, on one of these internet sites. He
had previously said, when I think it was a Reuter's or Associated Press,
one of those two main things, had turned up pictures of him dressed as
a drag queen in Brazil. He adamantly said, that's a lie. I
never did that. That's not me. It's not what you think. And
now he's owning it. This guy is just an amazing line again, another
thing that he shares with Lindsey Graham. Yeah, he's howking his character.
He calls it Katara. He's now going to bring Katara out of the closet.
Yeah, hide your eyes. But while we're talking about the gold bars,
and we're talking about John Menendez, the friend of Lindsay Graham, not
Joe men Indez. But I forget Bob Menendez. Bob Mendez was caught,
if you remember this most recent scandal, when the FBI raided his house.
They said he had multiple goal bars. How much is a goal bar?
I looked it up today, four hundred ounces of goal So we're talking about
something nearly a million dollars in each one of these bars, and he had
multiples of these. Maybe it's Bob Mendez who's driving the price of gold up.
Is being hoarded not just by the crooked Chinese communists, by the crooked
American Senate as well. So anyway, part of what's driving this is the
fact that in China they've got capital controls, and so how do you escape
capital controls? Well, with financial privacy and with things like metals and stuff
like that, you know, gold and silver and things like that, that's
how you escape it. They know, everybody's always known that you keep it
secret, you keep it safe as goandof set. So that's why people are
flooding into gold in China because the economy is going down very rapidly there as
well, and they also have put in capital controls in Japan. I was
surprised to see this because I don't typically keep up with what's going on in
the Japanese economy. The yen, the Japanese yen was downgraded to Banana Republic
currency, says the headline, after another roller coaster session. Well that's an
insult to all those hardworking people in the malls, that's one Republican candidate said.
He said, yeah, we've got I don't want to make fun of
these people who are working in the Banana Republic stores. No, it's not
the same thing the Japanese yen, which increasingly books like third world Banana Republic
currency instead of belonging to the world's third largest economy, and which first plunged
below one hundred and sixty versus US dollar, only to sower more than five
hundred in what is now the first confirmed Bank of Japan intervention since twenty twenty
two. Well, we know that there is this official that the official system
everywhere, the financial system everywhere is set up and ripe for a great reset.
That's what they're focusing on, and cash the society. The World Economic
Forum has boasted that ninety eight percent of central banks are adopting CBDC. Now
we know this is especially Biden, but it's not limited to Biden. You
know, Trump is saying, well, I'm not going to do CBDC.
Do you really believe it? It was kicked off with Jared Kushner and Steve
Manuchin. We got the emails they're talking about how to moved to a CBDC
during the Trump administration. And then you had in March of twenty twenty two,
you had Biden put out the executive order to every one of the deep
state swamp, your three letter agencies that you however you want to describe them.
Every single one of them was given four different things that they needed to
investigate in order to make CBDC happen. And they had six months to report
back. And so the four different things where they had to completely redesign the
financial system. That's what's going on worldwide right now. They had to completely
redesign the financial system. You had to come up with the way that the
FBI and the Department Justice was going to force us to use this new financial
system. And then the people actually going to do the computer coding and then
the fourth one was how are we going to sell to people as green and
preferable to cryptocurrency which supposedly is the big user of electricity even though that's not
The big user of electricity is really the and I say the CIA. And
then finally we saw Congressional whip Tom Emmer, who is the number three in
terms of the Republicans. He showed when publicans showed on social media a document
that came from the FED, they said, here are primary duties and they
had seven of them and FED now which is the hostsale movement and hostsale version
of CBDC was number six and number seven was CBDC, so it is official.
Two of the seven key duties of the Federal Reserve revolve around central banks
and CBDC. So again, folks, if you want to be outside of
the system Chinese understand it, Gold and silver. If you want to accumulate
some of that, best place to do it, in my opinion is with
Tony Ardaban of Wise Wolf. And if you go to David Knight Die Gold,
that'll take you to Tony's site and you can he can handle small or
large transactions for you, but he can also get you as part of the
buying group. You can buy into that at a lot of different levels,
and you can get group discounts as part of wolf Pack and a variety of
different places. And you can also handle I Rays Gold and Silver I Rays.
So again, go to David Night Die Gold. That'll take you to
Tony Ardamen. You need to make plans on how you're going to get outside
this web that they're weaving for control of everyone. So we're gonna take a
quick break. When we come back, we're going to talk to Alex Newman
about his new book laying out how they have been making designs for how they're
going to control and reduce society through the schools. We've seen that, but
it's really important for people to see how this has progressed for about two hundred
years or so. This is a long term plan. These people carefully plan
this stuff out, and that's what his book really lays out in a very
concise way. We'll be right back. If you like the Eagles, the
cars, and Huey Lewis and the news, you'll love the classic Hits channel
at a p S radio, download our app or listen now at a p
S radio dot Coming of Biased and false common Unfortunately, this is a great
dangerous democracy. This is extremely dangerous democracy. This is extremely dangerous. Democracy
is extremely to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This
is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
Break free from the usual script with a David Knight Show, a fresh
perspective bringing you genuine insights on current events. But if the show is going
to stay on the air, we'll need your continued support. Sharing the show,
subscribing and even just hitting the like button all helpful. And if you
found our show helpful, please consider donating and becoming a part of a community
the values the truth, because independent listener funded news, untouched by corporate globalist
agendas is extremely important to our liberties. And speaking of liberties, we have
Alex Newman of Liberty Sentinel dot org joining us, and he has just put
out an excellent book about education. You've heard me on this program for years,
quote Alex on his I think perfect metaphor. As a matter of fact,
it's one of the chapters that he's got here about the burning building and
how the schools are like a burning building. Get your kid out of the
burning building, then work with your neighbors to put the fire out before it
burns down the entire neighborhood. And that's what our schools are like. And
the government involvement in it that he lays out in this book goes back two
hundred years. It's a very meticulous, iterative process to get us where we
are. So joining us now is Alex Newman. Good to talk to you,
an Alyx. It is great to be here. Thank you so much.
David Well, thanks for coming in. Let's talk a little bit about
this because you know, there's a lot of familiar names. Thomas Dewey,
the Dewey decimal system. I remember when I was in Tampa there was a
school that was named after Horace Man as well, and I didn't at the
time know who he was, but when we got into homeschooling, I learned
who he was. Kind of give us an idea of how this thing has
I look at it, and when you look at the table of contents and
you read the book, it makes it very clear this is a long term
plan of incremental takeover now. Very much like what Antonio Gramsey said, you
know, we're going to march through the institutions. You know, forget about
this, you know, shooting people on the streets type of thing. It's
more effective if we take over the institutions. And that's really what they've done.
