Into this nightcap full throttle now with my Rep from the fourth District the Commonwealth
of Kentucky and the US House of Representatives at full disclosure, a guy that
I have voted for and will vote for again in this next election cycle,
and proudly do it because I feel like he does truly represent my values and
the values of the other three quarters of a million or so maybe more constituents
in that fourth district. The one and only US Rep. Thomas Massey on
the nightcap, and Thom it's great to talk to you again. It's been
a long long time, but I think it's high time that we do have
this discussion. How are you. I'm doing well and I'm glad to be
able to reach your listeners who listen at this hour. All right, first
off, they're doing it again. Well, they being you as a member
of this body, threatening us with shutting the government down and the omnimous spinning
Bill and all the rest of this garbage. I've always thought that the budget
thing was ridiculous because you know exactly what you've got to do. You've got
a cut spending if you're going to actually make a debt in thirty four thirty
four trillion dollars in debt if you're going to not have to pay a trillion
dollars in interest payments on that debt. And it's it's a pretty simple thing
for anybody who's ever balanced a check book, and apparently most of a lot
of your members at least have not ever had to balance their government pay checkbook.
And you know, you've been full, i mean fully voiced on this
full throated voice on this toime all along about what needs to happen. So
so tell me you're in the slim majority in the House. Are the Republicans
going to pull together and get something together at the last minute just for political
purposes like they always do? Well, listen, this is I think the
fourth or fifth last minute that we have. You know, don't forget.
This spending bill was due at midnight on September thirtieth of twenty twenty four,
and it didn't get done. We were working on twelve separate bills. We
had had like seven of them done. They punted, they did a CR,
they did a CR, they did a CR and so the next two
crs they split these two and they split the twelve bills into like two sets
of four all right, so there's two crs that expire on two different dates.
This is like some strategy thing that's the forty chess, but which obviously
I don't buy into. But there's going to be. There would be if
we don't do a CR or an omnibus or something we should be doing twelve
separate bills, there would be some kind of partial shutdown in March, and
then in the second or third week there would be the rest of the government
would shut down. But you know, I've been there twelve year, and
here's what they do, Gary, Jeff. They they come in and they
scare everybody and they say, you need to vote for the shut or for
this omnibus bill. Yeah, and it's got a lot of crap you don't
agree with. But if you don't vote for it, the shutdown will happen.
The soldiers won't get paid, you know, the air traffic controllers,
you know that that'll shut down. Like they give you this apocalyptic scenario,
and that's pretty effective at scaring a lot of my colleagues. Enough of them,
and then the Democrats as well, they love more spending and big omnibus
bills, so that's how they get a majority in the House of Representatives to
go for the omnibus bill every year, and it's like groundhog Day. And
I decided last year, let's change the rules of the game. So when
they wanted to raise the debt limit, I said, okay, if you
want to want this to go through Rules Committee, which I serve on now
regards us the weather, I vote for this thing when it gets to the
floor or not. If you want it to go through the Rules Committee so
it can get to the floor, then you have to add a provision which
says all of government discretionary spending will be cut by one percent if six months
from now you're still doing CRS. Okay, now here's the It was my
plan. So you know, I may think it's more brilliant than it is,
but let me explain what's happening now. If they do a CR that
goes past April thirtieth, all of government gets cut one percent, yes,
and yes, all of discretionary. And I know people who are listening say
one percent, you need to cut it, ten percent, you need to
cut it thirty percent, and they're right. But Joe Biden has signed that
one percent cut into law. So here's what gives us the high ground of
Speaker Johnson will use it. If we just merely put a CR on the
table for the rest of the year, the Democrats have to vote for that.
How can they argue against a bill that basically just cut copy paste Nancy
Pelosi spending from last year to this year. I mean, we could basically
just be carbon copying their last budget. That's what a CR is. So
they would have to vote for it. But when April thirtieth comes, everything
would get cut one percent. And not because we have to put anything special
in this CR. It's because they've already agreed to it last summer as a
condition of getting the debt limit bill through the Rules Committee that I serve on.
So it's not forty chess, it's just checkers thinking six months ahead.
And we are almost to that point where you get that one percent cut,
and Joe Biden can't go on TV and say this is austerity, this is
evil because he signed it into law last summer. Now, what I'm afraid
they'll do, and what I know they're planning to do if we can't stop
them, is they're planning to do an omnibus this month, this coming month,
in March and they're planning to spend somewhere around sixty billion dollars more than
Nancy Pelosi spent in the biggest budget she ever passed. Wow, and we
control the House. We should not be doing that. The reason they want
to do that is they're afraid of the Senate. But I'm making my case
to Speaker Johnson and their people in Ohio represented in Ohio like Warren Davidson and
Jim Jordan who are making the same case to Speaker Johnson with me, that
in order to gain the high ground, we should let them throw us in
that briar patch, do the continuing Resolution and wait for the one percent cut
to kick in in April. And then at that point they are going to
squeal, They're going to squirm, and there and there will be willing to
negotiate for policy the things that we need to get done in America, like
securing the border. Uh So, But and then if they don't agree to
secure the border, then they get everything cut one percent and they get zero
ear marks, no ear marks. Well, this sounds like a wonderful plan.
Finally, there is a plan that has some some semblance of fiscal responsibility.
Tom, You're swimming. You're swimming with a with minnows a term you
coin a majority majority in name only? Why now we know? We know
that the Democrats are populated by leftist and Marxists who you know, don't really
have the interest of their constituents at heart generally, or they'll they'll sell it
that way, but the results say differently. Republicans, on the other hand,
seem clueless as what to do when they have a leadership role. And
it seems that way again. And as your listeners are probably familiar with the
term rhino, we have lots of rhinos in Washington, d C. Republican
and know him only. But I coined this term mino a couple of weeks
ago because I just feel like we're the Jordy and name only at this point.
You know, when Nancy Pelosi's in the majority, she gets the Democrats
to jump through hoops like poodles. They line up and do the thing.
We are having a hard time getting any kind of consensus in the House,
But you know, I don't. Mike Johnson, our speaker, was put
in a difficult situation. I do not think we should have changed horses in
the middle of the stream. I don't think we should have vacated Kevin McCarthy
when we did, because, frankly, he was working on the twelve separate
bills. He helped me get this one percent cut into law as a condition
of the debt limit increase. He was thinking ahead, and then they took
him, shot him out of the saddle. So now we've got Mike Johnson
who doesn't have the tools to keep the majority in line. You know,
when the speaker becomes a speaker at the beginning of a Congress, there are
people who feel indebted to him because he helped them win their elections. There
are people who feel indebted to him because he put them on certain committees that
he could take them off of. There is none of that allegiance that exists
right now. You're saying, you're saying he doesn't have leverage. He doesn't
have a carrot, and he doesn't and he's not willing to use the stick,
and so he has no leverage. I've heard, I've heard the man
speak, and I have immense respect for him, especially as a believing Christian
and some of the things that he's put forth and kind of stood fast.
But you're right, if he cannot leave from a speaker's position because he doesn't
have the carrit or the stick. Then I get your point absolutely well.
And here's just an example of a couple of things that have happened as a
consequence of that. We were going to reform the FISA program. That's a
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. That's the program that's supposed to be used to spy
on foreigners without a warrant. But they've figured out a way. They think
it's a legal loophole. I think they're running through the constitution. Though they
running over the constitution. They have used this Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to survive
to surveil Americans without using a warrant. And so Jim Jordan made this a
priority to fix in our Judiciary Committee. I now serve on that committee with
Jim Jordan. We put a warrant provision in that program, and we wanted
to bring that bill to the floor. The Intel Committee, which is actually
chaired by another Ohioan, Mike Turner, Yeah, disagreed with this. They
said, no, take the warrant provision out and we'll put that. We'll
put the FISA bill on the floor and then you guys vote on whether to
put the war you can have a vote of the whole House of Representatives on
whether to put the warrant provision back in. Well, that feels a little
bit putting the Constitution in jeopardy, but we agreed to those terms of engagement.
This was a couple of weeks ago. We were going to bring the
bill to the floor. We was coming through the Rules committee that I serve
on, and the Intel Committee just said, we're going to take the whole
bill down if you bring this to the floor. So they threatened to basically
shut everything down, and so instead of bringing the bill to the floor,
we ended Congress early. Mike Johnson said, Okay, we're done, no
more things to vote on, and we went home early right before this latest
recess without having taken up that warrant provision because basically, Mike Turner and some
of the other Intel Committee folks just threatened to shut the whole process down if
we proceeded even on the rules of engagement parliamentary engagement that they had demanded.
So what was what was the reason that Mike Turner, for example, didn't
want to take the the warrant thing out of the Explain that to me again.
Well, why why Mike Turner doesn't want to have the warrant in there?
Yeah, and why didn't want to still allow to have a vote on
whether to put the warrant in the warrant requirement in there, right because they
want the status quo. The the Intel Committee is responsible for oversight over CIA
NSA outwardly directed Intel just activities. The Fights of program falls under the jurisdiction
of the Intel Committee and the Judiciary of Committee, and we are responsible for
the intelligence operations that are directed at civilians. In other words, the FBI
and the Intel Committee, frankly, they're over writing their jurisdiction. They're trying
to legislate in an area where they don't have jurisdiction. Want that because the
FBI has their ear on the Intel Committee. They're supposed to be doing oversight
of the intelligence agencies and the Executive Branch, but I feel like they are
captured by the Intelligence agency. It sounds like the FBI is doing oversight on
the Oversight Committee. Yes, yes, yes, I wanted to ask you
someone we're talking to, Thomas Massey. By the way, real quick,
if we had a police officer and everybody's living room, we'd all be safer,
but we agree that's not how we want to live in this country.
Hell no, all right, Tom, you you caught flak on previous funding
measures for for not supporting Israel. Can you tell me about foreign aid and
what's going on in the in the in the Congress and why this has been
so contentious and why you have been against this foreign aid because I again,
you're you're championing things that I believe in too, so I appreciate it,
but just explain yourself on this on Ukraine and Israel specifically. Sure. So,
we've we've probably had two dozen votes on Israel. I'm sorry, let
me do Israel. Second, we probably had two dozen votes on Ukraine.
Yeah, and I have voted no on every one of those. That is
not our conflict. The Europeans, if they cared, they need to fund
that. Uh. And I've just been against it. Even before the war
started, I was against it. And so by the way, we can't
afford it. You can't. This is the other thing. You can't balance
the budget and send tens of billions of dollars overseas. And now we're at
the point in Ukraine where we're not just paying for the lethal aid. We
are paying pensions for government retired government workers in the country of Ukraine. The
Ukrainian government. Why Why Because because this whole war has devastated their entire economy
so much and hollowed out their coffers, that they don't have money to pay
the pensions of the people who've retired from their own government. So why There
is no good reason. I'm just telling what's happening, all right, So
let's let's let's do let's do Israel. Yeah, So what they've decided now
is, you know, typically we've spend about it's about three point eight billion
dollars a year to Israel. They received more financial aid from the United States
than any other country right now that we're out of Afghanistan used to be Afghanistan,
but Israel's the number one recipient of US four and eight. I'm not
particularly for that. I've never been for foreign aid to any country. This
year, there was that three billion dollars in our own defense funding, so
and I voted for our own defense bill, even though I disagreed with some
of the things in it when it was one of twelve separate bills. Right,
Okay, But they've decided that now instead of three point eight billion,
they need fourteen billion, which became seventeen billion, and Speaker Johnson had a
plan to pay for it. He's gone offset from this extra money that goes
to IRS. I did not vote for the seventeen billion, but it did
make it through the House with that offset. Now they're trying to remove the
offset and just send them the money with no concept of how that's going to
be offset anywhere in the budget right And something that I learned a few weeks
ago that really made me mad. And I learned this in a briefings public
knowledge, so it's not classified, but I just don't think anybody's reported on
it. Our small arms manufacturers are ready to send AR fifteen's to the people
who are most vulnerable in Israel, and our government is stopping that transfer from
happening because they don't want the people of Israel to have firearms. And so
the fourteen or seventeen billion dollars of additional money that's in addition to the three
point eight that's in our own defense bill, because to Israel, that additional
money is all for things that raytheon Lockheed Martin and Boeing by this is to
enrich the military industrial complex, which they now call the Defense Industrial Base.
