Rin, we' re here. We are already here this Wednesday, March
6, the year two thousand twenty- four. I don' t know
why our dear Efrabed hasn' t arrived, but we' ll be waiting
for him here by now. Welcome, Doctor amen Hello, how very good
night, yes already waiting here. It' s probably not too late,
Ephraim, but I' m glad to say hello. There' s a
lot to talk about exactly an apology. We started again seven thirty. I
programmed it felt thirty, there were other previous recordings, but already from tomorrow,
again seven fifteen as always, but today seven hundred thirty. But there
' s good, we' ll be in three minutes late, but we
' re here. Welcome. All those who are Spreaker, Spotify, iTunes,
all those who are on Facebook, those who are on YouTube, thanks
to those who are member subscribers, those who are passing by, all those
who give us their likes, comments and so on, we will be eternally
grateful and God will give you more oya. Well, welcome back, girls,
how are you, what do you say this Wednesday? I don'
t know what day I' m on anymore. Wednesday or boys ge six
of March, Wednesday already very very good week for everyone and well, it
has been intense and everything, but it has been a good week, the
truth as far as I am concerned. But let' s start what you
think we start with this day with the good ones or remember that this is
not a Here we like to analyze, to talk, to think about yarnos.
They said we' re very serious, so we' re not gonna
be so serious anymore. We' re going to be more like this,
because as more of the Bliss, you can hear characheros. We have the
subject of because yesterday we talked about the issue of Hector Parray and we are
going to have a guest soon who knows of laws that he wrote to me
with great pleasure today. It' s gonna help us understand this case.
But it' s on the Chisme No Like show. It has to be
said that it was them in Chisme No online. Those who get the interview
with lawyer SamaraÁvila over there can see it complete on the Chisme No No
Like channel. For us it caught our attention because in these in this,
because in this interview they do with the lawyer leaves many things clear that are
the ones that we have asked ourselves. What are those tests that made us
accept, why is it said that there is something unfair, why is it
said that there is a black hand the lawyer. Among the things he says,
for example, is that how it was possible that because the interviewers asked
him, it would be Mr Serian and the lady asked him why and how
he knows how much he will be sentenced now that it is 15 March.
He said no, because I' m a wedding boy. I couldn'
t tell you, but because there are other characters who do know how long
they' re gonna hurt them before the judge says so. This is as
in reference to Mr Mayer, because also in gossip like I think they agree
with us in this regard. What is behind this and why there is no
more social pressure, because perhaps an injustice is being committed and we are witnessing
it. There' s a lot of evidence. Look, you remember something
that Ahorita was saying, in what the lady said about the lawyer, about
how they lived, yeah, how. Well, I heard it before and
I thought it was very important because we already mentioned it here. However,
she explains it well. Before I explained it, she tells you that they
have information from the file folder and then she expands that information, in which
you gave that the question of the dates, the question of the times is
incongruous in some sayings and in others that she talks about that she saw her
dad until a certain age, at some times that until he was fourteen years
old and at other times that until he was sixteen. So that, on
the one hand, already disillusions this idea that some people argue that, as
for the mother, she knew that there was some kind of inappropriate behavior,
she had suspended her cohabitation with her daughter' s father, which would not
be real. But also, in fact, it speaks of how she was
at a time that they were living in some apartments, in the same building,
on the same floor, in the same hallway, and that Alexa came
and went very often to the dad' s apartment and that, obviously,
there are witnesses to that is nothing more than that she is asserting it and
that there was no reason at that time for her to think that from that
moment there was already some kind of complaint from Alexa. So the coexistence was
very natural where he told them she went and came in both departments. So
this is what she' s talking about, which wasn' t considered during
this trial, because when you talk about evidence, I guess that' s
what she should have, or should have it documented in some way, and
that' s why they insist that all that be taken into account. Then
it gets a lot of attention. Even what you were saying. I also
found it very remarkable when she says no. I' m not going to
say what that sentence might be, because there are people who, before it
' s announced, already know it. And that leaves a glimpse, because
there is also a great deal of doubt about the way in which the process
is developing and very sad. You don' t see anything desolate. But
and I repeat as we have said with all peace over and over again in
this program is not that we consider someone to be a and not to feel
or to blame, but to be cloudy. I' m cloudy about all
of this that' s seen over and over again in what way it'
s fully operating. It' s true this and I think the important thing
is that here what I hadn' t done Hector' s part was exactly
that they went out to have to expose all this, that lawyers came out
to say this way, because it' s long and explained everything very punctually
and there are so many things that didn' t stay in my head.
