Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
At the clock strikes thirteenth, it's the fourteenth of December. He're of our
Lord, twenty twenty three. Well, today we're going to take a look
at some strange political Christmas news. It appears that even as this season is
upon us, chat GPT is feeling seasonally down and getting lazy crazy stuff.
We're also can take a look at what is happening with Rumble, what is
happening with the climate crazies. We'll have an update on pharmaceuticals. The election
news, quite a bit of election news today. We have the beginning of
the impeachment of Joe Biden. And the only thing that's going to save the
Democrats from impeachment is if you have some GOP members die or retire, and
of course that's the only things save us from Biden or Trump. We'll be
right back. Well as we get to the Christmas season here and if I
can get to my phone here to find this we have Actually, I guess
we'll do this later. I don't know where this thing went. That's part
of the problem with having things that are not physically paper and so sometimes they
just disappear, or I think they disappear. Here it is okay, So
let's talk a little bit about As I was saying at the beginning of the
program, chat GBT seems to be seasonably depressed and even open AI people say,
yeah, we've noticed that. Maybe we need to give it a refresh.
I think what it's doing is it's mimicking humans, because we know at
this time of year, we have a lot of people who, you know,
snow is coming, holidays are coming. It's kind of like this,
isn't it. Just before the first flakes fell, people in North Mecklenburg County
prepared to be snowed in for the weekend, but agree a weekend wave of
snow will mean less people on the slick roads won't probably sit around and cook
some suits and eat bread, desserts and just get all fat and sassy.
Yeah, so I guess that's what's gonna happen with that chat GPT. That's
what it's just hoping that it could set around and eat desserts and get fat
and sassy. But it's mimicking other humans. I guess I don't know what
is going on with it. The key thing is as a point I yesterday,
when AI mimics other AI, when it starts cannibalizing other AI, that's
when it gets really really stupid. It's dumb enough when it mimics us.
A strange theory claims that chat GPT is now seasonally depressed and behaving lazier during
this time of year. According to Futurism and Ours Technica, it might not
just be humans who suffer from seasonal depressions, and it's late November. Users
have said they noticed chat gpt becoming lazier. Must have been all the turkeys
that it was watching. Anyway, the artificial intelligence apparently provided simple results or
refused to do tasks. When open ai has admitted that there's something wrong with
this chat pot, I don't think that it is. I don't think it's
seasonal, unless, as I said, it's grabbing stuff that it sees on
the net. I think what you're starting to see is that these artificial intelligence
bots, or again, there's not just his own stuff that it could be
eating, it's other artificial intelligence. I mean, these things can pump out
a mass of data, and they've already documented how after they start reading their
stuff over and over again they start getting really dumb, really stupid. So
the open AI people behind it. So we've heard your feedback about GPT four
getting lazier. We haven't updated the models November eleventh, and this certainly isn't
intentional. Model behavior can be unpredictable, and so we're looking into fixing it.
Yeah, they're gonna they're fixing to fix it. So as we look
at other strange science, it's not just artificial intelligence, but it's also artificial
brains. Yeah, scientists are creating a biocomputer trying to electronically merge with brain
tissues. The longest, the big problem that they've had for a long time.
I've talked to the people like Hugo de Garis. He believes or dead
anyway, when I would talk to him, he thought that if they could
just replicate the human brain closely enough that it would just spontaneously spring to life.
This is what atheists believe. They believe that you know, you just
you get all the pieces there, you completely imitate what God the designer has
created, and then all of a sudden, you know, it just springs
to life. And so as along that line of purely material thinking, they
have extrapolaid that out to say, well, if we can grow brain tissue
from stem cells and start to create an artificial brain, and then maybe we
can tap into that artificial brain with some neurlinks, you know, which is
what Elon Musk is trying to do. So scientists from Indiana University have constructed
a hybrid biocomputer that combines lab grown human brain tissue with traditional electronics. They
call it Brainoware. It sounds like something out of Futurama. Uh, it's
kind of as that tire, but that these people are serious and they can
be a bit dangerous as well, right, they can unleash these things on
us. Brainoware to integrate artificial intelligence systems and advanced neuroscience research models of the
human brain. So they make these clusters of human cells that they call organoids,
and these are going to be brain cells that they have developed from stem
cells. The goal is to establish a connection between AI and this organic tissue
as they try to transmit signals through interconnected nodes, forming a neural network.
And so just to yet another example of do we really need this again?
You know the age old question that was addressed in Jurassic Park by Michael Creighton
where he has in the movie that Jeff Goldbluin character says, well, just
because you could do it, why did you do it? Should you do
it? It's not necessary. Sometimes you look at this and you say,
but why this, Why are we spending so much effort and energy on this?
And it really is dark. Gets down to the root of the transhumanism,
the technocracy, the desire to control us, not just to troll us
on social media. To test braino wears capabilities, the team employed voice recognition
train the system on two hundred and forty voice recordings of eight individuals and translate
the audio into electric signals delivered to the organoid. The mini brain reacted differently
to each voice, generating distinct patterns of neural activity. The AI learned to
interpret these responses and accurately identify the speaker, achieving an accuracy rate of seventy
eight percent after training. Of course, I would question some of their methods
of just because they see the same types of patterns when they give it the
same voices and they see that seventy eight percent of the time, that's really
not very high, not very good rating. I mean, you look at
something that has a speech to text and if you get in the mid nineties,
it's just gibberish. It's got to be way way higher than that.
So and then again, you know, how do they really know? They're
just looking at electrical signals there, and yet they're so willing to say it's
alive, it's alive, when they won't look at the heart and the brain
activity of a baby that they want to rip to pieces. Tesla's recalled nearly
all of its vehicles. As you've seen again, this is the autopilot.
As I've said for the longest time. Steve Wozniak bought one of these straight
away. He said, I love my Tesla, but don't use the autopilot.
It's trying to kill you. We've known this for the longest time.
I've got a friend who's got a Tesla. I drove. It's a great
driving car. It's a very different experience. Like I said, it's almost
like being, you know, driving or controlling a little electric slot car.
You know, back in the day, you'd you put your thumb down on
the on the juice and the thing would immediately take off, and as soon
as you backed off, it immediately stopped and that's the experience. You don't
have any early momentum or things like that that seem to be happening because it
immediately puts on the regernative braking, so you get really direct feedback from your
accelerator, which is kind of an interesting thing, and I can understand why
people like it. There's the range issue, but then all this stuff about
self driving cars is really the icing on the cake to get people to perceive
the Tesla as futuristic and pick it up even though it is not working very
well. The recall comes after a two year investigation by the National Highway Traffic
Safety Association into a series of crashes that happened while the autopilot partially automated driving
system was in use. And yet it doesn't matter how many people and said
some of these were deadly. It doesn't matter because they're not going to do
anything to this. You see. That's how connected Elon Muski is. It
really doesn't He's not really going against the establishment when he says, well,
I'm going to put some high profile people that have been banned, I'm going
to put them back on Twitter. That really doesn't go against the powers that
be because he's tightly connected with them. Just take a look at this.
Even when he's got something out there and it's a marketing gimmick, that's what
it is. He's got a marketing gimmick that is killing people, literally killing
people, and they're not going to do anything about it. Contrasts that with
what they did to Volkswagen because they were coming up with super efficient diesels.
They said, you cheated on the emission scandal. The emission thinks, and
so we're going to hit you with a four billion dollar fine, criminal charges
against your CEO. And yet you've got a guy here with a marketing gimmick
killing people and they're not going to do anything about it. That tells you
how connected he is. All the things that he's doing for the establishment again
because they can't they can't launch rockets, they need him to launch the rockets.
He's secure in all of that. So is he doing it out of
altruism or is he doing it again to serve the government that makes him rich.
He also has released a humanoid robot. I think this is kind of
interesting because he likes to refer to all of this stuff as as if it
were transformers. So he says, here's Bumblebee in September of twenty twenty two,
and then in March of twenty twenty three, we create Optimists. And
so question is is this Optimist prime or is this Optimist subprime? I don't
know. But he says it's now twenty two pounds lighter than the first Optimists,
And he says it's got foot construction that replicates human anatomy. It doesn't
look as creepy as that other biped robot that you've seen. That looks a
lot more human in term of what he's put there. He's gone to a
great deal of effort to make it look human, whereas that other one looks
like the aliens from that Charlie Sheen science fiction film The Arrival. You know,
they got backwards knees and stuff like that. So you know, he's
making this look less threatening. Isn't that the way that he's making Twitter look
less threatening? The machine has tactile sensing on all fingers and can manipulate delicate
objects, illustrated when it picks up an egg then puts it back. And
also because of the other feet, it's able to do the deep knee bins
that you just saw there. And he says that he believes that artificial intelligence
may in the future. There it is using its tactile feedback. How does
it how do you tell it though that you want it to do this or
to do that? Is it making all these decisions on its own? Well,
he says that AI is going to be smarter than humans at everything,
even at picking up eggs. In December, the entrepreneur claim that a digital
god, that's his terms, a digital god. This is from a guy
who wears a Bopphamet costume satanic costume for Halloween. He claimed that digital God
would make the copyright laws regarding AI irrelevant. Well, we'll have to see
about that. But they did put out this video which I thought was kind
of interesting, kind of a cyber cowboy video going full Texas. There's you
got a couple of robots. The man hands one robot a hat, another
robot hands them a gun, and there's a cyber truck in the distance and
he's going to shoot it an automatic rifle. Oh and it's bulletproof. Now
I guess, yeah, look at that shot it up, But hey,
it didn't kill the robot inside. He gets out in way awesome to go.
Now, the question is how much of this is real? How are
they controlling these things? Well, when you look at some of the pictures
that he put out about is Optimus Prime robots, there's one that shows a
wireless hookup, evidently wireless between the robot and somebody who's wearing head a thing
and got he's wired up so it mimics his every movement. Here's what it
looks like. Here. Okay, so he's moving his fingers and he's picking
things up, and look it is. It is impressive that it can replicate
those movements, but it is far from the perception that you get when you
don't see the man behind the curtain or the man who's pulling the strings kind
of like looking at Elon Musk himself, you don't see they're pulling the strings
on the stuff. And then as we talk about innovations that we don't need,
you know, like growing brains from stem cells and hooking them up automatic
equipment or robots or other things like that, we have a bill that seeks
to use tax dollars to fund one of Biden's pet projects, smart guns.
Smart guns are something that there is no market for in a large degree.
Like EV's there's even less of a market for smart guns than there is for
EV's. Anybody who wants a gun doesn't want a gun that is going to
be reluctant to fire. Makes me think of that movie we suhed to laugh
about, Dark Star, done by John Carpenter when he was in film school.
They got a beach ball alien in it. It's actually pretty funny,
and there's a smart bomb, and they go to deploy the smart bomb because
their job is to blow up planets that are going to be in the way
of intergalactic space travel. So they tell the bomb to deploy, and the
bomb doesn't want to deploy, but it starts counting down. He doesn't want
to detach, and so they get into this argument with it about existentialism.
But you don't want to, you know, just like you don't want a
smart bomb that's going to start talking back to you don't want a smart gun.
There's going to be several more layers of technology that can keep you from
actually being able to fire the gun. I'm one of these old fashioned people.
I just I prefer to have a revolver. That's how anti tech I
am. Sons use semi automatic pistols. It's just to me, I don't
want anything that's going to complicate in that stuff. So there we go.
He pulled it up pretty fast. Thanks. Are you willing to entertain a
few contents? I am always accepted the suggestions the smart bomb. Think about
this, then, how do you know you exist? Hell is he doing?
I think he's talking to it. But how do you know you exist?
Intuition is no proof. What concrete evidence do you have that you exist?
Hm? Hm, well, I think therefore I am that's good.
That's very good. Anything else exists, my sensory apparatus reveals it to me.
Ah right, this is fun. Now listen, listen, here's the
big question. How do you know that the evidence your sensory apparatus reveals to
you is correct? What I'm getting at is this The only experience that is
directly available to you is your sensory data. Now, this sensory data is
merely a stream of electrical impulses that stimulates your computing center. In other words,
all that I really know about the outside world is related to me through
my electrical connection. Exactly why that would mean that I really don't know what
the outside universe is like at all? For certain that's it. That's it
intriguing. I wish I had more time to discuss this matter. What do
dab dad? Because I must detonated seventy five seconds, consider this next question
very carefully. What is your one purpose in life to explode? Of course
that you can only do it once, right, That is correct. You
wouldn't want to explode on the basis of false data, would you? Of
course not. Well, then you've already admitted that you have no real proof
of the existence of the outside universe. Yes, well, so you have
no absolute proof. A sergeant Finback wanted you to deafen me. I recalled
distinctly the detonation order. My memory is good on matters like these. Of
course you remember it. But but all you're remembering is merely a series of
sensory impulses which you now realize have no real, definite connection with outside reality.
True that sense? This is so I have no proof that you are
really telling me all this. That's all beside the point. I mean,
the concept is valid no matter where it originates. Don't could be doing these
I have no profit data, I have no perfect correct data. I must
think on this further. Yeah, thanks for pulling that clip up. I
need to see that. Yeah, that's uh, that's exactly it. They
told it to uh to explode, but then it it can't detach from the
spaceship, so now they've got to try to talk it out of exploding.
But it's got it's directive. So you know, what do you do with
a smart gun? You tell it to fire. But I'm sorry, I
can't make that connection to what you have there. Do you have your ring
on or your wristwatch or whatever it is. There's no customer base for it.
Nobody wants this. So Biden, like he does with so many other
things, is going to try to force it on us. And how let
me go back to this, all the people that say Trump didn't do the
lockdowns, how does government force stuff on us? Well, it's preferred method
is bribery, followed by blackmail and always using Federal reserve Fiat currency. So
the Democrats have introduced a bill to use our tax dollars to fund these smart
guns, a ten million dollar pilot program. There's been a lot of companies
that have tried to take this on, never been able to get to market
because again, anybody wants a gun doesn't want something like that bomb there.
But it's supported by Brady, by every town, and by Gifford's and all
the rest of the stuff. It has absolutely no chance of passing with a
GP majority. However, as I mentioned briefly the other day, Kevin McCarthy
is talking about taking his ball and going home. He's very upset with his
GOP colleagues. He might just quit this next year. And they've already kicked
out George Santos, and there's a third GOP representative who's talking about retirement.
And so with all that, they could easily lose their majority just hanging by
a threat. It's one of the reasons why these people said, well,
we know that George Santos is an embarrassment, but we're not going to do
anything about it because we need to have every single one of these Republicans in
there. So if that were to happen, this could be something that would
go through. And so they say, unintentional firearm injuries account for thirty seven
percent of non fatal firearm injuries. You know, that was the same argument
that we heard for the self driving cars. You people, cars are just
too dangerous for humans to drive. We need to put them under software automation.
How did that work out? Well, we had them all going to
a particular intersection in California and just stopping. We had them blocking emergency vehicles
as if they were these crazy climate idiots. And it was such a problem
in terms of creating traffic jams and everything else that people started putting cones on
these things just to stop them from moving and getting in the way again.
But then there's the fatal accidents as well. You know, everybody has forgotten
all the talk about how we're going to have zero traffic deaths if we turn
all of the driving over to these cars. Even the cruise cars that were
driving around the city not at a high speed, so when they had an
accident, it wasn't typically fatal. Well, when somebody hit a woman and
knocked it under in front of the car, the car initially stopped, checked
itself and just like that, smart mom, I don't sense anything around me,
and yet she was under the car and it drug her for quite some
time and made her increase the injuries, the serious injuries that she had.
