Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
As a clock strikes thirteen, it's Monday, the sixth of May. You're
of our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, today we're going to begin
with some new censorship. As we've told you, we were on rock Fan,
but of course that is dependent on a Vimeo channel which has now been
flagged because I told the truth about vaccines. They're not over with this stuff,
folks, and I'm not going to bow to any of this stuff,
and so we're going to talk about that as well as this Anti Semitism Act
that is running through. It's amazing to me to see people's reactions to this,
especially the Southern Baptist's Religious Liberty Ethics Board or whatever it is. These
are the same people who are pushing the vaccines with Francis Collins. Yeah,
big surprise, there isn't it. We'll be right back. Well, as
we've had the roku channel just for a few weeks. How long has it
been, Travis, About three or four weeks? I guess you know.
We've told people about it. I asked people to promote it because there's not
really too many places I can go without being censored. And now this was
set up eventually the people were doing the Roku channel that we paid and it
spent a lot of time on this, as a matter of fact, a
lot of time, a lot of Travis's time, a lot of Karen's time,
and a lot of money to us to get this thing put on dependent
on it being hosted in the interim on Vimeo. Well we'll see how this
works. And so we got this message. This is your video from Thursday.
It's been taken down. Get this on Friday because we talked about vaccines.
We do not permit content that makes faults or misleading claims about vaccination safety.
Oh yes you do. You have stuff from the CDC and Faucy all
the time. You still got stuff that's a lie out there, That is
a lie. Who are you to say what's true and false? This is
what I have a problem with with censorship, folks. If we don't get
the censorship thing right, You know, I don't really when we look at
this anti semitism stuff from Israel, who are they to say what I am
allowed to say. You cannot have free speech if you don't allow what you
think is false. And then criticize it. That's the way that works.
If you're going to say, well, I'm going to be the standard to
decide what this is. And we all know that Vimeo is doing this for
the government. They always do it indirectly. That's our subversive government. That's
our government that actively plots to subvert the Constitution. When you look at the
mechanism for how they're doing this with universities, right, it's through the money.
Oh well, I'm not violating the First Amendment because I didn't make a
law about that. Well, what you did was you made a law saying
that you're going to stop giving them money. Oh I can do that,
Yeah, you could have. I wish you would have stopped giving the universities
money a long long time ago. But they had no problem with them when
they were Marxist seminaries as they have been all of my life. When they're
actively involved in racism and hatred, actively purging out white people from the colleges
began with the Ivy League colleges. It's now trickled down everywhere pretty much.
All this DEI stuff. They had no problem with that. They had no
problem with the CRT, Marxism, racism, hatred, the dei, the
sexual grooming of everything. They had no problem with that. Congress still funds
that, and they still will. There's not going to be any monitors for
any of that stuff, not at all. I tell you, you know,
if we don't get this free speech thing right, that's the first thing
they attack. Right. What's the first thing that dies in a war?
Free speech. What's the first thing our government went for when it went to
war against us? Free speech? The COVID war, the climate, McGuff
and all the rest of the stuff. They've been moving towards shutting down free
speech for a long time. They did it covertly, they did it overtly,
and now they're doing it in your face in Congress. They are at
war with us. The lockdowns were sanctions. Sanctions are the first act of
war. In ancient times, the sanctions would be somebody, you know,
they would show up and they would barricade the city state. Because they didn't
have nation states, they had fortified cities, and so what they would do
is they would surround the city and try to star the people out. That's
what they did with us, with Trump and with Trudeau and with every other
global leader that you can announce whatever their party. It didn't matter. It
is a war with us. The sanctions, the attacks on free speech always
there, excessive attacks on free speech when they won a war. As I've
pointed out many times Woodrow Wilson, when he wanted his to get us into
World War One on the side of the British taking that film the Spirit of
seventy six, throwing the guy who did it into jail ten year sentence,
gave him a massive, massive fine by today's standards if you adjusted formflation,
because this is before they created the federally serve and destroyed the value of the
dollar. But you know, absolutely you came after this guy. The Supreme
Court said that's fine, there's no First Amendment rights for free speech because he
wanted a war. Speech is the first casualty of war. It's the first
thing they've gone to because they're already at war with us. I get this
article. Forty nine percent of the people think that there's not going to be
a civil war within the next five years. Forty one percent say yes,
folks, isn't that what it was in the last four years. It began
the Civil war already four years into the Civil war, and we're already about
let's see, we're fort sixteen years, sixteen years in the fourth turning,
right, is that right? Yeah? I guess so going back to two
thousand and eight, so we're sixteen years in the fourth turning, we're four
years into the civil war overtly declared against us with sanctions, with censorship,
and it just keeps getting worse, and it's focused on the vaccine stuff.
So going back to this thing and allow anything that makes false claims about vaccination
safety, yes you do, or health related information has a serious potential to
cause public harm. So they didn't take any advisor commercials, or they didn't
take any of that two hundred and fifty million dollar ad Council money that was
out there from Trump. They didn't take any of that. What a bunch
of lying filth scum at Vimeo. They've not purged our channel. I want
you to purge our channel. Go ahead and do it, Vimeo. I
dare you to. I don't care. I don't care if anybody sees this.
I'm not gonna lie for you. I'm not going to live by your
lives. I'm not gonna play games. You know the thing. You know
that I've seen people do that. I saw a pinwheel Freel do that.
Todd frel you want to talk about the vaccines, And of course he was
going to push the vaccines, and he wanted to talk about the vaccines and
convince people to take the vaccine against their conscience, against the Constitution. And
so he wanted to stay on YouTube because if he said vaccine, they'd probably
kick him off anyway, So he'd say the thing, you know, the
thing, the thing I can't say on here. I am sick of these
quizzlings. Quizzlings make me want to throw up. People like Todd Frele,
people like this guy who is the Religious the Ethics and Religious Liberties Commission,
Brent leather would of the Southern Baptist What a quizzling. This guy is unbelievable.
What he's telling people makes me disgusted. Oh this is fine. You
know, we've got this non governmental organization. Yes, not even an unelected
bureaucracy like the FDA and the CDC or the EPA or whatever. It's not
even an unelected bureaucracy is going to be dictating things to us in our life.
No, this is going to be a non governmental organization. Doesn't have
anything to do even the most tenuous, you know, connection to the government.
International Holocaust IHR. A interesting, isn't it that the WHO is going
to try to exercise another non governmental organization is going to try to exercise control
over us with the who's IHR International Health regulations and now we've got the International
Holocaust Rules whatever the group is called unbelievable. So this is the new pattern,
right, A new pattern you always wind up with. Now, I
guess instead of it going to be bureaucracies that do it, federal bureaucracies,
state bureaucracies, unelected people. I said in twenty twenty, why do you
care about Trump running for president? He turned the government over to bureaucrats.
He paid them to lock you down. We've been run by unelected and unaccountable
bureacrats. Why do you care about election? I don't care about elections anymore,
but I do care about this stuff, and we need to call these
people out. In Tennessee, every single one of the GOP representatives, every
single one of them, voted to shut down our free speech and the free
exercise of our religion, every single one of them with this Anti Semitism Awareness
Act, the Trivia a. Every single one of these Republicans in Tennessee voted
to shut that down. Well, guess what I'm not voting for. Whoever,
whichever one of you guys is my representative, just amazing to me.
So let's talk about where we are in terms of the vaccine. Here's an
update from Handy EMS and now Handy he's got his own substack. Did he
put that in here? Well, anyway, I don't see Handy substanct and
I can't remember what it is, but look for Handy you'll probably find him
that way on substack. He's been sending me stuff for a long time as
the kind of reports on the ground is what he was seeing in the hospitals
with patients coming in with the MS. He said. A couple of updates,
he said. First, my friend who just had open art surgery my
card idis endocard idis, aortic valve destroyed, mitrol valve damaged, ortic rout
destroyed, still making a slow recovery, says he's lost just shy of sixty
pounds since January. And he wasn't a big guy to start with. I
wouldn't recognize him had I not known him, known that this is him his
heart is functioning at only thirty percent, so I think he's being set up
with a congestive heart failure team. Next, the hospital bills for two weeks,
four hundred and eighty thousand dollars. They get their cut, don't they.
Oh boy, death and hospital bills two things you can't avoid. I
guess, death and taxes. This doesn't include the hospital bills and doctor visits
between January and April, so it's only just the two weeks. So.
Secondly, I've mentioned my partner at work whose mom took the jabs in a
booster and was then diagnosed with lymphoma. I spoke with him this evening.
He says his mother went to a chemotherapy appointment yesterday and began having shortness of
breath. She was taken to the hospital and CT scans showed pulmonary embolism and
DVTs clots in her lungs and legs. I think she's doing okay considering the
circumstances, but when you began having pulmonary embolisms, that can change in a
second the blood clots as well as the cancer vaccinated. Third, nothing has
really changed regarding the EMF stuff. Here. We're still in the midst of
this new normal where your younger patients are having problems we typically didn't see in
younger demographics and numbers that we've not seen before. Twenty twenty one, I
had a forty one year old experiencing a stroke just today. Sudden cardiac death
is still a concern, he said. I think you're right. I believe
some people have damaged hearts and don't know it. Then they exert themselves like
they did before their hearts were damaged, and the heart can't take it.
The jabs are like a ticking time bomb. Things can be fine for months,
then overnight you have a lifelong debilitating illness. If you're lucky, it
may be something that can be treated. But now you are a pharma customer.
Well, it's not just people who are let's say forty one years old.
Karen's brother, Keith, was just talking to a friend. I was
telling him his high school son, who is excelled in sports, involved in
a lot of different sports, has been just diagnosed with myocarditis. But he
said, and Keith is very concerned because he listens to this program. Not
through Vimeo, by the way, they can go to anyway. He said,
and this is what bothers me about all this stuff. Why are people
dying like this? My people perish for lack of knowledge. God said that
about people spiritually, but it's also true politically, medically, physically, all
those things are true. So he said the doctors were very positive about it
and said, yeah, lots of kids have that. Today. They're setting
him up. Not only have they lied to him about the vaccine, not
only did they give him an experimental drug when there was no pandemic, and
they changed their definition of them old people. Oh now we've got to get
the young kids as well, because they might kill grandma. All the rest
of this stuff. And now I guess it's a thing to screen athletes.
I've shown many different school jurisdictions where they do that. Perhaps that was what
was happening. I don't know if he had any symptoms of anything, or
he was a symptomatic and they scan it because he's participating in sports. A
lot of schools have now started doing that. Nobody asks why why is it
that they've started doing that. The answer is just too obvious. And yet
what they're doing is they lied to him about the pandemic. They lied to
him about the vaccine. They lied about every single thing, and now they're
telling him go ahead, yeah, no problem, you got microdis still play
sports whatever. They're setting them up for sun to die. It is just
absolutely beyond belief what these people are capable of. And Vimeo you're just like
that, You're just like that, you calculating sobs. It's just amazing to
me, amazing, He says. The ers are a mixed bag in terms
of mask wearing. Some rs are encouraging masks by signage that says that masks
are required, conveniently placed boxes of surgical mask on most countertops. They seem
to be just using peer pressure at the moment instead of police pressure. Right,
We've seen that. We've seen people tackled, brutalized by the cops on
the ground. We've seen a mob of people, some of them on horseback
in Australia, grabbing a long own individual outdoors walking for exercise, fresh air
and sunshine. This mob of cops would attack him, held him there and
put a mask on him. Tried to find the clip. I've shown that
many times. They couldn't find the clip where I'd show it to you,
and I just have to describe it but you know, it's it's kind of
interesting to see what's happening now with these protesters. They love the mask,
and so you can see this. Here's a protester. Oh she got her
mask taken off. Oh there you go, I could see the face there.
Why is it that they don't want their face shong, Well, because
we've got people like Mark Levin and these big money Jewish donators who to Ivy
League schools, who said we're going to make sure they never get any job
again. They we're going to work again in this country. This is my
country. We own this country now. Oh really, really, I'm done
with the cancel culture. I'm done with anybody that pushes this stuff. I'm
done with a foreign government that fleeces us of money and then fleeces us of
our free speech, our free exercise, religion, and our constitution. I'm
done with you people, and I'm done with any Republican who supports that,
who panders to that. And that's the vast majority of them, quite frankly.
So someone walks into a waiting room full of masks people and sees boxes
of masks and signs everywhere saying masks required. They just automatically don their mask
of shame. When are they going to make us wear the con of shame?
I mean that's you know, they could put a cone shame on us
and then maybe we wouldn't have to stay six feet apart. You know,
it might even expand out a little bit so that you know, you get
a couple of feet between you and everybody. But hey, you know it's
going to be going still be able to breathe at the top of it's open,
right. You know they got the plastic shields that they put up everywhere
during the pandemic. Why don't they put sheels around our head? Is that
what they're going to do the next time? Are you going to do that?
Todd Friel will tell you you got to do that? Is a thing?
Is well, I'll not even say what the name of his program is.
I don't want to give him any publicity. Just amazing what we haven't
seen and quite some time as a hospital using their security to escort someone out
of the building for refusing to wear a mask. Been there done that?
He said, he's been escorted out of the building because he wouldn't wear a
mask. So now we've got, you know, cops who are taking masks
off of people? Isn't that interesting to everything? There is a season to
wear a mask, to not be allowed to wear a mask, which is
whatever your dictators say at the moment. That's where we are at any given
moment. So you know when Vimeo says we do not permit content that makes
false or misleading claims about vaccination safety or health related information, Well, you've
got radical leftists saying that oil companies are committing climate murder. For them,
that's hyperbole. They can't prove it at all. I can prove that these
Trump shots kill people. We've got lots and lots and lots of evidence.
As a matter of fact, we knew they were killing people in unprecedented reactions
as soon as they started rolling them out while Trump was still president. This
is nothing new, This is not hyperbole. But you got radical leftist saying
oil companies are committing climate murder. You think they're going to get kicked off
OFMEO? No, No, not at all. A recent Harvard Environmental Law
Review article proposes prosecuting major oil companies for climate homicide and mass murder. Sounds
very much like Robert F. Kennedy Junior, doesn't it, so, you
know, give them three hots and a cot, three meals in a bed
in a prison for supposedly killing people by raising global temperature sea levels and causing
deadlyer hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, droughts, heat waves, blizzards, and
wilfires. Total nonsense. Media outlets eagerly promoted the claim. Sorrow's funded prosecutors
will undoubtedly be thrilled to indict Exxon Mobile and other companies once they put more
flash mob thieves back onto our streets. As a matter of fact, you
know, I'm sure that do you think that RFK Junior would revert back to
his ways? He hasn't renounced that he tried to finesse it while I was
talking about the company. I think we should give the death penalty to the
company. Do you really so we don't do any extraction, right, just
kill all the oil companies? How about that? Yeah, that's what you
get with him. You know, they say you've got people who are double
haters. They don't like Trump or Biden. I'm a triple I hate all
three of them. Fortunately here in Tennessee, there'll be somebody. I don't
care about the presidential election anyway, but I don't have to scratch it out
or write a name in there. I've got somebody Constitution parties on the ballot
here in Tennessee. By the way, Joel Skousen did not get the nomination.
