1
00:00:15,480 --> 00:00:21,359
What is up, fellow thermonuclear A
adverts. I am Dan for Valley,

2
00:00:21,800 --> 00:00:25,559
coming at you solo to talk some
NBA trade deadline. We had some moves

3
00:00:26,000 --> 00:00:29,960
that happened, and I scheduled a
bunch of different live streams. I had

4
00:00:29,960 --> 00:00:34,960
to keep moving them back because it
turns out that you all know I cover

5
00:00:35,079 --> 00:00:37,600
the MBA full time for Bleacher Report. Said Hey, I actually had to

6
00:00:37,640 --> 00:00:42,640
write about these trades, which are
both just super duper incredibly fascinating. So

7
00:00:42,640 --> 00:00:47,079
if you were sitting there waiting,
I appreciate you sitting there waiting. Let's

8
00:00:47,079 --> 00:00:49,960
talk about them. Though. We'll
give people, some stragglers a few minutes

9
00:00:50,000 --> 00:00:53,280
to come in here, so I
will very quickly just remind you to subscribe

10
00:00:53,280 --> 00:00:55,840
to us. If you're checking us
out for the first time, drawing YouTube,

11
00:00:55,880 --> 00:00:59,600
subscribe like comment, help you outgorithm, love us back. Subscribe to

12
00:00:59,640 --> 00:01:02,399
us on any podcast player that you
use, Apple, Spotify, Stitcher,

13
00:01:02,479 --> 00:01:06,239
Google Play that helps out a ton. Reviews and ratings on Apple do help

14
00:01:06,239 --> 00:01:07,719
out a ton when it comes to
the charts and exposure. For us to

15
00:01:08,719 --> 00:01:11,920
join our discord, the link to
that is in the podcast and YouTube descriptions.

16
00:01:11,959 --> 00:01:15,239
There's a lot of great discourse that
happens in there, and we'd love

17
00:01:15,280 --> 00:01:19,079
to see that community can continue to
grow and grow and grow and grow.

18
00:01:19,280 --> 00:01:23,599
Follow us on all the socials those
around the YouTube screen, but they're also

19
00:01:23,640 --> 00:01:26,159
in the podcast and YouTube descriptions.
You could follow us on Twitter, at

20
00:01:26,159 --> 00:01:30,519
Hardwood Knox, on TikTok at Hardwood
Knox, We're at Hardwood Underscore Knox on

21
00:01:32,120 --> 00:01:37,159
Instagram. Those are the housekeeping notes. Those are all of them, I

22
00:01:37,200 --> 00:01:38,599
think. So I think we can
finally get into these trades. And you'll

23
00:01:38,599 --> 00:01:42,840
have to forgive me if I'm like
triple screening it at the moment. If

24
00:01:42,879 --> 00:01:46,319
you're watching me, I have my
phone, I have my second computer setup.

25
00:01:47,239 --> 00:01:49,400
It's that time of year. It
also doesn't help. It'd be a

26
00:01:49,439 --> 00:01:53,599
lot easier if Twitter and fucking suck
at the moment. I hate you elon

27
00:01:53,680 --> 00:01:57,480
hashtag that sucks. Just tweet deck
is all sorts of weird at the moment,

28
00:01:57,480 --> 00:02:00,719
and it was down for a second. So yes, I will be

29
00:02:00,840 --> 00:02:06,040
my h I will be. My
eyes will be scattered all over the place.

30
00:02:06,079 --> 00:02:07,240
I will get to questions as they
come in once we talk a little

31
00:02:07,240 --> 00:02:10,840
bit. But since someone's already in
here, got one FK retro These trades

32
00:02:10,879 --> 00:02:15,919
today made no sense for so many
teams, I think. So let's start

33
00:02:16,039 --> 00:02:21,120
with the Jazz one, because I
do think that's the trade that people are

34
00:02:21,199 --> 00:02:24,280
most confused of when they look at
the return, like, I don't fk

35
00:02:24,400 --> 00:02:29,520
Retro, You're not You're not alone
in saying that. So the actual terms

36
00:02:29,520 --> 00:02:34,599
of that trade is the Lakers will
get Malik Beasley, Jared Vanderbilt, and

37
00:02:34,680 --> 00:02:38,639
D'Angelo Russell. The Timberwolves will get
Nikki, Alexander Walker, Mike Conley,

38
00:02:38,879 --> 00:02:42,199
a twenty twenty four second round pick
from Memphis or Washington. It'll be the

39
00:02:42,280 --> 00:02:46,199
less favorable and it'll come via the
Lakers. They also get UTAs twenty twenty

40
00:02:46,240 --> 00:02:50,159
five second and Utass twenty twenty six
second. The Jazz will get Damien Jones,

41
00:02:50,199 --> 00:02:53,960
Wantis, Connolly, Anderson, Russell
Westbrook and the Lakers twenty twenty seven

42
00:02:54,039 --> 00:02:58,599
first round pick. It's top four
protected. And also, and this is

43
00:02:58,639 --> 00:03:00,560
just this is super note worth at
the moment. If it doesn't convey,

44
00:03:01,080 --> 00:03:05,120
it just turns into a twenty twenty
seven second, And that's huge because it

45
00:03:05,159 --> 00:03:07,599
allows the Lakers to then turn around
and trade at twenty twenty nine second.

46
00:03:07,960 --> 00:03:12,319
And so I want to break down
the The implications for the Lakers is I

47
00:03:12,400 --> 00:03:14,879
give this trade if we were grading
them, which I technically am, but

48
00:03:14,919 --> 00:03:17,120
I'm not doing that here. It's
just it's an a for the Lakers.

49
00:03:17,120 --> 00:03:22,879
I don't know how it's anything other
than an a for the Lakers. They

50
00:03:23,199 --> 00:03:24,759
only gave up one first round pick, and there was this school of thought

51
00:03:24,879 --> 00:03:29,199
that if they were going to trade, make a trade that was so geared

52
00:03:29,199 --> 00:03:34,560
towards this season that they needed to
trade both picks because they needed a mega

53
00:03:34,639 --> 00:03:39,240
return, and so like, even
then, would the mega return be enough?

54
00:03:39,280 --> 00:03:42,400
Like if you if they had gotten
Kyrie Irving, I think you could

55
00:03:42,400 --> 00:03:46,120
say, oh, well, I
guess they had some like championship equity or

56
00:03:46,560 --> 00:03:52,919
potential outcomes, but maybe they also
didn't. So like, that's to get

57
00:03:52,960 --> 00:03:55,599
this haul only giving up one pick
and that you got to protect it,

58
00:03:55,919 --> 00:04:02,120
and it doesn't trickle down because now
you're able to do is you'll move like

59
00:04:02,199 --> 00:04:06,360
this pick, move your twenty twenty
nine pick. Excuse me, and I'm

60
00:04:06,360 --> 00:04:11,000
sorry I'm stammering here. I'm trying
to get this promoted on Twitter, and

61
00:04:11,360 --> 00:04:14,560
it's tweet deck. I guess if
you're sending out tweets, it won't actually

62
00:04:14,560 --> 00:04:18,199
publish. So that's that's that's fucking
awesome. That really kind of sort of

63
00:04:18,240 --> 00:04:23,160
definitely blows anyway, though, So
for the Lakers, the fact that you're

64
00:04:23,160 --> 00:04:26,240
still able to trade you're twenty twenty
nine pick, you go out and make

65
00:04:26,279 --> 00:04:29,120
another move right now, or if
you think this is enough and we'll get

66
00:04:29,120 --> 00:04:30,920
into the fit of the players in
a second. If you think this is

67
00:04:31,040 --> 00:04:33,560
enough, like now, you get
to holster that pick, and when you

68
00:04:33,600 --> 00:04:39,120
go into the off season you can
trade. You can still trade a swap

69
00:04:39,279 --> 00:04:41,680
in twenty twenty eight, you're twenty
twenty nine pick, and then a swap

70
00:04:41,680 --> 00:04:45,439
in twenty thirty. I don't know
what value that necessarily has, but if

71
00:04:45,480 --> 00:04:47,439
there's there's more value there, it
opens up more avenues for you to improve

72
00:04:47,480 --> 00:04:53,959
your team. And also just looking
at the books of this, if you

73
00:04:54,040 --> 00:04:56,360
want to, you can still just
say, hey, we'll go into this

74
00:04:56,519 --> 00:04:59,839
offseason with cap space instead of keeping
any of these guys. Russell's a free

75
00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:02,879
agent, Malik Beasley is a team
option. Jared vanderbilt salary is completely non

76
00:05:02,920 --> 00:05:05,319
guaranteed, So you can just get
rid of those, get rid of Ruey,

77
00:05:05,399 --> 00:05:08,480
and still have all that cap space. If you want to sign Kyrie

78
00:05:08,680 --> 00:05:11,199
Now you don't. I want to
be clear, you don't make this move

79
00:05:11,240 --> 00:05:15,079
with the intention of doing that.
But if if for some reason it doesn't

80
00:05:15,079 --> 00:05:18,279
work out, you have that avenue
and you only gave up one first round

81
00:05:18,279 --> 00:05:25,120
pick while significantly increasing your ceiling on
this season. And I don't know,

82
00:05:26,279 --> 00:05:30,040
I don't know how to judge what
the Lakers highest and olcome is right now,

83
00:05:30,160 --> 00:05:33,319
to be honest with everyone, mostly
because the West is just so fucking

84
00:05:33,439 --> 00:05:38,199
jumbled. That being said, the
Lakers are disappointing. And yet if you

85
00:05:38,240 --> 00:05:41,480
want to just to get in a
top six spot to really have a chance,

86
00:05:41,519 --> 00:05:44,360
like let's say you just want them
to avoid the plan, they're only

87
00:05:44,759 --> 00:05:47,560
four losses back of the six seed
Dallas Mavericks. Now the catch twenty two

88
00:05:47,600 --> 00:05:50,199
there is you have all these teams
in front of you Portland, okay,

89
00:05:50,199 --> 00:05:54,360
see the Jazz, Minnesota, New
Orleans, Golden State, and Dallas.

90
00:05:54,439 --> 00:05:57,639
That's a lot of teams. We've
already shown that Utah's gonna punt on the

91
00:05:57,639 --> 00:06:00,519
rest of this year, do we
bet? Are you try us in anything?

92
00:06:00,560 --> 00:06:01,879
In Minnesota they've been on a tear
of late, but D'Angelo Russell was

93
00:06:01,879 --> 00:06:04,160
a huge part of that. And
Mike Conley's been solid. He kind of

94
00:06:04,199 --> 00:06:08,199
elevates your floor. I think without
raising your ceiling. We'll get to them.

95
00:06:08,199 --> 00:06:11,680
The Golden State Warriors are dealing with
the Steph Curry absence for another month.

96
00:06:11,920 --> 00:06:15,600
What's gonna happen with Kyrie and Dallas? The Blazers just traded Josh Hart,

97
00:06:15,639 --> 00:06:17,639
Like did they They didn't get better
in that deal, getting Cam Reddish

98
00:06:17,639 --> 00:06:23,600
and Ryan Orchidiacino and Spi McKay Luke. So, and we'll talk about that

99
00:06:23,720 --> 00:06:27,800
as well. So like you have
and the Thunder, you know, they're

100
00:06:27,839 --> 00:06:30,199
sort of like they're not fading,
but like they're a team that you could

101
00:06:30,199 --> 00:06:33,040
see fading and you've gotten better.
That's the other thing is this is not

102
00:06:33,079 --> 00:06:36,399
the Lakers, like just being the
Lakers and hoping that oh, Lebron and

103
00:06:36,480 --> 00:06:42,680
I d have to will most definitely
kind of sorder are gonna stay healthy and

104
00:06:42,680 --> 00:06:46,560
they need to carry the little of
themselves. D'Angelo Russell is like having a

105
00:06:46,600 --> 00:06:49,720
pretty good year and he's been on
a tear for basically the past two months.

