1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:04,919
But there is a drama in the
music world. Is there never not drama

2
00:00:05,000 --> 00:00:07,559
in the music world? Well,
you know there are certain It's funny if

3
00:00:07,639 --> 00:00:10,519
I were to I didn't even know
about this until he brought it to my

4
00:00:10,560 --> 00:00:16,399
attention this morning. But if I
were to say to you, who are

5
00:00:16,399 --> 00:00:18,519
some of the bands off the top
of your head, who are some of

6
00:00:18,559 --> 00:00:22,839
the bands if I if I mentioned
if I say the word drama, who

7
00:00:22,839 --> 00:00:28,280
are some of the the legendary bands
that have had the most drama happen within

8
00:00:28,399 --> 00:00:32,000
them? Kiss? Okay, kiss
comes to mind, right, yep,

9
00:00:32,520 --> 00:00:36,439
yep. And I mentioned Fleetwood Mac
a few moments ago. Yeah, yep,

10
00:00:36,560 --> 00:00:39,119
yep, yep. That's another good
one. And of course has another

11
00:00:39,159 --> 00:00:43,159
band that has had Motley Oh,
lots of drama there yet. We've talked

12
00:00:43,159 --> 00:00:46,320
about that on the show. Lots
of drama there. There's a whole book

13
00:00:46,439 --> 00:00:52,640
about it called The Dirt about all
the Motley Crue drama. Metallica some drama

14
00:00:52,679 --> 00:00:57,439
there. They have a great documentary
which Eric reviewed out Journey one week on

15
00:00:57,479 --> 00:01:02,359
the show that uh, some kind
of monster about Metallica. Journey. Yep,

16
00:01:02,399 --> 00:01:03,879
they've had some legal drive. I
don't even think they talked about last

17
00:01:03,879 --> 00:01:07,879
couple. I know they share the
stage, but don't actually speak to each

18
00:01:07,879 --> 00:01:11,200
other. Jonathan Kane. I think
they talked about their lawyers or something bizarre

19
00:01:11,280 --> 00:01:14,120
like that. Jonathan Kane and Neil
Sean. Yeah, I don't think they

20
00:01:14,159 --> 00:01:19,000
actually speak to each other. They
just the play, which I've always thought

21
00:01:19,040 --> 00:01:21,359
that that's gonna be so weird,
like being in a band with someone and

22
00:01:21,400 --> 00:01:26,079
not even speaking to them. I
remember seeing a documentary once about the Beach

23
00:01:26,120 --> 00:01:30,519
Boys, and there was a period
where the band had essentially split, and

24
00:01:30,560 --> 00:01:34,120
this was like at their commercial peak, the band had essentially split into two

25
00:01:34,159 --> 00:01:38,799
factions. One was the Mike Love
faction and the other was the Brian Wilson

26
00:01:38,840 --> 00:01:44,640
faction. And they would actually enter
the stage from opposite sides because they didn't

27
00:01:44,640 --> 00:01:47,000
want to. Like, how does
a band even function that way? It's

28
00:01:47,000 --> 00:01:49,920
always been fascinating to me, like
how do you how do you write a

29
00:01:49,959 --> 00:01:52,879
set list? Maybe you have one
person who's in charge of writing a set

30
00:01:52,920 --> 00:01:55,280
list. You can't all have input. If you can't even have a conversation,

31
00:01:55,400 --> 00:01:57,840
go through the lawyers, you know, they just pass it around and

32
00:01:57,920 --> 00:02:01,319
agree to know, we're not going
to do this after that, or maybe

33
00:02:01,359 --> 00:02:06,200
the two. All of those dramas, though, are within bands that we've

34
00:02:06,200 --> 00:02:09,000
brought up. This is not a
drama within the band, well there is,

35
00:02:09,479 --> 00:02:15,439
so of course we're talking about the
Eagles, and the Eagles so much

36
00:02:15,560 --> 00:02:19,439
drama historically in that band that when
they did their reunion in the mid nineties

37
00:02:19,479 --> 00:02:23,039
they called it Hell Freeze Is Over. I think it was ninety four and

38
00:02:23,080 --> 00:02:24,599
they did the Health Freezes Over tour, and then of course that wasn't the

39
00:02:24,639 --> 00:02:29,960
end of the drama. There ended
up being more drama with Don Felder getting

40
00:02:30,039 --> 00:02:34,960
fired from the band and so forth, so it never truly ends. Also,

41
00:02:35,120 --> 00:02:39,080
some intense personalities and Don Henley,
about whom this latest but of drama

42
00:02:39,080 --> 00:02:44,599
seems to center around, known for
having a particularly intense personality. By the

43
00:02:44,639 --> 00:02:49,319
way, are you an Eagles fan, because Eagles I always did like the

44
00:02:49,360 --> 00:02:53,759
Eagles, Me too. But they're
one of those bands that people who don't

45
00:02:53,840 --> 00:02:55,639
like, well, they're kind of
like Kiss in this sense, you know

46
00:02:55,719 --> 00:02:59,879
how, you know how with Kiss, like people who don't like Kiss really

47
00:03:00,080 --> 00:03:02,479
don't like Kiss, like really hate
them. Like. I've never met anyone

48
00:03:02,520 --> 00:03:07,560
who simply doesn't like Kiss, they
like, like, I've only met people

49
00:03:07,560 --> 00:03:13,039
who either really like kiss or really
hate kiss. I feel like the Eagles

50
00:03:13,080 --> 00:03:15,919
is like that too, Like people
who don't like the Eagles really hate the

51
00:03:15,960 --> 00:03:19,319
Eagles. You've seen the Big Lebowski, right, yes, yeah, you

52
00:03:19,360 --> 00:03:21,759
know, and there's a whole thing
in there about how much he hates the

53
00:03:21,800 --> 00:03:25,919
Eagles. Yeah, I personally I
love the Eagles. I'm a dudast priest.

54
00:03:27,759 --> 00:03:30,759
What do you mean? Oh,
yes, right, Sorry, that

55
00:03:30,800 --> 00:03:32,599
took me a second. Took me
a second. Still. I used to

56
00:03:32,599 --> 00:03:38,280
doing this in the morning. My
brain isn't but it's different. This is

57
00:03:38,360 --> 00:03:43,840
not within the band. Yeah.
Oh, by the way, we have

58
00:03:43,879 --> 00:03:46,759
to say hello to Chris Porri or
our friend Chrispy, who's a Facebook live

59
00:03:46,840 --> 00:03:51,719
chat Hello, buddy, he's he's
isn't he supposed to be coming on the

60
00:03:51,719 --> 00:03:53,960
show at some point? He will? Yes? Good, good, good,

61
00:03:53,400 --> 00:03:57,960
when he's ready. I'm bringing them
in. Last time we saw him

62
00:03:58,000 --> 00:04:00,759
was at an event at the Hop
knot that's true. That's true. So

63
00:04:01,159 --> 00:04:06,479
yeah, there's some weird legal drama
involving Don Henley and uh this is uh

64
00:04:06,560 --> 00:04:11,639
this story is from Billboard dot com. Uh. And again I didn't know

65
00:04:11,680 --> 00:04:14,400
this was going on until because apparently
this has been going on for a little

66
00:04:14,400 --> 00:04:16,439
while. But there's a new wrinkle. But I this had completely gotten past

67
00:04:16,519 --> 00:04:19,319
me until you brought it to my
attention this morning. I wouldn't call it

68
00:04:19,360 --> 00:04:23,519
a wrinkle. I'd call it a
bit of a creator. Yeah, so,

69
00:04:24,360 --> 00:04:30,920
uh, Eagles. This is the
article Eagles Stolen Notes trial ends suddenly

70
00:04:30,399 --> 00:04:39,560
after judge says Don Henley manipulated prosecutors. Yes, I we got to spill

71
00:04:39,600 --> 00:04:44,879
the T. Yeah, spill the
t. That is what the young people

72
00:04:44,920 --> 00:04:48,319
say, yes, it says.
The abrupt end came after prosecutors revealed the

73
00:04:48,360 --> 00:04:54,639
newly disclosed evidence from Henley cast out
on whether the Eagles notes had been stolen

74
00:04:54,720 --> 00:04:59,920
in the first place. Now,
and I'm just getting familiar with this story.

