1
00:00:01,120 --> 00:00:07,280
You're listening to the Mind Over Murder
podcast. My name is Bill Thomas.

2
00:00:07,799 --> 00:00:12,080
I'm a writer, consulting, producer, and now podcaster. I am now

3
00:00:12,119 --> 00:00:16,039
trying to use my experience as the
brother of a murder victim to help other

4
00:00:16,120 --> 00:00:20,280
victims of violent crime. I'm working
on a book on the unsolved Colonial Parkway

5
00:00:20,359 --> 00:00:24,760
murders and I'm the co administrator of
the Colonial Parkway Murders Facebook group together with

6
00:00:24,839 --> 00:00:29,120
Kristin Dilly. My name is Kristin
Dilly. I'm a writer, a researcher,

7
00:00:29,320 --> 00:00:32,840
a teacher, and a victim's advocate, as well as the social media

8
00:00:32,920 --> 00:00:37,880
manager and co administrator for the Colonial
Parkway Murders Facebook page with my partner in

9
00:00:37,920 --> 00:00:44,799
crime, Bill Thomas. Welcome to
Mind Ever Murderer. I'm Kristin Dilly and

10
00:00:44,840 --> 00:00:49,880
I'm Bill Thomas, and we're joined
today by doctor Mike Amott of the Bradford

11
00:00:50,079 --> 00:00:55,719
University, Florida Gulf Coast University Serial
Killer Research Database here to talk to us

12
00:00:55,880 --> 00:00:59,880
all about serial killers. Mike,
thank you so much for joining us.

13
00:01:00,520 --> 00:01:03,439
So happy to be here, christ
and you make it sound so upbeat.

14
00:01:03,480 --> 00:01:07,239
I do. That's just a function
of me being excited to be here and

15
00:01:07,719 --> 00:01:12,439
really geeking out over this amazing data
analysis that I have at my fingertips as

16
00:01:12,480 --> 00:01:15,480
a result of this serial killer study. So, yeah, I'm a little

17
00:01:15,480 --> 00:01:19,680
amped about serial killers. Maybe I
need to tone it down just a bit.

18
00:01:19,719 --> 00:01:23,200
I'll try to dial it back.
Let's let you jump right into it,

19
00:01:23,239 --> 00:01:27,200
since you're so incredibly enthusiastic, Mike, go ahead and start by talking

20
00:01:27,200 --> 00:01:32,959
to us about how this database originated. I know you said that it started

21
00:01:33,000 --> 00:01:36,680
as a classroom project. Tell us
more as an educator. I love that.

22
00:01:36,799 --> 00:01:40,200
I'm fascinated, So tell us all
about the database and how it got

23
00:01:40,200 --> 00:01:42,680
started. Sure, so, there
was no intention of creating the database when

24
00:01:42,680 --> 00:01:48,120
it when it first started, but
I was teaching a course in forensic psychology

25
00:01:48,159 --> 00:01:52,200
at Radford University, and the students
were really interested, even back then,

26
00:01:52,239 --> 00:01:56,000
this is the early nineties, even
in serial murder. But what I found

27
00:01:56,079 --> 00:02:00,280
was that there really weren't very many
good sources of information. There were a

28
00:02:00,280 --> 00:02:05,040
lot of true crime books, but
there really weren't any good academic sources.

29
00:02:04,439 --> 00:02:07,759
There was a profile that the FBI
had put out about serial killers. You

30
00:02:07,800 --> 00:02:12,280
had a lot of people speculating,
but there really wasn't good data. So

31
00:02:12,360 --> 00:02:15,680
what I did was. I had
my students do a serial killer timeline.

32
00:02:15,719 --> 00:02:17,840
So put them into groups of about
three or four students, gave them a

33
00:02:17,879 --> 00:02:22,439
true crime book on a serial killer, and told them basically to create a

34
00:02:22,520 --> 00:02:25,759
timeline from when that serial killer was
born all the way through until they died

35
00:02:25,840 --> 00:02:31,479
or were convicted, and then to
compare with their timeline and what their research

36
00:02:31,560 --> 00:02:36,039
is showing how it compares to what
we talked about in terms of aggression in

37
00:02:36,080 --> 00:02:38,960
the classroom. And so we started
off with a few of those. I

38
00:02:38,080 --> 00:02:40,639
took them and throw in the firing
cabinet, and then I started looking through

39
00:02:40,639 --> 00:02:44,960
my filing cabinet realized I've got a
lot of timelines. So I just stuck

40
00:02:45,000 --> 00:02:47,560
them into an Excel sheet and it
might not even been Excel back then.

41
00:02:47,599 --> 00:02:51,319
I can't remember what the order was, but I think maybe Excel wasn't even

42
00:02:51,360 --> 00:02:53,599
ready. Then just started putting them
in there. And then students wanted to

43
00:02:53,680 --> 00:02:58,120
know if they could do independent studies, to start doing more research, and

44
00:02:58,159 --> 00:03:01,639
it just kept building and building,
and then it got out to our local

45
00:03:01,840 --> 00:03:06,319
news media that we had this database, and they were so interested in it.

46
00:03:06,319 --> 00:03:08,240
We thought, let's make it a
little more formal and it's just kept

47
00:03:08,280 --> 00:03:16,039
growing. So did it change format
over time as that data was entered by

48
00:03:16,080 --> 00:03:20,879
you and the students? How did
it all come together? It changed and

49
00:03:20,919 --> 00:03:24,439
that we removed some fields and we
added quite a few fields. And then

50
00:03:24,479 --> 00:03:30,439
when the FBI changed the definition from
three murders to two, we had to

51
00:03:30,439 --> 00:03:34,080
go back and collect the people that
we had thrown out because they had only

52
00:03:34,120 --> 00:03:37,199
the two murders. But we keep
adding the fields, and we add a

53
00:03:37,199 --> 00:03:39,560
field, we have to go back
and start filling in the thousands that we

54
00:03:39,919 --> 00:03:45,520
hadn't looked for that piece of information
for. I'll ask the question that I

55
00:03:45,520 --> 00:03:49,919
think a lot of lay people who
are not interested in true criming serial killers

56
00:03:50,000 --> 00:03:53,560
might ask, what is the end
goal of having a serial killer database?

57
00:03:53,960 --> 00:03:57,840
That goal has changed a little bit. So when I first started, it

58
00:03:57,879 --> 00:04:00,719
was really more to just give me
good statistics to use while I teach my

59
00:04:00,759 --> 00:04:04,240
class. And then it became let's
go ahead and try to see if we

60
00:04:04,280 --> 00:04:10,080
can get great statistics for everybody to
use on serial murder. And then the

61
00:04:10,120 --> 00:04:13,159
goal became, in addition to that, let's see if we can find some

62
00:04:13,280 --> 00:04:16,600
ways to maybe help law enforcement be
able to find or profile serial killers.

63
00:04:17,319 --> 00:04:20,240
And then we got rid of that
goal because it didn't look like that was

64
00:04:20,279 --> 00:04:24,079
going to be very successful for a
number of reasons. I think the goal

65
00:04:24,160 --> 00:04:28,560
right now is just compiling the most
accurate data that's available, So we don't

66
00:04:28,600 --> 00:04:32,800
really have some of these misunderstandings about
about serial killers. So how many subjects

67
00:04:32,839 --> 00:04:39,199
are currently in the database, Mike, what's the universe of people were looking

68
00:04:39,240 --> 00:04:44,439
at? So overall we have just
short of fifty eight hundred serial killers in

69
00:04:44,480 --> 00:04:48,000
there. Most of them thirty seven
hundred are from the US and about twenty

70
00:04:48,040 --> 00:04:54,160
one hundred are international. That's a
scary number, it is. And we've

71
00:04:54,560 --> 00:04:58,199
created a kind of a second database
where we're looking at instead of just a

72
00:04:58,279 --> 00:05:01,480
serial killers were looking at their victim
and so that's limited for the most part

73
00:05:01,600 --> 00:05:05,240
to the US and Canadian victims.
But I'll tell you that was a huge

74
00:05:05,360 --> 00:05:13,639
change in our database because what we
realized is breaking really basically saying we need

75
00:05:13,639 --> 00:05:17,879
to see each victim name for each
serial killer really made the database more accurate

76
00:05:17,959 --> 00:05:21,839
because we had people listed as,
for example, having killed six. You

77
00:05:21,879 --> 00:05:25,399
go through and try to find out
who those six are, and you realize

78
00:05:25,399 --> 00:05:29,160
there were only two. But somewhere
along the way somebody in law enforcement said,

79
00:05:29,399 --> 00:05:31,959
it wouldn't surprise me if they've killed
six, and you realize that's not

80
00:05:32,079 --> 00:05:38,600
proof. It's not the same thing
at all. Though. One thing before

81
00:05:38,600 --> 00:05:43,160
we move past these numbers. Is
it significant to you that there are thirty

82
00:05:43,240 --> 00:05:47,680
seven hundred serial killers in the database
for the United States and twenty one hundred

83
00:05:47,759 --> 00:05:53,959
internationally. Is that a matter of
data access or does the US have more

84
00:05:54,000 --> 00:05:58,600
serial killers on a per capita basis
than every other country on the planet.

