She stands than the stents springs. You're down with opp and Heimer. Yeah
you know me, you're down with opp and Himer. Yeah you know me.
You down with opp and Himer. Yeah you know me. You're done
with opp and Heimer. Yes you know me. Yo, we all bow
this. We're about to blow the roof off the sucker to the roof off
the sudden and tell the roof off the soccer. Tell the roof off the
up and Himer to the roof off the soccer, to the roof off,
so to the roof off the mother Himer. I've seen some movies, and
then I've seen some other things that might not out to be called movies.
They might have to be called sleep aids Oppenheimer more like Knappenheimer. Stole that
joke from Jamie Oppenheimer. More like Sleepenheimer. That's what I said on Twitter.
Oppenheimer. How hour and a half in and we gain't had no nothing
blow up. We ain't even had an m ad, not even a sparkler.
Two hours in we get a little bit of pop fizzle. It took
two hours to blow anything up. Where's Michael callin? Michael Bay Page and
Michael Bay help us out them movies, gay calling Michael Bay, you know
an opp and Himmer, Yeah, you know me. Michael Bay should have
been blowing up. They would have been nukes in the first five minutes.
We would have had rolled out in five minutes. We didn't even get a
sparkler. Jamie didn't feel like coming on, but she's in there giggling,
so she approves. I stole one of her jokes. We know if Michael
Bay was directing it, we would have had a freaking explosion in the opening
sequence. The opening sequence would have just been explosions blowing up other explosions.
We would have had Optimus Prime over there. Given Oppenheimer and Asside. Welcome
everybody. I was on Lord Valtimort and as you probably saw, the fourth
hour, and I didn't get into the deep dive like I wanted to.
I ran out of time. I'm not fussing. I'm happy for any of
the time that I get. They skipped the commercial breaks to let me do
my my little stick, my humble little routine. Oh here comes the movie
analyzer author comedy man, ha ha ha. Let him do his little thing,
and I ran out of time. I thought I had more time than
I did, because I couldn't see the clock for like the first twenty minutes
of the between the breaks, and so I did. I talked about old
Tom Coombe over there, and I did that for that large audience, which
it did make it onto the front page of their little impozine they got.
Then I tried to get the Barbie, but then I only had a few
minutes. So let's get into Barbie. Let's do this. Let's do this.
You got you barbies, you get your kens. There we go.
Y'all want to play barbies with me? Uh? Yeah? So a lot
of people were saying too, because I'll listen to Rachel and Jamie talking about
Barbie, and Rachel was like, how is it nastic? Somebody else I
mentioned this, they said, how is it nastic? I'm gonna tell you
how y'all gonna get learned, because by the way, Hollywood recycles nastic narratives
all the time. It's like their go to superstructure narrative for any of this
kind of a movie. Right, remember Lego movie? Did you notice the
parallels with Barbie and Lego movie? Even to the point of the demi Urge
character being Will Ferrell. That was odd, But yeah, that's what we
see over and and over. So how is that the case. Well,
the movie begins, as I'm sure you know, with the two thousand and
one Space Odyssey sequence, and we see the idea that motherhood is slavery,
and the girls, the little children from two thousand and one, the little
monkeys over there, they're taking the baby dolls and they're bopping other baby dolls
and breaking them again, spoofing the two thousand and one Stanley Kuber ever heard
of him? That sequence, and the ideas that evolution of women, we're
all coming from a primordial matriarchal society. So there's an ideal world, by
the way, where Barbie lives, which is different from the human world,
which is pattern on the matriarchal world. You see. So the ancient primeval
Barbie is the monolith. And the reason she's a monolith is that she is
the the archetype, the ideal at the beginning, she's perfection, she's the
identic state as the monolith. Yes, it'sn't totally nasty. Now, it's
not nasting in every single sense because we get a recurring theme which we're gonna
I'm probably gonna do a podcast on this in the near future, because this
is a new thing that they're doing, and we covered this with the SIBE
Cinema guys. They mentioned the dark goddess archetype, and I'm kicking that up
a level to not just the dark goddess archetype, the dark goddess savior archetype,
because sometimes the dark goddess is also now the new female savior, contrasted
to the patriarchal religion of the last you know, several thousand years, mosaic
religion, Christianity, etc. And back to Barbie. So at the beginning
when they're evolving, women are evolving on the basis of moving towards the Barbie
archetype. So the ancient primal idea of traditional roles is old. It's outdated,
right, because the original society, the ideal is matriarchal. So we
learned that in the Barbie world. Let's see, there's any pictures here,
Yes, so right here in the Barbie Let's see. I wish these pictures
would get in the day middle of things. Yeah. No, in Barbie
world, there we go. Everything's ideal and it's a matriarchal society where there's
all female Supreme Court. Just better not commit your crimes and get scheduled on
that day of the month, because you're gonna get the book thrown aid.
In the matriarchal ideal world, women rule. Men basically serve women in all
capacities in the female feminine role, rolling around in a little you know,
roller skates, rolling around and roller skates and pulling I don't know, ice
cream cones out of their Fannie packs. That's basically literally, that's like all
they do and swim in fake waters, right, But this matriarchal society that's
perfect with a all female Supreme Court. And I'm having to defend myself because
a couple of dumb dumps try to debate me on this movie, like I
got it wrong. Number one. I'm the greatest movie the analysis sizer that's
ever been in the world. So you're probably not right, first of all,
because you tried to step to this. Try to step to this,
you get smoked. You try to you try to start a smoke with me.
I'm gonna start up smoke signal to call my Indian bros. Oh ma,
ma, mama, you go, You're gone. You're about to get
tomahawked with logic with a Tomahawka logic flying at your scalp, bro, because
what happened? They tried to step to me on Twitter. I'm like,
let me put you in your place. Boy. You ain't talking to no
Ken Dall. You're talking to Fabio. I'm I'm the Fabio of logics,
Bro, I'm the Fabio movie analysis dog. Look at this hair trying to
step to Fabio hair. I'm almost at Matthew McConaughey phase. Bro, you
better step off anyway. What I'm getting at is that people were arguing me,
saying, oh, this was trad and baysed, what did you go
to the wrong movie? You step in a different movie, Doll. Trad
and Bays This movie was radic. It was the most feminist gnostic movie I've
ever seen. So in the matriarchal world where I think's ideal, where this
evolving world is placed as the lower, you know, degraded world, Barbie
is still the archetype, the margot Robbie Barbie. She's the every Barbie,
the alta like. She's the Barbie that all the other Bobbies are basically pattern
on. She's the archetype of Arca Barbie, the Barbie type, Barka type
Barba type, and she's the monolitht She's the one that brings in the next
phase of evolution. However, in our fallen world, it evolves into a
patriarchy. They make this clear in the film. Who was not listening the
people that try to step to me on Twitter? That's too over there,
asleep, I don't blame you. Both of these movies are essentially sleep bombs.
Sleep in Him, I'm gonna need I need a Mike Lindell atomic pillow.
That's the most powerful sleep you'll ever explosive sleep with my new Mike Lindell
atomic pillow. Perfect for going to see Nappinheimer. That's what I'm talking about.
Well, that's why you get a penguin from Mike Lindell too. For
Barbie. My new knee on Barbie pillows perfect for Barbie. Anyway, Barbie
and Barbie World. Remember, by the way, has her own money,
her own job, she does everything on her own, her own career,
her own car. It's essentially an egalitarian, matriarchal, fair society. And
it's fair because the men submit and they serve the women. Literally. Now,
as you said, in this world, it's fallen and it's a patriarchy,
and they make that clear because eventually, when Barbie learns that there's such
a thing as death, so she has a nosis where she comes to learn
that there's imperfection and death. This knowledge, this nosis actually begins to introduce
decay, corruption, rebellion in the ideal, pretend, imaginal world, the
Barbie world. She starts to experience burnt toast. She's got sour milk,
right, she's got problems, and she goes to Weird Barbie, and Weird
Barbie says, if you want to solve this problem, you're going to have
to go to the real world and find your handler, the girl that that
handles you, right, who it turns out was a girl boss, But
there's a single mom now and the daughter is a radical social justice warrior.
So this lower level thing with the radical social justice warrior daughter, the gen
Z daughter arguing with her mom, that's what everybody And then and then having
some character development. That's what's making me, Oh, I see it was
trad and bays because the social justice girl learned that she was too radical.
Oh so right, what we really need is traditional third wave feminism exactly right.