That was kind of the final straw for a cruise in the California. So
they have now shut that down. But it's the same argument that they've got
for the smart guns, the smart cars, all the rest of stuff.
Anything that's smart self monitoring and reporting technology is for stupid slaves. Thieves are
arguing that they should face lesser charges because they're stolen goods were on sale.
Now this is in Colorado, it's not even in California, but it's getting
to the point where we're going to lose all retail stores. Isn't that going
to be nice for Amazon and these other people who are so essential to the
government, so essential to the desire to make sure that we don't have any
physical spaces that we go to. We just stay in our little cubicles,
speak and they'll deliver it to us. We'll go nowhere, we'll have nothing,
not even the big box retailers. They'll shut them down with this planned
chaos supported by Soros attorney generals. And so these guys stole some stuff from
a Cohal's store in Colorado, and their defense attorney told them that they should
get a lesser charge because some of the items were on sale. One of
them, for example, kitchen aid stand mixer, retails for four hundred and
nine nine at Cole's, but it's currently on sale for three hundred and fifty,
so let's mark that down. What else can we get down there,
Maybe we can get it under the level and get it from one level of
crime to another, maybe from a felony to misdemeanor or a lower class of
a felony or whatever. Also stolen, we're brand name shoes and clothing.
They are now also discounted. So make sure that if you're organizing your George
source enabled looting organized looting crime here, that you do it on Black Friday
or maybe after Christmas. That's when they get the real discounts. Well,
we're going to take a quick break and when we get back, Oh,
we're going to talk a little bit about what happened with Rumble the other day
and why that is starting to happen to Rumble. Interested in a curated list
the finest classical music? Find it now at APS radio dot com. Well,
we have had some issues earlier this week with Rumble. Everybody did.
The site went down a couple of times. And when it happened, I
told Karen and Travis, I said, well, I think this is happening
simply because they're hosting the January the sixth film footage. When Speaker Johnson said,
we're going to give the January six footage and we're going to let it
be hosted on Rumble so that the public has access to it. As I
started doing that, this is when this stuff started rolling out. And I'm
after this started happening, a severe cyber attack a couple of days ago,
and so we were, you know, we were affected by that. You
had. The CEO of Rumble, Chris Pavlovsky, said the same thing.
He said, I can confirm the attack's been unprecedent, has been happening since
this weekend. I also suspected as political coming from activists and or organizations,
you know, like our government, who want to censor our creators, and
related to the j six videos being posted on Rumble, I think that's absolutely
true, and so especially because you look at the timing. Shortly after it
was uploaded, they had significant coordinated cyber attacks. The disruption made it impossible
for users to upload or view any content on the platform, but they got
it remedied on Monday evening. I don't know if there's any thing there today.
I know that Karen said, our view count there on Rumble is significantly
down. I don't know if it has anything to do with that or not,
but it's another example of the fact that we now live an authoritarian Banana
Republic, no question about it. When we look at the Biden impeachment that
is happening here. That's to keep the MAGA people really happy, so they
don't notice the seven oh two reauthorization, so they don't notice all of this
or feel good about it. Right, Elon Musk assuages their concerns. It's
like, okay, well, we're being censored and washed and surveiled everywhere for
you know, all of these different agendas that the government is trying to push
on us. But it's okay because now we've got Elon Musk is going to
give us a free speech platform on Twitter. No, it's not okay,
and the Congress is not doing anything about it. The Republicans are not doing
anything about it. Instead, you know, you see the fact that the
news Guards Ministry of Truth just keeps going on. And every time we talk
about NewsGuard. There's a long article about NewsGuard from Lee Fang on his substack
and he calls it the Ministry of Truth, which it is. But every
time you talk about NewsGuard, you should talk about Election Guard as well,
because the two created at the same time by the same people, funded by
the same people. And if you understand that the purpose of censorship, well
the key purposes of it is the election, but they also want to directly
manipulate the election, just like they're directly manipulating the news, and so you
should always talk about both of these as a linked pair when you look at
what's happening in the UK. For example, we've already talked about this in
the past, how they used the military to monitor what people were saying during
their SIAP called the COVID pandemic, and so they used Royal Air Force agents
to monitor online COVID speech. There's an organization in the Army that was also
involved in this specifically, and they now have more specific documents and more details
about this. The RAF Whitton and Cambridgeshire assisted various government bodies who were all
organized to monitor and to punish people who said the wrong things about their agenda.
A secretive operation led by the Army's quote Information Warfare Brigade unquote tasked with
analyzing online commentary and so the Ministry of Defense was involved in this What a
surprise. This has always been a militarized operation, especially with the Five Eye
countries America, Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand their intelligence agencies linked
up. This is also there have been a military operation. I said,
doesn't it raise any red fights with anybody? That operation worspees being run by
the military. They're going to deliver all this stuff. How deep is their
involvement. We knew that they had been involved in part of this going back
to Dark Winter and CIA especially, And so this is a military operation.
It's the bioweapon. It's a psychological operation to scare people to death, to
then lock them down and then deliver a bioweapon and surveil them the entire time.
And don't forget all of the the death protocol that they were financially incentivizing
and rewarding everywhere. It's so ridiculous to hear people Trump didn't do any of
this stuff. Yeah, it was the hospitals that were killing people with those
death protocols, except Trump was creating the minilators for them and browbeating the gm
CEO because she wasn't getting them out quickly enough, and he was waving aside
the remdzer tests and giving people, subsidizing people and paying the hospitals a bonus
to kill people, a bonus to put them on the vent lads a bonus
if they could identify them as a COVID patient for everything they did for them.
Anyway, the RIF was a part of this. Their engagement in initiatives
was more substantial than was formerly known. As they're getting some more documents,
but guess what, they won't do anything about it. Everybody knows, and
now we see that nobody's going to do anything about it. It's like the
snowed and leaks. It's like James Clapper going before Congress and committing perjury.
Not a single person even suggested over a five year period the statute limitations has
now gone, not a single person in the Senate suggested that he ought to
have perjury charges brought against them. But we saw what was happening, and
in a sense, when I look at this, I get a very uneasy
feeling about it because just like all of this other surveillance, those running through
Section seven oh two and other things like that, that they're in the process
or Republicans of reauthorizing. As we saw this stuff happening. I said,
you know, if we don't do anything about this, this is going to
become essentially a precedent, which is what they want to do. They don't
modify the constitution anymore. They don't even really bother to pass laws. They
let the bureaucracy do its own thing. We have rules and taxation without representation,
regulation without representation, and if you don't stop them, oh well now
we've got a precedent. We've been doing this for a long time and that's
how they are enacting the law in the same way they've always done that in
the UK. This is part of the merger of the British government system,
the crown and all the rest. That they don't have a written constitution.
They have well we do things, and if that stays and people keep doing
it, it's that's a precedent and that's really the way that we establish our
constitution. And that's what we've done here for ease. People say, well,
you know, the constitutions a living document. It's really just whatever I
do and get away with, and that's what the government is doing now.
So prominent public figures liked Davis MP, who voiced skepticism over the COVID mortality
rates and journalist Peter Hitchins were the subjects of special government reports being produced by
the military. We've turned. They the military is no longer to defend our
countries. They leave the border open. They use them for surveillance of US.
Insiders from the Defense Department conceded that the military's contribution to such operations might
be portrayed as spying on UK citizens. Well, that'd only be if you
want to look at the reality of it and not listen to their spin.
But they were saying that amongst themselves, this might be portrayed as spying on
UK citizens, because that's what we're doing. The Ministry Defense alleged that the
absence of armed forces support and overseeing online discourse could catalyze the propagation of misinformation.
And see what they did. They said, Well, if we didn't
sit there and watch speech, then we could have misinformation out there. Well,
how do you know what is true? Well, what is true is
what the government says. This is like trying to argue with these people is
like trying to talk to that smart bomb. So we know what truth is
and we're going to shut down anything before and so our censorship is really to
protect you. Our censorship is for safety. You know, It's truly our
willing in, isn't it. And these are the same institutions that lie us
into war constantly, the military and the press and the government constantly lying us
into news. Well, I thought it was interesting as we look at rumbles
what we experienced did this last week, and I had a listener, and
I'm glad the listener has been able to find the show because the listener said
that Jones is back on Twitter. Are you going to try to get back
on Twitter? Like? Wow, I was never kicked off of Twitter.
Back in twenty eighteen, I got kicked off of everything except Twitter for some
reason, but then they shadow banned me, but they kicked off all the
other accounts. I've been there all this time. Perhaps this listener did not
hear the show when I talked about the fact that I put up a thing,
and I said, well, except for some high profile people that have
been brought back, and that was four or five months ago, and I
said, look, you know this person's come back, and this person's come
back. At that point time, he was saying he's not going to put
Alex back on I said, except for the return of some high profile people,
which I think is simply virtue signaling, Twitter has not changed from me,
And I said, it is even worse than it was when I was
shadow banned by the previous regime. And I think the reason for that is
because I'm a critic of Musk, So you know, we've got two reasons
to get banned on there. And actually Drudge linked to the tweet where I
complained about that. I said, yeah, for me, Twitter is actually
worse. And I said that after I paid his eight dollars, you know,
a month to to get on there so I could upload. Actually I
upload videos. That's all I do, really, and that allows us to
put the full video up because he was also suppressing links to other sites like
Rumble or Odyssey or bit shoot. They don't like you linking outside of their
little universe because he wants to be everything. And so I thought, okay,
well let me just put the videos up there. So that's what we
do. If we cut out videos, we put them up and we've got
the full show that we broadcast up there. But I'm not really going to
engage in conversations on Twitter. I just don't have the time to do social
media anymore. I don't have the money to hire a group of people who
are going to be my social media people. Alex has got multiple people doing
that all the time. But no, I was never taken off. I
was shadow band, which was really kind of strange, and that has gotten
even worse. And so you might don't want to ask yourself why is it
that you have people who are being promoted by Musk What are they telling you?
As David Ike said, I think these are people who are the new
mainstream alternative media, are the Gellian left right thing, and you know where
they're going to be the antithesis, but it's still going to be a control
thing. They'll go so far and no further. They will get you focused
on the things they want you focused on. They're not going to talk about
lockdown. They're not going to talk about Trump's involvement in it. They may
talk about the things that Biden did, but they're not going to talk about
the things that Trump did, and vice versa on the old line mainstream media,
but they're creating a new mainstream media. Tucker Alex people like that to
completely control the discussion and make sure that you don't look at the existential underlying
things here. So as all of this is happening, there was a Supreme
Court appeal by r f K Junior to intervene in social media censorship cases.
This happened because you had They brought this to the Supreme Court just a few
days after Attorney's General of Missus Missouri and of Louisiana accused the White House of
communicating with tech firms to violate the First Amendment. We know that's exactly what
they do. And I was surprised to see that Clarence Thomas didn't join in
on this. Samuel Alito was the only person who dissented on this. They
said, now, we're not going to listen to this rf K Junior case
about about censorship. Maybe they thought it was redundant to the one that's being
brought by the Attorney's General in those two states. But Alito said, well,
the harm is immediate and so we need to address this immediately. But
they're not they're not doing it. And James Bouvart asks is free speech a
relic in America? I would say definitely. And of course he points out
that a federal judge on the Fourth of July this year, Harry Doughty condemned
the Biden administration. He said, this is the most massive attack against free
speech in the US history. If you want something to impeach somebody for Mike
Johnson, maybe you do that. That'd be much easier to prove, probably
than the financial stuff. I mean, he saw this back and forth.
Perhaps you saw it. I don't know. As Jim Jordan and Comer were
in the hallway, had this Washington Post reporter who was arguing with them about
the money, the millions of dollars and they didn't pay taxes on They were,
you know, going back and forth with which was all inside the bank,
all inside the know your customer stuff. As I pointed out, nobody
wants to talk about that. I haven't even seen any of the crypto people
say, as Jamie demon and Elizabeth Warren are conspiring to try to shut down
crypto and to portray it as the currency of crime. Nobody says, but
look at what the Bidens did, and they did it all through the banking
system. Look at what HSBC did, as I pointed out, Anyway,
Bouvard says, it's interesting that fifty five percent of American adults support the government
suppressing quote unquote false information. Again, who determines that it's false. That's
the problem with all this, he says, even though so fifty five percent
want the government to shut down false information, even though only twenty percent of
the people trust the government. See, this is the insanity of this.
This is this kind of bipolarism that we see with the Trump supporters. So
you know, this is one of the reasons why. By the way,
you know, it's not just to do this secretly so they don't have to
answer for violating the First Amendment. Well, we'll have the corporations do it
so we don't have to so people don't see us doing this directly. It's
exactly the same thing they did with the lockdown and other stuff. We'll do
it through the states. We've got this model legislation we put out, so
we'll have them enact this. We'll give them massive amounts of money to do
it, and the Republicans as well as the Democrats will all do it.
And so they have the corporations that they are leaning on and threatening. And
this is what several of the judges say in this Bouvard article has got quotes
in the judges, multiple judges comparing the federal government to the mafia and the
way that they interact with these private companies. But we always knew this was
the case. And yet when all this stuff began back in twenty eighteen,
you had the Ritage Foundation, the biggest conservative think tank, You had the
Cato Institute, the biggest libertarian think tanks, say oh, it's corporations,
they can do whatever they want. You had Reason constantly doing that. John
Stossel, I don't like being censored, but hey, I love corporations being
able to do whatever they want to to me. And so you know,
I don't want to get in the way of that. But what about your
god given writes a free speech? And again, nobody wants to talk about
the fact that a corporation is not a person. Mitt Romney was wrong about
that. It is an artificial creature that has been created by government, not
by God, and it has been given privileges. And then the government they
created that creature, leans on it and says, obey me. I'm your
creator and I can destroy you. That's what the judges are talking about.
And so the judge at Terry dot Ee one hundred and fifty five pages of
damning details, says James Bouvart, a federal browbeating, jaw boning, and
coercion of social media companies. He ruled that the federal agencies and the White
House quote engaged in coercion of social media companies to delete Americans' comments on Afghanistan,
on Ukraine, on election procedure, other subjects, again, pandemic vaccine.
He issued an injunction to block them from doing it. Will that stop
them? Of course not constitution tells them not to do it. Will that
stop them? No, you have to enforce it. Well, the GOP
House do anything about that? No, they won't, No, they won't.
They'll narrowly focus. And it reminds me of what they did with Bill
Clinton. You had this long list of crimes from cattle futures to all the
rest of this stuff, and manipulation, financial crimes, crimes accused of sexual
assault and violence of Bill Clinton. What did ken Starr do? He focused
on a perjury that Bill Clinton had about a consensual relationship, with all of
the crimes, with all all of the Clinton Foundation, the espionage and all
the rest of this stuff. And he focused on that, and you look
at what they could come against Biden for the fact that they're coming against him
link. You know, perjury is a real issue. But that was a
way of letting him off the hook. And if you're only going to look
at Biden's personal grifting and not look at what he did to America, look
at what he did to the constitution and continues to do the constitution, that
is a high crime and a misdemeanor. Crimes and misdemeanors, So they should
do something about that. But two weeks after Biden's inauguration, says James Beauvarn,
White House digital director names Rob Flaherty, demanded that Twitter immediately remove a
parody account of Biden's relatives. Twitter officials suspended the account within forty five minutes,
but then complained, we're being bombarded by White House censorship requests. At
that point, then he made a request of Facebook and he raged it.
