We' re here, we' re here Sorry I wasn' t here.
I was still checking their phone. But welcome, this Tuesday, 28
May. Or swear here all day. I said 27 but it' s
28 May. Good thing this is the first show and I didn' t
give the wrong date. Welcome, Doctor Hello. How about good night and
twenty- eighth of May is the end of the month and we here with
many interesting things that will continue to analyze, because there are issues that never
seem to end. Indeed, there are issues that are not exhausted, that
are not finished today. We' re going to touch on two topics that
I put in the program description. There is one that is in slope and
another that is after so many years unfinished that we know nothing after yesterday'
s program that we did about the first two chapters of this series of Amazon
Prime, who killed Paco, because much to discuss, much to talk about.
So many messages have come from you. We are very grateful because there
are many versions. We all have one version not and the other case of
fofou Marks, which is pending, but good before we start. Thanks to
those who are connected here on YouTube, thanks to all those who are members
of the channel, they are all subscribers of the channel, dear moderators,
the anchorer or I love them, and thanks to everyone who is watching this
program and passing by here with us. Thanks to all stand Spreaker in Spotify
or p PS on Amazon Music. Thank you and good. What I was
telling you yesterday is that there have been many messages about the theories that everyone
has or can have, because we can all in a case that I don
' t know, because it hasn' t been solved, because only that
there would have been a guilty conviction, would have been a case solved.
But it wasn' t a case solved. Pago Stanley' s case still
has a lot to talk about. But first it seems to you, Dr
Amel, that we should clear up about Fofomark, is that we' ve
touched him here. Yeah, what' s going on is he actually showed
up good. There have been, as always, many rumors. We'
re a little used to the famous fake news. That is why we always
try to verify the information, because there appeared in several places an apparent news
or a false news that this boy, Rodolfo r, had been sentenced and
it turns out that this is not the case. There was even talk of
a number of years. There it appeared that twenty- six years and well,
it already lupita especially began to investigate and it is not so. On
the contrary, there will still be a hearing that will soon be on June
6, and in that what is expected is that Fofo Marquez' s defense
will try once again, to change the crime for which he is charged,
not for a minor one, because this murder or attempted femicide is what he
does, since it is something very serious and therefore the possible sentence would also
be very harsh. So, what you want in that audience, because it
' s changing. No, I mean how hard. No, because notice
that there is this boy who commits this assault against this woman, who is
not a hit, who is a beating that he gives, who leaves her
lying on the ground, who sends her to the hospital and almost that because
someone intervenes after many cars that passed, nor anyone intervened to have Fofo Marques
or Rodolfo Márquez stop to connect to beating. I gave her a lady who,
then, all I was saying was call your insurance. Yeah, I
hit your mirror, but we' re gonna fix it and he' s
pissed off. And besides, with this arrogance my family gave me, it
' s going to get me out of the problem because we' ve touched
that we just played in broken souls. Or the case of a junior under
the cover of his family who says no, because they are eccentric things that
our son does and he ends up being a real criminal. Well, here,
before that happens, before he commits a femicide or anything else or another
major crime, because they stop him and they land on him this charge of
attempted femicide, which is extremely serious, which is already very serious, and
it is a shame, because it is a pity for a life that is
wasted. But there has to be a consistent sequence of acts. There must
be a People have to understand that you can' t go down the street
beating women or bothering people without any kind of sanction, exactly and especially because
it had a record that many of us already knew. Some people already knew
him because of the videos he made, his arrogant attitudes and so on.