Sure enough, some of that money will come back to Ohio and Kentucky and
your listeners in Indiana. But that is not it's not sustainable. It's not
all of the money. And then it's ultimately getting drained and going overseas,
and if it's in the case of munitions, it's being blown up. Finally,
finally, Thomas, I'm just I'm just I'm just go ahead, please
finish, just to close that out. The attack that you saw Hamas do
on Israel is despicable, but you weren't going to stop that with these things
that you buy from Raytheon. You need it. You needed small arms.
You need soldiers on the border and a better wall and being prepared for it
right, uh, real quickly. But I'm sorry, time's so short,
man, and we don't have a uh too many chances to talk, but
uh on the border. Joe Biden said two weeks ago that there's nothing he
can do. He's done everything he can. It's up to Congress. He
needs more and more and more money, of course. And now and most
people like me and you who have paid attention over the years and know how
the government works and what an executive can do. He could have just undone
what he did on day one when he when he got into the uh he
got into the Oval office yea, and reverted back to Donald Trump's policies on
the border, and we not we would not have seen this invasion at all.
And now he's correct. Now he's talking about uh, you know,
well, maybe I'll just use my executive fen to sign Well, Joe,
why didn't you do that three years ago? Yeah, the remain in Mexico
policy. There's three other different policies that he could implement that he just fails
to do. And you know what he wants. What I worry he's going
to use the extra money for is just to process more of these claims quicker
and bring them into the country quicker yep. Or to give bunny to NGOs
who are actually helping them in their in their travel through Mexico. Oh,
the n g os you mean the cartel's partners. Yes, their partners,
they're partners. Yes, all those good charities who are partnering with the illegal
uh human human smuggling, drug smuggling cartels. Answer, that's great here and
if and if you don't believe any of that. Here, here's the best
evidence he's insincere when he says that he can't do anything. The one thing
he is doing is taking down what Texas has tried to erect to keep the
illegal aliens from overrunning taxes. Exactly he did. That's how you know he's
in sincere. And he says he can't do anything because the thing he is
actively doing is trying to let them in. By the way, we could
address that problem in the next spending bill, whether it's an omnibus or whether
it's twelve separate bills, or whether it's a cr All you need is one
sentence that says, none of the money hereby appropriated to the executive branch can
be used to disassemble barriers erected on the border by the States. Thomas Massy,
thank you very much. I love your one sentence bills too. Take
care. Thomas Massey from the fourth Congressional District in Kentucky, my representative on
the nightcam News, Traffic and weather News Radio seven hundred WL Cincinnati. Stepping
into block of merger with the nine point thirty report, I'm Sean Gallagher breaking
now the nearly twenty five billion dollar merger between Cincinnati bas Kroger and Albertson is
is now facing a legal challenge from the Federal Trade Commission, as it argues
in a lawsuit it would eliminate competition and lead to higher prices for millions of
Americans. Scott Beck, who's a marketing professor at Xavier University, believes that
the merger will actually benefit consumers. I think it is really clear Alberson's is
for sale, so if not Kroger, than whom. But a different view
by Eleanor Fox is an anti trust expert at New York University. These companies
will probably get a lot of bargaining power against suppliers and workers, and we
know that the FDC is very concerned about that. Kroger and Albertsons, who
are the fifth and tenth largest retailers in the US, announced that merger back
in the fall of twenty twenty two. Now the latest traffic in weather together
right now taking a look at the major interstates and highways, not seeing any
near reports of accidents. Now, the ladies forecast from the Train Heating and
Cooling Weather Center on News Radio seven hundred WLW tonight is increasing class Now it's
a chance of rain overnight in a low of fifty four. Our Tuesday,
spotty rain and clouds a high as sixty nine. At night, We're going
to see rain and storms develop late, a marginal risk of severe storms overnight
a low of forty five. And on Wednesday, we could see floorries from
your severe weather station. I'm nine first warning cheek Meteorologist Steve Rawley, News
Radio seven hundred WLW Welt of Claude. Right now, our current temperature is
fifty eight degrees. Cincinnati Police investigating after a man is found dead in Avondale
this afternoon. Officers responding after five o'clock to carp And Place near Running Robe,
where the victim was found shot inside a vehicle, pronounced dead after being
shot at least fun time. Facing a March fifth deadline, the Bengals use
the NFL franchise tag. It's a move that comes with a hefty price tag.
The Bengals have officially designated wide receiver T Higgins as the team's franchise player
this offseason, meaning when free agency starts up next month, the fifty year
wide out will not be eligible to negotiate a contract with any other team.
His agent can negotiate a long term extension with the Bengals, and if one
is not worked out before mid July, Higgins will earn just under twenty two
million dollars for the twenty twenty four season and then hit free agency next year.
Higgins has over thirty six hundred yards and twenty four touchdowns during his first
four years, and Stripes head coach Zach Taylor, in his statement, says
he's glad that he'll be sticking around to be a big part of the Bengals
offense. I'm Ricky Yuchino, who's Radio seven hundred double wel split squad Cactus
League action for the Reds today as they fell in Goodyear to the Mariners too
nothing, but in Phoenix that squad defeated the Brewers eight to three. The
Reds will visit the Cubs at Mesa Tuesday afternoon, with the Inside Pitch starting
coverage to two thirty five on Fox Sports thirteen sixty with a three ZHO five
first pitch. College basketball you See will visit Number one Houston Tuesday night,
with pregames starting here on the Big One at six thirty five, tip off
at seven o'clock Kentucky's up on spots a number sixteen in the latest Associated Press
Pull, while Dayton drops five spots to number twenty one. Yukon, who
was number one in the country for six stra eight weeks, falls to number
three after a loss of Creighton. Our next update is at ten o'clock.
I'm Sean Galviager News Radio seven hundred WLWL. Don't miss hearing Bengals coach Zach
Taylor at the Friars Club Annual Dinner Friday, March first. The Friars Club
provides organized youth sports and leadership programming to over one thousand kids each year,
and the Friars Club is thrilled to honor Taylor as the Coach of the Year
at their annual Friars Club Dinner March first at five thirty pm. It's the
Friars Club biggest fundraiser of the year. You won't want to miss it.
Visit Friar's clubink dot org or called five one three four eight eight eight seven
eight four to get your tickets. Today it's the Marketer's Report Today. Capital
One's Chief brand Officer, Mark Mintry weighs in on building loyalty with customers.
Capital One has really worked to create amazing access moments for our customers anywhere from
when we have a live event, there be customer event ahead of that.
We will do sound check parties that only Capital One cardholders can get access to.
And we can't pull that off without the relationship iHeart has with the artists
with venues to create these really exclusive events. Festivals that iheartputs on gives Capital
One the ability to create those moments. People are passionate about their favorite artists
and so we try to tap into that together. As the number one audio
company, iHeartMedia gives marketers access to all from national to local, every audience,
live conversations, trusted influencers, and the insights and data you need to
grow. Not just a media company, iHeartMedia is your access company. If
you're a marketer, go to iHeart results dot Com. At Sharmon, we
hired just shouldn't talk about going to the bathroom in public, so we decided
to thing about it when you're rolling Showman thre WLW. One thing I enjoyed
doing every once in a while on this program is to re air interviews that
I conducted over the years with the late and I truly mean Great low Ponte.
He was a great writer, thinker, He was a fantastic man.
He was a personal friend of mine, and when he passed at well just
before twenty twenty three, it was a definite blow. But I'll always be
grateful to God that he allowed me the chance to get to know Loll Ponte,
who was also somewhat of a prophet. Let's listen to an interview from
January tenth, twenty twenty two. As my wife Chris to two point zero
is being tucked into bed right now or hereabouts, she loves to listen to
Lowell's voice. So honeysweet dreams here once again, an interview with the Great
Loll Ponte on the Nightcap. Welcome back into the Nightcap. And because you
asked for it, well somebody did. Maybe it was me who asked for
it, because I asked for it. A full hour of Ponte power pontification
from the highest level, from one of the best sources I could think of,
or somebody who will actually talk to me still, the Great Loll Ponte,
author and racconteur, longtime editor and columnist, and my friend Loll Ponte
joins us for the entire eleven o'clock hour on tonight's night Cap. Good evening,
mister Ponte, what a pleasure to be here as always, well,
you know, and I can never come up with a magnanimous enough intro for
you, so I'm just reaching looking for, you know, higher and higher
levels of worship and kudos that you deserve definitely, So that's another reason.
Now, well, the challenge. The challenge is just to settle on a
topic and do a lot of research on it, that's all. And you
have definitely demonstrated the ability to do that. And thank goodness you have because
because I really don't have that kind of time. Well, somebody has to
do it, especially if they're bored and aging. But the challenge in this
case, this is an amazing day in America because finally we have a definitive
document from a Nobel Prize winning scientist, Luke Montaignier, winner of the two
thousand and eight Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, and he is concluding now
that while people are debating should we be forced to take the vaccine or not,
he has found that in the case of the Pfizer and the MODERNA vaccines,
that they lose essentially all their positive ability to hold back COVID after about
thirty days. Wow, And that after thirty days, by ninety days,
this is the part you would find especially endearing. After ninety days, you
actually, if you have taken the vaccine, have a greater risk of coming
down with COVID than if you had not taken the vaccine's doing so. It
actually, it actually is a pandemic event that Biden and company used to talk
about, you know, that would spread disease, or that doctor Fauci and
the philosophy of Faucism was teaching, if you have a Christmas party, you
have created an event potentially that could spread the disease. Well, it now
turns out that taking the vaccine may spread the disease. And this is from
a Nobel laureate scientist. Yeah, he's not exactly a slouch, and he's
not a YouTube troll giving misinformation to the masses, even though I'm sure that
at Facebook or whatever it now calls itself or Twitter or like they are,
we have nineteen year old student radicals who know nothing about life or science willing
to censor this Nobel laureate scientists because he is not following the party line.
But even the party line has been bending of late, the party line on
disease. According to the head of the CDC, Rachel Wolinski, she admitted
a day or two ago that seventy five percent of COVID deaths were people with
four or more co morbidities such as old age, obesity, diabetes, other
problems such as cancer and cancer chemotherapy. So, in other words, these
people are not really dying of COVID per se. In three out of four
cases, they're dying of a combination of maladies, any one of which could
have killed them, but they just so happened to be positive for COVID nineteen
of the stars COVID two a coronavirus. Well, as you and I have
discussed though in the past, the government from the beginning the bureaucracy was offering
money incentives to any hospital in New York. It was at least three thousand
dollars per hospital. In Montana, one hospital was offered up to four hundred
thousand dollars for every case that they attributed to COVID and put that on the
death certificate. So there was a tremendous financial incentive. You know, we're
talking about a condition where For example, let's look at New York University's Langne
Hospital as a sample for the nation. One of their chief physicians and experts
on COVID admitted in a Fox interview a few days ago, and I'm saying,
like, no later than a more recent than Friday, maybe and maybe
no, it would have been Friday. But she acknowledged that at least sixty
five percent of the people they had hospitalized with COVID in fact, were hospitalized
for some reason other than COVID. And as we know, this incentive was
quite powerful. They were documented cases of people who died of motorcycle crashes who
when their body was dragged to the hospital, was found to have some degree
of COVID infection. There was a case of murder suicide famously in Grand County,
Colorado, where a husband shot his wife and shot himself and they were
both listed as COVID nineteen deaths by the state examiner or whomever, yes,
or as a Bill Clinton political consultant put it, you drank one hundred dollars
through a trailer park, and it's amazing what you can pick up. So
the government was raging thousands, even hundreds of thousands of dollars through hospitals,
and it was amazing how many deaths they could attribute to COVID that way.
Well, people who are listening to this, lol, because it becomes very
personal if someone you know has died and the cause of death is listed as
COVID and they obviously had a respiratory infection, whether it's COVID or not.
In many cases certainly it could be. And they hear this logic and sense
being doled out by people who have more pedigree to know what's going on than
you and I, and they still go, well, my mother passed of
COVID and it's not pleasant and it's not good. In other words, their
emotions get in the way because of their personal experience of the actual facts and
what this actually is, don't they. I'm not saying that COVID did not
influence no their relatives having a tragic death. I mean, obviously COVID is
not a nice disease, except in its current form, where it's more like
the common cold, running nose and a sore throat. Yeah, but for
instance, we had what last Friday, was it, Supreme Court Justice Sonya
Sotomayor declaring that there were at least one hundred thousand children in American hospitals,
many of them on ventilators, she declared, and all on the verge of
dyne. The CDC actually debunks what she said. The fact sector and said,
no, this is not anywhere close to correct. What are you talking
about, lady, Well, let me do their own exact statistics. Yes,
for disease Control said at the moment SODO mayor spoke. According to their
statistics, there were three thousand, seven hundred hundred young people, not one
hundred thousand young people. And this is in the country of it more than
three hundred and thirty million people. And if their own director's analysis is correct,
we are likely looking at in the death risk anyway, three quarters of
those who are severely infected suffering from a series of comorbidities, any one of
which could be the cause of death. Well, we've not been honest too
about one of those co morbidities that has been associated with a good mini listed
COVID nineteen deaths, and that is gross obesity. We have a problem in
this country saying that people are overweight, or you know, to use the
most common term fat, which of course has been poo. Food is politically
incorrect, And you can't call anyone fat, you can't fat shame anyone.
