Hey, everybody, Jay Widener, Reality Jacket like and subscribe and all that,
and I kind of a special show today, kind of out of the
unusual because I have as my guest writer Lee, who is most famous for
directing jfk X Solving the Crime of the Century. Hey, writer, how
you doing? How's it going? Ja? And honor and a privilege to
be with you here today and my friend thanks for having me on. Yeah.
So back when we were making jfk X, I remember having dinner with
you or something, and I said something like, expect some weird stuff to
occur after the film comes out. And I couldn't tell you what because I
didn't know what, but I just knew that this was going to elicit that
film was going to elicit some kind of weird response. So the film went
up on am is, on Prime and a few other platforms on July eleventh.
On September tenth, almost exactly three months later, is the announcement or
I guess, the interview in the New York Times of the secret Service agent
who was supposedly writing on the foot of the car behind jfk who we really
can't see in disaboter film at all. And now I'm gonna, in fact,
i'm gonna get to this. I'm gonna read this article, at least
some of it from the Daily Mail. Secret Service. Go ahead. Yeah,
it's really interesting that after sixty years, this gentleman, Paul Landis just
now decides to come out about his involvement with the magic bullet. It's really
interesting timing. And like you said, and like you mentioned, we said
on several interviews that there's going to be more evidence that's going to be coming
out up until the sixtieth anniversary, which happens this November. And yeah,
I think that Paul Landis should be prosecuted. That's just what I think.
Is going to completely agree. So let me go through this and then we
get into that because I think he should be prosecuted. I guess there's what
do you call it, the length of time or whatever, but still there,
it's really disturbing and it's well, let's just let's let me just read
this for anybody who doesn't really know what's going on. A former Secret Service
agent was President President at President Kennedy's assassination has come forward with a new claim
that would debunk the magic bullet theory and Rais's question about whether there was a
second shooter. Paul land This eighty eight broke his silence on Saturday, at
nearly sixty years after Kennedy was shot dead in a motor passing through Dallas,
to share his bombshell recollection with The New York Times. Landis, who in
sixty three was a young Secret Service agent assigned to protect First Lady Jackie Kennedy,
said that in the chaos following the shooting, he picked up a nearly
pristine bullet sitting on the back seat of the open limousine, which means it
had to have been at the hospital because we know it drove away who was
just behind where Kennedy was. It was just behind where Kennedy was sitting when
he was killed, he says. Landis said he took the projectile and placed
it on the President's hospital stretcher to preserve it for the autopsy investigators. That
bullet, the first piece of evidence logged in the murder investigation, has for
six decades, been said to have been found on the stretcher of Texas Governor
John Connolly and hypotheized that to have fallen from a wound to his thigh Landis
thinks the bullet may have rolled on too Connelly stretcher from Kennedy's while they were
next to each other. That's a stretch his long been known as the magic
bullet. The bullet that supposedly passed through Kennedy's neck from the rear, then
entered Connolly's right shoulder, struck his rib, exited under his right nipple,
passed through his right wrist, and hit his left eye. Yeah, but
Land's assertion that had been actually exited Kennedy in his Cadillac could lay waste to
the magic bullet theory and bolted the claimant. Lee Harvey Oswald did not operate
alone, and we have some photographs and according to the Warrant Commission, Kennedy
was killed by alone got even Lee Harvey Oswald, who fired three shots at
the Motorcade from sixth floor of the Texas Book with a six point five millimeter
Man Liquor Carcano rifle. According to the report, one of the shots mister
Motorcade, another was the magic bullet, stroke both Kennedy and Connolly, and
the final round fatally struck Kennedy in the head. Now Landa says he believes
the bullet he retrieved from the limo may have been under charged and dislodged from
a shallow wound in the President's back falling back onto the limousine seat when the
fatal shot hit his head. He theorizes that after he placed the bullet on
Kennedy stretcher, it may have fallen onto Connolly stretcher when they were jostled together.
Is also possible at the hospital staffer who found the bullet and handed it
over the Secret Service misidentified which stretcher it came from, or that his account
was mangled by investigators. The bullet which had been fired was nearly fully a
technical It was fully intact. That is, bs there was not a scratch
or a chunk of anything missing from that bullet was possibly matched to Oswald's man
liquor carcano through ballistics analysis, But if Landis's claim is true, that's adjust
a bullet tagged as evidence Q one was not responsible for the injuries to Connolly
and there was no so called magic bullet. Almost done here. James Robinot,
an attorney and historian, I'd like to find out what his reel background
is, who worked with Landis on a book he plans to release in October.