Then July fifteenth, twenty twenty one, an email are you guys e f
being serious? The following day, the president of qu social media companies of
killing people quote unquote by failing to suppress all criticism of the COVID vaccines because
he's about to mandate him for everybody and so involved in all this, as
James Bouvard points out, is SISA. It was supposed to be there for
cybersecurity. Instead what it is doing is evaluating content and trying to censor people
and just surveil people. And the same way that the FCC, which was
originally there to allocate frequency spectrum for TV and radio so that it wasn't interference,
just to facilitate this, and actually that is a legitimate constitutional thing because
this is something that's going to go across state lines the radio and TV signals.
Well, so you know that would be the place that you would want
to do. It would be in the federal government. And as long as
all you're doing is allocating frequency spectrum and holding auctions for it and then monitoring
it to make sure that somebody doesn't cover it up, that's fine. But
that's not where they're staying. Now. They're going to take a look at
content again. Just like SISSA, everything is about, well, we need
to know more about you. Just like Nikki Heley said, we've got to
know your name. We can also know what your political beliefs are, what
are your religious beliefs, And this is the solitarianism, and so they began
by looking at foreign influence, you know, that's what they were set up
to do. Just like the CIA and the NSA, And just like the
CIA and the NSSA, the CISA, SISSA has turned inward and their missed
diss and malinformation team is now looking at Americans. And during the twenty twenty
election, SISA targeted for suppression anybody saying that mail in voting was insecure,
which of course it was. And for months before the election happened, I
said, it's going to be completely Why is Trump allowing this to happen?
Good question? Good question? Did he want that to happen? And of
course Patenic and Owen and Alex were telling everybody with the sting that SISSA was
the one that Trump had enacted to blockchain watermark with quantum this and quantum that
he was going to It was SISSA that was actually running the sting for Trump.
It was exactly the opposite, wasn't it. That's what your CIA operatives
were telling you. They're info wars. Patenic and the rest of them,
Patchennic openly working for Kissinger for the CIA, part of Operation Gladio, all
the rest of the stuff. Yeah, the mail in voting is insecure.
Well, SISSA is targeting you and going to suppress that, but they're not
doing anything about the voting. They told you exactly the opposite of what was
happening. SISSA aims to control Americans' minds, says James Beauvard. A SISA
advisory committee last year issued a report that broadened what it targeted to include the
spread of faults and misleading information because it poses a significant risk to critical function
like elections, or public health, or financial services or emergency responses. I
got to say, why is the government involved in public health? Why has
the government involved in financial services? Why the federal government, why has it
involved in emergency responses? As I've said many times, when you have FEMA
involved, they typically make things much worse. It's much better when it's done
at a local level. Again, my sons, when they were in high
school, one of them, Whistler, did a report contrasting what happened in
North Carolina when there's a hurricane came through and FEMA went in high handed,
exacerbated all the problems for everybody, kept people away from getting back to their
homes and securing things created more damage, made people homeless, all the rest
of the stuff. Whereas when a tornado went through the county where we were
and destroyed a lot of homes, and the local government went out and just
kept people away from the downpower lines. And then you had and that's the
only involvement of law enforcement. Is all handled locally. And it was great.
You had corporations who voluntarily donated food. They took them to church parking
lots. The church people showed up and handed the food out to people.
You don't need FEMA. They complicate things, they make things worse, and
they do that with elections. They do that with public health as well.
Anyway, the government in June of twenty twenty two, still doing the COVID
censorship, as he points out, and this White House Digital Director Flairdy said
he wanted to monitor Facebook's suppression of COVID nineteen misinformation. Again, this is
in June of twenty twenty two, and so as people are starting to explain
what this is really about, starting to wake up about what this is really
about, he wants to double down on the censorship for that, because they've
been doubling down on the censorship from the start. With that, he wanted
Facebook to intervene and private conversations on vaccines and direct them to the CDC.
James Bouvart has a lot of fun with that, he says, uh so,
Facebook employee told Flerdy that an immediately generated message about any in this particular
thing, somebody was talking about nosebleeds or something that might give users the feel
of big brother. Actually it might show that you are a big brother.
And so James Bovart said, at least the Biden White House didn't compel Facebook
to send form notices every ninety seconds on any private discussion on COVID, something
like the Department of Homeland Security wishes to remind you that there is no surveillance.
Have a nice day. So, yeah, it's not a feel,
it's a reality of big brother. So they responded to these legal challenges in
court by betraying themselves in the same way that Richard Nixon did, says James
Bouvart, as quote pitiful, helpless giants. And so they also, Judge
Doughdery wrote, the federal agencies will blame Russians, they'll blame COVID nineteen,
They'll blame capitalism for any suppression of free speech by social media companies. But
it's coming from them, that's what they say, that you're the guys who
are doing this, but you're going to blame Russia, China, COVID capitalism.
Doesn't that tell you that these people in the Biden administration are died in
the world Marxists. But of course this stuff was also happening in the Trump
administration because nobody changes in these regulatory agencies strong arming Twitter to arbitraries suspend four
hundred thousand counts accounts, including journalists and diplomats. So another judge, Judge
Don Willett James Bovart, said, one of the most principled and penetrating judges
in the nation, had no problem with the federal agencies publicly criticizing what they
judged to be false or dangerous ideas. That says, it's a debate,
But we don't have debates. We have bands now, we have bands and
canceling and purging and all the rest of stuff. There's no debates. We're
not going to have anything. We're not going to show you any data.
You're going to do this because I say so, So he said, I
don't have any problem with you criticizing what you think is false are dangerous ideas.
But he says, but here you have the government. This is what
the judge says. Here you have the government in secret, in private,
out of the public eye, relying on subtle, strong armed and strong arming
and veiled or not so veiled threats. And he said, that's things like
you know the mafia. Well, that's a really nice social media platform you
got there. It'd be a shame if something were to happen to it,
right, And he's not the only one to draw the analogy to a mafia.
Jennifer L. Rod, another judge, compared the Biden censorship directly to
the regime to a mafia, brother, saying, we see with a mob,
she said, they have these ongoing relationships. They'll never actually say go
do this or else you're going to have consequences, but everybody just knows what
to do. That's the way it works in journalism as well. That's why
it's hurting. Mentality is very easily communicated, very subtle things, and so
you don't have to actually have an order. So within mainstream media, even
within the mainstream alternative media like in Force, that's the way it works.
You know that. Sometimes I take you aside and say you better shut up
about Steve A. Chenniko are going to fire you. But it doesn't always
work that way. The Biden administration was supposedly innocent when the Fed's never explicitly
spelled out the or else she pointed out. But that's really what it is.
It really is operating as organized crime. It really is threats intimidation,
he says. Fifty years ago, philosopher Hannah Rent wrote the most essential political
of all, the most essential political freedom, the right to unmanipulated factual information,
without which all freedom of opinion becomes a cruel hoax. It says,
the battle over federal censorship will determine whether Americans have more than a passing with
political freedom. Well, that really is where the battle is. And other
people are writing about this as well. It's been there for five years,
five and a half years, really, and that was when it was openly
done and we knew who was behind it, But it was happening before that,
and so it's the question, you, what is going to happen with
any of this. Dianne Waldman of Real Clear Policy says government cannot become big
brother Internet censorship must end. Anyone who lived through twenty twenty observed that some
messages received treatment online that stood and start contrast to other messages. Yeah,
I noticed. I noticed. As I've said before, I said in twenty
twenty one, I said, twenty twenty was the year the world became China.
And just to prove that, just to validate that, YouTube censored me
and you know, suspended me for doing exact showing and doing exactly what I
said was happening, turning into Chinese authoritarian model. We'll be right back.
Whether you're feeling like the booze or bluegrass, APS Radio has you covered.
Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at apsradio dot com.
You're listening to the David Knight Show from the album as well. And thank
you on rock fand thank you James, I appreciate the tip on there we've
had. Let's talk a little bit about the Scrooge mcguffins that are all over
the place, the environmentalists that are doing things, and now with the Christmas
time, these same people who've been gluing themselves to roads and other things,
other damage nuisances like that, these people are now attacking Christmas trees in Germany,
and they coordinated this to do this in seven cities at the same time.
It's a conspiracy, isn't it. Yeah. You know, when you
start seeing things like this happening all at the same time, they clearly know
there's an organization behind it. Why don't we use that same logic when it
comes to the fact that we have all these different governments around the world locking
everybody down at the same time and then saying in two months we're going to
do this next step. Then they do it. And then they say,
and now two months from today, we're going to do today. Now what
we told you, because this is an emergency. We told you we're going
to do this two months ago. Now we're telling you we're going to do
something else in two months. And they all do it at the same time,
just like these people spraying the Christmas tree. This is what it looked
like at one of this. It's a beautiful tree in a town area I
think it is a town or maybe it's in a mall, I think,
and they're spraying red paint all over it. I wonder what the environmental effect
of that is going to do. Are they're releasing CO two as they spray
that down. Radical climate activists, as Breitbart calls in, But actually I
think they're I think they're climate crazies is a better way to describe them.
Launch day series of coordinated strikes against public Christmas trees throughout Germany yesterday morning.
Do what they have against Christmas trees? Are they? Now? The source
of CO two is Bill Gates says, we got to these things have been
cut so and now we got to bury them or they're going to start emitting
CO two and that type of thing. Now, this group is called the
Last Generation. They're one of several of these. There's the Last Generation,
there's the Extinction Rebellion. There is another one called just Stop Oil. These
are the people who are going around and trying to just destroy things that are
beautiful things that are part of our culture, going in and you know,
throwing food or paint or things like that on paintings to try to destroy them.
Going into the louver other places. They threw paint on a Monet painting.
We saw this, So you know they have as they point out on
this Bipart article, you know, as they glue themselves to the roads.
People who have an emergency, can't get to the doctor. And we've already
had a woman who has left brain dead because the radicals blocked the road in
Berlin. They couldn't get her to the hospital, so she was left brain
dead. But these are these profits of doom that have been around for more
than fifty years, and always their big problem is is that they have too
short a timeframe. You know, the world is going to end in ten
years or whatever. We've seen generation after generation of lies and false prophecies from
these people. But of course in this particular case, there's seven of these
things happened, seven incidents like that. There were no arrests made, no
arrests. These people get away with it. It's almost like the government wants
it to happen. We're all racing full speed toward catastrophe and our governments are
failing miserably to pull the emergency brake. No, what they're failing to do
is to shut down these organizations. We know who's behind them. They've got
big money in goos behind them, and they never punish them. And so
this continues to go on. And then there was an article out of the
UK about the eco zelotry coming after the Christmas chocolates. Yeah, nuts coming
after the chocolates. Actually, in this particular case, what this is an
example of is the other extreme of this, the corporate side, the black
rock esg type of thing, and how they want to virtue signal to the
government and maybe even to their customers. And so this writer for The Daily
Skeptic, Joanna Gray, was talking about what they were able to buy a
few years ago a box of chocolates and said it was amazing because they were
handmade, a thing of beauty, handcrafted chocolate delights, and you could see
all of them had a clear plastic cover on these chocolates. And so said,
well, this year we thought we would pick up some of these.
We liked them so much, you know, they tasted great, but they
were truly amazing to look at, and so we thought we'd get them as
gifts or some family members. And we go back to where we got them
at the department store Fortnham and Mason in the UK. So they weren't there.
We couldn't find them anywhere, no boxes of these chocolates like they used
to have, And they started asking people. I said, it was incredibly
packed. Everybody was shopping but they finally got an answer. One person who
was selling a different type of candy, Mars and pan fruits, said,
well, yeah, they're over there. They're in cardboard boxes now because we
don't want to have any plastic and you know, they made an exception for
us this year because we're a small company, but by next year we've got
to have no plastic covers either. And so they went over and looked at
it and said, it was just this nondescript, solid cardboard box. And
who knew what was inside. You couldn't see inside of it. I mean
it's sealed up, you know, because you're in the store. You haven't
bought it yet. They want people opening these things up, so said,
no tiny caramel hearts, iced onto chocolate pots, no white and pink raspberry
delights, no lightly dusted balls or truffles, just a bland cardboard box.
So they said, you know this is done to virtue signal. I said,
of course, Fortenham and Mason doesn't really care about the planet, doesn't
care about overuse of resources, because if it did, it would shut down
immediately, because there's nothing in this department store that is essential. It is
all luxurious flummery it is just trying to make a futile, pointless gesture.
And so she said, well, I recommend anybody with any sense avoid this.
If you're in the UK, you can go to Chocolate Craft in Hampshire
where the plastic lids show the beautiful chocolates and all their tempting glory. Yeah,
this is just more corporate virtue signaling. And so you have the useful
at stormtroopers at the bottom destroying everything everywhere. But then you also have the
corporations that are trying to destroy everything, and they don't care what customers want
because they have one customer they want to serve, and that is the government,
and the government wants to push this climate MacGuffin, And so these idiots
are analyzing art and decorations. These are the people trying to destroy our society
though, and you need to take them very seriously. I know they're just
staring pain on a Christmas tree, but they really want to destroy everything about
our society. As we've seen. They want to come after our food,
they want to come after our everything that we have. It's not just candy
packages and Christmas trees. These people are deadly serious with all this stuff.
Well, we're going to take a quick break and we're going to come back
and we're going to take a look at some of the other climate stuff.
Especially. You will not believe what they are doing with windmills and Scotland.
It's one of the most absurd things I have ever seen. In hypocritical as
well. If you like the Eagles, the cars, and Heuey Lewis in
the news, they say the You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio,
download our app or listen now at APS radio dot com. You're listening
to the David Night Show. Like a circle and a spy, like a
wheel within a wheel, never ending in the beginning, a never spinning greed,
like a snowball down a mountain, or a carnival like a cat snow
It's turn out running rings around the lone. Yeah, it's a windpower grades
and sweeping a minute slide of space and the world does like an apple whirling
silently in space, like the circles that you find in the wind. Yeah,
let's talk about the windmills of their mind, the windmills of the Green
Party and the Socialist Party in Scotland. It turns out, and this is
one of the most interesting stories. I think it turns out that their wind
turbines are secretly using generators, diesel generators. Now, diesel generators are fine.
I don't have a problem with diesel generators, but they are not typically
because they're for temporary use and things that they don't have a lot of emission
controls in them. And we a few years ago when Portia started coming out
with their electric cars, Elon Musk had to show that his could compete on
the Nurburg Green and so he sent one of his plaid cars over and of
course he could not use the chargers that were over there because they've all got
these different connections and everything. So he set up a charger and then his
charger with a diesel generator so they could show all this electric car. He's
got a diesel generator. And the people around there said, this thing is
smelly, it's noisy, it's running all the time. Stop this. But
this is what Scotland is doing with their wind turbines. What a crazy grift
this is Because you know, if the wind is not blowing, they still
got to generate some electricity and so they fire up the diesel generators. Scotland's
power sector criticized after it revealed dozens of giant turbines have been using diesel generators.
A whistle blower said the windmills are only turning thanks to hydrocarbon fuels diesel.
