Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Night Show.
As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Monday, the sixteenth of October. You're
of our Lord, twenty twenty three. Well, today we're going to talk
about news and truth. Kind interesting a couple of developments in terms of the
propaganda wars going in both directions on what is happening with Israel and Hamas.
We're also going to talk about border migration. We now have a move to
bring in the Palestinians into the United States. Of course, let's make everybody's
problems our problems, and it's being pushed. I have all people the editor
of Breitbart, Breitbart that has made our open borders their number one issue.
Oh well, it's not a problem. Just bring in the Palestinians, I
say, We'll be right back now. Well, I've said from the very
beginning of this that the concern shown by governments for their own citizens is nothing
but phony. They don't mind sending us off to war, they don't mind
jabbing us. And another example of this is an Israeli boy that they used
for their vaccine campaign has now died at the age of eight from a heart
attack a heart attack. It was so important for Netan Yahoo to use his
own people as lab rats. And of course he and Kissinger and Lindsey Graham
and both parties will use us for whatever their geopolitical aspirations are, and they
don't care what happens to us. An Israeli boy, reports Life site News,
featured in a video used to push COVID vaccines on children in a nationwide
Israeli campaign, died from a sudden heart attack. His father wrote, my
father grand His grandfather was a physician, they say, a distinguished physician.
The boy died unexpectedly of cardiac arrest while taking a bath, taking a bath,
not even in sports. And so when I saw this, I thought,
well, is the grandfather going to have the integrity now to oppose the
vaccines after it has killed his son. You know, we see many mainstream
articles about all the people that have been killed in this terrorist attack. I
remember seeing one of them, retired Isn't in his eighties, retired Israeli physicist
killed by Hamas. But what about the physicians who are pushing their kids to
the forefront to be used as lab rats. Will they get a clue?
Will this wake him up. In twenty twenty, at the age of five,
this boy appeared in a video produced by the Regional Council. The video
was part of a government program aimed at pushing vaccines on kids, the COVID
vaccines, despite the fact that they had been telling us all along that there
was zero chance of it happening to kids. Remember that those were the big
red flags about all this stuff. They kept talking and of course Trump still
talks every time he mentions it about the nineteen eighteen epidemic of flu. And
yet if you look at that, the people who died had a big surge
in terms of age demographics, a big surge of people over eighty and children
under the age of infants. I forget what is one or two years old,
but that is always the case, really, but especially if there's something
going around. But in terms of every other demographic they were all roughly the
same. That was not the case with their so called COVID pandemic. It
looked exactly like the actuarial table, where it's basically very low at a young
age and increases exponentially with age. And that's what they were reinterpreting that data.
They were lying to us with propaganda, and so the children had no
risk of anything. There wasn't a pandemic to start with. Their own data
showed that children had no risks, So why would you do this? Family
put out a statement, Our Jonitan Mosha passed away recently on the eve of
Yam Kapor Joniton suffered a cardiac arrest in her home. And since we have
fought by his side after he collapsed. So that's all they said. So
they've not talked about this, and again, his grandfather is a distinguished physician.
One Israeli commentator said, so, where are the headlines about this?
Where's the investigations about this? How many more children will die on the golden
altar. Oh, that's a good way to describe it, isn't it.
Yeah, bring your children and lay them on the altar for Pfizer and Moderna
and Trump the sacrificial altar. Biden demands it. There are already two control
studies, said the Israeli connentator, two control studies indicating that MR and A
vaccines cause heart problems. Remember that at any given moment, this can happen
to your beloved children and grandchildren. And then in Argentina last year, an
Argentine boy who had similarly served as a national poster child. How uncomfortable for
these people that the poster children are dying. It was a national ad campaign
there in Argentina. He died suddenly at the age of four last year.
According to reports, he was rushed to the hospital because of fever and vomiting,
So he died suddenly there. But again, this one is absolutely along
the lines of the vaccine a heart attack. I notice that this is a
sort of damocles that is going to be hanging over everyone's head has been vaccinated.
The Argentine government used this photo of this boy on their website and still
are using it to push a vaccination of children. He's holding up his fist
with a slogan vaccines protect us. The cynical government lies in propaganda. I
wonder which untested Trump vaccine these boys got so and as I look at this,
I don't know how anybody can support that fool or trader Trump. But
let's talk a little bit about the consequences of what is happening. As everybody
is waiting to see what the Israeli government is going to do in terms of
pushing everybody out of the Gaza strip. George Soros once blasted the US and
Israel for not embracing Hamas. He said that, and remember that, as
I get a lot of a lot of email from people, and I've shown
this and I've talked about it as well. The fact that Israel and misguided
geopolitics, as we see the US government doing all the time as well,
decide that it would be better to have Hamas than what they thought was a
more radical group. I think it was a plo at the time, but
they encourage the creation of Hamas, and we do that all the time as
well. We're always creating monsters that come back with our geopolitics. If Israel
had accepted the results of the election, said Sorrows, that might have strengthened
the more moderate political wing. Well, yeah, at one point in time
they thought that Hamas would be more moderate. But no, and so it
was not a sticking point for him that they said we will not acknowledge the
existence of Israel. He said, well, that could be made a condition
for eventual settlement rather than a precondition for negotiation. So they don't believe that
you even exist, but you should make peace with them, and then we
have the BBC, and I think that's a very interesting back and forth between
a guy who worked for the BBC for thirty years and hasn't been there for
twenty years. And as I said, the BBC has said, we are
not going to use the term terrorism. And this is this whole idea that
one person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter. And that's why I began when
I first talked about this last Tuesday, I said, there is you have
to understand the idea of a just war. And of course the BBC doesn't
completely pagan the reason why you wear uniforms even and of course the terrorists don't
wear uniforms. The terrorists, as we've been told over and over again,
when US soldiers were fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, they would mix themselves in
amongst the civilian population to use their own people as human shields. They would
put themselves in two mosques and then snipe at soldiers to say, well,
you know, we can get them to fire back at us if they blow
up the mosque, we can use that as propaganda. So they don't follow
the rules of a just war. They don't try to minimize civilian casualties.
They don't try to identify themselves as soldiers. They hide, they're cowards,
they're murdering cowards. And so we have to make a distinction from the very
beginning, the difference between terrorism and a war. If they don't like the
way they're treated, people ask me, you know, what's the difference between
you know, what is going on there these freedom fighters and what happened with
the American Revolution. Well, the differences are just war. You identify yourself,
you carry a flag, you wear a uniform, you do all these
other things to identify yourself. And that's the big difference. So if you've
got a gripe with somebody, if they want to go to war, fine,
put on a uniform, go to war. Don't hide amongst the civilians,
civilians and use them as human shields. Don' use your own people as
human shields. Don't kill and target civilians. That's the difference. And so
this BBC Chief Political Correspondent John Sargeant got into a heated discussion with a gb
news anchor who was doing it, and they had a Jewish guy who was
his National Jewish Assembly chairman was the guy who was debating him on it.
But you basically didn't need to have anybody debating him. He just basically laid
it out there by himself. He says, well, you know, people
have found this very difficult to follow. He said. They think, well,
it's obvious the US government calls them terrorists. We've heard this from other
people who call them terrorists. They don't seem to understand the BBC operation,
the news operation is not like a government Oh, come on, come on,
it is government propaganda. Writ large, the BBC is as much a
government propaganda as Pravda and as Vestia in the Soviet Union. There's much government
propaganda as the Washington Posts and New York Times and the New York Post.
On the conservatives anyway, the mainstream media is nothing but propaganda. Of BBC
is more like PBS. They are owned by the government, run by the
government. And what he's trying to say is that, you know, people,
this seems pretty obvious to people. They know what terrorism is, but
we know better, right, we know better just because the US government has
some other government labels that is terrorism. Well, look, terrorism is not
a political designation versus freedom fighter. Right, you could call somebody a freedom
fighter, that's your opinion, whether they're fighting for freedom, or they're fighting
against freedom. But terrorism is about a tactic, you see, And that's
what he won't admit that. If you're going to use violence and you know,
murder and threats and fear to achieve your political objectives, that's terrorism.
And of course governments do that all the time as well, But terrorism is
a tactic. Focusing on civilians is a tactic. And so he says,
well, a lot of people just don't understand. It seems to them like
it's common sense to call them terrorists. He said, here are these people
who are acting outrageously, outrageously poor sportsmanship. I guess they must be terrorists.
And so then the host interrupted him and said, well, do you
think maybe it's because they slit a baby's throat. He says, oh,
no, that's an atrocity. Is that not a terrorist act? No,
that is a different matter. He said, you are trying to if you
ask me what I think about that rite a straightforward question. I left the
BBC more than twenty years ago. What do I think about hamas terrorism?
Right? This is a terrorist act, that's quite straightforward. But ask me
when I was in the BBC as a correspondent, and I would give you
a completely different answer. Well, first of all, the whole thing about
focusing on babies, that's why I focused on babies. I find it amazing.
As I said, you know, whether we look at they cut off
baby's heads. Okay, well didn't we do that. Didn't our own government
do that, didn't Fauci do that. Didn't Fauci pay planned parenthood for babies
heads and hearts and livers and all the rest of the stuff so he could
engage in his disgusting transhumanist mice experiments. We're not outraged about that. As
a matter of fact, these people who exposed it are the ones who are
going to jail, Just like the CIA whistleblower John Kyaka, who exposed the
torture by the CIA so they could produce lies about weapons of mass destruction.
He's the one who goes to jail, nobody else. There was civil action
against the psychiatrists who trained the CIA to torture, but that was lost as
well. Gina Haswell was promoted by Benedict Donald for lying US into the Iraq
War and using torture to do it. And so when you look at this
again, this whole I don't understand why they're going to try to make the
case on the beheading of babies, which I think is something that they I'm
sure that some babies were beheaded. I'm sure that babies were beheaded in Gaza
strip with bombs that landed. I've seen baby. I was a disgusting picture
of a baby's had exploded on a stretcher in Gaza. But isn't it interesting
how they always go to babies, And that's still tugs at our heartstrings,
except when we've had so much propaganda about abortion from entertainment news, planned parenthood,
politicians, everybody, so much propaganda about abortion that our hearts have been
so hard into it that we don't care. I mean, they know that
this strikes a resonant cord with everybody, But we have seared our consciences when
it comes to abortion, haven't we. Oh, we can justify war because
the kuwaitis take babies out of incubators and leave them to die. But this
happens all the time, and we call it comfort care when it's an abortion.
It's just amazing to me this terrorism thing does not hinge on whether babies
were beheaded, because quite frankly, we don't care about babies. Do we
really care about babies anymore? Let's be honest about this stuff. The BBC's
not trying to decide who's done well or badly in the Middle East and then
tell people what they should think. We see anybody who tells you that they
are objective like the BBC, you should walk away. A person is either
a fool or liar. They're a fool if they believe it because they're not
aware of their own biases. As I said over and over again, best
way to look at this is Matt Drudge, for example, America's editor.
He was clearly identified with conservative causes and the right and everything before Donald Trump.
He so despised Donald Trump. He's gone hard to the left, or
he's sold it or whatever. I kind of think that Matt has gone to
the left, frankly, just because he hates Trump. He was very,
very connected to George Conway, who has been at the forefront of opposing Trump.
He's very much connected to George Conway. Conway was the lawyer for Monica
Lewinsky. He gave Drudge the information about Monica Lewinsky and that made the Drudge
Report. And so the people that he's been connected with servative side. And
of course you know big friends with Ant Coulter, who is a big Trump
supporter and then big Trump opponent because of what he actually did. A Trump
supporter for what he promised, a Trump opponent for what he did. But
anyway, getting back to Matt Drudge, Matt Drudge, everybody understands that he's
changed signs, right, How do we know these changes? He doesn't write
any articles. He doesn't write articles. All it is is what he chooses
to report. And what you choose to report will show your political bias.
There is no such thing as objective news News, week Time, CNN,
Fox. I mean, you know they and of course CNN and Fox,
they are appendages of the two political parties. That's their business model. You
know, they suck up to one party or the other. That's where they
get their guests and so forth. But everybody understands that part part of it.
And if somebody tells you that their objective, run away from them.
The important thing is to take a look at this and to be honest about
where you're coming from and then tell people what you think instead of pretending that
you don't have an opinion. And so the host interjected and said, well,
the problem is that some people like they do have an agenda, and
that agenda is to support Hamas in Palestine or to support Israel. We've seen
this on both sides. So he said, I have spent thirty years at
the BBC. I was never told what to say, but I certainly knew
what the rules were. Well, yeah, you won't find any of these
news organizations a written set of rules. You'll know what the rules are.
You'll know what the rules are just by watching what everybody is doing. Yeah,
everybody's cheering Trump. Well better not criticize him. Now, everybody's telling
on everybody that Trump's playing forty eaches when he's stabbing you in the back or
in the arm. Well no, that's uh, there's no written rules that
you got to say that. But that's what they want you to say.
So, uh, post said, or he wanted to say. So what
did the BBC staff say about the Nazis? He said, of this BBC
veteran. Were they allowed to call them wicked or evil? No, they
were not, and they were told not to rent. They simply called them
the enemy. Look to say that the BBC and mainstream media don't weaponize labels.
They are incredibly deliberate about all of their weaponized labels. Don't call them
illegal aliens. They are undocumented migrants or children of undocumented migrants, not anchor
babies and so forth. Don't say pro life, you are anti abortion rights.
And if you say otherwise, you will have your story spiked. It
will not be passed around, it will not be accepted by the associated press.
Do not pass go, do not collect two hundred dollars. And of
course it's the same way on the other side as well. Here's an example
from the right Gateway Pundit. Sixty eight percent to eighty nine percent of Palestinians
support terror attacks on Israel according to a poll. Is that what the poll
said, No, it isn't. As a matter of fact. If you
look at this Gateway Pundit story, scroll down and show the poll results.
Poll results are eighty eight point nine percent support the firing of rockets from Gaza
at Israel. Well, if that's terrorism, then Israel is engaged in terrorism.