So yeah, it's it's not feminism that is the problem. It's radical,
super radical whatever activism nonsense that the little girls involved in the high school
girl, right. But the real feminism that we need, the trad Bays
feminism and we need to go back to, is the one where Barbie is
independent, don't need no man right now. So what's Barbie's job to come
to the real world to heal and fix her handler person and whatever the problems
are that they're going through, to get rid of the decay and corruption in
the perfect identic Barbie world. When she comes to the real world, it
turns out that it's dominated by the Mattel Corporation, which also controls the ideal
world, and things have gotten out of whack, and there's a bumbling Creator
God, Will Ferrell, creator of you know, the one that run the
architect of the Mattel imaginal world, but also has a lot of sway in
this world because it's corrupted and run by a patriarchy. In other words,
the patriarchal god figure. Y'all debate off the Creator God, you know,
the demiurg is Will Ferrell, and he rules from a top the Mattel Corporation
in this like Heavenly Corporate Council. When Ken comes to this world with Barbie,
ask her beta sidekick, her beta orbiter. Literally, he decides he's
gonna learn about patriarchy in this world. So he starts studying the corporate world
right, and he meets this corporate CEO guy and he's like, hey,
I want to be the CEO. And the guy's like, well, you're
dressed like a doll. You can't just be a CEO. And he's like,
oh, well, teach me what it is to be a patriarchy.
And he's like, well, people think that it's egalitarian and it's feminist,
but wink, wink, we all know the patriarchy is corporatism. So corporate
control is oppressive patriarchal structure. It just needs to be filled with women.
Now wait a minute, I thought that corporatism is an oppressive control structure.
Oh but if it's just women, oppressors and we won't be oppressed. Okay,
so it's not it's not the structure itself that's the oppressor. Because if
a the structure that's oppressive, then just filling it with another bunch of people
means that. Oh now it's just power dynamics. There was nothing about the
structure. You were just trying to seize power. Well, that's what a
lot of these postmodern activists believe. It's nothing to do with truth and falsehood.
It's about power dynamics. And that's what goes on in the movie in
the sense that Barbie sees that this world is a patriarchy. And so when
her and Ken go back to Barbie World, Ken is now infected with the
disease of patriarchy and he's literally checked out a bunch of books by men's rights
people. I mean, did nobody notice this? I mean, this is
like obvious. I can't imagine anyone coming to the dumb conclusion that this was
in any way a quote trad movie. What I mean, Ken literally's got
freaking rollo books basically, okay, And when he gets to Barbie World,
he initiates a patcle rebellion based on the corporate structure of this world. Right,
And so then what happens is that Barbie World turns into a kingdom.
Instead of a kingdom, it's kingdom, and Ken there operates an act like
just your average kind of sort of meathead, right, which are some masculine
characteristics like he wants to be fit, he gets into weightlifting, and he
just watches horses running on TV. That I didn't get. I don't understand
the like every scene his horses running on TV, no idea what that means.
But he basically just lays around and drinks beer and watches horses on TV
and exercises and has the women bringing him you know, cold bruise bear me.
Barbie comes back and realizes that Ken has set up an oppressive patriarchal structure
and it's now Barbie's due to fix the imperfection in Barbie World. She thought
she had learned the imperfections and healed things in the real world so that she
could come back to Barbie World. But now the problems are not knowledge of
death. Now it's the oppressive patriarchal structure. Now, I kid you not,
you're not gonna believe this, But so then what happens is Barbie and
her team dress up in pink sort of communist worker outfits. So basically,
imagine everybody in their commie garb, but they're all wearing like pink COMI black
ops outfits pink ops basically, and so they because they're so sophisticated, and
you know women are masters of you know, black ops. We all know
that, right, They engage in a bunch of conspiracy and subterfuge to cause
dividing conquer amongst kingdom. So they set the two groups, two groups of
kN men against one another, cause a giant collapse within Ken's kingdom. And
then when Ken collapses, he comes back weeping and crying to Barbie and submits
to Barbie. Barbie then says Ken, the whole message was that instead of
it being Barbie and Ken, you be Ken, and I'll be Barbie and
we can be fine with each other. The men who are we're under Ken
then beg the women to be part of the female Supreme Court and achieve equality,
and they literally say, well, then, I guess the idea is
that we have equality. The women all then respond to the men, you've
not evolved to be ready to handle that responsibility yet. And she even says
to one of the guys that says, put me on the women Supreme Court.
You're not ready for that. You might get a local court, but
no, no men on the supreme court, because you guys just are toxically
masculine and You're irrational, Are you serious? Yes, men are irrational.
Women built civilizations and do the black ops into the warfare tooth and intelligence operations.
I mean, it's just like what. Then Ken thinks he's gonna get
Barbie back with all his weeping and beta sob stories, and She's like talked
in a hand because I'm going back to Earth world where I have real biological
parts. And everybody was mystified by this because spoiler alert, when Barbie leaves
the imaginal world and goes back to human world, the ongoing joke in the
film is that because you know, dolls don't have parts, genitalia as they're
called by some in the technical fields, Well, Barbie decides she wants her
parts, and then she goes to at the end a gynecologist. So the
final scene is that Barbie's going to see a gynecologist, which is supposed to
be funny, I guess for the women that made this movie or whatever it
is, I don't know, but I think the point of that was Barbie's
now here to save this world, right, the enlightened, sophisticated celestial feminist
who has fixed the heavenly rebellion in her world of the patriarchal oppress of tyranny,
and she's now created the fairness world. She's become now incarnated. So
here it does depart from some of the gnostic narratives. She's becoming incarnated here.
I think now with the mission to girl boss this world she's going to
get rid of because they'll probably make a sequel, right if it made money,
She's gonna have to then girl boss the willf bumbling Will Ferrell and the
Mattel Corporation to unseat them from the tyranny of male, patriarchal, toxic masculine
dominance. So absolutely it was one gnostic. Absolutely it was super feminist.
So basically, yeah, she is the pistis Sophia, the gnostic goddess who
saves us from our poor masculine selves. By the way, if when I
support the show, you can't buy the super chat functions use these super chats
there, And yeah, it's just kind of I mean, there's a couple
of things in this movie that we're clever in terms of, like the cinematography.
I thought it was really clever. The way that the ideal world is
structured that I did I think was neat. It's really trippy looking because it
looks like a Barbie house or something. But um, and there right there,
that's that she Barbie right there, that's that's that's the new Barbie coming
out. Slow Barbie right there. Um. By the way, they make
it a point to say that Barbie could be anything, doctor Barbie, lawyer,
Barbie, corporate CEO Barbie. Right. So when when she comes to
the real world, you've got this sort of pinocchio, U make me a
real girl narrative going on. And she becomes a real girl and says,
I'm going to see my gynecologist because I have my parts. In other words,
now that I am master of my own destiny, I don't have a
kin man telling me what to do with my parts. That I'm supposed to
be a slave in the kitchen turning out the babies with my parts, I
will now determine the meaning of my parts. That's what that was about.
And she's here to fix our fallen world. Now, this is the gnostic
dark goddess archetype. But I'm adding the dark goddess savior archetype to the lexicon
because I started thinking about it. How many movies are giving us now instead
and they'll even use the biblical imagery virgin birth right, incarnation or actually is
stepping into our corrupted you know, gnostic lower realm or whatever evil realm to
save us and bring us back to the ideal. And thankfully the ladies are
here to save us because us men has done messed at all up. And
I was thinking of some other movies where this pops up, and then I'm
like, you know what this is? In a crap ton of movies.
I can't even there's too many to think of. So I started thinking,
Okay, fifth Element Mila djovivic Leelu multi pass right. She's the incarnation of
the fifth element, the Ether, She's love or whatever incarnate. She's the
new Gnostic Savior in that future fake world religion they have that Ian Holman is
the priest of Jupiter ascending. Right. Remember, Mila Kunas is basically the
new goddess Savior chick. And the reason I say the dark goddess savior is
because a lot of times they're the sort of wrathful, vengeful female resent the
mont deities incarnated who, through the destruction of the patriarchy and their vengeance,
brings about the new salvation. You see right, and that's Mila Kunas.
Jupiter Ascending was about that. And then I started thinking, oh, y'all
all of those what's his name that makes the freaking he made all the Mila
job a bitch movies and then he did, uh Luke Bissan, right,
Luke Bissan. He's always got the female gnostic archetype Lucy. Then we get
Scarlett Johanson in a bunch of movies where she evolves into the goddess, she
turns into the sentient black Goo and Lucy, which is all about Lucy being
that first stupid ass fake monkey Lucy evolving into black Goo and becoming a sentient
female computer goddess. Uh huh sure. And the Soyman eat this up right
this I think the religion of the soy Men is the dark gnostic goddess Savior.