But because many of us had no knowledge of his personality and once again there
is this issue of which a person has not been held back since early childhood
and much less in adolescence and youth, and yes, sometimes it can end
up in something as tragic as this, which, fortunately, the victim,
because he has lived to tell it, has recovered apparently from the injuries and
now the life that is ruined is that of this man. Although she didn
' t have glitlars notice what Eva Maria says, Maria Fines tells me very
much about a comment by Sastian Niño de Rivera that said that in the end
they were injuries and that everything got bigger because they were influencers. And it
' s true, you' re right in your trouble, because it actually
goes viral because it' s an influencer. But that' s not why
you did less? Is that not why you did it less? It was
necessary to put a brake, because in the same way as if it had
been left unpunished, if it had not become great, if you had not
been viral, if you had not intervened as if the authorities intervened, he
could have come out with the smile that had to be stopped. Anyway,
it' s always something with impunity. Nothing. Nothing is going to happen
to me and I' m going to be able to keep doing it then,
because yes, it' s a double- edged weapon to be an
influencer and to magnify your case. But somehow it' s also a warning
to the rest of the population, whoever you are, whoever you are you
can' t do this is and also good the fact that these communications exist
today and all this technology that allows things to get so fast everywhere and without
a doubt, because you' re seeing it happen there practically live and at
the moment that things are happening, because it can also result in other people
who may not be influencing or anything, but who become viral for something.
Thus, they also receive the same attention on both sides, attention on the
part of justice and attention to what is wrongly done to stop people who commit
these illegals is also a subject of our time. I think I do exactly.
It is important, because it is not a phenomenon that happens in this
country. It' s a global phenomenon, it' s a global phenomenon,
and see that there are other influencers who, maybe they don' t
commit crimes, but they do terrible things, like pretending to take photos on
cliffs, in buildings that have lost their lives in very serious cases, with
a terrible thing. But I think it' s something we' re learning.
There are no times, well, there are no times. Freedom is
one of the things that has to be handled with responsibility, with a lot
of responsibility, and freedom lies in learning to decide on that, in learning
the cid in a right way. But good is the case of Fofo Marques
that he has seems to me an audience. On June 6, as you
said at the beginning, I had heard this rumor that I already had a
20- year sentence. And no, what his lawyers are looking for is
that the crime is reconsidered that he is not charged with attempted femicide, but
that it is for injury or something that does not involve so many years in
prison. So, I believe that by today too, it was said that
he had received privileges and so on. But the mom says it' s
not true, it' s normal, but somehow, because I think she
already, by the time she learned. And so, then, there will
be the authorities what they have to do, the lawyers, because we will
already know what this ends up for the week that enters yes expensive. No
and yes, but it' s something that' s given a lot to
talk about for all the implications and because it' s true that it'
s not the same as an accomplished femicide as an assault like the one we
saw through the videos. But just to think that, as she said,
she herself who was the mother of one of us, his mother, your
sister or yourself, because your perception also changes, because she was attacked in
a very violent way, without having any guilt, therefore, why exactly she
hears you remember that yesterday we also touched on the issue of the mothers,
of these mothers, of these closing nuns that have revealed themselves against the Vatican,
and here they did us favor to write us in the chat tell us
not to invest it well, because they continue to notice, that this is
very interesting. Says they follow a father Rojas. There is then this father
Rojas who is not even a father, who is not even a priest,
it turns out that he is the one who manipulates them. So they say
ay lupita, because we need to investigate more, because what is the end,
not for what purpose. The manipulator always looks for something. Then you
' d have to see what it is you' re looking for. But
that also holds our question of why. Suddenly, they say ay is that
the Church is no longer what it was when for many years what is seen
today at least as an organization. Let' s say in the Church it
' s like that and I said it. I said since they took the
vows, the Church before which they made those vows is what it is now.
So, wow. We are not talking about a neuralgic moment, as
Martin Luther' s might have been, not or I don' t know
about others who protested against it and changed the Church, but they are nuns
who, besides, are closing and suddenly from where they were born to say
something, we are going to leave. I had to see something behind it.
We said it and now it seems that it is, because this assumption
or manipulation, which would be very interesting, notice that I am reading it
here all in the Chatre. Thank you for what you write to us,
but it would also be very interesting to review in what condition a nun is.