It's been a long march through the institution of education that has lasted over
two hundred years, hasn't it. It has. It's been a tremendously powerful
movement that has largely operated behind the scenes, at least in terms of their
true agenda. But it does go back a couple hundred years. And I
always start with before the government got involved in education, because a lot of
people don't even realize there was a time when the government didn't educate our children.
In fact, there was the time not all that long ago, when
government didn't educate our children. Parents were primarily responsible for that, and if
they needed help, they'd go to the church. And at that time,
we were the best educated people who had ever existed in human history, at
any place on the planet. At any time. It was extraordinary. We
had one hundred percent literacy rates in our cities. We had ninety five plus
percent in the rural area's Alexis to Tokville, came here from France in the
eighteen thirties and was astounded. He said, every citizen knows the history of
his country, the leading features of the constitution, the evidences and doctrines of
his religion. He says, everyone gets the elementary notions of human knowledge,
which today, you know, we'd probably equate with a master's or a PhD.
He says, Somebody wholly ignorant of these things is a sort of phenomenon.
They did a study in eighteen twelve DuPont de Neymour, not more than
four and a thousand young people, he said, were unable to write legibly,
even neatly. So this is where we were at before the government got
involved and then came a socialist. This was before Karl Marx had come along.
This was before communism was even a thing. His name was Robert Owen,
married into a wealthy textile family, an actual socialist, right back before
this was really a thing. He believed so passionately in these silly ideas,
you know, get rid of private property, live as a collective, get
rid of the family. Things like this, that he bought a piece of
land in Indiana and started a commune called New Harmony, very rapidly failed.
The whole thing came crashing down. Not because communism is stupid though right,
not because getting rid of private property and the family doesn't work. It happened
because these people had been educated and raised in an environment filled with Christians and
individualism. So he started writing these really weird essays where he argued, actually,
really for the first time that I can find since Plato, the raging
totalitarian, who thought we had to have philosopher kings lording over us and they
could use government schools to brainwash us all into being good, submissive serfs.
And so he argues that the best government would be the one that does the
best job educating its population. And of course these ideas did not take off
in America. As I mentioned, we had a fabulous education nonsystem where everybody
got a great education, mostly at home. To the extent that anybody outside
the home was involved, it was typically the clergy. And he set up
a secret society conspiracy. Here. We know about this because a whistle lower
who was part of the secret society defected. He became a Catholic and repented
of his involvement in this wicked plan, and he said they had two surface
level goals. They wanted to change public opinion, to convince Americans that education
should be handled by the government, or at least that the government should have
some role. And then they wanted to get men elected to legislators who would
support that concept. But the ultimate objective this is a direct quote from Oris
Sprounson, the defector who left this wicked movement. He said, the ultimate
objective was to get rid of Christianity because they understood that Christianity was like a
big brick wall. It was an insurmountable obstacle to their plans for utopia.
So that didn't take off in America. As I mentioned, but the Prussian
ambassador got a hold of these ridiculous essays that Owen was writing, and he
was very popular at the time. There were, you know, owen Knights,
as they were called, his followers and disciples. So the Prussian ambassador
gets these essays, takes them back to his master, the Prussian Dictator,
and of course the Preussian dictator was still smarting from losing a war with Napoleon,
you know, wasn't going well for him, so he thought, hey,
this is what we need. So he orders his interior minister to set
up this government school system based on Robert Owens's ideas. According to Robert owens
autobiography, he so much approved of this idea that he ordered this to be
constructed in Prussia, first ever education system of the state, by the state
and for the state. And then from Prussia it was reimported into America by
Horace Man, who you mentioned. There are still all across this country.
Government brain launched camps masquerading his schools named after Horace Man. The guy was
also a socialist, He was a Unitarian. He rejected the Bible. He
believed the government schools should equalize all men. He wanted the Bible out of
the schools under the guys of getting rid of sectarianism, which we didn't understand.
The Bible was the primary textbook in those days. Be trying to think
of education without the Bible in the early mid eighteen hundreds, it was like
an oxymoron. How could you possibly do that? So that didn't go over
well. But he imports the system into Massachusetts right away, down takes off.
The quackery takes over, and then he travels across the country like this
ridiculous evangelist preaching the good news of salvation by government schools. They were going
to get rid of ninety percent of the crimes, and it's just going to
be a wonderful utopia. And so he gets this system in place and stayed
after state so that by the early nineteen hundreds, every state now has intruded
somewhat at least into education. Some have set up networks and government schools.
And then World War One big turning point. That's when, for the first
time in American history, most American children are in government schools. And that's
when John Dewey bursts on the scene. He had been writing and rambling about
education for a long time. He actually went to the Soviet Union and just
loved what they were doing. This is so incredible. He wrote about it
too, David, This is a Everybody who goes to a government college to
learn education will learn that John Dewey is this hero, you know, the
architect of America's wonderful progressive education system. They won't learn about his essays about
the Soviet Union, about what a great city they were published in the New
Republic. They're still in their art And so he wanted that in America,
and very interestingly, he teams up with the Rockefellers to fund this. So
you've got it. Sounds like a bad joke, right, A super capitalist
and a communist walk into a bar and they decide, Hey, let's dumb
down the population by setting up a government school system. But it's the truth.
And so that's kind of the genesis of this, and it's been getting
worse with every generation moving towards this goal of a dumbed down, fully indoctrinated
population that will give up its liberties, turn against God, turn against the
family, turn against the country, and you know, revolution by other means
if you will. It's fascinating. And I had an example I've talked about
this in the past when I was in Raleigh. There was a counselor there
before the Soviet Union fell. She went to Moscow and she came back she
said, you can go anywhere you want to in Moscow for a nickel.
We need that here in Raleigh. It's like this woman smoking, I mean,
sounds like just like doing But yeah, it is. It is interesting,
isn't it. How you see these so called capitalist teeming with the communists
to run this kind of stuff through. You were talking about how in the
early days of America, the literacy rate was so high, and of course
we know that because look at the impact that Thomas Paine's Common Sense had on
people, right, everybody was. It had a big impact because everybody read
and they were able to comprehend what they read as well, and so it
really was a system where people didn't spend eighteen years to get a little bit
of understanding and to be miseducated. I think today what we've seen is that
this is all about social engineering. And of course you break that down in
your book, just like you broke down the history of this how it went
from socialism to the people who embraced Marxism. I mean, Owen was out
there even before Karl Marx was out there, wasn't he. That's right,
yep, and promoting really similar ideas to what Karl Marx would come along and
promote a few decades later. You know, a lot of people when they
think of where did the government schools come from, the first one they get
big it is Karl Marx, because he, of course proposed in the Communist
Manifesto in the ten Planks, that government should control the education of all children.
