1
00:00:15,480 --> 00:00:22,160
What is up, fellow thermonuclear a
efforts. I am Damna Valley coming at

2
00:00:22,199 --> 00:00:27,879
you with another one question podcast that
involves the Washington Wizards before we cannonball into

3
00:00:27,960 --> 00:00:32,600
that. Just the reminder slash the
please rate, review, and subscribe to

4
00:00:32,679 --> 00:00:35,240
us wherever you get your podcasts.
If you're watching this on YouTube, hit

5
00:00:35,240 --> 00:00:38,840
that subscribe button to help us grow
the channel. Like and comment on every

6
00:00:38,920 --> 00:00:42,200
video to help the algorithm love us
back as well. It means a lot

7
00:00:42,200 --> 00:00:44,479
and helps the channel out a lot
if you subscribe to YouTube. If you're

8
00:00:44,479 --> 00:00:47,799
listening to us via podcast player,
subscribe to YouTube as well, and vice

9
00:00:47,880 --> 00:00:50,759
verst or if you're on YouTube.
Really trying to climb up the ratings on

10
00:00:50,799 --> 00:00:54,640
the Apple charts specifically even Spotify,
head over there. If you have access

11
00:00:54,679 --> 00:00:59,840
to those players, rate us and
review us on Apple podcast That helps out

12
00:01:00,039 --> 00:01:02,200
a ton of the charts as well. As I mentioned at the top of

13
00:01:02,200 --> 00:01:04,359
this week, and I'll stop reiterating, we peaked I think at number eighty

14
00:01:04,400 --> 00:01:08,799
seven in Apple's basketball podcast in the
United States last week or the week before,

15
00:01:08,799 --> 00:01:12,480
I can't remember, and I really
like to build upon that. We

16
00:01:12,480 --> 00:01:15,560
did drop this past week, so
it was two weeks ago and it would

17
00:01:15,560 --> 00:01:19,400
help out a lot. And also
subscribe to YouTube, join our discord linked

18
00:01:19,400 --> 00:01:23,840
to that is in the podcast description
and the YouTube description as well, and

19
00:01:23,879 --> 00:01:26,000
follow us on all the socials they're
either on the screen on YouTube or in

20
00:01:26,040 --> 00:01:30,280
the podcast and YouTube descriptions. Two
and so we cannon ball into this question

21
00:01:30,359 --> 00:01:36,200
that I think I've talked about or
danced around this podcast, and then it

22
00:01:36,319 --> 00:01:41,480
sort of came to more of a
topical head recently with Quentin Mayo from the

23
00:01:41,879 --> 00:01:46,040
Mayo sub Stack, and he's also
over at bet MGM and he's a podcast

24
00:01:46,040 --> 00:01:49,920
go host for Blue Wire Pods as
well. I believe wrote essentially that the

25
00:01:51,680 --> 00:01:57,719
Wizards are confident that they that there's
a package out there that they've given that

26
00:01:57,760 --> 00:02:01,480
has them feeling they're in this race
for Donovan Mitchell and not far behind New

27
00:02:01,560 --> 00:02:06,439
York. So there's a couple of
things here. This is not to say

28
00:02:06,480 --> 00:02:08,400
the Wizards have an offer that can
beat the Knicks, because they can't.

29
00:02:08,400 --> 00:02:12,639
There's no team in the league.
I won't say no team. There are

30
00:02:12,639 --> 00:02:15,520
teams. I think if you envision
the Pelicans or okay, see that theoretically,

31
00:02:15,560 --> 00:02:19,080
maybe even Toronto, but they're not
going to trade Scotty Barnes or SIOK

32
00:02:19,240 --> 00:02:22,360
for Mitchell. But there might be
one or two teams that theoretically could offer

33
00:02:22,400 --> 00:02:24,719
a more attractive package for Mitchell,
but they don't have the incentive to or

34
00:02:24,759 --> 00:02:30,719
the outright desire right now to the
Wizards just flat out can't when you look

35
00:02:30,719 --> 00:02:32,840
at their assets structure. But we're
going to get into that, and the

36
00:02:32,919 --> 00:02:38,280
question becomes They've been linked to Dono
Mitchell before by Sean Sharania. This is

37
00:02:38,319 --> 00:02:40,560
more of like a concrete link though, where there's still no details as to

38
00:02:40,639 --> 00:02:45,319
what this package is that they're confident
in. But at least Quentin Mayo doesn't

39
00:02:45,360 --> 00:02:47,439
dance around the fact that they believe
they have a competitive offer. Could they

40
00:02:47,479 --> 00:02:50,759
be trying to frame this in a
way that makes this seem like they're active

41
00:02:50,800 --> 00:02:54,240
and they're more involved whatever. But
the question is, can do the Wizards

42
00:02:54,280 --> 00:03:00,400
have enough to entice teams into making
a blockbuster trade or do they have enough

43
00:03:00,439 --> 00:03:05,599
assets to make a viable blockbuster trade
package. This is not the same as

44
00:03:05,599 --> 00:03:07,560
saying it's Mitchell only. I will
use him as an example throughout this just

45
00:03:07,560 --> 00:03:10,919
because he's the star who he knows
available right now, and it's not to

46
00:03:10,919 --> 00:03:15,319
say that they can beat every other
package that's out there. But just because

47
00:03:15,319 --> 00:03:20,719
teams can beat a certain package doesn't
mean that they're going to We've seen this

