Sun ninety- six. Point five. Last night was the debate of the
vice presidents of the candidates for the Vice Presidency of the Republic Doña, Raquel
Peña, Zorayma, Neck and Ingre Mendoza. They were involved because, according
to Angel' s rules, candidates were elected to participate in the parties that
won more than five percent in the last municipal election. That' s why
you don' t see that two emerging party group that had their debate in
other media legitimately, as it should be. But every debate organizer sets up
a rule. These were part of the rules that the National Association of Young
Entrepreneurs gives years before ANG, and they have been holding debates for a long
time. They debated in the 16th in the 20th and if I am not
mistaken, then conversational and pods between candidates in the 2 thousand twelve. But,
as always, there are some people who want to push a corner.
There' s always some people who want to throw a douche. And here
I want to express a free country well, everyone can say what they want,
but there are opinions. It' s not a douche bag. Really
worse the soap legs is used to say it in space much more. Yeah,
' cause the bell makes a lot more sense in the shank and because
it looks like a living and gives it color. It gives it color.
But, as always in the Dominican Republic, we believe that everything is resolved
with laws. There are things that resolve with laws, but not all there
is the elbow that is the sheath of the evangelicals saying that in the debates
they have to be imposed by law, which seems to me a bad idea.
If we have come to this day to what without a damn law,
fuck not for what to put a law, put it by law, it
gets hurt. We' re shit. It' s going to happen like
a lot of countries that are going to say nothing, nothing happens, and
people, as they know it' s a forced sheath, it doesn'
t make any sense, and people become disinterested as they would challenge you to
a debate. I' m not forcing you. It would be that if
you want to aspire to a public post, you have to go to a
series of debates. In Argentina and in many countries, an America that has
imposed it by law, it has a series of pre- election and post
- primary and post- primary debates. I don' t know that you
' re going to the primaries open those same ones and I don' t
think that' s a good idea. I think we' ve come this
far well. Last night we saw three ladies, or of them the audience
was very surprised by others that the other was left to duty. Doña Ingri
is owed yes, but we must recognize. I believe that in the exercise
he has shown this and that it must be recognized that Doña Raquel is a
woman who has qualities and a solidity of her impressive formation and in the four
- year service of the State as Vice- President of the Republic, the
President has placed in her hands a series of responsibilities that she has exercised,
which she has to do with positive results. On the other hand we have
Zoraimacoel and a woman over twenty- five in the public service. She was
and is minister of the Presidency in the Government of Danilo Medina, and she
is also a woman with a very solid formation, but also with a mastery
of the issues that have to do with the State, the public polka,
etcetera. Also quite impressive a woman of very solid formation. None of those
three women are there for being a woman and I think last night I was
hoping that if they were elected, by whomever I said we' re going
to put them to them is because they gave her the conditions to sit on
the chair and the desk. They have to take care of becoming vice presidents.
It' s not the quota, not me the worst thing that can
happen to women is the quota, because it would really be an exact humiliation.
It would be like installing even more of the speech that woman doesn'
t serve as you don' t serve anything. We' re going to
put a stop to you here if you' re forced to. You'
re so hear me the world, you' re so useless exactly. What
doesn' t matter when your study doesn' t matter, how much you
' ve prepared, no matter when you master the subject. You have to
give yourself the purest place and simply because you have vagina. You' re
at a disadvantage for having a vagina. Then we' ll give you this
job. And if you go out good amen and if you go bad,
then also if you don' t give the size for that. That'
s the worst thing that can happen to anyone, like the quota for being
a bird or the quota for being black, the quota for being young,
the quota for not, the quota for being you jido in a wheelchair look
at the quotas, don' t solve any problems. Positive discrimination, as
they call it, and I believe that for evidence, it gives the experience
we have had in this country for more than eighteen years, which was imposed
by law that if the candidate is a man, the candidate for the visi
mayor must be a woman, why she must be a woman, supposedly for
there to be parities. All that is garbage, invented by the same group
that has divided this and divided it as they have not divided. I believe
that an example has been every time a mayor has died and you end up
playing it all or all why, because sometimes you put a leader of the
party of Poca Monta without much aspiration, or Fulano' s wife, who
is one who was not happy. We' re going to put his wife
in so that then he gets his share in the administration, the city council,
etcetera. So that I think last night was evidenced that there are enough
more women. Those who fought a lot of issues were alone and 45 minutes,
but what evidence that they should get out of the head of the quotas.
When you, as many men as women, are told that that makes
participation more equitable, say that is a lie. Women and men are in
a position to compete on the basis of merit and quality to occupy a position
without taking into account whether they have vagina or have pe if they perceive vase
or they perceive flower if they sleep with men or sleep with women, if
they are black or white. That is the infantilization of society. Totally then
that night was evidenced I that is not necessary and neither the stupidity of the
elbow that it must be imposed debate by law. I believe that it is
very difficult for one to appear after this election cycle who says that he is
not going for a debate. I, honestly, Alberto was pleasantly surprised.
I thought Rachel was going to have it easy, but above all Soraima surprised
me, although I must say Rachel I was fully in love. From you
for a little bit. You speak very well. He' s got an
impressive diction. It reminds me a lot of my mother' s, with
the particularity that, just like Mommy you get her cibaño sometimes like a little
word. I was faith go to that god of mine. Okay. Now
we await the discussions of the governors and all that of the presidential. And
that' s the end of the century of bar No. But there were
regulators. It is also that already the election of traitor passed him. Okay,
but there needed to be candidates and so on those issues of councillors,
what happens, that they passed it on Facebook, on YouTube, in pairs
of municipalities. Hey, hey, what' s up with this. I
think that, apart from what candidates can do like that, the people can
really see what these people have in their heads, of course, and not
just what they have in their heads, but that development they have. It
leaves a lot to say, because it is certainly very easy to grab you
when the parties or the boards give you twenty or thirty million pesos. I
split a million pesos between him solving problems and doing it with prista and giving
him a box that you see a guy expressing his supposed ideas and from then
on you take a you really have, you forge an idea, you form
an idea of how that guy can work or if it' s worth the
comb to vote for him and you know them. And in my case,
for example, I didn' t know Soraima or Ingrid Mire. The way
you talk about a person leaves a lot to say. Then you can make
him have good ideas, but you can' t express it. And that
' s where you owe a lot of people who did it. And that
makes people, the people, the people who are going to vote, better
know their final candidates, because here people don' t like for ideas or
boots, for projects or launched by vaia boot, because your immediate problem resonates
with them. What' s your immediate problem? I don' t have
a milk in my house to give to my children. It' s the
guy. I need a prescription here. That' s why I envot them