They should be free and so called public schools. But really Robert Owen
deserves the real credit for kicking this movement off, of course, with a
major assist from the dictator in Prussia. Now I cannot yet, I'm still
looking. I cannot yet conclusively connect Horace Man to Robert Owen's secret network,
right what the whistleblower described as a secret society based incidentally on the Carbonari,
this nasty, vile group headquartered in Italy. So I can't connect them definitively
yet. I suspect there is a link there beyond just you know, went
to Prussia and then Horace Man imported it back, But I can't prove it
yet. By nature's secret societies are difficult to track. But it's so interesting
how every one of the critical men in creating the system that today we call
the public school rejected God, rejected the principles that America was based on,
and had this utopian vision involving really what call marks called for eliminating private property,
eliminating nametions, eliminating family, and moving toward this alleged brotherhood of man.
Yeah. Yeah, they see themselves as God, and so they don't
want any of that competition in this out there they want to be, especially
today, omnipresent and omniscient about everything that we're doing everywhere that we are.
The big Brother moved, you know when we talk about the pression involvement,
and we see that in things like kindergarten. Right, this whole idea that
we got to get the kids very early, as you pointed out, going
back to Plato, he was talking about that. You know, we want
them to see the state as their family, and I don't even want them
to know who their parents are. We will raise them from a very early
age. Everybody understands that. Totalitarian dictators who understood that. Of course,
the Bible warns us about that as well. Yeah, you get these kids
when they're young, and you train them, they're not going to depart from
that. And the dictators know that as well. And so it's a real
battle to try to get the kids at the earliest possible age, isn't it
It is? And Robert Owen that was one of the things he pioneered.
Even before setting up this ridiculous commune, he had this textile manufacturing operation on
the British Isles that he had married into. Again, he married into a
wealthy textile family and one of the social experiments that he tried there was getting
these young mothers to come work in the factory and promising to take care of
their babies. Right, so they were getting two three year old kids in
these social engineering center. This is like, really the pioneering effort to do
this. And you say something else, David, that I really want to
pick up on, because it's so critical for people to understand that they see
themselves as gods. So John Dewey wasn't just a communist in the traditional sense
of the term. Now, in his defense, he did reject violent revolution.
He believed that slowly brainwashing the population over a period of generations would be
a better way to achieve total power. So in his defense, but one
of the things that he did, one of the things that he's best known
for, other than his education blabbering, was something called the Humanist Manifesto.
So John Dewey and the thirty something of his buddies, members of the clergy,
unitarian clergy, academics of philosophers, and other leaders, came together and
they wrote what they called the Humanist Manifesto. Today we call it the Humanist
Manifesto one because their disciples have released new and improved versions. But right at
the very beginning of this document, and this was their religion. And they,
again, in their defense, they were open and transparent about the fact
that this was their religion. Don't know where they found enough faith to believe
some of these idiotic things, but you know, it's a free country.
You believe whatever you want. So the very first tenet of their false religion
was religious humanists regard the universe as self existing and not created. You know,
you can compare and contrast that with the word of God Genesis one,
in the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. You can contrast
that with our declaration of independence, the self evident truth that God created us,
God endowed us with unelienable rights, God made us equal, et cetera.
And so clearly they're telling you our religion is fundamentally at odds at a
most basic level with the Bible and with the principles that America was found around,
which largely came from the Bible, despite being called self evident truth.
So there we have something really article. Now as you read through the rest
of this religion, it's kind of just warmed over. Karl Marx. You
know, we've got to I think they said that we need equitable distribution of
the means of life, which is another way of saying abolished private property and
have the government control the means of production. So we've got to institute a
radical change in methods and motives. We've got to get rid of the profit
motive as the organizing principle for the economy. So it was communism, but
there was a really really critical undertone that it wasn't stated explicitly. If there
is no real God that just leaves us as gods, it will be you
and I who determine what is right and wrong. You and I who determine
what rights or privileges you may have. And I tell people like they thought
they invented a new religion. They pretended like they were inventing a new religion.
This is literally the oldest line in the book. If you go back
to Genesis chapter three, you've got Satan saying that very same thing, ye
shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. So this really was a
false religion from the pit of hell. And this was one of the reasons
why John Dewey was so obsessed with the schools. One of the guys who
wrote, who co signed this humanist manifesto is then was C. Potter,
who wrote a book called Humanism a New Religion. And in this book he
brags. He says, you know, we're going to use the public schools
as the greatest ally of humanism. And and he kind of laughs, like,
what is your Sunday school, Your theistic Sunday school is going to do
teaching some of the children for one hour a week when we have them for
five days of humanistic teachings. He didn't even answer. I think the answer
was obvious, absolutely nothing. So along comes the Supreme Court in nineteen sixty
two. They say, you can't have prayer in the schools anymore. And
you know, by the way, this was a non sectarian prayer. Was
a Catholic priest, a Protestant minister, and a Jewish rabbi came together and
wrote a prayer like, hey, God, please bless our school, bless
our family, bless our parents, bless our country, bless our teachers.
Amen. And so Supreme Court said, no, First Amendment, you can't
have that because apparently the state of New York is Congress. Wait, no,
that's how dumb down we were that people bought into this. Nineteen sixty
three comes along, they banned the Bible in school. Again, they cite
First Amendment and the guy who wrote the Descent in this case, Justice Potter
Stewart. I encourage people to read this Descent. It is beautiful, it's
wonder what should be required reading for everybody interested in education and everybody interested in
constitutional law. He says. What we have done here is not neutrality with
respect to religion. What we've done here, he says, is establish the
religion of secularism or what John do what it call it humanism. Under the
guise of preventing Congress from establishing a religion, the Supreme Court established a false
religion, forced us to pay for its propagation with our taxes, and forced
our children to be brainwashed with this false religion. So we're full circle.
You're right, they think they're gods. You know, we used to go
frequently when we lived in North Carolina. We used to go to Colonial Williamsburg,
and they had a very good guy there who did a good job of
impersonating Thomas Jefferson, and he would take questions, and of course I knew
he wasn't going to respond anything that was contemporary, anything that's going to be
political, you know, But I would throw it out there to kind of
speak to the audience, And every time I was there, I would always
ask him a question as a you know, you said that you stood up
very much for freedom, free exercise of religion and not having an official state
religion. You said it was an abomination for people to have to be forced
to attend a church, and it was also an abomination for people have to
be to be forced to pay for something that they disagreed with. And I
said, but then you also set up the state university there. Would you
admit that perhaps a government education system is no different from an enforced government education
system, which is what you just pointed out it is. So that's why
I was trying to get people to understand. You understand that we're right back
to having an established religion. It's just that the seminaries are the colleges and
the places where they indoctrinate everybody on a daily basis of these government schools,
and you're forced to pay for it. We're at the point right now where
they were at some of these some of these early colonies over a period of
time they transitioned away from it. At first everybody had to attend the official
state church and pay money to it. Then they said, well, you
don't have to attend, but you still got to pay for it. That's
where we are right now with homeschooling. You don't have to attend this state
religion they call government schools, but we still got to pay for it,
don't we. That's exactly right, And you know, the Bible actually teaches
this. Early Americans would have recognized. I think pretty quickly what's happening here.