106
00:06:49,839 --> 00:06:54,160
Right now, he's shooting thirty eight
point five percent on catching shoot threes

107
00:06:54,199 --> 00:06:57,800
and even more importantly, shooting thirty
nine point four percent on off the dribble

108
00:06:57,879 --> 00:07:01,920
threes. This is a wild stat
though nobody on the Lakers is averaging one

109
00:07:02,279 --> 00:07:06,759
pull up jumper per game, end
posting an effective field goal percentage which measures

110
00:07:06,759 --> 00:07:12,439
two point and three point efficiency above
fifty. D'Angelo russells affect a field goal

111
00:07:12,480 --> 00:07:15,480
percentage on pull up jumpers fifty three
point three. That is the eighth best

112
00:07:15,519 --> 00:07:18,680
mark in the league among seventy three
players who take at least four of those

113
00:07:18,680 --> 00:07:23,360
shots a game. That's absolutely huge
when you're looking at the dynamic of the

114
00:07:23,439 --> 00:07:25,959
Lakers offense. It's something that Rust
didn't give you, even though he was

115
00:07:26,000 --> 00:07:28,680
going to take those shots. I
think he's actually averaging more pull up jumpers

116
00:07:28,680 --> 00:07:31,959
per game than D'Angelo Russell, which
is a capslock problem. So you get

117
00:07:32,040 --> 00:07:35,240
someone who I think, yes,
the Wolves, maybe we're worried about his

118
00:07:35,360 --> 00:07:40,279
long term fit off the ball when
you were funneling so much of your offense

119
00:07:40,639 --> 00:07:45,560
to Anthony Edwards even Kyle Anderson there, but like Delo has been able to

120
00:07:45,600 --> 00:07:46,959
play off the ball, so he
could play off Lebron. The line ups

121
00:07:47,000 --> 00:07:49,839
with him and Anthony Davis and no
Lebron, that should work out. Really

122
00:07:49,839 --> 00:07:54,360
well. I think this is just
in itself. I think if the Lakers

123
00:07:54,360 --> 00:07:58,279
made this trade and the comment from
fk Retro, which I left up on

124
00:07:58,319 --> 00:08:01,160
the screen for a while, yeah, they literally gave up nothing, really

125
00:08:01,160 --> 00:08:03,399
for three guys that so many teams
were going after. Don't get how they

126
00:08:03,439 --> 00:08:05,560
got them for so little. I
will talk about that in a second one

127
00:08:05,639 --> 00:08:09,439
once we get to the Jazz.
But I think you could have done this

128
00:08:09,519 --> 00:08:15,120
trade for just Delo and it probably
would have been okay, Like maybe the

129
00:08:15,319 --> 00:08:18,519
you know, the value would have
been different because how does Minnesota give up

130
00:08:18,519 --> 00:08:20,079
calmly in that deal? But if
that was the you know, if that

131
00:08:20,160 --> 00:08:24,399
was the only like, if Delo
was the only thing that you got out

132
00:08:24,439 --> 00:08:28,360
of this trade, would you have
said that it was that it was a

133
00:08:28,399 --> 00:08:31,240
failure on the Lakers part. Maybe, but like maybe not, because you

134
00:08:31,240 --> 00:08:33,279
could say, well, they just
might have signed him in free agency.

135
00:08:33,600 --> 00:08:39,000
So that's huge for them. Now
they get someone in Malik Beasley who brings

136
00:08:39,440 --> 00:08:41,440
uh, sorry to anyone who's hearing
all my messages, work messages go off

137
00:08:41,480 --> 00:08:45,080
in the backgrounds. Here's the season
to just get tons of texts and dms

138
00:08:45,120 --> 00:08:50,960
and emails and keep up with absolutely
none of them anyway, So training thought,

139
00:08:50,960 --> 00:08:52,840
oh yeah, so yeah, they
could have signed him in free agency,

140
00:08:52,840 --> 00:08:54,279
but if you just got Delo,
that have been huge. Malik Beasley

141
00:08:54,480 --> 00:08:58,559
high volume three point shooting that has
value to this Lakers offense. And he's

142
00:08:58,720 --> 00:09:01,320
not a properly size of wing,
but at six five, he's like their

143
00:09:01,360 --> 00:09:05,360
second biggest wing if you're like outside
of Lebron, and I don't consider him

144
00:09:05,360 --> 00:09:09,399
a wing. I don't even really
consider Ruey a wing, but that's huge

145
00:09:09,399 --> 00:09:13,240
for them. I will know.
Beasley has been shooting under thirty one percent

146
00:09:13,320 --> 00:09:16,799
from three over his last twenty one
games or twenty three games, so that's

147
00:09:16,799 --> 00:09:20,320
more than a quarter of the season. That's something the monitor. He should

148
00:09:20,320 --> 00:09:24,320
be getting at least the same quality, if not better quality shots in LA

149
00:09:24,360 --> 00:09:28,159
when you're catching passes from Lebron.
I think that that's a good pickup under

150
00:09:28,159 --> 00:09:30,840
team control for next year if he
works out as well. And then Jared

151
00:09:30,879 --> 00:09:33,000
Vanderbilt, then talent infusing alone.
I liked that play. The on off

152
00:09:33,039 --> 00:09:37,159
splits don't love him. He became
a little redundant and definitely awkward once Walker

153
00:09:37,240 --> 00:09:41,159
Kessler emerged, though, And so
now you're playing on a Lakers team where

154
00:09:41,159 --> 00:09:46,240
you have If you're gonna try and
play him next to Ruey Endoor Anthony Davis,

155
00:09:46,720 --> 00:09:50,159
you might run into some of the
same spacing issues, but defensively,

156
00:09:50,159 --> 00:09:52,639
he should be able to spend more
time around the basket, which is where

157
00:09:52,639 --> 00:09:56,720
he's best suited, and he just
brings you some rebounding hustle and then then

158
00:09:56,799 --> 00:10:00,960
pure energy night tonight. Again,
the talent play there alone is just like,

159
00:10:01,120 --> 00:10:03,080
yeah, get it and then figure
out the rest later. I don't

160
00:10:03,080 --> 00:10:09,039
know, Like these are all three
of the players that the Lakers are acquiring

161
00:10:09,120 --> 00:10:11,360
right now, Like there's a chance
that at least two of them would be

162
00:10:11,399 --> 00:10:15,360
their third best players overall. Like
I mean, you have Anthony Davis,

163
00:10:15,399 --> 00:10:16,919
you have Lebron, and then it's
I don't know how you feel about Austin

164
00:10:18,000 --> 00:10:20,879
Reeve. Let's not have the Russell
Westbrook discussion at that point. Like the

165
00:10:20,879 --> 00:10:24,279
whole six minute of the year bus
thing with him was totally overrated for the

166
00:10:24,360 --> 00:10:31,360
Wolves. I don't love this,
but I understand it. So you get

167
00:10:31,399 --> 00:10:33,879
Mike Conley, who has experienced playing
next to Rudy Gobert. He's having a

168
00:10:33,879 --> 00:10:37,960
solid season, and I do believe
we need to view this through the lens

169
00:10:37,000 --> 00:10:41,320
of Okay D'Angelo Russell was going to
be a free agent. If you thought

170
00:10:41,840 --> 00:10:46,799
that he was going to leave or
you didn't want to be the one to

171
00:10:46,919 --> 00:10:50,039
pay him, you needed to figure
out a way to get value out of

172
00:10:50,120 --> 00:10:54,360
him. And so what you do
with Conley is you basically fold delo salary

173
00:10:54,840 --> 00:10:58,639
into a smaller salary that's on the
books for next season. Mike Conley has

174
00:10:58,639 --> 00:11:01,320
a full salary of twenty four point
four fourteen point three million, of which

175
00:11:01,320 --> 00:11:05,840
is guaranteed, so they could waive
him if they wanted to to cut that

176
00:11:05,879 --> 00:11:07,120
ten million off. I don't think
you make this deal to do that,

177
00:11:07,159 --> 00:11:11,279
though, So you bring in someone
who's just cheaper can still play, so

178
00:11:11,320 --> 00:11:16,919
you're not losing Dealo for nothing.
Has the experience with Rigobert, He's probably

179
00:11:16,960 --> 00:11:20,080
if you really want to continue to
allocate more touches to Anthy Edwards and like

180
00:11:20,159 --> 00:11:22,600
to play Kyle Anderson on the ball, and you also want to make sure

181
00:11:22,639 --> 00:11:26,360
that when karl anthy Towns comes back
that he can be a prominent part of

182
00:11:26,399 --> 00:11:30,080
what you're doing on the ball and
not strictly playing away from it. He's

183
00:11:30,080 --> 00:11:35,159
probably the better fit for your roster
and so the depth chart makes a little

184
00:11:35,200 --> 00:11:39,279
bit more sense here to me.
That being said, Mike Commy's thirty five,

185
00:11:39,320 --> 00:11:43,600
He's gonna be thirty six next year. His contract is like, that's

186
00:11:43,639 --> 00:11:46,840
net negative value when you're paying him
that much, and I don't like,

187
00:11:46,960 --> 00:11:50,159
what if he slips off? Doesn't
have the intended impact. So while your

188
00:11:50,240 --> 00:11:54,120
roster does make more sense, DeAngelo
Russell to me, gave you the higher

189
00:11:54,159 --> 00:11:56,320
ceiling when you look at what might
have happened in the playoffs. There is

190
00:11:56,399 --> 00:12:01,840
value though and catering towards fit and
synergy and optimizing you know, the talent

191
00:12:01,919 --> 00:12:03,120
that you're most invested in, and
like I said, you need to view

192
00:12:03,120 --> 00:12:07,799
it through the lens of DeAngelo Russell
probablyving or maybe earning too much money for

193
00:12:07,840 --> 00:12:13,200
the Wolves to finance in free agency, and I think that helps with the

194
00:12:13,200 --> 00:12:16,279
optics here. And then also you
get those like two distant Utah first rounders,

195
00:12:16,279 --> 00:12:18,919
which in twenty five and twenty six, Yeah, the Jazz should be

196
00:12:18,919 --> 00:12:20,159
better, but what if they're not? So like, what if those picks

197
00:12:20,200 --> 00:12:24,399
end up being in the thirties,
that's just you know, some nice value

198
00:12:24,440 --> 00:12:26,559
there. I also I like the
flyer on the kil Alexander Walker, just

199
00:12:26,600 --> 00:12:31,679
because this team doesn't have a lot
of reserve firepower. And while Nall can

200
00:12:31,679 --> 00:12:39,039
be sort of this firecracker or inconsistent
firecracker, he's just like that's an extra

201
00:12:39,080 --> 00:12:41,399
body there, especially if you wind
up, you know, acquiescing to the

202
00:12:41,480 --> 00:12:46,639
jail and Noel trade demand that we
know is there, so that helps you

203
00:12:46,240 --> 00:12:50,960
as well, or at least is
interesting to do. So again I understand

204
00:12:50,000 --> 00:12:54,559
it from their perspective, but it's
not a very inspiring move and now they're

205
00:12:54,600 --> 00:12:58,919
just very much out of alternatives because
it's what is there. But like Delo

206
00:12:58,000 --> 00:13:01,600
was sort of their last big trade
chip unless you're gonna look at moving Carl

207
00:13:01,639 --> 00:13:05,600
Anthony Town's over the offseason once he
becomes trade eligible. And so it really

208
00:13:05,639 --> 00:13:09,519
gets like they have Jane McDaniels too, but like what you're just to build

209
00:13:09,519 --> 00:13:11,039
out packages now gets so tough,
and if this doesn't work out, Mike

210
00:13:11,080 --> 00:13:13,600
Conley's not all of a sudden an
asset. Yeah, you can move his

211
00:13:13,679 --> 00:13:18,120
expiring contract, but at twenty four
point four million, you're probably not taking

212
00:13:18,120 --> 00:13:22,320
back great money at that point.
Again, I understand it from their perspective.

213
00:13:22,360 --> 00:13:26,279
That doesn't mean I love it.
The jazz they are the team that

214
00:13:26,360 --> 00:13:30,200
was criticized the most. I think
in the aftermath of this deal, a

215
00:13:30,240 --> 00:13:33,799
lot of people there were reports early
on that the Jazz wanted a first round

216
00:13:33,799 --> 00:13:37,879
pick for Jared Vanderbilt, Mike Conley, and Malik Beasley, and so I

217
00:13:37,879 --> 00:13:41,720
think people are sort of treating this
trade as if that was an absolute fact

218
00:13:41,159 --> 00:13:48,039
or even possible. It wasn't.
Like so I already mentioned, let's break

219
00:13:48,080 --> 00:13:54,159
this down player by player. Jared
Vanderbilt became awkward redundant after after the emergence

220
00:13:54,200 --> 00:13:58,159
of Walker Kessler. He's on the
books for four point seven million next year.

221
00:13:58,200 --> 00:14:01,159
But a reserve big man who doesn't
based the floor is never getting a

222
00:14:01,159 --> 00:14:05,919
first round pick without other moving parts
involved, i e. The Jazz taking

223
00:14:05,919 --> 00:14:09,720
back bad money and he makes too
little money to have been sent out for

224
00:14:09,759 --> 00:14:13,559
bad money on his own. Malik
Beasley, Yes, he'd probably get you

225
00:14:13,600 --> 00:14:16,120
a first round pick on his own. Still, that first round pick is

226
00:14:16,159 --> 00:14:18,960
not nearly as high end as the
twenty twenty seven Lakers selection might be.

