You. We' re here, we' re here, we' re
here, we' re here to talk about Madonna, women leaving tracks,
and I' m here to see him. But at the end of the
day, at the end of the day, welcome, today Tuesday 16th July,
welcome, Dr Amel Hello, how good afternoon, how are you?
All right, very well hear welcome, dear Efra Hello, girls, how
are you happy to come by to see chapter three of women leaving a mark
of Madonna, who we had invited to the valley, run, run to
see them and give her a lot of love. I' ve talked to
Luquita, I' m sorry, yes, let him see all the carmen
happy day. Today I hadn' t forgotten, but well, I'
m congratulating my nephew, because I had forgotten that even now I said happy
day forgiveness. So this was a very important impression to make it that it
is has left me. So, welcome, everyone, excuse this interruption.
So, congratulations to all Carmen Armendaris carmens, of course, our lady of
Carmen, today there in Mexico, And well let' s start with today
' s program, because what happens hears, what a strong photo, so
impressive, everything that is happening with Camilo Blanes, Camilo Blanes Junior, Camilo
Blanes Junior, to see wait is uploading the photo, because we have already
seen it. We' ve done shows here about the celebrities' children.
How Tristan, Jair' s son, has recovered, which is to be
celebrated, which is good, other children who have had less luck, But
here the thing is that he doesn' t listen to his mother, He
doesn' t have a good relationship with his mother, but and his father
is dead and has left a lot of money to this young man who has
his house open for them to come in a lot. They' ve stolen
him, they' ve done everything and now he presents this one with this
photo, with those legs totally bruised. No, but at most very decadent
Camilo Blanes, Camilo Sesto Junior or Camilo Blandes Junior, how you see it.
Oh, well, very sad. No, and above all, that
as he publishes himself in these photographs and in these daring images means that he
has no conscience, disease or any kind of problem, but as if he
thought that he is well, that he feels very well. And that'
s why, because it shows, I tell you how even posing in a
kind of debacle that has nothing to do with it, because I don'
t want to give this impression that it has nothing to do with the fact
that now I have decided to dress in women' s clothes or what he
wants to do. That is not the point, but these erratic behaviors the
face, when there are also photographs of his face that have completely destroyed teeth,
that this is a classic sign that speaks to us. And surely Ephraim
too, because he will know better is called consumption results of certain substances.
It' s the problem. It does a lot of damage, they do
a lot of damage. Problem is the physical deterioration we' ve been seeing.
But parallel to his mental deterioration is that we return to the dangerous trance,
he' s identical to us, so it can be closed, so
it' s frog. You don' t frog, you can' t
be a frog, but let it be a ra if you want to manifest
as a frog, which manifests itself as a rapacious one. We haven'
t seen those crazy cases before, the one that feels like kitty and doggy.
No. No, I don' t, I don' t,
I don' t, I don' t, I don' t,
they don' t, they don' t, they don' t,
they don' t, they don' t. No, and like the
woman you want to be horses. No, I' m not sure.
No. Before, it was before, it was something that was said as
a metaphor for forgiveness. The problem is, it' s real. Then
it can be whatever you want from your human life. He' s a
pain in making a boxer, that is, he can do what' s
not happening. And yet, he is in absolute freedom to do with his
life. Still terrible, but that' s freedom, he' s decided
to destroy his life and he' s gone the way of self- destruction.
That' s what he' s doing. It is regrettable, because
indeed, he makes it public, because he is the son of an idol,
because he is the son of a great figure that we all know he
inherited, for all his father' s gifts, plus the fortune that she
had and is destroying. I believe that is the great concern as a person,
as a human being Ephraim and to separate, not exactly separate, this
issue of him being behind with whom he is destroying himself, that is,
because it is the same thing that happens with Paola. It' s got
nothing to do with me being involved with the issue of me messing up things,
that it' s wrong, that it' s sad, that it
comes from a very complicated childhood where he saw his dad because he said he
saw him separated, he says woman and stuff so I don' t want
to put you down because then you talk about more and I' m not
there. We talked about what he said. If that can affect him,
because there' s a real factor. I mean, there are childhood issues
that do shock us, and here' s someone who' s shocked by
a matter of some dads who never gave him what they had to give him.
I mean, it' s wrong to date. The bottom line is
that you' re not, I mean, you' re right, absolutely
right, but the origin is also a huge loneliness, because the mom is
separated from the mom, she' s taken away, the mom' s
taken away, the dad gives the mom a distant life, I mean,
I think she' s a very lonely person. Yes, indeed that because
from the beginning their story is turbulent, because, besides, the way they
take everything that came out, many of us remember as something very far away.
