Attention. You're listening to the Top Huff radio show, America's home for conservative
not Bitter talk radio. Be advised. The content of this program has been
documented to prevent and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean
to the right. Here's more conservative but not bitter host Top Huff. All
right, my friends, you have tuned in successfully. I might add to
America's own for conservative not bitter talk here on the Conservative Not Bitter Network.
It is my pleasure to be here. You know. The other day I
was talking with an individual. He sells t shirts, sells conservative t shirts,
and one of his shirts said, I love my country. I'm Parafrae.
It just came to me as I was listening to the music, but
because I'm thinking about this, So I love my country, not my not
my government or something something like that, which I have a lot of share
those sentiments, right, I mean, our government, government is force.
Government is a The Founders would say it was a necessary evil. If men,
in fact were angels, government would not be necessary. You've heard these
words before, I guess unless you went to the public school system. I'm
kidding. I went to public schools anyway, But this this concept of you
know, conservatives, we love we love our country, we love this nation,
this land. We love the brilliance of our founders, what they set
forth in the Constitution and the Declaration, these ideas and concepts, and I
won't go into all of them, but that were citizens and not subjects.
That our rights come from God, our creator, not from government. That
we have the right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, that
we are in charge of our own life. That we answer not to government,
but to but to God. And there's lots of other things that we
like about this, but it's the government itself that's the problem. The government
is the instrument that is often used. It's often weaponized against against people,
against liberty throughout the ages. And so but I'm sorry, I will say
this, and this is what made me think of this as I'm as I'm
watching what I think over time will amount to very large victories for lovers of
liberty and the constitution and limited government. I think that these Supreme Court cases
that have been ruled recently, these recent rulings will have a very positive effect.
It would make someone like me say I hate my government a little bit
less. I hate my government a little bit less. Again, I don't
mean that in some like maniacal way or some you know, like like these
leftists when they say I mean they hate in levels that I you know that
that's not healthy. I have a healthy a healthy fear and a respect that
says this government, this government, if it grows too large as it has,
what's the old adage, a government that can give you everything you want
can take away everything that you have. That is true. But I'm starting
to like the direction that things are going in the government through these court cases.
They're ruling the right way the less, you know how ultimately, if
you there's lots of reasons that we could talk about to say these are you
know, the right decisions and so forth. But if you want to know
the best, the easiest way, if you're new to politics, to tell
if a Supreme Court case is the right thing or just something something like that
Supreme Court case is the most obvious one because there's you know, a lot
of those being released right now being shared with the public. If you want
to know, look at the reaction from the left and from the medium.
If they are acting like it's the end of civilization as we know it.
It's typically a good thing because remember what they want. They want more government,
they want more control, they want less liberty. That's what they want.
They want to move us to a morally bankrupt worldview and ideology. And
I'm not talking about every rank and file Democrat or even liberal, but those
in political power that is in fact what they want. Do not doubt me.
These cases are actually giving me hope that this country can that it's being
turned back around. And I want to say to those who were never Trumpers
back in twenty sixteen, if you voted for Hillary back in twenty sixteen,
do you realize do you realize how close you brought us to these things not
being materialized? Do you realize how much more atrocious our situation would be we
would probably be in the second term of Hillary's presidency right now. We would
undoubtedly have the same problems, probably more scandal and corruption, probably won't well,
probably probably more debt and deficit because we wouldn't have had Trump in there.
Who knows. I know that it would be atrocious, But bottom line,
I like the direction. I mean, there is hope. There is
hope for this country, my friends. I'm telling you, there is hope.
I'm hanging on to that. The Supreme Court is doing good things.
Trump, of course, can do a lot of good things. The American
people seem poised to re elect Trump. The left is in again utter meltdown
mode. So lots of things I want to get to today. There's plenty
of things to get to in the stack of stuff. We'll get to as
many of those as we can today in just in the normal course of getting
up and running here at the program. But before we do that, let
me remind you, my friends, that I started my weight loss journey with
my the my PhD myphdweightloss dot Com. That's my phdweightloss dot Com. Started
with them a couple of months ago. Now, time time flies, and
I have lost weight. I've shared this with you. I've lost weight.
