Friday was the opening of the Olympic Games in Paris. I have seen many
Olympic Games, but I believe that these of this year has been like the
coldest that we have ever seen myself personally I am not going to see them,
honestly good that I am not interested in a couple of years ago,
since those of the two thousand and twenty and I kind of cooled down,
like the last memorable Olympic Games that they remember, were those of the two
thousand and two thousand and twelve in London. There were many interesting things that
happened for many of the other athletes. Remember that where Felix Sanchez wins a
gold medal again and also Luguelling Sanchez won silver later. Hence, our new
Olympic performance has been good. We had Mari Lady in the 20' s
that looks pretty good on them, and it' s not like it went
wrong. In the ten of the sixteen, in those of the twenty it
was not so bad, but they have gone as losing interest to the people.
Or maybe people like the media are already so horizontal, you don'
t have to sit in front of a screen to see an end. Let
' s say fencing or polybolo of whatever the Olympic Games are. Historically,
the International Olympic Committee has been an entity that brings together hundreds of countries,
more than a hundred countries in the world, and, like FIFA, they
try to maintain or move away from issues that are highly controversial, such as
politics, religious issues and these issues that are very polarizing. But it seems
that the IOC with the arrival in Europe and the taking of part of its
directive, of this postmodernist gang that wants to deconstruct everything, because it has
already put aside, that practice that the controversial and polarizing out of our competition
and everything that has to do with it the games, because basically what we
seek is exactly the opposite, is to unite through sport the world. There
have been controversial episodes, such as the Moscow Games or the Los Angeles Games,
where both nations that at the time polarized the planet, the Soviet Union
and the United States, sought to boycott each other. But still these games
prevailed and were the most neutral possible of the Games of the Angels of nine
hundred and eighty- eighties peak, since the American entrepreneur tectoner product of the
division, seeking to take politics out of the sport, because he created some
games that I do not know if they still exist, but for a long
time the games of goodwill were there. I don' t know if you
remember it from Google Will Games, which was broadcast on the channels of your
half- TV company and all that channel chain he had. Well, he
sába. On Friday we saw an opening of the awards that played or recreated
Da Vinci' s painting of the last dinner. If people knew what we
are facing today, if they really had any idea, if Christians gave themselves
ideas and if the West had an idea, then people would be much more
attentive and stop thinking so much that this is artistic freedom freedom of expression.
If it' s true, is that art? Isn' t that art?
This is done expressly with the intention of going so, ending and destroying
all the symbolology that may have some kind of importance to what are the values,
beliefs and symbols that, in some way many can consider sacred as the
portrait of the last scene that recreates the final cool moment with his disciples,
where Jesus Christ, for he is apprehended, taken, judged and then crucified
and dead. At that time, more or less out there, in that
sheath, that was not a show of tolerant people, respectful of the beliefs
and values of others and of people who understand that the world in which they
live, as well as they, ask for respect for themselves from those who
consider what they practice and how they live sinful and contrary to the values that
sustain their beliefs. No, that was done with all intent of fucking,
with all intent of offending. It was made expressly so because the perverse minds
that are behind it, that is, they think and act and they are
going with everything and steam and they did it at the most important event they
can have, the sporting world that the Olympic are. They knew they were
going to offend clearly that they know and why they do it with Christian symbols,
because Christians of a time, this part are people who have ended up
being very tolerant, very peaceful people who, although offended and disturbed, are
not going to burn the streets of Paris or go out in the big cities
of the world to protest or see as enemies those who can understand that they
identify with some feature of what they were there theatricalizing in an absurd and ridiculous
way what was seen on Friday. They dare not do it with Islam,
they dare not recreate anything that can not even resemble the island. They'
re not so brave, they' re not such iconoclasts. They should have
done so with Islam as well. Of course because yesterday those who mounted this
sheath came out and cynically say no that I did not seek to offend the
intention. It was offending the intention, it was assaulting the intention, it
was subverting, because if there is something that these people go and go,
all steam I repeat is disassemble, destroy, derail everything that is the foundation
and that has sustained the identity and values of the West. There' s
no other interest. And I hope that people worry about knowing about it,
because they' re going to stop choiring these mentally ill people and in the
useful process, san groups that think they' re gaining space, when what
they' re doing is exactly the opposite. The rejection of these groups in
the United States over the last five years has grown exponentially in Europe or that
day because we have gone from being the group you were asking for. I
say we haven' t because I dismounted from Zahuaua ten years ago. They
' ve gone from what they asked for. Let me live as I please,
respect my way of life. Don' t mess with me, don
' t get into what I want and who I love don' t care
what you think. I want to take away everything that has value for you.