That's there, that's who. That's why they're Soyman, because they worship
the soy Goddess basically, and they think if they serve her in the metaverse,
they're gonna get access to, you know, some of that Scarlot Johansson
boot you know what I mean, Well, I'm gonna have access in the
metaverse to the digital version of whoever. Now, you're just gonna be put
in a coomb tank and put the sleep. That's what's gonna happen to you.
You're gonna be You're gonna be give me in that coomb tank six ft
under because that coom tank is a trap. That's what I'm saying. Y'all
know what I'm talking about. Thank you for those super chats. We've got
a nice little crowd here if you would hit like and chair. Welcome everybody.
We're having fun. We're gonna be returning to a little more of a
serious topic, I think in the next couple of days, where I've come
across some really good deep geopolitical analysis that will be commenting on I haven't covered
in a while. That's the background to the architecture of Mockingbird and Mockingbird two
point zero, and mocking Bird two point zero was really all of the Russia
collusion Pegate stuff. So we're gonna be doing a breakdown of that because you're
gonna understand that all of that Pegate stuff was all the same model of Mockingbird.
But now two point zero on the internet cyber Mockingbird basically, and I
found a really good podcast that doesn't just tie in that, it ties that
all of that in even up into the today present day ukron sitation situation.
If you understand my drift here, if you catch my grift, you know
would op and hummer? Yeah you know me, You don't with opp and
himmer? Yeah you know me? Do do do do do do? Do?
Do? Do do do? Do? You down with CCP yeah you
know me. You don't with opp and hummer? Yeah you know me.
You're down with FSSP. Yeah you know me, you know without the SSPX
Yeah you know me. Uh, there's one more thing I want to say
about Barbie, and then I forgot what it was. I forgot to get
my anyway. No, it was obviously feminist, nastic nonsense. Anybody couldn't
see that. Basically, should uh get fired from doing movie analysis? How
about that? I as the CEO of internet movie analysis. You fight it.
Anybody that didn't see this movie was gnostic. You fight it. You're
never allowed ever again by me to analyze any more movies. You fight?
Do you lip take a square and you can automatically do down trip You fight
nor more movies gonna be wonderful without you? Thank you if they no more
movie else is for anybody that got this one wrong. You're done. You're
cooked. Your goose is cooked in the ten thousand degrees Celsius fires of the
Hairosia, my bombs. Oh this can't reach my Carol. Quickly, come
here, Carol, Come here, Carol, Larry Nicol, Hilary is a
week. Yeah, my Trump is a little off because it's hot in here.
It's a little too deep. Trump's not that deep. Um, it's
gonna be great. It's could be wonderful. Hillary, Hillary, Joe sleep,
Joe sleep Jobaden. That's better. I was a little too low there.
Anyway. I think that's everything I want to talk about. Barbie kay
good enough. So I didn't get into all the depth that I wanted to.
But hopefully you see how that's Oh uh, that's right, dark goddess
savior archetype in the movies. Uh, Calypso Pirates of the Caribbean. Remember
her Jack Sparrow Jack Sparrow Mire one you do one more team for me?
These are right, rises bro bro a Razzies. Yeah, exactly, y'all.
Remember my Jamaican man talking at you. Calypso, she doesn't she turn
into a big old hurricane hurricane and not a rap song Hurricane. She turns
into a big rap song, I mean a big hurricane and uh, you
know flushes the cracking down the the ocean toilet, right, remember that miguing
flash this, yeah, cracking down the ocean toilet. Nah, this crackings
a raise, And I feel like I'm forgetting a big one. What's another?
I wrote it down. I wrote down a list of all of the
female goddess revenge archetypes of x Mashina. You could argue that's another one,
even though she's a robot. Right. You know, have you noticed they
always make the matrix because the matrix of the womb, right, they always
make sky Net is a she? Remember it was Helena Bonham Carter, the
Gnostic Goddess, the Red Queen, Resident Evil is a she? Just spout
what miss Cleo Nastic Savior, Dion Warwick nastic Savior. I feel like I
feel like I'm forgetting something. Do a Robin Williams. But I can't.
I can't do Robin Williams. I feel like I got a little bit of
Robin Williams kind of spurg energy in me, though, but I hopefully I
feel like I'm actually kind of funny, because I mean, Robin Williams is.
I get what he's doing. I like the kind of stream of conscious
and stuff. That's what I like to do. But I just don't think
Robin Williams' stuff was funny. It's just kind of dumb, and I feel
like, but I feel like I'm forgetting some really big female savior goddess movies.
Anyway, Oh, children are men? Remember that? Yeah? Because
the children are men. She has a virgin birth and it's a girl.
Who whoa? And that we just watched some other movie recently where the new
Gnostic savior was a girl. Anyway, all right, let's move on to
Nappenheimer. Credit to Jamie for that joke. I stole it, but I
give credit. And the first thing is that, you know, I had
to refer back to my Quigly because nobody knows what Carol Quigly said about Oppenheimer.
Nobody cares, Nobody listens to any of this stuff unless it's you,
smart people, because you over here talking to me. And I gotta look
at the index because I got so many notes that I can't tell anything about
where it is. But I remember some pretty wild admissions from Quickly on this,
and people are gonna get mad think that I'm saying, oh, everything's
fake. I don't know. In fact, I don't claim to know.
Let's see eight eighties, eight fifty to eight eighties. Is I don't have
any knowledge of atomics. You know, if I if I, if I
end up hanging out with Paula Trades muadeb, if I'm not hanging out with
Muadeve and he teaches me atomics, then I will let you know the secret
to atomics. But until then I don't know. But what Quickly admits is
pretty wild. And we do know that it was Laurel Canyon Wonderland Studios,
that the Trinity, New Mexico site, that film was produced there. Interesting,
why would it have to go to a premiere film lab like that Disney
had access to and all that? Right, So this is one prop again,
in fact, Quickly on the first page says much of what we know
and think about this is that it's a lot of Hollywood stuff. Am I
saying that all of this is fake? No, I'm not saying that because
I don't actually know. I can't prove that. But I what I can
know and prove is that they're saying that this is a lot of propaganda.
And I'm trying to find this this old article. I remember this from years
ago. Yes, here it is. It's admitted. It's here in this
Slate article about Laurel Canyon. See how my memory works. And then the
United States Air Force established a Lookout Mountain nineteen forty seven to produce movies and
the photographs of the nuke tests. So the Oppenheimer staff is literally where we
get the Lookout Mountain studios from. It was created for that military civilian filmmakers.
Oh wait a minute, so military Hollywood exactly, Yeah, Disney,
all of the big producers of the forties capture footage of exploding bombs and they
brought it back to Laurel Canyon for editing and production. Interesting, now,
why is quickly in this very important seventeen chapter of Trading and Hope see that
nuclear rivalry in the Cold War? And I have to wonder, is Chris
Nolan over there like giggling a little bit, because do you remember what was
in Interstellar? Remember old Mike Kane is over there, and he's over there
talking about my few mafeo the moon land in the moon landing day I faked.
Now it's not him actually saying that. It's Michael Caine saying we had
to leave Earth because the Earth wasn't made for humans. Much of nonsense,
right, But Matthew McConaughey goes to the local professor or the local teacher in
the Dystopian future and they're like, well, America faked the moon landing.
And then Matthew mcconaughy's over there, like, you change him. We didn't
go into spage. You're trying to tell me as all a fake and gay
we want just a fake gay And they're like, yes, it was all
faking gray. And then Michael Caine's like'sh a shake Ritch spice program. SHAKERI
spice program. And so then they're just, oh, we're gonna have an
off world colony, breakaway civilization, and you know the rest of them are
still a right. So but it's odd, and everybody pointed out at the
time that hey, wait a minute, why is uh Christopher Nolan over here
talking about secret space program and faking the moon landings and all this stuff,
And now we're being told about Oppenheimer and the bomb. You dropped the bomb
on me I thought, I'm over here like George Clinton dropping bombs. Remember
that old onion article atomics and atomic propaganda. It's the first thing quickly talks
about. Now, I'm not making any statements because I don't know. And
I was thinking about this this week because of some of the stuff I put
on Twitter that made a lot of people mad. And you know, people
love their stories and their narratives and they're wedded to them. And I don't
care what you're wedded to. I mean I do, but I don't,
but I do. If you really want to believe in all that garbage from
NASA, that's your You can do that. And the other thing is that
people say, ah, well if you if you doubt NASA, you must
be a flat earth or that is a non sequitor. NASA liized therefore fat
Earth. No, that's a non sequitor. So this is what throws people
for a loop is they can't figure me out. They're like, wait a
minute, I thought you was a true die in the wool conspiracy dudes.
