Using free speech to free minds. You are listening to the David Night Show.
As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Monday, the twentieth of November.
You're of our Lord twenty twenty three. Well, today we're going to begin
with the what has happened with J six, the new footage that's been released,
as well as the criticism of the way it was released and what is
really behind this? What are we finding out about this? And now the
army is getting desperate. They want people to come back, Please come back,
Please come back. We've got some shots set aside for you. After
everything is all healed up, we'll take a look at the wars. We'll
look at the not just the moral bankruptcy, but the financial bankruptcy of the
Pentagon, having failed six audits in a row each year more than three trillion
dollars. Maybe they want to be on the lookout for some kind of cruise
missile coming at the accounting office there and Javier Malay managed to get through and
become the head of Argentina, the President of Argentina. What's going to happen
next? We'll be right back. We'll also take a look at you know,
Sama Bin laden the new hero. I think probably he's going to be
the new Cheguavara of the TikTok crowd as young kids. Absolutely amazing. Again,
we'll take a look at it. One person said, well, regardless
of what you think about happened at nine to eleven. You know, we
have our big questions about nine to eleven, don't. We don't believe the
official government narrative. But regardless of what you think about this, these kids
believe it, hook line and sinker. And even though they believe that he
orchestrated the attack instead of CIA, even though they believe it, they still
worship him. That's how incredibly dangerously stupid a lot of the younger generation is.
But let's take a look first of this January the sixth stuff, and
we had made available on Friday Mike Johnson, the new Speaker of the House.
So they're going to make available forty thousand hours of security footage by at
the capitol there. It's going to be made public. Now, they've only
released ninety hours of it so far, so it's only one quarter. It's
like zero point two three percent, so it's one quarter of one percent of
the total footage that is there. And yet what was macarthy going to do.
Part of the reason that some of these people said they'd vote for him
was that he would release this and give it to Tucker Carlson. Why give
it to Tucker Carlson? And a lot of people are saying this now,
after they saw what Tucker Carlson and his producer did in terms of hiding information,
Yeah, that's right, hiding information. After they saw the betrayal there
by Tucker Carlson and his producer, they say, no, we want to
have this put out completely. And the problem is a lot of people are
concerned about the fact that they're taking the time to blur out people's faces.
Now, let people see what's going on. We need to see this,
and we need to see it because the people who are being accused have already
been publicly outed as part of the accusation. But we need to see the
faces of the people who were acting as if they were members of the crowd
when they were actually police officers. That needs to be shown. And so
this blurring out the faces, what they're doing is they're actually hiding the faces
of agent provocators. There may not have been cops, it looks like it
with the fist bumps and things like that that are now coming out, and
so we need to know who these people were to prove that this was an
inside job, as I said it was going to be anyway, individual video
clips released to the media other requesters will have the faces of identifiable individuals blurred.
Sod A Singer, Senior Congressional aid that restriction drew the immediate ire of
some defendants in January sixth, they have been publicly outed. Why can't we
know the people who instigated this thing, provoked it, and so forth.
Isn't that a crime? Is that a crime to do that? Well,
if it isn't, it should be. So while we're significantly expanding the amount
of clips it will be available and who can request them, we will be
blurring faces with respect to individuals who are identifiable, Johnson wrote, to restore
America's trust and faith in their government, we must have transparency. Well,
that would include blurred faces that we can't see. So there's that. I'm
glad that he's moving forward with it. Of course, you know, Pelosi
wanted to keep them hidden in secret and to you know, cherry pick what
they were going to show to create a narrative. Everybody knew that was very
dishonest, but it was also very dishonest what MacArthur and Tucker did it tell
us it's a great deal about them. My current estimates, there's roughly forty
thousand hours that we will be making public over the next few months as quickly
as we can blurt out so you can't see faces. Beginning on November the
twentieth, members of the public will be able to view footage on terminals in
the Committee's office and Capitol Hill. In person viewing of the Congressional video terminals
offers advantages over the online viewing room in person, so they've set this up
online and you know they're going to be putting clips out there just you know,
I don't know if there's any order to them or not. The point
is that if you go to their in person viewing room, then you kind
of get a map and it shows you different cameras and so you can start
to coordinate it, and so you can switch from camera to camera to follow
an individual or something like that who has their face blurt out. So the
in person system has maps for each level of the Capitol. The Capitol grounds
are separated into zones of the camera locations indicated by small icons. Viewers can
access the entire database, whereas the online viewing room that's what they mean the
website. The online viewing room will be stocked with tranches of footage on a
rolling basis. So McCarthy said earlier this year that he would release it,
but that commitment never resulted in the public getting any direct access. They ran
it through their controlled opposition, Tucker Carlson and his producer, who, by
the way, has gotten so much criticism that he has essentially taken his Twitter
account private. The viewing room set up and the plans to blurfaces on the
video clips drew fire from some on social media. Releasing batches of January sixth
Close Circuit TV is merely a way for Congress to pretend that they're making the
tapes public while holding back important footage that they will someday get back to us
on a future batch, said Will Pope, who was a January sixth defendant.
He said, they gave it all to the FBI. Americans deserve it
all in one batch two. They gave it all to the FBI in January
twenty twenty one. This is what I said from the very beginning about Ed
Snowden leak. It bothered me a great deal. It was very suspicious of
what Glenn Greenwald was doing, releasing it here and there a little bit at
a time. It just put it all out there. But you know,
we saw this in spades of January the sixth. So Pope Is, who
is a defendant, said, blurring the faces of those shown in the downloadable
videos, will he rode public trust? He called the November seventeenth announcement Friday
a publicity stunt. Americans another trust blurred and edited January the sixth footage.
Others ask, how can they be sure they haven't already been altered, or
that footage hasn't been deleted by the Democrats in the Capitol police, the FBI.
You know, the FBI has a history of deleting evidence, don't they.
You go back, you look at TWA eight hundred. We talked about
that great deal with Jack Cashle and of course when it happened, there was
ample testimony from people talking about how the FBI came in, confiscated footage,
confiscated tapes of air traffic control. You know, people were getting ready to
give to the media this is what they typically do, so have they deleted
a lot of footage with this stuff. During an online spaces meeting on x
on Twitter, several of the more than eight hundred participants said they expect Google
and YouTube to censor not only news about the January sixth video releases, but
also any video clips that people try to upload to social media. Oh really,
well, that'd be pretty big, pretty predictable, don't you think they
do not understand why the online viewing room does not have a download function.
Well, you can still do screen capture. And by the way, you
know, here's some as we're talking about this, here's one individual who is
being escorted. He's evidently a rioter. He's dressed as a Trump supporter.
So before then here they bending over. These guys take him into a room
and they undo the handcuffs, and as soon as he gets his hand free,
he does a fist bump to the other cop. Yeah there we go.
It worked good. Yeah, I guess I can go out and do
this again. Yeah. And when you see the videos and the handshakes and
the rest of this stuff, here's another Oh yeah, he's got well his
face you can't see anyway because he's got a helmet on. When you look
at these people prepare preparing shaking hands like a cop shaking hands, and people
dressed as protesters and street clothes giving them fist bumps and all the rest of
this stuff, because that is a preferred way to celebrate. So the question
is is people talk about this. You know, they've criticized Mike Johnson because
he hasn't released all of it. I'm glad that he's releasing it. I
think that was a good move. Frankly, they should criticize and ask for
more to be done. I think it should not be blurred. I think
they need to just put it out, just dump it, and the organization
can be done later to help people will go through it again. Sometimes when
you look at this is not you know, what they're not doing is trying
to say, well, we're holding it back and we're doing it a little
bit at a time so we can organize it. As I've said before,
when I've been involved in organizations trying to get information from the government, they
would comply and they would give us a massive, unorganized dump where you can't
find anything. Well, the information is all there, go fish right,
and you can put you know, to try to find the proverbial needle in
that kind of a haystack is very difficult, so it is good to be
able to have it. I'm glad that they're putting this in an online viewing
room where you can go through and look at it, but blurring it is
not a good idea, and they should put all of it out and let
people start to go through it themselves. There'll be some die hard people who'll
make this their life work and they will get the truth out there if they
were to do that. So that's unfortunate that they're not doing that, but
it is good that he's doing more. And the question is, you know,
we know Pelosi was covering it up. Pelosi was, you know,
cherry picking and editing the footage and McCarthy wouldn't release it except to Tucker,
and they didn't release much and then Tucker hid some of what they released.
That was a real misdirection. So hopefully this is a bit more genuine.
But you know, what nobody is talking about is did Trump know all this
stuff? Right? Did Trump know that all of this stuff happened under Trump?
But of course he's not responsible for this. He's not responsible for what
happened on January the sixth. He's not responsible for the capital area, even
though he's head of the government. Nothing that the government does to his supporters
is her responsible for. Just like he wasn't responsible for the lockdowns. He
wasn't responsible for the federal government policies that paid hospitals to kill people. He
wasn't responsible for the poisonous vaccine. Oh yes, he took credit for that,
But he's not responsible, say his schizophrenic supporters, even though he bragged
about that, Even though he took credit for it, even though he took
credit for the lockdown, he's not responsible. Fact, she's not responsible either.
Other people did it, not them, and we'll never hold him responsible.
Trump can tell everybody send me money. He took in two hundred and
fifty million dollars a quarter of a billion dollars. He fleeced his supporters for
said, go to Washington January. He gets up there, makes a speech,
meet me at the Capitol. He disappeared. Alex Jones, who fired
me for telling people this was a grift? Who fired me for telling people
don't show up? Who fired me because I told that? Sorry, sob
don't come on my show and push those lies to people, and I did
it in front of my crew. That line, grifter, Why did people
send Alex Jones money? He wasn't even supposedly hiring any lawyer. Supposedly Trump
was going to hire lawyers, but he didn't. So what was going on
with all this stuff? The first I saw of January sixth was I got
Twitter notifications people saying exactly what you said was going to happen happened because I
said it that morning. I said it right after Steve Patinnick started lying two
days after the election. I talked about it, and I talked about it
for about a month and a half. I got fired. I continue to
talk about it because I continued on air, and I talked about it the
morning of January sixth, I said, don't go. It's going to be
loaded with agent provocateurs. This whole thing is a setup. The whole thing
is a setup. Here we are nearly three years later, and people see
this as a setup. Can they see who set them up? Trump and
Alex Jones and the rest of these stop the steal and save America. Grifters
out there their biggest crime, their biggest crime was what they did to their
supporters, people who have committed suicide, people who are rotting in jail after
they fleece them of money. Absolutely reprehensible. The insurrection stuff, as far
as you know, the Democrats, it was all made up. There was
no insurrection, and there's plenty of evidence in this stuff. As we're talking
about this, we take a look at these people. Take a look this
shooting into the crowd, and of course has been and now that's a paintball
gun, right, except that you know, when they're shooting this, it's
got enough force that you'll see, you know, the crowd is standing there,
they're not attacking anybody, and the cops start shooting into the crowd there.
And as I've said before, look at that that was a non lethal
thing, went through the guy's cheek, went through his cheek, so called
non lethal thing. Blood all over the place, being shot at close range
with these you know, I don't know if it's pepper spray or if it's
just paintball gun, whatever it was, rubber bullets, I think it was
that they were shooting. And as this footage goes on, this is some
of the footage from the police cameras showing that they're firing into the crowds.
And I've said over and over again, look at the difference in the Tennessee
insurrection led by the Tennessee Three against the State House. And you got this
mob that shoves its way in, the mob that gets its hands on the
state legislators here in Tennessee, starts shoving them around. What did the state
police in Tennessee do. Well, they didn't fire, They didn't put on
body armor and fire into the crowd. No. What they did was they
were just wearing their state Patrol uniforms and they used their bodies to try to
put themselves between They didn't push back on anybody, even right turn their backs.
These protesters just use their bodies as a shield to try to shield the
legislators who were trying to get to the floor. And they were shoving the
legislators, they were shoving the State Highway Patrol. That's the way it should
have been done. These cops and DC were the provocateurs. You had hidden
provocateurs, and you had provocateurs in uniform shooting into the crowd, throwing tear
gas into the crowd. And these people were led into this by these judas
goats like Trump and Alex Jones and what they do. They get you focused
on ray Epps. I don't care if ray Epps which side he was on.
He didn't do a tiny fraction of what Trump and Alex Jones and Ali
Alexander and Roger Stone, the rest of these people, all of them making
money off of this, off of their own supporters, what backstabbers, what
judas goats to lead them into this stuff. So yeah, meet me at
the capitol. Yeah, this will not stand. We will not let him
take office at Alex. Well, here's one of the victims here. This
guy's name is Matthew, Matthew Perna And as you look here he's in the
red T shirt. Look at this peacefully walking through. They're being escorted by
the police. Come on in, everything is fine, you know, just
as you've got some people who are in their pastor a couple of pastors in
their seventies had to go to the restaurant. Police say come on in,
come on in. It's right around there. Now they're looking at several years
in jail, which is essentially a life senate. So there's Matthew right there.
They didn't blur his face out, and so he Initially, he was
just walking calmly there. He pled guilty to the initial charges, believing that
he would face six to twelve months in prison for that. That's an outrage,
just to walk through there when the police are standing there, not telling
you you can't come in, not opposing you, just to walk through six
to twelve months. Only after he pled guilty did the Department of Justice,
Yeah, inform Matthew that they would seek a terrorism enhancement to his sentencing,
which would raise his sentence to a potential nine years in prison. Four days
after getting the news that they would push for this terrorism enhancement, Matthew went
into his garage, put a rope around his neck and hung himself. Yeah,
how do you feel about that, Alex, Get that on your conscience.
These people you betrayed. Yeah, it doesn't excuse the Department of Justice.
They're criminals for doing that. The Department of true criminals, the FBI,
and the DOJ. These people politicized tyrants, and you delivered them into
the hands. You didn't know that would happen. You didn't know that would
happen. Many Tucker Carlson's could show the world, but he won't. And
that was that shooting video that Ari showed you. His producer Greg underscore Ra
and his team at Fox were given all of this last year. That shooting
footage. By the way, that was back in September. I had not
seen that. I don't spend much time on social media. It's just now
getting coverage from a lot of media because of the release of this other footage.
But that was not just recently released. That was there. I got
no coverage whatsoever. JA six protesters fired upon with no warning the US Capitol
Police Chief Waldo, Where's Waldo lied saying that he gave warnings that you can
see from the footage that they didn't did not give warnings, And so new
footage So the Capitol police may have incited the riot by firing muitial munitions into
a peaceful crowd. They may have entrapped people by saying, oh, you
want need to use the rest of them coming in he was in the Capitol,
sent him to jail for five or six years. Each new piece of
footage only confirms what Americans already understood. Many many a lot of them believe
the Weaponized Line Committee that the few scant minutes available video recycled by the media
paint a false picture of what happened. The latest footage shows capitol police inviting
protesters into the building as a peacefully assembled in the corridor, the same people
who would later be prosecuted and labeled as insurrectionists, such as Matthew and so
the police firing rubber bullets, tear gas grenades, stun grenades under the crowd
peaceful protesters before anybody tried to enter the Capitol building, possibly triggering the violence.
Again, compare that to what the police officers did the state police at
the Tennessee Capitol taking the de escalating the situation down because you know, we
don't want to have any leftists be charged with insurrection or violence or have to
go to prison or anything like that. Right, No, it was all
set up on the way they handled it. To the people who led them
in, the Judas Coats, it's easy to control the narrative when you have
all the evidence under lock and key. So we're Cheney and Kinsinger and the
rest of these people doing well. They got a lot of criticism as more
footage came out. Some of the criticism was coming from Senator Mike Lee.