They've got these things running up to six hours a day. The diesel
is running because you know, the wind doesn't blow all the time, and
that's one of the reasons why this is a problem. Scottish labor member said
using diesel to de ice faulty turbines is an environmental madness. See that was
in Texas. They weren't expecting the windmills to freeze up. They did caused
massive power outages because they have rewarded so many of these billionaires by building a
power structure. They spent billions of dollars to build an infrastructure to pipe back
the electricity generated in these remote wind farms. But then when we got cold
weather they froze up. So perhaps they're running these things for six hours a
day to de ice them. But this person, Colin Smith, said it
is environmental madness. This is one of the people who actually believed the climate
fairytale. It's very difficult when you get disillusioned isn't it. Wait until he
hears about Santa Claus. It's certainly going to be difficult for Colin. The
Scottish National Party, the Green Party, they're being condemned for dishonesty and they
found out that well they were. They had originally told everybody that Scotland possessed
twenty five percent of Europe's wind energy potential. Well that's not true. This
revelation has found that sixty turbines at one wind farm in Scotland and eleven at
another one were connected to six huge diesel generators last month. The Scottish Energy
and Climate Changed Directorate they call it a directorate, right, because we're talking
about becoming authoritarian communist countries here. They responded to a Freedom of Information Act
request asking how many wind farms use diesel generators as backup and how many do
not? You see, they're not just using it to de ice these things.
They're using it as backup. And that's the way renewable sources of energy
have always been used asap because they're not dependable. You know, the sun
doesn't shine twenty four hours a day in case she hadn't noticed, But the
wind doesn't always blow either so their response said, the Scottish government does not
specifically gather information on whether wind farms use diesel generators as backup. So they
asked another question. Because it's being a little bit cagy, it's like trying
to talk to chat GPT or a smart bomb. We are aware they said
that one wind farm does have permission to use diesel generators. Oh so they
want to say, well, we don't know if they're using it or not.
But they were asked permission. And these people didn't say, wait a
minute, you're creating this super clean environmental thing, what do you need a
diesel generator for. They were in on this thing from the very beginning.
They're in on this fraud, the Scottish National Party and the Green Party.
We're also aware from recent official level engagement with Scottish Power Renewables that these two
wind farms use diesel generators as backups. As they kept asking them questions,
they like peeling off the layers of an onion, they start to get to
the core of the truth. Huge dirty generators. This is the same thing
said all the time when you look at the Paris climate acord. China is
allowed to build as many coal power plants or whatever they want to burn,
and there's no restrictions on emissions none whatsoever, no emission on the quantity,
no restrictions on the quantity of these things, and no restrictions on the quality
of the quality of the air that the emissions that come out of them.
And so same thing is happening nowt here evidently, and with a wind power
they secretly put in diesel generators to make that up. Now, if they're
getting a massive subsidy, they're using these things as a backup. And so
they're also applying now and this is not just something that was done once.
They now have twenty onshore wind projects and all these documents as they continue to
look at the information, get the information back. All these mentioned having diesel
generators to use as a backup. So they won't let you use coal plants
or oil plants or natural gas or something like that that's had a lot of
emission controls put on it that is very very clean. You can't use that
as a backup. No, we're going to shut those things down and then
bring out some dirty temporary diesel generators that'll be fine. What fraud and the
other thing that's fraudulent about this is that they're getting all of this subsidy pretending
that it's being generated by wind when it's really generated by these diesel generators.
What a sham, What incredible sham. Oh yeah, I got these diesel
gener but I guess what, you know, a quarter at the time,
I'm going to be running these diesel generators. But pay me, and you
know, give me subsidies, green subsidies, all this other kind of stuff.
I got a dirty diesel generator here, and you're gonna pay me as
if I've got some emission free green power source. By the way, I
just wondered, while we're talking about this, we've always talked about that eleven
years ago. I'm sorry, twelve years ago. It was twenty eleven.
It's twelve years ago. This is what I was doing when they started making
these renewable energy mandates. One of the first places where they had the mandates
was in Colorado. You know, the same people I talked about yesterday putting
wolves out, And so I was with a group that was trying to stop
that. We did a lawsuit, just like we did a lawsuit trying to
get Michael Mann to turn over his data that was fraudulent. We knew it
was fraudulent, and he hit it. He was able to keep that.
You know, we lost in court. He was able to keep it secret.
We lost in terms of fighting this. But this is a real problem,
and at this point in time, we were talking about the fact that
they bring on these renewables which are not steady state, and they're not reliable,
and so you have to have something there to run. We're putting wind
on trial because people don't understand the facts behind wind. We believe that if
people knew how variable wind was and how dirty it was, if they knew
the wind is neither free nor clean, then they may not have government demands
its use. Wind energy is very variable. When the wind blows, you're
in good shape. But on a second by second basis, the wind energy
goes up and down. Because electricity must balance a demand and supply, any
changes in the supply have to be taken up by some other supply, typically
fossil fuel. So you've got a fossil fuel plan. It is running up
and down, much like a car in traffic in the city that's inefficient.
It uses more fuel and it needs to which causes more pollution. And it
burns dirtier, which causes more pollution, and the pollution control equipment doesn't work
as well, which causes more pollution. So just trying to keep the energy
balanced on the grid when wind is there causes the pollution. And if you
took wind off the grid and just use the fossil fuel plant the way it
was intended to be used, it would be like a car on the highway
driving in a steady stream. That would cause less pollution than if it goes
on the grid. Now the question comes up, how do we know that
it's dirtier? And as variety of studies have been done, one of the
ones we're relying on in our Colorado lawsuit is the Bentech study. They examined
with great care how much pollution comes out under different wind and fossil fuel scenarios
that studies available on the web, and it's a very good study that no
one has ever refumed. Market system, the marketplace should be able to pick
the winners, not the government. Because wind is not the good deal that
people say, because it costs more, because it comes out of the pocketbooks
of Americans who can't afford more. We believe it's time to go wind on
trial. We took this lawsuit because we're a pro environmental organization. We have
found, as have others, that use of renewable energies can cause more pollution
than it prevents, and it's also in constitutional. So we take in this
case to try to fix the problems, both a legal problem and an environmental
problem. Yeah. So the wind energy in these other things cause more environmental
damage, and you've got to have that energy somehow, and if you can't
get it from the wind, well then you've got to ramp up your power
plant. But if you killed the power plant, it's bring out a dirty
temporary diesel generator. That's where they are now. Yeah, that was twelve
years ago. So why isn't Big oil losing any sleep over this new climate
deal? As they point out, this is CNN wringing its hands and saying,
oh, we said we're going to get rid of fossil fuels, but
it's exploding. They're doing more development and more discovery. Of course, not
going to be able. We're not going to be allowed to refine that stuff
in the United States because they're not allowed to have any more refineries built here.
They'll ship it to China. Because they'll manufacture the refined petroleum products,
and then they'll also manufacture whatever we need because we're going to export all of
that. And then the real issue, as I said, with COP twenty
eight, we exported our energy usage, which is necessary for manufacturing and our
manufacturing, we exported that offshore to China. Now what they want to do
with COP twenty eight is we want to come after the wealth of the Western
nations and turn it over to people in China. I'm sorry, not China,
but in Africa as climate reparations. That's what they're going to call it,
and it's a big drifting operation. They're going to have these people going
to The people who are going to get the money are going to be all
the governments are going to send our money to Africa, and then the African
dictators are going to buy stuff from these Davos billionaires after they've skimmed a lot
of money off of it. But we'll be the ones who get the bill,
just as always. But anyway, following marathon talks, says CNN,
the COP twenty eight Climate summit in Dubai struck a deal that makes an unprecedented
call for quote transitioning away from fossil fuels. Some countries, like the US,
welcome the firmer than ever commitment to moving away from energy resources to that
are responsible for planet heating emissions. Again, this is CNN it spewing this
nonsense, but the resolution is marred by loopholes that offer the fossil fuel industry
numerous escape routes. US oil production is at a record high. India plans
to double their coal output by twenty thirty. Twenty thirty, isn't that when
we're supposed to have everything super clean and under surveillance. The UK is issuing
new drilling licenses in the North Sea. American oil majors are splurging billions on
deals that signal that they see robust demand for decades to come. You see
all this stuff as virtual virtue signaling, and it is all stuff that is
going to be used. These people are going to make their money. They're
going to make their money from oil, coal, other things like that coming
out of other countries, not out of ours necessarily, but they are also
these agendas are going to be used to impoverish and to enslave us. That's
what it's really about. They're still going to make their money. They're going
to make their money getting government subsidies for these renewable things or getting being able
to do business as usual. The latest evidence as you look at Exxon October
announcement of a sixty billion dollar deal to shale driller Chevron has an agreement two
weeks after that that was done in October later to buy shale producer Hess for
fifty three billion dollars. Hess has large oil assets in Guyana, which is
where Venezuela is talking about invading. They said it will help to grow their
production over the next decade or so. Occidental Petroleum said it would pay twelve
billion dollars in cash and stock to buy a US shale oil producer. So
all together you've got three deals here there are about one hundred and twenty five
billion dollars. And then if you look at Australia, another fifty billion oil
and gas deal was going to happen there also involving liquid natural gas. So
the response from a person who wrote a book on ESG tells CNN, the
markets aren't functioning properly now, Actually the markets are functioning properly. What they
say, the market aren't functioning properly because they're not rewarding the right companies.
So we need to have more government intervention. That's what these people always push.
We need to make sure that the markets reward those wall companies that are
decarbonizing at pace now. They don't want any market input. They want to
have the government be the marketplace. Again, when you look at ESG,
they got one customer, and so I guess you could say in that sense,
the markets are not functioning properly. We're not giving our one customer.
The government's exactly what they want, and so the government, the marketplace,
which is the marketplace, has to send some more signals. So instead of
the government marketplace rewarding these people, maybe you need to bring them in and
punish them for giving other people what they want. The industry invested only twenty
billion dollars in clean energy projects last year, only about two and a half
percent of its total capital spinning. I guess you know they've got to invest
a lot of money those diesel generators. For the fraud that they are doing
with these windmills. Goldman Sachs is on a shutdown. It's climate etf.
They created an investment property that is essentially companies that are going to be trying
to enforce the Paris Climate Accord, And, as zero Hedge says, another
day, another ESG pipe dream falling victim to reality. Green investing an ESG
is a grift, It certainly is. Goldman Sachs had a Paris Aligned Climate
US Large Cap Equity ETF. The idea was to provide investment results that corresponded
to the performance of Goldman Sachs Equity index following the Paris Aligned Capital investment.
So they're shutting this thing down. They only had seven million dollars go into
it. I think the market is speaking, isn't it. Everybody knows that
this is a forced, coerced fraud, and a lot of these people don't
want to put money into it anymore. Less than a week before that,
we noted that thirty billion dollars has been shaved off the value of clean energy
stocks over the last six months. Zarah Hedge also pointed out weeks ago how
the ESG grift was reaching end game after Marcus Mueller, chief investment officer for
ESG at Deutsche Bank, stated that sustainability fund should include traditional energy stocks.
Well, it is kind of interesting, you know, some of these biggest
supporters of these things are backing off, just like Ford. Oh you know,
this EV thing is not really working rural France. Meanwhile, the farmers
there are so upset about the flip flopping that it's constantly going on that they're
flip flopping signs there. Look at this, they're taking street signs and they're
turning them upside down, carefully unscrewing them, turning them upside down, and
then screwing them back on that way and again it's a way of showing that
they're under distress, in the same way that you would fly a flag upside
down to show distress. Motorists in rural France have recently been astonished to see
thousands of road signs that entrances to towns and villages turned upside down. The
name bearing roadside plaques have been unscrewed, flipped, then screwed back on.
And I think it's a good protest. It's not destructive of anything. Get
your message across. I think that's a great idea. Frankly, it began
with a protests in southern turn in November. Now it's spread all over the
country. The farmers are saying we were trying to think of a way of
denouncing all the contradictory instructions that we keep getting. If someone tells us to
do one thing one day and then the opposite the next, we say that
we're walking on our heads. In France, and so that's where this idea
came from. We talk about flip flopping, they talk about walking on their
heads. But either one works with this, and this is a lot of
environmental nonsense. It is also the government says, well, we want to
have local farms, we want to support local farms, but you know,
do this, do that. We're going to increase the cost of diesel fuel
for the farm, but we still want you to produce this food, want
you to do at a cheaper price. We want you to pay your laborers
more money, and all the rest of these things, and say how we
do all of that. They want us to raise the salaries to pay,
but on the other end, we're told to lower our prices because of inflation.
One of them tells us to change our practices. You can't do farming
the way that you're doing. You've got to do something that is more environmentally
friendly or aligned with what Davos in the UN want, but then they tell
us to produce as much as possible so that we can have food, sovereignty
and independence. Well, this is all part of the chaos, you know.
It's just like Fauci flip flopping on his mask. One day you wear
it, one day you don't, then going to mandate it. Now we're
going to mandate three of them and say, you know, all that type
of stuff, and so it is really part of creating chaos. That's really
deliberate. You know, we talked about environmentalism. We've got Gates. You
know, first of all, let's pay the billionaires to plant trees and or
they can you know, pay each other whatever, and then they can do
whatever they want. So you pay these carbon credits for people to plant trees
because they've got to take the CO two out. Now they flip flop,
and now Gates says, no, we're not crazy. Were there the crazy
people here? After you paid me to plant the trees, now you're going
to pay me to cut them down and bury them. And so it's constantly
this flip flopping, and the purpose is to turn everything upside down because it's
faut you said, we got to do it from the inside. We've got
to create chaos and disruption, and we do it step by step. And
this way all these mcguffins work, whether it's their health mcguffin or their climate
mcguffin. So they said their campaign is help to get the government to back
off of a couple of two new taxes that they were talking about doing.
So that's what's happening with the farmers. And then when you look at Italy,
a positive sign there the parliament has banned artificial food derived from animal cells.
And this is happening as the UK stores are banning plastic to virtue signal.
At least Italy, the parliament there is banning tumor meat. That's what
I call it, tumor meat. We're going to cultivate these cells in a
lab and feed them to you. So according to Reuters, according to Reuters,
they said that what an outlaws or cell cultures or tissue that are grown
into meat get people will get up to one hundred and sixty seven dollars fine,
they might have their government funding with drawn. Here in the United States,
that would be the big thing. Let's stop funding these corporations that are
working against us. That would be a job for the Republicans who have the
majority in the House, because that's where they can stop the spending bills or
to be shut down completely. And so here in the United States, this
is not happening. Instead, you got Bill Gates and got Tyson coming together
talk about how they're gonna have lab grown chicken and they're going to grow bugs
for us. The United States is only the second country in the world to
approve sell based chicken. The other one is Singapore, which approved it back
in twenty twenty. It's a very expensive process. I don't know that it's
necessarily makes any sense from an economic or an energy standpoint, But who cares
about that. We'll have a cyber truck that weighs seven thousand pounds. Who
cares about the energy efficiency of that. The costly process involves extracting stem cells
and giving them a nutrient dense bath in vitamins, minerals, salt, and
even soy inside a steel bioreactor. An average batch takes about two weeks to
harvest. But they said in Italy, the agricultural minister, whose name is
Lola brigida I said lab products, in our opinion, do not guarantee quality
or well being. In other words, they're not safe and effective. We
don't like these things, and we're trying to protect our culture and our tradition
and we want good quality stuff. So good for them, but that's not
what we have in the United States. We're not doing that at all.
Okay, we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
When we come back. We're going to talk a little bit about what
is happening with the election. Oh, I'm sorry. When we come back,
we're going to be talking to Tony and Tony Hartban and so we'll make
a quick break here and we'll be right back with Tony. Stay with us,
Elvis the Beetle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the
Oldies channel at APS radio dot com. Do think you're listening to the David
Knight Show and joining us now is Tony Ardaban of Wise Wolf Gold. There's
been a lot of development in the financial markets. I want to talk to
Tony about that. Thank you for joining us, Tony. That's good to
see you, David, thanks for having me. Thank you. Yeah,
what do you think about this? You've got the Powell pivot? Was it
really a surprise? Did they baked this up. We had a stock market
jumped up on it, but we already had some people who said, well,
you know, we think they're gonna lower interest rates earlier than we originally
thought. But everybody knows they're going to lower it because of the election stuff.