227
00:14:20,320 --> 00:14:22,879
And I think the other thing to
consider is, like he's been sub thirty

228
00:14:22,879 --> 00:14:26,039
one percent from three for quite some
time now. He's just been super up

229
00:14:26,039 --> 00:14:30,159
and down for them. On offense. It's a good move for the Lakers,

230
00:14:30,159 --> 00:14:33,600
and he's a valuable player, but
like, I don't know, Like

231
00:14:33,639 --> 00:14:37,120
he wouldn't have gotten you more than
a lottery protected first round pick from a

232
00:14:37,159 --> 00:14:39,440
team that would have wanted it to
convey this year, and it would have

233
00:14:39,440 --> 00:14:43,679
been in the twenties or something along
those lines. So yes, he would

234
00:14:43,720 --> 00:14:46,879
have gotten you a first round pick. There's that first round pick, but

235
00:14:46,879 --> 00:14:48,639
it wouldn't have been nearly as high
end or off into the distance. And

236
00:14:48,679 --> 00:14:52,519
for a team like the Jazz,
they have so many first round picks now

237
00:14:52,559 --> 00:14:56,519
they're up to fifteen future first round
picks that are loosely or unprotected. I

238
00:14:56,519 --> 00:15:01,240
believe, as Wog framed it,
loose protection means like top four, I

239
00:15:01,240 --> 00:15:05,399
would say, or lower so top
five or better so, and that makes

240
00:15:05,440 --> 00:15:07,879
sense. I think they have the
top five for Minnesota and twenty nine now

241
00:15:07,919 --> 00:15:09,840
the top fourth for the Lakers in
twenty seven. You wouldn't have gotten a

242
00:15:09,840 --> 00:15:13,440
pick nearly that high end. And
then Mike Conley, that's not I'm not

243
00:15:13,480 --> 00:15:16,320
saying they would have needed to move
off an asset to get him out of

244
00:15:16,360 --> 00:15:20,559
town. He wasn't getting you a
first round pick on his own. I

245
00:15:20,600 --> 00:15:22,840
think even pairing him with someone other
teams would have looked at, well,

246
00:15:22,879 --> 00:15:28,600
we're taking on this asset because we're
gonna pay Mike Conley next season. And

247
00:15:28,799 --> 00:15:31,840
when you when you look at it
that way, which is the right way

248
00:15:31,840 --> 00:15:35,840
to look at it, they maybe
maybe again, I'm just gonna say,

249
00:15:35,879 --> 00:15:41,799
maybe could have gotten two first for
these three players. That's maybe they would

250
00:15:41,840 --> 00:15:46,879
Those two first would have just been
afterthought first and not as potentially high end

251
00:15:46,919 --> 00:15:50,200
as the Lakers might be. Now, you are taking on some risk here

252
00:15:50,320 --> 00:15:54,720
because if that Lakers pick doesn't convey
in twenty twenty seven, it turns into

253
00:15:54,120 --> 00:15:58,519
just a second. But you also
get the benefit here of increasing your cat

254
00:15:58,559 --> 00:16:03,120
flexibility this summer. You just went
getting rid of Beasley's team option. You're

255
00:16:03,120 --> 00:16:06,320
not gonna pay Vanderbilt and un guaranteed, and then all of Mike Conley's money.

256
00:16:06,600 --> 00:16:08,480
They're just they're gonna have max cap
space and then some if they don't

257
00:16:08,480 --> 00:16:11,679
want to do anything. And I'm
not saying they need to go spend spend

258
00:16:11,679 --> 00:16:15,399
spending free agency, but that's going
to give them avenues to facilitate other trades

259
00:16:15,480 --> 00:16:18,120
or make other trades themselves, either
as buyers and lopsided deals, like,

260
00:16:18,200 --> 00:16:21,360
you know what, if the Hawks
just blow it up, John Collins is

261
00:16:21,399 --> 00:16:23,600
going to slide right into Utah's cap
space, Like that's still eminently possible.

262
00:16:26,279 --> 00:16:32,120
So that having that flexibility is part
of the value that needs to be incumbent

263
00:16:32,279 --> 00:16:37,679
of this trade. That's like,
you know, that's that's not bad value

264
00:16:37,679 --> 00:16:41,320
here when you're looking at the Lakers
first round pick that you're also getting.

265
00:16:41,399 --> 00:16:44,919
Fk Retchers said, Jazz basically got
cap space in a second twenty seven for

266
00:16:44,960 --> 00:16:47,600
Westbrook? Who are they going to
buy out? And yes, you could

267
00:16:47,639 --> 00:16:49,559
look at it that way, and
that's fine because look, most of the

268
00:16:49,559 --> 00:16:52,919
season's already gone. That RUSS number, while it's huge forty seven plus million

269
00:16:53,559 --> 00:16:56,919
already most of the salary has been
paid, so it looks like a huge

270
00:16:56,960 --> 00:16:59,159
number on the books, But it
doesn't matter now because you know what the

271
00:16:59,200 --> 00:17:02,399
trade market is. But you don't
really know what else you could have done.

272
00:17:02,840 --> 00:17:04,559
So you know, excuse me,
you know what else you could have

273
00:17:04,599 --> 00:17:07,400
done, and clearly there wasn't any
better move out there. Otherwise you don't

274
00:17:07,400 --> 00:17:14,000
make this trade. Alan Pinhoe says
Lakers turn difficult Westbrook situation into three players

275
00:17:14,039 --> 00:17:18,240
that fold in much better. Add
this to Rudy improving Thomas Bryan at center

276
00:17:18,279 --> 00:17:21,240
burning minutes you Todd did well with
the pick. But Minnesota, Yeah,

277
00:17:21,240 --> 00:17:23,640
I just talked about Minnesota, Allen. They not inspiring. I get it

278
00:17:23,680 --> 00:17:27,880
from a fit perspective. I think
Conley's better suited for a roster where when

279
00:17:27,920 --> 00:17:32,039
Karnthy Towns comes back, you're gonna
want him to be on Balsam in addition

280
00:17:32,079 --> 00:17:34,720
to Auntie Edwards and Kyle Anderson.
So I think he's easier to fit in

281
00:17:34,720 --> 00:17:37,920
that dynamic and has the experience with
Rudy. But there's no way, and

282
00:17:38,799 --> 00:17:41,839
there's no way in hell that this
is like an inspiring move for them.

283
00:17:41,920 --> 00:17:45,000
I think it could be a better
fitting one, but I don't know if

284
00:17:45,000 --> 00:17:48,000
it actually elevates their ceiling. Might
only elevate their floor. So I think

285
00:17:48,000 --> 00:17:53,119
the jazz to get back to them
did like fine, It's it doesn't have

286
00:17:53,119 --> 00:17:56,240
to be overly inspiring. But if
you could have would you have preferred Let's

287
00:17:56,240 --> 00:18:00,480
say you could have gotten two additional
twenty twenty three first round picks that we're

288
00:18:00,519 --> 00:18:04,880
going to convey in the twenties,
Why do you want that if you're Utah,

289
00:18:04,920 --> 00:18:08,839
because you already have so many picks, like in general, that you

290
00:18:08,839 --> 00:18:12,599
can afford to put something into the
distance. They have their own pick this

291
00:18:12,680 --> 00:18:17,640
year, they have Minnesota's pick this
year, and then they have a first

292
00:18:17,720 --> 00:18:19,240
round pick coming from Houston, Brooklyn, or Philly. It's at least favorable.

293
00:18:19,279 --> 00:18:23,960
So you're already looking at three first
round picks in the chamber. You're

294
00:18:25,000 --> 00:18:26,079
not gonna do you what are you
gonna do with a fourth and a fifth

295
00:18:26,160 --> 00:18:30,039
one? So I would rather have
the twenty twenty seven pick because it's right

296
00:18:30,079 --> 00:18:33,160
now. Yeah, they do have
two, or they have four. Now

297
00:18:33,240 --> 00:18:34,960
they have four twenty twenty seven first
but it's so far down the line you

298
00:18:36,000 --> 00:18:37,400
can decide what you're gonna do with
them. They're probably not going to keep

299
00:18:37,640 --> 00:18:41,000
Cleveland's Minnesota as the Lakers send their
own, but like by that point they're

300
00:18:41,000 --> 00:18:44,599
gonna have a better hold of their
rebuild. They'll be further along in their

301
00:18:44,599 --> 00:18:48,200
timeline. Right now, you're kind
of just kicking the can there. And

302
00:18:48,240 --> 00:18:52,400
I think the other thing is they
didn't They've been plucky and fun and like

303
00:18:52,480 --> 00:18:55,599
in the you know, they're they're
in the thick of the middle class of

304
00:18:55,640 --> 00:18:57,960
the West. That's not why they
traded Rudy Gobert and Don Mitchell. It

305
00:18:59,000 --> 00:19:02,519
was too anger for something bigger,
better, and so like, while they've

306
00:19:02,559 --> 00:19:07,519
been surprisingly competitive, there's value in
saying, Okay, well that doesn't fit

307
00:19:07,559 --> 00:19:11,920
the bigger picture motif. And so
what they did is they decided, hey,

308
00:19:12,039 --> 00:19:17,640
we're gonna short the Lakers future while
forefeiting no one mission critical to our

309
00:19:17,680 --> 00:19:19,319
own. Do you think Beasley and
Vanderbilt we're both going to be on this

310
00:19:19,400 --> 00:19:23,839
team beyond next season, like going
into their expiring dealsn't Conley for sure?

311
00:19:23,920 --> 00:19:27,359
That was the age thirty six season. Doing that while also drumming up your

312
00:19:27,440 --> 00:19:30,759
draft lottery odds this year. And
look, we know what the league looks

313
00:19:30,799 --> 00:19:33,680
like right now. There are some
really bad teams that Jazz are not going

314
00:19:33,680 --> 00:19:37,599
to catch up too. But like, you know, they could go on

315
00:19:37,720 --> 00:19:41,319
a they could lose five sixth straight
games and like all of a sudden,

316
00:19:41,319 --> 00:19:45,000
they're in Orlando Magic territory, which
is basically top five lottery odds at that

317
00:19:45,039 --> 00:19:47,759
point, Like that that's a possibility, So you drum up your own draft

318
00:19:47,799 --> 00:19:52,680
lottery odds there, and you also
just have that effortless line too. You

319
00:19:52,720 --> 00:19:55,920
know, I would probably have them
at between forty and sixty million in cap

320
00:19:55,960 --> 00:20:00,440
space. So that's look, that's
for where they're at. I don't think

321
00:20:00,440 --> 00:20:04,079
that that's bad value. I am
surprised that the Lakers got this much for

322
00:20:04,119 --> 00:20:07,640
their one first round pick, and
as Ryan says in the chat, how

323
00:20:07,759 --> 00:20:14,319
Lakers, how Lakers getting these deals? Yeah, I'm pleasantly surprised, mostly

324
00:20:14,319 --> 00:20:17,920
because general manager Rob Polinka has not
done anything that I think inspires confidence in

325
00:20:18,000 --> 00:20:23,720
him. Ryan also says Lakers to
finals. I would respectfully yet strongly disagree

326
00:20:23,839 --> 00:20:26,799
with that take. I do think
they're more of a threat, as the

327
00:20:26,839 --> 00:20:32,640
thumbnail that I put on YouTube should
should show everybody. But I you know,

328
00:20:32,880 --> 00:20:37,920
let's maybe maybe we should slow the
role a little bit here. So

329
00:20:38,039 --> 00:20:41,440
it's a it's a big time I
think it's a big time win for them,

330
00:20:41,480 --> 00:20:45,519
and I think that most of the
players in Beasley and Russell fit seamlessly.

331
00:20:45,599 --> 00:20:48,920
Vanderbilt I'm a little bit more skeptical
on, but you could build certain

332
00:20:48,960 --> 00:20:51,720
lineups around him and look, maybe
him and a D can definitely work.

333
00:20:51,759 --> 00:20:55,440
It's definitely easier to play him with
a D than it would be a Walker

334
00:20:55,559 --> 00:20:59,240
Kessler. So that's my impressions there. I think if you're to rank who

335
00:20:59,559 --> 00:21:03,400
who may made the U, who
made the who made out best in this

336
00:21:03,440 --> 00:21:07,960
I would probably rank it as the
Lakers first by a mile, and then

337
00:21:08,359 --> 00:21:11,160
I think I'm putting the Jazz second, and then I like it the least

338
00:21:11,160 --> 00:21:15,720
for the Wolves, even though I
kind of understand it here. So that's

339
00:21:17,160 --> 00:21:18,839
like, that's just where we're at. I think that then if there are

340
00:21:18,839 --> 00:21:21,920
any questions, if you want to
throw them in the chat about this trade

341
00:21:21,920 --> 00:21:23,720
specifically, we'll get We'll get back
to them as I continue rolling through this.

342
00:21:25,079 --> 00:21:30,519
But I think I think that's really
the more interesting h implication here out

343
00:21:30,559 --> 00:21:33,039
of all this. I mean,
it does I think maybe the most industry

344
00:21:33,079 --> 00:21:37,400
ones, Oh, the Jazz are
really just they're they're not about this season

345
00:21:37,440 --> 00:21:40,200
at all, Like they're maybe they
still kind of stumble into the plan because

346
00:21:40,279 --> 00:21:44,480
Lowry Marketing and Walker Kessler are so
good. Oshak Bashi has been really good

347
00:21:44,880 --> 00:21:48,519
lately. They have Jordan Clarkson,
of course, so there's a possibility that

348
00:21:48,519 --> 00:21:52,440
they don't get much worse. But
they've now you know, continue to stack

349
00:21:52,480 --> 00:21:53,359
their deck for the future. And
I think people need to look at this

350
00:21:53,400 --> 00:21:56,759
in terms of cap space, even
though free agency has changed, even though

351
00:21:56,839 --> 00:22:02,720
Utah's not a desire the most desirable
mark get. Having that flexibility absolutely matters.

352
00:22:02,880 --> 00:22:07,880
So Pippin and from Ryan and Beasley
and Pippen junior chemistry would be fire.