He said, why didn't Liz Cheney and Adam Kinsinger ever refer to any of
them these tapes. Maybe they never looked for them, Maybe they never even
questioned their own narrative. Maybe they were just too busy selectively leaking the text
messages of Republicans that they wanted to defeat. Well, it was more than
that they have. This is all partisan political warfare. It is political persecution,
and they're using it for political purposes. Just take a look at this
back and forth between Corey Bush on the progressive left and Mike Johnson. We're
not here today to consider real solutions that will make people's lives better. We're
here as a distraction from the sad truth that dangerous MAGA Republican policies make us
less safe. They deprive us of basic investments that would move us closer to
a genuine community safety. And at the end of the day, Republicans refuse
to consider those investments because Republicans are not seeking solutions to the problem. Gen
ladies time, they are the problem. Thank you. When I yield back,
only the's times is bribed. The genial lad yells back speak. I
want to welcome miss Bush to the committee. Did she leave already? Oh?
She left already. She's still here. She makes fortunate. I was
going to point out to her a couple of ironies. She came to lecture
us. She was here for five minutes and three seconds. I appreciate her
time investment. She came to lecture us about quote avoiding responsibility. We've had
four full committee markups. She has not attended three of the four. I'm
not sure today her five minutes councils and attendance, but let's say she's she's
made two of them now. I was going to ask her if she's still
in favor of defunding the police, because we have her on record more times
than I can count of having been the great champion of that. She wanted
to talk about responsible investments that will make a difference. I wanted to ask
her how that defunding police thing worked out. I think everybody in the country
knows that we're facing chaos and a catastrophe of crime, violent crime, and
all the major cities that she went and protested in and many more that took
the CUE. I wanted to ask her about the reality of how that works
out in real life. She accuses us of engaging in talking points. We're
trying to pass meaningful legislation to solve these problems, and she is advancing policies
and ideas that create the mayhem. So wow, it's so unfortunate that she's
not here to engage in a colloquy on that. But I'm not surprised.
This is what we get from the radical left. She is part of that
radical left that is bringing down the party and having them associated with the crime
crisis that we have on the streets. This is the very reason that we
need Police Week to reinforce our support for the brave men and women who are
on the front lines, that thin blue line, put their lives on the
line every single day, and we lose them now at alarming rates in the
line of duty, trying to protect their communities from wacko, crazy, maddening
policies like the one that Miss Bush has supported in Congress. I will also
point out she, as we noted earlier, she was the vice chair of
the Crime Subcommittee of Judiciary and she doesn't believe in funding police. What a
tragedy that she's not here to join us. Yeah, she makes her a
little speech and runs away, And that's exactly what this is about. However,
you know, we talk about defunding the police, just just look at
the big picture. You've got the radical left, and you've got George Sorows
removing police from protecting communities and creating chaos, the Soros chaos everywhere. Well,
on the other hand, you have the federal government that is engaged in
a police state persecution, political police state persecution. I absolutely agree with what
he had to say about this defund the police and the communities and Soros district
attorneys and the progressive left. But the ball is now in his court and
what he needs to do is he needs to do something about the police.
They're at the capitol. Something needs to be done about that. You've got
to have some people fired, publicly humiliated, have their pensions taken away.
At the very least, if you don't put them in jail and let the
j sixers out, don't blur their faces, show their faces, make examples
of them. If you don't reform. Look, every institution, every institution
is going to have good and bad people in it. And as Frank Serpico
said, when it comes to the police especially, but it's any institution,
you have to purge the bad actors. Out. If you don't, the
institution becomes bad. Well that should have been done decades ago with the Capitol
Police and the FBI, and they've become bad institutions. And the question is
what are you going to do? You're going to continue to fund them and
do business as usual. Are you going to actually reform this mess? That's
the real key. So you know, there was again back and forth with
Mike. Lee also called for an investigation in the committee itself. Exactly,
you know these people running this McCarthyite hearing who have even if these people have
their convictions overturned or pardoned or whatever, they still spent years in jail under
very harsh circumstances. And so I think that Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger,
these Democrats that they worked with, they need to be given a taste of
that medicine. I think they need to be investigated. I think they need
to go to jail because they were the ones who unjustly jailed so many people
and escalated these charges so much that many people, several people committed suicide.
Lee called the investigation of Sham. He said the crucial information about the committee's
work could have been deliberately lost were destroyed. He cast doubts on the committee's
transparency and its objectivity. It is McCarthyism, and that kind of McCarthyism just
continued under Kevin McCarthy, didn't it. The FBI lost count of how many
paid informants were a capital at the Capitol in January the sixth, and later
performed an audit to figure out the exact number. According to the New York
Post, Well again, I think by now we all know what's going on,
and it just becomes more of an irritant, more perhaps of a deliberate
provocation for this to continue to go on. And I think Mike Johnson's made
an appropriate step. I think he needs to step it up. They need
to dump everything unedited, unblurred. So Jordan has a poena the Bank of
America because it is a very wide net that was involved in capturing people.
Again, Bank of America, as we've talked about in the past, they
went through their data and they gave jail location, you know, stuff that
they went through and they gave all the charges that were done on Bank of
America credit cards within a couple of days, and that large vicinity there of
the Capitol and surrounding areas into Virginia and Maryland. They sent if you used
a credit card there, Bank of America tried to get you in jail.
Think about that, if you deal with Bank of America. What criminals they
are? What absolute criminals. Bank of America. The FBI didn't even ask
for it, they did it. And then they went through and they also
gave them anyone who had used the Bank of America credit card to purchase a
gun, anyone anywhere, anytime. This is not just January the sixth in
that area, anyone anywhere, anytime you use a credit card to buy a
gun. Bank of America. I said to the FBI, here, do
something with this too. What a bunch of criminals. And so now they
have subpoena them. Now we've known all of this stuff. So what is
new about this? Well, Jim Jordan has subpoenaed them for records that would
be internal communications, in other words, what was said back and forth between
Bank of America officials within the bank and then what was said between them and
any communications that they would have with the FBI. Now that will be interesting
to know, but we're not going to find out anything about that. For
another six, well seven months. They've got till June the eighth to comply
with that, so it's going to be a while before we get that data,
but that will be interesting to see. Bank of America told the Judiciary
Committee that its conduct was quote within a legal process initiated by the US Department
of the Treasury un quote November sixteenth letter to Bank of America CEO Brian moynihan
informing him of the subpoena. Mister Jordan, who also chairs the Weaponized Select
Subcommittee, wrote that quote, it is unclear what legal process permits the FBI
or the Bank of America to share sensitive customer information of potentially thousands of BOA
customers and to implicate them in federal law enforcement investigation without any clear criminal nexus.
Yeah, what is it that allows them to do that? Again,
it amounts to a violation of privacy. It also amounts to Bank of America
trying to get you in jail. I mean, just look at what's happened
to so many of these people. Sam Montoya, who was the only Info
Wars person acting as a real journalist that day, goes in and shot footage
and he narrowly escaped jail, but it was a real ordeal financially for him.
Of course, he was fired by Alex in the midst of all of
that, and because he doesn't want to be connected with any of that stuff.
The only person who actually did any reporting at Info wars arrest. The
people were instigating this and then trapping people. But Sam went in an honestly
shot video of it and he gets in trouble. Just amazing. Before we
go to break some of the comments people have Georgia Boy eleven forty two,
could we please see all the footage from the Venegon on nine to eleven,
two thousand and one. Yeah, wouldn't that be interesting? Yeah, maybe
they could also do that. You know, we never had any We had
promises that were broken by Trump that he was going to show release some nine
to eleven information and all this other kind of stuff in JFK assassinated and things
like. None of that happened. But it didn't even talk about releasing the
footage from the Pentagon around nine to eleven. As a matter of fact,
we know they went around confiscating outside surveillance cameras to get the footage from that,
and of course the Pentagon it's covered even at that time was covered with
a surveillance footage and so yeah, they don't want that scene, Jay Caravella,
why don't Why does Nancy release Paul's footage from her living room? Yeah,
Jason Barker says, ha ha, blurring faces as they rush in public,
facial recognition for things like airports and everywhere else. That's right. Yeah,
this is a government that demands to know everything about you, but keeps
everything about what it does hidden from us. Let's talk about transparency. I
mean, that's where we are today. We got a long way to go.
Releasing ninety hours of this stuff and then blurring faces on what's coming out
that is not uh, that is that is such a minor move towards transparency.
It is almost laugh it's laughable. But it's also almost cynical to do
something like that. Guard Goldsmith, I still wonder how much they gave to
Carlson. Yeah exactly. Well, you know, his his producer was stonewalling
on it. But good to see their guard and Jason Teta ninety seven four
oh one. They were dumb enough to think they were part of the plan.
Now they know they're expendable. That's right, that's right. How much,
says d G eight, is Trump giving to the victims and the families
of the j six. Lie. Yeah, wouldn't give them the time of
day. Didn't want to talk about it for several months. He was worried
about what's going to happen. And again he's somebody who is as we could
see with the pardons for the January the six people, and his defense of
these people who came to his defense, we can see that, as his
former lawyer said, he is incapable of acting except out of his own perceived
interest or as we now see in this campaign, out of revenge Michael de
Silvia, everyone will think twice about peacefully protesting from now on. That's a
big part of it. Unless you know you're the left. Now, as
we talked about this on Friday, you know you had, you know,
these protesters. You showed up at the DNC video footage of some of them
pounding on it. Yona the listener said, well, that was taken out
of context. The cops incited this. They attack people. I can easily
believe that's the case. They The reason that I talked about that to agin
with is because the left has typically gotten a pass on any of the stuff.
No matter what they do, even if it's riots where they're torturing a
neighborhood that's mostly peaceful, they'll tell us as they stand in front fire,
the mainstream media will And so now what you're seeing is and we've always said
this, look right now, they're using these useful idiots on the left to
help them to take away our free speech, to take away so many things.
But it'll all be used against them. And perhaps that was what happened
with that group's protesting the DNC. Yeah, perhaps we and we have seen
that in the past with them, but typically is not the case. Perhaps
it'll be more and more the case now that they will use these same tactics
they've been using against people on conservatives that we now use this on the progressive
left. And so anyway, I let me finish a couple more of these
comments before we take a break. At KWD sixty eight, all the focus
on reps, there were hundreds of instigators there besides the police and Stasi.
Exactly right, exactly right. But you see that's the way that these people
operate. That's a very effective propaganda tool for Darren Beattie, who started all
that at Revolver and then got on with Tucker Carlson. Right. That's why
I say Tucker Carlson again by using Ray Epps to distract attention away from Trump,
from himself, from Alex Jones, other people who were pushing everybody to
go to this thing, right, Well, we got a scapegoat out here,
and so you personalize it because you know, if you start saying,
well, there was just one hundred inns agoin now, you have to have
some face, some face, And that's the purpose that reps serve for them.
Whether or not he is an agent provocateur, I really don't care at
this point. There are hundreds of them. The question is why the focus
on this one guy, because he couldn't have possibly kicked off this whole thing
by himself. So what are they distracting you from? You see Darre Immediate
Revolver, Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, all these people on the right,
reps, reps, reps, reps. So what is it that they're using
him as a red herring for to throw you off the trail? What is
it that they don't want you to see? They don't want you to see
what they did because they're the instigators. They're the agent provocateurs, they're the
backstabbing betrayers of their own people who continue to follow them. It's amazing to
me, amazing, Guard Goldsmith. I don't understand how the current speaker can
claim it's a release of all the footage if that already happened when it wasn't
given to Fox. Unless it wasn't all of it, then yeah, I
don't think that it was. I don't think that he gave everything to Tucker,
but I think he gave more than Tucker released. I don't know.
I don't know. We'll have to see. But again, what he's saying
is he's going to release forty thousand hours. He's released ninety hours, and
they're going to blur things out. That's the real issue. And I think
that he released a lot more than Tucker actually put out there because people were
complaining, Yeah, there was a certain quantity that was said, and I
think it would They said it was as large a quantity as McCarthy released to
Tucker. The question is why would it be released to Talker. See everybody
complained about that at the time. Everybody said, yeah, but can we
trust Tucker to show the stuff and then they believe that he did not show
a lot of stuff. We don't need to have this stuff filtered. We
don't need to have it blurred. We need to have it dumped for everybody
to see. That's transparency. Sending stuff to Democrats who are going to edit
it, sending stuff to Republicans who are going to edit it, maybe not
release all of it, and then blurring it out is not transparency. There
needs to be transparency. Too. Many people's lives have already been ruined with
this KWD sixty eight. The use of cash is getting harsh enough that people
will welcome CBDC. Some places are not accepting. Banks are questioning deposits and
withdrawals. Yeah, they're gradually pulling the net in, aren't they. So
what will happen is we usually see with this stuff, we'll go through a
gradual process of pushing people, nudging people psychologically. Well, it's easier if
you do this, and then of course they do make it. It is
easier to use plastic than it is to use cash. For the longest time,
there's the guy Dave Ramsey. Okay, tell everybody get out of debt.
Don't have credit card debt, Get rid of credit cards and all the
rest of it. And I remember him having on a physician. He said,
look, I've got you know, I'm not struggling financially, But he
says, I force myself not to use a credit card. Even when I'm
getting gas. I'll make myself walk in and give them the cash and then
fill it up and go back and get the change and all the rest of
the stuff, because I just don't want to use a credit card. I
absolutely refuse to use it. Well, most people will go for the convenience
of just, you know, at least using your gas card to pay for
it, so you don't have to walk in. Remember when they used to
come to your car and fill it up for you and check your will and
clean your windshield and make the change. I'm old enough to remember that.
Now it's the incoming. Well, I don't want to have to walk in
after I do everything for myself, or at the pump. I don't want
to have to walk in there and get the change as well and all the
rest of this stuff. So they make it easy for you, They nudge
you along with a comfort and ease, and then those of us who don't
want to do that at some point in time they drop the hammer and just
ban it. You know, most people get the Brave New World treatment,
and for those people who don't want to go Brave New World, you get
the nineteen eighty four or wellly in treatment. Jason Barker, thank you very
much for the tip, he says. I pray that all have a safe
and happy Thanksgiving this week. With all the chasts in this world, we
need to remember to be thankful for what God has given us. Absolutely true,
and you know we all have been given so much, and many of
us don't even realize what God has given us. We should be able to
see it in the land that we live in. The founders who fought to
set this up saw God's providence and his blessing, and they gave him credit
for it. But we have become a generation that does not recognize what God
has given us and given us in our own homes and our own families.
I know everybody has struggles that they go with and some people are going through
some horrific stuff. But even with a death of loved ones, try to
think of it as the fact that you had them for a while. That
was a gift from God, that you enjoyed for a while, and it
doesn't have to end with this life if we have a relationship with God and
that begins with thanksgiving for what He's given us. Audi, Mr. Arth
and Modern Retro Radio. Thank you very much. Just wishing everyone a good
week. Modern Retro Radio. Yes, we'll be doing rebroadcasts on Thursday and
Friday, and we'll have something of some Thanksgiving stuff that do every Thanksgiving.
We also have on Wednesday. I'm excited to talk to David Stockton. Many
people, younger people may not remember him. He's still been very active.
