1
00:00:14,720 --> 00:00:20,320
What is kraklacin fellow thermonuclear a efforts. I am a Dan Valley coming at

2
00:00:20,359 --> 00:00:26,239
you as always with my certified fantabulous
co host, mister Grant Hughes. We

3
00:00:26,320 --> 00:00:32,119
are on to our Eastern Conference Optimism
Index, where Grant and I will talk

4
00:00:32,159 --> 00:00:39,520
about one thing, development player,
whatever reason, why we have liked watching

5
00:00:39,520 --> 00:00:42,240
this team, why we're higher on
their future for some reason, even if

6
00:00:42,240 --> 00:00:47,159
they're not playing too well. Just
trying to shine some bright bright light on

7
00:00:47,200 --> 00:00:50,799
some brighter spots so far this season. Go check out the Western Conference edition.

8
00:00:50,880 --> 00:00:55,600
Grant spearheaded that one. It was
fantastic as as I expected it to

9
00:00:55,679 --> 00:00:59,920
be, and all the usual reminders. Please remember to sub YouTube, spot,

10
00:01:00,320 --> 00:01:03,880
Apple or the biggest ones. Comment
like our videos helped the algo,

11
00:01:03,960 --> 00:01:06,959
love us back, follow us on
the socials. The links to those are

12
00:01:06,959 --> 00:01:10,239
in the podcast and YouTube descriptions as
well as on your screen if you're watching

13
00:01:10,640 --> 00:01:12,719
join our discord. The link to
that is in the podcast and YouTube description

14
00:01:14,079 --> 00:01:17,799
description. Great discussions always happening over
there. That's also how you can get

15
00:01:17,799 --> 00:01:23,879
in mail bag questions or sometimes talk
with Grant and myself. I believe that's

16
00:01:23,920 --> 00:01:26,799
it, so Grant, how the
heck are you doing. I'm doing very

17
00:01:26,799 --> 00:01:32,040
well. I'm excited to take a
back seat to you as you lead most

18
00:01:32,079 --> 00:01:34,959
of the discussion on the East.
And I'm also glad your voice is back

19
00:01:34,000 --> 00:01:38,120
so that you're up for that task, because you know, everybody wants to

20
00:01:38,120 --> 00:01:44,519
hear those golden pipes. Apparently some
of the people liked the first podcast we

21
00:01:44,560 --> 00:01:47,879
did, was it Piece or Panic
for the West? I think, or

22
00:01:47,959 --> 00:01:51,799
was it the East. My voice
was apparently struggling to the point where people

23
00:01:51,920 --> 00:01:55,480
liked it though. But then that
second podcast we recorded back to back and

24
00:01:55,519 --> 00:01:57,879
went off the rails and we got
a little lucky where we didn't do our

25
00:01:57,879 --> 00:02:00,799
normal two podcast session this week because
of our schedules. So we're recording this

26
00:02:01,280 --> 00:02:06,079
these stats any numbers I know will
be accurate heading into games on Wednesday.

27
00:02:06,120 --> 00:02:07,680
There's no games on Thursday. This
will go up on Friday, so it'll

28
00:02:07,719 --> 00:02:12,639
all still be germane. But it
probably helped me a little bit that we

29
00:02:12,639 --> 00:02:15,439
weren't talking for four hours this time, so my voice is a little bit

30
00:02:15,520 --> 00:02:17,240
a little bit fressure as we get
into the Eastern conference. Also, I

31
00:02:17,240 --> 00:02:22,840
didn't have to talk as much because
you had the West that's true. So

32
00:02:23,319 --> 00:02:27,800
do we want to start things off? I think so. And I'm in

33
00:02:27,879 --> 00:02:30,719
charge of the alphabet this time,
so I'm feeling the pressure. So but

34
00:02:31,240 --> 00:02:35,120
this is always easy because you know, when we start the alphabet, it

35
00:02:35,159 --> 00:02:38,719
is a letter A. That's the
that's what you come here to learn on

36
00:02:38,800 --> 00:02:42,759
hardwood, Knox. So let's tell
me Dan about the Atlanta Hawks. What's

37
00:02:42,759 --> 00:02:46,960
got your attention there? In a
positive way? The Jalen Johnson breakout still

38
00:02:47,000 --> 00:02:52,240
has my attention. We've talked about
him sufficiently enough that it's kind of like,

39
00:02:52,319 --> 00:02:53,520
oh, are we really going to
talk about this dude again? So

40
00:02:53,560 --> 00:02:57,680
I tried to approach it from a
different way and just I'm looking at his

41
00:02:57,879 --> 00:03:00,759
entire package and I don't expect him
to nail more than forty percent of his

42
00:03:00,840 --> 00:03:05,680
threes all season, but defenses are
starting to treat him as more of a

43
00:03:05,719 --> 00:03:08,439
threat. They're closing out harder when
he's catching it, and that will erase

44
00:03:08,639 --> 00:03:13,080
some of his wide open triples.
But he counters that with just like a

45
00:03:13,159 --> 00:03:17,039
tough to plan for speed attacking those
closeouts, and he's keeping defenders off balance.

46
00:03:17,879 --> 00:03:23,159
He has some real on ball acceleration. He's busted out a nifty mix

47
00:03:23,199 --> 00:03:27,479
of floaters and fades, and he's
a pretty reliable finisher around the hoop when

48
00:03:27,479 --> 00:03:30,599
he gets all the way to the
basket. And I think a big element

49
00:03:30,840 --> 00:03:34,120
of why the Hawks offense is I
mean, they were efficient last year,

50
00:03:34,159 --> 00:03:38,000
they're fast as hell this year.
Their second and average possession time right now,

51
00:03:38,039 --> 00:03:43,240
and they're first off opponent misshots.
And that's in part because you have

52
00:03:43,800 --> 00:03:47,159
so many different guys aside from a
Tree Young or Dejontey Murray who can just

53
00:03:47,199 --> 00:03:52,000
push off a rebound, and Jalen
Johnson has been one of them. I've

54
00:03:52,039 --> 00:03:59,000
really also enjoyed his defense. He
does he makes mistakes, but like Atlanta

55
00:03:59,039 --> 00:04:01,240
can tether him to a big forward
and say just stay on him, and

56
00:04:01,280 --> 00:04:04,280
they're asking him to fight through these
screens, but he also just has the

57
00:04:04,360 --> 00:04:08,759
chops to hang in space. He
had some really good moments against shake Yil

58
00:04:08,840 --> 00:04:14,039
just Alexander, against Tyrese Maxi.
I think he's been a really good help

59
00:04:14,080 --> 00:04:18,399
side rim protector this year. No
other Hawks rotation players actually surrendering a lower

60
00:04:18,439 --> 00:04:23,120
clip at the basket, which is
pretty gnarly when you consider they have cappella

61
00:04:23,160 --> 00:04:26,279
and a kungu right there and the
big one. I don't know if I

62
00:04:26,279 --> 00:04:30,560
expect this to sustain, but the
Hawks' is half court defense improves by twenty

63
00:04:30,600 --> 00:04:34,040
points per one hundred plays with him
on the court. That's the best mark

64
00:04:34,560 --> 00:04:39,160
among anyone who has logged at least
two hundred and twenty five minutes. And

65
00:04:40,079 --> 00:04:44,800
I'll frame it this way. If
you have any other thoughts on Jalen Johnson,

66
00:04:44,800 --> 00:04:47,360
please share them. But like he's
creating this interesting dilemma where the Hawks

67
00:04:47,399 --> 00:04:51,600
just got off one expensive forward.
He's extension eligible after this year, and

68
00:04:51,639 --> 00:04:55,480
the way he's playing right now is
gonna be worth quite a bit of money.

69
00:04:56,160 --> 00:04:58,920
So that's where I was gonna go. Actually, as I agree,

70
00:04:58,959 --> 00:05:01,040
I think he's been one of the
most you know, I don't know if

71
00:05:01,079 --> 00:05:05,680
it's a surprise, but like pleasant
players, you know, young among young

72
00:05:05,680 --> 00:05:11,600
guys, certainly for this season.
And I echo everything you said about,

73
00:05:11,639 --> 00:05:15,839
like I think, you know,
the the athleticism, the defensive impact,

74
00:05:15,879 --> 00:05:18,319
the help stuff. That's all I
think if you look at the numbers,

75
00:05:18,959 --> 00:05:23,800
what makes him you know, different
or better than guys like Collins who was

76
00:05:23,800 --> 00:05:26,639
there before, and even DeAndre Hunter
now and to a lesser extent, aj

77
00:05:26,759 --> 00:05:30,120
Griffin not quite the same player types
exactly, but if we're talking about Hawk's

78
00:05:30,319 --> 00:05:32,480
big wings and forwards, yeah,
you have to draw some comparisons. Like

79
00:05:32,600 --> 00:05:38,560
he I think he makes quicker decisions
with the ball just generally speaking, he's

80
00:05:38,600 --> 00:05:42,000
not tasked with a bunch of playmaking. But you know, hunter Is has

81
00:05:42,040 --> 00:05:44,639
never been a good passer, has
always been a guy that if he puts

82
00:05:44,639 --> 00:05:47,040
it on the floor, like the
expected outcome of the possession just gets way

83
00:05:47,040 --> 00:05:49,720
worse. He's not going to set
a lot of guys up. Johnson moves

84
00:05:49,720 --> 00:05:54,839
the ball more quickly and intuitively,
and I think that also ties to his

85
00:05:54,920 --> 00:05:58,839
instincts are just good defensively, Like
he's disruptive. Like his block rates have

86
00:05:58,879 --> 00:06:01,839
always been high. He's above the
eightieth percentile. This year, he's his

87
00:06:01,920 --> 00:06:05,319
steel rate looks not as impressive.
He's you know, one point four percent

88
00:06:05,720 --> 00:06:09,439
is in the fifty first percentile,
but last year he was at one point

89
00:06:09,439 --> 00:06:12,519
five percent at the same position,
that's the eighty first percentile. So,

90
00:06:12,600 --> 00:06:16,160
like, he's a disruptive defender because
he kind of processes pretty quickly and has

91
00:06:16,160 --> 00:06:20,079
the athleticism to get there and make
stuff happen. And then you see that

92
00:06:20,120 --> 00:06:24,439
on the offensive end too. And
that's why I think, like when it

93
00:06:24,519 --> 00:06:28,000
comes time to pay up, you
have to treat him. You know,

94
00:06:28,439 --> 00:06:30,240
the Hawks were, you know,
in the right I think at the time

95
00:06:30,319 --> 00:06:32,959
to pay John Collins what they did. But you've got to maybe pay this

96
00:06:33,000 --> 00:06:38,879
guy more just because of he's more
versatile already, he's he can shoot it

97
00:06:38,920 --> 00:06:42,839
like he's he's kind of like a
lot of the calling stuff, except maybe

98
00:06:42,839 --> 00:06:46,920
a little more on ball skill potentially, And so you've got to pay him.

99
00:06:46,920 --> 00:06:50,120
And then it's suddenly like, well, we've already earmarked a kong Wu,

100
00:06:50,160 --> 00:06:54,959
We've paid him to succeed Capella.
And now it's like, well do

101
00:06:55,040 --> 00:06:58,639
we talk about DeAndre Hunter moving?
What? What? Because the Hawks do

102
00:06:58,680 --> 00:07:00,360
not pay the tax. We know
that, like all their moves are based

103
00:07:00,399 --> 00:07:04,959
on avoiding that. So there may
be a forced decision kind of in a

104
00:07:04,959 --> 00:07:09,399
good way, I guess, because
you're happy that Johnson has developed like this,

105
00:07:09,920 --> 00:07:13,519
but you wonder what the fallout will
be through the rest of the rotation

106
00:07:13,639 --> 00:07:16,560
with guys like Hunter that I think, in hindsight, probably wasn't the right

107
00:07:16,560 --> 00:07:21,160
decision to treat him like someone that
is a cornerstone, and Johnson looks more

108
00:07:21,199 --> 00:07:27,120
like that type of player. I
think just because of positional scarcity, Capella

109
00:07:27,160 --> 00:07:29,680
will be the one that would fall
by the wayside. I will just to

110
00:07:30,160 --> 00:07:32,160
the money point because of all he
does defensively, if the three point and

111
00:07:32,199 --> 00:07:36,879
the fact that he's John Calls had
trouble contributing offensively within this roster context.

112
00:07:36,920 --> 00:07:41,879
So Jalen Johnson does different things and
just clearly fits as more of a play

113
00:07:42,079 --> 00:07:45,680
like in the play finisher reps that
are available to him, he's doing more

114
00:07:45,680 --> 00:07:48,680
with them. If he continues to
hit threes at anywhere near this clip,

115
00:07:49,040 --> 00:07:54,879
you're probably looking at a twenty five
million dollars a year player. I would

116
00:07:54,879 --> 00:07:58,480
think. So, I mean,
like, you know, he he's averaging

117
00:07:58,480 --> 00:08:01,279
a block and a steal, he's
two and a half assists these more assistant

118
00:08:01,279 --> 00:08:05,720
turnovers, which is like, you
know, not necessarily the highest bar,

119
00:08:05,279 --> 00:08:09,240
but given his usage, it's impressive. I just I just think, yeah,

120
00:08:09,279 --> 00:08:13,439
I I so. Then you've also
we didn't even talk about Sidik Bay

121
00:08:13,519 --> 00:08:16,920
yet, and the reason he was
you know, not let go but the

122
00:08:16,959 --> 00:08:18,800
Pistons moved on is I think that
the thought was that they didn't want to

123
00:08:18,800 --> 00:08:22,120
pay him his next contract, and
so Sidik Bay is gonna be up for

124
00:08:22,279 --> 00:08:26,639
I guess he'll be restricted. But
that's another one, like, would you

125
00:08:26,680 --> 00:08:30,279
just be better off with Bay and
Johnson and move on from basically every other

126
00:08:30,680 --> 00:08:33,960
winging forward on this roster. That's
that's a totally realistic possibility. But you're

127
00:08:33,960 --> 00:08:37,360
gonna have to cut some salary someplace
if you pay those guys' market rates.

128
00:08:37,600 --> 00:08:41,559
The bright spot that's causing a dilemma
that they were gonna enter anyway, frankly,

129
00:08:41,600 --> 00:08:43,919
because they don't want to pay the
tax and you're paying Murray and Trey

130
00:08:45,559 --> 00:08:48,279
as it is. Yeah, all
right, that'll cover the Atlanta Hawks,

131
00:08:48,279 --> 00:08:52,039
Boston Celtics. Nothing great going on
there. I can't imagine you were able

132
00:08:52,039 --> 00:08:56,159
to find a positive to focus on
forever Charlotte Horneton overtime. So it's doom

133
00:08:56,200 --> 00:09:00,000
and gloom, and this is the
most overrated team in an NBA history.

134
00:09:00,320 --> 00:09:03,000
No, So look, you know, I was a Celtic skeptic, more

135
00:09:03,080 --> 00:09:07,080
so before the Drew Holiday trade.
I thought they just conceded too much defensive

136
00:09:07,120 --> 00:09:11,039
versatility and playmaking. Even after Drew
Holiday, I questioned whether they would have

137
00:09:11,080 --> 00:09:16,600
the same versatility on defense. You
worry about the health stuff with Christops,

138
00:09:16,960 --> 00:09:20,840
and then there's still there's probably still
a playmaking deficit, but the amount of

139
00:09:20,879 --> 00:09:24,679
space they're able to generate, and
like they're driving kicks, spacey driving kicks

140
00:09:24,720 --> 00:09:28,960
is what I called them. I
still would to argue they underutilize them.

141
00:09:28,000 --> 00:09:31,519
Their drives per game are down from
last year. I think a lot of

142
00:09:31,559 --> 00:09:37,600
that probably just has to do with
some absurd shot making from the perimeter and

143
00:09:37,799 --> 00:09:41,559
leaning on it perhaps too much.
But when you get going downhill as Boston

144
00:09:41,600 --> 00:09:46,000
this year, like there's real ball
movement and there's real great opportunities, and

145
00:09:46,120 --> 00:09:50,080
just having Chris stops has broken defenses
a lot of the times because whether he's

146
00:09:50,080 --> 00:09:54,799
camped out on the wing, above
the break in the corner, so many

147
00:09:54,799 --> 00:09:56,559
teams don't really understand like, oh, is he gonna duck in baseline?

148
00:09:56,559 --> 00:09:58,519
How do we account for that?
Or how do you just defend a pick

149
00:09:58,519 --> 00:10:03,120
and pop or someone who's camped out
on the three point line and can get

150
00:10:03,159 --> 00:10:07,759
a shot off over anyone and is
hitting his looks so efficiently. And then

151
00:10:07,799 --> 00:10:11,360
you add the element of oh,
he's still able to punish mismatches. That's

152
00:10:11,440 --> 00:10:15,320
huge. But like the driving kick
game over the past, like a little

153
00:10:15,320 --> 00:10:18,960
bit over a week, the Celtics
have an eleven point three assists rate on

154
00:10:18,039 --> 00:10:22,759
their drives that's the fifth highest.
It's about the fifth highest in the league,

155
00:10:22,879 --> 00:10:26,240
and they have a top five pass
rate on drives during this span.

156
00:10:28,360 --> 00:10:31,200
When you watch it, it just
works. And so my point here is

157
00:10:31,240 --> 00:10:37,639
there's a lot to just appreciate about
Boston, which right now Milwaukee is is

158
00:10:37,679 --> 00:10:43,000
perking up. But Boston has clearly
been and by and large always had the

159
00:10:43,039 --> 00:10:46,200
ceiling of they could be the best
team on offense and defense in the league.

160
00:10:46,200 --> 00:10:48,279
And probably we're the only team we
could say that. About the fact

161
00:10:48,279 --> 00:10:52,919
that they can attack in this way
in the half court, I think will

162
00:10:52,919 --> 00:10:56,440
give them a variance that serves them
well once you get to the playoffs.

163
00:10:56,480 --> 00:11:00,559
I just feel like it gives them
an It was something they could always do,

164
00:11:00,840 --> 00:11:03,080
but like this spacing is next level
from them, and I think it

165
00:11:03,120 --> 00:11:09,200
gives them another way to go about
winning, and in some to some degree,

166
00:11:09,200 --> 00:11:13,039
you should offset what I still feel
like is a team that is at

167
00:11:13,240 --> 00:11:16,840
a play making deficit. Yeah,
yeah, no, I did you give

168
00:11:16,879 --> 00:11:20,600
the Porzingis post up numbers specifically?
I was looking him up while you're talking.

