You really can't make sense of all the stuff that's happening and what's happened in
the twentieth century with the two World Wars and the Cold War without understanding this
game plan, without understanding this Pagalian dialectical conflict and synthesis, which really undergoes
the whole process of the way that the Milner Fabian elites, Lord Rocheld,
Lord Salisbury, Lord Cecil, all of these different characters, Lord Curtis who
were involved in Ruskin, TWAINB. H. G. Wells, all these
royal society elites who had this idea to use socialism as a better means than
Marxism. So, even though the elite were in many ways behind funding Marxism
from its inception, even Angles himself was a wealthy stock owner who kind of
helped Marx just kind of mooch and lay around and be lazy and write a
bunch of nonsense, it actually ended up being a very interesting technology for destroying
society. And when the original Marxist plan for the revolution didn't really work,
so they had a few phases of early revolutions. As you may or may
not know, we know the French Revolution was basically a Marxist kind of revolution
with the Jacobins, and then you get marx coming on the scene, as
we said, in the mid eighteen hundreds, and then you get some revolutions
in the eighteen hundreds. But the real flowering of that revolution was of course
the Bolshvic Revolution, right, that was the next phase of this really intense,
hardcore terror using red terror revolution. And the reason for that is that
many of these Marxists, I think, not only were they just completely demonically
possessed, but the Paris Commune, for example, engaged in red terror.
That's where Leon trot excuse meet Lenin and Trotsky got this idea for red terror
from the Paris Commune and then engaged in all kinds of means and methodologies which
would intended to rip apart the previous society, completely demolish it so that you
could have corporate socialism set up. And I call it corporate socialism because as
we've seen from Professor Anthony Sutton's works, bullshrig Revolution was completely funded by the
elites in the West three the coming socialist dictatorship. Yes, that's right,
and how a lot of what we're seeing might fit into the overall plans of
the technocratic elite to move us into their technocratic global governance, which I think
is best titled corporate socialism, or we could call it scientific socialism scientific governance.
But corporate socialism is good because it really merges monopoly capitalism with not so
much classical Marxism which didn't achieve what they wanted to achieve with it, but
rather socialism, Fabian socialism, that slow approach model which has been very successful
that the elite have used. That's the real strategy. And so we want
to look through some of the plans that they've had, how effective they've been,
and if we understand that, we might be able to stop some of
their future plans. And I don't know if we're going to stop World War
three or if there will be World War three, but if there is,
we know that it's for the purpose of a dialectical outcome, of a order
of the new order of the ages that emerges out of these dialectical conflicts.
And one thing that might emerge that I think not many people have talked about
is if there is a Middle Eastern war, and if there is a war
that breaks out as a result of not just Ukraine and Israel are Ukraine and
Russia, but Israel versus Palestine, in the Arab world, the Muslim world,
then it might be then cast as look at nationalism, you see,
because Jews are an ancient biblical notion of a nation state, nationalism is part
of the problem, you see. Now that's my own speculation that they might
demonize it. But one of the reasons that Klausen company have consistently said to
be well, anglia world, an angrier world because of the conflicts, and
because of the the bioweapons, and because of the wars, and because of
the economic collapses that are coming, the food shorts, all this stuff that
we saw a taste of in the last three years. What ended up being
kind of the the scapegoat, and what was the scapegoat that was mentioned in
the Rockefeller document, the Lockstep document. Well, one of the scapegoats was
the inadequacies and the lack of capabilities of national governments to solve their own problems,
which solution is then offered as the design solution of an international body which
is able to then adjudicate and divvy up and solve the problems, solve the
economic issues. So there's always this assumption that greater centralization will be able to
somehow solve the localized problems. Of course, just because you centralize all the
power doesn't necessarily mean the problems are going to be solved. In fact,
you're just giving over more and more power to these centralized bodies. So let's
look at the older, older plan that the technocratic global con men planned out
about one hundred and seventy is years ago. So we'll go back to the
first plan that we had that we know about. There was an older plan
with Adam Bishopt and his plan for Illuminism, which was an earlier proto form
of communism. That's not conspiracy theory, that's mainline history from Firing the Minds
of Men by James Billington. But the next phase of that was a rewritten
plan that Karl Marx wrote when he was in this little secret society called the
League of the Just, and they said, hey, Karl, buddy,
you got a giant atheistic beard there. We want you to write for us
a manifesto. And so Carl wrote a famous manifesto with planks, and I
want to go through some of these planks and then talk about where it failed
but where it's succeeding. And then how that plan was reconstituted and then put
into a different strategy some years later. So the first plank was the abolition
of property and land, of all rents of land to public purpose. So
basically the abolition of private property right and the abolition of private property is important
because in their view, really the only way to manage society is if you
have this quasi central basically this technocratic control system that's totally centralized from the top
down. And they begin with this in various countries, but then eventually it's
intended to be international. Right, So the idea is that everything that's holding
back mankind is the barriers like family and nation. Those are things that hold
us back from progress. Of course, we don't know what we're progressing too,
except that Marx says, well, there'll be a withering way of the
state in a future golden age, and machines will do all the work and
we'll all basically be free, will be libertarians. So people don't know this,
but Marx's final stage was actually libertarianism. It was the idea that the
governments of the world would all wither away and everybody would have total freedom.