No, no, you got it backwards, bro, You got a backwards
dog. How my philosophy, my world view is different from you and most
people. Most people think science the science is settled, dude, we was
all we was monkinggs we was monkeys though science is settled. Well, as
a philosopher, I know that that story has very little evidence behind it,
So I feel completely justified being a skeptic about the Darwinian narratives. I don't
find the philosophical argumentation convincing, But because most people don't study philosophy, they're
throwing for a loop because everything I'm talking about sounds crazy that it's a wait
a minute, and they will just assume that I have these other positions.
Oh, you don't believe the mainstream science. You must be one of them,
crazy blah blah blahs. Pit put in it whatever you want there.
You must be within a totally flamiko and think that we're living in the year
eleven hundred and there was no Middle Ages like I've never talked about that.
You must be a tarian. I'm the one that coined the term tard tarian
dog. No, why can't you figure it out? Because you don't understand
that in my worldview, metaphysical categories are more certain than scientific theories. So
I from my parod of my perspective, I'm completely justified in being a skeptic
about any of these claims from mainline history and science, because what's prior to
that. My first principles that underlie the possibility of science or knowledge are metaphysical
logical structures. That's more certain. And if the theories can't explain things like
transceno categories, basic metaphysical principles like teleology causation, then I'm within my rights
to completely be say I don't find any of that commitsing. It does not
hold weight with me. Maybe it's true, maybe all of the space stories
are true. But if you're going to convince me of all the space stories
and the way the planets form and all this not the dumbest of all these
is the way the planets form. The Bellybunton lint theory, which is the
main dominant theory, that dust just starts spinning in space. Dust just started
spinning, Yeah, and it collected more dust, and then it spun even
faster, and it got hot and it became a giant oven. And then
it collected more dust which congealed and it became a planet. That is the
dumbest thing in the world. And also people don't understand that there are such
a thing as large scale scams. So on many of these mainline scientific theories,
I just withhole judgment. I say, I'm a skeptical on all this
stuff. In fact, I don't have a problem with geocentrism. That might
be true. I've seen Robertson Jennis makes some interesting points about that, but
I don't know, and I don't have I don't have to choose something.
So don't assume that I have a position which you've never heard me say because
I questioned certain things. So that's the weird part is that people think,
oh, you're so mean, he's dogmatic. I actually think I'm like super
open minded. Maybe you can convince me of long term AONs of Darwinian evolution.
What's the argument for that. You need to address the major problems,
and nobody ever does that. They just like flies in a jar. Oh
you're so dumb, dude, fly in a jar. How does flies in
a jar tell me billions of AONs of this? And it doesn't. It
doesn't tell me any of that. It's this huge leap you make. Again,
maybe it is true, but you need to have a better argument than
flies in the jar. Dog indigenous retro virus dog boom Gabert. So don't
assume that people have a position because they question the mainstream stuff you question,
that's the must be a flat No. I think a lot of that stuff's
goofy. So what's your position? I don't have one. I don't have
to have one. Why do I have to have a position on every single
bizarre theory? I don't. But I can tell you that from the philosophy
perspective, the categories and preconditions of knowledge are more certain than your theories,
because what I'm talking about has to be the case for you to have theories
at all. So if my presubpositional categories are necessary for a theory at all,
then maybe I'm right about flipping those starting points. That's why all these
normans they don't know anything about philosophy. They all think philosophies. Dumb dude,
We got science now, good signed. No. Science is a tool
for theorizing about and understanding the natural world, and that's it. Nothing else.
And real science, by the way, is not done by dorks like
Dawkins and Hitchens sitting around speculating about life origins. That's theory. Real science
is like engineering. Dude, do you everything about that how come a bunch
of engineers aren't all over the TV telling us about science. I listen to
them because they're actually applying these principles, proving that it works with their product,
with their engineering capabilities. What has Richard Dawkins engineer? What is Neil
de grass Tyson engineered to prove their theories? Maybe they have. And guess
what, something that freaking proves my point on all this is the quantum theory
stuff. Because all the quantum theory stuff came in and up seated the Newtonian
stuff. And in the movie that they make a big deal about this in
the first third of the movie, if you can stay awake, if you
can wipe the drool off, because Oppenheimer has all these discussions with Werner Heisenberg
about Neil's born and all these other people about quantum theory and how this underlies,
you know, his approach to the questions of what will eventually be the
bomb and all that, and that part was kind of interesting, Like the
first you know, thirty forty minutes, I was kind of into it,
and then it just went like to arrest the movie. It's just like this
boring, bureaucratic like deposition for like the rest of the movie and flashbacks to
him having a couple memories of sleeping with what's her face from Midsummer So I
just thought was super boring movie. But there were a few interesting admissions that
actually come up in Quickly did you catch the world government discussion? From Robert
Downey Jr? And the United Nations mentioned that he mentioned. He says,
yes, the United Nations will come out of that, and that's exactly what
Quickly says. Quickly says that the Atomic Energy Commission and the Oppenheimer stuff was
all engineered not by Oppenheimer and Matt Dadbot over there from the military, but
by the banking elite and Bernard Baruch boom baby. They even mentioned Henry Loose.
So Robert Downey Junior is playing what is a con Senator Strauss Wright who
was on this commission, and he was supposed to be like the government the
legislative angle of it, there's the military angle of it with Matt Dabot over
there telling them what to do with the project. And meanwhile he's investigated by
the FBI because of the oh he's a commie and we think he's a red
the Soviet and there's Klaus Fuchs, who was a Soviet spy, is there.
So I just wanted to point out though that the very first thing Quickly
talks about is the Hollywood element of all this, and quickly says that a
lot of what was going on in this period was aided, that the arms
race was aided by the narrative of the Cold War build up, and Hollywood
was a big part of that, and a big part of the Hollywood ten
and the investigating the Hollywood commies and all that. All these trad cats and
people were like, this is a commy, this is covering for commies.
It's not covering for commies. It's pointing out that the Cold War was a
dialectic. I think I'm talking about Quigly. He's pointing this out right.
I think. I mean, the Christopher Nolan movie is not exactly making Oppenheimer
into some Saint's I think it's it's trying to do greedy realism, and you
know, presenting him as a complicated figure because he's, you know, not
an alf an amicable person. He's supposed he's a womanizer, he leaves his
wife and all this guy he doesn't care for his child, and so he's
not a good person, but oh, we must revere him because of the
scientific genius. And you know, Quigly, I'm going from memory here,
but Quickly basically says, no, Appenheimer was kind of like an organizational genius
for this project. He doesn't really speak of him like he was this master
scientist, but rather this is on page eighty eighty five of Trijan Hope Aupernheimer,
who had communist socialist sympathies, was more of a cultural critic and an
administrator. What and that nukes quote where air force propaganda, Now there's I
mean that there aren't ICBMs, or that there aren't maybe I have no I'm
not saying any I'm just saying that's what Quickly says. And by the way,
he admits in this that mal was aided by the OSS, which I've
said for many years. And then we get to the McCarthy period, and
so Klaus Fuchs in the story and the Venona manuscripts and all that, I'm
not saying that's not real. Yes there were Soviet spies, Yes there were
defectors. And the cold work kicks off in the very next chapter. According
to Quigly, because of Stalin rejecting the Marshall Plan aid, and that is
the beginning of the Cold War. Cold War begins with Stalin rejecting Marshall Plan
AIDE in nineteen forty seven. This is page eight ninety two. Quickly,
I think that's I accept that that's true. And then the Atomic Energy Commission
scientist create what is essentially a nuclear racket set up by Bernard Baruch, and
Quigley says, not me. Quigley says many of the members of this commission
were scientifically ignorant, and he says they weren't really worried about it because they
were ultimately had a goal of creating This is pages eight ninety eight five of
creating the UN Security Council. So the just location for policing of the nukes
is the nuclear dangers in war, which quickly says, basically exaggerated. I'm
going to read what he says the Atomic Energy Commission function as a disappointment to
the bas scientists. This is the real scientist that were there. They thought
it would be freedom from military influence and reduced influence influence on military uses of
their nuclear fission tech, free from dissemination of theoretical research free dissemination of their
research. However, they failed on every point. The Atomic Energy Commission operated
in terms of weapons research and production and remain extravagantly secret even on theoretical matters,
and this was because of the scientific ignorance of most of the commissioners.
It was dominated by the Scientific Advisory Commission and the official statements of Oppenheimer.