I think that's war. I think it's horrible. I think it needs
to be minimized as much as we can. It needs to be You need
to try to control it, you need to try to make an effort not
to hit civilian targets and all the rest of the stuff. That's all comes
out of the just war theory. But that is not terrorism. That is
war. Next, one seventy five seventy five point four percent believe the deterrence
of Palestinian resistance has increased. Again, does that prove that these people are
terrorists? Now? And I could go on. They've got six different points
here, not a single one of them shows people supporting terrorism. As a
matter of fact, when they say eighty nine percent of Palestinian support terr attacks
against Israel, and they say that's quite a majority, Well, that comes
from the support of firing rockets from Gaza at Israel. And look as we
look at the water being turned off, that whole issue. Water was turned
off, then it was turned back on. Israel supplies ten percent of the
water to Gaza. And then other people have shown pictures of Hamas bragging about
the fact that they're ripping up water pipe infrastructure and using it to make rockets
to shoot into Israel. So again that's part of their war. And your
priority is war. That means that you're going to bring hardship and death to
your own people. That's why priorities should not be war. And whatever these
people do, this is not what America should be involved in as a matter
of fact. And then go over to CNN. Now here's an example.
CNN has got such a reputation for fabricating news that a lot of people believed
this CNN parody. I'll let you see a little bit of it. To
me, it was quite obvious that it was a parody from the very beginning,
and the person who put it together and put it out on social media
admitted that it was a parody. It's pretty believable when you look at CNN's
past history. Here here, we're getting video free now Jerry. Now you
can see the area is completely deserved. But when you get him off the
road and get him night down next to the road, Okay, closer to
the road, Jerry, move the middle. You're in the middle of a
forest. So you get the idea. So you get the idea. He
put a voiceover on there, you know, and says, Okay, make
it look like this and do this, and you know, pretend that this
is happening and so forth. And CNN is outraged because a calisso ward was
taking cover in a ditch as rockets are being fired overhead and the iron dome
anti ballistic missiles were going off and so forth. Uh so they're very angry
about that. But why is that getting passed around by people by the millions,
Because that's the type of thing that we've seen CNN do in the past.
And of course it wasn't that long ago we had CNN telling us,
you know, preparing us with propaganda. They were going to have to accept
the JAB and the JAB passport. Remember this, I don't think I had
them on me. In that case, we'd have to ask you to come
along from Casablanca to today. A demand to produce personal documents can be uncomfortable,
but post pandemic it's something we'll all likely to have to get more and
more comfortable with. We could be asked to show proof we've had the shots
in order to get on an airplane, go to a concert, or go
back to work. Joining me now is medical ethicist, Arthur Kaplan. Medical
ethicis give me a break. And so again they are part of the propaganda
operation. We have seen them fake that the famous clip. As a matter
of fact, us on social media after most of these things were taken down,
saying, this is the real clip, you know, showing what it
was aired on CNN, and this is what this is the fake clip from
CNN after they cleaned it up, and this is what was really going on
that people picked up. No, that was a parody, but of course
we've all seen so many things from CNN that are rigged just like that to
push their agenda. And the fake footage, which has been viewed over five
million times on Twitter, audio intended to sound like a CNN producer began,
Yeah, we can see the areas completely deserted, but I want you to
get them off the road, get them to lie down next to the road.
Okay, And again it was pretty clear to me that it was parody,
but a lot of people believed it. Despite the audio clearly being manipulated,
The video was circulated widely, with many viewers seeming to believe that it
was legitimate. And of course, as they are pushing back on this,
the Daily Mail says, oh Snopes who first pointed out, give me a
break, It was anybody, I think pretty much could see it. But
this is why we have to be careful about what is put out because there's
that discredit. And when you put out the fake parody, the people who
put that out were discredited, and it can be used now to say,
see, look, CNN is legit. They're not. I mean, they're
propagandists. And so by putting out this fake cherry on the top, it
removes the truth that CNN is nothing but propaganda for a lot of people,
Lesson put that out there. And that's why, as I said from the
very beginning, I go back to this all the time, this lie about
the sting of Steve Pritennank. And you know this got shared around with social
media five million times over a couple of days. Well it was four million
shares of what Steve Chennick put out about the state. And I talk about
this all the time. Let me play it for you just so you can
see what that nonsense looks like. This is even more ridiculous and even more
unbelievable than the CNN Parodyauci says, and Bauchi trained me at Tornelles. Sorry,
let's take this thing now. And the reason I couldn't come on the
Alex Jones Show last night was I was not given the permission that I needed
in order to say what I'm about to say now, you didn't have permission
the federal government. I'm not paid by them. Yeah, it's really a
sting operation. Contrary to what everybody else said. Trump knew this was happening.
Eric knew this was happening and won the public. I knew this was
happening. However I did not say anything about it. What happened was we
marked water marked every ballot with what's called QFS block chain encryption code. In
other words, we know pres where every ballot is, where it went,
and who has it. So this is not a stone own election. That's
why we're still fighting over this and a half years later. First, the
entire game of war along the lines of Sunzuo, the art of war,
and Trump was brilliant and still is brilliant at it. All of this was
expected. All of this is part of the sting operation we're running. And
let me tell you that forty eight hours ago, not only did we put
markets on those ballots, but I can say now, with the position of
people in the intelligence community and elsewhere, sent out thousands and thousands of national
guards to twelve different states Washington, Delaware, Texas, Arizona, Alabama and
everywhere. So now you have to consider and rethink what this is really about.
The genius of Trump is that he is able to pull back at any
point and manipulate the opponent without the opponent ever realized. When we expose Hillary
Clinton, we now exposed and it was Trump initiated this Biden family Hunter Biden,
Joe Biden, Jill Biden, Jim Biden, Frank, the whole family
were He sure got the Bidens then right into a game where they were convicted,
and you're seeing what's happening now. What was not announced was that we
orter marked all the ballots with what I said at the QFS blockchain, which
is a very hard encryption code to break. And the second thing is we
sent is I probably twenty thousand or more our national guards forty eight hours ago.
None of it was reported, and I thanked the press for not reporting
it in others. So what in fact friendly pressing is You're seeing a sophisticated
state operation that was initial sheated by Sean Well. Steve, you've just broken
certainly perhaps the biggest news since the election here on this show. I have
to play this out logically in my head RS show to basically, I keep
sing, I love you, Steve. I'd kiss you on the lips right
now if it wasn't digitally Yeah, okay, well there you go. That
was passed around from Clarence Thomas's wife sent that to Mark Meadows. Trump's chief
of staff, Rush Limbaugh talked about that, and the next day I talked
about the next day too. Uh. And this was something to set up
this whole idea that you know, we know this all happened. We got
the proof. Well we're still waiting for your proof, but Chennik uh and
all the rest of them, Rudy, Uh, We're still waiting to see
your proof. But anyway, that was used to set up to stop the
steelcrift, that was used to set up to save America Griff by Trump,
and it was used to discredit people. Of course, I'll like use it
to make money stop the steal thing. But that's what I'm saying. You
have to be careful what you jump into. And the reason I pulled that
back up as well is because I had a listener who sent me a thing
and said, did you know that Steph Chinnick said that he knew Fauci.
Going back to Cornell. He said, I didn't know that, and he
sent me the link to it. Well, I didn't reply to him.
He just sent me the link with that. Here is a little clip where
he says that Fauci says, and Fuci says Cornell, and I like Fauchi.
Fauci, unfortunately, is a very strong Jesuit follower. In other words,
he's more more Catholic than the Pope. He's a great puretician. He
was a great epidemiologist. But in the real world, Tony has never left
an ihfter four years, and Tony will probably leave soon. I'm glad he
helped out Trump. Yeah, okay, oh that's a lie. Well,
you know, maybe he was with him at Cornell. That's part I do
believe. And I think probably both of them. Instead of Faucci's studying medicine,
he's probably studying psychology, because that's what Patchennik is. Yeah, he's
disinformation SSYOP master. His all his degrees in psychology. Everything he does is
a SIOP and that's what Fasci does as well. He's a master at behavioral
psychology. But yeah, it's it's great, you know, he helped Trump,
and it's really good. You know Tony is a great guy. Yeah.
Anyway, so where are we with all this stuff? How do we
sort out the people who are on our side? Well, he got a
representative here, Brian mass a member of Congress, Brian Mast and he's from
Florida, and he wears his Israeli Defense Force uniform to capital will and he
says, I'm doing it because Rashida Talib's got her flag, so she's for
the Palestinians and Brian Mast is for the Israelis. Is there anybody in Congress
that represents us? No? No, at least they wear their uniforms and
stuff. Unlike most of them, As I've said before, they got to
put their sponsorship on their suits like they were a NASCAR driver. You say,
all the Pfizer and Moderna stickers and the military industrial complex stickers on there.
Most of them don't fly their flag. But they're not on our side.
They're owned by foreign governments. They put other governments interests ahead of ours,
They put corporations interests ahead of ours. That's what it's become, just
a perfect example of that. He says, it's the only member to serve
both the US Army and the Israeli Defense Forces. I will always stand with
Israel, and he said when asked why he was wearing an Israeli Defense Forces
uniform to the GOP conference meeting, he said, well, Talib has got
her flag, I've got my uniform. So who is it that is on
our side? Anybody on our side in Congress? No, maybe Thomas Massey.
I can't think of anybody else. The ideology behind celebrating Hamas's atrocities,
and this is one of the other reasons why my first day back after the
attacks last Tuesday, I said, the uh, what we need to pay
attention to is a celebration by the left of these terrorist acts. And there's
reason why they celebrate this because there is a commonality here. They're Marxist,
by the way. You know, the interview that I had with a guy
who wrote the book about diversity, inclusivity and equity, I like it in
that order because it spells a die. I disagree with him. It is
Marxism. It is not cultural Marxism. It is pure Marxism. It's a
kind of Marxism that was pushed out by Antonio Gramsey. The Marxism that marches
through the institutions and the Marxism that has captured all of our institutions. And
you can especially see this in the reactions to terrorism from BLM, from universities
and all the rest of them. Just like Madeline Albright when she was asked,
do you regret killing half a million Iraqi children with your sanctions? She
didn't have the decency to say, well, I didn't kill half a million
children with sanctions. No, she just said it's worth it. It's worth
it. When you look at these people from Black Lives Matter and our universities,
what do they say. They say it was justified. They don't try
to say, well, no, I don't think they beheaded any babies.
I don't think they did this. I don't think they did They don't.
Typically, there are some people who are out there saying, well, it
wasn't a shooting at the concert. That's nonsense, but of course that's what
Steve Chennik did at one time when I banded him on my show for saying
that about Vegas. But for the most part, they're not denying that the
acts were committed. They're saying the acts were justified, and they celebrate that.
And so you have to understand that they're doing this because of their Marxism.
As a matter of fact, there's a video of a captured farm worker
from Thailand, and not just one, several of them, and Hamas and
others are about to decapitate somebody that they have wounded. They're about to decapitate
him with a hoe, and they take that video and they put it out.
They're proud of that, They're proud of that. These are the people,
by the way, that the left wants to bring to America. And
so although it may seem odd, says this writer on a zero hedge,
this is from ah Well, I don't see the author here anyway. Although
it may seem odd to celebrate atrocities, this is a key part of the
ideology of decolonization that was put out by Franz Fannin. And you hear them
all the time talking about colonizers and all the rest of this stuff. And
this is why they celebrate this terrorism. A moss marching in, slaughtering women,
children, pensioners, parading the stripped and raped corpses of young girls is
a decolonial praxis. Decolonization is ultimately about killing. To Franz Fannin, who
wrote in the wretched earth, he said. At the level of individuals,
violence is a cleansing force. It frees the native from his inferiority complex and
from his despair and inaction. It makes him fearless and restores his self respect.
And this guy is starting to sound like Niche anyway. Illuminated by violence,
the consciousness of people rebels against any pacification, he says. For colonized
people, this violence invests their character with positive creative qualities. The practice of
violence binds them together as a whole, since each individual forms a violent link
in the great chain, a part of the great organism of violence, which
has surged upward in reaction to the settler's violence. In the beginning, you
notice the pattern of behavior. You notice how black lives matter an Antifa,
and these university professors and these Marxists communists. You notice how they worship death
and violence. They do it with abortion, they do it with terrorism.
They're actually pretty consistent. If you stop and think about it, it tells
you who they serve. The first who wrote this article said, the only
critique I've ever seen from any of the leftists. They all agree with this,
and this is why you see them cheering in the streets. So the
only critique that I've had is from an Indian Marxist B. K. Jah,
and he nails it pretty pretty well. The Indian Marxists who criticized this
idea of celebrating terrorism and violence and it being justified and a wonderful thing to
restore your herman humanity after you've been colonized. So the Indian Marxist says,
well, a fundamental objection may be raised against Fannin's view that violence frees the
individual from his fear and from his inferiority complexes. Fannin's own psychiatric case histories
proved beyond doubt that the act of killing is dehumanizing and that it leads to
neurosis and to distortion of personality. Yeah, the fruit of that action is
against that individual even in this life, he says. An African militant,
and these are people that Fannin, who was a psychiatrist, had actually treated.
An African militant had planted a bomb in a cafe, killing ten people
every year. At about the same time, he suffered from acute anxiety,
insomnia, and suicidal obsessions. An Algerian whose own mother had been wantonly murdered
himself, wantonly murdered and killed a white woman who was on her knees begging
for mercy. As a result, he suffered what Fannin calls an anxiety psychosis
of the depersonalization type. Thus, his own deep understanding of such cases makes
his theory of renovating violence more difficult to understand. In other words, these
are people that he's treated, people that he's written about, what terrorism,
what killing innocent people does to them. Fannin'slute absoluting absolutization of violence goes even
further. For him. Violence is not just a method. He proclaims it
to be of value in its own right, and he equates it with revolution.
This is why I say, you know, when somebody asks me,
what's the difference between what's going on in Gaza and what happened with seventeen seventy
six? The just war theory, the just war theory again, it's not
to say that there weren't any atrocities. Probably were on both sides. And
that Mel Gibson movie The Patriot, He goes nuts, and that movie they
show the coldl looted killing of people by Tarlington or British who had a very
bad reputation, is like a general Sherman. But in the movie, remember
they blockaded a bunch of people into a church and burned the church. Now
with the people, and it burned them alive. There's questions about whether or
not that happened, but I would not question whether or not things like that
did happen in a war. But we don't embrace that, we don't celebrate
that. We as a society must reject that and punish it, not celebrated.