85
00:05:59,519 --> 00:06:01,839
My take on this, and not
everybody agrees with this take, but my

86
00:06:01,959 --> 00:06:05,319
take on it, it's a matter
of access, because if you look at

87
00:06:05,480 --> 00:06:10,160
murder rates by country, the US
falls about in the middle, and so

88
00:06:10,199 --> 00:06:13,800
it doesn't make any sense that we
would be about in the middle in terms

89
00:06:13,800 --> 00:06:17,560
of murder rates but number one by
so much in terms of serial killers.

90
00:06:18,079 --> 00:06:20,519
It doesn't make a lot of sense. But then, if you think about

91
00:06:21,000 --> 00:06:25,600
how people get into the database,
they had somebody had to have killed two

92
00:06:25,680 --> 00:06:29,879
or more people on two or more
occasions. That had to be discovered,

93
00:06:30,680 --> 00:06:33,759
It had to be reported someplace,
had to be reported someplace in English,

94
00:06:33,759 --> 00:06:38,839
because that's pretty much the only language
I speak, and I barely speak that,

95
00:06:39,279 --> 00:06:42,480
and so I think the thing is
it's just so much easier to get

96
00:06:42,560 --> 00:06:46,279
information about US serial killers than it
is others. To give you a good

97
00:06:46,279 --> 00:06:50,399
example of that, years ago,
there was a master student out in California,

98
00:06:50,399 --> 00:06:54,279
and I can't remember the name of
the university, but she was from

99
00:06:54,360 --> 00:06:59,279
Japan. So she spoke fluent Japanese
and she did her thesis on Japanese serial

100
00:06:59,360 --> 00:07:03,279
killers, and her thesis found so
many serial killers that nobody had ever reported

101
00:07:03,360 --> 00:07:06,600
before. But the difference was she
spoke the language. She could look at

102
00:07:06,639 --> 00:07:11,920
the Japanese newspapers and media sources and
find things nobody else could. So,

103
00:07:12,040 --> 00:07:14,920
even though it's a boring answer,
it's a matter of it's more a matter

104
00:07:14,959 --> 00:07:18,480
of access than it is something about
the US. I think that's really the

105
00:07:18,879 --> 00:07:23,879
explanation for it. And that's why
I think when you interpret serial killer data

106
00:07:23,879 --> 00:07:28,639
in general, you just really have
to be careful about how you interpret things

107
00:07:28,680 --> 00:07:32,680
because so much of it is access. What is your methodology for this in

108
00:07:32,800 --> 00:07:38,160
terms of data collection, what are
the metrics that you're looking at, How

109
00:07:38,160 --> 00:07:42,079
do you get all your data,
and who is doing the data entry?

110
00:07:42,199 --> 00:07:46,040
Hopefully this doesn't all fall to you. It does for the most part,

111
00:07:46,079 --> 00:07:50,879
these days. But over the years, it was mostly my students creating the

112
00:07:50,879 --> 00:07:54,800
the data I started to put in
the database. But again, as students

113
00:07:54,879 --> 00:07:58,879
wanted to do independent studies, they
would start to enter the the data.

114
00:07:59,360 --> 00:08:03,600
I retired from I'm teaching about fifteen
years ago. I'm a full time consultant

115
00:08:03,680 --> 00:08:07,519
with a consulting FIRMAUNT at DC,
and so I don't have the access to

116
00:08:07,560 --> 00:08:11,600
the students that I used to.
When we first started the database, the

117
00:08:11,639 --> 00:08:16,279
Internet really didn't exist, and so
pretty much it was a matter of looking

118
00:08:16,319 --> 00:08:20,560
at true crime books, and there's
such a difference in terms of accuracy of

119
00:08:20,600 --> 00:08:24,279
those books. There are some really
good true crime writers and there are some

120
00:08:24,360 --> 00:08:28,120
horrible ones. One of my students
got confused because the book she had they

121
00:08:28,160 --> 00:08:31,279
listed three different birth dates for the
killer in the same book. And that's

122
00:08:31,320 --> 00:08:35,720
not really a good that. It
doesn't give you much confidence in the inaccuracy

123
00:08:35,879 --> 00:08:39,159
of the book. But then the
students would go into the library and look

124
00:08:39,200 --> 00:08:43,600
at microfiche and microfilm, of looking
at major newspapers like the New York Times.

125
00:08:45,240 --> 00:08:50,080
But then as the Internet came about, it started changing everything. And

126
00:08:50,120 --> 00:08:52,120
if you think about today, we
go through and we still look at true

127
00:08:52,120 --> 00:08:56,360
crime books. We look at different
media sources, but for example, ancestry

128
00:08:56,360 --> 00:09:01,919
dot com has been a phenomenal source
in terms of getting birth dates and death

129
00:09:01,000 --> 00:09:05,200
dates, and race information and family
information whether they served in the military.

130
00:09:05,840 --> 00:09:09,559
Newspapers dot com is again one of
those. We get these from these small

131
00:09:09,600 --> 00:09:15,120
towns. We get access to all
these different newspapers. So the methods has

132
00:09:15,200 --> 00:09:18,120
changed in a little bit. But
what we try to do is make sure

133
00:09:18,120 --> 00:09:20,039
we have at least a couple of
sources that are going to say the same

134
00:09:20,080 --> 00:09:24,320
thing. For example, if we
have the date of a particular murder,

135
00:09:24,440 --> 00:09:26,960
we want to find out a couple
of sources more for the birth dates,

136
00:09:28,080 --> 00:09:31,840
same type of situation. Everything we
have in the database is from public information,

137
00:09:31,960 --> 00:09:35,559
so we don't have any secret access, let's say, to the FBI

138
00:09:35,639 --> 00:09:39,039
files. We don't have psychiatrist reports
that weren't part of the court proceeding,

139
00:09:39,240 --> 00:09:43,440
and we have done that on purpose
because we want to share our database with

140
00:09:45,279 --> 00:09:48,960
other researchers, and if we had
access to data that was private, it

141
00:09:50,000 --> 00:09:52,399
would limit our ability to share that. So everything we have now is something

142
00:09:52,519 --> 00:09:58,080
that anybody could get if you want
to spend thousands and thousands of hours getting

143
00:09:58,120 --> 00:10:03,799
it. It sounds like you miss
your students in that regard. Oh I

144
00:10:03,840 --> 00:10:05,639
do. I miss teaching quite a
bit, But I just had they were

145
00:10:05,679 --> 00:10:11,879
offering a early retirement option, the
state was and this consulting firm had wanted

146
00:10:11,879 --> 00:10:13,919
me to come on board full time. It was a tough decision, but

147
00:10:15,799 --> 00:10:18,720
I'm glad I made it. But
I really missed teaching, being with my

148
00:10:18,759 --> 00:10:22,679
students. How often do you add
new information to the database. Is this

149
00:10:24,000 --> 00:10:28,720
a weekly thing, a daily thing, monthly? It's at least a weekly

150
00:10:28,759 --> 00:10:31,080
thing, So at least once a
week I'll go in and search to see

151
00:10:31,080 --> 00:10:35,000
if there are new serial killers that
have been identified, or if, for

152
00:10:35,039 --> 00:10:39,679
example, from an old case,
there's new information that came out, for

153
00:10:39,720 --> 00:10:43,759
example that with the DNA technology now
to beginning to identify victims that we had

154
00:10:43,799 --> 00:10:46,960
to be listed as unknown in the
past. And so those are the kinds

155
00:10:46,960 --> 00:10:52,279
of things we update. But it's
really it's a weekly process. When I

156
00:10:52,320 --> 00:10:56,080
had called you, I think it
was last week, to ask if you

