Attention. You're listening to the Todd Huff radio show, America's home for conservative
not Bitter Talk radio. Be advised. The content of this program has been
documented to prevent and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lead
to the right. Here's your conservative but not Bitter host, Todd Huff,
Conservative Not Bitter. Indeed, my friends, you have tuned in to America's
home for Conservative not bitter talk. Hope you had a wonderful Labor Day weekend.
It took one extra day here yesterday. My apologies for not being here,
but if you want to be part of today's discussion hit the ground running
on this shortened holiday week, you can do so by emailing Todd at totufshow
dot com. You can also text us three one seven two one zero twenty
eight thirty. That is direct access, direct access to yours truly here in
the studio, and it's a pleasure to to be here today. You know,
I heard from one of you yesterday who actually I wanted to start with
this because doctor Jill Biden was in Indianapolis, specifically Westfield High School. For
those of you who are in this, I know we got listeners all over
the country, all over the world in fact, but here in central Indiana
Westfield High School, doctor doctor Jill Biden showed up recently, and that was
just days before she announced that she had tested positive for COVID. Of course
she made this announcement over action, maybe on Labor Day week was it Labor
Day itself, I don't know. On the holiday weekends like this, I
lose track of specific time time a little bit. It was one of the
days between the last time I was on here and today. But doctor Jill
Biden announced that she had COVID after being here in central Indiana, and my
first thought was, all, here we go. If Trump did this,
it would be called a super spread or event. But then I realized it
was a Biden, so nobody was probably there, although she was attending a
high school, so kids were forced to be there, something that the Left
loves to force, you know. The left says this is a whole We're
not going to get into this today, but it just made me realize and
it's worth reiterating and saying to you. The Left positions itself as a party
of choice. They want you to think that they are pro choice, in
fact, pro choice on the issue of abortion. That's it, my friends.
They're not pro choice on anything else nothing. You want the choice to
carry a firearm, they're not cool with that. You want the choice to
decide where your tax dollars are spent for your child's education, No way,
no how. You want the choice on whether or not you get vaccinated,
or wear a mask, or comply with some authoritative, out of control government
shutdown, Nope, not going to be in favor of that either. I
mean you get down. You want a choice on whether or not you can
join a union, Nope, they're not happy with that. They want you
to be forced to do that. Incidentally, you know, my dad and
I talk about this. My dad, former you a w REP? Who
you a w It's potentially on the verge of a strike, which could cause
all sorts of problems for an already beaten and battered auto industry. Thank you
leftist policies, Thank you Joe Biden, Thank you inflation caused by aforementioned people.
There. But my dad and I talk about this, and you know
there's I think that there's absolute common ground on this. I think that there
is anyway there should be If you don't want to join a union, okay,
but also don't think that you should have access to all the things that
a union provides to its members, which some of you say, fine,
no big deal. Others of you are I know, are members of unions.
Your unions shouldn't be forced to defend people or whatever who are not part
of it anyway, but they don't want They the left are not pro choice
on anything other than well, I think two things, abortion and changing your
gender, which leads me to another story here that's in the stack of stuff.
There's a judge that ruled that kids are going to have to be forced.