I feel better, I feel the inflammation in my knees is down, I
have more energy. I can play basketball with the kids much better than I
could a couple of months ago. And so I'm glad that I did this,
and I shared with you the reason why, the reason why I wanted
to lose weight. I was an athlete in college. That was a long
time ago. I'm no longer an athlete. My friends, my son and
I lift weights. I'll play a little basketball. But I got my knees
are kind of shot. I've had two acls and a arthroscopic surgery on my
knees. Those are thirty year injuries, by the way, I think one's
twenty seven and one's thirty. I mean these are older than some of you
listening listening to this program today. So but the reason that I, you
know, i'd gotten we get busy. There's a lot that this is.
You know, there's been stress around here. We've been we've been busy.
Starting a business is not the easiest thing in the world, especially when a
Democrats in office or whatever are just managing it. If even if it's been
in existence, but inflation, all these things, there's just stress. Stress.
As we grow, stresses, we're atting you know, God willing,
we're atting stations here, but just stress and life gets in the way.
You get bad habits. Next thing, you know, you put on the
pounds. So I said, hey, I it's important to me that I
stay healthy. You know, if something health wise happens to me, I
don't want it to be something that I could prevent, you know, not
everything's preventable, but some things are, and so part of that staying at
a healthy, healthy weight. Now I don't buy into the whole b M
I weight. I mean, that's that's another story altogether, but but clearly
the number on the scale was higher than it should have should be for me.
So I wanted to stay healthy for my kids, for my grandkids,
and I didn't want any of the things that I would want to do with
them my wife. I don't want any of the things to be impacted because
I'm not able to physically do them. So I started this journey. If
you're having similar thoughts, if you have maybe other reasons for why you would
want to lose weight, I encourage you to check out my phdweight loss dot
Com. You can go to their website, read their testimonials, start a
conversation with them, see if it is something that's good for you. I
gotta tell you, I'm not hungry on this plan. I'm just not.
I mean maybe a couple times, but usually it's because I was doing something
wrong, and that's why you have a coach to help you. So my
phdweight loss dot Com is the website my Phdwight looss dot com. So let's
get back into the issues of the day. So I want to talk here,
we talk Supreme Court cases, and we may still get into this as
as the program. Actually I do want to talk about that because there's some
things I didn't get to in a previous hour. So let's start there.
Let's start with the descent of the liberal justices on the Supreme Court as it
pertains to the Trump case. As it pertains to the case that says where
the court ruled that the president of the United States the ex president has protections
from criminal prosecution after he's at at all time, but in particular when he's
out of office, it's not a time to be engaging in political retribution.
And so the three liberal justices that would be Sonya Sodomayor, that would be
Elna Kagan, and that would be Katanji Brown Jackson, have they wrote a
descent now ascent that this is important. You know, there's a lot of
people that are It's funny today, especially with social media, they get out
there and they become Supreme Court experts when you know, two days prior they
didn't even to know who was on the Supreme Court. How many people are
there, what the purpose of the court is, all that sort of stuff.