157
00:10:56,080 --> 00:11:00,320
wanted to appear in my mind ever
murder, and I had mentioned the Wade

158
00:11:00,360 --> 00:11:01,799
Wilmer Senior. You had said,
oh, yeah, we already have him

159
00:11:01,840 --> 00:11:07,399
in the database. So Oh my
gosh, that's fast work. That's great

160
00:11:07,440 --> 00:11:13,200
because it's really only been since January
eighth that they made that announcement that he

161
00:11:13,320 --> 00:11:16,440
is good for the murders of Robin
Edwards, David Noveline, and Teresa Howell,

162
00:11:16,480 --> 00:11:20,960
which does make him a serial killer
absolutely. How does Wilmer move on

163
00:11:22,000 --> 00:11:26,240
to your database so quickly? In
this example, again just going through media

164
00:11:26,320 --> 00:11:30,960
sources, it popped up in the
headlines, and so I had his name

165
00:11:31,159 --> 00:11:33,519
go through and verify that, in
fact, the three people he was suspected

166
00:11:33,559 --> 00:11:37,679
of killing there's a reasonable suspicion for
that. You get a lot of ones

167
00:11:37,720 --> 00:11:41,759
of people that you can't really put
in because they suspect but there's not really

168
00:11:41,879 --> 00:11:46,320
enough evidence to suggest that they did
it. But right away the name goes

169
00:11:46,360 --> 00:11:50,360
in. I spend some time trying
to find whatever information I can find at

170
00:11:50,440 --> 00:11:54,840
him, and then mark him down
as a follow up because there'll be other

171
00:11:54,879 --> 00:11:56,919
information that comes out. But he's
one of those, for example, that

172
00:11:58,039 --> 00:12:01,120
could go to ancestry dot com get
the birth date information, get the death

173
00:12:01,159 --> 00:12:03,360
information. You get all that stuff
that wouldn't be in a newspaper article for

174
00:12:03,360 --> 00:12:07,120
example, or a media source,
but is available as soon as we knew

175
00:12:07,120 --> 00:12:11,639
about him, which is a few
months ago before the announcement, we had

176
00:12:11,639 --> 00:12:16,039
done all that basic research with using
ancestry in newspapers, dot com and other

177
00:12:16,120 --> 00:12:20,879
sources, so we had a pretty
decent address history, day of birth,

178
00:12:22,240 --> 00:12:26,399
marriage, divorce, when his kids
were born. But that's sort of thing,

179
00:12:26,440 --> 00:12:30,279
so we had a sense of that. We're just pleasantly surprised that as

180
00:12:30,320 --> 00:12:33,679
a newly minted serial killer, which
by the way, is an expression we're

181
00:12:33,799 --> 00:12:39,320
comfortable using because according to as you
said, according to the FBI's criteria,

182
00:12:39,879 --> 00:12:46,799
Alan Wade Wilmer Senior meets their criteria. Interestingly, the FBI, so far

183
00:12:46,919 --> 00:12:50,000
and it's only been a month,
they never call him a serial killer.

184
00:12:50,519 --> 00:12:56,480
They seem to avoid terms like that
quite often they do, and I think

185
00:12:56,519 --> 00:13:00,600
that the fbis boxed themselves into a
corner with their definition, because if you

186
00:13:00,639 --> 00:13:05,120
think about two or more murders on
separate occasions, think about somebody who's a

187
00:13:05,120 --> 00:13:09,600
contract killer, they certainly fit the
definition of a serial killer. So as

188
00:13:09,639 --> 00:13:11,120
we find them, we'll put them
in our database. We don't go searching

189
00:13:11,159 --> 00:13:13,840
for the contract killers, but they
would be in there. But those are

190
00:13:13,879 --> 00:13:18,960
certainly different types of people than somebody
that is killing homeless folks on the street.

191
00:13:20,519 --> 00:13:24,000
The kind of the term I like
to use instead of serial killer is

192
00:13:24,320 --> 00:13:28,879
multiple event killer, and then I
think a serial killer is going to be

193
00:13:28,919 --> 00:13:33,240
a subdivision of that, because when
that term first came out, it was

194
00:13:33,320 --> 00:13:37,879
coined to describe people who killed in
the series. And most of these multiple

195
00:13:37,879 --> 00:13:41,840
event killers, again, they fit
the definition of the FBI serial killer,

196
00:13:43,360 --> 00:13:46,639
but they're not killing in the series. They might kill three people over a

197
00:13:46,679 --> 00:13:48,879
thirty year period because they're angry,
or they kill people over a period of

198
00:13:48,919 --> 00:13:52,799
time because they're robbing banks, but
they're different. They're not that serial killer.

199
00:13:54,080 --> 00:13:56,159
And that's one of the things that
I think that we're going to try

200
00:13:56,200 --> 00:14:00,399
to do at some point is see
if we can subdivide serial killers into different

201
00:14:00,399 --> 00:14:03,279
types. We already have started that, but we haven't done any analysis on

202
00:14:03,320 --> 00:14:07,159
that, and I think we're going
to see some real differences in these kind

203
00:14:07,200 --> 00:14:11,679
of these subtypes. For example,
a person who is killing women and sexually

204
00:14:11,679 --> 00:14:15,200
assaulting women is going to be very
different from the person who is killing people

205
00:14:15,200 --> 00:14:18,279
at seven to eleven. They're still
they're going to be serial killers, but

206
00:14:18,320 --> 00:14:20,679
they're not the same type of serial
killer. And I think once that research

207
00:14:20,759 --> 00:14:26,080
really starts again, we're already doing
the categorization of those I think we're going

208
00:14:26,159 --> 00:14:31,440
to see some really different results,
different patterns. So are you thinking going

209
00:14:31,519 --> 00:14:35,399
to end up with several different subcategories? Yes, however many that is,

210
00:14:35,440 --> 00:14:39,279
I'm not sure whether it's going to
be something like ten or twenty. I'm

211
00:14:39,279 --> 00:14:43,440
not sure. But I think one
of the reasons that profiling has not been

212
00:14:43,519 --> 00:14:48,279
very successful is because all serial killers
aren't the same. What it could be

213
00:14:48,360 --> 00:14:52,320
that if you look at a certain
type or subtype, that maybe they share

214
00:14:52,360 --> 00:14:54,440
a lot more in common and that
profile can be much more accurate, because

215
00:14:54,440 --> 00:14:58,679
the current profile is certainly not not
very accurate. I was taking a look

216
00:14:58,720 --> 00:15:03,159
at the landing page for this study
and it states that you utilize over one

217
00:15:03,240 --> 00:15:09,919
hundred and eighty five data points multiple
murderer methodology, victimology, and statistical analysis.

218
00:15:09,320 --> 00:15:13,320
Can you talk about those one hundred
and eighty five data points that you

219
00:15:13,320 --> 00:15:16,799
look at? Sure, but to
save your audience a lot of listening,

220
00:15:18,879 --> 00:15:20,639
let me put it into categories.
Perfect. That'd be great. Yes,

221
00:15:22,039 --> 00:15:26,480
So we start off with the actual
murders themselves, in terms of when they

222
00:15:26,519 --> 00:15:30,360
began and when they ended. What
cities they occurred in, what counties what

223
00:15:30,480 --> 00:15:35,720
countries. We then go to a
series of columns that describe childhood, So

224
00:15:35,840 --> 00:15:39,080
when they were born, where they
were born, who were they raised by,

225
00:15:39,480 --> 00:15:41,639
Did they have problems in school?
What type of education did they have

226
00:15:41,799 --> 00:15:46,600
at the time of the first murder. Then going to the information about the

227
00:15:46,639 --> 00:15:50,399
person themselves in terms of where they
abused as a child, Did they have

228
00:15:50,720 --> 00:15:54,600
the try, did they abuse drugs
or alcohol? Can you explain the triad?

229
00:15:54,639 --> 00:16:00,759
I'm sorry for those of our listeners
who are not criminologists. The McDonald's

230
00:16:00,759 --> 00:16:04,759
try. It basically postulates that people
who were aggressive had three common experiences.

231
00:16:06,399 --> 00:16:11,039
They were having bed wedding past the
age at which you would expect bed wedding.