He's just written a book. But he was there in the Reagan administration as
the deficit was exploding. He was director of OMB and he actually pushed back
against Reagan on that and he's got a lot to say. As a matter
of fact, I've got an article here from him today talking about how we're
going to spend all this money for all these wars. We don't have a
single penny of the hundreds of billions of dollars that we want to send.
People are totally in debt. Jason Parker says they're working on making the unbankable
be bankable. It's one of the signs of incoming cbdc's The fifty and five
plan is to do the same with countries that are not ready for the system.
That's right. The fifty and five plan is their idea that by I
think the date was twenty twenty five, if I'm correct, but fifty fifty
states signed onto this digital and optagon on everybody. Grammy for God, says
Mike Johnson, the Christian who killed a bill to stop abortions. They're all
frauds KWD sixty eight. Yes they are, Grammy. The upright people character
in Congress could be evacuated in a smart car, assuming that the battery was
charged. They may have some gasoline versions, so I don't know. Well,
we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. If
you like the Eagles on the cars, Heuey Lewis and the news, they
say the hard you'll love the classic hits channel at APS Radio, download our
app, or listen now at APS radio dot com. When I was my
stern down booker, I thought without a doubt that I was through with all
my parents' trivet, that I was there a mes after months of tough civilian
life. But gee, I wish I was back in the army. The
Army wasn't really bad at all. Three meals a day, three for which
you didn't pay you and the moms or winners bring them all. There's a
lot to be said for the army and life without responsibility. A soldier out
of luck was re stock. There's over something one higher up where you can
pass the buck policy. I wish I was night to be well, just
in time for Christmas. I guess we've got a new recruitment film for the
military, because now they're begging the unvaccinated soldiers to return the ones that they
kicked out. And of course there's somebody higher up that they're not passing the
buck to. Instead, they're passing these people that were higher up that instituted
this relentless policy of vaccinating every last person with an experimental drug and again playing
these games. Well, you know, cormonati, but it's you know,
it's approved, it's not approved, and you know, but we're going to
do this so that we don't have any legal responsibility all that stuff. We're
going to say that Coromanati is approved, but it's legally distinctive, I said.
Pfizer said the FDA. It's legally they're identical, but it's legally distinctive,
but we're going to legally require you to get it. And so with
all of that, they've you know, promoted the people who kicked everybody out,
and now they've got a big shortfall, and it really is big.
Quite frankly, a lot of people. The US Army is now begging the
unvaccinated soldiers that they kicked out who underwent in voluntary discharge for refusing to take
the vaccine, begging them to return to service and permitting them to correct their
military records. Well that's good that they're going to let them correct their records
because a lot of these people were given dishonorable discharges because they were really vicious
about this stuff. Just two years ago, in a shameful campaign, the
Pentagon was gleefully discharging soldiers who refused to take COVID vaccines. Says the Zero
Hedge article, one individual has put up the letter that he got and the
woman in charge now the army hope hope, rampy, hope springs eternal.
I guess a lot of people hope that the Army has changed, but it
hasn't. And so he underscored some things. Former soldiers who were involuntarily separated
for refusal to receive the COVID nineteen vaccine may request a correction of their military
records. Individuals who desire to apply to return to service should contact us go
to your nearest recruitment office. Yeah, you know they're getting serious. The
memes show when they go from promoting trainees and their DEI stuff to showing hardcore
males and their recruitment stuff. You know that the war is coming, right,
the war's coming, and they've got all these these DEI generals in charge
of it, and they can't get anybody to sign up. So, yeah,
you want to sign up. To be elaborate, you want to sign
up to go to a foreign war while our border is being crashed and invaded
all the time. Yeah yeah, that government, that government wants you.
Uncle Sugar wants you, doesn't he We were assured that these discharges would not
affect military readiness at the time, The Marine Corps Lieutenant General David Adding said
to lawmakers in Congress, I can tell you there are no operational impacts across
the force for readiness. There's not one community that has signaled an instance where
a leader, an NCO or another enlisted Marine is not present. Because of
that vaccine thing, they kicked out more people than anybody else. Supposedly that
number is one nine hundred and sixty eight kicked out of the Marines. Twenty
percent of those got an honorable discharge. That means that eighty percent didn't didn't
And so that's when you look at that. Now, kicked out about two
thousand people and only four four hundred or so got an honorable discharge. Now
the Marines are looking for a few good men to use as cannon fodder and
whatever the next war that they want to get us involved in. The readiness
suffered. Thousands of service members were dismissed. Potential recruits then declined to enlist
in the armed services. More than seventeen thousand service members bulked at taking the
shots, citing safety fears linked to the vaccines. Speedy development spurred by misinformation
about messenger RNA technology, as well as concern over fetal cell lines used in
the formulation and testing. The more the controversy raging the news, and more
troops asked to skip the shots, said the Military Times, And they're reporting,
and so you got people like Jason Barker, who even though they had
seventeen thousand people they say, who refuse to get it, they kicked out
about a little more than half of that, well, well less than half
of that three hundred and thirty nine they said. Okay, so they were
kicked out, and if the Marines are any indication, eighty percent of them
got dishonorable discharges. Others. You know, Jason was able to hang in
there and retire, and I'm glad that he was, but he was not
going to take this stuff. And his letter that he wrote was very thoughtful,
very complete. A lot of people used it as a template, an
idea for what they could do to write about their religious exemption, nurses and
other people. I remember we put it up and many people used that letter.
And so, you know, the eight three hundred and thirty nine people
that they kicked out is way more than were killed in Afghanistan. They had
twy four hundred and two soldiers killed in Afghanistan over twenty years. So they
kicked out, you know, nearly four times that many. And I wonder,
you know how many are slowly dying now? How many have they crippled
and injured? Kind I think of this as kind of the roadside bomb of
the Pentagon against its own troops. Who I look at it. You got
a lot of people wounded, long term, poisoned, stabbed in the back
by the people that they had signed up to protect this country. But of
course the Pentagon is not about protecting this country. It's about everything but protecting
this country. Not only do they not protect the borders, but they get
us involved in foreign wars that get us put targets on our back everywhere.
They're putting targets on our back, not to mention the money and the blood
that they're spending. Lieutenant Colonel Terry Kelly, a spokesperson for the army,
so that twenty seven hundred and sixty seven soldiers have received General Officer written reprimand.
So this is you know, twenty eight hundred or so that stayed in
and they're getting reprimands. Yeah, to pull that picture up, that's the
clownish look at that Darth Vader reviews the troops. I mean that picture just
they've seen it before. It's just you know, a thousand words right there
in that one picture. You want to sign up for that joke of an
army. What a joke this is. There's one great, big, traveling
stomach sucking up all of the money that it can. They can't even button
his jacket there. As a result, the military is missing its recruitment goals
by twenty five percent. So they kicked out eight thousand people and they're missing
fifteen thousand soldiers. They kicked out people who were trained, they kicked out
people who had great records, and now they're looking for fifteen thousand soldiers and
it's your shortfall. And a lot of people say, well, I don't
really want to join a clown show like that. You look at all the
woke garbage and rest of this stuff. I'm sorry, it says this person
who wrote this article on zero Hedge. I'm sorry about the destroyed careers of
the best service members. And they are the best because not only they stood
by their principles, that's the cream of the crop that they kicked out.
Really, they kept their health. They'll get military discharge papers corrected, but
they'll always remember the unfairness, the trauma of the helplessness that they felt as
their commanders dismissed them for not taking experimental vaccines that we subsequently saw it did
not work, unsafe and effective. The soldiers have not been compensated, but
they at least remained healthy and stayed true to their principles. Please appreciate how
hard it was for those brave souls to stick to their principles, their entire
lives and careers being wrecked by this illegal COVID order. These are courageous people.
The military needs stoic, strong heroes, of which three and thirty one
were dismissed due to the insane orders of the Biden administration, and many more
took early retirement. So I think we ought to have a special Veterans Day
to honor the people of the vaccine wars. Not a foreign war, but
it was a war that was brought onto us by foreign power, by the
UN, by the World Economic Forum, by billionaires. You people who fought
this, and whatever profession you're in, are veterans at the beginning of the
art elect war, the artificial intelligence war, the war of the technocratic elite
against us. So the army is trying to get back the soldiers that it
kicked out. And when we look at this in retrospect, it truly is
amazing how they have just trashed these people. Recently retired Army Major Chase Spear
suggested in a Peace on the American Mind that the recent measures were tied to
the Army's abysmal recruiting numbers. He said, one might be curious why of
the Armies doing it about face on this right now, given that its top
official clearly has a different perspective from the policy change that she is authorizing.
Last month, the Army missed its fiscal year twenty twenty two recruiting goals by
ten thousand. Spear has discussed the persecution that soldiers who did not wish to
receive the vaccine faced from overzealced commanders eager to implement the mandate from Biden.
He wrote, the Army requires several immunizations and checkups throughout the year to maintain
one's medical readiness. Not one of those came with a coersive force of the
COVID mandate. Were you laid on your flu shot, well, you just
get told to take one at your next convenience late on a vision check.
Same thing applies. But in twenty twenty one on Fort Levenworth, proof of
the COVID shot was the only path to being able to live in existence that
in any way might reflect normal. It became the primary marker of human worth
on that base and at many others. Under the management of Major General Douglas
Simms, some base facilities against is Fort Levenworth were set aside only for the
vaccinated. I traveled to Fort Riley for a war fighter exercise in late twenty
twenty one. First Infantry Division policy limited unvaccinated visitors to hotel rooms and workplaces.
It also restricted access to base morale facilities and the commissary, such as
the base grocery store. It limited to those who had a vaccine card.
Friends of mine on Fort Bragg, which is now called Fort Liberty, because
you know, we can't talk about a Confederate soldier told me of similar policies
at their location. A two class system among military service members was established across
much of the base, hearkening back to Biblical language. You were clean or
unclean based on your shot status. That's right, you get set outside the
camp like a leper. Major General sims performance, however, was rewarded.
You say, oh, it's always somebody higher up to pass the buck.
No, you pass these people higher up. That's what happened. He has
since been promoted to lieutenant general. He's currently the director of Operations for Joint
Staff. Would he treat an unvaccinated officer who re enters the army with respect
in the days to come, or would such a uniformed citizen still be worthy
of segregation? Have they changed? No, No, of course they haven't.
They've rewarded the people who did this, same people still there that the
leaders who pushed this through there other army leaders punished unvaccinated soldiers and were rewarded
and said retired as spears. So he said, a force that can so
easily lose sight of its purpose is one that is rightly viewed through a skeptic's
lens. So what is the purpose of the military? I mean, you
know foreign wars? Do you even want a military that is competent and capable
in order to fight your foreign wars? Because we know that you're not about
defending America our borders. So what is the purpose of this. We've got
an expeditionary empire and they can't even do that competently. By the way,
when we look at the vaccines themselves, like I said, how many people
has the Pentagon killed of its own soldiers slow killed. And of course this
is something's always been there, whether you're talking about depleted uranium or other things.
They constantly expose their soldiers to health risks and they don't care about it.
Ninety four percent of COVID nineteen deaths over the past year were among quadruple
vaccinated and triple vaccinated. This is coming out of the UK. The Office
for National Statistics in England has just released some new data, an update on
deaths by vaccination status, and this is you know, we've already had a
lot of this released. We saw the big spike that happened in September and
on of twenty twenty one. Now this is for the twelve months between June
twenty twenty two and the thirty first of May twenty twenty three. They said
ninety five percent of those COVID deaths people who died with COVID or from COVID.
Ninety five percent of those were people who had been vaccinated, and ninety
four percent of those deaths were among the people who were triple or quadruple vaccinated.
So the question is how many of when the military is requiring people to
get the jabs, did it just stop at the first one or the second
one, or did you have to get booster after booster after booster after booster.
Yeah, they're going to have a big problem moving forward. It is
going to be very, very big because they're going to start seeing all kinds.
And of course, this is the military, who has their own d
MED database that you had several officers. Medical officers said, look at this.
We have all these different things that have gone up by several hundred percent,
several of them by thousands of percent increase, and these medical issues that
are gone up, life threatening medical issues compared to our own database. Because
they want to keep a very detailed record that's not like not like the vyar's
database from CDC where people voluntarily call stuff they're not required to. As a
matter of fact, they're discouraged from doing it. A previous study back in
twenty ten, they paid Harvard to look at it. Harvard said only about
one percent of the adverse events from vaccines are actually sent in. It's a
time consuming to do it. They're discouraged from doing They were heavily discouraged from
doing it with COVID. But when you look at the military's database, they
need to have as a part of readiness, they need to know if something
is going around, is it a chemical attack, is it a biological attack?
And so they keep very detailed records of everything, and so these records
showed what was happening. And so then the Pentagon went back and said,
well, last five years that you're comparing this to that was all wrong,
and so we're going to get rid of that obvious lies. How much more
obvious could they be? The unvaccinated account for at least for the least amount
of COVID nineteen deaths, and every single month up to May twenty twenty three,
barely even getting into and that's when the data stopped getting into triple figures
in most months, whereas the vaccinated population accounted for the majority of COVID nineteen
deaths every single month, hitting four figures in all but two months throughout that
year. Yeah, this is what we're talking about. And so the last
thing is why are German politicians so eager to vaccinate children? Why are they
lying about it now? Ask eugipiis why were they so eager in the summer
of twenty twenty one to vaccinate children? Why would they place public pressure on
vaccine regulators to recommend child vaccination because we were told, well, it doesn't
affect children. And by the way, that was a big red flag right
there, telling you this wasn't any kind of a pandemic. It was what
they were doing, was they were hastening along the actuarial table of our death
by age and by the hospital protocols that they were doing and they weren't even
trying to make a case that it was affecting children. But now you've got
children who have to have a heart test before they can participate in any athletics
at schools. They believed, or professed to believe that a vaccination rate and
excess of some magic number within the pandemic. Remember that all that heard immunity,
Well what is it, doctor Faunci, mister science, what is that
number? Well, I don't know, you know, it could be this,
it could be that. I don't know it just yeah, they and
they keeps changing it, right, so he says. Eugipia says, I'd
still say that maybe they didn't know where they were doing. But a recent
news story has caused me to consider this question more deeply. Where did the
specific pressure come from? What drove for example, random regional ministers in Germany,
ministers of education to mount their own appeals to vaccinate school children. What
did these dumb people ever know about viruses or reproduction numbers or population immunity?
What was going on? Well, of course these are all rhetorical questions.
We know this is political, we know it was psychological, and we know
it was mass murder, and it's continuing. The people who did it are
continuing in effect. Doug Log, thank you very much for the tip.
I appreciate that it's on Rockfinn Audi modern retro radio. Those kicked out soldiers
would have to be crazy to reenlist. That's right, Jason Barker. I'm
waiting for a recall Audi. Before they do a draft, they will recall
all of the ir R guys and retired that are not broken. Yeah,
you're right, I'll recall you, he says. There are also a lot
of soldiers that have died suddenly. Yeah, died from suddenly. Brian and
Deb McCartney, our son in law, is glad that he is out of
the army. Yes, yes, j Caravella. What's wrong? Doesn't this
younger generation want to enlist to be cannon fodder? In Ukraine, Israel,
any other of our many foreign entanglements. Jason says, that just shows you
these people don't support these wars. Yeah, it's all media propaganda. Remember
after nine eleven people flocked to come into the military. They lacked the same
conviction now, says All. Yeah, a lot of people believed it,
a lot of people believed it, sincerely believed it. And I think that's
another part of it too. You know, quite frankly, as I've said
over and over again, the twenty twenty stuff that Trump pulled and Biden pulled
after him continued, that's just the other shoe to drop from nine to eleven.