169
00:11:20,600 --> 00:11:22,159
Sorry if I so. No,
he's been killing it. But it's

170
00:11:22,200 --> 00:11:26,600
like, so that's like the if
you were skeptical about Boston, I guess

171
00:11:26,639 --> 00:11:28,879
other than the depth and like some
of the health stuff, one of the

172
00:11:28,919 --> 00:11:33,080
things you might have cited was well, like can't you just get away with

173
00:11:33,519 --> 00:11:37,399
switching and then leaving small guys on
porzingis because forever you know, Rick Carlisle,

174
00:11:37,480 --> 00:11:41,759
I think famously an oppressor, was
confronted with why don't you post up

175
00:11:41,799 --> 00:11:45,240
porzingis more in Dallas and he said
he cited the points per play on post

176
00:11:45,279 --> 00:11:48,240
ups and basically it was like,
because we don't score or when we do

177
00:11:48,320 --> 00:11:50,519
that, and it's a dumb thing
to do. Uh, And now the

178
00:11:50,600 --> 00:11:54,879
numbers are unbelievable. So one point
five to six points per play when porzingis

179
00:11:54,919 --> 00:11:58,159
posts up, which is the in
the one hundredths percentile, And it's not

180
00:11:58,240 --> 00:12:01,360
a small sign. Yeah, it's
pretty high. It would be hard to

181
00:12:01,360 --> 00:12:05,080
be higher. I don't know how
you would do that. And he's doing

182
00:12:05,120 --> 00:12:09,799
that on you know, fifteen ish
percent of his touches or post up touches.

183
00:12:09,360 --> 00:12:13,200
The crazy like he's getting fat.
He's drawing shooting fouls on a quarter

184
00:12:13,519 --> 00:12:18,840
of his post ups, which is
just like that's free money and he's a

185
00:12:18,879 --> 00:12:22,519
good free throw shooter. And so
if you're worried about the playmaking in Boston

186
00:12:22,559 --> 00:12:26,840
and the offense stagnating, to have
this as a okay, nothing worked,

187
00:12:26,279 --> 00:12:30,679
let's throw it in there and based
on the numbers so far, we're gonna

188
00:12:30,720 --> 00:12:33,480
score a point and a half just
by throwing it into the post. To

189
00:12:33,559 --> 00:12:37,120
Porzingis, like that, you know, that doesn't necessary directly address the fact

190
00:12:37,159 --> 00:12:41,159
that, you know, there's not
a lot of great passers on this team

191
00:12:41,200 --> 00:12:45,559
and things can get stagnant. But
that's a pretty sweet, you know,

192
00:12:46,279 --> 00:12:48,559
button that you get to push if
an offensive possession is not working well.

193
00:12:48,639 --> 00:12:52,639
So, yeah, I think and
unexpected that's the main thing, is like

194
00:12:52,759 --> 00:12:56,879
you can't have foreseen Porzingis's post up
game being like the key to a potentially

195
00:12:58,240 --> 00:13:01,279
you know, certainly top five,
but maybe number one offense in the league.

196
00:13:01,320 --> 00:13:05,600
That's kind of wild. Yeah,
And it's like he was as I

197
00:13:05,679 --> 00:13:09,600
realized that my video is off.
Now this is an apology to listeners on

198
00:13:09,799 --> 00:13:13,440
YouTube. We've been having issues with
that and I don't know why. Yeah,

199
00:13:13,759 --> 00:13:16,080
he he did a lot of this
stuff last year. Was just could

200
00:13:16,120 --> 00:13:20,120
this sustain in where he is in
a system where he's not the primary option

201
00:13:20,200 --> 00:13:24,200
necessarily on a better team, And
it was just he had a career year,

202
00:13:24,200 --> 00:13:28,720
and so you're always going to be
inherently skeptical, but totally all right,

203
00:13:28,080 --> 00:13:31,440
that was quick because basically everything about
Boston's been good. Howbout the Brooklyn

204
00:13:31,480 --> 00:13:35,279
net stand they're next in the alphabet, They're not on Boston's level, but

205
00:13:35,559 --> 00:13:39,120
some positives to pick out here.
Yeah, So my thing is an emergent

206
00:13:39,200 --> 00:13:45,080
supporting cast for them, specifically looking
at like what that's done for their offense,

207
00:13:45,120 --> 00:13:46,440
because we know that and part of
this just might be health related.

208
00:13:46,639 --> 00:13:50,960
Their defense is not as good as
we've expected. They're eleventh in points score

209
00:13:52,000 --> 00:13:56,000
per possession on offense, which is
a really big deal because like McHale Bridges,

210
00:13:56,080 --> 00:14:00,600
Spencer Dinwidie, Cam Johnson, they've
not been off to the best starts

211
00:14:01,440 --> 00:14:03,679
this like most efficient starts anyway this
year. So you have a guy like

212
00:14:03,720 --> 00:14:07,360
Cam Thomas, and I actually saw
he's been out dealing with that ankle spray,

213
00:14:07,360 --> 00:14:13,000
and I think and I saw some
conversations start and float around that giving

214
00:14:13,120 --> 00:14:16,399
him such agency over the offense has
actually hurt mckal bridges. I could see

215
00:14:16,399 --> 00:14:20,120
that a little bit. But like
mcal Bridge is shooting percentages are Elon's worse

216
00:14:20,559 --> 00:14:24,559
with cam Thomas off the floor,
and so when you have Cam Thomas,

217
00:14:24,679 --> 00:14:28,960
yes, he's still a little too
mid range dependent. But like among the

218
00:14:28,000 --> 00:14:31,639
sixty five players who have finished at
least one hundred drives this year, only

219
00:14:31,720 --> 00:14:35,960
Joell Ebiid is scoring more, is
yielding more points per drive, Like that's

220
00:14:35,960 --> 00:14:39,000
a big deal. He's exploring different
levels of the middle, is how I

221
00:14:39,000 --> 00:14:43,600
would phrase it. Then Lonnie Walker
the fourth might have been the best minimum

222
00:14:43,679 --> 00:14:46,240
signing of the summer. He's a
sixth Man of the Year candidate. He's

223
00:14:46,320 --> 00:14:50,759
hitting his shots. Specifically, his
fifty four point seven effective field goal percentage

224
00:14:50,799 --> 00:14:56,519
on pull up pull up jumpers ranks
eighth among anyone who is attempted as many

225
00:14:56,519 --> 00:15:00,559
of those those attempts. And so
the only players in front of a Dianner

226
00:15:00,559 --> 00:15:03,639
Fox, Luca, Tim Hardaway,
Junior Tyres Halibert and Shake Gilges, Alexander

227
00:15:03,919 --> 00:15:09,279
Now Chris Middleton shout out to him
and de Jonte Murray and then look Jorny

228
00:15:09,320 --> 00:15:13,240
Finney Smith. Forty five plus percent
from three is big. After shooting sub

229
00:15:13,279 --> 00:15:16,399
thirty percent on drives last year,
he's up to over fifty percent. Now,

230
00:15:16,600 --> 00:15:20,399
it's not a huge part of his
game, but the fact that he

231
00:15:20,440 --> 00:15:22,840
can now do that and a lot
of it has to do Oh there's there

232
00:15:22,879 --> 00:15:26,120
is open space in Brooklyn when they
have either none of Simmons or Claxton on

233
00:15:26,159 --> 00:15:28,960
the floor or just one of them. And Simmons has been out and Claxon's

234
00:15:30,000 --> 00:15:33,600
back, so that's been Stuff's been
pretty open for him. Those guys are

235
00:15:33,639 --> 00:15:37,200
not the driving force necessarily behind what
Brooklyn is doing on offense, though I

236
00:15:37,200 --> 00:15:39,679
think you could argue Cam Thomas and
Lonnie Walker might be. They're helping the

237
00:15:39,720 --> 00:15:46,759
Nets sustain what's been a less than
optimal start from from their most their three

238
00:15:46,799 --> 00:15:50,480
most important players or a few of
their most important players. Yeah, you

239
00:15:50,480 --> 00:15:54,559
know what's interesting. The defense side
has just been kind of confounding to me,

240
00:15:54,759 --> 00:15:58,080
just based on the personnel, and
you went through some of the reasons

241
00:15:58,080 --> 00:16:00,399
why maybe it's underperformed this and I
didn't know this. I was just looking

242
00:16:00,399 --> 00:16:04,279
through some stats here. So last
year, granted, like the Nets were

243
00:16:04,320 --> 00:16:08,279
kind of two different teams last season, but they were number two in terms

244
00:16:08,279 --> 00:16:12,039
of suppressing opponent three point at ten
frequency, which we care more about than

245
00:16:12,080 --> 00:16:18,200
accuracy. Obviously, because phantom defense
can make the accuracy numbers go one way

246
00:16:18,279 --> 00:16:22,000
or the other. Opponents took thirty
three percent of their shots from deep last

247
00:16:22,039 --> 00:16:26,559
year. They're up to forty percent
of those shots now and that ranks twenty

248
00:16:26,559 --> 00:16:30,759
seventh. And basically what looks like
has happened is the nets have kind of

249
00:16:30,799 --> 00:16:33,159
flipped in terms of they don't allow
a lot of attempts at the rim.

250
00:16:33,200 --> 00:16:37,039
Their top ten there and last year
they were twenty fifth. So they've basically

251
00:16:37,480 --> 00:16:41,200
exchanged a bunch, you know,
walling off the rim for giving up a

252
00:16:41,200 --> 00:16:44,039
lot of threes, and I think
maybe that just means you're going to have

253
00:16:44,080 --> 00:16:48,600
more variants generally speaking. So I
still think the defense can get better,

254
00:16:48,519 --> 00:16:52,759
and I think, you know,
offensively, I'm not sure how great it

255
00:16:52,840 --> 00:16:56,799
is to have Cam Thomas matter this
much, because he feels to me like,

256
00:16:56,639 --> 00:17:00,159
you know, don't do it,
don't say you know, I'm gonna

257
00:17:00,159 --> 00:17:03,240
say six, man, I know, I thought you were gonna say microwave

258
00:17:03,279 --> 00:17:06,039
score, which I feel like is
an insult. How deep his his armory

259
00:17:06,160 --> 00:17:08,599
is. I think he might be
like one of the most talented scores in

260
00:17:08,640 --> 00:17:11,640
the NBA full stop. I just
don't know if he's going to do enough

261
00:17:11,680 --> 00:17:15,720
else to justify like, I don't
think the bridges, like detracting from bridges

262
00:17:15,799 --> 00:17:18,680
is a real issue, and you
give a stat that you know kind of

263
00:17:18,680 --> 00:17:22,440
corroborates that. But I just wonder
how great it is if if Thomas is

264
00:17:22,440 --> 00:17:26,240
in your starting unit and is doing
you know, if he matters that much.

265
00:17:26,359 --> 00:17:30,680
I'm not I'm not sure if there's
a precedent for that being optimal,

266
00:17:30,720 --> 00:17:33,799
but certainly a positive so far because
he's been one of the before he got

267
00:17:33,880 --> 00:17:36,640
hurt. He was one of the
most fun players to watch in the league

268
00:17:36,720 --> 00:17:40,440
and will be again once he's back. Thank you to everyone who bore with

269
00:17:40,519 --> 00:17:42,640
us through I guess was it part
of the Celtics. I was off screen

270
00:17:42,839 --> 00:17:48,799
and most of the nets. I'm
back on screen using my FaceTime camera because

271
00:17:48,799 --> 00:17:52,920
my webcam, my four K webcam
barely just is not working. Don't you

272
00:17:52,960 --> 00:17:56,359
just love it? So thanks everyone
who bore with us through my blank screen.

273
00:17:56,880 --> 00:17:59,960
That's all right. I just ignored
it because I believe it throw you

274
00:18:00,039 --> 00:18:02,400
off a little bit, or you're
not looking at the screen enough. Because

275
00:18:02,440 --> 00:18:04,240
sometimes when people disappear on me,
it throws me off while I'm trying to

276
00:18:04,279 --> 00:18:07,240
talk it is weird. I was
concerned if I was going to pick up

277
00:18:07,240 --> 00:18:11,000
on when you were ready to stop
talking about the Nets, but powering through.

278
00:18:11,279 --> 00:18:15,319
The Charlotte Hornets are next. They're
four and nine and they are minus

279
00:18:15,319 --> 00:18:18,759
eight point one net rating. Dan, tell me what's good about the Charlotte

280
00:18:18,759 --> 00:18:22,839
Hornets. We can just move on. No, uh, there's actually I

281
00:18:22,359 --> 00:18:26,160
think we can frame it this way. People were too quick to judge the

282
00:18:26,240 --> 00:18:33,440
Brandon Miller pick as a basketball like
value proposition, and I did that.

283
00:18:33,880 --> 00:18:36,200
Yeah, I mean we both did
it. But by the people i'd be

284
00:18:36,319 --> 00:18:40,799
the Hardwood Knox jackasses, Scoot and
him are going to be tied together.

285
00:18:40,920 --> 00:18:42,480
Maybe for the rest of their career. We're going to debate who's better,

286
00:18:42,480 --> 00:18:47,759
who's more valuable, who should have
been drafted by the Hornets Specifically, I

287
00:18:47,799 --> 00:18:51,000
think Miller right now is proving why
we play the games, and part of

288
00:18:51,039 --> 00:18:55,720
that is Goot Henderson is not playing
the game at the moment. But even

289
00:18:55,759 --> 00:18:57,680
when you look at Brandon Miller the
counting stats, you don't fall in love

290
00:18:57,720 --> 00:19:02,839
with them. The shooting splits aren't
great, but I appreciate the process and

291
00:19:03,440 --> 00:19:07,079
the he looks very plug and play
off the ball. He's already, he's

292
00:19:07,079 --> 00:19:10,839
already cutting. He will run the
floor in transition, which makes sense because

293
00:19:10,880 --> 00:19:15,920
LaMelo ball exists. He's also but
he's hitting like forty eight plus percent of

294
00:19:15,920 --> 00:19:18,119
his pull up twos right now,
and so the jumper looks good. I

295
00:19:18,119 --> 00:19:22,599
would expect that to come around.
Can he ever create consistent separation and get

296
00:19:22,599 --> 00:19:26,119
to the basket in these frum scratch
situations, I do not know, But

297
00:19:26,160 --> 00:19:32,119
he also doesn't need to do that
to be an All star level player,

298
00:19:32,279 --> 00:19:37,319
if not better than that. I
think I've been most impressed though, with

299
00:19:37,400 --> 00:19:41,160
his defense. They are putting him
on a bunch of tough assignments and the

300
00:19:41,200 --> 00:19:47,240
results aren't always good because Charlotte's defense
is really bad this year. But the

301
00:19:47,240 --> 00:19:49,559
fact that you could put him on
point of attack guards with his size,

302
00:19:51,000 --> 00:19:53,599
it has worked like it's John Hollinger
wrote about this at the Athletic. It

303
00:19:53,640 --> 00:19:57,319
has forced the ball out of their
hands unless you're name Jordan Poole, who

304
00:19:57,440 --> 00:20:02,960
just took shots anyway against him.
And he's also just like as a helper,

305
00:20:03,079 --> 00:20:06,519
just as someone who's sticking with bodies. He's contested about as many looks

306
00:20:06,559 --> 00:20:08,960
at the rim as PJ. Washington
like, that's a big deal. And

307
00:20:10,279 --> 00:20:11,880
I know the Hornets are leading a
lot on Mark Williams right now, who

308
00:20:11,880 --> 00:20:15,039
doesn't look as good in your two. I think in part because of how

309
00:20:15,119 --> 00:20:19,039
much responsibility he's bearing on the defensive
end. It feels like he's really impacted

310
00:20:19,079 --> 00:20:25,400
his offense to have a prospect like
this at Miller to where it's three an

311
00:20:25,480 --> 00:20:29,920
elite D and more and his three
hasn't even come along yet. Yeah,

312
00:20:30,079 --> 00:20:33,119
is a big freaking deal. That's
the thing. Like I think he's a

313
00:20:33,119 --> 00:20:36,279
little, I mean, maybe a
lot too mid range heavy still, but

314
00:20:36,319 --> 00:20:38,759
he's he's an accurate mid range shooter, so the damage there is kind of

315
00:20:38,799 --> 00:20:41,960
mitigated. I wish you would shoot
more threes, but the defense is legit.

316
00:20:42,039 --> 00:20:45,839
And especially on a team where maybe
you don't want LaMelo Ball having to

317
00:20:45,880 --> 00:20:51,119
handle you know, much, since
his offensive playmaking loads so big, you

318
00:20:51,119 --> 00:20:53,480
know, a guy like Miller really
matters. I kind of think, you

319
00:20:53,480 --> 00:20:57,400
know, it is going to be
hard to avoid the Scoot Miller comparison basically

320
00:20:57,440 --> 00:21:03,079
forever. I think people that thought
that believed in Miller are kind of looking

321
00:21:03,119 --> 00:21:07,799
you know, right to some extent
now. But also people that were skeptical

322
00:21:07,880 --> 00:21:10,160
of him can point to a lot
of stuff, which is just to say,

323
00:21:10,519 --> 00:21:12,440
do you feel like the rap on
him was he's going to be a

324
00:21:12,440 --> 00:21:17,839
good NBA player and like probably a
good starter, but nobody was seeing,

325
00:21:17,960 --> 00:21:21,440
you know, true superstar upside,
which is kind of the problem if you're

326
00:21:21,440 --> 00:21:26,160
picking a guy second. But like
again, Scoot hasn't played, and when

327
00:21:26,160 --> 00:21:27,359
he did play, he didn't look
very good at all. So you know,

328
00:21:27,480 --> 00:21:33,000
upsides all great, But if Miller
is a useful contributor now and just

329
00:21:33,079 --> 00:21:37,920
projects to be nothing less than that
going forward, you know, there's worse

330
00:21:37,000 --> 00:21:41,400
things than having a rookie that you
can put on the other team's best offensive

331
00:21:41,400 --> 00:21:45,039
player and you can trust to make
shots Like that's you know, even if

332
00:21:45,079 --> 00:21:47,359
the ceiling may be still is not
as high as you'd want it to be.