I thought it was a done thing, but it's gone to Randall Terry,
which would be kind of interesting because Randall Terry had in the past run
abortion ads on the Super Bowl when he ran for president. That could be
interesting. Of course, the super Bowl is gone now, but it should
be interesting if he decides to do what that Democrat candidate did. Remember this,
I showed you this. We're progressive activist last year. I recovered the
remains of these five babies from an all term abortion center in Washington, d
C. These are the phases of a genocide supported by Joe Biden and my
own Democratic Party. We can provide for the working class and resist this extremism.
I am challenging you to never vote for a pro choice Democrat again.
I'm theresa of a covin Act pro life Democrat running for president of the United
States, and I approved this message. Yeah again. She is a radical
leftist, but she's got that there. I wonder if Randall Terry will do
that with Operation Rescue. As a matter of fact, Yeah, I don't
know it was. Operation Rescue was around before I really got involved in the
pro life thing. I remember hearing a lot of stuff, but you know,
I don't trust anything that heard the mainstream media, but their confrontational tactics
for the reason they have this Face Act here, not that it justifies the
Face Act. Again. You know, these are people who are not violent
with anybody. It really the Face Act is really about shutting down free speech.
But even the New York Times Vimeo, even the New York Times NEMEO
is talking about vaccine harm. Even Chris Cuomo is talking about vaccine harm better
late than ever. Here we are four years later, and they're talking about
the vaccine stuff and the fact that nobody is paying any attention to people.
And in the New York Times, even though they have to bow and scrape
and cowtow to big pharma and big government over this stuff, they still every
person in this article. I read the first half of it and it got
very repetitive. But they kept going to doctors, doctors who have been injured.
And I've talked to doctors who have been injured, who've had their career
ended. An orthopedic surgeon, for example, who cannot stop his hands won't
stop shaking since he got the vaccine started right away. Other doctors don't want
to talk to him about it. One said finally, well, we know
what this is, but we're not going to talk about it, and I'll
see what I can do to help you. Right. That's how afraid they
are, folks. We can't let them do that to us. This is
why it doesn't matter what they take away from us. We cannot live by
their lives. We cannot censor our self. Self censorship is the worst thing
you can do, the worst thing. Let them take you down, but
don't take yourself down. It's a difference between dying fighting a war and committing
suicide. Don't do that. Thousands believe the COVID vaccines harm them. Is
anyone listening, asked The New York Times? Well, not if they're watch
vimeo. Within minutes of getting the Johnson and Johnson jab, Michelle Zimmerman felt
pain racing from her left arm, up to her ear and down to her
fingertips. Within days, she was unbearably sensitive to light and struggled to remember
simple facts. She was thirty seven with a PhD in neuroscience. Until then,
she could ride her bicycle twenty miles, teach a dance class, and
give a lecture on AI all in the same day. Now, more than
three years later, she lives with her parents. Eventually diagnosed with brain damage,
she cannot work or drive, and even cannot stand for long periods of
time. When I let myself think about the devastation of what this vaccine has
done in my life and how much I have lost, sometimes it seems too
hard to comprehend. So here's the obligatory praise of government and big pharma,
even though they don't mention Trump by name. They say the COVID vaccines a
triumph of science and public health. The Trump shots they are miracle. Quote
Ernest Aangley right, a miracle. And of course, to quote people like
Al Muhller and Franklin Graham who were telling people to take it. You know
what, I understand that this wasn't their wheelhouse, this wasn't their beat to
cover. It was mine. I'd covered it, I knew it, and
so there's a little bit there should be some grace there of people who didn't
understand what's going on They know it now and they're still silent about it.
That is not anything that you overlook. They've got to be called out on
that stuff. It's estimated, they said, says The New York Times,
to have prevented millions of hospitalizations and death. And the vaccines do produce rare
side effects. Blah blah blah. That's their paragraph, their disclaimer for their
sponsors, the government and pharmaceutical companies. Then they get back to the real
story. Doctor Zimmerman's account is among the most harrowing. But thousands of Americans
believe they have suffered serious side effects following COVID vaccination, a lot more than
that. Why do they say thousands, Because thirteen thousand people have filed vaccine
compensation injury claims. Guess how many have been compensated forty seven. Only twelve
of those forty seven have been paid out. They have gone through nineteen percent,
so you know, one fifth of them have been have gone through.
So, in other words, out of those that one fifth that they've looked
at that have been filed, a lot of people haven't filed any stuff.
Of the people who have filed it, they've only looked at one fifth of
them, and of the one fifth that they have looked at, they've approved
one point eight percent of those. They've only paid out money for a quarter
of those zero point four percent right, and they have paid out an average
of thirty six hundred dollars. Your life destroyed? How much of the vaccine
companies been paid by Trump and Biden? Tens of billions of dollars, free
marketing everywhere, vilifying and shutting down anybody that questions their products, sometimes to
scientists feel that patients with real injuries are being denied help and believe that more
needs to be done to clarify the possible risks. This is the New York
Times. The reason this is happening as beholden as they are to the government
and the big pharmaceutical companies. The only reason this is happening is because it
wasn't thousands of people, It wasn't rare. It is a building avalanche of
truth that is going to bury these sons of Bolsheviks. The history is going
to be clear on this. I'm afraid that it is just now building,
and it's going to get a lot worse in the next couple of years.
A lot worse going to be able to hide it. So they are starting
to try to do some damage control for themselves personally, But they can't get
off of the big pharmatits, can they. People who say they have post
vaccination industries are just completely ignored and dismissed and gaslighted. She said, person
who was injured. Hundreds of millions of people in the US have safely received
COVID vaccines. They say, well, I think this is too soon to
say that, isn't it. The test is still running. These things would
not have been approved yet if they had followed their procedures. In a recent
interview, doctor Janet Woodcock, longtime leader of the FDA who retired in February,
she had been the acting commissioner in January of twenty twenty one. Now
that she's retired, she's going to give us a little bit of truth,
just a little bit of truth. I felt bad for these people, she
said. She said, I believe that their suffering should be acknowledged, that
they have real problems, and that they should be taken seriously. Said the
former head of the FDA. I'm disappointed in myself, she said. I
did a lot of things I feel very good about, but this is one
of the few things. I just didn't bring it home. Okay, this
is as close as you're going to get to a confection a many of these
people. This is kind of like what Robert mcnamaray did when he had Errol
Morris film him in the fog of Warren talked to him about the Vietnam War.
Yeah, you know, we got it wrong, and it doesn't talk
about how many people died because he got it wrong. There's no central repository
vaccine reprecipients, says New York Times wrong, nor of medical records, and
no easy way to pool these data. Wrong. It's been done by many
people. They just don't want to show it to you. Reports to the
largest federal database of so called adverse events can be made by anyone about anything,
So this is not true. There was tremendous amount of red tape involved,
and then it became even more difficult to report things into the vaccine Adverse
Effects Reporting System. The VARUS system became even more important, more difficult because
there was a lot of professional intimidation. Don't put that in there. The
red tape alone was enough to discourage people. And so there are multiple studies.
One of them showing and I think it was only like one percent or
something. I can't I can't remember the number now, but it was something
like that one percent that we reported. There was a Harvard study that was
I remember it was Harvard study that was commissioned by the CDC. So there
you go, gold standard, elite organizations and all, and then they said
that, well, most of them are not being reported. Why well,
because of the red tape. Then there was active intimidation. Nevertheless, what
we did see was an unprecedented number of people reporting. Now it doesn't matter,
does it. You know what percentage if it's one percent or if it's
ten percent that's reported, or if it's one hundred percent reported, If you've
got an explosion more people reporting problems then all of the other vaccines for thirty
five years combined in just the first few months. That's not a warning flag
for you. And that was four years ago. We knew that four and
a half years ago anyway, So that's an absolute line. Of course.
It was another system that was there. They shut that one down, and
then there was a Pentagon system where they kept very careful records because they wanted
to have an early alert if there was a bio a warfare attack. Well,
there was a bio warfare attack by our own government. And then when
they got the signals, they shut it down and they told people, well,
you know these army doctors or military doctors, I said, you're looking
at this databation and comparing it to the previous five years. Well, all
previous five years are wrong. We're just going to go back and retroactively change
them. The lies and the cover ups there. I hope some people go
to jail for this stuff. I really do. Sean Barkovich fifty four,
a nurse practitioner in New York City who's worked on clinical trials for HIV and
COVID, said that ever since his first COVID shot, merely standing up sends
his heart racing, a symptom suggested of postural orthostatic tachy cardia syndrome, a
neurological disorder that some studies have linked to both COVID and much less often to
vaccination. No, it's a vaccine. The vaccine was a bioweapon. They
misattributed this to anything and everything, even stirring up some mysterious gases in the
soil if you're gardening, just the nonsense. They have gone to is like
the bet soup stuff. He also experienced stinging pain in his eye's mouth and
genitals, which has abated, but also tendas, which has not abated.
I can't get the government to help me, he said. I'm told I'm
not real. I'm told I'm rare. I'm told I'm a coincidence. Renee
France forty nine, a physical therapist in Seattle, developed Bell's palsy, a
form of facial prolysis, something happens a lot with vaccines anyway, but even
more so with this one. I mean, we had had friends when we
were in Texas forty five years ago, and he was from England, and
they got married and she had to get a vaccine to travel, and she
got Bell's palsy. So she goes to England to meet all of the new
in laws and half her face is paralyzed and drooping down. I mean,
fortunately for her it went away, but not until after that trip. Doctor
Gregory Poland sixty eight, editor in chief of the journal Vaccine with somebody who's
been injured? How about that? The editor in chief of Vaccine magazine,
Oh the irony, Oh the Justice, said that a loud whishing sound has
been in his ears every moment since his first shot. This is a medical
doctor, editor in chief of the journal Vaccine, a loud whishing sound in
his ears every moment since his first shot. But his entreaties to his colleagues
at the CDC to explore this has led nowhere. We got the guys the
Vaccine journal here. He's kind a problem with his vaccine up not listening.
I know nothing. He received polite responses to as many emails, but I
just don't get any sense of movement. If they have done stuff. Wait
a minute, he's the editor in chief of the journal Vaccine. If they've
done studies, you know, first of all, you know, this is
a guy who should know that you do studies. He should also know,
since he's got the journal Vaccine, that they haven't done that. They didn't
do any studies before they pushed this stuff out, at least now that they
would tell people they were now finding out they did do some studies. They
found very horrific stuff, and they put it out anyway. They covered up
the studies. If they've done studies, a studies should be published. That's
one of the reasons why he's saying that because now we know they did some
studies and they know exactly what they were doing. They knew exactly what they
were doing in despair, he says, I might never hear silence again.
It's going to go through life with this incredible wishing sound. Doctor Buddy Creech,
fifty, who led several COVID vaccine trials at Vanderbilt, said his tonightis
and his racing heart lasted about a week after each shot. It's very similar
to what I experienced during acute COVID back in March of twenty twenty, he
said. He said, regardless, he said, when our patients experience a
side effect that may or may not be related to the vaccine, we owe
it to them to investigate that as completely as we can. No, you
will have all of these bought and sold prostitutes like Vimeo shutting down anybody that
even makes a mere suggestion or anybody who reports what a study has had to
say. What I was talking about last week was the fact that it's now
an established fact. Both the American government, health agencies Canada as well as
the UK have all acknowledged that there's all kinds of DNA garbage in there that
they didn't clean up, and doctor Robert Malone testified before Congress as to why
that is, how they use that as part of the manufacturing process, and
how they're supposed to clean and filter that out but they didn't bother to,
and how they left the most dangerous part of SV forty semi and virus forty
in there that causes cancer. They left all that stuff in. Now,
what has happened with any of this stuff. We've had one state attorney general,
Surgeon General Latipo in Florida, who has said, we don't recommend this
for anyone of any age because of that. He's taken a lot of heat
for that, but he's not banning it for anybody. And Desanta's isn't banning
it. It should be banned. It should be banned by the FDA.
Violates the FDA's safety and purity rules. Ought to be banned. But you've
only got one surgeon general and one state who recommends against it. That's all
they've done. And we had we had a couple of people die decades ago
from a vaccine. He had nine states ban it right away. Our government
has become so captive to corporations to foreign governments, to the military industrial complex.
It's run by the CIA. It's just The CDC also links mRNA vaccines
made by Pfizer and Moderna to heart inflammation of myocarditis as the New York Times,
especially in boys and young men, and the agency warns of anaphylaxis,
or a severe allergic reaction, which can occur after any vaccination, which was
something that they knew would happened because they used polyethylene glycol to encapsulate the particles.
And as I said, the scientists that Children's Sealth Defense called the FDA,
they said, well, we don't care. Call Pfizer, so we
don't care. So Chris Cuomo finally breaks down admits his vaccine injury, first
time publicly. I remember it was his brother who was governor at the time,
Andrew Cuomo, who was saying, you know, you all have to
get this, all you young kids have to get You might go home and
kiss your grandmother and kill her, but you won't transmit it if you have
a vaccine. Really, is that how that works. Let's say that you've
got a vaccine against some kind of bacterial thing or something. Right, Let's
say that your hands are dirty, with it or something, and maybe you
know you've got an immune system. Let's say, let's just go through the
how this is all supposed to work. Right, You train your immune system
for whatever this is. I'll say it's a bacterial infection, and your immune
system has been trained because you got a vaccine and it worked according to all
these theories. And so you get this stuff on your hands and you're all
dirty, but it doesn't make you sick. But you can see your grandmother
and you know you can transmit it that way, even if you're vaccinated,
even if you don't get sick. That stuff. None of this stuff was
even consistent with their vaccine theory. You know, we were told all the
time by Fouching other people, Oh, no, natural immunity, that's nothing.
Natural immunity means that you were in a real battle with a real disease
and you beat it, And that means that your immune system has been trained.
The whole purpose of a vaccine is to train the immune system, according
to their theories, and so everything they told us was a lie. Everything
they told us was nonsense and consistent. So he says, telling the young
people, oh, you know, you got to get it you're going to
kill grandma. By the way, that was nothing new. We've been told
that was part of the Yale Psychological study and that was released in July of
twenty twenty. By the way, before I forget it, eye Handy at
Substack. That's where you can find handy eye Handy at Substack and Eco Taxi.
Thank you very much for the tip on rock Fan. I appreciate that.
So Chris Cuomo did an interview and he basically highlighted this New York Times
piece. You know, why aren't we listening to it? So now it's
safe. They're all starting to get concerned about the fact that they've committed massive
murder crimes against humanity. They're going to be exposed, and so they're starting
to try to pull it back around the edges. And as one of them
steps forward, like the New York Times a little bit, still doing obeisance
to the pharma mob, then others like Chris Cuomo will say some things.
So he admitted publicly for the first time the he's also suffering from a vaccine
injury. Well, it's we've known this for a long time. A living
nightmare. Former Pussycat Doll is still recovering from COVID vaccine injury. For those
of you who don't know or care about contemporary culture like me, that was
a very successful girl group. They actually they were multi platinum, which means
they sold a lot of records. Her name is Jessica Suda. She shared
a life altering journey of pain, confusion, and advocacy. After being injured
by Moderna's trump shot, she said, I remember when he injected me.