75
00:05:00,120 --> 00:05:04,040
We're just getting familiar with this story, uh as well, because Jenny

76
00:05:04,040 --> 00:05:06,360
didn't know it. You didn't know
until this morning that any of this was

77
00:05:06,360 --> 00:05:09,680
going on either, right, No, that's not true. I actually knew

78
00:05:09,720 --> 00:05:14,160
about the case being dropped, but
I didn't know why. And now that

79
00:05:14,199 --> 00:05:16,720
I know the why, it's like, really, yeah, you can't.

80
00:05:16,759 --> 00:05:21,399
You can't trust that dastardly done Henley. I like you see the judge it

81
00:05:21,600 --> 00:05:26,519
monished them. I like the Eagles, but I've never trusted them. See,

82
00:05:26,600 --> 00:05:29,839
and everybody goes to Hotel California,
and I was already not that I

83
00:05:29,839 --> 00:05:34,079
don't like Hotel California. But my
go to song was always Desperado. Yeah,

84
00:05:34,079 --> 00:05:38,120
I never liked a Desperado. I
liked that, and uh, Hotel

85
00:05:38,160 --> 00:05:40,800
California. I liked it when I
was a kid, But after the seven

86
00:05:40,879 --> 00:05:43,839
millionth time of hearing it, I
was over it. I can't tell you

87
00:05:43,879 --> 00:05:46,920
why is my favorite Eagle song?
Why can't you tell me? I can't

88
00:05:46,959 --> 00:05:51,040
tell you why. That's my favorite
Eagles song? What song? I can't

89
00:05:51,040 --> 00:05:54,720
tell you why? Like won't you
tell me? I can't tell you why.

90
00:05:54,839 --> 00:05:57,720
That's not nice. I want to
know. I know I can't tell

91
00:05:57,759 --> 00:06:01,319
you why, But that is my
favorite Eagle song. So I can't tell

92
00:06:01,360 --> 00:06:08,360
you why. Manhattan prosecutors made the
stunning decision Wednesday, March sixth to drop

93
00:06:08,399 --> 00:06:14,199
a criminal case against three men accused
of trying to sell stolen notes linked to

94
00:06:14,279 --> 00:06:18,040
the eagles nineteen seventy six album Hotel
California, with a judge saying Don Henley

95
00:06:18,079 --> 00:06:24,439
had manipulated prosecutors. At a hearing
Wednesday, a New York judge dismissed the

96
00:06:24,519 --> 00:06:29,519
charges after prosecutors alerted him that newly
uncovered evidence cast out on whether Henley's notes

97
00:06:29,560 --> 00:06:33,959
had been stolen in the first place. The court defense advanced by Glenn Horowitz,

98
00:06:34,639 --> 00:06:45,120
Craig in INCRTI, and Edward Kazinski. The disclosures came midway through a

99
00:06:45,160 --> 00:06:48,639
closely watched criminal trial against the three
men, in which Henley and longtime Eagles

100
00:06:48,680 --> 00:06:53,720
manager Irving Azoff, who's a legend
in the music industry or Irving as Off,

101
00:06:54,560 --> 00:06:58,720
had already testified. The proceedings had
already run more than two weeks and

102
00:06:58,800 --> 00:07:03,120
had been expected to keep going until
at least next week. The sudden reversal

103
00:07:03,160 --> 00:07:09,519
was sparked by Henley producing new evidence
that had previously had been previously withheld under

104
00:07:09,600 --> 00:07:14,759
attorney client privilege. The new materials
touched on whether a journalist tired in the

105
00:07:14,839 --> 00:07:17,480
nineteen seventies to write a book about
the Eagles, Ed Sanders, had legitimately

106
00:07:17,480 --> 00:07:23,680
come into possession of Henley's notes.
At a hearing in open court on Wednesday,

107
00:07:24,240 --> 00:07:29,720
Justice Curtis Farber sharply criticized Henley and
Azof's conduct. Quote, it is

108
00:07:29,800 --> 00:07:33,480
now clear that both witnesses and their
lawyers used the privilege to obfuscate and hide

109
00:07:33,480 --> 00:07:39,560
information that they believed would be damaging
to their position that the lyric sheets were

110
00:07:39,600 --> 00:07:44,759
stolen unquote. The judge said he
was also troubled that prosecutors had been quote

111
00:07:44,800 --> 00:07:48,720
manipulated into bringing the charges in question
why they had not more thoroughly vetted the

112
00:07:48,759 --> 00:07:54,600
accusations and the evidence, But he
praised them for dropping the case once new

113
00:07:54,639 --> 00:07:57,759
evidence had come to light. Now, by the way, is it possible

114
00:07:59,040 --> 00:08:03,160
that there was no manipulation here,
but the prosecutors were merely big fans of

115
00:08:03,199 --> 00:08:09,279
the Eagles now or perhaps Don Henley's
solo work. Uh uh, you know,

116
00:08:09,560 --> 00:08:11,800
Building the Perfect Beasts is a great
album, and that in case,

117
00:08:11,800 --> 00:08:15,759
they wouldn't have dropped the case,
they would keep going. Because I have

118
00:08:15,839 --> 00:08:16,959
to tell you, like, if
I were, if I were some sort

119
00:08:16,959 --> 00:08:20,839
of prosecutor and Gene Simmons came to
me and said, Hey, I got

120
00:08:20,839 --> 00:08:24,399
to I gotta I want to press
charges, I'd be like, whatever you

121
00:08:24,399 --> 00:08:26,480
want to do, dude, let's
do it. Stop it, Gene Simmons

122
00:08:28,040 --> 00:08:31,800
of Kiss of Kiss, Maybe you'll
call in one of these mornings, stop

123
00:08:31,879 --> 00:08:35,519
it one of these morning. No. See, now I'm mixing this is

124
00:08:35,559 --> 00:08:41,759
an interesting situation because it's not often
that you see prosecutors pulling their own case

125
00:08:41,759 --> 00:08:45,440
and going, oh, no,
we're not going to prosecute anymore. Yeah,

126
00:08:45,480 --> 00:08:48,240
So you know, it's pretty damning. And this is information that Henley

127
00:08:48,279 --> 00:08:54,600
and his attorneys kept from prosecutors,
kept from the court, and that information

128
00:08:54,720 --> 00:08:58,720
was very damning to them, which
is why the judge was admonishing them.

129
00:09:00,279 --> 00:09:03,279
You're not supposed to do that,
not supposed to hide stuff. Oo.

130
00:09:03,679 --> 00:09:09,799
They use the attorney client privilege as
their foundation to keep these documents private,

131
00:09:09,360 --> 00:09:13,399
but apparently something happened that I don't
know if it forced their hand to whatever,

132
00:09:13,480 --> 00:09:18,759
that they had to give these documents
over and the prosecutors are going,

133
00:09:18,879 --> 00:09:22,120
oh, wait a minute here,
If this is right, nobody ever sold

134
00:09:22,200 --> 00:09:28,480
anything, it says you're In a
statement to Billboard following Wednesday's hearing, Henley's

135
00:09:28,559 --> 00:09:33,960
attorney Dan Petrocelli said, quote,
the attorney client privilege is a foundational guardrail

136
00:09:35,000 --> 00:09:37,639
in our justice system and rarely,
if ever, should you have to forsake

137
00:09:37,679 --> 00:09:41,799
it to prosecute or defend a case. As the victim in this case,

138
00:09:41,840 --> 00:09:46,960
mister Henley has once again been victimized
by this unjust outcome. He will pursue

139
00:09:46,279 --> 00:09:52,120
all his rights in the civil courts
unquote. The Manhattan DIA's office declined to

140
00:09:52,159 --> 00:09:58,399
comment. Horowitz, a rare book
dealer in CRT, a curator at the

141
00:09:58,440 --> 00:10:03,519
Rock and Roll Hall of Fame,
and Kazinski, a memorabilia auctioneer, were

142
00:10:03,559 --> 00:10:09,759
all charged in twenty twenty two with
conspiracy over accusations that they tried to resell

143
00:10:09,320 --> 00:10:16,000
and hide the origin of the handwritten
notes penned by Henley during the creation of

144
00:10:16,000 --> 00:10:20,240
Hotel California. Manhattan DA attorney Alvin
Bragg, Ah, we've heard his name

145
00:10:20,279 --> 00:10:24,519
and connection with other cases we won't
talk about here. You have said the

146
00:10:24,600 --> 00:10:28,399
trio had quote made up stories about
the origin of the documents, and they're

147
00:10:28,480 --> 00:10:35,120
right to possess them so they could
turn a profit unquote. But the three

148
00:10:35,159 --> 00:10:39,759
men always maintained that they had done
nothing wrong their core argument. Okay,

149
00:10:39,799 --> 00:10:41,879
so now't now we're getting into the
heart of the matter. You see what

150
00:10:41,919 --> 00:10:46,600
I did there, Yeah, trying
to get down to the heart of the

151
00:10:46,600 --> 00:10:50,679
matter. That's one of my favorite
Don Henley songs. See, I'm telling

152
00:10:50,720 --> 00:10:54,120
you, if I were a prosecutor
and Don Henley came to me I'd be

153
00:10:54,159 --> 00:10:56,879
like, let's let's get these guys. This is why you shouldn't be one.