But there was this whole lawsuit and yes, Lucia Mendes was helping the
mom because the mom had worked with her or knew her for some reason they
would come and go and return it to her and I didn' t know
it. You were. The problem is that here what seems to be happening
because and it caught my attention when you said, he claims that he saw
his dad, that he dressed as a woman and that kind of impacted him,
and that' s why he broke down. And I doubt it was
that alone. Yeah, I think that' s not your motive enough.
No. I think it is, as you say melo, a set of
things that is surely seen between the abandonment and others continued yes and what you
can think. I don' t know I' m freezing, no or
yes, no good, well, I' m sorry I see it then
or it' s freezing to a lupita, but good. The fact is
that yes this revelation, what it could make think and how well you say
and all that we say here with all peace, are mere hypotheses from what
we see and what they tell us. They might be if he saw his
dad dress up as a woman, but he doesn' t give him any
explanation, he doesn' t tell him Look, I like that. In
other words, there is not something that makes you understand why you do it.
It means there was probably an oversight in other areas. So it'
s nothing more than that he tells us that he saw one thing or that
he saw another, but that what he remembers seeing can be a bit of
many other things that he saw, lived and so on, and that it
seems that, in fact, the dad took it away so as not to
take care of it, that is, he didn' t take it to
form it, to keep an eye on it. He took it because he
wanted to have it with him in his style, that is solitude, that
there was no containment, that there was no good, a good set of
inculcated values, among which the very first value would be life, and life
is cared for by caring. Of course I think he' s actually taking
it. Then I think he' s teaching that point where you comment is
like a part, but for him. For him it' s like something
that means a lot of exact things, it' s like a trophy is
how he takes it to Camilos this as a trophy as a prize, an
exa thing, because Camilo knew this at that time was super successful. He
had the world at his feet. Well, I also have a son,
which is the only way I' m gonna have him, period. But
I think that, on top of that, you may have actually seen a
lot of things and whatever that is wouldn' t be so serious if I
think that and it happens very often that a dad who is so successful,
who is so big, overwhelms you and it' s very likely that Camilo
Blanes, second or junior, or whatever, Camilos of this junior, feels
a lot less than his dad impossible to reach those levels, because they made
their debut because they sing very nice, because the voice is very similar to
his dad' s, because it could have gone well. But they know
that, for example, there is a case like Alexander Hacha with Emmanuel,
who have a very similar voice. Alexandra Cha is very polite, she is
very handsome and everything and she has not succeeded or taken off like Emmanuel in
any way. But the difference is that Alexandra has a very solid family,
she has a very strong containment network, she has other suitable ones. I
mean, while I' m not the superstar who was in Dad in fame
and so on, I' m talented, I do have my own accomplishments
and I do have self- esteem and family support. Here' s what
happens is that this white camel sees a super successful, full, jammed dad
that millions of people follow him. He' s trying to raid, but
he' s never gonna make it He' s never gonna be able to
be half of what his dad' s been, because he' d always
be a copy of him. And I think that limits it and that hurts
him a lot and that' s where it comes from, I mean,
I' m never gonna be able to be and the key is what you
' re saying. Indeed, that there has been a family here can contain
and that can even guide the person then to look for other paths, in
other spaces or in other areas and develop and do his family, as Alexander
did. And now that you have just done or good that you are doing
in women, leaving those Madonna specials, because I thought what more overwhelming personality
than Madonna and Madonna has an older daughter, we already know that later she
had other children that well, she had a biological one and I think she
adopted, but her older daughter, Lourdes, who is the first daughter,
because something did good Madonna, being the superstar that is and living in this
world and with the image so strong that Madonna has and so contentious, also
so controversial that as far as we know, this daughter, because she grew
well. Today she must be a young woman in her thirties. I think
as far as we know, it' s fine. All of a sudden,
modeling. Then I don' t know what he does his things,
he does his life, but he doesn' t see that he' s
in conditions like the ones that this hote is and doesn' t have any.
He had no containment network, he doesn' t have a support network.
For love, he' s always been far away. His mom'
s always been away. He died. Dad doesn' t have one,
he didn' t have one to support it. And then all I can
do is control my own life and keep controlling my own life. I want
to destroy myself, because it' s my business and tell me what you
want. He' s going to keep making a point, because I can,
because I have the money, because this is me walking with my strong
power. No. Britney, as a prince, yes, but Britney is
not heiress. Here' s a big difference. Brittin is no one'
s heir. Britney has his own talent. And if Britney wants to go
to Vegas right now and sing, he' s gonna make millions of dollars
and get them back. It' s not him, it' s not
the big star. He' s never been the big star. Britnis if
it' s her for herself. No, then here' s the difference.
We could talk about any other child that' s going through. There
' s a lot of kids who feel beat up. And the son of
Julio Cesar Chavez, as easy as that to want to pursue the same career
as his father as a boxer. But he' s not the great champion.