Parents have no way, no constitutional right, according to this radical judge,
to pull their kids out of courses in high schools, in schools I
don't know if it's all high school. It might be kindergarten for all we
know. They shouldn't be able to pull their kids out of classes where they
are studying or lgbt school lessons, which of course means lgbtq i AA plus
indoctrination, because that's what it means. My goodness, there's so many side
stories. Oz texted me something where there has and I can't even get into
this today. But all these, all of these things that all tie together
right in the battle that we're facing. There's been some something that was shared
on social media lately that showed the plan of the LGBT. Fact back in
the day, it was probably just the lgb community and how they planned to
infiltrate basically schools and government and lo and behold here we are today. But
if you look at their plans and strategy, I mean, it's exactly what
I just said. It's exactly what I just said. It's the subtle indoctrination
into these into these policies and issues. Anyway, what I want to start
with today, all that stuff is true and important. I want to start
here with something that is actually what I consider quite good news, and that
is there's a pull out showing that Trump and a Santists have high net favorability
ratings with Republicans. And all that basically means is is if you look at
the number of people in a poll who say that they like or whatever,
they have a favorable opinion of a particular candidate, and then you subtract the
people who say they have a negative opinion of that candidate, that's called your
net favorability. So let's just say, for example, I think Trump's was
something like I'm ball parking here, but it was something like seventy two percent
favorability, you know, people that either had a favorable or highly favorable opinion
of Trump. Seventy two percent, I think was the number, and if
it wasn't, it was close to that. And then twenty percent had a
negative viewpoint in the Republican Party of Trump. So that's a net. You
take the seventy two seventy two pot the you know, positive favorability of Trump
the twenty negative favorability of Trump. If you want to look at it that
way, you take seventy two minus twenty. I don't want to get all
mathematical here. In case a Bernie Sanders subscriber listener has tuned in today,
the seventy two minus twenty would be fifty two. So then that would be
the net favorability plus fifty two. So Trump and de Santis have high favorability
ratings. I think De Santis's was forty forty four. I believe even the
forties, Trump was fifty two. I believe the two candidates who have a
not so good favorability rating. In fact, Chris Christie's is negative. Chris
Christie's is negative in the Republican Party amongst GOP voters, and I think Pence's
was as as well. Let's see here, Christy has a negative fifty five
point favorability seventy three percent disapproving, eighteen percent approving his record, so that
would be eighteen minus seventy three, which, boy, oh boy, if
a Bernie Sanders person tunes in, and here's that there's such a thing as
negative numbers. In fact, when socialists run the world, everything's a negative
number, so they might actually they might know more about this. But eighteen
positive rating for Chris Christie seventy three puts us into the negative negative fifty five.
And this guy's running from president. He thinks he can beat Trump,
he thinks he's the nominee. I actually think this guy is being funded my
people who simply want to see him take Trump out. This guy's got no
chance of the nomination. This guy's got even less chance of winning the presidency.
But here we are negative fifty five percent approval rating. And I thought
I had Pinces in here as well. What is pinces? Yeah, Pinces
is underwater as well. Sixty three percent of Republican primary voters Viewpence unfavorably,
so sixty three percent negative, thirty six percent very favorable favorably, so you
got thirty six minus the sixty three and he's underwater as as well. So
that is a snapshot of just where the candidates stand as we're moving headlong into
well, we're September now, the primary. The first votes would be cast
in not too far after the first of the year in twenty twenty four,
and we're quickly approaching the fourth quarter of twenty twenty three, so it's really
close. It's not that far away. A few months away. People will
be casting their first first ballots four months or so, maybe four and a
half months. So it's starting to take shape. We've got all the stuff
happening with Trump, of course, we've got all of the stuff happening.
Nobody cares really about the other stuff happening with the other GOP candidates. And
it appears that all of the people who are the talking heads the media,
the left, people that were sitting around the table speaking with George Stephanopoulos this
past weekend are all finally coming to the conclusion that we all we have come
to folks, years ago. It is remarkable to me and I go back
and forth. I'll be honest with you, I don't know sometimes if these
jokers and clowns just don't want to admit the truth, or if they genuinely
don't know the truth. Now, there are some truths that I absolutely know
that they don't know. But I also think sometimes they live in that bubble
so much. They live in the bubble that promotes these leftist ideas. They
live in the DC bubble or the elite circles, and they don't understand.
They don't understand the Trump voter, they don't understand the Trump movement. And
again, as I've said on this program before, and this is something I
wish President Trump would accept or like now maybe he's accepted it. I don't
know acknowledge a little bit more is that this movement is greater than him.
And now in a lot of ways, he of course is being directly targeted.
We know this, We've been through this extensively. But he's being targeted
politically, and the government is being weaponized against him. It has been weaponized
against him in the past, it is currently being weaponized against him today.
And of course we all have to come to the realization that the government will
absolutely be weaponized against him in the future as well. And so it's like
people are in the leftist and the media circles. They have no idea.
They can't understand why this assault on Trump, which they will of course frame
as legitimate, defend as necessary, talk about as though it is saving our
democracy. That's what they want. Oh, it's saving our democracy, tide.
This is if we didn't have these folks willing to stand up to the
authoritarianism of Trump, we would be complete, incomplete collapse. We would be
basically a fascist state. We would be slaves to Trump and all this sort
of stuff. That's the position in the argument. This is so disingenuous and
patently absurd in every conceivable way, but yet it gets traction in some circles.