154
00:10:56,960 --> 00:11:00,799
That's right. You know, people
have liked these rights. I know,

155
00:11:01,759 --> 00:11:05,039
but I'd be more interested in my
fandom of Don Henley and the Eagles.

156
00:11:05,360 --> 00:11:09,039
Apparently we see that selfishness in you. I would not have the discipline

157
00:11:09,080 --> 00:11:11,720
to uh not. Uh well you
don't have a discipline. We know this

158
00:11:13,000 --> 00:11:15,799
now if Joe Walsh came to be. If Joe Walsh came to be,

159
00:11:15,799 --> 00:11:20,519
I'd be a little bit more suspicious
because that song Life's been good. I

160
00:11:20,600 --> 00:11:26,240
never cared for it. Wow.
Yeah, that's so if Joe Walsh wanted

161
00:11:26,240 --> 00:11:28,799
to bring charges against somebody, I'd
be like, uh no, we're not

162
00:11:28,879 --> 00:11:33,480
doing that, Joe, go get
me Don Henley, why you judgemental?

163
00:11:33,639 --> 00:11:37,879
Well, it's uh you know we
are talking about legal matters. Oh is

164
00:11:37,919 --> 00:11:46,240
that change your perspective? Yes?
So, so their core argument that the

165
00:11:46,279 --> 00:11:50,960
alleged theft Sanders said legally obtained them. This is their core argument Sanders legally

166
00:11:50,960 --> 00:11:54,360
obtained them in the nineteen seventies in
the process of writing a never released book

167
00:11:54,559 --> 00:11:58,559
about the Eagles. If the notes
were never stolen, the three argued,

168
00:11:58,600 --> 00:12:03,759
how could they be charged with re
selling stolen property. Okay, so in

169
00:12:03,799 --> 00:12:07,120
other words, so if I understand
this correctly, In other words, if

170
00:12:07,120 --> 00:12:09,519
Don Henley willingly gave the notes here, yeah, take these because you're going

171
00:12:09,559 --> 00:12:15,000
to write this book. Yes,
although that means they're not stolen because you

172
00:12:15,080 --> 00:12:20,000
hand them over, and if you
never sell them to anybody else, then

173
00:12:20,080 --> 00:12:26,240
how can you be criminally prosecuted for
selling stolen property? Is that's what the

174
00:12:26,320 --> 00:12:30,960
charge is. It does seem like
it would be unethical though, if maybe

175
00:12:30,960 --> 00:12:33,679
not illegal. But and there's more
of this, we'll get to it.

176
00:12:33,720 --> 00:12:35,879
But just as we're going through it, well, but if they tried to

177
00:12:37,320 --> 00:12:39,080
if they tried to sell the documents
they had, because the thing is if

178
00:12:39,120 --> 00:12:43,600
somebody So, if somebody gives you
something for the purpose of writing a book

179
00:12:43,639 --> 00:12:45,559
and then you never write the book, and then you say, well,

180
00:12:45,960 --> 00:12:48,799
I'm just gonna take these and sell
them, that that seems really that that

181
00:12:48,799 --> 00:12:52,679
would be that would be I would
think criminal. Well, I don't think

182
00:12:52,679 --> 00:12:56,559
it's I wouldn't think it would be
criminal. In other words, if Henley

183
00:12:56,679 --> 00:12:58,759
gave him the documents and said,
here these are so you can write your

184
00:12:58,759 --> 00:13:03,960
book book and the book never gets
written, but Henley gave that property to

185
00:13:05,200 --> 00:13:09,639
that author or perspective author, and
then so he gave that So they're now

186
00:13:09,679 --> 00:13:13,240
the property of the author. If
Henley gave them, they gave that the

187
00:13:13,279 --> 00:13:18,519
author. I argue that they are
not the profit property of the author.

188
00:13:18,759 --> 00:13:22,519
If the information was given for the
expressed purposes that I'm hiring you to write

189
00:13:22,600 --> 00:13:26,960
this book, here are the documentation, and you never give them back,

190
00:13:28,039 --> 00:13:31,799
does it necessarily mean you have the
right to sell them. I would say

191
00:13:31,159 --> 00:13:37,960
definitely that that's your argument means to
me it would be unethical to try to

192
00:13:37,000 --> 00:13:43,039
sell those documents. Completely unethical,
but not necessarily illegal. If Henley gave

193
00:13:43,200 --> 00:13:46,320
If Henley takes his property and said
here, I'm giving this to you,

194
00:13:46,679 --> 00:13:50,320
so and that now becomes the property
of the author, that may be where

195
00:13:50,320 --> 00:13:52,679
the hang up is. So is
it illegal. I wouldn't think it would

196
00:13:52,679 --> 00:13:58,720
be illegal, but I do think
it would be highly unethical. That well,

197
00:13:58,840 --> 00:14:01,919
yeah, something something to to be
unethical. But necessarily you're hired for

198
00:14:01,960 --> 00:14:09,320
an express purpose and your given documentation
for that express purpose. I'm assuming there

199
00:14:09,320 --> 00:14:13,200
would be a contract there that spells
out what he's doing, you would think.

200
00:14:13,240 --> 00:14:16,919
But remember this was during the in
the process of doing that doesn't mean

201
00:14:16,919 --> 00:14:20,080
you have the right to and there
may there may not have been any kind

202
00:14:20,080 --> 00:14:22,720
of a contract. I mean,
remember this was during the making of Hotel

203
00:14:22,759 --> 00:14:26,399
California. These guys are all coked
up. No no, no no no

204
00:14:26,399 --> 00:14:31,039
no no no no no no,
no no no. This is about not

205
00:14:31,200 --> 00:14:37,279
the writing part, but about giving
these documents over to a writer who was

206
00:14:37,399 --> 00:14:41,399
hired to write a book. But
the book was never published. Right,

207
00:14:41,720 --> 00:14:46,440
That doesn't mean it wasn't written,
doesn't mean it wasn't even finished. Right,

208
00:14:46,559 --> 00:14:50,120
could have been totally finished, ready
to go to print, and they

209
00:14:50,120 --> 00:14:52,360
pull the plug on it and say
we're not going to do that. That's

210
00:14:52,399 --> 00:14:56,080
what he was given these documents,
which does are Yeah, even if that

211
00:14:56,240 --> 00:15:03,039
doesn't give him the right to then
sell them. I come to you,

212
00:15:03,039 --> 00:15:07,039
you're a cake baker, and I
come in with a photograph. I want

213
00:15:07,120 --> 00:15:13,799
this photograph on this cake and it's
somebody famous, and I want you to

214
00:15:13,840 --> 00:15:16,159
copy this picture, but I don't
want you to do anything else. Do

215
00:15:16,159 --> 00:15:18,879
you have the right to take that
picture and then sell it and turn a

216
00:15:18,879 --> 00:15:24,080
profit on it? Isn't that doesn't
that picture still belong to me. I've

217
00:15:24,120 --> 00:15:28,000
only given it to you for the
purpose of making that picture on that cake.

