1
00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:05,160
And explain what criminal law is like
here to the audience, because I think

2
00:00:05,200 --> 00:00:12,000
the American series that illustrate on the
subject, like Sutts or the other that

3
00:00:12,240 --> 00:00:17,559
How To Whore and that Vaina or
Coberto col Sol and all that series,

4
00:00:17,920 --> 00:00:23,359
which are from the life of lawyers. People believe that law and justice in

5
00:00:23,559 --> 00:00:29,920
the Dominican Republic works as they see
it in the series. And one of

6
00:00:29,960 --> 00:00:36,560
the reasons why here we came up
with the idea of having Juan Arturo participate

7
00:00:36,600 --> 00:00:40,920
was one day in the Chinese neighborhood
eating and talking about law and I realized

8
00:00:41,039 --> 00:00:46,280
talking to three lawyers of the same
generation. We were on Saturdays comedies or

9
00:00:46,320 --> 00:00:51,640
shit and Vaina was more with the
interest of me to learn from them that

10
00:00:51,679 --> 00:00:58,240
they learn nothing from me and I
realized talking about simple subjects that is nonsense

11
00:00:58,240 --> 00:01:03,280
that should be super understood by anyone
that, regardless of whether I was discovering

12
00:01:03,319 --> 00:01:10,040
neither the wheels nor the warm water, we ignored the simplest elements of laws

13
00:01:10,840 --> 00:01:19,280
and republic law in Dominican republic,
because sometimes you hear people. Not here,

14
00:01:19,319 --> 00:01:21,640
because they' re not supposed to
sue. Here it is not demanded

15
00:01:21,680 --> 00:01:23,719
as it is demanded in the United
States, which is a national sport.

16
00:01:23,959 --> 00:01:26,560
Ah not clear that for everything here, based on civil law, there are

17
00:01:26,640 --> 00:01:32,640
a number of questions, almost everything
depending on what and you can well motivate

18
00:01:32,680 --> 00:01:36,560
a lawsuit, but it is a
cumbersome process. In America, you file

19
00:01:36,599 --> 00:01:40,319
a lawsuit, and that takes half
an hour. Here it is a subject

20
00:01:40,519 --> 00:01:44,799
to fatten a tea more difficult than
you have not been accompanied by a good

21
00:01:44,799 --> 00:01:49,000
legal advice, because you can end
up losing a lot of money and a

22
00:01:49,000 --> 00:01:49,840
lot of time thinking that you will
get some repair for some given fact.

23
00:01:51,480 --> 00:01:55,480
So, based on that reasoning and
other issues also that have to do with

24
00:01:55,480 --> 00:02:00,519
criminal law and with many issues that
people do, after that it is not

25
00:02:00,599 --> 00:02:06,239
that that is not so. Something
as simple as what a consult that made

26
00:02:06,280 --> 00:02:10,039
me a friend about his son and
his girlfriend, than a void that has

27
00:02:10,039 --> 00:02:15,680
the minor' s code. His
sixteen- year- old son had love

28
00:02:15,439 --> 00:02:19,960
with a sixteen- year- old, but the following year he turned eighteen.

29
00:02:20,000 --> 00:02:23,000
He' s already sixteen. So, in that relationship he' s

30
00:02:23,719 --> 00:02:27,599
an elder with a minor, that
is, he' s already of age,

31
00:02:28,479 --> 00:02:30,960
but the law of the Minor'
s Code says nothing about that,

32
00:02:31,599 --> 00:02:38,680
but I did give him I didn' t tell him Mr. I don

33
00:02:38,719 --> 00:02:42,680
' t know any such cases.
But if the family is old enough to

34
00:02:42,680 --> 00:02:46,680
fuck up, they can screw it
up because it is still underage and the

35
00:02:46,759 --> 00:02:52,479
code makes no exception, except among
minors, especially in sexual consent. Parents

36
00:02:52,599 --> 00:02:54,560
can' t give or consent to
not. She' s sixteen, he

37
00:02:54,599 --> 00:02:58,319
' s twenty. They can have
love. The code doesn' t admit