Believes the new accounts suggest the possibility of multiple shooters. If what he
says is true, which I tend to believe, it's likely to reopen the
question of a second shooter. If not even more, If the bullet we
know is the magic or pristine bullet stopped in President Kennedy's back, it means
that the central thesis of the Warren Commission, the single bullet theory, is
wrong. The infamous the Bruder film shows that there was roughly a second between
the physical reaction of Kennedy and Connolly to being shot. Yes, there was,
let me show that in the film. Yeah, we show that in
the film. All right, So I look an worry anymore with it.
But basically he's saying, Uh, this agent is saying that he heard the
shots, So I heard the shots. So what this is looking like is
and I don't know any about this guy, what his background is anymore.
He quit right a few months afterwards after the assassination, he quit the Secret
Service. But this looks like a just an attempt to discredit our film,
is what I'm thinking, And that it doesn't really discredit our film though,
it just throws more garbage into the heap to confuse everybody and everything. Because
here's the thing about the bullet. It had no blood on it unless he
wiped the blood. He's not telling us if he did. He destroy evidence.
You know, he planted evidence, so he might as well have destroyed
evidence as well. I mean, years without telling anybody that you put a
bullet on the stretcher with JFK. How is that even possible. The dude
should be prosecuted for tampering with evidence and for obstruction of a crime scene.
Absolutely, there's about ten crimes this guy committed and they're not talking about any
of that. How unbelievable it is that he would find evidence the bullet that
may or may not. It's not his job to figure out if that bullet
killed Kennedy or not. And it's not his job to speculate that it came
out of his back. He doesn't know any of that. This is the
raw speculation. The real point is is that there was no damage to that
bullet and there was no blood on that bullet, all right, So I
would say that he was involved and as he planted the bullet and he walked
into the hospital with this pristine six point five millimeter and dropped it on maybe
even the wrong stretcher, we don't know. And he was Jackie's probably one
of Jackie's top secret service agents. So he actually worked with the family.
He went to Greece in October of nineteen sixty three with Jackie while she visited
Aristotle Onassis, her soon to be husband. Right, he was there the
whole time. He actually babysat the kids on the island with her. I
looked into his background. He was very familiar with the family. He ate
dinners with them. And then you know, he quits just a few months
after the incident, right, which is kind of strange that you're twenty eight
years old and you worked your but to get to this position, and why
would you quit? And that's very strange too. And and I can't say
this is all speculation. I don't know, but I know that there are
three months is more than enough time to write a book. I know that
I ghost written many books in my life, and I've written books in sixty
days. If I've already got the plot, I know exactly where everything is
going. It's really just a rudimentary, like a carpentry job. It's just
putting the two by fours up and getting it all done so it's easy.
These intel agencies have reams of riders working for them, putting out counter info,
counter info and so. And also, if this is true and he
did plant the bullet, then that means that the Warren Commission's investigation is even
more botched than what we showed in JFKX Solving the Crime of the Century.
We already showed you that the Bruder film has been altered several times. And
if this is true in him saying that he planted this bullet, and that
bullet was basically the whole where the whole theory came came from. So if
the bullet is planted, then that means that the Warn't commissions whole theory of
what happened is even more wrong than we originally thought that it was. And
he sat on it the whole time. That's even more incredible to sit on
that kind of information. That bullet shouldn't have been touched. He should have
called in the FBI, they would have come in. They would not touched
that bullet had probably had it could have had fingerprints on it. You don't
know. He just completely botched the outside of the brewer, from the single
most important piece of evidence in the whole Kennedy assassination is now just called into
question on everything. And I personally believe that this is a counter offensive to
the film. I really do. I've seen this happen before, and I'm
going to bet I'll buy the book when it comes out in October. I'll
bet it's really rushed. I bet the the writing job is a really rushed
job, which will be the indication that this was a major freak out that
started probably on July twelfth, twenty twenty three, as they all ran for
cover because they just don't want it all to come out. And it is
going to come out, but in some ways, you know, first off,
I don't believe his story that he found it on the seat. I
don't. I don't believe his story at all. I believe that he somehow
he just planted it because first off, when did he see it. He's
not really very clear as to when he saw it. He could not have
possibly seen it in the zu Bruder film that he isn't anywhere around. So
yeah, the only secret service stage and we see in the Zubruter film is
Clint hill. Yeah, clinting on the back of the limousine. Yep.
