And we are alive. It is Friday, July twelfth, two thy twenty
four. Good morning from the blocked out Sunseuch Sunshine State. Yeah, yeah,
lovely. They do a lot of messed up things in Florida, yet
it's supposed to be the free state, even though the Santus is the Zionest
Man of the Year. Well he was in twenty nineteen or something like that.
Okay, so I need an audio check from you. It's loudest hack
in my ears, but the little green meter that's on stream yard is barely
moving and it's not usually like that. So please let me know if I'm
sounding very low, because if I am, there's or if it sounds weird,
like if it doesn't sound like a full microphone voice, then I know
that it's trying to use the microphone that's in my camera and that's far away,
and it'll sound like a really crappy microphone, like if you're talking through
like a laptop or something without a mic. So if you can tell me
if the audio is okay, that's what I was messing with. That's why
I'm a little bit late, because I noticed that the green meter when I
do the audio test before I come in, was not raising as high as
it usually does, and I don't know why. It's always something with streamyard
and I took out the hopefully I think I figured out what was clipping.
It sounds a bit lower than normal. What the fuck? Oh my god?
Yeah, yeah, so why though? It doesn't make any sense?
Uh huh, I'm looking right now through the audio. Yeah, it says
I'm on the right things. It says I'm on the road caster which or
cast jet blah blah blah. Communications get yeah, default microphone, Yes,
so it's yeah, but it's way low like I can't ah, I can't
get any higher than that. It doesn't make any sense why it's doing that
at all. So if i'm if I'm way lower, then we' we have
problems. It's gonna be a real problem. It doesn't make it like it's
why would it be muffling it? I don't get it. I don't even
know how you fix something like that. Maybe if I yeah, no,
that's the same, that's the same setting. The speakers are in the wrong
spot. Maybe it looks like it's yeah, I you know, I think
it's screwing something up here. Hold on, Yeah, whatever I think they're
putting both on the same line. Again, I think that might be an
issue. Let me see if I they just make changes. I don't fucking
get it. Uh, let's see if I can do the microphone on main.
Yeah, there's this HP h Hewlett packard switch that jacks things up,
and then streamyard does its best to jack things up the road. The roadcaster
board is fine. It's just all these little shit buttons that come in between
that that screwed everything up. So that says the speakers of that, and
then this is the speakers here. Let me see if I change the speakers
over the main. Sorry, guys, I didn't walk I walked into problems
right after I take a nice, friendly, happy poop and come in here,
and you get problems, you know. Oh, let's see. If
that's the main, then we're to the hell that's the problem. To me,
this is set up right. Let me let me just see something.
I don't want to mess with things too much because a screw shot up there.
All right, all we better know we're worse now, we're even worse.
That's fantastic. All right, let's try this then, m let's try
Okay, are we still here? Can you see me again, give me
a hello. Yeah, I know, I know it's down. Whenever you
make any adjustments on stream Yard while you're in progress, it shuts everything down
because it's retarded. It has to do with the browser. But if somebody
can tell me if you see me now, otherwise the game's over. Are
you nine percent? It's a nine percent? All right. So apparently if
I want to go stereo mode, it makes the microphone super low. Don't
ask me why they do that, but yeah, so I have to have
echo cancelation on just a stupid setting. Everybody's gay. Everybody's gay, all
right. So sorry about the very slow introduction today. We lost our time
to place some muzak. We gonna have to get the muzak box. You
know, like when you worked at a fast food restaurant that was called the
muzak box. They played the same ten songs over and over and over again
until me dud insane. Yeah, good times, especially if you're doing the
night shift. Love it. It's too quiet. It's all you have to
do this here. That's stupid music. Good times. So let's get into
it. We're going to be watching the final installment in that series, called
The inter of Ascher logos and it's called The Interconnectedness of Aryan Peoples. And
this one was put out about eight months ago. And here we go.
This one's one hour and four minutes. So yes, we will have time
to do other stuff. But I have to tell you, I have to
tell you. Gotta tell you something. Ready, let me tell you,
let me show you something. Actually in the description, I'm sorry. In
the chat, very top should still be there, but sometimes Rumble deletes shit.