353
00:22:08,759 --> 00:22:11,599
I'll take your words for that one. That one Ryan. So for

354
00:22:11,640 --> 00:22:15,799
the Lakers of the implication here is
just like they're clearly going for it.

355
00:22:15,880 --> 00:22:18,519
I think a lot of people viewed
some of the moments from a D and

356
00:22:18,599 --> 00:22:25,200
Lebron when Lebron broke Kaream scoring record
as something that felt like finality or closure.

357
00:22:25,279 --> 00:22:26,440
A D just looked completely off that
night. When you look at his

358
00:22:26,480 --> 00:22:30,799
interview, his body language, the
way he played on the court, I

359
00:22:30,799 --> 00:22:33,480
thought he was hurt. There was
like the one hustle play made was diving

360
00:22:33,519 --> 00:22:37,319
into the stance or like a random
loose ball. There was the sound bite

361
00:22:37,359 --> 00:22:41,200
of Lebron like telling Ady he loved
him. Hopefully Ady wasn't injured or going

362
00:22:41,200 --> 00:22:42,480
through something, but that was sort
of weird. This at least shows like

363
00:22:42,480 --> 00:22:47,119
the Lakers are really committed to this
core and I think it's not just about

364
00:22:47,160 --> 00:22:48,559
this season. The m RS was
only twenty six, Like this is something

365
00:22:48,599 --> 00:22:52,880
that kind of gives them more of
an open ended window and aligned to doing

366
00:22:52,920 --> 00:22:56,359
other things over the summer. And
look, this trade is objectively better for

367
00:22:56,400 --> 00:23:02,640
them to me than giving up two
first round picks and uh, you know,

368
00:23:02,759 --> 00:23:06,240
to get Kyrie Irving. I would
prefer this trade eleven times out of

369
00:23:06,240 --> 00:23:10,440
ten to the Kyrie Irving scenario that
was that was on the table for them.

370
00:23:10,920 --> 00:23:12,759
Let's get to this other trade before
I wrap up. So the Blazers

371
00:23:12,759 --> 00:23:17,279
are trading Josh Hart to the New
York Knicks in exchange for Cam Reddish,

372
00:23:17,440 --> 00:23:21,880
Ryan Archidiacono, Shia mckail Luke,
and a protected future first round pick.

373
00:23:22,759 --> 00:23:29,119
I don't know that we've seen what
pick is coming from the Knicks there.

374
00:23:29,640 --> 00:23:33,200
Uh, it's going to turn into
though it's a lottery protected and it's going

375
00:23:33,319 --> 00:23:37,240
to turn into four second rounders.
I don't like. Is that going to

376
00:23:37,319 --> 00:23:41,359
be Dallas's or the Knicks? Is
that the Knicks's own? There's a chance

377
00:23:41,440 --> 00:23:44,359
that the Knicks still finish in the
lottery, I guess, But if it's

378
00:23:44,480 --> 00:23:48,759
if it's Dallases or the Knicks,
my bet would be, like, you

379
00:23:48,839 --> 00:23:51,599
know, neither of those teams are
probably gonna finish in the lottery. The

380
00:23:51,680 --> 00:23:55,480
Knicks are just sort of iffy there
there's seven in the East. The Hawks

381
00:23:55,519 --> 00:23:57,440
have been parking up a little bit
lately though they have lost two straight.

382
00:23:57,480 --> 00:24:00,000
But then it's like, oh the
Bulls, wrapp There's Wizards, Pacers or

383
00:24:00,039 --> 00:24:04,920
any of those teams really gonna put
pressure on the Knicks. Maybe they like

384
00:24:06,319 --> 00:24:07,720
it feels like they'll get in via
the play in and then Dallas I think

385
00:24:07,759 --> 00:24:11,119
just might be a depending on when
Lukadanci comes back and how the Kyrie Irving

386
00:24:11,200 --> 00:24:15,319
fit works out, that that might
just be like a flat out like playoff

387
00:24:15,400 --> 00:24:18,119
team in the West, which is
you know, that's fine. I don't

388
00:24:18,200 --> 00:24:22,519
love the idea. Josh hart Is
gives you some defense, some rebounding.

389
00:24:22,240 --> 00:24:26,920
He is first team all, doesn't
shoot as well from three for his career

390
00:24:26,400 --> 00:24:30,480
as you think, but he's going
to give you like a lot of just

391
00:24:30,880 --> 00:24:36,039
gusto, as I think Clive Fraser
would say in transition. And so maybe

392
00:24:36,079 --> 00:24:37,960
that just adds like like a different
cadence to some of New York's games.

393
00:24:38,000 --> 00:24:41,440
But he's got thirty point four percent
from three this year, almost sixty percent

394
00:24:41,559 --> 00:24:45,119
on Two's again, a really good
rebounder, not much of a score can

395
00:24:45,200 --> 00:24:48,039
make. It can be like a
just a fine ball mover, secondary passer,

396
00:24:48,400 --> 00:24:51,480
someone who I think adds value,
but he's going to be a free

397
00:24:51,519 --> 00:24:53,200
agent. He has a player option. So if you're giving up a protected

398
00:24:53,200 --> 00:24:56,559
first round pick here that that looks
like my guests would be that it will

399
00:24:56,720 --> 00:25:04,720
convey like I don't, I don't
love it, like I don't love it.

400
00:25:04,880 --> 00:25:08,880
I just don't. I don't.
I guess I don't understand it.

401
00:25:10,160 --> 00:25:14,279
He played with Jalon Brunson at Villanova, so that's super fun. What does

402
00:25:14,400 --> 00:25:17,400
this say about how they're gonna flesh
out the rest of the rotation. I

403
00:25:17,440 --> 00:25:19,119
mean, if anything, look,
the trade deadline is not done. But

404
00:25:19,240 --> 00:25:23,240
when you look at the depth chart, like Josh Hart should probably and we'll

405
00:25:23,240 --> 00:25:26,039
see if Tims is invented enough to
do this, that's someone who could play

406
00:25:26,079 --> 00:25:30,279
some small ball four and it's that
gonna make it. You know, we're

407
00:25:30,359 --> 00:25:36,599
just gonna bury Obie Topping even further
in the rotation for that. I guess

408
00:25:36,640 --> 00:25:38,000
you can look at it as Okay, now your wings are kind of Quentin

409
00:25:38,039 --> 00:25:41,880
Grimes, RJ. Barrett and Josh
Hart. That's not overkill by by any

410
00:25:41,960 --> 00:25:45,440
stretch. And there you're gonna have
a lot of good defensive minutes. If

411
00:25:45,519 --> 00:25:48,440
you play him with quickly, if
you play him with Grimes, and you

412
00:25:48,519 --> 00:25:52,480
know, pair them with heart maybe
Mitchell Robinson up front, there's gonna be

413
00:25:52,480 --> 00:25:55,920
a lot of damage done there defensively, so it's not looking at their death

414
00:25:56,000 --> 00:25:57,440
chart. It's not overkills. It
seemed to me with First Clans. I

415
00:25:57,559 --> 00:26:00,720
just don't get. I know,
you don't have cap space this year,

416
00:26:00,759 --> 00:26:03,640
so you wouldn't have been able to
sign them out right, But I don't

417
00:26:03,640 --> 00:26:07,279
get giving up a protected first round
pick here if it's just their own,

418
00:26:07,480 --> 00:26:11,240
because I do think they're probably less
likely to make the lottery than the Mavericks.

419
00:26:11,240 --> 00:26:18,279
I'm not really sure. Perhaps I
just, you know, I guess

420
00:26:18,319 --> 00:26:25,480
it's nice that I don't know.
It's I don't love this deal for that.

421
00:26:25,519 --> 00:26:26,519
I can't get into it. It's
just that it's going to turn into

422
00:26:26,559 --> 00:26:32,519
four future second round picks if the
if the selection is not conveyed this year.

423
00:26:33,880 --> 00:26:38,119
I'm not like, I don't I
don't love this. I'm just I

424
00:26:38,240 --> 00:26:41,599
know the Knicks have two twenty twenty
three first this year, and they could

425
00:26:41,640 --> 00:26:45,559
technically have more, but the picks
that they have from Detroit and Washington aren't

426
00:26:45,559 --> 00:26:49,279
going to convey, so they have
two twenty twenty three first two first round

427
00:26:49,319 --> 00:26:55,559
picks in this draft is not overkill? And what is this? DJ ben

428
00:26:56,000 --> 00:27:00,279
uh? Now, all we have
to do is fire Pam whoa, that's

429
00:27:00,319 --> 00:27:03,960
a Lakers trade comment. You want
Darwinham fired already. I don't really know

430
00:27:03,039 --> 00:27:07,240
that Darwin him has done anything that's
warranted being dismissed in LA even if you

431
00:27:07,240 --> 00:27:10,400
haven't been inspired by the job he's
done. Look at the roster they gave

432
00:27:10,480 --> 00:27:12,680
him to start to see how much
time if the Davis missed as well.

433
00:27:12,880 --> 00:27:17,640
So yeah, I don't. I
don't love it. I'm not gonna kill

434
00:27:17,680 --> 00:27:19,440
the next for it, like I
get it, I don't. I guess

435
00:27:19,480 --> 00:27:22,720
some the logic would be, Ah, they were never gonna play two rookies

436
00:27:22,799 --> 00:27:25,480
or even one rookie. That's the
way that TIPS would operate. I just

437
00:27:25,640 --> 00:27:30,039
two rookies is not It's not overkill
here, So there doesn't need to be

438
00:27:30,240 --> 00:27:32,640
like this, Oh we needed to
move off of these picks. It would

439
00:27:32,640 --> 00:27:36,640
be different if you had all four
first coming in, but you don't.

440
00:27:37,039 --> 00:27:40,119
We know two of them just aren't
going to convey in Detroit and Washington.

441
00:27:40,359 --> 00:27:42,880
So I just don't love it.
I guess the fit is there, but

442
00:27:42,920 --> 00:27:47,720
you don't do anything to improve your
spacing here. I do wonder what does

443
00:27:47,720 --> 00:27:49,440
this say about maybe there if you
want to read superinto what does this say

444
00:27:49,440 --> 00:27:52,599
about their faith and RJ? Barrett? Are they gonna they've just paid Barrett

445
00:27:52,680 --> 00:27:55,920
his deal kick in, they're gonna
pay Heart. You don't give up a

446
00:27:56,000 --> 00:27:59,079
protected future first, I would say, if you don't plan on paying Heart,

447
00:27:59,359 --> 00:28:02,720
just sort of a curious move.
It feels very this season focused to

448
00:28:02,799 --> 00:28:06,960
like really push their defense, which
if you're betting on this quiet and saying

449
00:28:07,000 --> 00:28:08,519
like we think this is gonna nudge
us towards the playoffs, then yeah,

450
00:28:08,960 --> 00:28:12,160
that's fine. I just I don't
love this move for New York. If

451
00:28:12,200 --> 00:28:15,839
I was to grade this one,
I haven't written about it yet, but

452
00:28:15,839 --> 00:28:18,720
I probably give it like a C. Maybe a C, maybe a C

453
00:28:18,880 --> 00:28:21,160
minus, not a not a D. You'm not gonna kill it or anything

454
00:28:21,599 --> 00:28:26,000
like that. I think it's fine
for the Blazers. They get another conditional

455
00:28:26,079 --> 00:28:30,440
first round pick that they can technically
reroute as part of other deals, which

456
00:28:30,480 --> 00:28:33,440
is good because they can't trade their
own and their other picks are just encumbered

457
00:28:33,480 --> 00:28:38,799
by that protection. To Chicago,
they have lottery protected through twenty twenty eight

458
00:28:40,079 --> 00:28:42,920
is the is that pick that they
owe to the Bulls, and so that

459
00:28:44,839 --> 00:28:48,839
definitely hamstrung them and other talks.
You're also you get the flyer on Cam

460
00:28:48,920 --> 00:28:52,680
Reddish if you're gonna keep him.
So there's that. To consider the fact

461
00:28:52,720 --> 00:28:56,079
that they took that they did a
three for one here, it does mean

462
00:28:56,119 --> 00:28:59,079
that there's probably more other moves to
follow. We know that they were shopping

463
00:28:59,519 --> 00:29:02,960
use of Kitch. It's we knew
they weren't gonna keep Josh Hard and so

464
00:29:03,039 --> 00:29:04,680
to get a conditional first round pick
and a flyer on right as you're betting

465
00:29:04,680 --> 00:29:07,920
that the Knicks are going to make
the playoffs, essentially, let's say,

466
00:29:07,359 --> 00:29:11,160
and that's a fine gamble to make. I don't love it for them,

467
00:29:11,279 --> 00:29:15,359
but I think the idea that now
you can trade the concept of a first

468
00:29:15,440 --> 00:29:18,640
round pick because you can't guarantee it, but that was something you really couldn't

469
00:29:18,680 --> 00:29:26,160
do before. Now that you can
actually do that. Now that you can

470
00:29:26,200 --> 00:29:27,599
actually do that, I think opens
up some more doors for them. So

471
00:29:27,799 --> 00:29:30,559
I'm very interesting what they do for
the rest of this deadline or how much

472
00:29:30,680 --> 00:29:34,960
Cam might even play. Fk Retro
says, this heart being there hurt quickly

473
00:29:36,160 --> 00:29:40,680
in grimes rotations at all. See
I thought of it the other way.