232
00:16:11,440 --> 00:16:15,879
They were they were setting fires,
and there was animal abuse, and

233
00:16:15,960 --> 00:16:18,279
so that was pretty exciting when when
it first came out, But like anything,

234
00:16:18,320 --> 00:16:22,759
people thought that meant everybody that's a
killer has those characteristics, and if

235
00:16:22,759 --> 00:16:26,679
you have those characteristics, you're going
to be a killer. And what it

236
00:16:26,720 --> 00:16:30,720
turns out is that most of your
killers and most murders don't have those characteristics.

237
00:16:32,080 --> 00:16:33,720
They might have one, but they're
not going to have all three.

238
00:16:34,080 --> 00:16:37,759
And there are plenty of people who
have those that don't become murders. But

239
00:16:37,879 --> 00:16:41,480
if you look at the kind of
the probability, those that have all three

240
00:16:41,559 --> 00:16:47,279
characteristics are probably more likely to become
violent than those that don't. But it's

241
00:16:47,360 --> 00:16:51,679
not strong enough that you can predict
with those. But if they have those

242
00:16:51,679 --> 00:16:55,240
three characteristics, regardless of whether they're
going to be violent in the future,

243
00:16:55,360 --> 00:16:57,879
it's problematic in terms that they're going
through psychological trauma. So it's not one

244
00:16:57,879 --> 00:17:02,600
of those things that you ignore,
but you don't instantly assume that they're going

245
00:17:02,639 --> 00:17:07,079
to become a killer. Very interesting, So murder's childhood, emotional factors.

246
00:17:07,200 --> 00:17:11,799
Any So those are the three main
categories. Were there any others that you

247
00:17:11,799 --> 00:17:15,000
take a look at. Sure,
And then we go ahead and look at

248
00:17:15,039 --> 00:17:18,640
the murders themselves in terms of how
they were committed, whether, for example,

249
00:17:18,640 --> 00:17:23,200
there was something such as necrophilia that
occurred, what type of weapon was

250
00:17:23,279 --> 00:17:27,519
used, who were their victims,
And then it goes into the outcome of

251
00:17:27,720 --> 00:17:32,039
when they were arrested, how many
murders were they charged for, did they

252
00:17:32,079 --> 00:17:36,759
confess, did they plead insanity?
So it goes to pretty much every part

253
00:17:36,839 --> 00:17:41,599
of their life, in every part
of kind of the murder series. Now,

254
00:17:41,000 --> 00:17:44,519
I would love to say we have
every bit of that information for every

255
00:17:44,599 --> 00:17:48,119
killer, but we don't. There
are some things, for example, like

256
00:17:48,200 --> 00:17:52,160
race and gender that we have information
on for everybody, but then things like

257
00:17:52,200 --> 00:17:57,079
were there abused as children we might
have information on let's say twenty percent with

258
00:17:57,160 --> 00:18:00,079
that. And that's a good example, by the way, with the child

259
00:18:00,119 --> 00:18:06,880
abuse of a difficult variable because if
you're reading the trial transcripts, if the

260
00:18:06,920 --> 00:18:10,920
person was abused as a child,
it's going to show up, most likely

261
00:18:10,960 --> 00:18:15,880
in the sentencing part of the trial. But if they weren't abused, it's

262
00:18:15,920 --> 00:18:18,599
not really going to be mentioned.
So when you see that lack of it

263
00:18:18,640 --> 00:18:22,839
being mentioned, you don't know if
that's a no or just we don't know,

264
00:18:22,480 --> 00:18:26,640
And so you have to just be
and so we limit our entries to

265
00:18:26,720 --> 00:18:30,920
ones that we know, and most
of the ones it just isn't mentioned anywhere.

266
00:18:30,000 --> 00:18:33,240
And then you have to be careful
too. For example, like with

267
00:18:33,960 --> 00:18:37,519
Arthur Shawcross, who was the Genesee
River killer, he told all these stories

268
00:18:37,519 --> 00:18:41,160
about being abused as a child.
When they interviewed his parents. Of course,

269
00:18:41,200 --> 00:18:45,960
his parents said didn't happen when they
interviewed some relatives they said some of

270
00:18:45,960 --> 00:18:48,720
it happened and some of it didn't. And that's what you deal with a

271
00:18:48,759 --> 00:18:52,279
lot, and so you have to
make some judgment calls on who are we

272
00:18:52,319 --> 00:18:56,880
believing here, And we've changed several
of those codes or ratings over the years

273
00:18:56,920 --> 00:19:00,119
where we realize what we thought twenty
years ago, there's evidence to suggests either

274
00:19:00,160 --> 00:19:06,000
it did or didn't happen. This
is pretty data intensive. How long is

275
00:19:06,039 --> 00:19:10,200
each entry if it's complete, Does
it go on for page after page?

276
00:19:10,640 --> 00:19:14,319
Oh? No, it's an Excel
spreadsheet. So every serial killer will have

277
00:19:14,440 --> 00:19:18,240
one row in the database, and
then they'll have hopefully entries in most of

278
00:19:18,279 --> 00:19:22,880
the columns. And you can add
more data as it becomes available. So

279
00:19:22,960 --> 00:19:27,960
if you learn new things from an
interview or a court transcript or a well

280
00:19:29,000 --> 00:19:33,000
researched book, you may add additional
data points as you go along. Oh

281
00:19:33,079 --> 00:19:37,319
absolutely, yep. And then we
have and this is where it's probably going

282
00:19:37,359 --> 00:19:41,200
to get start sounding boring, but
in the same file as the rest of

283
00:19:41,200 --> 00:19:47,880
the database, we have separate tabs
that will automatically calculate all the data Kristen

284
00:19:47,920 --> 00:19:51,680
that you were looking at in the
board. It's going to automatically update those

285
00:19:51,720 --> 00:19:55,400
every time we add some new data, so it makes it makes it easier

286
00:19:55,440 --> 00:20:00,680
to summarize, and it is fascinating. What we'll do. We'll put a

287
00:20:00,720 --> 00:20:03,799
link to your most recent annual report
into the show notes so that people can

288
00:20:03,839 --> 00:20:07,400
take a look at it, or
that the most recent one that people have

289
00:20:07,480 --> 00:20:11,960
access to. I know it's not
all publicly available. It was just fascinating

290
00:20:11,119 --> 00:20:15,920
sitting there and combing through that because
it is it is just so much interesting

291
00:20:17,039 --> 00:20:21,200
data to take a look at.
So how did the partnership with Florida Gulf

292
00:20:21,240 --> 00:20:26,079
Coast University come about? Because this
was originally it started at Radford. How

293
00:20:26,079 --> 00:20:30,319
did that partnership come about? It
was really interesting. There was a grad

294
00:20:30,400 --> 00:20:36,039
student at Florida Golf Coast University,
Kristin eLink Sherman, Laura so a long

295
00:20:36,119 --> 00:20:40,279
name, but she was requested to
access to the deity base to work on

296
00:20:40,519 --> 00:20:42,759
her thesis. She was looking at
from a remembering rite. It was the

297
00:20:42,759 --> 00:20:48,839
relationship between military service and serial murder. And she got the idea that it

298
00:20:48,839 --> 00:20:52,359
would be great to put this thing
online where people could go in and have

299
00:20:52,440 --> 00:20:56,599
access to it. And I thought
maybe, and so they brought me down

300
00:20:56,599 --> 00:21:00,839
to Florida Gulf Coast and did a
to meet all their students and they were

301
00:21:00,880 --> 00:21:04,880
really charged up about doing this,
so let's do it. Dween Daubert was

302
00:21:04,920 --> 00:21:10,640
the faculty advisor at the at the
time, and so they took the database,

303
00:21:10,720 --> 00:21:12,920
they went through and they try to
confirm every entry in it, and

304
00:21:12,960 --> 00:21:17,440
so we went back and forth about
whether they found something wrong, whether I

305
00:21:17,440 --> 00:21:19,279
thought it was actually wrong or not, or whether the their source was wrong.

306
00:21:19,319 --> 00:21:22,720
So that went back and forth,
and then they put that online and

307
00:21:22,920 --> 00:21:27,160
people can try to get access it. Now the online version is way behind.