They were born at the same time. As a matter of fact,
Dark Winter two months before nine eleven. Let's see Brian dub McCartney, our
son in law, was made to put on high heels when he was in
I've seen pictures of that. I've not hurt anybody say that. It made
them walk around in red shoes and just pathetic. Audi. Mr. We're
looking for a few good non gender specific pronouns. That's what they're looking for.
It's a game. It's a game. Yeah, they're still experimenting on
people's minds, even if they're backed off a little bit. The experimenting on
the bodies. Brian Devincartney, who was a recruiter in the end and hated
every minute of it. They've forced thousands to be recruiters. Now. Trump
Burger forever says no vaccines, but they didn't say anything about not making you
wear high heels. Nathan Bedford, for is eighteen sixty five. Most of
those that left because the JAB were white Christians. They should not go back
because the deck is stacked against them and they will be used as cannon fodder
for the military industrial corporations. Yeah, and I say corporations instead of the
complex, because it's not too complicated to see that the corporations are driving this
thing as these stakeholders. It's a public private partnership, so let's synthesize the
private part of this. We'll be right back. Whether you're feeling like the
blues or blue grass, ATS Radio has you covered. Check out a wide
variety of annals on our app at APS radio dot com analyzing the globalists next
move and now the Deep Nut show. Well, Biden is invoking wartime powers
for what for his climate war in the same way that Trump invoked wartime powers
for his COVID war, these different mcguffins, and then Trump did it.
He invoked wartime power so they could manufacture ventilators to kill people. Well,
high eighties, low nineties percent of people who put on ventilators died. Biden
is doing this so he can kill gas powered residential furnaces. He was to
get rid of our gas furnaces. So you know, they've all got something
they want to kill. It's a war against us. And they both have
the same tactic, don't they Both Trump and Biden petty little dictators going to
war with their own people using executive orders. Whether there's ventilators or in the
case of Biden, I guess you could say duckwork. But a Cold War
era law that will pour tax payer funds into domestic manufacturing of electric heat pumps,
an alternative to gas powered residential furnaces. Well, I mean you could
look at it and say, at least at the moment, of course,
this is part of the Green agenda, is going to kill us all.
But at this moment, you know, Biden is not engaged in directly killing
people like Trump did with the ventilators. This is the same thing that they're
doing here. The federal government would award an a store one hundred and sixty
nine million dollars for nine projects across fifteen sites nationwide and an effort to accelerate
electric heat pump manufacturing. The significant level of funding was made possible with a
grant from the Edinburgh Pandiction No after Biden utilized the nineteen fifty Defense Production Act
today's Defense Production Act. He said funds for heat pump manufacturing show that Biden
is treating climate change as the crisis it is, said John Podesta, who
is the White House clean energies are. Yeah, he's been involved in some
other things too that weren't so clean, wasn't he. Yeah, the climate
change as the crisis that it is now as the mcguffin that it is.
It's the mcguffin. And he said, these are will grow domestic manufacturing.
They will create good paying jobs, good paying jobs for some millionaires and some
billionaires in these companies that are getting graft and corruption. Were those jobs where
people made gas furnaces that actually worked better? Were those not good paying jobs?
So the people who are going to be making electric heat pumps, they're
going to get better paying jobs, and the people are making gas stuff.
Is that right? No? No, but they will be getting government money,
government money. No. The other jobs are just as good, and
they made a product that people wanted and would purchase in the free market.
So this is a harbinger that not only is Biden misallocating resource, essentially planning
the economy, but also getting ready to ban the other stuff. Ben Lieberman,
a senior at the senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute. So do
all the Biden administrations claimed climate emergency declarations? This may be the craziest of
them all. There is no shortage of heat pumps. It's just not that
every homeowner wants them. Consumers ought to be able to decide for themselves.
The government has no role in tilting the balance in favor of one energy source
over another, or one appliance over another. But that is clearly what is
happening here. Yeah, they want to micro manage our life and destroy it.
That's the purpose. They're not even trying to help us. They want
to destroy everything. They want to tear firm the environment here. I mean,
they're sucking CO two out of the air. In general. For the
first time, you have they've already set up these facilities where they would go
to some manufacturing facility or some power station where they're generating power, and they
would capture the exhaust and they would extract the CO two and they would send
it into a pipe and they would you know, the idea is to pipe
it all the way across the country and to start somewhere underground. What a
bunch of nonsense that is. But it's even worse now, and it's gone
from silly grifting lies to something that is really dangerous for us all. And
now they're starting to set up these facilities where they're going to extract CO two
out of the air. We need CO two. CO two is you take
CO two out of the air, the plants are going to die. The
more CO two that's there, The more the plants grow, the more they
produce oxygen and other things like that. But no, no, no,
we're going to just we're going to cut the trees down and we're going to
bury the trees. We're going to extract CO two out of the atmosphere.
These people are insane, and the craziest ones are us for letting them get
away with this. Meanwhile, as we look at this war that he has
a against heat pumps. Biden goes to war with Americans. It's not just
going to war with heat pumps. He's going to war with Americans and the
Pentagon. As I said early in the program, has failed to produce sufficient
information for the accountants to do an audit six years in a row, and
their budget is over three trillion, So there's no accountability for three trillion dollars.
I don't know this stuff has gone missing like it did just before in
January, you know, September eleventh, of January sixth, September eleventh,
and I've told the story. I won't go into detail about it. Lady,
we went down to Wimberley in Texas and it's kind of a tourist area,
just kind of hanging around. She's in a shop and she says,
yeah, yeah, it was completely empty. Karen is looking around at some
of the nick knacks, and I'm standing there, and so she wanted to
talk, and so she starts telling me about all of her history, how
she used to be in the military, she and her husband they retired.
She said, I got out just before nine to eleven. It's a good
thing I did because because she said, you know that that missile went right
through the office where I was working. And then she tells me, and
we had trillions of dollars that was missing, and she said, I can't
tell you how many congressmen and senior military officials resigned rather than facing the charges
and crimes and all the rest of stuff. And she couldn't put that together.
She couldn't put it together. Asked her, I said, what do
you get your news? Usually CNN? She could not connect the dots.
And so you know again, Pentagon six years, three trillion a year.
I mean, that's eighteen trillion. Now not all that is missing, but
they can't really account for it. And the annual audits, the twenty twenty
three audit, when the accountants did it, they added a disclaimer. A
disclaimer of opinion is the technical term that the accountants use, which made that
there's not enough data here to form an opinion. So you paid us through
an audit, but you wouldn't give us the data. So here's the disclaimer.
We have no opinion. An unqualified or clean opinion would be the highest
possible rating, and a qualified opinion is an acceptable rating. Both of those
would mean that the auditors were given enough information to make a complete judgment,
but they didn't get either one. They didn't get an unqualified and they didn't
get a clean. Instead, they got a disclaimer. I've got no opinion
on this because you didn't give me any data on this. And twenty twenty
two, the Pentagon only managed to account for thirty nine percent of its three
and a half trillion dollars in assets. And then, of course there's the
four budget estimations in the rampant over expending, like you see with the F
thirty five program. The estimated lifetime cost for the F thirty five planes one
point seven trillion dollars, would make it the Pentagon's most expensive weapons project ever.
A twenty twenty one Pentagon assessment of the F thirty five found eight hundred
resolved unresolved defects still in the plane. This was before it was hacked by
the Chinese. He ejected the pilot or whatever whoever hacked it. Chinese Russians,
you know, they ejected the pilot and uh, whatever happened to the
point, we don't know about that either. Furthermore, in twenty nineteen,
a loon the Pentagon made thirty five trillion dollars in accounting adjustments. Accounting adjustments.
I was twenty nineteen. Now they point out thirty five trillion dollars that
they made in accounting adjustments. It's bigger than the entire US economy. Talk
about a fudge factor. You're looking at the repo market. Yeah, the
Federal Reserve kicking in. You know, well, here's here's some money we
kicked into the repo market. That's about the size of the Puerto Rico's economy.
And then a couple of weeks later, let's kick some that was about
the size of the Swiss ecunty. The Pentagon is out there with their eraser
making adjustments that in the thirty five trillion dollars bigger than the entire US economy.
Pentagon budget is not only gargantuan, but it's replete with waste. These
shadowy practices have boosted the profits, however, of US weapons makers. That's
why I say the military industrial corporations of Lockheed, Martin, Raytheon, Boeing,
Northrop Grumming major gains made despite the challenges posed by inflation and supply chain
issues caused by the pandemic. Along the same lines, the US government is
expected to reach a one trillion dollar defense budget by twenty twenty seven. If
not before, I think it'd be way before. I mean, we've been
up in the eight hundred billion dollar range for quite a while, and now
with all these multiple wars are trying to get going fire up, I think
they'll make it way before twenty twenty seven. The defense budget has expanded as
a result of both the war, both these wars and Ukraine with Russia and
as well as the guys between Israel and Hamas, and of course the eager
anticipation of a larger war with China and Taiwan. That's why they're doing all
this stuff. Germany vows to massively expand their war effort in Ukraine even as
they're melting down their economy. You know, we're in we've got suicidal people
who are leading our countries in the West. Now, the suicide of the
West, the suicide of actually it's a demicide of the West by his own
government. Yeah, you want to describe government in three words? How about
war, death and poverty that they get through taxes. Germany is my overall
value, the second largest source of weapons and combat material to Ukraine, having
promised or delivered to Ukraine seventeen billion euros of military aid in all forms from
late January twenty twenty two to July twenty twenty three. Over the same eighteen
month period, the US delivered or committed about four forty one billion euros.
So again, you know, we are way more than anybody else, more
than double the number two guys. And David Stockman. So as Uncle Sam
doesn't have one thin dime for Joe Biden's hundred and six billion dollar war package,
I'm going to be talking to him again about his new book. His
new book is not on this, by the way, is another topic.
Win your face with the next essential threat to your very national survival. He
says, this is what you do. You mobilize your economy for an all
out struggle, and you impose heavy duty war taxes to pay for a dramatic
buildup of military capabilities. And here's an example what happened during World War Two
with the American government. Between nineteen thirty nine and nineteen forty five, federal
government seats rose nearly sevenfold. On top of that came a huge amount of
war bonds and borrowing. You had is mostly for military mobilization. The military
expenditures rose from less than ten percent of GDP in nineteen forty to a wartime
peak of forty percent by the end of the war nineteen forty four to nineteen
forty five. So he says, now, as you look at Israel talking
about the Hamas attack, every single one of them is comparing this to Pearl
Harbor. And yet there is no comparison to Pearl Harbor when you look at
the Israeli reaction to this. Netanyahu has insisted that Israel's withering bombardment of Gaza
must not give way to a pause or a ceasefire, just as Washington did
not stand down from Pearl Harbor either. However, where is Netanyahu's powerful budget
speech to the Kanesset, there'd be equivalent to FDR's famous call to arms and
economic sacrifice before the Congress in January of nineteen forty one. Member, it
is December seventh. In nineteen forty two, it was December seventh, nineteen
forty one. Pearl Harbor happened, and in less than a month he said,
all right, we got to massively ramp up. You see anything like
that in Israel isn't Yahu talking about how they have to go undergo massive build
up and we've got to have you know, we've got to suck it in
and build it up. No, where's his lobbying campaign for an all out
Israeli economic mobilization and stiff war taxes that would dramatically increase the government's claim on
the nation's economic source resources. No, of course not, because he's got
Uncle Sugar who's going to pay for their war. They don't have to have
any big military budget or any build up. We will pay for that.
Where's the plan for a true garrison state with a vastly expand ded military budget
and armed forces that be needed for the future to protect Israel's citizens from being
caught flat footed again? Where are the plans for the hundreds of thousands of
additional soldiers it would be required to ensure that several thousand Hamas barbarians who inhabit
the open air prison on Israel's southern border never again break through the properly sealed
off militarized barrier on the perimeter of the Gaza Strip. There is nothing like
that in the works. There is a whole lot of lobbying going on,
but not in the Kanesset. Instead, it's in Washington. Uncle Sam is
flat outbroke. Washington cannot afford a single dime of the one hundred and six
billion dollar package that Biden is trying to shove down the collective throats of America's
Apolis of legislators. That especially includes the utter waste of another sixty one billion
dollars for Washington's insane proxy war against Russia and Ukraine, and the fourteen billion
dollars for Israel as well. Israel has not yet even begun to tighten its
own economic belt in order to pay for its war policy that its militaristic and
religious extremist government insists upon. Instead, the pending usaid package amounts to only
two and a half percent of Israel's GDP, and it comes on the back
of Netanyahu's ceaseless, decades long campaign for a garrison state national security policy,
but one that he funded on the cheap via a quasi pacifist defense spending level
Dogman said that's right. Israel's military expenditures had plunged from more than twenty percent
of GDP at the time of the last existential crisis during the Yam Kapor War
of nineteen seventy three, they were spending twenty percent of their GDP on military.
Now they're only spending five percent. It's as of October the seventh.
When that happened. Netnyah Whuo falsely told Israeli voters that they didn't have to
take the risk and make the territorial concessions implicit in a two state, diplomatically
based solution to the Palestine problem. But at the same time they could also
avoid having to be taxed to the gills for the alternative, a costly,
heavily militarized garrison state. So we're not going to we are not going to
make any concessions. We're going to be tough. We're going to have a
garrison state. We're going to approach this with a military with no political negotiations.
But then they don't fund that garrison state. Instead, they're going to
look to us to fund it. So, even more than the failure of
Israel's vaunted intelligence operations and the run up to the October seventh massacre, the
real deep policy failure is the flaccid blue line below, slouching toward five percent
of GDP defense spending after the Net and Yahu coalition came to dominate policy in
the nineteen nineties. You simply can't have Garrison state policy. No negotiation with
a Palestini is no two state solution, no continuation of OSLO or anything else.
And do it on a four on a five percent GDP war budget unless
you get America to foot the bill. Israel seeks twenty five billion dollar defence
budget, and he points out that the entire GDP of Gaza was twenty eight
billion, and that they have a five hundred and fifty billion dollar national GDP,
and their GDP, in other words, is twenty times larger than what
is in Gaza. Their military budget is about the same size of the entire
GDP of Gaza, and yet they come to US for money. Between twenty
twelve and twenty eighteen, net Yahoo gave Cutter approval for transfer of accumulative sum
of nearly a billion dollars to Gaza in the form of suitcases full of cash,
same kind of stuff that Obama was doing, where they ran by and
doing giving them suitcases of cash, and we at least and at least half
of that is estimated to have reached Hamas, including its military wing. In
an interview with the Whynutt News website in twenty nineteen May fifth, Netya Who's
associate gershen Hakkonen Cohen, a major general in the Reserve, said quote,
we need to tell the truth Netna, Who's strategy is to prevent the option
of two states. So he is turning Hamas into his closest partner. Openly
Hamas is an enemy, but covertly it is an ally. Earlier that spring,
in twenty nineteen, Netanyahu himself widely quoted as saying whoever opposes a Palestinian
state must support delivery of funds to Gaza done in the case of suitcases of
cash from Cutter because maintaining separation between the Palestinian authority in the West Bank and
Hamas and Gaza will prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state. So that's where
we are now. Now what is going to happen? The Pentagon is mulling
deploying marine regiments as the Israeli Hamas war rages. Yeah, they're going to
send about I forget, I didn't put down it. Six to eight thousand
people about the number of people that they kicked out over the vaccine. Eighty
percent of them with a dishonorable discharge. We're not going to just send weapons,
We're not just going to send money. We're going to send people.