And I don't know if they just want to sell out so much to
the idea so as not to show any hint of trying to relate to or
give any amount of credibility whatsoever to the opposition to Trump's actual side, or
if it's just genuinely that they cannot even see it because they've been blinded by
their well, their allegiance to the movement of the radical left. But it's
as though they have these glimpse says. And I want to play some soundbites
as we get into the program today. Donna Brazil, former head of the
DNC, the Democrat Party. She was remember she was the one who helped
rig allegedly an election in favor of Hillary against Bernie. Yeah, that's actually
where elections are rigged and so forth, leaking questions, making sure that they
kept their super delegates, which is to me, you go back in time
and you look at what the Democrat Party has done just internally. The idea
of super delegates, to me is a perfect illustration, a perfect symbolism of
how they really think about the average person, because they didn't want the average
people. The reason they were super delegates, which basically meant voters who could
decide who the nominee for president was back in twenty sixteen and however long they
had their super delegate situation, but they wanted to have people, prominent people
right the party that talks about being for the little guy. They wanted the
little guys vote to be watered down by the superdelegates. And when the superdelegates
all started to support Hillary Clinton, which was the plan from the beginning.
Maybe a few notable exceptions, but the plan from the beginning was to do
that back in twenty sixteen, and it wiped out any sort of grassroots support
that Bernie would have gotten or did get during the twenty sixteen campaign cycle.
But she was involved in that was her DNC. But even she's coming to
the realization that this Trump Maga movement is an actual movement. It's not just
people who voted for an individual. This is something much much deeper. She
compares it, in fact, to supporters of Reagan back in the nineteen eighties,
supporter of Mama in two thousand and eight and two thousand and twelve,
the Hope and Change movement, which was a movement. I'm not going to
deny that it's a movement. However, that no one knew what it stood
for. It was one of those things that people felt good about because it
sounded right. It had no depth. What are we hoping in and what
changes are we embracing? It didn't matter. That was in a sense,
the beauty of the campaign was that you could be anything and anybody and jump
into that movement. Because it was all about electing America's first black president and
all that sort of stuff, which, again, as I've I'm on record
as saying, it's a good thing that America has gotten to the point where
we are able and willing to vote for a black president. We just simply
should not be voting for someone because of that or because of anything else like
that, whether they're white, black, any of this stuff that you understand
when you're five years old. So timeouts in order. I've got some sound
bites I want to play here from George Stephanopoulos's program, which you undoubtedly didn't
watch, because no one watches this crap anymore. Donna Brazil's on there.
There's some other folks as well. They're all more or less confused, including
George Stephanopolis, as to why Trump is even still able to show his face
in public, let alone, let alone instill the sort of confidence he has
in the vast majority of the Republican Party right now, which I referenced earlier
in this segment. Timeout is in order, though, my friends, long
in this segment, you're listening here to conservative not better talk. I am
your host, the one, the only Todd huff Back in just a minute,
Welcome back, my friends. By the way. By the way,
if you want to see the latest specials, discounts sales offered by my Pillow,
you can go to the website my pillow dot com slash Todd that is
my first name, of course, you can go and take a look at
some of their sales. They've got a six piece towel set on sale again.
Use promo code Todd on any of these items. You can get a
buy one get one free on the my Pillow two point zero. They've got
original my slippers discounted sale price saves you a lot of money as well,
so getting towel sheets, pillows, mattress toppers, slippers, yes, even
dog beds. Dog beds. We've got Echo and Tango, who both love
they're my Pillow dog Pit. You can check out those specials by going to
my pillow dot com slash Todd. Use promo code Todd during checkout to receive
savings of up to eighty percent in some instances My pillow dot Com slash Todd
promo code Todd during checkout. So during the break, during the break,
at well before the break, I should say, I was talking about how
the left is just now starting to realize that President Trump has started a movement.
This is not just something about a campaign from twenty twenty or a campaign
as we head into twenty twenty four, or a campaign that first started back
in twenty sixteen. This is about something much greater. The left either doesn't
understand you, those of us in flyover country, those of us who find
something about Trump, his message, whatever he's trying to do, whatever we
whatever, connects with us in that they don't even want to understand that.
They want to brand us as racists, as bigots, as stupid, idiotic
morons who aren't capable of seeing the brilliance that is brought to us on a
daily basis by the Democrat Party, and the stupidity and the danger not just
the stupidity of Trump. It used to just be the stupidity. They learned
quickly that that was not going to get it done, so they had to
scare the heck out of people. And it has worked in to a large
extent amongst people who are, of course in the low information voter crowd.