I made a joke because it ripped out through my arm. It was like
one of the most intense, horrible feelings. I looked at him and said,
am I going to turn into the Hulk? In August of twenty twenty
one, she decided to get the trump shot, believing it was the right
thing to do for her community. Yeah, I'll be a guinea pig for
community health. We're talking about communist health, right And you know the interesting
things about communists didn't care about the individual. Community health. People don't care
about the individual. That's all about the health of the community. Well,
the community is made up of individuals. You know, the individuals not free.
If the individual's not healthy, guess what, the community is not free
and healthy either. So I was very much focused on mainstream media. She
said, I believed everything they were telling us. I believed all of the
propaganda. Three days after her first shot, she woke up with a muscle
spasm in her back, breathing difficulty, and brain fog that left her feeling
dizzy and unable to think coherently. She spent a day in the hospital,
but the medical staff was still unable to make a definitive diagnosis. She said,
I didn't know it was a vaccine injury for at least a month.
I thought it was MS multiple sclerosis. Despite her initial symptoms. She got
her second dose of the vaccine three weeks later, she said, and that
is what completely did me in. The second shot marked the beginning of a
cascade of symptoms, including double vision, burning in her rib cage, muscle
fatigue, skin sensitivity, and joint pain. It was a living nightmare,
she said. Soudo's journey through the medical system was a frustrating, disheartening experience.
She struggled to find answers for her worsening condition, and doctors were quick
to dismiss her concerns, and so was Vimeo. They would take down this.
If she was to talk about this they have no sympathy for her ordeal.
They're sold out prostitutes. Any information about her ordeal would be taken down
by those people, by you two, by all these people, PayPal,
Vimo, you name it. Despite her please for help, the medical staff
treated her with skepticism and dismissal. They ran all these tests, she said,
catching nothing. They kept telling me I'm healthy. I'm crazy, she
said, and I'm like, please make the pain stop. Listen to this.
The medical staff answered her and said, what pain? We don't see
it? They see pain? Is this a new thing? Now? They
got some painometer or something. Now I'm looking at your spatial era and I
don't see any pain there. Yeah, right, we don't see pain.
Yeah, that's amazing. It's science. This is science, folks, This
is medical science. Now it's pure prostitution, murder for hire. What these
people are? She eventually connected with a neurologist, upon hearing her symptoms,
asked if she had been vaccinated. I asked him, are there a lot
of us? And he said, well, how about fifty of you?
He said, I've treated. That's what he's treated. However, when she
later consulted him, he clamped up and he wouldn't talk about it, she
said, as if he was being recorded. She said, they put me
in a lot of psychiatric meds as well, because they said I was making
it up. But the medication is only exacerbated here already debilitating symptoms. Yeah,
of course, Well let's put you on some SSRIs. How about that
murder suicide that would get rid of One of these people's going to blow the
whistle on us. So Children Self Defense Fund, it's asking the Supreme Court
to hear a case alleging that the FDA misused as emergency powers to authorize these
COVID shots for children. Why were they in such a rush to get it
to kids because of legal immunity. We talked about this at the time.
You know, they get this approved for the kids, then they get you
know, different kind of legal immunity. It was a tenuous immunity that they
had with the under the prep pack that George W. Bush put in.
So they wanted to get the full thing, and that's why they were playing
these games with Corminatti label versus the Pfizer biointech. Yeah, they're the same,
they said, but they're legally distinct because they got a different label,
and so we'll say that one of them is for emergency use and the other
one is for fully approved for children to use. And it was all about
the legal immunity for these people. So they filed lawsuit and they're hoping that
it's going to be heard by the Supreme Court. They filed it more than
two years ago. So I guess we're at the point now where the sold
out court system is kind of reached the end of it. And so,
as I said all of this stuff about what has happened with the DNA contamination,
Health Canada admitted it on Thursday, I was talking about that. That's
the reason why I guess they pulled it down on Vimeo. I have talked
about the vaccine every day that I've been on Vimeo. I talk about it
pretty much every day. So I'm assuming that they'll go back and pull these
things down. I don't know what their rules are about censorship, but I
imagine that it's done. You know, you can see if you can find
anything on the Roku channel if you want to go there, and you can
leave your comments. If you want to on Vimeo to any of it,
you can go directly to the Vimeo channel. And leave the comments there about
their censorship. I don't really care. I know I'm poking the bear and
I'm going to poke the bear. I'm going to continue to poke the bear,
and you better poke the bear as well, because the bear is not
Paddington Bear. It's not a cuddly, little cute bear that we can control
or allow it to be in our midst We're going to take a quick break
and we will be right back. Elvis the Beagle and the Sweet Sounds of
Motown find them on the Oldies channel at APS radio dot com. H Making
Sense common again. You're listening to the David Knight Show. We got the
New York Times, we have Chris Cuomo, we have the editor in chief
of the journal Vaccine, and they're all talking about these vaccine adverse effcs there
are four years later, and it's only going to get worse. This is
a Bill Gates insider, So somebody who worked for many years as a vaccine
expert and a scientist at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and he went
on with Steve Kersh and he talked about what he sees coming in. So
we're so now, as you see, we've been telling people about this before
it happened, and because we had seen what they did with vaccines in the
past, we knew what their mo was. And they keep doing the same
thing over and over again. And it doesn't matter whether it is the COVID
mcguffin or the climate mcguffin or whatever. They keep doing the same tactics.
They have the same long term strategy and goals, but they keep using these
same tactics because frankly, they work. And so we were talking about this
for a long time. Now you've got four years later, you've got the
mainstream media starting to talk about the adverse effects of the vaccines that they've always
denied, that they've always censored. But now what are the people who are
looking at this talking about. They're talking about a massive killing of the population.
That's where we are now, and it's going to be happening in a
few years now. And that's why these people are running scared, because I
think they know it as well. I know they know it. Former Bill
and Melinda Gates Foundation scientists and vaccine expert doctor Garrett benden Bosch has warned the
populations around the world will soon experience a completely unprecedented punge. Completely unprecedented is
his phrase. He predicts that the death toll will be up to thirty to
forty percent and highly vaccinated companies countries. And again that's what I said about
Deegal. He said, isn't it interesting, especially considering the fact that this
mr Anda vaccine, every think was a product, just like the Germ Games.
It was always a product these simulations that they did. You know,
you look at CIA's involvement in this for example, okay, the Dark Winter
simulate, they were heavily involved. As a matter of fact, the former
CIA had Wolsey was the one who played the role of the president in the
Germ Game simulation. Fauci was there, Johns. Hopkins was there, all
the usual suspects, gates and all that, right, and we know that
they did that every year, you know, Event to one. The last
one they did in the fall of twenty nineteen. It was a two one
or three on one. I always get that confused. I think it's two
to one anyway, same thing. Dark Winner was key two months before nine
to eleven, Cio was involved in that. Nine to eleven CIA was involved
in that. Then a week later you've got the anthrax attack. Guess what
the CIA was involved in that as well. Yeah, that's right. When
they went back and did the investigation, of course New York Times and Washington
Post at first they said, well, it was coming from Saddam Hussein in
Iraq. We got to go get him. No, nobody has that kind
of weaponized anthrax except for the American government. And as they continue to do
an investigation, the FBI to help the CIA, pend it on as signcientist
who worked at a lab that didn't have that kind of anthracs didn't have the
It was a not only was that a particular type of anthrax that was unique
to the United States, but it was a weaponized anthrax that would propagate in
a particular way, and that was only done in two labs. Both of
those labs were connected to, you guessed it, the CIA. So they
went with a third lab and penned it on a scientist there. They never
took it to trial because they didn't have any evidence. They just you know,
made it sound like it was him and harassed him and all the rest
of the stuff. He died, They said he committed suicide. And then
they said, yeah, we know he was the one who did it depended
on him after he was dead, and so a top scientist with Bill Gates
raised the alarm. During interview with Steve Kersh. He also notes that COVID
is impossible to tackle with an mRNA injection because it'll always continue to mutate.
He says, And what are he's talking about here is any kind of a
star's virus? And again I'm not dogmatic about viruses even existing one way or
the other. They can't even decide whether they're live or dead. They can't
see him on a Microsoft. It's an abstraction, folks. It's a way
of explaining a physical phenomenon. And I'm not buying even into that anymore.
I don't buy. I rejected long ago vaccines, now reject the virus theory.
I just see it as an abstraction. It's a model, and we
all know about models, don't we. As I said, every time I
talk about this, it's like atomic models. They can't observe it, and
so they come up with abstractions like Neil's board dead, or they come up
with quantum mechanics and other things like that. But of course, as Heisenberg
pointed out, I think it was Heisenberg you know, even if you to
observe, to try to observe this stuff, you change it. So you
can't observe it because merely looking at this stuff is going to change it.
Okay, So you know these are intellectual abstractions. Uh, and we should
not think that this is you know, you've actually got you know, they
can look at these viruses and see them under the microscopes as a matter of
fact. So Kerry Mulla said, he said, Fauci's so ignorant. He
thinks, or at least he tells people talks about this as if you could
look into the microscope and you could see a virus. You can't do that.
The guy who invented the PCR test that Fauci has weaponized and abused and
misused, Well, you talk about false information, you talk about misinformation,
disinformation, malinformation. That's what Fauci has done to the PCR in every regard.
And called out not using those terms, of course, because those are
newly minted terms to shut down free speech about everything. But he used those
terms extensively, you know, in terms of talking about Fauci. So he
says, Uh, the expert that warned that these highly vaccinated countries will soon
see quote unprecedented unquote numbers of deaths, he said, quote and my humble
opinion, what we will see is something completely completely unprecedented in terms of the
magnitude of the wave of morbidity and unfortunately, the mortality that we will see.
Kersch asked him about specifics about what are you talking about completely unprecedented future.
He responded by predicting that over one third of all people will die as
a direct result of the COVID mRNA injection rollout. He said, in some
highly vaccinated populations, I would not be surprised that we'd be dealing with a
serious decimation of the population some populations, maybe up to thirty or forty percent.
Now what he's talking about there where I think he's talking about a country,
for example, a highly vaccinated population. If he was talking about just
the people who have been vaccinated, he would have said, just the people
have been vaccinated. But he's talking about in particular countries where you've had a
high percentage of the population vaccinated. He thinks that we're going to see thirty
forty percent of the people die. Well, since a country that has a
high number of people vaccinated is sixty to eighty percent that they've achieved in some
Western countries and in the United States. What he's saying is about half the
people jab are going to die. That's what he's saying here in essence.
A former Gates Foundation vaccine scientist, he warned that a quote huge, huge
wave unquote of illness and death among those vaccinated for COVID is now imminent.
That's his word iminent. He also said, this is going to be a
quote massive tsunami that will collapse hospitals and cause financial, economic, and social
chaos. That's what they always want, isn't it. Isn't that what the
lockdowns and you sorry, you can't open your business and you can't go to
work and all the rest of the stuff. As Jeryl Clenty said about the
commercial real estate, we knew that was going to happen, and what happens
with that as that rolls out, it's going to take down the banks as
well. What this guy is saying is that the knock on effects, the
long term effects of these vaccines has yet to be seen. Any thinks we're
going to see it in the next couple of years. And he thinks when
that happens it's going to have massive financial and economic consequences, not just not
just the the consequences for each of these individuals. I think we're already seeing
that, you know, when we look at help wanted signs about everything.
Even though we're bringing in millions and millions of people, many of them not
interested in working. They want to get the welfare, like the squatter that
we saw bagging about it. But nevertheless, there's a lot of people that
are out of the workforce now. We're told they just don't want to work.
And some of that is true. Some of that is the universal basic
income training that Trump gave them with a lockdown, the stimulus check to move
the overton window towards people, Oh, I don't have to have a job.
I'll just stay home and play video games. You cut me a check
for that. But I think some of it is people who have gone missing
and they don't want to talk about it. They will start to replace the
surge of cancers now we have a more chronic phase, he said, and
it will end with a hyper acute phase, a huge, huge wave.
I've been studying this now, he said, for four years, and I
know what I'm talking about, said Bosh, it is very very clear that
when this starts, our hospitals will collapse, and that means the chaos and
all kinds of layers of society, financial, economic, social, us you
name it will be complete. And that is what I am very clearly predicting.
It's very strange for me to make such statements, he said, but
I'm not hiding it because I'm two hundred percent convinced that this will happen.
This will be something that will be recorded, reported in history for many,
many generations to come. Well, you know, Johnson, Trader Johnson,
he calls himself speaker, I call him Trader. Trader Johnson says, well,
just got to be on the right side of history. He is on
the wrong side of every issue, and history will remember that. And these
people, Republicans and Democrats who participated in this massive culling, this massive demicide,
and it's every country. But of course you know we were seminal in
it. Trump funded the vaccines and sent him out from here. History will
not remember them. Well, frankly, I don't care about history. History
will cease someday, just as this world will cease. But God will remember
it, and these people may not be interested in recording the adverse effects of
what they have done. But God collects their tears in a bottle. And
I know that's a metaphor that's been soiled by these idiots in the right.
But that is a biblical metaphor, collecting the tears in a bottle, and
I know they have run that into the ground. It's another satanic aspect of
these people, the way they defile it. That is a very it's a
very true thing. God is not going to forget the suffering those caused to
these people. He will forget it if they repent and call on Christ for
forgiveness. But I don't see that that happening, do you. Professor Dolores
Cahill, that I talked about last week, a world renowned immunology expert,
was even more explicit. As I said last week, she said everyone who
has been vaccinated, even if they have one injection, will die within three
to five years. And in spite of her credentials, as I said,
I didn't think that that was I don't think that anybody could make that kind
of an absolutist diagnosis because there will always be individual variation. You know,
some people are immediately affected by this. Others aren't. And I know there
was a big variation in the different vaccine lots, but depopulation has been the
thing that they're after. And again, whether whichever mcguffin you're talking about,
whether it's climate or COVID or whatever, depopulation is something that they have aspired
to. Here's Larry Fink talking about that. With the World Economic Form,
I could argue in the developed countries, the big winners or countries that have
shrinking populations, it's a feature, not a buve. It's something that most
people never talked about. You know, we always used to think shrinking population
is a cause for negative growth. But in my conversations with the leadership of
these large developed countries that have xenophobic immigration policies, they'll allow anybody to come
in. Shrinking unemployment, excuse me, shrinking demographics. These countries will rapidly
develop robotics in AI and technology. And if the promise I didn't say it's
going to happen, but as the promise of all that transforms productivity, which
most of us think it will, we'll be able to elevate the standard of
living a country is the standard living of individuals even with shrinking populations, and
so the paradigm of negative population growth is going to be changing, and the
social problems that one will have in substituting humans for machines is going to be
far easier in those countries that have declining populations, and so for those countries
that have rising populations, the answer will be education and so rapidly developed.
You know, for those countries that do not have a foundation of rule of
law or education, they're going to be left. That's where the divide is
going to get more. Well, I guess that's pretty bad for us.
We don't have either one. We don't have rule of law, we don't
have education either. And when he said there he said those are replacing machines
with humans, he doesn't mean it. He meant it the other way around,
replacing humans with machines. And of course who's he talking to there saying
it's going to be much better for us. He's talking to the elites there
at the World Economic Form. Not much better for us, not better for
us if we die. That's what they've always been after. It doesn't matter
whether it's the COVID mcguffin or the climate. Mcguffin Earth Day nineteen seventy.