And so I don't know what he's what he what he's doing. Is he
through his narrative, he says, I was on I was riding in the
car on the foot footstep of the old cars used to have, and I
heard the shot and I turned around to look right. So he's like,
this is like brand new evidence confirming that there were shots going on right now,
now we have it somebody who says they reacted to the shot going on
right. Then he heard the second shot go on, right, and he
reacted to that shot going off also, he says. So he's we're saying
in the films that nobody reacts to the shots and nobody nobody can hear any
shots, And he's refuting those two really important points that we're trying to make.
Okay, So that's the first thing that has to be kind of a
fourth here. And then he somehow is acting as if he was like right
there and saw the brains flying out. He says he saw the brains flying
out, So he's now confirming that the brains flew out right, which is
again, so three points of most important points that we try to make in
our film, he is literally refuting with the story and and admitting that he
broke the law, several laws actually in the crime of the century. He's
willing to come forth and say that I'm a lawbreaker. Although none of the
news articles ever point this out, not one yet has pointed out that this
is, you know, destroying evidence or not destroying manipulating evidence, and it
should have been. You know, I am absolutely sure that they are taught
in the Secret Service academy that you're not supposed to touch evidence in a murder.
Well, that's not the only thing that they messed up with on the
whole investigation. The FBI in the Secret Service both did reenactments of the JFK
assassination, and during one of those reenactments they literally use the gun that was
Oswald's Carcano rifle. They used the rifle that was supposedly used in the murder
of JFK for the reenactment. What kind of nonsense is that you're going to
use the actual supposed murder weapon that's evidence for your reenactment. Why would you
ever do that? Makes absolutely zero sense. And this whole thing with the
bullet actually kind of does enforce our the statements and the things that we talk
about in jfk X, solving the Crime of the Century, and the fact
that there wasn't any gunshots fired that day, right, we will talk about
that in the film. And if he planted this bullet, it's a pristine
bullet, right, And I don't know. I think people realize how bullets
work. There's a there's a shell casing around a bullet, and then when
the bullets fired, the bullet comes out of the shell casing. But the
shell casing was around the bullet that was found in on the stretcher, Like,
how can you say that that was a fired bullet? And Paul Landis
is now saying that it was. He found it lodged I think in the
backseat of the limousine. That's what it says in that article. But there's
another article that I read that stated that he said that he thought that the
shots weren't gun shots, that they were firecrackers. Yes, now that is
that is also about several witnesses say that they thought somebody had lit firecrackers behind
the grassy knoll, and I think it's actually somebody did. I think it
was all part of the sky op that they had somebody planted back there who
has you know, little small black cats or something, and just let them
off right at the state, right at the moment, just to cause more
confusion and everything. But when I heard the audio of that, the warr
commission said three shots ron it. I could say that there could have been
some firecrackers going off in the background, you know, I really could,
but not gunshots, not nothing piercing like that, right, Like, so
I don't know, but I know that, you know, here's the thing.
The Secret Services in on it. We show it in the film.
So the Secret Service, how's as a is getting their name kind of smirched
here, and so they're taking action to make sure that, you know,
the enough disinformation is thrown out there right now that the credibility has gone from
the film. And it's not going to be because it will stand the test
of time. It already is. But that's what they're hoping with this.
And I would look for some more things too, to be honest with you,
I would look, you know, he's eighty eight year old witnesses.
It's like the like giving money to the Holocaust survivors in Ukraine, you know,
way of how how old are they? You know what I mean,
It's like, holy crap, you have to be at least one hundred and
fifty. And so, you know, bringing out this old guy, nobody's
gonna arrest him, and nobody's gonna criticize him. They'll fact. Nobody's bringing
out the fact that he altered evidence in the greatest crime ever. Nobody's even
bringing it up. So they're giving him a free ride. And and that's
one of the reasons I wanted to have you on was because I don't want
him to have a free ride. We need to bring these questions up.
And we can't just let this guy go out there and say a whole bunch
of statements unchallenged, especially when it's absolutely a fact that he broke a whole
bunch of laws and really messed up the investigation, rankly, really messed it
up. So yeah, yeah, we show in JFKX Solving the Crime of
the Century how screwed up the investigation already was with the alterations from there's a
Brooder film, the missing frames for missing frames and there's a Brooder film.