Jesus is quoted twice in the Gospels and Matthew and Luke. He says,
whoever's not with me is against me. And so I encourage people to
think about this for a minute. Are the government schools with Christ? Well?
And if the answer is no, and it obviously is no, no
Christian or anti Christian would even deny that at this point, then that leaves
one option. They are anti Christian. And to your point, you know,
the Bible teaches the Proverbs twenty two six train up a child in the
way you go, but he's old, he will not depart from it.
In Luke, Jesus is quoted saying the students are not greater than their teachers.
When they're fully trained, they're going to be like their teachers. And
so we have a system here that was designed to instill a worldview in your
children, was designed to handicap them. Literally. When we can get into
that, there's a reason why half of American adults are functionally you literate.
And when you put all that together, you realize this is a profoundly religious
exercise. It may not be a religion that an average person would recognize,
but it is religious, and in fact, I think education is inseparable from
discipleship. The question is who is doing the discipling. Is it parents,
is it pastors from an official religion, or is it a school that doesn't
tell you it's a religion but is still instilling very religious concepts In a true
all of the fundamental presuppositions that underpin the worldview taught in the public schools today
are profoundly religious, and it takes an enormous amount of faith to agree with
them. The idea, for example, that everything came from nothing, I
mean that contradicts everything we know about physics. It contradicts the most basic tenets
of common sense, and yet that is the underlying philosophy that underpins virtually everything
that is being instilled in these children as far as the worldview goes, how
can it be that we can accept this tenet of faith being taught to children
but not stop and say, wait a minute, this is a profoundly religious
exercise. So we need to understand that this is not a secular school system.
This is a religious school system masquerading as a neutral school system. Sorry,
true, do you talk about R. L. Dabney in your book,
because I remember he was He was a chaplain. It's actually Stonewall Jackson's
chaplain. And after the war he blamed the Civil War. He thought it
had its roots and the government school system is drawn about in Massachusetts, where
was first established. But he wrote essays saying and very very prescient about where
we were going to be, and it not even a central Well about a
century later, that's when the Supreme Court started doing that. But he said,
there's absolutely no way that you can have government involvement in a education without
violating the free exercise of religion, without establishing a religion. He goes,
it's only a question of which religion is going to be established. You can't
have neutrality and have the government funding it. You can't have the government involved
in any way an education or it is going to be establishing a politicized religion.
And he was talking about that in the eighteen sixties. Yeah, so
I don't mention him in the book, but he was absolutely correct. And
one of the things that's interesting is that actually the Southern States were the last
holdouts when it came to government schools. They resisted until the bitter end.
It wasn't until Reconstruction that the Northerners forced these institutions on the South. But
you know, to your point, I just had a piece published in Newsweek
just about a week or two ago, and I quoted two modern scholars,
And you know, people can think whatever they want about these two guys.
One is a former US Attorney General, Bill Barr, And you know,
I've got my obvious concerns with his background and all the rest of it.
But what he said in a twenty twenty one speech, he said, this
militant and extreme section progressive climate of our state run education system is the greatest
threat to religious liberty in America today. And of course he is correct.
I also quoted a Columbia law professor, Philip Hamburger, arguing that public schools
by definition violate the First Amendment rights of parents. And that's because they force
parents, or at least very strongly pressure them into substituting their own speech right
what parents would tell their own children for what the state wants to tell their
children. And so this is an infringement on our religious liberty, this is
an infringement on our freedom of speech. It's an infringement on our parental rights.
It's an infringement on our property rights that they're extorting us for thousands of
dollars every year on our property to be able to pay for these brainwash camps
to hurt our children. So this is a fundamental violation of every tenant of
a truly free society. And yet today we're supposed to think of it as
American, as apple pie. It's not. It's wicked. Frankly, you
know, when people ask me how to reform it, I said, why
would you want to reform it? It's like asking me how I want to
reform my cancer. I'll pass, thank you. I want to get rid
of the cancer. And it's not because I'm anti education. It's because I'm
pro education, that's right, that's right. But they have inextricably linked education
in schools in people's minds, and they're two different things. We're talking about
an institution versus you know, something that you actually have, the education,
something you have but you don't need to have the school system. That's as
you're pointing out. We've see the way that's evolves you pointed out in your
book. Let's talk a little bit about the Frankfurt School and it's effect on
education. Mostly we talk about the Frankfort School and this effect on Hollywood and
entertainment and media stuff, but talk about it's an effect on education. Yeah.
So the Frankfort School. Once again we intersect with John Dewey. Right,
So he had set up this experimental school at the University of Chicago and
you funded by the Rockefellers. They gave him three point one million dollars through
the General Education Board, one of their early philanthropic efforts, if you want
to call it that. Frederick Gates, the guy they put in charge of
it, was a total megalomin The act bragged about, how you know,
in a perfect world, these people will yield themselves with perfect docility to our
benevolent molding hand, all this gobbledygoog So eventually once they come up with this
formula that they really like. So John Dewey's experimental school graduated a bunch of
kids who couldn't read, couldn't write, couldn't do math, couldn't tell right
from wrong, and so they loved this idea. So John Dewey then goes
over to Columbia University, and at Columbia University starts bringing in a bunch of
these progressives. Now the Frankfurt School is happening over in Frankfurt. So the
Frankfort School, the Institute for Social Research at the University of Frankfort Goutty.
They had actually been a project of the common Tern, the Communist Internationale.
And this is in Germany for people, yes, right in Frankfurt, Germany.
And so they actually this idea was hatched by the common Tern. They
came to the same conclusion as Grahamsya, although they would never admit it publicly.
But Marx was wrong, right, Marx was wrong. He thought it
was inevitable that the working class was going to rise up in a revolution.
And then you know, they find after sixty years of realizing that wasn't going
to happen, said okay, fine, that's not going to happen. We've
got to do something different. And so Graham Shey and the common Turn through
the Frankfurt School concluded, Hey, we've got to break down these cultural barriers
to revolution. We've got to attack the family. We've got to attack the
church, we've got to attack the values. We've got to attack patriotism.