If you scroll to the very top, you should see a link that
says I will be going on to FTJ Media Live this night Nation Review and
or National whatever night National Review, I think it or something like that,
but I think that's abbreviated for the thing. But it's gonna be at ten
am so rate after this, so I have to kind of cut out a
couple of minutes early so I can get on with Giuseppi on their stream yard,
and then I have to talk about stuff that I'm not an expert in.
It's whatever. It's like, I've watched the same stuff, so I
can kind of sort of comment on it. All right, So there we
go, and so yeah, and it go over to f Tjmedia dot Com
and get yourself an account, super easy to do. If you want to
actually upload stuff, then you just have to talk to Josh, which I
would highly recommend. Just becoming part of the members, becoming a member of
the Telegram group, which is free obviously, but doctor Monzo is in that
group. Josh has been in that group. He's an admin, so is
doctor Monzo. So yeah, do that. It's called Friends of Ball,
Friends of Doctor Monzo and Ballbusterers and what I named it after meeting doctor Manzo.
Yeah yeah, okay, so yeah, it sucks that I can't have
stereo sound and also echo cancelation or just the lack of echo cancelation. But
anyway, I wanted to test the music today because I took off this stupid
thing that was saying that it was, you know, adjusting the mic settings
and I didn't even know it was a new feature that they just decided to
add to it, reduced mic background noise, and I think that's what was
make the music kind of like sound like a sign wave, like it would
get you'd hear it, okay, and then it would like downscale it,
you know, it would like throttle it down, and it sounded like an
old cassette tape that was wearing out. Didn't like that feeling, didn't like
that sound. Okay, let's get it going. Enough talk, you talk.
I kind of wasted all my time to do an intro. They wasted
my time. All right, So we're starting this way from the beginning.
I will be here to comment. It's begun to lead us all into it.
Got a minute. Shut the fuck up. I can't stand YouTube.
Okay, hopefully it doesn't try to jump ahead again bout this and it's not
in full screen either. Have we done now? Fuck? Okay, technical
difficulty day. It's Friday, Why the fuck not? And we were going
I had to readjust from doctor doctor Glinton's awesome talk yesterday, by the way,
awesome talk. And I'll be putting it back up on uh FTJ media
too. It just for some reason it didn't finish Friday, you know,
encoding, So I just have to put it back up there later on.
Ye kind of spun around here. Here we go, let's get started.
The year was approximately nine hundred and fifty a d and Emperor Constantinus seventh's elite
Barangian guard retained as his private defense force in what seems to have been practically
a timeless tradition of virtually all Roman Germanic, but also Persian and Indian and
Greek peoples and beyond, stretching back to the dawn of recorded history, took
their positions to do their famous quote Gothic dance. We don't know a great
deal of details, but the dance is said to have involved two circles of
warriors, one inside the other, moving in opposite directions. Some of the
warriors were said to have worn animal skins or masks, while others carried spears
or swords, all spurred onward by a periodic and rhythmic chant of Ti,
meaning victory an old Norse. It's said to have both frightened and fascinated all
those What was likely an ancient pre battle ritual and a display of martial prowess
and a proactive honouring of the ancestors now served the dual purpose of allowing these
elite warriors to retain a sense of identity and culture in largely foreign lands as
they spread across the vast majority of the civilized world. It allowed them to
retain a sense of connection to the route, no matter how far they might
travel. In time and space. These greatest and most proficient of all warriors
had a strong connection not just to the Norse and the Vikings, but to
their renowned berserkers. In particular, they also obviously had a connection to the
Goths. The Goths, in turn were said to have been largely indistinguishable from
the Vandals, who in turn were said to be essentially indistinguishable from the Alands
or the Alungi. The Allans were said to have the closest connections with the
Scypho Sarmatian people's and the Germanic Swabi, who in turn had the closest connection
with the Franks and long Lards. I could go on like this with ease
and off the top of my head for twenty to thirty minutes, unabated.