218
00:15:28,120 --> 00:15:31,360
But see then we get into and
again, by the way, neither

219
00:15:31,399 --> 00:15:35,840
of us are legal experts. Feel
free to chime in, So if anyone

220
00:15:35,919 --> 00:15:39,720
is yeah, six O three two
five six seven, But I would think

221
00:15:39,000 --> 00:15:43,320
so in the example that you just
gave again, it would be completely unethical

222
00:15:43,360 --> 00:15:46,480
for someone under those circumstances to then
take that property and try to sell it.

223
00:15:46,519 --> 00:15:50,720
But is that is that a criminal
matter? Is that really a criminal

224
00:15:50,759 --> 00:15:54,799
matter or is it a civil matter? At that point, it's a criminal

225
00:15:54,840 --> 00:15:58,279
matter if you took something that didn't
belong to you and you then sold it,

226
00:15:58,279 --> 00:16:03,159
which is what this case was about, taking those those documents and then

227
00:16:03,759 --> 00:16:08,679
selling them to turn a profit.
But that's not what happens, yea.

228
00:16:10,759 --> 00:16:14,559
In this instance, they did have
it, but they never actually sold it

229
00:16:14,600 --> 00:16:18,240
to anyone. So you can't be
convicted of selling stolen property if you never

230
00:16:18,320 --> 00:16:22,960
actually sold it. But they tried, right, I don't know if they

231
00:16:22,080 --> 00:16:26,639
tried or not, because isn't that
the whole point they tried to Because if

232
00:16:26,679 --> 00:16:30,399
you try, I mean, you
know, you know, trying but not

233
00:16:30,440 --> 00:16:33,600
succeeding doesn't doesn't help you. I
mean, you can well just because you,

234
00:16:33,200 --> 00:16:37,120
Oh you can. You can try
to rob a bank, but that's

235
00:16:37,240 --> 00:16:41,120
without selling. That's still the you. No, that's different. You can't.

236
00:16:41,200 --> 00:16:44,559
You can't put robbing a bank and
conflate that into what I'm just I'm

237
00:16:44,559 --> 00:16:47,039
just saying. I'm just saying,
if you try, if you try to

238
00:16:47,039 --> 00:16:48,840
do something illegal but you don't succeed, that doesn't get you off the hook

239
00:16:48,960 --> 00:16:53,440
and anything. I'm just saying,
you can't get prosecuted for selling stolen property

240
00:16:53,480 --> 00:16:57,519
if you never sold the stolen property. Well, but you could get tempting.

241
00:16:57,639 --> 00:17:00,960
Well, yeah, that's that's my
point. But in this but they

242
00:17:02,120 --> 00:17:07,279
but eh, but they specifically point
out that the reason part of the reason

243
00:17:07,400 --> 00:17:12,759
why these charges were dropped was because
the notes were never stolen. They were

244
00:17:12,880 --> 00:17:21,920
handed to the writer and then they
never How could they be Okay, oh,

245
00:17:22,000 --> 00:17:23,559
maybe I'm wrong about this now that
I'm looking at it and thinking about

246
00:17:23,599 --> 00:17:29,400
it. If the notes were never
stolen, then if they did sell them,

247
00:17:29,440 --> 00:17:32,960
they wouldn't be stealing, they wouldn't
be selling stolen property. They would

248
00:17:33,000 --> 00:17:36,920
simply be stolen property that was within
there. Well that was my point,

249
00:17:37,000 --> 00:17:40,960
But that's starting to think you're right
and I'm wrong on this. So that

250
00:17:41,039 --> 00:17:42,920
to me is not a criminal matter, but it but it could be a

251
00:17:42,960 --> 00:17:48,079
civil But a civil matter if Henley
says, wait a minute, you're trying

252
00:17:48,119 --> 00:17:49,960
to sell this property that I gave
to you for the express purpose of writing

253
00:17:51,000 --> 00:17:53,440
a book that never came out,
and now you're trying to sell that,

254
00:17:53,440 --> 00:17:56,440
that would be a civil matter.
Right. Henley could then say, well,

255
00:17:56,440 --> 00:17:59,720
I'm going to assue you because you're
trying to sell property that I that

256
00:17:59,759 --> 00:18:03,319
I get specific purpose, and now
you're trying to profit off of that,

257
00:18:03,240 --> 00:18:10,920
right. M Yeah. See,
this is why I'm thinking you're pro I

258
00:18:10,920 --> 00:18:14,799
think you're right. I think that
because they never they were handed over willingly,

259
00:18:14,880 --> 00:18:19,720
they were never stolen, right,
And then if it's just happening in

260
00:18:19,799 --> 00:18:23,759
nineteen seventy that those notes were actually
handed over, we're now sitting here in

261
00:18:23,799 --> 00:18:27,559
twenty twenty four. Yeah, I
mean how far How long do you have

262
00:18:27,640 --> 00:18:32,839
something in your possession before it becomes
yours? Isn't possession nine tenths of the

263
00:18:32,920 --> 00:18:37,000
law anyway, So maybe it's been
so long he had it. If he

264
00:18:37,039 --> 00:18:41,759
did sell it, is it even
criminal or is it even unethical if he's

265
00:18:41,799 --> 00:18:45,599
had it in nineteen seventy Yeah,
Well, there is that. I mean,

266
00:18:45,000 --> 00:18:48,880
yeah, I think it's I think
it's unethical to do that regardless of

267
00:18:48,960 --> 00:18:52,240
time. But that but the mentioning
of time does bring up something else that

268
00:18:52,240 --> 00:18:57,440
I'm thinking about too, is and
it's it's a similar thought to uh,

269
00:18:57,559 --> 00:19:02,960
excuse me, it's a similar thought
who when we were talking about the months

270
00:19:02,960 --> 00:19:06,000
ago the Darryl Hall versus John Oates
lawsuit, and we were talking about how,

271
00:19:06,039 --> 00:19:07,279
you know, these guys are in
their mid to late seventies, is

272
00:19:07,319 --> 00:19:11,039
this what you know? Is this
how they want to You know, Don

273
00:19:11,079 --> 00:19:14,119
Henley is seventy six years old.
I mean if I were seventy six years

274
00:19:14,119 --> 00:19:17,279
old and already had more money than
I could ever spend, I don't know

275
00:19:17,319 --> 00:19:18,920
if I'd want to be spending time
in court trying to sue somebody out of

276
00:19:18,920 --> 00:19:22,119
making money off of something I had
done. I mean, I guess maybe

277
00:19:22,119 --> 00:19:26,599
it's a matter of pride or principle, but at seventy six, I you

278
00:19:26,640 --> 00:19:32,920
know, just this, Don Henley, relax. This is a nefarious side

279
00:19:33,079 --> 00:19:37,079
in the in this as well,
when you look at what the judge had

280
00:19:37,119 --> 00:19:41,880
said a review, he said,
quote a review of these newly discosed materials

281
00:19:41,880 --> 00:19:47,720
has demonstrated a highlight. Mister Henley
and mister asov use of the privilege to

282
00:19:47,799 --> 00:19:52,960
shield themselves from a thorough and complete
cross examination was said by Justin Farmer.

283
00:19:53,279 --> 00:19:59,839
So in other words, because they
withheld this information, the defense doesn't didn't

284
00:19:59,839 --> 00:20:02,880
get to cross examine them on it, didn't even get to know about it.

285
00:20:03,240 --> 00:20:07,319
So they're shielding themselves by keeping this
close to the test and not sharing

286
00:20:07,319 --> 00:20:15,920
the information when legally they had the
legal what's the world I'm looking for requirement

287
00:20:15,480 --> 00:20:19,480
to disclose this information. They had
no right to keep it secret under the

288
00:20:19,519 --> 00:20:25,519
guise of client attorney privilege, which
is what they were doing. So the

289
00:20:25,599 --> 00:20:30,559
judges can olderly admonishing them for doing
that because not only did they prevent important

290
00:20:30,559 --> 00:20:33,680
information from being released, but they
also prevented the defense from being able to

291
00:20:33,680 --> 00:20:41,799
face their accuser. Yeah, it
says here again. This is from Billboard.