You' re, Julio is, although you' re talented, but
you' re not, and then you start a road of self- destruction
that' s already well, that' s recovered and it' s coming
through and you' ve understood everything. But that' s like having a
very big figure on top of you. So, if you have parents like
Lucero and my jars, then you can have a little light. But if
not, the key will be containment. The key is the education you have
in self- esteem that you have in the containment network, that you have
in the family the support and how you have grown. That' s not
it. I believe that it is important the attention, the attention that was
given during the development and during the growth of a teenager to become an adult,
to tolerate frustration, to tolerate comparison, to find his own way and
so on, that he is not the child of but that he is himself.
And here' s what I think weighs him to walk a very sad
story, no doubt very sad. Hey and good to see what has happened
with these feminists Efraín, these feminists who want already we have already seen that
they have cancelled the show to Temach in Guanajuato and now they are looking to
cancel it also again and they think they want to cancel it again from the
Temach in Queretaro. Now in Queretaro he' s going to introduce himself,
he' s leaving because he still doesn' t cancel this one in the
city theater. Not then were they looking and the feminist collective said no.
We don' t want him here and they justified him in their words.
This is a public space, of the Municipal Culture Secretariat, and it is
hoped that the place will guarantee equality, inclusion and reject violence and discrimination.
And then someone said good is that freedom of speech and so on is at
stake. The point is that the temoch does have hate speech, and then
we would have to have a very broad discussion of what a hate speech is.
But all his fair measure. I mean, when people are going to
follow me to Hitler, because I didn' t think it was going to
be the mess that that was. I mean, people said no. He
has the truth and he loves us Germans and so he ended it. But
not in a slaughterhouse then. The point with the Temach is that that'
s why the wisdoms say you have to start limiting now I don' t
know what you think of girls. I think he has the right to keep
doing his show, because it' s a reality, that is, he
has no right to generate hate speech. What could be done, because starting
to decant in his show to say this you can say, this cannot say
that they review what he will say, he will not say above all if
it is going to be a place that is part of the Secretariat of Culture
in Querétaro or that is part of the State, that is, he could
not go to say hate speeches. The point is that in temach I try
every month to get a shine out of it. I mean, I'
m gonna rescue something from here. I' m sure of one good thing,
no, no other, you don' t find anything. Then people
are very angry, because there are those who say they are already censoring it
and those who say it is necessary to start limiting hate speech. I,
in particular, believe that at a time of so much violence and so much
confusion, where there is so much information and now what we have to sing
to see what information is real, what is real, what is right and
what is wrong, because before we have information. Yes, we have to
start as we do, to generate these blocks to stop the violence and the
gender belenza more, because what the temach does is normalize what has been done
to women for years, that is, it' s creepy the fact that
the day women are designed to go out, yes, that is, to
see what backs up and, as you say, if the intention is to
show up in a public space. I believe that it belongs to or depends
on the State, because it is paradoxical that the struggle that has been so
much demanded and has been insisted on by the citizens towards the Government, that
it gives support to women when they are raped, when they are segregated,
when they are not given the same rights, the same wages and so on,
that in a space of that a spectacle like this is presented. No
or a dissertation of this nature, yes, it is something that would not
be very congruent and I think that from there is where the protest is.
Not exactly like what they' ve already said. As you say, the
followers of our freedom, freedom of expression, are curtailed. You have the
right to say what you want and listen to what you want. Yeah,
but I think that' s where this congruence would go wrong. When it
comes to something very important like this kind of hate speech. I am also
clear that in the site Lodio Mira says Magdalena Orozco, but feminists also have
a hate speech and are not tolerant. They' re the same to me.
Feminists say there shouldn' t be men. It' s not the
same. I don' t think so. I think Magdalena means an extreme,
a radical thing, which is the same thing. It would be the
same as male, a radical part of misogyny and feminism. And it'
s the feminazis, for example, no, but I think that what feminism
seeks gives you more equal conditions in the healthy way, not equal wages,
equal conditions that housework is distributed in an equitable way, that a woman can
go out on the street without any problems. I think that refers now,
when you go to the east end, because you are already radical beings.
If you couldn' t call it feminism, it would be something else.
And what temach does is go back, that is, if women have to
take care of women they like to be raped. That' s not right,
because that' s a lie, because it' s not. I
mean, you can' t talk You can' t tell anyone who'
s not a woman. What a woman wants is absurd. Besides, it
' s absurd, I mean, at what point you were a woman to
know what a woman wants. So it' s absurd, starting from there.
It' s not the other age I was telling you about the other
day. I can' t understand bringing women in because I' m not
a woman and this name isn' t feminazis. It has a real anthropological
name. It exists, it is called embrism and the subject is not feminism.