48
00:03:20,800 --> 00:03:24,120
time and again that, yes,
teams that are trading stars don't typically get

49
00:03:24,199 --> 00:03:28,199
fleeced, but there are always other
teams out there that could, if they

50
00:03:28,240 --> 00:03:30,840
wanted to, for the most part, offer more. There are, I

51
00:03:30,879 --> 00:03:35,319
don't want to call them rare instances, but you know, the Minnesota Rudy

52
00:03:35,319 --> 00:03:38,599
Gobert deal, it's very rare that
we look at a trade and say,

53
00:03:38,639 --> 00:03:40,960
oh, there was no team in
the league that was going to or could

54
00:03:40,960 --> 00:03:45,960
have offered more. You even look
at that with Brooklyn there was and James

55
00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:50,840
Harden. There was debate as to
whether their package was the best, was

56
00:03:50,879 --> 00:03:53,280
something built around Ben Simmons back them
from the Sixers even better? Were there

57
00:03:53,280 --> 00:03:57,039
are other teams that could have came
in with picks, more picks or more

58
00:03:57,439 --> 00:04:00,400
let's say enticing picks long term at
the time. It's then they actually did.

59
00:04:00,719 --> 00:04:03,680
And so I'm not trying to frame
this as oh, can the Wizards

60
00:04:03,680 --> 00:04:08,319
outbid the Knicks for Donovan Mitchell?
I do not think that they can.

61
00:04:08,719 --> 00:04:15,240
However, when everyone points to their
inability to cobble together a trade package.

62
00:04:15,279 --> 00:04:19,800
They harp on this first round pick
that's owed to the Knicks and protected until

63
00:04:20,240 --> 00:04:26,639
Kingdom cub and so let's start there. The Wizards owe twenty twenty three first

64
00:04:26,639 --> 00:04:30,680
to the Knicks. It's lottery protected
for next year. Then in twenty twenty

65
00:04:30,720 --> 00:04:33,399
four it's top twelve protected, in
two twenty five it is top ten protected,

66
00:04:33,639 --> 00:04:38,240
and then is top nine or eight
protected, I believe in two twenty

67
00:04:38,240 --> 00:04:41,240
six. After that, if it
is not conveyed, it turns into two

68
00:04:41,279 --> 00:04:45,680
seconds. If the Wizards stay the
same, there's a fairer chance that that

69
00:04:45,720 --> 00:04:48,759
pick never conveys. I would bet
that it does, because them giving Bradley

70
00:04:48,759 --> 00:04:51,720
be able to no trade clause does
imply some sort of an urgency. But

71
00:04:51,759 --> 00:04:56,560
there's a chance that it doesn't convey. However, that doesn't mean that they

72
00:04:56,600 --> 00:05:00,439
can't just trade a first round pick
before twenty eight. Other people have framed

73
00:05:00,399 --> 00:05:03,399
it is twenty and twenty nine.
That is inaccurate. Humbly, I'm not

74
00:05:03,480 --> 00:05:06,920
donkey on anyone here, but I
do get a little bit annoyed when people

75
00:05:06,920 --> 00:05:10,399
are on Twitter tell me I don't
know what I'm talking about, and they're

76
00:05:10,439 --> 00:05:17,600
just commenting with inaccuracies, they can
structure a deal around conditional first round picks.

77
00:05:17,879 --> 00:05:20,560
The Sixers just did it when they
got James Harden, and so it

78
00:05:20,600 --> 00:05:25,480
would be framed This way is the
Wizards could say they will trade. Let's

79
00:05:25,560 --> 00:05:28,800
use the Jazz as an example.
They're two thousand and twenty five, pick

80
00:05:29,160 --> 00:05:32,319
two, utah, if they're two
thousand and twenty three pick to the Knicks

81
00:05:32,399 --> 00:05:36,800
conveys. If it doesn't, instead
of deferring because you're trying in theory to

82
00:05:36,839 --> 00:05:41,480
maximize the number of picks you're giving
out, you can just have that condition

83
00:05:41,519 --> 00:05:46,360
expire it turns into a second round
pick or nothing at all, and so

84
00:05:46,800 --> 00:05:48,959
or just to set let's say protect
a second round pick, and so then

85
00:05:49,240 --> 00:05:51,639
you move on to the next one, which is two and twenty seven.

86
00:05:51,639 --> 00:05:57,240
You would include in there. You
also make that conditional upon your obligation of

87
00:05:57,240 --> 00:06:00,079
New York conveying. And if it
doesn't convey by two and twenty five and

88
00:06:00,079 --> 00:06:01,800
they get it instead in two thousand
and twenty six, it would expire,

89
00:06:01,920 --> 00:06:06,079
turn into two seconds again, and
then you can trade your twenty twenty nine

90
00:06:06,120 --> 00:06:11,759
pick. In theory, yes,
and I know that was convoluted and I'll

91
00:06:11,759 --> 00:06:14,480
try and remember to put up on
the screen or at least right in the

92
00:06:14,480 --> 00:06:16,399
comments on YouTube, or wrap it
up with this podcast what I think the

93
00:06:16,399 --> 00:06:21,279
Wizard's actual best offer would be.
But they can only guarantee sending out one

94
00:06:21,360 --> 00:06:25,800
first round pick as of now in
twenty twenty eight or two and twenty nine.