And that is also disturbing to see these leftist socialist and they're all Marxist
organizations. BLM is black lying Marxist. That's what this stands for. They
black lives don't matter to them. Nobody's lives matter to them. The anti
fah they are fascist themselves, fascist, fascist, authoritarian. So Scot Horton
says, it's all really about provoking your reaction with terrorism. As with all
asymmetric political action, the action is in the reaction of the opposition, says
Saul Olenski and his rules for radicals. This is not conspiracy stuff. This
is not four dimensional chests, he says Scott Hart Horton, It's just plain
old two dimensional chess. That's all it is. Beheaded babies are not Hamas
certainly murdered hundreds and hundreds of innocent civilian Israelis and non combatants. It is
called a tactic again, terror, violence, fear, intimidation as a way
to achieve your political means. And there are people at the local, at
the grassroots level that get caught up in it, you know, like these
two cases that I just talked about, But it's really for the geopolitical calculations
of the people. With the various governments. They're trying to make you angry,
they're trying to make you hate, They're even trying to drive you crazy
for the purpose of making the more powerful force. In other words, United
States and Israel do even worse to their own people, such as getting the
US to invade Afghanistan and getting Israel to bomb the Gaza strip. You see,
that's what it's about. And we've already seen this immediately, right regardless
of whether this was a stand down like Pearl Harbor or not a stand down,
but an open the gates. And you know we know about this.
You don't tell anybody. We'll take this attack and then we'll come after them.
Regardless of whether or not it was that or not. Immediately Natanyahu promised
to escalate this, not to have it be proportional, not to go on
as a surgical strike and to get all these people. But you know,
go to level Gaza and people will talk about this for generation. Annihilate the
area, annihilate everybody, you see. And so, as I said before
when Caitlyn Johnstone said, they people keep saying this is unprovoked, unprovoked,
unprovoked. No, it was provoked. But their response to that provocation was
not proportional, and it was not justified, and it was unhinged terror.
And so the question becomes, is not going to be the response of the
Israeli and the US government? Well they then, you know they've been provoked.
Are they now going to escalate it? Finally, there's this article was
written by a Jewish guy and he was let's see, this was put on
the FP. I saw this because it was linked by Drudge. So an
essay that he wrote, he said, once I was a peace advocate.
Now I have no idealism left. And his cousin was Daniel Pearl, the
journalist who was kidnapped and then executed simply because he was Jewish. And he
said when that happened, his family's response was to set up a charitable organization
to try to argue for peace. And he said, but you know,
as he and he went to Israel, he volunteered to join the military.
Said they put him in a kibbutz, very communal, very much community.
As a matter of fact, when you look at how collectivistly organized Israeli is,
that's one of the reasons why most Jewish people are coming from the left.
It's a very collectivist and it's understanding. And so when this guy comes
in, he doesn't have any family there. He's an American Jew and he
wants to fight for Israel. They put him with an adopted family. And
he said the family was all leftists like me, And he said they were
mocking me for being in the army. He said, we're trying to avoid
getting into the army. Would you come in here, you know what you're
getting into, and so forth, and so he said, when all this
stuff happened, the family that he was staying with and had come to know
as family, the ones who had adopted him and adopted him in a sense
that kibbutz, they were abducted. He said they were eventually released, that
somebody got them out somehow. But he said they're not okay because they've seen
their neighbors murdered and killed. And he says, now as he's looking at
this, he said, he could handle all this other stuff, but now
at this point in time, he doesn't have any idealism left. He said,
they have killed my ideal And he said in the sense of iron,
he said, and I can't forgive them for that. See, here's the
difference for Christians. This world is not our home. I have strong attachments
to this country, but we were called to protect innocent life. But innocent
life is not the concern here right when we're talking about terrorism and when we're
talking about baby murders. If innocent life was the issue, then we would
care more about the sixty million plus babies that were killed by planned parenthood,
then we would about forty babies that were allegedly killed. We would care more
about the hundreds of babies that survive in abortion and are left to die than
we would about a couple of babies that were taken out of you know,
incubators allegedly and it wasn't happening. And so when we look at this,
if we're strong Christians, and this is a test for all of us,
right, I understand this is not easy, and for all the people writing
me saying well, I think you know we we've got to do something about
this, or we justify government is there to hand out justice and to try
to create law and order, and of course that's breaking down here in our
societies. We can see deliberately, we see our government deliberately turning its back
on law and order and on justice. And so when we look at this
from a larger standpoint, I hope when this comes to us, and who
knows how we're going to react, right, But if we're strong Christians,
we understand that the wrongs that are done to us we leave at the cross,
just as the wrongs that were done by us we leave at the cross.
I know that sounds like idealism, but it's not just a philosophy.
It's what we live by. If we are Christians, and if we are
not able to leave the wrongs that were done to us at the foot of
the cross, then there's no forgiveness for our wrongs either there And so be
careful when you ask for vengeance. If you would rather have vengeance carried out
by corrupt, self interested governments rather than by a just God, be careful
what you ask for. If you want vengeance and justice, we will all
get that. If we don't accept the mercy of the cross, we will
all get that vengeance and justice at the hand of God. He has been
patient and long suffering with us all. And so when this comes to us,
as I believe it will, and I think America is going to continue
to be isolated on its own as we have been, And so when it
comes to us, it will be a test, won't it. It will
be a test of whether or not we really believe what we say we believe
as Christians. Will be right back liberty, It's your move. And now
the David Knight Show. I love this online. Europe successfully closed its borders
to the unvaccinated. Why can't they do that with the illegal immigrants that are
pouring in? Good question, isn't it? It all comes back to these
fundamental questions, doesn't it. You know, we look at twenty twenty,
the pandemic, the vaccine, the mandates, the lockdowns, the masks,
the rest of this stuff. The greatest bipartisan betrayal of this country in my
lifetime, perhaps of all time, by Trump, by Biden, by Republicans,
by Democrats. Oh, they claim they can't protect our border. Oh,
but they were able to do, especially in Europe. They are able
to run their vaccine passports. Not as much here because we had cars,
and we better keep our cars, and we better keep our guns, because
that's what they're going to try to do to us. Those are deterrents,
those are ways that we escape their net. So Europe presented at second Great
Migration Crisis since twenty fourteen from the Italian Institute or National Political Studies. A
graph of migrant arrivals from Italy from January twenty twenty ten through September twenty twenty
three. Travis. Pull up that chart if you can and show people how
it went up. As they took Al Kadafi massive wave of migrants coming in
from Libya, they started to get that taken care of, and now they
have lost it again. So before the end of twenty twenty three, the
EU, Norway and Switzerland together are projected to receive more than a million asylum
applications and therefore to meet or even exceed the twenty sixteen record of one in
a quarter million. Germany loon has seen a seventy four percent increase. Sco
up a little bit and show that chart. There you go. You see
how went up, then went down. Now shooting back up again. Who
knows where it's going to stop? Uh, thank you. Germany loan has
seen a seventy four percent increase in applications compared to the same period in twenty
twenty two. So far, the EU, which is entrusted with the security
of European borders, and the EU doesn't care anymore about the security aboard.
It despises the security of the EU borders, just as our federal government despises
that. So far, it's reacted with tepid half measures, proposing to fast
track the approval process outside of Europe for those applicants do they say have the
least chance of success. The rest will enter the Shinjin area as before and
live on state entitlements. Why their applications are being processed over months and years,
And that's what Biden is doing here. Come on in, come on
into Texas. And of course, when you look at the numbers of people
coming in, the numbers of people coming in through Texas dwarfs what's going into
the EU. The examples of Denmark and Hungary show that the migration policies of
individual member states can have dramatic impact on the settlement of migrants domestically. Both
countries have taken a hard line against mass migration, and Denmark has seen their
asylum applications fall by fifty six percent compared to twenty twenty two. Listen to
this, Hungary has processed only twenty six applications twenty six applications for all of
twenty twenty three. They have control, but they're the only ones. Migration
is now the most important political issue for forty four percent of Germans. And
then, of course the energy crisis that was again manufactured crisis by Biden and
others, that has also energized, so to speak, the German public.
This is one of the reasons why you're seeing AfD, the alternative for Deutsch
Lant soaring collectively the ruling parties right now, the ruling coalition that's there claims
that it only has a loyalty of thirty three percent of Germans, and so
what is the response by this criminal regime in Germany? The ruling coalition has
the approval of only thirty three percent of the people. They're massively moving towards
AfD, so there is a move to make AfD illegal. That's the response.
Yeah, talk to us about democracy. The media cannot suppress the migrant
problem or talk it away because the consequences are very immediate and extremely visible at
the local level. And this is happening in the United States. Even in
these Democrat sanctuary areas. Every last community has to find housing for new arrivals.
Generally they're accommodated at first in school sports halls, and the longer term
the migrants receive housing rented by municipal authorities, which is expensive and extremely short
supply. So we know how to handle that, just as I think it
was in New York City where they just threw out a ninety plus year old
pinsioner South Korean War, a Korean War veteran American who was at a hotel.
They just throw him out on the street. Sorry, no room for
you. We got to bring in foreign refugees. And so I'm sure you've
seen this. Now everybody has picked this up. As of Thursday, I
think it went out. I haven't talked about it yet Kissinger, Henry Kissinger
says that Europe let in too many foreigners. Who would imagine, yeah,
by the way, I played the Patinics stuff. He was Patchinic's boss during
the false flag operations of Operation Gladiol where the Italian Prime Minister was killed,
and yeah, the Red Brigades and other things like that going through Italy and
Germany, and it was a NATO false flag. Patchink was involved in that,
bragged about it. As a matter of fact, the Italian government found
that. They held an inquiry and they said that he had ordered the execution
of Aldomole based on Kissinger. So it was a mistake, was it,
Kissinger? Really, it was a mistake. Who knew that this would happen?
Right, give me a break, I thought so, one headline says.
Now he tells us, No, he knew all along. He says,
now, it was a great mistake to let in so many people of
totally different culture and the religion and concepts, because it creates a pressure group
inside each country that does that, right, That's probably what it sounds like
when he says it. No, it was done by design. It was
done by design, And so why is he saying this now? He's saying
this now just defend Israel and to support Israel. He now says Europe should
give unconditional political support for Israeli action because a terrorist attack has happened, And
he says, Israel must vindicate its sovereignty in that area, and it cannot
permit Gaza to return to a state where it could emerge, could take thousands
of or a large number of hostages, kill thousands, and then live in
that condition side by side with Israel. And so he's in the uncomfortable position
of saying, you know, when we create this type of situation, it
creates conflict. And that's exactly the kind of situation that they've been engineering for
Europe and for America. We've seen it in Israel and Palestine. And so
then where do the Palestinians go? Well. In twenty fifteen, Kissinger was
co signatory of a letter to Congress demanding that borders be kept open to Syrian
and Iraqi migrants in the wake of deadly Paris terror attacks. Huh, yeah,
they've committed terrorist attacks in Paris. Let him in anyway, right,
The letter said to do otherwise would quote be contrary to our nation's traditions of
openness and inclusivity would undermine our core objective of combating terrorism. He said,
got the gordically refusing to take Muslim migrants only feeds the narrative of ISIS,
and so you should bring in the terrorists with open arms. And he's not
the only one who's saying that now. And of course the terrorism has not
stopped in France where they have brought in so many people allowed them to come
in, allowed them to stay. I mean, we've seen the Charlie Hebdo
attacks. Well, they came after the cartoon company killing people there, Louve
and Versailles, who were both shut down with bomb threats. They've got seven
thousand troops on the street to try to keep order. This is what it
looks like when we follow the policies that Henry Kissinger and the Builderberg Group and
the UN and the World Economic Forum have demanded from us and have tried to
guilt trip us into. And sad thing is is that it's not just the
Kissingers and the people on the left, you know. And we also see
this in London. London streets flooded with pro Palestinian protesters. That's one of
the reasons why Suddik Khan is mayor. We've got Jamal Bowman, part of
the radical left Democrat, says, we need to welcome the Palestinian refugees,
same thing that Kissinger as saying. Welcome Palestinian refugees. As experts predict that
one million people will flee you the Gaza strip, there's about two point four
million people, he said. Fifty percent of the population in Gaza are children.
Except that Egypt has closed its borders with Gaza. Why is it that
none of the Arab states want to bring in the Palestinians. We should shame
them on this, but nobody wants to talk about that. It's the you
know, Saudi Arabia doesn't want them, Egypt doesn't want them. They've seen
what happened in Lebanon, but nobody wants them, right, Iran doesn't want
them to come in. So Egypt has closed its border with Gaza and is
unwilling to receive any Palestinian refugees. Why is it? Are they racists?
Do they know what is going to happen to their country? Do they understand
the pattern of violence that we've seen elsewhere? And so Jamal Bowman says,
fifty percent of the population, and God's our children understand that. It is
the second generation that truly becomes dangerous because even though maybe it's peaceful refugees who
come into the country, they come in with absolutely nothing, and the kids
grow up with the kids that were there in France or elsewhere, and they
grow up and they're taught in the schools because the schools are run by people
like Henry Kissinger and their agenda. They're taught that the people in their host
country are evil, that they're colonizers, and that violence is justified against colonizers.
They see other children have got things that they don't have, and it's
that second generation then that becomes a really dangerous rists. Not so much the
first generation. They understand what they fled and they're grateful that they were able
to flee that. But it's usually the second generation that the terrorists come out
of. Since this data shows about one hundred and seventy thousand Palestinians already living
in the US, according to the State Department, the US took in twenty
five four hundred and sixty five refugees. That's twenty five, four hundred and
sixty five more refugees in Egypt took or Saudi Arabia, and so Republican lawmakers
have begun to speak out against this idea of re settling Palestinian refugees in the
US. Marco Rubio said, the US is the most generous nation of the
world, but we are in no position to accept additional refugees, especially from
a region with as higher risk of terrorism, given our nations an ability to
secure our own border or vet those who are already here well. So I
guess the problem is that the Palestinians want a place to go. Since no
Arab countries will take them, I guess America has to take them. But
even if the official position of the government is that they won't take them,
they can still come through the southern border because that's all wide open to anyone,
and everyone who wants to come in right come in through Mexico. We
see a Palestinian rally in Philadelphia where they congratulate Hamas for a job well done.