38
00:02:58,319 --> 00:03:02,360
that. Neither does the minor'
s code say anywhere. He makes an

39
00:03:02,400 --> 00:03:06,560
exception in that case. You say
that if the age difference between the two

40
00:03:06,560 --> 00:03:10,479
minors is greater, to six years
is abuse, to five years is abuse,

41
00:03:12,039 --> 00:03:14,719
is abuse? What he says.
But when they' re both minors,

42
00:03:15,680 --> 00:03:20,319
let' s say pure eleven and
one, sixteen or one. There

43
00:03:20,360 --> 00:03:23,719
' s abuse. But those simple
things like that, as simple as that,

44
00:03:24,319 --> 00:03:28,120
are confusing a lot of people,
because when the vander Franco thing happened

45
00:03:28,240 --> 00:03:32,360
here, I' ve heard a
lot of people say on radio and TV

46
00:03:32,479 --> 00:03:38,759
no, but she was sixteen and
he was nineteen, or she was sixteen

47
00:03:38,960 --> 00:03:43,840
and he was twenty, under five. That' s not what the law

48
00:03:43,960 --> 00:03:50,360
says It literally explains that article of
the Children' s Code, and here

49
00:03:50,360 --> 00:03:52,159
he explained it. And obviously,
there' s a lot more to it.

50
00:03:52,520 --> 00:03:58,719
So what this week that we have
so many digital criminals, yesterday I

51
00:03:58,719 --> 00:04:04,599
saw an analysis of a listener and
I kept it because also people don'

52
00:04:04,680 --> 00:04:11,479
t understand what due process is and
you lose in that and I have always

53
00:04:11,479 --> 00:04:15,399
told you here. In many media
cases, sometimes opinionologists make people think that

54
00:04:15,439 --> 00:04:21,000
there will be a sentence in one
way the party is interested. They'

55
00:04:21,000 --> 00:04:26,720
re going public relations with the cases. They' re done in public relations.

56
00:04:26,759 --> 00:04:30,040
For them then it' s like
they' re tollets. It comes

57
00:04:30,079 --> 00:04:36,240
from the sentence, the judge applies
the law and feasts on the collective imaginary

58
00:04:38,279 --> 00:04:43,680
what in law has been done correctly, but that in opinionology has been misreported.

59
00:04:46,399 --> 00:04:51,040
When the girl from San Francisco,
the teenager Emely died here, everyone

60
00:04:51,160 --> 00:04:54,920
thought Marlyn Martine was going to be
thrown thirty years into another judicial system.

61
00:04:58,079 --> 00:05:01,720
Perhaps she would have put him on
the chain, but justice as it works

62
00:05:01,839 --> 00:05:04,920
and this structure of the Dominican Republic
and the criminal offences that exist for which

63
00:05:04,959 --> 00:05:10,279
she could establish a responsibility does not
carry a greater penalty than she received.

64
00:05:11,040 --> 00:05:15,839
It is that alberto when then people
have to understand that Dominican Republic law is

65
00:05:15,920 --> 00:05:20,040
not like in the United States.
Stop watching American series and learn to understand

66
00:05:20,120 --> 00:05:28,000
better, because then they get frustrated
and worse, as the good friend says,

67
00:05:28,319 --> 00:05:30,560
give me to see it. I' ve got it around here I

68
00:05:30,600 --> 00:05:32,680
' d say it here in my
favorite he. I say if you don

69
00:05:32,680 --> 00:05:36,519
' t want to feel bad about
Dominican sentences, there is a French series

70
00:05:36,600 --> 00:05:41,519
that is why our law exactly comes, because as long as we continue to

71
00:05:41,600 --> 00:05:46,240
see and take as a reference to
the United States, they will not succeed,

72
00:05:46,759 --> 00:05:48,600
because they are totally different systems.
And this I won' t say

73
00:05:48,600 --> 00:05:53,480
to disqualify anyone who sometimes when you
don' t understand something, it'

74
00:05:54,399 --> 00:06:01,560
s best to try or get informed
or understand what things are like. That