95
00:06:25,959 --> 00:06:29,680
But if you're trading for Donovan Mitchell, if you're trading for another star,

96
00:06:30,879 --> 00:06:35,040
is it it's a fair risk to
take as the other team to say,

97
00:06:35,079 --> 00:06:40,079
hey, they're going to convey that
first round pick to the Knicks by

98
00:06:40,279 --> 00:06:43,160
twenty twenty four at the latest,
or we think that they're going to be

99
00:06:43,199 --> 00:06:46,680
a playoff team after this trade,
and so we believe that their twenty five

100
00:06:46,920 --> 00:06:48,639
pick will be able to convey,
and so are their twenty and twenty seven

101
00:06:48,639 --> 00:06:53,240
pick. So let's take their two
twenty nine pick if it's on the table,

102
00:06:53,480 --> 00:06:56,959
and they can also include their twenty
twenty eight swap. That is something

103
00:06:57,000 --> 00:07:00,720
that they can guarantee at this moment, and so in theory, any offer

104
00:07:01,079 --> 00:07:05,439
that the Wizards give can be framed
thus lee a conditional twenty twenty five first,

105
00:07:05,680 --> 00:07:10,920
a conditional twenty twenty seven first,
they're twenty twenty nine first outright and

106
00:07:10,959 --> 00:07:15,040
a twenty twenty eight first round swap
outright. Those are things that you can

107
00:07:15,160 --> 00:07:17,360
offer. And if you're a team
like the Jazz, I do think you

108
00:07:17,399 --> 00:07:21,600
probably need to be prepared to say, Okay, that twenty twenty five pick,

109
00:07:23,600 --> 00:07:27,120
maybe it doesn't convey because you're only
giving it one chance. You're betting

110
00:07:27,399 --> 00:07:30,279
that the Wizards are going to be
a playoff team next season, that they're

111
00:07:30,279 --> 00:07:34,800
going to finish outside the lottery.
That's a you know, that is a

112
00:07:34,879 --> 00:07:39,720
gamble. But if you have Bradley
Beale and you haven't obliterated your depth to

113
00:07:39,759 --> 00:07:43,759
get let's say, Donovan Mitchell or
another star, it's not an unreasonable gamble

114
00:07:43,800 --> 00:07:46,959
to think that you could get all
three first or at least wind up with

115
00:07:46,000 --> 00:07:50,639
two and the swap. The question
then becomes what else are the Wizards offering?

116
00:07:50,759 --> 00:07:54,639
And so, just in this theoretical
world of how I'm doing it,

117
00:07:54,759 --> 00:07:59,160
I think that you can count on
the Wizards structuring a package where yes,

118
00:07:59,240 --> 00:08:03,480
the picks will be conditional, but
you're going to get a swap guaranteed first

119
00:08:03,560 --> 00:08:07,560
round pick, and then another at
least one other first round pick. That's

120
00:08:07,560 --> 00:08:09,480
how I'm looking at this is that
minimum, because I would think that the

121
00:08:09,560 --> 00:08:13,600
Wizards are going to finish, if
not outside the lottery next year. Again,

122
00:08:13,759 --> 00:08:18,480
if they're acquiring a star, then
that the top twelve protective pick would

123
00:08:18,879 --> 00:08:22,160
would convey in twenty twenty four,
and so you're twenty seven and twenty nine

124
00:08:22,199 --> 00:08:28,199
picks could have been trade would have
would then convey what else are they going

125
00:08:28,240 --> 00:08:33,039
to include? And they have a
bunch of interesting players sess slash salary matching

126
00:08:33,080 --> 00:08:37,559
fodder. You could go the route
of what we're gonna need big money to

127
00:08:37,720 --> 00:08:41,200
Let's say it's for Donovan Mitchell to
match. Could we dangle Christaps Porzingis?

128
00:08:41,200 --> 00:08:45,600
He has two years left on his
deal. It's unclear whether KP at two

129
00:08:45,679 --> 00:08:48,399
years and like seventy million ISSH dollars, is actually an asset. He's a

130
00:08:48,399 --> 00:08:52,320
player option on that final season,
so he could be a free agent next

131
00:08:52,320 --> 00:08:56,639
summer. I would bet that he's
not considered super desirable if you're a team

132
00:08:56,639 --> 00:08:58,799
like the Jazz, or if there's
another rebuilding team and for some reason enters

133
00:08:58,799 --> 00:09:05,639
the may So you know, if
it's Toronto deciding to get rid of Ogianna

134
00:09:05,679 --> 00:09:09,399
Nobi for whatever reason and sort of
divest, not yeah, divest Ganna Nobi

135
00:09:09,480 --> 00:09:11,960
into I don't think they will.
I'm just throwing out names out there.

136
00:09:13,200 --> 00:09:15,519
Or if you're the Wizards and for
some reason want John Collins, I don't

137
00:09:15,559 --> 00:09:20,759
think KP's gonna hold you know,
value to Atlanta. I think you go

138
00:09:20,879 --> 00:09:24,200
the route of your step laddering your
way via contracts, and it must include

139
00:09:24,240 --> 00:09:26,840
For me, it would be twenty
one year old Denny Avya, who I

140
00:09:26,879 --> 00:09:33,440
already consider a very rock solid and
underrated defender, just to cross a bunch

141
00:09:33,480 --> 00:09:35,159
of positions. When you look at
the positional spectrum he's able to switch on

142
00:09:35,200 --> 00:09:39,759
to or just cover individually, it's
a lot higher than you'd think. I

143
00:09:39,799 --> 00:09:43,559
think there is really more to his
offensive game to explore. I would like

144
00:09:43,600 --> 00:09:46,879
to see him run more pick and
rolls. I would like to see his

145
00:09:46,000 --> 00:09:48,879
and I've mentioned this with other players, kind of the speed at which he

146
00:09:48,919 --> 00:09:52,879
processes things in the half court accelerate
a little bit more. But there's a

147
00:09:52,879 --> 00:09:56,279
physicality to his drives and the way
he can use his shoulders around the basket.