But it is true that one of the populations that has mostly been severely affected
by this infection lull. They all have that in common is gross obesity.
And no, but you made a very important point there, as you so
often do, Gary Jiff, and that is we are now told by the
politically correct that you cannot fat shame people. That's another way of saying you
cannot bring peer pressure on them to lose weight, to stop eating as much
as they eat. Now, an extremely obese person, I suppose has the
right to be obese. You might get one of those cable television shows where
you talk about you and your sister each weigh in a thousand pounds. I've
seen the promos. Wonderful. I've never watched that once, but I've seen
the promos and I was just like, a really okay, people are into
this apparently. Point is the politically correct are enablers of obesity because they attack
those who would fat shame people who would encourage them not to be as fat
as they are. That is a kind of peer pressure that in that case
might be beneficial, but they are not allowed to apply that peer pressure because
it's so wrong to do that, even if it may cost the person's life.
So you can decide for yourself. The Biden administration, at the same
time it plays these games, is actively supporting the left point of view that
one must not In fact, I imagine there's even an office at the CDC
which has recently issued a directory of language you should not use. I'm sure
that includes language that constitutes fat shaming. So they're prohibiting people from actually using
the problem that Biden himself is facilitating death from COVID by not put any pressure
on people who were overweight. Yeah, and then instead, you know,
trying to force them to get the jab in their arm, which, as
you mentioned at the top of this conversation, may actually increase the likelihood of
you getting the disease as a fully vaccinated and boosted person, at least through
the Pfizer and the Madonna Yeah, go ahead. Yeah. As a footnote,
we should add one proviso here, and that is the government, including
the CDC in company, years ago, issued its conclusion that eating fat was
bad for your health, and so the food industry promptly sought out other ways
of making the food it was selling palatable and what did it choose, Well,
it gave you no fat or low fat food, but food with higher
levels of sugar in it. Not good because diabetic like imbalances, and of
course diabet diabetes is one of those potential mortalities. Yeah. Co morbidities with
COVID, yes, no morbidities yes. So as a result, we are
seeing that the government encouraged the changeover from fat, which it turns out is
actually quite good for you. I mean, when you call someone a fat
head, that could be a compliment because about a third of your entire brain
is fat. I mean, fat is essential to health. So if you're
if you eat, if you were eating someone's brain, it might be delicious
because of all the fat. I might also give you kuru. The disease
from New Guinea that is like the slow disease in American deer and other thing.
It's like the Great Beef slow disease that people were panicked over the way,
the mad cow disease. Yeah, the Jacops Crutchfeled disease, an article
about which I wrote and readers digest so well. I'm I could remember things
easily, I could discourse. I do I do. I do appreciate you
bringing that to my attention, but I thought you did it specifically because you
thought I might want to eat a human brain. I have no desire.
Well, I'm reassured and deeply jumported by learning that in any event, we
have this challenge. Oh, by the way, so the mayor, I
think, if you have a Supreme Court justice as wrong as she was,
as wrong as Briar was in his similar panic. See, this is one
thing that's very common on the left. Researchers have found if you ask a
leftist how many people are at risk of dying over of this this COVID disease,
they will answer fifty percent, sixty percent, whatever, when in fact,
a miniscule fraction of one percent of the population on average is at risk
of dying theoretically, and among children, among people say under twenty years of
age, the risk is essentially zero. And yet we have this obsession with
forcing young people. It's down to age two now that they're pushing forward,
amazing, it will soon insists on disgusting your child while it's still in the
womb. It's disgusting well, especially since the vaccine may in fact cause the
disease or may cause variance of it. And it's the variants that are now
a major problem for us. This Nobel laureent you quoted, this Nobel Prize
winner in Physical and Health that you mentioned at the top, Who said,
who made this claim about the vaccines actually making it more likely you could contract
the COVID infection afters did he give any specific reason? What was a specific
reason this was occurring. I've heard of something called immuological confusion that these spike
protein vaccines, like the ones that are out now may cause in a human
body. Well, I don't recall the term he used, but what it
amounts to is, if you create an ata body to a virus that's in
your body, the virus will respond by endeavoring to mutate, because after all,
the virus wants to live, yes, And as a result, mutation
of the virus is speeded up by that process. Now, if you had
natural immunity, if you had caught the disease and your body responded, your
body responds with all kinds of different antibodies, so the virus faces a challenge,
can be killed or driven out. But if you are only dealing with
the spike protein as these modern modern aphis or vaccines do. Then the virus
simply finds a way around that, sure, and as a result you wind
up with a significantly different virus. The general tendency in natural virus is to
become more infectious but less lethal, And this too is part of the logic.
You know, if not all parasites and virus do act like parasites in
the human body, not all are as dumb as missiletoe, which is quite
capable of killing the tree that it has built a home on. Now,
of course the tree dies, then you die, right as the missilete.
So normally the pattern of a virus is to become less lethal. You don't
want to kill the host ideally, and so you mutate in a direction that's
more infectious, that can spread faster, but that is less deadly. And
that now is for the most part, what we're seeing. The exception.
Course, we're plunging into winter, and every year as we plunge into winter,
there are more covid like diseases, common colds and the like that strike
us because we tend to go indoors with other people lol. Lol. Last
week, I'm listening to the top of the hour news, which I rarely
do anymore, even on our station, and the announcer the newscasters said,
there are almost as many cases as there were last year at this time.
Well, imagine that just exactly what you're saying, what you're pointing out,
it's a seasonal endemic. Now it's not a pandemic anymore. It's an endemic,
and the omicron proves that. And more and more people are professional doctor
people, researchers are saying this very exactly. But if Joe Biden gets his
way, and if millions more are mass vaccinated, that will accelerate the creation
of variants which could be much more serious. Absolutely, listen, Lowel,
we got to take a break for the half hour news. You will come
back right, absolutely wonderful. Lowell Ponte is our guest. This is the
nightcap more right after the eleven thirty news, which is coming up on seven
hundred WLW. Fellas, if you've been feeling tired, grumpy, maybe notice
a lack of motivation, drive into another hour on seven hundred WLW, Gary,
Jeff Walker back, which you and I got to tell you of all
the key landmark guests that we've had in this program. This guy's been one
of the more impactful on me, and he will from the truth in the
data that he has brought out. He is the executive director of the CO
two Coalition, a geologist, the author of Inconvenient Facts several years ago,
which was a multiple times best selling book on climate and the actual data,
the scientific data on climate, and now A very Convenient Warming, his latest
book, How Modest Warming and more CO two are benefiting humanity. CO two
is not a poison. It's necessary, folks, time to listen up and
listen to the actual truth. And that's what's come out of the UN or
the WEF or any of these other places where their scientific research has been bolstered
by lots of money, people who have an agenda, my opinion, to
push a certain narrative, which is, you know, man is killing the
planet, fossil fuels are killing the planet. This just does not, simply,
this does not seem to be true at all. If you look at
the data that Greg writes, Stone and his other cohorts and the references in
this book will show you plainly if you don't have it and you have questions,
and as Greg says, Greg, I got to tell you I was
talking with someone else who was kind of on the side of the facts and
not a side of the climate cult or agenda that's being pushed. You're a
strong proponent too, of the scientific process. The caller said, well,
why don't you just show both sides. When did protecting the planet become political?
And I said, well, the other side is on display all the
time, this side is not, and you are a proponent of that.
Let both sides be fairly heard. So in an effort to do just that,
we have got you back. Greg Writestone, Good evening and welcome back
to the show. Yeah, you're right. The other side, those that
are promoting this false theory, as it turns out, of man made than
climate catastrophe, just they get they get their message promoted twenty four to seven
by the mainstream media. While we are silenced. Those of us with we
call ourselves climate royalists, they'll call us science denials. Nothing to be further
from the truth. So thank you for having me on. I appreciate it.
Well, the science denial is actually coming from the other side that's calling
us climate deniers or science deniers, and it's it's all bast backwards, just
from the the information that you brought forth and many many other sources are now
you know, starting to a little bit come around anyway, First, go
ahead, what'd you have? I say, we'll just get into it here.
I know you want to talk about historical data and human history. And
so when we do talk about be thinking about this, they call us a
science denial and I'm a scientists, but I would call them history redni ers
because when we look at actual history, it doesn't conform at all with what
their contentions of unusual and unprecedented warming. Well from the data that is on
display in your book of very Convenient Warming, I want to before we get
to human and what humanity has been benefited from over time, whether it's warming
or cooling, the correlation of which there is no correlation for three hundred and
sixty years. I'm looking at this chart here, page forty four, Figure
thirty two between temperature global temperature and atmospheric CO two parts per million. One
of the things that is always pushed by the other side of this issue,
Greg, is that the warming temperatures increase the CO two levels in the atmosphere,
and that just is simply not true if you look at the actual data
between temperatures and the carbon dioxide in points parts per million in our atmosphere.
Right, I'm looking at this, that's right, And we can in the
book I capture how it's incorrect that CO two is driving temperature increases. Whether
it's looked on tens of years, hundreds thousands, or millions of years,
there's just there's just no correlation between it. In fact, in many cases
it's just been the opposite. We know over the last eight hundred thousand years,
actually temperature was driving carbon dioxide levels. That's changed all since the middle
of the twentieth century because we started adding huge amounts of CO too, thankfully
to the atmosphere, and so so now this increase in CO two is from
our burning the fossil fuels. Prior to that last eight hundred thousand years,
has temperature increased to cause the oceans to increase, and in the oceans when
they increase, they expel CO two kind of You can imagine if you take
a lead container of ginger ale pulled out of the bridge it barely yes,
here will go off. Put that out in August on your picnic table in
the sun and open it up. Man. I think I'll go off like
a volcano because the liquids are expelling it like you dropped a Mento's tablet into
it just expas. Yeah. So, in this particular chapter, and I
don't know if it's a chapter, it's a part two of a chapter.
Humanity and Climate is a title Blessed Warmth Horrific Cold And you start by saying,
are we destined for the catastrophe of a climate apocalypse due to an unnaturally
warming climate? Or do the prognosticators of doom have it exactly backwards? Might
a warming planet bring great bounty? This section will examine the historical consequences of
past warming and cooling to find out if the Earth and human kind suffered or
benefited from temperature increases over the last several thousand years. A problem right now
is that a lot of a lot of younger generations in our society think that
the earth began when they were born, and they're sadly mistaken, as you
talk about them, lacking any historical context for what has happened. Let's start
with the early human history, going back to about five thousand BC. What
does the data actually show you. Well, if we start with the first
great civilizations, they first arose and profited and bloomed. The great empires and
civilizations was up the first and in a really warm period called the Minoan Warm
Period. It coincided with the Bronze Age, and so we had the Assyrians,
the Hittites, the Babylonians in the Indus River valley was the Corpas Empire
that we may never have heard of that, but they were a huge empire
in India, in the subcontinent there, China, Egypt, and then it
was much much warmer than it is today. Oh no, I'm looking at
the chart. It's it's like about almost ten to five to seven to eight
degrees warmer Celsius on average during the Manolan Warm period. Yeah, I liked.
I like to use historical data. People understand that the graph you're looking
at was was called proxy data, and they use oxygen isotopes to do it.