He says, you can go out and paint a picture, you can go
and fish, you can do whatever you want. When we get the Final
Revolution, so successful in the abolition of all property, but they were successful
in getting certain nations and especially throughout the West, to begin to pass laws
which would severely limit public or huld be private ownership, laws like emminent domain.
These kinds of things are socialist ideas. And in the countries where they
tried these communes, of course it failed, but they were able to begin
to do this. But notice that the failure was the attempt to pass this
through in terms of local commune unal organizers, right the local communist boss or
whatever, trying to run these communal farms or whatever. And they didn't realize
at that stage that maybe there would be better ways to manage these these communes
and these quasi socialist ways of living that would later be solved via technocracy and
smart cities. And I'm not joking. So what the Marxist socialists we're talking
about in the eighteen fifties, this kind of failed, But now we're actually
going into where they wanted to go. Number two, a heavy progressive graduated
income tax. Of course, the irs and all of this is the total
manifestation of this. So they were very successful in getting this through as well
as the Federal Reserve Bank. People don't realize that a federal reserve bank is
actually something that's akin to a more of a Marxist idea of how you would
run the society. And that's why the next plank, or excuse the two
planks later, is the centralization of all banking or credit into the hands of
the state and by means of a national state capital and exclusive monopoly via this
state bank. Now we have that essentially with the privately run Felt Reserve.
And somebody might say, well, that's not communists if it's run by a
private entity. It's run by a bunch of private individuals. Oh, but
you see, Marxism was always about private individuals running these things with this cloak
of humanitarianism. That's why Marxism was always funded by and run by the wealthiest
people out there. But the third plank was the abolition of all rights of
inheritance. Now we haven't gotten that yet. They haven't gotten that yet,
said we people said, oh, clip it, he's one of the marchists.
They haven't gotten that yet. But we're going into that because we do
have pretty heavy taxes on inheritance in the West. Anybody that fled countries or
tried to flee Marxist comingut countries would immediately have their property confiscated. And thus
anybody who rebelled against the system would be deplatformed. I wonder have we seen
any of that. Yes, we're beginning to see that. So notice that
the Fortune one hundred, Fortune five hundred technocrat system, which a lot of
people mistake for being purely a capitalist system, is corporate communism corporate socialism.
It's both of these things. You see, because the corporations themselves they run
on the stock market, they have their publicly traded companies, they run on
the dollar, but they're also private companies with key government interface, and so
they're given a lot of these startups. We're given CIA front company in q
Tel money, right, like I think Google Facebook, right. So it's
a private public private partnership that is more accurately kind of a corporate socialist and
that it is something like communism. So we've seen a few of these planks
already in place. The centralized federal reserve FIAT system, a debt based system
that is actually a plank of the Communist Party, which is in place,
and it's not just in the US. The intended IMF world bank system is
itself a Fabian socialist system. So the Bank for National Settlements is also the
central bank of central banks. It's sort of the federal reserve bank for the
world. And you could say it's basically the same model. So that they
did get through the centralization of all communication and transport to be run by the
state, I would say that we are pretty far down that plank. It's
not totally there, but the corporate state, or the corporate socialist state that
we live under, it's almost there, at least when it comes to shutting
down anybody who dissents the centralized the censorship that we've seen in the last few
years. This is the sixth plank of the Communist Party. It's kind of
there, but remember or at least trying to put it in more and more.