Okay, So something that came to light during my study because a lot of
people had asked, did Jacob Frank make that? You know, because his
name is Jacob Leeblwitz, right, Jacob Frank Frankism And apparently because the Franks
were pushing the whole Catholic thing pretty hard, because of the way they could,
you know, it was control right. There's some who speculate that he
did, in fact, because Frank was a name that apparently the uh the
Turks gave him or whatever to a European merchant, you know, operating in
their territory. So there, and of course he's a merchant, right because
he's you know, who knew nook what. But so there's that there's that
possibility that that's the name was like a nickname that was adopted, or it
also could be that he was trying to uh invoke the that idea that because
he's also you know, converting into Catholicism in Christianity by getting baptized, you
know, the infiltration, the co opting of the religions, that he was
taking the name of the Franks as well for that reason. So yeah,
I guess there is possibly something to that, But how how definitive and how
you know, verified it is? I don't know, the point being that
what seems to have been one massive family of people's since become something akin to
a people with one hundred names, a people who academics and modern historians studiously
labor to break and factionalize into ever smaller charts, which can be helpful in
a sense being able to hear the more specific history of a branch of people
is informative and valuable, but it also makes us seem like they're unrelated,
and they can then territorialize achievements and take them from the court group. And
then it also gives the impression that there isn't a dominating force that was once
there that was then destroyed by connivance and trickery. And that's what happened.
But it's come at the cost of our beginning to miss the forest for the
trees, of our beginning to no longer see the multitude of points of interconnectedness
genetically, culturally, linguistically, spiritually, and slowly but surely it's begun to
lead us all into a profound misunderstanding of history. When looking at the vast
expanse of human history, the only way to understand it with clarity is to
learn, at least to some degree, to view it in the manner that
the ancients did. If we take our borders of the present day, our
racial groupings or cultural groupings of the present day, an attempt to superimpose these
on those people who lived in the same regions in distant times, we'll gradually
develop the most confusing and convoluted picture as a result. Similarly, if we
take our modern, politically correct mindset and use this as a prison through which
we view history, we'll inevitably experience a similar confusion. One of the things
I try to do is speak to ancient times as they were experienced by the
ancients, and so far as I'm able. Only when I began to do
this did things begin to make some real sense to me. Only then did
various puzzle pieces that had initially baffled me began to fit together and begin to
form something of a cohesive whole. I've come to believe more and more strongly
with the passage of time that the peoples comprising the Indo I met a girl
like that before, a cohesive whole European language group, those we've alternately referred
to as Aryans or Yamnaya, even Scythians by some historians, at various points
in time, were once essentially a single family who would go on to spread
very far and wide and gradually come to forget, perhaps even be helped to
forget, this common heritage, though there seemed to have been great efforts to
avoid forgetting, and I suspect this is one of the reasons why so man.
Any of the very oldest documents we possess focus so heavily on bloodline,
lineage, and ancestry. Great kings and heroes across vast stretches of time and
space so often traced their lineage to the same figures. Of course, today
we've taken to claiming that these figures were their quote gods and merely legendary and
mythological. But the ancients seemed to speak of them as flesh and blood heroes.
Yes, descended from a royal lineage of lower case g gods, if
you will, But this term god seems to be used far differently today than
it was in these distant ages. Their own practice seemed something akin to extreme
ancestor veneration, more so than what we today think of as religious worship.
One of the reasons adopting this framework proved so incredibly hopeful is that this subset
that claimed the most direct descent from these gods seemed to be more often than
not immensely capable, men who traveled and migrated across the world to a degree
and at a scale that modern academics now claim would have been impossible, despite
overwhelming evidence proving them wrong. In the most clear, direct and matter of
fact ways. The Alans or Alani people are just one fascinating example of a
great many closely connected to the Vandals and in fact often following them to distant
locales, apparently due to the Vandals having a greater degree of dynastic royal blood.