So let me just set the record straight. Number one, there's nine
justices on the US Supreme Court. Six of them are what the media would
call quote unquote conservative justices. Now, political ideology, I've said this on
here before should not matter on the Supreme Court in the In the event that
it does, it means that if the justice is operating out of political ambitions
or political motivations, the justice is acting improperly. That's that's been a problem
routinely throughout the history of the Supreme Court. Especially I wouldn't say definitely in
modern times. I don't want to say especially, there's been there's been seasons
where this has been a bigger problem than others, and that is what's typically
happened. The Supreme Court had historic well in modern times, if you go
back to the say, the sixties, the seventies, the Supreme Court was
used by the left, by liberals, by the left to advance their political
agenda. That's where Roe v. Wade came from. Roe v. Wade
was an atrocious decision. I don't even care personally what you think. I
do care we think about abortion. It is killing a human being. But
put that aside for a moment. Abortion. It shouldn't not matter what the
Supreme Court thought about that. It shouldn't matter what the law said, what
the constitution, you know what principles we could get out of that, and
then you go from there that you know the decision. They clearly made up
the trimester stuff there, there's the terms of viability. All this stuff was
made up out of complete whole cloth by the Supreme Court. That is not
their role. That is the job of the legislative branch. If the legislative
branch wanted to have this concept of trimesters and viability of the unborn child and
so forth, and that's the job of the legislature to hash it out and
to vote on it. And if it's passed by both houses of the legislature
meaning congre with the Senate and the House of Representatives, and it's signed by
the President, it is the law of the land, unless at some point
in the future it turns out that that law violates the Constitution, where the
Supreme Court can chime in and say whether it does or doesn't. I mean,
that's the beauty of our system. But that's the way that it should
have been done. It's not the way that it's done. A lot of
these things, there's books written on this. I know Mark Levin has written
lots of books on this very topic. You know, these men in long
in the long black robes, they come in and they tell you, men
and women, they tell you what we're going to do today. The Supreme
Court is not there to correct something that happened legislatively that maybe people even want
to be different. The Supreme Court is there to read the law, to
read the Constitution, to apply it, and to work out something that well
as the law and the Supreme Court demand. That's their job. And there
can be disagreements on some of these things, without a doubt. But in
this particular case, in this particular case, the left has blown this massively,
incredibly out of proportion. So six justices that would be who's that Clarence
title the Supreme Court, the Chief Justice, John Roberts, Samuel Alito,
Neil Gorsich, Amy Coney, Barrett Clarence Thomas, and who am I forgetting?
Forgetting someone? Oh, Brett Kavanaugh. So those six voted to say
that the Constitution prevents essentially political retribution against a former president as he's performing his
official duties. So you can't say someone who's performing an official duties should then
be subjected to criminal indictment and criminal prosecution. This seems like a pretty logical
conclusion to draw. The left today wants you to believe that President Trump could
go in and murder room full of people and there'd be no there'd be no
consequence for this because they say, well, if it's his official capacity.
Well I challenge you, what what's the official capacity? And what capacity would
President Trump or any president for that matter, what's the official capacity of their
job where they're going in and killing Americans? What is that? Right?
Once somebody suggests that I played a sound bite in a previous hour, some
leftists on social media that Biden should just uh call for the end of the
Supreme Court, you realize how stupid that is that this in the Constitution,
It clearly lays out, it clearly lays out that we have our you know,
branches of of co equal branches of government. I mean, the Supreme
Court could say, well then we are going to out well, you know,
uh, calling into the presidency. It's the same thing. What is
this These people they have no idea what they're talking about, because five minutes
ago they didn't even know that we had a Supreme Court. Five minutes ago
they did know the makeup of the court. They didn't understand what the court
was. They don't care, they care about their ideology. They have been
stoked, their fears and anger and rage have been stoked by the media,
by the Democrat Party into hating, I mean hating with the passion Donald Trump.
And you know what, they see that everything that they've invested in,
everything they've invested in these past several years, is for nothing. They see
that Trump is on the verge. And I'm not going to predict the victory
because God only knows what could happen and what they've got up their sleeve here.
But they can see the riding on the wall. Trump is positioned very
well, statistically likely to win reelection here in twenty twenty four. They can
see that everything they've thrown at him has bounced off of him, and some
of the things have actually bounced. What's the old saying, as a kid,
I'm rubber, you're glue. Whatever you throw against me bounces off and
sticks to you, or something like that. So all these allegations they're throwing
at Trump, you know, he's misusing his powers for political gain or whatever
bounces off of Trump. And now suddenly we've got the Hunter Biden laptop scandal.
By the way, there's reports that Hunter Biden is insistent that Joe continue
his presidential run. I mean, for obvious reasons, right. I think
he sees that as his get out of jail free card. And it may
still be who knows, allegedly, allegedly it could be his source of income
for the next four years. And obviously Biden can't win reelection if he doesn't
run for reelection anyway. So we've got this, we've got this mess that's
happening, and we've got the left who is completely invested in the demise of
Trump. And Trump is just rising from the ashes. He's he's not supposed
to be here if you follow the traditional whiz them, if you follow the
narrative and so forth, conventional wisdom, it's not supposed to be this way.
