Attention. You're listening to the Tod Huff Radio Show, America's home for conservative
not bitter talk radio. The advice that the content of this program has been
documented to prevent and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean
to the right. Here's your conservative but not Bitter host, Todd Huff.
Welcome, my friends to the home of Conservative not Bitter Talk. I am
your host, the one, the only, the ever so beloved Todd Huff
Email. You know the game, You know the drill if you've been listening
for any link to time Todd at Todd Huffshow dot com three one seven,
two one zero twenty eight to thirty. That's the text line. Thoughts,
questions, feedback, adoration, and praise needs to accompany whatever you send to
either one of those, either the email or the number. It's good to
be here today. So you know, if you really want to know what
the left thinks about where we stand in this election, you really want to
know where, well what the left is preparing itself to deal with. I
think there's no better example of that, no better example of that than what
I heard what I heard from Jake Tapper the other day. Sorry, my
SoundBite has skipped the I have to reload it here. But Jake Tapper on
CNN is inviting well, let me just read you. This is a tweet
from a gentleman named Curtis how Curtis Holck is the managing editor of new NewsBusters
NewsBusters. In fact, you'll hear us from time to time reference NewsBusters on
here. But Curtis Howck tweeted this out. It's a clip from CNN.
Here's what the tweet reads from Curtis Howck, CNN's Jake Tapper and the cast
of the ultra elites at the Atlantic. That's a very radical leftist publication that
thinks it's much smarter than everybody in this audience. Want you to know that
they're very disappointed in you numbskulls who don't or won't, excuse me, vote
Democrat. In twenty twenty four, they just did fifteen minutes on why America
and the world would cease to exist if Trump wins. They truly hate you
and don't care you know it should there be an if in there. Maybe.
So they've got these elitists, these leftists, these radicals on here,
and so they're in panic mode. They're an outright, unmistakable panic mode.
So they've written in the Atlantic, which I'll put in today's show notes,
but they've gotten in this publication in the Atlantic, they've got a series of
I don't even know how many. It's like a If you go to the
digital version of this, there's so many articles about all the dangers of Trump.
It's like a landing page. So if you can, for those of
you that are tech savvy, or if you know what I mean from a
marketing perspective, So you click on the link to the article, and it's
not just the article, it's a link then to like sections of the article.
So for example, it would have one person writing about Trump's threat to
I don't know journalism. It would have another section, another link, and
this is at the top. I don't even think when I click on the
link that I can see any of the article. It's a series of articles.
It's like a it's like a mini series. It's like a book,
and it's got all of these threats. Trump on misogyny, trump on you
know, journalism, trump on who probably authoritarianism, trump on whatever, overthrowing
our democracy, which of course you know, we have a constitutional republic.
But the point is, the point is there's there's like ten or fifteen.
I don't even know how many. I didn't take the time to count.
It's just and it'll say, like you know, Author A on Trump's threat
to misogyny, Author B on Trump's threat to journalism, Author C. And
it's just a list of radical leftists, self appointed experts, elitists who loathe
the average rank and file American. And so this is designed, as is
everything that the left u is designed to further their agenda, further their cause,
to try to give someone some reason to vote for Biden, to not
vote for Trump. I mean, these things just taken on their own and
looked at for face value. My friends, these folks need to be evaluated
for some sort of a mental breakdown. This stuff is so ridiculous and so
absurd. In fact, the starting point of these series of articles is,
well, Trump was terrible in twenty sixteen in his first term, but he's
going to be so much worse. He's going to be so much worse in
his second term. We don't even know. Trump had every chance to figure
out all the ins and outs, and now he really knows, he really
knows how to navigate the system. In fact, you'll remember I've said on
this program, I'm pausing to think. You know Rush. I know Rush
used to say this. He says, I know these people like the back
of my hand. And he would also say, which is a much more
colorful way of putting it, Rush with this is Rush saying it. He
would say, I know these people like every square inch of my glorious naked
body. Is what he would say. And he did. He did,
and I think we all do too. We know who these these folks are,
and we've pointed out that this is what they were going to do.
They have no other option, my friends, they have no other option.
They cannot tell us reasons to vote for Biden. They cannot give us reasons
in our day to day life of things that are better. They cannot point
to something and say wow, look at They try to. They try to
do this with January sixth. They try to act as though we were on
the verge of our government collapse and give me a break. Absolutely, just
the ridiculousness of that entire argument. And again, people that broke the law
need to face the consequences. We would be nice to know how many people
were FEDS there understand really all the evidence of what was going on that day.