State Department committee led by Dean Atchison and David Lilienthal, and a second committee
of citizens organized by Bernard Baruke spent most of nineteen forty six engaging the monstrous
task of trying to work out a system in international control of nuclear energy.
This task of educating the non scientist fell to Oppenheimer, who gravely who gave
dozens of brilliant, extep iraneous chuck dusted lectured on nukes and physics. The
final plan, presented to the UN by Bernard Baruk in nineteen forty six provided
for an international control body like the Atomic Energy Commission, but under control of
the United Nations. This became the Unit UN Security Council. So this is
where you get In the movie, Robert Downey Jr. Is saying it's almost
like well, We're finally going to get FDRs, United Nations, global governance,
he says, world government, and then quickly goes into talking about the
exaggerations of communist Soviet particularly here Stalin, Stalin's capabilities. Okay, and remember
not all communism is identical. This is a stupid mistake that trad cons and
Normy neo cons and trad cats all they make this as they think that it
was like this monolith of all the communes all working together, when many of
these Trotskyites and Frankfurt school people hated Stalin and that doesn't make Stalin a good
guy. That just that's I think that's a fact, and you can't ignore
that. If that's a fact, that's what I'm trying to say. So
just assume that it's this giant machine that works together, as if the Manichean
dialectics of the Cold War is accurate. Oh, it's just we're the good
guys and they're the bad guys. We're the Jesus people and they're the atheist.
No, it's not true. That's a that's a ridiculous exaggeration, as
all of these high level policy people are admitting. And that's why it annoys
me. When people are like, have you seen but you're he began a
video mind bloom, dude, Oh you mean the same one where he goes
on to say that all the people in the Eastern Bloc countries need skittles.
That video that bays tried video. That's the way you're talking about. And
yes, he says that for those of you that don't know, all you
dummies out there to buy into the like base level propaganda. I'm not saying
there weren't defectors that. I'm not saying that NKVD was good. I'm just
saying that these are basic history facts, and I don't understand why people can't
figure that out. There's so much propaganda about the Cold War. It was
like the Coal War was like not, it's actually not even about bombs.
It was like the propaganda bombs. The real nuclear bomb of the Cold War
is propaganda, dude, And everybody was propaganda is, especially freaking boomers.
Meanwhile, the OSS and CIA are helping Mao out. It's like in this
period where the Cold War is kicking off, they're over there training Mau and
his gorillas. And Mao was a yale in China, sculling bones set up
the program which produced MAO, you didn't even know that, did you?
Well? Your imbasement on dude anyway, So in my view, the money
power elite in the West wanted a Cold War eventually. That's my view.
And so this movie it kind of dances around the edge of that a little
bit, but not really. I mean, there's just a few glimpses of
it with Robert down with the stuff Robert Downey Jr. Says and he even
mentions Time Life Magazine, Henry Leus and he's They're like, how you know
what Henry Leuse is gonna publish? And they're like, oh, because he's
a friend of mine, and he tells me out of Time and we collude
basically to know what it's going to be in Time Magazine. Right, So
it's like, yeah, because that was a skull and bones establishment publication.
Absolutely. David Wimhall's book shows it beyond any shadow of it out in eight
hundred pages of it. The whole book is about that and out of this
period. This is the key section in Tragic Hell. Guess what rises out
of the Cold War? The real result, Oh, the Military Industrial Complex
CIA NSA National Security Council, the arms race, all of the Cold War
friction really produces the gigantic surveillance apparatus and the intranet, the interwebs comes out
of all of this. You see the Rand Corporation, from Curtis Lamai,
NATO, all those things. The fear of communism was a tremendous justification for
the ramping up of all of this. And Quigley says on page nine sixteen
that when they were saying that there was like one hundred thousand secret communists,
it was really only a few thousand. So by nineteen sixty there were three
thousand according to equipment. Here's what he says. The communists that Moscow actually
controlled the United States were at their max. I think. He says the
FBI estimated about seventy five thousand and nineteen forty five. So apparently Cortney,
Quigley and the FBI the peak of Kremlin influenced communism in the United States with
seventy five thousand people in nineteen forty five. In nineteen fifty, that fell
to fifty thousand. In nineteen sixty it fell to three thousand. So certain
stories, which are real stories, Hiss, Venona Fuchs Ethel and Rosenberg's Okay,
yeah, they're Soviet spots, sure, but it is not this giant
threat that's going to destroy the whole country, and they're you know, everywhere
there is basically like the t R R O R threat back then exaggerated,
And he goes on to say that the red threat was exaggerated because it was
perfect for the justification for all the build up, just like the mild Try
Industrial complex. They did the same thing with the last thirty years of the
t R R O R crisis, much of which they ate it. And
guess what, it wasn't any different with the Commies, much of which the
Western elites ated. Build up the enemy, allow them to be a controlled,
managed threat that justifies your own build up, and then you dispense with
the enemy, which you basically managed the entire time, manage in the sense
of, you know, like a a lion on a leash, is what
I'm trying to say. In fact, there were even fake atomic spy stories,
completely made up, completely planted, and covers that on page twenty.
Most of the information about Soviet spies was not secret hidden information. It was
just public news stories. Some of those were fake, and he does mention
fake nuclear stories and fake espionage again on nine twenty two, the red conspiracy
red threat was largely trumped up, and he says, if we were really
concerned about this, there wouldn't have been a program to send nuclear scientists to
Russia. But nuclear scientists were sent to Russia a joint program. Oh,
but we're also worried about all of the scientists getting compromised by the NKVD and
uh, you know, sleeping with you know, Julia and Khrushchev and uh,
and drop off of getting us nuked. Basically, it's a bunch.
It's a bunch of stories. And I don't know why people can't get that,
because that doesn't mean that I'm saying that Stalin is a good guy.
It's like, it's not that hard to figure out. But everybody wants these
really simple, kind of easy narratives, right, And that's when he goes
on to say that people who he makes fun of the John Birch Society for
not figuring out who was really running things, because the John Bircher's were the
first conspiracy theorists. If you don't know the first era of like you know,
Grandpa era of conspiracy people and they pick. They figured out part of
the picture, right, a lot of McCarthy type people, Yes, But
like Alex points out, McCarthy and a lot of the John Birch people.
They actually started figuring out, Hey, wait a minute, this isn't all
Moscow in Beijing. This is a bunch of people in our establishment, like
David Rockefeller. And so they first kind fell into this thinking this track,
Oh, maybe the commies have maybe Moscow and China have compromised David Rockefeller and
the Carnegies and the Melons and the you know, all of these elite families.
Because why are the families and the tax ree foundations supporting leftism and socialism
because you're all commies. No, it's the other way around. Wealthy people
have always funded and controlled and managed socialism communism, you say, And we
just still can't get people past that that robom. They just can't figure that
out. They can't. That's a roadblock in so many people's mind. It's
like an eight. There's like an age drop off, right, Like if
you're above fifty, you just can't ever believe that for whatever reason, I
don't know where you want, but so there you go. Anyway, it's
a really good sections in all this the quickly a chapter seventeen, really good
stuff there. So hopefully that clears things up and people don't automatically assume that
I have some kind of ridiculous position. A lot of a lot of the
science stuff I don't care people who can't figure out that a lot of science
is propaganda. Man, what about quantum physics? Well, my view is
and I one of my essays in the Red Book I cited I think Berner
Heisenberg because Heisenberg says, I'm pretty sure it's Werner Heisenberg. Right, doesn't
he argue that the smallest particles operate and have structure like platonic solids? Right?
He says, it's more like platonism at that level. Okay, well
that fits into my world view perfectly. Is my worldview destroyed it? That's
not true. No, I don't have a problem saying, well, okay,
maybe it's maybe quantum physics is just a wild theory. And so a
lot of people mistake theorizing where and they just have this this mystical sort of
they just think science is this this Olympus council. Right, there's a there's
a at the universities, there's the Council of Science, and again that's a
much a movie crap. That's not how it works. People over there theorizing.
That's fine, there's a place for a theory. But I'm gonna listen
to an engineer before I listen to a quantum foam theorist, because a quantum
foam theorist is theorizing Richard Dawkins. Though they're theorizing about aliens, space,
sex, and panspermia, that's a theory. So in the movie, as
we'll say, I'm not gonna spend a whole lot of time, and I
just want to comment on that stude because I think that's the most fascinating element.