474
00:29:40,680 --> 00:29:41,440
To me, I think it makes
less sense for the Blazers, but your

475
00:29:41,480 --> 00:29:45,839
thought process makes sense. I'd be
curious you could throw in the channel or

476
00:29:45,880 --> 00:29:48,160
up there. Why do you think
it makes less sense for the Blazers if

477
00:29:48,160 --> 00:29:51,559
we're just operating under the assumption that
they weren't going to pay Heart, just

478
00:29:51,680 --> 00:29:53,519
with Jeremy Grant also about to get
paid, and they just resigned, They

479
00:29:53,559 --> 00:29:59,319
extended Dame, they resigned Simon's,
they resigned nurk Kitch. I don't think

480
00:29:59,359 --> 00:30:03,759
they were ever going to I don't
think they were ever going to keep Heart,

481
00:30:03,119 --> 00:30:06,519
and I don't think that they were
ever you know, everyone talked about,

482
00:30:06,559 --> 00:30:08,000
oh teams are interested in Heart.
I couldn't really think of a no

483
00:30:08,079 --> 00:30:11,759
brain or destination for Josh Hart.
The Knicks were one of them. I

484
00:30:11,880 --> 00:30:14,880
just never thought they'd give up a
first for him, even conditionally. I

485
00:30:14,920 --> 00:30:18,000
thought it'd be like Isaiah Hartenstein if
the Blazers wanted another Reserve Big Look or

486
00:30:18,119 --> 00:30:22,240
Cam Reddish in seconds to get Josh
Hart, which, by the way,

487
00:30:22,319 --> 00:30:25,720
that could end up being what this
is. And that's perfectly fine for the

488
00:30:25,759 --> 00:30:29,599
Knicks, but I for the Blazers, like, yeah, I do think

489
00:30:29,640 --> 00:30:33,519
it's Josh Hart's been so I don't
even like up and down this year that

490
00:30:33,799 --> 00:30:37,279
I do think Blazers fans got not
that they turned on him, but like

491
00:30:37,359 --> 00:30:41,599
weren't super high on having him now
or long term. And so you could

492
00:30:41,640 --> 00:30:45,480
look at it as, Okay,
we just lost someone who's averaging. I

493
00:30:45,519 --> 00:30:48,799
think he was at thirty three plus
minutes per game, but he wasn't scoring

494
00:30:48,839 --> 00:30:52,359
a ton viewing, how are you
going to replace his minutes? I guess

495
00:30:52,440 --> 00:30:56,599
gets super interesting there because that look
that is you know, no bones about

496
00:30:56,640 --> 00:31:00,079
it, like that's those are a
ton of minutes to actually so that you

497
00:31:00,160 --> 00:31:03,599
have to figure that out. And
Cam Reddish is not some bankable someone who's

498
00:31:03,599 --> 00:31:07,960
gonna come in. He's not going
to replace hearts rebounding, that's for sure.

499
00:31:07,039 --> 00:31:11,440
He's not going to replace hearts.
I guess like he has the he's

500
00:31:11,440 --> 00:31:15,119
not going to replace hearts like kind
of girth on defense. So look,

501
00:31:15,200 --> 00:31:18,160
it's you could get there by okay, if Justice's Winslow is healthy, maybe

502
00:31:18,160 --> 00:31:22,000
they're just playing on upping and shading
Sharp's minutes. And then you also Gary

503
00:31:22,039 --> 00:31:23,480
Payton the second pack, so that
makes this a little bit more palable.

504
00:31:23,720 --> 00:31:27,440
Addition to if not little is healthy, so you play him aton in addition

505
00:31:27,480 --> 00:31:30,960
to, let's see what this flyer
is on Reddish and if he pans out,

506
00:31:30,000 --> 00:31:33,960
look maybe you have a cheaper option
now that you get to keep in

507
00:31:33,079 --> 00:31:38,119
restricted free agency. So I get
the lottery from play even if you don't

508
00:31:38,119 --> 00:31:41,079
love the trade for the Blazers,
I get. And there are concerns,

509
00:31:41,119 --> 00:31:42,680
like I said, how are you
going to fill that rotation? I do

510
00:31:42,799 --> 00:31:47,640
think they just have options where you're
definitely not gonna lose too much offensively going

511
00:31:47,720 --> 00:31:51,480
from heart to like the names that
I listed, But Cam Reddish is such

512
00:31:51,480 --> 00:31:52,599
a stab in the dark that there
was a chance that, oh, did

513
00:31:52,640 --> 00:31:56,200
we just trade Josh Hart for four
seconds? And that's kind of just like

514
00:31:56,319 --> 00:32:00,440
a whatever deal. But you also
chance to get a first You've decided to

515
00:32:00,480 --> 00:32:02,359
bet on the fact that the Knicks
are going to make the playoffs, and

516
00:32:02,359 --> 00:32:06,440
the Knicks have decided, I guess, to not bet on the fact that

517
00:32:06,480 --> 00:32:08,119
they're gonna make the playoffs, but
that making the playoffs means something to them.

518
00:32:08,160 --> 00:32:13,079
Otherwise you don't you don't give up
this conditional first round pick. The

519
00:32:13,160 --> 00:32:16,079
Reddish trade initial one those you gave
up a conditional first that might never convey.

520
00:32:16,240 --> 00:32:20,160
But now you've given up two conditional
first. It's part of like to

521
00:32:20,400 --> 00:32:22,400
get Cam Reddish and then to get
rid of him, and you end up

522
00:32:22,400 --> 00:32:27,039
with Josh Hart for two conditional first
and that's what it amounts to. I

523
00:32:27,160 --> 00:32:30,599
again, it's just like a like
I don't really know how to feel about

524
00:32:30,640 --> 00:32:32,079
that. I certainly I don't.
I don't hate it. I don't love

525
00:32:32,119 --> 00:32:36,559
it. I don't know what I
don't. I guess I really don't know

526
00:32:36,599 --> 00:32:38,359
how to how to feel about it, but I will say that I think

527
00:32:38,400 --> 00:32:45,960
that it's mostly just flat out uninspiring. I just don't really have a like

528
00:32:45,079 --> 00:32:47,640
A I don't love this deal for
the Knicks. I don't think you have

529
00:32:47,759 --> 00:32:51,960
to love it for the Blazers,
but I think it makes more sense for

530
00:32:52,039 --> 00:32:53,720
them, and I like it better
for them. DJ Ben has something on

531
00:32:53,799 --> 00:32:57,400
the Lakers trade. The lineup hand
puts out on the floor stupid in my

532
00:32:57,440 --> 00:32:59,519
opinion, I'm sure he's going to
mess up, even though we got some

533
00:32:59,599 --> 00:33:01,240
good play years now, more spacing
etched. But I don't think he's a

534
00:33:01,240 --> 00:33:05,319
good coach. I just tell me
what lineups he's playing that you're mad at,

535
00:33:05,440 --> 00:33:07,839
and then what your alternatives would be
when you're looking at which players have

536
00:33:07,880 --> 00:33:10,720
been available, which players are actually
on the roster, I don't you know

537
00:33:12,039 --> 00:33:15,200
you can quibble about some of them, like some of those really ultra small

538
00:33:15,240 --> 00:33:17,519
Lakers lineups that we've seen over the
course of season. Yeah, I get

539
00:33:17,599 --> 00:33:21,759
that, but it's not like he
was just dealt this hand that had all

540
00:33:21,839 --> 00:33:25,279
these options here either, So I
just I can't I'm not willing to really,

541
00:33:25,720 --> 00:33:30,960
like, I know that Russell Westbrook
was a scapegoat and that he was

542
00:33:30,039 --> 00:33:32,319
not the sole reason that LA was
where they was. That was on like

543
00:33:32,359 --> 00:33:36,400
the front office and Genie Bus flat
out like those are the people most responsible.

544
00:33:36,680 --> 00:33:37,640
I don't know, even if you're
not high on Darvin Ham, I

545
00:33:37,680 --> 00:33:43,880
don't know that we've seen enough from
him to just like with a quality roster

546
00:33:44,079 --> 00:33:47,240
and a fully healthy roster, to
make too many snap judgments about him.

547
00:33:47,880 --> 00:33:51,279
We are probably getting to the point
we're gonna wrap up here, So if

548
00:33:51,279 --> 00:33:53,160
you have any questions, what were
any other deadline questions you want to throw

549
00:33:53,640 --> 00:33:58,240
in the chat? There's not a
lot of other like real juicy news items

550
00:33:58,279 --> 00:34:01,680
going around. Did it see Boston's
jail and down suffered a facial fracture per

551
00:34:01,759 --> 00:34:05,559
shams and we'll miss some time.
He took an elbow to the face from

552
00:34:05,920 --> 00:34:08,239
from Jason Tatum. He's now sidelined
through at least the All Star break.

553
00:34:08,280 --> 00:34:13,840
He's gonna have a follow up with
a specialist on Thursday. That's really something

554
00:34:13,920 --> 00:34:17,480
to monitor. Doubt it impacts Boston's
trade deadline plans at all, but that'll

555
00:34:17,480 --> 00:34:21,920
wind up being a huge loss for
the Celtics. Predict, Oh, this

556
00:34:22,039 --> 00:34:25,079
is fun. Predict the next trade
right now? This is this is tough.

557
00:34:25,239 --> 00:34:29,599
So who will be the next player
to get moved? So now that's

558
00:34:29,599 --> 00:34:31,679
sort of the Malik Beasley like one
of the jazz Like all of the Jazz

559
00:34:31,760 --> 00:34:37,880
dominoes have fallen and di'angelo Russell's off
the table, and we kind of at

560
00:34:37,960 --> 00:34:39,519
least as it could change, we
saw it change with you know what what

561
00:34:39,599 --> 00:34:43,880
Woud was saying about James Harden last
year the day before the deadline, James

562
00:34:43,960 --> 00:34:45,320
Harden isn't getting traded. The morning
of the deadline, he was like,

563
00:34:45,360 --> 00:34:49,119
oh, James Harden kind of wants
out and there might be a deal coming

564
00:34:49,159 --> 00:34:52,199
about. So we could see something
like that with Kevin Durant as my point,

565
00:34:52,280 --> 00:34:55,639
but I wouldn't expect it the team
that I'm watching the I think the

566
00:34:55,800 --> 00:35:00,320
Raptors will be the team that moved
someone next. I'm gonna say that it's

567
00:35:00,360 --> 00:35:02,960
going to be at least give me
two players here, a Fred van Fleet

568
00:35:04,079 --> 00:35:07,719
or o Gianna Noby trade. I
do wonder if the fact that the Knicks

569
00:35:07,159 --> 00:35:13,400
got Josh Hart means that they deemed
o Gianna Noby ungettable and so that the

570
00:35:13,480 --> 00:35:15,920
Raptors are less likely to move him. I still think like a Gary Trent

571
00:35:15,000 --> 00:35:20,239
Junior or Fred van Fleet trade is
eminently on the table. I would say

572
00:35:20,960 --> 00:35:25,440
that two Gary Trent junior suitors are
off the table. I'd like because the

573
00:35:25,519 --> 00:35:29,159
Knicks were good Gary Trench Junior destination
in my opinion, I thought they were

574
00:35:29,159 --> 00:35:30,920
good for Mollie Beasley too, and
I thought they were good. He was

575
00:35:30,960 --> 00:35:36,199
a good target for the Lakers.
I don't know if he still is.

576
00:35:36,360 --> 00:35:38,920
When you have like, do you
tray Mollie Beasley for Gary Trent Junior?

577
00:35:38,960 --> 00:35:42,840
Like? Is that something you think
Gary Trench Junior is enough of a defensive

578
00:35:42,920 --> 00:35:46,559
upgrade. He's younger that if it
was Mollie Beasley and the Raptors of value

579
00:35:46,559 --> 00:35:50,480
having that team control of the next
year rather than having to pay Gary Trent

580
00:35:50,519 --> 00:35:52,199
Junior. Can we see that type
of a deal Maybe, But I do

581
00:35:52,320 --> 00:35:59,440
think we've kind of seen two potential
G G T J destinations go off the

582
00:35:59,480 --> 00:36:01,800
table here. Fk Rete, I'm
leaning towards the Raptors traded something compass.

583
00:36:01,920 --> 00:36:05,760
Yeah, I'm right there with you. I'm wondering which player it will be

584
00:36:05,800 --> 00:36:07,679
if we had a predicted player.
I've I've been back and forth on everything.