308
00:21:27,559 --> 00:21:30,839
That's not hasn't been updated, and
we're working right now with Florida Golf

309
00:21:30,880 --> 00:21:34,839
Coast to try to update something.
And we're actually starting a new partnership with

310
00:21:36,079 --> 00:21:41,079
Norwich University in Vermont, and they've
got some just really smart faculty and smart

311
00:21:41,079 --> 00:21:44,640
people there that Elizabeth Gurri and Rachel
Sickler that are going to take it to

312
00:21:44,680 --> 00:21:48,640
the next level. So right now
we're going to be working with them and

313
00:21:48,839 --> 00:21:52,160
in Florida Golf Coast to try to
bring this to the kind of the modern

314
00:21:52,240 --> 00:21:57,119
times as opposed to my spreadsheet.
Is there such a thing as a typical

315
00:21:57,319 --> 00:22:02,920
user, like what are some of
the examples of things that people might do

316
00:22:03,000 --> 00:22:07,640
with the information and the database.
So the typical user is either going to

317
00:22:07,720 --> 00:22:11,400
be a college professor or a grad
student working on, for example, a

318
00:22:11,400 --> 00:22:15,359
thesis or a dissertation that has a
particular question in mind that they're trying to

319
00:22:15,400 --> 00:22:19,039
answer. So we'll provide the database
to them and they will use what we

320
00:22:19,119 --> 00:22:22,960
have but also add new information.
For example, if they're going to only

321
00:22:23,039 --> 00:22:27,319
be concentrated on one thing, for
example, that they can maybe find things

322
00:22:27,359 --> 00:22:30,839
that we didn't because we're concentrated on
so many different variables, and then we

323
00:22:30,880 --> 00:22:34,880
can add that to the database as
well. We've had a few folks in

324
00:22:34,920 --> 00:22:40,079
law enforcement that have asked for it. We thought it would actually we'd get

325
00:22:40,200 --> 00:22:44,119
many more requests from law enforcement,
but we haven't. Is that because people

326
00:22:44,119 --> 00:22:48,039
don't know about it, or because
they don't see how they can immediately relate

327
00:22:48,079 --> 00:22:51,079
that to the work that they're doing. That's a good question. I think

328
00:22:51,079 --> 00:22:56,359
it's probably a mixture of both.
You're listening to Mind over Murder. We'll

329
00:22:56,400 --> 00:23:15,720
be right back after this word from
our sponsors. We're back here at mindover

330
00:23:15,839 --> 00:23:22,480
Murder. So when you hear about
a new serial killer, like Allen Wade

331
00:23:22,480 --> 00:23:26,920
Wilmer Senior. We talked a little
bit about some of the basic data that

332
00:23:26,000 --> 00:23:30,240
you can put into the database for
them, so date of birth, so

333
00:23:30,319 --> 00:23:33,839
on and so forth. What other
sort of information are you looking for when

334
00:23:33,839 --> 00:23:37,000
you add a new killer to the
database. Would it benefit you, for

335
00:23:37,079 --> 00:23:41,160
example, to talk to an investigator
that's worked on the case, would as

336
00:23:41,200 --> 00:23:45,519
long as it was data that we
can publish. Again, so if we

337
00:23:45,599 --> 00:23:48,880
talked to an investigator said, now
this is off the record, but that's

338
00:23:48,880 --> 00:23:52,720
not going to help us because we
have to have things that are publicly available.

339
00:23:53,000 --> 00:23:56,880
Where I think it comes in handy
or where information is to be helpful

340
00:23:57,000 --> 00:24:02,799
is when we added the victims section. We've added a lot of columns involving

341
00:24:03,400 --> 00:24:06,799
what went on at the actual murder
site. For example, was a person

342
00:24:06,880 --> 00:24:10,559
bound, was their torture, was
their overkill? And that can be really

343
00:24:10,559 --> 00:24:14,359
difficult information to get. But that
some of that information is still very public.

344
00:24:14,480 --> 00:24:17,680
It's just maybe something we haven't come
across, and so that's the type

345
00:24:17,720 --> 00:24:21,440
of information that would be helpful.
A lot of that's just not available because

346
00:24:21,440 --> 00:24:23,720
they hold it back, or if
there's not enough for a trial. For

347
00:24:23,839 --> 00:24:27,119
a trial, if there's not really
an appeals. It doesn't show up very

348
00:24:27,160 --> 00:24:30,839
easily. To be able to read
that, you'd have to be able to

349
00:24:30,839 --> 00:24:33,440
go get the original documents, and
that's more work than eveninem willing to spend.

350
00:24:34,640 --> 00:24:38,640
Is there a difference in what you
feel you can put into the public

351
00:24:38,720 --> 00:24:44,440
record depending on whether or not a
serial killer is alive or dead. For

352
00:24:44,480 --> 00:24:49,279
example, Alan Wade Wilmer Sr.
Died in twenty seventeen. The FBI and

353
00:24:49,319 --> 00:24:55,039
the Hampton, Virginia Police Department have
confirmed through DNA that he's responsible for the

354
00:24:55,119 --> 00:24:59,079
murder of at least three people,
and they're looking into more. Kristin and

355
00:24:59,079 --> 00:25:06,079
I aren't terribly shy about using his
name publicly and saying he's involved in these

356
00:25:06,160 --> 00:25:10,440
murders, whereas if someone's alive,
maybe they're incarcerated. But are you as

357
00:25:10,519 --> 00:25:15,160
comfortable sharing data about their crimes?
I am? But the reason I am

358
00:25:15,279 --> 00:25:19,000
is because we have a column where
we will label the person as, for

359
00:25:19,039 --> 00:25:25,960
example, serial suspected, serial accused, And so various researchers, for example,

360
00:25:26,000 --> 00:25:29,240
have made the decision they're only going
to use those that have been convicted

361
00:25:29,480 --> 00:25:33,079
in their study that being accused of
being suspected is not going to be enough.

362
00:25:33,400 --> 00:25:37,160
With that kind of hedge, we
feel a little bit more comfortable where

363
00:25:37,160 --> 00:25:41,839
we're very careful and don't release to
very many researchers is our victim data,

364
00:25:41,880 --> 00:25:47,799
because it might be, for example, that a particular victim was a prostitute,

365
00:25:47,799 --> 00:25:49,799
at least that's what the police labeled
that person or the media labeled that

366
00:25:49,880 --> 00:25:56,079
person. And we've had instances where
people said, I see in their database

367
00:25:56,119 --> 00:25:59,279
that so and so would kill prostitutes. Well, he killed my daughter and

368
00:25:59,319 --> 00:26:03,119
she wasn't a pute, and go
back and look at the individual victims,

369
00:26:03,200 --> 00:26:06,720
and that's exactly right. Let's say
eight of the nine were prostitutes that the

370
00:26:06,799 --> 00:26:11,519
one person actually wasn't. But when
you're trying to define what's that person's basic

371
00:26:11,559 --> 00:26:14,880
motive or who are they killing,
it was prostitutes. So I'm really gun

372
00:26:14,960 --> 00:26:18,599
shy about sharing victim data. For
example, that would never go to a

373
00:26:18,640 --> 00:26:22,279
grad student. That would have to
be to an academic that we trusted in

374
00:26:22,359 --> 00:26:26,720
that agreed to be very careful.
And if you have we have several people

375
00:26:26,039 --> 00:26:30,519
that we are close with in the
community who have survived serial killers. If

376
00:26:30,559 --> 00:26:33,559
someone has survived an attacked by a
serial killer, do they go into the

377
00:26:33,640 --> 00:26:37,519
victim database or is there like a
whole separate set of data to go with

378
00:26:37,559 --> 00:26:41,480
that. That's a great question.
Right now, the only victims we have

379
00:26:41,480 --> 00:26:45,200
are ones that were killed first a
serial killer. We might list them as,

380
00:26:45,240 --> 00:26:49,319
for example, two murders plus attempts, So it may be that they

381
00:26:49,359 --> 00:26:56,319
had three unsuccessful attempts. And we
think that's important because again we find researchers

382
00:26:56,319 --> 00:26:59,359
don't feel comfortable with the FBI two
or more. They want to maybe go

383
00:26:59,480 --> 00:27:03,119
three or four, and so they
can then decide is two murders and two

384
00:27:03,160 --> 00:27:06,839
attempts enough for them to do that. I want to get into some of

385
00:27:06,839 --> 00:27:10,640
the nitty gritty questions that I came
up with as I was doing my deep

386
00:27:10,720 --> 00:27:15,079
dive into the data analysis here.
So I'll start with something kind of general,

387
00:27:15,119 --> 00:27:18,240
and then we'll move into more specifics. What were some of the most

388
00:27:18,240 --> 00:27:22,880
interesting or surprising pieces of data that
really stood out to you as you went

389
00:27:22,960 --> 00:27:27,079
and started combing over the database.
I think the biggest surprise, this is

390
00:27:27,079 --> 00:27:32,400
one I've mentioned previously, is that
there's so many types of serial killers.