Is the stuff I mentioned. The movie is not that fascinating. All
that stuff I just said is way more fascinating interesting than this movie. I
guarantee you that unless you really want to sit in, if you want the
virtual experience of a bureaucratic nineteen forties boardroom and being questioned by other bureaucratic boring
boardroom men, I mean, what the heck? And then one dumb humping
sequence which everybody was losing their mind over. I'm like, there's a million
different movies with this exact same thing in it. So Hollywood's making our scientists
into prawn stars. What And then I heard this must have been viral marketing,
I think, because I mean it was just the whole movie was super
boring, and people are saying they came away traumatized from this, traumatized.
I mean, maybe you can be traumatized from being extremely bored in a theater
for three hours. What that had to be marketing. I can't imagine actually
being traumatized from this, I mean, and people believing these stories, of
which quickly says a lot of this is just exaggerated. So there's references to
alchemy, there's references to subtle references to what we call Michael sex magic because
the phrase, you know, read this from the Vedas is right when they're
in the midst of their intimacy, right, because intimacy time is when you
read the Vedas right out loud. I mean, it's it's just silly.
But there's a reason for that, because he keeps referring back to the Big
Bang, get It, get it, and then he's the new Big Bang,
right, because he's this destroyer of worlds and the creators the creator of
a new world basically with fusion and fission, and which I take as a
thesis antithesis, dialectical synthesis. Right, that's kind of what's the structure of
this movie. And they mentioned that famous phrase in the midst of the intimacy
sequence the bang get it. And then she has him read the Sanskrit from
the Vedas about you know, I've become destroyer of worlds or whatever. Anyway,
he is Prometheus, that's the thing. They keep referring to him as
the American Prometheus throughout the movie. And so as Prometheus, he's stealing the
fire of the gods to destroy worlds now. And he's there with this Council
of High Council of Science, which that's I saw Normis think it this it
works right, There's like there's this High Council of Science with Oppenheimer and ed
Tell, Edward Teller and all these scientists sitting around right. And by the
way, did you know Edward Teller not just the Manhattan Project guy. He's
also the father of atmospherit atmospheric aerissoul spraying or GEO in Jermy. That is
on record what Edward Teller is known for as well as being on the high
council of Oppenheimer's science. You see. The other biblical archetypal references are that
he says that the nukes when this goes off, it's a pillar of fire
in the desert, you see. So there's this Moses Egyptian Exodus narrative,
the pillar of cloud and fire. He calls it the divine power, where
he says that we will detonate this in the city of the three person God,
Trinity, the three person God because they're the new gods, you see.
And by the way, that's in my book where I cite Strange Angel
about Jack Parsons and all that and Trinity site. So maybe even solo references
to secret societies and psychological warfare with the idea of the ritual dividing of the
atom and the release of energy. So there is perhaps an esoteric component to
this movie. I think you could you see I see traces of that with
the biblical references and him actually saying that we're going to blow this up at
the side of the three person God and Matt Dadbod's like, what's the three
person God? And he says Trinity New Mexico because he's the new god.
You see, who are the new gods? The stars of science, and
they actually talk about them as if they're sort of cult stars. But the
cult now is the Cult of the super Weapon. And you should go read
the Collins Brother's excellent article on that called the Cult of the super Weapon,
because it talks about exactly as Quickly was saying, the psychological warfare components of
the Cult of the super Weapon gave the impression that America now had the ability
to destroy worlds. The cult of the super weapon the Bomb Almighty. If
you watch Planet of the Apes too, I recommend it because this is.
In Planet of the Apes Too, they actually worship the Bomb Almighty and they
have an organ and they have a liturgy of the bomb. I'm not joking.
You should go watch. It's a it's a good B movie. It
makes this point, the Cult of the super Weapon. But this movie is
not really going that deep. It kind of dances around the edges of some
of the stuff I'm talking about from the quick from Quickly and whatnot, But
it falls back into your typical sort of normy approach where everything is as normy
history has told us, nothing is exaggerated and out of placed, out of
a chord with reality, except maybe the commune stuff is shown to be exaggerated,
which maybe that's true. But you have Truman, basically who was a
committed freemason, calling the shots. I don't sorry, the president doesn't doesn't
call the shots, right, he's over there, the shot caller. We're
gonna need these people, We're gonna bomb these people. I'm gonna call the
shots because I'm the PRIs the press calling the shot. No, sorry,
the press submits to the people with zillions of dollars. The dude that makes
two hundred thousand dollars a year does not submit to the people that make zillions
of dollars a year. I'm sorry, I mean, I mean he does
submit to them. Okay, Barack Obama doesn't tell David Rockefeller what to do.
And out of all this is where we get the boomsday clock. All
of this stuff was like the greatest psyop in the history of the world prior
to the whole Cold War stuff. I'm saying the Cold War is basically a
giant exercise in mastering psychological warfare. Jump under your desk, boomer for the
nuke blast shall get ye unless you stop dropping a roll. Now, I'm
sorry, stop dropping a roll. Angle to do nothing if a nuke blast
is coming, according to the story of the nuke blast right. And we've
covered some of these propaganda classics too, by the way, like, um,
what's the Steve Guttenberg Reagan era nuke movie that freaked all the boomers out?
Remember that supposedly this movie just scared the crap out of everybody. The
we covered Jimmy and I covered. I just I just went blank last day
the last y'all help me out. My mind's going blank. Here. This
is where we get the boomsday clock. Remember my video, the boomsday clock
video, my original crunch. A lot of build don't know there was an
original cringe course song about boomers the boomsday clock instead of the doomsday clock,
because the doomsday clock is a is a stupid terrifier thing that's supposed to terrify
the crap out of you. Maybe I changed it to boomer music boomer tunes.
I think there it is. Look at that. Don't blow us all
love for you. Let's see if I can play this. I won't work
right anyway. You can go watch this later. Uh. I was reading
at the time The Rand Corporation book by Alex Abeam, and I was reading
I think I was reading quickly too in these chapters, and I was like
just laughing at all this boom, the doomsday clock and all this nonsense,
like that's such an obvious scio and everybody gets scared and they roll that stupid
thing out every now, and they remember they tried to roll the doomsday clock
out like a year or two ago, that we're all we're right next after
COVID. They were like, we're right next to midnight. Do the world's
about to blow up? And then when the Ukraine wore ah, bro,
we're about right next Domina. And it's all the same, idiot, You're
like, what is this. Oh, it's just a bunch of normy science
people, atomic scientists, Oh, the same people like Oppenheimer and these people,
right, And it's just some freaking woman and a bunch of nerds over
here moving a big fake clock. This it doesn't mean anything, dude,
it's nothing. Literally's fake. Asked people over standing here, look at this,
dude, fifty one minutes like I'm gonna watch this. Can you imagine
who one hundred and eighty thousand people watched this. Who watched the whole thing?
That's what I want to know. Twenty twenty three doomsday clock. I'll
shoot well as long as as long as we got argent teen science girls.
Do we got an Argentine science girl? Yes? Check? Do we got
she got glass? Oh? We got a Normie Nova Sordo? Archbishop?
Check? Archbishop? Do we have a purple haired social justice check? Okay,
look at these people. This is science people, This is science.
Lalita Sundai Ram purple haired freak with his eyes going in different directions like he's
possessed, asked Jay Beard and Hayden Bellfield the Center for the Study of Risks,
Existential risks, so basically just made up nonsense people just making up titles.
What in the world? So these are the scientists wearing his pink hoodie
telling you that the boomsday clock is two seconds to midnight? We got Kamala
Kamala over here, Kamala Harris over here. All good? Another Latin X
nice? Nice we got while we're the ratios are good. I've only seen
one one or two men. I've seen all women so far, so I
know this is fair and balanced. Science got the ladies over here, represent
and then we got this guy here, very reputable, credible. We got
boomers represented, and we got also the orient represented. Nice. Yeah,
grandma's over here with chow young fat. You got random British looking man,
very scientific. Who else we got who's over there in the green hiding out?
WHOOPI Goldberg over here doing some science. Set us straight. Telly savalis
over here science and us up. My grandma's over here, chaw, you'm
fat. And then we got the Council of Science. Boom boy, look
at that Council of Science, where the beaker's at, where the test tubes
at. I like it, I like it, I believe it. And
then they set the baboomsday clock for us. So boomers watch out because it's
the end is nigh. A lot of science going on there, a lot
of science going on there, so you see, definitely not propaganda, definitely
science anyway, other enough of that nonsense. I'm done these movies. They're
stupid, dude, if you would hit like a chair, let's get to
these super chats, super chat super chat, eh TJ says, for three
dollars, do they explain where Ken got his frankin beans? Ken doesn't have
frankin Beans. So actually in the movie, Ken never gets frank and Beans,
but Barbie does, so Barbie gets her parts. Travis thirty dollars.