But, then, they' re going to use the strategy that they used
to have to go out to the media to make it all public, because
if we' re not going to be watching the situation. And it'
s good that you' re already giving a voice in the media with the
arguments that come out to the lawyer and that she says, for example,
this issue that the girl was already coming what Amel said, because they'
re things that at the time they I guess that Hector' s part of
doing things the way they were supposed to do, without making this one cinder
had said it and good that Ahorita comes out to the bogada and says no
good, you' re still like this and so, but that' s
the sentence. I can' t tell you, because I' d let
myself see. Another thing is the intelligence you' re not going to have
to fight twice as hard as you' ve fought so far. Well,
yes, this case seems complicated to me, but she said it. Moreover,
she also says that she implies that they did approach her to buy it
and she says no, because I do not sell myself. I' m
loyal to my client and he still talks about seeing Hector Parra and so on.
Anyway, if I really do then go see that over there at the
gossip channel and see to see that there are doubts on the other side,
if there is evidence that could not be presented, if there are things that
were not accepted. And yes, many contradictions sound to me. What you
said about the age when he stopped seeing the dad why there wasn' t
talk about, for example, that Alexa. The thing is, he asked
for the most expensive phone, he wanted the car again, he wanted trips
that Hector Parra couldn' t give him. And there may be a manipulation
out there. So do I. That could be you, too. How
you see this one. This starts when Alexa is underage or older. I
don' t remember and the problem and the complaint. Let' s not
forget that first it was a public media denunciation, a media denunciation was already
of age and just the reason they claimed that they had done so at that
time was that I wanted her to be an age when, by her own
voice, she decided to denounce her dad That' s what Jimy said in
all her interviews and all the rest said I didn' t say it before
this. We know it since she was little around six years old, and
we hadn' t made it public until they were old enough to do it.
That' s how they handled it as far as I' ve seen.
Not then, because this was a great subject too because imagine you shut
up something that ten twelve years and keep it? Save it? Save it?
Until you say, okay, now you do? It' s so
big, now say it already, now yes already? Let' s tell
you everything that happened and then you get the questions of and of this age,
at this age in these ten years. Or if you want eight who
were what happened then this girl kept living with a man who was hurting her
more. And then notice that one thing they say sorry, one thing they
say in not like gossip is that they' re going to try to find
the nana, that the nana was always willing to cooperate with Hector Parra,
because seeing her because that' s one of the contradictions. The child was
always cared for by a nanny. However, how could something have happened to
her if the nanny was always there? The nana is the one who says,
well, she never saw anything and then they say they' re going
to try to get this nana to interview her and hopefully get close. I
think it would be a matter of raising it yourself and going to see,
Madam, to person and say what is there, yes and perhaps there I
say to you that what you would like to see is clear and convincing justice,
because then, since all the evidence is really taken into consideration, you
will be put on this table and in due course, if you are invalidated,
you will be invalidated also by this, for this reason, and then
you will end up giving yourself a verdict against this man, as it will
be. But let all resources be exhausted so that this becomes as clear as
possible. As you say this Nana witness, it could be a very impotestigo
nanny, very important, for go ahead and call her to speak, say
And all that is protected one test with another, one test with another so
that an accurate proper conclusion is reached. Look Guadeloupe Quintero, ask this question.