585
00:36:08,079 --> 00:36:12,320
At one point, I assume that
og and and Nobi was basically untouchable,

586
00:36:12,360 --> 00:36:14,880
and now I almost feel like he's
the second most likely Raptor to be

587
00:36:14,920 --> 00:36:16,760
traded, if not the most likely. I am just wondering what it says

588
00:36:17,239 --> 00:36:22,159
about the Raptors willingness to move Og
or his market in general, or they're

589
00:36:22,159 --> 00:36:24,559
asking price that the Knicks have basically
pulled themselves. They had the picks to

590
00:36:24,599 --> 00:36:28,000
give up to get them. But
I don't know why you would trade Josh

591
00:36:28,079 --> 00:36:30,519
hard and then also turn around and
get Og again. They could do it,

592
00:36:30,880 --> 00:36:35,679
but I don't think that that's I
don't think that's something they will do,

593
00:36:35,719 --> 00:36:37,159
and so I'm just gonna look at
Fred van Fleet here, and they're

594
00:36:37,239 --> 00:36:40,320
the team that I'm watching. I
think the other like teams that could define

595
00:36:40,320 --> 00:36:44,960
the trade deadline now, especially look
the Jazz again, maybe they surprise us

596
00:36:45,000 --> 00:36:49,000
and move like a Clarkson or a
Sexton, But aside from there, they've

597
00:36:49,039 --> 00:36:51,519
played there. It just feels like
they've played all the players we were talking

598
00:36:51,519 --> 00:36:53,719
about. It just it was Vanderbilt
Willie, Beasley and Conley with a little

599
00:36:53,719 --> 00:36:58,079
bit of a link and Clarkson and
Sexton. Talks sprinkled and they've they've not

600
00:36:58,199 --> 00:37:04,280
dealt the three most likely players to
be traded. So yeah, that's just

601
00:37:04,440 --> 00:37:08,400
like I think it's aside from Toronto, when we get I think Atlanta is

602
00:37:08,440 --> 00:37:12,239
a team that could wind up to
finding sort of the deadline. Do they

603
00:37:12,280 --> 00:37:17,079
move John Collins and then also just
sneakily Brooklyn because they prioritize the return in

604
00:37:17,119 --> 00:37:22,320
the Kevin Durant trade. That screams, hey, we want to continue winning

605
00:37:22,400 --> 00:37:25,599
now and we'll be open to moving
these picks or other players. Do they

606
00:37:25,639 --> 00:37:28,639
get in on the van Fleet sweep
stays? But then we also have the

607
00:37:28,679 --> 00:37:31,519
reports from which that Katie's talking to
them about his future, and I don't

608
00:37:31,559 --> 00:37:36,000
think if you're the Nets, I
don't think you could make any other like

609
00:37:36,199 --> 00:37:43,960
now focused trade without an assurance that
Kevin Durant is going to stay, is

610
00:37:44,039 --> 00:37:46,280
going to stay with you beyond this
season. Like you can't just move that

611
00:37:46,519 --> 00:37:52,679
like picks now on a lark.
Like you definitely can't do that because if

612
00:37:52,679 --> 00:37:54,480
he then he wants out, you've
now like moved future equity there. You

613
00:37:54,480 --> 00:37:58,320
don't recruit a ton of it in
the Kevin Durant trade. But unless you're

614
00:37:58,320 --> 00:38:00,800
getting a player back that you can
then reroute for I guess like the similar

615
00:38:00,880 --> 00:38:07,320
value or even more that you more
than you gave up to get him,

616
00:38:07,639 --> 00:38:10,480
that's just too much like an iffy
proposition there. And so I'm wondering just

617
00:38:10,639 --> 00:38:15,039
what they do. And I would
like, you know, this is like

618
00:38:15,199 --> 00:38:17,239
only tangentially related, but I really
want if we're going through the teams that

619
00:38:17,320 --> 00:38:22,239
I want Okay Record to say,
yeah, I'm hoping FV and Collins both

620
00:38:22,280 --> 00:38:24,599
get moved. Look, I just
feel like John Collins needs to get moved.

621
00:38:24,639 --> 00:38:28,360
Miles Turner signed an extension with the
Pacers, so now him being there's

622
00:38:28,360 --> 00:38:30,480
on him. And I know Collins
resigned with the Hawks as well, but

623
00:38:30,840 --> 00:38:34,280
he's been involved in trade rumors for
so long. But the offers that you

624
00:38:34,400 --> 00:38:38,400
see out there for him are just
so I know he has seventy five million

625
00:38:38,559 --> 00:38:42,119
or whatever left on his deal over
the next three years. Oh my god,

626
00:38:42,760 --> 00:38:46,079
his value to me isn't that low. I think if you get I

627
00:38:46,159 --> 00:38:50,360
think, if you like get him
in a system where he can at least

628
00:38:50,360 --> 00:38:52,519
be more of a roller, at
least more often than he Isn't Atlanta now

629
00:38:53,199 --> 00:38:55,679
that you're going to be fine.
Indiana's the perfect destination for him, but

630
00:38:55,679 --> 00:39:00,480
you need a third team to send
Atlanta immediate players teams that I want to

631
00:39:00,599 --> 00:39:02,760
see make a move though. I
really would like to see the Kings just

632
00:39:02,840 --> 00:39:06,159
to get like, let's get weird. You're third in the West and your

633
00:39:06,199 --> 00:39:08,079
margin for error isn't that huge,
Like what can you do? And then

634
00:39:08,159 --> 00:39:14,079
Phoenix, I'm just kind of looking
at them there. If the character,

635
00:39:14,119 --> 00:39:16,880
if the Clips get both Fev and
Collins somehow be pretty happy. I would

636
00:39:16,880 --> 00:39:21,280
be fucking floored if they were able
to do that at this point. I

637
00:39:21,360 --> 00:39:23,320
guess in that scen area, you're
giving up both your swaps, a first

638
00:39:23,400 --> 00:39:27,119
round pick and Terrence Mann. I
don't know if that's enough to get you

639
00:39:27,239 --> 00:39:30,079
both. I think they could definitely
get one, and it wouldn't shock me

640
00:39:30,119 --> 00:39:32,599
to see them get one. I'd
probably prefer to see van Fleet there.

641
00:39:32,679 --> 00:39:36,559
They've already been linked to Russell Westbrook
on the buy out market, which is

642
00:39:36,559 --> 00:39:38,559
a little concerning because this isn't even
a shot at Russ. I just don't

643
00:39:38,599 --> 00:39:43,000
think he's a great fit for that
roster. It's like what if John Wall

644
00:39:43,199 --> 00:39:45,800
took even worse shots at some points. I just like he's been better than

645
00:39:45,880 --> 00:39:52,559
john Wall this season. I just
don't love to fit there, But I

646
00:39:52,599 --> 00:39:54,559
would like to see, like,
what's gonna happen with the Suns. They're

647
00:39:54,840 --> 00:40:00,159
they're kind of a what is this
Dale Ruca No we talked about? Is

648
00:40:00,239 --> 00:40:04,840
that in reference to Russ to the
Clips or what what's happening there? You

649
00:40:04,920 --> 00:40:07,159
worry about Rust to the Suns,
but the Suns, I'm just very much

650
00:40:07,599 --> 00:40:13,440
fk Retro and Russ to the Eclips. Yuck. I'm very much intreasing what

651
00:40:13,559 --> 00:40:16,000
the Suns do because now that the
Kevin Durant spector, which was already looming

652
00:40:16,039 --> 00:40:20,800
over what they were always gonna do. How do you give up future assets

653
00:40:20,920 --> 00:40:23,119
if you think that you might also, Yeah, this is to get back

654
00:40:23,159 --> 00:40:25,920
to Westbrook from Mecca Rotter. You've
been linked to the Bulls. That makes

655
00:40:25,960 --> 00:40:30,880
no fucking sense either, Like I
guess because you don't have Lonzo, But

656
00:40:30,960 --> 00:40:31,960
no, I don't. I don't
want to see Russ and de Rosen and

657
00:40:32,079 --> 00:40:36,159
Lavine. No, that is not
That is not a coherent team. I

658
00:40:36,199 --> 00:40:37,360
don't know. The Bulls just can't
get out of their own way if they're

659
00:40:37,360 --> 00:40:42,239
gonna move one of those guys,
like maybe, but it's not even Caruso

660
00:40:42,280 --> 00:40:44,360
would have to be de Rosen or
Lavine. And at that point, like,

661
00:40:44,840 --> 00:40:49,239
what are you what, what are
you like even doing if you're moving

662
00:40:49,280 --> 00:40:52,599
to Rosen and then signing Russ,
Like what is the actual endgame? I

663
00:40:52,639 --> 00:40:54,480
struggle to see their in game now. No, Dala Muca, I'm not

664
00:40:54,559 --> 00:40:58,199
I'm not moving Russ to the Suns. That would be. They were interested

665
00:40:58,199 --> 00:41:00,360
in Kyrie though, so I have
question their decision making a little bit,

666
00:41:00,440 --> 00:41:06,159
but to like to that end with
the Suns now that KD is just very

667
00:41:06,920 --> 00:41:10,199
very likely to be back on the
table because if not this season, over

668
00:41:10,280 --> 00:41:15,480
the off season after the Kyrie trade, can you justify I mean you could

669
00:41:15,519 --> 00:41:20,440
justify, but how likely are you
to trade a first like a future first

670
00:41:20,519 --> 00:41:22,079
round pick, or even you're twenty
twenty three first round pick, which is

671
00:41:22,119 --> 00:41:25,360
just more valuable than it was before
the Devin Booker injury. Quite frankly,

672
00:41:25,719 --> 00:41:28,679
you could go the other route,
though, and say, well, you

673
00:41:28,760 --> 00:41:30,280
know the Suns are now fifth in
the West, like they've quietly you know,

674
00:41:30,320 --> 00:41:32,199
they're on a three game winning streak
right now, like when eight of

675
00:41:32,199 --> 00:41:37,000
their last ten the offense has been
like ify without Devin Booker, but he's

676
00:41:37,039 --> 00:41:40,840
back now you are quite literally only
three losses back from being in the third

677
00:41:40,920 --> 00:41:44,119
seed in the West, And so
why wouldn't you just go for it even

678
00:41:44,119 --> 00:41:47,559
if you can't kick KD But knowing
that Pascal Siakam would be a target for

679
00:41:47,639 --> 00:41:50,840
this team, knowing that Kevin Durant
would be a target for this team,

680
00:41:50,920 --> 00:41:53,440
and then also knowing that those two
players are more likely than not along with

681
00:41:53,559 --> 00:41:58,159
other ones like what happens at brandon
Ingram hits the market in New Orleans or

682
00:41:58,199 --> 00:42:00,679
whatever. But knowing that the star
trade market is going to open up even

683
00:42:00,719 --> 00:42:05,679
further over the off season, do
you have the guts to make a bigger

684
00:42:05,719 --> 00:42:08,079
trade now? And that would be
a stark departure from the way that James

685
00:42:08,159 --> 00:42:12,719
Jones is operated even when the trade
market wasn't this turbulent where you knew that

686
00:42:12,840 --> 00:42:15,760
you were coming off of Finals Birth
last year, for instance, and you

687
00:42:15,800 --> 00:42:17,960
didn't just go out and get Eric
Gordon at the time. Maybe there's a

688
00:42:19,079 --> 00:42:22,159
move they can make to sort of
straddle, you know, can you just

689
00:42:22,280 --> 00:42:23,519
get Eric Gordon for seconds and call
it a day and say, like,

690
00:42:23,599 --> 00:42:27,519
let's just see where this is will
reevaluate over the off season. I know

691
00:42:27,599 --> 00:42:30,440
they've been linked to Fred van Fleet. I don't hate that for them,

692
00:42:30,599 --> 00:42:34,199
Actually, I just question what the
package would be going out there. But

693
00:42:34,280 --> 00:42:37,000
I also just questioned in general,
well, how committed to you are you

694
00:42:37,239 --> 00:42:40,239
to making a move when you don't
know what's going to happen with Kevin Durant

695
00:42:40,320 --> 00:42:43,800
and his future with the Nets,
and you're gonna want to be in on

696
00:42:43,880 --> 00:42:46,039
him and maybe even Siakam his future
with Toronto, which again I do not

697
00:42:46,159 --> 00:42:50,320
expect to be neither of these futures
to be settled at the deadline, although

698
00:42:50,360 --> 00:42:52,960
for a minute I was like pretty
sure the Nets were just going to trade

699
00:42:52,039 --> 00:42:54,440
Katief in the deadline. Hey,
we have more than twelve hours to go

700
00:42:54,559 --> 00:42:58,400
though, like we have like fourteen
or fifteen hours whatever it is, so

701
00:42:58,480 --> 00:43:02,400
it's still technically possible. I don't
I don't know what to expect from them.

702
00:43:02,480 --> 00:43:07,719
They also have like having the new
owner matt Ishbayah. I like you,

703
00:43:07,960 --> 00:43:13,719
there's the there's the impetus of a
new owner to want to do something

704
00:43:14,079 --> 00:43:15,559
major whenever they come in. We've
seen I mean, look at what happened

705
00:43:15,559 --> 00:43:20,880
with Minnesota with Mark Larey and Alex
Rodriguez coming in and they just go and

706
00:43:21,000 --> 00:43:22,679
like they hired him Connelly and they
made that Ridico bertrade, Like holy shit.