I don' t know, I mean, I probably knew when I
was in a nun' s school, because they were more or less so
close to each other until today. I do not know at what age they
enter, with what schooling they enter, in what is it that they do
within a convent and why do they become companies? Why do people become vulnerable,
capable of those preys of someone who can manipulate them? That' s
very interesting. It' s also a phenomenon. Yes, because there are
different ones. No, as you well said, there are, for example,
the ones you know in a school are totally from another kind of order.
This is called the order to which they belong, which is different from
those within the cloister. And yes, Carolina, they' re also called
closures and they' re figure because they' re in a cloister aha and
themselves. So, they themselves in their video watch the video of them,
of these nuns that we' re talking about, and they say we'
re closing nuns that we' ve noticed that here ago is very bad.
Then they are different from those others, for example, who are engaged in
nursing, who are engaged in missions or who are engaged in teaching. That
I was also in religious school, then they are different types of vows and
also different preparation. For example, at school, in high school I had
a nun as a teacher who was a doctor of literature and was a teacher
of literature and a doctor. Then don' t be, it' s
left of her, she' s already in or anything. I don'
t know exactly the specifications of each, but it would be interesting to investigate
in this case soon, not clear, or it would be very interesting.
Of course, you' d have to see how they handle it Look here.
I have different ones. I have other comments, because Laura Lrón de
Guevara says, but jos stop or something like that she stayed in jail more
for passing a video. It wasn' t for passing a video, it
was for having in his possession material that the Crime Commission was involved. That
' s why that' s what kept her in jail. On the other
I was more proud later, and it was not just who did, not
to see then says Araceli. Yesterday I did not get to comment that they
noticed that the lawyer Pasquel is the same one who defended Besares and besides,
when they passed him the murder, the lawyer Pasquel is right now defending someone
or to see if they tell me, because I did read it that they
said he is the lawyer of the famous, but to whom he is defending
right now the lawyer Pasquel yes, sounds very good to me. We heard
and continued with the case of Paco Stanley, from this series of Pacostan,
who keeps getting dusty because he was watching a video that said this for seventeen
years, this idea fourteen years ago. But there' s one very significant
one I checked out. What he declares to Paco are what Mario Besares,
at the funeral declares to Jacobo Sabludovski. But I hear that Mario says that
he did not actually come out. I mean, there' s a columnist
who sent us this column, a columnist who says there are contradictions, because
Mario talks about that if the car came out, that if the truck walked.
But Mario does reiterate and emphasizes and it seems that he even does ex
- profeso, that is, as saying listen to him I never left the
restaurant. I got out of the bathroom. The waiters stopped me and still
James greets, he tries to insist, insist, but there, in those
first moments, he does not contradict what is contradicted, that is, Paco
was a great man, a great person, he was the most generous,
He was my great friend, a close relationship and a wonderful family to say
no later. No. We weren' t friends, I was never his
friends. Yes, that note that was sent to you by this Martin Moreno
Durán and published a year ago, just about June of the year two thousand
and twenty- three. But he says in that interview. But it also
seems very curious to me, because in this interview, which is in our
power referring to the medium that Mario César works for, he states that he
saw a person who came with a squad that started throwing him in the truck,
that is, he witnessed everything and because he later said that he had
never left the bathroom. But you' re right when you see this thing
that asks Mario Besares Jacos to Bludovski, because it seems to me that it
is the same thing that has always maintained about being in the bathroom. Then
I don' t know where he might be. That' s what this
journalist Martin Moreno is talking about No, I haven' t seen him.
I haven' t seen this part where I said he went out and he
was. No, that' s held him up all the time. Yeah,
he' s held all the time he never left the restaurant. Because,
besides, that must be very true? And that must be very true?
And unquestionable that never leaves, that never sees the car shot or maybe
sees the car shot, since everything happened now. On the other hand,
I agree a lot because they were writing to us and that also coincides very
much with those who have written this to us in Paco Maybe they didn'
t follow no more than a day. Maybe I came to study his movements
several days ago. That may have been, but the mere day must have
been a warning, I mean, there probably was a warning and a planning,
but at the moment, at the moment, at the time, then,
yes, there must have been a bit that there may have been now.