It was still you know, pushing Erlick's population bomb and all the rest of
this stuff. This was also sent to me by Handy again eye Handy at
Substack. He said, hey, look at this. You got a gorilla
that died a little bit early at the zoo. Oh yeah, you know,
this is little Joe, interestingly enough, and he sent me a clip
not just the article about the about the gorilla dying heart attack, by the
way, but he sent me a clip from September of twenty twenty one,
as they were rolling out these vaccines to everybody. And of course, you
know, one America Health Insurance Life insurance company said, we had this massive
increase in the number of people dying in a third and fourth quarter of twenty
twenty one. Never seen anything like it. It's more than the three standard
deviations away from the meat. And they say this was not from COVID,
but he goes, but I know better. It had to been from COVID,
and it had to have been only the unvaccinated, because we know that
it had to be COVID. And I know that you can't die if you
get the vaccine, So we're going to charge unvaccinated people more money. Well,
the unvaccinated people are going to be the ones that you're going to have
left for the most part. But the people that are really going to bleed
the insurance companies dry, just like the hospitals are going to be the people
who have had the shots. You just wait for it and see if that
doesn't happen. But anyway, Handy sent this to me. This is September
twenty twenty one. Saint Louis Zoo begins vaccinating it's at risk animals against COVID
nineteen. I think Little Joe was the gorilla and the coal mine showing us
here we are. Three years later, he died from a heart attack.
I don't know what happened to hass Actually I do know what happened to Dan
Blocker. He died from a minor operation in the hospital, leading cause of
death. Hospitals have always been anyway, it is incredible, with incredible sadness
that we share the Western Lowland gorilla, Little Joe, who had been in
treatment for heart disease, died of a heart attack overnight May the fourth.
Well, they want to try to explain this away. He also had his
other mate who just died as well, vaccinated four years ago. They died
just recently, another twenty seven year old grill. They lived for about thirty
or forty years in the wild. They said, well, yeah, heart
disease is a common cause of death and grills. It's nothing unusual. I'm
sure that it's not the vaccine, don't you think of course it's not the
vaccine. So the and you also got former football players, former basketball players
dying at an early age. This is an NBA player, Darius Morris passed
away at thirty three. Cause of death unknown. We do know that they
were vaccinated. I think it was last week. I think the guy was
at twenty seven years old or something like that. Former NFL player. I
think he'd only been retired about a year year and a half. But he
would have had to have had the vaccine in order to play. So you
know, nothing at all unusual about athletes dying. Nothing at all unusual about
young children having my or carditis, Nothing at all unusual about young children dying
suddenly of heart attacks. None at all. We're gonna take a break and
we come back. We're going to talk about some questions that are not being
asked about bird flu. Yeah, there's some real interesting to me questions about
why they're doing what they're doing and why they're not doing other things. And
if you answer these questions, you're not gonna put this bird flu scare to
an end. You're listening to the David Night Show. All right, let's
talk about bird flow before we do real quickly a comment on Rumble Midwestern Canadian.
I thank you for the tip, because I think my wife and I
are pretty good parents. But the best saying we might ever do for our
kids is to keep them safe from the shots. Second best was going homeschooling.
Yeah, yeah, that's you know, keep them from harm. You
know, that's the first thing, and we want to think about that as
parents. It used to be that that was a motto of the medical community.
First do no harm. It would be one of the best things we
could do as parents to first do no harm. Don't send your kids to
school, don't send them to injections. That's really key, I think,
And but you know, it's the key thing is we need to and I
think a lot of people who homeschool do it for the reason they're trying to
protect their spirits. That is an eternal thing that is an eternal thing on
rock fan Jason Barker, thank you Jason for the tip he sets You're on
fire today, David, Well, thank you. I've yeah, I really
got set on fire when I saw that. Take my blood pressure up a
few points when I saw that. I had a lot of people send this
to me. It's an article from Axios. They're now mapping out bird flu
in the wild and there isn't anything that they won't do. And take a
look at what Drudge did. This was the I took a screenshot of this.
This is a Drudge on Friday, I think Friday or Saturday or something
like that. The very top bird flu fears rise Drudge report. Well it's
rising because he's putting at the top, but at the top of his his
feed there and then disturbing. First photo of a Texas farm worker who caught
bird flu shows bleeding in the eyeballs, and we're going to show that to
you. I'm going to show you the bleeding eyeballs of this guy. And
I'm going to see if you can distinguish between col flu, conjunctive itis,
and uvi itis. And I'm going to show you pictures of all three and
We'll have a little multiple choice quiz here and see if you can tell which
one is the disturbing first photo of a Texas farm worker that's coming up in
a moment in here. But as I said, several people send this to
me. Drudge picked up this Axios article as well. But I like the
comment from Roy. He says, a polar bear has it? You were
right, And of course the map shows we found a polar bear with it
in Alaska. One polar bear. Isn't that interesting? Just one polar bear?
And then they found a dolphin in Florida? Just one dolphin? Is
this an epidemic? How come the entire school didn't come down with it?
Did they close the school of dolphins? Did they lock it down? What
is going on with any of this stuff? Do you see how nonsensical that
is? But the polar bear, actually, there was a report that went
out in January January sixteenth of this year saying we found a polar bear who
died died from bird flu? Did you really again? This is back to
where we always were with the human stuff, right? Did I with a
PCR test? Did he die from bird flu? Or did he die with
a bird flu PCR test, what were the symptoms? And interestingly enough and
again Gavey is the Gates vaccine organization pushing it everywhere, vaccines for everybody,
everywhere as part of this twenty thirty IA agenda, immunization agenda, everywhere,
every age vaccinated, presumably every vaccine that they can imagine. So we're back
to zany zoonotics here. Bird flu's wild and crazy range sex, Steve Martin,
you know, it's the wild and crazy. So there's some questions that
I have. You know, when we go through and we get this narrative
that is being sold to us by the mainstream media, not a day goes
by now that we don't have some fear porn put out there, some disinformation,
misinformation and malinformation being put out there. We've got the FDA, the
CDC, the USDA, and they're not on the same page exactly. The
USDA is pushing this harder for the moment than the CDC is and the FDA
is and of course they've got their bots in the press who are pushing them
to do more. You're not doing no. We saw that with the other
one too, didn't we. But let's just you know, when we got
the USDA going around checking ground beef and milk. Of course it was the
FDA that looked at the milk, and the FDA said, yeah, okay,
we did the PCR test and we found some fragments. What does that
mean fragments because they didn't sequence anything really, I mean, if they found
fragments of it. I don't know how the PCR test works. I do
know that they're multiplying it by one point one trullion times. I do know
what Kerry Mulla said, if they could find this virus in you at all,
and with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost
anything in anybody. It starts making you believe in the sort of Buddhist notion
that everything is contained in everything else, right. I mean, because if
you can model, amplify one single molecule up to something that you can really
measure, which PCR can do, then there's just very few molecules that you
don't have at least one single one of them in your body. Okay,
So that could be thought of as a misuse of it, just to claim
that it's meaningful. It allows you to take a very minuscule amount of anything
and make it measurable and then talk about it in meetings and stuff like it
is important. It doesn't tell you that you're sick, and it doesn't tell
you that the thing you ended up with really was going to hurt you or
Yeah, So what does it mean when they say they found a fragment in
the milk they found fragments a bird flu. You know, there's a lot
of different bird flu supposedly that tell us if they found a fragment of it,
how do they know what it is? It could be something completely different.
It could be a different kind of bird flu, it could be a
different kind of flu altogether. When you look at the DNA sequencing, you
know, we're told we share a great deal of DNA with all the different
animals, especially with monkeys. But you know, that very tiny difference there
makes a huge difference. You know, we're not like monkeys at all,
and yet there's a lot of similarity there in the DNA doesn't indicate evolution.
What it indicates is a common designer and creator who created that mathematical error correcting
code and self propagating code. But when we look at that and say you've
got some fragments of DNA, you know how much do you need to distinguish
a human from another animal? How much of a fragmented DNA do you need
to distinguish between bird flu and something else, between different strains of bird flu.
So I have questions about that. I also have questions about why when
the FDA and the CDC says, well, it's nothing because it was destroyed,
when it was past rized, when it was cooked, it was destroyed.
Okay, So then why is the USDA looking for it then? And
why is the USDA then looking at beef? Because if this is bird flu,
wouldn't you think that they start looking at eggs. Why aren't they looking
at eggs if it's bird flu? Why are they looking at milk and meat?
First question, why are they not looking at chicken meat? Why are
they looking at cow meat if it's bird flu? Wouldn't you think that if
this was really a pandemic, a pandemic cord is necessary to kill tens of
millions of chickens and industrial farms. If this wasn't simply an attack on our
food supply, If this was a real concern, don't you think they would
look at the birds where supposedly the source. Why are they skipping the chickens.
Now, why are they so focused on cows? Well, we know
why, don't we Because this is to shut down meat and dairy. That's
why they're not looking at eggs. That's why they're not looking at chicken meat.
And then when they look at meat from cattle, why are they looking
at ground beef instead of steaks. Well, because once you grind that up,
you're exposing it to a lot more air. You're aer rating it and
all the rest of this stuff, and so you're more likely to pick up
anything. You know, and as carry Mullis's, if you magnified enough,
you run through forty cycles, you magnify it by one point one trillion times.
You can find anything, especially you know, if you've you know,
run it through the air, air rated it a lot, like you do
with ground beef. So they're not looking at steak, they're not looking at
chicken, they're not looking at chickens eggs. And so if they were looking
if they were concerned about bird flu in humans, what about salmonella? We
have about fifty to two hundred and fifty cases of salmonella a year, So
why aren't they looking at We've only according to them. We've had a single
case of bird flu this sky with the red eyes, We've had a single
case of that, But we've had fifty to two hundred and fifty cases of
salmonella every year. So why are they focusing on pink eye? Is it
pink eye or is it something else? Right? I mean, is it
is it bird flu or is it pink eye or is it UVI iis or
whatever? And why haven't we had a single symptomatic cow. Why is the
USDA pushing this when the FDA said and the CDC said, well, we
looked at the milk, but it's harmless because it's booked. If the FDA
tested the milk and pronounced it harmless, why is the USDA creating controls about
transporting milk cows? We know why because this has nothing to do folks with
bird flu. There's no risk to the birds, there's no risk to the
cattle, there's no risk to the humans. The risk to the humans is
that they're going to use this to ban meat and dairy and that's why they're
focusing on this, and it's why the USDA is involved in this, and
why they're getting involved in the meat stuff and why they are putting travel restrictions
on lactating cattle, dairy cattle, because they want to centrally control our food
supply. They want to centrally control the processing of meat. And the one
thing they've said about the raw milk that they've all one thing said about the
milk. Don't have raw milk. So what they do and they're focusing on
attacking raw milk. They're focusing on attacking local farms and especially local processing of
meat, which we saw them going heavy within the last year several different farmers,
Amos Miller of the Amish Guy, others. That's their agenda. They're
rolling this out to give them a you know, a cover story for what
they want to do, which is to completely centralize and shut down our meat
and dairy. That's what this is about. When you look at that article
from Axios, they you know, put spots in where we found you know,
one case, or we found five cases, or we found eight cases
in this area. So they put different sized dots on a US map all
together in the entire United States, according to that fear mongering article that was
at the top of the Drudge Report and so forth. Two and twenty one
total cases in all of the United States. This is not an epidemic,
folks, And these are animals. They didn't say died, they tested positive.
You had eighty five of those were foxes. As many people said,
Well, if a fox eats a bird that's got bird flu, then the
fox will test positive for the bird flu obviously, right. So again,
this is US news, US bird flu outbreak, outbreak. It spreads to
chickens and cattle, and it raises concerns over human infections. No, you're
the one raising concerns over human infections that we don't need to be concerned about.
Again, why don't we see you know, fifty to two hundred and
fifty cases salmonella. You know that's also easily taken care of with hygiene.
So why are we freaked out about this? Why are there no sick cows?
These are PCR tests. When they talk about cases, it's the same
stuff, no symptoms, no sickness, just a misapplied PCR test that the
inventor called out FAUCI for misusing. They said, since twenty twenty two,
no bird fluo in the United States has infected over ninety million birds. No,
since two thousand and two, it's been around, and it's just in
the last few years. They started killing tens of millions of egg producing chickens
and meat chickens because they want to raise the price of food. More than
ninety million, they said, And they said they had to kill these.
One person who came in close contact with affected cattle, I guess I want
to kill him too, right. Colorado became the ninth US state to report
an infected dairy herd. So what the USDA said it will require dairy cattle
moon between states be tested for bird flu. The FDA said it found bird
flu virus particles, but said the commercial milk supply remains safe due to pasteurization.
But don't have anything locally produced or any raw milk. Get your stuff
from Big Agra. Get your animals vaccinated by Big Pharma. The US government
said it was testing four potential bird flu vaccines for poultry. BINGO, there
we go, see the narrative. They make up a phony story so then
they can demand that everybody get vaccinated. And this tracking of cattle is so
they can track their vaccination status. They've already said that track their movements and
their vaccination status and will do it by every individual cow. So they're testing
four potential bird flu vaccines after more than fifty eight million chickens, turkeys,
and other birds have died from the nation's worst outbreakover. No, they were
killed. They were killed. It's very similar since to what was happening in
the hospital death protocols. Right. Oh, well, we had a positive
testerer, put them in here and kill them with a ventilator. And that's
what they're doing to these chickens, except in just doing massive, you know,
straight up up in your face murder. But it's the same way they
did it with a hospital death protocol. They also killed businesses, they killed
travel and everything so they could push the Trump shot. And now they've got
four bird flu vaccines. And I'm sure you know you've got all these different
companies out there. They have played along with the government. They have greased
the right politicians. They'll be allowed to make a fortune off of this as
they vaccinate our entire food supply, and it'll be an mRNA vaccine. It's
not going to be safe to eat chicken and beef anymore soon, you understand.
And that's why they want to get rid of local farms, the local
processing, the raw milk the local dairies. More than twenty two million commercially
raised US chickens and turkeys have been killed, not died, not dyed with,
but killed. You only have to have one, you have one bird
that they find a PCR pot tested on, and they kill them all.
So this is a program of chaos, of destruction, of poverty to take
us down. Then we'll let's talk about this individual, this really scary thing.
And and just to go back, and you know, my dangerous childhood.
I don't know how I ever survived. I mean I had measles and
mumps and chicken pox and all this other kind of stuff. And I had
pink eye multiple times when I was in elementary school. I grew up in
Florida. We didn't have air conditioning until I got into my last year of
high school, so I'm not really fond of hot climates. And we had
these big windows that were kept open and they didn't have screens, and we
got gnats all the time. And when you're a little kid, you know,
you don't really you're rubbing them and you're rubbing your eyes and stuff,
and they you know, when I was first grade, I got pink eye
several times from these I gnats, Lewis and Clark talked about it. Mosquito
is extremely troublesome to me. Today, they're ot in their diary. The
large black gnat though less troublesome. But it doesn't sting, but it tacks
the eyes and swarms, and it compels us to brush them off or to
have our eyes filled with them. Now they even call them ie gnats because
the females love to get around eyes and open wounds, and it causes conjunctividis
commonly called pink eye. Now, I'm going to show you some pictures here,
and I want you to pick out the pink eye from the bird flu
via cow in a human. Okay, and so here's picture number one.