We' re going from there to him. It is a temporality that
does not exist and will not exist. But ask my mantaya, what would
have happened if instead of a magazine, they had denounced in such a way
that Sergio Mayer didn' t get involved, that Jenny liked people. It
is clear to me that it would be another story with all peace. Of
course if they had gone to one instead of going to a magazine, they
would have gone to that authorities, it would be more credible. If Sergio
Mayer hadn' t gotten involved, he' d be more credible. And
Jinny Hofman is indistinguishing whether we like him or not The truth is that we
don' t care She earns the public' s antipathy since she resorts to
a magazine, since the audios are known, where she' s threatening her
daughter, putting her father in jail, where her daughter is telling her no
longer to talk to my dad. That' s where, but Ginny'
s sympathy wouldn' t alter the facts. Here. That' s the
thing, but it didn' t exist that way. It was done this
way because surely what was best for the one who denounces yes, apart from
this kind of assumptions that no longer happened at that point. In fact,
we don' t have a certainty about what would have happened either. Yeah,
' cause that can' t be done like it didn' t happen.
There' s no way to know if it' s gonna work or
not. However, imagine that it is how we take to an extreme or
a very exaggerated thing, as it is as you look at it. If
I don' t know, if I don' t get a light,
then maybe I don' t bump into the one that, well, you
do have to start there. I would not have to pass a traffic light,
a red one, I mean a stop, because certainly, if I
do not do something wrong, I will not have consequences either. In other
words, yes, the way in which this situation is made known is very
important. Of course it is important and, of course it does influence public
opinion, but not as a personal rejection, but as a doubt such as
exact doubt, exact Ephraim and me something that you notice, that has a
lot that I want to comment and that is blowing my head, in the
supposed case, and it would be for the girl to ally that something that
you made wrong is wrong and that you do not know, because imagine love
the snowball so big that it is already doing this more and more and more
and more and more and more, And yes it is already alienated and it
is starting to have a news of light in its head telling him what happened.
My dad' s in jail. This first audio is not good and
others know that people are not going to judge it, because it is also
the issue. I don' t feel like we' re pointing at your
mom all of a sudden, because it' s clear to us that you
' re a victim and I think it' s something that we should start
seeing Alexa here in the media right now, because suddenly I do think that
at some point it' s going to happen, it has to happen.
I have faith that she wakes up and says bom this something is not right
and that she asks for help, because, of course, that she is
alienated and something is happening weird, because the hypothesis of this girl who gave
us the comment, because it is non- existent. I mean, that
wasn' t like that. Sergio Mayer got into li threw out a magazine.
There was a lot of gossip. But to someone and if someone is
around Alexa and wants to help her, to tell her you' re not
alone, you' re not going to be alone, because imagine if this
would change and take a turn of 180 degrees, the guilt of having blamed
her dad and knowing that she can' t run there and that she'
s going to betray her mom now, which was the one that alienated her
and she can' t turn around to see her dad because now her mom
' s going to be angry, because I mean, Alexa isn' t
alone. And this I hope that this well annexa you are not alone.
There are people who can help you and we are and I am speaking here
in you antidistoy we cannot help because finally, justice and justice and if someone
is a victim in this story, it is you of whom it is,
but you are a clear dictum, of course and you have to know what
there is to run for, because imagine and we have not reflected so already
accused the dad and can not run there. If he comes back, what
' s going to happen to the mom? I mean, in the story,
chimel that' s the analyst, she' ll tell us how she
' s gonna feel. It' s so completely plummeted where I turn from
where I get exact is that it' s interesting what you' re saying.
It' s very interesting. What would happen there? Don' t
imagine. This is it. It' s been a long time. The
fracture and squeaking began, from the moment a daughter is being forced to stand
in the middle of a dad and a mom she must have loved or loved.