And as Jason said, they may not wait for people to voluntarily re enlist.
They might be recalled because not only will we pay for their war,
but we will fight their wars for them as they go to war with us
trying to ban everything, every little convenience in life, because nothing is too
small to escape the purview of Biden. And these people who want to wage
war on us with their climate justification, well they get us involved in an
actual war because we see what is happening with the pandemic. We'll be right
back here News Now at apsradionews dot com or get the APS radio app and
never miss another story. Liberty, It's your move. And now the David
Knight Show. Some of the comments here is hearing girl says, I guess
Netanyahu didn't just didn't kill off enough Jews with a jab. He has to
thin out the herd a little bit more. Yeah, that's right, Jay
Caravella talking about the heat pump wars that Biden is using. You know,
we're at war. We got a you know, send special financing in to
make heat pumps. Jay Caravella says heat pump is the most inefficient thing ever
created. It barely puts out a couple of degrees warmer than what is taken
in. I know because we suffered with that. We we bought, we
built a house. We're living in North Carolina, and I argued with this
idiot architect that we had, and I was a general I was a general
contractor for it, but I hired an architect. Oh no, heat pumps
are completely different. Now. It's like, seriously, I don't know.
But he convinced me, against my better judgment, to get a heat pump,
and we were shivering all the time. The only thing that saved us
was that we had a really intense fireplace. We had a fireplace that had
an interior that was I forget the material was made. It was some kind
of sandstone or something like that. But it had a venting that went up
and around, and then they built the facade on it. But that thing
had had smaller doors, very heavy doors, and we had in vented from
the outside the fresh air coming in, and we could stoke that thing really
big. I got it so hot that we melted the iron grate that was
holding the logs up. And uh, and we did that on a regular
basis. I mean, there wasn't any wood anywhere close around that thing.
It was all it was all marble and brick and everything else. But that,
you know, it was that was in another room, and it still
didn't help us in the bedrooms. It was still very, very cold all
the time. I really hated that. He says, It's even funnier about
it is there's no way that he pump is going to be adequate to keep
people from freezing to death in Canada. That's right, that's right. It's
for very mild climates like you would have in Florida or something like that.
And he writes Trude Hoe justin Stephen caspar I worked at a power plant in
the nineteen eighties. They were burning oil and gas and ran almost perfectly clean.
Everything was adjustable to do that. And they keep graphs that the EPA
collected monthly. Yeah. Well, you know that's the thing. It's like
anything you can make it diesel cars that are perfectly clean. But they're going
to ban him anyway. And this is, you know, just as last
year, first time the EPA has put out emission standards to ban power plants,
and it's just absurd. We know what their religenda is, there's no
question about it. Jason Barker said, when the military terminates a contract early,
they have to still pay out the full amount to the contractor. In
that spirit, they should pay all the soldiers they kicked out. That's right,
with full salary they would have gotten over the course of their contract.
I absolutely agree. Of course, there's not going to be any justice there.
They will get very stingy. Isn't it funny how they are so free
with money when it comes to their contractors, and how stingy they are when
it comes to their soldiers. And this is what you see in government all
the time when it comes to paying their friends. Money is no object and
we don't really care to do any accounting. But oh, but you know,
we've got to balance the budget here. That means we've got to do
something about social security. And I know that it's Social security and Medicare and
these things. You know, that's the biggest part of the budget. There's
not even any talk about transitioning in a way. There's no talk about maintaining
their quote unquote Social contract if you will. So I've said before people criticized
ain Ran for taking Social Security. She said, well, I had to
pay it. I was forced to pay into it, and I was given
assurances that this is going to happen. And it's not a retirement account anyway.
If you had an individual retirement account, and if you died before you
depleted it, you could pass it on to your heirs. But you can't
do that with Social Security because it's a Ponzi scheme. It was always designed
that way. They picked the age of sixty five Bismarck did in Germany because
that was life expectancy of the time. That's why they keep saying, well,
the best thing we can do is to raise the age of retirement because
they never planned on anybody getting it greg talent. They will offer a path
to citizenship to illegal immigrants in exchange from the military service. Yeah, that'll
be part of it. Angus must nang. Maybe that's why they're bringing in
the army of young men across the border. You think they'll do that,
do you think they'll find Maybe they'll bring them in and train them to fight
us when they create the chaos in the Civil War. Angus Mustang Greg Talent.
Yes, that's what I've been saying. They will load up the ranks
of them as thirteen members or any immigrants that they can ye turn against the
US citizens during martinal law. I haven't read that, but yeah, I
agree. I think the same thing Teteb. Ninety seven four oh one.
Plenty of military age males seeking US citizenship, paycheck, healthcare, etc.
Will gladly take a rifle and point it at anyone they are told to.
Exactly, so let's talk about this is from Daisy Luther and the Organic Prepper
blog. She says an insurgence of idiots, and so everybody's talking about insurgents
everywhere. I guess that's the new point of view on TikTok these trend on
social mediallity is a bunch of stunned young people making shocked faces at the camera
talking about the brilliance of Osama Lawden. And I see this is the problem
that I have with it. I don't you know, is this? Why?
Is this a big thing? Right now? Right? You should be
asking yourself why now? Why have we not heard anything about Osam bin Laan's
letter for twenty years and now all of a sudden we hear it. I
have my real, real doubts about this. This guy is the Swiss army
knife of misinformation from the CIA. They can use them for anything and everything.
So now we got from Tim Osmond, that's the name that they gave
him when they would check him into the Pentagon, the CIA would and anything.
So now Tim Osmond's stuff is out there. Do you trust anything about
Osama bin Lauden? I don't quite. Frankly, I don't trust anything.
But the other thing about it is is that was this letter from Osama bin
Laden? Do you care? Does it make any difference? It's as if
you know, we got a letter from Anthony Fautsci about vaccines and pandemics,
does that matter to you, Or if you got it from somebody that you
would trust, you know, put in the name of one of these doctors
or somebody that's pushed back against this stuff, does that make it legit?
It should never make it legit. It's just like we're talking about different news
organizations, right. I've always had this discussion. You should never ban a
news organization, which is what the CIA developed news guard working with Microsoft,
an election guard. That's what they do, you know, they give labels
and say, don't trust anything that this organization says. Meanwhile, you know
they're most highly trusted news organizations like the New York Times, the Washington Posts
and others like that. Oh, believe everything that they tell you. No,
you should be doing this on a case by case basis. New York
Times and Washing Posts are even capable of doing something accurate once in a while,
capable, but not usually doing it. And you know, even though
somebody else that may be overall trustworthy, they everything that anybody says, it
is not always one hundred percent true or trustworthy. People make mistakes, and
then you have other people who deliberately try to lie to people. But they
don't make that distinction. They just say, well, I don't like the
fact that they're opposing our government narrative, and so we're going to say that
you don't pay attention at all to what these people do out there. But
what difference does it make whether this letter is from Obama Osama? I always
get them confused for some reason. I don't know. Does that make it
credible because it comes from Osama bin Laden? What does it say? You
got to look at what it says and say well, is this true,
because there's a lot that's in it that's not true, a lot that is
opinion and conclusion. It's an op ed piece. Whoever wrote it, it
should stand on its own as to whether or not it's true or not.
I give references when I quote things because I don't want to plagiarize people.
But it doesn't make something true because it comes from, you know, somebody
that you generally agree with. But Osama bin Laan is becoming the new Chegwavara
of the TikTok generation, and so Daisy Luther says would call them useful idiots.
I call them youthful idiots, because there's nobody that's more useful than the
youth. And of course Lenin knew that. I think he was the one
who called him useful idiots. TikTok has now rehabilitated Osama bin Laden nine to
eleven. They say was justified and an act of resistance. They say,
well, you know, the reality is is that what is really scary about
this is that this is multiple layers of idiocracy. Not only do these people
believe it hook line and sinker, but even though they believe that Osama Lawden
did nine to eleven and was able to take down in New York three say
ice scrapers with only two planes, and they fell right into their footprint.
Even though they believe that's true, they support him, but truly is amazing.
I mean, if you believe it, you would want to do something
like go to war with Saudi Arabia, you know, not Afghanistan, but
you'd want to go to war with Saudi Arabia. You do want to go
after Asama bin Lan, which by the way, they didn't. It's kind
of like you see what happened what's happening right now with Israel and Hamas.
You have these terrasts who organize this thing, and they're living a life of
luxury and cutter and everybody knows that they're there. But you don't have the
US negotiating turning over these people. You don't have Israeli assassins going there to
take them out. No, they're gonna They're going to use this to pursue
their agenda of what they wanted, which is land in territory. And I
think that was a big part of what Afghanistan was all about. They wanted
the poppy fields, they wanted the lithium that was there, and they use
nine to eleven as an excuse for that. But just as a reminder about
what we're talking about, osam Bin Latten, let's remember what nine eleven was
about. Here is a retired chief with the Fire Department of New York.
How did you come to the conclusion that nine to eleven was a false flag?
For the first ten years, I did not see New York Fire Commissioner
other than the official narrative. Then after being shown a video, a close
up video of Building number seven coming down, and that got me going because
it's obvious to me that Building seven was a controlled demolition because the building collapses
from the bottom down. Did you basically break down and it wasn't even hit
by a plane? Firefighting and construction for US, okay, I've been involved
with heavy construction for over thirty years, been involved with the constructions of a
high rise steel framed buildings in Manhattan. I've worked on bridges and I know
what goes into these buildings. I know what file loads that they can handle,
how fire is going to act. The trade centers were unique in that
they were designed to withstand the impact of a jet. From what I understand
the outer skeleton of the building, the outer columns, was like a fish
net, and you had these inner core columns which were substantial, thick steel
beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. That the engineers
always over designed a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or
since nine to eleven, so that should say something right there. I came
across an analogy of the twin towers, and if you could visualize cast iron
stoves stacked one on top of each other, the stoves up at the top,
Yes there's fire and they've been damaged, but the stoves on the box,
they haven't been damaged. So the structure underneath all of that is intact.
So it's impossible for a building to collapse near free full speed and increase
without a control demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. Something
else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or
the fires. I think that. And they examined the dust and they found
what they call thermitic material, which is like an explosive incendiary which was in
the dust samples, and that's document. I think the fireman knew something was
up. City New York City Fire Department knows exactly what happened, and they've
they've been told, you know, not to not to comment on it.
They know. These are my brothers, These are the guys I went to
fight fires with. These are the guys I grew up with. They don't
see how you know, when you lose my friend Mike Kaefer. He was
the only son, he was going to get married, he had a life
ahead of them. His parents were devastated. So you have all this,
you know, collateral damage on top of that that people don't see that.
It just infuriates me that something like this could take place. These people that
did it don't even care about that. You know, you killed some of
the best people in this country. You murdered them. Yeah, I learned
a lot of people. They always do that, isn't it interesting? And
again that's the New York Fire Department, former fire commissioner. And there's been
no change in building codes or construction. There's been no change in firefighting procedure.
So obviously these people don't believe any of this stuff. The architects who
are lying to you about that, they don't believe this, or they would
change the way they build buildings. They don't change anything in terms of fire
fighting tactics or fighting a fire. And a skyscraper is he pointed outs,
the only time before and since that you've had a steel core building that just
collapsed. I've shown pictures of steel buildings in other countries on fire for days
and there's nothing left but this, you know, steel structure, and it's
leaning a little bit, but it still didn't fall. And so these people
on TikTok are too stupid to understand that. And I say stupid, it's
stupid to believe the government narrative. This is beyond the magic bullet, stupid,
incredibly stupid, so low information. And so, as Daisy Luther says,
let's put aside for a moment all of our doubts about what occurred on
nine to eleven, the actual culprit, because that isn't the topic of this
conversation. This conversation, these young people believe lock Stock and Barrel that the
Biden bin Laden was a mastermind of attack on America, that he was able
to kill three thousand innocent people, and they think that he is awesome,
awesome. These are the double down dummies, ignorant haters, incapable of any
critical thinking, and so she says, the letter is ravings about why they
attacked America. And of course, again this supposedly surfaced about two thousand and
I think this was set up to enforce the CIA story. But now these
idiots on TikTok are looking at it and in the context of what's going on
with Israel and Hamas, and they've made him a hero. Where did we
get into a situation that this crazy no sources are cided. He simply goes
on on about the evils of America and Israel through the lens of his religious
belief. Again, I think this is the CIA. CIA made him the
mastermind. We had to have a boogeyman. And even though in the narrative
that they created most of these hijackers was in Saudi Arabia, they went to
Afghanistan. Tim Osman, you know, the guy that's supposedly on a dilation
dilator machine. He's running through the mountains with his dilator machine for years and
years until he served the useful purpose of making Obama look good. Because Obama's
They've used this guy over and over again. I guess they were all really
upset that Obama decided to kill this fictional character because now they've lost that.
But now they're bringing him back, bringing him back. So you know,
when you look at the CIA, think about the fact that the CIA organized
feminism campaign. They were very involved in that, using these radical feminists in
the sixties and seventies, and of course, you know, creating the drug
war, creating many of the drugs, but you know, running the drugs.
The CIA is doing that to the extent of pushing abstract art and architecture,
removing beauty from our society. The CIA has been at war, a
satanic war against us. The climate stuff that's heavily footprints and fingerprints in that,
the poisoning of our minds everywhere. But of course they were also involved
in the poisoning of our bodies. There's a CIA running these germ games going
back to two months before nine to eleven. beIN Laden hated Jews, Americans,
and gay people, just to name a few on his hit list.
Again, I don't, unlike Daisy Luther, unlike Jerald Slindy, I don't
even think this has been lauden. I think this was written by the CIA.
And if you know this is you know their attempt to sow discord and
chaos and hatred and everything else. And it's an attempt to shore up again
in two thousand and two, to shore up their phony war against their guy
tim Osman. He believed the name body who died on nine to eleven deserved
it and wasn't innocent because they paid taxes in a country that committed the acts
against what he had grievances. He was filled with hate because the first segment
of this manifesto mentions the Palestinians. These kids think that he is now a
beacon of truth. Well again, the fact that they would celebrate this is
bad enough, and it's compounded by their total ignorance and gullibility to believe this
CIA narrative in the first place. Again, I don't believe that this has
been laden. It wouldn't make it true if it was. But they're now
making bin laden another che guevera. The letter goes on to demand that everyone
convert to Islam. It discusses how we've separated church and state in Americans,
says that's a bad thing. Well, it's only a bad thing if it's
Christian, right, Yeah, See, the organizing principle left my entire life
has been We've got to get God out of our society. We've got to
get Christ out of our society. We got to purge any free exercise of
religion out of our schools and any other institution. And there is again,
there is an ignorance and an inability to understand history to distinguish between establishment of
religion and the free exercise of religion by people who work for the government,
or work in schools, or who are students in schools, and all the
rest of this stuff. The letter concludes, if the Americans refuse to listen
to our advice and goodness, guidance and righteousness that we call them to,
then be aware that you will lose this crusade Bush began just like the other
previous crusades in which you were humiliated by the hands of the moujah hadeen,
fleeing to your home and great silence and disgrace. Well, she said,
ignorance is bliss until it gives you a big fat dose of scharial law.