He asks James, Bludovsky, Mario Kisses. Hey, you don'
t know if there was one of the hit men in the restaurant that was
there and Mario says no, I don' t know. And indeed,
it' s very difficult to know if you went to the bathroom and they
immediately fill out paco, although, according to all the versions, no one
leaves the restaurant, none of the hit men leave the restaurant. They come
from outside and yes, they are the exact witnesses. There was never anyone
who came out of the restaurant. To put an end to this, this
didn' t exist. No. In fact, precisely something that supports Mario
' s version, because they are the versions of the witnesses, precisely of
all those who were inside all those waiters, of which he says that some
shouted at him that he did not come out and I do not know what.
But, for the time being, if you witness that he was inside
and wasn' t exactly that and he' s still brs as Carolina Maral
says, it' s still a coincidence, that he went to the bathroom
just when he was shot. But he' s got this fourth because that
' s what they call alibis for me He had diarrhea and he presents it
in the series. I wasn' t sick to my stomach and that'
s why I went back to the bathroom before we left that well, it
sounds very logical. Sounds very logical. What I didn' t understand anymore
is why they didn' t do any more research on this foot injury or
something. But, well, here it is, and I think we can
talk about it today about the impact it has during these times, because it
' s all the newspapers that are reporting it. Thank you so much for
him and the day. We have the press, we have the universal chart.
I worked there the debate, we got the reform, we got the
good one, we got the press again. But this is already with the
funeral and everything that was said later, not everything that was being said about
paying Stalle, but it was a reading. It was a time of political
turmoil, because, moreover, it was just the year ninety- nine,
as I recall, and in the ninety- nine, as it was coming,
it was a pre- electoral year, not the following year would be
when President Fox entered, the year two thousand. But it is a pre
- electoral year that there is always a lot of agitation and movement and confusion.
That' s why there are many theories. Then they told me that
Patti Chapoy also said in his program that she knew who had killed the life
of Paco, but she never said it, no, no, because I
think that if I say unless the man who sent it Matar sits with you
and says hey look I will tell you my plan from there on the outside,
because it is very difficult for someone to say that they have the absolute
certainty of who was clear. No, no, no, no, no.
No. Now yes, because what we were talking about yesterday, this
caused a lot of dismay, indignation, fear, hypothesis. Ivan came up
with theories that also appeared so crazy suddenly incredible, that they were dismantled little
by little and in which he had, therefore, a very important role.
Who was then attorney Samuel of the Billiards, exactly. Listen to see and
let' s see who Samuel was from the Billiards, because, because he
was also very questioned, because they' re supposed to send him there.
I mean, we need a culprit now and we need that solved now.
And that' s one of the things that could have hurt kisses. Yes,
notice that what is said first good, for it is that when fearing
blues, because it had on it all the citizens demanding a rapid response and
that he, as it is remembered, at that time, at some time,
pointed out that this reaction of the citizenry he a storm in a glass
of water and that that still indignant much more to the population, so that
he delegated the management to Rosario Robles, who had been Secretary of Government,
and is charged, therefore, to Samuel del Villar, to resolve quickly he
is Samuel of the billiards O era Kretschman, who was a key figure who
oversaw different lines of investigation, but that if at any time he determined that
there were links with drug trafficking, according to the investigations that he had headed,
he, therefore, dies of a question of cancer at the age of
sixty. In the year two thousand and five. He was a man of
preparation. He had studied law at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. He
had a master' s degree from Harvard, Harvard Law School, where he
also held a PhD in Law. He was a professor of Constitutional Law at
the Colegio de México and part of the professor' s team of Bachelor'
s degrees in Political Science and Public Administration and International Relations. So, yes,
it is not that I had neither information, nor preparation nor experience,
but that the case was actually carried out in a very peculiar way. I
don' t know between the hasty and the superficial. That was going to
say that I rushed him, rushed him on the case. This hurry to
solve it and find guilty that I insist that can if I read them here.