Again, they're not denying the violence against civilians. They are celebrating that.
And you have to understand one of the reasons why the squad wants to
bring them in. It's not for humanitarian purposes. They see the Palestinians as
being the army of Marxists for them, the same reason that Kissinger was doing
this stuff. They want to mix it up, they want to take it
down. That's the way they get civil war and conflict having different ethnic groups.
White supremacists they called, they slammed the white supremacist settler colonial state of
America. So it's the same as Israel. Job well done. There's no
difference between these colonial settlers in the Zionist state of Israel or in America.
You see, that's their ideology, and so they think that violence makes them
stronger and more acceptable. Take a look at Sweden. What is happening.
They're executions, bombings, and child assassins, and this is happening because of
migration and because of the drug war. I think this is what's going to
happen to Texas. Texas has finally started to take some measures. I'm still
skeptical as to whether or not these measures or anything other than virtue signaling,
because that's all I saw when I was there. But maybe they have started
to learn earn a lesson from this. But going back to Sweden, innocent
bystanders, including a twelve year old girl being gunned down, as a country
that was once deemed peaceful and safe becomes a terrifying gangster paradise. Again,
it is organized crime, it is foreign gangs. A daily mail goes out
of its way not to identify these gangs as non Swedish, the gangs that
have turned Sweden into a war zone, but you can't escape it. One
of them is the Kurdish fox is what they call it. The other one
is the Greek. This is the same type of thing we're going to see
in Texas. All the gang warfare that is going on in Mexico because of
the drug war, it's going to eventually spill over across the border. And
I think that's exactly what Biden wants. Just two decades ago, Sweden had
one of the lowest gun violence deaths per capita in Europe. Now it's at
the top of the league. But wait a minute, they've got gun control,
right, We'll tell that to the criminal gangs. Gangs are hiring children
as assassins and furnishing them with weapons, giving them the addresses of targets.
According to a police chief under Thornberg who has a Swedish name, unlike the
other people that are there. But again, let's not point out other than
saying that they're Turkish and Greek, let's not point out that they're not Swedish.
And then we have the Breitbart editor Joel Pollock, truly amazing the position
that he has taken and all this stuff because Breitbart has more than anything focused
on immigration, focused on the border, and so, as Information Liberation points
out, he immediately came out on the day that the attacks happened in Israeli
says, I've broken the Sabbath in the Jewish holiday to deliver the message Israel
should wipe out Gaza. He said, allow forty eight hours to evacuate,
evacuate women, children and the elderly, to score it, destroy everything that
remains, plow it under, and annex it to Israel. Joel Pollock is
the editor of Breitbart right now. And then within a couple of days he
said, we we being the US, we should give civilians from Gaza temporary
refuge during the war. Well, you first, Joel, an interesting choice
of terms. We again, like the people who wear another country's uniform or
fly another country's flag, and Congress, Joel Pollock has just phoned the flag
of Breitbart. He criticized GOP efforts to ban the US from accepting Palestinian refugees.
He wants to make Israel's problem our problem, because that is what the
open border immigration stuff is. They've seen how effectively it works. And I
got to say, you know, when I look at Briipart, I saw
them as they were cheering the vaccine, the Trump shot, they were cheering
Trump's phony pandemic. They're pushing that fear, they're pushing the lockdown. They
have said nothing, by the way, nothing at all about the jabs killing
people. Total crickets. You will not see any of that stuff at Breitbart.
Now they continue to focus on the border. And now you've got Joel
Pollock saying, well, send the pal sending refugees to the US. Why
why Well, like I said, nobody wants them, so let's push them
on the US. He wants to make us the world's toilet. You got
some refuse here that nobody wants. Let's turn it into the United Sewers of
America. I'm disgusted with Breitbart, just amazing. And now this is a
total betrayal. You know, Breitbart never talked about censorship except when it affected
them. With the exception of Alum Bakari, none of the other people there,
and John Nolty, who used to be their editor, who now writes
on entertainment one of the biggest vaccine pushers you'd see anywhere. Is as bad
as anybody on CNN. And so the House Republicans have introduced the Gaza Act
to stop Biden from importing terrorists into the United States. Tom Tiffany and Andy
Ogles have introduced legislation to ban Biden administration from importing Palestinians. Well, they're
going to have to get a speaker first. I mean, this is the
internal chaos that's going on inside the Republican Party. The bill exclusively shared Breitbart
News ahead of its introduction see Breitbart News is still pushing Oh, he's got
to control the borders. Joel Pollock is not happy about the fact that you
know they gave this stuff to them. As a matter of fact, you
oppose it at a time when the threat of terrorism is not only grotesquely on
display, they said, but being encouraged and justify it is critical that we
do our best to ensure the security of our nation. Set Ogles Following the
US withdrawal from Afghanistan, Biden used his administration's parole pipelines to resettle nearly one
hundred thousand Afghans across American communities, many of whom were not interviewed in person
beforehand and who were found to be linked to terror. You know, this
is happening. At the same time, a lot of people who put their
lives on the line, as as interpreters, were left behind. Because it's
the same kind of chaos that you saw in the evacuation and the retreat by
Biden. They don't know what anybody's doing. So you leave people who put
their life on the line, you leave them behind and abandon them, and
you bring other people in that you don't even vet. That's the US government.
Even in Nashville, we've got the Socialists of America in the streets cheering
terrorism, cheering terrorism. Hey, they want to have that terrorist army.
They want to get you know, more people here. And then finally,
the Biden regime is threatening to refuse to give credit lines and loans, threatening
banks brother that don't give credit lines and loans to illegal aliens. Give them
what you've got, you know, forget the American dream. You know,
we've got to build schools for any kids who parents want to send them here
to be educated at our expense. Forget any of that stuff. And how's
he running it through, Well, it's his criminal Department of Justice combined with
the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, this Frankenstein monster created by Elizabeth Warren and the
wake from the last financial crisis, the Frankenstein monster that is beloved by the
big banks because the CFPB pushed new rules that effectively pushed out small and medium
sized banks of being able to make a law of the loans that they used
to make and shuddered them by the hundreds year after year after year. So
this Consumer Financial Protection Board is now saying that financial institutions they're reminding people,
sending out a threat from the Department of Justice and the CFPB to remind financial
institutions that all credit applicants are protected from discrimination on the basis of their national
origin, race, and other characteristics covered by the Equal Credit Opportunity Act,
regardless of their immigration status. They said, well, that doesn't say.
That's not what it says. It doesn't say regardless of their immigration status.
What it says that you will not discriminate against people on the basis of their
national origin, race, and other things like that. But think about that,
on the basis of their national origin. It doesn't say on the basis
of their nationality. You see, if this really was about people who come
here as refugees or people who come here as illegal aliens, then the bill
would have said you will not discriminate on the basis of nationality. But it
doesn't say that. It says on the basis of their national origin. In
other words, they were originally from somewhere else, but now they're citizens here
in the United States. That's really what that law is about. That law
is not about putting illegal aliens at the forefront of this. And so now
you got four out of seven Americans want a southern border wall, which is
the thing that has constantly being pushed by brightbarn As. You just see with
what Biden is saying, give them loans. Put them at the front of
the line. I don't care if they don't have money to pay you back.
We're going to shut you down. If you don't give them the money,
make the loan. It may be a bad loan, but you make
the loan, or I'm going to shut you down for sure. And so
when you have that type of situation, as I said over and over again,
the wall isn't going to stop anybody. If you've got that kind of
a welfare magnet. If you're making all kinds of promises about all the goodies
that you're going to give people, they're going to get here somehow or the
other. If you're going to offer them a pot of gold, they're going
to get over any barrier that is there. They'll figure that out. And
that's all they've got to figure out is how to get in. So that's
not going to stop anything. Texas, the Senate has passed for I think
it's a third time now, Yeah, third time the Senate has a asked
the bill and it keeps getting shut down in the House. The bill is
to allow state and local police the authority to arrest illegal immigrants. Why would
they not have that authority? I see everybody is looking the other way,
Nobody is doing anything. Everybody's well, it's not my job, somebody else's
job. Texas reached a record number of illegal immigrant apprehensions in fiscal year twenty
twenty three, with over one point eight million apprehensions like I said, when
we're talking about Europe, I said, it's far, far bigger in the
US, just in Texas alone, double what went into all of the European
Union. And we know what that looks like. This isn't a projection,
This is not a theory. It is a conspiracy by people like Henry Kissinger
and others build a Berg and World Economic Form and others. The federal government's
unwillingness to enforce federal immigration laws and secure our southern border. They said,
we are going to have to be able to arrest them ourselves. Well,
look, here's the thing. I think that as we saw I think it
was Italy where they said, okay, you've got these boats and they're just
bringing people in from northern Africa over and over again. So let's take the
people off the boat. Let's sink the boat, destroy the boat, and
let's put people in a big in prison for six months to a year or
something like that before we send them back home. There has to be some
kind of a deterrent this whole catch and release thing or dropping somebody over the
border without holding them intotention. Texas needs to put them I think in an
open air prison. We talk about open air prisons all the time. That's
their plan for all of us, is an open air prison with five G
and smart cities and fifteen minute city and all the rest of stuff. Put
them in an open air prison. Put them in an open air prison in
Texas over the summer. They may not want to come back quite so quickly.
And then you send them back home. We let there be some consequences
for it. First of all, even in Chicago, the majority of people
there want to end the sanctuary city policy. I don't look at this and
rejoice as Bright Barton some of these other people do, because this is destroying
the country. It may or may not destroy the Democrats election hope. You
know, Trump may revive that, they may stuff the ballots. They know
a lot of different things can happen with these elections. And frankly, I
care what happens to the country. I don't care what happens to the politicians
or the elections of the political party, because these politicians don't care about this
country. We'll be right back. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Let's talk a little bit about domestic news. We have a billion dollar supersized
prisons, say to be built across the United States. What's that about.
Well, you know, if the open air prisons or the smart cities don't
work, they've got other alternatives. Then they are building domestic gems. And
of course that Marty Gotsfeld was put in one of those, the CMUs,
the communication management units, they said initially with going to be for radical terrace,
you know, like the ones who supposedly flew two planes and made three
buildings collapse in New York City. But now you see people who are dissidents
in America being put into these communication management units because they don't want them communicating
with anybody outside. I think you're going to see a lot of J sixers
put in these types of things as well, as they were abandoned by Trump
after he fleeced them and used them for his own purposes. Billion dollars supersized
prisons everywhere. Alabama's building one. It's going to cost over a billion dollars.
And it's not the only one. Nebraska is building a three hundred and
fifty million dollar, fifteen hundred bed prison in Georgia, a one point seven
billion dollar facility with forty five hundred new beds. It's going to be added
there. So some of this is to replace collapsing prisons, as we saw
with Trump being indicted there in Fulton County. You know, the jail is
just falling apart, and so some of this stuff is as we torn down
and rebuilt, but they're also expanding it. You know, we've gone through
massive prison expansion with the War on Drugs policy that was pushed by Joe Biden,
and it has been a for profit business in many cases not clear from
this article, just you know how these things are going to be run.
But Bianca Tylick, executive director of warth rises it is a non profit dedicated
to dismantling the prison industry, believes the more beds there are, the more
people will be put in them. I don't know, you know, when
we look at this and we look at the ramping up of the I R
s, the ramping up of the prisons, building a wall across the border,
I mean, the wall is not the problem, folks. The welfare
magnet is somebody wants to come here and work. There ought to be a
way that we can allow them to do that and not put them on welfare.
That was not anything that ever happened with immigration in the eighteen hundreds,
in the early twentieth century, it was not come to America and will immediately
put you on unemployment like they do in California. And if we have any
doubts about what this looks like, just take a look at the UN's Digital
ID Governance Framework, the United Nations Development Program, the UNDP. What are
they developing, Well, a new form of infrastructure, except this infrastructure is
digital. This infrastructure is an airless prison. The top of their homepage they
say governance for people and planet, a planetary governance, a corporate governance.
It'll have the facade of national governments. Will remain to fool some people,
but you know, when we look at it, it's the same type of
thing that they've been preparing for a long time, same type of thing that
CNN was preparing us for when it ran that report. Yeah, that's exactly
I remember that well, But we're going to have to have that because of
the of the vaccine, the vaccine passport. A robust digital public infrastructure DPI
has become increasingly crucial for governments, especially when it comes to delivering large scale
public services. They say this is their document, well as reprinted by technocracy
dot com, the Technocracy dot News. I'm sorry. So, in order
to deliver large scale public services, they've got to have a digital infrastructure to
identify everybody. Well, guess what, I don't one their public service.
I don't want to be serviced by them. This reminds me every time I
see that of the Twilight Zone episode where the aliens come to Earth and they
say, why are you here to serve mankind? And then at the end
of the episode, a guy gets on the ship and he says that to
serve mankind is a recipe book on how to cook humans and eat them.
For the public sector, the debate isn't about whether to adopt digital technologies,
but which ones to embrace and how to ensure there's seamless and effective integration.
The DPI, the digital public infrastructure is made out of digital building blocks,
says the UN, laying the foundation for subsequent innovations. Oh so they're doing
it from the inside, and they're doing it iteratively. The only thing they
don't mention here is that it is being done based on chaos as well.
It's imperative, says a u N to be intentional and meticulous on the outset.
Don't forget the Machiavelian stuff too. Intentional, meticulous and Machiavelian. Those
are all essential ingredients as we lie to people about what is happening. They
go on to say, the UN says the importance of legal identity is an
integral part of Agenda twenty thirty. Right there, Agenda twenty thirty lock you
down, make sure that you don't have freedom, economic travel, freedom,
anything key to that is your identity. The identity papists police right, because
that's what authoritarian governments always do. And the Sustainable Development Goals a center goal
to that sustainable Sustainable Developmental Goal Target sixteen point nine. They quote their own
documents, aims to quote, provide legal identity for all, including birth registration
and underscore is a widespread significance of civil registration and societies globally. I don't
know. I think we would just find in America without that that kind of
stuff. My mom told me the story when she went to get her marriage
license. They got married in the thirties and early thirties, and when they
went, she took her father along because she didn't have a birth certificate.