Sano is a father, that is, men can be allies of feminism
and we can support it, not by supporting bollocks like Mr Temach, but
embrism I will not support it either. No, obviously, this thing about
being hit by men is not feminists, they do have one thing that'
s real and fair and go there' s no point of comparison. Not
embrism, which is antagonistic, machismo chacha here all and if we stop for
hate speech. Look carefully at what match is, because he was telling me
the last time we talked about it. Ah, Ephraim, they are now
curtailing the freedom of pressure. The more you think, the reflection for our
public would be that a person can have a hate speech based on their freedom
of expression. I don' t think so. Besides, I' m
going to tell you one thing like there may be a very thin line between
freedom of expression and being saying a hate speech. He' s not here.
The problem is that what you say, not all people are going to
get it the same way. So you' re reminding me. I saw
this note. Thank you Shi, because indeed, now that there was a
dramatic question with a person, a woman, a teenager who asks for a
didi in Mexicali And then this man who ends his life, because he was
a follower of tache, then he may not. You can' t blame
yourself, but you don' t have to understand that not everyone is going
to process that kind of message. No, I mean, he didn'
t encourage this man to be a thing like the one he did. But
yes, he told you that women like the violence they are worth less than
they have to serve you. That' s the problem, rather than hate
speech, it' s like a devaluation of women. That' s what
I feel. It' s not that you' re afraid of machisms for
those we live with, no, that' s the dicromachisms we live with,
that' s why women are less listened to than men. That'
s a reality, I mean, women heard you men too. So,
so it is in society and it is not named, i e here I
am between two beauties and Lupita has, because teams of the few men we
are here. But the factor, actually, is that this is a team
of how many, that is, in all the teams of me I have
worked, there are three girls and eighty- four men the reality and besides,
they earn more, besides, they earn more. This is the world.
That' s the world, that' s the reality. I had
some girls going on while we were either two teachers, we did the same
thing and once in a Catholic school women earned a lot less than men.
Real exact real. It' s terrible. It' s terrible. So
listen, there are issues that a group of feminists are asking you not to
let him present himself because, yes, his speech is a little, this
retrograde, the truth and good. And, on the other hand, we
talked yesterday about Marifer Centeno, who, then, was questioned, dismembered his
program with respect to diet and graphology and lost weight writing with blue and letters
long or large or some. I remember what it was like, but the
formula for weight loss based and based on graphology. Then Mr Doctor says that
' s a charlatanism. That' s not true, that doesn' t
exist. And, well, I believe in the part that I still believe.
If we consider that what a Marifer Centeno does is a style of entertainment,
it is very valid at the time that she says that she is scientific
and that this part of science and that because she was going to see it
said that graphology is part of psychology on the subject, because I got into
the UNAM agenda, of the National Autonomous University of Mexico and, of course,
that in no special good, neither in the bachelor' s degree nor
in specialty does graffiti appear as a matter. It appears as there is a
matter that is the design of instruments, that there you could design an instrument,
but from there to that graphology is a matter that there is in psychology,
that does not exist. On the other hand, I think it presents
itself today. She also presents today Marifer Centeno something I don' t know
if it' s a tiktok or something, but she dressed like a sailor,
I don' t know. I don' t know how he'
s going to defend or what Marifer Cente has said not with regard to what
' s going on with what' s going on, because he comes to
do his job, because in the end he' s been very questioned by
many people and in a very valid way, because he' s not there.
I don' t think this is a personal attack. I don'
t think maybe, like you did yesterday mel yes, maybe it was very
hard for the doctor to talk to her in the terms he used to refer
to Marifer, because they were strong. But maybe he did it a little
personal by now. But because the questions were not, they have not been
resolved. As I understand it, how do you see it, don'
t look. Yeah, I was struck by the fact that she was on
a couple of shows, but basically she refused to talk about it. He
said he didn' t have time in the first place and couldn' t
see the show. More like the presentation of the Mr Two and that'
s why I couldn' t say anything. He also said that he did
not know him, which is striking, because he showed a very brief conversation
that they had, but where she writes to him to tell him that,
with much respect, I do not know what he means. And then,
I don' t mean, in fact, there' s a part of
the little man where he tells him how I know you don' t want
to talk about it. That' s not what I' m going to
ask you, but tell us, how' s your office going that was
looted and I don' t know what. Then he' s not gonna
talk about it anymore. It did catch my eye. I believe and look,
I' m not special. Now you do, you freeze, but
now you' re as good as I have. Yes, yes, yes,
but there we are, here, we are going to read here,
tells Jorge Carvajal told him that he was still considering replying to Mr Doctor.
I think his silence is worse. Says Jorge Carvajal. He talked to Marifer
and told him he studied law law. However, what Mr Doctor presents is
not a Naucalpan tech. That' s what Mr Doctor presented as a professional
card and Jorge told him that he studied law- free, which is one
of the best or one of the best universities to study law in this country.