Okay, there's on high lots of redness there. Here's picture number two.
Okay, here's picture number three. Here's picture number four. Oh, they're
starting to look I don't know, I can't tell. Now. Some of
these are pink i, some of these are uv itis, and some of
them and one of them, only one of them is bird flu Okay.
Here's another picture here, Okay, one more there, and the last one
right here. Now, which one of those did you think was cowbird flu.
I guess that's what we should call it, cowbird flu. There is
such a thing as a cowbird you know which one should we call cowbird flu?
You know when you look at some of these things like that one looks
really bad. That's pink i. By the way, Uh, this is
pink eye. This is pink ie, This is pink i. This is
uv idis, This is uv idis, this is cowbird flu. See,
they can't really tell conjunctive itis from uvi itis except you know, it's like
my ocaris, it's an inflammation. My arcarditis and pacarditis are both inflammation of
the heart, different parts of the heart, right, And so the difference
between pink eye and uvi ititis is that one is external the other is more
of an internal thing. But the symptoms look pretty much the same. And
then when you look at this, the interesting thing that pointed out last week
was uv ititis has just been identified as an adverse effect of people who have
been vaccinated. Oh okay, so is it the I neat is it the
vaccine or is it the cowbird flu? This is just ridiculous. It's just
ridiculous the lies that our media is telling you. And if I talk about
this, and I'm talking about they pull my video down from Vimeo, which
is pulling it down from rock Roku. So, yeah, that was the
picture of the guy who had the cowbird flu? Was this one? But
you know the other ones looked even worse to me? I don't know.
And he was a farm worker who caught it. But listen to the way
that they hype this up from the UK, this tabloid, the Express,
and of course this is what Drudge went with when he was pushing the fear
right bird flew Fears Rise, and then right underneath and then Drudge Report,
then right Undernath drug report disturbing. First photo of a Texas farm worker who
caught bird flu shows bleeding in the eyeballs. He suffered bleeding in his eyeballs.
Yeah, if you got pink eye from a gnat, you get bleeding
in the eyeballs as well. Uvi itis from the jab. Yeah, bleeding
in the eyeballs as well. It is thought to be the first known case
of mammal to human transmission. As a CDC warns that bird flu could pose
pandemic potential. No, it's not serious. You need to be afraid of
the CDC, not the birds, not the cows, not the flu,
the CDC, the FDA, the USDA, they are our enemy. His
eyes began to swell up. Listen to this. This is why I say
that it wasn't bird flu. Okay, he didn't have flu. Listen to
this. His eyes began to swell up, they turned red, but he
had no fever and his lungs were clear. He didn't have the flu.
He didn't have any kind of flu. He had pink eye. Was it
a net or was it the vaccine? Or was he just getting stuff in
his eyes? And you can get an eye infection just to have dirty hands.
I mean, he's working on cows in the you know, the farm.
The biggest improvement we've had in health has just been through hygiene, through
washing your hands. Maybe he's the only one who didn't wash his hands.
They even said the scientific term this isn't the article. This is the fear
mongering article that everybody's pointing. Look, we got a um who's got it.
The scientific term for his eye condition is conjunctivitis. So the infection is
on the outside, so it's not the uvi itis, but it is conjunctividis
and you can get it from nats in your eyes, you can get it
from dirty hands rubbing your eyes. Right, what's the deal with this?
They're using this, folks, you're being gaslet. They're pushing for another agenda.
World Health Organization's pandemic Treaty ignores their COVID policy mistakes, and of course
they are going to commit within the next month or so to a new global
treaty to prevent and manage future pandemics. Now, the question is will the
Senate call Bolshevik on this or will they just keep quiet like they did with
the Pair's Climate Accord, which is a treaty. Are they going to do
something about it? And it's got a lot of similarities to what we're going
to talk about next, which is THEAA, the Anti Semitism Awareness Act.
But again, the Senate has to prove it sixty votes they need to approve
any treaty. So the question is are they going to just silently go along
with this and pretend that this is ratified by Biden or by Kerry or by
Obama or something like that, Because we've got forty four senators were urging Biden
to dump this World Health Organization treaties and these changes of the rules. If
we've got forty four senators, that's far more than we need to stop a
treaty. So will even one of these forty four senators, I mean,
because we see them do virtue signal all the time about stuff. Will any
one of these forty four senators stand up and say we need to have a
vote on this new treaty and we need to have a vote on these new
international health regulations? Or will they just turn this over to a non governmental
organization and give a non governmental organization the power to do to us what Trump
did in twenty twenty, what Trudeau did in twenty twenty, what every boris
Johnson, every single one of these people. Will any of them stand up?
And so when we come back, we're going to not talk about the
International Health Regulations the IHR, but we're going to talk about the International Holocaust
Rules Organization or whatever they call themselves. The IHR will talk about that and
the Triple A when we return. Will be right back. You're listening to
the David Knight Show all right on Rock Fan. Any code Taxi, thank
you for the tip, writes the pre COVID nineteen varus underreporting factors were credibly
found to be between ten to one hundred times lower form morbidity and mortality.
So the post COVID nineteen vax mortality under reporting factor was obviously let's see,
he's got I can't some extra so I think he's saying two hundred. I'm
having a difficulty. He's got so much stuff here. I'm confused. But
anyway, it's just in the US alone, So again, thank you.
Yeah, anywhere from ten to one hundred times undreported. Because there are multiple
studies. I think one of them found it is a factor of only ten
percent report and the other one found only one percent. That's the key thing.
This is clearly literally minimally possible, and so it is giga demicide.
So yeah, that's right, And there's it gives a website that you can
look at as well, openvahars dot com, which helps to explain that.
On rock Fan, Karen Carpenter says they need to put their milk through a
mask. That's right, because we know that that stops all the viral particles.
Right. Well, let's talk a little bit bit about this attack on
free speech coming through the Congress. I've talked the beginning of this program.
Now about half of the program about the attacks on free speech coming still through
social media, through the Internet companies, the Silicon Valley companies working in partnership
with the federal government, still shutting down vaccine information, even as the smart
ones are starting to try to edge away from this a little bit towards a
more neutral ground. The anti Semitism bill royals the right, says World Magazine.
Well, it's not just the right. There's people on both the left
and the right who are speaking out against this censorship bill of Trader Johnson.
The delicate balance of rights and responsibilities sparks a big debate. There's a subtitle
there. Let me just say this. There is no balance. There is
no trade off. You do not trade off your liberty for security. Also,
I didn't remember I signed up for any responsibility for Israel. That's right,
that's right. Well, and again, it isn't about responsibility. It's
about liberty and it's about the rule of law. You either obey the law,
you either obey the constitution, or you don't. It's just not simple.
There isn't any kind of trade off. And every time they offer this
to you, anybody that says something like that, you know where these people
are coming from. They just want your liberty. They want to take it
gradually and incrementally. And so, yeah, speech, folks, is not
a crime. It is protected on the constitution. Speech is not a crime.
Censorship is the crime. Censorship is the crime. Absolutely. So they
begin by saying, well, I said, we know, we've got people
on both sides of this. You know, we've got people who are conservatives,
some of them support it, some of them don't. And so they
begin with a guy who supports it. On the one side, we have
advocates for the bill who see it as an important statement in response to the
meltdown on lowns. Really, I think we've been having a lot of stuff
happening at the universities. As I said before that these people who are demanding
now that we destroy our free speech had no problem with it whatsoever. They
never suggested monitors for anti white racism. They never suggested monitors for CRT or
DEI. As a matter of fact, they wanted all of that stuff.
It was not okay to be white. Black lives mattered, But if you
said white lives mattered, you were racist. They have advocated all of this
stuff, and these people are making excuses for it now didn't have a problem
with it before. So when they talk about what is happening on the college
campus, folks, their crime is not their speech. As much as we
dislike their speech, as much as we dislike what they have to say,
that is not a crime. Censorship is the crime, not the speech.
Censorship is the crime if you have a federal government that is doing it.
It's a crime. If the federal government is doing this in partnership to produce
plausible deniability. If they're doing it in partnership with social media companies, as
we always knew they were, now we've got the receipts for it as well,
that is a crime. Because the censorship is being directed and incentivized by
the government. They are bribing and blackmailing companies to do that, in the
same way that they're now going to be bribing and blackmailing universities to shut down
speech that they don't like. That is the crime, but they always do
it with the money. This is why these clueless maga people who say Trump
didn't do anything wrong. Biden is saying the same thing as well, I
didn't order anybody I just told them that the and have a job or a
contract, and we shut their business down because it lose all their government business.
We would shut down their cms to the hospitals if they didn't vaccinate all
their nurses in times. But I didn't force anybody to do anything. No
coercion is force. It is force. And when you are bribing people to
do something for you, they're acting as your agents, and it is coming
from the government. And the government is censoring people. The government is creating
a crime. They didn't pass a law, but they're acting law less lee
they're acting in defiance of the First Amendment. And this is true of the
States as well. As a matter of fact. This is something that is
now happening, you know, to protect the State of Israel, the state
a political foreign entity. You've got laws being set up at state levels all
over the place. It was an article about I'll get to it here in
a second, and I said, well, it's a different thing because that's
being done by the states. You know, the federal government. They're not
supposed to do it, but we know they're doing it by using money.
You know, they're bribing and blackmailing people with the money. But the states
are just doing it and they're making crimes out of all this stuff. Well,
guess what, and you take state office, you swear to pull the
Constitution as well. Constitution is still there, even if it's a state office.
The Bill of Rights is still there. But this is what they say.
Well, here's a guy who is on the right and he likes this.
He says, the anti Semitic display is that we've seen across our nation
and especially on college campuses, are absolutely detestable and should be denounced at every
turn. Approving this bill is the right response, said Brent Leatherwood of the
Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the of the Southern Baptist Convention, right and
also Family Research Council, saying the same thing. Let me just throw in
here as an assign, and we're talking about the Satanic temples, mocking displays
that they put up for one stated sole purpose, and that is to shut
down the free exercise of religion. These are the kinds of people, Brent
Leatherwood and others who have said, no, no, no, you got
to leave that up. Got to leave up the Satanic display. That's protected
speech. But if you say that the Jews killed christ that's not protected speech.
Now, even Ben Shapiro knows better, even Gerald Nadler knows better.
You've got conservative Ben Shapiro, Jewish, Jerry Nadler, Jewish, radical leftist.
They both agree that this Johnson Bill is against the First Amendment and it
sets up some very dangerous precedents because it is an affront to the First Amendment
and our free speech. This is to me, this is amazing how the
lines have been drawn on this thing. But again, when you look at
people like this Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, you know, it was a
there was a state rep in what was it, Iowa or Idaho, I
can't remember. I get the I can't remember which one of those two it
was. Were around Christmas time you had a Satanic display that was put up
and yeah, here thunder out here a lot. We may lose power,
so I said, don't want them thinking that massad drone struck us here or
the CIA or Big Pharma or Vimeo or something. But yeah, so we
may lose power. But when you look at these people, and there was
a pastor that was a state legislator as well in that state where some guy
went up there and he knocked the whole thing down, and so now they're
charging him with a crime. I think that was his speech. Frankly,
it was a protest. Now, when you do certain things, it's different
than if you just speak okay, But they were not protected for religious liberty
because they had been upfront about the fact they don't believe what they're doing.
They've been upfront about the fact they don't believe in Satan. They don't believe
what they're doing. They're there merely to shut down Christianity. It is an
anti Christian group. It is a display there to shut down the First Amendments.
So I don't think we need to accord them anything. We don't need
to lose any sleep worrying about how we divide the baby of religious liberty and
free speech at all. But by the way, this guy, Brent Leatherwood,
I've got a clip of his here. Here's what he had to say
as that bill was coming up for a vote in the House. And of
course it's now passed, but this is what he said just before it came
up for the vote. Hey, there, I'm Brent Leatherwood, President of
the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention. Behind me is
the building I just came out of, which is the Israeli Embassy here in
America, and we met today with various members of the staff of the Ambassador
to reaffirm our support as Southern Baptists for Israel and Israel's right not only to
defend itself but to exist. And it's very clear you can probably hear the
music behind me. Before we were worried about even being able to tape this
video because there was a loud siren that was playing. And that's because the
folks who work in the embassy are being subjected to continual harassment by sympathizers of
and other terrorist groups, and so it was important for us today to meet
with the ambassador's team. Now we're being subjected to continual harassment from people like
this Baptist and Mike Johnson. Solidarity with the people of Israel and to condemn
acts of anti Semitism that we're seeing not only in Israel, but even right
here in the United States. Later today in Congress, the Anti Semitism Awareness
Act is expected to pass the US House. We are in full support of
this legislation and we urge the US Senate to take it up swiftly to show
that America is not a place where harassment and intimidation and evil will persist.
And so we stand with our friends from Israel, we stand with Jewish citizens
here in America, and we want to make sure that we are constantly being
a voice for the vulnerable in these types of situations. So thank you.
And he stands against the Constitution. He stood with Francis Collins. By the
way, the UH, the Southern Baptist Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission UH stood
with Francis Collins. As a matter of fact, the same guy, Brent
Leatherwood wrote an article here and it's got I don't have that in the list
there, I don't think, but here it is. It's got their their
E R l C logo there. You know. It's interesting. I can
I can find in the Bible where it says many places in the New Testament
where it says the Jews killed Jesus. And I talked about that on Thursday,
and I'll mention what that, what that meant, full implications of that.
But I can't find anything about a denominational convention. I can't find anything
about denominations except to see condemnation of it in the New Testament. I don't
see anything about ethics or religious liberty, convention or committee inside a convention either.
Uh. These people are statement of principles of church and civic partnership on
contact tracing. This is what they did in July of twenty twenty one.
Key to successfully confronting this crisis is for churches to conduct themselves as co equal
partners with civic entities to combat the spread of the coronavirus. I regard people
like Brent Leatherwood as traders to his people, as traders to Christians, in
the same way that Benjamin Netanyahu is a trader to Jews. He betrayed them
to the World Economic Form. I've played the clips many times of Benjamin netanyahoo
calling multiple times and recording it with a World Economic Form talking about how he's
vaccinating everybody. He's going to give them all the information in the reports.
He's going to use Jews as lab rats. And I said, he's no
different from Joseph Mingla, except he's probably experimented on more Jews than Joseph Minga
did. We've got to be careful that we don't become the monsters that we
fight, and unfortunately, both the United States and Israel have become the monsters
that we fought. We said it was a day of infamy when Japan attacked
us at Pearl Harbor, and it was even though FDR was passively aggressive,
even though he enabled it, even though he shut down the early warnings.
It was still the Japanese who attacked. And to say that they bear no
responsibility for that attack is the same as saying that a man who killed his
wife because she nagged him constantly was justified. It was not justified. And
yet when we see how we have conducted ourselves since then, we don't see
any problem at all with doing premptive attacks like Japan did on Pearl Harbor.