333
00:21:47,720 --> 00:21:52,279
I don't understand why the default comparison
for players of this body type and

334
00:21:52,319 --> 00:21:55,480
who people decide can't be superstars as
always. I guess, I guess,

335
00:21:55,799 --> 00:21:59,839
did you say the name yet?
What is it? Middleton? No?

336
00:22:00,000 --> 00:22:03,839
I was gonna say Paul George.
Paul George is better. That's my point

337
00:22:03,920 --> 00:22:06,599
is, like, if the number
two pick turns out to be Paul George

338
00:22:06,640 --> 00:22:10,039
or Chris Middleton. I thought that
as an absolute victory. That's a home

339
00:22:10,119 --> 00:22:12,200
run. Yeah, that's great.
Like, how many players over the last

340
00:22:12,920 --> 00:22:15,960
fifteen years are better than Paul George
Like year to year, I mean,

341
00:22:17,000 --> 00:22:19,400
he's always the top twenty guy and
has been what he finished third in the

342
00:22:19,480 --> 00:22:22,319
MVP, you know when he was
with OKC, Like, yeah, and

343
00:22:23,839 --> 00:22:27,200
you take Paul Georgia too, right, I just don't understand why it feels

344
00:22:27,359 --> 00:22:30,559
just like it's not everybody, but
when the comp is, oh, it's

345
00:22:30,599 --> 00:22:34,000
this, it's this kind of elite
wing who's not actually elite, and we're

346
00:22:34,039 --> 00:22:37,240
so we're just gonna say they can't
be a superstar. His best case scenario

347
00:22:37,279 --> 00:22:41,359
is Paul George. I'm like,
his best case scenario is Paul George's head

348
00:22:41,359 --> 00:22:44,319
to the Hall of Fame. Right, He's definitely in Like he's been one

349
00:22:44,319 --> 00:22:48,160
of the best all around basketball players
of our lifetime. Basically, really quickly,

350
00:22:48,200 --> 00:22:52,240
you did mention Scoot I saw I
caught the Blazers a good chunk of

351
00:22:52,279 --> 00:22:57,119
the Blazers Suns game on Tuesday night, having Malcolm Brogden back because we dumped

352
00:22:57,200 --> 00:23:00,960
all over the Blazers offense during the
optim A stick portion of their podcast.

353
00:23:02,279 --> 00:23:04,920
Just not having an organizer, it
just it looked so much better, oh,

354
00:23:06,279 --> 00:23:08,119
just having him there. And so
I'm just curious if this team gets

355
00:23:08,160 --> 00:23:11,160
a little friskier. Now, that
was not related to the Hornets, No,

356
00:23:11,920 --> 00:23:15,680
Brandon Miller kind of sort of but
not really kind of. So what

357
00:23:15,759 --> 00:23:18,279
you got there was like two degrees
of separation. Let's separate from the Charlotte

358
00:23:18,279 --> 00:23:22,440
Hornets and moved to the Chicago Bulls. Five and ten, minus four point

359
00:23:22,440 --> 00:23:26,279
eight in net rating. Let's get
positive. This team was surprisingly easy to

360
00:23:26,319 --> 00:23:30,480
come up with something positive because it
feels like there's really only one thing to

361
00:23:30,559 --> 00:23:36,400
go with, and that's the defense. Still knows how to force turnovers.

362
00:23:37,640 --> 00:23:41,759
They are second in opponent turnover rate
right now, only the Magic are in

363
00:23:41,759 --> 00:23:42,960
front of them, which, holy
hell Magic. They have the best defense

364
00:23:44,000 --> 00:23:45,960
in the league. By the way, did you know that had updated after

365
00:23:47,519 --> 00:23:51,400
I saw they were top five a
couple days ago and I did a double

366
00:23:51,400 --> 00:23:55,920
take then, so it's a triple
take now there. The Bulls lead the

367
00:23:56,000 --> 00:24:00,640
league in turnovers forced when defending and
transition, and they are second behind only

368
00:24:00,720 --> 00:24:03,960
the Oklahoma City Thunder, which just
makes so much sense when you like read

369
00:24:03,000 --> 00:24:07,759
who the team is inforcing turnovers on
pick and rolls. It starts on the

370
00:24:07,759 --> 00:24:11,440
perimeter, it ends on the perimeter. For them, they get incredible,

371
00:24:11,519 --> 00:24:15,039
incredible ball and passing lane pressure from
both Javon Carter and Alex Caruso, and

372
00:24:15,079 --> 00:24:19,279
they just have a smattering of peskiness. I called it with Tory craig Io

373
00:24:19,359 --> 00:24:23,559
de Summu and even doubt here Patrick
Williams has had his his defensive highs.

374
00:24:25,119 --> 00:24:29,680
I do get a little annoyed that
they don't parlavies turnovers into transition opportunities.

375
00:24:29,680 --> 00:24:33,160
They're just so I know they don't
necessarily have the personnel when it's Vuch and

376
00:24:33,200 --> 00:24:36,880
Derozen, but it's you're forcing turnovers
be better than twenty fifth and pace.

377
00:24:37,279 --> 00:24:41,200
However, they're still playing faster,
a lot faster in those situations than their

378
00:24:41,200 --> 00:24:45,119
overall offense, and they are eighth
in offensive efficiency after forcing a turnover.

379
00:24:45,240 --> 00:24:49,200
And so this is why the forcing
the turnovers is important from a defensive perspective.

380
00:24:49,640 --> 00:24:53,640
It's driving what is a very weak
offense overall. For the third year

381
00:24:53,720 --> 00:24:57,880
running with zach Levine, Demarta Rosenen, nicole I Vucevic as you'r as your

382
00:24:57,880 --> 00:25:02,759
headliners there, I don't think we
could overstate how important this is. It

383
00:25:02,880 --> 00:25:06,119
really just I don't It doesn't matter
in the context of should they keep this

384
00:25:06,160 --> 00:25:10,319
team together? But forcing turnovers are
mazifake with Chicago. That's part of the

385
00:25:10,319 --> 00:25:12,759
reason why you could stomach watching them. But I look, I think it's

386
00:25:12,759 --> 00:25:17,319
a bright spot. These are the
players who are always selling out. Specifically,

387
00:25:17,319 --> 00:25:19,160
when you look at Carter and Caruso, two of sort of the driving

388
00:25:19,160 --> 00:25:23,319
forces from their their top down defense, and even Patrick Williams, that's like

389
00:25:23,359 --> 00:25:27,000
a good baseline to where if you
could kind of if they had more assets

390
00:25:27,079 --> 00:25:30,759
or just were more creative, you
could see the bones of well, maybe

391
00:25:30,759 --> 00:25:34,440
we're a trade or two away from
being a sensible, sensibly built team.

392
00:25:34,839 --> 00:25:37,319
Yeah, And I think to me, one of the other positives is going

393
00:25:37,359 --> 00:25:41,319
the other way, which I think
probably you'd bet on a tear down.

394
00:25:41,640 --> 00:25:45,880
Obviously with the Levigne stuff kind of
you know, boiling right now, someone

395
00:25:47,000 --> 00:25:52,079
like carus I think they're gonna get
a pretty good return for like, you

396
00:25:52,119 --> 00:25:55,359
know, up to four guys that
they might think about trading, like Lavin

397
00:25:55,359 --> 00:25:57,599
will bring back plenty. Caruso is
playing some of the best basketball of his

398
00:25:57,640 --> 00:26:00,720
career. He's making half of his
threes. I think I saw Stati's on

399
00:26:00,759 --> 00:26:04,240
the longest streak of double digit scoring
nights of his career, which isn't long,

400
00:26:04,279 --> 00:26:07,160
but like, if you're getting any
offense from him two games, I

401
00:26:07,200 --> 00:26:11,720
think it was like eight or something. But you'll get something for him,

402
00:26:11,799 --> 00:26:14,200
you might. I think you should
get a first for Alex Caruso, like

403
00:26:14,240 --> 00:26:18,039
a decent one. Javon Carter's shooting
over forty percent from three, You'll get

404
00:26:18,039 --> 00:26:19,599
something for him. I don't know
what you get for DeRozan, but he's

405
00:26:19,640 --> 00:26:23,480
expiring, and you know, assuming
he's gonna make mid Rangers at some point

406
00:26:23,480 --> 00:26:27,400
again this year, someone will want
him. Like the positive to me in

407
00:26:27,440 --> 00:26:30,359
addition to like, the turnovers are
crazy, and that's a huge plus.

408
00:26:30,559 --> 00:26:33,200
But when you trade a couple of
the guys that are causing those turnovers,

409
00:26:33,240 --> 00:26:36,960
you're still going to get a good
return, and this rebuild can kind of

410
00:26:37,359 --> 00:26:40,799
you know, we're not that far
away from talking about how the Bulls have

411
00:26:41,079 --> 00:26:45,640
like a pretty sweet collection of assets
to start over with. I think that's

412
00:26:45,680 --> 00:26:49,799
pretty flattering. Yeah, right,
you know, you should get a couple.

413
00:26:51,119 --> 00:26:53,000
I think they should meet like four
or five first pretty easily if they

414
00:26:53,039 --> 00:26:56,000
trade me. I don't know the
zach Colvine stuff. I feel like this

415
00:26:56,079 --> 00:27:00,160
happens a lot where what's being reported
in the speculation matches up with what they

416
00:27:00,160 --> 00:27:04,759
actually get. But if you had
to take the over under on two point

417
00:27:04,759 --> 00:27:11,519
five first round picks or prospect equivalents
on a Zachlavine trade right now, would

418
00:27:11,559 --> 00:27:14,119
you bet the over the under on
that? I think it'd probably go over

419
00:27:15,039 --> 00:27:18,160
if you're letting me use a like
a you know, a rookie scale contract

420
00:27:18,200 --> 00:27:21,440
prospect type guy as one of those, because I could see it being two

421
00:27:21,440 --> 00:27:25,279
first like decent ones, and then
a young player plus the salary match,

422
00:27:25,599 --> 00:27:27,880
or you could even get three if
one of those is you know, have

423
00:27:27,960 --> 00:27:32,599
some decent protections on it or might
not convey or whatever. And then and

424
00:27:32,640 --> 00:27:36,359
then whatever you get for Carter Caruso
DeRozan, I don't know what you get

425
00:27:36,400 --> 00:27:40,599
for Vucevic. He may just not
be someone that the Caruso between them is

426
00:27:40,640 --> 00:27:42,279
at least two first round picks,
I think. I think so. Yeah,

427
00:27:42,519 --> 00:27:45,920
even even though ones are rental and
the others like, you know,

428
00:27:45,960 --> 00:27:48,799
not going to play more than twenty
five minutes for you. It's just what

429
00:27:48,240 --> 00:27:53,000
they both bring is valuable Uh,
Cleveland Cavaliers are next up. They've we've

430
00:27:53,079 --> 00:27:56,519
moved on from the sub five hundred
East teams for a little bit, eight

431
00:27:56,559 --> 00:28:02,920
and six plus zero point nine net
rating, kind of rounding into form after

432
00:28:02,960 --> 00:28:06,880
a rough start and still not fully
healthy. Donovan Mitchell's been missing time,

433
00:28:06,920 --> 00:28:10,880
and they were able to beat the
hold off the Sixers on Tuesday night.

434
00:28:10,920 --> 00:28:14,160
I bet you thought I was gonna
focus on Evan Mobley's offensive growth, which

435
00:28:14,160 --> 00:28:17,079
I think is way more pronounced than
people are giving credit for. I decided

436
00:28:17,079 --> 00:28:22,079
to focus on the entire team though. They are playing faster and it's it's

437
00:28:22,119 --> 00:28:26,559
important, slower, methodical over dribbling
stuff kind of punctuated what they did last

438
00:28:26,640 --> 00:28:30,559
year. They were twenty ninth in
average possession time. They're all the way

439
00:28:30,640 --> 00:28:34,279
up to twenty first right now,
which again is not lightning speed, but

440
00:28:34,319 --> 00:28:37,839
it's faster. And the bigger thing
is they're getting out in transition more,

441
00:28:38,599 --> 00:28:42,880
especially after snaring live rebounds. They're
getting out in transition on those plays thirty

442
00:28:42,880 --> 00:28:48,319
one point two percent of the time. That's a top nine rate compared to

443
00:28:48,680 --> 00:28:52,319
the ranked seventeenth in that same category
last year. And I think the bigger

444
00:28:52,400 --> 00:28:55,880
thing is so when you're playing with
some of your bench guys. There is

445
00:28:55,920 --> 00:28:59,759
that inherent inclination to play fast.
They also rolled out I haven't been seen

446
00:28:59,799 --> 00:29:03,519
a lot of even when Jared Allen
was out with George Nang and Dean Wade

447
00:29:03,559 --> 00:29:06,759
as your front court, they rolled
that out against the Sixers. I didn't

448
00:29:06,759 --> 00:29:08,519
look at the data on it,
like that lineup is just built to play

449
00:29:08,559 --> 00:29:11,799
fast. That can happen. We're
not built to play fast, but like

450
00:29:11,839 --> 00:29:15,559
Georgia x oct particularly fast, but
he will push the ball or he'll get

451
00:29:15,559 --> 00:29:18,880
rebounds and get the quick outlet so
that the guards can start running things.

452
00:29:18,039 --> 00:29:22,000
Also, by the way, maybe
one thing I should have focused on this

453
00:29:22,039 --> 00:29:25,480
more, but I started prepping before
he was really going off. The Craig

454
00:29:25,480 --> 00:29:29,720
Porter Junior minutes have been an absolute
delight for what's going on. He's had

455
00:29:29,759 --> 00:29:33,440
two unbelievable games in a row and
just like talk about found money, like

456
00:29:33,440 --> 00:29:37,279
how in the world has he been
so impactful out of nowhere and just really

457
00:29:37,319 --> 00:29:42,279
helping him navigate absences from both Garland
and Mitchell who speaking of Mitchell, he's

458
00:29:42,279 --> 00:29:48,279
looking to push more. Evan Mobley
is just making quicker decisions and there is

459
00:29:48,279 --> 00:29:51,160
a when you're looking not even just
at the transition, but the half court

460
00:29:51,200 --> 00:29:55,839
stuff running faster. Max Struce just
provides. It's not just he fires up

461
00:29:55,880 --> 00:29:59,960
so quickly, he's moving quickly.
He'll pass quickly, He'll decide to drive

462
00:30:00,240 --> 00:30:03,720
and then pass quickly. He'll get
off his two's quickly. The fact that

463
00:30:03,720 --> 00:30:08,759
he is such a quick decision maker
has really benefited their base offense. That

464
00:30:10,079 --> 00:30:12,759
I think, combined with Domin Mitchell
looking to push even if he can hold

465
00:30:12,759 --> 00:30:15,119
the ball, still a lot when
you get to the half court. And

466
00:30:15,160 --> 00:30:18,039
then just Evan Mobley, I know
there's been moments where it feels like there's

467
00:30:18,039 --> 00:30:22,720
a stall or it's buffering internet and
he's trying to figure things out. The

468
00:30:22,079 --> 00:30:26,599
decisions he can make from the center
of the floor with his live dribble,

469
00:30:26,680 --> 00:30:30,720
like they're just faster, and I
think you could argue is Cleveland fast enough,

470
00:30:30,759 --> 00:30:33,519
but like this is just another as
you're sort of dealing with some of

471
00:30:33,519 --> 00:30:37,279
the space and concerns that you still
have when you're playing dual biggs, dealing

472
00:30:37,319 --> 00:30:40,720
with some of the defensive concerns that
have returned when you're playing both those bigs.

473
00:30:40,799 --> 00:30:44,319
Just being able to play faster,
not just in transition, but in

474
00:30:44,359 --> 00:30:48,799
your half court base. I do
think it makes them more viable in the

475
00:30:48,799 --> 00:30:52,119
playoffs. And that's not something I
think a lot of people would say about

476
00:30:52,119 --> 00:30:56,599
the Cavaliers and the Macro because of
how topsy turvy their start has been.

477
00:30:56,880 --> 00:31:00,200
I'm just a full on believer that
it's owed to injuries literally more than anything

478
00:31:00,240 --> 00:31:03,119
else. Yeah, and they've been
a little unlucky in terms of three point

479
00:31:03,240 --> 00:31:07,039
opponent three point accuracy. I just
like you're at, what are they ranked

480
00:31:07,119 --> 00:31:11,599
right now? On defense? They
were number one last year and they're twelve

481
00:31:11,880 --> 00:31:15,880
right now, Like they're going to
be a top five defense, Like,

482
00:31:15,960 --> 00:31:18,920
there's just no I don't care if
it's two small guards. We've seen it.

483
00:31:18,960 --> 00:31:21,599
We've seen proof that that doesn't matter
when you've got the bigs behind them.

484
00:31:21,880 --> 00:31:23,599
So yeah, there's I mean to
say that, I think there were

485
00:31:23,640 --> 00:31:26,799
four and six at one point,
and they were just such an easy pick

486
00:31:26,839 --> 00:31:30,319
for teams that you just could sell
their slow start because of the injuries and

487
00:31:30,359 --> 00:31:34,079
because of all like just the proof
of concept from last year. So yeah,

488
00:31:34,119 --> 00:31:37,559
of the teams that are I don't
know whose record still isn't what you

489
00:31:37,559 --> 00:31:41,079
maybe thought it was. Cleveland's just
like there's no doubt that there's going to

490
00:31:41,160 --> 00:31:45,359
be, you know, significant improvement
even from even from Hero when they played

491
00:31:45,440 --> 00:31:51,480
well lately. That takes me happy
about Isaaco Korro's three point shooting when healthy

492
00:31:51,519 --> 00:31:55,000
over forty percent on the air is
he he is right at forty percent?