148
00:09:56,679 --> 00:10:01,639
I do believe that his shooting numbers
from the outside, especially off the

149
00:10:01,679 --> 00:10:05,519
catch, are going to be better
than we've seen thus far, and that

150
00:10:05,600 --> 00:10:09,799
this is someone who I can see
developing into a playmaking wing and I have

151
00:10:09,879 --> 00:10:13,799
not ruled out like an all star
fringe all star trajectory for him. And

152
00:10:13,840 --> 00:10:18,840
to have him with two years left
on his rookie skial rookie scale, it's

153
00:10:18,840 --> 00:10:20,000
an asset. It's just float out
an asset. Is it on the same

154
00:10:20,080 --> 00:10:24,720
level as R. J. Barrett? No, Scottie Barnes. Absolutely not

155
00:10:24,799 --> 00:10:28,440
to me, But that's an asset. You also have Johnny Davis, who

156
00:10:28,440 --> 00:10:31,679
you just drafted. You have Daniel
Gafford who is on a very going to

157
00:10:31,720 --> 00:10:35,279
be on a very reasonable three year
extension that doesn't even kick in until twenty

158
00:10:35,480 --> 00:10:39,320
and twenty three, So he's owed
one point nine million this coming season,

159
00:10:39,480 --> 00:10:43,679
and then the salary doesn't escalate until
two twenty three, two twenty four,

160
00:10:43,960 --> 00:10:48,679
and he will never make more than
fourteen point four million dollars on that three

161
00:10:48,759 --> 00:10:52,799
year deal. He's not great for
money matching purposes, But just to have

162
00:10:52,840 --> 00:10:58,080
Gafford, Johnny Davis, and Denny
Avdias as raw pieces in this deal that

163
00:10:58,120 --> 00:11:01,200
means something. I think you can
include Kissburg as well. His wing defense

164
00:11:01,240 --> 00:11:05,159
was a little bit better than I
expected last year. I'm curious to see

165
00:11:05,159 --> 00:11:09,440
if he can sort of find his
bearings as the shooter he profiled as.

166
00:11:09,639 --> 00:11:13,120
That's just sort of another young flyer
to include. There's still Ruey Hotchimura.

167
00:11:13,240 --> 00:11:16,360
I'm not gonna lie. I still
don't know what to make with Ruey Hotchimura.

168
00:11:16,480 --> 00:11:18,759
The positional versatility on defense is sort
of tantalizing, and maybe some of

169
00:11:18,759 --> 00:11:24,279
the ISO stuff he's shown on offense
as well. Is there a world the

170
00:11:24,320 --> 00:11:26,320
reality in which he works really is
a small ball five and can even be

171
00:11:26,440 --> 00:11:31,759
used as like this situational screener.
He might be worth plumbing. But he's

172
00:11:31,879 --> 00:11:35,799
entering, you know, the final
year of his deal before stritches free agency.

173
00:11:35,799 --> 00:11:37,919
He's extension eligible. As I record
this, I'm sure teams will be

174
00:11:37,919 --> 00:11:41,320
interested in him. And he does
make six point three million dollars, so

175
00:11:41,360 --> 00:11:43,360
that helps you get to whatever money
you need. I just don't think,

176
00:11:43,960 --> 00:11:48,200
you know, he's gonna be viewed. Whereas RJ. Barrett excepian eligible before

177
00:11:48,200 --> 00:11:52,240
he signed his extension with the Knicks, like he was considered more of an

178
00:11:52,279 --> 00:11:54,840
asset there, even if he didn't
think he was worth two or three first

179
00:11:54,919 --> 00:11:58,559
round picks. It's not the same
Ruy Hotchimore, who's just such an unknown

180
00:11:58,480 --> 00:12:01,360
come on on the basketball court right
now. But you do have him,

181
00:12:01,399 --> 00:12:05,159
and I would throw him in the
same vein as Corey Kisspert, not quite

182
00:12:05,200 --> 00:12:09,320
afterthoughts. Just these oh that's you
know, these quaint, unknowable assets right

183
00:12:09,360 --> 00:12:13,320
now. And then you have Gafford
Davis and Avdia, who I would think

184
00:12:13,320 --> 00:12:18,679
are just more attractive. You can
get higher money elsewhere as well. Will

185
00:12:18,720 --> 00:12:22,039
Barton, who I believe can be
aggregated soon enough, and so can Monte

186
00:12:22,080 --> 00:12:24,840
Morris. Those are two players you
could look into moving if you're confident in

187
00:12:24,919 --> 00:12:28,600
having Delan right and especially if you're
trading don Van Mitchell. You don't necessarily

188
00:12:28,600 --> 00:12:33,080
need both those guards on the team. Kyle Kuzma is entering the final year

189
00:12:33,080 --> 00:12:35,120
of his deal. He has a
player option for twenty twenty three twenty twenty

190
00:12:35,159 --> 00:12:39,080
four, he makes thirteen million.
My point is it's very easy for the