Yes, it was very rare that Mario Besares would have danced the chicken
on the show, as we said yesterday, and walked with crutches in the
restaurant. That, then, was to draw attention. However, that gives
as a certain doubt, but not as much as to put him in jail.
But if there was this haste already find me guilt solves this case and
we will blame a third party, because to whom it suits. And well,
in research cases we' ve always seen that what you look for is
who' s good for you. That Paco wasn' t there, why
there would be a reason to specifically kill him, specifically him and not someone
else, because we wanted to end it, because this looks like an execution.
I think the cover of the day was, I think, the right
thing to do. He executed organized crime, well, not the most accepted,
but it was an execution. It was an execution because it' s
not the same. He was killed for a crime of passion that he was
executed. That already changes, it changes a lot, it' s not
the same thing. He died who killed him. And the characteristics of that,
yes, yes, have all the signs of an execution, yes,
exactly. In the end, Samuel of Billiards, as we are being told
here, died, but did not leave a good role. I think he
had several cases that were in doubt, several cases that were not, because
there was no certainty. Not that that happens a lot with prosecutors or now
prosecutors. Then we don' t know. In the end, we don
' t know what else it was one time you remember what the demons didn
' t write to us yesterday and there was that saying and that had come
out a book and that had declared one of the Massi ruiz. We had
a moment of a lot of political turmoil, of a lot of political turmoil
in general. Not if it was like the country very convulsed. And this
comes to sow much more doubts on which side, whose side it was,
whom it suited. It' s a political case, who was accurate.
Yeah, look, says John Castro, says Lupita. I don' t
know if you' ve already commented. Marta Figueroa with Hugo Maldonado, recalled
that they became the pilot of the program friend of her, Jorge Gilli and
Mario Besares already sanse of death. I don' t remember that. They
did a pilot program. I didn' t know, because probably to see
what happens with the pilot programs is that they do a lot, a lot
you don' t have and how many programs are made, because there is
always a constant search for something that can work and they do a lot.
Then it' s a good thing a pilot program has been made. Wouldn
' t have been weird, wouldn' t have been suspicious. Simply because
one more program for Aztec television, which was where Jorge Hill wanted to extend
his work. I didn' t want to do this to sex. What
were you called exorcisms. I said, let' s not exorcise. I
don' t get excited about what you' re thinking. No, no,
don' t exorcise me. But it wasn' t uncommon that they
wanted to make you another program with Marta Figueroa that at the time, because
she was there with Jorge Gill and with good they were taking advantage of a
moment when you' re on a television station, because what she wants most
was to get a job and present projects until one works. And besides,
it was a great time on Aztec television. It was precisely when they were
coming up, they were having a lot of production and they were bringing in
a lot of actors because they were obviously televised, because there was nothing prior
to that moment and then it was like the world of opportunity was there.
So, obviously, they wanted to take advantage of it and they wanted to
do a lot of things. All those who were at the time being called
by this television and well, because Paco and Mario and well, Jorge Gill
was also part of the team and everyone else who integrated him was doing very
well. I mean, they came in and they started going up clearly I
then that was one of the times when Azteca was better. It had been
greatly strengthened, much strengthened. I was at the peak of production and I
' m telling you about cast and so on. I see that some people
say that crutches is like not so important that not that why it attracts so
much attention, but it is what we are saying that when you look at
a situation as delicate as this in detail or in detail, because obviously you
see with magnifying glass everything that happens and everything can be a fact that does
not necessarily mean something in particular, does not necessarily blame anyone much less.
It' s just all those little details that got the attention. I myself
told them yesterday that in that program he also made a reflection, calling on
the government to take more care of the security of the citizenry and saying that
we were very bad and that people were afraid and that there was danger.