So they went after the institutions, the values, the attitudes that they understood
were blocking revolution. And so that really was where the Frankfurt School came in.
Now, I want to be clear because sometimes people say, well,
if you don't like the Frankfurt School, you must be pro Nazi. No.
No, the Nazis and the Communists were very very close cousins. In
fact, The New York Times reported before the outbreak of World War Two that
the Nazis, the Hitler writes, actually regarded Vladimir Lenin as the second greatest
man in the world, second only to Adolf Hitler. So really the very
very close beliefs. I mean, they had some differences on you know,
racial issues and stuff, but they were all in favor of the state uber
OLiS. They were all in favor of genocide against Mark actually advocated genocide against
the groups that hadn't reached the capitalist stage because you know, he just thought
they were two backwards to do anything with. So they had a lot in
common. But eventually the Frankfurt School of the Socialists, the communists there had
a falling out with the National Socialists, and so they had to flee Germany
and John Dewey, with Rockefeller money, brought them to Columbia University, and
then from there they spread out across our country like a cancer University of California,
et cetera. And they started promoting these incredibly subversive doctrines under the guise
of academia. Right, they all got set up in universities. A lot
of them actually went into the education field to educate educators, and they came
up with these very subversive ideas, like, for example, the idea of
the authoritarian male. So dads and husbands in America were basically fascists, right,
They were lording it over their wives and children, and of course they
understood dads and husbands were critical to protecting their families from this tide of wickedness,
and so they figured, we can emasculate the dads and the husbands,
the father is the patriarchs. It'll be a lot easier to steamroller over this
society. So they spread this notion through the colleges, through the schools of
education, that the American father was somehow a totalitarian, that they needed to
be stopped. They spread the idea of perversion and phil being in every element
of our culture. So they spread all these evil doctrines, and again education
was one of the primary fields they went into. So this was a critical
component of hijacking the then existing government school system, weaponizing it further again with
money from the big foundations, and turning it into the most effective tool for
revolution really, I think, ever conceived in human history. Yeah, it's
interesting to see as you lay this out, I think about what we've got
in terms of these institutions. I think about, you know, the building
of a building and how long it takes to lay the foundation, and then
all of a sudden, after the foundation is there, boom, you know,
the stick walls go up. You know, when you got the framing
going up, it goes up very very quick. And that's really what we
see. We see this foundation being laid over a very long period of time,
and then you have the stages where it goes through and spurts and a
lot of stuff happens all at once. And we're in, uh, I
think the final stage of this stuff now as we see everything changing incredibly rapidly,
I guess maybe we're in the stage where they're decorating and painting things with
a drag Queens torture to this analogy here to that point, but you know
the uh. But but we're people are looking at this stuff now, we've
got a good good shot at this During the lockdown, people are able to
see on zoom what was actually happening in their kids class. But it's just
amazing how rapidly this has changed. But I've seen all this stuff throughout my
lifetime. You know. I began school before you had the Supreme Court decisions
saying that you've got to purge God out of the schools, and it was
even the government schools, and it was a it took a while for them
to implement that. So I was in that system for a few years and
gradually saw this kind of stuff change. And I've had like a front row
seat of this dumbing down and degeneracy that is going on in the school system
all my life, and it truly is amazing to see that, and I
think it's very important. That's the real importance I think of your book is
for people to get that sense of history, to see how this is done
iteratively, to see how these foundations were laid over a very long period of
time. Talk a little bit about, of course the something is a little
bit more recent, but still several decades back, and that's common core,
And of course we had the Republicans heavily involved in that as well. We
did. And you know, common Core I think is misunderstood by even most
of the people who follow closely education. Yes, it dumbed down the population.
We know that it's objectively provable. The federal government actually hired a group
se Sale to do a study on this, and seven years into it they
said, well, the negative effects of this are just wild. We don't
know where the bottom is because we haven't hit it yet. We're still going
down, so terrible from an academic perspective. In fact, they put two
subject matter experts and only two subject matter experts on the common Core validation committee.
This was the hand picked committee that was supposed to rubber stamp these things
and say they were great. Both of them refused to sign off. The
math expert that doctor James Milgrim of Stanford said, some of this is based
on incorrect math, like, no, I'm not signing off on this garbage.
The image expert, doctor Sandrastots, I know her. I serve on
a board with the right Very nice lady, she said, Look, this
is going to reduce the critical thinking abilities in children. You're taking out good
literature and you're replacing it with like Obama's executive orders and EPA regulations on roof
insulation. No, I'm not signing off on this. So both the subject
matter experts said, no, the federal government knows it's making your kids dumber.
And a lot of people look at it as the nationalization of education,
and yes it was. That was a process that started decades earlier. In
fact, the George hw New World Order administration had really really put the pedal
to the metal on nationalizing the school system just very shortly after the birth of
the US Department of Education. But really what common Core was even more significant
than those two other things, which I don't want to downplay the significance of
those, it was the globalization of education, and that's what people don't realize.
So Bill Gates of Health went over to UNESCO headquarters in two thousand and
four and he signed an agreement with UNESCO. UNESCO, for those who aren't
familiar, is the UN's education agencies, the United Nations Educational, Scientific,
and Cultural Organization, and so Bill Gates signed this deal with them back in
two thousand four. I've got a copy of the deal he signed on behalf
of Microsoft. They vowed that they were going to work closely together on creating
global education standards, global curricula, global teacher training programs, and global technology
systems to make sure it was all being implemented properly. Well, he comes
back to the United States, it starts jumping millions of dollars and then by
the time it's all setting down two point three billion dollars into this project called
common Core. Most of the funding, of course, came from taxpayers,
but Bill Gates provided the genesis there just starting the ball rolling, and they
actually bought ads. I've got some of these ads. I play them when
I go out and do talks on this where they're bragging that common Core state
standards are actually going to align American education with international standard. They're saying this
proudly. They bought ads to tell this to the American people. And so
let's go back a little bit more in time. Prior to two thousand and
four, the UN had concocted what they call the World Core Curriculum, and
the guy who wrote it, Robert Muller, he was the Assistant Secretary General
of the UN, one step below the actual Secretary General. He says,
this needs to be taught to every child in every school on planet Earth.
I've got a lot of these documents. I've got a lot of these materials
in my office. And in the forward to the teacher's manual, he says
something astounding, David, and I think this is really the most critical thing
to understand about what's happening on the educational front today. In the forward,
he says, this is based on the teachings of Alice Bailey and the Tibetan
teacher javal Coole. And you know it's very easy to read write over that.