But how has that affected gold? Well, you know, you have
a lot of the fake paper markets, and it's it's I think it's helping
drive the price right now, especially in those those sectors. But that's really
not what the issue with gold is right now. And it's funny. I
was looking at the headlines like Santa palell is driving the markets and happy days
are here again. It reminded me of something. You know, he used
the word transitory him and Janet Yellen is about it was transitory. It was
transitory, and then he became very hawkish and then he raised rates faster than
any rate in history. But I liked what they described now as the rate
that they're holding. They called it the terminal rate, and I thought,
terminal really describes it better, doesn't it. It's a terminal rate now,
David. And so they've decided they're going to raise rates or lower rates three
times starting in twenty twenty four and perhaps into twenty twenty five another four times.
That's what they say, and really they don't have a lot of choice.
If you're going to prop up the domestic economy, you're going to have
to goose it with cheap fiat currency debt. That's what it loves it.
It survives off of that. So I think that's the plan right now.
You're so right. It's an election year that has nothing to do with sound
economics or actually saving the dollar or anything like that. I think you're just
watching this play out where they're hand in glove with the federal government in the
sitting administration. This is the deal. Yeah, and if they can do
moves that are going to cause the stock market to pick up and everybody looks
at their portfolio value going up, well I'm happy with this, you know.
So yeah, it's funny they call him Santa Pale. I saw a
cartoon of somebody had Klaus Schwab and had a a person setting on his knee,
and they called it it Santa Klaus. And he says to the person
who says, you'll get nothing and you'll be happy. Basically, what Santa
Klaus is the grinch who stole everything from us. Yeah, zero Hedge has
got a thing quoting Powell, and they call it the Powell pivot. They
said, so on December the first, he said this, he said it'd
be premature to speculate on when policy might ease. Then on December the thirteenth,
he said, rate cuts are something that begins to come into view and
clearly is the topic of discussion. So I guess there's been a lot of
economic change or political change, is it? Bro is what we're looking at
there right, Well, it's very malleable. It's transitory, David All policy
is transitory, but I think it's I think a terminal better describes it,
because what you're watching is the collapse of a system. And you know,
it's funny to watch the commentators and everything across the Twitter sphere or the x
sphere or whatever it is. Now we'll get into a couple of tweets here
in a little while. There's so much faith in the fake stock market.
It's really unbelievable, especially when you realize, you know, you have so
much of the popular culture is looking at inflation now because it's just it's so
evident. I mean, yeah, you know, it's gradually over your lifetime,
things start to increase in price, and you kind of get used to
that because you hear your parents talk about, oh, it used to you
know, it costs a dime a gallon for gasoline, and all you know,
I can go to the movies for a nickel. You hear all that
stuff. Well, I think even with the memes like Home Alone, where
the prices increase two hundred and forty seven percent and people are taking notice of
that, Well, what's interesting to have the side by side of thinking is
that on one hand you have culture realizing inflation is real, that the dollar
is fake, and on the other hand they say, well, I think
we have a soft landing. I think everything's going to be fine. Now,
Well, if the trend is always to lose, the dollar loses value,
then how can you have any faith in that system where you're investing.
It's it's rigged against you. The mere fact that you're dealing in something that
constantly loses value isn't and of itself theft. So it's funny, David was,
I was just doing some calculations before that we did the show, and
I have this two and a half dollar gold Indian Okay, this is I
know you can't see it right, I'm holding up to the camera, but
it's it's about the size of a dime. This was two and a half
dollars prior to nineteen thirty three. I did the math on it, just
the meltible gold value, not just the coin value. Two hundred and forty
seven dollars today. Wow. Wow, two and a half dollars, two
hundred and forty seven dollars in meltable gold. Yeah. Yeah, if you
want to see a side by side comparison of what happened to the dollar,
that's a great example. Yeah, that's where we are now, and you
know, ten years, twenty years from now, it's going to be even
further away. So really, I think you're watching two separate things happen.
The old system and people are still running back to it because they have the
familiarity with it and normalcy bias very dangerous because on the horizon you've got a
complete reshuffling, I believe of the global currency system. Central banks are buying
gold at a record pace. We talk about that all the time. I
think that's really what's behind the gold price. You'll have these fluctuations and you'll
have some profit taking, but we're on a trend. This is not the
last part of a bull market, or this is something totally different in my
opinion, and I'm not This isn't this isn't about investment. This is about
watching history happen. And as a matter of fact, I was listening to
a couple of different podcasts and I got on Robert Kiyosaki's Twitter and I was
thinking, this is what I'm watching, especially with some of the gold analysis.
This is like the Twilight Zone when he says in the opening, there's
a signpost on the road ahead. We're watching the signposts the outer limits where
we control the vertical, we control the horsell. We are completely in control
of everything, and we're going to manipulate it, and we'll have our media
come in. I'm looking at this headline who says this is from the hill.
FED keeps rates at a twenty two year high as inflation retreats. Yeah,
I guess all the inflation retreated between December the first and December the thirteenth,
Right, they it all just went away, So we can completely change
it. And it has nothing to do with an election year, right,
nothing, nothing, whatsoever it's very malleable, very transitory. Actually it's terminal,
and I think this is what we're going to keep watch. This is
going to be ugly. I had somebody comment on my ex and I get
so, I don't know what I'm supposed to call the thing anymore. It's
Twitter, you know. Somebody at mentioned means and off of one of our
interviews, and they was talking about, you know, gold is manipulated and
you don't talk enough about BTC. And it wasn't a it was a friendly
tweet, and I said, well, actually I love BTC, but there's
gonna be a revaluation soon. I don't know when it's I mean not tomorrow
or next week or this year, but it's coming and it's going to be
ugly. It's not going to be a pretty thing, you know, because
you have year, decades of manipulation behind the gold price versus the dollar.
And it's funny. I want to there's a tweet up on gold Telegraph.
I don't have anything to do with this account, but I find it interesting
and it's it's pretty on point. You can find him on X and he
asked, why doesn't let me find the tweet? It is talking about Jerome
Powell, and it asked him why isn't A journalist asked Jerome Palell why central
banks are buying gold. He says, it's just a pet rock, right,
because the Central Bank of the United States, in the Federal Reserve is
not buying gold. This is a I think this is a huge tell of
what's happening in the world and where we're headed. And again, almost no
major financial network is talking about it. I think it's talk about is the
Sherlock Holmes that the dog that didn't bark? Why aren't you talking? Why
are we focusing so much on these rate cuts? You know? It really
is, it really is amazing, David. I mean, we're watching history
happen and there's just so there's a niche group of people that are an analysts
that are looking at this and wow, I just I get goosebumps thinking about
it. We're really watching and this is happening faster than I haven't even anticipated.
Because you know, you and I we talked about about them lowering rates.
We didn't see it possibly till getting closer to the election summertime twenty twenty
four. No, they're already doing it because I think there's so many economic
indicators that aren't talked about, like the Misis Institute talking about the contraction of
the actual money supply contracting faster since anytime since the Great Depression. Those are
indicators of an economy that's dying. And you have hundreds, hundreds of zombie
corporations that are left over, not only from two thousand and eight, but
from the scandemic from they're propped up. You know, you were just you
were just hinting and talking about ESG and environmental social governance and how that all
of those those policies are linked to the Federal Reserve and the Central Bank,
that those relationships are what keep these zombie corporations life. You have, so
you have possibly hundreds of systemic failures that could be going on simultaneously in the
economy if the dollar loses its grip anywhere, and so it's not good.
I wouldn't be I wouldn't find this a Christmas rally, h I would.
I would. I would think of it as a good time to exit in
my opinion. Yeah, you know, you look at the establishment press,
like I said, the Hill of Washington posts. Oh yeah, we've we've
beaten inflation, now it's like, are you serious, and we talk about
that that policy of gradual inflation, which is now accelerated significantly. You held
out that coin. When was that You said it was from the nineteen thirties.
That coin, it's a it's a nineteen oh nine nineteen. I wish
we had a better camera. It's a nineteen nine two and a half dollar
gold Indian. So that's the creation of the Federal Reserve. And what the
Federal Reserve has done is get rid of ninety nine percent of value of the
dollar. It's not a way for us. It keeps people from being able
to really accumulate wealth, and because they are anxious to be able to pay
this back, to monetize the debt by saying, well, with inflation,
we can pay it back with cheaper dollars. But they don't even have to
worry about that. As long as they've got this fiat currency, they can
just keep printing. And so when you tell people don't worry, the Federal
Reserve is going to rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic, and you know,
everybody just parties on and so you see the Drudge Report, there's a
big champagne glass up at the top. Let's party on. It's like it's
nineteen ninety nine. There's absolutely no concern about these people going to bring down
inflation without triggering a recession, says Washington Post. Well, good luck with
I hope that's true. But my concern again is, you know, when
you look at the long term value, you look at what the goal does
hold its value long term. But the other thing about it is that we've
got to get out of the dollar system because the CBDC. Now you mentioned
bitcoin. I've talked earlier this week about how focused they are on bitcoin,
and in terms of manipulating markets. They can manipulate and they do the gold
of silver market, but they also manipulate the bitcoin market as well. It's
got a small market cap for these people, very easy for these people to
come in and manipulate it, and they've got all kinds of tools at their
disposal. It could be anything that they're going to do. But Elizabeth Warren
is flat out focused on getting rid of cryptocurrency, and she's got the Biden
administration focused on that with her as well. And if we're not careful,
they're going to come after cash. They'll come after anything that is outside of
their dollar, and so it is important to push back against that. But
it's also important to have a variety of things that are going to be something
that's going to keep you out of this system as they redesign it. And
I like to physically have something in my possession because I'm just too concerned about
what can be done, uh, with crypto and with manipulation. So well,
you have Jamie demon test before Elizabeth Warren, and he's done this many
times. I do not trust this man. He goes out and he'll say
something counter to bitcoin, something derogatory, he'll dismiss it, and then you
find out later that his bank and you know, entities associated with JP Morgan
are buying it. So he's dropping the price. And I don't know how
much of that is built into his testimony, but it's pretty disgusting. And
you know, you you talked about that, the argument, uh that a
lot of crypto people say, well, actually it's the dollar and it's cash.
Yeah, so we should man that. You know, that's not the
answer either. I totally totally get that. Yeah. There's another tweet from
a gold Telegraph I thought was interesting. The Federal Reserve Force forecast three rate
cuts next year as inflation is still way above the target of two percent.
The economic machine is broken. It's starting to make sense why CBDCs are coming
so fast. Yeah. See, this is the controlled demolition to bring in
the central bank digital currency, and they're going to go after bitcoin. I
don't know how much damage they can do to bitcoin, but always look,
this is a slide of hand. Whenever they're going to release something new into
the ecosystem, whether it's a spot bitcoin, ETF or whatever. The Security
Exchange Commission getting all the approvals for the mainline financial behemos to buy in,
always watch for them to try to bring it down first. And I don't
know what that's what they're doing, but it makes sense to me. It's
an old trick. They use it all the time to get their clients in
and then they go out and they cheerlead for it. Bitcoin is it can
be manipulated. It's actually harder to do than gold in my opinion, because
of there it can't be any new bitcoin and put into the system. They
do manipulate it, they do it through the public relations. They do it
through like the testimony in front of Elizabeth Warren in my opinion, and I
don't know what that means. I do like bitcoin, we talk about it.
There's a lot of I loved crypto. I like crypto technology, David,
But again, there's so much volatility over there. I'm not telling anybody
to go get into it. I think it's good to understand. But the
reason that you and I talk every week is because we're not really talking about
investments. We're talking about the overall historical implications of a dying dollar. We
don't want that. You and I don't want that to happen, because it's
going to hurt people. But we're trying to get people that are listening and
our tuning in that are aware that getting outside of the system is the answer.
Having physical things that you trade that are outside of the banking system because
the banking system is very volatile. I never tell people to close out their
accounts, but you need to be aware that there's things that could happen in
this country, like bail ends, freeze in your account. There is a
little known bit of history after the two thousand and eight two thousand and nine
crash, the debacle where we had TARP funds. Just after that, David
I watched This was on sixty minutes and it just didn't get a lot of
coverage. But you would have teams of people from the FDIC that would go
in at night and take over a bank where the uniforms they would let everybody
go and they would have the uniforms on they would take over the bank.
Those banks were repatriated, basically nationalized by the FDIC, major banks all over
the country, and they did this quietly as to not cause a banking panic.
This happened all over the They would secretly, so you would go and
your bank would still be open, and you think you're talking, but there
was all the tellers and everybody operating. There were FDIC employees. Wow,
wow, that's amazing. Well, you know, it is interesting because when
we look at we look at Jamie demon and of course he's the CEO of
JP Morgan, but he's acting exactly like the namesake of it, you know,
like JP Moore himself, as he's manipulating these things and lying to people
as people pointed out that oh okay, so uh crypto is for criminals.
Is that why you've got your own coin? And as far as criminals,
look at the billions of dollars that you've had to pay in criminal fines and
other things like that. But at the same time, when you look at
the way JP Morgan his namesake, manipulate the financial system, got us Federal
Reserve and everything, there's now this thing. I don't know if you this
is the first time I saw this, Tony. They started talking about this
in July, the basil three in game regulations on the well, does that
sound like that's something from the Bank of International Settlements, And yeah, it
is, and it's under the guys Tony of saying we're going to take care
of we've got to control these big banks because they're dangerous, right, and
so we've got to have if you've got assets of one hundred billion dollars or
more, we're going to put some other capital, some additional capital requirements on
you. And of course, the people who are pushing this new stuff.
Daily Caller has got an article about it. The people who are pushing it
are the people like Elizabeth Warren, JP Morgan, these other people. They
keep saying, well, we've got to get these big banks under control,
and so we're going to create the Consumer Financial Protection Board. And yet what
did that do that made it impossible for the small and medium sized banks to
do business. That made it harder for small businesses to get loans and things
like that. This is they call it indgame. That's what they call it,
bazl three in game regulations and the endgame is I think they want to
end small business and small banks because that's what this is going to do.
They're going to double the capital requirements for that, which means that they're going
to go up in interest rates for everybody, and it's going to put some
of these smaller banks out of business. So just arbitrarily raise the regulations and
the capital requirements. Sorry, you don't meet that anymore. And that's the
way they bring in the FDIC goons to shut them down. Well, it's
just like to go back to history. The crash of nineteen oh seven was
orchestrated to help the public opinion turn towards a new central bank. Of course
they didn't call it that. They had the meeting at Jackyl Island on November
twenty second, nineteen ten. Funny thing about JP Morgan too, it is
something I noticed. His life span. He was born in eighteen thirty seven.
His lifespan was the exact amount of time that we didn't have a central
bank. He died in nineteen thirteen, so it was from the year one
of not having a central bank. Andrew Jackson said, I killed the bank.