Remember that this is the failed plan. So this is the original eighteen
forty eight planks of the Communist Party that Marx wrote for the League of the
Just, and a lot of this didn't succeed, and so the socialist Marxists
went back to the drawing board. And said, let's let's restrategize and figure
out a different plan. But a lot of this they did get through,
not so much at the time because when they tried to force this stuff in
in the Marxist revolutions, the Red Terror and all that, a lot of
this just didn't work because it was so absurd and idealistic, and the expectations
were that the working class, the proletariat was going to cause all of this
and bring about this revolution. When nobody in the proletariat cares about all of
Marxists theory of values. They're not going to read his boring ass dos capitol.
They want, you know, cigarette breaks, they want lunch breaks.
They don't care about this stuff. And so they had again had to go
to the drawing board. A Number seven was that the state would take over
all of the factories. Now we don't have overt taking over of all of
the corporate world, but you have that public private partnership, which is essentially
the same thing. Again, whether it's a single corporation running everything like a
company town, or whether it's a gigantic centralized government, just think of the
communist government or a Soviet style government. Just think of it as the only
corporation and it's no different than all the other corporations. You say, so
corporate socialism. The next plank was equality of labor exc mean equality of liability
of all to labor. So everybody has a right to work, everybody has
the ability to you know, I guess equality of outcome as well is a
logical conclusion of this, which all of which is absurd because even Marx admitted
that some people are more equipped for certain jobs and can get more work done.
Yeah, we have the equality of outcome for I mean, it just
makes no sense, right, And even though we don't exactly have that yet,
we're beginning to see through a lot of the CRT, a lot of
the woke stuff, a lot of the lowering of standards for graduation, for
education at all levels, calling educationist racism, a calling math racist, all
the stuff that they're pushing. It has the effect of doing what that plank
was intended to do. The ninth plank was the combination of all agriculture and
manufacturing and the abolition between distribution of the population in the country and in the
cities, so you can't have country people being kind of self sufficient and on
their own and all of these city soy bugmen that are derascinated and have to
worship the state. You've got to have everybody packed into cities and equally distribute
this or have an equal distribution of the city people into the country. And
this again has the effect of destroying people's livelihood and structure of life in the
country to make it more metropolitan and to get them to adopt and to likewise
to get people in the city who might be, say in New York,
attached to Wall Street right, to get them attached to more agrarian communal ideas.
And if anyone alex went to New York a year or two ago whenever
that was, and there was the un billboards outside describing the type of life
that you would have in the smart city, it would be this communal I
mean again, it's very much like the older experiments in communal living that the
Marxist socialists tried to do. Number ten plank was the free education for all
via public schools. But of course the public schools are the indoctrination system,
so they're not actually interested in giving all the workers education and giving them the
ability to read, write, and do arithmetic. No, that the education
system is intended eventually to become this is a generation after Marx, a socializing
institution. And this is what Horseman, John Dewey, all these different figures
that dreamt up the American public education system. They said it would be the
socializing tool to bring about the socialist world order. They explicitly said that a
lot of the woman involved an invention of kindergarten. Her name is his Peabody.
She said that kindergarten and socialist education would bring a new Pentecost to the
world. Literally, she saw it in a religious sense. This is the
Alex Jones show. Don't go anywhere. We'll be back in just a second,
as we cover the ten planks of the Communist Party and then how they
had to reorganize it to bring about the technocratic order. Welcome back to the
fourth hour of the Aux jown. So we're talking about the history of the
attempt to bring in a scientific socialist government or a scientific dictatorship corporate socialism.