When they went to get the marriage license, and the person who was offering
them the things said, well, I can't give you a marriage license if
you don't have a birth certificate. How do I know that she was born
at home? And my grandfather said, because I just told you, so,
you're calling me a liar. He was able to get the person.
I don't think that would work today. But anyway, such governance insures that
stakeholders are both cognitate into the rules and committed to adhering to them. So
you understand this is for the good of the stakeholders, not for the public.
Public isn't going to own anything. We're not stakeholders. So you just
have to understand that. You know, it's going to be stakeholders who own
everything, stakeholders who govern us, and it's going to be corporate governance.
And the amazing thing is how out in the open this conspiracy is. The
question is for all the people who think Trump is going to save us from
this, and why he didn't Trump get us out of the UN, Why
didn't he reduce our commitment to NATO and on and on? Instead he put
neukom Niki Haley in at the UN. A new brain map has revealed thousands
of different cell types. Researchers studied one hundred TSSUE samples from different regions across
the human brain and then lies the RNA and millions of individual cells to see
which genes in the brain are being expressed to make different proteins in the cell.
Well, that's kind of interesting, isn't it. Maybe we can do
something and pass some kind of mRNA across the blood brain barrier to change some
of this stuff. But there's so much that they don't understand about all this.
We just identified all kinds of new brain cells. They said they found
more than thirty three hundred cell types in the human brain. They refer to
that in this article as diversity. Isn't it interesting that these people will ignore
the creator and worship the creation. You know, they'll see this incredible machinery
here and they don't think anything about it. It's like it's like taking a
look at some complicated automobile in the future where we don't know anything about them,
and you know, just saying, well, it's amazing how these things
used to just pop out of the ground evolve from nothing. We had a
plane that was trying to fly back to Panama, well, trying to fly
from Panama City and to Tampa had to turn around. The headline says they
had an explosive adult diaper and they started the plane for a suspicious object,
only to find an adult diaper. How did this happen? You know,
I don't know. I guess somebody thought it was a bomb. No pun
intended here, I guess. I guess. So when somebody says that is
that an explosive and person might have said depends. I don't know, and
then it was on. We think it got a possible plane. The hijacking
here and Tennessee here. I don't think I had reported this, the fact
that the Biden administration has finally laid off of this family in Tennessee. It's
a German homeschooling family who was facing fines There were going to be more than
their entire income because they wanted to homeschool their kids because of their Christian beliefs.
The government under George Bush didn't believe that they were refugees, didn't give
them refugee status, but they were given a deferred under Obama. They were
able to win a deferred status because of the time he was kicking in Dhaka
and they've been on that status for quite some time. It's even surprising to
me that they've had a couple more babies after they came to this country.
But evidently anchor babies don't apply if you're white Christians. Different set of rules
for different people, right, And so they got a sudden order after years
of being here. Obama tried to get them thrown out in twenty twelve.
They came in two thousand and eight and with five children. Now they've got
seven children, but again those two children who were born here in the United
States, they'll throw these people out. There was a lot of pressure.
This was reported by Life Site News, and Homeschool Legal Defense is representing them.
And you had Republicans here in Tennessee. Congresswoman Diana Harshbarger and a Senator
Marsha Blackburn wrote letters and they've now backed off and given them another year.
Isn't that great? But not permanent status? Truly amazing. So the Homeschool
Legal Defense Association said, it's tough to know. Is it a new official
who came into ICE and looking at this, or is this new policy from
the Biden administration. Is it just an individual ICE officer who who doesn't understand
this, or was there some superior in the bureaucratic process somewhere who just decided
that they wanted to affect the deportation. I don't know, he said,
he's the one working on it as a lawyer. You see, we have
these bureaucracies. It's like the IRS. When the law is sufficiently complex,
you know, these bureaucrats can pretty much do whatever they wish. A law
that is sufficiently complex, like the IRS is the same as having no law
at all. And so you know, it could be just the opinion of
one individual. Because these people are not elected and they're not accountable to anybody,
you can't get them out. We have regulation without representation as well as
taxation without representation. We'll talk about that as well. There's been a new
move by the IRS, an important court case coming up that is going to
wind up affecting well, it's only going to be affecting the really rich,
they tell you, but it's going to wind up affecting everybody. There is
a seal tax law that isn't extrapolated in some way, shape or form to
everybody. A sponsor of a Kansas born alive law so that I personally saw
a baby survive an abortion attempt. So this is a law that would require
basic medical care for newborns who survive botched abortions. He says he knows such
legislation is necessary because he said, contrary to the abortion lobby's narratives that this
never happens, he personally witnessed a baby survive an abortion attempt, and of
course Ralph Northam, Governor of Virginia, said, oh yeah, I'll call
it comfort care. He said, the law will require that they exercise the
same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the life and
help of a child as a reasonably diligent and conscientious health care provider would render
to any other child born alive at the same gestational age, and ensure that
the child who is born alive is immediately transported to a hospital. On October
the ninth, Republican state Representative Ron Bryce, who is a doctor, appeared
in the Wichita Eagle with an opbed detailing an incident that he witnessed in nineteen
eighty eight as a medical resident in Texas. He called to he was called
to a code blue, typically an alert from medical emergencies, Yet When he
arrived in the room, neither the female patient nor the attending surgeon showed any
signs of emergency situation. Bryce then heard the cry of a premature infant who
accomplished the seemingly impossible. He said that survived his abortion. Though strong enough
to live briefly outside the womb, he was still too young to survive very
long separated from his mother. Bryce transferred the baby boy to the neonatal intensive
care, where he died after several hours of difficulty breathing. Was this an
I rock, No, it was in Texas again. Yeah, we want
to have a war over comfort care, but nobody pays any attention to it
here, He said, this is the first I knew of an infant surviving
an abortion attempt, and I assumed that it was rare. But then our
county health department investigated infant mortality cases and found twenty seven of these babies born
alive over a three year period. We're gonna take a quick break and we'll
be right back. If you are listening to the David Knight Show. Well,
as I said, you know, these bureaucrafts can basically do anything that
they want, and the irs has got a Court case now that is going
before the Supreme Court, and it is something that is going to, as
the headline says, a fifteen thousand dollars tax bill is going to ignite a
constitutional challenge that could redefine US tax law. And it truly is amazing.
This is about unrealized capital gains, the ability of the government to have you
pay taxes on something that you haven't made a profit from because you haven't sold
it. Everybody has seen paper profits and paper losses on things, but they
want to be able to tax you. This is moving the bar into a
kind of wealth tax, which is what they're trying to do. So this
couple had invested in an Indian company and they were handed an unexpected tax bill
despite never enjoying a single penny of profit from their venture. So they got
a tax bill for fifteen thousand dollars. The mores the family argues that this
tax violates the sixteenth Amendment of the Constitution, transforming their case into a constitutional
crusade. And as they talk about in this issue, there's a lot of
individual details in this that it may turn on rather than the larger issues.
But this goes back to the twenty seventeen tax bill. Who was president then,
well Trump? Okay, so the Trump tax thing. The case hinges
on a provision in the twenty seventeen tax bill that imposes a one time tax
on investors' shares of profits that have not been distributed to them. And so
how do you tax something that you have not you know, profits that you
have not received. But again, this is part of a move to go
after I believe it's a kind of wealth tax that people want to impose.
In Argentina, the central Bank now has just increased their interest rates. The
interest rates are one hundred and thirty three percent in Argentina. And you know
that's like the FED raising its equipment to This is the Central Bank of Argentina
and their interest rate. That'd be as if the Federal Reserve increased the rate
up to one hundred and thirty three percent. And of course it's not even
equivalent to the rate of inflation either. But this is a move that's being
done by the Central Bank of Argentina desperately trying to protect not the economy and
not the people that are there, but trying to protect their precious paso,
the Argentine paso. So one of the reasons why Javier Malai, who is
again they've not had their election yet, but he is. You know,
he came in first place, the libertarian economist, and he says, we've
got to just get rid of the paso, just peg our currency to the
US dollar something like that. Is I understand the U s dollars got his
issues. We've got to peg it to something outside of Argentina. The Argentine
Central Bank, he said, is one of the worst of the worst.
The monetary authority raised its key interest rate fifteen percentage points to one hundred and
thirty three percent. However, prices even by the government's measures, which understate
what the actual inflation is, even their understated official inflation rate is one hundred
and thirty eight percent, so it's not going to keep inflation under control.
The dollar blue rate, again, that's kind of the black market rate.
They call it the blue market. The dollar blue rate touched a record low
of forty pesos per dollar on Tuesday. And again, the central bank doesn't
care about the economy, doesn't care about the people. It cares about saving
its paso. The government is trying to gain time time and unfortunately this doesn't
solve anything, the effect is essentially going to be nil. That said a
economist there in Buenos Aires. And so where does all of this stuff we
were talking about the war and everything else that is happening, where does this
leave us? Well, this is an article from Tauomas Melanin on Substack,
picked up by zero Hedge, the sort of damocles an economic worst case scenario
for the Israeli Palestine war. And he's got ten points and basically what we're
looking at here, quite possibly, if we get a wider war and we
now have two US carrier groups there, two British carrier groups there, the
conflict, well, he says, so we could get into a Here's what
the worst case scenario that he laid out looks like. First of all,
we have it escalate into a regional conflict where the US becoming directly involved.
Again, we've got two carrier groups there already. Number two. Opek responds
with an oil embargo. Number three. Iran closes the Strait of hor moves
number four. The price of oil reaches three hundred dollars a barrel. Number
five of Europe. So it comes to a full blown energy crisis due to
a LNG shortage, liquid natural gas a massive spike, and energy prices reinvigorates
inflation, with central banks responding accordingly. Number seven, financial markets and the
global banking sector collapse. Number eight debt crisis engulfs the US, forcing the
Federal Reserve to enact yet another financial market bailout. The petro dollar trade collapses,
and hyperinflation emerges. Now that's the worst case scenario. But you notice
how all this is tied to energy. And of course anybody is old enough
to remember when OPEK first asserted its power. We know just how fundamental energy
is to the entire economy and to inflation. How it was that embargo that
created the stagflation, As Gerald Clinty said, I think it'll be dragflation,
he said a couple of years ago. He said, you look at all
the quantitative easing and all the rest of this stuff, even without the disruption
of oil. But of course it's not even what Opek does. It is
Joe Biden who has from day one focused on destroying our energy supply. He's
depleted our strategic oils but on oil reserve, and he has on day one
shutdown pipelines and other means of domestic oil production. If he was a foreign
entity, we would say that he was at war with America, right,
I mean, we're looking at in his scenario. He says, well,
what happens if we get involved in an Israeli Palestine Palestinian war and it gets
bigger, we get directly involved in this and things start shooting it. But
Biden did all that. He did all that as part of the war on
climate change. He did all of that already. A Strait of Hormuz is
a pivotal narrow strait for global oil markets. One sixth of all oil and
one third of all liquefied natural gas or energy consumed in the world passes through
it. About a third of all energy passes through that little narrow strait.
It has eight islands, of which seven are controlled by Iran, but it
has a military presence in all eight of them. Thus Iran has a military
capacity to close the strait. Well, I don't think that they will.
I think that's the reason that you've got two carrier groups from the US and
two aircraft carriers from Great Britain as well. But if this oil isn't enough,
you've got looney Lindsey Graham out there saying that we have to go to
war with Iran and we have to shut them down preemptively. Here's Lindsay on
iran oll infrastructure. The money financing terrorism comes from Iran. It's time for
this terroist state to pay a price for financing and supporting all this chaos.
Yes, if you're the Iranians. If we're up to me, this war
escalates, I'm coming after you. I think this is what I'm trying to
clarify here, because I'm wonderings in Israel, US, in Israel, the
United States and Crystal Clear, the United Let me just let me just let
me just understand you, just to be clear, you're saying that you would
want the United States and Israel to bomb Iran even in the absence of direct
evidence of their involvement in this attack. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I
don't care if they're involved in I just want to bomb Iran, and that
has long been the plan. If we go back and look at Wesley Clark
after nine about ten days after nine to eleven, I went through the Pentagon
and I saw Secretary of Rumsfeld and Deputy Sacretary wolf Witch. I went downstairs,
just sailed over to some of the people and the joint staff who used
to work for me, and one of the generals called me and he said,
Sir, you got to come in. You got to come in and
talk to me a second. I said, we're too busy. He said
no, no, he says, we've made the decision. We're going to
war with Iraq. This was Honor about the twentieth of September. I said,
we're going to war with Iraq. Why, he said, I don't
know. So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and
by that time, we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, are we
still going to war with Iraq? And he said, oh, it's worse
than that, he said. He reached over on his desk he picked up
a piece of paper and he said, I just he said, I just
got this down from upstairs meeting the Secretary of Events office today and he said,
this is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries
in five years, starting with Iraq, and then syria An on Libya,
Somalias, Soudan, and finishing off Iran. I said, is it classified?
He said yes, Sir. I said, I said, well,
don't show it to me. Well, I could have gone to Marrow Lago
and seen it there. I guess I don't know. We've known this for
the longest time. They've got an agenda, their geopolitical agendas, to go
after Iran. They don't really care what it does to the rest of the
world. They don't care what it does to our economy, to our lives.
They're perfectly fine if it kicks off World War three, if it kicks
off hyperinflation. They don't care about any of that stuff. Single minded,
you know. And I don't care if Run's involved in this or not.
Let's go after them. Let's let's have some excuse to go after They've been
looking for an excuse to go after them. And again Nukum Nikki and Lindsay
Loopy Lindsay and these people are just knee jerk militants, always ready to go
to war. From financial chaos to hyper inflation again, as he's looking at
the sort of damocles hanging over us. Going back to this author, he
says, naturally reinvigorated inflation pressures would force central banks to enact another round of
interest rate hikes. This would wreak havoc among consumers and corporations, but also
in the capital markets. Yields of sovereign debt would likely explode. This would
be followed by a utter collapse of asset and credit markets, just like in
the Spring of twenty twenty. At this point, we would most likely see
the central banks take their monetary perversions to another level. This means that while
they would be raising interest rates to quell inflation, they would also enact asset
purchase programs to support the sovereign debt, credit and asset markets, and of
course, to bail out their friends. The bailout of financial markets would need
to reach several trillions of US dollars, just like in the Spring of twenty
twenty, where it was the big guys who were essential that got bailed out.