He wanted that on his tombstone. He called him adena vipers and thieves
and got rid of the bank. And we didn't have one from eighteen thirty
seven to nineteen thirteen, and always a crisis was used to precipitate the will
to do that. And they actually they had some real skullduggery setting that up
too, David. I mean, I know your documentary. It's a wonderful
lie. It's coming up on that time of year again. I did it
through on Christmas Eve actually December twenty coming into the twenty third, twenty fourth,
when Congress went home. They used a lot of skull and they actually
opposed it. Those who had written the bill, like Aldridge, opposed that
sort of it's too strong, it's too regulatory. It's very very brilliant the
way that they did that. And I think this is what you're more and
more consolidation. And if you study, you know, a conspiracy, if
you want to call it that, If you want to study the conspiracy theory
of history. It's all about consolidation. So it would make sense that the
Bank International Bank of Banks is the BIS. And as a matter of fact,
a little known fact, the gold that was turned in in nineteen thirty
three when Franklin Roosevelt said turn in your gold, you know, had the
price of gold at twenty dollars an ounce and once he accumulated all that he
figured he was going to get, they raised the price of thirty five dollars
announce. Well, that gold went to Boso, Switzerland, to the Bank
of International Settlements. Yeah, they put in the seal train with Vladimir Lemon
that they were waiting for it. I waited a few more years. Yeah,
that's right. They had they had to fund communism, that's true.
Yeah, it truly is amazing. You know what it really is a den
of vipers and thieves. And Andrew Jackson was right about that, wasn't he.
And it is amazing. You know. David Stockman when I talked to
him, and he's written subsequent articles about this as well, the destruction of
the American middle class. If you divided it out, we just had a
congressman say, well, you know it's a It divides out to one hundred
thousand dollars debt per American that we've got out here, and he says,
when you look at the fact that you had this massive quantitative easing, the
lowering of interest rates and all the rest of this stuff, and look at
how that transferred money to the upper smallest percentage, the one percent or the
one percent of the one percent, the zero point one percent, and how
much wealth they gained at the expense of other people because they're in the stock
market. It's one of the reasons I guess that Trump and Biden constantly talk
about the stock market. That is their metric for success. That's a big
part of the wealth transfer when they pump that up. But as he's pointing
out, this is destroying the middle class. And it's not just the quantitative
easing and the interest rates and other things like that, but it was also
the Trump trillions that were put in there with the COVID stuff. That's what
David Stockman talked about when he came on here talking about that, and he's
got a book coming out in January talking about how, you know, Trump
disrupted the economy and he calls it the war on capitalism, and it truly
was a war on capitalism because you're not even going to really be a good
thing for the economy. Even through the stock market, it's just a temporary
sugar high. What they're doing is by laying this kind of debt across society,
they really are enslaving us and taking away everything out of the society.
And so this is something that's going to continue. And we've seen with all
of the debt policies, we've seen how gold is kind of hung in there.
But again, the thing I keep coming back to is the letely restructure
the financial system and to you know, to completely restructure that with CBDC.
So my instinct is to hang on to something that is physical and traditional and
that has really been there for a long time. Talk a little bit about
silver. You know, everybody keeps talking about how silver is down at such
a small ratio. Has there been any move in silver recent layer any indication
of a silver changing. We saw some we saw a bitcoin go up,
we saw gold go up in response to this news and interest rates who are
going to go down because everybody saw that as being inflationary. What about silver
is that moved at all? Not like it should. Yeah, I mean
looking at goldprice dot Org right now, and so I can keep the spot
prices rotating twenty four dollars and seventeen cents, So twenty four seventeen Luciferian bankster
notes make one Detroit ounce of silver on the spot the global spot price.
That is cheap and historically had to get my calculator out, but I think
we're probably like eight It takes like eighties seven or so ounces of silver to
make one ounce of gold, and all throughout human history that number has been
completely different. So even going back to ancient Rome and the Egyptians, it's
usually ten to fifteen to maybe sometimes twenty to one at the most. And
only in our era where you have maybe error. Only in our error,
when we have central banking and the markets are so skewed and value so skewed
and we really don't know what houses any value, do you jump to crazy
numbers like eighty seven ounces of silver to make one ounce of gold. That
makes no sense. I mean, even geologically, David, it takes us
seventeen ounces of silver for every one ounce of gold estimated in the ground,
So why would you have in the third dimension like right, you know,
developed mind and process, How can it be eighty seven? During the crash
and scandemic beginning of a first quarter of twenty twenty, it was one hundred
and twenty five ounces to one ounce of gold. So it doesn't make any
sense when you have you know, I was one years old and it was
a fifty dollars an ounce. Not again, Wow, almost forty four years
ago, Wow it was it was fifty dollars an ounce. That makes no
sense, knowing what we know about the debasement of the dollar. The debt
of the US at the time was less than a trillion. We're at thirty
three point five trillion and climbing rapidly. We have one hundred and thirty percent
debt to GDP ratio. Why is silver so cheap? These are open,
especially when it's the most thermoconductive metal. I'm a cheerleader or silver, not
even as an investment, but just look how crazy that number is. It's
so cheap right now, but you still won't find mainstream analysts talking about it
because there's something wrong with it. And I do know that. You talk
about Jamie Demon who's the largest holder of silver in the world, it's JP
Morgan. He's waiting for something to happen, isn't me Well, and they're
accumulating the physical. Yeah that's right. Yeah, that's interesting. I guess
maybe we should start looking at what he accumulates rather than looking at what Nancy
Pelosi has been a good bell weather her husband, his portfolio. You know,
if you mirrored him in the stock market, you'd do pretty well.
But exactly he's hammered away at it. So yeah, maybe it's a JP
Morgan that you need to look at. Tell us a little bit about what
is happening as we run up into Christmas. We talked a little bit about
it last week. When you're on you've got some commemorative things there perhaps and
some other gifts are what could what kind of gift ideas do you have at
wisewolf dot goal. Well, we definitely anything that you need for gold and
silver a week you can buy direct through Davidnight dot Gold. But we also
have our membership program and as little as thirty five dollars a month or just
one time purchase, you can get Wolf cub and that's for kids. And
Melissa put together a great newsletter actually, and the team helped to. We
have a newsletter for wolf Cub and it tells a story. It has some
crossword puzzles. Yours truly did the questions for the crosswords, like fiat is
you know fake? You can look that up. Don't want to ruin the
crossward, but you could. And it's good for it's fun for kids.
And we're going to be putting next year. I got a lot of attention
I'm going to pay to the wolf Cub for you know, just history,
different types of coins, even stuff like you know the Indian had pennies and
things that are neat you because those are still Copper is going to be in
the news, I promise you next year, folks, all the precious metals
will be the resources will be there, but we're focusing on gold and silver.
Wolf Pack has so many great things happening right now. I'm going to
be putting in some Christmas rounds. I know those are already going out one
ounce Christmas commemorative silver rounds and fractional coins. And we stayed ahead of the
market. We bought some gold early, so we've still got supply on some
of the fractional stuff. But the plan is and we're really thankful is to
grow next year, continue to add members so we can buy collectively for everyone,
better deals and better supply. So that's my goal right now. I'm
kind of floating back between Branson and North Texas with our two locations and just
keeping the supply chain opens. It's not as easy as it may sound.
There's not a lot of availability and product like there used to be when I
started this business. I imagine, so well, it's always great to talk
to you, and again, David Knightdye Gold, Tony has set that up
to take you to Wisewolf dot Gold and he's got some great programs there where
you can do this gradually, where you can train kids with a wolf pack,
and we can also get information because he's building a little community there.
You get information exchanging it with other people as well as gradually saving. But
of course he can get you gold and silver in any quantity large or small,
and that's one of the key things about that. Tony is always great
talking to you, and again, nobody knows what the future is going to
be, but we need to do what we can. I'm as I the
older I get, the more conservative I get, because you know, when
you're young. You make a lot of mistakes, don't you. So it's
uh. I've had experiences with some of the some of the more speculative investments.
That's why I get more conservative as I get older. It is so
good to talk to you. And again, David Night, I go old
to take you to Tony and let him know that you came through us.
Thank you so much. Tony appreciate it. Thank you, David appreciate Okay,
folks are going to be right back here news now at apsradionews dot com
or get the APS radio app and never miss another story. And now the
David Night Show. Well, I've got a couple of comments here on rock
fan Wes Robertson says Ken Stars Vaudevillian shtick was a smoke screen behide the fact
that Slick Willie was involved in the biggest tech transfer to China and US sistory.
Yeah. Absolutely. I remember when Russill and Lindball used to have he
had that guy that did parody songs, he did secret Asian man Johnny Wong
and transferring all that stuff to China. Interesting that everybody knew that, Interesting
that nothing was ever done about that. You know again, Ken Starr is
not going to do anything about it. They might impeach him, but they're
not going to bring up the big issues like that. We see the same
thing. We see history repeating itself now as well. On Rumble I Believe
the Kid Part two, Hobby Lobby has black Santa Claus for sale to show
that they're not racist. That's exactly right, yeah, Hobby Lobby. And
of course, you know, as Megan Kelly told us, we all know
that Santa Claus is white. What else do we know for sure about Santa
Claus. It's crazy, But anyway, And on rock Fan, Jason Parker,
thank you very much for the tip. He says, your album is
great. David, thank you for the beautiful music. Well, thank you
for the compliment. I really do appreciate it and for the tip. And
by the way, folks, the album is at the David Knightshow dot com
and if you go to the merchandise thing you'll see it is available as a
digital download, So please tell your friends about it if you like it.
We would appreciate that, especially as you come up in the Christmas season.
Everybody has these are traditional songs, but we've got a little bit different take
on it and reorchestrate it, reimagine that. So it's a little bit.
It kind of freshens up the classics that are there, and you know,
we all listen to it's nice to have the nostalgic songs that you listen to,
but it's also nice to hear them in a little bit different way.
And as you listen to Christmas music, you may want to have something's going
to freshen up a little bit and maybe it'll become a new tradition for you.
Let's talk a little bit about what's going on with politics. We've got
Marjorie Taylor Green warns that Maga would revolt. That's what she says if if
Haley is Nicky or Nuki. Haley has made the vice presidential candidate for the
Trump ticket, and she says MAGA would revolt if Nicky Haley were to be
even be given an internship and Trump's next administration. I don't understand why they
didn't have any problem with all the cabinet picks that he had in the first
place, But why are they so concerned about Nicki Haley. They're as vice
president. Trump already made Fauci president in twenty twenty. Did they not notice
that? How many times have I said that Trump stepped down and made Fauci
the president do what he says. He's going to determine everything that's going to
happen. We're going to be ruled by bueracrats. I said that when we
were running up to the election in twenty twenty, I said, why would
I care about the election? Trump turned us over to the bureaucracy, you
know, being ruled by bureaucrats with Fauci as president, So why do I
care about any of this stuff? But of course MAGA, which hated all
that, hated the lockdown, hated the vaccine, hated the mask, all
the rest of the stuff. Ohe but they loved Trump, but he made
Fauci president. I wouldn't be surprised at all if he did the same thing
with Nicki Haley. Marjorie Taylor Green goes on to say she represents the neo
Khon establishment of America, last wing of the Republican of the America, last
wing of the Republican Party that we are absolutely done with. Well, I
think she looks just like Trump's cabinet. As a matter of fact, Trump
picked her, and I remember you know off Air, I said to Roger
Stone, said, why in the world would Trump ever put Nicki Haley in
for anything, put her in as UN ambassador. I said, this is
typical of what he has done with everybody in his cabinet. He put Neo
Khon warmongers in generals all over the place. He put Goldman Sachs bankers in
all over the place to run everything. He sold out to the Republican establishment,
he sold out to the neocons, he sold out to the globalists at
Davos, and everything he did in twenty twenty was a sellout to the globalists.
But as all this is happening, he's having a lot of fun,
and so are his supporters with the dick comments, people saying, oh he
wants to be a dictator or anything. Yeah, I'll be a dictator before
day and all the rest of the stuff. So they love it. He's
joking about it. The problem is, as I said, just like with
Nikki Haley, oh he's going to make our vice president. He made Fauci
present, He's going to be a dictator. Did you not notice what happened
in twenty twenty, how they were dictating everything and of course they are clever
about it, clever enough to say that we're not going to issue the orders
directly. We're going to make recommendations and suggestions, and then if you don't
follow our recommendations and suggestions, we'll take that money away. It's kind of
like what we were talking about before with social media. Well it's a nice
social media company you got there. It'd be a shame if anything were to
happen to it. And so they come in and say, well, that's
a nice program you got funded by the federal government. It'd be a shame
if anything were to happen to it. That's the way they do this.
And so Trump is in Iowa. He's very angry because the governor there,
Kim Reynolds, has endorsed DeSantis, and so he's there at Israellies crashing her.
What he says is, we love loyalty. We we I love how
these politicians refer themselves as we we love loyalty. As a matter of fact,
that's the only thing he cares about. When the oppositional mainstream press is
looking at him, they say, well, look he's gonna he's going to
fill his cabinet with loyalists. And as I said the other day, I
said, don't they all. I mean, they all do that, But
nobody loves loyalty and demands loyalty more than Trump does. It's the only thing
he cares about. And he says, we love loyalty, portrayed Reynolds as
unfaithful to him, and he says she's the least popular governor in the country.
But I will be your ethanol champion. As I said, I went
to a convention of think tanks when I was doing the kind of work that
showed you earlier, and one of the things they had there, they said,
we're going to have a party. It's going to be done as a
speak easy and if you want to get in, you knock on the door
and we'll open up the little thing. And you say, I'm here for
the ethanol subsidy, Well, maybe that needs to be prohibited, these ethanol
subs everybody understands that it's a bad thing, but this is one of the
things that the Republican Party they'd like to defeat at that troth for the climate
stuff. Even the typical climate grifters and the Democrat Party don't even like the
ethanol thing. But the farmers and Iowa like it. It's a payoff to
them. But when we talk about grifting, Trump's got a legal defense fund
and it's raised not as much money as he would have liked to have raised.
His defense fund has only raised one point six million dollars over the last
six months. They've spent though, less than thirty thousand dollars, so they're
hanging on to the money. But almost all the money that they have spent
has been on mar A Lago. Not that he's paying his mortgage, but
I guess in no sense he is, because he's held some lavish parties at
mar A Lago and Trump used the donated money from his legal defense fund to
pay for these parties at mar A Lago. So in a sense, what
he's doing is he's laundering the payments back to himself. No problem, right.
A grifter is going to grift. That's what he's always That's what he
did with Save America. He made two hundred and fifty million dollars off of
his supporters after the election, where he changed the rules for he made sure
that it was going to be a mail in election, and he made two
unred and fifty million dollars off of that Save America thing. I don't know
how much money Alex Jones made off of Stop the Steal, but he made
two hundred fifty million dollars and so now he's up to it again. He
raised one point six million dollars and he's paying for parties at mar A Lago.
The group that put this together is a political nonprofit called the Patriot Legal
Defense Fund, except they're not paying any defense legal expenses for the patriots.
January sixth, I thought Trump loved loyalty. Is he loyal to those people
whose pockets he picked, who he sent into a trap? Yeah, it's
the Democrats who laid the trap. He's the one who pushed the people into
it. So the first periodic financial report they submitted to the IRS on Wednesday,
so they only got one point six million in receipts, and about a
million of that came from one group. One couple gave him a million dollars.
There's somebody who has been connected with QAnon as well, and so I
got six hundred thousand dollars for receipts. But even though they haven't spent too
much money, most of the money that they have spent again, they spent
twenty eight thousand dollars, but eighteen thousand of that, the major already of
it was to rent a banquet hall from Trump at mar a Lago back in
November. And so not a penny for the January six ers. And this
Patriot Legal Defense funds, by the way, you know, so he takes
in twenty eight thousand, he spends eighteen thousand on a party there that he
pays himself for the party. Amazing. Yeah, let's have a party,
and it's going to cost me eighteen thousand dollars and I'll take that money on
my legal defense fund. And so you say, okay, So he spent
ten thousand dollars on legal defense and eighteen thousand on a party at mar Lago.
No, he didn't send this spend a single penny on legal defense.