But yet here we are. And now they're looking at this and thinking
the only thing that stands between Trump and the White House again was maybe the
Supreme Court, if they could say, yeah, go ahead and use every
resource in the government to throw the former president in prison if they were going
to write that decision, which I think is what the three liberal justices were
possibly prepared to do. And Joe Biden, a guy that doesn't even know
he's on the debate stage. There's nothing left. They are beside themselves.
And then you factor into that some of these things that have come from from
these recent Supreme Court case decisions. You've got again the Trump case, You've
got the Chevron deference case, You've got the case that impacts the Fisher case,
the January sixth defendants. I mean, they are losing, losing and
losing. And just a month ago they were celebrating because they could call President
Donald J. Trump a convicted felon. So there you go. Now that
being said, I want to get into some of the negatives, the reactions
from the left, and I've i played one of them. I want to
play. I want to read to you a line or a couple of lines
from this Supreme Court case, the Descent, which again the dissent is the
anger of the well. It's a group of three justices that are saying what
they believe this could lead to. This is not This was not in the
opinion of the court, the majority opinion that said this is what we know
is going to happen. This was the dissent saying, hey, this is
what this is going to lead to. So it's their opinion. But it's
pretty dramatic, of course, as the left often is. But I'll read
that to you as well. And some of the reactions that are out there
amongst the left in the wake of this, I mean, they are completely
they are in complete disarray. We were told that Trump was going to bring
down the Republican Party. It would seem instead that Biden is bringing down the
Democrat Party. We'll get to that, my friends, in due course.
But let me remind you. If you are currently smoking, chewing, vaping,
Nick knack Naturals is here to help you crush your vice. They've created
a mint. It's a nicotine mint, so it is not for you if
you are not currently using nicotine products. But if you are, and if
you're looking to crush your vice, you're looking for a naturally better alternative to
the nicotine that you get through cigarettes and chewing and vaping, then check out
nick nac Naturals. Nicknack dot Com is the website in ic nac nicknack dot
com. Use promo code todd when you check out, and you'll save fifteen
percent on nick Nack Naturals. It's again, it's a it's a nicotine mint.
It's discreet, it's odorless. You don't have to go outside to take
it. No smoke, no spitting, no slimy pounches, no bad breath,
no yellow teeth, no having to go outside and excuse yourself to smoke
a cigarette, none of that stuff. Nickknack dot Com promo code todd saves
you fifteen percent. Crush your vice, my friends with nick Knack Naturals.
So let's look at we have a little time here remaining this segment. Let's
look at some well. First of all, let's look at one of the
the line from the Liberal Descent again written by katan Well, written by Sonya
sodomy Orbit. It was joined was signed onto by Katanji Brown Jackson and to
by Elena Kagan. But let us look here at this line from the Descent
again. This is the opinion of the minority leftist judges. This is their
opinion. This is not something that the majority opinion says that this is clearly,
you know something a president can do. But this is what they write.
If the president quote orders the Navy seal Navy's Seal Team six to assassinate
well, they raised this question. What if what if the president orders the
Navy's Seal Team six to assassinate a political rival? Immune, writes Sonya Sodomayor
what if they organize a military coup to hold on to power? Immune,
she says, takes a bribe in exchange for a pardon immune Immune Immune Immune.
That's what she says. Of course, that is a far and distant
cry from reality. My friends, It's it's crazy. I mean, I've
I've heard some people talking about this and saying, you know that, really
what's happened here is the original case. The Trump case was to say,
hey, the current government is being weaponized against me. And the response is,
oh, okay, you want us to stop it so that you can
kill your political opponents. I mean, that's that's quite the leap, right,
You're gonna send Seal Team six to to Biden's house? What official activity?