191
00:12:39,159 --> 00:12:43,759
Wizards to step ladder their way to
superstar money. What does get tough is

192
00:12:43,759 --> 00:12:48,039
that so many of these contracts,
like you can view Will Barton not as

193
00:12:48,080 --> 00:12:52,120
an albatroz because it's expiring, but
you could be fine using him as salary

194
00:12:52,399 --> 00:12:56,639
ballast. I think I think Will
Barton's offensive upside is there. I know

195
00:12:56,720 --> 00:13:00,320
he feels like the past two seasons
he's also dealt with injuries. They've been

196
00:13:00,399 --> 00:13:01,679
touching go. But I think if
you're the Wizard, you can say,

197
00:13:01,759 --> 00:13:07,559
yeah, viewing Will Barton as a
salary anchor in prospective blockbuster trade talks,

198
00:13:07,600 --> 00:13:09,600
that's what we're going to do,
and that's fine. It gets harder a

199
00:13:09,639 --> 00:13:13,559
lot harder to say the same for
Monte Morris, for a Kyle Kuzma,

200
00:13:13,600 --> 00:13:16,399
and even for a Ruey Hachimura,
just as a six point three million dollar

201
00:13:16,480 --> 00:13:20,200
player, because if you trade him
on his own, he's probably not going

202
00:13:20,240 --> 00:13:22,799
to net a first round pick.
And so that's just sort of why I'm

203
00:13:22,840 --> 00:13:26,759
viewing his salary as the primary utility. But if you're the Wizards, you're

204
00:13:26,759 --> 00:13:31,840
not gonna want to move him just
as this usable salary, I would hazard.

205
00:13:31,440 --> 00:13:35,200
So gets harder to move those guys
because they actually add value to the

206
00:13:35,240 --> 00:13:39,000
deal. And if you're a team
like Utah or a team that's suddenly rebuilding,

207
00:13:39,759 --> 00:13:45,720
maybe you don't want age twenty seven
Kyle Kuzma going into his contract here,

208
00:13:46,000 --> 00:13:48,679
Maybe you don't have a need for
Monte Morris, who could become a

209
00:13:48,720 --> 00:13:52,360
free agent. Is a starting caliber
guard, but can become a free agent

210
00:13:52,399 --> 00:13:56,320
himself after next season. He nobody. He is two more years left on

211
00:13:56,360 --> 00:13:58,200
his deal, So yeah, he's
he's a bargain. But if you're the

212
00:13:58,200 --> 00:14:01,679
Wizards, that's all of a bark. He's making less than the mid level

213
00:14:01,679 --> 00:14:05,600
exception and he could should be your
starting point card right now? Does a

214
00:14:05,679 --> 00:14:09,279
team want him when he's not a
youngster with all this upside? I believe

215
00:14:09,320 --> 00:14:11,440
that he is. I always think
that he's older than I think he is.

216
00:14:11,440 --> 00:14:15,679
I'm glad I will jake this.
He is also age twenty seven,

217
00:14:15,720 --> 00:14:18,879
so both him and Kuzma or age
twenty seven. He did just turn twenty

218
00:14:18,919 --> 00:14:22,279
seven though, that is for for
Monte Morris. Wow, excuse me.

219
00:14:22,679 --> 00:14:26,080
That's where it gets difficult. But
if you're a Jazz team, and again

220
00:14:26,120 --> 00:14:30,240
I'm just using the jazzes framework here, if you're a Jazz team that is

221
00:14:30,320 --> 00:14:35,080
only interested in picks, you could
get would I would guess my belief is

222
00:14:35,159 --> 00:14:39,320
right now. It would not be
like a super high one that you could

223
00:14:39,360 --> 00:14:41,639
get a first round pick for Kyle
Kuzma. You could get a first round

224
00:14:41,679 --> 00:14:46,200
pick for Monte Morris. I don't
think you could get a first for Ruey

225
00:14:46,279 --> 00:14:50,960
Hachimura. You're not going to get
a first for Will Barton. Could you

226
00:14:50,960 --> 00:14:54,720
get a first for Christops Peerzingis.
I definitely don't think so, Probably not

227
00:14:54,720 --> 00:14:56,679
even get a first for Daniel Gaffer. He's just more valuable as like keep

228
00:14:56,759 --> 00:15:00,159
him just the money he's making.
He gets started at center for you,

229
00:15:00,159 --> 00:15:03,080
and he's young enough to where it's
worth continuing to plumb. Johnny Davis like

230
00:15:03,279 --> 00:15:07,639
just drafted. Denny Avdia could definitely
get you first round pick on his own,

231
00:15:07,679 --> 00:15:11,159
But I found Utah and using them
as evil. I want Ava And

232
00:15:11,200 --> 00:15:15,039
so if the deal, if the
Wizard's all in deal, I'm not advocating

233
00:15:15,159 --> 00:15:18,919
for the Wizards to do this for
Donovan Mitchell, but they could in theory

234
00:15:18,279 --> 00:15:26,120
go Will Barton. Let's say Monte
Morris or Will Barton, Kyle Kuzma,

235
00:15:26,240 --> 00:15:31,080
and then you include Denny Avdia,
Johnny Davis, Daniel Gafford. Let's just

236
00:15:31,120 --> 00:15:35,039
say those five players and then the
picks that I outlined. Is that not

237
00:15:35,240 --> 00:15:39,759
a viable like a real offer if
you're Utah and you think that you're gonna

238
00:15:39,759 --> 00:15:43,159
get at least two first from them, plus that swap, and you know

239
00:15:43,279 --> 00:15:46,440
that a third team will take Kuzma. And let's say you're sending Kuzma to

240
00:15:46,519 --> 00:15:50,200
a third team and getting a first
round pick. I'm just viewing Kuzma as

241
00:15:50,200 --> 00:15:52,000
the equivalent of a first round pick
here. Not a high end first round

242
00:15:52,000 --> 00:15:54,559
pick, but I'm viewing him as
the equivalent of a first round pick here.