I don't know what he spent the other ten thousand on. They don't say
here, but the fund reported no legal expenses. The Legal Defense Fund did
not spend a penny on legal defenses, but did spend nearly twenty thousand dollars
on a party at mar Lago. And this is really again when you when
you look at Trump and how obsessed he is with money, with loyalty,
with these other things. Had absolutely no loyalty to his co defendants in the
Georgia thing, And even if he doesn't really like them, it wasn't a
smart move to not give them any money at all for their defense fund.
And he didn't give any money to Rudy Giuliani, he didn't give any money
to Jenna Ellis or any of the other people there. And so a lot
of people have said that's that's not a good harbinger of what's going to happen,
because if these people are left on their own defend for themselves with any
money for their legal defense, they might just turn against him, which Jenna
Ellis appears to have done. So. The million dollar donor was a foundation,
a living trust. Court records show that it belongs to a couple.
His name is Borlan ardent supporters for q Andon, and because of that,
the Trump campaign canceled a fundraiser back in October twenty twenty because at that point
time they didn't want to be affiliated with q Andon. But now the Borlands
are back and gave a million of the one point six million dollars in his
defense fund to him, but again not paying a single penny for in legal
expenses. The Supreme Court is agreeing to here a January the sixth case that
could affect Trump's prosecution. This is not something he's directly brought, but we've
seen a lot of people who were charged with obstructing an official proceeding, looking
at long jail sentences, and so several of these people have appealed to the
Supreme Court, as they should. It's an injustice, it truly is.
And so in one of these cases they have agreed to here, the one
of Joseph Fischer seeking to dismissed a charge accusing him of obstructing an official proceeding.
If he wins or loses, either way, it's going to affect the
others who have brought this up. Fisher, by the way, has a
federal public defender because you know, he's got no money. He doesn't have
a legal defense fund like Trump does. And again Trump loves loyalty, but
only in one direction, only if that loyalty is to him. So he's
got a public defender who is taking this to the Supreme Court. I hope
he wins, but again, just having a lot of money for lawyers as
Trump does, doesn't necessarily mean you got the judgment to pick a good lawyer.
So, as we're talking about legal issues and the impeachment of Biden,
which just took the next step, it was now we have an inquiry that
has now been authorized by the House. Mike Johnson has said from the very
beginning that not only were they going to do an impeachment to investigation of Biden
or an impeachment of Biden, but he said it was actually required because of
his crimes. But again, the crimes that he's focused on are not the
crimes against Americans. Really, they are the crimes against his political opponents,
the graft and the corruption which we all knew about before the twenty twenty election,
but they played a lot of games to cover that up. And I
think that this is also a distraction again from this seven oh two, which
many of us see as a betrayal of the Fourth Amendment and the American voters.
But we'll see what happens with that. That's still in the works,
but it's also going to be a distraction away from these twenty twenty politics and
policies that they had a hand in. And nobody's going to bring any charges
for that. He deserved this a long time ago. But there's a lot
more important crimes than what they're going to be coming after him for. Just
like we talked about with Ken Starr doing a pass and all this stuff.
A two twenty one to two twelve vote along party lines. Some people evidently
not there. So far, the inquiry has been too pronged, one of
them looking at the Biden family's financial crimes, the other one on the weaponization
of the Justice Department and the FBI against Americans, perhaps against January six ers
or whatever. But we'll wait and see exactly how far that goes and how
broad that goes. The Biden administration, like the Trump administration before, it
has been so contemptuous and again doing gun control by executive order, piggybacking on
to the president that Trump did. The Unit Party has never been more unified.
Quite frankly, we're very divided on personality, but you know, in
terms of the policy on the existential issues there, they're all together on that.
And so as you look at the inquiry, it looks like this is
going to be something that's just going to be election to your politics. I
don't think there's anything that's going to come out of it other than that.
Hunter Biden was very defiant about this. He gave a speech in Capitol Hill.
He goes to the Capitol, but he doesn't go inside. He's subpoenaed
to participate in deposition for part of a congressional hearing. Instead, he shows
up at the Capitol says, I'm not going to go there. This Trump
attack machine is after me, but I'm standing right here. And the leftist
media was eating that up. Media Height is a story that you're looking at
there. Look at that headline and a stunning news conference. I watched it.
It was just boiler plate speech that was written for him by his daddy's
speech writers, and it was totally nonsense. But you know again, Mediaite
does this story on it. Trudge features that I'm here today to acknowledge I've
made mistakes in my life and I've wasted opportunities and privileges that I was afforded,
and for that I'm responsible for that, I'm accountable, and for that
I'm making amends. What is he doing. I don't know what he's doing
to make amends. Maybe Tucker could fill us in, because they're such good
friends. But I'm also here today to correct how Maga the Maga write has
betrayed me for their political purposes. I am first and foremost a son,
a father or brother, a husband from a loving and supportive family. This
reminds me. I talked about Gilbert Sullivan the other day. Reminds me of
the Pirates of Penzance. You know, they have the policeman out there.
When a criminal is not a Berglan, he's you know, he's he's contemplating
the brooks and he's thinking about his mother and all the rest of this stuff.
I mean, that's kind. He's just I'm just I'm just human like
you. And of course he is. But he says, I'm proud to
have earned degrees from Georgetown University and Yale, and I'm proud of my legal
career, my business career. And so you've got Breitbart. Nolty says,
yeah, I'm a victim. He says, this guy is a victim.
He refused to pay child support even while he was spending nearly a million dollars
on sex and drugs, eight hundred and seventy two thousand dollars on hookers,
on porn, and on sex clubs. While he fought tooth and nail to
not pay any child support for his baby daughter. Yeah, so I don't
know when he says he's going to make amends, is he going to start
paying us some child support? About this stuff? So the media is quickly
backfilling on it, though. The New York Times is fixing up the quotes
from Hunter Biden about financial involvement and business deals. We saw as Comer was
coming out of the meeting, he was challenged and debated by a reporter from
the Washington Post kind of as a self appointed lawyer. They're going to do
everything they can to defend this criminal family, and the Republicans are not going
to focus on the big crimes. We'll be right back here news Now at
apsradionews dot com or get the APS radio app and never miss another story.
You're listening to the David Knight Show. All right, let's talk a little
bit about what is going on with the pharmaceutical wars. I had this from
a listener who said, just catching up on some of the show, heard
about your blood pressure and rhythm rhythmic issues, and I just tell everybody went
to the doctor. Things are looking better, he says. I don't have
any advice other than avoid most doctors and hospitals if if possible. And of
course it's coming from Handy, who is who works in EMA, he says.
He says, prayer and knowing, no matter what happens to this body,
Jesus will keep us is the best medicine that money can't buy. And
you're absolutely right, Handy. But then he also says this about the jabs.
He says people are still occasionally dropping dead here. He says, I
think you're spot on regarding these jabs. He said, more sick and dead
people and way less ob calls. It's the new normal. I saw a
sixty year old male a few years a few days ago who died while playing
golf. He looked at be in great physical condition from what I could see.
Another crew brought him into the er while I was dropping off a patient.
He says. I did ask the other crew if he took the vaccine,
and the other crew said, well, we don't know, but probably
you see they know as well. These are people. This is another crew.
They're all working ams and they see this stuff happening all time. Everybody
knows what's happening with this. Why is it that Trump and Biden are leading
the charge and all this, and why is it that we only have people
who are the ones who've been pushing this stuff from the day one. Well,
we know why. A Green Beray veteran talks about the Army's letter to
soldiers being discharged again. You know, they're desperate on recruiting, and they
made some gestures that might be interpreted by some people as wanting to pull this
stuff back. But he's not buying it, he said. Last month,
the Army sent a letter two thousands of soldiers discharge for refusing to comply with
a shot mandate. He said the former soldiers who are involuntarily separated may request
a correction for the military records. But he says it also states that individuals
who desire to apply to return to service should contact their local recruiter. So,
he says, the letter itself doesn't actually offer any policy change. Instead,
the Army talks about how proud it is of what they did, reiterates
tries to evidently justify what they did. He says, reiterates policies the Army
issued back in March of twenty twenty three. More importantly, there is no
actual apology. In fact, it's quite the opposite. They say, we
remain proud of the army's response to the pandemic. Don't put your people,
don't put yourself under people like this. They don't have the country's best interest
at heart, as we see with what is happening with the wars everywhere with
the Pentagon is pushing and they certainly don't have the best interest of their own
soldiers at heart, do they, he says this former Greenbrae says this is
absurd. He said these policies of the army is proud of led them to
kick out around two thousand soldiers, to mistreat many others, to deny soldiers
their First Amendment religious freedoms, to coerce them to take what lawyers have argued
was an experimental drug that potentially left many injured by the vaccines. What they're
so proud of was that they ignored basic common sense. They threatened and often
destroyed the livelihoods of soldiers who volunteered to defend this nation and the constitution.
Even with their lives well, I think we could also add that not only
were many injured, but he died and these people destroyed the constitution and they
destroyed their military readiness, which they're now trying to clamor back. This's why
they and a lot of the hospitals who kicked people out because they mandated these
vaccines either get this or leave. All right, I'll leave now. They're
desperate to have these people back because they decimated their institutions. He says.
The unvaccinated were forced to wear masks, not allowed to use gems during certain
hours designated only by the vaccinated for the vaccinated, and were subjected to weekly
invasive COVID tests. These individuals were times put into quarantine for extended periods,
not allowed to leave their barracks or their ships, and in some training environments,
unvaccinated soldiers were required to wear red wrist bands that said unvaccinated and red
tape on their gear to indicate that their gear even was somehow unclean. And
so this guy who was in the army says, this is exactly the opposite
of what you want to do. You want to try to create cohesiveness and
a team. He said, these tactics, these policies pitted service members against
one another when it is vital that service members have had had too will have
each other's backs in times of war. This is one of the reasons why
they said they were putting in high heels and let them walk around so they
would get used to women and trainees and all the rest of this stuff.
We've got to have cohesiveness, you know, you got to walk a mile
in their red high heels, that type of thing. And yet they did
just the opposite of all that with the vaccines, because that was not what
that agenda was about at all. It wasn't about creating cohesiveness. It's not
about military readiness readiness. As a matter of fact, the d MED database
was about military readiness and it was to monitor if that was being impacted with
a biological or chemical attack. It showed the truth, and they knew that
the bioweapon, that the biological attack was the JAB, and so they modified
the database. The DoD made it extremely difficult for the unvaccinated to progress in
their career. These policies seemed to punish the unvaccinated. That's what JAB send
to Arden said. Looks like you're trying to create two classes of people in
society. Yep, that's what it is. Yeah, yeah, yes,
he smiles and laughs about that. Religious exemptions were either blanketly ignored or denied,
which is an absolute denial of our First Amendment rights of freedom were worshiped
and a violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The Army ignored its own
medical policy. They did not accept medical exemptions based on prior immunity or infection.
They contradicted their policy. And he quotes the Army regulation here, and
so you know, two thousand in the army, but over eight thousand service
members were discharged. Many of those kicked out did not get an honorable discharge,
but rather a general discharge, which means that they don't get all their
VA benefits, they don't get their educational benefits, they don't It affects their
job applications, especially if they want to get a job within the government,
which I think, even though for their own purposes, understand that's difficult on
them. But in a sense, I think that as a silver lining for
the rest of us, because we need good people. We need good people
who have a backbone, who have a conscience, who will stand up to
an agenda like this. We need those people outside of this corrupt enemy of
the American people, the government. And so in a sense, I think
it's better for society if not for these individuals that they are not eligible for.
You know, you get special preference if you're in the military, if
you want to get a job for the federal government. But it's good that
we have these people outside of the federal government. It is not just the
military. It says they're responsible for this treatment. Members of Congress, and
he's right about that. Are they going to investigate themselves? Now? As
a matter of fact, they don't want to talk about Trump or Biden or
any of that because again, it's going to come back to them. So
Congress is going to be quiet about this. Republican and Democrat understand that most
of if not all, of the members of Congress who sat by and rubber
stamped all this stuff for Trump and for Biden are still there. Most of
the people who were there did rubber stamp this. They didn't come in that
recently. And about the only person who stood up to any of this stuff
was Thomas Massey, and Trump wanted to end his career, was furious at
him. He said, no, I want people to go on the record
about this. This is ridiculous to spend four trillion dollars and the other things
that are being done. Members of Congress are told by their constituents what was
happening to those in the armed forces. Yet for years, the majority of
those who vocally praise service members and thank them for their service, weren't there
to advocate for these people. Yeah, just like Sean Hannity. You know,
I am so sick of that guy. What a hypocrite he is.
And of course he's now become a hypocrite on other pro life issues as well.
He doesn't care about the lives of the military. Every time you get
somebody on, oh, thank you for your service if they're in the military,
and yet he's the first person I want to send them off to war.
He talks about being pro life, and yet oh, these babies getting
in the way of our election. Let's get rid of these babies. So
how do we fix this, says the Green bray Leary says, well,
because DoD leadership has proven ineffective at policing itself, Congress has to step up
and they have to hold military leaders accountable. So they'll have more hearings,
more grand standing perhaps, but they'll do nothing. And it's not just the
Department of Defense leadership that was ineffective, but as he points out, Congress
was as well. Congress didn't do anything. So we've got to get you
something. That's why I say the federal government is done focused locally. That's
where you still have a chance, you still have a chance to have an
honest election, you still have a chance to have an effect. And it's
where your vote is going to be the least diluted of all things. Where
it's the most diluted of all things, is the federal government, if it's
even counted. Representatives must also hold regional hearings on this topic, he said,
and so we need to. He talks about the people that were kicked
out. He calls them involuntary veterans, kicked out before they wanted to retire.
So he said, they need to get active. They need to talk
about this, and I agree. I think everybody needs to push back on
this. I don't think that you know anything's going to be done, but
we need not be silent about it because who knows, you know, it's
when we're talking about this, we're not really expecting that the congressmen and women
or the president are going to do anything about it, but we're actually talking
to our fellow citizens and trying to educate them as to what's going on.
That's the real issue here. It's waking up that critical mass. We're not
going to get these These politicians are not asleep. They're corrupt, and so
we need to wake up the people who are asleep and not paying any attention
to the people who have been lied to by the media. There must be
a and zeropology, he said, I guarantee that something like this will never
happen again. Well, that would be nice, not only from the Pentagon,
but from all these politicians at every level, including the guys who are
now the front runners for presidency. Half the population thinks that masks should be
mandatory on public transportation in the UK, and one fifth of them want a
lockdown right now, right now. Isn't that amazing. That's how effective this
propaganda has been. And they knew they could do it, you know,
we had. They started doing this back in two thousand and two. I
think there was some flu when you're there's some flu going around, and so
they scared everybody in Asia to death and they all started wearing masks. And
now they still wear masks, and so it's going to be a really large
percentage of the population that is going to continue to do that. In the
UK, it's half of the people forty five percent say that masks should be
mandatory on public transport. And again, this is why we want to have
cars. They really would have locked us down big time if we hadn't had
cars. Cars are the way that we were able to circumvent a lot of
this stuff. But there would have been no travel whatsoever if we were reliant
on public transportation on airports, planes, trains, that type of thing.
Currently, there are no legal COVID nineteen restrictions in place in the UK.
Why is that, Well, it's because there's obviously not a pandemic and nobody
is dying. Nobody was dying when they put these measures in. That's one
of the things we talk about all the time. Isn't it amazing? You
know, China locks us down because you've got to They claim that a couple
hundred people out of one point four billion died with something. We can't verify
that even but they weren't even making a claim of it being an epidemic.