But that does not mean that that day he said and today this is going
to happen to me, for no, because there is no way that they
would know much less. But it' s those details that you say wow,
that happened that day or that day Mario danced without crutches and then attacked
with crutches. You' re right, yes, it' s true,
maybe you knew how to accommodate him He was a dancer in some way to
be able to do that. I don' t know, but it'
s two details that caught attention at the time, because everything was observable.
When you said Lupita, we don' t know. I saw someone put
here that it was proven that there was no such injury. I don'
t remember it being checked, only he hesitated about it. Now I think
with everything we suspect already and all the research that there is and that it
has advanced science or maybe, if this was happening today, they would not
only be checking whether there was injury or no foot injury, but also whether
he had really got sick from the stomach or not. Not really, because
that' s how you' re going to see someone notice that there was
also a rumor that there was someone from the crime who texted him. That
' s when he got there You see Paco was reading the messages on the
air And, well, there was a suspicious message. I' ll read
them. Angelo Angelo says about crutches. It may well be that the evil
will be worse and that has happened to me in a problem in my heel.
I don' t see any suspicion. It' s very valid if
they take it out in the series and Mario says he never saw Jorge again,
no, I don' t think so anymore. Jorge Hill always said
he suspected kissing and I agree with him. Samuel of the Villa looked,
looked like a clump with all peace. Ho Jessica says what' s going
on is that Mario had said he never saw Gil again after Paco and Marta.
That' s why he said about the pilot program. Ah ok ok
Annie Cecilia says the problem with Mario is that when you watch Big' s
documentary after interviews with Adela and Jordi, it totally contradicts itself. Lupita finishes
watching the documentary and the one telling the truth is Benito. Yeah, Benito,
I got it. I' ve seen shorts, but I' m
going to apply now to see if Bigs works for me to watch the whole
documentary. And you have to see And it' s that I think this
is very interesting because you have to see what the documentary says, what they
say in the series and what we also see in the videos, that they
are reproductions of what did happen in the original program, of the original interviews
of how everything moved at that time. It' s very interesting. Lupita
takes care of the commentary on what Marta Figueroa said. I think it contradicts
Mario, who said he didn' t come back for thanks. I already
understood that the pilot did it after Paco had died mm Ok exactly, as
that also contradicts. I think I insist and it is not to justify Mario
Besares, but I do think we commented yesterday, after such a great trauma,
of course, that you forget what may have happened. What happened the
moments, the minutes you forget. But when it' s as deeply serious
as this, there must be something that makes it clear to you how.
How can I say that I never saw Jorge Hill again if I did see
him again to make a pilot with a figueroa kill. You don' t
forget that, because you' re already out. Besides, you' re
out of the moment, I mean, you' re not in the trauma
moment, you' re not in the mess, I mean, you'
re not in that afternoon or the next day, you' re not in
the trauma moment. That could be remembered. Yes now also the stories,
as in anything imagine in something as terrible as this. But in anything,
whatever life experience a human being has that of which we all have, some
loss, obviously, derived from a loss, some kind of mourning at best,
some situation in childhood that was complicated, some lack. Whatever it was
that you live, yes, it' s transforming. We' ve said
it here many times. Over time, that memory can get worse or it
can soften or it can' t say good. It wasn' t that
bad or it' s worse than I remember. I didn' t realize.