It' s good. Then the doctor says it' s hard and
kind of rude. Even if you' re right, you have to take
it seriously. Marifera talks about graphology and it' s just psychotic entertainment,
but Marifernos doesn' t say it' s just entertainment. She claims it
' s a science. She signs and makes observations, talking about neurobiology,
talking about psychology, talking about nutrition and a lot of things, but well,
keep me going. Yeah, and I had to get out and get
in I hope I don' t freeze anymore. Okay. The point is,
she doesn' t say much. He was also with Inés Moreno.
He said he didn' t want to go into controversy and he didn'
t have the time because he hadn' t seen anything he said, Mr
Doctor. But later she was also with Ana María Alvarado, who also did
a little bit to me. That' s how he gets the attention he
says. I' m very busy. I can' t see what this
doctor said about me, but he was in several programs, that is,
I say for the time being I saw her with Ana Maria, with the
little man and with Ines Moreno, and in none of these cases he meant
beyond. However, it seems to me that already with Ana MaríaÁlvarado he
did say a couple of other things in which he continues to insist and says
that graphology is a branch of psychology, which is not what he intends to
equate, because I too have been looking for some of the arguments they use
or why they give this impression or want to give this impression. And it
is because, then, what she has always said that through the ways of
living one can detect certain personality traits. You can believe that or not.
As you said in entertainment matters, someone could use it as one more element
if they wanted to, but that doesn' t make it a branch of
psychology and much less a therapeutic method, because something that is studied in a
few months or I don' t know how long it lasts two hours.
Every time I don' t know how much she doesn' t empower you
to be my psychologist, because she' s talking about a psychological branch,
let alone a therapist. That' s why I think that' s why
this idea is that personality traits are detected. Yes, but in a way
I said it yesterday probably very partial, very general, very shallow, and
I also read that good has the effect that some people who like this type
of graphology have in the same way they like it. And I say that
also in peace. We' ve been talking about horoscopes and all that stuff
here. It' s because it has these traits that I' m not
going to use any kind of technical language which it does, and I think
it does sometimes to confuse, because it starts to use certain language. So
it' s just an effect that there' s like complacency, that is,
you start saying name, because you look at your handwriting. You see
your affections are very strong and you, when you have yourself, do a
form of flattery, of course it' s a form of flattery and I
insist, that is, as long as you take this as an entertainment.
It' s okay. The problem is that they sell you a course like
he says. I think so, and I ignored this part until I saw
Mr. Doctor, they sell you a course where they tell you that you
' re going to be an expert, that they' re going to receive
you from the prosecution to work with them, when it' s not true
and really yes, it' s considered a pseudoscience and there' s nothing
wrong with it, because there' s a lot of people who do astrology
and you can tell them it' s a pseudoscience. And no way,
because there is clear, because it is, there is one thing that is
called the s scientific method that you are taught from first high school, from
first high school. So, well, if you can' t pass the
test, because it' s not a science of Ephrain I think that what
hasn' t understood the context of everything that happened with my serruptor and because
he' s like that. He' s a character and he loves the
mess. This is Danorca from medicine. I' ve loved it for that,
because for people who are dedicated to health sciences, the subject of charlatans
is very serious. The section of my servatos is called that unmasking charlatans.
And the issue with Marifer is that what she' s doing is a talk
she' s going to talk about and with all peace, with all peace
and with much love, that is because the fact that she says she'
s a scientist when she' s not. And then Marifer I hope you
see us I tell you your personal thing, if you say you' re
talking about psychology and you have nothing to do with psychology, is that it
' s called usurpation of yes, yes, notice that I' m going
to tell you nothing clearer. Besides, I think that, in addition to
that being manipulated, it' s a bit of manipulation that Marifer rye does,
so from false hopes to people he puts them in one, that is,
he puts them to believe in something they shouldn' t believe. And
I insist it' s not bad. What makes the problem is that you
take that problem seriously, that' s the one that' s really serious.
And apart from what Ephraim said right now, we should also add,
in fact, one thing that, in addition to the fact that she does
not have the training to propose a therapeutic method, this is not a therapeutic
method. Nor even though it promotes it a little as if it were,
not a therapeutic method, because look at me nothing more. I want to
say fast four very quick things that I just heard just now, that Jorge
Carvajal tells her, that she told him. This is what Jorge Carvajal says
Marifer doesn' t appear on the program, but he says I asked him
promptly and answered me number one, this from the look card. I thought
because I' m going to tell you here with all the respect of the
world. The degree is one thing that means that one completed the exams.
Well, he completed all of the training and his exams got a degree on
average or presented a thesis, defended it, passed the professional exam and gave
him a degree. That is what one studied complete and is entitled and then
comes what is the professional card, that this is an administrative procedure that is
needed to be able to exercise and is required and that can happen in different
times. There are people who take too long or get complicated or sometimes things
happen, but it doesn' t necessarily mean they' re not qualified,
which doesn' t mean it' s not a requirement to have this card.