What official role is the president playing and sending a Seal Team six to
a US citizen's home. That's not how that works, My friends, this
is grossly distorted. And by the way, if anybody's doing these things or
similar things already, is it not the Biden administration to Trump who sent the
FBI to mar A Lago, who reportedly sent boxes that were at least marked
as top secret or classified, boxes that were sent from the bureaucratic state to
mar A Lago mere weeks before the raid itself. Isn't that Biden in his
administration anyway? My friends, I'm up against the clock. Got to take
a quick time out. You're listening here to conservative not bitter talk. I
am your host, the one and only Todd Huff back here in just eight
minutes the back, My friends, the left is again freaking out about this
Supreme Court decision. They freak out about a lot of them. They don't
like the overturning of Chevron and the end of Chevron difference. They don't like
the Fisher decision and how that could impact people who were charged with obstructing an
official government event and in relation to January sixth, And they certainly do not
like that the Court has basically said, in not so many words, but
has basically said, the efforts you have made to take out a former president
of the United States. Those efforts we're here to, well, we're here
to make sure that that is not what typically happens to a former president of
the United States. That is not what the Founders wanted, That politics should
not be criminalized, and so forth, and so that has them freaking out
because that's their entire strategy. You've heard me talk about the Seinfeld Newman strategy,
which again is from the television show show Seinfeld from the late eighties and
the nineties. It's one of my favorite shows. And you've heard me say
that. Jerry said that he wanted to help Newman transfer to Hawaii because he
wanted Newman out of his life. Jerry lived in New York City, and
he said, Newman, I'll do whatever it takes as long as it takes
me, so long as it takes you away from me. And that's effectively
the same as what the left is doing, what the seven Pillars of Propaganda
are doing to Trump. They will do whatever it takes as long as it
takes them, so long as it takes Trump away from sixteen hundred Pennsylvania Avenue.
That is, of course the House. And so the Court has basically
said your entire strategy, everything you've invested in. They didn't say it in
these words, but in a way they did. It's it's unacceptable. This
is not what our founders envisioned. This is not the role of the you
know, the new political ruling class to go after the previous political ruling class.
And so that has of course caused all sorts of angst amongst the radical
left. So there's some reactions that people have on the left to this,
and of course they're as usual, blown massively out of proportion. But nonetheless,
let me pause here and remind you that salty Salty is an all natural,
clinically proven way to lower cholesterol. It's ideal for overall heart health.
And just taking two of these salty soft cells a day, which is what
I do, It's the equivalent of taking thirty five cups of green at tea,
but without the caffeine. It's a theoflavin super extract from enriched green at
tea. It's a dietary supplement for optimal cholesterol health. This is an all
natural, decaffeinated, clinically tested as safe product, and it can help your
heart. It can help lower your cholesterol, your lipid levels. And so
with the discount the special pricing that we get that you would get as a
listener to this program, it might be worth testing it out seeing if it's
something that can help your heart health as well. Solty dot com is the
website sol tea promo code Todd, that's of course my first name. Use
that and you're gonna get twenty nine ninety five off your first your first order.
You're gonna be getting three months supply for about ten bucks a month.
Some people are able to take their test their levels their lipid levels prior to
using the product, and then three months later after taking it, many folks
report to their lipid levels improved, some substantially significantly. So so salty dot
com to get a hold of this product. Promo code Todd gets you a
three month supply for just about ten dollars a month. Salty dot Com Promo
code Todd gets you the special pricing. So the Left is of course in
utter panic mode about these Supreme Court decisions about a lot of things. And
so there's a piece here in in the Hill. I'm going to read a
part of this The Hill dot Com democrats rage at Supreme Court for Trump immunity
ruling, calling it a travesty. Capitol Hill Democrats are hammering the Supreme Court
on Monday over its decision to grant immunity to presidents for official acts, saying
it will empower future commanders in chief to break the law with impunity. The
Democrats have long argued that under the Constitution, no one, not even the
president, is above the law. Well, I don't know if that's true.
I don't know if that's true at all. I mean, they seem
to have all sorts of special exceptions to their guys. But anyway, by
ruling that former President Trump is exempt from prosecution from certain for certain actions,
possibly to include those related to his effort to overturn his twenty twenty election defeat,
I get so tired of reading that this is the way this is presented,
is so juvenile. But anyway, the Supreme Court has not only defied
the intentions of the nation's founders, the critics say, but also tacitly sanctioned
the same dictatorial powers they had revolted against this decision. This is Representative Bill
Pascoral, a Democrat from New Jersey. This decision by the Supreme Court today
is a travesty and perhaps the most dangerous judicial opinion from our Supreme Court in
generations. By smooth and naive legallyes, these partisan justices have created a framework
for a president to commit any acts here. She chooses this opinion as nothing
less than a blueprint for a lawless dictator to take root in the oval office
of the right house of the White House. The day is a dark day
for American democracy, says Representative Dan Goldman from New York Democratic Course, a
former federal prosecutor the Supreme Court. He says the Supreme Court's ruling gives expansive
immunity to a corrupt president who purports to use his acts within his official authority
to conspire to overturn a lawful election. Give me, I mean, this
is so pathetic, so pathetic. I remember I've played on here before.