This one people could be found everywhere from the westernmost point of Europe to
Persia modern Turkey, and even in later times making up the elite royal guardsmen
of the greatest Mongol rulers. The Vandals to a people nearly identical to the
Goths, with her gard to ethnicity and in many cultural respects, could be
found everywhere from North Africa to the Byzantine Empire, and many argue with traces
all the way into China and Far East Asia at least of incredibly kindred and
closely related relatives. In short, the three key points that help bring history
to life and create some thoo, it makes sense that there would be like
a wild gene in China because you have some you have like a pretty much
a stationary, relatively common height of people. Then you have people that sprout
up like freaking the jelly green giant. Occasionally that might be a recess of
gene Us like that that finally shows itself. From the influence of this far
back logical and rational and coherent picture are firstly the understanding that there was an
immense amount of movement and migration of peoples, especially the most capable and successful
of the Secondly, that these most successful made up something of an aristocratic caste
that were subjugators and rulers and governors over a great portion of the entire world
at any given time. And thirdly, the understanding that the lion's share of
this spread of peoples was very similar to what moderns have come to call colonialism,
orchestrated by a largely seafaring people who first seemed to create vast trade networks
and later helped spark the rise of several nations and empires, especially at the
most major nodes or central hubs of these vast trade networks. Tacitus, in
describing a tribe toward the northwest coast of Europe, which would appear to be
in the region of Leewarden, Groningen, and Imden, tells us this quote,
hitherto I have been describing Germany towards the west to the north. It
winds away with an immense compass, and first of all occurs the nation of
the Chaucians, who, though they begin immediately at the confines of the Frisians
and occupy part of the shore, extend so far as to border upon all
of the several people whom I have already recounted, till at last by a
circuit, they reach quite to the boundaries of their cuttons. And the Frisians
are who we're talking about when we go through the oral into book. It
doesn't necessarily mean they were only located in that area, but that's the people,
and they are all descendants of the same core group. A region so
vast the Chaucians do not only possess but fill a people of all the Germans,
the most noble, such as would rather maintain their grandeur by justice than
violence. They live in repose, retired from the broils abroad, void of
avidity to possess more, free from a spirit of domineering over others. They
they provoke no wars, they ravage no countries. They pursue no plunder of
their bravery and power. The chief evidence arises from hints that without wronging or
oppressing others, they are come to be superior to all, yet they are
all ready to arm, and if an exigency require, armies are presently raised,
powerful and abounding as they are in men and horses. And even when
they are quiet and their weapons laid aside, their credit and name continue equally
high. End. What he seems to be referring to here is an epicenter
of the larger Germanic people group, a root of sorts which might be said
to be best represented by those people who reside around Doggerland or Friesland. It's
awesome that that core group would be the epicenter would be the Frisians, because
when you look at the Earl in the book, you really find a really
just a perfect blueprint for how to live and how to appreciate family and all
those other wonderful things that go along with it. It's all too perfect.
But it doesn't mean it didn't happen. It's just we're so screwed and so
defiled by these people that it seems like a fairy tale. And that's what's
said, is that it has become that way that it would actually be unrealistic
to us. That's sad, and certainly encompasses parts of the Netherlands of Anglo
Saxon, Britain, of Norway and Sweden. And look at look at the
the close quarter, like how close it is to Italy, Like I mean,
northern Italy, You're going to see this, You're going to see them,
and probably in Sicily and Sardinia and all those other places they fund tall
people there too. I mean, this whole area, doesn't it spreads out,
And being Italian doesn't mean like you're not potentially of Frisian descent too,
And then also being like I'm Italian in German, right, so I could
be a little bit of both, or it might be one and the same,
just with a tan, because I have Sicilian in me Mark and northern
Germany, parts of Switzerland and Belgium, and whose branches seem to extend virtually
everywhere, powerfully into Ireland and Scotland, making up virtually the entire population of
Iceland and the Faroe Islands, on into France, Spain, Italy, Eastern
Europe, stretching to the Black Sea, and in more ancient times into the
Caucasus and the Caspian into Athens and Greece, Ancient Troy, Persia, northwestern
India and into the Taram Basin and beyond. And what the Orlanda book teaches
us is that these tribes, when they started migrating, some of them did
so because they were cast out, because they were favoring the merchant life,
the trade, the buying and selling, and the black magic. So just
because they went different places, like when you hear Amin talking about Greece and
these backing cults, those people would not be accepted. These maniacs wouldn't be
part of the core group that the Frisians would even recognize as being the same
people. It's important to be clear here. This isn't to say that this
epicenter was a superior racial subset, standing head and shoulders over those branches extending
into so many other regions. After all, it's important to remember a timeless
custom of these people seemed to be not just the banishment of their worst,
but often the more prevalent custom. He just said that right there, the
banishment of their worst of sending out their best, especially when their domestic and
local success caused such population explosions that things began to get crowded. When this
occurred, many of the best and brightest and most adventurous would be periodically sent
to distant shores and distant lands as colonists, conquerors, explorers, and settlers,
and in some exceptional cases even mercenary warriors or Viking style pirates and raiders
who initially at least focused these raids on foreign peoples and long standing enemies.
