This is just absurd levels of stupidity and hypocrisy, and it's just it's kind
of amazing to me. And people think that this is some kind of bazed,
red built thing. It's not. It's a completely controlled and manipulated operation
and it has nothing really to do with these ideologies other than that these are
controlled groups that are controlled by Western intelligence to engage in irregular warfare, to
engage in proxy warfare, to destabilize and to restructure and destroy areas to fit
them into not the American century. Do you people understand that all these boomers
and Cold War people saying well, we're going to commun Is, We're gonna
keep the KGB in Russia out of Ukraine. No, it's not the American
century anymore. Do you understand that that was a con At this anniversary,
I guess you could say of one year of tragedy in terms of warfare in
the Ukraine. And so I thought it'd be great to kind of hearse how
we got to where we are and what the dangers are here, because you
know, lately I've been diving really deep into the Cold War, trying to
get an assessment of what was really going on, why there was this larger
project throughout the Cold War to kind of synthesize and create this third way out
of the Cold War dialectic for a future technocracy. And we know that from
a lot of the writings of the elite, which we've covered in the last
several years, some fifty or sixty. Though, So if we go back
to the reason for the twentieth centuries, two World Wars and the Cold War,
according to doctor Carroll quickly, that was to exhaust the opponents of the
Anglo American establishment, and they would exhaust them through two World wars and then
through a Cold War. And if we fast forward up to what happened to
Russia in the fall of Sovietism, the fall of communism, this led to
the invasion of Western economic warfare and looting. This is the Harvard Summer's Ruben
crew that came in and through IMF shock therapy, reorganized and looted the wealth
of Russia. So while I'm sure too many people's public appearances, the idea
was that Russia was going to be freed from Sovietism. And it's true that
the Soviet system was a nightmare, terrible system, and communism is a nightmare
terrible system. Absolutely, and it's just amazing to me. I can never
really talk about this topic without people getting mad and assuming that I'm somehow kind
of defending communism or Sovietism, when all I'm really trying to point out when
we look into this is that there's there's a danger I've taken on new masters,
and particularly in the realm of the religious world, which we've been covering
as we've analyzed various texts and into the history of NATO and the history of
the Vatican and both the CIA and the KGB kind of vying for influence and
power with the Vatican. In order to understand this, we have to understand
the Cold War and getting out of the dialectical thinking of thinking that the West
is necessarily good and the East is necessarily evil. If you read Brazinski,
for example, in his older writings all the way back to his nineties text,
he talks about this being a Manequean dialect. He says the Cold War
was a Manichean dialectic arising out of the powers in the post World War two
period. And we might think that the West was waging a war against communism
and socialism, but the reality is that the elites of the West were not
really anti Marxist, they were against what you might call classical Marxism. And
that's because Pascal Marxism failed to achieve its objectives, precisely because there was no
workers revolution, right. The workers didn't rise up. We didn't see the
proletariat overthrowing their masters and taking over the means of production. But what did
happen was that there was a reformed Marxism that found itself a lot more amenable
to big capital, known as Fabian socialism, that was a lot more effective
and had a lot more power and influence. And it is in fact,
entities like the IMF, the World Bank, the United Nations, et cetera,
et cetera set up by the same Roads World, Milner Rothschild roundtable groups
that then were able to seize America as well and turn it into an engine
for this same power block. And they did that via backdoor deals, backdoor
intelligence operatives such as Noel Coward, Old doll Ian Fleming, William Stevenson and
others who convinced FDR and convinced people in the administration to set up this private
intelligence network, the secret intelligence network known as the OSS that we become the
CIA, which becomes America, comes Americ's government. And the secret Government wasn't
really tasked with protecting America from invaders, protecting America from foreign threats. Really
it was tasked with controlling and steering America. Because we see that the other
entity that was created out of this was, of course the Council on Foreign
Relations, and that's a policy steering group that sits above the government structure,
and it in fact hands down the policies of the global elite to the government
as an unaccountable, unelected bureaucratic structure that then controls government. So you're electing
elected officials that submit to and are handed policy by these people who are unelected.
And you look at entities in the government that really run throughs the National
Security Council of the State Department. It's always CFAR people always, and the
same CFR people go to the Builderberg Group, and they are also members of
the Trilateral Commission, and they make decisions about corporate policy globally as well as
government policy globally. Because these corporations are above government, they own government.