But no matter who broke what law, there needs to be consequence.
But that does not mean the only two options, the only two options for
January sixth, are not It was either the near death of the American governing
system or just a tour of the Capitol building that day. Those are not
the only two options. Reasonable people understand that, yes, there was a
protest, Yes there were plenty of people that didn't do anything wrong. There
were people that did do things wrong, and the ones that did need to
be held accountable. But they shouldn't. They shouldn't have things ginned up,
they shouldn't have a lack of access to due process. And that's what's happening.
And so they point to January sixth, they've compared January tomorrow. By
the way, today today is one of the days they compare to January sixth,
and I usually talk about this day. If you go back through the
archives of December seventh, you'll hear where we've talked about Pearl Harbor Day.
We'll probably do that for a bit. It's an important day in the history
of this great nation. It was an incredibly destructive and sad day for this
great nation in no universe. Should December seventh, nineteen forty one be compared
to January sixth, twenty twenty one the other day they like to throw around
flippantly without regard for reality. In comparing to comparison to January sixth is September
eleventh, two thousand and one. They literally compare those two days, those
two days where thousands of Americans were killed. My enemy force is won by
the Imperial Japanese, the other at the hands of the radical Islamic terrorists,
by the way, the kissing cousins of Hamas, who they also currently defend
today. It's just remarkable the series, the series of events that have gotten
us to where we are today. But they cannot make this election about anything
besides the un mitigated fear of Donald J. Trump. And that's what these
articles, that's what this article or series of articles I guess in The Atlantic
is about. So with that being said, good old Jake Tapper CNN,
he wants to wants you to believe he's a real, fair minded, objective
journalist. He invites some of these folks on. He wants his viewers few
and far between, though they may be. He wants his viewers to listen
to just how serious this really is. We're this isn't a game anymore.
There's real risk here for this country. I want you to listen. I'm
not going to play this whole thing. It's several minutes. In fact,
the whole thing I think maygo fifteen minutes, So don't worry about that.
I just want you to listen to get a feel about what's being said.
Hey, let's start done here. Warning twenty four. Leave a special issue
of the Atlantic magazine so that he lays at a detailed, compelling case that's
specifically helling what could happen if Donald Trump returns to the Oval office by Atlantic
writers outline how the threats to democracy will be bigger than ever before. Stop
that, now, listen. I don't care if there's two million essays,
Jake. What matters is the context. He acts as though the number of
essays that the starting point here is that. I mean, we've got this
regular journalists out there doing their work, and they were all just independently working
here, just you know, taking the day's events where the day's events might
take them, and they stumbled onto this, and they all realized Hey,
we're all writing about the same thing. Now he's not saying that directly,
but that's kind of the feel here, is it not we had twenty four?
Why else would he point out twenty four? Otherwise? Otherwise he could
have simply said the Atlantic called a meeting like we did here at CNN,
and they said, hey, I want each of you to take a subject
that's going to be worse when Trump is president, and a well, should
Trump be president in twenty twenty four? In fact, if James O'Keefe was
there, if he had the log in credentials for the Atlantics Zoom meeting Zoom
meeting room, then we might have actual evidence of this. It wasn't as
though these journalists just all happened to just by chance be writing about these things.
This is exactly the strategy, This is the intention, this is what
it is by design. And I've got a break. I've got a break
here, so we'll play this thing. More of this thing on the other
side of the break. The faux outrage, the fake panic too much for
me to take today, my friends, sits out. You're listening to conservative,
not better talk. I am your host, Todt huff back in a
minute. Welcome back, my friends. Sue listening here to this SoundBite,
be ever so panicked, Jake Tapper, I want you to know that democracy
as we know it. Of course, I know we have a constitutional republic.
I'm simply using their words. By the way, that is a code.
That's when they say democracy, and this applies anytime I say it on
this program. Just hear me out, democracy as we know it is at
risk when they say that, when they say Trump is a threat to our
democracy. Trump's going to end our democracy. Trump's going to overthrow our democracy.