Well, I thought it was gonna be her case. I thought that
I said maybe I hadn' t taken out the card, but I did
have the title of the time back, because Jorge Carvajal says that she told
him that she actually got the title last year because she hadn' t been
able to do the social service. That' s a good thing we'
re not asking about your career, that' s valid, but about this
other talking about physical or physiological health issues, mental and so on. Then
says Jorge Carvajal who told him again. But then it' s science or
it' s not science, graphology. And says Jorge Carvajal told me it
' s a branch of psychology. Then again, according to Jorge Carvajale,
she claims that it is a branch of psychology, when it is not third,
which is why she gives a specialty. But yes, but no,
and that she told Jorge Carvajal we did not teach in my institute a specialty.
It' s just a course. And he still tells Philip ah like
it' s a summer course for kids, something like that, and he
says Jorge Carvajar No, I don' t know if it' s for
kids or not, but he already told me it' s just a course.
And then I realize it. Jorge says something on his page is wrong,
because there are parts of his page where he says this is a specialty
and she says no to me. No, no, no, no,
it' s just a course. And the last thing is, I tell
him. I never said I could lose weight with writing. I just said
that writing can lower the anxiety that makes people eat and that so people can
lose weight when they eat out of anxiety. That' s all bullshit.
It' s not like I heard Marifer' s voice say as soon as
you find out what' s the excitement that makes you fat. You'
re going down and here' s Juan and I mean, what are you
talking about? Look, I' m gonna make this clear to you.
Angelica naba asks, Lupita, I' m wrong, or you were in
favor of Marifer' s comments before. I' ll explain to you clearly
that I' ve invited Marifer. Of course he did. In fact,
when they discussed poncho with clau in the story so we did a special Marifeer
and I with them and analyzed the faces. Of course I do, and
I like Marifer very much. The problem is, it' s entertainment.
As long as you tame it as an entertainment, we have also done shows
here with Juan and random And we have done with mel and we have done
here with Ephraim. We' ve already done in history, in history,
in researching stories about the coaches of life, how someone can get into making
a coach of life and dare to lead someone else' s life and others
accept someone coming to tell you what a coach of life is like. That
' s what I don' t agree with. And, for example,
someone who liked the life coach thing has been Marta Carrillo and she knows perfectly
well that I am very critical on that topic and recognizes it respect. What
happens is that when you already want to do this a business, as they
say, when you come, we have done many hundreds of good. We
haven' t always done several shows talking about when a famous hearer or I
don' t know he just grafted hair and told you he grew up with
a shampoo. It' s a fraud, because that' s a fraud,
whoever says it. Well, the same thing happens here. Then I
want and I estimate marifer of course I love her. He' s worth
it. The point is how far you' re going to take what'
s entertainment, make a life coach and run yempo. When we do the
program here, the program that most refers to theoretical and orientation issues, creates
your life with John and Salazar, where we touch the topics in a much
more way, since in knowledge. However, in spite of Juani' s
preparation and the same thing we do in broken souls is channel, channel if
you identify any of these traits and you think someone nearby is looking for help,
seek therapy, but we have never dared to say take it to the
letter. What is said here much less to give advice and much less to
give advice. And that, indeed, there is a degree in nutrition.
I did not graduate from pedagogy, but it was what I studied that I
taught them all my subjects and more. But you don' t dare do
that because it' s not right, because it' s not right.
Efradin to see now here the subject of the burr. No, I mean,
everybody knows I' m in there I have my beliefs. I believe
in the sleeves of the vest and the sopre sonics and some very strange things.
And then I believe a lot in astrology, which is pseudoscience. Imagine
no more, I want to invent a low- weight course with Chinese horoscope,
that is, not the batburet. It' s not that clear,
because it' s unreal. It' s unreal. Look it says that
Juan and Salazar in the is to leave me with a stop. I was
in a lot of comments. The point is where he got into an eleven
- rod shirt. Marifer was saying that she treats diseases such as anxiety and
obesity with writing. Indeed, it says to me. I don' t
like her either, Marifer, but it bothers me that with a signature I
want to tell you about a person' s life and she does, well,
Miguel Gemini and no, ma' am. Entertainment is also regulated towards
like professions. At your convenience, it' s entertainment. So what Paul
said is entertainment. There was also a crime. That' s what you
' re doing? What is making sea fers feel is not a crime in
terms of saying things on TV i e, no, entertainment is regulated and
there is no point of comparison in what Paula is a maritime subject is no
other. It' s two things that have absolutely nothing to do with it.
Nothing to see, nothing to see. As a lawyer, he is
not as capable either, as he should know that he can get into strong
legal trouble with what Lupita Marifera does, assured on many occasions that someone is
lying in legal matters without having credentials to ensure that someone is lying. That
is the problem when it ceases to be entertainment to affect someone else’ s
life in serious matters, for there is the serious. Don' t keep
going if you notice that, for example, let' s be clear.