They'll regurgitate and repeat the same silly, ridiculous assertions about Trump made by the
Democrat Party, by the media, and of course now they're weaponizing that the
Apartment of Justice to do everything they can to take him out. I've been
through this before, but I think it is worth noting and remembering. The
things that Trump is being indicted for happened two and a half years ago,
closing in on three years ago. The things that Trump is being indicted for
more or less. I mean, there's some exceptions here. Of course,
there's what are they're now ninety one charges, so I can't speak with complete
with I'm speaking with a broad brush, and there's some exceptions to this,
But basically this all goes back to his response to the twenty twenty election,
which, of course, I mean all this is tied together. It is
all tied together, and at the core of all of this, at the
core of all this to the Trump voter and the left either doesn't want to
understand this, they don't want to talk about it, they don't want to
acknowledge it, or they're scared of it something, but they do not want
to have to acknowledge that Trump and the support that he has is about something
more than what they're telling us, or something other than what they're telling us,
because in the vast majority of cases, what they tell us it's about
actually has zero to do with it. It has nothing at all to do
Why you, for those of you who voted for Trump, voted for Trump,
Why I voted for Trump? Why Oz or whoever else voted for Trump?
The things that they say are important to us, or of course it's
false, it's fake news. And so then when we hear Trump saying those
things, it simply says, he's acknowledging what we have dealt with for a
long time. He is acknowledging, he is verbalizing, he is verbalizing boldly
some of the problems that we have seen in our government. Folks. I
don't know if you know this, and it's in the stack of stuff,
but the fiscal year twenty twenty three budget, which ends here shortly, we
are on pace to have a two trillion, with a t trillion, with
a tr actually trillion, not to be confused with million or billion, but
trillion. Each Each time you move up, each time you move up from
one of those words to the other, from million to billion, it's a
thousand times bigger from million, from billion to trillion, it's a thousand billions.
That's what a trillion is. That's why the highest number of billions before
each say, trillion is nine hundred and ninety nine billion, A thousand billions
is a trillion, and so those words are separated by degrees of one thousand
magnitudes. We are two trillion dollars, two trillion dollars short of what of
the money we've brought in versus the money we've spent out. We have spent
out two trillion, more than trillion then we've brought in. Now the left
tears at and they think, ah, we need to tax the wealthy.
We need to go after millionaires and billionaires and make sure they pay their fair
share in taxes. Folks, they can raid one hundred percent. I'm not
endorsing this, but just to make the point, they can raid the coffers
of every billionaire on well in America today and not even begin to touch the
scope of the problem. It wouldn't even get us through it's months. It's
not even if they took everything and left these folks with nothing, which I
am one hundred percent not endorsing for multiple reasons. I mean, that's absolutely
tart. You talk about weaponizing the government. There you go, and I
don't even necessarily I like a lot of these people. But I don't think
that I have. I'm entitled. The government's entitled to their billions. Anyway,
we're two trillion dollars in deficit spending in fiscal year twenty twenty three,
that's where it looks like we're gonna end up. That's twice as much as
what it was in twenty twenty two. Yet Biden is out there touting Bidenomics
the White House campaign. They're telling us how great it is, how much
people love this two trillion, one trillion dollars of deficit spending, of spending
money we don't have from last year is a bad problem. We've doubled that
the two trillion, and yet Biden wants to tell you he's reducing the deficits.
They lie in wait, they just they lie boldly. They don't even
care they know the average person either, the people the people that know,
we know, so we're not going to be fooled by anything they say.
We know that they're professed deceivers. They lie to us constantly. We can
we have zero percent interest in taking anything they say seriously other than we know
it might affect our lives, our businesses, our families, our freedoms.
We take that part seriously, but we don't take them at their word as
though they're telling us the truth. We know better. And then there's the
group of people that just they hear these things and they'll post them on social
media. In fact, in the stack of stuff that they've got a list
of so called it's a meme or a graphic. I guess should be a
meme that's mocked relentlessly. But if Biden's so called accomplishments and all it does
is listed, it does a list legislation. The first one is the Inflation
Reduction Act. Wow, he passed the Inflation Reduction Act. I remember talking
about this. It literally had no impact on inflation. It said it would
actually the studies showed that in the first couple of years it actually would increase
inflation, and then it would decrease it. But over the course of ten
years there was a net zero effect on inflation. Yet they call it the
Inflation Reduction Act. People applauded on the left because they don't think about it.