I don' t know right now what you' ll feel, but
you must have loved them very much. One does not forget these audios that
also met where she is defending her dad and asking her mom not to speak
ill of him. I mean, imagine, from there there there is already
a lot of this problem and I think that this thing that Ephraim said is
very important because there is also the other possibility that we have never ruled out,
although sometimes they tell us that we do it and it is not so,
that yes this guilty parent, but that then Alexta can also have the
right to know that the process by which she receives this justice that she would
deserve if she was actually attacked in this way, is also given in a
clean, transparent way and that to her neither leave any resquemor, already you
leave the public opinion, or not her. Inside you say, of course,
that all the evidence was presented, he was allowed to speak came I
don' t know who everything and ends up proven guilty and that could also
give him. Undoubtedly, the pain that she must be there will continue,
but it would give her another kind of peace than the fact that this stays
as it is rare and that it always ends with the terrible doubt. That
' s not important. I think I do, yes, yes, yes,
or I don' t think they' re telling us. Jessica says
she' s not. I can' t find what you' re telling
me. Says Lupita already saw the tweet. The economist says so. He
put a fixed one where Alexa makes a statement saying that her mom was asking
her questions and so she was putting her thoughts together. I' d love
you to tell me which user, because that' s not there. I
don' t know where what you' re telling me is, but for
me to look for it or send me to my ruff, Lupita Martinez on
Twitter says María Magdalena. When you' re a victim. There are a
number of behaviors that don' t check anything with this young lady. Yeah,
yeah, yeah, yeah, I' ve always said that. Alex
is a victim of his mom and look who' s uh, but she
' s a victim. At the end of the story, he' s
a victim wherever you look at him from his mom or dad who' s
excellent guilty. Fray' s an idea. Exa girl must be scared to
death. You' re right, Efra Baby is a scoundrel what this witch
like lupita. In X you can see that writing where Alexa says that while
her mom asks her questions, she remembers what happened Chris Cruz. I know
I can see it in X but where X. In X there are billions
of users, billions if you can tell me which user you are in.
So, I' m happy to go and find out why Monick didn'
t say the word in disguise without Ginny' s revenge. It crossed Jin
' s boundaries, but it was the magazine. Indeed. Well, while
they send me the user where I can look for what they' re telling
me, what they say about alexa, because we' re going to talk
about something else too because about Mayer who' s going to be in is
that it' s movie theater. What it' s gonna be. Ay
no oy for sure, do not go look if something cannot be denied,
it is that he seeks and seeks no and I say within everything, for
we would say until then what enthusiastic entrepreneur wants to do things. I mean,
we can' t take that from him either, because it' s
a reality. But, well, he' s going to be a play
called Venegia under the snow, says it' s written by ay, I
don' t know how it' s pronounced, please, this name pardon
Gills dired and is produced by Christian Valadez under the direction of Jaime Estés and
who' s going to starize her. Sergio Mayer and his wife Isabel Akamil.
He says they' re very excited. She says that it is a
French work and that it is very beautiful, very funny, that has very
deep dialogues, but also very nice. And so he talks about two couples,
two couples who meet after a long time and are going to have some
there I don' t know encounters, disagreements and so on. And it
caught my attention because when I was reading the information what the work was about,
it took me to many works, to many works that there are so
couples and marriages and it seemed to me a little bit, like a story
that seems as long as it is told. I don' t know what
it' s about specifically, but immediately. Mauricio Castillo, who is also
going to be in this play, says no. These do not believe,
that it is like all there is. That' s different. I don
' t know in what aspect and between the cast to see what they think
Claudia Isaldi is and driver, but as an actress, I don' t
know. I don' t know Maybe I think he' s acted on
something, no, but at least monologues of the vagina. I think so.
No. Ah well, that' s Perez it' s Atril'
s tea theater exactly and there they were all at the time. It'
s also good Mauricio Castillo, who I already mentioned, Homero Ferrus tarray Ori.
I don' t know what his name is Natalia Sutil and Victor Hugo
Martin and Torlugo Martín. I remember a lot about him, who seems like
a good actor to me. I haven' t seen him in a while,
I don' t know what else he' s been doing recently.
But there he is, because he' s already going to work on this.