75
00:06:01,800 --> 00:06:09,560
' s not that a judge a
fucking or insensitive. It is that the

76
00:06:09,600 --> 00:06:13,680
field of action, the range of
action that a judge has to make a

77
00:06:13,879 --> 00:06:16,920
decision, is what the law commands, is what the law establishes, is

78
00:06:16,920 --> 00:06:23,519
what the codes say. And when
he talks to you about due process,

79
00:06:23,600 --> 00:06:29,319
as the friend Marinovinincio Castillo grandson says, writes yesterday and explains to him,

80
00:06:30,199 --> 00:06:36,120
explains in a tweet that he says
your rights explained, says he still without

81
00:06:36,160 --> 00:06:41,959
reviewing the terms of a conviction.
It is important to keep in mind that

82
00:06:41,959 --> 00:06:43,879
this is written by a lawyer.
Hey, don' t think it'

83
00:06:43,920 --> 00:06:46,959
s being written by a digital voicemail. In fact, he' s a

84
00:06:46,000 --> 00:06:51,920
boy, although he' s his
is making life on Twitter by a person

85
00:06:53,040 --> 00:06:57,000
who likes to walk away from controversies
and vaginas, but he does an analysis

86
00:06:57,000 --> 00:07:01,720
to try to help digital channelology to
get some understanding of design. Judges cannot

87
00:07:01,800 --> 00:07:05,519
rule on facts that have not been
proven, and so deliberation proceedings, where

88
00:07:05,560 --> 00:07:11,000
they must verify all the evidence and
testimonies of the parties, may last,

89
00:07:11,639 --> 00:07:15,600
as they do, for a long
time to add, while the analysis of

90
00:07:15,399 --> 00:07:24,079
the evidence of the proceedings may last. Judges must be careful when drafting their

91
00:07:24,120 --> 00:07:29,079
judgments, since they must be able
to withstand subsequent scrutiny both factual and factual

92
00:07:29,720 --> 00:07:35,000
legal is, in fact, concrete
evidence so that they understand more or less

93
00:07:35,040 --> 00:07:45,319
juridically from hierarchically superior courts. A
first- degree sentence containing conviction is usually

94
00:07:45,439 --> 00:07:51,040
appealed by those affected. Even the
possible sentence of appeal could, if the

95
00:07:51,120 --> 00:07:56,839
legal requirements are met, be appealed
in cassation that those have to explain to

96
00:07:56,879 --> 00:08:00,000
the scoundrel, that they do not
know what cassation and none of that before

97
00:08:00,120 --> 00:08:03,519
the supers more court of justice.
The time spent in pretrial detention during the

98
00:08:03,800 --> 00:08:11,000
proceedings would be calculated for the purpose
of determining the longer period of exclusion that

99
00:08:11,160 --> 00:08:15,240
must also be explained to the people. Many people do not understand it has

100
00:08:15,240 --> 00:08:20,639
still been convicted in the first instance, they continue to be pretrial prisoners,

101
00:08:20,279 --> 00:08:24,639
since they have in their favour legal
deadlines that would appeal decisions for which the

102
00:08:24,720 --> 00:08:31,240
sentence has not yet been acquired.
The authority of things evocably judged that that

103
00:08:31,360 --> 00:08:35,320
is another concept that you make people
understand. Once the sentence has been confirmed,

104
00:08:37,080 --> 00:08:43,000
any case and the degree it acquires
must be completed by the convicted persons.

105
00:08:43,440 --> 00:08:46,840
The judge of the execution of the
sentence, after fulfilling all the requirements,

106
00:08:46,960 --> 00:08:50,120
may order the conditional release of the
convicted person, provided that the convicted

107
00:08:50,120 --> 00:08:54,519
person has completed at least half of
the period to which he was sentenced.

108
00:08:54,720 --> 00:08:58,720
In general, these media advances,
he says, in parentheses return a cigno

109
00:08:58,799 --> 00:09:03,320
every request for parole, in other
words, and in particular in this case,

110
00:09:03,559 --> 00:09:07,960
now that mambo is missing he hears,