Look It' s like she did a description of what she saw in that
show Lupita is commenting on where there was, but now for a second.
We just wait hard, we wait a clear second to see Mira Miguel I
explain that entertainment according to you, not, according to me, that entertainment.
In the United States you can' t talk about mental health issues without
having an expert on the forum. Yes, but Marifermo works in the United
States, he works in Mexico. Mexico is not regulated. What Paola did
was promote a crime or announce his crime. It' s different. You
' re talking about the United States when Marifer does it in the United States,
because already to give the authorities what is right is that Marifel' s
crime is unethical in exact in Mexico, santi forgive me continues not yes alone
and I was saying then that when there was that program where the moods got
up a little bit, he came and analyzed and then she said good.
Here you see that, for example, of me, of my person,
it does not say. Here you can see that Dr Mel already felt a
little nervous, because she also looks at how she is already quiet and is
turning on one side and not on the other, because yes, very probably
I of course, it is evident and because of her it is a little
more incisive in that. But that wasn' t diagnosing me at all,
I wasn' t prescribing anything or anything. I was just doing one or
a piece of something that was happening. And that' s what he did.
And that' s what lupita means with entertainment. That is because I
lie and not to say that diseases are also cured with something that does not
because I tell you I read says Jorge Carvajal and she tells him that with
the writing it lowers the anxiety that is eaten, neither neither does it not
white as they arm the batiburrillo, because it already stole your sentence. It
cheers me up because that' s the problem, so it has to see
the balls, that' s where we' re wrong, we' re
falling into the same thing, because to attack and to defend one attack in
the other it doesn' t have to do and it' s what'
s going on like the hyper I mean, it has nothing to do with
one thing with another. And I think the sangos, right now I went
out to say good, because I do entertainment. It got out of hand,
it' s over exactly, exactly, and I wouldn' t have
anything wrong with seeing now the matter of professional usurpation of saying that you have
a title that you don' t have. We had a man named Fausto
Alsati many six years ago, who in the end was Fausto Falsati because he
was appointed Secretary of Education and was not entitled then by Mr He did not
go to jail. Of course, I don' t know if it'
s a crime or administrative misdemeanor, I don' t know what, what
it consists of, but the joke is that he was separated from his duties,
but he didn' t go to jail. Here' s what'
s gonna happen to Mary Ferps who' s gonna tell her don' t
say you' re lying, but that' s got to tell someone and
so on. But the problem is deception. I don' t know,
I' m not a lawyer and I' d have to tell someone who
knows about laws. I wouldn' t know if being on TV and giving
health advice is a crime or not, because look at all the mornings doing
that. Shannik Berman has just been given nineteen injections of acid already to the
uronic and they recommend it to the public, as it is the same,
not more than physical health and the other one of mental health as serious one
as the other. So I don' t dare say if that' s
a crime, if you can fake a responsibility, I don' t know.
Yes, but what' s wrong is that you say I insist,
as Juan says and as Mel Ephraim says, as we all say, that
you tell people that changing your lyrics you' re going to lose weight,
because that' s fraud. That' s a lie Now, whether it
' s a crime or not. No, I know, unethical, yes,
it' s unethical. No. That' s the problem when it
stops being entertainment, because you' re on TV and you get a signature
and say no man, you' re like you said very much at first,
bad you' re very funny. You like to tell, jokes you
do a lot of good. So much is fine. All right, well,
how do they call you sagittarius? Sure, you like to travel.
You' re okay, nothing' s gonna happen. Hey, the problem
is when you tell yourself you have this problem. I' m your life
car, I' m going to tell you what you have to do if
what you want is because I' m going to believe you and blind table
and blindly to what you tell me. And that' s where life coaches
make a lot of money? That' s where they make a lot of
money? Ask a ton and a lot, how much they pay as they
are, dismissing the importance of these physical and mental health issues, because in
addition, they can increase. We couldn' t, as Ephraim also told
us yesterday, be ignoring the need to go to a different specialist, maybe
coming out with a crinologist, maybe I don' t know a metabolic risk
specialist and you' re letting it go, because you think that that can
be solved through writing, just as the problem of an anxiety disorder doesn'
t solve either because you change the writing. Of course you have to take
care of it, you have to go on medication and in addition, they
are sufferings that have to deal with a multidisciplinary team. It says sweet tide
is and a fraud. It' s not a crime. There' s
fraud to fraud. Please, I mean. I remember someone selling bits of
the Cross of Jesus Christ on television, because one of my neighbors asked me
to wait for a very important package that was coming to him and I didn
' t leave my house waiting for the package and when I asked him,
he told me it was a piece of the Cross of Jesus Christ. I
said use means. That' s a fraud, of course, it'
s a fraud and it exists, but a fraud. For it to be
a crime, I think it has to be property damage. It' s
got to be for telling you, forging a signature, I don' t
know, but showing up on TV and lying if it was a crime,
there' d be a lot of people committing it by now. I mean,
I don' t know. I insist if anyone you know, because
Ephraim says so already, and the point is that exactly why I said that
my jungler is very humble, because I don' t know if it happens
to him so badly, but suddenly the doctors get a lot into the nutrition
area and then they send people to lose weight with pills. And that'
s good for me. I mean, it' s not your area,
just stay out of it, just go, I mean, you' re
the doctor and do what you have to do. And my salesman always defends
that. The psychologist who does what he is. The psychologist, the psychiatrist
who locates the psychiatrist, because then there are also psychologists who are medicating.