And until we recognize that, until people can figure that out, there's not
going to be any changes. I'm not saying you can't care about who is
elected, but as quickly says, the president is limited, right, president
can only do so much. Your senators, your congressman, they can only
do so much. I mean maybe on a local level they can do more,
But we're dealing with an international elite, and there's not an international clique
that not only has the ability to that up global institutions that give top down
global policy. Remember, in the last three years, what do they say
now it's going to be the UN and the CDC getting their policies directly from
Rockefeller Foundation. This last week they had the World Government, the Government summit,
right, and they had all these global elites out there pushing for the
idea of an international health organization treaty and control grid that would enforce mandated stabbies
because what held them up the last time was local, national, and state
laws. So they couldn't forcibly stabby everybody because of regulations. They were saying,
and I put these clips on my Twitter if you want to see them
from the World Government summit, and so they said, in the next pandemic,
we want to get rid of all that so that we can forcibly,
forcibly inject, inoculate, or experiment on track and trace. And so while
Russia has within it, of course a fifth column, as Russian geopolitical analysts
have written about, because a lot of the foundations that think tanks, Carnegie
Endowment, so forth, Michael McFowl, they were they've been in Russia for
a long time. Because the West took over and restructured after the collapse via
the IMF shock therapy and the Harvard people. Then we have putin kicking out
a lot of these oligarchs right late nineties, early two thousands, and that
led to a new struggle, a new Cold War, this new East West
battles that's now emerging as a real large threat. So let's get into more
of that. We want to talk about heartland theory, mckinder, all that
kind of stuff that give us the background as to where we might go in
this crisis. On guest host Jaydor Jaysonalysis, Welcome back to the auction.
Jaydy or Jaysonalysis. Were talking about the setting for how we got into this
grand chessboard situation with Russia and the new conflicts that have arisen last year,
how it arises ont of the alignments coming out of the Cold War, and
we were talking about this idea of controlling the Eurasian heartland. This is an
idea that comes out of the British imperial strategy of Lord Halford mckinder and it
was the kind of operating system for the British Empire as a sea empire,
seeking to control the land power, the sea power and the land power,
the land power of course being the Eurasian heartland. And that's why, of
course Russia and Ukraine are so crucial in this strategy. Russia has to always
be kept at bay, always has to be pushed back. That was the
purpose of NATO actually as a defensive strategy during the Cold War and then became
offensive after the Cold War, which was a violation of what NATO was supposed
to be. But we see NATO now tweeting out on its actual pro file
that NATO is the Marvel Hero Universe power as it fights against the evil Russians.
Yeah, I kid you not. That's actually on NATO's Twitter. They're
tweeting out that they are William Wallace. They are, even though William Wallace
actually fought against degenerate British kings. But NATO is saying that they're William Wallace
because they're freedom fighters. What does it mean to fight for freedom? What
is free? Well, in the case of this, this war has now
been cast as a rainbow skittles t R A n S war and NATO fighting
for the rights of t R A NS. So isn't ironic that in the
Cold War, you know, we were told that we're being persecuted by atheist
communists, and if we just have neoliberalism, will we open up these other
countries behind iron curtain to economic realism, we'll have freedom. Religion can come
back. But what happened was, in reality, the largest institution in the
West, the religious institution of the Roman Catholic Church, was literally being co
opted, advised, and utilized by the Central Intelligence Agency, and multiple books
confirm this. Now, the deeper that I go into this, I'm really
just amazed at how wide and how deep spread this is. Even from two
conflicting views of the Cold War. You have somebody like Paul Williams, who's
a Roman Catholic who's very critical of the CIA and the Vatican during the Cold
War, who admits that it was essentially a captured institution for the CIA,
and then we have a cold warrior himself, John Koehler's book that admits that.
Yeah, of course, the Brazinski, of course, kissing your of
course, William Casey, of course, they were all working and all the
way back to William Colby with Gladio. Of course, they were working hand
to hand with the Vatic funneling black ops funds through the Vatican Bank to fight
against the Soviets. And it sounds plausible, right, It sounds okay,
that makes sense. We don't want a bunch of commies running everything. But
the danger here is that when Uncle Sam wins, it's not really Uncle Sam
that wins. And it's not really communism being defeated for free market capitalism.