707
00:43:23,280 --> 00:43:27,679
I don't know if something similar will
happen in Phoenix, but like you

708
00:43:27,760 --> 00:43:30,880
could see a little bit of that
there as well. I do think it's

709
00:43:30,880 --> 00:43:34,320
more likely that they do something disorder
strato line in the middle. FK Retro

710
00:43:35,400 --> 00:43:39,039
saying, also Eric Gordon is linked
to the Clippers now too. Apparently he

711
00:43:39,079 --> 00:43:43,039
would be interesting because he gives them
some rim pressure in addition at three point

712
00:43:43,079 --> 00:43:45,199
shooting and could probably play like he's
not going to hurt your defense at all.

713
00:43:45,519 --> 00:43:47,880
I don't know what you give up
to get him from, Like who

714
00:43:47,920 --> 00:43:52,840
would the rockets they would want.
I have no doubt Terrence Man. I'm

715
00:43:52,840 --> 00:43:55,719
not moving Terrence Man for Eric Gordon. You can get to the salary pretty

716
00:43:55,760 --> 00:43:59,920
easy. But I'd just be curious
just to what are you attaching to get

717
00:44:00,159 --> 00:44:04,199
to the money, Like if you're
using Luconnard and Robert Covington and then another

718
00:44:04,280 --> 00:44:07,599
salary, like what is it that? What is it that Houston wants for

719
00:44:07,679 --> 00:44:12,159
me? Is it seconds like a
flyer on Brandon Boston Junior or Jason Preston,

720
00:44:12,440 --> 00:44:15,840
I'm your coffee. You can do
that. I would probably do that.

721
00:44:15,000 --> 00:44:17,840
I like that way better than Russell
Westbrook will tell you that right now.

722
00:44:20,519 --> 00:44:23,719
David Luca says a CP and KD
aging will be very expensive. Yeah,

723
00:44:24,039 --> 00:44:29,159
no shit. I will say that
it helps that CP three could basically

724
00:44:29,159 --> 00:44:31,159
be his last year next season because
he doesn't have a guarant the full guarantee

725
00:44:31,199 --> 00:44:35,440
on the final year of his deal, but three more years of KD going

726
00:44:35,519 --> 00:44:39,000
into his age thirty five season next
year. That is shout out. I

727
00:44:39,039 --> 00:44:42,280
said, no, oh my god, I'm taking it off the screen.

728
00:44:42,800 --> 00:44:45,559
I know you're trolling Dave Muka,
but that was just and then they come

729
00:44:45,599 --> 00:44:47,400
out like you know that you've made
a fucked up decision when you have to

730
00:44:47,440 --> 00:44:52,639
come out and basically retract it.
Like you saw the reporters who were I

731
00:44:52,639 --> 00:44:53,639
don't want to use the word in
their pocket, but it might be more

732
00:44:53,679 --> 00:44:57,519
favorable to their comforts just coming out
right away and saying, oh, no,

733
00:44:57,679 --> 00:44:59,760
no, no, there's been no, there's been no decisions made.

734
00:44:59,800 --> 00:45:01,719
And I sayah, Thomas, that's
how you know that you probably shouldn't have

735
00:45:02,360 --> 00:45:06,960
even thought about doing that in the
first place, especially that no teams should

736
00:45:06,960 --> 00:45:10,559
have considered this, but especially given
what the Suns have been what's been going

737
00:45:10,599 --> 00:45:15,360
on with their workplace culture over the
past two decades. So yeah, that's

738
00:45:15,599 --> 00:45:19,920
uh. And then for Eric Gordon
to La Clippers, Yeah, you think

739
00:45:19,920 --> 00:45:21,840
a third team is in there.
That's a good point too. Is it

740
00:45:22,000 --> 00:45:24,000
like a I don't know, like
how you set that up? Maybe maybe

741
00:45:24,039 --> 00:45:29,079
it's like an eight team trade to
finally involved Jay Crowd or getting moved Joseph

742
00:45:29,199 --> 00:45:34,320
Cruz, Are there any moves in
Charlotte, sir at the moment, Joseph,

743
00:45:34,880 --> 00:45:37,400
No, they should be one of
the more active teams. I will

744
00:45:37,480 --> 00:45:42,960
say there was the report that they
really wanted to get a first round pick

745
00:45:43,000 --> 00:45:46,639
for Mason Plumley. Then than Jazz
got one first round pick for Beasley Vanderbilt

746
00:45:46,760 --> 00:45:49,760
and Mike Conley. I think we'll
tell you that you're not gonna get a

747
00:45:49,760 --> 00:45:52,519
first round pick for Plumley. I
did think that like three of their soon

748
00:45:52,599 --> 00:45:57,039
to be free agents in PJ.
Washington, Mason Plumley, John McDaniels,

749
00:45:57,079 --> 00:46:00,800
and Kellyoobridge Junior would be moved.
I still think will see a multiple of

750
00:46:00,840 --> 00:46:05,320
those guys moved. Probably Mason Plumley
is the most likely one, just because

751
00:46:05,400 --> 00:46:07,320
John McDaniel doesn't seem like he'll be
too expensive and he kind of plays like

752
00:46:07,679 --> 00:46:10,840
a real position of need for them. At least with Plumbly, the air

753
00:46:12,000 --> 00:46:14,679
parent is there and in Mark Williams, and you can also just go find

754
00:46:14,719 --> 00:46:17,199
a Mason Plumley. But I John
McDaniels is sort of a bigger wing type

755
00:46:17,239 --> 00:46:22,519
that's harder to replace. Maybe Kelly
bridge Yours expiring salary will be valuable to

756
00:46:22,599 --> 00:46:27,000
someone, especially if they think he'll
be healthy for the stretch run. But

757
00:46:27,280 --> 00:46:30,159
I don't know for them specific with
targets, I think they're probably more looking

758
00:46:30,199 --> 00:46:35,039
to load up on flyers for youngsters
or picks. Joseph does ask Is.

759
00:46:36,079 --> 00:46:38,920
Rashaun Holmes had a conversation on it. I mean, he'd be interesting in

760
00:46:39,039 --> 00:46:43,400
Charlotte to pair with LaMelo Ball.
I guess if you wanted to give up

761
00:46:43,440 --> 00:46:47,000
Mason Plumley and something else for Rashaun
Holmes, and the Kings are probably compensating

762
00:46:47,039 --> 00:46:50,360
you at that point a little bit
because he's two years and twenty five million

763
00:46:50,480 --> 00:46:53,239
left on his deal. You can
afford to pay him because first of all,

764
00:46:53,239 --> 00:46:55,800
I don't think his contract is that
egregious if you actually play him,

765
00:46:55,840 --> 00:46:59,559
but you know, we'll have to
see maybe really has fallen off that much.

766
00:47:00,280 --> 00:47:01,840
But they can afford to pay him
more than most teams because Mark Williams

767
00:47:01,880 --> 00:47:06,239
is just so cheap and so like
if and I mean, look, look

768
00:47:06,280 --> 00:47:09,360
if you went to if you went
to Sacramento right now and said, we

769
00:47:09,440 --> 00:47:14,519
don't even need compensation for Rashaun Holmes, like we'll just give you Mason Plumley

770
00:47:15,159 --> 00:47:17,000
or even kellyer Bridge junior for Rashaun
Holmes is like a trade that you could

771
00:47:17,000 --> 00:47:19,920
flow, Like, yeah, I
would do that if I'm Charlotte, just

772
00:47:19,960 --> 00:47:22,320
to take the flyer on Rashaun Holmes. He'd be fun to pair with LaMelo

773
00:47:22,400 --> 00:47:25,639
Ball. I also thought about if
they were if they were looking to take

774
00:47:25,719 --> 00:47:30,079
flyers here. I really think that
they would be, and I proposed this

775
00:47:30,280 --> 00:47:31,559
it was both loved and hated.
I would love to see them be a

776
00:47:31,599 --> 00:47:34,280
team like go to the nets and
say, hey, do you just want

777
00:47:34,280 --> 00:47:37,159
to get off of Ben Simmons's money, Like, well, we can fold

778
00:47:37,239 --> 00:47:42,239
Gordon Hayward into this trade. So
like that's like if they could, they

779
00:47:42,280 --> 00:47:45,679
could just be a team that doesn't
anything because they're so just They're not aimless,

780
00:47:45,719 --> 00:47:47,159
but they're just they're so bad right
now and they should just be They

781
00:47:47,199 --> 00:47:51,639
should be focused on either taking really
big swings that don't mortgage their future,

782
00:47:52,239 --> 00:47:54,360
or you know, just trying to
take stabs in the dark on players that

783
00:47:54,360 --> 00:47:58,320
they could reboot their value. I
do like per Joseph if if you're looking

784
00:47:58,360 --> 00:48:00,360
for just like another big that you
want on the roster next season and it's

785
00:48:00,360 --> 00:48:04,880
not Mason Plumley and you really just
don't have faith in like Kai Jones,

786
00:48:05,000 --> 00:48:07,559
or you don't want to bring back
Nick Richards, who's gonna be I think

787
00:48:07,599 --> 00:48:09,239
he's an early bird restrict to free
agent this year and for some reason,

788
00:48:09,280 --> 00:48:14,719
you don't want to play J T. Thor all the time. That's something

789
00:48:14,760 --> 00:48:16,480
to monitor and then it's like it's
cost controlled in a sense that, Okay,

790
00:48:16,599 --> 00:48:20,679
we know we're paying Mark Williams nothing
for Shaun Holmes is twelve million a

791
00:48:20,800 --> 00:48:22,079
year or whatever it is, and
then we're gonna have to pay PJ.

792
00:48:22,239 --> 00:48:28,800
Washington this summer and that's like,
that's not a terrible allocation of money to

793
00:48:28,880 --> 00:48:31,159
your front court. So I'd like
the Holmes is interesting there as long as

794
00:48:31,199 --> 00:48:34,880
it's not, Oh, we're really
gonna like bury Mark Williams on the bench

795
00:48:34,920 --> 00:48:37,679
behind him because he's shown a lot
of flashes this year. Rob Sheldon hearing

796
00:48:37,719 --> 00:48:40,199
plumbly could be a buyout and headed
back to Denver, or is that just

797
00:48:40,320 --> 00:48:45,599
what never wants to hear? I
don't I can I say both. I

798
00:48:45,639 --> 00:48:50,639
wouldn't shock me if he doesn't get
traded that he becomes a buyout candidate just

799
00:48:50,760 --> 00:48:55,199
because the Burdens don't need to anyone
to suck. But if he wants to

800
00:48:55,239 --> 00:48:58,840
play for a contender where he wants
to play meaningful games, that will up

801
00:48:58,920 --> 00:49:01,480
his value ahead of free agents.
See, there's there's always buyout possibilities on

802
00:49:01,559 --> 00:49:05,760
the table. It's the same thing
with it's it's not it's like apples to

803
00:49:05,840 --> 00:49:07,639
oranges. Here a little bit because
neurlands now Well is not playing as much

804
00:49:07,639 --> 00:49:10,199
as Plumley is. But like that's
why nourylans the Well is a buyout candidate.

805
00:49:10,480 --> 00:49:15,840
Obama becomes a buyout candidate if the
if the magic don't move him,

806
00:49:15,840 --> 00:49:17,639
So wouldn't shock me if he comes
a buyout candidate. I just when you

807
00:49:17,719 --> 00:49:21,760
look at the teams that seem to
be in the market for bigs or reserve

808
00:49:21,840 --> 00:49:24,760
big men, Like if you just
look at Portland, Toronto is still floating

809
00:49:24,760 --> 00:49:30,519
around the Yacca Peartle sweepstakes. The
Clippers are looking for a reserve big And

810
00:49:30,559 --> 00:49:34,280
I'm not saying he's a good fit
at all these places, but like the

811
00:49:34,360 --> 00:49:37,119
Nuggets are one of the teams,
and he could slide into their trade exception

812
00:49:37,199 --> 00:49:38,599
as well, And so the Hornets
might say, well, like why would

813
00:49:38,639 --> 00:49:42,880
we you know, we don't care
about your luxury tax bill. Why can't

814
00:49:42,880 --> 00:49:45,960
we just slide him into your your
trade exceptions? Like given the number of

815
00:49:45,000 --> 00:49:49,440
teams that seem to be in the
market for another even Washington wants another big

816
00:49:49,480 --> 00:49:52,159
man. I guess because they're playing
Gafford and kp together a lot. Now

817
00:49:52,239 --> 00:49:55,440
they want that other big to come
off the bench. I would bet against

818
00:49:57,280 --> 00:50:00,800
Mason Plumley being bought out at this
moment. What do I think he's a

819
00:50:00,800 --> 00:50:04,480
good fit for Denver? Yeah,
I mean he beats like a lot of

820
00:50:04,519 --> 00:50:07,840
the alternatives right now, and like
I love Zeke Naji, but I also

821
00:50:07,880 --> 00:50:10,880
recognize that maybe he's not the like
the like, the just the flat out

822
00:50:10,960 --> 00:50:14,480
five. And then Jeff Green has
been all over the place this season.