No, I mean, we' ve also been weirder, and besides,
they' re not okay. So, that' s why I think my
place is very humble, because it always says go with the specialist, that
is, this one touches him so, this one touches him so, and
every specialist should say they are nil limits. I can' t help you
anymore You' re going to the one who' s coming to finish what
Mariferma is doing, because besides, it' s like omnipresent Marifer It'
s not like it' s but a photographer, but it' s a
psychologist, but it' s not to see that you don' t,
no, you' re not You can' t claim that you have all
those professions and all that knowledge and you can' t go from entertainment to
being a therapist. He does not hear at least that you do all the
training so that you are, if that is of interest to you. And
then, you want to implement or complement a certain form of therapy or a
certain therapeutic model, adding these other elements, because it is obviously writing,
in itself, that is writing, because the exercise of writing, of course,
can be a part of a therapeutic indication within a treatment model that is
being carried out, but it is not in itself, much less in this
way, a treatment as such, as it is not. I think so.
I think so, and I should have marifel a little bit for someone
to help you in this damage control, because there can be a lot of
things, there are a lot of things that can be rescued from what Marifer
does. She' s very good at talking, but I insist, when
she goes from entertainment, to being a specialist who isn' t, because
it' s the serious thing. I don' t think there' s
anything to segregate guys doctor from him, because I don' t think it
seems like this is going to keep giving a little more to talk about.
I hope that she will therefore organize her ideas a little better and the intention
she has to do this work, and that one too will continue to have
this responsibility to inform oneself. I don' t see some comments here that
say, but she' s a member of I don' t know what
she' s mine, because we have to investigate what that is, because,
for example, one thing that also said Mister Doctor is that she talks
about a school of graphology, which is hers and her mother' s,
that is, it' s her own institution, which we wouldn' t
have to criticize anymore because it' s hers, but we should also see
if she' s registered what she offers, if she does what she offers,
and if it' s like she said earlier that I was listening to
Jorge Carvajal for a course. We offer a cul is fine. You'
re like offering a corsine course and you don' t have to be a
chef and I know how to cook very well, I mean, I wouldn
' t have anything wrong exactly maybe if he offered you that, coming out
of that, you' re going to be an expert, that you'
re going to work at the prosecutor' s office. Well, maybe there
if I see a little bit of the truth. But if not more,
it' s a course based on Marifer' s books that exists in the
auto thingy. So it can be, I mean, it can be how
you can take a course of something else. Why she came out dressed as
a Marine. I don' t know They say it' s gonna be.
Marifera said that on her channel she' s going to tell the truth
and she' s going to bill for sure. And it' s okay,
it' s okay. And she' ll know what she' ll
say and it' s very valid. We' ll listen to her and
we' ll see what she says and we' ll talk about it too.
And we' ll talk about it too. Yeah, sure, yeah,
yeah, well, something you want to add. Dear friends, Ephraim,
I' m already going to look for specialists. Go to the specialist,
check well what they have and go decanting. If this one was not,
don' t keep the first, p check and go to the specialist
who have to go the exact one, the little guy who touches him.
Not exact, exactly, well, she says she offers graph therapy based on
the results of your study Yes, because it is. This is the hilito,
the line, which divides where you' ve already gone from being an
entertainment and something fun to do and working with the audience in short. But,
well, thank you all very much for having accompanied us and we see
each other soon in history, in history, but there will be women leaving
a mark that are Madonna' s three programs. They can be followed and
all of them can be thrown out. And I' m going to sor
your pastor, I' m going to send you a course. No,
it' s not true, it' s true, it' s not
true. The lupic ship. You should do that, yes, look at
it, of course, but there you notice that it is an absolute fraud,
which is a cover that, of course, no more so that I
give us natives if we have never said that the ship in Madrid is true
more than a joke. But well, thanks a lot to everyone and we
' ll see you then tomorrow, thanks for joining us here, on the
YouTube channel and on podcast platforms and thanks to subscribers, members and so on,
guys. Let' s go, then.