292
00:20:41,799 --> 00:20:48,519
The trial kicked off last month with
Inc's attorney telling the judge the prosecutors

293
00:20:48,559 --> 00:20:55,119
had distorted the history to charge innocent
men and the DA's office would be apologizing

294
00:20:55,200 --> 00:20:59,119
at the end of this case.
Henley later testified that he had not willingly

295
00:20:59,200 --> 00:21:03,720
given away the no, saying they
were quote something very personal, very private,

296
00:21:03,839 --> 00:21:07,240
unquote. So it sounds to me
like Kenley and asof and their attorneys

297
00:21:07,279 --> 00:21:10,960
are trying to make it sound like
these notes were stolen, when actually he

298
00:21:11,319 --> 00:21:15,000
sounds like he gave it to them
and forgot and never retrieved them. Well,

299
00:21:15,000 --> 00:21:18,640
again, it's it's an indelicate way
of putting it, but but I

300
00:21:19,039 --> 00:21:22,920
do think it's valid. These guys
again, the Eagles during the making of

301
00:21:22,920 --> 00:21:27,240
Hotel California. Who knows what the
hell they did or can remember correctly or

302
00:21:27,279 --> 00:21:30,319
not. They were all cooked up. I'm not And and again it's it's

303
00:21:30,359 --> 00:21:33,400
an indelicate way of putting it,
but it's just true. You know what

304
00:21:33,440 --> 00:21:37,160
I mean? You think there's something
in those papers that he doesn't want out

305
00:21:37,200 --> 00:21:41,559
there. No, I'm just saying. I'm just saying, who knows what?

306
00:21:41,759 --> 00:21:47,559
Who knows what conversations were had between
Don Henley and back at nineteen and

307
00:21:47,680 --> 00:21:49,240
with this and this guy, I
mean, who knows. You don't even

308
00:21:49,319 --> 00:21:52,440
realize that he gave it to the
writer with it at the time, right,

309
00:21:52,839 --> 00:21:56,480
That's that's why I get that.
I get that. But no matter

310
00:21:56,519 --> 00:22:00,559
what the situation was in that moment, it sounds like he just left the

311
00:22:00,599 --> 00:22:03,559
paperwork with the guy. Right,
They never went back to the writer and

312
00:22:03,599 --> 00:22:06,759
said give me back my notes.
Who knows? Who knows, just kind

313
00:22:06,799 --> 00:22:08,720
of shoved it all to him,
write me this book, and then somewhere

314
00:22:08,759 --> 00:22:11,960
along the line, dude goes,
I got your book, and he goes,

315
00:22:11,000 --> 00:22:15,519
never mind. Yeah, that sounds
like exactly what happened, because it

316
00:22:15,680 --> 00:22:22,319
never was actually published, it says
here. On Wednesday's hearing, Justice Curtis

317
00:22:22,319 --> 00:22:26,480
said that Henley had recently handed over
more than six thousand new pages of emails

318
00:22:26,480 --> 00:22:32,640
and other disclosures that contained new information
about how Sanders came to own the notes.

319
00:22:33,319 --> 00:22:42,839
Such jarringly late disclosures violated Horowitz in
CRTI and Kazinski's constitutional rights. The

320
00:22:42,960 --> 00:22:48,559
judge said, yeah, six thousand, Come on, it's not like it's

321
00:22:48,559 --> 00:22:55,440
a single six thousand documents. Wow, that's an awful lot to be keeping

322
00:22:55,519 --> 00:23:00,599
secret. Yeah, especially where obviously
it was information that should have been provided

323
00:23:00,880 --> 00:23:04,119
under the disclosure of our rules,
it says. An a statement to Billboard,

324
00:23:04,119 --> 00:23:08,759
Horowitz's attorney, Jonathan back Bach said, quote, we are glad the

325
00:23:08,799 --> 00:23:11,880
DA's office made the right decision and
finally dropped this case. It never should

326
00:23:11,920 --> 00:23:17,680
have been brought mister Horowitz looks forward
to carrying on with his important work.

327
00:23:17,799 --> 00:23:22,319
Unquote well regardless. I mean again, I'm not any kind of a legal

328
00:23:22,359 --> 00:23:25,359
expert, just as a layman.
It sounds to me like this this was,

329
00:23:25,839 --> 00:23:30,480
if anything, a civil case,
not a criminal one. Oh,

330
00:23:30,720 --> 00:23:36,119
these guys could have been facing real
jail time. Yeah. Keeping that paperwork

331
00:23:36,279 --> 00:23:41,319
is literally put three people's lives in
jeopardy. That's that's pretty hard, man,

332
00:23:41,759 --> 00:23:45,519
that's pretty bad. Yeah. So
you got to have a lot of

333
00:23:45,559 --> 00:23:49,920
hate in you hat to want to
ruin people's lives like that. I wonder

334
00:23:49,960 --> 00:23:56,400
what's in that book? What's in
that never released book? H Yes,

335
00:23:56,759 --> 00:24:00,720
we'll probably never know. I was
looking to see if there's any kind of

336
00:24:02,000 --> 00:24:04,039
other update. But again, it's
like, you know, this is the

337
00:24:04,079 --> 00:24:11,880
really reason this just happened. Just
this past week was the case officially dismissed.

338
00:24:11,160 --> 00:24:15,000
And it's really it's also very telling
when you look at it, because

339
00:24:15,039 --> 00:24:18,759
it's not the judge who dismissed the
case. It's the prosecutors themselves who went

340
00:24:18,799 --> 00:24:23,240
to the judge and said, we
need to pull back on this, we

341
00:24:23,279 --> 00:24:26,519
need to get rid of the charges. We're not going to prosecute now.

342
00:24:26,559 --> 00:24:30,599
I want to go back. I
can't imagine prosecutor is liking to drop criminal

343
00:24:30,680 --> 00:24:36,039
charges too much, so this must
have been interesting. Although Alvin bragg got

344
00:24:36,079 --> 00:24:38,839
kind of has a handsful. I
do want to think if you want to

345
00:24:38,880 --> 00:24:44,079
go back to uh By the way, do you think Don Henley pays his

346
00:24:44,160 --> 00:24:48,039
lawyers? Probably I might have him
confused with somebody else. Anyway. I

347
00:24:48,240 --> 00:24:52,119
don't think he gets away with not
paying lawyers. I think there's only special

348
00:24:52,160 --> 00:24:56,039
class for that. Just for context, I do want to go back to

349
00:24:56,559 --> 00:25:03,480
there's a story here. This is
from February twentieth, and this might add

350
00:25:03,519 --> 00:25:07,039
some context to what we're looking at
now, which is the latest update.

351
00:25:07,319 --> 00:25:11,000
This is from the AP News.
This is from February twentieth, but this

352
00:25:11,079 --> 00:25:15,400
kind of explains the foundation of the
trial. Story titled Welcome to the Hotel

353
00:25:15,440 --> 00:25:21,839
California case the trial over handwritten lyrics
to an Eagles classic. It says here

354
00:25:21,839 --> 00:25:25,079
in the mid seventies, Eagles were
working on a spooky, cryptic news song.

355
00:25:25,519 --> 00:25:30,440
On a lined yellow pad, Don
Henley, with input from band co

356
00:25:30,559 --> 00:25:36,000
founder Glen Fry, jotted thoughts about
a dark desert highway and a lovely place

357
00:25:36,359 --> 00:25:40,839
with a luxurious surface. And ominous
undertones and something on ice, perhaps caviare

358
00:25:41,599 --> 00:25:45,039
or tatinger? Is that any say
that? Or pink Champagne? The song

359
00:25:45,079 --> 00:25:49,680
Hotel California became one of rock's most
indelible singles, and nearly half century later,

360
00:25:51,079 --> 00:25:53,160
those handwritten pages of lyrics in the
making have become the center of an

361
00:25:53,240 --> 00:25:57,079
unusual criminal trial set to open on
Wednesday. So again, remember this is

362
00:25:57,079 --> 00:26:03,079
from February twentieth rare book dealer Glenn
Horowitz, former Rock and Roll Hall of

363
00:26:03,079 --> 00:26:07,880
Famer curator Craig Nciarti I finally figured
out how to say his name, thank

364
00:26:07,920 --> 00:26:17,319
you, and memorabilia seller Edward Kazinski
are charged with conspiring to own and try

365
00:26:17,359 --> 00:26:21,200
to sell manuscripts of Hotel California and
other Eagles hits without the right to do

366
00:26:21,279 --> 00:26:25,599
so. The three have pleaded not
guilty, and their lawyers have said the

367
00:26:25,640 --> 00:26:30,200
men committed no crime with the papers, which they acquired via a writer who'd

368
00:26:30,200 --> 00:26:34,200
worked with the Eagles. But the
man okay, so so they these guys

369
00:26:34,200 --> 00:26:37,839
are not the writer. None of
these guys are the writer of the book.