And the reason that we have to understand that is that you really can't make
sense of all the stuff that's happening and what's happened in the twentieth century with
the two World Wars, and the Cold War, without understanding this game plan,
without understanding this Pigalian dialectical conflict and synthesis, which really undergoes the whole
process of the way that the Milner Fabian elites, Lord Rocheld, Lord Salisbury,
Lord Cecil, all of these different characters, Lord Curtis who were involved
in Ruskin TWAINB. H. G. Wells, all these royal society elites
who had this idea to use socialism as a better means than Marxism. So
even though the elite were in many ways behind funding Marxism from its inception,
even Angles himself was a wealthy stock owner who kind of helped Marx just kind
of moos and lay around and be lazy and write a bunch of nonsense,
it actually ended up being a very interesting technology for destroying societies. And when
the original Marxist plan for the revolution didn't really work, so they had a
few phases of early revolutions. As you may or may not know, we
know the French Revolution was basically a Marxist kind of revolution with the Jacobins,
and then you get Marx coming on the scene, as we said, in
the mid eighteen hundreds, and then you get some revolutions in the eighteen hundreds,
but the real flowering of that revolution was of course the Bolshvic revolution,
right, that was the next phase of this really intense, hardcore terror using
red terror revolution. And the reason for that is that many of these Marxists,
I think, not only were they just completely demonically possessed, but the
Paris Commune, for example, engaged in red terror. That's where Leon trot
excuse meet, Lenin and Trotsky got this idea for red terror from the Paris
Commune and then engaged in all kinds of means and methodologies which would intended to
rip apart the pre this society, completely demolish it so that you could have
corporate socialism set up. And I call it corporate socialism because as we've seen
from Professor Anthony Sutton's works, Bullshriec Revolution was completely funded by the elites in
the West, and so this then led to people in England saying, well
is this going to work? We had the Fabian Society essentially supporting the Bolsheviks.
Beatrice Webb wrote letters to Lenin's wife Krypskaya, very glowingly saying, we
love your Bolshek revolution. We support it. We hope it's successful because we
want to see scientific governance. And if you remember when we had our friend
Rachel Wilson on in her book, she covered the figure of Alexandra Colantai,
who at that time was writing a lot of books and articles about how the
way to bring in the international order would be to destroy the family. And
along with destroying the family, you got to also destroy the nation state because
the nation state's kind of extension of the family, and all of those are
accurately seen by this socialist Marxists as roadblocks to the global order. But what
not many people have understood is the power of monopoly capital to build the order
and the infrastructure that the socialists themselves said they would take over, so the
only way and they actually say this right HG. Well said it. If
you read the Ratu book, he covers it. Very few people have stumbled
onto this, that some of the smarter inner party Marxists figured out that Marxism
itself doesn't have the ability to build a gigantic infrastructure. The energy and power
of capitalism does it can build you know, this global order that's you know
rivals Atlantis right with its advances and it's you know, you know technology,
and you know amazing inventions like coin all this kind of stuff, Right,
none of that comes out of socialism Marxism. But what socialism Marxism does as
a technology is that it is very useful in terms of infecting, subverting,
and turning a nation over to an internationalist power structure. It consolidates wealth and
power and transfers that wealth and power offshore. That's all it does. And
it's very effective at that, and very wealthy, smart people and cutting people
know that. Dumb people in the street think that they're actually going to get
a universal basic income and they're going to get to live in their compods,
and that's not what you get. You don't get any of that. This
is a technocratic order that ultimately has the design of mass depopulation. And so
a lot of this we've already covered, so I don't want to rehearse all
the old stuff. But I'm happy to say that a book that has long
been out of print that independently vindicates everything that we've covered in this great book
is doctor John Cole's other book. We covered the Committee three hundred, but
I guess what he has another book that he wrote, The Former British intelligence
analyst doctor John Comman wrote One World Order of the Socialist Dictatorship. And so,
although it's probably out of print now, because I've been mentioning on my
live streams every time I mentioned a book it sells out. You might be
able to find a copy on Amazon. I don't know. But the thesis
of his book is great because independent from Ratu and all these other texts,
he's coming to the same conclusion that Professor Sutton came to, the same conclusions
that other researchers have come to, and that is that the enemy in the
Cold War wasn't actually Moscow. And people thought that, oh, well,
if we focus everything on, you know, fixing Stalin and fixing Soviet problems
and all this, then we'll finally be able to, you know, breathe
free and the world can be free. You read The Evil Empire and all
that. But as many people who really dig into this research discover the enemy
was actually in Washington. And I don't mean it's just in federal government.
I don't know, the corporate one hundred, corporate fortune one hundred, fortune
five hundred, and the banking elites. That's the real power structure, and
they are allied together in that Anglo American Atlantis's establishment power structure, which includes
Israel as well, in that they would like to set up an eventual technocratic
world socialist dictatorship, and they intend to do this vias certain strategies and means.