And so TikTok, they say, is cracking down on this, But that's
another aspect of this. Daisy Luther says, I think the genie is out
of the bottle. Well, it's more like a gin, right, that's
what the Muslims essentially called a demon. Our young people have been radicalized,
which is something I've written about before. They've been taught by our education system
and our media to hate America. Yeah, because we're colonizers. And again,
that is what is going on with all this stuff about Musk. You
know, he's pointing out, you've weaponized these kids along and Marxist agenda,
along a Hitler agenda, where you've got to have the other, You've got
to have some ethnic group that everybody is organized to hate. What was that
group? Well, people like Jonathan Greenblatt at the ADL and others like that
still celebrated and infended by the mass majority of Jews out there. They don't
say anything about that. They embrace that, but they weaponize us. Greenblat
says, well, we got an oppressors Olympic. Well, he was one
who said white people are the oppressors. It's not okay to be white,
and we don't know not all lives matter, only black lives matter. This
kind of tribalism that was pushed for power and money by the ad L,
the Southern Powary Law Center and the federal government who was using them to do
this. They were the surrogates for them, in the same way that Twitter
and Facebook and Google and YouTube were used for censorship. It was coming from
the government. You know, the useful and well paid idiots. Well,
they aren't idiots. They knew what they were doing at the ADL and the
Southern Powary Law Center. They've been doing this for a long time. They've
been running this oppression Olympics and this victimhood status. Everybody is a victim of
white Christian males, and so we got to kill the white Christian males.
I'm sick of that game. I'm sick of the ADL. And you can
call me whatever you want. I will I am. They've called me everything
that they wanted to. You know, they've been doing this crying wolf stuff,
and you know what, it's getting really old. That's why I defend
Elon Musk on this. He's absolutely one hundred percent right about this. These
people have been selling hate. They're whores selling hate. I'm sick of the
ADL. I'm sick of Jonathan Greenblatt. He's the most racist, hateful person
out there and he's spewing this and projecting it on to everybody else. Yeah,
it wasn't oppression Olympics until, as Victor Davis Hanson pointed out, until
the Jews got labeled as white oppressors, white colonizers. They're not going to
escape that once you get labeled by the mob that you created. Just like
Grobspear created the mob and then he became somebody impowered create a mob to take
the people in power out. Well, then these Jacobins got into power and
guess what, the mob came after them and they got sent to the guillotine.
And so when you look at this TikTok stuff, you need to understand
the bigger picture here. Why is it that conservatives are so focused on TikTok
and now all of this stuff about Osam bin Laden And you want to know
what I think is happening. I don't think this is something that happened organically.
In my opinion, this looks like a CIA operation. CIA going back
and pulling up this letter that they probably wrote themselves back in two thousand and
two and putting it out there, obviously antisemitic, as an excuse to take
down TikTok and so TikTok is saying, well, we're going to aggressively take
this stuff down and so forth. But you got all these people, all
these conservatives who say we got to get TikTok down. Look, I agree,
it probably is a horrible piece of propaganda. So what these people,
the ADL wants to censor, and people like Descent is doing it for them,
going to Israel and signing a law in Israel, not in Florida,
signing a law in Israel about hate speech. We'll take down your opponents.
Got some cash, can you pay me? Now? I'm sick of this
type of thing being done. And of course they want to take TikTok down
because if they can ban an entire website, and imagine what they can do.
They can take down Rumble, they can take down Odyssey, they can
take down bitch Shoot, they can take down substack because you know, that's
all content that they hate. That's content that they've already been able to censor
on YouTube and Facebook and other places. And so if you let this precedent
of being able to take TikTok down, that's going to go everywhere. And
so I think that the CIA is pushing this beIN Loden thing. I think
they wrote it. I think they resurfaced it and resurrected it. Oh look
it's Andy Semitic. So now we can take down TikTok. You got UNESCO
out there launching an action plan to regulate all Internet content and social media platforms.
Let's see who was it that was at the UN under Trump. Oh
that's right, it was Nuki Hayley, who's now the darling of Wall Street
investors. They just love her. She's going to be so good for business
for the military industrial corporations. The plans were announced on November the sixth.
The UN says the action plan it's action plan outlines the principles which must be
respected as well as the concrete measures which must be implemented by all stakeholders.
Whenever you see that, understand that these people are holding stakes that they want
to drive through our hearts. They see us as vampires and vermin and a
virus and everything else that they've labeled us. So UNESCO is going to organize
a the World Conference of Regulators middle of next year, a world conference of
regulators who will do regulation without representation, just like our bureaucracies do now.
We have taxation without representation from the bureaucracy in Washington, all under the president.
You know, the entire swamp was under President Trump, that's the executive
branch. He did nothing about it, by the way. And so this
swamp that taxes us without representation, this swamp that regulates us without representation,
now they're going to get a global swamp a conference of regulators in mid twenty
twenty four seven tenants. Number one, the impact on human rights at every
stage will be examined by every stakeholder. Yeah, it doesn't say that they
support these rights. It's going to be the compass for their decisions, you
know, the impact on human rights. But they very carefully don't say they
support human rights. If they did, they be lying. Number two,
independent public regulators are set up everywhere in the world with clearly defined roles and
sufficient resources to carry out their mission. This is what the UIN wants.
So they want public regulators set up everywhere in the world taking orders from them
about what to ban. Number Three prevent digital companies from taking advantage of disparities
between national regulations. In other words, we're going to have one set of
global rules. We're going to have some unelected global regulators. We're going to
tell every sovereign nation what they must do centrally controlled censorship. Number four,
Content moderation is feasible and effective at scale thanks to artificial intelligence and other things
that are coming along. Number five accountability, they hold people accountable to them.
And transparency. Not transparency for what they do, but transparency for what
we do. Transparency at all these platforms take a look at all of their
algorithms and where are you hearing that with the FCC regulation as well. Number
six, platforms must take make a take more initiative to educate and train users
to think critically. Yeah, start with the Osama bin Laden. And finally,
number seven, the bureaucrats and the platforms must take stronger measures during particularly
sensitive moments, like you know, elections and crises. Well, yeah,
it's always an election is a crisis for them. They're worried that's going to
get out of control. Now you see people on the right, like this
article from Epic Times on zero Edge, millions of Americans are walking into a
Chinese made trap, and they talk about how bad TikTok is, and it
is it's stupid. I've never been to it though, I mean, I
know how stupid it is because I've seen what libs of TikTok has pulled from
there. But look, do we ban everything that's bad? Is that a
response everything that's bad needs to be banned and needs to be banned by the
federal government. Well, you know there is another option. You don't have
to use it, or you can do something that is positive, right,
or you can oppose it publicly. It's very much like drugs. You know,
drugs have not been over fifty years, they've not been able to stop
the drugs by force of prohibition by banning. They did try to do it
legally. They understood the Tenth Amendment didn't give them the power to ban anything,
and it still is there. So they don't have the authority to ban
TikTok anymore than they have the authority to ban anything else without a constitutional amendment.
And that's why everybody went to the trouble of putting in the eighteenth Amendment
when they wanted alcohol prohbition, Because the federal government doesn't have the authority to
ban anything, whether you're talking about alcohol or tobacco or pot or TikTok or
anything. They have no constitutional authority. The emperor has no clothes. That's
why Jeff Sessions was afraid to push that. As much as he hated pot,
you know, the states could make it legal, you know, and
say, well, we're not going to enforce those federal prohibitions, and there
was nothing he could do about it. He did not want to have that
argument. He didn't want to expose the fact that this is naked tyranny,
that the emperor has no clothes, but the whole idea that everything that we
don't like needs to be banned. This is essentially cancel culture. Do you
think the cancel culture began with a left. No, the right was doing
that as well. We don't like drugs. I don't like drugs. I
don't use drugs. Therefore, but I understand that it is a spiritual issue,
not a law enforcement issue, and after fifty years, maybe the other
people might understand that as well. I understood that a long time ago.
I was in bands in college. Everybody was using drugs. The people on
the band using drugs, the people in the audience were using drugs. I
didn't have to use drugs. I didn't use drugs. I said. That
was to the engineers. I worked with, and they said, yeah,
they probably thought you were a narc and probably did always been that way.
Anyway, Thank god he saved me from saved me from addiction and a lot
of other things before I ever got involved in them. Uh. But anyway,
when you when you look at this, Okay, so they're they're freaking
out about the fact that you got a lot of young people getting a lot
of their news. Was it forty three percent or something from TikTok And that's
more than quadrupled. Okay, So you banned TikTok. Let's say the tristics
full conservatives, and you get TikTok banned, Well, where are they going
to go for their news? CNN, PBS, New York Times, Fox
News? Where are they going to go to get their news? These are
all phony places anyway. I mean you have to look at everything and with
a skeptical eye. Yeah, forty three percent of TikTok users say they regularly
get their news on their site from thirty three percent who said the same thing
a year ago. So it's increasing. So I guess you should get your
news from the New York Post, the New York Times, the Washington Post,
the Washington Examiner places like that. I know these people are going to
get off a TikTok and start watching me. So but you know what I
do is I look at this stuff and try to deconstruct it, try to
make sense out of it, and try to deconstruct these lying narratives that the
government has put together. Earlier this year, the Guardian published a piece of
meticulous piece meticulously outlining how TikTok appears to be a part of the Chinese communist
parties quote cognitive warfare campaign. Well, of course they are. Of course
they have a cognitive warfare campaign. Do you realize that the American government does
as well? Oh they won't talk about that, will they They have a
cognitive You know, Russia will tell you the truth about America most of the
time. The lighty about Russia, same thing about the Chinese. Earlier this
year the Guardian published a piece talking about that, and they said, it's
the cognitive domain of their military operations. They always have to have a boogieyman
for for what purpose? For censorship, for internet totlitarianism. Look where we're
just talking about Asama bin Laden, right, they had to have a boogieman
so they could put in the Patriot Act. They had to have a boogeyman
so they could have the Irockan Afghanistan Wars. They had to have boogeyman so
they could usher in the police state, surveillance state. So TikTok is now
the boogieyman to give themselves a power to arbitrarily seize and shut down any website
that is dissenting from their official story. That's what you need to understand about
this. And when you look at Nikki Haley pushing all of this stuff,
she doesn't want you to know her name. As a listeners pointed out,
and we talked about this last week, but she demands to know your name
because you know it's going to make the internet such a friendly, friendly place.
We'll be right back. Sometimes you want to go where everybody knows your
name, as Batch came, You want to be where you can see say.
You want to be where everybody knows your name. Whether you're feeling like
the booze or bluegrass. APS Radio has you covered. Check out a wide
variety of channels on our app at apsradio dot com. All right, Eric,
thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that. Thank you.
About nine to eleven. Chevkin three twenty one says, the B fifty
two, the crash in the Empire State Building, that's right, in nineteen
forty five, didn't bring that building down. Isn't that funny? Yeah?
And isn't it funny that it didn't bring didn't bring the Empire State Building down?
And even though it didn't collapse into his footprint, they came up with
more stringent building codes, which you know, even after you have three buildings,
only two of them hit biplane collapse in their footprint steel buildings in just
a couple of hours. They don't change anything about the building codes or the
firefighting procedures. Militant Melankovic, if the heat warped the steel, it wouldn't
fall straight. Make that make sense? That's right. Yeah. I've said
before we didn't have TV to watch any of this stuff as it was unfolding,
and and we had relatives in New York. As a matter of fact,
Karen had a cousin who worked in one of the nine to eleven,
one of the trade center buildings got out, and so you know, her
parents were calling us with updates and all this other kind of stuff, you
know, And yeah, they were and and then you know the phone call.
She says, one of them is falling down, and I'm thinking,
I thought, wow, Manhattan's not that big. This thing falls. How
many buildings did it knocked down? How many? You know? How far
down in Manhattan did this thing collapse? And never occurred to me that this
thing would fall straight down in its footprint. And then another and then another
one that wasn't even hit by a plane te Ub ninety seven four One free
fall speed is the key. The laws of physics dictate that can only happen
if all the supports are cut simultaneously. Exactly right, Nathan Bedford, Force,
eighteen sixty five. It was a B twenty five Mitchell bomber that ran
into the Empire State Building. The B twenty five is much much smaller than
a B fifty two, that's right, you know, I think they'd be
fifty two's came along by until World War two or around then or after.
I guess a B twenty five mass gross weight is about fifty thousand pounds.
A B fifty two's max gross is over three hundred thousand pounds. Still,
it was hit by a plane, didn't fall down, and they still changed
their procedures Jason Barker, just like cup Operation Northwoods exactly. They had the
exact plan to get us into a war with Cuba back in the early nineteen
sixties. They just recycled that plane that was shut down, that plan that
was shut down by JFK. That's right. They said, we can make
it look like Cuba did this. We can fly planes into buildings, and
we can pose fake hijacks, so you know, we can have people calling
in and saying that you know, they're in a plane that's been taken over,
and then destroy the plane over the ocean where nobody can find it.
You know, it was everything that happened on nine to eleven, you know,
with was it United ninety two, ninety eight, something like that,
Audi modern intro radio. JFK wasn't pro secret societies, says she had on
secret societies weren't pro JFK either, Yeah, very much. As a matter
of fact, you know, the guy who was putting that stuff together,
Liman Limitser. He fired him. He went to Europe, became head of
NATO after that, so he was chair of the Joint Season's staff when they
did the Operation Northwoods, and then he sends him you know, he gets
fired, he becomes head of operations in NATO, and that's when they ran
Operation Gladio, this false flag that you know, had these NATO people pretending
that they were communists, you know, shooting people and killing people, killed,
kidnapped, and then killed. Aldo Moro, the Prime Minister of Italy
and the Italians did an investigation and said that Steve Pachennik favorite guy, their
favorite guest of n four Wars do They had it on and on, over
and over and over again. Steve A. Cennick who sold the lie about
the sting January the sixth, while he was sent by Henry Kissinger to trying
to negotiate for the release of Aldomorro. What the Italian government said was that
Oldhamorro saw through all this, and Steve Achenick said, got to kill him.
Then went on to help to write fantasy novels with about spice stuff with
Tom Clancy Brian Taylor. The twin towers were built with a possibility of planes
crashing into it in mine. So the official narrative is BS Yes about Osama.
KWD sixty eight says anyone can be a hero. Lucifer has been a
highly rated TV show that's now. I saw that there was a TV show
like that. I haven't seen it. Ripper sixty seven to twenty. In
my opinion, Ben Lauden was not a man but an idea. Well,
it might have been some guy named tim Osman. I don't know. It's
a look Cat nineteen. I'm a bin lot and a useful boogeyman that never
dies. Yeah, because even though it runds me so much, wag the
dog, you know where they've got. They're playing this game. They got
a hero that's coming back and they're doing and then like the other guys realize
that they're playing this guy up and they kill off the guy and it's like,
oh, they put a narrative out that is planning and crashed about Biden's
carbon war. Karen Carpenter says, plants need CO two to thrive, animals
need plants to thrive on So it all adds up to life not doing it
doing too well. That's right, That's what the big plan is for.