493
00:31:55,039 --> 00:31:57,799
Man and Strus is at thirty seven
point three on almost eight attempts a game,

494
00:31:57,880 --> 00:32:00,559
like that's exactly what do you have
his per thirty six? Like,

495
00:32:00,599 --> 00:32:04,240
what is he doing per thirty six? That is a ten? Well,

496
00:32:04,279 --> 00:32:07,759
he's averaging thirty five point eight minutes, so it's all right, so I

497
00:32:07,799 --> 00:32:09,319
would actually like that number to be
hot. That's lower than what he was

498
00:32:09,319 --> 00:32:13,839
averaging last year. My have he's
doing more stuff inside the art though for

499
00:32:13,960 --> 00:32:16,720
them, which is important. He's
averaging just under four assists. I don't

500
00:32:16,720 --> 00:32:20,559
know what he averaged last year.
Jil Bald movement has been just great for

501
00:32:20,680 --> 00:32:22,079
them. They look really good,
all right. That takes us to the

502
00:32:22,119 --> 00:32:25,680
Detroit Pistons. Oh man, we
are pivoting hard here. They're two and

503
00:32:25,720 --> 00:32:30,400
thirteen minus seven point nine net rating. They are on what is the losing

504
00:32:30,400 --> 00:32:34,200
streak at eleven something like that.
It's not good, is what it is.

505
00:32:34,240 --> 00:32:38,480
They are not winning games and not
staying particularly close in a lot of

506
00:32:38,519 --> 00:32:43,039
them. So what do you got
here? One? I have three notes

507
00:32:43,680 --> 00:32:45,319
like one, thank you for going
through the vitals because it gives me time

508
00:32:45,400 --> 00:32:50,200
to time stamp these things before I
begin talking too. If anyone seen me

509
00:32:50,359 --> 00:32:52,319
just watching it, I'm just looking
all around. One of my dogs was

510
00:32:52,400 --> 00:32:55,680
laying right by my chair wheels,
and it felt like he was still there,

511
00:32:55,759 --> 00:32:59,480
and I just looked around, and
he's now in one of his beds.

512
00:32:59,480 --> 00:33:02,039
If anyone see behind me all over
the thing right there, so I'm

513
00:33:02,079 --> 00:33:06,119
not running over my dog. I
was very concerned that that's what I was

514
00:33:06,160 --> 00:33:08,279
about to do. But now I
can fidget like I normally do. That's

515
00:33:08,319 --> 00:33:14,039
exciting, and I think maybe so
maybe it was only two notes. My

516
00:33:14,119 --> 00:33:17,279
pistons, we've already talked about Joleen
Duran, we did a little thing on

517
00:33:17,400 --> 00:33:22,000
them, or Sarr Thompson. I
don't know if we've talked about him at

518
00:33:22,079 --> 00:33:25,599
length. Let's do that. Holy
holy fuck, is all I have to

519
00:33:25,640 --> 00:33:29,319
say there is let's get the cliche
out of the way, which is a

520
00:33:29,440 --> 00:33:34,319
very real thing. The jumper is
an issue, but like he can still

521
00:33:34,359 --> 00:33:37,839
do stuff on offense. I do
if he doesn't have a jumper, you

522
00:33:37,839 --> 00:33:40,680
do need to plan your roster and
lineups to where if you want him to

523
00:33:40,720 --> 00:33:45,480
cut more, you want him to
run off screens more downhill, you know,

524
00:33:45,599 --> 00:33:49,400
you need to either have a floor
spacing big or just better floor spacing

525
00:33:49,440 --> 00:33:52,119
in general, which the Pistons don't
have right now. Still, you can

526
00:33:52,160 --> 00:33:54,039
see the outlines of what he can
do away from the ball and the fact

527
00:33:54,039 --> 00:34:00,799
that he's just already a good passer
without running the offense. He's a top

528
00:34:00,839 --> 00:34:05,160
eight assist rate among everyone who has
finished as many drives as him, and

529
00:34:05,240 --> 00:34:08,320
that number is like over sixty players, I believe. And then we just

530
00:34:08,360 --> 00:34:13,440
get to the defense, like,
okay, look, the counting stats are

531
00:34:13,480 --> 00:34:15,199
sexy. He's grabbing over ten boards
a game, a lot of those coming

532
00:34:15,199 --> 00:34:17,719
on the defensive end. He's in
the top five of stocks, steals,

533
00:34:17,760 --> 00:34:23,480
and blocks right now. Super cool. Love it. Opponents are shooting forty

534
00:34:23,599 --> 00:34:29,000
six point four percent against him at
the rim. That's a top three mark

535
00:34:29,119 --> 00:34:34,199
among eighty players who have contested at
least forty looks near the basket, and

536
00:34:34,559 --> 00:34:37,039
Osar Thompson has by the way,
I brought the number down as low as

537
00:34:37,039 --> 00:34:42,159
possible because the star. Thompson has
contested like sixty looks at the basket,

538
00:34:42,280 --> 00:34:45,320
so only Walker Kessler is in front
of him, and you're not gonna guess

539
00:34:45,360 --> 00:34:49,920
the other name. It's Christian Wood. We really do players in front of

540
00:34:50,000 --> 00:34:52,880
him. Yeah, so playing with
Anthony Davis looks pretty good on him at

541
00:34:52,880 --> 00:34:53,719
point. I mean, he's looked, He's actually looked really good with the

542
00:34:53,800 --> 00:34:59,159
Lakers and basically all his minutes.
The other thing is just the assignment.

543
00:34:59,239 --> 00:35:04,039
So I dug into the data and
I pulled his top seven defensive assignments.

544
00:35:04,079 --> 00:35:07,639
These stats aren't perfect, but I'm
not gonna cite what opponent shot against him.

545
00:35:07,840 --> 00:35:12,760
Instead, I'm gonna tell you what
the teams have averaged per possession when

546
00:35:12,760 --> 00:35:17,199
he's guarding these players. Chicago average
is averaging point nine eight points per possession

547
00:35:17,639 --> 00:35:22,599
when when I saw Thompson guards the
marta Rozen Milwaukee has scored one point zero

548
00:35:22,679 --> 00:35:28,800
four points per possession when he guards
Damian Lillard. Portland has scored one point

549
00:35:28,880 --> 00:35:31,400
zero two points per possession when he
guards Shandon Sharp. Again, just because

550
00:35:31,400 --> 00:35:35,840
you're wondering why Shandon Sharp's there,
I'm just looking at the top seven assignments

551
00:35:35,880 --> 00:35:38,920
from him so far. Atlanta has
scored point eight points per possession when he

552
00:35:38,960 --> 00:35:45,079
guards to Jante Murray Okase has scored
point nine to seven points per possession when

553
00:35:45,079 --> 00:35:49,920
he guards Shake Gilges Alexander Golden State
has scored point nine eight points per possession

554
00:35:49,920 --> 00:35:53,400
when he guards Klay Thompson, and
the Sixers have scored zero point seven to

555
00:35:53,480 --> 00:36:00,000
nine points per possession when he guards
Tyrese Maxi. The breadth of these assignments

556
00:36:00,079 --> 00:36:05,920
and the results are just both absurd
and even if his jumper never comes along,

557
00:36:06,360 --> 00:36:08,400
this is going to be a really
useful NBA player, Not in Detroit's

558
00:36:08,400 --> 00:36:12,480
current environment, but if he can
even become I don't know what would be

559
00:36:12,519 --> 00:36:15,840
the comp where it's if he can
become this player. If he could become

560
00:36:15,960 --> 00:36:21,400
RJ. Barrett off the catch right
now, and even even a lesser version

561
00:36:21,400 --> 00:36:24,159
of what RJ. Barretts done off
the catch this season, this might be

562
00:36:24,199 --> 00:36:28,800
an all NBA player. He's almost
certainly gonna make it All defense team.

563
00:36:29,159 --> 00:36:31,840
I mean, he's like the Barrett
comparisons interesting. That's he kind of is

564
00:36:31,840 --> 00:36:36,559
a tricky guy to figure out.
Like if you ask the question, well,

565
00:36:36,599 --> 00:36:39,880
if he could do X like catch
and drive like Barrett or hit open

566
00:36:40,119 --> 00:36:45,480
like when he's left wide open in
the corners or whatever, be Gary Payton

567
00:36:45,519 --> 00:36:49,559
in the second and just you know, shoot thirty six percent or whatever it

568
00:36:49,599 --> 00:36:52,039
is. He's been higher, he's
been lower. He's tricky to like he's

569
00:36:52,079 --> 00:36:57,000
tricky to imagine if you add a
skill or two. I think he's ahead

570
00:36:57,000 --> 00:36:59,800
of where Barrett was in terms of
like if he has the ball with a

571
00:36:59,840 --> 00:37:01,480
line dribble, can he get to
where he wants to go? Like he

572
00:37:01,719 --> 00:37:05,719
first of all, he's a he's
ahead of r J. Barrett there now,

573
00:37:05,760 --> 00:37:07,960
probably even with r J. Barrett's
problems. I was more so e

574
00:37:07,000 --> 00:37:13,000
citing like what's a an if he
shooter that can be bankable and certainly if

575
00:37:13,039 --> 00:37:16,119
he gets RJ. Barrett's catch and
shoot stroke right now or something like who

576
00:37:16,159 --> 00:37:21,320
is the player where it's they're kind
of fringe even if if he's Marcus Smart

577
00:37:21,800 --> 00:37:25,920
off the catch from three in most
seasons and there's no reason, so like

578
00:37:27,039 --> 00:37:30,960
I don't know where to go with
like what he could be what's fascinating to

579
00:37:30,000 --> 00:37:34,440
me? And the stats are amazing, but just watching him play and he's

580
00:37:34,440 --> 00:37:37,679
one of the most fun like non
shooters to watch play that has been in

581
00:37:37,719 --> 00:37:42,760
the league for a really long time, usually a rookie, and considering the

582
00:37:42,760 --> 00:37:45,480
assignments he's gotten, it's like doubly
true. A rookie will get tested a

583
00:37:45,480 --> 00:37:49,119
lot, like guys will kind of
go at him, especially if he has

584
00:37:49,599 --> 00:37:52,440
some reputation like this, But generally
speaking, guys are gonna get shots up

585
00:37:52,440 --> 00:37:57,880
against him. You can already see
just anecdotally the amount of times every game

586
00:37:57,920 --> 00:38:01,320
where he's in a you know,
not necessarily an isolation situation, but maybe

587
00:38:01,320 --> 00:38:05,400
he's chasing a guy over a screen
and gets back in front, or like

588
00:38:05,440 --> 00:38:08,280
guys just don't attempt shots that they
would otherwise attempt. So, like the

589
00:38:08,280 --> 00:38:13,440
block rate's great and all the like, all the suppression of field goal percentages

590
00:38:13,599 --> 00:38:16,400
is great, but like his defense
is like there's a third level, which

591
00:38:16,480 --> 00:38:21,719
is you don't even let the other
guy shoot because he realizes I don't have

592
00:38:21,800 --> 00:38:22,599
the space to do it. I
got to get off the ball. He

593
00:38:22,639 --> 00:38:27,599
already does that all the time as
a as an individual defender. So like,

594
00:38:28,159 --> 00:38:30,400
I don't know, I mean,
I can't remember the last defensive prospect

595
00:38:30,440 --> 00:38:34,880
that I was like more excited by
as a wing than him. I And

596
00:38:35,159 --> 00:38:37,039
I don't know where I like I
literally can't think of someone. I'm sure

597
00:38:37,360 --> 00:38:42,519
listeners will throw out some names,
but like you know, I don't know

598
00:38:42,559 --> 00:38:45,159
what to I don't know who to
compare him to. That that's I guess

599
00:38:45,159 --> 00:38:47,159
that's the takeaway. He's that this
might be a good baseline. Is so

600
00:38:47,639 --> 00:38:52,320
when you look at I mean,
the dude is is six seven or six

601
00:38:52,440 --> 00:38:58,440
six, like he's around that size
and block rate is just absurd. So

602
00:38:58,719 --> 00:39:04,079
I went back and looked, h, this is every player to like until

603
00:39:04,119 --> 00:39:08,320
this season who is six foot seven
or shorter and had a block rate of

604
00:39:08,360 --> 00:39:13,559
at least two, defensive rebounding rate
of at least twenty, steel percentage of

605
00:39:13,599 --> 00:39:15,280
at least one point five. So
it's like it's cherry picked, but those

606
00:39:15,280 --> 00:39:19,800
are just common base lines. Yeah, and then I sorted them by,

607
00:39:20,079 --> 00:39:27,840
okay, who matched Asar Thompson's rookie
assist percentage. So there are three other

608
00:39:27,880 --> 00:39:30,599
players to date that have turned in
the season like that, and two of

609
00:39:30,639 --> 00:39:35,679
them all three of them have multiple
seasons of it. Draymond Green is first

610
00:39:35,679 --> 00:39:39,119
with seven, Paul Millsap is second
with three of those seasons, and then

611
00:39:39,119 --> 00:39:43,440
there's Charles Barkley with two. And
that's just it. And then Scotty Barnes

612
00:39:43,440 --> 00:39:46,599
is doing it right now. That's
like, well, and those guys are

613
00:39:46,599 --> 00:39:51,159
all that's the crazy thing. So
he's categorized on cleaning the glasses of forward,

614
00:39:51,199 --> 00:39:53,480
which he sort of is and isn't
right because he has like you know,

615
00:39:54,199 --> 00:39:58,039
like you just say, like some
point guard instincts, like as a

616
00:39:58,280 --> 00:40:00,960
prospect him win, I'm Thompson was
off the floor or off the ball like

617
00:40:01,199 --> 00:40:05,440
Lasar was running the offense. And
granted that's like, you know, we're

618
00:40:05,480 --> 00:40:08,360
talking about a totally different level of
competition, but like he's not. He's

619
00:40:08,400 --> 00:40:12,559
not Paul Millsap. That's like a
totally different type of player. So you're

620
00:40:12,599 --> 00:40:16,480
getting and so circling back like being
categorized as a forward, he still has

621
00:40:16,519 --> 00:40:21,320
a ninety seven percent percentile block grate
and he's still in the hundredth percentile as

622
00:40:21,320 --> 00:40:25,239
an offensive rebounder among forwards and like
you can put him on Damian Lillard defensively

623
00:40:25,320 --> 00:40:29,599
and feel great about it. They're
like the disconnect between those two things is

624
00:40:29,679 --> 00:40:32,119
kind of wild, and it again
it speaks to like who is what is

625
00:40:32,159 --> 00:40:37,119
this guy? Like he's definitely not
something you see more than once every what

626
00:40:37,519 --> 00:40:40,960
ten years fifteen years. I'm really
hoping when the Pistons are fully healthy that

627
00:40:42,000 --> 00:40:45,679
we get to and it's just tough
because they're never gonna roll out a big

628
00:40:45,760 --> 00:40:50,440
unless it's Stew at the five,
that you could get to four out around

629
00:40:50,480 --> 00:40:53,079
him. But can we get to
three out like consistent where it's you're looking

630
00:40:53,119 --> 00:40:59,159
at. Probably a good lineup would
be a healthy Monte Morris with Boye Bogdanovich.

631
00:40:59,679 --> 00:41:01,079
You could whatever big you want.
If he's not gonna be. If

632
00:41:01,079 --> 00:41:04,159
it's not gonna be Stew at the
five, get me dirt at the five

633
00:41:04,239 --> 00:41:07,800
then and that it's do you trust
Kate enough? Is it? Alec Burk's

634
00:41:07,800 --> 00:41:13,440
there, You're too small? But
give him three dependable shooters get to those

635
00:41:13,440 --> 00:41:16,079
lineups more often, which is not
something Detroit has had the capacity to do

636
00:41:16,639 --> 00:41:20,679
at the moment. And I would
really like to see, Okay, even

637
00:41:20,719 --> 00:41:22,239
if he's not the one taking jumpers, like what does this look like on

638
00:41:22,320 --> 00:41:25,880
off? Yeah? No, he's
he's one to watch for sure. Will

639
00:41:27,360 --> 00:41:30,239
this will not be the last time
we discuss him. I think will be

640
00:41:30,280 --> 00:41:31,840
the last time in this pot we
talked about the Pistons because we're on to

641
00:41:31,920 --> 00:41:37,840
the Indiana Pacers. Who are eight
and five plus point zero zero point six

642
00:41:37,920 --> 00:41:44,480
net rating, but the best offense
in the National Basketball Association, and that

643
00:41:44,599 --> 00:41:49,079
got a pretty solid boost when they
scored six hundred trillion points last night.

644
00:41:49,119 --> 00:41:52,480
As we record this on Wednesday,
that game I only caught bits of.

645
00:41:52,519 --> 00:41:57,119
It was absurd. I have no
I like, that's a game I should

646
00:41:57,159 --> 00:42:00,719
probably go back and watch, and
I just don't think it might exhaust me.

647
00:42:00,039 --> 00:42:02,760
Tyres Albert threw this one pass.
He was trapped at the back court.

648
00:42:02,800 --> 00:42:07,679
He slung it one handed across the
court to a to the corner on

649
00:42:07,760 --> 00:42:10,000
the other end obi top and then
got the actual assist to Uh. I

650
00:42:10,039 --> 00:42:13,840
think it was was Aaronie Smith,
like was just cutting the back. It

651
00:42:13,920 --> 00:42:21,400
was. It was chaos. So
I heard a stat and it like kind

652
00:42:21,400 --> 00:42:23,760
of warped my brain. So I
think the over and I'll get it not

653
00:42:23,880 --> 00:42:28,679
exactly right, but the point will
convey. I think the over under for

654
00:42:28,760 --> 00:42:34,159
that game was something like Indiana Atlanta
was what we're talking about from Tuesday night

655
00:42:34,639 --> 00:42:38,000
was in the like two fifty range, so like you know, one twenty

656
00:42:38,000 --> 00:42:42,360
four twenty six or one twenty five
apiece or whatever, which is the highest

657
00:42:42,559 --> 00:42:45,920
spread that we've seen in a really
long time. They scored. They beat

658
00:42:45,960 --> 00:42:50,519
that number by like fifty plus points. Like they were over the highest over

659
00:42:50,599 --> 00:42:52,880
under we've seen in a really long
time. They could buy for three hundred

660
00:42:52,880 --> 00:43:00,039
and twenty something was real five right, It's like, I just so so

661
00:43:00,719 --> 00:43:01,880
we haven't even got to what you'r
thing is. But like, holy god,

662
00:43:01,960 --> 00:43:06,800
Terry Saliburtn is the best offensive orchestrator
that we've seen in a very long

663
00:43:06,840 --> 00:43:08,760
time. But what do you like
about the Pacers? Is it the defense?