But people don't understand that, but they do understand historical references. Like
if I tell them that they were growing a crop called millet and Scandinavia,
it's only grown in subtropical climate, so it had to we know it had
to be a lot warmer at that time because of things like that. Just
global historically records of where they were growing, what kind of crops, and
it was people prospered, great empires arose, and then it started getting cold,
and it got cold quickly, and all of these great civilizations, with
the exception of the ancient Egyptian Empire, and they barely survived by the skin
of their teeth. All of these empires within they think fifty or one hundred
years, all collapsed and it was related to this cooling effect. And what
we see every time it got cool colder, we had crop failure, crop
failure, famine, pestilence, and nasty population. These were horrific times,
the cold periods, and it really that led to what was called the Greek
Dark Ages, where we really don't know a whole lot about it because all
these great empires and civilizations and the scribes kind of went away. It was
masty population and things didn't really recover in terms of civilization and empires until the
Roman warm period again christ two thousand years ago. Uh, the Romans were
growing citrus in the north of England. Life was good again. The Roman
empire and in its army marched on its stomach and there the supplier for Rome
was North Africa, Egypt, Tunisia. We hardly think of them as the
bread basket for the world today, but at that time they were. And
then again there are a lot of reasons why the Roman Empire collapsed. Uh
we think that temperature and the cooling was part of that, and it could
have driven the Germanic peoples come that came down the increasing cold could have driven
them south into the u to take over parts of the Roman Empire. But
again when after that, it was the Dark Age as a cool period with
again crop failure, famine, pestilence, and nasty population. And then the
final warm period before our own was the Medieval warm time period. Again warm,
life was good, was bountiful. And then the last cooling period was
the Little Ice Age, and it was thought to be with pretty good evidence
it was likely the coldest period of the last ten thousand years. This period
in the sixteenth and seventeenth century, and we know that again from historic record.
Just for example, I'm calling you from Arlington, Virginia, in just
eighteen miles south of where I am. Martha and George Washington lived in Mount
Vernon and Martha loved ice in her summertime, drinks so George constructed an ice
house and they he would have his slaves and servants down cut the thick ice
out of the Potomac River every winter, and they bring it up in June
August marth they had icebur drinks. Well, the last time the Potomac even
froze over much less that's solid, was some twenty five years ago, so
we know we know it was a lot colder at that period. Again from
historical data and the current period of modest warming that we're experiencing right now.
And by the way, the CO two levels in our atmosphere are not historically
high now either, but that's not necessary. That's not necessarily a good thing,
because the more CO two in the atmosphere up to a point, the
more the planet animals, plants, human beings flourish. Yeah, it's we're
at four hundred and twenty parts per million. I'm not going to throw a
lot of numbers at you, but that's that's fifty that's a fifty percent increase
since the Industrial Revolution began. And that's a good thing because the historical historic
levels throughout our history was twenty six hundred, which is six and a half
times what we are today, if we look at it in the big picture,
we find out that our current carbon dioxide levels, we're actually CO two
impoverished. We don't have too much CO two, we don't have enough plants
will evolved needing these higher levels of CO two. So even at today's higher
CO two rates than it was one other fifty years ago, it's still not
high enough for optimal plant growth. And in fact, at four to twenty
if you have a marijuana greenhouse, you'll you'll talk to these guys. They
buy canisters of CO two because they want they want that pot growing. And
it's just not pot in marijuana, it's it's greenhouses that grow tomatoes and everything
else. They add CO two, they usually take it up to about twelve
hundred parts per million, which is three times as much as what we are
today, And plants would still benefit at even higher levels, but it becomes
a cost benefit that they have. You know, it gets too expensive getting
too much CO two. The plants even can grow fast or even in exceeding
twelve hundred parts per million, three times where it is today. Plus and
here's the thing is that when these CO two levels rise, and the the
best awkwards part about this greg that we referred to at the beginning of our
interview was that the other side, the climate cultists who are claiming we need
to capture CO two so it doesn't go into the atmosphere, they are actually
doing everyone and the planet a disservice. When do they talk about trapping CO
two coming out of the back ends of cows, or you know, capturing
CO two out of the ground or out of the ocean to make sure it's
none of that nasty stuff is in our atmosphere. The fact of the matter
is we could use more and not less, and CO two is not pollution.
You're right, we just I just got back from Wyoming. I spent
four days, five days actually in Wyoming touring the state. We are late
this report. It's Wyoming and climate change. Carbon dioxide should be celebrated,
not captured. And this was a response to Republican Governor Mark Gordon's proposal to
decarbonize the West. And he's teamed up, believe or not, with Doug
Burgham and the South Dakota Governor Christy Noom. They're all teaming up because they
think there's too much CO two and they're going to capture it. They want
to decarbonize the West. But they're so misled, and so we wrote this
report and we looked at what's actually happening in Wyoming. We find that although
temperature since eighteen ninety five has increased a little bit, it's mainly being driven
by an increase in the coldest nighttime temperatures, which is good. I mean,
it gets really cold in January and February Wyoming at night. And what
this does with these warming nighttime temperatures means that growing seasons are lengthened. And
we can see that. I documented my book that the growing season the continentaly
the United States has increased by more than two weeks since nineteen hundred, So
we have killing frosts and earlier in the spring arrived later in the fall.
If you're growing an apple orchard or you have apple trees in your backyard,
what do you fear the most. It's a late spring killing frost that will
just wipe you out for the year. Because of this warming, we have
more crop productivity. So we've got these things all turbocharging crop productivity and again
in the brook a very convenient warming. I look at the top eight crops
in the world by tonage produced to find that they're each one have been breaking
records year after year after year, and this in spite of like global increase
in temperature. So did you have a chance to talk with Wyomings governor or
Doug Burr Room or Christine Nome while you were out west? Do you have
an audience now or a connection with them? But we did testify before the
Wyoming Senate Agriculture Committee. I spoke at two community colleges and the University of
Wyoming, all warmly received. People just thirsty for this information, and so
it was it was great. I had a chance to tour the Black Thunder
coal mine, the largest coal mine in the United States, very impressive,
along with the gigantic shovel of the largest of the world. And we toured
a coal fired electricity generation station, Dry Fork Station in Gillette, and it
was it's really impressive and they were in full operation and their stacks you couldn't
even see anything coming out the top because the only thing coming out the top
of that stack was carbon dioxide, the miracle molecule that's hugely beneficial in water
vapor and so it's it's clean technology. They're calling carbon dioxide in a pollutant.
But it's just as not. It's again we call it the miracle molecule.
Have you done any research, Greg, And we've just got a short
time now on man made chemicals that are polluting the atmosphere and are harmful.
Oh sure, you can. Just a Google search of EPA and pollution,
those two words and you'll get the EPA's study of the top eight real pollutants,
not co two real pollutants like knox socks, particulate matter. They've all
been in a fifty year significant decline and they've pretty much flattened out. Although
they've because it's been our air is so plain. Now they're going instead of
determining parts per million, they're going, now, well we want to reduce
it down to parts per billion. And it's giving the very last This is
really expensive, been probably unmed it's a but no, our air and our
water are cleaner today than they've probably been for more than one hundred and fifty
years. If you remember, you know Lake Erie was a toxic mass with
the three rivers in Pittsburgh were horrific. The Cauihoga River caught on fire for
crying out loud. Well, even the Ohio River at a time, you
know, not so long ago, fifty sixty years ago, was not in
the situation it is now. That runs right through downtown Cincinnati. It's much
cleaner than it used to be. Of course, its origin there is.
It is at the point in Pittsburgh the Ohio River that's the confluence of the
Alleghany and the Monongalia. Again, it was so polluted, nothing lived there.
Today they're having bass master bass competitions every summer there because it's so clean,
and it's that that's what we should treasure that. That's a really good
thing. We should be proud of that. Well, we'll leave it with
this Greg for you the listener. It's late at night, and if you're
ready to bed down, you can sleep well. There is no climate crisis,
correct, Amen, brother, Amen, A very convenient warming from Gregory
Wrightstone, executive director of the CO two Coalition, once again a guest on
the program. And thank you again for all the great data and information Greg,
to set some things straight. I appreciate it. Thanks so much.
You bet. It's the night Camp and it rolls on in minutes on seven
hundred Wlwad Doscinnati, author of A very Convenient warming get to the CO two
coalition. Every summer, every wildfire season, we're hit with the just bold,
stark headlines of man made cause climate change producing more and more wildfires,
and it's sensationalized and it's just crazy and it's crap. From nineteen twenty six
to twenty eighteen, the area burned millions of acres of wildfire in the United
States, from a high of over fifty million acres in nineteen thirty to a
low of less than ten million acres in twenty twenty two. That's the actual
data. So don't be fooled by all the bombastic headlines and people literally with
their heads on fire, no pun intended trying to make the claim that driving
your combustion engine or fossil fuels are causing the planet to burn. It's simply
not true. Thank you News. Just ahead, and then we'll talk to
Scott Kappus about where it's legal to own what as far as your Second Amendment
rights go in different states around the country. He publishes a guide every year
about new gun laws, which are not needed in my opinion, but anyway,
Scott kapp is on the night Cap here in just a few on seven
hundred WLW News Traffic and Weather news Radio seven hundred WLW Cincinnati. A Cincinnati
grocerer's quest to merge one of another giant hit with a lawsuit with a ten
to thirty report. I'm Lee Mawen breaking now. The Kroger Company, the
second largest grocer in the United States, first announce a merger with the Boise,
Idaho based Albertsons in December twenty twenty two, but now is met with
resistance via a lawsuit by the Federal Trade Commission. ABC News is Derek Dennis
has more not so fast with proposed merger between Kroger and Albertson's. The FTC
suing to stop the nearly twenty five billion dollar deal, arguing in court documents
with stifled competition and cause grocery prices to spike from millions of Americans. Xavier
University marketing professor Scott Bicks is just the prospect of such a deal spurs interest.
One thing that is really clear. Alberson's is for sale. So if
not Kroger, than whom if approved, a combined store chain would span forty
eight states with seven hundred thousand workers. Derek Dennis ABC News now the lightest
traffic and weather together. It's looking good Cincinnati. And how bad that ramp
from seventy five South to seventy four West. In case you haven't drove on
it yet, you can find a video of it on the Twitter page of
seven hundred WLW. Now the Ladies. Forecast from a train heating and cooling
weather center on news radio seven hundred WLW heading to our Tuesday morning, A
few showers possible, a morning low of fifty four, mostly cloudy four r
Tuesday and a few scattered showers, a high as sixty nine at night,
Storms develop late, A marginal risk of severe storms overnight. A LOA forty
five from your severe weather station. I'm nine first warning cheap Meteorologist Steve Rawleig
Radio seven hundred WLW. The closest source of precipitation at this time is Western
Missouri, meaning the radar in the Greater Sinsina area. All clear. It's
fifty nine degrees. Time's running out on keeping the government open, as Congress
has already passed three temporary spending bills and might have to pass a fourth later
this week. ABC's Andy Field tells us about the latest effort to prevent another
government shutdown. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell warning fellow House Republicans they must vote
for another temporary spending bill to avoid another government shutdown, saying that will require
that everyone rose in the same direction toward clean appropriations and away from poison pills.
Those poison pills are partisan add ons that the Senate Democratic majority will not
accept, forcing a shutdown. Andy Field, ABC News, Washington Red's Update
the first split squad day of the spring training campaign. The Reds split it
on Monday. The game you heard on Fox Sports thirteen sixty had the Reds
fallen goodyear to the Mariners two to nothing. In Phoenix, the Reds were
victorious over the Brewers eight to three. And tomorrow afternoon, the Reds will
visit the Cubs of Mesa Well, first pitch scheduled at three oh five on
Fox Sports thirteen sixty. In college hoops, you see will visit the new
number one team in town. That would be the Houston Cougars. Tuesday night
tip off is seven o'clock here on the Big One. Pregame six thirty five
Tomorrow evening and back to the polls, Kentucky is up one spot now at
number sixteen. Dayton falls five spots after the road loss at George Mason to
number twenty one in the newest Associated Press poll. Our next update is at
eleven o'clock. I'm Lee Mawen News Radio seven hundred WLW, seven hundred WLW,
Cincinnati, available everywhere with the iHeartRadio app now number one for podcasting seven
hundred WLW and iHeart Radio station. I'm getting vaccinated with me back into the
Nightcap on this Monday evening. And we have the author of the Traveler's Guide
for Gun Owners in all fifty States. And if I botch the title,
I'm sure he'll correct me. He is from out of Covington. I believe
his name is Scott Kappus, and he is a proud American, a proud
Second Amendment advocate and our guest. Hey man, thanks for being on the
show, Scott. Yeah. I thought with an introduction like that, I'd
like to make a can that and use it in future future additions. Because
that was great. I appreciate it very much. All right, So what's
the official title of this guide that you put out every year? You were
very close The Traveler's Guide to the Fire arm laws of the fifty States,
all right, And this is important for gun owners from people who are exercising
their Second Amendment as they travel from state to state, because well, our
federal Constitution says we have the right to own and bear arms, and that
right shall not be infringed. There are states who dance around that. Different
states dance around that Second Amendment, and some are pretty creative in their tap
dancings. The state of New York is one I know for sure that doesn't
understand the spirit or the intent of the Second Amendment, or at least their
governor, Kathy Hochel doesn't. And even though they lose in court cases with
their absurd gun laws, they find ways to skirt around them, and they
did that with the latest, the Bruin case, I believe. But if
you will tell me which states are the freest when it comes to upholding the
Second Amendments, God, well, we have quite a few in the southeast
and the Rocky Mountain West. I'd say Kentucky as very good as is Ohio.