And so when we see that the UN UNESCO in particular is going to be
setting up a big conference next year to come up with global rules for everybody
from unelected bureaucrats to control everything, to make sure that none of these corporations
get a pass because they're based in a particular country. All the countries together
are going to come together and say no, you know, we're going to
shut down Twitter or whatever. If there's any speech thing, we'll be able
to shut it down. You got Nicki Haley out there saying everybody's got to
have an ID. I got to know everybody's name. They're pushing everything and
it's all to protect the children. You've got conservative Republicans saying we got to
have IDs so kids don't get porn online. You got others saying, well,
artificial intelligence is going to be creating all kinds of fake stuff, so
you're going to have to prove that you're a human and also give Nicki Haley
your name. We're not going to control AI, we're not going to control
the smut generators or whatever. You've wanted to do something again, I don't
think that that would work. That, like drugs, is a spiritual issue,
which doesn't really lend itself to any kind of government prohibition. Unfortunately,
if only it were that easy, right, get rid of all these demons
that addict us and control us and imprison our spirits. Not that easy,
you know, we keep using keep using a hammer when a nuclear weapon would
be better. You know, our weapons are mighty. As Christians, we
can pray because we have a mighty God. But instead we would prefer to
try to use these little hammers to hammer everything, because everything looks like a
nail to be prohibited by the government. And so you've got all these different
threads that are coming together for censorship. Right. The TikTok thing is just
another one. Nikki is just another one. They are coming at it from
multiple places, and of course the FCC Commissioner, the FCC has exerted its
plan for Internet control last week. I haven't talked about this yet, and
it is all about DEI. Even Biden is calling it digital equity. Digital
equity, Well, we know what that means. They've used DEI programs to
punish people. You get sorted into different groups, many of these groups based
on characteristics that you can't change, like your skin color and or even your
gender because you can't really change the gender. If you're a man, you
know, you get kicked to the side here as well, and so they
sort you to these different boxes. Some boxes are good, some boxes are
bad. They've got a hierarchy. How many good boxes did you check?
How many bad boxes did you check? That's what this is all about.
Digital equity or digital equity is no different from diversity, equity and inclusivity.
It's all about intersectional ranking. That's what they call it. When they put
you in the boxes, then rank the boxes good and bad. Biden's plan
hands the administrative state, the FCC in this particular case, effective control of
all Internet services and infrastructure in the country. Isn't that convenient? You know,
just as the UN is coming up with this marching orders for what everybody
is supposed to do, they're laying the groundwork through the FCC for them to
be able to implement the plan, which we've already known that was a plan.
I read you the seven points. It's horrible, but it's just like
the CBDC. We know what CBDC is intended for, and we know what
their censorship of the Internet is intended for, and so never before and the
roughly forty year history of the public Internet, has the FCC or any federal
agency for that matter, claimed this degree of control. Indeed, Biden's plan
calls for the FCC to apply a far reaching set of government controls that the
agency has not applied to any technology in the modern era, including Title II
common Carrier, said Brendan Carr, a former FCC commissioner. He says this
is unprecedented, and he's also says it's unlawful. Congress never contemplated the sweeping
regulatory regime that Biden has asked the FCC to adopt, let alone authorize the
agency to implement it. Of course, that's Congress. That's so old school.
We don't do regulation with representation anymore. We have regulation as being done
by executive orders by our tyrants, whether it's Biden or Trump. They do
executive orders now, and then the regulatory agencies, whether it is the FCC
or the ATF under Trump, you know, they just implement these orders and
do whatever they wish. They don't have to be accountable to the Constitution,
and they don't have to get our approval. They don't have to be held
accountable to us or stand for election or that stuff. And what's even worse
is when they put these rules together. You understand, they use the legal
fiction that we will call these rules instead of laws. Even though they have
the same they use them under color of law. So they use these rules
as if they were law. But they say, well, since this is
not done by your elected representative, since this is regulation without representation, these
rules are not laws, and we don't have to obey the Constitution when it
talks about due process or presumption of innocence or protection against excessive fines. We'll
just do all those things to you because these are rules, they're not laws.
That kind of cynical, kafka esque speak. This makes me want to
throw up. I hate this regulatory state, this regulation with that representation,
and as bad as it is, as bad as it is that they're writing
laws, they say, well, with rules, you don't have any protection
against you know, we can do it without due process. We can punish
you as much as we want. The cost of car the former FCC commissioner
car Side, The Biden administration's broad band policies are failing. The Costs of
building internet infrastructure in this country have skyrocketed due to Biden's economic policies. Of
course, everything is skyrocketed due to his economic policies by design. While the
FCC has been looking to expand new five G services, he said, it's
needlessly blocked and delayed new broad band infrastructure bills because of reglatory red tape.
Well, because they want to control everything, right, I mean, I
don't even want new five G services. I reject this. It hasn't been
tested. We don't know if it's safe. Plenty of evidence that it's unsafe.
We know that it is the necessary foundation for the smart cities and the
full time surveillance and police state. So I don't want any five G services,
But they don't want them for a different reason. They want to make
sure they completely control everything. Biden has chosen to blame the private Secretary says
in free market capitalism for the administrations on policy shortfalls. If passed, the
FCC would be empowered for the first time to regulate every ISP's service termination terms,
the use of credit, the account history, the credit checks, account
termination, among many other things. Look, I'm not interested, and well,
we want to have you know, the free market work as good as
spot. That's not what this is about. Really, this is about them
being able to control everything. Because what they're doing is they're exercising this control
over ISPs. It will eventually drive them out of business or make them or
take them over to such a degree that they're just a little bit of a
pass through for the government. Regulatory This is about the government directly controlling everybody.
There'll be a little bit of an in direction and then eventually that'll disappear.
They're not talking about, you know, how can ISPs better serve people
or whatever. And the Republicans get on the side of this to say,
well, let's carve out a little bit here so the big business can still
make some money because they give me money when I run for Congress and that
type of thing. That's not what this is. Ultimately, this is about
complete control, and that's why they're doing this. The government wants to be
able to shut down our life except through the virtual reality of the Internet,
and then they want to control that completely and shut us out of that because
you're going to have to have their number, their mark for the beast government.
You know, again, the beast is a reference to the government.
You're going to have to have that in order to buy, sell, trade,
move anything like that. That's part of it. Complete control, global
control. The Biden administration's plan, says the SEC former Commissioner, and powers
the FCC to regulate every aspect of the internet sector for the first time ever.
And when do we see that they want to regulate every aspect of energy.
They want to regulate every aspect of the internet, every aspect of our
food and our transportation and everything that we see here and say, so we
see no evil, we speak no evil, and we hear no evil.
The plan is motivated by an ideology of government control that is not compatible with
the fundamental precepts of a free market capitalism. Way, if that isn't a
understatement, Biden is turning digital discrimination into a pretext for regulating everything. Yeah,
how is that different? Right? When they want to shut something down
or shut somebody up, what do they call you racist? And that's what
the ADL has been doing for them for the longest time. Oh, you're
racist. Okay, we can cancel you, and we can cancel this,
and we can cancel that. That's what all of this is about. And
that's coming not from the former FCC commissioner, but from a former FCC policy
advisor, Evan Schwartz Traumber. He said, to call it extreme or radical
doesn't do this proposal justice. Senator Cruz reacted to that, saying Democrats are
hoping to convince the American people that broadband internet is so racist that they need
to plow ahead with government mandated affirmative action, race based pricing again, racist
for anything. They want to destroy, anything, they want to cancel,
anything they want to take over in control. That's what's going on here.
So Cruz and twenty seven of his colleagues called on the FCC to rescind its
draft. Worry, see, this is how we got here. You know,
you'll have maybe a quarter of the Senate we'll oppose this, but nobody
will oppose the regulatory state that just does whatever it wants because they like that
they have. The Senate and the House have both agreed that they don't want
to have responsibility for making laws. They would rather have show hearings and show
trials and this and that. But they don't want to actually have to write
laws. Besides, they could never get the kind of oppressive government that they
want if they had to actually pass all these laws. So they punt it
over to the bureaucracy, and the bureaucracy moves so quickly that the boiling frogs
wake up and complain about it. Well, then Congress can come in and
pretend that there are saviors and adjust that little thing just a little bit and
make them pull it back. You saw that with the FAA a few years
ago. They said, well, you know, even if you've got a
drone that's about the weight of a paper airplane, you'll have to report that
to us and pay a twenty five dollars fee to report it. And if
you don't report it to us and we see you flying this, well then
we're going to hit you with a twenty five thousand dollars find Everybody said,
what this is crazy, So they talked about it. They pulled it back
a little bit. But look, this is all under the executive branch.
Trump is not going to change anything. He didn't change anything the first four
years. As a matter of fact, he increased this by doing gun control
by executive fiat and then giving us martial law by executive fiat as well.
We'll be alright back. Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have
access to the best channels anywhere, from country to blues, classic hits to
news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy. Get details
at apsradio dot com. If you are listening to the David Night Show.
Well, something did happened over the weekend. Uh, very surprising. Yesterday
we had the elections in Argentina and Javier malai one and the establishment press is
freaking out about this. They're afraid that he might set a new trend,
might show what happens when you've got free market economics. It's a tall order.
I don't know if he'll be able to get it done. He's like,
you know, a man alone. He doesn't have a big party there,
so not clear whether this is going to be able to work or not,
or how they will use this. And I've said even before the twenty
sixteen election, I said, if you've got somebody who's really popular as Trump
wise, I said, they will rig the elections if the elections are close.
But if there's if you've got somebody who's popular enough, they're not going
to try to rig the election. You know, if it's again, if
it's a very narrow thing, they can squeak it out. But if it's
a landslide, they're not going to do anything about it. And we see
that even here in some of the states. But I said, what they'll
do is they wait. I said this about Trump and twenty sixteen, I
said, he's so popular. I think that he's going to I think he's
going to win, and then they'll oppose him afterwards. And of course they
did, and they were already opposing him even before the election with all this.
Oh well, you know, I violated all of the national security rules
and regulations, says Hillary. Well, who released that information about me?
That's what I want to know. Forget about the crimes, forget about what
was there. I want to know who did this? You know that red
hearing And so I imagine that they'll do the same thing with him. You
know, the fight is just beginning. He has now got himself into in
a tight spot now, as George Clooney would saying, brother, all right,
though he's in a tight spot now and it's going to be really tough
for him to do anything about it. But he did make that first hurdle
there. And listen to the headlines like from Reuters Argentina elects quote shock therapy
unquote, libertarian aver Malay as president and again just a reminder, one hundred
and fifty percent inflation. But they think that this is just too risky to
try to do anything different. Let's just keep going down the same path that
we did. Maybe it'll all just go away. And I've talked several times
to Axel Kaiser, who wrote the very popular, best selling street Economics,
best selling economics book in South America, and he's translated into English recently,
so I've interviewed him a couple of times. And you know, I am
somewhat surprised because I figured that the well two things that were happening and we
had he came in second when they had the first runoff. So when I
first had the election the summer, he surprised everybody becoming by coming in in
first place. But they have a lot of different candidates, so they said,
all right, we'll take the top three vote getters and we'll have another
election. And they did that what about a month, the six weeks ago
or something like that, and at that time he came in second, and
the top vote getter was the socialist communist Paranista, who, by the way,
is the Minister of Economics when they've got one hundred and fifty percent inflation.
And so it was set up to where the older generation loved Parone and
Avida Parone and the Paranistas and they loved socialism. It was the young people
who are looking at this, as Axel pointed out Axel Kaiser, the young
people will look at this and say, I haven't got any future. This
is insane. They had known nostalgia about one Parone and Avita Parone, like
you know, the delusional, schizophrenic maga people have these, you know,
images that they've built of Trump, and it was the same type of things.
Its cult of worship of a personality. But the younger people were looking
at it. And so their secret weapon was going to be Taylor Swift opening
up her con CERTs in South America, you know, one in Brazil,
another one in Argentina. And we were laughing about the fact that mainstream media
here in the United States said, well, maybe they can pull this off,
Maybe they can convince young people that they want to stay with socialism,
stay the course. And so they had Swifties against Freedom Advances self owned name
the Taylor Swift fans who were against his party, which is called Freedom Advances.
But when you look at the phrase, it was really pretty funny.
So again Reuters says he is an outsider with radical views to fix an economy
battered by triple digit inflation, a looming recession, and rising poverty. Well
it's one hundred and fifty percent inflation, they said, And of course he
won by fifty six to forty four, so it was pretty good. I
went. And, by the way, the reason he came in second and
that the party that came in third was a business party. So that's why
it looked unless it was going to be cheating, it looked like you would
get this kind of result. So maybe they had an honest election because the
Conservative pro business party threw their support behind him. Once that party was eliminated,
and so the Paranista. As I pointed out before the second election where
the Paranista came in first place, he pulled out all the usual stops.
Even as they were having hyperinflation, and he was the economics minister. One
hundred and fifty percent inflation. He decides that he'll lower taxes and increased giveaways
to people, added some new social spending programs and things like that. So
I thought, well, is that going to work? Is it going to
work to have the swifties on his side, the not so swifties. Maybe,
Well, none of it did, and he cleared that hurdle, and
so then this is the way it is reported by Bloomberg, Argentina takes a
leap into the unknown. Better to stay with the devil that you know,
right, the socialist paradistas who have ailed at everything. According to Bloomberg,
I guess libertarian outsider Javea Malay won Argentina's presidency, promising a radical shake up
to fixed decades the policy of mismanagement, a strategy that resonated with a populace
suffering under a nose diving economy and one of the world's worst inflation rates today,
starts the building of Argentina, said Malay Malai. He said, there's
no room for gradual measures. But they push back and they say, well,
some economists are warning. In other words, they are they don't like
it, right, because then further down they actually have a Bloomberg writer who
opposes them. That's always attack to these Well, some people have said this,
and then they say what they want to say, but out their opinion.
Anyway, He says there is no room for gradual measures. He wants
to ditch the Argentine peso for the US dollar. He wants to close the
central banks. It wouldn't this be a nice example. If he's able to
do this, maybe somebody could get some ideas about our own central bate and
have drastic cuts to public spending in an attempt to jolt the country out of
its forty six million people out of its malaise. And so then Bloomberg says,
well, some economists, some economists, unnamed economists warn that dollarizing the
six hundred and twenty two billion dollar economy at a time when international reserves are
depleted could tip the South American nation into another bout of hyperinflation, another bout.
International Monetary Fund officials have meanwhile called on the next government to swiftly reset
the economy, emphasizing that there is no time for gradual policies. So not
even the IMF agrees with Bloomberg, Not even the IMF, because they want
to get some money out of this thing. Potential will now turn on how
Malai implements his most contested measures with only a handful of representatives and a fragmented
Congress and an impatient electric with more than forty percent of Argentines below the poverty
line. See this is this is where it gets difficult, because he's going
to have to put together some kind of a coalition to getting this stuff done,
unless he decides he's just going to operate by executive fiat like Trump and
Biden. I don't think he's like that, though he's not going to He's
going to take office December the tenth. The Central Bank has nearly run out
of international reserves to prop up the PAESO, meaning a large currency devaluation is
expected any day now. Despite his non existent party structure, he placed first
in the August primary, shocking political establishment. Then that in October that that
was when they had the second one, and then the pro business block of
a former president was eliminated, and so their candidate then and worst, Malai.