243
00:15:56,159 --> 00:16:00,879
Maybe you're asking for more, but
Avdia Davis three, two conditional first,

244
00:16:02,240 --> 00:16:06,480
a swap, one actual first.
Like this is this is a real

245
00:16:06,799 --> 00:16:08,960
package, and I will put it
up on the screen. I'll screenshot and

246
00:16:08,960 --> 00:16:11,840
put it here and run it through
one more time. But like there's an

247
00:16:11,879 --> 00:16:14,799
offer, and this doesn't have to
be the final details of it. Wilbarton

248
00:16:15,240 --> 00:16:19,000
Kyle Kuzma or is Wilbarton Kyle Kuzma, and I would view Kuzma as like

249
00:16:19,039 --> 00:16:22,320
a future first round pick. The
Jazz can be rad him, or do

250
00:16:22,320 --> 00:16:25,639
you find another team that would be
interested in getting him and giving up a

251
00:16:26,039 --> 00:16:30,360
first to do it? So Wilbarton, Kyle Kuzma, Danny Avdia, Johnny

252
00:16:30,440 --> 00:16:33,279
Davis, Boom, you're at the
money. Daniel Gafford's in there too.

253
00:16:33,399 --> 00:16:37,200
That's your fifth player. You're including
a conditional twenty twenty five first round pick,

254
00:16:37,480 --> 00:16:41,519
a conditional twenty twenty seven first round
pick, a two twenty eight swap,

255
00:16:41,879 --> 00:16:45,440
and then a twenty twenty nine first
round pick, and so in theory

256
00:16:45,840 --> 00:16:51,279
like you could be giving up three
first that would be unprotected, plus a

257
00:16:51,360 --> 00:16:53,879
swap, plus all of this other
stuff. Where Danny Avdia is a real

258
00:16:53,919 --> 00:16:59,200
prospect, Johnny Davis is a real
complimentary prospect, Daniel gafferd is someone who

259
00:16:59,240 --> 00:17:03,120
can actually play. Maybe Utah's not
high on him for the future, and

260
00:17:03,120 --> 00:17:06,440
you do run into roster spot issues, but to me, that's a real

261
00:17:06,480 --> 00:17:11,440
offer, and there can be other
moving parts like Hatchamura and Corey Kissberg involved

262
00:17:11,440 --> 00:17:15,440
there too. It's it's it does
feel like more of a hodgepodge, and

263
00:17:15,440 --> 00:17:18,599
you have to be okay not getting
a first round pick until two twenty five

264
00:17:18,640 --> 00:17:25,279
at the absolute earliest. Again,
could you trade Kuzma somewhere that he's going

265
00:17:25,359 --> 00:17:29,119
to net you though a first round
pick that's imminent a two twenty three or

266
00:17:29,119 --> 00:17:32,119
twenty and twenty four first round pick. I mean, is there something to

267
00:17:32,160 --> 00:17:36,119
be worked out with Miami there?
They desperately could use someone like him to

268
00:17:36,160 --> 00:17:38,559
play their four spot. If you're
the Wizards, maybe you're not okay giving

269
00:17:38,599 --> 00:17:41,839
them up. Because this is the
second part of the question, should the

270
00:17:41,839 --> 00:17:45,400
Wizards be chasing a blockbuster deal?
My answer is just yes, flat out

271
00:17:45,400 --> 00:17:49,359
you should chase it because you resigned
Bradley Beal to the Supermax, gave him

272
00:17:49,359 --> 00:17:55,039
the no trade clause. If you're
serious about winning, he's age, this

273
00:17:55,079 --> 00:17:57,279
is going to be his age twenty
nine season. There's no like, Okay,

274
00:17:57,319 --> 00:18:00,079
let's see what we have a special
one. You have to start thinking

275
00:18:00,119 --> 00:18:03,759
about, well, how much is
Kuzma gonna cost next year? And you

276
00:18:03,920 --> 00:18:07,160
essentially made that decision with KCP that
you didn't want to pay his next deal.

277
00:18:07,440 --> 00:18:11,960
So there's an urgency. It's it's
not even implicit, it's it's conspicuous

278
00:18:11,960 --> 00:18:17,000
like it's there. It's it's it's
material. So I think you are obligated

279
00:18:17,000 --> 00:18:21,720
to do it. Is Donovan Mitchell
that player, No, I don't for

280
00:18:21,759 --> 00:18:25,680
them just because you have Bradley Beal
already. I'm not gonna like the defense

281
00:18:25,720 --> 00:18:27,920
from him and Bill even if you
believe Mitchell is going to defend at a

282
00:18:29,000 --> 00:18:30,319
higher level, and if you do
have both of them, to me,

283
00:18:30,319 --> 00:18:33,119
you would need to figure out a
way to keep Kuzma as part of this

284
00:18:33,160 --> 00:18:37,680
deal. If there's another star that
comes on the market, yes, Kevin

285
00:18:37,759 --> 00:18:41,119
Durant obviously, but they definitely don't
have the horses to get into that race.