664
00:43:09,880 --> 00:43:14,199
No, I'm not gonna focus on
the defensive bride surprise. Last year

665
00:43:14,519 --> 00:43:20,360
there was a much ado made over
their offensive progress. However, despite being

666
00:43:20,559 --> 00:43:24,280
a flashy offense, they ranked twenty
fourth in half court efficiency. I hope

667
00:43:24,320 --> 00:43:27,960
you haven't looked at these numbers.
Do you know where they rank this season

668
00:43:28,039 --> 00:43:31,480
in half court not overall offensive rating, but half court offensive rating. Unfortunately

669
00:43:31,559 --> 00:43:35,679
I do know that because when they
were not even as high as they are

670
00:43:35,719 --> 00:43:37,719
now, I cited it as something
I wrote as like a holy shit,

671
00:43:38,000 --> 00:43:43,320
this is getting serious for the Pacers. But please tell us they are now.

672
00:43:44,079 --> 00:43:47,960
Jackie my notes first in half court
efficiency. That mark, I mean

673
00:43:49,280 --> 00:43:53,360
it includes the Atlanta game. But
they also got shellacked against the Magic on

674
00:43:53,440 --> 00:43:57,760
Sunday Night, the league best defense, Orlando Magics. So that's what the

675
00:43:58,039 --> 00:44:00,920
that's what Orlando's defense apparently looked like
against the best offense in the NBA.

676
00:44:01,039 --> 00:44:04,679
By the way, we haven't gotten
to the Magic yet, so I digress

677
00:44:04,920 --> 00:44:07,679
that stability is important because yes,
this team is still the fastest team in

678
00:44:07,679 --> 00:44:12,800
the league off opponent makes, but
to have the half court stability was sort

679
00:44:12,840 --> 00:44:15,320
of the missing element. And I
think they've done some stuff with Tyre's haliburt

680
00:44:15,360 --> 00:44:19,559
and off the ball. Caitlin Cooper
had pointed that out. I think really

681
00:44:19,599 --> 00:44:23,000
the bigger thing for me is well
over top and flying around helps Bruce Brown

682
00:44:23,119 --> 00:44:29,480
is his steadiness intelligence like rolled into
one, and so they've been able to

683
00:44:29,480 --> 00:44:32,800
get to units without Tyre's Haliburton.
We're no, the results on defense still

684
00:44:32,800 --> 00:44:37,199
aren't always great, but you're able
to survive without Tyre's haliburt, and I

685
00:44:37,199 --> 00:44:42,119
think that's really helped inflate their their
offensive rating. And look, we caught

686
00:44:42,119 --> 00:44:44,880
a lot of shit because neither of
us are as high on bennedc. Mathern

687
00:44:44,880 --> 00:44:49,360
as most pacers fans. I do
wonder if bringing Buddy healed off the bench

688
00:44:49,639 --> 00:44:52,800
has also kind of helped stabilize that
because now you just have this lights out

689
00:44:52,840 --> 00:44:57,440
shooter playing around. Yeah, he
could spend some time with like the main

690
00:44:57,480 --> 00:45:00,079
guys, but when you're getting to
these units that have to three reserves and

691
00:45:00,119 --> 00:45:04,400
Buddy Heeld and Jalen Smith around the
court at the same time, it doesn't

692
00:45:04,440 --> 00:45:07,559
matter how slow things are operating,
how much you don't trust your creation.

693
00:45:07,199 --> 00:45:12,840
Defenses are just being bent to the
point of breaking. And this is like,

694
00:45:12,920 --> 00:45:15,280
this offense is for real. The
show is real, and if they

695
00:45:15,280 --> 00:45:19,519
can get any sort of just stops
or at least I know you're playing small,

696
00:45:19,559 --> 00:45:22,199
but could we grab a defensive rebound? Could we stop pailing that's such

697
00:45:22,199 --> 00:45:27,079
an excessive clip this team could or
even if they make a trade, like

698
00:45:27,159 --> 00:45:30,840
who is the worst player they could
acquire? And you're just ready to say,

699
00:45:30,000 --> 00:45:32,800
oh, this is a top four
team in the East that I don't

700
00:45:32,800 --> 00:45:37,599
think it needs to be og Ananobi. No, I think you wouldn't.

701
00:45:37,639 --> 00:45:40,199
You wouldn't quite need that. But
but that is where the help. Can

702
00:45:40,199 --> 00:45:45,719
we can we just somehow get them
a star Thompson and just just enjoy the

703
00:45:45,840 --> 00:45:49,400
peer care. He would look like
on offense on this team, he would

704
00:45:49,480 --> 00:45:52,519
just be dunking NonStop, just over
and over and over again. A couple

705
00:45:52,559 --> 00:45:57,000
of things. Uh, guess who
started for the first time last night,

706
00:45:57,039 --> 00:46:00,400
Buddy healed, And guess who was
a plus twenty Buddy. So I think

707
00:46:00,800 --> 00:46:05,800
maybe that's changing, and I'm not
going to back off my Benedict Matheren does

708
00:46:05,800 --> 00:46:08,119
not make as much sense as a
starter as Buddy Heel does, and so

709
00:46:08,199 --> 00:46:12,239
I think I think we're gonna be
We're gonna be vindicated on that. I

710
00:46:12,320 --> 00:46:15,079
want to talk about Haliburton real quick, because I know time and time again

711
00:46:15,519 --> 00:46:22,880
when trying to convey just like how
little attention he was getting last year relative

712
00:46:22,920 --> 00:46:27,400
to how historic he was as an
offensive like initiator, because he averaged twenty

713
00:46:27,400 --> 00:46:30,199
and ten and he shot forty percent
from three that had never happened before.

714
00:46:30,599 --> 00:46:34,159
He's at twenty four and twelve and
he's shooting forty five percent from three this

715
00:46:34,239 --> 00:46:37,679
year, and I just like don't
see other than like suddenly he's a really

716
00:46:37,920 --> 00:46:42,039
improved in terms of volume, especially
like off the dribble three point shooter,

717
00:46:43,519 --> 00:46:47,840
Like nothing feels unsustainable. I think
we keep We've been a little hyperbolic these

718
00:46:47,920 --> 00:46:52,559
last couple teams talking about Thompson,
as you know, defies comparison and Haliburton

719
00:46:52,719 --> 00:46:57,920
is this great. But like the
list of guys I think that you can

720
00:46:58,000 --> 00:47:01,960
rely on to have so total control
over an offense and believe and know that

721
00:47:02,000 --> 00:47:07,039
they are going to generate awesome looks
for themselves and everybody else, like Haliburton's

722
00:47:07,079 --> 00:47:09,880
in. You know, you can't
just go around the league and say like,

723
00:47:09,920 --> 00:47:13,519
well, I mean it's you know, Curry and Luca territory. It's

724
00:47:13,559 --> 00:47:19,000
like you gotta do some like back
dating stuff and start mentioning guys like Nash

725
00:47:19,000 --> 00:47:22,800
and like young Chris Paul and stuff
like that, because just as an offensive

726
00:47:22,800 --> 00:47:27,840
engine, like good luck finding someone
that you can rely on to ensure elite

727
00:47:27,880 --> 00:47:30,280
offense more than you can rely on
him. He's been I mean I don't

728
00:47:30,480 --> 00:47:35,639
We can't say he's been the MVP
because that's just it's stupid to say anybody

729
00:47:35,639 --> 00:47:38,719
has this early. But if he's
not in the top like what six or

730
00:47:38,760 --> 00:47:42,719
seven in terms of MVP right now, I like, I don't know what

731
00:47:42,760 --> 00:47:46,000
we're doing because he's been unbelievable coming
off a year that no one had ever

732
00:47:46,079 --> 00:47:52,360
had last year. Yeah, I
and how does he do what he does

733
00:47:52,440 --> 00:47:55,639
with with apparently out ever turning the
ball. Oh right, he has a

734
00:47:55,719 --> 00:48:00,719
forty did you mention his assis presentage
at forty eight point three and he's a

735
00:48:00,760 --> 00:48:05,760
twelve point four turnover rate just like
I haven't looked, but I would hazard

736
00:48:05,800 --> 00:48:08,559
that a like first of all,
that it's this rate is just absolutely mind

737
00:48:08,599 --> 00:48:13,400
meldingly high. I don't know how
many players throughout NBA history, and maybe

738
00:48:13,440 --> 00:48:16,239
Chris Paul crops up there once.
This is just like it's that the the

739
00:48:16,360 --> 00:48:20,880
scoring package is the passing package of
the everything. If he wasn't such a

740
00:48:20,880 --> 00:48:23,880
weak point on defense though like he
does, that's just you could still build

741
00:48:24,119 --> 00:48:29,679
a contender around him. It's just
they they're still they need the wing thing,

742
00:48:30,159 --> 00:48:32,920
like it can't just be like the
Aaronny Smith or Bruce Brown like they

743
00:48:34,000 --> 00:48:37,559
need that. They need that player. And I'm one, I'm curious how

744
00:48:37,559 --> 00:48:39,480
they like this. JAREDS Walker's not
a wing. Could he develop into him?

745
00:48:39,519 --> 00:48:43,039
He's not playing a ton you mentioned. It's not gonna be better than

746
00:48:43,119 --> 00:48:45,280
Bathord, who I did not know
came off the bench on Tuesday night,

747
00:48:45,320 --> 00:48:49,199
and I do wonder if that could
hurt it might help him. Looking at

748
00:48:49,199 --> 00:48:52,079
the level of competition he goes at. But that doesn't hurt what I was

749
00:48:52,119 --> 00:48:53,360
mentioning about Buddy Heals where it's okay, well, you just have him coming

750
00:48:53,400 --> 00:48:57,800
off the bench to stabilize some of
the non Halibert minutes. Yeah, I

751
00:48:57,800 --> 00:49:00,360
think a lot of it, you
know, right, It's it's interesting.

752
00:49:00,360 --> 00:49:02,679
I think matheren is just his game
makes a lot of sense as the go

753
00:49:02,760 --> 00:49:06,519
get us buckets while we don't have
our best guys out there type of guy

754
00:49:06,519 --> 00:49:08,440
because he'll get to the foul line
or you know, he's shown in long

755
00:49:08,480 --> 00:49:12,599
stretches the ability to do that really
well. I mean, it's a good

756
00:49:12,599 --> 00:49:15,559
problem because both those guys can really
score it, and Halbert is just going

757
00:49:15,639 --> 00:49:19,719
to make it easier for whoever he's
out there with. So that's it for

758
00:49:19,800 --> 00:49:22,320
the Pacers. We're on to the
Miami Heat, who sit at nine and

759
00:49:22,440 --> 00:49:28,400
five, which is a pretty darn
good record considering they're just barely overbreak even

760
00:49:28,400 --> 00:49:32,119
in net rating plus zero point three. Have been mostly defined by their defense

761
00:49:32,159 --> 00:49:35,920
so far this year. But I'm
curious where you're going to go here for

762
00:49:36,039 --> 00:49:38,599
the Heat? Do you go in
any number of directions? Jimmy Butler flip

763
00:49:38,679 --> 00:49:42,880
the switch taken to making more threes. How may Hawk is filling all the

764
00:49:42,920 --> 00:49:45,880
gaps. He's starting to hit his
threes as well. Tayla Martin has not

765
00:49:45,920 --> 00:49:47,119
looked great, but he's at least
back. I'd be thankful for that.

766
00:49:47,800 --> 00:49:52,280
Dougan Robinson, the inside the arc
know how that he showed during the playoffs

767
00:49:52,360 --> 00:49:55,880
is carried over the regular season.
Yeah, Hayward hog Smith, what's that

768
00:49:57,400 --> 00:50:00,039
still here? I did not think
we'd be talking about the that Duncan Robinson

769
00:50:00,440 --> 00:50:05,400
sustained off the dribble and non three
point shooting game after the playoffs, But

770
00:50:05,480 --> 00:50:07,840
here we are, and then you
haven't Hay what Highsmith? Just defending up

771
00:50:07,840 --> 00:50:10,440
and down the positional spectrum, among
other things. I think the big one

772
00:50:10,440 --> 00:50:15,760
for me is just Bammannebayo continues to
grow on the offensive end. He's scoring

773
00:50:15,800 --> 00:50:19,360
more despite playing slightly fewer minutes.
Big part of that is he's just getting

774
00:50:19,360 --> 00:50:22,360
to the foul line more often per
thirty six minutes. What's interesting about that,

775
00:50:22,400 --> 00:50:28,599
though, is his rim frequency has
declined by ten percent for a second

776
00:50:28,639 --> 00:50:31,159
consecutive year like that double digit,
so he's not getting there as much.

777
00:50:31,320 --> 00:50:36,079
But a lot of that's just in
service of the agency he's having over the

778
00:50:36,119 --> 00:50:39,360
offense from the in between or as
a lead playmaker. He just looks so

779
00:50:39,519 --> 00:50:45,440
much more of that part. And
it's like the patience he is showing when

780
00:50:45,480 --> 00:50:49,199
he gets the ball to let plays
develop. He's taking more isolations this year,

781
00:50:49,280 --> 00:50:52,760
he's been knocking down shots in those
situations, added unreal clip. More

782
00:50:52,800 --> 00:50:58,840
of his buckets that ever have now
gone unassisted. He's upped his efficiency on

783
00:50:58,880 --> 00:51:04,119
fataway jumpers compare last year. And
when he is getting paint touches, he's

784
00:51:04,119 --> 00:51:07,920
shooting above sixty percent on them right
now, and then he's generating fouls at

785
00:51:07,920 --> 00:51:12,400
a good clip. There's only two
other players who have made as many field

786
00:51:12,440 --> 00:51:16,320
goals and free throws at the same
clips as bam Adebayo this season. That's

787
00:51:16,360 --> 00:51:20,360
Anthony Davis and chet Holmgrid who just
pops up into all these things. It's

788
00:51:20,719 --> 00:51:25,239
it's absolutely unreal. I think there
can be concerned because Miami still loses the

789
00:51:25,280 --> 00:51:30,239
minutes that Jimmy Butler doesn't play when
you look when you start to dig into

790
00:51:30,239 --> 00:51:32,480
the lineup data on that, though, bam is asked, being asked to

791
00:51:32,519 --> 00:51:37,880
carry these combinations that just have no
secondary creation. Maybe that changes a little

792
00:51:37,880 --> 00:51:43,639
bit when Tyler Hero comes back.
I do think ultimately this development from BAM,

793
00:51:43,679 --> 00:51:46,880
when you're looking at Miami's best lineups, is going to end up being

794
00:51:47,000 --> 00:51:51,559
huge for the team, what to
not just survive the regular season, but

795
00:51:51,559 --> 00:51:53,599
once you get to the playoffs,
especially if you're not going to wind up

796
00:51:53,639 --> 00:51:59,239
making a trade for someone who cracks
your closing lineup. Yeah, I mean,

797
00:51:59,400 --> 00:52:02,960
you're talking about lineups like their starting
unit is just one of the best

798
00:52:04,039 --> 00:52:07,400
ones in the league full stop right
now. So we're talking about Lowry,

799
00:52:07,440 --> 00:52:09,440
Duncan, Robinson, high Smith,
Butler, and out of Bio. They're

800
00:52:09,599 --> 00:52:13,679
in one hundred and fifty one possessions, which is a decent number for as

801
00:52:13,760 --> 00:52:16,480
early as we are. They're plus
nineteen point one, and the most surprising

802
00:52:16,480 --> 00:52:21,000
thing is that unit is really scoring. I guess maybe that's not surprising because

803
00:52:21,039 --> 00:52:23,239
Butler, Robinson, and Lowry are
all comfortably over forty percent from three,

804
00:52:23,280 --> 00:52:27,280
but high Smith is like thirty percent. Ish is not a threatening shooter.

805
00:52:27,679 --> 00:52:31,079
Auto Bio is a great offensive player. But like I thought that if you're

806
00:52:31,079 --> 00:52:34,880
gonna play Heismith a lot, and
you're gonna play him with BAM, you'r

807
00:52:34,920 --> 00:52:37,280
spacing might get a little crunchy,
especially with Jimmy out there, but that

808
00:52:37,719 --> 00:52:42,760
unit is scoring totally. Like if
if they're at one twenty four point five

809
00:52:42,800 --> 00:52:46,239
points per one hundred offensively, like
if that comes down by twenty percent,

810
00:52:46,280 --> 00:52:50,840
you're still like in pretty good shape
for a Miami offense. I did want

811
00:52:50,840 --> 00:52:54,519
to pull up the because you alluded
to it. The minutes with uh auto

812
00:52:54,559 --> 00:53:00,239
bio on the corp and Butler off
are real rough specifically on offense. They're

813
00:53:00,239 --> 00:53:04,800
like a seventh percentile scoring efficiency offense. In those situations they're getting out scored

814
00:53:04,840 --> 00:53:07,480
by eight point two points per hundred. So, bam, how many you

815
00:53:07,559 --> 00:53:12,559
know if you have the most used
lineup though, that's like in that the

816
00:53:12,599 --> 00:53:16,440
most used yes, bam, No, Jimmy lineup yeah is minus nine point

817
00:53:16,519 --> 00:53:21,400
three right now is but who's in
it? Is my point? It's yeah,

818
00:53:21,599 --> 00:53:27,199
Josh Richardson, Jimahawk as Duncan Robinson, Caleb Martin and bam. So

819
00:53:27,519 --> 00:53:30,760
that sounds like a lineup that should
be working will work better over the long

820
00:53:30,880 --> 00:53:32,519
terriblely it should, I think.
Well, yet, see I don't know

821
00:53:32,519 --> 00:53:37,039
if it's sorted for like what the
opponents are shooting, but they're not scoring

822
00:53:37,559 --> 00:53:40,639
actually they're scoring fine, they're giving
up one twenty five point three on defense,

823
00:53:42,280 --> 00:53:45,039
so maybe that's that's the issue.
Maybe that's I don't have it sorted

824
00:53:45,079 --> 00:53:46,920
to tell me how opponents are shooting
from three. That could just be kind

825
00:53:46,920 --> 00:53:52,199
of noisy. But yeah, no, the heat. Just to fin I

826
00:53:52,239 --> 00:53:57,159
thought the heat were like based on, you know, being basically a five

827
00:53:57,199 --> 00:54:00,400
hundred team last year, until they've
made the finals all of a sudden and

828
00:54:00,440 --> 00:54:02,119
losing talent. We're just going to
really struggle this year. And was wrong

829
00:54:02,159 --> 00:54:07,360
about that. We're both officially because
we don't think we were fair when we

830
00:54:07,679 --> 00:54:10,320
killed them for their offseason, but
we're both default they do. We don't

831
00:54:10,360 --> 00:54:13,760
need to explain it. You just
have to believe that my A is going

832
00:54:13,800 --> 00:54:15,880
to be a threat. What about
it? Like they've just earned that benefit

833
00:54:15,920 --> 00:54:17,159
of the doubt. Now. I
know they'll figure it out, and then

834
00:54:17,199 --> 00:54:21,920
once we fully embrace that, then
they'll suck and we'll just not know which

835
00:54:21,960 --> 00:54:24,880
way is up after that. Speaking
of up, the Milwaukee Bucks, things

836
00:54:24,920 --> 00:54:29,880
are looking up after a start I
stupidly panicked over. So they're ten and

837
00:54:29,960 --> 00:54:32,679
four. They are plus two point
two, which still seems you know,

838
00:54:32,760 --> 00:54:37,199
that's not in step with the ten
and four record, but we're not super

839
00:54:37,239 --> 00:54:40,880
worried about that. And I'm also
just gonna stop panicking about Milwaukee, especially

840
00:54:40,960 --> 00:54:44,800
after like six games, which I
did, So tell me about the Bucks.