I don' t respect you, I hate you, I despise you,
as the song says, I show it to you, and if you
dare to criticize me, I destroy you because they went from being the oppressed
to the oppressive role changes and it is with all the intention of the world
that they are instrumentalizing that group of people of mentally ill extremists who call themselves
collective of I don' t know what, using as a spearhead an issue
that is completely absurd. People are fed up with that in the process.
People who are sick of it understand that any homosexual is a LGBT plus not
and don' t confuse that. That group is an extremist political movement that
does not seek equality, that does not seek to respect anyone, seeks to
impose and subvert and replace everything that unites the West and sustains it as a
culture. That' s what they' re looking for and not born of
They make more powerful groups that are contrary and hate and understand that all of
that must be destroyed with the supposed hope of creating a new society, and
many acritical birds let themselves be used penitently and they don' t know that
perhaps within three more years or five more years, to the extent that this
shit keeps giving itself the society that is difficult to manipulate, to start reacting
and perhaps the respect, tolerance and all the consideration that has been given naturally
over time, to the extent that we' ve gone no more is going
to begin to disappear. Then there will be people in society who will say
these birds have wanted to destroy there against everything I value and appreciate. And
if it' s a bird, it' s my enemy and that'
s not true. It is a small political group, very scandalous, well
funded, over- exposed and over- represented. What' s behind that?
And it' s not the same. I repeat I' m gay
that being LGTB PLoS doesn' t confuse one thing. There is no such
community. There is no individual who is lgtb Q plus. There' s
no individual like that. I' m a bird. There are men points
already, but I am not transsexual, nor bisexual or all that sheath is
that all that is not included in one individual. And if you' re
a critic and how this works, it' s basically how all dictatorships work.
Imposition of what is dictated because it has the power And you do not
dare nor can and need to criticize, because if you do, you are
breaking the norm. What' s the rule is the politically correct thing,
that is, shut up and nod, keep quiet, so don' t
get confused with that thing that wasn' t to offend, as the organizer
of this said. That guy' s a mental patient. Look for the
story you produced. He did so with the intention of offending, not that
of uniting, as he said, to celebrate community tolerance. No tolerance would
have been to respect what a group of people have for represents something sacred.
That will have been tolerance, another respect for what you value eye. Not
respecting does not mean not having a critical stance and expressing it. But the
question I ask myself every time I see that as what happened in Mexico,
why don' t they do it with Islam. I want them to cheer
up that you see, you know Alberto that there was one of the drags
that looked at his testicles. It was a totally perverse thing and the proper
gross grotesque that brings you nothing but hatred and resentment on the part of what
you feel attacked more than nothing. But a meter away was the girl,
just a meter away from that boy, not a meter away, it'
s a barbarity. That girl' s parents are not that it can'
t be and the same thing you say why they don' t grab and
I don' t know any of that. Grab that when you do,
I will celebrate it with you, because you will have shown that you are
truly brave in a world where we are unwilling to respect or cannot live together
in peace. And definitely, what we' re living through lately is throwing
away an avocational ingredient, a provocation that' s going to lead us to
the initial point or all this shit started the day that those who feel bored
already overtaken by all this crap, get arted or stay and there are two
worlds that are inevitably going to collide and are about to do so. They
will do it atomically, which is the world of Islam and these activists celebrate
critics who believe that it really defends, does not notice that Islamists, because
that is Islamophobia. When you already meet that world, as it has already
happened in London, in Paris and has happened in the City of America,
when you meet that, you will see and wonder, it will have been
worth it to have gone straight and against Christians who did not mess with us
rather than to have their fundamental belief in what your Bible teaches you, that
sodomy is a sin and the sodomy is a sinner. But they don'
t go out hunting birds or throwing them away. From the top floor of
the empistate. They criticize you, but they let you live on the other
side. They don' t criticize you, no, they don' t
criticize you. They hunt you like a dog and then throw you away.
Or it happens like in some cities in Iran. You get your buttocks planted
on a stake to run you.