Whatever I am hereby giving myself in this day today, December seventh,
twenty twenty three, this free pass up is going to apply to all points
at all shows that I've ever done that I talk about this so basically,
when they use that phrase, what they're trying to do, they don't really
get bogged down and defining words. They they try to find the words in
the way to phrase it that has the ability to elicit the strongest emotional response,
the strongest desired emotional response from those who hear it, and that is
one of fear. They want you to be so afraid. They want the
American people to be so afraid that they will cast a ballot for anybody who's
not associated with whatever scary term they've come up with. And so the term
is overthrowing our democracy, a danger to our democracy, danger to our institutions,
which suddenly they care about. They've been destroying these things for decades.
It's all a facade, it's all make believe, it's all faux outrage.
None of this is real. It's all about salvaging if they can the twenty
twenty four election. They are terrified of Trump in multiple ways. One way
that we'll get to as the program unfolds, that we've already touched. I
tell you some days I read the news and I think you guys are lucky
because we've talked about these things, in some cases years in advance of the
things that are in the news today. Because it's predictable, it really is.
And so none of this is real. And when they say again,
our democracies at risk, I know that we live in a constitutional republic,
and that matters. It's not a pure democracy, and there's some key differences.
A constitutional republic is designed to protect the rights of the smallest minority,
which is the individual, and so they enumerated some of the liberties. Some
of the liberties the founders would say, we're given to us by our creator.
Oh my goodness, gasp. Our creator is the one that give us
rights. Not the government, not someone who's been elected, not some elitist,
not someone who's a writer for the Atlantic. Our rights, your rights,
They don't come from any person. They come from Almighty God, a
virtue of being a human being. You have those rights no matter what Joseph
Robinette Bribery says about them, no matter what these authors at the Atlantic say
about them, no matter what take your pick, no matter what anybody says
about them, you have them. A democracy, looking, there are democratic
aspects in a constitutional republic. We have the right to be self governed through
representation and through the constitution, which is the rules. Them's the rules,
right, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights. We can self govern ourselves,
but there are certain things we can't do, and we cannot take away
the rights of the individual. It doesn't matter if ninety nine percent of the
people want to take away someone's rights. That's not the way that it works.
But that's not how the left. Now, the left has dumb people
down. The left has deceived people as to what a democracy really is.
There's a risk. There's certainly that the idea of self government governance is a
great thing, but there's a risk there's a thing called the tyranny of the
majority that the founders were terrified of. And if you if you look at
the landscape of today, it's these These are reasons why they were because people
can be stirred into a frenzy by these leftists, by these members if you
will, of the Seven Pillars of Propaganda, who are out there lying and
deceiving each and every day, stirring people into a frenzy, getting people to
abandon principles overnight because they're so afraid of something whatever. They've been stirred into
a frenzy over and the founder said, we want something that's not at the
whim of the tyranny of the majority. And so when I if I ever
say on here they're worried about our democracy, it's to use their own phraseology.
But it's also I'm not going to stop every time and explain that because
they don't have the time. And sometimes I see comments about people who think
I'm saying it. I'm simply saying the phrases. They're saying, we absolutely
unequivocally live in a constitutional republic. It absolutely positively matters. But I can't
stop and do that every time. So anyway, so what Jake Tapper here,
going back to this SoundBite, is that what he's doing, what they
are doing collectively. Maybe there was another meeting at CNN. Who knows chances
are probably better than not that they had a meeting and they said, okay,
guys, look, let's sit down here and let's talk about what we
can do to stop Trump in twenty twenty four because he's kicking our butts in
the polls. Biden is out there getting, you know, needing help off
of stages. We have no viable candidate. There's nothing good that hope.
We got open borders, we've got Yeah, we've stopped the rate of growth
of inflation, but we've done disastrous our policies. Of course they wouldn't admit
this, but the truth is their policies have done dramatic harm, great harm
to this country, to our economy. Everywhere we look, the world is
on fire courtesy of the leftist running this country. American weakness, it turns
out, is, as I've said for a long time American weakness is what's
truly provocative in this country. And so they go back to the playbook of
twenty sixteen and twenty twenty. Let's get people terrified of Trump. Remember in
twenty twenty, what did they say Trump? Everybody who died with COVID as
a reason on their death certificate was basically we were told Trump murdered them.
There are people that said that. There are people who said Trump murdered However,
many people finally had COVID as a cause of death and their death certificate.
We had people saying that Trump staged an insurrection and a coup on January
sixth. We've had people say all sorts of things, that he was collude
with Russia in twenty sixteen. You know the routine, you know the drill.