841
00:54:44,800 --> 00:54:47,519
What's good that's going on there.
I think the big optimism, aside

842
00:54:47,519 --> 00:54:51,760
from you know, Dame just has
really has changed their offense even when he's

843
00:54:51,800 --> 00:54:55,440
not hitting threes, is that Adrian
Griffin apparently listens to his players. So

844
00:54:55,719 --> 00:55:00,800
through the first four games of the
season, they didn't have Brook Lopez,

845
00:55:00,800 --> 00:55:05,079
the Defensive Player of the Year runner
up who thrives working at drop coverage.

846
00:55:05,239 --> 00:55:08,599
He was not working at drop coverage
nearly as often. The results were bad.

847
00:55:08,920 --> 00:55:15,000
Milwaukee ranked first in opponent rim frequency, but they were dead last in

848
00:55:15,079 --> 00:55:19,119
shooting accuracy, surrendered surrendered at the
hoop. They were allowing about an eighty

849
00:55:19,159 --> 00:55:23,480
one percent clip through those first four
games. That contributed to their defensive struggles.

850
00:55:23,519 --> 00:55:27,400
They were twenty ninth overall on defense, twenty fourth and a half court

851
00:55:27,440 --> 00:55:31,840
defense. Then they started playing Brook
and dropped more. It was on November

852
00:55:31,840 --> 00:55:36,960
third against the Knicks. During that
game, Griffin went on ESPN and said

853
00:55:37,440 --> 00:55:42,039
the players acts to put Brook back
and drop and so he just obliged,

854
00:55:42,679 --> 00:55:46,000
and the Bucks defense has been night
and day since then. They're allowing more

855
00:55:46,039 --> 00:55:50,119
looks at the rim, but that's
what happens if you're going to drop that

856
00:55:50,280 --> 00:55:54,719
deep. But they're now fourth in
shooting accuracy allowed at the rim. Their

857
00:55:54,719 --> 00:55:59,840
half court defense has recovered from twenty
fourth to a good, not great,

858
00:55:59,840 --> 00:56:02,480
but better fourteenth. And they still
have their issues, I think, specifically

859
00:56:02,519 --> 00:56:07,320
when you're looking at the point of
attack, even more specifically when you're looking

860
00:56:07,360 --> 00:56:10,760
at their guards, how easy it
is to get behind them off your missus

861
00:56:10,760 --> 00:56:15,199
in the offense. That's something they
need to figure out a way to address,

862
00:56:15,239 --> 00:56:16,920
maybe at the trade deadline or can
you know, some of these guards

863
00:56:16,960 --> 00:56:22,280
just play better in those situations.
But if you're the Bucks and your offense

864
00:56:22,639 --> 00:56:27,119
is just going to be thermonuclear af
and is only going to get better as

865
00:56:27,199 --> 00:56:30,360
Damian Lillard gets better, you just
need to have an average or better defense.

866
00:56:30,840 --> 00:56:36,320
They have a better than average defense
right now, and so that case

867
00:56:36,360 --> 00:56:38,800
that we were building for them to
actually be the favorites in the Eastern Conference,

868
00:56:38,840 --> 00:56:43,960
even though the Celtics exist, especially
with you know, Chris Middleton minutes

869
00:56:44,000 --> 00:56:47,280
gradually coming up his pull up jumpers
starting to fall like this team is right

870
00:56:47,320 --> 00:56:51,079
there, it's not Boston and everyone
else. To me, it's still Boston

871
00:56:51,119 --> 00:56:53,360
and Milwaukee and everyone else. Yeah, I think that's right. And I

872
00:56:53,440 --> 00:56:59,119
think too, like I wonder what
the sort of statute of limitations is going

873
00:56:59,199 --> 00:57:02,960
to be on this Discussing the logic
of taking brook Lopez out of a drop

874
00:57:04,360 --> 00:57:07,920
getting off of it after four games
is great, but I just wonder almost

875
00:57:08,159 --> 00:57:12,039
like, hey, let's try to
force turnover. So right, that was

876
00:57:12,119 --> 00:57:15,559
the stated goal. But it's like
this team was, you know, has

877
00:57:15,599 --> 00:57:19,239
been top whatever defensively. There's like
one blip in there when they were fourteenth

878
00:57:19,239 --> 00:57:22,000
a couple of years ago. But
their top ten routine league with like terrible

879
00:57:22,199 --> 00:57:25,039
opponent, Like they don't force turnovers. It's just like not part of it

880
00:57:25,079 --> 00:57:29,840
and it still works great. It's
almost like like, you know, how

881
00:57:29,960 --> 00:57:32,880
whenever we've been through this, as
Bleacher Report has been like acquired and reacquired

882
00:57:32,920 --> 00:57:38,039
and had bigger and bigger companies in
charge of it. Sometimes like things people

883
00:57:38,039 --> 00:57:42,360
will come in and say, like
I gotta change something, So we're going

884
00:57:42,440 --> 00:57:45,280
to use a new email server for
some reason, just because that's that's what

885
00:57:45,320 --> 00:57:49,280
we do. When when a company
gets taken over and it's like, yeah,

886
00:57:49,320 --> 00:57:52,159
but the old one was fine,
do we need and it's gonna,

887
00:57:52,559 --> 00:57:55,519
we're gonna. I am here to
effect change and guess what now it's outlook,

888
00:57:55,679 --> 00:57:59,719
deal with it. Now we're gonna
So it's almost like Griffin came in

889
00:57:59,760 --> 00:58:01,079
and was like, how do I
put my stamp on this team? I

890
00:58:01,119 --> 00:58:05,599
know, I know we're gonna change
the defense, We're gonna we're gonna force

891
00:58:05,639 --> 00:58:07,320
turnovers. It's a new day.
And then you quickly realize, like,

892
00:58:07,400 --> 00:58:10,119
no, the old one was totally
fine. We don't need to we don't

893
00:58:10,119 --> 00:58:15,800
need to do anything. They also
were not forcing overs during that stretch.

894
00:58:15,840 --> 00:58:19,639
Anyway, I understand the logic of, Okay, we're significantly weaker at the

895
00:58:19,639 --> 00:58:22,159
point of attack. Is this a
way to cover up for it? Yeah,

896
00:58:22,199 --> 00:58:23,840
but it was nice. I wouldn't
have tried it either. But you're

897
00:58:23,880 --> 00:58:28,119
right about the leaving their mark,
because we talk about this when there's a

898
00:58:28,159 --> 00:58:31,159
front office change or an ownership change
of NBA teams, they want to leave

899
00:58:31,159 --> 00:58:34,400
their mark. Is it firing the
head coach, isn't making a trades,

900
00:58:34,440 --> 00:58:37,800
is tripping down the roster. I'm
assuming that's the logic. I think it's

901
00:58:37,840 --> 00:58:43,519
good that he listened to his players. And I also think it's like these

902
00:58:43,559 --> 00:58:45,599
players were so quickly to ask for
that. They didn't even give it five

903
00:58:45,639 --> 00:58:50,280
years like no, this is this
is cooked. I knew that they they

904
00:58:50,320 --> 00:58:52,960
got like a half decade of information
that says like no, no, it

905
00:58:52,960 --> 00:58:54,480
works when we do this, Like
but like you couldn't you, like,

906
00:58:54,679 --> 00:58:59,559
especially see a new head coach,
we have to do personnel that oh will

907
00:58:59,559 --> 00:59:01,360
give it more more than four games. Right, the fact they asked for

908
00:59:01,400 --> 00:59:06,559
it so quickly, I love and
appreciate. Yeah, I think he ultimately,

909
00:59:06,559 --> 00:59:08,800
You're right, he deserves credit because
it would have been so easy to

910
00:59:08,840 --> 00:59:13,519
say, like maybe not even in
as polite as terms as let's just see

911
00:59:13,719 --> 00:59:15,559
as like no, no, no, this is my I'm I'm going down

912
00:59:15,599 --> 00:59:19,559
with it. I'm sticking to this
for better or worse for half the year.

913
00:59:19,800 --> 00:59:22,119
We'll see where we are. Like, no, he moved off it

914
00:59:22,239 --> 00:59:25,119
quickly, So that's that's definitely a
credit, especially like you're coming in to

915
00:59:25,559 --> 00:59:30,440
coach a potential championship roster and you'd
want to make it feel like you're doing

916
00:59:30,480 --> 00:59:34,800
something to affect to like get this
team where it wants to be, to

917
00:59:34,840 --> 00:59:37,280
get off that quickly is good.
Let's get off of the Milwaukee Bucks and

918
00:59:37,320 --> 00:59:40,960
move to the New York Knicks,
who are eight and six plus four point

919
00:59:42,039 --> 00:59:45,960
seven net rating. The offense is
tenth, the defense is seventh. Should

920
00:59:45,960 --> 00:59:49,519
have a better record than they have, but here we are. What do

921
00:59:49,559 --> 00:59:52,719
you like about the Knicks so far? I don't know who needs to hear

922
00:59:52,800 --> 00:59:55,480
this, but Mitchelle Robinson has been
their best player, and I think we

923
00:59:55,519 --> 00:59:59,320
really need to appreciate them. Jalen
Brunson is coming for that crown. He's

924
00:59:59,360 --> 01:00:02,239
more important. The RJ. Barrett
decision making turn is real, but he

925
01:00:02,280 --> 01:00:06,599
has been dominant, arguably at both
ends of the floor. The on off

926
01:00:06,639 --> 01:00:09,920
splits on defense are very wonky.
Opponents are shooting more often and better at

927
01:00:09,920 --> 01:00:14,920
the room when he's on the court. But those offenses are really planning around

928
01:00:14,960 --> 01:00:19,400
Mitchell Robinson this season, where they're
trying to have bigs where they can stretch

929
01:00:19,480 --> 01:00:22,599
him out. They're gonna put them
in the corner or they're gonna go out

930
01:00:22,599 --> 01:00:25,519
of their way, which it makes
sense to put Julius Randall and Jalen Brunson

931
01:00:25,800 --> 01:00:30,400
in pick and roll together, and
they either know that the Knicks aren't gonna

932
01:00:30,400 --> 01:00:32,679
switch or they know that the Knicks
aren't gonna change up their coverage. The

933
01:00:32,719 --> 01:00:37,880
ground that Robinson has had to cover, and I the hesitance that I feel

934
01:00:37,920 --> 01:00:45,480
like he inflicts upon opponent offensive plays. It's Anthony Davis esque. It's not

935
01:00:45,679 --> 01:00:47,320
nearly the same as Anthony Davis.
I'm just talking about the ground that he

936
01:00:47,360 --> 01:00:52,320
needs to cover as a big who's
not allowed to play this traditional big man

937
01:00:52,400 --> 01:00:59,599
role on the defensive end. But
he's arguably been even more valuable on offense

938
01:01:00,199 --> 01:01:04,840
because the Knicks still desperately need his
offensive rebounding. He currently has the highest

939
01:01:04,880 --> 01:01:10,199
offensive rebounding rate on record, and
so that's just massive unto itself, because

940
01:01:10,400 --> 01:01:15,360
you look at a Knicks team,
their first chance offense in the half court

941
01:01:15,599 --> 01:01:19,880
is bad. They're twenty third right
now. Mitchell Robinson. This is all.

942
01:01:20,000 --> 01:01:22,920
This is according to PBP stats,
and it's entering Wednesday's games. Mitchell

943
01:01:22,960 --> 01:01:29,639
Robinson's grabbing about twenty five percent of
New York's missed twos, including twenty nine

944
01:01:29,719 --> 01:01:35,159
percent of their missed attempts at the
rim and twenty five percent exactly of their

945
01:01:35,199 --> 01:01:38,760
missed twos between four and fourteen feet. This matters because the Knicks are dead

946
01:01:38,840 --> 01:01:45,599
last in efficiency at the rim and
twenty fifth inefficiency from that foreign fourteen foot

947
01:01:45,960 --> 01:01:52,239
range, So him generating those second
chance opportunities is just critical to their offensive

948
01:01:52,519 --> 01:01:55,679
livelihood for anyone who cares. He's
also grabbing about eleven percent of New York's

949
01:01:55,679 --> 01:02:00,440
miss threes. Now, Robinson is
woefully inefficient when it comes to trying to

950
01:02:00,440 --> 01:02:04,559
go back up with the ball and
score when he does this, but he

951
01:02:04,679 --> 01:02:07,960
knows how to get the ball out
to someone who's on the three point line

952
01:02:08,159 --> 01:02:12,480
or just around the basket, and
the numbers actually bear that out that his

953
01:02:12,639 --> 01:02:19,440
offensive rebounds are more valuable than other
people's offensive rebounds because the Knicks' second chance

954
01:02:19,679 --> 01:02:23,039
offensive rating with Mitchell Robinson on the
floor, they're averaging one point one to

955
01:02:23,119 --> 01:02:29,239
two points per possession versus point eight
nine without him. And a big part

956
01:02:29,280 --> 01:02:30,559
of that is, yes, Mitchell
Robinson kind of knows where to look.

957
01:02:30,719 --> 01:02:36,039
But when you have so many bodies
trying to prevent Mitchell Robinson from getting said

958
01:02:36,079 --> 01:02:39,239
offensive rebound, someone's going to be
open, gonna be able to duck in

959
01:02:39,320 --> 01:02:44,199
going ahead and open three. And
until we've seen Jalen Brunson get a little

960
01:02:44,199 --> 01:02:50,119
bit hotter. But until this Knicks
team performs its first chance half court offense

961
01:02:50,320 --> 01:02:53,519
more consistently, because that's an issue
dating back to last season, Mitchell Robinson

962
01:02:54,159 --> 01:03:00,079
is probably no worse than the second
most important player in that building right now.

963
01:03:00,239 --> 01:03:02,400
Argue third, because it's like,
well of r J. John brunt

964
01:03:02,440 --> 01:03:06,519
in two and Julius Randall, two
of those guys hit more more of their

965
01:03:06,559 --> 01:03:10,239
perimeter looks that stabilizes the offense.
But right now, Mitchell Robinson is probably

966
01:03:10,280 --> 01:03:14,679
the Knicks's second most important player,
and he's been their best player this season.

967
01:03:15,119 --> 01:03:16,280
We should just appreciate it. I
don't know if this is the ideal

968
01:03:16,360 --> 01:03:21,159
situation for them to be in,
but you absolutely have to appreciate the body

969
01:03:21,159 --> 01:03:22,760
of work. I agree, I
think it's And it's just always kind of

970
01:03:22,760 --> 01:03:28,360
fun when we don't have this happen
very much, where a big guy doing

971
01:03:28,400 --> 01:03:31,199
big guy stuff like matters in the
modern NBA, because you know, all

972
01:03:31,199 --> 01:03:35,599
we focus on is like, well, Kinny Garden a switch and he's not

973
01:03:35,639 --> 01:03:37,639
gonna provide any spacing and all this, like that's all we've talked about for

974
01:03:37,679 --> 01:03:42,719
like ten years about big guys like
Mitchell Robinson, and now I just it's

975
01:03:42,719 --> 01:03:46,000
like a refreshing thing that he is, and you're like, you're not overstating

976
01:03:46,000 --> 01:03:50,320
it at all, especially for this
team specifically that just couldn't make a two

977
01:03:50,400 --> 01:03:52,960
for you know, the first three
weeks of the season at all, to

978
01:03:52,039 --> 01:03:59,559
have just the most like ideal fit
for that deficiency to just mitigate it and

979
01:03:59,599 --> 01:04:03,639
then you know, make the Knicks
semi functional on offense despite just at one

980
01:04:03,679 --> 01:04:08,039
point, maybe like not that long
ago, because they're up the fifty six

981
01:04:08,039 --> 01:04:10,239
point eight percent at the room,
which is still lasting the league, but

982
01:04:10,280 --> 01:04:14,480
it's not the worst in like franchise
history, which was but you know,

983
01:04:14,599 --> 01:04:17,360
up until maybe a week ago,
he's just like, you couldn't you could

984
01:04:17,360 --> 01:04:23,039
not come up with a player more
purpose built to keep the Knicks like at

985
01:04:23,079 --> 01:04:27,559
a break even level or better with
the specific flaws they have than him.

986
01:04:27,559 --> 01:04:30,079
So he's been yeah, like,
no no argument here, he's been unbelievable.