No one was ever made to come forward about how those missing frames came to
be how they got there. And then with the it's like it's just another
thing thrown in there with all of the another muddying of the waters, more
muddying of the waters, and to throw people off of what we what I
think that we discuss in our film, right, and I think it's people
really need to realize that conspiracy whenever conspiracy theorists discover that they're a part of
a conspiracy theory, to use conspiracy theorists to spread disinformation about conspiracy theories,
that's really what's happening here. And this is the inception of the conspiracy theory.
And when you go back and you realize that all this stuff is flawed
and everyone is wrong about everything, all the creations of all the theories that
they've come up with. Just like sixty years later, we're just now finding
out supposedly that the magic bullet really wasn't a magic bullet. But that's what
the Warren Commission used. They used as a Bruder film which was altered as
their timeline of events to figure out what happened. And now they're using a
planted, fake magic bullet that a secret Service agent laid in the stretcher of
JFK. How more convoluted and nonsensical can you get? No wonder? Conspiracy
theories are so easily propagated and take on a life of their own, and
they just get compounded upon a time after time after time, a new generation
of people come along, and then they just compound all of their theories on
top of old existing, pre existing theories and then create their new thing when
none of it's right. And and you know, the incongruities that we point
out in the film, like the autopsy pictures as opposed to this is a
Brooder film, right, So that's what's got them worried, is those the
incongruities that we keep pointing out. And so if they can muddy the water
and create another round of conspiracy theories, is that's what this is going to
do? Now, create another boring round of all. There must have been
another shooter somewhere, you know, the dal text building or somewhere right,
Well, I mean, you see, this is a Brooder film. Does
Kennedy expose his back to anybody? No? No, his back is not
exposed exactly, and where did in the autopsy doesn't say that Kennedy has a
wound to the back because I'm pretty sure the autopsy doesn't have that. So
what's he talking about? You know, the evidence doesn't show that. The
evidence of the War Commission doesn't talk about a wound to the back. There's
a wound to the neck and a wound to the head. That's what they
said, right, That's exactly what you see in the autopsy pictures. You
see a wound to the neck and a wound to the head. In the
Bruder film you see no wound to the neck and a wound to the right
side of the head. So all these incongruities were pointed out in jfk X,
and I think they had to send the send the damage control squad out
as fast as they could when I put out when I put out Kubricks Odyssey,
Kubrick out Apollo in two thousand and eleven, Yeah, two thousand and
eleven. I remember they put out a documentary about Apollo a year later,
the The Great Desolation or something, right, Brian Eno wrote the music,
and you know, and it's a big production, and and you know,
and without showing in that documentary, they hardly showed any film of the astronauts
on the moon, because if they did, you all see what I was
saying, right, So they just had long interviews with the astronauts without showing
them on the moon. So it was just a disinformation campaign. And that's
what this is going to be. And I'm going to say that we're going
to see at least two more documentaries that are going to be disguised as documentaries
but are really going to be veiled attacks against what we show in jk X.
I don't really think that's going to happen. And it's something to keep
leading the community on. It's exactly like what you said. It's something to
keep everybody on the hook about because unfortunately, the conspiracy community and the truth
or community has become an industry. It's an industry. It's a way to
make money. It's very little truth and evidence or a prove backs up any
of this stuff, you know, and it just keeps getting pushed out there.
It's exactly like the UFO community in ufology. It's they keep reverting back
to a singular event like Roswell, like that's their go to all the time,
every single time it's it's Roswell. And it's the exact same thing with
the JFK assassin issue. Now they're they're reverting back, They're they're changing their
story, they're switching it up just a little bit, just to keep all
the conspiracy theories going because I believe that we literally legitimately solved it. And
what's in that movie JFKX Solving the Crime of the Century is the reason why
the JFK files are never going to be released. They're never going to release
them. That's what was in those files. And I think that also that
was a way during the Boston bombing as well to destroy some of the evidence
of that at the Jfkmeomorial Library into that let's go into that. Tell us,
what are you talking about. So during the Boston Marathon bombing, a
few people they only they don't realize that there was a third bomb that went
off. Two apparently went off at the bust of marathon race, but there
was a third bomb that went off. A little, very little well known
event that happened. But you can google it and you can look at bombing
at JFK Memorial Library and you'll see. And they tried to kind of cover
it up by saying that it was a it was just a fire. But
there's a police chief that made a statement right whenever it happened, that said
that there was another bomb that went off. She was on the radio,
So that there's another bomb, a third bomb that went off at JFK Memorial
Library at the archives department. The fact that we don't know about this,
are you kidding? The same day as the Boston marathon bombings the JFK and
where the library is bombed and we don't know about that, that should be
bigger news all but well, I guess people died at the marathon, but
but still that should be big news and it's not. So there must very
little information is on that as well. It's very difficult to find information.