It's monopoly capital using Babyan socialism to restructure these countries. I mean, is
the EU Does this seem to be a economic freedom based institution to you?
Does the IMF seem like something that's based around economic freedom and liberty? Does
UNESCO seem like something based around economic freedom and liberty? Well, if you
mean by economic freedom and liberty going back to the British Empire and social Darwinism
and you know those kinds of things. I guess it makes sense that would
be atimistic individualistic Enlightenment libertarianism based around atheistic evolutionary philosophy, in which case rights
don't actually exist. There's this thing as rights. Rights, you're just arbitrary
because of we're all just manifestations of nature. Nature doesn't have rights. Do
you think the predator prey relationship has anything to do with rights? No,
it's just brute power, brute force. And so we're presented with a situation
post Enlightenment of are you going to choose Hobbsian leviathan state or do you want
a revolutionary anarcho state. No state, which always has playa says, falls
over into tyranny because when you have the rule of the many anarchy, that
falls over into despotism and oligarchy. And so it's just amazing to me that
people would buy into this dialect, Dick. And we're supposed to have believed
that NATO was the good guy all these years, and the reality is that
we're talking about two different bad guys. Okay, we're talking about Soviet communism
voisted upon Russia and the Baltic States via elites in the West. It's not
Russia organically that was communist. It's not the West organically that has any of
these ideologies that are unnatural to these people groups. These are created ideologies that
are techniques and systems of control. And so now that we're in this post
Cold War era where the war became an international war on terror, I was
watching a Goofy movie the other night that illustrated this in a very profound way,
which surprised me because we've done a lot of analyzes of the Bond films.
Typically we think about, oh, well, the most regulatory ones are
going to be the ones you know from the classic Ian fleming period. But
I was watching it Tomorrow Never Dies from nineteen ninety seven, and the weirdest
part about that one, I think that's the second to last, or maybe
it's this. It's the second Pierce Brosman bontom And if you remember this plot,
it's it's pretty instructive because you have this giant media empire, the Carver
Media group. Jonathan Price plays the Bond villain as a media mogul, and
the media mogul decides that the the world can be manipulated through fake news big
news, right, and so not only does he engineer crises. He also
creates the narrative around the crises that he's engineered, and the plot involves the
East and the West being manipulated into a conflict by an international supra international group.
And that's always in the Bond films, right, Obviously there's Specter,
this kind of thing. Now this is not Specter in this one. This
is nineteen eighty seven. Here's the weird part. So Bond ends up working
together at times with Russian Soviet individuals. I guess we're supposed to think as
post Soviet, so they're not Soviet, but they act like you know that.
Now it's a Soviet terror network. And then Bond aligns himself with a
Chinese communist spy to unfoil the plots of the international elite. Now that's bizarre,
because okay, there are international elites that try to play these powers off
against one another. And I think that to a degree, that's what's going
on. Because I'm not saying that there's no real conflict or there's no real
war. There is, but I'm saying that in so many films we have
an international elite, this kind of kissing Gerbrazinski structure Klaus you know, the
super international elite that plays the nation states off against one another, and they
plan and prepare for wars decades ahead of time. And so I think,
yeah, absolutely, they wanted this war in the Ukraine, and they want
a new Cold War, and it's part of the overall strategy to bring in
the technocracy. And we'll look at that here in a moment. Get into
the specifics of why these kinds of countries and states stand in the way.
Doesn't mean that they're perfect, but they stand in the way of a certain
kind of ideology, a certain kind of worldview that has to be pushed globally.