823
00:50:14,960 --> 00:50:17,039
DeAndre Jordan has probably been better than
expected, but just not the answer like

824
00:50:17,079 --> 00:50:21,159
Mason Plumley. Just as a passer, if you want to run your offense

825
00:50:21,239 --> 00:50:23,880
similarly to how you would with Yo
Kitchen, I don't want to say siminarly,

826
00:50:23,960 --> 00:50:29,519
but if you want to run stuff
through your center, Mason Plumley can

827
00:50:29,639 --> 00:50:31,840
do that. I don't know what
the defensive drop off is going to be

828
00:50:31,880 --> 00:50:36,280
there. I would argue that maybe
from a stationary position he's better than Yo

829
00:50:36,400 --> 00:50:39,599
Kitch, but in like like in
terms of mobility, he's a downgrade there.

830
00:50:39,800 --> 00:50:43,800
So Rob is with me, Good
Glen, someone agrees with me.

831
00:50:43,880 --> 00:50:47,719
It's almost I was doing look Shout
out to our podcast listeners and even I

832
00:50:47,800 --> 00:50:52,920
thought YouTube was mean, but Grant
and I were doing the Bleacher Report live

833
00:50:53,000 --> 00:50:55,079
stream. The other day, which
we're gonna be doing that if anyone is

834
00:50:55,119 --> 00:51:00,880
still listening to this point five thirty
Eastern time Trade Deadline Day winners and losers,

835
00:51:00,880 --> 00:51:02,079
so come hang out with us there. We'll also be going live at

836
00:51:02,119 --> 00:51:07,400
probably eleven PM Eastern Time to do
our own podcast reacting to the trade deadline,

837
00:51:07,400 --> 00:51:10,639
So mark all that down. But
they were man. The commenters were

838
00:51:10,679 --> 00:51:14,559
brutal. They did not they did
not like us, and they did not

839
00:51:14,719 --> 00:51:19,039
like my appearance. They were making
fun of me having spiky hair that I

840
00:51:19,079 --> 00:51:22,559
guess wasn't thick enough to their liking, so they was and it was.

841
00:51:22,639 --> 00:51:25,480
There was more than one comment.
So thank you for everyone who's just like

842
00:51:25,679 --> 00:51:30,119
even the YouTubers who were normally mean, at least they're just criticizing my basketball

843
00:51:30,159 --> 00:51:34,000
takes rather than my appearance, except
when I get called to EMO to cover

844
00:51:34,199 --> 00:51:37,719
the NBA. So that was quite
the experience. I'll stay on for a

845
00:51:37,800 --> 00:51:40,079
couple more minutes if anyone has any
other questions they want me to get to.

846
00:51:40,239 --> 00:51:43,280
I know, we don't have as
many people and here as we normally

847
00:51:43,320 --> 00:51:45,880
do between Twitter and YouTube. It
is, I mean, it's a little

848
00:51:45,880 --> 00:51:49,320
bit. It's definitely later on the
East Coast. I thought people would be

849
00:51:49,400 --> 00:51:54,360
more interested in the Russell trade to
the Lakers, but that's just a I'm

850
00:51:54,400 --> 00:51:59,519
so interested to watch the Lakers now
and I haven't seen if we if Lebron

851
00:51:59,559 --> 00:52:01,519
has tweet yet, because he's been
very quick to tweet when stuff doesn't go

852
00:52:01,639 --> 00:52:05,800
his way. But as he tweeted
about this trade, yes, i'mon't have

853
00:52:05,800 --> 00:52:07,559
to let me know since I can't
really be up on Twitter right now.

854
00:52:07,719 --> 00:52:12,199
Kyrie is apparently killing it in his
MAV's debut, so this is gonna be

855
00:52:12,280 --> 00:52:14,639
you know, where he tricks everyone
to think everything's gonna be fine before it

856
00:52:14,760 --> 00:52:19,480
sort of implodes. Another question from
Joseph Cruz, is Charlotte's Charlotte for a

857
00:52:19,599 --> 00:52:24,440
chance in top five picks in the
draft or maybe Wemby or Scoot Yeah,

858
00:52:24,639 --> 00:52:30,280
I mean, let's let me bring
up there at Kankathon odds or Pankathon odds

859
00:52:30,400 --> 00:52:32,320
right now. So if the season
ended today, they're gonna the fourth best

860
00:52:32,679 --> 00:52:37,280
lottery odds. So could they If
you're wondering, can they out tank and

861
00:52:37,360 --> 00:52:39,920
get into the you want to get
into one of the top three spots so

862
00:52:40,039 --> 00:52:43,719
that the odds are flattened. Can
they catch up too? I think Houston,

863
00:52:43,840 --> 00:52:47,159
San Antonio and Detroit are the bottom
three teams. Yeah, they're tied

864
00:52:47,199 --> 00:52:51,400
in lost colum with the Spurs.
And so look, if you're Charlotte,

865
00:52:51,480 --> 00:52:54,000
that thatcher and said to be like
Mason Plumley, gone, let's get rid

866
00:52:54,039 --> 00:52:57,800
of that. Let's even get rid
of PJ. Washington at this point.

867
00:52:57,880 --> 00:53:00,159
But you could end up with top
three pottery odds, which will give you

868
00:53:00,280 --> 00:53:04,559
the best chance of landing a wemb
or scoot, even though it won't be

869
00:53:05,039 --> 00:53:07,800
guaranteed. So yeah, there,
I'll look quite frankly right now, I'd

870
00:53:07,840 --> 00:53:12,320
probably be shocked if the Hornets don't
have a bottom five record, just because

871
00:53:12,320 --> 00:53:15,360
the teams in front of them.
I don't think Orlando or India is gonna

872
00:53:15,360 --> 00:53:16,880
actively tank. And then the Lakers
the Wizards are all trying to win,

873
00:53:17,400 --> 00:53:22,480
Blazers trying to win the Thunder and
the Thunder and maybe the Pacers kind of

874
00:53:22,679 --> 00:53:25,000
or Thunder and the Raptors. Maybe
you're like sort of in that in between.

875
00:53:25,039 --> 00:53:29,199
We'll see what Toronto does at the
deadline, but there's not as much

876
00:53:29,239 --> 00:53:30,519
of a clump when you're looking at
the bottom of the league. So like,

877
00:53:30,800 --> 00:53:35,679
yeah, there's Charlotte's locked in I
would say to the fourth worst record,

878
00:53:35,760 --> 00:53:39,800
Joseph, they have forty one losses
through fifty six games. The next

879
00:53:39,880 --> 00:53:44,440
team, the next worst team is
the Orlando Magic that has thirty three losses

880
00:53:44,480 --> 00:53:46,880
through fifty five games, and so
like we're talking about an eight loss lead

881
00:53:47,039 --> 00:53:50,599
there, the Hornets would have to
go on to caps lock or run.

882
00:53:50,679 --> 00:53:57,480
If you're worried about out tanking some
of the some of the like other teams,

883
00:53:57,480 --> 00:53:59,639
than yeah, like you're you're in
a rush to move things. But

884
00:54:00,079 --> 00:54:02,159
if you're worried about the Hornets winning
too many games to fall out of a

885
00:54:02,239 --> 00:54:07,159
top five spot, I think I
think you're fine. Like if they if

886
00:54:07,199 --> 00:54:12,679
for any reason, Sirie be quiet, please God. If for any reason

887
00:54:12,760 --> 00:54:16,239
the Hornets don't finish with a top
five records, something weird has happened somewhere

888
00:54:16,360 --> 00:54:21,000
Charlotte ripped off a crazy winning streak, or more likely, I would have

889
00:54:21,079 --> 00:54:25,159
to applaud the tank jobs of the
like the Pacers or the Magic or the

890
00:54:25,199 --> 00:54:30,360
Wizards who have twenty nine. Yeah, there's just don't worry, Joseph.

891
00:54:30,360 --> 00:54:32,360
The Hornets are locked into a bottom
four record and they have a real chance.

892
00:54:32,440 --> 00:54:37,360
There's so the four worst teams are
the Hornets fifteen and forty one,

893
00:54:37,440 --> 00:54:39,519
the Spurs fourteen and forty one,
the Pistons fourteen and forty two, and

894
00:54:39,559 --> 00:54:43,719
the Rockets at thirteen and forty two, you could feasibly end up being the

895
00:54:43,760 --> 00:54:45,800
worst team in the league. But
if I had to predict, will they

896
00:54:45,840 --> 00:54:49,599
finish with a bottom three record,
I think it's gonna be hard to out

897
00:54:49,639 --> 00:54:52,960
tank San Antonio, Detroit and Houston
so long as you're playing everybody. Now

898
00:54:53,039 --> 00:55:00,639
if we get into thank you for
the kind words, Rob especially, but

899
00:55:00,719 --> 00:55:04,239
if you're trying to outank those other
teams and you have Lamello, who I

900
00:55:04,280 --> 00:55:07,559
know has been banged up a ton
this season, like you have players that

901
00:55:07,599 --> 00:55:09,760
are probably helping you win a little
bit more like the coaching with Steve Clifford

902
00:55:09,800 --> 00:55:14,360
is definitely a better coach than looking
at Steven Silas, I'd probably even rank

903
00:55:14,480 --> 00:55:15,800
him above Dwyn Casey at this point. I'm not gonna put him above Pop.

904
00:55:15,800 --> 00:55:19,679
But the Spurs are just so barren
of experience, and they are I

905
00:55:19,679 --> 00:55:22,480
would guess they They are a team
to watch the trade deadline now too.

906
00:55:22,440 --> 00:55:27,320
They are someone that's going to be
I would say, materially worse after the

907
00:55:27,360 --> 00:55:30,000
trade on like between Josh Richardson,
Doug McDermot and Zach Collins and Jaco Purdle.

908
00:55:30,000 --> 00:55:32,199
I think at least two of those
guys get moved or at least one.

909
00:55:32,280 --> 00:55:36,760
Josh Richardson seems like the one that
everybody should want and could the Spurs

910
00:55:37,239 --> 00:55:38,480
Would they be willing to get rid
of him for you know, a few

911
00:55:38,519 --> 00:55:42,360
seconds, and just like salary or
whatever, they can draw up their return

912
00:55:42,400 --> 00:55:45,719
because they have cap space. If
they're willing to take on bad money.

913
00:55:45,360 --> 00:55:50,760
Maybe one of the funniest challenge trades
would be like Josh Richardson, Zach Collins

914
00:55:50,800 --> 00:55:52,760
and Doug McDermott for Ben Simmons and
like, let's just try to rehab Ben

915
00:55:52,840 --> 00:55:57,679
Simmons's value in San Antonio. So
this was a lot of fun everyone who

916
00:55:57,760 --> 00:55:59,920
joined us. So we made it
this far. And if not subscribe yet

917
00:56:00,079 --> 00:56:02,159
YouTube or on your podcast player,
hit that sub button on YouTube, subscribe

918
00:56:02,159 --> 00:56:05,360
to as an Apple, Spotify,
Stitch or whatever. We do put out

919
00:56:05,360 --> 00:56:08,480
a lot of content here. We're
podcasting a lot lately, and I'm sure

920
00:56:08,519 --> 00:56:12,159
it's going to pull back after the
deadline. I am. I will say

921
00:56:12,519 --> 00:56:15,480
I'm excited to be able to I
like focusing on new fits, and I

922
00:56:15,519 --> 00:56:17,960
do love the trade deadline, but
I'm excited to be able to Like it's

923
00:56:19,000 --> 00:56:22,559
really hard to and I still I've
done it, but it's like really hard

924
00:56:22,599 --> 00:56:24,719
to watch basketball this time of year
while you're also running around and writing and

925
00:56:24,800 --> 00:56:29,000
podcasting and trying to track all this
different different stuff. And so I'm a

926
00:56:29,000 --> 00:56:30,679
little bit more like frenetic and higer
than it normally ends. I'm like kind

927
00:56:30,719 --> 00:56:35,039
of looking forward to the end of
this week and like being able to focus

928
00:56:35,119 --> 00:56:38,480
more on what's happening on the court. But it's always fun to do these

929
00:56:38,559 --> 00:56:40,440
things. We'll have to try and
I think we'll try and do more live

930
00:56:40,480 --> 00:56:45,239
streams just in the future, since
they do seem to play fairly well on

931
00:56:45,880 --> 00:56:50,960
YouTube. Hopefully they're not insufferable to
listen to and podcast form for our listeners

932
00:56:51,000 --> 00:56:52,920
who are doing an audio, but
again, subscribe if you've done all that,

933
00:56:53,119 --> 00:56:57,280
tell people about us, shout outs
on Twitter, retweeting our promos,

934
00:56:57,599 --> 00:57:00,280
sharing our podcast, just whatever you
can do to help us can tinue to

935
00:57:00,320 --> 00:57:04,320
grow the community, and again join
our discord day. I know Dala Muka

936
00:57:04,360 --> 00:57:07,840
is in here. He can attest
one of the driving forces behind how fun

937
00:57:07,920 --> 00:57:10,239
our discord is, so go join
Discord. Link is in the podcast and

938
00:57:10,480 --> 00:57:15,079
YouTube description. Thank you all for
listening. This was a blast and until

939
00:57:15,079 --> 00:57:17,880
next time we could shout out to
one the only, the key X factor

940
00:57:19,239 --> 00:57:23,000
to the Mavericks Championship Hops, Frank
Nila Keith.