391
00:27:32,519 --> 00:27:36,119
We got just that one term that
wasn't expecting to see that because when we

392
00:27:36,160 --> 00:27:40,319
started the database. That term was
you conjure up like a Ted Bundy,

393
00:27:40,440 --> 00:27:41,880
that all of these serial killers we
find are going to be Ted Bundy.

394
00:27:42,079 --> 00:27:45,559
They're not. And so that was
the biggest surprise and the thing I think

395
00:27:45,640 --> 00:27:51,759
that's complicated again some of the data
analysis the most is until we really get

396
00:27:51,839 --> 00:27:55,880
these types figured out, these subtypes, we're not going to make as much

397
00:27:55,880 --> 00:28:00,519
progress as we wanted. Another thing
I found that was surprising was how inaccurate

398
00:28:00,680 --> 00:28:04,160
that kind of common profile was.
So the common profile is that it's a

399
00:28:04,200 --> 00:28:07,240
serial killer, was it's a white
male in their mid to late twenties.

400
00:28:07,599 --> 00:28:11,079
So that profile, if you look
to say it's nineteen ninety, it's seven

401
00:28:11,160 --> 00:28:15,160
percent fit that profile. That's not
a much of a profile when it's seven

402
00:28:15,240 --> 00:28:22,240
years old and far from a general
category that would fit most of the crimes

403
00:28:22,279 --> 00:28:26,160
committed. Yeah, so that's one
And one of the reasons I think that's

404
00:28:26,440 --> 00:28:30,279
particularly important is that you get somebody
who might be, for example, fifty

405
00:28:30,279 --> 00:28:33,920
five years old and is black,
and people would say that can't be one

406
00:28:33,960 --> 00:28:37,400
of our suspects because they don't fit
the profile. Nobody fits your profile,

407
00:28:37,720 --> 00:28:41,119
so you have to be careful about
about that. Another thing that I found

408
00:28:41,160 --> 00:28:45,480
really interesting was that there's a thought
that a stereotype that serial killers are going

409
00:28:45,559 --> 00:28:48,559
to have a certain type of victim, So I'm only going to kill women,

410
00:28:48,599 --> 00:28:51,240
I'm only going to kill somebody with
a certain race or age. Turns

411
00:28:51,279 --> 00:28:55,880
out that only thirty seven percent of
serial killers kill people that are the same

412
00:28:55,920 --> 00:28:57,839
sex, the same race, the
same age. And so again, if

413
00:28:57,880 --> 00:29:03,720
you're law enforcement and you're trying to
determine, trying to link different murders,

414
00:29:03,119 --> 00:29:07,359
and he said, couldn't be this
person couldn't be linked because they were shot

415
00:29:07,359 --> 00:29:11,000
as opposed to stab or this was
a male and most of the victims are

416
00:29:11,000 --> 00:29:14,799
women. It turns out that linkage
is just not there. And I think

417
00:29:14,839 --> 00:29:18,000
when you talked to Thomas Hargraved,
he probably found this. He probably told

418
00:29:18,039 --> 00:29:21,079
you some of the same things.
The linkage is a very difficult thing to

419
00:29:21,680 --> 00:29:26,640
do. I was pushing back on
this issue today regarding discussions in our social

420
00:29:26,680 --> 00:29:33,319
media pages on the Colonial Parkway murders. People are looking for patterns which may

421
00:29:33,400 --> 00:29:37,880
or may not be there. But
for example, I've got several people and

422
00:29:37,920 --> 00:29:41,119
these are well meaning folks, are
supporters of ours and are interested in these

423
00:29:41,160 --> 00:29:45,880
cases. But for instance, I've
got several people insisting, Oh, it's

424
00:29:45,960 --> 00:29:51,519
very clear that Wilmer likes dark haired
women. Yes, there are some victims

425
00:29:51,519 --> 00:29:55,839
with dark hair, but in the
mix there's some blondes and redheads too.

426
00:29:56,200 --> 00:30:00,680
And he has killed both women and
men, and he's killed there's one single

427
00:30:00,720 --> 00:30:06,519
woman and at least one straight couple. And he's suspected of killing a lesbian

428
00:30:06,559 --> 00:30:08,880
couple, my sister and her girlfriend. Now that hasn't been proving yet,

429
00:30:08,920 --> 00:30:15,039
but my point is, boy,
everybody wants to say this particular killer kills

430
00:30:15,160 --> 00:30:18,920
this particular kind of person in this
way, and both Kristin and I are

431
00:30:18,960 --> 00:30:23,720
trying to respectfully push back on that
because the profilers that we've met with and

432
00:30:23,759 --> 00:30:27,640
we've learned a lot and they're fascinating
people. Oh my gosh. Yeah,

433
00:30:27,680 --> 00:30:33,039
it's been so interesting for us to
have opportunities to sit down with these folks,

434
00:30:33,319 --> 00:30:37,599
both on and off the air.
They're saying the same thing that you

435
00:30:37,680 --> 00:30:41,119
are, Mike, which is that
we can't keep insisting that serial killers kill

436
00:30:41,160 --> 00:30:45,960
the same type of victim in the
same type of way, under the same

437
00:30:45,000 --> 00:30:51,359
circumstances. That just doesn't seem to
be anything close to the way profilers in

438
00:30:51,359 --> 00:30:56,240
twenty twenty four are seeing things.
I agree completely, and that's the problem

439
00:30:56,279 --> 00:30:59,240
though, when you have something that
was published at say, thirty forty years

440
00:30:59,240 --> 00:31:03,400
ago, it doesn't go away,
It just keeps it hangs on, regardless

441
00:31:03,400 --> 00:31:07,640
of what the kind of the current
facts are. It makes something else that

442
00:31:07,720 --> 00:31:12,240
I found very interesting, And I'm
wondering if some of this question can be

443
00:31:12,799 --> 00:31:18,240
answered by the idea that maybe there
just wasn't enough reporting going on during these

444
00:31:18,279 --> 00:31:23,440
decades. There is a massive jump
in the number of serial killers between nineteen

445
00:31:23,559 --> 00:31:30,160
fifty and nineteen eighty. You went
from ninety active serial killers in nineteen fifty

446
00:31:30,200 --> 00:31:33,160
to sixty to two hundred and fifty
one to six hundred seventy to eight hundred

447
00:31:33,200 --> 00:31:37,599
and twenty three in nineteen eighty.
Is that a reporting issue or were there

448
00:31:37,640 --> 00:31:41,559
really just a massive jump in the
number of serial killers in this country in

449
00:31:41,599 --> 00:31:47,200
those decades. I think a big
part of it a reporting issue. So

450
00:31:47,279 --> 00:31:51,160
the term serial killer was coined depends
on who you believe, but was coined

451
00:31:51,200 --> 00:31:53,359
in for the most part in the
nineteen seventies. So if you're doing a

452
00:31:53,400 --> 00:31:56,720
search for serial kill like using the
term serial killer, you're not going to

453
00:31:56,759 --> 00:32:00,440
pop up with something in the nineteen
fifties or sixty so you have to look

454
00:32:00,480 --> 00:32:07,000
for headlines that might be killed two, killed three, and so we meticulously

455
00:32:07,039 --> 00:32:09,039
go through when you use all those
kind of combinations to try to find those.