So it's Jadi or Jay's analysis. You know, what's interesting is that
the time of World War Two, when Hitler understood the importance geostrategically of trying
to control the Ukraine and to push back on Russia, the Galen network of
Reinhardt Galen and other Nazis had actually trained and set up a lot of the
intelligence and black ops structures in these areas. And this ties into NATO's Gladiol
operations. And what's amazing is that those networks then we're sort of taken over
by the West. We all know about Operation paper Clip, But people like
Dullus and others, Bill Donovan, they also made alliances with these Galen networks
that are still running things, still doing these operations in the Ukraine. So
it's amazing all the posturing in the last about being everybody who's not for total
liberalism is a Nazi, and yet we're openly supporting and aiding, openly take
pictures with Nazi battalions in the Ukraine, the real actual Nazis, And I
mean, this is just absurd levels of stupidity and hypocrisy, and it's just
it's kind of amazing to me. And people think that this is some kind
of bays red billed thing. It's not. It's a completely controlled and manipulated
operation, and it has nothing really to do with these ideologies other than that
these are controlled groups that are controlled by Western intelligence to engage in irregular warfare,
to engage in proxy warfare, to destabilize and to restructure and destroy areas
to fit them into not the American century. Do you people understand that all
these boomers and Cold War people saying well, we're the commies, We're gonna
keep the KGB in Russia out of Ukraine, no, it's not the American
Century anymore. Do you understand that that was a con? And maybe there
could have been an American Century that wasn't a con And I don't know,
but all the people who came up with the idea of American Century, the
State Department, George Keenan, that was all dreamt up by the CFR and
the nineteen thirty nine War Peace Studies Project from the New York City Council on
Foreign Relations. That's when they created right after that that you en right right
at that time. And so this idea of fostering democracy, fostering free market
liberalism, which is not really what it was, that was for the fortune
one fortune five hundred to go into these countries and restructure them, to loot
them. So again, does that make the Cold War iron curtains? Does
that make them good? No? But is it possible that we have turned
into a worse thing. That's what I'm trying to pose it to you.
And the more that I read about the Stalls in the KGB and all these
guys and how awful they were, all the awful stuff that they did to
people in these books, I'm just reminded of. But aren't the global elite
that run things now like ten times worse? Are they doing ten ten times
worse things? Isn't what they want to set up with every area of your
life? Traction trace a ten times worst version of all that stuff seems like
it to me. And while it's true that communism had this ridiculous idealistic system
that was based around everyone being essentially sacrificed to the collective and to this bizarre
technocratic atheistic system, that was an older technocratic model that has caved to a
new technocratic model. If you remember the way that Brazenski and no Brazinski,
the way that bertand Russell and HC. Wells these different, these big level
strategies, the way they talked about communism and socialism marksim was as if they
were experiments in other countries to see how well they functioned, how well they
worked as control mechanisms in other areas and for certain people, And not every
system works that well to control everybody equally, because different regions, different people
groups require different strategies. That's why the CIA studies ethnography to master the local
customs and idiosyncrasies of various peoples to best influence and control them, and so
do we understand what's going on really that it's and it doesn't mean that Russia
is a representation of authentic, pure, accurate Christianity. There's absolutely corruption in
Eastern Bloc countries. There's absolutely corruption in the Russian government, sure, but
that's everywhere. And if you listen to Putin's speech, what did Putin say
about what Russia represents? It's the representation of a system that didn't completely get
destroyed in the post Cold World period, in the World War two and post
Cold War period. In other words, there's a representation of the maintenance of
people and their faith and their tradition and that they don't want enforced Satanism.
And even if Putin is some villain or something, which he just seems to
be a pragmatic global leader like anyone else right, people always ask me,
all's what do you think about Putin? What do you think about Elon Musk?
What do you think about Donald Trump? I don't know. I don't
have any thoughts other than I like it when they do something good, and
if they do something bad, I disagree. So there's no pipe dreams about,
you know, some utopia that's going to be created in some other country.
But there is the reality of Western elites being completely maniacal, completely out
of touch with the reality completely. I mean it's people like brazil Ski and
Kissinger and Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab and George Soros, and I mean they
brag about what they're doing. They're into malenthusianism. But even the Soviets weren't
maniacal Malthusians, right, they had ridiculous things like Lysyncoism and these stupid philosophies.