If you were a main street small business, you were not essential,
just like if you were not one of the half dozen big banks that had
formed in the previous in the decade prior to the two thousand and eight,
if you weren't one of those half dozen big banks, well you were too
small to succeed and you weren't going to get a hand. But the two
big two fail banks were going to be bailed out, just a push of
vast amounts of money, and especially US dollars into the global economy to naturally
increase inflation pressures massively, he says, But there's a risk of something even
worse as a nuclear option. Opek could stop using the US dollar and the
oil trade altogether. This is happening gradually, and so again, you know,
how do we go bankrupt as a country, well, gradually and then
suddenly, and so it is a very dangerous path that they have put us
on. Oil and gold are soaring as of the end of the week last
week. I don't know what's going to happen today. Markets have opened,
but I haven't seen a report on it. While the dollars are relatively flat
overnight, both gold and crude or soaring as an bond bid as fears of
what lies ahead in Israel and Palestine. So again, it continues this even
if we don't get involved in some kind of a hot war. It's the
economic repercussions of this that are going to be very concerning. Inflation is going
back up, and we're going to need to have shock inducing rate hikes.
As a several economists, as they look at all this stuff again it is,
you know, gold is going up. Gold is a hedge against that.
I always see though gold I don't try to time the markets in terms
of you know, inflation, in terms of war and things like that.
It is a good hedge. Again is that I see gold now though,
as a hedge against the central bank digital currency, against this digital id that
is so central to everything they want to do. It is central to the
UN twenty thirty agenda, and the digital idea that everybody is going to have
is going to be the CBDC absolutely is going to be the case. Again,
if you want to try to have at least some insulation from that system,
go to David Knight dot gold. That's what Tony Ardaban has set up
if you would like to buy gold and silver at Somebody asked a question last
week that I think that said they were a college student or something that didn't
have a lot of money. It's like you can buy any amount from Tony.
He doesn't have a minimum amount that you can buy, and you can
also set up to save money on a gradual basis. He's got wolf packed
set up that way, as well as having a community of people that you
can talk with there. Again, that is David night Goal. Let Tony
you know that you're coming from this program. His site is Wisewolf dot gold.
As some of the comments that we see here on Rumble Chevkin three twenty
one, people don't realize war with Iran is also a war with Russia.
Well it seems like they want that pretty badly, doesn't it. We're going
to talk about how they have betrayed the Ukraine and since as soon as all
this stuff started up we were getting a lot, there was already noise that
we're going to leave the Ukrainians and to kind of hang out there as we
use them in our proxy war with the Russians. Now that is escalating,
so we'll talk about that when we come back. On Rock Fan Angry Tiger,
thank you for the tip. Good to see you there, he said.
Sad thing about domestic oil production is that they've always sold it to other
countries. We never get to use our own oil, and oil producing countries
in the Middle East don't pay a lot for gasoline like we do. Yeah,
there you go. And on Rockfinn Risha m thank you for the tip.
A great show this morning. Would you be willing to have a USS
Liberty survivor as a guest. There are still folks who don't know what happened
to them. Yeah, sure, and of course that people who don't know
what that is. That was USS Liberty was a ship that was attacked for
a very long time by the Israeli Air Force. They're off the coast of
Iran. That was I think it was it Johnson, Lyndon Johnson that was
president at that point in time. I can't remember, but it was.
Yeah, it was a very famous case. But of course nobody ever got
any answers, not from the US government and not from the Israeli government.
So I'd be interested if somebody wants to come on and talk about that,
we will be right back. Loved. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Well, while we've been talking about wars and the lies that get us
into wars and the lies that keep them going, this happened at the end
of the week last I didn't to this. On Friday, Kim dot com
commented on Washington's pivot after the Hamas attack on Israel. He said Washington just
dumped Ukraine into the wastebind of US victim nations. Quote as long as it
takes unquote is now as long as we can unquote end quote. We are
coming to the end of the rope in financing Ukraine. These were quotes from
the State Department. Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians died for empty US promises of
unwavering support. Ukraine has been wrecked and it won't recover for decades to come.
Zelenski is finished and Russia has won. The United States, its Western
partners, and NATO defeated. Why would any nation trust security guarantees by the
US government ever? Again, Well, this is something I've been asking for
a long time before this quite frankly, but he said, the people of
Taiwan must watch very carefully who they are counting on for their security. What
does this tell us It is an admission of US bankruptcy. The US government
can no longer afford a prolonged war in Ukraine or anywhere else in the world.
Lies and deception propaganda are not enough to stay afloat. Corrupt journalists don't
win wars or pay trillions of dollars in deficits and liabilities. And of course
it's the corrupt journalists who are the handmaids of this. The Iranian intervention in
Israel via Hamas accelerated the inevitable outcome for Ukraine. A threat of war in
the Middle East with all of its dire consequences for the oil price and a
fragile US economy was all it took. The world is witnessing the rapid end
of US dominance and the rise of multipolar order. But never underestimate the arrogance
of the US government. They may end civilization in a nuclear war rather than
accept responsibility for destroying the US from within via blatant corruption. Well, I
got to say I completely agree with what he had to say there, and
it was Jack Kirby. I'm sorry, John Kirby. I they call him
Jack Kirby sometimes Jack is nickname. Who said that Ukraine funding for Ukraine is
coming near the end of the rope and is not going to be indefinite.
So that last week Thursday, I think it was in the near term.
He said, We've got appropriations and authorities for Ukraine and for Israel, but
you don't want to be trying to bake in long term support when you're at
the end of your rope. So even going back before that, and even
going back before Israeli Palestinian thing happened, you know, the attack happened of
a Moss on Saturday. So three days before that we saw an article after
article about how Ukraine was freaking out because of aid from the Congress being shut
down, and of course at that point they were saying, well, it's
just the Republicans don't want to continue to support this war. But now you're
hearing it from the State Department after what happened with a Moss and Israel,
and so they were freaking out. The Brits were saying that they were at
the end of their rope in terms of financial stuff. They warned they were
running out of weapons to give to Ukraine. And of course all this is
being done in a context where the Ukrainians are losing the counter offensive in a
big way. Douglas McGregor, Colonel Douglas McGregor, retired, says the US
is facing a geopolitical reality check in Ukraine of thousands Ukrainians killed wounded, reportedly
inducing thousands of exhausted Ukrainian soldiers to surrender. Ukrainian soldiers are tired of dying
and their feelings are justified. And what was this for really you know,
we don't want to allow the people in eastern Ukraine, who are geographically close,
who are culturally close, religiously close, speak the same language. We
don't want them to be allowed to be a part of Russia. And so
we'll shell the civilians there for eight years and then Russia invaded. So again
when you look at it, it's all goes back to and has the fingerprints
of the US government on it. Nobody will be allowed to leave our jurisdiction.
That is the type of thing that we have continually seen from the US
government. On Rock Fan, Thank you very much, James, I appreciate
the tip. Thank you. And on Rock fand Jason Barker, Hey Jason,
good to see you. I think once a month David should do a
Hawaiian shirt day. Yeah, they go full steeper chain. You know,
it's kind of interesting when the listener sent me that link to that little video
where I cut out where he's talking about how he and Fauti go back to
was it Columbia or something, some Ivy League school or something where they were
there. He has a lot of videos up there, you know, because
he kept going on Info Wars, pushing those lies well into twenty twenty one,
but I haven't seen anything posted from him for quite some time. And
the thing where he sold the sting two days after the election, that we
got thousands of National Guard troops going around arresting people. We got this blockchain
watermarks. That video that I played for you where he was pushing that that
is not on his website, So I don't know what kind of lies he
started spinning after that, But yeah, he didn't want you to see that
one, So let me just play that for people. A lot of people
maybe haven't seen that particular one. We're going to take a quick break and
we'll be right back. The common Man. They created common Core and dumbed
down our children. They created common past track and control us. They're Commons
project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see
the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth
and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in
common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons
or isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us,
while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose
what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at
Thedavidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If
you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot
com. Well, we may not have oil or a natural gas or any
functional fuels, but we've always got wind power, right, That'll be fine.
Wind power is not cheaper than gas. It turns out it is incredibly
expensive, and this article from A Daily Skeptic points out advocates of zero policies
repeatedly reassure the public that they are advancing cheap green energy. I mean,
you know, it's coming from sunlight and wind. It's ample supply of that,
and it's just always there. Except the devices that you're using to pull
power out of the wind and from the sun don't last forever, and they
are incredibly expensive with their own problems. Unfortunately, for the hard press British
Electric, cheap green energy is nothing more than an empty political slogan arrived at
by a dishonest slide of hand. Specifically, the politicians simply ignore the true
costs of cheap green energy, which soon become very expensive, factoring in all
the costs the chart and this article and show that Travis that no wind power
is not cheaper than gas. The chart is from the UK's own Electricity Generation
Costs of twenty twenty three report, and it is the centerpiece of green propaganda,
supposedly showing the levelized cost of electricity, but they use deceptive calculations to
arrive at a distorted cost for electricity generated by wind power over the lifetime of
a plant, by which means the government can falsely claim that offshore wind is
two and a half times cheaper than dirty, old gas generation. The most
outrageous trick in this analysis is that the government has treated completely reliable electricity generated
by gas in exactly the same way as extraordinarily unreliable electricity generated by wind farm.
This is not even apples and oranges comparison. This is an elephants and
microchips comparison. In other words, factoring in to all of this, factoring
into the fact that this thing is not going to last forever, you also
have to factor in all of the storage, and then we get back into
one of the biggest battery scams of all. But it's also something that whether
it is put on land. The cost that it is done to wildlife,
to bats, to large birds as well, even to eagles is incredible.
And then when you look at what happens, I say, well we'll put
it offshore. Well, even offshore it has big issues for humans. You
know, the low frequency audio disruption that you get from this. It's one
of the reasons why they start relocating them out at sea. But now we're
starting to see massive die offs of whales and it is all being run by
foreign governments. Isn't that always the case? Not foreign governments, foreign corporations,
the multinationals, just like the toll roads right selling us out to international
stakeholders, the crony capitalism of the green agenda. Foreign firm is going to
begin offshore wind farm construction at a New Jersey state park. A Danish company
will begin construction of its offshore power complex this week Island off of Island Beach
State Park in New Jersey, one of the most popular family beaches there.
Surveys show a dramatic decline because of this and support for green offshore wind projects
nationwide. Yeah, they're not in my bankyard, not at my beach.
And of course we saw the same type of thing happening when they wanted to
put it off of the coast of the luxury islands in Massachusetts and other places.
As I said before, to make these things work you have to have
massive battery backup. And we still can't really control the fires that are happening
from the cars, the fires that are happening from even the small scooters.
This is sent by David Weatherby and he sent this to me in the middle
of last week. This is airplane flights suspended at Luton Airport after a huge
fire tears through the terminal's car park and it was by an EV so they
completely shut down all the flights. They are all flights currently suspended as emergency
services respond to a fire and terminal car park number two. And I guess
you know, if you've got enough electric vehicles there, you could call it
a terminal parking place terminate all those cars. Access to the airport is currently
restricted. We asked that people do not travel to the airport at this time.
And as he says, nothing to see here, right, And he
says, and of course he drives a bus in Orlando. He says,
wait until Universal gets they're electric buses. Well, since then, we've now
seen pictures of the EV fire that started it all in that car park.
Here's what it looks like there. It is self igniting, and of course
that spreads shuts down entire airport. We've had entire ships loaded with cars taken
down. In China, a vast graveyard of electric vehicles, that is a
place that is ripe for a fire. Aerial shots of cars parked cheek to
jow and vast open areas of China, and it's an example of the failure
of central planning. And so the secret vast lot is near the city of
hangs out in the lot hundreds of discarded failed evs or riding away covered with
weeds and cobwebs, and it's going to get even bigger. The reporter who
filed this original article, Dan Murthag, wrote said these cars were mostly no
frills EV's with batteries. It would be lucky to get more than sixty two
miles on a charge. That was the beginning of the EV industry in China.
They're built in the mid twenty tens, when generous government subsidy, cony
capitalism, or the kind of corruption that you see in China where you have
the people in the government owning shares in these things. So government subsidies lured
hundreds of automakers into the field, purchased by ride haaling companies who are less
concerned about long term quality. Well, this article from Slay News is somewhat
skeptical that these were all done simply by ride haling companies, by taxi companies,
and they point out that the writer Dan Murthagg was I'm not concerned at
all about the waste of material. He argues that ev technology has advanced so
rapidly over the past decade that older models have become obsolete. So it's not
a bug, it's a feature. Know what this is is yet another example
of the malinvestment in China by their centrally planned economy. And of course now
we're seeing a lot of articles about the overbuilt commercial real estate, massive ghost
cities that they built and abandoned, and even they're built and road initiatives which
in many cases were nothing more than debt traps for the people there, and
debt traps in the sense that oh, well, now you owe us,
so you don't have any money really to pay us for this, so will
take your minerals that you've got there. In many many cases, the promise
of building infrastructure. They so they were going to do. They they failed
in these projects, but they still have the people on the hook to pay
them off. Slay News says, as we know, gas powered vehicles can
often provide decades of service if maintained properly. However, the eves raise concern
about their disposable nature, as many will just replace the vehicles when they get
old. It's a planned obsolescence and this has been one of the key features
about the One of the hidden costs of evs is a short battery life and
the incredibly expensive replacement cycle on it. I know that Harry Peters talked about
the Chevy. I think it was the Vault. They got the Vault in
the Bolt. I think the Vault was the first one, and it had
a small generator motor, so it was completely electric. It wasn't a hybrid
or anything, but it had a small generator that ran off of gas to
extend your range. It could charge the batteries and recharge them on the fly,
but that made it non zero and so the government said to General Motors,
well, you can't really sell that thing. My son looked at one
of those that you know that really air. Peter said, this is the
one electric car that I really like, so I looked at it. The
problem is is that you would think that it doesn't because it's got that generator,
it doesn't need to have really big batteries. But the problem is is
that those batteries are still incredibly expensive true place, and so since they stopped
making these things a few years ago, all of them have got batteries that
are kind of old and facing replacement in a few years, and they're incredibly
expensive. There it's expensive or more expensive than some of the all electric cars.