Natalia Subtil, the mother of Sergio Mancher' s little granddaughter, and
the couple are going to be there playing a couple in this play that then,
to see how they do. I don' t feel very much like
it, frankly, because I probably wouldn' t spend my money. There
' s such a good theater. I want to go see the wild God
with Pablo Perroni at the Lucerne forum. That one I want to go see
not to these things, not that I' m going to be seeing this
man. Don' t go, dick We' re going and we'
re not going to see. Come on, it' s Saturday. Let
' s go Saturday, yeah, let' s go Saturday. And then
there' s no time. And then we' re not going to give
anything you already tell me, but no, listen to Claus Orgis. I
was going to go pick up Gabriel García Márquez' s new book, but
now that Mayer' s best seller came out, it' s no better
Markse' s than that Chinese postponlo listen here I already found this. Thank
you, Elie Caballero. I love you, because the user is ng L
one nine seven zero is the user and the economist is nicknamed, but the
user is that, and then he says that there was a note that I
guess is this magazine, because it is also those magazines. Who is going
to but well, says Jinny Hoffman, who is currently involved in fools,
do not go to heaven. In other words, he left a long time
ago, declared acer Diz that his sentimental partner, Héctor Parra, with whom
he lived in Unión libre and had a five- year- old girl named
Alexa, separated from it. The actress said things we' ve been talking
about for a long time. We realized that we were best friends that couple
was healthy to make the decision in time for the three of us and not
to hurt us. There' s always been a lot of communication between us.
It' s a very mature decision. Valga, well, it'
s good that you were friends if you didn' t already have three stab
wounds on your back, the poor man. Really. Thank you for sending
me. Yeah, yeah, frankly, then I don' t want to
be friends with Jinny Hoffman anymore. In a little while, imagine he'
s gonna tell you that you stole his wallet or something. Listen, yes,
yesterday, for example, yesterday, by the way, I' m
going to ask you for an anecdote so that you do. I was already
leaving the gym and a lady came back running on saw she was going to
work on my keys. I didn' t leave them here. Yes,
they were delivered here, but a bunch of keys from those eight hundred that
I can' t afford, but no, I don' t know how
anyone can bring a keychain like that. But so little girl already gives them
and still scolds the ladies of the reception is that why they didn' t
give them to me, because because bo means, because we keep it no
longer or totally that it is already leaving. Then he goes running, running,
running, and I go down there with my suitcase, which the truth
is pretty slow, my bag of rolls, because it' s very slow.
And then there I go making horror because it' s old and then
it makes noise. I got to the parking lot, I paid for my
return and the lady had already run away because I was in a big hurry
and when I go down to my car, the lady' s wallet is
not true, yes, and then I picked her up and said this wallet
ah must be from the lady who ran out. And indeed, in the
end we went out at the same time and I said listen to your wallet
you threw it away. Thank you, friend, thank you so much Good
- bye. But when we do things, racing, as we lose everything,
we forget everything, we leave everything, and that has absolutely nothing to
do with the subject. But it does have to do with the subject,
because there are details in life that we go unnoticed, like this note that
this Twitter user is putting, or like some other things and surely like the
nanny. There will be other people who have witnessed Alexa' s relationship with
her dad, Jin' s relationship, and Héctor Parra' s relationship,
who can speak in favor. What I don' t explain to you is
because now that you have this dialogue between Hector Farra and Daniela, I say
this man Mayer and Daniela Parra on Twitter, he almost gives you the impression
that you' re better off and you' re not moving, because if
you' re not going to do any worse, imagine, it seems threatening
to me. Not to see is terrible to see help me to the hero
that while I teach them it. The dialogue is there, says Berenice.
Eugenia says lue to see yes, you read it. Please, Lupita.
Monic said that Alexa must report Daniela because, when she was older, she
did not report the wisdom that her father made against her sister, of which
she witnessed. He noted, he did not report the uses his father made
against his sister, of which he witnessed. Oh, yeah, that'
s it. And who is Monic or Monic is the one who extra in
the interview of Chismeno Light Not if it is already, no, because not
me what I saw was Nick. What we' re talking about is what
the lawyer named Samara said, but not you. Who is Monito said who
Exan should denounce Daniel I mean now there' s someone to see if they
tell us who Monik is. Please, I don' t know the truth.