And so they say, let's go back to that. Let's get to
that. The people that are in our audience, CNN says, aren't gonna
be savvy enough to realize that what we're doing here is the same thing we've
done in the past. We're just gonna change it. In case they do
think of it, We're just gonna tell them it's gonna be worse we're gonna
tell them it's gonna be a little bit more dangerous than before because Trump's been
there. Trump is, you know, kind of got the blueprint of how
this whole presidency thing works. So we're just gonna we're gonna scare them into
thinking, yeah, well we were trying to tell you before if it comes
up at all. But if it comes up, we can say, yeah,
well we did tell you before, and yeah, well the country didn't
collapse, but it could have if it wasn't for Biden, it could have.
And this time Trump's gonna be worse. This time. Trump's gonna care
less about the constitution. This time, Trump's gonna care less about any consequences.
He knows it's his second term. Well I thought you told me he
was going to be the autocrat, the dictator for life. Well, that
too will make up your mind. Does he either not care because he knows
he's only got four years, or is he establising him establishing himself as the
eternal king of this country? Make up your mind. But it doesn't matter.
None of this matters because it's all designed to evoke fear. That's the
point. It's not to give you any information it's not to give you anything
of substance. It is to terrify you on an emotional level. And I
know, I say you, but you're above their abilities anyway. So here
we go. I'm going I rewinded this thing. I guess I'm born in
the I'm a child of the eighties. So I rewound it. And we're
starting this clipover. This is Jake Tapper introducing this scary series of articles in
The Atlantic. Listening Stark, starting in our twenty twenty four League Dark Morne
issue of The Atlantic magazine Today, lays out a detailed, compelling specifically,
what could happen if Donald Trump turns to the Oval office. Two dozen essays
by Atlantic creditors outline how the threats to democracy will be bigger than ever before,
potentially changing America forever. Some of those Atlantic editors and contributors join us
now. Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor, let me start with you these essays.
How Trump could carry out a revenge a retribution presidency, what might happen
to NATO, How women could be targets, How Trump will get away with
it all this time? And an editors note, you write, the country
survived the first Trump term though not without sustaining serious damage. A second term,
if there is one, will be much worse. Tell me about why
you decided to publish that's a sprawling account of what might happen. The impetus
of this list to this. I think that people have normalized the possibility of
Trump coming back to office. We get used to anything that's one of our
To the credit of human beings, we can get used to anything. And
I think we're too accustomed to the idea that he's coming back. And I
don't think people understand that that the Trump who comes back is going to be
very different than the Trump we had the first time. And the Trump we
had the first time culminating in January sixth was a pretty troubling phenomenon. But
I think this time he is coming bent on revenge. David Frum has a
very excellent essay about that. He's coming with the idea of revenge. He
knows how government works, he knows how he was thwarted the last time.
He's not going to be hiring the so called grown ups to run the cabinet.
You know, you remember Jamadis and Rex tillersoner John Kelly, all these
establishment figures who were there to Bill Bill Barr to keep him in check.
No more people keeping him in check, right, and so you know it
wouldn't be surprising, and is an expert on this, it wouldn't be surprising
to find him pulling out of NATO and your say, focus is on NATO,
which is the European aregra stuff? You get the idea. I'm not
going to play that. That garbage goes on for I think fifth the clips
five minutes, but I think that whole conversation, I believe is something like
fifteen minutes. You get the idea, timeouts in order, got some other
They actually brought up some terms there that you've heard on this program in the
past. I don't know if Jake Tapper listens in Jake, you need to
take some notes, buddy, because you got a lot of work to do.
But anyway, quick timeout is in order. All in good fun,
my friends, but we need to be aware. We need to be aware
of what we're up against. This is it. They are not masking themselves
anymore. They're actually showing us. The irony is so thick to me.
They think they're coming all serious to the podium and that America is sitting there
just with baited breath, waiting for them to tell us just how dangerous,
how serious is it Atlantic And they get all serious to the microphone. But
in reality reality, as they step up to that microphone, what they're telling
us is how dangerous they are, how dangerous, and how far they will
go to deceive the American people into making or manipulating the American people into choosing
what they want them to choose. Quick time. And this is what real
interference looks like, by the way, which by the way, they can
say whatever they want, but it's not real. This is fake, this
is made up, this is gender, this is not sincere. These are
jokers and clowns and professional deceivers and sophists. That's what we're dealing with.
Quick time. Out back in a minute, and welcome back, my friends.