As a matter of fact, that's become core American policy to do that,
to attack them before they attack us. It's also become core policy for us
to attack civilian populations, as you see happening in Gaza, even when there
is a justified response to an initial attack. The prolonged attacks against the civilian
population go back to the types of things that we did in World War II,
the extensive fire bombing of Dresden, and then the nuclear attacks on the
cities. And I've seen this argument going back and forth and again it is
a Hegelian argument. They'll say, well, here's our two alternatives. We
could either have fought them island by island, and it would have maybe taken
more Japanese lives than we did with the nuclear bombs. They would have been
soldiers, however, not civilians, and we would have lost a lot of
American lives. Or we could or we bomb these civilian populations of Hiroshima and
Nagasaki to end the war. Well, as you usually see with these things,
they give you two choices, and those are not the only two choices
we had. Of course, if you're fighting the Japanese soldiers island by island,
why did they have to go bomb a civilian population. They could have
taken a nuclear bomb and dropped in on one of the islands, you know,
dropping on Okinawa or something, right, so we don't have to fight
them. I don't know when that came in. I think that battle was
before that. Nevertheless, we've got a chain of islands. They're gonna have
to take one by one, blow up that island, take pictures of it
and show it to the world, just like they did in Nagasaki Hiroshima.
If that doesn't work, blow up the next island with the soldiers on it,
that's part of the combat. Instead, they chose to go to a
civilian population. And we always have this argument given to people, Well,
you know, we could have let the war go on forever, or we
could have bombed these civilian populations. No, there was another alternative. You
could have used the nuclear bomb in the war. Because a justified war is
a war that is conducted after you have been attacked, and a justified war
tries to minimize civilian casualties, and a justified war tries to end the war.
As a matter of fact, we all know that that is not the
intent of the American government to end any of these wars. Babylon b at
a headline, the Congress is told that we've got to pass this bill for
Ukraine or the war might end. Yeah, would end if we didn't keep
funding it. And which is better for the people of Ukraine, have a
partitioned Ukraine or to be completely destroyed. Well, we know which one our
people want. And yet you look at this guy, Brent Leatherwood, who
just sold us out on the First Amendment, and not even on the free
exercise of speech. But he was never there on the free exercise of religion.
I've always said, these people who push for the idea of Romans thirteen
that you do whatever the government says. I said, when unless the government
tells you that you can't worship. It's what they would always say. The
government tells you you can't worship, then you are. You have the right
and the duty to not obey those orders, right, but you have the
duty to not obey those orders. And yet these are the people telling you
lockdown, stay locked down, and even worse, people like Brent Leatherwood were
bringing in Francis Collins to convince other people there to tell everybody to lock down.
And you had them also saying that we're going to work with them in
terms of doing contact tracing on our own people. So the SBC does that
stand for Southern Baptist Convention or does it stand for the Stasi Baptist Convention.
I think that's what it stands for. These people are quizzlings and they will
report on you. That's what they were saying. They would do it time.
And now they want to shut down your free speech, and apart from
you know, this article from Moral Magazine said, well, you know,
you got the back and forth of this, and even the people who are
apologist for it say, well, I'm not saying that the legal issues aren't
troubling. The legal issues are troubling, but the religious issues are also troubling.
Have you ever noticed that whenever they do these mcguffins, it is never
a direct order from the government. They always act through surrogates. If you
were any of your people or caught or captured the impossible mission for us,
will deny any knowledge of your involvement, right plausible deniability, wash our hands
of it. They always use these other agents that are out there. They'll
use the bureaucracies, they'll use companies to censor people, or they'll use NGOs
now to censor people. Not just corporations, but NGOs to do that.
And so these are people who are saying, you know, wear the pinwheel
on your head if the government tells you the pinwheel, freel God, freel.
This is what they were about, and they still are about that.
And this is not just the Southern Baptist but also the Family Research Council.
These are people understand when you look at this guy, Brent Leatherwood, what
is he doing. He's hanging out with politicians. He wants to be a
player, that's his God. He wants to be a political action figure.
So he's hanging out at the Israeli embassy. He's hanging out with speaker Johnson.
He wants to get audiences with these people. He wants to have an
opinion and be seen as a player, so he's playing ball with them.
No, Brent christ is king, you ought to write that down. Maybe
you forgot that. Prominent religious freedom advocates, including frequent World Opinion contributor This
is World, saying so frequent contributor Karen Wagner of the Alliance Defending Freedom,
fear that a bill against so called hate speech could be the groundwork for future
legislation on hate speech against LGBT issues. Yeah. Of course, God created
the male and female. Can't say that, can't say that that's hateful.
It never ends. There is always a religious component to this stuff, isn't
it isn't that interesting? There's always an ethical component to it. Whether you're
talking about the lockdown, can't go to church, I don't know, or
whether you're talking about the vaccine. It can't object to the ethics of how
this vaccine was created with aboarded babies. You can't object to the fact that
the government is using this to move the Overton window towards a one world government
and a global ID. You can't object to that on religious ethical issues,
No, no, no. And then when it comes to this, sorry,
you can't object to this issue on ethical or religious things because you're going
to have to be quiet. We're going to have censorship, and we're going
to take money away from these colleges that we have handsomely rewarded them to push
racism and hatred and Marxism. That's all fine, But now because they're pushing
anti Semitism, we're going to put monitors there and we're going to take away
their money if they say anything about it. But they won't take them away
for any of these other things. They'll continue to fund all of the Marxism,
the DEI, the CRT, all of that, will can the LGBT
stuff. That will all be funded by Johnson and by these Republicans who voted
for it and the Democrats who voted for it. They have no problem with
that, folks. The only thing they got a problem with is anti semitism.
So do you think that this is going to set up a president?
Of course it will, of course it will. The bill says that it
shall not be interpreted to infringe on the First Amendment. That's a disclaimer.
That's like, you know when somebody comes out and says, well, you
know, I think abortion is a tragedy, but let's have more of it.
Right, I think censorship is really illegal, but let's have more of
it, and we'll let it be defined. We'll let truth be defined by
some foreign in goo or by some foreign government. Professor Robert George of Princeton
University put on X He says, this does not help those of us who
are calling out anti semitism on campuses and pushing back against this vile form of
bigotry. More broadly, for legislators to enact laws placing viewpoints based restrictions on
speech, that's what we're talking about here. You're talking about censoring political speech,
you're talking about censoring religious speech. Whether or not you agree with it
is beside the point. Free speech isn't the speech that you agree with.
And if you if you don't allow free speech for speech that you disagree with,
then you don't support it at all. So he says, it's important
to remember the bill does not directly regulate or censor speech. That's what the
World magazine says. See, this is the trap. This is why the
MAGA people, well, you know, Trump didn't do anything. That was
the public health officials and the governors that he gave so much money to,
and it was Fauci and all of this sudden. They just made suggestions to
people, but you know it was actually implemented at the state level by the
people that he was giving tens of billions of dollars to. Yeah, and
that's what they're saying here. Well, you know, it's important to understand
that this build does not directly regulate or sensor speech. It expends upon or
clarifies existing rules for what educational institutions qualify for federal funds. You see the
money, it's always money, not mandates. And it's actually the money is
the mandate because the money is how they bribe and blackmail people to do this
stuff. And that's what these people should know. I don't expect the MAGA
people to understand it because they never got involved in politics before, and they're
clueless about how it works. But it's about time to get a clue.
It's about time to see this because this is how it always works. It
always works through money, not through direct mandates, because they don't have the
legal authority to do that, and they operate through bluffs, just like Jeff
Sessions and his marijuana obsession and how he's going to pay the the police departments
like the Sheriff's department and sam Bernardino County to rob armored cars. They were
taking cash from legal marijuana retail sales in California to rob them. You give
us twenty percent of money, we'll let you keep eighty percent of money.
It's always about the money they don't have. He doesn't, you know,
Jeff Sessions never attacked any of these states because prohibition doesn't have a legal basis.
This censorship doesn't have illegal basis, and the lockdowns and all of the
stuff that they did in the so called pandemic does not have a legal basis.
So they do it through regulatory they do it through the bureaucracies. They
do it through their rules, not laws, and they do it with money.
Now, even Jerry Nadler says Benjamin Netanyahoo is the worst Jewish leader in
twenty one hundred year talking about it, called him, compared him to a
Jewish leader in history, the king who invited in the Romans. Here's what
he had to say anti Semitism. And I am as attuned as anyone to
threats and bigotry aim the Jewish people. I will take lectures from knowing about
the need for vigorous efforts to fight anti Semitism on campus or anywhere else.
I am also a deeply committed Zionist who firmly believes in Israel's right to exist
as a homeland for the Jewish people. But as someone who is also a
longtime champion of protecting freedom of speech, I must oppose this misguided bill.
Well, there is much in the bill I agree with. Its core provision
would put a thumb on the scale in favor of one particular definition of anti
semitism to the exclusion of all others, to be used when the Department of
Education assesses claims of anti Semitism on campus. This definition, adopted by the
International Holocaust Remembers Alliance or IRA, includes quote contemporary examples of anti semitism close
quote. The problem is that these examples may include protected speech in some contexts,
particularly with respect to criticism of the state of Israel. To be clear,
I vehemently disagree with the sentiments toward Israel express in those examples, and
to often criticism of Israel does in fact take the form of virulent anti Semitism.
Many Jewish students no longer feel safe on campus, and some colleges have
not done nearly enough to protect them. But while this definition and its examples
may have useful applications in certain contexts, by effectively codifying them into Title six,
this bill threatens to chill constitutionally protected speech. Speech that is critical of
Israel alone does not constitute unlawful discrimination by encompassing purely political speech about Israel into
titles and so forth. Right, any equals mandates, Fiat currency equals fiat
orders. That's their superpower, the money. And as he said, you
know, look, I agree Israel's got a right to exist. I have
absolutely no problem with that. If they have the strength to take the land
and hang on to it, I got no problem with it. Frankly,
I also, as a Christian, understand that they've been there for a very
long time. They were given that land. They're run off of that land,
they have a right to take it back. I think what they do
not have a right to is to loot the American taxpayer. They do not
have a right to destroy our First Amendment. They do not have a right
to bribe and to cajole and to threaten our legislators and to take over our
government. They don't have a right to take over our government. They've got
a right to exist. But they better not continue to take over our government.
Let's say, better not continue. They've been doing this for a long
time. It's just more open all of the time. That's what disgusts me
about all this. That's what disgusted me about people like Mike Johnson is misplaced
Christian theology where he supports war everywhere. First of all, that's a non
starter. Secondly, he took an oath to the Constitution. He is a
Christian who has become a liar, an oath breaker. How is that christian?
How is a Christian to push for war? How is it christian to
break your oath? How is it christian to destroy the liberties that many people
died in this country to establish? And now we're going to let a foreign
government pay these crooked politicians to destroy our bill rights. That's what's happening with
Israel right now. That is a political entity. Understand folks, as a
Bible says, not all Israel are Israel. God said, even at the
time he said, look, my chosen people, the children of the Promise.
He said, I've got he said, at the time it was Israel.
He said, there's a small remnant here that actually follows me. That's
what I mean by Israel, he said. And you got people, whether
it's liberal Jerry Nadler, or you got Ben Shapiro, or you've got ultra
Orthodox Jews who do not support the political entity of Israel, and yet they
always want to conflate this political entity with the Jewish people, and there is
no comparison, there is no connection there. And this Holocaust organization is making
that a comparison. All these people are always doing that. It's anti semitic
to criticize Israel. That's why I've had the anti semitic label put on me,
because I criticize political entities, especially if they're foreign entities, especially if
they're foreign entities who are trying to manipulate our government to their advantage and to
our disadvantage. Though the you know, the headline for this is the ERLC
of the sb C Southern Baptist Convention Lobbies Congress or unconstitutional bill that makes it
illegal to quote scripture. He said, we are in full support of that.
Again, that's the that's what these people are all about. They were
in full support shutting down churches. They were in full support of going full
Stasi on their church members. Again. The working definition of the religious side
of this working definition is using symbols and images associated with classic anti Semitism.
For example, claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel to characterize Israel or
israelis now not as it says, Jews killing Jesus or blood libels. Some
of the apologists for this have said, well, I know what they meant.
They didn't mean that contemporary Jews are responsible for this. And yet look
at what they do to white people at these same universities. Right, you're
white. That means that you're guilty of slavery. Like I haven't as slaved
anybody. We talk about that all the time. The Jews that are here
today, they didn't kill Christ. But as I said on Thursday. I
said, look, the Jews demanded that he be The Jewish leadership demanded that
he be held over. The people who were there said, give us who
I release to you, says Pilot Brabas or Jesus Brabas. We want,
bravest kill Jesus. That type of thing. And then when you have fifty
days later, Peter is talking to them at Pentecost and he says, you
know this, Jesus you killed to the people that were there, and they
were struck. They said, what do we do? He says, well,
repent to be baptized for the forgiveness of sins. There's forgiveness for any
of this stuff. This isn't something that is on people because of who they
are, how they were born. But as I also said, you know,
why did you know who killed Jesus? Well, Jesus said, no
one takes my life from me. I lay it down. He laid it
down for people like you, like me, who are sinners. And I
said, who killed you? I did you did with you? He died
for your sins. The question is will you accept that mercy or will you
turn your back on it? But I will not be quiet about it.
That is one thing I will not do, and you know there is absolutely
it is in direct contradiction to the essential law of the land. If you
don't have the Constitution, folks, none of these other laws make any difference.
But even if the Constitution did not protect my religious liberty or my free
speech, I would refuse to comply with this. This is the problem I
have with these Christians out there who were saying, well, yeah, it's
okay. No, even if it wasn't the bedrock of the Constitution, the
First Amendment, it would still be wrong for a Christian to capitulate. And
what can be said, are we going to leave a legacy to our children
that they're going to grow up in a society where they can't say God created
a male and female. Are we going to leave them a legacy where they
cannot quote the Bible? I mean, we've got a woman who was in
the cabinet of Finland. She was an elected representative for several terms. She
served multiple terms as a cabinet position, and you've got a prosecutor coming after
her because she talked about homosexuality being promoted by her church. So she put
a post up to her church saying this is what the Bible says about this,
and for that, this prosecutor has come after her, not once,
not twice because he lost the first time. Then he took to appeals court,
lost there, He's appealed it to the highest court, the Supreme Court,
to still relentlessly come after her because she quoted the Bible. What this
Holocaust non governmental organization is doing is putting a gag in our mouth. And
people like Brent Leatherwood of the Southern Baptist Convention or the Family Research Council or
any of these other political groupies who want to get a little pat on the
head and they want to get invited to the big parties because then they can
show themselves posing with the president or the Speaker of the House, and they
can show that to their donors and they say, look at us, you
know, we're big players. You need to support our organization. We're going
to defend your liberties. When they're doing exactly the opposite. They're getting access
to these criminals by selling you out, just like Trump did so many different
issues. He sold the MAGA people out, he sold the Conservatives out,
He turned his back on what he said he was going to do. He
never had any principles. He had some political promises that he went back on.