Thank you so much. Travis. By the way, support the show via
the super chat function. We got several super chach You guys have been generous
tonight. I want to remind you too that we have a show sponsor.
In that show sponsor is chalk dot Com. The best supplements you can get
like the Sheila jet to Legit to quit Sheila jet Baby, mental focus and
clarity. You want to you want to set up the real Kingdom, you
need some of that she Legit for mental focusing, clarity, you need some
of that ton Catale for boosting your testosterone. So I've already the Tonctallee is
not in here because I've already taken that bottom. I've already upped my toxic
masculinity. Have you? Well, you better heading over to chalk dot com
us coote J fifty that's Jay five zero. If you look at the show
description, you'll see the promo code there J fifty that's Jay five zero.
In the show description, you will also see the links for all of the
other things that you can get to support the show, to sport me,
support my work, including the philosophy course that we taught with Richard Grove twelve
lectures, twenty nine thirty ish hours somewhere in there. It's a lot of
hours, especially if you count all of the Q and A. You can
get that philosophy course right there in the autonomy Agora marketplace link. You can
get signed copies of my red book, the Gigantic six hundred and sixty page
tome of all of my essays on geopolitics and philosophy and theology. You can
get my other books Eslter Hollywood one and two in the show description at the
shop. And yes, all of the copies are signed. So everybody always
ask me, can I get signed copies? They're all s. That's why
you don't get him from Jeffrey Bezos. Traviss with thirty dollars, spit that
hot dire fire for us, Big Daddy. I add a little bit to
that. You should have said hot dire fire. But thank you for the
Super nineteen six six, great stuff. Thank you so much, long time
Superchter bmx B ninety six six again ten dollars. Once again, this is
a great intro slasher who does your intros. Everybody asked me, it's on
the screen, it says up by amid the Ruins. That's it. Thank
you so much BMX, longtime superchedar support. I love you guys so much.
One compliment three seventy seven. Get Curtis Yarvin on um. I don't
know Curtis. I'll be happy to have a chat with him. Everybody says
you need to talk to Curtis neoaction luminary, and I'd be glad to talk
to him. Eight hundred five dollars. Alternative analysis, Barbie is the patriarchy,
bro, Come on, y'all gotta be joking. If you're having to
go that far right, I mean, maybe you're just joking. Ken is
the representation of women's strife. Okay, I mean if that's where y'all who
have the alternative analysis are having to go to to make it work, then
you're still fired. You're still fired from doing movie analysis. You're not allowed
to. But I will go ahead and read your super chat since you sent
me five bucks. Patriarchy is oppressive. Feminism is created, the movement becomes
oppressive. Patriarch is redefined to appease the feminist and then Barbie as a christ
figure to sends to Earth to spread ideology. No, I'm sorry that one
don't work. Dog Turtle Thames one dollar. Do you have opinions on nuke
again? I did cover that when I got to the section on what I
can and can't prove. So anything that is an authority claim from the system
in terms of like normy science, I don't have any problem with it being
true unless it contradicts my presuppositions. But I'm also not just going to accept
it because it is stated to be the majority belief of most of the scientists,
or because the authority says that it's the case, because I also know
from many years of studying psyops and geopolitics that the authority structure lies all of
the time, and everybody knows. In the last three years the authority structure
has lied immensely, and that's part of the governance of mankind is that governments
lie, empires lie. Now does that mean that everything is then false?
Now? So how do we know? Well, we don't, so we
have a likelihood. You know, It's like sort of a scale, But
for me, my scale begins with the things that are most certain or not
bizarre theories that come and go. Like most people who's a science science,
well, the science nowadays on all these normy science sites says that black holes
are proven to be false. I remember in my Facebook feed years ago there
was a day where the same science publication, right like science dot org or
whatever, space dot com. I don't here what it was, but it
was like one thing was like black holes now proven to not exist, and
literally the next post from the same thing was black holes now proven. Or
it's like come on, man. So I am literally agnostic on all these
things, not because I am just contrarian, but just simply because I have
no way to verify all of these theoretical claims. And that doesn't mean that
I think that maybe they are true. So, like, what's going on
it CERN, I don't know. I don't claim to note and I don't
care people have theories, but I don't think that somebody turn CERN on and
the Mandela effect happened, and now all the screenplays from thirty years ago got
altered. Okay, I don't believe that. That doesn't make any sense,
But maybe there's elements in simulation theory where we could find analogies and parallels that
actually show that the world is ordered in structure. So I could take things
from simulation theory about the world having geometric forms and pattern in structure without adopting
the idea that everything is a simulation. You see. So I'm not bound
of any of these dump theories, and I don't care ultimately what. In
other words, it doesn't bother me if there's a bunch of theories, you
see, and everybody wants to have, you know, everybody wants to jump
to the craziest stuff, like because if we don't really know what CERN's doing,
oh, then they must be altering the Bear and Staying Bears VIDHS tapes
from thirty years ago. I mean, that's just crazy, dude, That's
just crazy. Look, what's a more likely explanation for bearn Saint Barns.
People were typing out the name and they just mispelled it and they thought it
was Steam and Staying. You see, isn't that a lot more likely that
people just mispelled stuff. Then they turned CERN on and it flipped all of
the VHS tapes from thirty years ago. That this is ridiculous. It was
more likely that everybody was lied to about a thousand year period of history,
and the Byzantine emperors all concocted it and tricked everybody, and all the appstock
succession is false or no, actually there's there was. The history is you
know, the last two thousand years is fairly accurate. I mean, if
you're if you believe Christian history, you wouldn't believe that stuff. I mean,
maybe we just don't know a lot about Tartaria. Doesn't mean there was
a giant world mud flood or I mean what I mean, isn't it more
likely that buildings sink into the ground over time than that there was a giant
hidden empire. And by the way, I'm pretty open minded about megaliths and
hidden civilizations. I don't sure. Okay, maybe there are, but there's
a lot more skeptical and a lot of these things. That's all. By
the way, you think I'm crazy, he's luka dogmatic you No, no,
no, I'm very open minded. You see, it's not what you
think. In fact, I've been watching I've been doing a little side study.
Oh there's a little side study, am I what are you doing your
free time? I study other things that I'm not normally into. So lately,
I've been in on this kick, and I'm gonna start doing some streams
on this about ghosts and paranormal stuff, because I'm starting to side more and
more on No. Actually, I think ghosts are real now, and I
don't know how to explain all that, but that's okay. I'm okay not
having to explain everything, and we'll get into this more. I'll do some
streams on it. But so basically, in the last couple of years,
just as a side project for fun, I've been watching tons and tons and
tons of ghosts and paranormal videos. Why have I Well, because first I
just just doing it for fun, just to you know, click around and
watch something dumb in my spare time. So I've been watching a lot of
James Lafleur's videos, and I've been watching slaphand videos, and I've been watching
Bizarre bub videos. And the more you watch of these more I'm thinking,
Okay, wait a minute, I don't think all of these are people just
faking them. Now. I think what's likely here, Well, what's likely
is there will be some fakery, and sometimes these are fake. Right,
A lot of these UFO videos they're obviously fake, they're stupid CGI. However,
a lot of videos of people's nanny cams and housecams. I don't think
all those are fake. I think that there might actually begin to We're starting
to see more paranormal phenomena. I don't have an opinion on cryptids. There
could be a species that we haven't there's new species that's covered all the time.
I don't think there's a cheap picabra, but it wouldn't destroy my worldview
there is. Do I think that spirits or beings can manifest. I think
maybe they can't. I don't know how it works, but I'm starting to
think yeah, because I've watched in the last two years hundreds of videos and
clips on this just again as my side projects study. And I would say
two years ago I was very, very super skeptical anti ghost Now I'm I'm
on the other side, right, I'm no, Actually, I think I'm
I'm more on that. So I think there are ghosts, no, and
I don't don't. I don't know what it is. Aliens. No,
I don't believe in aliens. Now there are demonic aerial phenomena that I think
are inexplainable. And so you see what I'm saying, so, I'm pretty
open minded about stuff I think, but I find it harder to believe that
out of these probably again, hundreds of c I've probably seen a thousand or
maybe two thousand and two years, two thousand various clips a sort of paranormal
phenomenon, and I would say, just guestimating, I would say maybe ten
to twenty percent are fake and staged, maybe thirty forty percent are inexplicable unknowns,
and then the other ones are like, those are pretty that's pretty strong,
right, And I've watched so, I mean, I'm not a video
analyzer, so I can't say for sure. I'm just saying that this is
mine elysis, my opinion. Now, if a person tends to side on
the oh, no, I think most of these are fake, Okay,
I don't. It doesn't bother me like it's okay, because I would say,
again, two years ago, I probably would have thought, no,
most of these are fake, but now I'm starting to think, no,
I think a lot of these are not fake. So yeah, I'm a
little more open money on this stuff. So you, yeah, you could
say there are no ghosts, it's all demons. You could say that,
However, in our eschatology in our immediate state. I mean, you know,
in the life of the soul after death, I mean there's periods where
the soul is still here, doesn't Father Rose talk about, you know,
the tradition of two to three weeks, so the soul still being here,
and we don't know what it's like in ghost time right in the next dimension.