286
00:18:41,759 --> 00:18:45,480
I would also note that some people
have pointed out that they could get

287
00:18:45,480 --> 00:18:49,839
the Knicks to unbottle the protections on
that twenty twenty three First, I wouldn't

288
00:18:49,880 --> 00:18:55,920
necessarily rule it out if it's involves
the Wizards getting a different player, but

289
00:18:55,960 --> 00:18:59,200
if it's the Wizards going after Donovan
Mitchell, the Knicks are absolutely not gonna

290
00:18:59,240 --> 00:19:02,240
do that. It would just be
bonkers for them to even try. So

291
00:19:03,079 --> 00:19:04,480
went not bonkers for the Wizards to
try, but I would be shocked if

292
00:19:04,519 --> 00:19:10,319
the Knicks even considered doing that.
I don't know if don Van Mitchell's that

293
00:19:10,359 --> 00:19:14,599
guy, though, I do think
that the Wizard's offer is more interesting than

294
00:19:14,640 --> 00:19:17,599
people are crediting. I don't think
it beats the Knicks. I don't even

295
00:19:17,599 --> 00:19:18,680
think it rivals the Knicks. I
want to make that clear. I'm just

296
00:19:18,720 --> 00:19:23,680
talking about blockbuster trades in a vacuum, and there might be other avenues for

297
00:19:23,680 --> 00:19:30,519
them to explore improving their team.
Things happen all the time in this league,

298
00:19:30,519 --> 00:19:33,680
where a player we don't expect becomes
available. Even though we thought don

299
00:19:33,759 --> 00:19:37,000
Van Mitchell eventually wanted to get out
of Utah, that was basically no knowledge.

300
00:19:37,440 --> 00:19:41,319
The expectation wasn't necessarily was going to
happen this summer, and if it

301
00:19:41,480 --> 00:19:44,680
was, a lot of people thoughts
were going to be because he requested it,

302
00:19:44,960 --> 00:19:48,319
not that the Jazz were sort of
the driving force behind this. We

303
00:19:48,319 --> 00:19:51,359
didn't think Kevin Durant was going to
deliver a trade demand and then rescindent.

304
00:19:51,599 --> 00:19:56,400
Unexpected shit availability happens all the time
in this league. And I won't sit

305
00:19:56,440 --> 00:19:59,240
here and try and pinpoint. Okay, well who's next? Like the things

306
00:19:59,279 --> 00:20:03,680
go sour Hortland, like a year
from now and it's Dame and you held

307
00:20:03,720 --> 00:20:06,119
onto your assets and you're the Wizards. Does that even make sense Dame and

308
00:20:06,200 --> 00:20:11,519
beal? No, But my point
being, like you have these assets,

309
00:20:11,599 --> 00:20:12,559
you can go into the season with
them. I'm not telling them to make

310
00:20:12,599 --> 00:20:15,960
the deal now. But if the
Knicks are actually pulling out of this and

311
00:20:17,000 --> 00:20:19,880
the Jazz actually want to move Donovan
Mitchell, I don't necessarily view that as

312
00:20:19,920 --> 00:20:23,920
settling. If you're Utah and you
believe you're going to get at least two

313
00:20:25,160 --> 00:20:29,160
of those first distant first from the
Wizards. And here's what's also interesting about

314
00:20:29,240 --> 00:20:34,279
this is when you're trading Mitchell to
the Knicks, you're doing so knowing that

315
00:20:34,319 --> 00:20:38,200
he's going to stay long term.
That in theory, should bring down the

316
00:20:38,319 --> 00:20:42,960
value of their future first round picks. Now because of the Knicks track record,

317
00:20:44,240 --> 00:20:48,799
where you know they've actually drafted quite
well, especially on they're not your

318
00:20:48,880 --> 00:20:55,680
primo first round picks. So it's
not that you don't trust them to like

319
00:20:55,960 --> 00:20:57,839
make the right picks if they keep
them. It's that you just don't trust

320
00:20:57,920 --> 00:21:02,319
them to be in the the right
spot long term. If you're an outside

321
00:21:02,359 --> 00:21:04,640
team, maybe fans do. That's
fine. I think this regime has earned

322
00:21:04,640 --> 00:21:07,480
a lot of trust. There's still
parts that I'm not completely sold on.

323
00:21:07,720 --> 00:21:11,440
I think that's fine to say Knicks
fans seem to get mad. Some Knicks

324
00:21:11,440 --> 00:21:12,480
fan seemed to get mad at me
when I'm just not, like, this

325
00:21:12,519 --> 00:21:17,640
team's gonna win sixty four games as
is, and they're they're perfect that type

326
00:21:17,640 --> 00:21:22,279
of bs. But if you're an
outside team, you're betting on the Knicks

327
00:21:22,440 --> 00:21:26,039
continuing down this historical path of sub
mediocrity. And so that's why those picks

328
00:21:26,039 --> 00:21:30,359
are attractive. But if we're talking
about the Wizards, and let's use Dondra

329
00:21:30,440 --> 00:21:33,640
Mitchell get as the example. Do
we know Donfred Mitchell wants to be in

330
00:21:33,720 --> 00:21:37,079
Utah Washington long term? This is
not Miami or New York. And so

331
00:21:37,160 --> 00:21:41,720
the fact that he could leave when
he becomes a free agent, if not

332
00:21:41,799 --> 00:21:44,519
before, then should they decide to
trade him. But the fact that it

333
00:21:44,519 --> 00:21:48,920
would hover over him potentially leaving in
twenty twenty five free agency and knowing that

334
00:21:48,039 --> 00:21:52,440
two that you could have two first
and a swap owe to you that are

335
00:21:52,440 --> 00:21:56,480
going to post date, that there's
there's appeal there that I don't think we're

336
00:21:56,480 --> 00:22:00,319
considering. I would want to short
Washington's future with Donovan Mitchell more than I

337
00:22:00,319 --> 00:22:04,960
would Toronto's future with Donovan Mitchell.
Maybe i'd want to short Charlotte's future.