I would greatly appreciate it if you could tell us who Monich is,
because he says he' s there now involving Daniel as Daniel is one He
' s given me a favor Listen, look, they' re going to
go, they' re going to what he publishes. The economist also publishes
an issue. Here' s what you guys were telling me and retweeting him
for that I' m seeing daniela parra. But it' s this user
that I mentioned to you that the economist of the General Coordination of Expert Services
is taking over and then it' s a statement from Alexa where she says
what she was doing to me, because I was scared and I didn'
t want him to continue being part of my life. There was a problem
at my grade of sixth grade, which was him and his partner, my
sister and my mom got angry because they were the means to make themselves look
like him and I saw that interview and because of how manipulated I was for
him, I got mad at my mom. Imagine how manipulated I was with
him, I didn' t get mad at my mom. And after many
years, my mom went to an event and they question her about the money
and tell her if she doesn' t leave me, she' ll see
me about the money. And she explodes and tells them that if not a
father, he doesn' t do the crap he did. And that'
s where everything I have to see explodes. And then this is the part
that underlines the economist says and there is exploit that everything that I have blocked
everything. If you help me by asking and so I can put my thoughts
together. It' s just the way I do it with my mom.
She' s gonna ask me and I' m gonna remember that' s
called inducing? By the way, I didn' t do that here,
but that' s called inducing? I don' t think I told you
on Monday, but I also saw Pip in bed, which is that when
they were many years old and I had it in mind when he was twelve
years old, and that' s when he slept with me because in the
night he would stick Pip in Pip Pipi and I didn' t mention it
on Monday because I wasn' t calm and because I didn' t have
to repeat it many times And I don' t know if I told you
that or I don' t know who I told about it to. I
just don' t know what I gave one person and another. Exactly there
is, yes, yes, that part where it is put are the statements
and that is the issue that, because that is the things that leave in
doubt. Yeah, listen, in myth, they already told us that Monic
is a person who has a YouTube channel and, because he has very opinions
that he defends a lot about all this. But good is someone who is
also on YouTube and who talks about it. What normally strikes us when we
see someone else' s content is because she was there talking about some of
the people involved, not because she gave an interview, because she commented how
in this case Lumita is talking about that Chisme no like lawyer Samara appears talking
about this case that is happening now. So that' s why we see
this. But what another communicator thinks, because it is of his perception,
because it is already different, it is not too much of everyone exactly,
because we will then review what is still going on in this case, because
if it is an extremely highly controversial case, you know who Natalia Antonov is.
Ah, well, it costs and tell me everything, please, no,
I didn' t know, but I already knew because it' s
this person' s what thing. Not changing the subject, by the way,
uh, changing the subject. And yet, each one comes out a
new candidate, like you tend to not, like you say to see and
especially in certain parties, but in general, anyway, then what you say
is what' s not going to happen, what' s going to happen.
Now we saw the other day learn to kiss, no, we already
saw that to see Stegi always not. And now it turns out that good
Ephraim, on which he sent us and I sent the note I was on
another planet. I tell you to associate suddenly, but to see you tell
us you send her to? Turns out this girl, she' s a
very bright girl, she' s not true. This was Achin. She
didn' t go to Shartag many years ago with sharks, because she had
a very entrepreneurial project in which what she did was do the homework to lazy
people. So the project was that you sent your homework with an app and
they demanded your tares. So your essay that your equations, that which comes
your summary the fabric. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, that'
s what the thesis is. Then all the sharks said hey. If this
comes to you, you' re realizing that you' re encouraging the egg
shake. But leave the bollocks, i e, copyright. Theses are plagiarisms
Those are copyrights. We' ve already seen how many cases I say forgive
some other guys and then all the sharks said I' m out. But
the most beautiful thing of all is that this girl is a great entrepreneur who
has sought to stand and then she is now going to be a candidate for
deputy, nel or if she was a deputy, not something so difficult.