Well. Alice Bailey, I've got her books here right, here's her
book Education in the New Age. She was the founder of the Lucifer Publishing
Company. Literally, that was the name of the organization. Still around the
day, it's called the Lucius Trust. And the Tibetan Teacher was actually a
spiritual entity that Alice Bailey claimed to be communicating with. She called it an
ascended Master, and so channeling these demons, she wrote books like Education in
the New Age, and people can read this, it's absolutely bonkers. I
mean you almost can't believe it until you read it yourself. We need a
one world government, we need a one world brain. The government school system
is going to unite humanity into this global society where we're going to evolve to
a new age of consciousness. And the only problem that she says, is
these people who insist on this great heresy of separateness, which also known as
Bible believing Christians, who are told to be holy and did not participate in
these whig at things of the world. So Christians are the obstacle to this
one world utopia on whom the global World Core curriculum is based. So that's
what's happening here, folks. The schools are preparing your children for submission to
an all powerful, one world dictatorship based on the rantings of crazy woman enter
demons. Yeah, yeah, are ascended masters. And of course we keep
seeing this stuff about ascended masters keep reweaving itself everywhere. You know, even
when we break off. We've got a conservative group. We got like Michael
Flynn leading prayers to an ascended Master that he verbat him from Elizabeth Claire prophet.
You know that we were awakened stuff. So you constantly have this this
occultic ascended master stuff weaving itself back in, even in you know, nominative
you know, nominally, you know, they call themselves conservatives. Even in
those circles, it's always there, It always finds a way back in.
It truly is amazing when we look at David. Yeah, David, can
I stop you there for just one moment, because I want to pick up
on this a Master theme, especially since you seem to be interested in it.
So even before the World Core curriculum, actually George H. W.
Bush had hired a lady. This is the New World Order guy, right,
who said we're going to have a credible United Nations that's going to use
a peacekeeping role to implement a vision the UNS founders. So he hires a
lady for the US Apartment of Education named a doctor Shirley mccoon. Surprise,
she's also talking to ascended masters. The true story. She wrote a book
with one of her buddies called The Light Shall Set You Free, same general
idea. Right, the assended masters told me, we got to know evolve
to this new hire consciousness date. So she is the lady that they put
at the Department of Education to start leading the charge for the national testing,
the national accountability ultimately the national standards. And she gives a speech to the
fifty governors. George H. W. Bush convened all fifty governors together,
and she gives a speech. I've got a copy of this speech. I've
got the video, and she says to the look the schools. You know,
the real purpose of schools is, she said, transforming society. She
says, we're fundamentally restructuring society, and we have to understand that the social
change function of schools is what's going to get us there. Right, And
they'll fast forward to more recent times. You've probably heard of social emotional learning.
In fact, I have a chapter on this end of the book.
And the NEA, the National Education Association, says, now this is the
most important function of schools, and it's in all the school even in some
Christian schools, by the way. And so I started investigating this years ago
before people had done any real critical research on this, and they still had
all the documents publicly available. So I went to castle as, an organization
funded by Bill Gates. It's the premier SEL organization. It's called the Collaborative
for the Academic Socially Emotional Learning. And right there they had a history tab
on their website. So I click on the history tab and right there,
in Planning English, it says the idea for SEL came out of conversations that
we had at the Fitzer Institute. Up what is the Fetzer Instituy. I
had never heard of the Fetzer Institute, so I look it up real quick.
Turns out it's a new Age, occult, bizarre place founded by some
crazy rich guy, a disciple of Alice Bailey, and they're doing these invocations
to the Ascended Masters and all that. So this theme of the occult,
this theme of the Ascended Masters bringing us into the New Age, runs through
this entire program. And yet your average Christian has no idea. Eighty percent
of Christians in this country are still sending their children to these pagan, godless,
diabolical indoctrination centers, and you just want to shake them like wake up
you oooh, what's happening to your children? Don't you care? Yeah?
Absolutely, And you talk about the fact that even private schools are going to
have sel there and a big part of this, this is one of the
things that concerns me about charter schools, about private schools, whenever you take
the government's money, then they're going to start telling you what you've got to
do, even if it means putting boys in the girls showers and that type
of stuff, which takes us back to the Department of Education. And I
believe, what do you think about the Department? I think that as primary
function was there to bribe into blackmail people to get these things through, because
that is such a powerful superpower that the federal government has or can just create
money out of thin air, and then they can channel it through the Department
of Education, and they can use that to take over charter schools or private
schools or anybody who takes the government coin, especially in colleges. I mean,
look at how they've been able to control colleges through the power of the
purse and the money. And that's the way the federal government operates most of
the time. Would you agree, absolutely? And that's why I set out
the Department of Education. I quote William Zoster in the book. He's a
former leader of the Communist Party here in the United States and he wrote a
book called Torta Soviet America. It is one hundred years ago. He says,
one of our key objectives is to establish a national Department of Education that's
going to be used to cleanse all the schools of everything that might be considered
religious, or patriotic or bourgeois. We're going to turn them into institutions of
revolution. And actually that goes back to we started off the conversation with Robert
Owen, the whistleblower. I mentioned aris Is Brownson when he's exposing this whole
agenda. Why they're doing this, he said, the great object is to
get rid of Christianity. And what he says is our goal was to get
a system of state and then national education so that we could then bring religion
into contempt. So that was the goal from the very beginning. The totalitarians,
the anti god fanatics wanted a national system where they could then much more
simply control all education in this country. And now this is actually being bumped
up to the global level. So Arnie Duncan, who spent seven years as
Secretary of mis Education under Barack Obama, this guy was bragging about how UNESCO
is the partner of the US Department of Education with the implementing global education initiatives,
so that all he actually he quoted a communist terrorist. He said,
education is a weapon that we're going to use to change the world. So
they're telling you all this. I mean, you don't have to listen to
David Knight and Alex Newman. These people will tell you what they're doing if
you'll just listen. You won't see it on Fox News, you won't see
it on CNN, on the front page of your local propaganda orgon owned by
the USA Today or whatever. But these people are telling you what they're doing
if you'll just listen. And of course it's not something that the politicians are
going to talk about either. You know, it was at least in nineteen
eighty and it was created in a campaign here by Carter and Reagan said he's
going to get rid of it. But of course he didn't. He had
people like Charlotte Disabe and Philis Schlaffley who went there to help shut that thing
down, and they left and discussed. Charlotte Desbey said, it's the delibert
dumbing down of America, and it truly is. That's what it's about.
But it's gotten beyond that. Now it's not just dumbing us down. It's
pushing us down into degeneracy. You know, we look at and you've got
chapters of course on critical race theory, but also one of the chapters to
solitary and agenda behind the LGBT sex ad. I've looked at this for long.