370
00:26:37,440 --> 00:26:42,000
They're claiming they got these from the
writer. So we should clarify that,

371
00:26:42,079 --> 00:26:45,240
because I wasn't clear on that myself. I didn't. I wasn't clear

372
00:26:45,279 --> 00:26:48,960
on that either. So none of
these three guys are the author of the

373
00:26:48,960 --> 00:26:52,400
book. They're they're they're all saying
that they got they they came into possession

374
00:26:52,519 --> 00:26:56,960
of the notes from the writer of
the book. So they have to prove

375
00:26:56,000 --> 00:27:00,119
that the writer didn't steal them.
Yeah, all right, now we're getting

376
00:27:00,160 --> 00:27:04,880
Clara. Here we go. But
it says but the Manhattan DIA's office says

377
00:27:04,920 --> 00:27:11,519
the defendants connived to obscure the document's
disputed ownership despite knowing that Henley said the

378
00:27:11,559 --> 00:27:18,000
pages were stolen. Clashes over valuable
collectibles abound, but criminal trials like this

379
00:27:18,119 --> 00:27:22,440
are rare. Many fights are resolved
in private, in lawsuits or with agreement

380
00:27:22,400 --> 00:27:25,400
surchter in the items, like I
was saying, like it being a civil

381
00:27:25,440 --> 00:27:30,279
matter, not a criminal one.
Travis McDade, a University of Illinois law

382
00:27:30,319 --> 00:27:33,799
professor who studies rare document disputes,
said, quote, if you can avoid

383
00:27:33,839 --> 00:27:37,960
a prosecution by handing over the thing, most people just hand it over unquote.

384
00:27:37,119 --> 00:27:41,119
Of course, the case of the
Eagles Manuscripts is distinctive in other ways

385
00:27:41,160 --> 00:27:47,000
too. The prosecutors, star witnesses, indeed that Henley is expected to testify

386
00:27:47,039 --> 00:27:52,839
between Eagles tour stops. The non
jury trial could offer a peek into the

387
00:27:52,880 --> 00:27:56,759
band's creative process and life in the
fast lane of the seventies of seventies stardom.

388
00:27:57,319 --> 00:28:03,359
At Issue are over eighty pages of
draft lyrics from the blockbuster nineteen seventy

389
00:28:03,359 --> 00:28:07,880
six Hotel California album, including words
to the chart topping Grammy winning title cut.

390
00:28:08,240 --> 00:28:12,400
It features one of classic rock's most
recognizable riffs, best known solos,

391
00:28:12,400 --> 00:28:18,200
and most oft quoted arguably over quoted
lines you can check out any time you

392
00:28:18,359 --> 00:28:22,519
like, but you can never leave. Henley has said the song is about

393
00:28:22,519 --> 00:28:26,079
the dark underbelly of the American dream. It's still streamed over two hundred and

394
00:28:26,079 --> 00:28:30,319
twenty million times and got one hundred
and thirty six thousand radio spins last year

395
00:28:30,359 --> 00:28:34,240
in the US alone. According to
the entertainment data company Luminant, the Hotel

396
00:28:34,279 --> 00:28:38,839
California album has sold twenty six million
copies nationwide over the years, bested only

397
00:28:38,920 --> 00:28:45,119
as bested only by an Eagle's Greatest
Hits disc in Michael Jackson's Thriller. The

398
00:28:45,200 --> 00:28:49,400
pages also include lyrics from songs including
Life in the fast Lane, and New

399
00:28:49,480 --> 00:28:55,960
Kid in Town. Eagles manager Irving
Azoff has called the documents irreplaceable pieces of

400
00:28:56,039 --> 00:29:02,319
musical history. Horrorwitz INCRTI, and
Kazi are charged with conspiracy to possess stolen

401
00:29:02,359 --> 00:29:07,519
property and various other offenses. They're
not charged with actually stealing documents, nor

402
00:29:07,640 --> 00:29:11,839
is anyone else, but prosecutors will
still have to establish that the documents were

403
00:29:11,920 --> 00:29:17,519
stolen. The defense maintains that's not
true, and I think that's where the

404
00:29:17,599 --> 00:29:22,839
rub is. How do you prove
that the documents were stolen? Much turns

405
00:29:22,839 --> 00:29:26,720
on the Eagles interactions with Okay,
this is the context I was looking for.

406
00:29:26,000 --> 00:29:30,759
Much turns on the Eagles interactions with
Ed Sanders, a writer who also

407
00:29:30,839 --> 00:29:37,359
co founded the nineteen sixties counterculture rock
band The Fogs. Fugs got to be

408
00:29:37,359 --> 00:29:41,559
careful how I say that on the
air He worked in the I don't even

409
00:29:41,559 --> 00:29:42,839
want to pronounce it the way I
think it's supposed to be pronounced, because

410
00:29:42,839 --> 00:29:47,559
again, we're on FM radio.
He worked in the late seventies and early

411
00:29:47,599 --> 00:29:52,640
eighties on an authorized Eagles biography that
was never published. Sanders is not charged

412
00:29:52,680 --> 00:29:57,799
in the case. A phone message
seeking comment was left for him. He

413
00:29:57,880 --> 00:30:03,119
sold the pages to horror Witz,
who then sold them to Incrti and Kazinski.

414
00:30:03,880 --> 00:30:07,880
Okay, so the writer ed Sanders. He took those documents and he

415
00:30:08,000 --> 00:30:14,079
sold them to Horowitz, one of
the three guys who was charged, who

416
00:30:14,160 --> 00:30:18,000
then sold them to the other two
guys who are charged. Horowitz has handled

417
00:30:18,119 --> 00:30:23,559
huge rare book and archive deals,
and he's been entangled in some ownership spats

418
00:30:23,599 --> 00:30:29,720
before, one involved papers linked to
Gone with the Wind author Margaret Mitchell.

419
00:30:29,960 --> 00:30:33,680
That was settled Inciarti worked on notable
exhibitions for the Cleveland based Rock and Roll

420
00:30:33,720 --> 00:30:37,599
Hall I'm sorry, Rock Hall of
Fame, not the Rock and Roll Hall

421
00:30:37,640 --> 00:30:41,720
of Fame, the Rock Hall of
Fame. Kazinsky has been a principal and

422
00:30:41,960 --> 00:30:48,640
Gotta have It collectibles known for auctioning
celebrities personal possessions, so personal that Madonna

423
00:30:48,839 --> 00:30:56,359
unsuccessfully sued to try to stop a
sale that included her LATEX briefs. If

424
00:30:56,400 --> 00:31:02,839
only we'd note about that when we
did the Madonna segment. Yes, those

425
00:31:02,839 --> 00:31:07,559
were auctioned off. Apparently, Uh, Henry, well, you know,

426
00:31:07,279 --> 00:31:14,279
he know what anyone wait, listen, it's Madonna. She's don't care what

427
00:31:14,480 --> 00:31:18,680
anybody's use son to Madonna. It's
Madonna, though you don't know that.

428
00:31:18,799 --> 00:31:23,640
Yes, I do not Madonna.
She does not Madonna. Everybody does.

429
00:31:23,720 --> 00:31:27,920
How dare you? She is named
after the mother of our Lord. I

430
00:31:27,960 --> 00:31:32,079
don't think so there is an R
E M song about that. I think

431
00:31:33,000 --> 00:31:41,279
everybody fus. Henley told a grand
jury that he never gave the biographer of

432
00:31:41,319 --> 00:31:45,960
the lyrics, according to court filings
from Kazinski's lawyers, but defense lawyers have

433
00:31:47,039 --> 00:31:53,200
signaled that they planned to probe Henley's
memory of the time. M we believe

434
00:31:53,279 --> 00:31:57,160
that mister Anley voluntarily provided the lyrics
to mister Sanders, unquote, attorney Scott

435
00:31:57,240 --> 00:32:01,039
Edelman said in court last week.
Now, by the way, so Henley's

436
00:32:01,079 --> 00:32:07,039
not claiming that these three guys stole
anything. He's claiming that the author,

437
00:32:07,240 --> 00:32:09,359
ed Sanders, is the one who
stole. And they have possession of a

438
00:32:09,400 --> 00:32:14,480
stolen property. Well, possessing stolen
property is a crime. And what were

439
00:32:14,519 --> 00:32:19,240
they trying to sell it? So
were they trying to sell them? Yeah?