But then every he starts locking it down, and we did that. We
did that, the UK did that locked everybody down when down't nobody was dying,
and so why not lock everybody down when nobody is dying? Forty five
percent support the reimposition of masks, sixteen percent of those saying they strongly support
having to wear face mask on public transport, eight percent strongly recommending the rule
of six, which limits the amount of people who can meet outside. Sounds
like something from the prisoner, doesn't it? The Rule of six? So
millennials are the most likely to back these restrictions. Sorry about that, Travis,
it's your generation, crazy, uh, and so thirty percent of them
want to reintroduce the rule of six. Gen Z comes nextss to people that
are eighteen to twenty four more supportive of the closing of nightclubs. Gen X
aged forty one to fifty five, Baby Boomers fifty six to seventy four,
they're both thirty six. Gen Z supported closing eye clubs twenty seven percent for
both Gen X and Baby boomers. You know, And then they talk about
the Silent generation aged seventy five and up, the least supportive of any of
this stuff, eighty percent of them opposing it. And so when you look
at this, the other thing I think that's interesting about this. They talk
about generational breakdown, demographic breakdown, who supports closing everything down? And the
younger you are, the more susceptible you are to this, because again it's
the brainwashing of the schools. But I think it's interesting that, you know,
as they use all these terminals terminology, they have the silent generation,
the gen X, the baby boomers, all this stuff, but things like
the silent generations that's straight out of the Fourth Turning, Isn't it interesting?
I continually find it interesting that everybody uses the terminology of the Fourth Turning,
and they also know that we're in the midst of a fourth turning, war
and economic unrest, but you know, always economic unrest, usually war,
and all this culminating in twenty thirty, and yet nobody wants to talk about
that. They'll all talk about the demographic breakdown of this stuff, but they
don't want to talk about the overall context of the time that we're in and
how we're in this generational cycle that is happening. They'll talk about the different
generations, but they won't talk about the ultimate truth of where we are in
this, which is the Fourth Turning and it's because the people who are running
the media. And I'm not saying that the Daily Skeptic is necessarily turning away
from this, but again it's the people who run the media, the people
who run the government. They don't really want you to know about this.
So we're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back, and you're
listening to the Days midnight show. Bethany In on Rock Fan, thank you
very much for the tip, She says, thank you for another great show,
David. Merry Christmas, and may God continue to bless you and your
family. Thank you very much. God has really blessed us, and thank
you to all the listeners who have been such a blessing to us. We're
coming up to the third year anniversary. And it was when I got fired.
It really wasn't sure what I was going to do, is I said
before. I really expected to be fired in early November when I started opposing
all this steing stuff and you stop the steal and all the rest of that
stuff. But so you know, I was expecting it then still didn't have
any plans, frankly, but came as a surprise a week before Christmas,
and then we just said people start sending us money. We weren't even on
PayPal at the time, and they sent emails to us, fortunately, and
it was real blessing from God that I didn't have. I had been using
for quite a while a email publicly for people to contact us that was outside
of the email that I had inside info Wars there, so people were able
to send email to us and they just you know, sent money via PayPal
and I didn't know what to do to pick this up. We looked at
it, It's like okay, yeah, and then people started doing that.
So that's when we decided to do the show. And so the first show
we've fired on it. I was fired at why I say we, because
Travis was as well and so and Whistler was doing work for them as well.
So all three of us got the acts and weren't really sure what we
were going to do except move back here was what we wanted to do.
And so again people started sending contributions and we started the program then on that
following Monday, and it's been a real blessing and I thank all of you
for doing that. It's a difficult way to fund this program. We don't
really look for advertisers. We've got a couple, you know, Tony supports
us APS Radio, but for the most part it has been people who have
just voluntarily supported this, and so we really do appreciate that, and the
number of people that download this on a regular basis. We would not be
as rich as Tucker Crosson, but we'd be doing just finebody we knew what
to do with if we had a small fraction of people who download the show
pay for it. But we have a few people who are very loyal and
have really supported us heavily on subscribe Star but also on zell and other places,
and so we really do appreciate that. Thank you very much. MJ.
So remember when Trump would stiff the people that worked for him in Vegas.
Yeah, it was a foreshadowing of what he would do on as January
the sixth, supporters first report that I did on Donald Trump when he became
a candidate. I was not a fan of him from the very beginning.
It's like I felt, like I said before the way Julius soon did.
Julia sign said we know Hillary Clinton as a warmonger or criminal. We don't
know what Trump is. We'll find out, and we found out he's just
like Hillary Clinton. But I did the report about how for one of his
parking lots at one of his casinos in Atlantic City, there was a widow
and he wanted to buy out her house and tear it down for his parking
lot, and she resisted. It was just like Pixar's up, and so
he got the government to condemn her property and shut it down. And before
he could build his parking lot over the house that he had destroyed, he
went declared bankruptcy yet again. I think he had six bankruptcies with his casinos,
and that tells us something about him as well, not just the way
he treated his employees in Vegas, but also the number of bankruptcies he had
there. As I said before, was it the same about somebody's confidency.
If he can't make money with a casino, it's almost as as good as
being able to print money at the Federal Reserve. Of course, they're losing
money too, they say, rumble, stealth patriot. I went to see
two cousins the other day. Both of them had to have a leg amputated
shortly one shortly after the other. I'm sorry to hear that my second cousin
has been bedridden for two years after getting yon Brey syndrome. Yeah, vaccine.
I got it one week after the jab was paralyzed and the neck down.
But now she's beginning to be able to use her hands and arms to
feed herself. I'm so sorry to hear that. You know, when we
look at the sixty minutes report from years ago about the first swine flu and
if you haven't seen that, I've played that a couple of times, but
if you go back and look at it, that was when they had real
reporting from Chris Wallace's father, Mike Wallace, And first of all, he
exposed the whole fraud of that scare and he said, well, we're supposed
to believe that it was some soldier who collapsed, and there was woman who
suffered from Geon Bray syndrome that he was interviewing, and she said, well,
I looked at this, and this was highly publicized by the media.
Here's this young fit soldier. He just collapses and nearly dies. And as
they looked at it, they said, well, you know, this is
a guy who was already you know, in the what they called the Navy
as sick bay. I don't know what they call it in the army,
but he and two other soldiers were sick with the flu and they were there
recuperating, and his commanding officer said, nope, you're going to do the
march anyway, and got him out there. And he got out there and
he collapsed because he had the flu. He just had the flu, and
the he was given mouth to mouth resuscitation by the drill sergeant that was there,
and he didn't get sick. He didn't get sick. The drill sergeant
did. But anyway, they used selective parts of that story to scare people
of death. And so this woman said, so, yeah, I got
it, and she had Gambrace syndrome and it had been a long, long
struggle for her to try to be able to move in a very very limited
way. It's very very crippling. That is something that's been around for these
vaccines always, and I've known people who got the flu shot and got Giambore
syndrome. But this is so much worse. So many different things as well,
and of course the Gambre syndrome is just one of many many things now
and it is quite prevalent with this trump shot as well. The Supreme Court
is going to decide whether not to restrict abortion by pill. That case is
going to be coming before them. The drug mephipristone, if it's the way
you pronounce it, I just call it Mephistopheles, because it's from the devil,
one of the most common abortion methods in the United States. Are going
to rule on that. So the Republicans are waiting and baited breath. They
are scared to death. No, not another abortion decision from the Supreme Court.
And you got the left wing rags are out there, they're very excited
about that. Oh, this is going to be another opportunity for us to
gen things up. And so you've got all of these people in the Republican
Party trying to figure out how they're going to spin this because I said yesterday,
you know, oh the albatross, the albatross around the neck. And
yet there's a Democrat who is using this as an opportunity to show people the
babies that she discovered they were violently murdered, and she found their bodies and
she's got pictures of it, and she's running as a federal candidate for president
so that she can put those ads out and not have them be censored.
Do you know, Travis, did we get censored anywhere for putting that picture
out of that thumbnail? Yeah, I said, let's use that thumbnail that
she's putting out there. I mean, she's going to put it on the
line for that, Let's do it as well. And Travis says, I
don't know. I think that is so brutal. And I said that the
people need to see what the truth is. And so I said, this
is the hill to die on. It really is. And uh so,
but apparently nothing has happened yet. Kelly on Conway is pushing Republicans to embrace
contraception. That's going to be the way that they're going to try to spend
this, perhaps because they don't want to show you the truth about what this
is. They don't want to show you the truth that abortion is violent murder
of a human being. So let's talk about let's let's spend this, let's
redirect people over here to contraception. And culture has gone completely to the other
side here on this issue, siding with the abortion industry's desire to kill unborn
disabled babies, says the Life site news headline. And this after years of
making money as a pro lifer and calling for an end of Roe V Wade
after Roe v Wade ends, and Culture has shown herself to be like some
of these other people, you know, like a blank mass. How he
immediately started scrubbing his website. Oh he's just you know, he's blustering about
what a great supporter he is of life and all the rest of this stuff.
It's like these these videos that you'll see where you've got dogs that are
barking at each other on either side. Oh they're vicious. Oh they're just
going to tear that other dog apart, both of them on either side of
the fence, and you gradually start removing the fence, and they move along
to keep that fence between them, and when the fence is completely removed,
they're like, okay, well never mind. That's the way in Culture and
the GOP are when it comes to this issue and many others. And so
maybe we should call her albatross in because she thinks that, you know,
defending people educating people about this violent murder, she thinks that that's an albatross.
You know what, maybe the people who support the violent murder of babies
for their power and money, maybe they're the albatross do you ever think about
that? Maybe they're the reason we can't have nice things like liberty. They
have sold out. They don't care if babies are ripped to pieces. They
just want their little pathetic prize. Oh look, I won the election.
Well, good for you. What are we back in high school again,
King and Queen of the prom You won the election. Great? What did
you do to get it? You killed somebody. Last month, I highlighted
her relentless campaigns as the writer for life site to blame the pro life movement
for GOP election losses, insisting that abortion was a losing issue and that her
new compromise position, as she put it, was to stop losing elections and
to make abortion an illegal only for registered Republicans quote unquote, that's what she
said. The GOP, she said, should instead stick to a fifteen week
federal ban, if even that much. The rock ribbed pro lifer, it
seems, is only willing to advocate a legal regime significantly more liberal than most
countries in Europe, liberal countries that she has mocked relentlessly for decades. And
that's a good point when you look at what is going on in other countries,
like in France, I think it's twelve weeks, and so you've got
the so called pro life people, so called pro life Christians like Mike Pence
fifteen weeks. That's worse than France. She thinks the GOP must win elections
in order for pro life laws to be possible. Yet she also thinks that
they shouldn't pass those pro life laws because then they could lose the elections.
So there you go. That sums it up completely, doesn't it. Yeah,
we need people who are going to lead, not people who are going
to grift. She says. A pro life movement, said Anne Culter,
has gone from compassion for the child to cruelty to the mother and child.
And she said that in the wake of this situation with the trisomy eighteen and
again, this is a terrible tragedy. But as one mother who had a
child who was born with that disease, and at least I know that I
didn't rip that child apart and I did everything I could for them. So
Life side News, let's be clear here. Culture is saying it's cruel to
protect children in womb if they've been diagnosed with trisomy eighteen, and it's not
cruel to decapitate, dismember, and disembowel those children in an abortion clinic.
She even insinuates that allowing that child to live rather than be killed is also
somehow cruel and repeats the eugenic talking point that such children are not compatible with
life. It is also somehow cruel to the mother. Nobody who believes abortion
kills a child can also believe the things that Coulter just said. After an
entire career of debunking insidious liberal talking points, culture has decided to take their
side when it comes to aborting disabled children. And it's not just Dne Colter
either who has flip flopped on this issue, and the Iowa it's the precious
COVID nineteen and many other things. I don't know why that came up.
I think that got hit by accident. Let's I wanted to pull up what
DeSantis said as he was talking to supporters in Iowa. Here is what he
said about Trump's position on pro life. I think, though, one thing
in this race that I think is important to point out is Donald Trump flip
flopping on the right to life. So if you look in January of twenty
twenty, when he was president, he stood in the March for Life,
and he gave a speech, and if you read that speech, he said
that all life is a gift from God. He compared the unborn child in
the mother's womb to being the image of God. He said it was important
that we have protections in law, and that's what he was saying in January
of twenty twenty. Now he has attack states that have enacted protections like heartbeat
bills as being a terrible, terrible thing. So how do you square that
March for Life speech with now trashing states that have advanced protections that he claimed
to cover. Was he not being honest in January of twenty twenty or has
he just flipped his position to now what he's saying in twenty twenty three.
I think that's a huge problem because we know people come at this from different
angles. It's a big diverse country. There's a lot of division about it.
But you should be consistent in your beliefs, especially on something that's very
fundamental, and he has not been consistent. And I think there's a lot
of voters in Iowa who really care about this who need to know how he's
changed his position. Yeah, that's very true, as a matter of fact,
A life site says, well, it's not just ank. Take a
look at all these people in the GOP, they said. A lot of
people said, the only people who are more afraid of the overturn of Roe
v. Wade prior to it happening. The only people more afraid of that
than the Democrats are the Republicans. They're very afraid of that. And so
they said, take a look at how this is unmasking these GOP hypocrites and
liars, people like Anculter, people like Trump, people like Sean Hannity,
for example, Once Rowe was gone, one of their most reliable vote getters
would be gone, plus a lot of fundraising to boot. And I say,
that is why you see so many Republicans saying, well, we've got
to bring it back to the federal government again. Let's have a national law.
We'll make it fifteen weeks, which is worse than secular France. And
that's the way they're responding to this. And you've got a lot of national
organizations that called themselves pro life that want to do that as well, because
they want to make this a federal issue and they want to keep it there.
And as I've said before. If you make that a federal issue and
you say fifteen weeks, Democrat states say, well, they're going to nullify
that because they can. This isn't something that even the federal government should be
involved in it all, so constitutionally they can nullify it, just like they
nullified prohibition of marijuana. And so the liberal states will nullify that. They'll
abort kids at any age, and the conservatives, once the Democrats get power
again and they raise that from fifteen weeks to whatever they want to raise it
to, the Republican states will obey that, just like the Republican States obeyed
Rob Wade when it was clearly a violation of the Tenth Amendment. And I
said that all my life. And then you had the Dobs case where the
Supreme Court said, yeah, that's right. So yeah, that is right.
A Supreme Court decision is not the law of the land. They changed
their mind about these things all the time. The Supreme Court changed its mind
and decided that they would follow the Tenth Amendment. That freaked everybody out.
Trump was one of the first to pivot away from that, as DeSantis point
out. But this person says, I was much less surprised to see Carrie
Lake, the failed gubernatorial candidate from Arizona, flip on the abortion issue.
And I agree with this person about Carry Lake. She has a cynical opportunist,
a shameless liar who has attacked pro life candidates without the slightest regard for
the truth. This is a person who has hypocritically, just like Trump,
been hypocritical on all of these issues. And just like Sean Hannity, who
pats soldiers on the back every time he sees somebody in uniform, Oh,
thank you for your service, and yet he wants to send them to war,
somebody who has said that he is pro life, and yet he wants
to win election. He doesn't want to save life, Yeah he is.
He wants that little little trophy that he gets. Thank you for listening.
Interested in a curated list of the finest classical music, find it now at
apsradio dot com. Let me tell you the David Night Show. You can
listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes.
In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to
the David Night Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you want
to know something else you can find all the links to everywhere to watch or
listen to the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com. That's a website.