But it absolutely did happen, and it is a factual information. And why
would they do that. Why would they bomb the archives department of the JFK
Memorial Library unless they were trying to get rid of some evidence, Unless there
was some kind of mind blowing evidence that was in the JFK Memorial Library.
Someone used to go through there and go through those documents that are still left
to see what's missing, to try and figure out exactly what got destroyed,
to try and figure it out. But I believe they were were legitimately trying
to get rid of evidence that could possibly come out in the future. And
they realize that and the only way that they could do it was blow it
up and bomb it. And they used the cover of the Boston Marathon bombing
in order to take out the JFK Memorial Library. Man, I'll tell you
what, I know a lot about the Boston Marathon bombing. Dave McGowan of
the Laurel Canyon Fame wrote an incredible series of essays on the Boston bombing.
And what he did was he took two sets of photographs that were taking that
day. You know, there was two photographers there, and each one took
like forty photographs from d two different angles, right, and he starts cross
indexing them. And there's there's something so wrong with the Boston bombing that I
can't even begin to describe it. But I can't because I'll get kicked off
YouTube, so I'm not so anyway, we should ask him if he knows
about the I'm sure he would have to know about the bombing at the JFKMA
World Library if he's researched it enough and looked into it. I can't remember
if he talked about that in his essay. I'll have to look it up
again. He would not be the kind of guy that would miss something that
important. But I never thought about it until you brought it up. I
mean, I really never thought about the angle. But then again, you
know what we did in jfk X is that we pulled out all of these
weird nuggets that no one had ever brought up, like the fact that they
exhumed the body in nineteen sixty seven, Like the fact that none of the
CBS, ABC and NBC did not send camera people although they did two d
lee Plaza that day. Those are the kind of nagg thing I think that
really make the film so effective. And then, of course, you know
being you know, showing audiences a four K high quality version of There's a
Brooder film where you can clearly see that there's no brains splattered on the back
of everybody's drunk. Collie says, there was brains splattered all over the back.
He didn't even turn his head to look. He watches a Brooder film,
doesn't turn back to see what's on the hood of the car. He
dives under the seat as soon as everything starts. So if you remember when
we were making the film and I was I called you and I was like,
I'm watching this is a Brooder film right now, and I don't see
Connolly or his wife. I didn't realize that until I looked at it in
slow motion. There as soon as JFK's head explodes, they're nowhere to be
seen. They're just gone. They're they're gone, They're not even there,
they're not looking anywhere. They're ducked underneath the seat completely. So I thought
that was really interesting because I was going through because I suctioned out that little
part of the video to put it in slow motion to put it in the
film, and I call it Jay. I'm like, Connolly and his wife
aren't in this footage at all, and you're raced over. You're like,
no, they're there, they're just ducked down anything, just donning the floor.
Yeah, probably Connolly is laying on the floor and his wife's on top,
you see, because he's got to be protected. He's the governor.
No, just kidding, So yeah, And I think that's what makes the
film so powerful, is that all of the little nuggets that we stick together,
string together one after another of unknown things that people just never talk about
like the fact that nobody reacts to guns going off, and the fact that
you know so many in the tip it, no one ever brings up tipp
it. You know, we do, right, And so there's that.
I think that's what makes the film not only really powerful as as a film,
but I think also even today, sixty years later, they have to
preserve the BS story. And that's what this is here. This is the
first their first salvo in attempting to do a limited hang out by saying the
Secret Service actually did something wrong, something unlawful that day. Inexplicably too.
By the way, why would he do that? What would be the point
is his fingerprints on the on the bullet, Did he wear glove, did
he put it in a kerchief around it or something? I mean, there's
like all this does is raise one hundred other questions about everything, right,
And the fact of the matter is is that bullet had been fired, probably
from the carcano they found on the sixth floor, But it was fired into
like a mattress or something that soft stop it, not into hard bone because
it would be cracked, there would be chips off of it. Anybody's ever
hunted. But know that so they they just you know, he planted it.