987
01:04:30,800 --> 01:04:33,840
From the New York Knicks, we
moved to the Orlando Magic and they're

988
01:04:33,920 --> 01:04:38,519
number one in the NBA defense,
allowing one hundred and six point seven points

989
01:04:38,519 --> 01:04:41,079
per hundred possessions. As we record
this, they are nine to five,

990
01:04:41,679 --> 01:04:45,440
their net rating, seventh best in
the league. Plus four point seven despite

991
01:04:45,800 --> 01:04:48,599
an offense that has not been good. What what I've we got to talk

992
01:04:48,639 --> 01:04:51,880
about the defense? I guess,
But what do you like about the Magic

993
01:04:51,960 --> 01:04:56,920
so far? Well, it is
just their their top right defense feels for

994
01:04:57,000 --> 01:04:59,519
real, even if they're not going
to say in first place, it feels

995
01:04:59,559 --> 01:05:03,280
top five, top seven at worst. Would you dig into when you watch

996
01:05:03,360 --> 01:05:06,920
them? I think you just get
it. They don't start. There's like

997
01:05:08,239 --> 01:05:13,480
no deficient defensive players on this roster
that are logging heavy minutes. Cole Anthony's

998
01:05:13,559 --> 01:05:16,239
not great because he's small, but
he's a really good defensive rebounder for his

999
01:05:16,320 --> 01:05:21,920
size. Anthony Black navigates the floor
in the half court as a defender like

1000
01:05:23,039 --> 01:05:27,000
in all defense, vet Jalen Sugs
is this unique meld of strength and eclipsing

1001
01:05:27,039 --> 01:05:30,079
hands. The Jonathan Isaac Minnetes.
Yeah, they're always gonna be limited until

1002
01:05:30,119 --> 01:05:35,400
the end of time, but his
dominant interchangeability is really able to inflict havoc

1003
01:05:35,800 --> 01:05:39,679
on the half court. This is
all happening. By the way, Markel

1004
01:05:39,760 --> 01:05:43,159
Foltz has missed a bunch of time
with his left knee injury, and then

1005
01:05:43,159 --> 01:05:46,400
Wendell Carter Junior, who was holding
opponents to sub forty percent shooting at the

1006
01:05:46,480 --> 01:05:50,599
rim, has not been playing.
Oh that's okay, because Gogo Batadz is

1007
01:05:50,639 --> 01:05:54,639
just gonna come in and be a
really good rim protector and move well on

1008
01:05:54,679 --> 01:05:58,480
defense. I would not I did
not see enough of him last season.

1009
01:05:58,519 --> 01:06:01,400
I guess. I don't know if
he saw Saw flashed or gave us flickers

1010
01:06:01,400 --> 01:06:04,519
of this. I've been absolutely mind
blown by that. I do think a

1011
01:06:04,519 --> 01:06:09,360
lot of it helps where your role
becomes simplified when you're this good on the

1012
01:06:09,400 --> 01:06:13,119
perimeter. I think even Franz Wagner's
more of a nuisance on the wing that

1013
01:06:13,199 --> 01:06:16,639
he gets credit for. Palla Bankaro's
a little bit switchier and just physical that

1014
01:06:16,760 --> 01:06:20,880
he more physical than he gets credit
for. So this defense is the best

1015
01:06:20,920 --> 01:06:24,840
in the league, might get better. And when you dig into the numbers,

1016
01:06:24,920 --> 01:06:28,920
so watching it, you just get
it forcing turnovers like whoa. But

1017
01:06:28,960 --> 01:06:32,000
then you dig into the numbers and
it's well, where is the regression going

1018
01:06:32,039 --> 01:06:35,480
to come from? I don't know. Opponents are shooting thirty three and a

1019
01:06:35,519 --> 01:06:40,320
half percent on wide open threes,
that number will come up. Yeah,

1020
01:06:40,440 --> 01:06:43,000
that is That's like the only thing
I found where I'm like, well,

1021
01:06:43,039 --> 01:06:46,920
you know like this is gonna change
because are markkel Foltz and or when no

1022
01:06:47,000 --> 01:06:53,599
Carter Junior're gonna make them worse on
defense. They've they've catered to defense in

1023
01:06:53,639 --> 01:06:57,400
a way to where it has impacted
their offense when you start to get into

1024
01:06:57,440 --> 01:07:00,960
the half court stuff how it looks. But by building this defense, it

1025
01:07:01,039 --> 01:07:06,800
is also giving them a we're one
off the dribble shot maker away feel from

1026
01:07:06,840 --> 01:07:13,960
being this materializing giant in the Eastern
Conference. Yeah, and I will,

1027
01:07:14,519 --> 01:07:16,880
like I it's kind of a bit
at this point where I just I dump

1028
01:07:16,920 --> 01:07:20,159
on Jalen Suggs because he's such a
good defensive player and he can't pass and

1029
01:07:20,159 --> 01:07:25,480
can't make threes thirty five point one
percent from deep this year still turns it

1030
01:07:25,519 --> 01:07:28,320
over way too much, doesn't have
He's just I don't know what you're gonna

1031
01:07:28,360 --> 01:07:30,159
do with him as like a facilitator. But if he could be a league

1032
01:07:30,199 --> 01:07:33,920
average three point shooter with the level
of defense that he plays, then like

1033
01:07:34,079 --> 01:07:39,159
I'm not I think I might be
done bagging on how the Magic just don't

1034
01:07:39,159 --> 01:07:42,039
have good enough guards. At least
they're gonna have one. I think if

1035
01:07:42,039 --> 01:07:44,480
he's gonna shoot like this, the
other thing. I just looked this up

1036
01:07:44,480 --> 01:07:46,920
because I had to do. I
couldn't believe when I saw this. So

1037
01:07:47,360 --> 01:07:50,840
Jonathan Isaac, right thirteen point seven
minutes, you mentioned like he's just always

1038
01:07:50,880 --> 01:07:54,800
gonna be a pitch count guy and
just is not gonna, you know,

1039
01:07:54,880 --> 01:07:59,039
play tons of games in a row
uninterrupted based on his history. In thirteen

1040
01:07:59,039 --> 01:08:02,079
point seven minutes per game, he's
averaging over a block and a steal and

1041
01:08:02,119 --> 01:08:05,679
he's played a dozen games. No
one in NBA history has played that many

1042
01:08:05,679 --> 01:08:09,400
games in a season. It's a
low bar and averaged a block and a

1043
01:08:09,440 --> 01:08:12,000
steal with as few minutes as he
has. I could have just pulled up

1044
01:08:12,000 --> 01:08:15,159
his block and steal rates on cleaning
the glass to emphasize how ridiculous he's been.

1045
01:08:15,479 --> 01:08:18,159
But like, man, you're getting
a lot in a short amount of

1046
01:08:18,159 --> 01:08:21,399
time from him in terms of defensive
impact. I think, and this is

1047
01:08:21,399 --> 01:08:24,720
what this is kind of who we
thought he would be if he could have

1048
01:08:24,720 --> 01:08:28,079
stayed healthy. And you're never going
to get this over thirty five minutes a

1049
01:08:28,119 --> 01:08:30,840
game. But man, like just
as as someone to throw in there and

1050
01:08:30,880 --> 01:08:33,479
just ruin an offense for you know, the equivalent of like a quarter per

1051
01:08:33,520 --> 01:08:38,960
game that's like he's you know,
he's not the reason that they have the

1052
01:08:39,000 --> 01:08:43,640
number one defense, but he is
for sure a reason. All right,

1053
01:08:43,720 --> 01:08:46,399
we've got Orlando, here we go. Philadelphia seventy six Ers are next.

1054
01:08:46,760 --> 01:08:51,479
They are ten and four plus nine
net rating that's second best in the league,

1055
01:08:51,760 --> 01:08:56,800
number three offense, number ten defense, a whole bunch to like and

1056
01:08:56,920 --> 01:08:59,319
maybe some knits to pick, but
not that we're going to do that here

1057
01:08:59,359 --> 01:09:02,039
because this is a positive edition of
the podcast. What's going on with the

1058
01:09:02,039 --> 01:09:05,560
Sixers that has your attention? Tyres
Maxley going kaboom And it's just like you

1059
01:09:05,560 --> 01:09:09,800
could look at other stuff Tobias Harris, Jaden Springer and I'm just no like

1060
01:09:09,880 --> 01:09:12,760
it. It has to be Tyres
Maxi going kaboom. This is not your

1061
01:09:12,840 --> 01:09:15,439
run of the mill star arrival.
It's more like an all NBA turn.

1062
01:09:16,680 --> 01:09:20,560
He's averaging twenty seven points and seven
assists, hitting over forty two percent of

1063
01:09:20,600 --> 01:09:26,640
his triples. Luca, Steph Hallie
and Tatum are the only players who've made

1064
01:09:26,640 --> 01:09:29,960
more pull up triples, and Maxi
so far as shooting fifteen of twenty seven

1065
01:09:30,000 --> 01:09:34,119
on step back threes, and that
includes the weirdo airball step back three he

1066
01:09:34,159 --> 01:09:40,319
took against the loss to the Calves
on Tuesday Night. Mid Range efficiency not

1067
01:09:40,479 --> 01:09:44,279
there yet. Tough to kind of
harp on it though, when he's polished

1068
01:09:44,279 --> 01:09:47,840
his change of pace when he goes
downhill, he's shooting fifty percent on floaters,

1069
01:09:47,880 --> 01:09:51,319
which is lower than last year.
But it's just coming amid more attention

1070
01:09:51,760 --> 01:09:59,279
and like more more traffic and tighter
spaces. So his growing unpredictability is huge

1071
01:09:59,319 --> 01:10:01,600
for the Sixers all defense. And
it's also you know, it's translated to

1072
01:10:01,640 --> 01:10:04,560
his playmaking. You don't know what
type of passes he's gonna make. Now

1073
01:10:04,600 --> 01:10:09,000
he's doubled his He's nearly doubled his
assists for thirty six minutes. He was

1074
01:10:09,039 --> 01:10:13,159
averaging six point nine potential assists last
year. That's up to ten point eight.

1075
01:10:13,239 --> 01:10:16,439
Now. Defenses are harder pressed to
get him to pick up his dribble,

1076
01:10:16,600 --> 01:10:18,920
which I think has helped him a
bunch. And yeah, there's a

1077
01:10:19,000 --> 01:10:24,720
chemistry with Joel Embiid that is telepathic, but he doesn't need Joel Embid,

1078
01:10:24,720 --> 01:10:28,479
like this rise is independent of Joel
Embiid, And to that end, the

1079
01:10:28,520 --> 01:10:31,720
Sixers have are winning the minutes without
Embid. When Maxi plays by ten points

1080
01:10:31,760 --> 01:10:35,880
per one hundred possessions with an offensive
rating that rates not only the eighty fifth

1081
01:10:35,880 --> 01:10:41,640
percentile, but in a half court
offensive rating that rates in the seventieth percentile.

1082
01:10:42,159 --> 01:10:45,239
This is like what we're witnessing now
is huge. It changes the entire

1083
01:10:45,319 --> 01:10:48,000
calculus of not just the Sixers future, but what they need to do with

1084
01:10:48,079 --> 01:10:53,159
the trade assets they got from the
James Harden deal. Where we weren't the

1085
01:10:53,199 --> 01:10:56,159
first once introduced this, we have
talked about it. You don't necessarily need

1086
01:10:56,199 --> 01:10:59,840
a capslock star. You're not desperate
to get involved on the zach Lavine discussions,

1087
01:10:59,920 --> 01:11:02,279
or Pascal Siakam becomes available, you
might be able to just kind of

1088
01:11:02,600 --> 01:11:06,039
fuz and fiddle, not on the
margins, but I'm like the top,

1089
01:11:06,119 --> 01:11:10,119
middle, middle, top of your
rotation, rather than looking, oh,

1090
01:11:10,119 --> 01:11:15,000
we need a second best player or
a third best player. So the fact

1091
01:11:15,000 --> 01:11:19,880
that Maxi has one of the most
dangerous step back threes, like just if

1092
01:11:19,880 --> 01:11:23,399
you were just a good off the
dribble, like pull up three point shooter,

1093
01:11:23,439 --> 01:11:26,279
which he's been even last year.
He's in the thirty eight percent range

1094
01:11:26,319 --> 01:11:29,720
last year on those shots. But
the fact that like maybe the fastest guy

1095
01:11:30,399 --> 01:11:33,760
Downhill has a step back and you
have to guard him like on your heels

1096
01:11:33,800 --> 01:11:39,880
anyway is just cruel, Like there's
no there's no like easy solid for a

1097
01:11:39,920 --> 01:11:43,159
guy that you have to give a
cushion to or he's gonna go right by

1098
01:11:43,239 --> 01:11:45,880
you. But who also can go
back, like go away from you the

1099
01:11:45,920 --> 01:11:49,479
opposite direction and get a shot off
and you're getting yelled at by your coach

1100
01:11:49,560 --> 01:11:51,600
either way, like you, oh, you can't let him get to that.

1101
01:11:51,680 --> 01:11:54,760
It's like, well if I,
if I don't let him get to

1102
01:11:54,800 --> 01:11:58,000
that, he's gonna be three steps
by me and you know, be touching

1103
01:11:58,000 --> 01:12:00,520
the paint with no one's even had
a chance to blink yet I wanted to.

1104
01:12:00,720 --> 01:12:03,760
So I don't know where we talk, and we may have talked about

1105
01:12:03,800 --> 01:12:08,279
him as a most improved guy.
Certainly he's gonna get a lot of votes

1106
01:12:08,319 --> 01:12:11,680
for that, but that's like even
that award is kind of beneath him at

1107
01:12:11,680 --> 01:12:15,119
this point, like what potentially,
but it's not. I just want to

1108
01:12:15,119 --> 01:12:18,920
emphasize, like it's not just always
playing a little bit more. You know,

1109
01:12:19,000 --> 01:12:23,039
he's leading the league in minutes right
now. He's up to thirty eight

1110
01:12:23,039 --> 01:12:26,239
point seven from just thirty three and
a half last year. So like,

1111
01:12:26,319 --> 01:12:29,159
yeah, he's playing more, but
all his per one hundred possession stats are

1112
01:12:29,239 --> 01:12:32,079
up, all his per thirty six
stats are up like substantially. And the

1113
01:12:32,119 --> 01:12:35,479
thing is, it's not like he's
just playing more minutes in the same role

1114
01:12:35,600 --> 01:12:40,640
like his the difficulty of his role
and the negative impact that should have on

1115
01:12:40,680 --> 01:12:45,800
his scoring efficiency is just totally reversed
because he's just doing way more with more

1116
01:12:45,840 --> 01:12:50,159
defensive attention and is more efficient than
ever. It's just the volume and efficiency

1117
01:12:50,199 --> 01:12:55,039
are usually like you're trading off has
not happened. So this is not a

1118
01:12:55,079 --> 01:12:58,399
case of if he wins most improved, it's because the guy went from ahways

1119
01:12:58,399 --> 01:13:00,399
a bit player too. Now he's
on the ball and the counting stats are

1120
01:13:00,479 --> 01:13:03,079
up. It's like the counting stats
are up because he's playing more and he's

1121
01:13:03,079 --> 01:13:06,239
doing more with those minutes in a
harder role. It's just like, this

1122
01:13:06,279 --> 01:13:11,720
doesn't this isn't how it works.
Typically speaking, he's he's just exceeded expectations

1123
01:13:11,760 --> 01:13:15,079
in like every possible way, I
guess he'd say, or really quickly,

1124
01:13:15,079 --> 01:13:18,680
our bur colleague and friend, Brian
Depoory pointed this out to me. Maxually

1125
01:13:18,720 --> 01:13:23,920
may have actually benefited from the Sixers
not extending him because he would not probably

1126
01:13:23,960 --> 01:13:28,359
have had the leverage to include the
all NBA language in his contract or maybe

1127
01:13:28,399 --> 01:13:30,920
even get a player option, because
like we're seeing all these hiring guys not

1128
01:13:30,920 --> 01:13:33,680
get player option, and I was
just like, we might make it all

1129
01:13:33,800 --> 01:13:38,319
NBA team this year, or now
we know that he has Oh, he

1130
01:13:38,319 --> 01:13:41,800
can get the five year player option
special. Yeah, right, No,

1131
01:13:41,960 --> 01:13:44,199
he could ask for anything at this
point, and you can't. I don't

1132
01:13:44,239 --> 01:13:45,800
think you can tell. Well,
I mean there is a max salary.

1133
01:13:45,840 --> 01:13:49,000
I'd like it. I'd like the
seven year deal please, and I'd like

1134
01:13:49,000 --> 01:13:51,960
one hundred million a year. Make
it, make it happen. Darryl moorey

1135
01:13:53,039 --> 01:13:56,560
Tamper, figure it out. All
right. So that's the that's Philly.

1136
01:13:56,840 --> 01:13:58,680
We are on too. We've only
got two more here in the East.

1137
01:13:58,760 --> 01:14:01,479
Unless my skipped some alphabetical teams,
I don't think I have. No.

1138
01:14:01,600 --> 01:14:04,479
This is similar quick one because like
the Sixers is kind of just you can't

1139
01:14:04,520 --> 01:14:09,079
pick any any one or anything else. Yeah, So we have the Toronto

1140
01:14:09,159 --> 01:14:13,600
Raptors coming up next. Six and
eight minus one point five net rating,

1141
01:14:13,640 --> 01:14:17,039
twenty fifth in offense, eighth in
defense. You know, kind of a

1142
01:14:17,039 --> 01:14:20,640
weird year. Scottie Barnes is up, seat comes down. What do you

1143
01:14:20,640 --> 01:14:25,720
think so far are the raptors The
Scottie Barnes megal leap is for real,

1144
01:14:26,039 --> 01:14:30,680
and we've covered in detail on this
podcast. You could still sort of harp

1145
01:14:30,880 --> 01:14:34,520
on his flaws. There's that hesitance
in drawing contract contact, not getting all

1146
01:14:34,560 --> 01:14:39,920
the way to the basket. Has
some Yankee fadaways, but like the book

1147
01:14:40,000 --> 01:14:45,000
on, his scoring and playmaking transformations
are like they're extensive. He's now a

1148
01:14:45,079 --> 01:14:48,560
multi level threat as a scorer.
Defenses aren't gonna guard him on threes,

1149
01:14:48,920 --> 01:14:53,760
but he's making them pay for that, and his decision making from the in

1150
01:14:53,880 --> 01:14:58,199
between. It's still not perfect,
but he's definitely more comfortable splitting traffic,

1151
01:14:58,600 --> 01:15:02,399
angling his body to maintain separation after
he leaves his feet, and he's consistently

1152
01:15:02,439 --> 01:15:06,640
hurting opponents who just dropped too far
on him inside the arc. This number,

1153
01:15:06,800 --> 01:15:10,199
it's not he's not taking a ton
of them, but this number is

1154
01:15:10,199 --> 01:15:14,960
now held up for weeks. He's
shooting sixty percent on more than two pull

1155
01:15:15,039 --> 01:15:17,640
up two attempts per game, so
he's hitting sixty percent of his pull up

1156
01:15:17,680 --> 01:15:21,520
twos. Uh, that's probably not
unsustainable, but it is a harbinger of

1157
01:15:21,560 --> 01:15:27,800
how much more expansive his offensive package
has become. The same goes for as

1158
01:15:27,840 --> 01:15:32,239
passing. It's I would say it's
visibly more measurably more dynamic. The live

1159
01:15:32,359 --> 01:15:38,239
dribble vision feels more comprehensive, especially
when he's in the open floor. He's

1160
01:15:38,279 --> 01:15:43,600
certainly calmer, more collected when facing
doubles and threading the needle over length.