The transgender stuff is obviously se actual component to it, a grooming that
is there. But as we start to see this other stuff in the furries
and this complete detachment from reality starts me to believe that they're moving us into
that other branch of secularism, transhumanism, preparing kids to live in this to
be completely incapable of operating in the real world, not wanting to be in
the real world, but also to push them into a virtual reality, which
they're already doing in the schools. I can't believe that in the schools,
they let the kids dress this way, have things pause that have claws on
them that they can scratch people with. I mean, that is the absolute
breakdown of any kind of discipline. But you have to ask yourself what is
their agenda, And as you can see in your book, it is a
very clear agenda. It is a very clear goal of all this stuff.
It's all converging on this and marching progressively forward. Talk a little bit about
that, but I do want to spend some time in terms of talking about
the vision. You know, it's it's very important for people to understand how
the how the school is really on fire. A lot of people don't realize
it's on fire. They don't realize that it was a deliberately set fire,
and they don't see the implications of it for society, for the neighborhood in
general. And that's what your book really does lay out. But I want
to talk a little bit about, you know, positive vision, but talk
a little bit about what is going on with this this LGBT thing. I
mean, it's a sexual component, but I think it's also got something to
do with this transhumanism and high tech and virtual reality. Even though we're talking
about costume characters. At this point, what do you think You are absolutely
right, David, there's no question about it. And so there's there's actually
multiple agendas. But let's talk on the two that you just hit on,
and they're both discussed extensively in the book. The first is, you know,
the LGBT thing. I think one of the major reasons they're pushing this
is actually to take down the family unit. And if you go back and
you look at the history of sex education v to m R one hundred years
ago describing himself as a Freidoh Marxist member the Communist Party, and he said,
we've got to get the sex said in the schools, so we can
turn children away from their families, so we can undermine their credibility, we
can undermine the influence of the church, and basically grab a hold of the
minds and hearts of these children and write on a blank slate that was why
they did it. You look at Georgie Lucox, the Deputy Commissar of Education
and Culture in the Bela Kun Communist regime in Hungry short lived Communist dictatorship.
He ended up going to become part of the Frankfurt School incidentally, he was
doing these nasty, raunchy puppet shows in front of kindergarten kids for the purpose
of breaking down the Christian moral order, and he said so right, So
you look now at the modern iteration of this. First they told us,
oh, just loving homosexuals, just want to be married, you know,
just quit being in such a prude. And people say, well, don't
kids need a mom and a dad? Well, you know it's better to
have two dads than no dads, right, Or it's better to have two
moms than no moms. Right, So they they First they started off by
saying, well, it's really not that important to have both a mom and
a dad, which, of course, anybody with two brain cells to rub
together knows is ridiculous. Yes, you can, or vibe you might become
a great human being even without one of those. But the optimal condition,
the divine order that God has established is for a child to be raised by
a mother and a father, a loving marriage relationship. Well, they figured,
hey, if we can get the mom or the dad out of the
picture by marketing this homosexual marriage and homosexual adoption, that's a good first step.
Now you come to the next step, the transgenderism. Well, now
they're saying, there's no such thing as a mom or dad. Right,
the gender is a social contract. You could be anything. I'm a non
binary, you're a non binary, I'm a free spirit whatever. So now
they're saying, not only is a mom or a dad, not essentially,
Now they're saying there's no such thing as a mom or dad. So you
can see this is a calculated assault on the nuclear family, so that the
state ultimately can usurp control over the raising, education, discipling of these children.
Now the transhumanism element is just as significant. They're telling these kids right
now, you can transcend your they call it sex assigned at birth, really
your sex, right, you can translated. But if you can transcend your
sex, here might be a boy born in a girl's body. Well,
why in the world shouldn't you be able to transcend your humanity all together?
Why shouldn't you be a cat? Why shouldn't you be an elephant? And
so this converges with the technology in a very very evil and dark way.
David, I've got a section in the book on the first Conference on AI
and Education hosted by the UN in Beijing, of all places, and they
openly said in their final declaration, we're going to fuse artificial intelligence with education.
We're going to connect these kids to the system, and we are going
to use this to manipulate and ultimately change their attitudes, values, beliefs,
and behaviors. This is what they said in the final document. So that's
where they're moving in China. Now, in a lot of schools, they're
using these headbands that monitor the children's brave brain waves and feed this information into
a computer so that it can be processed by the algorithms and the AI to
determine whether the child's paying attention, et cetera. Now, with neurlink,
folks, you don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to project the lines here
and see where this is going. It is dark, it is wicked.
Bill Gates actually predicted just last year, I believe that soon we'd be able
to replace teachers with AI. That's what's happening. Teachers are going to become
glorified babysitters. The kids are going to sit there on their tablets and eventually
with the you know, stupid goggles on their face, learning all about you
know, how great open borders are, abortions et cetera. There's no education
going on here anymore. And the sooner parents realize that the better. Oh
yeah, I wouldn't replace Bill Gates. That's what I want replaced. We
could get a nice AI was not quite as wicked, anything, would not
be quite as wicked as that he's out there, to be perfectly, Yeah,
exactly, he's out there, you know, pushing against math now,
I mean, he really is going the full goes yeah two plus two equals
five stuff. But yeah, it truly is a war on parents, especially
as you pointed out, Uh, just think about the fact that you must
use these pronouns, but you must not say mother and father, right or
mom and dad or whatever. Does that kind of mind control that we see
out there, And it really does go back again to the UN and to
the children's rights movement that was there you in Convention on the Rights of the
Child. If they can say that children have rights, and that's their legal
way of shoving parents out. And so even though we didn't sign on to
that treaty ever, the only country that didn't, they are still enforcing this
through the courts, enforcing it through the schools and all the rest of that.
But Let's talk a little bit about homeschooling, because it is an amazing
opportunity. You know, God has left us this open door for us to
have a family, for us to have a relationship with children, for us
to actually be able to educate our kids about the things of this world as
well as about God. And that is a very very important window that is
there, and it's never been more open since after the lockdown. People are
open to it, they're looking at it, and there's so many more resources,
and we homeschooled our kids. It truly is blossoming there and there's an
opportunity for anybody who wants to do it. Talk a little bit about that.
Yeah, I do regard homeschooling as the gold standard. If anybody is
capable of doing it, and I believe almost everybody is capable of doing it.
I cannot recommend it highly enough. It's one of the best decisions you
will make in your entire life. Also one of the most important decisions you
will make in your life. So I go back to you know, the
Bible, in Deuteronomy chapter six, Deuteroonomy chapter eleven, you have God explaining
to his people how they ought to be educating their children. He says,
you know, you need to be teaching them about God and God's laws and
God's ways and what He has done for us. When you wake up in
the morning, when you're walking by the way, when you're sitting down to
eat, when you're laying down to go to bed at night, at all
times, you should be educating your children. And I think the most fundamental
part to understand. And I do believe, you know, we have freedom,
we can delegate some of that responsibility and authority to others, whether it
be a homeschool co op, you know, a Christian school that is thoroughly
vetted and well examined. But with that said, I do believe homeschooling is
the gold standard. I believe it's the best possible thing that you can do.