I don't know if he was working for the for the whole thing or
working for the people, but I would say that he probably was aware of
what was really going on that day. Rankly. Yeah, I think so
too. Within the fact of not telling anybody that you did it, Why
would you not tell your superiors or somebody else that was running the investigation that
you found the bullet in the limousine and that you put it on the stretcher,
and and who You're trying to cause more confusion and muddy the waters even
more than you would do that. Right then, after sixty years, then
finally coming out and seeing that, oh yeah, I to put that bullet
on the stretcher, and that's what the Warren Commission is. And everyone's talking
about this magic bullet when there wasn't any magic bullet. It makes absolutely no
sense. Why would you do that. You're a secret Service agent, You're
like one of the agents in the government President's wife. I mean, you
were a highly trusted guy, and this is what you would do. It's
outrageous. It really is outrageous that nobody's calling him forth on any of this,
and that's The main reason I want you to come on because I wanted
somebody to rage against the whole idea that this guy can be allowed to say
he did this. I mean it, it's outrageous. But he's saying and
I mean, there's no explanation. And like I said before, we you
and I watched as the Brewer film, probably more than anybody on earth at
this stage. And I can tell you what. He never exposes his back
until he rolls over at the very end. That's the only time that Kennedy
exposes his back, all right, and that only for a second because he's
down underneath where you couldn't get him with a gun anywhere that you were.
So, and I guarantee you have gone through all of the autopsy stuff.
There is no mention of a wound to the back. There's a wound to
the neck and a wound to the head. And so even the autopsy disagrees
with this guy. So and also, if you just like that guy that's
doing the UFO stuff right now, what's his name, Bruce or whatever?
Yeah, okay, so if you follow, if you actually listen to that
guy and doing an content analysis of the languaging that he is using he's not
saying anything, all right, he's not actually saying anything. The same thing
with this guy. Oh, the bullet must have been lodged in his back
and it fell out. Well did you see the bullet lodged in his back?
Or he was making an assumption here? And since there's no wound to
the back in the autopsy report, how do you reconcile that? You know?
And so I think that this guy needs to be questioned a lot more
through than he has been so far. Yeah, I think he needs to
be questioned. I think he needs to be prosecuted. But just like you
mentioned with David Grush, people aren't asking David Rush the hard questions. They're
not asking him for proof and evidence for his claims that he's made about non
human biologics and non human craft. Right, people aren't giving him the heat
that he needs. I mean, he is literally in front of Congress telling
people that the government has non biologica that means bodies that they've recovered from a
crash retrieval. Well, where's the proof and the evidence to back up those
claims? Like, how are you going to sit in front of Congress and
tell them a bunch of wacka doo nonsense stories that have been regurgitated in the
community for decades now that we're inevitably made up by Richard Doughty, freaking disinformationalists
from the Mirage, a man that was going around giving disinformation to UFO contacts
in the UFO community in the seventies and the eighties. You know, it's
a regurgitation of a story that has compounded upon it. Then it gets to
be accepted truth in mythology within the community, and everybody that talks about these
topics has been guilty of this. They're they're talking about regurgitated information over and
over and that wasn't proven back when it was originally talked about it. Oh
yeah, I mean there's like, uh, and the conspiracy community is doubling
down. I'm sure you've noticed on all their their on all their conspiracy things,
and that's fine, but uh, we're right. I'm sorry, But
the film is right, and the fact that there's going to be all this
flat coming out trying to disprove it is just more proof than it's right.
So you know, years will go by and then it'll be accepted and that's
the way it goes. But This guy did a pretty good job of a
counter intelligence I got to give him credit. It was actually a pretty good
salvo. It's completely meaningless and it's not gonna work, but I think it's
the best thing could come up with. I really do. And I think
he Isn't he the last remaining Secret Service probably that time, Yeah, probably
twenty eight, so he had to be one of the younger ones. Yeah.
You know, the fact that he had really close ties to Jackie I
find to be quite telling actually, because you would want, you know,
the guys that you're closest to. So Clint Hill and he were the two
closest Jackie's secret Service agents, right, And they were both right there.
In other words, they were at the front of the car, the Secret
Service car, following JFK's car, right, So they were the front witnesses,
these two guys who were Jackie's pretty much her right hand secret service agents.
Right. So yeah, you can take that with grain as salt.
But I mean, if any of the government theorists and the conspiracy theorists want
to come at us about this film, tell us what's on the side of
JFK's face. Yeah, tell us what that is? What is that no
one's been able to come up with a good explanation of what that is.