Now, we mentioned the Ten Planks of the Communist Party. Some of
those they were successful and some of them weren't so successful. But they also
have another list that they came up with after the Fabian socialists saw the inadequacies
of first Marxist plan, the ten planks and then the actual Bullshriek revolution where
it succeeded where it failed from their vantage point, so they went back to
the drawing board. And when they went back to the drawing board, they
came up with what we call Fabian socialism, which is this slow approach model,
not the overnight worker revolution, but a slow model of gradually bringing in
each of these planks. But they're kind of reorganized. And so the Fabians
came up with a plan and they wrote it up, and this was their
plan back in the days of Woodrow Wilson, under which we had World War
One via the Maschin nations of British intelligence and Colonel Edwin mandel House and under
which we got the Federal Reserve. So big key plans there, sending nations
to war to bankrupt them, to get them involved in an international order,
out of which came the League of Nations. And the League of Nations was
drawn up by Fabian socialists to create a Fabian socialist order. Now, the
League of Nations failed and its ultimate goal. They didn't get what they really
wanted from the League of Nations. However, at the time, according to
doctor Coleman, they drew up plans of a revamped, revitalized version of Marx's
planks. They said, all right, let's let's not go with Marx's ten
planks. Let's let's revamp this and let's come up with seven points that the
Fabian socialists had to take down the United States of America. And why would
they want to take it down? Why wouldn't they want Well, by taking
it down, they mean retooling it and repurposing it for international socialist order objectives.
So it doesn't mean completely destroying the country. It means turning it into
something other than it has been. And they've been very successful in that.
And if we understand this, Fabian socialist model and plan. We actually can
give context and meaning to a lot of the conflicts, a lot of the
events that have been happening in the last the last century, and where we
are today in America twenty twenty three. I mean, this thesis makes sense.
It makes sense of a lot of these things. It makes sense of
why doesn't matter which people you elect. This plan marches forward. And I'm
not trying to break everybody's wills or make you be black pilt, but we
have to see that this is who's really running things right. And remember when
Ron Paul talked about the Federal Reserve. Has everybody just forgotten the Federal Reserve?
I mean Trump at least talked about it, so he wanted to take
actions at least according to some of his campaign talk against the Federal Reserve.
But nobody even thinks or talks about the Federal Reserve. Or have we just
forgotten about this? I mean, that's still running the country. That's still
why, right, we lose our purchasing power and we lose all of our
you know, the dollars Fiat. It's going to nothing right eventually, but
we just forget about that because we're entertained by the next thing on the news,
this person, this mass event or whatever, or oh there's going to
be a new unflicked here or there, and the news just dominates everybody's focus
and attention in a very effective way to forget the real issues. Right,
fortune one hundred, fortune five hundred, big banks, better reserve, that's
what controls the country. So what were the Fabian socialists seven point plans?
The retooled plan that they came up with under the Wilson administration. And remember,
not too long after this you get FDR who pushes the new deal all
drawn up by Fabian Socialists. Well, the number one plank for the new
revamped Fabian plan was we must overcome, not completely destroy the way the Bolsheviks
did, but to permeate and penetrate the Christian religion. What did Klaus say,
It penetrates and Cobntz Klaus is saying the Fabian Socialist strategy permeate and penetrate.
That means take over the institutions, not destroy them like Lenin tried to
do. Just completely destroy the church, tear them all down. That didn't
work, But what they found was much more effective was to create international institutions
like the World Council Churches National Council Churches. Originally before that they had what
they called the Faith Forum or something like that that was sort of the proto
one world religion movement that was going on in the nineteen twenties and thirties that
eventually would morph into the Rockefeller funded World Council of Churches National Council Churches.
And so this strategy was self conscious on the part of these very wealthy people
and their friends in the Fabian society, and amazingly Beatrice Web, George Bernardshaw,
Sydney Web, these Fabian socialist ideaologues, they got a bunch of money
from the British elite. They were also successful in convincing a bunch of very
wealthy American industrialists and entrepreneurs to put a bunch of money into their stuff too.
They impressed Henry Ford, the impressed David Rockefeller, and a host of
other Laura Spelman Rockefeller Fund. She gave tens of millions of dollars to feminist
Fabian socialists. And yes, all the Fabian Socialists were feminists, So there's
an alliance there. They're all part of the same plan in fact, the
entire feminist movement in America all comes from Fabian socialists, literally all of it.