1161
01:15:44,680 --> 01:15:46,600
There are some lineups where it still
just gets a little bit clumpy. That's

1162
01:15:46,600 --> 01:15:49,800
not really on him so much as
on the Raptors, And I think even

1163
01:15:50,159 --> 01:15:57,840
what's what's just as crucial is that
this offensive growth has come with defensive growth.

1164
01:15:57,880 --> 01:16:00,079
So it's not like doing more on
offense has made him received on the

1165
01:16:00,119 --> 01:16:04,880
defensive end. The Raptors under dark
old Royakovich do have him guarding like more

1166
01:16:05,079 --> 01:16:10,520
likely sized players. Uh, And
he's racked up these counting stats that are

1167
01:16:10,560 --> 01:16:13,600
like, oh, why wasn't this
happening all along? He's seventh in stocks,

1168
01:16:13,840 --> 01:16:16,239
But he's also just he closes out, and I when I was writing

1169
01:16:16,239 --> 01:16:19,840
about this, he closes out with
his speed and control dials both turned to

1170
01:16:19,880 --> 01:16:28,119
eleven. I don't like it just
doesn't make sense. He's he's as my

1171
01:16:28,199 --> 01:16:31,439
dogs go off in the background.
For everybody with a Kniett Barnes fans,

1172
01:16:31,479 --> 01:16:35,079
those guys, yeah, they're pretty
happy. Let me shut this this door

1173
01:16:35,119 --> 01:16:40,600
and see if that helps. So
I don't even know what I was saying.

1174
01:16:40,680 --> 01:16:44,119
Oh, I was talking about his
closeouts. So those are a great

1175
01:16:44,159 --> 01:16:47,319
thing from him. And he's also
just like when he gets behind the play,

1176
01:16:47,680 --> 01:16:51,199
he's he's recovering well. And he's
also been a regular help presence around

1177
01:16:51,239 --> 01:16:56,159
the basket. I think this his
leap hasn't been lost in Toronto. There's

1178
01:16:56,199 --> 01:16:58,560
a question of, well, how
meaningful is it when they're not great.

1179
01:17:00,159 --> 01:17:03,359
It's not that Toronto doesn't have access
to a direction. Scotty Barnes is the

1180
01:17:03,399 --> 01:17:08,920
access. He's good enough to be
that direction. Whether they're optimizing that access

1181
01:17:09,520 --> 01:17:13,000
is what's at play, and I
think the answer is still no. But

1182
01:17:13,439 --> 01:17:16,239
the fact that they know they have
access to a direction in Scottie Barnes is

1183
01:17:16,279 --> 01:17:19,920
a pretty big deal. Yeah,
no, I'd echo everything you said there.

1184
01:17:20,760 --> 01:17:24,720
If we're gonna I was gonna pick
knits about like still too many mid

1185
01:17:24,840 --> 01:17:27,960
range shots going up. But he's
just better at though he's more accurate on

1186
01:17:28,000 --> 01:17:30,239
all those now, so it's less
of an issue, and the three point

1187
01:17:30,239 --> 01:17:33,239
frequency being like, you know,
significantly spiking, and he's making them,

1188
01:17:33,359 --> 01:17:36,319
Like I'm I'm not concerned that,
like he's a little more jumper dependent than

1189
01:17:36,359 --> 01:17:40,119
he's been in the past, just
because he's making them. And if you're

1190
01:17:40,159 --> 01:17:42,479
gonna knock like that was the knock, is that, well, he doesn't

1191
01:17:42,479 --> 01:17:45,000
make him Well, he's making his
jumpers, so I don't care if his

1192
01:17:45,079 --> 01:17:48,560
rim frequency is down. That takes
us to our last team alphabetically, and

1193
01:17:48,640 --> 01:17:53,279
I'm just actually, I haven't looked, but I feel like I can guess

1194
01:17:53,680 --> 01:17:57,800
where you're going here. For the
Washington Wizards, who are two and eleven,

1195
01:17:58,560 --> 01:18:00,479
they are not dead last in that
rating, so that's cool. There's

1196
01:18:00,479 --> 01:18:03,840
two West teams below them, Portland
and San Antonio, still minus ten point

1197
01:18:03,880 --> 01:18:09,520
nine twenty first on offense. They
are dead last in defense and pretty comfortably

1198
01:18:09,560 --> 01:18:14,840
so, one twenty three point three
per one hundred allowed and the highest opponent

1199
01:18:14,880 --> 01:18:19,079
effective field goal percentage. They are
also allowing the most opponent offensive rebounds,

1200
01:18:19,119 --> 01:18:21,199
so if you don't get him the
first time, you're getting them the second

1201
01:18:21,239 --> 01:18:26,439
time. This is the Washington Wizards. What's the best thing about the Washington

1202
01:18:26,479 --> 01:18:31,399
Wizards so far. Jordan Poole sound
bites. Look, it's Denni Avdi has

1203
01:18:31,399 --> 01:18:34,920
gotten a lot better. But anyone
who listens this podcast knows how much I

1204
01:18:35,079 --> 01:18:39,920
have been enamored with Denny Avdi and
talked about Dennyavia but a lot of cool

1205
01:18:39,960 --> 01:18:43,319
Bali was supposed to be a project, and just like I know, the

1206
01:18:43,560 --> 01:18:46,920
Wizards aren't having him running a bunch
of picking rolls and running sets for him.

1207
01:18:47,439 --> 01:18:53,720
He's a nineteen year old who is
shooting forty six plus percent on threes.

1208
01:18:54,079 --> 01:18:58,119
They're all unguarded and I don't care
like he's taken them. They're going

1209
01:18:58,159 --> 01:19:02,319
in. The efficiency will slip potentially
even plummet put the willingness to just un

1210
01:19:02,399 --> 01:19:08,279
cork those trays at all. That's
the win right now, Like, that's

1211
01:19:08,279 --> 01:19:12,880
the win for this team. And
he can do other stuff on offense which

1212
01:19:13,000 --> 01:19:16,880
will mitigate whatever regression might hit his
jumper. His drives are chaotic, but

1213
01:19:16,920 --> 01:19:21,840
he's a willing kicker and he doesn't
let the ball stick his half court off

1214
01:19:21,880 --> 01:19:26,960
ball floor navigation. It does keep
defenses on tilt, and he's just a

1215
01:19:27,039 --> 01:19:30,199
lightning rod. In transition. He's
averaging one point three three points per possession

1216
01:19:30,199 --> 01:19:33,960
in transition, shooting thirteen of eighteen
overall, that rates in the eighty six

1217
01:19:34,039 --> 01:19:40,079
percentile. I think I've been I
think what he's doing on offense is just

1218
01:19:40,119 --> 01:19:44,520
more shocking because he's contributing and he's
clearly ready, and I'm curious to see

1219
01:19:44,520 --> 01:19:46,119
what they could do if they what
he can do if they put the ball

1220
01:19:46,119 --> 01:19:50,000
in his hands more. The defense, though, is just we can't lose

1221
01:19:50,000 --> 01:19:53,840
sight of it. Even though Washington
is just not a good defensive team,

1222
01:19:54,159 --> 01:19:59,520
they're baptizing him by fire. He
has defended everyone from guards like Jalen Brunson

1223
01:19:59,800 --> 01:20:03,640
and Damian Lillard for extensive reps,
to guys like on the wing in Jalen

1224
01:20:03,720 --> 01:20:09,000
Brown and Brandon Miller, to then
like these combo forward big types like both

1225
01:20:09,439 --> 01:20:14,079
Scottie Barnes and Pascal Siakam. Again, the results aren't always going to be

1226
01:20:14,159 --> 01:20:18,479
pretty, and you can toss Kolabali
around on screens. He also doesn't look

1227
01:20:18,520 --> 01:20:24,319
overmatched in pretty much any situation.
He slides his feet really well. Like

1228
01:20:24,359 --> 01:20:29,520
the east west agility that he has
is incredibly impressive. He closes out hard

1229
01:20:29,520 --> 01:20:32,840
and at intelligible angles. It's like
he's kind of operating even faster than Scotty

1230
01:20:32,880 --> 01:20:36,279
Barnes on closeout speed. I'd like
to compare those two if there's any data

1231
01:20:36,359 --> 01:20:40,920
on their closeout speed. But like, he's not fouling a ton in those

1232
01:20:40,960 --> 01:20:44,960
situations. He rebounds well for someone
of his size and build. I know

1233
01:20:45,000 --> 01:20:46,399
he has the length. I know
a lot of those rebounds are uncontested,

1234
01:20:46,439 --> 01:20:50,399
but he hasn't knows for finding the
ball off those misses. And then he's

1235
01:20:50,399 --> 01:20:56,279
just really good at using his length
to disrupt shots and handles at every level,

1236
01:20:56,319 --> 01:21:00,640
both on and away from the ball. This is just it's the perfect

1237
01:21:00,680 --> 01:21:03,640
type of emergence for him because I
don't know, you look at him and

1238
01:21:03,680 --> 01:21:06,239
say, oh, that will be
the guy who directs our rebuild. But

1239
01:21:06,279 --> 01:21:09,760
he's talented enough to where you wonder, oh, is this gonna be one

1240
01:21:09,760 --> 01:21:13,000
of our two or three most important
players on a great team. And he's

1241
01:21:13,039 --> 01:21:15,920
not driving too much winning at the
moment, like you're still gonna be bad

1242
01:21:16,359 --> 01:21:20,279
for the next two years. And
so it's sort of a perfect storm of

1243
01:21:20,279 --> 01:21:25,359
optimism with him. And I'll close
with this the caveat that it's still early.

1244
01:21:26,079 --> 01:21:30,119
Here is every other rookie Grant who
is shorter than six' seven to

1245
01:21:30,199 --> 01:21:33,760
post a steal rate of at least
one point five and block rate of two

1246
01:21:34,640 --> 01:21:41,600
while maintaining Klabally's defensive rebounding percentage and
playing at least twenty five minutes per game.

1247
01:21:41,800 --> 01:21:45,479
So it's matching cool Bally's defensive rebounding
rate being shorter, then six to

1248
01:21:45,520 --> 01:21:50,479
seven block and steel rates of one
point five for steals, two for blocks,

1249
01:21:50,520 --> 01:21:53,479
and then you have to be playing
at least twenty five minutes per game.

1250
01:21:53,760 --> 01:21:56,880
There's Charles Barkley and Lonzo Ball,
so it's a cherry pickstat, but

1251
01:21:56,920 --> 01:22:00,279
it's just interesting company to look at
with what he's doing. I think those

1252
01:22:00,279 --> 01:22:04,279
are really because what I was gonna
say is is he's he's still a mystery

1253
01:22:04,319 --> 01:22:09,159
box, but like the good kind
now because in the draft it was almost

1254
01:22:09,199 --> 01:22:13,159
like, you know, there's all
these tools here. Defensively, we think

1255
01:22:13,159 --> 01:22:15,520
he'll be good, but we don't
really know like how what form that'll take.

1256
01:22:15,560 --> 01:22:19,439
And then offensively, no idea.
So mystery box but not the right

1257
01:22:19,520 --> 01:22:24,319
kind. Like now it's well,
he's shooting sixty one percent on corner threes

1258
01:22:24,359 --> 01:22:27,039
and eighty percent at the rim,
and as an awesome defender. And is

1259
01:22:27,079 --> 01:22:31,359
in this weird combo or this weird
status where his comps are in one regard

1260
01:22:31,399 --> 01:22:35,840
anyway, Lonzo Ball like the Ultimate
Connector and Charles Barkley like the Option one

1261
01:22:35,920 --> 01:22:40,199
superstar. So he's somewhere between those
guys, and they're both good. We

1262
01:22:40,239 --> 01:22:45,279
don't know what kind of player he'll
ultimately be, but the options like are

1263
01:22:45,479 --> 01:22:47,600
just you know, they're broader even
than they were in the draft, but

1264
01:22:47,600 --> 01:22:50,640
they're just all the options look better
now, you know, in terms of

1265
01:22:50,680 --> 01:22:56,600
his possible outcomes, just because again
I don't know, like even if all

1266
01:22:56,640 --> 01:23:00,399
of these numbers regress significantly, I'm
still gonna leave his rookie seat thinking he

1267
01:23:00,520 --> 01:23:05,319
just had so much more than I
was led to believe going into the draft.

1268
01:23:05,399 --> 01:23:09,840
So yeah, that's that is the
absolute like gott to pick him for

1269
01:23:09,960 --> 01:23:14,159
the Wizard's positive positive vibes. What's
interesting is I'm not sure if I feel

1270
01:23:14,199 --> 01:23:17,880
any more confident in my prediction that
he would make first team All NBA because

1271
01:23:17,880 --> 01:23:21,319
you have a star Thompson, Wemby's
gonna make it. You have Chet Holmgren,

1272
01:23:21,800 --> 01:23:26,960
and so that's just two spots,
and they're just like Marcus sasser Case

1273
01:23:27,000 --> 01:23:31,479
and Wallace Derek Lively, de George
Hibay Hawk as Brandon Miller, Jordan Hawkins,

1274
01:23:31,800 --> 01:23:35,960
Like the names are just like,
I mean, the fact that Scoot

1275
01:23:35,960 --> 01:23:41,560
Henderson and Amen Thomson got injured probably
help his case. So I don't know

1276
01:23:41,560 --> 01:23:44,479
if I feel better, I don't
feel worse, but like it doesn't even

1277
01:23:44,520 --> 01:23:46,760
if he doesn't make it. That
prediction I think some people thought was ridiculous

1278
01:23:46,760 --> 01:23:49,840
when I made it. It definitely
does not, at least look ridiculous now.

1279
01:23:50,000 --> 01:23:54,640
No, I think it wasn't because
you know, you're banking on the

1280
01:23:54,640 --> 01:23:58,760
Wizards is gonna be so bad that
like, why wouldn't you play him,

1281
01:23:58,960 --> 01:24:00,800
you know, thirty plus minutes every
night? And then that wasn't happening early

1282
01:24:00,880 --> 01:24:03,720
in the year, but he's played
over thirty in three of his last five

1283
01:24:03,760 --> 01:24:08,560
games, So like, as the
volume ticks up, maybe those counting stats,

1284
01:24:08,680 --> 01:24:11,520
you know, get to where you
know, I don't know what you'd

1285
01:24:11,520 --> 01:24:14,840
call a casual all rookie team voter
would say, like, well, I

1286
01:24:14,840 --> 01:24:17,359
mean, he's got this many twenty
point games now and in addition to all

1287
01:24:17,399 --> 01:24:20,039
the stuff you see on film,
which was a big part of my basis,

1288
01:24:20,039 --> 01:24:24,319
and the fact he's driving his case
by I just thought that we're going

1289
01:24:24,359 --> 01:24:27,479
to give him absurd volume on offense
to explore what he is. That's not

1290
01:24:27,600 --> 01:24:30,840
really what they're doing. And yet
he's driving his case anyway, which is

1291
01:24:30,920 --> 01:24:32,720
a big deal. Yeah, and
that could change and then maybe maybe then

1292
01:24:32,720 --> 01:24:38,840
the numbers really spike. I think
your bet on that front is only going

1293
01:24:38,880 --> 01:24:41,720
to look better as time goes on, unless he just, like you know,

1294
01:24:42,600 --> 01:24:44,960
shoots twenty percent from three for the
rest of the year. But I

1295
01:24:44,960 --> 01:24:47,039
don't think that's going to happen.
Are you ready to take us out?

1296
01:24:47,039 --> 01:24:49,920
No stat heading today? I am
fading. You have a schedule crunch,

1297
01:24:50,279 --> 01:24:53,840
Yes, you want to take us
out of here. All that means is

1298
01:24:53,880 --> 01:24:56,479
there'll be more. I have some
stat hadding. I'm excited about that.

1299
01:24:56,560 --> 01:24:59,399
I will keep in my back pocket
for next time. I have the most

1300
01:24:59,479 --> 01:25:03,039
random STAF padding question for you yet. Oh that's saying something. Yeah,

1301
01:25:03,520 --> 01:25:05,680
I don't know what I'm gonna lose
sleep over that one. I don't know

1302
01:25:05,720 --> 01:25:09,840
what to think about that. Everybody, Thank you for listening, thank you

1303
01:25:09,880 --> 01:25:13,039
for watching, Thank you for contributing. Even though we didn't use any of

1304
01:25:13,039 --> 01:25:15,800
your stat padding stuff this time,
we probably will in the future, you

1305
01:25:15,840 --> 01:25:19,279
know. The drill. If you
want to support us, you can do

1306
01:25:19,359 --> 01:25:23,279
that by following us on our socials. You can join our discord. You

1307
01:25:23,319 --> 01:25:25,960
can buy our merch figure out how
to do that through the links in the

1308
01:25:26,000 --> 01:25:30,560
YouTube and podcast description. Again,
continue, rate, review, subscribe,

1309
01:25:30,199 --> 01:25:32,960
write good things about us where you
can do that, Say good things to

1310
01:25:33,000 --> 01:25:36,359
your friends and enemies. We close, as always with an apology oooh,

1311
01:25:36,399 --> 01:25:40,319
I almost got the closing wrong.
Geez, I'm Russian too much, with

1312
01:25:40,399 --> 01:25:43,760
a shout out to the one and
only Frank Milakina and an apology to Jared Allen