Ohio used to be not quite as free, and over the last ten
years, through efforts like Buckeye Firearms Association, they have May Ohio a very
good state for guns, as is Indiana. And if you go through the
southeast, most of your southeastern states are good. The southwest, the Northeast
seaboard is probably the worst. And you mentioned New York, and it's kind
of funny because what you said it frames it perfectly. The Supreme Court said
that New York's way of issuing permits was completely contrary to the Constitution, and
instead of accepting that and saying, Okay, we've got to get our situation
here in line with what the Constitution says, they say, okay, fine,
we'll issue permits on a shell issue basis, which basically means there's no
sheriff intervention. If you qualify along the preset line of qualifications, you will
receive the permit. Instead of simply doing that and leaving it as is,
they said, fine, we'll issue permits, but we're going to ban carry
in just about every public area. So you went from basically having restrictive permits
and relatively free carry. Once you got your New York permit, there weren't
a lot of places that were off limits to where now, yeah, you
can get a permit in New York without having to know somebody locally, but
they essentially ban carry in quite a few public areas to where it makes it
almost impossible to carry anywhere. Now they're challenging this in court. It's going
to probably go back to the Supreme Court. But it's an example of where
even if you win at the Supreme court level, the state that doesn't like
guns is going to find some way to circumvent that. And you know,
their attitude is, hey, it's your tax money, we're going to use
it against you, and if you don't like it, move out of the
state. And I think that the local governor said the same thing a few
weeks ago. She said that, you know, basically she wanted everybody didn't
agree with her to move move south. And of course that's what's happening New
York and California. You're both losing population. They are hemorrhaging people both states.
Yes they are, and it's because of policies like that. And of
course when you tell people if they're not wanted, and that's even worse.
It's like it used to be, theocrats would at least try their best to
convince everybody. Now it's almost like they write off half the population and say,
hey, you don't like it. We don't care. We're just going
to import some more voters and run over you with whatever we can run over
you with. And you know, I've always told people this, there's no
such thing as a blue state. You've essentially got red states with big blue
cities. If you look at New York, New York, most of it
is red. Western New York is just like Kentucky, Ohio in terms of
the people and their attitudes. But the problem is the five boroughs of New
York City. They've got twice as many people as the rest of the states.
So they're going to control the politics, and they're going to make it
one one hell of a bad place to live. And finally people are realizing
that and they're moving out, But unfortunately that's not going to help the people
that are stuck there. They're doing a great job of totally destroying New York
City right now with the illegal immigrants and sanctuary city and the sensitive areas like
Times Square where shootings and stabbings are happy almost on a regular daily basis.
And if you know, a responsible, law abiding citizen who had a firearm
could probably diffuse these situations and these migrant beatings and everything else that we're seeing
going on in New York and some of these other large cities. Chicago is
another great example or a terrible example, depending on your side of the fence
of what I'm talking about. And the gun laws in Illinois, which have
also been very, very contentious and have been challenged in courts and they still
are being Tell me about Illinois, Yeah, well, Illinois, it was
the last stay to not have any permitting system in place to allow public area
of a loaded gun, and back in twenty thirteen they were forced through court
intervention to reform that. And it did get better. I mean, I
will say Illinois is better than it used to be. And they did preempt
a lot of the local laws that were in place in cities like Chicago for
handgun carry, but there are still restrictions on local restrictions on say like what
they term assault weapons, which are essentially semi automatic rifles. And also Governor
Pritzker, he's been instrumental in passing assault weapon and magazine bans that affect the
entire state. So it's a bad state by any stretch. But it did
get better. I mean, it got better from a permitting standpoint. They
at least do issue a permit. They ban it in almost every place that
you can possibly carry. They issue out of state permits to a few to
residents from a few select states. So unless you're for one of those states,
you're not going to get outside permit or a non resident permit, and
aven if you did, they charge you like three hundred dollars for that permit
and you have to go through hoops to get pat The one benefit is if
you have a permit from your home state, you can have the gun in
your cars you're passing through Illinois. Well, that support helps. That was
my next question, Scott. If you're taking a trip and you're going west
from Cincinnati from northern Kentucky and you have to pass through Illinois, if you've
got your legal permitted weapon with you in your car as you're traveling, what
do you need to know if you get pulled over? It Well, as
long as you've got a license from the state that you live in, you're
good to go. Now. The way their law is written, it says
if you're allowed to carry publicly in the state you live in, which technically
that means even if you don't have a permit, if you come from a
constitutional carry state, and you're not a fellow, you should be good to
go there. However, what they require for proof, you know, the
policeman on the street proof is a concealed carry license. So there's a bit
of a contradiction there. In court, you could probably win the case,
but when you're traveling through I don't know if I want to risk it.
I'd want to have a permit from your home state. And as long as
you've got that, you can have that loaded gun in your car if you're
pulled over. There's no requirement that you declare it when pulled over unless the
policeman asks for it. In other words, some states were the states that
would require you to volunteer the information first. Illinois simply requires it if the
policeman asks if you have the gun or if you have the permit. Now,
a lot of these states, I'll caution you, they have a license
plate readers, and sometimes your concealed carry status is on your license, and
so they might know you've got the gun before you even get pulled over.
So to avert a bad situation, sometimes it's good to at least let the
guy know you've got the gun with the permit, but at least you can
do that going through Illinois, which you couldn't do that prior to twenty thirteen.
Well, would you call an AR fifteen or an AK forty seven.
Would you call them assault weapons as they often are, not the ones that
are currently being sold as over the counter semi automatics or simply replicas of what
would be a true assault weapon is defined by the military is a weapon capable
of select fire. You can go between semi and full auto. The problem
is a lot of these bad states have redefined the term assault weapon. They've
defined those semi automatic replicas of true assault weapons as being assault weapons. And
so that's kind of where you run into an issue. It's when the left
controls the language, then they can control laws actually used. And and you
know, there are plenty of examples of this, you know, just like
when they refer to a normal straight guy assist gender. I had no idea
what that meant, but then I realized they're you know, they're making me
into kind of a weird sounding title. And they do that on purpose.
It's it's their way of controlling the narrative because they control the language. And
that's exactly what they've done with with guns is they've they've redefined these these semi
automatic rifles as assault weapons. They do and they're not in a technical sense.
They become that. Yeah, they do this all the time with a
lot of things, you know, gender itself. It's supposed to be about
language, not about sex. Scott Kappus is our guest again. Give me
the full title of the book, Scott The Traveler's Guide to the Firearm Laws
of the Fifty States. Where can it be found. It's on Amazon,
It's also on my website, Gunlawguide dot com. And I advertise in the
National Rifle Association magazine. So if you're a member of n O, I'll
price the display ad for it, and you can certainly use that because it's
pretty prevalent in the American Riflemen in Shooting Illustrated and American Hunter and a few
of the other magazines that NRA publishes. If you're taking a trip, you
should have this in your possession and know what the laws are where you go.
Scott Kappus, thank you so much for being on the show tonight.
Garry, thank you very much. I appreciate it. I enjoyed it very
much. You bet you. We'll we'll have tap Scott back and we continue.
The wild Man is coming up next on seven hundred WLW. Hey Cintinni's
former Bengal and Pro Football Hall of Fame Anthony Munias. Are you or someone
here? He is back for another bite on the Nightcap on seven hundred WLW.
My friend, your friend wild Man forever, wild Man Walker? How
you doing? Wild Man? Just back from the the Blue Jackets Rangers game
in Columbus yesterday, right? Uh yeah? Blue Jackets beat the Rangers four
to two, ending the Rangers ten game franchise time winning streak. It was
a nice win for the Blue Jackets fans. They haven't had much to cheer
about all year. Of course, they cut the Rangers kind of in a
down spiral because they were they just played the Flyers the night before, so
they had to fly in and they probably really didn't have their legs. But
I mean, it's a nice win for the Blue Jackets who are going nowhere
where the Rangers are going to the playoffs. They've had a great season.
Yeah, do we really need another major league NHL team that close to Columbus?
I mean, you think we could You think we could spread out the
losing here in Cincinnati. If we had one two donkeys will fly first before
that happened, Okay, wanted to talk to you over the weekend. Of
course. Major League Baseball spring training now in full full tilt. Man,
they're going at it in Florida and in Arizona and over the weekend, and
the Reds, by the way, are two and oh wild man, it's
better than no one too nothing. It means a damn thing. But what
if they were owing too, if they were owing to Gary Jeff social media
know it all would be saying fire David Bell and bring back Joey Vado and
trade this guy. Because that's how that's how they are. You know,
spring training means nothing, that never has never will. I remember the Washington
Senators back in the late sixties. I think they lost like three games in
spring training and everybody was all geeked up about the Washington Senators competing for the
American League, the Pennant. They finished like forty five games out, lost,
lost over one hundred games. Right, that's same Washington Senators team.
Yeah, you know, you know we don't. We don't have Senators in
Washington anymore unless you count those adults up at Capitol Hill. Uh we I
prefer no doubt, no doubt, storming the court in college basketball must and
over the over the weekend we saw another instant, uh wake Forest. Wake
Forest defeated Duke and one of the Duke starters was injured. I don't know
what his status is for the next Duke game, but it was it was
up in the air that they've got to find a way to stop this completely.
I mean, they used to storm the fields at football games like homecoming
or whatever, tear down the gold post for a big upset. But and
and they've they've more or less stopped that. But how do you stop it
in the college basketball but both men's and women's Hey, because you know,
the fan is so close to the court, you can only have so many
security people, I mean without how much would that cost to have them lock
arms all the way around the court and that you can still get knocked down
and the security people to get hurt. And that's opening a can of worms.
But they could be suing a university or whatnot. The best way to
handle this, Gary Jeb is to make the announcement and say, if you
storm the court, the game's a forfeit and that'll end it right there and
then and there. You could make two or three forefits you want to have
this happen. Ever again, can you do you think you can get college
administrators in the NCAA to go along with that wild man. Well, they're
going to have to because this is you know, this is like an accident
waiting to happen, a major accident waiting to happen. What if a really
tough college prospect goes down in a heap and enters this knee. You don't
think his lawyer is going to come suing. Oh my god, you know,
Oh yeah, to see the n c DOUBLEA. They're gonna see the
school. They're gonna sue everybody. It's it's it's just an accident waiting to
happen. It's protecting the players, it's protecting the coaches, it's protecting cheerleaders.
You refereesere yeah, Well, you know, we were talking about spring
training and uh, for the first time over the weekend, I guess at
a game in Florida in the Grapefruit League there was a female umpire for the
first time in Major League baseball. And you say it's time that the women
are just like in the NFL, just like in uh in NBA. Right,
well, well, yeah, her name is Jen Paywall and she I
think she was umpiring a third base. She's worked their way up, uh,
you know, to this level to be able to be a major league
umpires. She's got great credentials. And I think it's time. I mean,
the NBA they have women referees, the NFL has women officials usually you
know, back judges or slide judges. It's it's time. I mean when
you when you see some of the umpiring that's going on today in Major League
Baseball, with guys like CEB Butner and laz Das and of course Angel her
Nandez, who has the worst strike zone in the history of the game.
That these guys have a job, Oh no, it's time for a woman
umpire to give her her to do and see what she can do well.
And uh, you make that point if you know the umpire or referees,
if you know an umpire's name, that's probably not a good thing because it's
it's kind of you know, it's kind of like an offensive lineman. If
they get their name mentioned on TV or their number called, it means that
they more than likely just screwed up. And if you know the umpire's name,
if he's notorious enough for not having any kind of consistent strike zone or
being a bad ump then that says more about that umpire. I mean the
good ones you don't notice, right, You're not supposed to notice the empire.