And doctor Coleman has an old chapter on all those women cole and Tai
one of these. You can also read Rachel's books. She covers the same
topic. Now, so permeating and destroying Christianity from within, not completely getting
rid of it, but turning it into something that's a tool of the one
world state. And you have to do that because to level all the religions
and make them essentially all kind of on the same spectrum, they're we all
believe in the same God. There's just one sort of generic God, and
all the religions are pointing to that right, which is kind of a free
Masonic idea. This is the obstacle that they wanted to overcome through permeation and
penetration, through institutional capture. And now you see, of course abatic in
pushing that very thing with the Abrahamic faith house all the world religions together,
or at least the Abrahamic religions, where Paul says that you're not in the
Abraemic religion without Christ. There is no such thing as being in the Abrahamic
faith. Without faith in Christ. Jesus, says John five, Abraham saw
my day right, he worshiped me, Moses believed in me. There's no
Abrahamic tradition if you're a Christian without Jesus, without the Trinity. So that
doesn't exist, this idea that, oh, well, we all have the
same monotheistic Abrahamic faith. Not unless you want to reject the New Testament.
Number two, national pride of nation states. This is the second key plank
in the Fabian socialist seven point plank that had to be destroyed. And that's
because, as we said, pride in your nation state is connected to your
heritage, to your tradition, to your family in America, typically to Christianity
or some form of Christianity for the most part. And so number one it
said religion of Christianity had to be destroyed, especially permeated from within. Destroyer
does not mean totally getting rid of it. It means turning it into a
tool for soft power for global elites to get people into this nascent one world
religion. The national pride has to go away. And we were at that
point, right, So we've seen point one. Yes, they very much
permeated all the institutions that go by the name of Christianity, Protestant, Roman,
Catholic, even in the Orthodox world. They've achieved permeation to push these
kinds of agendas. And we've also seen the decline in belief and pride in
your own nation state in a lot of places in the US. Now you
can't put up the American flag. They call it racist. That's exactly what
the Fabian socialists wanted, and they were actually pretty ahead of their time in
saying we've got to weaponize all term of calling everything racist. That was a
Fabian socialist idea they came up with in the nineteen twenties. So they were
even way ahead of critical race theory stuff. They were pushing the woke stuff
at the same time or decades before anybody in the marxistphere was pushing it.
And again you can see why in order to have an international order, you've
got to get rid of nation states. Nations, people groups don't exist.
And one way you partly get rid of that is by mixing and flooding all
the cultures with foreign cultures. This is called demographic warfare. Has nothing to
do with quote being racist per se. It's an actual strategy of warfare Kelly
Greenhall from I think Stanford one of the big army war colleges. But there's
books written on this, So there's actual military books on this, but you
can't talk about it because it'supposed to be racist. But I mean, just
look up Kelly Greenhall's book, So to Get Rid of the Nation State Prepares
for the International Order patriotism. Patriot is another thing. You can't have pride
or the desire to self defend. And guess what many of the Fabian socialists
were first pushing. They were some of the pioneer groups to push in the
eighteen nineties, nineteen hundreds, nineteen tens and twenties, pacifism, passivism.
You don't hear passivism talked about much, but passivism is actually a socialist technique
of disarmament, because remember passivism is not just about oh I'm anti war.
I mean I'm typically anti war because most of the wars are not fought for
the reasons that we're told. They're fought for very powerful, wealthy people,
corporate interests, and so forth. So that's why I don't support I'm not
dying for coke and PEPSI In other countries, so that Iraq and Ukraine can
have subway and abortions. Why would I want to die for that? But
patriotism has to go away because patriotism stands in the way of you being obasent
to the international order. And a lot of what you see here is actually
outlined in Brave New World. Remember we just covered Brave New World again recently,
and so this one world socialist dictatorship, not Marxists, but socialists.
There is a difference, the difference being reorganized reform. Marxism is Fabian socialism,
and that's the effective model. That's the model that has turned the EU
socialists. They were all Fabians. All of these international institutions like the IMF,
the World Bank, they're all Fabian socialist institutions. John n ter kains
Fabian socialists. The Eastern Seaboard establishment colleges, they're all peopled by and have
been run for decades by people who adhere to Fabian socialism or forms of socialism.
And there might be the occasional, you know, and Randean type professor
here or there, but that's a super minority. That's the majority of where
people are going. In the last fifty sixty years in their thought process is
towards socialism. All of the millennials and zoomers that think they're going to get
a UBI and think they're going to get that, all that socialism is nonsense.