Now part of voting, not citizen movement, that well, please vote for
whatever you want, but citizen movement doesn' t. There shouldn' t
be so many parties anymore. In fact, and she' s already a
federal talca, she' s a federal talca, she' s a federal
talca, she' s a fright, why we' re gonna have these
candidates, because I' m crazy, because I don' t know,
but I think there' s an atri tendency here we use that word a
lot. I do not know why it will be, because we speak with
all peace but a tendency to trivialize so many things, to diminish value to
so many others and to have one thing as well as good, for each
and every one is going to be worth And so, yes and not what
there are also limits in life And we would not be, then good even
in language. That' s why we say that if we weren' t
to be the Tower of Babel again, then there has to be something that
narrows down life. And then this woman I don' t know how she
comes to this possibility of having a candidacy. But you have made famous for
having had the idea of doing something she defined, because I saw the fragment
of your presentation in that that sent us Shark Tang' s ray, where
she says, because ultimately moral but not illegal. It' s immoral,
but it' s not illegal. And that' s why I offer this
service, that is, where we stand. But love when someone forgives,
I mean, you' re not right, you know it' s immon,
it' s not illegal, because you know. I don' t
know if it would be illegal, because that' s lying and that'
s because it would be illegal to get a thesis, a university degree,
because you' re falsifying a test, that is, you' re going
to be a doctor or you' re going to be a historian, that
is, without having the necessary knowledge, because you don' t know how
to do it, you didn' t make your thesis, so you'
re committing a fraud in the background and it' s a crime. I
think so. I think you and I just think it would invalidate you to
get a grade, an exam pass, and a grade. Unquestionably because I
am, I' m going to tell them. Me, for less than
that. I have, I have failed people and I have discharged from a
group and also touched you in my formation that was terrible, because besides,
I was already a master' s degree at that time and that the teacher
that I also do not know if I had done it here, but everyone
carries his class how he wants. But in front of the whole group,
he picked up a colleague and told him to please withdraw, that he could
not be in the living room and that he should be told about his discharge
from the matter because he had plagiarized an essay no longer say of a thesis.
I mean, that' s terrible. So she says that And what
made me a little sad is that the comments I saw on this note were
people who were good, but neither that the political parties were so straight nor
that the business told me. I swear it' s not that that'
s going to be dealt with, because then all eyes are ticked, because
there are some that do what they do, I mean, what answers so
far and I said no, for what is the tannable, what, but
how unfortunate, that this is the mentality no, that is how sad,
because what clumsy it is, yes, seems to me very serious, very
brave, but it is not, because since she went to Shart, all
that said that she was very successful, that she did many tasks, that
she didn' t get enough, that she already had people helping her doing
the tasks and so on. That' s me, because that evolves.
No, and obviously, it' s something that' s not illegal at
the time. But what we talked about the other day that we were doing
the program of this ruin victory of the industrial revolution. There are things that
are not legal. Right now, because technology is gaining on us, but
at some point it' s legislating and the laws are changing And this is
that they have the carafe for an application at some point, it' s
going to be illegal, that is, it' s going to happen.
You have to hope not exactly good, because child or this saying goodbye to
us I am very sorry. I' d love for us all to stay
here until dawn, but we have to say goodbye to go to history in
history. Today we will soon have, as I told you a specialist who
communicated with me today. I hope it' s tomorrow' s day for
us to get this straight. What happens to the courts, how are all
these things, these things, why? Why? We have so much doubt
about this case. And some are others, maybe, but about this case
especially, Hector Parra, Alexa Hoffman, Jinny Hoffman and Daniela Parra, Well,
Alexa Parra, Well, she' s already changed her last name.
Thank you very much, Dr Amel, thank you very much. And,
of course we go to history, in history, in a little bit more
and at ten o' clock at night we see ourselves in soul clothes,
in a live, uh, all live. Thank you, thank you very
much, dear Ephraim, girls, thank you very much. How nice to
be with you guys and it' s really hard to laugh at such serious
things, guys, forgive us exactly, exactly. I think you want everyone
back and thank you so much for joining us. Bye Bye,