They either are trying to push the narrative and they don't care about the
truth, or they're blinded from seeing the truth. Nonetheless, they're applauding that,
thinking some sort of accomplishment. So you've got the people who just aren't
going to care. They don't care about reality. They want what these leftists
are pushing for. You've got people like the vast majority of you and me
who don't take anything these jokers and clowns say. Seriously. We know that
they are a threat to our liberties, to our freedoms, to our finances,
to our families, to our churches, to our schools, every facet
of our lives. They are a threat to We get that. But then
there's the people in between there who either don't know a lot, can be
easily led astray. Those are the people they're after. Those are the people
that they are after, And those are the people that I'm after, And
those are the people you should be after. To speak truth to this situation,
we are in a mess. We're folks, weren't a deadly situation here.
We are talking the life and death, the survival of this constitutional republic,
your children's future, their health, their sanity, their ability to have
a job, the economy they're gonna live in, the economy we're gonna live
in next week, whether or not there's gonna be wars. I mean,
we're it's just it's incredible what we're witnessing here, and so timeouts in order
I want to play these sound bites. I know I got along this segment,
but I'm gonna play these sound bites. Next segment, Donna Brazil acknowledging
we have a movement by Trump, and then just conversation from people on that
panel, with George Stephanopoulos saying things that you and I have known for years,
literally for years. They're just now coming to this realization in spite of
everything going on for all this time, they've not caught onto it. They
didn't care about it. I don't know. They're out of things to talk
about other than coming to grips with a possibility that this guy, President Trump
has a legitimate chance of being the president of the United States again after the
campaign at twenty twenty four. So quick, time out, play some sound
bites. When we get back to my friends, sit tight, you're listening
to conservative not better talk. I am your host, Todd huff back in
a minute, welcome back, my friends. Sorry, Oz is out today,
so it's just me playing solo here. So I want to get to
this sound this is the first. I don't know if I have time for
the second. It's the second one is a little bit longer, which is
the other issue I have here. But I just want you to hear Donna
Brazil, and I want you as you think about the campaign, as you
think about all the things that we know that have happened here, the weaponization
of the government against President Trump and all these things, and I just want
you to almost again. I don't know if she is not wanting to accept
this, if she's out of excuses, if she's just now coming to the
realization of this, or what, but she now understands that this is a
movement. The government of this country has infuriated massive amounts of people, and
I want all of you to take hope in that now we still have to
have people who can and this is where I think you have a role.
I have a role in shaping and directing that anger at the proper sources.
I think that this becomes the next step. There is enough anger where people
are motivated to do something, but a lot of people still don't know.
They just know they're they're mad. They don't know who to direct it at.
It's almost like I remember I remember a few years ago. This just
came to me as I was thinking about this. I remember a few years
ago I was at the park with my son. I was running, I
think he was on his bike, and I ran in this one part of
the trail. It's under some really big trees, but they're you know,
it's it's shaded, but the trees are really tall. It's not like they're
right at head level or something. I'm talking like sixty plus feet and I'm
running through here, and all of a sudden, I feel something on the
back back of my neck, like my shoulder area and my back my neck,
and it's just bang, bang bang. It started. And I realized
by the second or third time, because at first, honestly, it was
around the fourth of July, and I didn't know if because there were some
people that were setting off some fireworks and so forth. I wasn't sure.
I thought, did I just get hit by some ember or something. I
felt something hot on the back of my neck, but it wasn't heat.
It turned out to be a sting, and I remember ripping off the shirt
and just swinging and wailing my head in my hands and just trying to get
the horn It was a hornet, is what it was. Trying to get
the bald face hornet off of me, we end up getting it was in
my shirt. It stung me in the hand too, because I as I
grabbed my shirt in my hand, I didn't see it stung me in the
hand and in the neck, the back. And the point is and telling
that story, it's not to give you visuals here, but to say that's
how a lot of the people are in the country today. They are they
know they're getting pain inflicted. They're not necessarily sure the source. They don't
even know where it is. At the moment, I didn't know where that
little sucker was in my shirt, and that's why it stung me in the
hand. And actually it's an apt analogy because when we go to use our
hand to press the ballot or to pull the lever in the voting booth,
it can sting us again if we make the wrong choice. And that's where
I think we have a lot of responsibility on our part to help direct this
anger, to tell people, hey, there's the hornet, there's the metaphorical
hornet, there's the source of your pain and discomfort, and maybe friends,
there are places that there's discomfort coming from that. You and I aren't necessarily
quick to point out because we see all the other stuff and we got to
be well, I'm cool with accepting some of that, but the main source
of our our problems today are in Washington, DC. But listen to don
and Brazil here. Well, that's the question, Donna Brazil, what happens
when it actually comes to a general election. We've we did. There is
a pattern in the last couple of elections where the Democrats are winning the close
races because I think the Democrats understand that, you know, you can be
the superficial, which would you know. What we're seeing on the Republican side
was substance and the substance to policies of the practices of a Biden Harris administration
improving people lives this past week, this uh, this movement to reduce prescription
drug crisis. That's going to help Democrats. But I have to say something,
because George, I'm old enough to say this. I want to pause.