Now imagine yourself in a situation where you can see that, in addition,
they lived in a state that I would say almost maniac all the time,
because they worked a lot. The show was early, it lasted many
hours. Yeah, I had to do a lot of pre- production work,
keep a very high energy during transmission, that is, they had to
have the audience. So they had to come up with things, that is,
it was very demanding and they either solved it or tried to solve it
in many ways, which Benito Castro said in the documentary at the time,
but also Mario himself in some interviews. Yes, he did. Yes,
he did. We started drinking such a thing. Then we followed up with
I don' t know what. Then we ate and such and such then
lived in a state as I would say altered, a border, a border
state, i e lived limit, lived to the exact limit. Then imagine
all that. Then the crazy drama happens, you get arrested, you get
jailed. You don' t know what' s going to happen, because
imagine how these minds of revolts are and I repeat, I' ll always
say it as scared, because if there was something cloudy about what Mario knew
and that could have related to what happened. I think it' s also
very difficult for someone to come out and say, well look, yes no,
I tata ta And then, if that' s how, yes no,
although very complicated, I think we' re going this went on to
become like a maze, like a dead end, like half- truths complete
lies, where, well, we' re going to do this, we
' re going to do this comparative. I promise you and write down a
little bit for the eyes of what one thing says, what another says and
what the actual and momental interviews say and what happened in such a program in
detail. And, well, that must have been done by the police,
that must have been done by the investigators and they couldn' t reach a
conclusion and if a lock might come and they didn' t want to blame
the culprit. It is worth the redundancy, because if I do not want
to, they did not want to point out guilty, for some reason they
will have had that which also makes it even more viable for people to have
suspicions like those they have. Not why. It is not said, for
once it was this and this and it happened in such a way is not
very complicated. Now look how what you were saying to me a while ago
and you were reflecting on how Paco Stanley came to make this character who,
besides drawing attention to how dramatic his death was, was already moving a lot
of people, that is, he was a very dear person. There were
some of us who said they couldn' t stand it. They didn'
t like him because he had this sour mood. His jokes were heavy,
but it seemed that most people did want him the way he was. It
seemed like the day he identified himself in some things and you see a lot
of people crying about it. Not people on the street saying, but it
' s going how he came to make that character, because because he had,
He had a lot, he had a lot of charisma. Yes,
yesterday they came here to the program messages that they said to me I liked
because their jokes were very heavy, because I did have a kind of love,
very bullying, but there was one thing that he tried to balance it
with. He also laughed at the exact same saying that he was handsome and
gallant, and made a little mockery and talked, making his fatobics. That
was really fun for me. I was very fat at the time. Then
the fatbics loved it, but it made the fatabi that it was like that.
You remember right, yes, and he got tired, and they were
clear, and he did some very funny things. The truth is, yes.
He was nice, he had an angel and he had a charm but
he did have a very heavy mood. Sometimes, yes, but people liked
it. Most people loved him so much is so good, because he had
successful programs. I was questioned today by Gustavo Fernández on Twitter, but and
I agree, they say who didn' t want us in the series.
They say you don' t want it, the tiger unloads. But the
Cargo tiger had already died two years earlier. It must be remembered that when
Mr Ascar dies, Mr Ascara Jan is making a series of changes right now,
which is when he goes out to Bludovsky, he comes out Abram to
Bludovsky, he comes out Paco Stanley and they come out a lot. Television
is completely changed. They don' t make a big change on the TV
set. Then that was due to the new times of the television. Yeah,
of course you know that lunita. That' s the problem with the
series. I think whoever makes that comment to you probably saw the second chapter
of the series and in the second chapter of the series before they leave Televisa
and spends this period where Mario gets hit by the theater and then Paco goes
for it and tells him we are going to Terazteca. There' s a
scene in this new series, where you see Mr Ascar meet Scarga, Milmo
and Paco make a joke about his hairstyle. You can see that he had
the lock This silver makes a joke to him. The actor who' s
playing gabil or gets serious, doesn' t answer, stays upset. And
Luis Gerardo Méndez playing Mario tells him his boss. I think that joke didn
' t fall and make them understand because they do imply that that' s
where they tell them. Oh no, the show' s over and they
' re going to become Aztec. That' s how the show handles it.
And that' s the problem that causes people to sometimes assume that that
actually happened that way when, as you well say, times don' t
give up for you to have. It was fictional. I mean, I
think that this one is representative of television already wasn' t comfortable with me.
They wanted to get me out then maybe you reasons of much more weight,
much stronger, for or that they got out of Paco. But they
' re not going to mention them in this case, because what you mean
and the argument and the driver, this is the crime, exactly then.