But again it's over and over again in the New Testament. First,
Thessalonians Jews killed both the Lord Jesus and the prophets. You say that that's
illegal according to this non governmental organization pushing the Holocaust. And let me just
say this about the Holocaust. Okay. I had a friend in college who
was Jewish. His mother had been one of these camps. She was crippled
for life, always in a wheelchair. She had a tattoo on her hand
that was the numbers that the Nazis gave her. Now, you know,
I don't I don't know why it is so blazingly important for their six million
number. I don't care if it was six million or six Jews that was
criminal or sixty million. Okay. And there have been more people killed in
communist purgase. Stalin killed more people than six million, now killed a lot
more. The Khmer Rouge probably in Cambodia even killed more people than that.
The Marxists are doing it all the time. But it's not Marxism versus fascism.
It's not communists versus you know, solomn versus Hitler or whatever this is
to solitarianism, folks, how do you get to solitarianism? Will you start
by taking away free speech? You want to start with you want to wind
up with death camps, you take away the free speech. I know these
organizations think that the Holocaust gives them some special right to have Israel. That's
flawed thinking. They need to go back to the fact that And it's interesting
that these secular governments in Israel are constantly covering up archaeological evidence of the Jews
being there long before you know, the Palestinian which is what the Romans called
it. They were there forever. We have archaeological evidence, we have biblical
evidence of that. They don't need to justify this in terms of the Holocaust,
And they don't need to just and they don't need to have this precious
Oh you can say anything about it being six million people. How many times
in any war have you ever gotten the casualty figures? Right, I've said
over and over again. Look you look at the casualty figures from a civil
war. I don't believe them for a minute. Supposedly you had exactly the
same number North and South die really are you kidding me? Exactly three hundred
thousand from each side. Come on, that's nonsense, and we know it.
And it doesn't count any civilian casualties. It doesn't count the economic damage
that was done or whatever. But that's absolutely cooked books And I'm not saying
that the six million is cooked. I don't really care how many it was.
Do they care about what's happening in Armenia? Do they care about that?
You know, Armenia is going through ethnic cleansing. It's Christians in Armenia,
real genocide, real ethnic cleansing done by Muslims, done by people who
are working with our NATO. Turkey always has been that way. As a
matter of fact, the term genocide was coined about the Christian Armenian genocide,
and it was done by a Jewish guy. He coined the term genocide in
terms of talking about what the Turks did the Armenian Christians. And yet what
is happening there is still going on. Does anybody care? No, does
Mike Johnson care what's going on right now in Armenia? This long history,
a century of this stuff. Last week, thousands of the country's citizens in
the streets of Yerevan, holding flaming torches to commemorate genocide Remembrance Day. Meanwhile,
the Armenian diaspora met on soccer fields in South America and in churches in
Belgium, where the Belgian Foreign minister told them never again. This year,
the commemoration is especially Celian. Despite the platitudes and the prime promises of foreign
leaders, including those in Russia and the United States, the specter of genocide
continues to haunt the Armenians. Just months ago, one hundred and twenty thousand
Armenians fled in Nagorno Karabach, a semi autonomous region of Armenia known to its
inhabitants as Artsak, that contains the oldest Christian nation's oldest churches. So again,
Armenia is the oldest Christian nation and it's its oldest churches are there,
and this is the last holdout there. The resulting humanitarian crisis and ethnic cleansing
a predicate for genocide. During just one week last September, Azerbaijani troops completed
their invasion of the region and the Armenians fled, leaving behind their homes,
their dogs, their churches, and their graves. The US had months of
fore warning and could have responded, but it barely did. It wasn't that
the US was caught unaware, but rather that a complex web of lobbyists and
alliances. You see, it's which politicians you own. You go in and
you buy. Politicians like Johnson twenty million dollars in his first full quarter as
speaker, an obscene amount of money. He should be ashamed, He should
be driven out just for that fact alone. He is for sale. He
is a prostitute, a whore, a war mongering whore who has just sold
out our first amendment. Azerbai Johnny troops have been blocking to Gouerno Carabah for
months. The region was starved of food and medicine and electricity and cut off
on the rest of Armenia since January twenty twenty three. Does that sound familiar?
Oh well, you know, we've got people on campuses now saying,
well, Israel's doing that to Gazit. Nobody cares about the Christians as the
Palestinians and the Jews, that's all we care about. And the Christians like
Brent Leatherwood, the nominal Christians like Brent Leatherwood, the nominal Christians like Mike
Johnson. Christians by name, not by deed, don't care about them either.
It's just amazing. So, yeah, that's the real genocide that is
out there, and they really don't care, could not care less about any
of that stuff. And so Brent Leatherwood and full support of this legislation.
He was in full support of the lockdown of churches. He was in full
support of contact tracing of members the Stazzi Baptist Convention. That's what he's in
full support of this amazing so Son says, I got a quote from Yes,
Okay, I'll read it. They do not understand the nature of a
law anymore than the nature of a dog. Oh, speaking of dogs,
we'll talk about Christina anyway. If you let loose a law, it will
do as a dog does. It will obey its own nature, not yours.
Such sense as you have put into the law or the dog will be
fulfilled, but you will not be able to fulfill a fragment of anything you
have forgotten to put into it. That's right, It'll be used as it
is there if there's a problem, if it looks like there's a problem,
folks, there is a problem. So as Mike Pottage says, it's simple,
what the Bill of rights rule? Do we want to anybody want to
talk about the Constitution? Is that a thing anymore? He says, there's
an underlying assumption involving the recently House passed Anti Semitism Awareness Act. Once Congress
passes a law, the enforcement or the application of that law is assigned to
a cabinet office. Sir, with that potential law and all other laws are
words empowering the Secretary to adopt such administrative rules and regulations as necessary to carry
out the purposes of this act, quote unquote, that's what they always say.
See, I'll never forget how everybody look at Nancy Pelosi. She's so
stupid. She says, we've got to pass Obamacare to find out within it.
No, what she was doing was she was passing Obamacare, kicking it
over to the was it HHS that operated the thing, so they could put
in the details, so they could write all the rules and regulations. They
didn't know what was going to be, and they were just giving broad powers
to an unaccountable, unelected bureaucratic agency for them to fill it in. This
is how I talk all the time about that it's regulation without representation. It
is also taxation without representation. It is rules not laws. The same thing
happened with civil asset forfeiture in the drug war, thing happened with COVID,
Same thing happening here in this case the Department of Education. When the goal
is censorship, anti Semitism is the excuse, always has been. I have
been accused so many times by the Southern Property Law Center and ADL, and
I don't even talk about this issue as far as I look at it.
What's going on in Israel and with Palestine is their business. They can work
it out. It's their war. We don't need to get involved in it.
I agree with the ultra Orthodox Jews. God gave them the land.
He can do it miraculously again. And I don't agree with the Israeli government.
I think it's one of the most reprehensible governments on the planet Earth.
And so I do not get involved in these fights. I don't like Kamas,
and I don't like the government of Israel, their political entities, their
political entities that have, as I said last week, absolutely no respect for
the live of their own people. Hamas doesn't care what happens to the Palestinians.
A matter of fact, the more Palestinians they get killed, better for
hamas they can play the victim card, they can get international sympathy. Netnahu
has absolutely no regard for the people of Israel. He doesn't care as long
as he gets his geopolitical stuff through what happens to them. He showed that
with the vaccines and in many other ways as well. There are a number
of political leaders who advocate eliminating the Department of Education and not giving it censorship
rights over what people say about religion and religious people see, that's the real
traitor. Johnson aspect of this, as I've said many times, Jimmy Carter
pushed through the Department of Education, created it in nineteen eighty in the middle
of an election campaign, and Ronald Reagan said We're going to get rid of
that. But he didn't. He grew it and nurtured it for eight years.
We've had politicians in the past say, well, if I'm elected,
I'm going to get rid of the Department of Education. They should because it
has been a corrupting influence. It has used federal funding to push Marxism,
critical race theory, DEI and all the rest of this stuff. This anti
white hatred that's on college campuses has always been funded and pushed by the Department
of Education, just as they were pushing for mentally ill trainees men to get
into the showers and the dressing rooms of girls. It is always the money
and they've always pushed this. And so we don't have any politicians anymore saying
we're going to get rid of the Department of Education. Instead, what they
do is they use the Department of Education to impose censorship and censorship for one
group and one group only. They're not there to say we're going to have
free speech. They're there to shut down any criticism of Israel or Jews,
political Israel or Jews individually. They're not there to shut down any criticism of
white males, or Christian or any other group. And there you have it.
More rules about disinformation and misinformation, which are often more often than not,
protect the bureaucracy and keep the citizens confused during the dark. The Bill
of Rights got it right. The public does not need to hear the anti
semitism, Identify the perpetrators, and shun them. Make sure they never have
a job that tells you the heart of Mark Levin and these other people.
They don't have a heart for liberty, They don't have a heart for the
rule of law. The biggest bunch of nonsense Mark Levin's liberty amendments. Do
you trust a guy like that who has never had respect for individual liberty none
whatsoever? Mark Levin? He wants to have a constitutional convention. Can you
imagine the kind of constitution Mark Levin would produce? And people of his ilk
can you imagine the kind of constitution that you would have by people who have
prostituted themselves to a foreign government? We have a constitutional convention. Who's going
to write it? We'll be China. Who's going to write it depends on
who the politician is right. Bill Wright's got it right. The public doesn't
need to hear the anty cinematism to identify perpetrators and to shun them. Hearing
stupid people say stupid things is part of the public's overall education about those who
seek public office and said, what would we have done if we didn't have
this intellectual property thief that was president of Harvard? Would she had been forced
to resign if there hadn't been publicity? Are we allowed to criticize people?
What are we allowed to criticize. And again, just in case you think
that Israel is a democracy, just in case you think that political Israel respects
free speech, they just shut down the Al Jazeera offices there. Look,
I understand Al Jazeero is critical of Israel, but they don't support in any
way, shape or form the principle of free speech and a free press in
Israel. And they are demanding and paying for free speech, free press,
the free exercise of religion to be shut down in our country. That's the
Israeli government, the same ones that shut down Al Jazeera. And they own
Congress, as Trump said, well, you know, Israel owns Congress,
and rightfully so. Really well, they appear to own every one of the
Republican representatives, which is all the representatives from Tennessee are Republican. They appear
to own each and every one of them. That's for sure. Now,
I played you what Jerry Nadler, a Jew on the left, said about
this flawed bill. Here's what Ben Shapiro says. The way this is phrase
suggests that it is antismitic who say that Jews kill Jesus. Well, according
to the New Testament, Jews did involve themselves in the killing of Jesus Jews
the san Hedrin according to the New Again, I'm a Jew, so this
is not my book, but my best understanding from all my Christian friends and
from reading the New tests is that the Jews under the New Testament, the
Jews referred Jesus for prosecution to Pontius Pilot, who then convicted, out of
fear of riots, Jesus to death, and then gave the Jews the opportunity
to free Jesus and they chose not to do so. And the Book of
Matthew there's verse where it says his blood be upon us and our children.
Right, that's all from the New Testament. Hey, Christians, saying all
that stuff doesn't make Christians antisemitic. I think what the IHRA was actually going
for here was a different claim which has been rejected by the Catholic Church,
which is that Jews today are collectively responsible for the death of Jesus. Which
but white people say, again, my understanding and correct me if I'm wrong,
because again I'm not a Christian, is that the basic idea is that
all of humanity is collectively responsible for the death of Jesus. That is humanity's
great sin, and Jesus wiped away original sin through his death. Well,
he got that pretty close. He got that pretty close. It's not that
Jesus wiped away original sin. It's there's an offer for those who ask him.
But other than that, he got it exactly right. Hey, The
interesting thing is is that when you're going to apply that blood libel, essentially,
that is what has been done by the Marxist in order to ferment a
race war. That's what they do to white people. You know, you're
guilty of slavery, every one of you white people, you're guilty of slavery.
Why don't we have any monitoring of that? Why can't these conservative Republicans
do that? Well, because nobody's paying them to do that. They do
what they're paid to do, and they're being paid by Israel or this thing.
And here's the other thing too. We can talk about what the IHRA
has to say about his definition of semitism anti semitism. Why should a non
governmental organization have a say? Why wouldn't Again, when we're talking about that
quote of Chesterton, right, whatever you put into the law, you have
Johnson and these other people, and it was a Republican bill. It was
put in i think last October by a lawler out of New York. A
Republican out of New York put that in in October, and they brush it
up and rushed it through real quickly. Now, why why is that being
done? You have to ask yourself, why don't they do something about these
other hateful programs, racist programs, Marxist programs. They'd be done in these
other places. They're not interested at all. So you had Lawler put it
in back in October, it was okay, and then Johnson quickly pushes it
through, and now you've got in the Senate, you've got Rick Scott and
Tom Cotton, Republicans working to hurdy put together their version of what had been
setting there dead because it's a horrific piece of legislation to put through a similar
piece of legislation. If the government, if the Congress going to pass something
through, they have a responsibility. If they're going to have an anti Semitism
Act, they have responsibility to define anti Semitism, not to point to an
NGO somewhere and say it's what they say. No, they have a responsibility
to define it themselves. And they chose not to do it that in and
of itself is a huge red flag that in and of itself is a huge
new precedent, kind of like when Trump did gun control by executive order with
both the bump stock and the pistol brace, and he did the pistol brace
in twenty nineteen, pulled it back in twenty twenty when all the election stuff
was going on, and then Biden put it back in. But Trump did
two gun control bills by executive order never been done before, pushing this stuff
off and letting, you know, putting out a a bill to shut down
free speech, free press, free exercise, or religion, and to do
it based on a definition done by a non governmental organization. Even it's bad
enough if you allow these bureaucracies, these unelected, unaccountable government bureaucracies, to
do regulation without representation. Now these people are letting non governmental organizations do legislation.
That's yet another issue with this thing. This bill would codify the IHR's
definition of anti semitism into federal law. That in and of itself is a
big enough problem to shut this thing down. So only twenty one Republicans opposed
the bill. There were seventy Democrats, who also opposed the bill. The
IHRA examples of quote manifestations unquote of anti Semitism, according to their definition,
includes that Jews killed Jesus or making stereotypical allegations about Jews. Again, Ben
Shapiro said, it's obviously unconstitutionally vague, and it is obviously as he said,
Look, he said, I don't believe it, but that's what their
religion says. So it's obviously an attempt to censor religion. Whether or not
you agree with it, it's not the point. You don't have free exercise
religion. If everybody's got to agree on it, you won't have any right.
That's what the goal is actually. But every one of these tyrannies has
got a direct religious test component to it, and every single one of them
has a situation where our elected representatives have kicked it over to some bureaucracy or
now to a non governmental organization to say that I didn't do it, or
plausible deniability, every single one of them. That is what's common to them.
They have of these tyrannies, they always have a surrogate do it for
them. And so Marjorie Tillergreen said anti Semitism is wrong, but I will
not be voting for the Anti Semitism Awareness Act that could convict Christians of anti
Semitism for believing the Gospel that says Jesus was handed over to her to be
crucified by the Jews. But again, you know, Jesus delivered himself.