And I was back and forth a lot with making this film. I was
calling Jay like every day. I was like, Jay, I don't know.
You know, I'm like, it might have been in the CIA,
it might have been the mob, because I'm doing all the research for it,
and I'm realizing that the Kennedy brothers were legitimately going after the mob like
hardcore. They were literally trying to take down organized crime, governmental organized crime.
And I was like, maybe it was the mob. Maybe they really
did kill him. And then once I got farther into the film, and
then I'm really closely looking at this A Brooder film, the highest definition version
of the A Brewder film ever made that's in our film. I seen it
and I'm like, wow, this really was a huge fabrication. And I
was back and forth on it just as well and jaking a test. But
once you see the footage and what we're presenting, there's really no way around
it, Like what can you come up with to disprove what we're showing you
as evidence in the film. I mean, this would be the perfect way
to do it, is to bring a secret service agent from sixty years ago.
That's like eighty three, eighty four, eighty five years old, talk
about eighty eight. It was even older, eighty eight years old to talk
about that he planted a magic bullet, which then, just what we were
doing is we wanted to come in and demolish all of the conspiracy theories that
were surrounding the JFK assassination and actually solved the crime of the century. And
I believe that we did. But now they threw in this new piece of
evidence that makes it seem like they are then solving the crime of the century
in a way, right, because it has to make everyone go back in
and let's start all over again when we already did it. We already did
it. That's exactly right. And that's why I know that this is a
uh some kind of sciop because of the way that the guy structures everything,
and it's like it's like a counter not a very good counter, but a
counter to our felm An attempt, like a counter punch, and it's a
very weak counter punch, and it doesn't make any sense, but it was
so, yeah, hey, they did it, So how could they even
let him come in How could they even let him come out with that.
That's the thing that's boffling me, Like, how can a secret service a
drink come out and admit to a crime? Like you're admitting to a crime
right there. I'm sure a statue of limitations the assassination of the President of
the United States, so he can be prosecuted. He should be. Actually,
yeah, that's tampering with evidence. That's tampering with an active investigation and
active crime scene. Like those are huge charges. Oh man, he altered
history, literally altered history. I want to ask you another question. Give
us a list of names and times we rough, times that you told other
people this. I want to hear other witnesses come forth and say, yo,
yeah, Paul told me that. Oh yeah, right, because why
did you say something? Then these witnesses that he's told, So are you
telling me that you didn't tell your wife or your best friend or anything for
sixty years and he just suddenly went to the New York Times and told them
and they decided to run with it. And Nope, not in the midst
of the release of our film. Nope, nope, nope, nope,
nope, nope, nope nope. Then also the limousine being destroyed soon after
the assassination. Why would they do that? That's like, that's prime evidence.
And as we found out after we made the film, the limousine that's
at the gerald Ford Museum in Michigan that they are saying is the Kennedy limousine
isn't. It's a four seater, it's not a sixth seater. So I
don't know what that is. I probably a backup limo that they had and
they put it in the museum, But it's not the same limo. It's
closed. It's Cadillac, but house only has four seats. And also I
don't think that the time of the Time Life magazine pictures of the limousine isn't
the same limousine either, right right, Yeah, the picture of that time
one week after the Kennedy assassination, Time Life had a big, huge photograph
of the Jackie's roses and the blood on the back seat of the limousine.
But it's a four seater the limousine in Time Life magazine, you know.
And those guys should be arrested for tampering with the evidence too, as we're
proving the film they altered. There was a Brooder film. It removed at
least four frames, so man, so much tampering with evidence has been uncovered.
It's amazing, and it's just to serve to create more to the convolute
the story even more. And then you think, oh, well, why
would they do that, Why would they intentionally create why would they intentionally muddy
the waters? Right? And they think it's for they don't. Yeah,
they don't have a choice. They have to keep the whole thing going,
and you're going to see more of it. I would. I'm gonna bet
you also that uh, nasty stuff is going to start coming out about Aristotle
Anassis. You watch I say that, because once you go down this whole
thing what we're saying in JFK X solving the commissentary, Aristotle Nassis becomes a
much more important character, all right than he was before than just some rich
guy who married Jackie. He now becomes something more important to the narrative.