But and they would, they would certainly killing and starve off people who
oppose them, but hourly who by the way, supported all those ideas,
now want something ten times worse than that. Do you understand how crazy that
is? And now we're at the point where it's like, oh, yeah,
now we need to nuke, we need to know to blow everything up,
destroy everything. These lunatics like Sean Penn, Let's nuke everybody, Let's
nuke these whole all of those blow everything up. I mean, I can't
imagine that these people. I mean, it's almost as if they're completely taken
over by something else, something else was running them, and they just have
this innate thirst four, the destruction of cities, the destruction of countries,
the destruction of what they think is their enemy. Like the view Heartbeat saying
that everybody, everybody in the Midwest deserves to be destroyed because that state went
for Trump. That's crazy. But we see the spirit that motivates somebody like
that can't be good. That is a demonic spirit. And so this whole
Cold War situation and where we're going, it's not random conflicts. This is
all drawn up by the Rand Corporation, drawn up by these entities, created
out of the same network that I'm talking about, the state. And by
the way, it's great that Trump called out Victoria Neyland's that's I mean,
that's who has been pushing this for all this time, trying to provoke this
conflict, trying to provoke Russia for all these years, back to twenty fourteen
and all the way back to the eighties with the color revolutions. But if
Rain Corporation was drawing up these strategies and these plants decades ago, then how
can it be the fault of countries that just want to preserve what they are
in their way of life. And Ukraine is not a historic nation. State
part of Russia. So of course they want Ukraine. Why wouldn't they win?
That is the heart of Russia. Heah is the heart of Russia,
and breaking it off is a Western imperial strategy going all the way back to
World War One. So you have to understand that this is a bigger game
that's being played. And it doesn't mean that Russia or any of these other
countries is a perfect utopia. It means that they represent things that stand in
the way of the advance of total technocracy and total Malthusian depopulation. Sometimes you've
got so jador Jay's analysis. We were talking about what emerged out of the
Cold War dialectic and what the long term plan was, and the long term
plan is now completely evident. Right again, I think we could give some
leeway to people in the fifties, sixties, seventies, you know, living
in the time of the Cold War. They didn't have access to the information,
they didn't have access to what we have access to now, and so
a lot of good people, including my family members. I had family members
that fought for the West, and we're Cold warriors that engaged in Cold War
activities for the Air Force, for example, and so you know, it
has nothing to do with I want to pick some side because I have this
idealistic view that somehow there's going to be this future Orthodox Christian empire, or
that Russia is going to save the world or something like that. Now,
maybe maybe Russia saves the world by and I don't know, I don't know.
I mean, things are getting so crazy, who knows. But I
don't think that salvation or anything like that comes necessarily from a nation state per
se. But God can providentially use situations like this to stave off completely demonized
structures that are openly everybody can see what's being promoted by the Western elite now,
and this is a global agenda. They want to push this everywhere.
And so what's happening is the removal of potential areas of resistance. And that's
not just the Ukraine conflicts. That also is domestically in the West. It's
anybody in the in the Western countries that potentially could stand up to or oppose
a threat. And that's why there are these long term operations to demographically destroy
different areas and regions. It's an open stated thing. There's a book called
Weapons of Mass Migration. By Kelly Greenhill. It's I think it's a Stanford
University publication. I think it's connected to the Army War College. It's about
warfare with population. But you can't talk about that because that makes you a
bad person, even though it's a public fact that it's a real strategy of
warfare, and that's too weaken and destroy to integrate into this coming global government.
So the danger is that now that we're reaching this coming to a head,
and now we have Zelinsky and others threatening World War three if there's a
union between Russia and China. Again, keep in mind that it doesn't make
any of these powers necessarily the good guys. And my point is that,
as I was pointing out with the Bond film Tomorrow Ever Dies, there's a
lot of other movies that have the same kind of plot going on. Think
about X Men, the one with Michael Fastman or where he's Magneto. You
have this elite group that's trying to kick off a nuclear exchange between the East
and the West. Think about war Games where an AI tries to kick off
this global world war between the East and the West. Think about Tomorrow Never
Dies, where an elite group is trying to cause an instantiate in an act
that war between the East and the West. And so I think that there
is a desire on the part of some of the more demonically energized elites in
the West that they would be happy to see full on total war, because
eventually what happens is that these people are so given over to evil that they're
not even in control of their own faculties anymore. They lose their own reasoning
faculty, and they become essentially unionized, united with powers, and by doing
so, they're not in control. They're not steering anymore. They're steered by
something else. And what is it that all these people want to enact.