456
00:32:09,440 --> 00:32:15,279
Now, it makes sense that serial
killers means would rise in the fifties,

457
00:32:15,279 --> 00:32:17,839
sixties, and seventies because the interstate
system, there's more access to the

458
00:32:17,880 --> 00:32:22,079
country, and if they're killing in
different states, it's more difficult to perhaps

459
00:32:22,119 --> 00:32:24,759
to be to be identified and caught. But I think so much of it

460
00:32:24,799 --> 00:32:30,119
is a reporting issue that definitely makes
sense. I'm writing that down about the

461
00:32:30,119 --> 00:32:36,240
interstate system because that is not something
that I had previously thought of. It

462
00:32:36,319 --> 00:32:39,119
was interesting to think about the ways
that the country was changing during those time

463
00:32:39,160 --> 00:32:44,480
periods that might lead to those numbers
changing. I'm making sure I'm putting that

464
00:32:44,519 --> 00:32:47,200
down. I guess in the same
sort of vein why is it that the

465
00:32:47,279 --> 00:32:52,839
numbers of serial killers have trended steadily
downwards since nineteen eighty Is that because law

466
00:32:52,920 --> 00:32:59,039
enforcement is getting better at tracking them
in solving cases. Is it just that

467
00:32:59,200 --> 00:33:01,559
maybe serial killers are getting a little
tired and taking a break and going into

468
00:33:01,599 --> 00:33:07,119
retirement. I think there's several things
that are going on there. One is

469
00:33:07,119 --> 00:33:10,960
certainly the law enforcement's gotten better in
terms of things like DNA being able to

470
00:33:12,000 --> 00:33:15,000
link murder, so that's certainly part
of it. Technology, though, I

471
00:33:15,000 --> 00:33:17,200
think, is another one of those
things that has changed. For example,

472
00:33:17,440 --> 00:33:22,079
if you think about serial killers that
are black widows, so those are predominantly

473
00:33:22,079 --> 00:33:25,640
women who kill spouses for usually for
money, But there are other reasons as

474
00:33:25,680 --> 00:33:29,359
well. If you go back to, for example, nineteen twenty or nineteen

475
00:33:29,440 --> 00:33:31,319
thirty, somebody could kill a spouse, move to another state, kill a

476
00:33:31,359 --> 00:33:36,720
spouse, still get the insurance money. Where today all these computers are,

477
00:33:36,759 --> 00:33:39,960
the databases are linked, it would
be very difficult to try to get insurance

478
00:33:39,960 --> 00:33:45,720
on a third spouse that was mysteriously
killed. So I think the technology is

479
00:33:45,720 --> 00:33:49,640
there. When you think about hospitals
serial killers who kill their patients, the

480
00:33:49,720 --> 00:33:52,920
software is out there now that you
have expected death rates for every type of

481
00:33:53,000 --> 00:33:58,279
illness, and when those death rates
exceed a certain level, it's flagged.

482
00:33:58,440 --> 00:34:00,759
So those are some of the reasons. But I think there's really two main

483
00:34:00,839 --> 00:34:07,960
reasons that are responsible for this decline. One is change in parole. If

484
00:34:07,000 --> 00:34:09,719
you look at the seventies and eighties, for example, where the serial killer

485
00:34:09,800 --> 00:34:14,199
rates were highest, there was a
lot of pressure to parole people, the

486
00:34:14,239 --> 00:34:17,000
prisons were overcrowded, there was kind
of a movement toward prison reform. So

487
00:34:17,199 --> 00:34:22,480
we're releasing people then that would maybe
become serial killers. An interesting fact is

488
00:34:22,519 --> 00:34:27,920
that in our database, eighteen percent
of the serial killers in our database had

489
00:34:28,039 --> 00:34:32,079
killed, gone to prison and been
released. And so if you are more

490
00:34:32,079 --> 00:34:37,840
strict on parole, I think that's
one of the reasons people which we are

491
00:34:37,920 --> 00:34:42,920
these days. I think that is
one of the explanations. And the other

492
00:34:42,960 --> 00:34:47,239
one is there are just fewer high
risk behaviors that people engage in today.

493
00:34:47,639 --> 00:34:51,880
So when I think about when I
was growing up, I rode my bike

494
00:34:51,960 --> 00:34:57,360
everywhere, I hitchhiked, I picked
up hitchhikers, I walked to elementary school.

495
00:34:57,559 --> 00:35:00,079
Today, there are no parents that
are going to let you do that.

496
00:35:00,159 --> 00:35:02,559
There are very few people who would
hitchhikers hitch hikers. And so we

497
00:35:02,599 --> 00:35:07,960
did an analysis of comparing in the
seventies and eighties the percentage of murders that

498
00:35:08,000 --> 00:35:13,840
were serial killers, serial murders that
were of high risk behaviors such as hitch

499
00:35:13,920 --> 00:35:17,320
hiking, and helping people who with
stranded motorists with the ones from the last

500
00:35:17,599 --> 00:35:22,519
two decades, and there's such a
drop. It's a huge drop. And

501
00:35:22,599 --> 00:35:25,199
when you think about cell phones,
thirty years ago, if your car broke

502
00:35:25,280 --> 00:35:28,960
down, you'd either have to get
in a car with somebody or have them

503
00:35:29,000 --> 00:35:31,199
go to the gas station to use
a payphone. Now you're not going to

504
00:35:31,320 --> 00:35:34,480
let anybody in your car. You're
not going to get in their car.

505
00:35:34,519 --> 00:35:36,960
You're going to use your cell phone
call for help. And so I think

506
00:35:37,000 --> 00:35:40,039
a lot of those high risk behaviors
have changed. A few days ago,

507
00:35:40,320 --> 00:35:44,719
my partner Pamela and I were driving
along the country road and there was a

508
00:35:44,760 --> 00:35:47,880
pickup truck parked next to the road
on this kind of straight, quiet stretch.

509
00:35:49,239 --> 00:35:52,800
The hazard drawn on and we didn't
see anybody in the vehicle. But

510
00:35:52,880 --> 00:35:55,760
then a couple one hundred yards down
the road, and this is wintertime,

511
00:35:57,079 --> 00:36:00,880
snowy and cold, there's a woman
walking along on the road. We stopped.

512
00:36:01,000 --> 00:36:05,840
I tried to let Haamla be visible, so she leaned forward. But

513
00:36:06,079 --> 00:36:10,039
we just stopped briefly to ask if
the woman was all right, and she

514
00:36:10,159 --> 00:36:14,239
smiled and said she was, and
it looked like she was actually out for

515
00:36:14,320 --> 00:36:16,880
a walk. And I'm not even
sure that was her truck. Necessarily,

516
00:36:17,039 --> 00:36:21,039
she told us she was fine and
she was just out for a walk on

517
00:36:21,079 --> 00:36:24,000
a beautiful winter day. We just
wanted to make certain that she wasn't out

518
00:36:24,039 --> 00:36:29,480
there in the boonies without a cell
phone or whatever. So she smiled,

519
00:36:29,480 --> 00:36:34,239
and she seemed accepting of the fact
that we'd made this offer of assistance.

520
00:36:34,800 --> 00:36:38,400
In listening to you just now,
Mike, I'm thinking maybe that's increasingly rare.

521
00:36:39,039 --> 00:36:44,519
I think it is. Yeah.
Absolutely. Do you have enough information

522
00:36:44,760 --> 00:36:50,679
yet to draw any conclusions on how
the pandemic affected the number and type of

523
00:36:50,760 --> 00:36:54,000
serial killers? I realized we're really
barely out of the pandemic. Has there

524
00:36:54,039 --> 00:36:59,480
been any information that you can lean
about how that affected serial killers? And

525
00:36:59,639 --> 00:37:04,039
there are activities not at this point. One reason would be is that there

526
00:37:04,079 --> 00:37:07,880
have not really been a lot of
serial murders over the last few years,

527
00:37:07,119 --> 00:37:10,079
which is a good thing, but
it's a bad thing for data, so

528
00:37:10,199 --> 00:37:15,400
it would be difficult to do that. There's a lag period really between oftentimes

529
00:37:15,559 --> 00:37:20,400
the serial killings and then when they're
arrested and whether it gets announced. So

530
00:37:20,679 --> 00:37:23,119
I would say it'll be at least
a decade before we could start to address

531
00:37:23,159 --> 00:37:27,920
that. Question. Oh wow,
Okay, that does make sense though.

532
00:37:27,960 --> 00:37:35,079
Absolutely. Do you feel like the
advances in forensic technology and manly the things

533
00:37:35,320 --> 00:37:39,920
we've talked about over the last few
minutes have discouraged people who might have exhibited

534
00:37:39,960 --> 00:37:44,599
these behaviors in the past. That's
a great question, and I've had those

535
00:37:44,599 --> 00:37:49,800
conversations with colleagues, and my initial
response to you is, I don't know,

536
00:37:50,239 --> 00:37:52,320
because it can go both ways,
right. It can be now that

537
00:37:52,400 --> 00:37:57,920
I know what these advances and forensics
are, I'm going to avoid leaving fingerprints.

538
00:37:57,960 --> 00:38:00,800
I'm going to avoid leaving DnaB and
so it could be to encourage some

539
00:38:01,039 --> 00:38:05,079
that think that they can avoid it, or for some of them, it

540
00:38:05,159 --> 00:38:07,039
may be They're going to catch me, so I'm not going to do it.