I'm supposed to notice the umpires exactly. And Angel Hernandez is constantly being
you know, exploited because he's so bad. He's he's battled the bases and
he's bad behind the plate. I mean last year, what was this of
the Philadelphia Harper? Yeah, Harper went off at him getting caught out on
strikes. He got caught on on strikes with her hands down at third base.
Oh and Harper went off, man, I mean he went off.
And that's just the tip of the iceberg with Angel and her and as who's
you know been He's been ragged on for a year. And Ceb Butner is
just as bad. Just this band. He's got a hot temper and it's
you know, these guys. I don't know where that where Jen Paywall can
go. I mean she she might be able to fill in because the umpires
believe it or not getting vacations these days, go on vacation. Yeah,
so she might get elevated to get her chance this year some way, and
that can last. But it's time for them. It's time. It's time,
it really is. If they develop AI to the point, uh,
there'll be a lot of umpires taking vacation. If they've got some robot calling
balls and strikes behind the plate, Uh, well, that'll be the end
of baseball for me, Gary Jeffer. They ever do that, that'll be
the end. That human factor. You can't take out. You got to
keep the human factor in there, right, even if they sucked. Uh
so they suck. The Bengals, as you and me and almost everybody talks
about last week, did the thing they had to do. They franchised Tag
T. Higgins. He will be around for next season for Joe Burrow and
any other additions that the Bengals need to make, you think for them to
make another serious run in another Super Bowl. Well, you know, with
the NFL adding that extra cap money, that helped a lot into helping franchise
Tag T. Higgins. Like you said, we'll be here, you know,
for another season and we'll worry about that down the road going into the
draft, the two major needs on this football team are a tight end who
can catch the ball consistently down the down the field, can stretch the field
a little bit like Travis Kelce, because the Begals haven't had a really good
tight end going back to Rodney Holman. I mean, Eiford was very good,
but he couldn't stay healthy, okay, and then er Smith couldn't catch
beach a beach ball. But they also need an offensive line. And know
whether they get that in free agency or they get that in the in the
draft, but they got to protect Joe Burrow because you know, and I
know, it starts up front. It always has. With all that money
investing in Joe Burrow, they got to protect them. I mean, we
see what to happen with Patrick Mahomes. They protect him with Tom Brady,
they protect them. They win when they protect them. And when Joe does
get the protection, he finds recent no brainer that they've got. They've got
to secure that offensive line. Wild Man, Thank you, brother, as
always a lively conversation. That's why I like to have you on. It's
fun talking with you, buddy. I'll talk to you soon, all right.
Seven hundred WLW News Traffic and weather. News Radio seven hundred WLW Cincinnati
a possible cease fire by the end of the week. With the eleven o'clock
report, I'm Lee Mawen breaking now President Joe Biden and I offering encouraging news
about the war between Israel and Hamas with hope for a ceasefire soon. ABC's
Andy Field has the latest from Washington. The President of New York City for
another campaign fundraiser, but telling reporters he's been busy trying to negotiate an end
to the fighting in Gaza. Close to not done yet, and my hope
is by next Monday we'll have the draft cease fire deal with have Hamas release
as many as forty women and older hostages in return for nearly three hundred,
mostly Palestinian women prisoners held by Israel. Andyfield, ABC News Washington Now the
latest, traffic and weather together. You're looking good, Cincinnati. However,
we did have something pop up. If you're traveling west on two seventy five
towards Indiana and the bend into Kentucky, watch yourself because of his reported there's
a major slow down. But everything looks clear right now. Now the latest
forecast from the Advanced Dentistry Weather Center. Advanced Dentistry, the judgment free dental
experience you've been looking for, No fear Dentist dot com. On our way
to Tuesday morning, it's a chance of rain, a morning low of fifty
four. The rest of our Tuesday cloudy, a spotty shower to o high
as sixty nine at night, though storms developing late. A marginal risk of
severe storms overnight a morning low of forty five and later Wednesday morning, a
chance of flurries. From your severe weather station, I'm nine First Warning,
Chief Meteorologist Steve Rawley, News Radio seven hundred WLW radar is clear. It's
fifty seven degrees right now. Ahead of Donald Trump's criminal trial in New York
City, a spokesman for the former president is comparing the request for a gag
order in the hush money case to election interference. The spokesperson also calling Manhattan
District Attorney Alvin Bragg a deranged Democrat prosecutor. More from ABC's Aaron Katerski in
New York, Ragg describing an extraordinary surge in threats he and his office received
the month Trump was indicted, including messages that said leave Trump alone or Bragg
will get assassinated. Rag said. The office flag more than six hundred emails
and phone calls. The NYPD log eighty nine specific threats against the District attorney's
family or employees, including an envelope containing a white powder and a note with
images of Bragg and Trump and the words You'll be sorry a deafen. The
inmate in Claremont County Jail is under investigation as thirty nine year old Angela Thornton
was found on responsive in her sale on February fifteenth, according to the Sheriff's
office, who also added she was alone in her sale with no visible injuries.
She was arrested on charges related to fentanyl, cocaine, and hairin possession.
Charges now pressed against two on an attack last week. Two Northwest High
School students have now been charged with assault after they allegedly attacked a fellow student
last week. The victim's mother says her fifteen year old daughter had been getting
bullied recently and the incident may have been in escalation of that. She told
police her daughter called her last Thursday she was crying and bleeding from her face
after the assault. In the hallway as class was being let out for the
day. A teacher was also struck in the head while trying to break up
that fight, but was not seriously injured. The sixteen year old and seventeen
year old students, now facing charges, were both released to their guardians.
I'm rick Yuchino, who's radio seven hundred. Double Oil learned the identity of
a man who was killed in a shooting in Avondale this afternoon. Cincinnati Police
responded after five o'clock to Carpland Place near Redding Road, where the victim was
found dead, suffering at least one gunshot won in a vehicle. The victim
was identified by CBT as forty two year old Jerry Spencer. CBD's homicide unit
is leading the investigation. As we look into sports college hoops. Tomorrow you
see back in action. They'll visit Number one Houston with tip off at seven
here at the Big One pregame six thirty five Tuesday evening. In the ap
pol Kentucky's up one spot to number sixteen, Dayton down five spots, now
at number twenty one in the new Associate Press Pool, and a Reds update,
the red split their split squad day as the Reds fell on the radio
on Fox Sports thirteen sixty two the Mariners two to nothing. In fact,
the Reds were help without a hit until the eighth inning, and if I
remember hearing Lance right, it was Herdebes Jacob Hurdabees with the first hit of
the game in Phoenix. However, the Reds to feed the Brewers by a
comfortable eight three margin. The Reds now head over to Masonet to face the
Cubs Tuesday afternoon. That game's on Fox Sports thirteen sixty first pitch at three
oh five, and our next update is at eleven thirty. I'm Lee Mallen
News Radio seven hundred WIW. This report is sponsored by Invisible Fence dot Com.
Going Staircrazy Febuary twenty six, twenty twenty four on seven hundred WLW one
of the mainstays of this program, and thank God for all kinds of great
free content. And this guy is Dave Hatter, our it guy Internet of
Things champion and the guy with the aluminum foil hat, ready to tell you
how your technology is aiming to kill you or turn you into a bot.
So as we get into tonight's conversation, you know the elephant in the room
still is what happened last week with the AT and T outage, of there
were tens of thousands, there's you know, in fact, Marco Rubio just
this week saying that a Chinese cyber attack will be one hundred times worse than
the AT and T outage, including your power, your water. This is
something you and I have talked about before, Dave, and apparently they're finally
starting to pay attention to us, because we've been talking about this for a
few years about yeah, the danger of hacks and outages, and now it's
a real life and death situation, which you know, the way people are
addicted to their phones, their little mobile devices, they acted like the AT
and T outage if they were affected, was a life and death No,
you have no idea, children, So what do we know about the AT
and T outage. Do you believe it was a software a hiccup like they
claimed, or do you think we'll ever know? Well, Derek, yes,
first off, thanks for having me on its all ways. Yeah,
my guess is we'll never really know o than whatever gets you know reported in
the mainstream press from the my take on it was at the time was well
since it kind of peaked around seventy thousand is users, and then you know,
they seem to be able to restore it pretty quickly, although it did
take almost the whole day. When you look at the full scope of their
network the last I checked, I think they have over two hundred million users.
Seventy three thousand, Well that's a lot, you know, it's a
relatively small percentage of the overall network. And then of course you know they're
transferring calls from one network to another. So again I don't want to downplay
it. I think seventy three thousand ish people out for a long period of
time is not good. But you know, I kind of figured at the
time since it didn't get any worse, and probably with some sort of software
outage, configuration issue, you know, something along the lines of what they
said it was. You know, it could it have been the network was
overloaded, maybe, but you usually don't see that nowadays unless there's like some
natural disaster or something where everyone is trying to make calls. You know,
solar flare EMP cyber attack. Again, if it were anything other than a
cyber attack, solar flaring and p type thing, you think you'd see a
lot more widespread outages on other networks. You know, so it's probably what
they claim it was, but I do think it's just one more example of
why it's so critical to start taking cybersecurity seriously from a general perspective and then
focusing on hardening these critical networks and critical systems that supply things like electricity,
water, communications, food, et cetera. Because I agree with everything Marco
Rubio said, and again he's just one more person who is raising the alarm
out there. You've seen the FBI director, You've seen visit the Cybersecurity Infrastructure
and Security Administrator administration director warn about the possible consequences of devastating cyber attacks from
our enemies who are trying to get you know, footholds in our networks and
so forth. You know, again, as Rubio said, that's a small
taste of what it could be like and if you really want to look into
how devastating these things could be. Russia has been doing this sort of stuff
in Ukraine since the mid twenty tens. You know, there are numerous examples
where Russia knocked out their ATMs, just don't knock out their power done all
kinds of stuff and it's because Gary, Jeff, We've said so many times,
most of the stuff that makes all of this work was designed in the
sixties and seventies. No one envisioned that it would be used in the way
that it's used today. And consequently, you know, all of this stuff
is sort of inherently insecure, and it's hard to secure without a lot of
effort and money and friction. You know, stuff breaks when you try to
secure it. So it's a major problem. And yeah, I wouldn't say
I'm happy that it happened, but I'm happy when these things happen on a
small scale and don't do any real damage because I think it helps people wake
up and realize, gosh, how terrible could this be if like a whole
cellar network went down or all of this networks went down, for example,
Think of the chaos that would cause and all of the stuff that relies on
cellular signals now to work. It would be bad. Oh, and this
is I think this is worse than an EMP I think this is worse than
a nuclear attack, just because we're all so interconnected with these systems. Just
to get people don't understand. They think that the loaves of bread just show
up at the grocery store on a weekly basis, and it's you know,
just the old school tech. Now we o the truck brings the bread from
the factory or from the distribution center, and they bring it to Kroger.
They don't take into account all of the little cyber chains that are involved in
getting that loaf of bread or that jug of milk to a Kroger. And
understand that if one of these systems gets attacked, say in a supply line,
a supply chain, then there's no loaf of bread, there's no milk,
there's nothing on the shelves with without that interconnected cyber network. And if
it is interrupted, if it is hacked, if it is brought down by
an attack, then people starve. There's the real possibility of that. And
you know this isn't some tenfoil hacked conspiracy. Go see again with people are
like FBI Director Array are saying about the possibility of attacks on critical infrastructure,
whether it's the electrical grid, which of course would knock out most all of
this other stuff, especially if it we're down to the link of time,
telecommunications, grid, water plants, chemical plants. You know, if you
knocked out all of the rail systems in the United States, you know how
many. My understanding and I could be wrong about this, but I've read
this several times and I haven't researched it recently, but there's like three days
worth of supplies in the supply chain out there to your point. So you
know, even if it's a week, if after a week, if you
could do significant damage and the power's not back on or you know, trucks
and trains can't run, we got a real, real, major problem on
our hands. So yeah, I'm glad that the FBI and others continue to
try to raise awareness about this and that you know, it feels like people
at all levels of government are starting to take this a lot more seriously,
especially as we see tensions ramp up. I don't know if you have to
catch it or not. Gary, Jeff, I just saw a story today
on Twitter US Admiral warrens China can lunch surprise attack for military drill, which
is in Newsweek. I just saw that. I just saw that come across
Dave. So again, you know, and if you look at what Director
Ray is saying, so our nation state adversaries advanced persistent threats usually what they're
called in the business, you know, China, Russia, others trying to
get back doors and footholds into our system. Do you think in the event
of an attack on Taiwan or some type of large scale attack anywhere, they
may not shut systems down and try to cause chaos as a diversion, Well,
of course they would. You know again, I'm this is Dave Hatter's
opinion exclusively. You can go out and see what many many experts and military
leaders and government leaders have said. In fact, now he just recently became
the former NSAY Director General, Paul KNAKASONI you know, cybersecurity as national security.