He is has a very interesting persona well they Wall Street Journal when they
do articles, they don't talk about his free market economics. Let's not talk
about that. They talk about his hair. They talk about the fact that
he has a dog, a favorite dog of his that died and he had
him cloned. He's got a lot of dogs and he's named them after economists,
like you know, Milton Friedman. He's got Milton and you know the
other. He'll be Argentina's first formally trained economist elected to the top job,
and of course they desperately need an economist, and he is somebody from the
Austrian school of economics. As we talked to our guests last week who was
with the Musa's Institute. He's from the practical school that practically works. He
has accused the parentised opponent and his allies running a campaign of fear, but
he walked back some of his most controversial proposals, such as loosening gun control.
In his final campaign ad, he looks at the camera and assures voters
that he has no plans to privatize health care or education. Unfortunately, but
again they keep the epithets coming ap fiery right wing populist. He's not libertarian
now, he's a populist according then, because that's a dirty word to say,
a populist. So meanwhile, how was Taylor Swift in her army doing?
It was a big defeat for them, even though in when we look
at Riodesian era in Brazil, she goes there for her concert and they have
this giant statue up there of they call it Christ the Redeemer. So they've
got this statue that's supposed to look like Jesus whatever Jesus looked like and in
a robe with arms outstretched arms. And what they did was they projected her
stuff about her and her albums and everything projected it on. There's a yeah,
you pull that up and show people what that looks like and make that
bigger. Yeah, there you go. So they essentially got Jesus wearing a
Tailor Swift T shirt. That's that you can look at that. She's getting
into John Lennon's territory here, I think, or whoever did that. Yeah,
bigger than Jesus, right, even the big Jesus that's up there in
the hills. Rio Mayor Eduardo Pays confirmed that the little symbols and the projection
were meant to evoke Swift on Thursday, and he gushed that she was as
big as Michael Jackson, you like all the rest of us is, you
know, died and all of us will die, so you might want to
stop comparing yourself. Well, he didn't directly compare her to Jesus, but
you know, in terms of political logic, I am a mistake, said
Malai, because what I have come to do is in fact to stamp out
the privileges of politician. Again, he wants in the currency controls that protect
the peso, and he does favor laxer gun control, although he's walked back
on that. He also talked about tighter rules on abortion. You know,
across the board he was leaning conservatives. Why the American press hates him so
much? One Gonzalez, Of course the press there hates him as well.
A journalist and an author on a biography of Malai. The biography is called
El loco, which means the crazy one cast doubt on the wisdom of electing
a leader who is seeking radical change at a time when inflation is one hundred
and fifty percent state that's a rising in recession is looming. Okay, So
according to this guy, they should keep on doing the same things they've been
doing. So who is crazy. The person who's crazy is the one who
says, well, let's keep doing the same thing we've been doing all along
and hope for different results. That truly is crazy. So we need to
stay the course, even though we got one fifty percent inflation, massive reception,
recession and people falling into poverty. Let's stay the course and keep electing
our socialist, communist government. Let's not try anything different. Harp says the
bloke wants to get rid of the peso for the US dollar and is an
Avid israel fan. Well, the first part of it there, in terms
of getting rid of it. I don't like the Federal Reserve, but he
says it's more stable than he says. All the central banks are awful and
he doesn't support central banks, but he says there isn't any central bank that
is worse than the Argentine Central Bank. And I guess you could make a
point that if you look at their inflation rate of one hundred and fifty percent,
maybe they are the worst one that's out there unless you have Zimbabwe or
somebody that's a little bit worse. But again that is a stopgap measure.
What he wants to ultimately do, as we talked about in the interview with
the guy from Sir Thharnton from the Mesa's Institute, he wants to get back
to people owning gold and silver and get the money, get the government out
of the money business. That's the economic school that he subscribes to, you
know, the Austrian school, and he believes in that, but he sees
the you know, getting shutting down the Argentine Central Bank and shutting down the
Argentine Peso. He sees that as a stop gap measure. So we'll see
about that. But I don't think that they're going to be sending any money
or troops to Israel, unlike US. So we're gonna take a quick break
and we will be right back. Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing.
Check out the Jazz Channel at APS radio dot com and the APS Radio app
and leave the stress behind. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well,
let's talk a little bit about some other pro life issues besides stopping war.
Nikki Haley's attempt to thread the needle on abortion. It's the way that
Business Insider put it. Well, I think what she's trying to do is
not thread a needle, but she's trying to thread the forceps. Maybe that's
what she's trying to do here. Nikki Haley has called for a consensus on
the issue of abortion. She's going to bring for us a consensus on abortion,
something we haven't been able to achieve for fifty years. Right, Well,
if you want to have a consensus, that means that you've got to
show that what is actually happening to the babies that are being killed. She
doesn't want to talk about that. What she wants to do is to have
a consensus of financial donors on Wall Street. And as we've seen over and
over again, they don't care. They don't care about the murder of babies.
They only care about winning. And if this is something that's going to
be difficult for them to convince people not to kill babies, to show what
the truth of the abortion is. If that's an issue, then these financial
backers say, drop that issue. The important things that we win so that
you can give me a payback for the money that I've given you. Because
return on investment for these politicians is really very high, and they want to
get that. If they win, they win really big. You know,
you're going to get like a twenty five hundred percent return on investment or better.
But they have to win. Haley is anti abortion, says a business
insider. No, you're not. If you want to try to make exceptions,
carve out exceptions on you're not, you're not. It's a matter.
Then we look at the other side of this, this progressive group that is
operating out of Washington, DC. Several of them have been arrested for violating
the Face Act, which again is being weaponized like the January the sixth stuff
against pro lifers. But they've been very active in terms of protesting. And
these people are true progressive, They are true leftists who for whatever reason,
have I don't know where they're coming from. They don't seem to be coming
from a religious standpoint, but I don't know what their basis of objection is
to it, but they seem to have a clear moral objection to this,
and they have used all the tactics of the left. And so the Daily
be says, these progressive anti abortion group is playing dirty to get ahead.
So that's just it. You know, they're going around bring graffiti everywhere and
writing slogans everywhere, the same kind of stuff that progresses always do. I
mean, I would imagine they're going to start gluing themselves to the sidewalk or
something or the road, you know, that kind of stuff. I don't
think really changes hearts and minds. And I don't think really that there's going
to be you know, we can show people what the truth is and we
can pray that God is going to change hearts and minds. That's what we
can do. You know, spraying graffiti and insulting people and getting in their
face about that does not work. It doesn't work for the left, it
doesn't work for the right, It doesn't work for any of these issues.
It's not going to work for the pro life issue either. No, the
tactics of the left won't do it. You have to show the truth and
then you have to pray for God to change, to change hearts and minds,
to open them up to the truth. The truth is there that abortion
is murder. You don't have to spray paint the slogan abortion is murder.
You need to show people what the abortion procedure is like. You need to
show people the aftermath of the abortion procedure. Then they will understand that abortion
is murder, or at least if they haven't hardened their heart that much.
So this summer, pedestrians, drivers and passengers in DC so a new type
of graffiti amongst the usual urban scrawls and anti abortion advocacy, designed to troll
this democrat city. Again, they prefer to these colors I hate that stuff,
blue and red. The group is called Progressive Anti Abortion Uprising, and
again they want to do all the stuff that the left does, you know,
taking over buildings. And this is another thing that I didn't like about
January sixth. That's not a persuasive It never accomplishes anything. You know,
show up and scream at people to shut down hearings or this or that.
I mean, that's a code Pink thing. It doesn't work. It doesn't
change people's minds about anything. And if you're conservative, will throw you in
jail for doing that. Just ask going you know, Code Pink gets away
with that, but not if you're a conservative operates mostly in the nation's capital.
They've embarked, they've embraced whether they're all kinds of media and as Daily
Beast likes to say, and misinformation to communicate a smash mouth message. And
so again, you know, this is a leftist approach to this, which
I don't think is going to work. Graffiti is part of it, decorating
public spaces, celebrating defacement. I mean, here they think they are they
can't do this stuff. Now. These are progressive tactics that Daily Beast has
never criticized, but when you do it for this issue, they'll criticize it.
So again, why why focus on this? Because as critics. As
Christians, we understand that we have a much better way to do this.
We have weapons that are mighty. By the way, we're talking about prayer.
There is a very important thing to keep in mind. I saw this
on a couple of different sites, talked about it. This is a guy
who was a street preacher and he just collapsed and they thought they he had
some kind of a seizure or something. They happened to the hospital. They
found that he had been shot in the head. And they don't know who
shot him. Somebody that was standing around there, or somebody that's in a
passing car, whatever. Nobody heard anything, but he was shot in the
head while he was a street preaching sharing the gospel. Arizona church leader in
critical condition after being shot in the head while street preaching. He is only
twenty six years old. He's a father of two. A CT scan revealed
that he had been shot. He began seizing and was intubated. There's been
some movement, however, physicians are uncertain how much of the movement is voluntary,
and they began draining fluid from his brain. No suspect has been apprehended.
They're not even sure, you know, no witnesses. Really. Again,
it wasn't until they got him in and did a CT scan that they
saw the bullet. Who knows why somebody we wanted to take out take it
out on a preacher like that, because he was speaking good news to everybody.
Well again, keep him in your prayers, and let's see where is
his name? Looking here? Just keeps talking about a street preacher. But
I don't see his name here. I'm looking everywhere in the article. Oh
Schmidt, Schmidt is his last name. But God knows who he is,
so please pray for him. It's just really horrible to see it. Another
street preacher, Great Comfort is finds himself at the center of a controversy.
They're trying to demonize Mike Johnson by saying, well, Licky's had involvement with
Great Comfort. Who does street preaching? It's it's kind of a different thing.
He he You'll see a lot of his videos on YouTube. He will
walk up to somebody and say, hey, you got a moment you want
to talk, and they volunteer to do it, and they agree to be
on video publicly on video, and he starts asking them what they believe about
God, And you know what, they think their basis of you know,
standing before God when they die. You know, you know you're going to
die, and uh, you know, what what is it that you're going
to tell God? And so you know, they typically they don't think that
they've done anything wrong, and so they spend some time convincing them that they
have done things wrong, We've all done things wrong, that we're all condemned
in God's sight. And then he tells them and by the way, somebody's
already paid your fine. You know, if you had traffic violations or something,
somebody paid your fine, you'd be able to walk out. He said,
well, Jesus paid your fine. You know, why don't you Would
you trust in that? Would you think about that? You know? And
so it's interesting to see how people will react to that. And that's basically
what his thing is. And yet you have Politico the size that they will
try to demonize Mike Johnson. Look, Mike Johnson's to point out before,
he's not perfect. I mean, there's things I disagree with him, especially
if he's a Christian. Why flip flop on Ukraine? Why support that war?
I understand why he's supporting Israel because it's a theology that I don't agree
with, but he's a Zionist on that. I think, you know,
regardless of what you think, the end of the world is going to be,
Like, God doesn't need your help to make it happen. God has
told you what to do. He's told you to defend life, whether you're
talking about life in the womb or life in a foreign country that you can't
find on a map, or that you don't know anything about. That's the
problem. We keep getting involved in these conflicts. We don't know anything about
either side. Most cases, we can't even find it on a map.
And I was like, went out the quote I think it was from hl
Mincon He said, God gives America wars so we can learn geography. Right,
that's the only thing we find out about it. We still don't understand
what was happening there. Just like in Vietnam after the war. You know,
we got this domino theory happening, and you have McNamara, who was
a whiz kid that ran that thing. He goes back to Vietnam and the
guy pounds the desk. He says, don't you know anything about history?
For a thousand years we fought China we're not there, puppet. This was
not a Domino thing. It's like, Oh and McNamara film that the Fog
of War. Just before he died. He said, yeah, I didn't
know that. Whiz Kid doesn't know anything. He may have known the geography.
We all learned the geography about Vietnam, didn't we the hard way,
But he didn't know anything about the history or who was there, or this
or that. And so we get ourselves involved in this stuff again. Before
we're going to get involved in wars. As a Christian, maybe you know,
we can pray for Mike Johnson that he will understand that God has given
him clear orders to be pro life, that they are just war principles that
should be followed. So maybe something will come of that. But again a
lot of slander statements. I'm not going to read the back and forth about
why they accuse him of It's nearly not very important, frankly, and I
would much rather read you this letter from a listener. Ron. He said,
you know, boomers watching wonder and dread that our country is falling,
failing rather irrevocably. Yet how many of us realize what we have become?
He said, painfully? The rest of the world knows by their destruction,
knows us there by destruction, death, and that in for a very long
time, our military has operated as a special interest, policy driven agency rather
than one that is for the protection and defense of the American people. Think
about the terror that we have brought to nations in your lifetime that can't be
justified by self defense. Note the alliances so gloriously praised, falsely contrived by
the ruling elite to preclude war that guarantee across the board conflict. Where israelis
on the beach of Normandy with us? Did you know where Ukraine was in
a map before you cursed Russia? What did we have in common with Akuwaitis
before we killed Iraqis? For them who surely contributed to the motivation behind terrorism
on US soil? He well, this very process is now is how the
citizen representatives are held accountable for when we kill overseas. Instead, these decisions
are made singularly by evildoers, senile old men and orange blowhards. Reflect on
the terror that we have brought to nations in your lifetime. They cannot be
justified in retrospect. The untold suffering that we wrought while we lived comfortably.
Consider do you think that it is only anti fohon BLM who showed no respect
for our founding fathers. These great men spoke eloquently to the horror of former
alliances made at the whim of the elite. So let us not dishonor them
by murdering those who are not a direct threat to us. Establish for yourself
some rules before you support bombs dropped on complete strangers. And of course are
our rules established for people like Mike Johnson and for us as Christians. Whether
the other people follow it or not, that's no excuse. As Michael did,
Sylvia says, what are they doing in our name? Yeah, and
so he says, if guilt or shame fails to restrain your lust for punishing
bad guys once again and a morass. We are not a party of to
know this. Israel is supremely capable of taking care of itself. Our sugar
daddy regard for that nation, long cultivated in us by the most powerful lobbies,
ensure it a robust military without sound and formal reasoning. Like the Christian
doctrine of just war. It is a moral and the worst way to enjoin
that war, and that's what we've been doing for the last seventy years.
And I don't see any change coming from this speaker, who has been involved
with one Christian cause after the other, I think are good causes, and
yet he's not looking at what justifies a response. Again, a just war
says, we don't go to war unless we have been attacked, and we
have not been attacked. But we will be attacked if we continue doing this,
if we continue to be the aggressor, if we continue to initiate this,
if we continue to support both sides and most of these wars, we
will be attacked. And you know it may come from God as we reject
him say well, I was just trying to make your prophecies as I understand
them come true. Well, that isn't going to carry much weight. And
part of this is not just initiating the war, but part of a just
war is to try to avoid civilian casualties. And net and Yahu said,
well, we did a really poor job. Yeah, I think everybody noticed
about that. And the other part of it that comes back to us and
comes back to people like Speaker Johnson, is that we need to as part
of a just war, seek to end the hostilities as soon as possible,
not just try to avoid killing non combatants, but to try to end the
war as soon as possible. I say, for today's broadcast, thank you
for listening. The common Man. They created common Core and dumbed down our
children. They created common past, track and control us. They're Commons project
to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the
common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and
dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are
isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they
hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they
want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at d davidnightshow
dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you
can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. D Davidknightshow dot
com. If you like the Eagles, Highway, the Cars, and Heuey
Lewis in the news, they say the You'll love the Classic Hits channel at
APS Radio download our app or listen now at APS radio dot com.