That' s why I don' t think it' s given more importance
at the time of what it was like. Besides, the joke is that
Televisa was no longer wanted by his ranks. So he spent a little while
where he wasn' t on TV. And then, we don' t
know yet, because we don' t have that part yet in this series,
what he would have been doing. But what they do say is that
Mario, because he was very happy doing theater until, out of loyalty he
decided to return with payment to make television. Now this is also interesting I
think, is that Paco is reading this character as you say, that he
had the ability to laugh at himself and that' s why he got to
the level of those of those who also laughed or who also made these heavy
jokes and then, like it was already we' re all even I make
them, but they also make me. And there is a very different perception
from that, unlike the one who mocks another nothing else and he stays in
his place. But Paco was a person who here too will make it useful
to know why. Most of the time, because knowledge and preparation do give
an amplitude to know how to handle yourself in a particular area, including this
one of the show. Because Paco is Naley is a man who, although
his biography indicates that he did not come from a wealthy family, but on
the contrary, that he was a family, because with some shortcomings, he
was able to study and he was also at the National Autonomous University of Mexico,
where he studied Law. It is said that he also had psychology studies
and that he had a natural ease of communication and that he was a broadcaster
from around the late 1960s, from around sixty- nine, he was an
announcer. He had a flawless addiction. He knew how to impose the voice
very well, he did serious work for a long time, also in driving.
Then it was slowly exploding that comedic beta. I saw on the Eco
ECHO program, which was this exact twenty- four- hour news, that
it was a projection that lasted all day long, yes, yes, yes,
yes, and there was a segment that inside ECO had Estanley paco,
where it did give news and suddenly began its comic moment, where Veronica Macías
was exactly standing and then making Veronica' s balcony. And that' s
where he starts to explode more and more this comedian beta. But he had
a background, let' s say, academic intellectual that allowed him somehow to
explore different communication formulas that would give him a clear result, of course not,
well, of what talent was, that is, they might have liked
bad to regulate their mood. Yeah, or not. But if he was
a talented man, if he was a prepared man, if he was a
saying for something, I got it because if he hadn' t had the
talents, because as much as he did and he would study and declaim and
make jokes, they wouldn' t have hit. But I did. And
that' s why he becomes a character of interest, that' s why
they become a person and that' s why he gets where he comes from.
And, well, we' re going to continue investigating this case,
Dr Amel. By tomorrow you think we' re getting ahead of ourselves,
because I' m going to throw myself tonight the documentary I promise you.
I' m going to hang Bigs to give me my service, as it
should be, but and to be able to see him and we' re
going to comment and compare what is said to wait for this third chapter that,
as I understand it, comes out I don' t know if tomorrow
or Thursday, Thursday, I think, but we' re going to be
looking forward to it. Let' s keep an eye on it. And
here we continue reading your comments to put together this case, because count that
we, besides we like the broken souls that tomorrow we have today. I
want to let you know that we didn' t have any women leaving'
cause really, uh, wax is really sick. I thought he had bronchitis,
no, he doesn' t have bronchitis, but yes, he'
s very, very, very sick of throat and cough and can' t
even talk. So you better get some rest and you' ll be back
with us to get back to all the shows. But, well, for
the moment, we' re going to continue our research, Dr Amel.
That' s right, and then we wait for you, we wait for
you tomorrow, and we wait for you in all the Ahorita shows, you
go to dinner, and then you go to history, exactly that' s
what I think. Well, I' ll get a little test. Thank
you so much for having accompanied us, thank you for your likes, for
signing up, for being part of this community and your comments. And I
don' t follow the way you see them I read them all and we
comment here. All opinions are valid. All opinions are valid. Thank you
very much, Doctor. Many thanks to everyone and greetings to the Savior,
who over there asked me. Thank you very much. I greet you,
i e, toronto too, and I' ll see you, see you
tomorrow, Wednesday, May 29th. See you guys bye bye,