I couldn't agree with that more because you nailed it earlier. Are everything
is increasingly digital, everything is increasingly interconnected. We rely on this stuff to
do everything, to to shop, to work, to entertain ourselves. Hello
Dave, And this is one of the reasons why I'm dead set against central
bank digital currency gearings. When you had no way to do any sort of
transaction, sort of this truly old school bartering. You know, I'll trade
it the hammer for that chicken. If you knock these systems out, you'd
have no money you'd have no access to anything. So yeah, it's it's
a real concern of mine. Well, and it should be a concern of
everyone, Dave. The fact is there are still people just walking around aimlessly,
except that taking it for granted that the technology is responsible for almost everything
that they do, every experience they have, what they have to eat,
what they have to drink, whether the lights come on or not. Can
you imagine attack on a norrad or our air traffic control and we've got planes
falling out of the sky nine to eleven and looked like a picnic. If
they could take out air traffic control in this country and they and I'm sure
that's part of the cyber attack plan, would I would think that it would
be. I mean, you know, I am not an expert on GPS,
and I know the military has a different encrypted system from what we use.
I don't know how airlines work with that, But yeah, what if
you could just confuse these systems and send long coordinates to ships at sea and
planes and the air trucks on the ground. And as crazy as this sounds,
too, as our cars become rolling computers, it's not far fetched.
And there's a story I know you and I have talked about it in the
past. A well known story that Wired magazine did where the reporter worked with
some hackers and they were able to take over almost all of the systems in
a Jeep Grand Cherokee remotely. Now that caused a recall and that's been fixed.
But again, all of these things are being built. I would encourage
folks to go look if you just want to see how crazy this is.
Mozit left. The people that make the Firefox browser, which I recommend,
by the way, versus Google's Chrome, did a recent study of modern cars
and they looked at the crazy amount of data your average new car is collecting
stuff that makes absolutely no sense and has no bearing on your ability to use
the car to get you from point A to point B. And my point
is less about the privacy, although it's quite eye opening and hair raising in
my opinion, especially because I don't think the average person understands what they's doing
it up for. But to be able to collect all that data tells you
everything is a sensor, everything is computerized, and if a hacker could break
into these systems, if you think these cars, there's plenty of evidence that
the bottom about to say is true, are really being secured in a way
that they're unhackable? Well, of course they're not, because they're like almost
all of this Internet of things stuff, it's always focused on ease of use,
market share, speed of market, not privacy and security for the users.
And it's there are plenty of experts out there who've been warning for some
time that, you know, a particular make or model of car, or
maybe all the cars from a given manufacturer could somehow be hacked and turned into
weapons at least at minimum, Like you know, just disable your brakes for
any car that's rolling disabled to break. I don't want to accelerate, you
know, it's crazy. I don't want a car that can be autonomously controlled
or autonomously driven. I don't want to. I don't even want the car
that'll help me parallel that used to be a part of the driving test and
still should be. Dave Hatter is our guest, and we're gonna take a
quick break Dave and come back with a few more stories tonight on the Nightcap
on seven hundred WLW, He's a battle of the Big Cast Throve Down Powerful.
It'll be a night of Cause and Jaws as you see bear cats take
on Houston's Cougars Way. It's Big twelve action at its best, powerful right
hand Get the call live from Houston, Come oh Now tomorrow night at six
point thirty on seven hundred WLW and the seven hundred WLW live stream on the
iHeartRadio app. The Cincinnati Home and Garden Show presented by This and Mister Hatter.
Here's a story that does not surprise me at all. It's something that
also has been forecast and could easily be forecast. It's hijacking my brain.
Young people addicted to social media, desperate for help. And it's not just
young people. I was getting on the elevator today here at work. This
is just a small example, and I see it everywhere. I see it
with people driving their cars, which are not supposed to be doing in Ohio.
I see it in every facet where you find other people out there.
They're not seeing you because they are, you know, ruining their posture and
are looking down at their phone as they're trying to navigate through a grocery store
or a parking lot, or getting on an elevator. The elevator was going
up to the studios here and the door's open, and the guy just walked
in. He heard the bell and saw the doors open, but he was
looking at his phone and it was obviously he was on an upper floor.
I said, this is going up. He said, oh, no,
worries and stepped out. He wasn't paying attention at all because he was locked,
brain locked into whatever he was looking at on his device. And I
see it happen all the time. And it's again and something that many of
the Facebook and these people knew. They they've they've admitted in testimony that they
knew that this was addictive, especially to a younger brain, and it's happening.
Yeah. Uh, it's sad. I see the same thing you're describing
all the time. And there's a new study out there. People can see
it for themselves at study finds dot org. I don't think it's too shocking
what they're saying, but it is kind of eye opening. You know,
they have some quotes from people, the teens that they talk to is part
of this study. You know, one of the quotes is TikTok has me
in a choke hold, and another is I'd say I'm one thousand percent addicted.
And you know, I again not shocked by this. I think it's
important for people to understand. You can go back and you know, a
you touched on the fact that, in many cases through leak documents or testimony,
you know, many of these companies understand the negative impact of having on
people, but they're making enormous amounts of money as a result of it.
And then b there was a guy from Twitter in the early days of Twitter.
He left because he started to have you know, remorse and regret about
helping build this whole attention system that they've tried to create where you know,
they want to get your attention, they want you to stay on their platform
as long as possible because you know, it means more impressions for the ads
they're selling, and it means more data they can collect about you to build
more profiles and sell to other people, and all that kind of stuff that
comes along with it. And when you look at what this guy had to
say, he said, you know, when they came up with this idea
of wipe down the refreshed screen, it was sort of loosely based on the
idea of playing a slom machine. You get that for people who enjoy that.
I'm not wanted them, by the way, But for people who enjoy
that, you know, you get that dopamine hit every time you pull the
handle. There's that anticipation you know that something good is going to happen.
And you know, sadly with social media guarage, Yeah, I think we
both know most of the time it's more of a due scrolling and you're waiting
to see what the next bad thing is going to be. Right, but
that it's literally kind of based on the same idea as gambling, and that's
one of the things that makes it so addictive for people. And Yeah,
when you look at this study from study finds it, it's pretty interesting what
they found. I guess the good news coming out of it is they found
as part of this study that you know, you can do like a four
week intervention. And I thought they had a really interesting take on this,
which is, you know, to think of it like a diet, like
when you you know, if you mix all kinds of bad stuff into your
diet, you're going to have bad results. They're not saying that you should
just give it up entirely, but they talk about this idea of a four
week intervention and trying to change your habits and you know, figuring out how
because you know, there are legitimate uses for some social media, but it's
it's pretty interesting what they can I'm up with, and they you know,
said in the Study of Practice that you can take right now to reduce your
dependence on social media, and then they you know, list some of those
out there, like turn off notification, limit the apps you don't need or
that you find harmful, you know, unfollow certain accounts, and just a
variety of other things you can do to sort of slowly start to wean yourself
off of these things, which I think would be good for society, especially
to get off TikTok. Well, I know you don't want to get into
deeply on it, but there's been a lot of news about Google here in
the last week, including their AI generated Gemini program, where it just was
very very strange when people were asking for images of say, our founding fathers
or any number of the pope or any number of things, and there were
mysteriously no white people generated by this. Because I guess that they their excuse
was they they're looking for diversity, they're looking for cultural diversity, and they're
they're champions of that. And all of that other what I consider nonsense.
But the fact of the matter is still is that even AI at this point,
we don't think it's sentient yet where it's making this up, this decision
on its own. It all comes back to whoever is originally programming the AI
or working with the gosh, what do you call them, the large language
model, Yeah, the large language model and the other things that go into
these programs. It all goes algorithm, thank you very much. You know,
usually usually multi syllable words don't escape me, but that one did.
Algorithm. But they're they're programmed in by someone who's a human being to their
preferences, and and that's an that's an issue too, isn't it with all
this stuff with AI? Yeah, you know, Gary Jeff. Ever since
AI has sort of come to the forefront of it, because this is not
a new concept. It's been around for a long time, and it's kind
of caught on and then died off, of caught on and died off and
in the past primarily due to technological limitations. Honestly, a lot of it
have been resolved now and we've seen some amazing progress with these things from a
variety of different organizations. But yeah, at the end of the day,
you know, one of the concerns has always been biased in the data that
you're using to train the large language model, bias in the algorithms, you
know. And the algorithms are the programs that the people who have built the
thing, you know, have written to make it do what it does.
And yeah, the whole Google thing recently has been getting a lot of flack.
There's an interesting guy, Mark Andresen, who was one of the founders
of Mozilla, the mosaic I'm sorry, rather Mosaic, the original web browser.
Uh. You know. He's a venture capitalist and interesting dude. He's
been talking about this stuff a lot on Twitter slash x. People can go
check out what he's what he's got out there, and it's gotten a lot
of grief. But here's an interesting related headline. And why you know,
I find some of these things very concerning. AI models choose violence and escalated
to nuclear strikes in simulated war games, and I don't know how much time
we get left, so I'll keep this really brief. But they basically said
the study by Cornell University in the us U five ll ins as autonomous agents
simulated war games and diplomatic scenarios. Three different versions of open ais GPT Claude
developed by Anthropic, and Lama too developed by Meta. So rewinder, folks.
Meta is Facebook now basically right, Meta is the parent company. And
you know, if you read through this, it's it's pretty disturbing that they,
you know, seem to want to go toward a violent outcome. So
yeah, I don't I don't think we're at the sky that point yet,
but when you when you see all the stuff coming out about this, and
there's also been a lot of talk about how it seems like some of these
models have sort of peaked and are starting to uh kind of I don't want
to go off the rails, but lose their their capability and produce less good
output, if you will. So, yeah, this all bears watching.
It'll be really interesting to see where this goes. But yeah, Google has
taken a major hit and received an enormous amount of bad press. Yeah,
and one of the one of the one of the things I saw, David,
and what you're talking about is that this AI model preferred nuclear war over
misgendering someone. Yeah, that's that's been some of the things that have shown
up. Well there's you know there people asking it. Who's done more damage
to society Hitler or Elon Musk And yeah again, you can get on Twitter
and see many, many examples of people pointing out how some of these answers
are kind of crazy. Like again, you know, I can't imagine how
you could compare anyone to Hitler really, you know, or killed tens of
millions of people. People who do that are always at peril of being laughed
at or just being totally you know, taken down, and they should be.
Dave Hatter, thank you so much, as always a wonderful conversation about
horrible things. My pleasure. Gars, Jeff, have a good one.
You got it. The Nightcap continues in moments on seven hundred WLW News Traffic
and Weather News Radio seven hundred WLW, Cincinnati, Hey. Government shutdown looms
large again with the eleven thirty report I'm Lee Mawen breaking. Now. They've
done it three times since last fall, and Congress may have to do it
a fourth time this week in passing yet another temporary spending bill. ABC's Andy
Field tells us about the latest effort to prevent another government shutdown. Senate Republican
leader Mitch McConnell warning fellow House Republicans they must vote for another temporary spending bill
to avoid another government shutdown, saying that will require that everyone rose in the
same direction toward clean appropriations and away from poison pills. Those poison pills are
partisan add ons that the Senate Democratic majority will not accept, forcing a shutdown.
Andyfield, ABC News Washington, Now for the latest traffic and weather together.
Looking good Cincinnati, A little slow trek from where seventy four and two
seventy five split off, heading towards Indiana, but nothing to write home about
now the ladies forecast from the Train Heating and Cooling Weather Center on news radio
seven hundred WLW. Heading to our Tuesday morning, A few showers possible,
a morning low of fifty four, mostly cloudy four our Tuesday, and a
few scattered showers, a high as sixty nine at night, storms develop late,
A marginal risk of severe storms overnight, A loa forty five from your
severe weather stay. I'm nine first warning cheap Meteorologist Steve Raleigh News Radio seven
hundred WLW. It's fifty nine degrees right now on the radar. There's one
little speck of green, meaning it's all clear. Does it seem like you're
paying less of the pump? It's not just you. Gas is slightly cheaper
this week, says ABC's Alex Stone. In the past week, the price
of regular unleded has gone down two cents to three twenty five a gallon,
according to new data from the Energy Department. That analysts say more rising prices
will be coming as when near spring and summer, when travel demand picks up.