338
00:22:06,839 --> 00:22:08,359
The Hornets are kind of in a
similar boat. By the way, I

339
00:22:08,359 --> 00:22:11,839
didn't I don't think I'm gonna do
a one question on them, just because

340
00:22:11,920 --> 00:22:15,880
I don't think they're non draft pick
assets are intriguing. And what makes this

341
00:22:15,079 --> 00:22:19,519
a possibility to me for Washington is
that I viewed Denny Avdya as that fringe

342
00:22:19,519 --> 00:22:26,200
blue chip type of prospect, and
they have other interesting to serviceable youngsters already

343
00:22:26,240 --> 00:22:30,759
on the team, coupled with salary
matching players that are actually more valuable than

344
00:22:30,799 --> 00:22:34,559
just for their salary. And so
my verdict here is I don't think the

345
00:22:34,640 --> 00:22:38,759
Wizards can trade for Donovan Mitchell.
If the Knicks are all in on Donovan

346
00:22:38,839 --> 00:22:41,680
Mitchell, if they actually have a
hard line in the sand, if they're

347
00:22:41,720 --> 00:22:45,640
serious about pulling out, if Utah's
not willing to wait, I don't expect

348
00:22:45,920 --> 00:22:49,720
anything I just said to come to
fruition. But if all those things work

349
00:22:49,759 --> 00:22:53,799
out, I do think Washington,
independent of the Knicks, has a viable

350
00:22:53,839 --> 00:22:59,200
offer, and outside of the Donovan
Mitchell sweepstakes, I think they can be

351
00:22:59,359 --> 00:23:03,440
reasonably in the hunt, depending on
which teams are also going to be involved.

352
00:23:03,680 --> 00:23:07,480
Could Memphis come over the top for
a star that's not Donovan Mitchell,

353
00:23:07,799 --> 00:23:10,880
Yes, their team that could do
it, Ditto for New Orleans, ditto

354
00:23:10,960 --> 00:23:14,599
for the Magic. But are those
teams operating on the timeline where they're going

355
00:23:14,640 --> 00:23:18,000
to go in for a star we
see Memphis really trust their development. The

356
00:23:18,039 --> 00:23:19,920
Pelicans I think need to see at
least for a half season what they have

357
00:23:19,960 --> 00:23:26,279
in the Zion CJ Brandon ingram Core
with Herb Jones and Trey Murphy and Dison

358
00:23:26,359 --> 00:23:30,119
Daniels if he's healthy, and Jonas
Valanciunis, Larrynett Junior, there's just Josie

359
00:23:30,119 --> 00:23:33,119
Alvarado, a ton of depth there. What does Kyra Lewis Junior do this

360
00:23:33,200 --> 00:23:36,559
season if he's healthy? And maybe
this is just you know, the Wizards

361
00:23:36,640 --> 00:23:40,559
using some of these assets or the
allure of them to make medium size moves.

362
00:23:41,039 --> 00:23:45,799
I just feel like they have the
ability to put together a package that

363
00:23:45,920 --> 00:23:51,119
affords them the opportunity to make a
bigger swing if it becomes available. So

364
00:23:51,240 --> 00:23:56,119
I wouldn't rule out the Wizards being
aggressive in blockbuster talks and then also being

365
00:23:56,160 --> 00:23:59,920
able to do something that profiles is
more than hitting a double. I'll tell

366
00:24:00,160 --> 00:24:06,640
about They're not going to trade for
Boyon Pagdanovich is like they're crowning Mover or

367
00:24:06,640 --> 00:24:10,640
Harrison Barnes like it feels to me. My belief is that the assets they

368
00:24:10,680 --> 00:24:14,519
have available and the mechanisms through which
they can get there, they would be

369
00:24:14,559 --> 00:24:18,640
able to pull off a move that
is splashier than something on that level.

370
00:24:18,720 --> 00:24:22,640
Do you agree? Do you disagree, let me know. Please remember to

371
00:24:22,680 --> 00:24:25,680
subscribe to us on YouTube that helps
us out a ton, and also subscribe

372
00:24:25,680 --> 00:24:29,240
to us on Apple, Spotify,
wherever you get your podcast. Join our

373
00:24:29,319 --> 00:24:33,240
discord the link to that is in
the descriptions of the pod and YouTube,

374
00:24:33,240 --> 00:24:36,319
and follow us on all the socials
which are also in the description. Like

375
00:24:36,559 --> 00:24:40,720
always you do with the shout out
to really the player that the Wizards should

376
00:24:40,759 --> 00:24:45,680
be ready to mortgage their future for
the one the only worth everything the Wizards

377
00:24:45,720 --> 00:24:48,160
have, and then some Frank Hilikina