And it's important to know that he was one of the major contributors to the
Kennedy campaign in nineteen sixty by the way, was Aristotle and gave millions to
JFK to run for president. And of course he was the one that sheltered
Jackie afterwards. And you know, I've talked to several people from Greece who
are like my age, and they said that they many times we talked to
people who would go to Scorpios Island to work maids and carpenters or whatever,
and they would see two guys in wheelchairs and one of them looked just like
JFK. And if he did have he did have Addison's disease, he probably
would have been relegated to a wheelchair eventually. So you know, those are
all speculations. But writer, it's been really good having you on. I
wanted to get this out because he says nagging at me, and I'm so
glad I have this platform because more of the stuff's going to come out.
So I'm going to be bringing you on every time they do a counter insurgency.
We're going to come back on, and I expect a bunch more,
especially as things heat up in the sixtieth anniversary approaches. Here we're after Labor
Day, so now this is going to be one of the major topics of
conversation for the next two and a half three months, and I want to
make sure that our voice is one of those taught voices and so get prepared
for battle. I guess yeah. I mean it's a he committed an a
tregious crime. He tampered with evidence, he tampered with an active crime scene
and didn't tell anybody about it. That is that he should be prosecuted.
There's no other way around it. But they're not going to because you said
he was eighty eight years old. They're not going to prosecute an eighty eight
year old man, especially when he already has a book deal already ready and
has probably the book was written by AI or written by the intelligence community.
Put out some more discs and misinformation surrounding surrounding the assassination. But I really
implored people just to watch the movie. It's going to be on twenty one
different platforms here, so it's going to be on two b I believe here
soon and on YouTube YouTube with ads to be of course has ads, so
three though, and it's international on those platform to me is Canada, Mexico,
Australia, and the United States. YouTube with ads is international, so
you'll be able to watch it there. It's on Amazon Prime, but it's
going to be on Apple Television. She's I'm gonna put a list out of
it. But weirdly enough, film Hub, our distributor, has gone down
for the next two weeks. I'm not sure what's going on there, so
I can't even give you the list because I can't even check my account.
So it's like film Hub, what you're supposed to do is you write the
software first, and then you do it at three in the morning. Okay,
you don't put the software up and do testing while we're sitting around wanting
to look at how things are going. So am a little disappointed in film
Hub right now. But I think we crashed the servers there for a minute
because there were several people that were hitting me up and telling me they couldn't
access the film was first release. I think that they weren't expecting as many
people to purchase it and rent it as uh as we had. And that's
uh, that's amazing because it tells you how great the film wasn't And you
know, right now you can find it on Amazon four dollar ninety nine to
rant and four ninety nine to purchase, and I highly recommend doing that because
you know, we're just doing this out of our own pocket. We don't
have any big production company behind us or backing us. And it's important to
support independent filmmakers because that's the direction that things are going in Hollywood is collapsing
right now. Netflix hasn't made any money. I don't think Netflix has ever
made any money. They've They've been in debt this entire time. It's unsustainable.
These streaming services are completely unsustainable, and it's going to switch at some
point and it's going to go to Uh, independent filmmakers. I absolutely one
percent beliefs. So thank you for the people that has supported so far and
watched the movie and bought the movie or rented the movi. I you really
appreciate it. Just be on the lookout because we got to more films that
we're going to be in the process of shooting here very soon, and uh
you know, we're gonna need your guys to support on that too, because
this is how it's done. It's a it's a grassroots word of mouth thing.
And if you can't purchase it or you can't rent it, send it
to your friends, send it to your family members, put it in Facebook
groups, just share it on on social media anywhere and everywhere, because I
guarantee someone will be interested in it, and uh, thanks so much Jay
for having me on. And anytime this kind of stuff happens, I think
it's important that and call it out. Yeah, we have to, that's
that's one of the main reasons I started the channel was to call out on
personal attacks, you know, or on my work, right, because you
know, we're just happening all the time, and I needed to have a
platform that made people who are going to come after me pause for a moment
because my platform is usually you know, people by very active people. Right.
So anyway, thanks writer, And the film is jfk X Solving the
Crime of the Century. You know, Amazon, Prime and twenty one different
platforms. It's everywhere, literally everywhere, and please go watch it, and
please get your friends to watch it. Please start discussion groups. And we
have to counter balance the things that they're doing because you know, they get
the New York Times to do their interview, they get big publishing company to
do their their books. We can't compete with that. So writers, right,
you know, we're small but strong and mighty, and we shall defeat
the beast eventually. All right, I'm watching see you