440
00:32:19,240 --> 00:32:22,440
Apparently yes, so stolen property.
So they're trying to sell them.

441
00:32:22,480 --> 00:32:27,599
So now that we have more context, now I'm starting to flip back to

442
00:32:27,640 --> 00:32:31,319
saying maybe this I can see why, I can see why this was considered

443
00:32:31,359 --> 00:32:37,319
a criminal case and not civil because
if there is alleged theft involved, right,

444
00:32:37,880 --> 00:32:45,039
but he was hiding six thousand ages
of documentation that apparently refutes that and

445
00:32:45,359 --> 00:32:52,119
insists that they willingly gave the documents
to the writer intending on having a book

446
00:32:52,200 --> 00:32:54,880
about them. Yeah, and then
squished the book and never took back their

447
00:32:54,920 --> 00:33:00,559
documents. Yeah. I mean charges
were probably against these guys until twenty twenty

448
00:33:00,559 --> 00:33:02,119
two. For all we know.
There could be something in those emails about,

449
00:33:02,200 --> 00:33:06,559
you know, a conversation they had
at Studio fifty four. I don't

450
00:33:06,559 --> 00:33:09,519
know they were emails at Studio fifty
four. No, what I'm saying,

451
00:33:09,799 --> 00:33:14,799
maybe referencing a conversation they add at
Studio fifty four about the lyrics or something

452
00:33:14,839 --> 00:33:20,319
that Don Henley now can't remember something
previous documents from like long ago, that

453
00:33:20,400 --> 00:33:23,599
they maybe from starting the book talk. Because back in the day when poly

454
00:33:23,759 --> 00:33:27,599
C and I used to hang out
at Studio fifty four with Share and all

455
00:33:27,720 --> 00:33:30,240
that, I think I remember seeing
Don Hemley there. That's a little bit

456
00:33:30,240 --> 00:33:37,039
inside. But if you're a if
you're a WMNH devote you know, reference

457
00:33:37,079 --> 00:33:40,759
please Sanders sold Horowitz in two thousand
and five that while working on the Eagles

458
00:33:40,759 --> 00:33:44,920
book, he was sent whatever papers
he wanted from Henley's home in Malibu,

459
00:33:45,000 --> 00:33:52,039
California. According to the indictment,
wait a minute, though, Yeah see,

460
00:33:52,640 --> 00:33:54,039
yeah, what do you mean,
Wait a minute? What? So

461
00:33:54,119 --> 00:33:58,160
he says, so he was sent
whatever he needed for the book. Basically,

462
00:33:58,400 --> 00:34:01,880
uh huh. If if if I
were an author, if I were

463
00:34:01,880 --> 00:34:05,319
working on a book for somebody and
they were sending me papers, I wouldn't

464
00:34:05,319 --> 00:34:07,359
just assume, well, these are
mine to do whatever I want with.

465
00:34:07,519 --> 00:34:10,119
Correct. But if you've had them
in your possession since nineteen seventy, how

466
00:34:10,199 --> 00:34:15,280
long in your possession right until they've
become yours and you are able to get

467
00:34:15,320 --> 00:34:17,679
rid of them, right or right? Are you ever able to do that?

468
00:34:17,960 --> 00:34:23,320
Right? That's an interesting conundrum,
it says. Then Kazinski's business offered

469
00:34:23,360 --> 00:34:29,519
some pages at auction in twenty twelve. Henley's attorneys came knocking, and Horowitz

470
00:34:29,559 --> 00:34:34,800
and Crdy and Sanders, in varying
combinations, began batting around alternate versions of

471
00:34:34,840 --> 00:34:39,519
the manuscript's providence. The indictment says, yeah, interesting, it sounds so,

472
00:34:39,679 --> 00:34:43,760
According to the indictment, they tried
to muddy the waters about you know

473
00:34:44,199 --> 00:34:49,320
how these doctors, by the way, But once again though just from Don

474
00:34:49,320 --> 00:34:52,000
Henley's perspective, and I understand pride
and principle and all that, but this

475
00:34:52,199 --> 00:34:57,000
seventy six year old man, who's
already extremely wealthy, if he gets if

476
00:34:57,000 --> 00:35:01,519
he stops this from happening, what
does he get out of it? Financially?

477
00:35:01,760 --> 00:35:07,199
Nothing? Right? But if somebody
else, unless he's looking to regain

478
00:35:07,239 --> 00:35:12,480
regain the control over those papers,
get him back and then he can sell

479
00:35:12,519 --> 00:35:14,840
them himself for more money. But
he's probably not going to sell him.

480
00:35:14,840 --> 00:35:16,239
He probably just wants him back.
How do you know that? Well,

481
00:35:16,280 --> 00:35:20,519
I don't know that, but that's
why he's doing the loss in the first

482
00:35:20,559 --> 00:35:22,840
one. But if somebody else can
sell him, there might be an Eagles

483
00:35:22,880 --> 00:35:28,679
fan who wants to spend the money. I mean, it's just what diehard

484
00:35:28,760 --> 00:35:32,800
Eagles fan would want to have,
right, So at a certain point,

485
00:35:34,239 --> 00:35:37,760
what's it matter? Again, I'm
just saying, why does this guy want

486
00:35:37,760 --> 00:35:39,840
to go? Why does Don Henley
want to do all that? Now,

487
00:35:40,039 --> 00:35:45,519
by the way, publicity out of
it. I do understand why in one

488
00:35:45,559 --> 00:35:49,559
sense, because I do understand why
in one sense because he is Don Henley,

489
00:35:49,800 --> 00:35:53,480
and this is consistent with everything that
we've heard over the years about him

490
00:35:53,519 --> 00:36:00,719
as a person. In his personality
has he always been a loss not necessarily

491
00:36:00,760 --> 00:36:04,960
litigious, but he's known for having
a very prickly personality. Oh, I

492
00:36:05,039 --> 00:36:07,800
really don't know much about the man. I just know some of the music.

493
00:36:07,920 --> 00:36:08,960
I mean, I'm a fan of
his music. But there have been

494
00:36:09,280 --> 00:36:16,199
some pretty consistently some unpleasant things said
about him as a person. He's never

495
00:36:16,239 --> 00:36:21,599
been a nice guy as far as
I can tell, just from what people

496
00:36:21,599 --> 00:36:23,880
say about him. I'm trying to
think of something nice that someone's ever said

497
00:36:23,880 --> 00:36:28,599
about Don Henley, and nothing leaps
to mind. That's terrible as a person.

498
00:36:29,000 --> 00:36:32,119
That's terrible. Yeah, that's just
my impression. I don't know,

499
00:36:32,719 --> 00:36:37,599
that's just my impression. It says
in one story, Sanders found the pages

500
00:36:37,639 --> 00:36:42,280
discarded in a backstage dressing room.
In others, he got them from a

501
00:36:42,320 --> 00:36:45,440
stage assistant or while amassing quote a
lot of material related to the Eagles from

502
00:36:45,480 --> 00:36:51,320
different people unquote, And yet another
story he obtained them from Glenn Fry an

503
00:36:51,360 --> 00:36:54,000
account that quote would make this go
away once and for all unquote, Horrowitz

504
00:36:54,039 --> 00:37:00,400
suggested in twenty seventeen, but then
Glenn Frye died the year before Wow twenty

505
00:37:00,440 --> 00:37:07,679
sixteen. One Fried died. Quote. He merely needs gentle handling and reassurance

506
00:37:07,719 --> 00:37:10,599
that he's not getting that he's not
going to the can unquote. Horrorwitz emailed

507
00:37:10,639 --> 00:37:16,800
NCRTI during a twenty twelve exchange about
getting sanders explanation shaped into a communication to

508
00:37:16,840 --> 00:37:22,440
auctioneers. The indictment says Sanders supplied
or signed off on some of the varying

509
00:37:22,559 --> 00:37:28,199
explanations, according to the indictment,
and it's unclear what he may have conveyed

510
00:37:28,280 --> 00:37:32,760
verbally, but he apparently rejected at
least the dressing room tale. And by

511
00:37:32,800 --> 00:37:37,159
the way, that's something that's that
we've heard, you know, like the

512
00:37:37,159 --> 00:37:43,519
Beatles, for example. You know
somebody picks up lyrics, handwritten lyrics or

513
00:37:43,559 --> 00:37:47,280
notes left behind in a dressing room
or backstage, you know, at a

514
00:37:47,400 --> 00:37:52,800
at a concert or in a recording
studio. Just somebody leaves something behind,

515
00:37:52,880 --> 00:37:55,679
somebody else picks it up. Who
really owns it? At that point?