Always doing it with community, right, getting together with other families,
getting together through your church, and having fun with it. But I think
ultimately we need to get back to a real understanding of what education is.
And this is one of the things that this system has caused us to lose.
What is the purpose of education is a fundamental question that people don't even
ask themselves anymore. What do I mean when I say, I want my
child to be educated. Now, if you ask Google, which tells you
men can get pregnant, Google will say the purpose of education true story.
They say, the purpose of education is to make your children successful members of
society. I asked a couple of Ais. They said the same thing.
They decided the Washington Compost as a source. So the purpose of education,
then, is either college and career readiness or making your child successful whatever?
Is that really the purpose of education? And I would argue absolutely not.
That's not even you know, third or fourth down the line. And what
does it mean, like in a Nazi society or a communist society to be
a successful member? Does that mean you're good at snitching on your neighbors,
that means you're good at guarding the concentration up and torturing political prisoners. It's
absolutely crazy. So I say we need to go back to the word of
God to understand truly what an education is. And God gives us again a
lot of freedom here. He doesn't say you need twenty five credit hours of
science and thirty two of matt but he does give us the foundations right.
Proverbs one seven, Proverbs nine ten says the fear of the Lord is the
beginning of wisdom, It's the beginning of knowledge. So if the fear of
the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, and the fear of the Lord is
the beginning of knowledge, and there is absolutely no fear of the Lord being
instilled in our children in virtually any educational setting, with a handful of exceptions
in this country, how much wisdom and knowledge are they getting with The answer
is none, absolutely none at best, it's counterfeit. So we've got to
go back and ask ourselves the fundamental questions. I actually ended the book with
a very very long afterward. I maybe would have been better to divide up
as several chapters. But looking at you, what did education look like before
the government took it over? What does the Bible say about education? What
are some resources out there for parents who are thinking about these questions? And
I believe this is one of the most important things we could be thinking about
and talking about. David, Oh, absolutely, And just as you said
earlier when you were talking about a family and you said a two parent that
would be ideal, and that's the goal. But hey, you know,
we still need to be a parent. Even though there's just one of us.
And when you look at homeschooling, you can say, well, I
would like to do classical homeschooling. That'd be great, but that's really a
lot I don't know if I could do that. Well, you don't necessarily
have to do that. You know, you can aim for certain things.
If you don't have two parents in your family, there are other ways that
you can do that, Especially now, there are so many more resources,
so many more people who are looking to partner in community to help to do
this, and so there's a lot of resources that are out there. And
sometimes we look at this and say, well, I can't do the ideal,
so I won't even get started. But what I have found is that
if you do this with the purpose of honoring God. God has always promised
us that He will honor those who honor Him. And it's an amazing blessing
everybody that I know, and I know a lot of people now since I'm
older, who have homeschooled their kids, and everybody that did it, they
are so blessed by the relationship that they have with their kids and have no
regrets whatsoever about it. It's one of the best things you can do with
your life, and when you're looking at society, you know this whole thing
about the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world. Well, these people
who want to rule the world have been rocking the cradle, and we need
to get their hands off of our cradles because they have rocked our world,
and they've rocked it in a very negative way. And we need to take
back control of the cradle, and we need to take back control of our
kids. And I think that whatever you can do is a move in the
right direction. We did a very informal homeschooling curriculum with our kids, but
you know, we were there with them and we talked to them in the
way as we're in the way, so to speak, and so it was
kind of a parapatetic form of instruction. But there's so many ways that you
can do it. And it is an amazing blessing to have that relationship with
your kids, one of the best relationships you could ever have in life.
And the best way to have that relationship, I think, is to work
with your kids. I'm so glad that you did this book, and again
you understand that, as you said, you've got a very long afterward toward
a Christian vision of education. And what did we have and what could we
have? Again, that's up to each and every one of us. You
know, we don't have to get the permission of Trump or Biden to educate
our kids ever. You know, even if they try to impose that on
us, we can still do it ourselves. And so that should be our
attitude that we're not going to do. But right now we have this amazing
opportunity. I said to my wife thirty years ago when we started this whole
process, I said, you know, isn't it interesting how we've lost freedom
in every aspect of our society except when it comes to education. And somehow
God has left that door open, hasn't he? Absolutely? And it's such
a joy. And you know, I would warn people that the totalitarians are
coming for us. So we've got to stand firm. This is a non
negotiable issue. You will not have my children, and that's a line that
will not be cross and every parent needs to make that determination. We will
not let someone go across that line. But they're coming at us from all
angles. They want to criminalize homeschooling, they want to start giving us government
money, so they can suck us back into the system we just fled from.
So folks, watch out right now is a great time to homeschool.
Pull your children out of the burning building right now. Cut your ties with
the government. I mean, obviously, I recommend that people follow state laws
as best they can on these issues. You don't want to get in unnecessary
trouble. But if it comes down to it and they say hand your children
over, the ANSWER's got to be no, I've got to go to another
country. If I got to go to go underground, it's not happening.
They're not having my children, period, end of discussion. Yeah. Yeah,
we've got homeschoolers here not too far f when we live in Tennessee who
were political refugees out of Germany because they wouldn't let them homeschool, they would
take their kids away from them. And they've been here for over a decade
and now the Biden administration tried to deport them a couple of months ago.
Then they gave up after there was a lot of publicity about it. But
that's the heart of our current federal government. They are in alignment with these
Germans who want to take the kids away from people. That's really where we
are, so we're not that far away from it. It's important for people
to understand the foundation of this, and again you can find you can find
the book at your website right Liberty Sentinel dot org and tell us again the
title of the book. I've got it here, but it's a couple of
pages over go ahead, so it's indoctrinating our children to death. Government school's
war on faith, family and freedom and how to stop it. You can
get anywhere good books are sold. If you want to sign copy and you
don't mind waiting a couple of weeks and paying shipping, you can get it
from my website Liberty Sentinel dot org, forward slash shop Good and do that
instead of giving them money to Amazon. Thank you so much, Alex.
And let me say thank you to the people here. Wayne Wonder, thank
you very much for the birthday gift and tip. And also Owen, thank
you very much, appreciate that. Thank you all day everybody. Let me
tell you the David Night Show you can listen to with your ears. You
can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can
hear me, that means you're listening to the David Night Show, right,
now yeah, good job, and you want to know something else. You
can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at
Thedavidnightshow dot com. That's a website.