They want to enact a new order and new aon, a new era that
is post human. Every one of the global elite that we've analyzed in terms
of their books, they're all one on the same page when it comes to
this. None of them disagree. There are no pro human, pro life
global elites. You understand that, none of them. There are none of
them who disagree with a global government, who disagree with a global single CBDC
currency. The BIS guy, the Triple Chin guy, just came out again
and said FIAT has won. It is beaten big point, which is laughable.
He says that we will have the CBDC. We will have it and
will shut your wallets off. You will be under total control for anything that
you say. That's esg. This technocratic system was designed out of rand CIA
World War two Cold War operations, studying all of the conflicts to figure out
the best techniques and mechanisms to control and manage populations through tech through smart cities.
For example, in the Phoenix Program book that we analyzed by Doug Valentine,
we learned that FEMA and Homeland Security were set up on the models of
the Phoenix Program and on the models of Vietnam and population reorganization studies. We
learned that in Vietnam a lot of the AI and drone technology was first tested
out in the Vietnam conflict. We learned that DARPA and the Pentagon were strategizing
and testing out various techniques for masses of population tracking and control in Vietnam and
subsequent conflicts as well. Right Desert Storm, we know that people were beginning
to be biometrically tracked and traced even at the time of Desert Storm. The
Iraq conflict, and so these power structures are the same power structures that control
the global drug trade. Do you think that these are good people? They're
controlling the global drug trade and the insane explosion of heroin production since the last
ten, fifteen, twenty years. Look at our country being destroyed by legal
heroin opioids and illegal opioids. That's because the Western power structure took over all
of the drug networks and lanes in the last fifty sixty years. And they
did that in concert with aligning themselves with the organized crime. Multiple analysts have
pointed out, even from the FBI itself, right FBI consultant Paul Williams ciass
they took over all of the old drug networks, drug lanes. And what
I'm trying to say is that this is what it means to have full spectrum
dominance. To have full spectrum control is to control all these areas of life.
They're not doing it because it's just a hobby. It's fun to do,
to study. Oh, we're nerds. No, it's about what they
are bringing in. Do you understand this is not this is a real plan.
It's not theories. I wonder what they're gonna do. I mean,
they all put in their books what they're gonna do. It's not guesswork.
Now, how they roll this out is guesswork. We don't know what cards
these people are going to play. A lot of people didn't know for sure,
right, we didn't know they were going to have this COVID, all
this kind of stuff that rolled out. But then after it happens, we
look back, we can say, oh, they're running all these drolls for
the exact same thing, Crimson, Contagion, Clay at X as far as
document events two one, and we can see that this is a strategized,
rolled out plan. It's the same with all these Rand Corporation documents that have
been mentioning, all these white papers that plan the future, that plan and
strategize a global conflict as one of the cards that can be played. Literally,
Rand Corporation strategies about a war between Russia and the West. Nuclear stranges
right PDD sixty or whatever it is Presidential Decision Directive under Clinton of absorbing a
nuclear strike, which supposedly has been updated or whatever. I don't know all
the PDDs, but the point is that you do have strategies about this and
none of those strategies are made with your welfare in mind. Because the same
people that run giant drug laundering banks like HSBC and all these other banks that
got busted ten years ago for three hundred million dollars worth of drug money.
Do you think that's just random bad apples. No, that's the people that
run the West. That's the same structure, the same people that we're talking
about. It's Specter and Spector would like to see a destructive war probably eventually.
It's definitely one of the cards that they could play. I mean,
I hope there's not gonna be a world war, but they could definitely play
that card. They have talked and strategized about it for a long time,
the possibility of a new world war. Now it's more likely than ever.
It's being talked about openly, and if it happens, it would be because
the elite want that to happen, to have a mass destruction, to bring
in their post human world where we're run by AI, We're running some kind
of new technocratic system where everything is tracked and traced. Maybe the elite emerge
from underground monkers after a giant exchange. Who knows, But that's definitely one
of the cards that they could play. We have to keep that in mind.
And another pandemic, there is another card they could play. They could
play both cards. So we have to be prepared for these things because there's
these are realities. That's the world that we live in, and if we
don't realize what's going on, it's just going to be all the worst for
us. Do you want to get my books? Go to Jay's Analysis.
You can buy my books in the shop, sign copies. You can follow
me over on rockfin as well and get all those products there and supports The
Tip of the Spear