516
00:37:55,760 --> 00:38:00,159
You know? Is it stealing?
If somebody leaves something behind and it doesn't

517
00:38:00,199 --> 00:38:04,000
look like they care about it and
you pick it up, is that is

518
00:38:04,039 --> 00:38:07,360
that theft? I mean it is
unethical. I think if you're oh,

519
00:38:07,400 --> 00:38:15,079
yeah, but if in that in
that situation. But Kazinski, h,

520
00:38:15,440 --> 00:38:19,239
I'm gonna skip down. This get's
pretty in depth. But okay, so

521
00:38:19,239 --> 00:38:22,199
I'm gonna skip down a little bit. But Sotheby's listed the Hotel California song

522
00:38:22,280 --> 00:38:28,039
lyrics in a twenty sixteen auction,
but withdrew them after learning the ownership was

523
00:38:28,079 --> 00:38:31,760
in question. Yeah, because Southeby's
doesn't want to end up in any kind

524
00:38:31,760 --> 00:38:37,960
of legal He's he apparently does go
after everything. I'm looking at some notations

525
00:38:37,000 --> 00:38:42,840
from someone else who's saying you can
rarely find any of the Eagles on his

526
00:38:43,199 --> 00:38:46,360
or his solo material on YouTube.
When a video of their music gets uploaded,

527
00:38:46,400 --> 00:38:51,480
it's quickly removed. He's strict about
not allowing people to take pictures of

528
00:38:51,559 --> 00:38:54,719
videos at Eagle concerts. Yeah.
He also doesn't seem to like people who

529
00:38:54,800 --> 00:39:00,719
play his music in public places.
Wow. Yeah, Hey, that's his

530
00:39:00,840 --> 00:39:04,440
reputation. That's all consistent with everything
that we know about Don Henley. The

531
00:39:04,480 --> 00:39:08,400
worst of the worst examples of him
being overprotective include that one time when he

532
00:39:08,559 --> 00:39:14,440
sued because of a hotel in Mexico
that had the name Hotel California. He

533
00:39:14,559 --> 00:39:20,400
also sued Deluth Trading Company because of
a T shirt containing the words Don Henley

534
00:39:20,679 --> 00:39:24,480
and take it Easy, and even
sued a foundation that helps protect Eagles in

535
00:39:24,559 --> 00:39:30,159
America because he felt they were infringing
on the band's name. He wasn't happy

536
00:39:30,199 --> 00:39:36,199
about Frank ocean sambling Hotel California and
went as far as to call him a

537
00:39:36,280 --> 00:39:42,320
cussword and attack him. Despite his
popularity at the time, Eagles shows are

538
00:39:42,320 --> 00:39:45,400
also some of the most expensive ticket
wise, Yes, especially for a band

539
00:39:45,400 --> 00:39:51,800
that hasn't released a new single in
thirty years. Wow, there was a

540
00:39:52,239 --> 00:39:55,559
I guess the reason this came up. I guess was there was a video

541
00:39:55,719 --> 00:40:02,039
some old commercials that were removed and
got copyright strikes issued on YouTube because Henley's

542
00:40:02,039 --> 00:40:07,239
song New York Minute was used for
a few seconds in a promo for a

543
00:40:07,280 --> 00:40:10,880
TV show, which probably made up
about five percent of the entire video.

544
00:40:12,599 --> 00:40:19,199
Yeah. Yeah, Apparently he's quite
quite the protective individual, for lack of

545
00:40:19,239 --> 00:40:25,119
a better term. Yeah, And
and you know, that's all fine in

546
00:40:25,159 --> 00:40:30,159
the sense that, look, you
should protect your intellectual property and so forth.

547
00:40:30,239 --> 00:40:35,559
But but at a certain point some
of it seems a little petty.

548
00:40:35,920 --> 00:40:40,679
You know, yeah, but yeah, I think it's sad really that he

549
00:40:42,400 --> 00:40:45,840
is this protective, because I think
it hurts in the long run, like

550
00:40:46,039 --> 00:40:51,559
not having people listening to your music
on YouTube? Yeah, what's why not?

551
00:40:51,760 --> 00:40:54,920
Why wouldn't you want your music to
stay alive and in the public eye.

552
00:40:55,039 --> 00:40:59,679
Why be that? Like, do
you want it to the best way

553
00:40:59,679 --> 00:41:02,400
to face something of ways to keep
it out of the public eye. Yeah,

554
00:41:02,440 --> 00:41:07,199
well, I mean then again he
may look at it as he never

555
00:41:07,239 --> 00:41:10,199
asked to worry about that really,
and neither do the Eagles, because look,

556
00:41:10,920 --> 00:41:16,039
you could probably turn on rock one
on one right now and hear an

557
00:41:16,079 --> 00:41:21,639
Eagles song, you know what I
mean. Like, because of classic rock,

558
00:41:21,719 --> 00:41:24,199
the classic rock radio format, they
never really have to worry about it,

559
00:41:27,079 --> 00:41:35,280
and they'll always be able to charge
enormous sums of money for their tours,

560
00:41:35,280 --> 00:41:37,920
and so they do have stuff on
YouTube of them. Though, yeah

561
00:41:37,960 --> 00:41:42,480
he must. He probably just go
finds one and goes after that one person

562
00:41:42,519 --> 00:41:46,440
and then finds somebody else. Maybe
that's how he passes his time. I

563
00:41:46,480 --> 00:41:51,119
think it's sad though, I really
do, because I mean I would I

564
00:41:51,159 --> 00:41:54,199
would think that an artist would want
their their music to never be forgotten and

565
00:41:54,239 --> 00:41:58,119
to have it be wide and far. But I might be wrong. I

566
00:41:58,159 --> 00:42:02,119
mean I could be wrong in this, I think. But it doesn't sound

567
00:42:02,159 --> 00:42:06,840
like anybody stole anything. It sounds
like they turned over stuff for a book

568
00:42:06,880 --> 00:42:09,320
and never took it back. Well
who knows, I mean, we don't

569
00:42:09,360 --> 00:42:13,320
know exactly what happened there. And
well we know we gave him the stuff

570
00:42:13,320 --> 00:42:17,000
in nineteen seventies, and there's no
evidence to prove that he's ever sued or

571
00:42:17,000 --> 00:42:21,480
anything to fight to get documents back. Right, he didn't care about them

572
00:42:21,519 --> 00:42:24,760
until they turned up in somebody else's
possession. Yeah, So does that because

573
00:42:24,800 --> 00:42:30,679
you forgot something doesn't make it theft? Right? Who is your responsibility to

574
00:42:30,719 --> 00:42:35,599
retrieve your belongings? It's not the
other person's responsibility to bring it to you,

575
00:42:36,480 --> 00:42:39,679
in my opinion. Yeah, I
don't know. I'll be curious to

576
00:42:39,679 --> 00:42:43,559
see. So this has been dropped
just to kind of put a button on

577
00:42:43,599 --> 00:42:47,079
it. It's been dropped as a
criminal matter. But well that doesn't end

578
00:42:47,079 --> 00:42:52,119
it, because he is vowing to
sue them civilly. Yeah. Yeah,

579
00:42:52,159 --> 00:42:53,880
So we'll have to stay tuned to
see if there's another court case coming up.

580
00:42:55,039 --> 00:42:57,880
Well, that's what you do,
right, I mean, if it

581
00:42:57,880 --> 00:43:00,559
doesn't work out criminally, you know, you always have that s yep