I don't have the time, I don't have a queute up or anything.
But remember when Martin, what's it, Martin Sheen, I've out said Martin
short, that's not correct, Martin Sheen. He and a bunch of other
Hollywood celebrities, many of which were at least sea level or less, they
put together in twenty sixteen they were urging electors after after Hillary lost to Trump,
they put together an ad campaign when they stood in front of the screen,
I think with a white background, I believe, urging electors to vote
their conscience, urging electors. Electors by the way, that were pledged.
That's right, they were pledged to be Trump electors. Oh, we just
need a few of you, a few of you to vote. You don't
have to vote for Hillary. Just don't vote for Trump. We got to
keep him away from two hundred and seventy electors. Now, I remember talking
about this, I remember thinking how pathetic and stupid it was at the time.
I never once said they were trying to overthrow our democracy, as they
say. I never once said that they were trying to steal an election.
They were calling for people to do things that were clearly against the law in
their states in many cases. But be that as it may be, that
as it may. I didn't sit here and clamor about that. I didn't
say Martin Sheen should be locked away and the key thrown away because he tried
to overthrow our country. How ridiculously disproportionate is that? It's stupid? But
they have invested in this in such a way that they can't they can't even
put that toothpaste back in the tube. Is there's no way to undo this.
This is what they're stuck with. This is a narrative they have for
the rest, well, for the rest of their political existence. I would
say the current folks that have been uttering this non since I know the American
public has a very short memory, but still, my friends, still,
this is where we are finding ourselves today. Not only that they were saying
stupid things, of course, but perhaps the queen of the stupid things to
say comes from none other than Alexandria Acasio Cortes. Newsweek dot Com here says
this Supreme Court impeachment plan released by Alexandria Ocasio Cortes representative AOC announced plans to
introduce articles of impeachment against US Supreme Court justices on Monday after the court ruled
that presidents have immunity for official actions. This, of course, the same
a who was rocking up on stage with Jamal Bowman at a rally right before
he lost his primary fight. The same Jamal Bowman who pulled the fire alarm
breaking laws in Washington, d C. When the House was to vote I
forget the exact bill. I remember talking about it, but in order to
prevent the House, I think it wasn't a one of those bills to extend
to raise the debt ceiling or some such thing. Anyway, she is going
to announce a plan, apparently to impeach Supreme Court justices. So that is,
by the way, a legitimate power that Congress can have. Of course,
her application of it is far far from that. You also hear people
in the left talking about adding people to the Supreme Court. They like that
idea because they have three committed leftists who are going to vote for the this
ideology regardless of what the Constitution in the law says. All the conservative justices
do, for the most part, Thomas does this. Gorstich has seemed to
have done this. Alito is a good justice. He seems to do this.
John Roberts does not. You never have any idea where John Roberts is
going to land on anything. Amy Cony, Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh. I
think the proverbial jury is still out a little bit on these folks, although
most times they tend to at least try to apply the Constitution. Of course,
they're newer justices as well, but as as the constitution and as the
law demands. And that's really what it means to be a conservative justice today,
and to be criticized as that it means you actually follow what the law
and the constitution says. To be a liberal justice, you're there as a
political hack to try to push through your ideology even when it fails in the
legislative branch. That's what it means. That's it in a nutshell, And
I've got to take a break long in this segment, my friends, sit
tight back in just a minute. Welcome back, my friends. I want
to shift gears here a little bit and get into a couple of things in
this final segment quickly pertaining to Biden's candidacy, the potential of Biden staying or
Biden somehow being replaced by the Democrats, what that could potentially look like.