So again it's the battery issue, and the battery issue is a big
issue of disposal and recycling. Wherever we look, we see this hypocrisy of,
well, we want to be fuel efficient, and you know, it
was all about fuel efficiency for the longest time, that's what the EPA was
doing. And yet they don't care when these vehicles are fifty percent heavier than
standard internal combustion engines. Don't worry about that at all. And we don't
worry about the recycling of these things, or the fire hazards or any the
rest of this stuff. And they're not trying to reclaim any of these materials
and recycle any of them and China or elsewhere. As they point out here,
well, maybe these things were used for the taxi companies or maybe not.
Show some of the pictures of these vehicles, their travis that are parked
in this graveyard. Here, some of the cars were a banned, so
suddenly the personal items such as children's toys could still be seen in the back
seats. A detailed difficult to reconcile with theories that the cars were abandoned because
the owners ran out to buy newer models or because they belonged to rental fleets.
Analysts told Bloomberg the early adopters of evs and China were mostly taxi companies
rather than individual private owners. These corporate purchasers create a wave of demand that
supposedly established evs in China much more solidly than sputtering sales to consumers in the
US. It is all being driven by centrally controlled planners, central planners.
There is no concern as to whether or not these things are efficient, whether
they're lasting, whether they're recyclable. Same thing that's happening in China that happens
here. Here. You see it with big failures like Clendra, the big
failures of the electric bus company that La La Harris was celebrating going bankrupt.
Even though they were selling buses at nearly a million dollars apiece, they still
couldn't make it. And even though the federal government was offering massive subsidies for
people to buy those buses, putting pressure on people to buy those buses,
even though you got California saying we're going to outlaw non electric vehicles, they
still can't make it. None of this explains why China did not re cycle
of vehicles for valuable rare earth metals. Bloomberg said that was disturbing for an
industry that ostentatiously prides itself on being earth friendly. There's nothing earth friendly about
any of this stuff. It's if you're going to be earth friendly, first
of all, you're going to be concerned about efficiency, weight and other things
like that, and whether or not these things are going to last, and
they're not. Some of those eve happy ride hailing companies look like excuses to
make huge inventories of unwanted electric cars disappear bingo bingo. Others appear to be
rackets cooked up to absorb the huge subsidies doled out by the Chinese company government
brother and that is the case as well. You see many of these green
companies here in the United States are also backed by people Chinese people who want
to get Chinese billionaires and multimillionaires who want to buy their way into a US
citizenship as well. And so they put their money in there. Whether they
get it out or not doesn't matter. They get their citizenship, which is
what they're really after. And that's what we saw with the failure of Solendra.
Even Chinese state media, which tends to underestimate or understate embarrassing details,
reported over a billion dollars in EVY subsidy fraud in twenty sixteen. Well,
we're going to take a quick break. I see a comment here from Max
BYRNS talking about Jim Jordan. We'll talk about Speaker of the House as to
whether or not they can get any of this stuff together. He says,
Jim Jordan, Speaker of the House, isn't his rule first politician not in
America. First. Well, we'll talk about whether that's going to happen when
we come back on Rock. Finn OUDI mrr good to see you there a
modern retro radio. He says, just imagine how bad morale is among our
military, the non sociopaths. That is one unnecessary invasion after another. Well
that's right, absolutely, But it is true to form, isn't it.
As we see Ukraine being kicked to the side, we'll be right back analyzing
the globalists next move. And now the Deep and Nut show. Well before
we get into what is happening in else I don't know if they've if they're
having an election right now, what's what's going to happen. But it's been
shut down as long as they don't have a speaker. But there's more crazy
stuff about the environment. And this truly is an amazing story sent to me
by a listener that the Department Justice is now going to sue eBay for selling
rolling coal devices and they could find them as much as two billion with a
b two billion dollars. That's just insane. I got to say, you
know, I'm not a big fan. Since I like to drive a convertible,
I'm not a big fan of rolling coal, massive mess of smoke light
there. But I do get kind of a dark joy out of the fact
that people are flaunting this when everyone else is so precious about emissions. You
got to really kind of love that. But I think it is truly amazing
the reach that the EPA will go to along with this criminal Department of Justice.
They follow a lawsuit claiming that eBay enabled the sale of more than three
hundred and forty three thousand rolling coal devices. Each one of these could spur
a fine of up to fifty five and eighty dollars under the Clean Air Act.
Again, this is the EPA as a weaponized bureaucracy. This thing's going
to be shut down. This is created by Richard Nixon jumping on the bandwagon
of Earth Day and all rest of this stuff. And yes, at the
beginning, there was a lot of very dirty sites that need to be cleaned
up. One of the guys that I worked with before when we were working
on environmental issues, he had spent his entire working life at the EPA.
But he went there when the purpose of it, the stated purpose and what
he agreed with, was to clean up pollution. But as he saw what
happened, you know, it has now become a weapon to you know,
going through the waters of America Act or whatever, and it's been used as
a weapon to control people, especially to a weapon to shut down internal combustion
engines, as well as other practices that the EPA has got into. Now
they've extended this to shutting down power plants on the basis of emission. And
now this excessive fine of fifty five and eighty dollars under the Clean Air Act.
Again, no protection against excessive fines in the constitution. To me,
that seems to be excessive. eBay denied the charges and a public statement and
again, why are they're going after after eBay? Well, because they're lazy.
Yeah, if they wanted to apply these fines, they don't want to
go after the individual drivers. The individual drivers would push back on this on
the successive fine. And you can imagine that if they went after thousands of
you know, three hundred and forty three thousand people, that would be very
difficult to do, and all of these people would be pushing back very hard
and very publicly against it. It's easier just to go after one giant corporation.
We just had the irs come after Microsoft for twenty six billion dollars something
like that, a back bill of tax. Now they've got an army of
lawyers and they'll contest that. But at the same time, Microsoft just bought
Activision for just under seventy billion dollars, So they're out there buying something three
times a size and it's just one of their acquisitions. So as astronomical as
that fine is, it is not that big a deal for Microsoft. Certainly
they don't want to pay it, but I mean, you know, they
can afford to pay it if they came. After all, these people have
rolling coal devices added to their trucks. They could not afford fifty five hundred
dollars fines and they would fight that. So they go after eBay because they've
got deep pockets. I remember when I was in Texas in the early nineteen
eighties at Texas Instruments. One of the guys that I worked with was on
a jury trial and he said it was a lawsuit brought by Cowboy against the
ranch and he said they were pressuring them and rushing them, and so as
part of this rushing thing, he had an accident. And I forget the
details of the accident, but it messed up his legs so that he couldn't
walk, he couldn't work anymore. And so he wanted a he sued them
for compensation. And so my friend was in on the jury and he said
they talked about it, and he said the other jurors agreed that they really
didn't have any liability for this. They really hadn't caused this accident. It
was something that you know, this guy did that was tragic, but he
said, and he just came back. He was just standing. He said.
The the other jurors there said that. He said, we don't care
if the ranch caused it or not, because they've got deep pockets. This
guy can't work now, so they need to pay that disability and you know,
we're going to give him the law suit, he says, but they
didn't do anything wrong. It's like, well, they got deep pockets,
so we'll just take it from anyway. He held out on that, and
you know, it was a big fight. It's like twelve angry men.
Actually he's like one angry man, eleven socialists deciding what's for dinner. And
I understand, you know, the situation that the guy is in, but
again they're abusing their power. This is what the EPA is doing here,
right, They're coming after you know, don't make me defend eBay and of
the billionaires who put this thing together. But again they denied it in a
public statement, saying they'd blocked more than ninety nine point nine percent of the
listings for the products cited by the Department of Justice, including millions of listings
each year. I didn't realize that rolling coal was that popular. But anyway,
eBay's partnered closely with law enforcement, including the Department of Justice for over
two decades and identifying em risks and assisting prevention and enforcement. This is the
kind of crime that they're concerned about, right, not drug cartels coming across
the border. But you know somebody blowing rolling coal and blowing smoke, Well,
I think the government is blowing smoke at us, don't you. And
then in New Zealand we see this is part of a global agenda of cows
that they claim we're blowing smoke. They're not rolling coal, they're rolling methane.
At New Zealand they call it a burp tax. So I don't think
the cows are burping, but that's a It causes a pre voting stink with
New Zealand farmers may be one of the key reasons why they just put in
a conservative prime minister down there. A lot of people are pointing out jab
Sinda Arden and her glee, her authoritarian glee and imposing misery on the people
down there. But you know, the party even after she left, you
know, it was no fun. After she couldn't order people around based on
a fake pandemic, but her party was still going to order people around based
on a fake climate change. So hopefully this is going to change. New
Zealand has a plan to tax farmers for their livestocks, verps and farts and
it's causing a stink ahead of the general elections, and that's one of the
reasons why you had a more conservative person elected there. I think that was
a key issue there. If you don't have food, and that's what these
people are, they're absolutely insane, and I think people are starting to see
that now, even to the extent that in Australia they want to destroy forests
and it's not just in Australia, and it's the koalis they want to plow
it under, get rid of those eucalyptus trees there. Since leftists have long
been known for situational values, it's not surprising that they now exhibit situational environmentalism.
Something is deemed to be irreplaceable natural resource that must be preserved at all
costs, but then years later it can be destroyed because well, if you
want to make a buck, you got to break a few green eggs and
ham And this is coming from the New American and so now it's become a
new agenda that the tree huggers now want to cut down the trees and bury
them because somebody has come up with a way to make money from that.
You know, we had to transition away from paper supermarket bangs, as they
point out in New American and plant trees. And actually people got indulgences for
their pollution by planting trees. And now all of a sudden, just to
show how fake this stuff is, the climate mcguffin, they do a complete
one to eighty and now we want a bulldoze seventy million acres and bury it
in the ground, not even use it for anything constructive, not allowed to
use it to build a home or even a paper bag. I know,
they just want to plow it under. This is the insanity, but it
is We've been seeing this from the very beginning, from the environmental movement.
Again, the first eight years or so, it was the planet was going
to go into a global ice age. Then just like that, they just
flip around and now it's global warming. And now they're doing that with the
trees. Climate activists want to save the planet by cutting down and bearing trees,
and we must dramatically accelerate forest thinning treatments. They say, so,
even Gates is saying, Gates has thrown his weight behind the practice of cutting
down trees and bearing them to address fears over carbon emissions, except that he's
the one saying, are we the crazy people? Are we the scientist?
Well, I think he's the crazy guy, crazy rich, getting crazy rich
off of all these things and whip sawing it back and forth. Look,
for the longest time, we all know that these people don't make any money
when the markets go sideways. They make money by pumping and dumping things,
and they create expectations of unlimited profits, and then they seed the marketplace with
doom and gloom, and they profit when it goes up, and they profit
when it goes down. They don't make any money when it goes sideways.
And the same thing with this during the New York Times Climate Forward summit in
September. Notice how the progressives and the Marxists always use that forward right.
Gates didn't hesitate to share his thoughts on the role of planting trees to mitigate
climate concerns. He called back, now complete nonsense. Well, of course
it isn't complete nonsense, And they completely discount the fact that trees are taking
this dreaded carbon dioxide they call a pollutant. No, it's a part of
what God set up. It's a symbiotic relationship between plants and animals, especially
with trees. They provide shade, they provide you know, they're very concerned.
Now, well we need to put stuff up that is going to reflect
sunlight and everything. No, the sunlight makes the plants grow, they take
in the carbon dioxide and they release oxygen. So he says, now that
to have trees and even to plant them, now, Gates says, that's
complete nonsense. Now he's the one who's good, He says, I mean,
are we the science people? Are we the idiots? Well, the
people who listen to you are the idiots, and you're crazy rich, he
says, the job your project says, this is spectacularly bad and counterproductive ideas.
He said, trees and for us are by far our best most effective
means to reduce any excess of carbon in our atmosphere. Well, you know,
maybe it wasn't ever about carbon dioxide. Maybe it was about money and
control. Maybe it always was, and I think it is. So net
zero is going to require us to live like slaves. As I pointed out
last week, they want us to living in earth and huts. And so
people are starting to wake up to this, and that's the key thing is
why we have to keep hitting this and get people to awaken to what is
actually being done with this. As Alex Newman points out on Epic Times,
he says, the era of unquestioned and unchallenged climate change claims is over and
we should be attacking them on all these lies and contradictions relentlessly. It's not
about science, as I said, for the longest time they sho hide their
data. It's not science and we've seen that, whether you're talking about the
code pandemic, or whether are mcguffin, or whether you're talking about this climate
mcguffin. But there is never an end to another project that has to be
done immediately, and we have to destroy everything that we've got out there now,
and so before it has completely sunk into people that the rabbit trail they
put us on is a dead end. Now you got the White House saying,
well, we need to spend seven billion dollars on hydrogen hubs. Hydrogen
hubs another technology that I've talked about in the past, and people have criticized
me, and so well, hydrogen's got these problems and these problems. It's
like, fine, I get that, you know, it does have the
advantage if I understand that all of these technologies have issues, and I understand
that they are pushing us to make this transition when they don't have any alternative.
They're pushing us into us already poverty for the purpose of control. And
so while I look at, you know, the hydrogen stuff as well,
okay, maybe that would work, but as with all of this stuff,
they don't want to wait until they've got something that works, because it's not
about that. It's about destroying our ability to live freely, and it's also
about their ability to own everything and to control our movement and every aspect of
our life. So now we're going to make a very quick pivot away from
trees, and we're and then now we've got instead of saving trees and planting
trees and getting carbon credits for planting trees, now we're going to destroy trees.
And now you're going to pay gates to destroy trees. And so now
we're going to pivot perhaps from the battery electric vehicles to hydrogen hubs, and
we're going to start with seven billion dollars of that. Because this is all
just about making you poor, making them rich, and giving the government away
to control us via disruption and chaos from the inside, and doing it iteratively.