541
00:38:07,400 --> 00:38:09,800
And that would depend, I think
on the again, like the subtype

542
00:38:09,800 --> 00:38:13,360
of serial killer, because there are
going to be some killers that they haven't

543
00:38:13,400 --> 00:38:15,280
need to kill, and they're going
to probably kill no matter what. But

544
00:38:15,320 --> 00:38:20,159
I think some of these ones that
maybe kill for financial gain that may have

545
00:38:20,159 --> 00:38:22,519
slown that pace down a little bit. Just occurred to me when you were

546
00:38:22,519 --> 00:38:28,519
talking earlier about subdividing different types of
killers. Are you eventually going to have

547
00:38:28,559 --> 00:38:32,360
a different database for mass shooters and
spree shooters. Is that going to become

548
00:38:32,360 --> 00:38:36,360
a whole separate database or are they
just going to exist on the serial killer

549
00:38:36,440 --> 00:38:38,599
database? Yeah, they don't exist. The mass killers don't exist in our

550
00:38:38,679 --> 00:38:42,480
database. Oh they don't, Okay, don't. And I know that there

551
00:38:42,519 --> 00:38:46,679
are several researchers that have developed databases
on mass killers, and so I think

552
00:38:46,760 --> 00:38:51,519
that's well taken care of by some
other folks. The one that was more

553
00:38:51,559 --> 00:38:55,599
difficult for spree killers because again with
the FBI basically said that they don't really

554
00:38:55,599 --> 00:39:00,599
distinguish between cereal and spree in terms
of the motives and those types of things,

555
00:39:00,880 --> 00:39:06,400
and so we will include those but
labeled them as within our database as

556
00:39:06,480 --> 00:39:09,440
spree and again, researchers can make
their own decision about whether they want to

557
00:39:09,440 --> 00:39:12,599
include them or not. One of
the things we've tried to do is be

558
00:39:12,880 --> 00:39:16,440
overly inclusive and then let researchers who
use the database make their decisions about who

559
00:39:16,480 --> 00:39:19,800
stays and who goes, and whether
they have to have a certain type of

560
00:39:19,800 --> 00:39:23,400
motive or not. Do you know
if any serial killers who are currently incarcerated

561
00:39:23,519 --> 00:39:29,440
have ever been permitted to access the
database? I know that there are people

562
00:39:29,480 --> 00:39:34,639
that are currently incarcerated that do have
internet access that actually have made use of

563
00:39:34,679 --> 00:39:37,920
their time. But I didn't know
if they ever had looked themselves or other

564
00:39:37,960 --> 00:39:42,159
people up in the database. To
have access, they would have had to

565
00:39:42,199 --> 00:39:45,840
make a formal request, and if
we saw, for example, that it

566
00:39:45,920 --> 00:39:49,639
was coming from a prison, it
would be declined. But it doesn't mean

567
00:39:49,679 --> 00:39:52,039
that again that they don't can't get
somebody else to request it for them.

568
00:39:52,280 --> 00:39:57,159
I've noticed that I've had several requests
from students where I've said, yeah,

569
00:39:57,360 --> 00:40:00,760
we'll give you this part of the
database. Here's the condition, so you

570
00:40:00,800 --> 00:40:04,920
need to agree to those and please
copy your advisor on the email and the

571
00:40:05,000 --> 00:40:07,039
way I can look up the advisor
make sure they exist. I've had several

572
00:40:07,039 --> 00:40:10,000
times where the student didn't get back. I thought, yes, because it's

573
00:40:10,039 --> 00:40:14,519
not for a class project. That
must mean you have people trying to access

574
00:40:14,559 --> 00:40:17,679
the database just for I'm interested in
serial killers, but not in an academic

575
00:40:17,719 --> 00:40:22,039
way. What we do and the
one where I struggle with now is I

576
00:40:22,079 --> 00:40:25,840
get requests from students who are in
data science programs, so they need a

577
00:40:25,920 --> 00:40:30,239
database to be able to do a
class project for data science, and they

578
00:40:30,239 --> 00:40:35,199
think serial killers are interesting, but
they're not really trying to study serial killers,

579
00:40:35,519 --> 00:40:38,360
and so in those situations, I'll
usually ask them what fields do you

580
00:40:38,400 --> 00:40:42,679
want and give them maybe a smaller
number of fields. We don't give them

581
00:40:42,679 --> 00:40:45,159
the whole thing, and then I
don't give them the names of the serial

582
00:40:45,239 --> 00:40:47,880
killers. That way they can run
their data and not worry about privacy aspects.

583
00:40:49,559 --> 00:40:52,599
Mike, what can we do to
help you with data on Alan Wade

584
00:40:52,639 --> 00:40:58,559
Wilmer Senior so that we can round
out his entry in your database? We

585
00:40:58,599 --> 00:41:01,119
want to give you as much help
as possible, because obviously we have invested

586
00:41:01,079 --> 00:41:05,440
interest in his activities. So tell
us how we can help you. We

587
00:41:05,480 --> 00:41:08,719
would love to be able to that's
and I appreciate that. Probably the easiest

588
00:41:08,719 --> 00:41:14,360
thing would be if I sent you
both the victim and the serial killer data

589
00:41:14,440 --> 00:41:16,039
that we already have. Have you
take a look to see if there are

590
00:41:16,320 --> 00:41:20,239
fields that you can fill in that
I have blank, and that would be

591
00:41:20,280 --> 00:41:23,039
great perfect. We would love to
be able to help in any way we

592
00:41:23,079 --> 00:41:27,960
can on that. How long do
you see yourself continuing to do work on

593
00:41:28,000 --> 00:41:30,119
the databasis? Is just going to
be an all the time thing? Or

594
00:41:30,280 --> 00:41:34,039
is this your baby and you're invested
in it. It's my baby, and

595
00:41:34,079 --> 00:41:37,480
I'm invested in it, so I
will all continue to do it. But

596
00:41:37,559 --> 00:41:40,880
I think that's why the kind of
the relationships or the partnerships with Florida Gulf

597
00:41:40,920 --> 00:41:45,320
Coast and Norwich are important because they
can take it to a different level.

598
00:41:45,679 --> 00:41:49,480
So I'm going to still work on
it because it's fun. It's like being

599
00:41:49,519 --> 00:41:52,719
a little detective. And it's terrible
when you get excited because you found a

600
00:41:52,719 --> 00:41:55,920
birth date, but it makes my
day, and so I'll continue to do

601
00:41:57,000 --> 00:42:00,599
that even after I retire. But
I think that again, with those two

602
00:42:00,679 --> 00:42:04,559
universities, they're going to take it
to that next level. Doctor Mike ah

603
00:42:04,599 --> 00:42:08,400
Mottz, formerly of Redford University,
the inventor, shall i say, of

604
00:42:08,440 --> 00:42:14,400
the Radford University of Florida Gulf Coast
University Serial Killer Research Database. Mike,

605
00:42:14,440 --> 00:42:17,559
thank you so much for joining us
today and lending us your considerable expertise.

606
00:42:17,599 --> 00:42:21,159
We appreciate it. Oh, I
enjoyed it. It was great to meet

607
00:42:21,199 --> 00:42:22,800
both of you. Thank you so
much. That is going to do it

608
00:42:22,840 --> 00:42:25,960
for this episode of mind Over Murder. Thank you so much for listening.

609
00:42:27,280 --> 00:42:39,760
We'll see you next time. Mind
Over Murder is a production of Absolute Zero

610
00:42:40,199 --> 00:42:45,719
and Another Dog Productions. Our executive
producers are Bill Thomas and Kristin Dilley.

611
00:42:46,079 --> 00:42:52,239
Our logo art is by Pamela Arnois. Our theme music is by Kevin McLeod.

612
00:42:52,760 --> 00:42:57,719
Mind Over Murder is distributed in partnership
with crawl Space Media. You can

613
00:42:57,760 --> 00:43:00,760
follow us on Facebook, Twitter,
or in Instagram. You can also follow

614
00:43:00,760 --> 00:43:06,079
our page on the Colonial Parkway Murders
on Facebook, and finally, you can

615
00:43:06,119 --> 00:43:09,679
follow Bill Thomas on Twitter at Bill
Thomas. Five six. Thank you for

616
00:43:09,800 --> 00:43:13,320
listening to mind Over Murder.