She's about to say. I kept this part in because I just wanted
to point out kind of what I just alluded to. She's saying that Republicans
are superficial and the left. The Democrat Party has substance. This is one
hundred and eighty degrees out of whack, one hundred percent wrong. The Democrats
of the Party of superficiality. The Democrats want to use the talking points to
keep people angered at somebody because they have a certain amount of income, or
that they're certain race, or a certain gender, or a certain this,
or that it's not us folks. I welcome anybody. I welcome anybody to
this movement. I was talking to Bernie Sanders fans earlier in the program.
Have a little bit of fun with them because they're not good at math or
they don't care about math. I don't think that they're all some terrible people,
ain't There's some good people who I bought into this nonsense. They either
don't pay attention or don't understand it, or just have ideas that I think
are completely wrong. It doesn't make them bad people. The bad people are
the ones that are trying to manipulate us anyway. But she's got it backwards
here. But listen to what she says here, and then I gotta take
a break. I've seen two movements outside of the social justice movements, in
my life. On the political side, why was the Reagan movement? Reagan
had a hold on his base the country at large. He did. They
saw him as someone who was willing to stand up for American values. Whatever
that might have met. Now, I thought it was reaction. The other
movement I saw it was Barack Obama hope and change that galvanized the American people.
I've never seen anything like this with Donald Trutt's right. I mean,
what doesn't kill you make you stronger. I mean being convicted, I mean
being indicted. That's making him stronger. Raising ten million dollars using an ugly
mug shot to raise money. This is a movement. And anyone who thinks
that you can apply the old political rules to trying to defeat this candidate based
on he's scary, he's ugly, whatever you might want to call him,
this is a movement, and we'd have to respect the fact that Gamlas Okay,
So, by the way, did you notice she just said that the
Democrat Party was a party of substance. But then she said the old techniques
for defeating candidates like Trump are to say he's scary and he's ugly. Boy.
That is super depth in depth and super profound. Is it not talk
about superficial? Give me a break. But she's admitting here to George Stephanopolis
and to the fifteen or twenty years watching this crap that they are, that
they know that they're traditional strategies which we've laid out on this program. They
don't work against Trump, and that, in some sense should cause us to
have a little bit of rejoicing. But in another sense it should terrify us,
because what in the world is coming next. I put nothing past these
jokers and clowns timeouts in order, though my friends sit tight back in a
minute, I'm back, my friends. Not a lot of time here.
But as I've told you before, and as you well know, you know
this, you know this deep down in your bones. This is the time.
It's going to just get amped up from here. This is not for
the faint of heart. We cannot lose heart. We cannot be we cannot
be discouraged. We have to know that we have a huge amount of people
that are awakened to this, some that are awakened to the problem, but
still don't understand who, who to blame, what to do about it.
This is going to get more and more intense by the day, week,
month, as we move closer and closer to the election. Quick time out,
my friends, just out of time, here, back in, back
in just a got here we go back in just a minute. Welcome back
to my friends. Unfortunately that is all of the time that we have today,
but my friends, never fear. You can always catch on core episodes
of this program on our podcast on the web site Todd Huffshow dot com,
slash listen, or go to your favorite podcast host. We've also got a
newsletter that's free that where we actually is not a newsletter, it's our weekly
column which we'll go out on Wednesdays. Can sign up for that on the
website as well, Todd Huffshow dot com. Just scroll down a little bit
from the top of the page and you'll see where you can sign up for
that. And I don't blame you if you don't get enough of me in
this program, my friends, but I've got to go. Thank you so
much for listening. Have a great day. SDG.