Three weeks might be three years or three hundred years. I don't know.
We don't really know how all that stuff works. So it might be
ghosts and demons, or maybe they're all demons. I don't have a problem
either way. I'm open minded about these things. But I do not believe
in extra biological entities flying here on spaceships from other planets that crashed here that
we re engineered their technology. That's a bunch of balogney. I do think
there's demons, angels, spirits. Some of these crypted videos, I don't
know. I don't know what they are. I mean, it's just I
guess, you know, again, it could be fake, it could be
anything. So I'm open minded, what do y'all think? But I have
to say when it comes to if you're looking for these kind of fun videos,
James L. Floors videos are kind of out there. I mean,
he gets a lot of like really wild speculation, glitch and the matrix type
stuff. I don't really buy. Most of that stuff's goofy and silly.
Most of the UFO alien videos are garbage, but there's a few things I
can't explain. So, but if you're looking for the best ghost demon videos,
bizarre Bub usually collects the best of those. Those are pretty solid,
and then the Slapham is kind of intermediate between those two. I just don't
think a lot of all this stuff's fake. I mean, it's just like
everybody faking videos. I mean, what's more likely that I think it's more
likely that ten to twenty percent or faking these videos? Anyway you get y'all
get the idea. We'll talk about this more. I'll lay out my theory
and analysis on this in upcoming streams that we do. Bobby A Dollar,
do you think freemasonry is a past or present threat. I don't think it
has the influence that it used to, but I mean it still has the
degree of influence, and it still has an ideology that is antithetical two hours.
It's hard to believe they have a major influence when the membership is declining.
Yeah, I think that what's rising is stuff like witchcraft, you know,
outright occultic stuff and outright you know, satanic groups. But I mean
there's still you know, quite a few boomer Freemasons and powerful Freemasons. I'm
sure Jesse Branch three dollars, did Enich and Elijah become the angels Metatron?
No Enich and Elijah or Enich and Elijah. So Metatron is gnostic Cobbalist stuff
we don't believe BMX ninety six six. I can't wait to hear your views
on ghosts and paranormal Well, I don't really have a lot of theorizing.
We're just gonna maybe walk through some of the examples and get people's takes.
When one reason I want to do this is that I want people too because
I've noticed that a lot of these things that pop up. This is a
great experiment because it shows us, for example, that individual pieces of data
don't necessarily tell us whose paradigm is right. And we see this with these
kinds of things all the time, because individual pieces of data can be can
fit into multiple paradigms, and in philosophy, in the philosophy of science,
as you guys know, this is called a problem of the underdetermination of data
thesis. Right, a lot of data can be equally viable in various models,
So just having a lot of data doesn't necessarily tell you which models correct.
And you can apply that to arguments like, oh, well, Jesus
was resurrected, so the apostles changed their mind and became strong after the resurrection,
and they were weak prior to that, So therefore the resurrection of Christianity
is true. Well, that just means that they had a change of character.
How does that prove the whole religion to be true? Or the idea
of If you can prove scientifically that Jesus rose from the dead, then all
of Christianity is true. Well, I mean Elijah, you know, other
people in the Bible rose from the dead or rose other people from the dead.
So in other words, the resurrection of Christ doesn't mean anything without the
rest of the story of Christianity. So it's a holistic thing, you see.
So these are fallacies, and when it comes to like the ghost paranormal
clips and videos, none of these in themselves necessarily can hands down prove anything
because we a lot of the videos, we don't know their origin, we
don't know what's going on. And yes, they could be fake, they
could be CGI, they could be whatever, just you know, people playing
around with photoshop. Who knows, right, But it does seem implausible that
they would all be fake. Okay, well if they if they're not all
fake, then some of them require other explanations which in many cases don't seem
to immediately have a scientific causal explanation. But that doesn't mean that they couldn't
have a scientific causal explanation. And a lot of times in this kind of
process, people in the comments actually do give good de bunking information. So
there is a place for genuine d booking. But dee booking can become its
own world view, right like Michael Schermer Skeptic Magazine. That's its own weird
belief system which precludes all kinds of things, and it can't justify itself.
You see, it's its own religion. And that's why every skeptic person,
the Skeptic magazine reader, the Schemer types, that's why they always believe literally
every establishment position. Oh, don't question the Big nine event, don't question
KUF, don't question. Stabbies don't see what I mean. Oh, so
you're just a voice for the ear, a mouthpiece for the establishment, because
you're just another type of religion, right Neil de grass Tyson down the line
at every establishment belief like a check like a perfect checkpoint, our checklist.
BMX says, I can't wait to hear about ghosts and paranormal analysis. Well,
I want y'all to come with me, because guess what, this audience
has the highest IQ out there. I'm serious, We got a lot of
high IQ people. So I want I want y'all to chime in and comment
when we do some of these upcoming ghost paranormal unexplained topics. And no,
I don't believe in Bigfoot. That's dumb. Bigfoot's faking gray Bigfoot. By
the way, if Darwinism was true, there ought to bigfoots. There ought
to be. We ought to be seeing some damn big foots. Okay,
Sashquatch ought to be. I'll put it this way. If the Bigfoot crowd,
which is a bunch of goobers, can prove Bigfoot to me, then
I might start thinking, Okay, maybe Darwinism is true, but I don't
think you can prove Bigfoot because all the Bigfoot videos are dumb. So anyway,
I think some of the most convincing is people that have there this mother
thesis I want, this is what I'm saying. This. What is different
about nowadays than anytime in history? Well, guess what, Not only are
surveillance cameras everywhere, and they got more and more prevalent in the last twenty
years. We know this. Not only does everybody have a cell phone with
greater quality cameras, Almost everybody has like you know, super HD four K
phone cameras now, right, Guess what else? Now, like never before,
almost everybody with middle upper middle class housing. Not maybe not everybody,
but it's becoming everywhere. There are cameras everywhere, home security everywhere. So
in other words, if ghosts, entities, whatever, if those things are
true, if they do exist, do now is the time we ought to
be seeing them on cameras everywhere because people are putting cameras in every room of
their freaking house now to me, houses cameras inside the house. This is
getting that's invasive. Okay, that's like I don't want X and Jeff Bezos
being able to you know, hack into my house. And watch me.
That's too far from me. However, a lot of the world doesn't care,
and there are cameras everywhere. So my theory is that, well,
if you've got cameras everywhere, more than ever in the history of the world,
and especially now with everybody getting the home security systems, we ought to
be seeing a prevalence of these types of phenomena. And it looks to me
like there's a lot of that. Now. Again, that's not it's evidence
is not proof. We don't know. It's still up in the air,
so I don't I mean, maybe if you were firsthand seeing you know,
some inexplicable thing like books flying off the shelf and hitting you, or I
don't know what, right, you're levitating over your bed at night, or
something I don't know right, or a phantasm appears and speaks to you somebody
like this, right, like maybe, then it's like, okay, that's
hardcore empirical evidence. Anything we see on the Internet is within the domain of
you know, ultimately not definitive. But my thesis again, I'm thinking,
okay, yeah, it looks so if we got cameras everywhere, we ought
to be seeing stuff everywhere, and we are seeing a lot of things.
That's my That's what I'm starting to think. But I could be wrong.
I'm not wedded to this, so we'll be looking at some of that.
Thank you for those super chats, Rat Dealer for a dollar. Is it
uncommon to feel lonely and orthodoxy in America? I guess it depends on whether
you're in a Like if you're in an ethnic church and you're just like like
a you know, regular Cracker man or a regular Southern man and you're in
a I don't know, Greek or Russian church and everybody else's foreign, you
might feel that way. You said you're in an Antiochian church. Well,
sometimes Antiochian churches are all arab so maybe if you're you know, so,
the solution of that is convert your friends. Then you'll have some friends in
your in your church. Head on Overdue Grand Theft World, our partner podcast
over on Rockfan Are okay, f I n that show that is linked in
the show description, and I'll lay out my thesis on the ghosts and stuff
and all that better