As I was perusing for show prep these past few days, I came
across an article that said gold has reached an all time high. Gold has
reached an all time high, and they expect gold to go even higher.
Did you know that gold has outperformed the S and P five hundred and the
Dalla since nineteen seventy one? Important here, when the US took the dollar
off the quote unquote gold standard. Have to ask yourself, is that a
coincidence? When the US government allowed people to own money, excuse me gold
again, they reclassified gold as a commodity rather than a paper currency backstop.
Even though the US itself hoards and holds the highest amount of physical gold in
its reserves, all the countries, all the central banks, major institutions,
and even the IMF, the International Monetary Fund owned substantial gold holdings. If
all the entities that control fiat money paper money, money that's not backed by
by gold, physical gold, if they have that gold, doesn't it make
sense to consider owning gold yourself. My friends, you can do that by
contacting our friends at Harvard Gold Group. You can visit them at Harvard gooldgroup
dot com. You can use promo code Todd my first name, and you'll
get a two hundred and fifty dollars credit when placing an order there again Harvard
Gooldgroup dot com. That's Harvardgoldgroup dot com. Use code Todd, promo code
Todd to get a two hundred and fifty dollars credit. So, as we
discussed last segment, we have, of course panic on the left, and
they're starting to use terms, they're starting to repeat things that I have said
on this program, things that you know, in fact, the day Biden
walked into office, I was gonna pull this sound bite, and I forget
exactly which there's one or two phrases I used. I think I called it
payback politics. The era of payback politics have begun retribution politics. So the
irony here is that we are currently in the period of political retribution. This
is something I condemn one hundred percent. This is something I don't want Republicans
to do. I don't want Trump to do. I want justice to be
done. If it is just that the things that were done to Trump or
to conservatives, if justice demands certain consequences, that I'm one hundred percent on
board with that. But I do not, I unequivocally refuse to support the
idea that because they the left have a bu used the powers of government,
that we should That's again, when we look at this impeachment situation, it's
the same sort of thing I've said before. Obviously, Congress has a constitutional
responsibility and a constitutional right to impeach the president of the United States, but
context matters. Just because Trump was impeached twice, by the way, doesn't
mean that the starting point is that we need to by definition, just automatically
impeach the next president if it's not a Republican, that is going to cause
more harm on this nation than necessary, and arguably it could cause more harm
to this nation than she can survive. But context matters. Context matters.
So if you have people running the government who are corrupt, which we do,
let's just say, let's just say, for the sake of discussion,
say that we have a group of people that are actively trying to weaponize the
Department of Justice, as I think we do, which basically means they are
doing precisely what precisely what should not be done with government. The most terrifying
use of government when one political party gets control of government, they use it
to go after their political enemies on the other side. That is, folks,
we are nearing the day of death for the Republic if that is in
fact where we are. But let's say, let's say one side is actively
using the government to do that, and then the other side comes in and
there's objective evidence that that's what the previous folks in the government were doing.
There should be consequences for that. But we shouldn't then use the government to
say, Okay, let's just go after anyone who didn't like us last time,
right, And that's it. It's like a pendulum swinging back and forth,
except for this pendulum. You know, eventually, if you just release
a pendulum and let it go, it will eventually lose this momentum and subtle
at a complete stop. This one is picking up momentum. It's being pushed
by the powers on one side. It's being shoved, and then when it
blasts into the people on the other side, they say, oh yeah,
well what about this, and they push it further. So instead of it
settling at an equilibrium, it's actually going further and further. It's more like
a wrecking mall than it is a pendulum. And so that's what's happening,
and that that is what is happening in the in this government. But they
are the ones that are doing this. It's not that they are warning us
that Trump might They are actually by by virtue of how they are going after
Trump. They are the ones that are doing this. They have weaponized,
clearly, they have weaponized the Department of Justice. Clearly, they have used
the government to insulate and for tech the Biden administration and the Obama administration when
President Bribery was then Vice President Bribery. Did you see that Joe Biden used
alias emails to send three hundred I forget the number, three hundred and fifty,
three hundred and sixty some odd emails to one of Hunter's business associates over
nine years and email alias, right, So they didn't He didn't want you
to know who it was coming from. Tried to throw people off the trail.