That's what we need to understand, and we need to understand why he did
it. Texas Republican Congressman Chip Roy called it a show vote. Yeah,
it was virtue signaling, but it was more than virtue signaling. Who are
they showing who are they virtue signaling to. They're virtually virtue signaling to the
people in the Israeli government who give them money. They're prostituting themselves to a
foreign government. He said it was jammed through to take advantage of this political
moment, and he criticized Republican leadership because again it was Johnson who took this
poorly conceived bill, written and sitting there on a shelf for six months,
nobody did anything with it, and he rams it through. Matt Walsh with
a Daily Wire also criticized the bill's vagueness. He said the vast majority of
Republicans just voted for a bill to criminalize criticism of the Israeli government. If
the bill passes, you will be guilty of hate speech if you apply quote
unquote double standards to the government of Israel, or if you accuse it of
genocide. He said, this is honestly one of the most insane pieces of
legislation I've ever seen. And it's got My comment is it's got Johnson's fingerprints
all over it. And so it's interesting, you know, I see Brent
Leatherwood, I see Michael Brown, who is a Christian pastor. He is
Jewish ethnically, and he asked, he said, did the House just outlaw
quote parts of the New Testament? And so as he talks about he says,
well, he's Ad Torba, Andrew Torba of GAB. He says,
who himself is frequently accused of anti sympitism. Who isn't Who isn't Michael?
Come on, you know they call everybody racist, they really do. Any
We've seen this over and over again. You show up to debate these protesters
somewhere, ask them what they're they just shout at you, racist, racist,
racist. They have nothing to say. It's like Karen at the abortion
clinic holding up a sign saying abortion is black genocide, and the anti FOP
people showing up with a black sign nothing, just to put it in front
of her sign. Yeah, they're going up and down. You know,
here's my thing, you know, back and forth. They don't have anything
to say. They just want to shut you up. And so he's been
accused of anti semitism. Seriously has he? Is he anti Semitic or not?
Don't throw these types of things around. This is the kind of stuff
again, Michael Brown. You shouldn't be throwing stuff like this around. If
somebody is not any Semitic, if he's anti Semitic, make your case instead.
He just throws these accusations out. He said, he wrote an email,
sent an email by the second the House passes this, and it is
a threat to the Christian faith. He then claimed that the bill adopts the
International Holocaust remember Its Alliance's definition of anti Semitism, which includes the basic biblical
truth that Jews killed Jesus and so forth. He didn't claim that that's true.
We all know that's true. And he noted that Torba then wrote this
as an urgent warning, and he signed off with Christ is king. Oh
that's something else we're not allowed to say. Now, right, I've had
it with these rules, I really have. I really don't care what these
people say. He says. In short, then this bill says nothing whatsoever
about citing these New Testament passages or affirming their truthfulness. Yes, it does,
Michael, It's very clear it says blood libel or saying the Jews kill
Jesus. The Bible does say the Jews kill Jesus. Ben Shapiro pointed that
out. He was objective about that, he was right about that. Rather,
he says, it addresses the historic and still present anti Semitic libel that
all Jews were and are Christ killers, a libel that has led to the
slaughter of Jews throughout history is documented, and our hands are stained with blood.
He says, well, what about all the white people again, who
were supposedly accused of being racist slaveholders. You never cared about that, did
you. No, you didn't care about that at all. Whether the bill
in fringes on free speech in general is a separate issue entirely, is it
is? That you don't even talk about that, So he doesn't he knows
that it infringes on free speech, so he doesn't want to talk about that.
Well, if you're infringe on free speech, you're by definition infringe on
religious liberties. Because even if it didn't explicitly say what it explicitly does say,
if you say that, you know we're going to let you say certain
things and we'll shut you down on other things. It's going to go back
to God created them male and female. It'll be that simple. So again,
no monitors for any of this other hate, but we will have monitors
for all of that that is are they're going to give us. And there's
going to be a wave of legislation seeking to penalize criticism of Israel as anti
semitism. This has already happened, not just federal, but it's also state
laws. This is from Lee thing as a substance. Federal and state laws
include subjective actions like holding Israel to a double standard. What does that even
mean? What does that mean? And so he runs through Feng runs through,
says, here's the status of war ar at state levels. Earlier this
year, Governor Brian Kemp of Georgia, a frequent World Economic Form attendee,
by the way, revised Georgia's hate crime statute to include certain forms of speech
critical of Israel. In March, Christy Nome signed legislation of the South Dakota
Civil Rights Statute that codified some forms of speech critical of Israel as a form
of illegal discrimination. Nearly identical hate crime legislation passed South Carolina's legislature last week
and now waits the signature by the governor there. Florida legislators are rapidly advancing
a similar bill. There's not enough that they did that. DeSantis went to
Israel and signed a bill there to get paid. Frankly, he needed money
to run for president. He goes to Israel signs a bill making it a
crime, a felony, an imprisonable offense, to hurl insults at Jews.
I'm sorry, but you know somebody who's had a lot of insults hurled at
me. I have no sympathy for that, none whatsoever. Perhaps you deserve
those insults if you're going to take away our free speech because of that.
There is no such thing as hate speech or a speech crime. The crime
is censorship, and it's committed by politicians all the time, to be paid
by foreign governments. In New York state legislators propose legislation that would make a
class A misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in prison, to vandalize any
poster, banner, flyer, or billboard that supports the country or the citizens
of Israel in any way. But again, burning a US flag is free
speech, and I agree with it. I think that is free speech.
I don't like it, but I think that's free speech. That's a saying
I disagree. I detest the policies of America or something. Right, that's
what people are doing when they burn an Israeli flag. But they're going to
make that a crime. But it's not even a crime to burn our own
flag. That is a crime, folks, a crime being committed against US,
a betrayal. These people are judas goats. These people are Benedict Arnold
Donald as well. So again it goes over federal funding. New York Georgia
directly expand the scope of behavior subject to criminal prosecution. An act of alleged
anti Israel vandalism would now be subject to a harsher penalty. You know,
you can set a pro life clinic on fire and endanger human life, and
the FBI doesn't care. Don't touch an Israeli flag. All these laws,
federal and state, require government entities to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition
of anti Semitism. Just like the WHO and their IHR, we have Johnson
and his IHR. A. Kenneth Stern, an expert on anti Semitism who
helped to develop the IHR a definition of anti Semitism, has since criticized efforts
to enshrine the definition into law. You see, you hear that this is
a guy who worked for the Holocaust Remembrance thing and he defined anti Semitism,
but he doesn't think this should be enshrined in the law. You see.
This is a piece of garbage put in by Republicans because, just like DeSantis,
they can't grovel enough to the Israeli government to get money. It's kind
of interesting, isn't it. You know, you give the Israelis billions,
tens of billions or whatever, they give you back millions, tens of millions.
That's how it works. They have the foreign governments bribing these American politicians
with American taxpayer's money, or more accurately, with our debt. There was
never kin Stern the guy who helped to develop these IHRA definitions of anti Semitism.
He said, there was never any idea that this would be used as
a de facto hate speech code on campus. You wanted to train police officials
on it and so forth, but to curtail speech on a campus in particular,
that is something that was never contemplated. As a matter of fact,
Greg Abbott, who had put in some free speech laws because the same universities
were shutting down the free speech of conservatives and of white students and things that
people who are speaking against their Marxist revolution. He said at the time,
these universities and these outdoor areas are quote deemed traditional public forums unquote, and
he said, we encourage disciplinary policies for students and faculties who quote unduly interfere
with others free expression. Some colleges are banning free speech on college campuses,
said Abbott in twenty nineteen, Well no more, because I'm about to sign
a law that protects free speech on college campuses in Texas. And again,
I'll say it again, when you see the violence being done, that's not
speech. That's something completely different, assault and battery. As a matter of
fact, you saw Doug Wilson's grandson at I think it was Columbia, and
he's standing there as this mob wants to break in and break up the building.
He and another guy standing there and they're trying to remove them and they're
shoving them around, and goes, this is assault. This is total assault.
That's right. It is assault. It's not free speech. And we
don't need to destroy the First Amendment because you've got a Marxist mob out their
assaulting people Jewish or non Jewish. He's not Jewish, but they're assaulting everybody
out because that's what the Marxist mobs always do. Why are we continuing to
fund them unless they criticize the state of Israel, then we will take their
funds away. Governor Kemp stood side by side with Israeli American Council Chief Executive
Elon Karr at the signing of this bill, making speech that the Israeli government
doesn't like a crime Jerry Nadler that I played for you earlier. He says,
if this legislation were to become law, he said, we can end
up suppressing protected speech criticizing Israel or supporting Palestinians. What is more important with
all of this stuff, and yet you look at what is happening. We
now have Mike Johnson has decided to invite Benjamin net Yahu, who barely has
a majority in his own country, who has completely subservient himself to the World
Economic Forum, partnering with them to inject and kill his own people there to
use them as lab rats. So Johnson wants to bring him in to do
more pandering. Johnson doesn't care a whit about America. He's giving them three
and a half billion dollars to send their trash to us. They're violent Palestinians,
export them to America, will take them. Here's the money to send
them to us. He won't spend a dime to protect our borders, but
he will keep funding wars everywhere. And he'll invite Netanyahu to come in.
And now he's got Chuck Schumer who needs to mend some fences with the Israeli
lobby. Because Chuck Schumer Jewish himself criticize the Israeli government. Do we lock
him up? Do we lock up the Orthodox Jews? Do we lock up
Ben Shapiro, Do we lock up Jerry Nadler? No, to probably just
be people like me that they lock up, because I'm not going to shut
up about this stuff. I'm done with censorship as far as I'm concerned.
When we look at this, the root of all of these tactics that they're
using against us, I understand the root of all evil is the love of
money. And that's really what is involved here, isn't it. We have
these people in leadership, these professing Christians like Mike Johnson, these professing conservatives,
these people who profess to be Americans, these people who profess to put
America first. They're out there selling us out for the love of money.
But the way that they're going to destroy this country is by destroying the First
Amendment. That's why it was a first Amendment. If you don't have free
speech, if you don't have free political and religious speech, you don't have
a country. You don't have a democracy. And so again the instigator of
this is Johnson. The main point to be made is that Schumer is joining
Johnson and bringing in Netting Yahoo, who has killed his own people. It
truly is amazing. Now, before we get off of this, I just
have to play this for you. This is some of these radical campus Marxists.
They are fighting the police and riot gear. And this is a little
bit of humor. I guess. We have this one guy who starts yelling
at him this is a school. This is an effing school. And then
he says, I'm here to learn about public health as he beats the cops.
What do you think? What are you joining the school? Learn about
public house? It's a school. I gotta learn. I gotta learn about
public health. That's why he's got his mask on. He's got his Yasser
Arafat headdress there, like Chaguavar or something. Right, he's probably got a
Chaguavar T shirt underneath the Yasser Arafat mask that he's gone on. Look,
I don't agree with these people, but you want to poison all of this
stuff by telling us we can't have free speech. It's not only the wrong,
it's not only overreaction. It is a dead wrong reaction to what is
going on here. Uh. But unfortunately it doesn't exist as an outlier.
It's a long pattern of abuses. It's a long pattern of people who proclaim
to be policing anti semitism and racism shutting me down because of what I have
to say, politically, shutting me down because of what I say about climate,
or because what I say about the you know, any of the pandemic.
This is the same stuff. And I have to say when I talk
about climate, and their response is to say not to show their data.
Now, we're not going to show you the data. Even when you sue
us, we're not going to show you the data. You do what I
say. Then when you have the pandemic, no, we're not going to
show you the data. We're not going to bother to do tests. You
do what I say, and then we have this. Not allowed to criticize
the climate, not allowed to criticize COVID, not allowed to criticize the Holocaust?
What are they afraid of? Truth doesn't need to be defended. And
if these people are juicing what happened, and again I know what happened was
evil. Doesn't need to be six million people. But if they're going to
have to preserve this and they're afraid to defend it, then they got to
preserve it by putting gags on our mouth, well then maybe it needs to
be questioned. It's just that simple. On rock fence Stealth Patriot, thank
you for the tip. Almost forgot to drop it. And give my little
tiple thank you. I was enjoying the show so much from Friday. That
was a great combination of guests. Yes, it was. I really do
appreciate Tony doing that. And again, Tony Ardaban has been a big support
of the show and I really do appreciate him taking it over. He had
a lot of guests on. He had Guard, he had Don Jeffries,
he had Charlie Robinson, had Jerald Slinty had a lot of people on and
that always makes for a good program. So I really do appreciate him doing
that and giving me some time off. I wanted to take you know,
last week, I think it was Tuesday was my birthday and then my son's
birthday was on Saturday. So we decided we'd take Friday off and do some
things with the family, just have some family time and just to take a
break. And so Tony was really kind to do that. He always has
supported us. Again, if you want to prepare for this financial chaos that
they're preparing for us as well, you can go to David Knight dot gold.
Tony has set that up that'll take you to his Wisewolf dot gold and
there you can buy gold and silver small or large transactions if you want to
do small, regular transactions and take advantage of group buys. He also has
the wolf pack there. You can join that and you can get a fixed
him out each month, you know, fifty dollars, a hundred dollars.
I don't know who the upper limit is there, but you can accumulate it
on a regular and gradual basis. And again that's one of the best ways
to accumulate gold, you know, just a regular accumulation is what the central
banks are doing. Quite frankly, it was very interesting back and forth.
I don't have time to get into it today, but there was very interesting
back and forth on zero hedge. They had a debate between Irwin Schiff,
who is one hundred percent gold zero percent bitcoin. You know, Tony is
not that way. I'm not even that way. I mean, I don't
demonize bitcoin. It's not something I want to put a lot of money into
because, quite frankly, I just don't understand it well enough and I see
too many issues with it being connected to the Internet and virtual reality. I
want something that is physical, that is going to have full transactional privacy,
and so that's why I lean toward it something that is simple, that that
has a very long history. So I see bitcoin as being something more speculative,
as being something of a roller coaster ride. And I've ridden financial roller
coasters in the past, and I've been thrown out and run over. I
don't like to do that anymore. But I thought it was kind of interesting
the back and forth because on one side they had Peter Schiff and on the
other end and Rubini. Rubini was the guy who called the you know,
the economic collapse before he was a bit towards the you know. He even
made some stupid claims like well this is for money laundering and things like that,
which is nonsense. But I thought it was interesting what Peter Schiff said
when they said digital gold. He said, well, no, that's like
saying I got a picture on the Internet of a Hamburger and you call that
digital food. That's an interesting I like to have something that is physical and
tangible. So again, go to David night dot gold that I'll take you
to Tony Ardaban. Thank you so much for joining us today. I imagine
I offended everybody today, not just the Vimeo sensors. But I'm going to
tell you what I think, have a good day. Baring of biased and
false neoze has become all too common social media first unfortunatelyform their exactly and this
is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our
democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to
our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. Break free from the
usual script with a David Knight Show a fresh perspective bringing you genuine insights on
current events. But if the show is going to stay on the air,
we'll need your continued support. Sharing the show, subscribing and even just hitting
the like button all help. And if you found our show helpful, please
consider donating and becoming a part of a community that values the truth because independent,
listener funded news, untouched by corporate globalist agendas, is extremely important to
our liberties.