It's a trap. It's a tool to get you into this slave system.
And doctor John Coleman is one hundred percent correct that all of these socialist
countries become slave states. It doesn't deliver the promises, and it doesn't matter
how many times it fails. People still believe in it because they just say,
well, socialism does work, but the capitalists sabotage it. We're always
sabotaged by the evil capitalists. And it's like, how could you be sabotaged
by the people that are funding and helping you come to power. Monopoly capitalism
is what allows socialism to even occur. It funds it, it aids it.
And the deeper inner party elite know this. They even say that in
their books. H. G. Wells says to the Marxist stop being done
Marxists thinking that the capitalists are your enemy. He says this, He says,
who do you think will build the international structure that we will take over
the capitalists? Number four plank of the reorganized Fabian strategy is we must get
rid of or change the notion of the United States Constitution and it's rule by
law. So even though not everything in the Constitution is necessarily ideal from my
vantage point, it could be a lot more explicit in some of its values
and so forth. It's kind of an Enlightenment deist ish John Locke type thing.
So, but it also has a lot of good points in it as
well. And one of those things, though, the good points, is
that there's limitations to power and limitations of centralization that's baked into the Constitution and
our form of government. Right, so everybody has these rights, but that's
all being eroded by design. It wrote it by design a long time ago.
Again, this is the nineteen tens, I think, when the Fabians
drew up this their plan, their seven plank plan nineteen tens twenties to completely
change the landscape of America. And here we are one hundred years later after
this plan was drawn up, and most of this seven point plank they've gotten
in. So the Constitution has changed because the Constitution limits the power of the
centralization model that these people all want. And so again AOC she doesn't know
anything about this stuff, but she's default a socialist of this order precisely because
she's a perfect product of this brainwashing and corporate control that created her. You
see. So the corporate socialism I'm talking about churns out the aocs as an
example. Who are turning our country into the very thing that the Fabians said
they wanted one hundred years ago. Number five, get rid of the or
excuse me, implement the graduated income tax the IRS system, and of course
that occurred. Number six, excuse me, Number seven the final plant or
excuse me, I guess he's got this misnumber. So it's six planks.
The six plank is free trade. And this is relevant because when doctor Coleman
was writing this book was back at the time when Ross Perrot was talking about
NAFTA and free trade and GAT and all that, and then it would be
a giant sucking sound destroying the industry in the country. Of course, that's
true. Free trade is a social Fabian socialist plan. Now people blow their
heads explode when you say this, because they say, wait a minute,
that's a free US free market. What do you mean free trade? Now?
Did you know that if you go to Marxist dot org you can find
the articles where Marks and Ingles themselves argued for free trade. Why would they
argue for free trade, that's a that's a capitalist idea, because free trade
allows for the devaluation of the existing population's labor and their quality of goods,
because it allows for the prices to collapse. And Marx knew this, and
he actually says in one of his talks that hopefully this would cause the proletariat
to get enraged and overthrow the country. So again that's one example of Marx
and Engles saying that let's institute a horrible policy that is damaging to the American
worker or the worker of the nation state to enrage them, to try to
cause the revolution. So it's it's economic warfare and chaos to try to destroy
the country, to bring it down and Beatrice and Sydney, weby the famous
socials actually know that. They actually said these policies don't actually work to help
the economy. They knew that it damages the middle class, it helps the
zero point zero one percent, But in destroying the economy, they actually believed
gradually bringing it down, destroying it over time, sapping it of the dollar's
purchey power, all of that. They actually believe that this would lead to
everyone crying out for an international order, save us, Save us, the
very thing Klaus talks about, the collapses, the wars, all of this,
and I think that this could tie it into the potentiality of World War
three that we may be going into. I mean, war is the health
of the state. War allows regions to be rebuilt. All of this A
lot of the military user complex, of course makes a bunch of money off
that, but it's also a way to say, all of all this conflict
resulted from religion and from nation states and the Bible, and it's time to
throw all that away and enter into the pure Luciferian order of a one world
socialist dictators. There's no religions except the pure worship Lucifer. There's no nation
states. There's just the technocracy. There's just the computers and the centralized grid
giving you your nutrients and your compot and then we get rid of you.