Plus more areas of the country will be switching to expensive summer blends of
gas in the coming weeks. Some legal challenges for local company's merging plans.
The nearly twenty five billion dollar merger was announced more than a year ago,
but the Federal Trade Commission has now stepped in filing a lawsuit to block it.
The suit argues that if the deal between Cincinnati bas Kroger and Albertson's goes
through, it will be bad for competition and when negative impact consumers who would
end up paying more. Both are grocery giants, with Croger the fifth largest
retailer in the US and Albertson's the tenth biggest. I'm sean gallbager he's Radio
seven hundred WLW. Our next update is at twelve o'clock. I'm Lee Mallen.
He's Radio seven hundred WLW. Sneezing, coughing, stuffy nose, runny
nose, post nasal drip, interrupted, sleeping. I just was groggy at
the end of the day, allergies and sinus conject cap And that's not euphanism.
It means that we are rounding third and heading for home in baseball parlance.
And we're doing so with our friend who is fond of spouting off.
And that's one of the reasons that I always rely on her for some fantastic
conversations. And it's yet another one about to begin on this Monday night.
Karen Katalene KK, how is you? I is good and you are just
way too kind and generous for little little me. It's always a pleasure to
you. It's a good thing, I said, spouting and not spewing,
so anyway, because something different, it would be something different. First and
foremost, we see now that the presidential potted plans you like to see,
they're going to ship him to the border this week finally like a weekend at
Bernie's moment and I mean, you can barely tell. You can barely tell
that he has a pulse most of the time. So this photo op,
which means absolutely nothing, was meant to look like Joe Biden is doing something
when we all know he has done everything in his power, as he likes
to say, to make sure that the invasion continues full throttle on our border
of people who are criminals from Venezuela, like the one that just stabbed to
death the college student in Georgia, like the gangs have been let in full
tilt, willy nilly, and all kinds of Chinese, Chinese military age men
by the thousands, who have been let in because of Joe Biden's policies when
he insisted that he could he'd done all he could do, and yes,
he had done all he could could do as president to make sure that the
invasion was going along and increasing exponentially by the week, which is what's happened
over the last three years. So now he's finally and there's talk about him
undoing what he did on day one when he when he first was inaugurated president,
which undid all of President Trump's policies that kept the border crisis at bay.
You know, so he's he's gone from saying there was nothing he could
do, it was up to Congress. He needed more money, more resources,
which Democrats always need more money. Uh. And and now now that
there's rumors afloat that before the State of the Union address next month, he
will undo by executive order everything he did and reinstate some of Donald Trump's policies
like stay in Mexico. Are you surprised that they're finally turning around because they
see the poll numbers and they understand that voters care about illegal immigration? What
do you think about all of this care? You know what, it's all
a show. I don't think that they care what the voters think. If
they had, they would have changed it before. Now, they would have
changed course before. Now. Everything that I've watched them do shows that they
really have very little regard for either polls or what people think. You know,
I could be wrong, but I'm noticing that. Hmm. This is
an election year. Yeah, right, and some voters, even though I
don't think they care what the voters think, but some people have phenomenally short
memories, or they're going to suspend every ounce of intellectual honesty or memory that
they have. I really don't know, but it bugs me. I guess
that more Republicans wouldn't say, now that the shoe is supposedly on the other
foot, well wait a minute, but I thought it was racist to control
your own border. I thought it was racist for you to want to have
a say in who comes into your country. And may they not want to
allow a completely porous border to allow terrorists and other criminals who you have invented.
You don't know who's coming into this country. If you think that you
have a right to do that, I mean, isn't that racist and xenophoree?
But unfortunately Republicans don't play that way. They always seem to be more
comfortable, many of them playing defense. And by the way, Gary,
Jeff, we know, we know, don't we as I think the Babylon
b reminded us to one of those other great cartoon memes that it's all Donald
Trump's fault. The only reason Joe Biden can't secure the border is because it's
Donald Trump's fault. We're supposed to forget everything we ever heard, know,
or live through about the resistance the Democrats put up about the wall, right,
they would not fund that wall, no matter what, and pretty much
even the person drunk behind a stupor behind a rock knows that Donald Trump has
been talking about securing our border and controlling illegal immigration and having on the campaign
tree. Yes, and look at the flack he took for doing it.
He always of course the racist and it I mean, the whole thing that
we're even talking about. Of course we have to talk about it because it's
what we do. Almost means that we're playing pretend like they are. You
have to pierce the armor of their unreality because what they're claiming is not even
based in any kind of reality at all. No, it's based in lies
and gaslighting, and they continue to do it. Karen, I I just
what you just said about what Donald Trump, what Donald said, what Donald
Trump, what Donald Trump said about the border. Have you noticed how many
things that Donald Trump was absolutely dead on right about when he came from China
to the border, to law enforcement, to It's like anybody with any kind
of you talk about short memories, but anybody can look on a video and
go back to twenty fifteen and twenty sixteen when he was campaign for president,
and all the things he said turned out to be true. That were like
you said they were. They were waylaid as racist, or he's an idiot,
or he doesn't know, he doesn't understand statesmanship. All of the things
about that were said about him, about him being a puppet of Putin,
when he kept us out of any kind of foreign engagements for the entire time
he was in office, Donald Trump has been right about everything except maybe the
COVID reaction. Other than that, that was the only thing that Donald Trump
was wrong about, and it's been proven over time. It's just me.
That's one of the reasons you can see the motive for having played the game
of obfiscation and distraction, in making it all about personalities, in trying to
whip people up into a frenzy about how terrible and awful and horrible and no
amount of hyperbole and insanity is to the man who has Jewish grandchildren, his
beloved daughter, one of them married a Jewish guy, and he did more
for Israel than any presidents in recent memory. They can call him a nettler
because nothing is too extreme for them, because they have a media that helps
them. So while people are being whipped up into a frenzy and trying to
wane up each other about how much say they're not paying attention to any of
the facts. And it's that's what can be so frustrating, because you have
to be smarter than the operatives who are whipping up hate not just for Trump,
but for each other, for differences of opigion, for one hundred and
one things that it suits them and feeds them when we're at each other's throats
and when it is just so obvious to me. But sadly, what amazes
me is that very smart people, people I've known for a long time,
or they are professed constitutionalists or conservatives or Republicans, I think the great majority
of them see through it. But there's still those who want to belong to
the right cliques in the right parties, so they're going to parent the same
information. So what we're watching is just a grand propaganda scheme. I never
thought i'd see it in America to the extent that we're watching it. But
that's what we're watching it. That's what we're watching here. You're right,
I tell you what, Karen, Let's take a quick break and we'll come
back and I'll ask you about endless shrimp. Karen Katleen on the nightcap back
after a break on seven hundred WLW is around the corner, which means the
rainy season will be here before you know it. Have aqua proof out now,
so your yard and basement round to find out how they could get some.
Well, pretty soon you won't be able to go to you won't be
able to go to Red Lobster and get endless shrimp. I don't know what
they were thinking when they made it a permanent part of their menu, Karen,
the Red Lobster Corporation, because in the last quarter they lost thirteen million
dollars and they blamed it all on the endless shrimp promotion that they made permanent.
See the thing about this, and I say, the reason that this
came to a head and the reason that Red Lobster wound up losing their losing
their carcass over the endless shrimp. I tie it losing their tails over the
endless shrimp. That's better. So but I blame it on social media and
TikTok and the people are trying to outdo each other, and it, you
know, it went viral, and so now everybody wants to be a star.
Everybody wants to be famous, and thanks to these social media platforms they
think they are, you know, but when somebody when it's a competition online
of who can have the most endless shrimp at Red Lobster, then you you
got to lose your tail over that. If you're in a business, you
don't need me for this interview. Now. I have been an endless shrip
my whole life, so I did not have to prove it to anybody,
nor am I any longer. I used to be in the theater and made
my living as a performer, musical comedy performer. Yeah, and then I
started watching I am fascinated, especially today with people who want to be famous
or who think that external fame is going to somehow make them happier, feed
their ego. It's just another I don't know, it's did you see this
story? Did you see the story? Though? I mean Red Lobster used
to do as a promotion for like a limited time only they do English shrimp,
but they decided last summer to make it a permanent part of their menu,
and people just you know, they gluttoned out and then they did it
online and then it was a competition of who you know, I did seventy
four shrimp. I did seventy six shrimp, and red Lobster's sitting there going,
we can't pay our employees because you ate all the damn shrimp. If
I hadn't taught to you every week, I would never have known that about
rip lobster number one, number two, look at it. You know.
I guess they should put a big sign in front of their restaurant that says,
even if it's free, it may not be worth it. I mean,
and God bless them. Nothing against the olive garden, but the endless
breadsticks and the endless salad never was really a big draw for me. You
know that all you can eat buffets, which kind of went out with the
COVID thing and now have come back. But the all you can eat buffet
concept to me was always kind of like, yeah, well, I can
only eat so much at a time, even when I was younger and maybe
a more robust eater, but I mean, I can only eat so much.
So I don't know if it's worth it to pay for all you can
eat it step instead, just pay for what you want to eat. It
depends on the quality of the food. By here and there are some buffets,
There are some buffets where the quality is not most many buffets are not.
Yeah, but I hate to overanalyze, which of course is my middle
name. You know, Y're an overanalyze catiline. But it isn't a statement
on anything is free, no matter whether people want it or not. I
mean, it's it's so interesting to me that we're living in a culture where
people will abuse themselves in order to get on Facebook. I don't think it's
a good idea to give this step away for too long, especially when people
are so given to wanting something for free. It's changing the whole culture,
the value, I would agree, and people and see and see the gen
Z people think that living in a free country means you get stuff for free
that you didn't earn it, and that has nothing to do with freedom or
liberty. All right, Finally we talked. We talked about the Republican primary
charade, as you called it earlier, and the charade is continuing thanks to
Nikki Hayley after getting trounced by twenty points in her home state the people that
know her best by Donald Trump once again. And then news came out that
the Koch brothers have decided that she's not worth their money after all, when
they were one of the ones propping her up. And that's no big surprise
either. You want to talk about the establishment trying to support Nicky Haley's run
against Donald Trump too. I don't know what the actual even what the reason
was for her to stay in as long as she has, and she's still
she's still hanging on like a hair and a grilled cheese sandwich. What's up
with that? The only reason she's staying up in is because she's being propped
up by two main sources of money, money, money, money, the
Trump haters, never trumpers, and a good many of the leftist Democrats who
want to make people believe that Trump has serious opposition in his own party.
None of that is true. They're always I guess that's been the theme,
is that appearances are more important in reality than reality to a lot of people,
and they believe that if they can give the impression of something, then
it will become true. One of the politics I hated most political slogans is
in politics, perception is reality. No. In politics, people create perceptions
and hope it will become reality. So it's a sham. It's a scam,
and the whole primary was a sham. And yet the Democrats will use
gullible Republicans to tell everybody see the Republican even the Republicans can't stand Donald Trump.
What nonsense. It's utter nonsense. So if the Koch brothers backed out,
and if any of the significant money like the Koch brothers drives up,
you will see Nicky Haley dropping out. That's the only reason she stayed in
was for the money that she's been the most The most telling thing about this,
Karen and watching the last week and a half two weeks was the interview
with Kevin Newsom where he called Nicky Haley one of our one of our surrogates.
It was like wow, right out there for everybody to hear, Gavin
Gruesome is saying Nicki Haley is a Democrat surrogate. He admitted it, and
yet people aren't paying attention to it. No, they're not. Either he's
too dumb to lie or lying doesn't matter anymore because they feel confident that they
can trounce all over the people and get away with it. And I'm sorry
to say that that the second one has been the case more than it has
not been. So we're having an extraordinary times. My friend boy, oh
boy. Yeah. See, people say, may you live in interesting times?
Well, I hope you yours are more interesting than mine. Okay,
Karen Catialen, can you slap that person? I just want to know.
Yeah, really, you you get arrested for slapping whoever spent that first.
Yeah, I tell you what you want to live in interesting times? You
go first, Okay, and I'll sit back and watch. Karen Catialen,
thank you, dear, my pleasure. All right, spouting off once again
on the nightcap, And now we bring you to the end of the program.
In our national anthem, Downer America, here is the star spangled banner.