I'll get to that here in just a moment. But if you've been considering
reaching out to our friends at Harvard Gold Group about a potential investment in gold
or silver, if you want to learn more about that, let me tell
you here the commitment that Harvard Gold Group has to you the listener here at
the Todd huff Show and if you decide to become their customer, this is
their commitment to you. They have a low price guarantee that means they're committed
to offering you the best value possible. They will beat or match. They
will beat or match any competitors' prices. That seems like an important thing for
those of you who want to make sure you're getting the best value, the
best price. Customer satisfaction guarantee I've mentioned before car Harvard Gold Group is a
five star rated company that strives to maintain one hundred percent customer service satisfaction.
They strive to do that and so they are here. It's why they're here
to develop a personal and a long lasting relationship with you. And they know
it's an important decision regardment well because it impacts your financial future. So that's
why they're committed to providing you with the best experience possible, the best value.
When purchasing precious metals for direct delivery storage or in setting up up a
precious metals IRA price transparency, they communicate all fees and all costs associated with
your account. Again with the goal being to build a long lasting relationship that's
built upon trust and mutual respect. They also have what they call the Harvard
buy Back Program. They charge zero fees to their clients, and they understand
that providing you, the investor, the customer, with an easy, secure,
way to sell back some or even all of your precious medals is important.
So if you buy those from Harvard Gold Group, they have a buyback
program as well. To learn more, go to Harvardgoldgroup dot com slash Todd.
You can also sign up for the Free Investor's Guide while you're there,
or if you decide to make an investment with Harvard Gold Group, use my
name Todd and you will get a two hundred and fifty dollars credit. So
time remaining here. CBS News Major Garrett Major Garrett used to some time ago.
I remember him being on Fox News. Right, Fox News, I'm
pretty sure. So's he's talking about the Department Department Democratic National Committee's rules on
who the nominee for president is going to be. So I want you to
listen to this. So there's the whole primary process, right, and the
person who gets the majority of the delegates is the nominee. That's the process,
that's the rules, that's the way that it's supposed to work, and
right now, short of Biden being well withdrawing himself or becoming just completely incapacitated,
I guess something like the twenty fifth Amendment being invoked removing him from office,
something dramatic like that he is the nominee. Now the caveat here and
where I've always held out on saying the Democrats are stuck with this guy.
I think they're stuck with this guy if they follow the rules. But since
when have rules mattered to the Democrats? I've said before, Remember that they
decided to extend the amount of time you had in some states to get your
ballot back in some states in the twenty twenty election. They violated They clearly
violated state law when they did that. That wasn't even their prerogative, that
wasn't their job. They just arbitrarily Executives in the state said in certain states
said well, we're just going to extend it. Arbitrary stuff. So who's
to say ultimately what they're able to pull out of the hat here? But
the truth is they have if they follow their rules. I mean Major Garrett
is correct here, they don't have anything else they can do. But again,
when have they cared about rules. That being said, here is major
Garrett explaining really how the Democrats are stuck with Biden unless something, unless Biden
steps down or something dramatic happens. DNC rules are absolutely clear on this.
The threshold to be the nominee is one nine hundred and sixty eight delegates.
President Biden currently has and ninety four. Unless he steps down, there is
no mechanism to dislodge him from becoming the renominated candidate for the Democratic Party period,
end of story. There are lots of people who are talking about it.
But unless he removes himself or is somehow otherwise incapacitated, this is a
closed matter. It's a family matter at the moment, a very important family
matter, not just the family, but the broader Democratic Party family. DNC
rules are at right, it's on loop there, So that's that's again,
them's the rules that that's what you care about following rules. But again,
rules are for suckers, that's the if I'm quoting the how the left looks
at rules. Rules are for suckers and losers, So who knows what they'll
do. And if you've noticed he said, unless he becomes incapacitated, I
mean, given what I've heard these people say in the wake of that Trump
Court decision where presidential protections are extended to ex presidents regarding criminal prosecution, when
I've seen reactions of people calling for Biden to quite literally kill Trump, I'm
just telling you I'm not saying it. I want to be clear on that.
I'm not saying it. These lunatics are saying it. When you have
those people in the Democrat Party, I mean, it causes one to wonder
what on earth some of these clowns and knuckleheads are going to think is the
appropriate course in dealing with this absolutely abysmal presidential candidate. Anyway, folks,
I'm out of time here for the day. Thank you so much for listening.
I hope you have a wonderful day. SDG.