When you do the math, it's almost an email a week. It's
really it's three emails a month, basically three out of four weeks. He
was emailing over nine years, just on average. I'm not saying that that's
how. If you look at it wasn't every week on the dot, you
know on the dot. And there's emails that were going between Joe Biden and
Hunter's business associate when Joe Biden was in Ukraine, when Joe Biden was throwing
down verbally threatening Ukraine to withhold funding if they didn't get rid of the prosecutor
that was going after Bearisma. Of course Hunter was involved with Bearisma, and
there's plenty of reason to see that. There's lots of evidence of corruption here,
lots of evidence of corruption, paid to play sort of stuff. Now,
if there wasn't evidence of any of this, you would not hear me
arguing for impeachment. But there is evidence, there is evidence. Now we're
going to be accused of targeting Biden for political retribution because they impeached Trump.
They're going to say that we're weaponizing the government. Whatever. Context matters.
Context matters, and there's a rationale, a reason. I just laid it
out. It's pretty clear. It's pretty straightforward for anyone who wants to be
objective about it. In fact, one of the things I've got I don't
have time to do it is I was looking and comparing and contrasting Trump's first
impeachment, Trump's second impeachment, and then what might might be happening here with
Biden. And the difference is stark, my friends, as Jake Tapper would
say, stark differences. Oh my goodness, there's such dramatic. There are
dramatic differences here. Though, timeouts in order a little bit long this segments.
It's tight, my friends. When we get back, I want to
talk. I told you this is December seventh. This is Pearl Harbor Day,
a day that the Left compares to January sixth, which is absolutely atrocious.
It's not laughable because the American lives were lost on Pearl Harbor and it
started World War Two, which ultimately ended in US dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima
and Nagasaki in nineteen forty five. And anyhow, I want to talk about
that today, as we normally do on December seventh. Quick time about my
friends back here in just a minute, welcome back to my friends. Today
is December seventh, December seventh, twenty twenty three. On December seventh,
nineteen forty one, America was officially well because of the acts taken on that
day, America officially entered World War Two. America had been you could say,
begged by Winston Churchill to join the war for some time, as Hitler
was on a rampage in Europe, but America stayed out for a good reason.
I mean, look, it's complicated. Obviously, you want to when
you understand and come to grips with the fact that Hitler wanted to truly rule
the world through his maniacal regime, of course you would want to stop that.
But it's understandable too that America had just gone through World War One.
It was not some thing America wanted to get back into. They didn't want
to be fighting Europe's wars. There's some I mean, we should at least
understand that it's a good thing to try to avoid war at all costs.
But Churchill was pleading with America to enter FDR would not and until December seventh.
December seventh, nineteen forty one. Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. I don't
know if you've had the opportunity to go there. I did visit Pearl Harbor
twenty some years ago, and it's surreal in a sense. You can,
of course see the USS Arizona directly beneath the memorial, not very far where
there are still well where American soldiers lost their lives, where there are still
what became their their grave, and you can still see oil coming to the
surface from the ship. And it's, you know, I don't know what
I was expecting when I went there, but it's I think it's smaller than
I had anticipated. The body of water. It's and when you see it
and you see pictures of you know, overhead of the of the harbor where
the ships were located and stuff. During that particular day or you know,
time, you can see how the plan was to Basically, the Japanese plan
was to blow the ships up, so especially those that were by the entrance
and exit of the harbor, so that they had nowhere to go. And
it was basically like I mean, shooting fish in a barrel. They had
nowhere to go. They of course, the Americans fought back valiantly and everything
else. But to compare that again today, I'm normally we talk about that
and how that led to World War to the American involvement the South Pacific,
and everything eventually led to the atomic bombs being dropped at Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
But to compare that to January sixth, twenty twenty one is amongst the most
deceptive, manipulative, ridiculous comparisons that I can think of. Today's December seventh,
nineteen forty one. Let's remember those who valiantly fought and defended this country,
giving their lives ultimately at Pearl Harbor. Quick time out my friends back
in a minute. Welcome back to my friends. So I mentioned I alluded
to Pearl harbor Day. Last segment, we talked about it, but this
again. When America entered the war, she fought through well two fronts,
the European theater and the Pacific theater. And this led I mentioned to World
War Two, whose well to fight in Japan dropping the atomic bombs, which
was a terrible decision, but the calculations that were made as Americans were island
jumping regaining the territory that had been taken over by the Japanese, the losses,
the casualties that would have been inflicted upon the American forces were astronomically high,
and so they made the very very tough decision too that it was a
better strategy to drop those weapons. Years later. Anyway, today's for Harbord.
They gotta go friends. STG.