We're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back. Unlike most
revolutions, whether people rise against the real economic oppression, in our case,
here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle. It is,
however, not nearly so abstract as a young gentleman supposes. The issue
involved here is one of monopoly. Today the British government will monopolize the sale
of tea in our country. Tomorrow it will be something else, liberty.
It's your move. You're listening to the David Knight Show, Well, Anchory
Tiger count its on rock, Fanny says I Roll Cole all the time.
I just smoked out the UAW guys on strike this morning. Well they're gonna
get They better support Rolling Cole because if they go with the EV thing,
they're going to be out of work permanently. Fox News Brett Bear had an
interesting comment on this speaker fight that's going on right now. He said,
Republicans told me that Jesus couldn't get two hundred and seventeen votes for speaker right
now. Well, I don't think they need Jesus for speaker. I think
they need him for housewhip. Get a scourge of cords and come after these
these bankster puppets and pharmaceutical puppets, the pharmaciea there. Bear said, I've
talked to a lot of people up there, you know, private conversations on
background. I know the number of them told me crazy things. Jesus couldn't
get two hundred seventeen votes, he says, So it's happening here. He
says, is this particular conference governable? Can you get to two hundred and
seventeen for anybody? Well, McCarthy said, well, you know, it
took me fifteen rounds to get there. It'll be interesting to see what happens.
But as we look at what is going on in the House, and
I don't I don't have a dog in that fight because as far as I'm
concerned, with the exception of Thomas Massey, nobody has stood up to any
of the stuff that's been rolled on. I just want to talk about rolling
Cole, how about rolling lockdowns, and rolling drugs and injections and all the
rist of stuff. And I think the big problem that they have that has
created the civil war is really Trump. Trump is the reason this's there.
And of course with his endorsement of Jim Jordan, that is going to be
a big obstacle to Jim Jordan getting elected. You know, Trump is there.
He's polarized the party, just like he's polarized the country. And if
and everybody's lined up on one side or the other based on Trump. I
thought it was kind of interesting to see in Louisiana a Republican just as they
pointed, he basically rolled coal on a Democrat. They say that he smoked
him, but of course he rolled Coal on Thisocrat. And so there isn't
even going to be a runoff in this election. He just won it outright.
And I think we'd be seeing a lot more of this if it wasn't
for all the infighting that is happening with Trump and the division that he's caused,
and how he has become a polarizing lightning rod for voters everywhere. We
see these types of things and elections where he's not involved, and when he
gets involved, as he's involved in the speaker race right now, it turns
into a civil war. A Republican, Jeff Landry, won a landslide election
on Saturday to flip the Louisiana governor's mansion to the Republicans and one of three
main gubernatorial elections this year, shocking political observers with a victory that saves him
the trouble of having to face a Democrat in the November runoff. And so
again you can see what happens if we get the divisive uncle out of there.
House GP has moved to finally expel George Santos from Congress. Question is
what took so long? I guess I had to wait until l after McCarthy
got out of there. This is coming from a fellow congressman in New York,
Anthony di Esposito. He said on Twitter, he said today, I'll
be introducing an expulsion resolution to get rid, to rid the People's House of
fraudster George Santos, to oust Santas. I saw that he got into some
kind of a shouting match with some pro Palestinian protesters because you remember, he's
not Jewish, George Santos, but he passed himself off as Jewish, and
when he was called on that, everything about this guy's biography, everything,
everything is a lie. And of course many indications he's been indicted, a
lot of indications, a lot of allegations that he committed fraud and not just
lying to the public about everything in his biography or background. But when he
said he was Jewish, because he's running in New York in a Jewish area,
so it was to advantage to say that. And then when he was
called on it, he said, well, I'm Jewish jew and so I
guess he's trying to get those street creds up getting into an argument with someone.
To ask him from Congress would require support from two thirds of the House,
a milestone that Nick Lolota says is attainable. I think there's probably going
to be more consensus to get rid of George sentis then that will be to
put Jim Jordan or anybody else there. And as Speaker, I predict this
resolution is going to catch fire. Many people feel, how we do well?
Again, the Democrats don't really care about ethics. The the Republicans,
they don't care about that. They just want to have get another Republican out
because then they got a chance of getting that seat back for the Democrats,
and the Republicans don't care about ethics either. For them, it's also about
the numbers. Take a look at Menendez. You know, it's a club,
and Menendez a senator who has got all these allegations and indictments against him,
a fraud and corruption and you know, favors for sale to foreign governments
and all the rest of this stuff he has. This is not his first
rodeo with all this stuff. They came after him before and again it was
Jack Smith who tried to get a conviction against him before and failed, and
it seemed to be pretty obvious at the time, but he had as a
character witness Lindsey Graham. Because again, you know, the Senate is a
club, and they cover for each other on their corruption, and they support
each other on war and all the rest of these things. This isn't the
first time that the House has tried to remove George Santa Hosts. The Democrats
sponsored a resolution to expel him in May of this year. But you know,
when McCarthy was there, and McCarthy and also Marjorie Taylor Green going to
support him, going to keep him there because again, well I don't care
what he did, he's a Republican. We're going to stand behind this corruption.
It's a very concerning thing when we see that integrity doesn't matter to either
party. Republicans voted toary for the motion to the Ethics Committee stalling motion which
has investigated Santos since March. They can't figure out what to do with it.
And then of course we have Trump having to walk back his criticism of
Netan Yahoo eating Crow in a very big way, because you know, Trump's
always shooting from the lip, you know, and jumping out there. Whatever
the situation is, he's going to comment on it. And so you know,
just from just improvising there on the stump speech, he got himself into
it pretty deep. But don't worry, because you've always got people who are
going to make excuses for Trump and here's Jack Kilner at American Thinker doing exactly
that. He said, leftist media is calling all Trump supporters far right,
and he goes, why why would anybody say that? You know, anybody
who supports Trump? For example, he says, Jim Jordan is labeled to
be a hard rightist, and he goes, so, what are the policies
that actually made Trump far right? And when I saw this, I thought,
Okay, good, is he going to finally take a look at some
of the policies of Trump instead of this personality hero worship that we see all
the time. Because policies do matter, the promises matter, but it also
what did the guy do when he was in office. It's important when somebody's
running as a candidate and they haven't held office. He had never held office
anywhere before, so we didn't really know what he was going to do.
But as he's talking about different policies, it's like, okay, well,
if he agrees with us on what the problem is, even if he doesn't
have exactly the right solution, like at the border, maybe he will do
something about it. But then after the person has been in office for four
years, then he has to run on his record. So what is his
record. Well, this guy Jack Hellner got it completely wrong, he says.
For example, he goes down policy after policy, he says, enforcing
border laws that Congress passed and building a wall. Trump didn't do that except
in your imagination, Jack, Really, seriously, he didn't build the wall.
He repaired the wall mostly, and he added about forty miles a new
wall. But you've only got about four hundred miles of wall in a two
thousand mile border. These people are delusional. Supporting limits on abortion, he
says, is that what got Trump labeled as far right? Well again,
Trump says that's too harsh. He doesn't support those anymore. Come on,
Jack, you got to get up to speed here. Trump didn't want people
to be fired for refusing to take a vaccine, just like most Americans.
Why would people refuse to take the vaccine that he was boasting that he stopped
all the testing on and these people he noticed that. He doesn't say anything
about what you know, Trump is far right because he produced a vaccine without
testing and anything. No, he doesn't talk about that. They completely ignore
the fact that he developed and bragged and pushed the vaccine. And I can
tell you that he would have bribed corporations to get this done, and a
large part of what Biden's mandates were were bribes. As a matter of fact,
you've now had in terms of talking about the vaccines, the vaccine mandates,
one point eight million dollars is now going to be given to some of
the people in the military who sued over these vaccine mandates, But only the
people who sued. No compensation for the many, many soldiers who got kicked
out, and no compensation for the people who got injected and are going to
be living with this time bomb in themselves. Nothing about that. And so
two different groups are going to split that one point eight million dollars, And
quite frankly, I think one of the groups, I think it's nine Navy
seals or something, going to split nine hundred thousand dollars each if they got
the vaccine. I don't think they took the vaccine. I think it was
to stop the Pentagon. Do you think the Pentagon cares about a one point
eight million dollar fine they light their cigars or their missiles. They light their
missiles with a million dollar bills. They don't care about that. And if
somebody got the vaccine, one hundred thousand dollars is not sufficient compensation. And
so I don't know what is going on with that anyway. So isn't that
great? We can cheer Trump because he didn't get a chance to mandate the
vaccine. He would have if he had been there. I'm telling you he
would have done it with blackmailing incentives. Trump moved to rapidly get schools and
businesses back open after the initial shutdown. This isn't far right, says this
person, Hey pal, who shut them down? Who shut them down?
Who told schools, businesses, and churches you're not allowed to be open.
Nobody has ever done that in the history of America except for Trump. He
did it, and he did not move to rapidly get them open. As
a matter of fact, the reason we had the male in election is because
he shut everything down and because he refused to hold the convention, because he
refused to go out and hold events. He played along with all this stuff
for Fauci, and he used Fauci to endorse him. Put together a video.
Trump opposes allowing men to compete against women. No he doesn't, No,
he doesn't. He has supported this forever from the very beginning. He
was pushing that, and he was pushing men to be in beauty contests.
Yeah, let him be on my beauty contest. I think men should be
allowed to compete. He said this a long long time ago. It's amazing
to me to see all of these right wing publications out there saying, look,
you know, we got two was it Miss Universe or something? Two
Miss Universe contestants won the national men dressed up as women. And yet this
is what Trump was pushing fifteen years ago. He's one of the first people
to push that, just like General Flynn, who's going around presenting himself as
some kind of a Christian nationalist, was pushing in the Pentagon, pushing the
transition of that Navy seal who now regrets it. He says, how did
they gaslight me with this stuff? He says, we absolutely got to shut
this down for kids. I was an adult, He said, I blame
myself for letting this happen to me. But he goes, they gaslighted me
on this thing, and he says it's my responsibility. I shouldn't have let
it happen. But he says, you can't let people do that to kids.
Trump was pushing this Flynn was pushing this from the very beginning. What
does it matter with the MAGA people that they can't see this. Trump does
not believe that climate change is the greatest existential threat. Oh he doesn't.
But he wouldn't do anything about the Paris Climate Accord. I remember at the
time, when it was so frustrating for six months, he was still going
like, yeah, I'll stay with it. Evanca says it's good. Rex
Tillerson says it's good. And even when he said we're going to move away
from it, and I'm going to get rid of it after the election,
after the twenty twenty election, I'm going to say we shouldn't have it.
I said, well, if you don't get rid of the treaty, this
fake treaty. I remember playing a clip from Casablanca with Humphrey Bogart, we'll
always have Paris, you know, And I said that, yeah, we're
always going to have this Paris combonic court because he isn't going to get rid
of it, and he never did. He didn't get rid of it.
Trump sought to make NATO pay what they were supposed to. Why would that
be an unpopular policy or a far right policy? Except he sought. He
sought, he wished in his heart of hearts in his forty chess game of
strategy. That's what he really wanted to do, but he was just too
weak to get it done. Just couldn't get it done. I don't know
what happened On Rumble RCF twenty twenty. Thank you for the tip. He
says, where's the tree hugging health when you need them? Yeah, that's
true, Yeah, the tree huggers. Well, we're about out of town
at time here, but I wanted to say one thing too about Disney,
which I thought was kind of interesting. And I saw that these are spread
out a couple of days apart, you know, and at first everybody is
portraying Disney as desperate cutting the prices of children's tickets by more than fifty percent.
And of course, as this is happening, you know, we're seeing
that Dollywood around here is so packed that they're extending their hours. I mean,
you know, I don't know what time they close, but you know,
we see the messages that well, we've extended it from let's say seven
or eight o'clock or something till you know, another two hours or three hours
or four hours because they had so many people packed in there. Disney has
got a lot of empty space there because they charge so much. And right
now the current prices for children are one hundred and four dollars and up,
and so they're going to do some limited time child tickets, but of course
their business model is to get the kids to bring in the adults. And
after they started talking about this a couple of days later, they said,
they're going up on the adults tickets. So they're going to go down a
little bit on the kids tickets, and then they're going to go up on
the adult tickets. So they were going to take the three day child pass
to one hundred and fifty dollars, when right you know, before the special,
it was three hundred and forty dollars for a three day pass. Pretty
amazing. But again, when we look at what is happening with Disney the
Magic Kingdom, as I was looking at these these articles, it dawned on
me just how you know, they say it's crashing and burning according to this,
and the Magic Kingdom is now becoming the Tragic Kingdom. You know,
it really always was about pushing magic in a really deep sort of way.
You know, if you look at Mary Poppins, it was really a pretty
a dark story. And there was a video that went viral a few years
ago where they recut scenes from the trailer for Mary Poppins, and they put
a scary soundtrack with it, called it Scary Mary. And when you look
at this, you realize just how dark it was in many different ways,
even though they had this shiny veneer on it. And I hear some of
the clips of it. And as I was looking at this and thinking about
Scary Mary and looking at some of this Disney background here, they had another
series of books. I'll just stop talking. Well, it's just you can
see it visually if you're watching this. There's people flying, kids running a
g She's throwing stuff around, people screaming, flying up chimneys and all the
rest of this stuff. Yeah, Disney has always leaned on magic in a
really kind of a strange way, but it's always looking at that. In
one of these articles they mentioned bed knobs and broomsticks. You know, they
were originally were going to do that. Bought that from a writer called Mary
Norton, and she wrote a book that was called It was based on the
magic Bedknob or how to Become a Witch in ten Easy Lessons and Bonfires and
Broomstick. So they bought the two of those together, they bought the rights
to them, and then they were able to do Mary Poppins, so they
put it on the backshelf for a few years. Then they did that one
as well. And now you've got a British university that is offering a degree
in the occult. It's very easy for them to insinuate these things in,
isn't it. You know, Disney's been doing it long before Harry Potter and
it really that's the real tragedy of the Magic Kingdom. I think thanks for
listening. Let me tell you the David Night Show you can listen to with
your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact,
if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Night
Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to know something
else, You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to
the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com. That's a website