So when I say that they seem to be an epicenter of this larger family,
what I mean is that this seems to be a subset whose culture and
traditions caused them to retain the greatest degree of homogeneity and thus continuity, and
likely the lowest degree of admixture with outside peoples, both culturally and genetically.
One of the great tragedies of history is that not only is virtually all of
it that survives written from the perspective of Romans or Greeks, but that nearly
all of the most comprehensive and informative accounts of those peoples lying outside of their
borders have been either gradually misplaced or destroyed, or otherwise lost over time,
or, as in the case of Cassiodorus's account of the Gothic peoples, has
had to suffer through a middleman stage of translation or reinterpretation, and in the
case of Jordanis's Gettica, this isn't even a direct translation at all, but
rather, by the author's admission, a very loose account, leaving room for
profound manipulation. If this happened to be part of the goal, much of
the most incredible fact, fascinating, informative and intriguing of historical accounts of this
sprawling family of peoples, especially prior to around the Fall of Rome, was
either never jotted down and retained, or has since disappeared, and it's likely
that the remainder perhaps sits heavily guarded and under lock and key in sprawling Vatican
archives or the Herculean Library. Let's hope, Let's hope if things are found,
that they actually make it to the public consciousness and not just be squirreled
away, shut away from the public eye indefinitely. This massive void, this
black hole of history, allows modern academics and historians to begin to spin their
tails and weave their webs to creatively fill in the gaps, to create a
historical picture that suits modern times, modern culture, and modern sensibilities and sensitivities.
It's my opinion that one of the more upsetting trends of modern scholarship has
been the attempt to portray ancient peoples as both exceptionally primitive and exceptionally isolationist,
to paint them as living short, brutish lives, filled with fear and baseless
superstition, as having difficulty event subsisting, let alone being able to travel great
distances. This is one of those viewpoints that growing up I initially took for
granted as truth, but that I've gradually become convinced couldn't possibly be more mistaken.
And I feel compelled to make that case, and to speak this truth,
to do whatever I'm able to help counter this trend. Of the hundreds
of works tying this larger racial and cultural family of Western mankind to ancient Greece,
Egypt, India, or Persia the term Basin or Asia or Troy,
for example, nearly all of these are now suddenly, in recent decades,
considered frauds or forgeries, or dishonestly written to add to the prestige of this
or that individual or people or nation or royal house, or to supposedly manufacture
a link with a biblical past, or merely to excite the reader and make
for a compelling story. But the more I've learned, the more I find
this tossing out of scores of our oldest historical accounts to be so unjustified as
to be outright strange and suspect. Can you see I know I'm kind of
jumping ahead here, but can you see how someone like Adolf Hitler revitalizing the
Germanic spirit and bringing people together under a common you know, nationalistic, I
don't know, what will you call, like energy whatever, that that would
be a great, great disturbance to the controllers of this world because they know,
they know, they have an idea of what the history is more than
we do, and they know who their enemies are. They would put them
down under a subjifuge to the rest of the people as to why they're actually
doing it. But this is a very ancient battle and to see that strengthening
on that side was a huge threat, and of course they had to do
their best, just like they're rewriting history and omitting stuff and changing it around
to make them look like barbarians and British people that just run around, you
know, basically giving them the traits that they have. You know, you
know, like kind of like a composite of a Phoenician or a you know,
a dirty little pirate, which is what they are giving those attributes to
the people who were in complete contrast to them, and thereby sucking them up
into that same collective of evil when it wasn't it was. It was just
like what they did with Germany. They're they're changing the attributes they're they're giving
them, they're projecting their own crimes onto the people that they're victimizing, and
so the story goes around and around we go again, especially considering how many
of these passages that speak to these links to far away lands are often short,
matter of fact remarks from ancient historians of the widest variety of different backgrounds,
and often buried within a larger work of serious and sober scholarship, as
opposed to being part of some document written for a king, for example,
with the obvious intent to glorify his lineage and or solidify his reign. I
wouldn't want to suggest this invention of history never happens, of course, in
more narrow, specific and exceptional cases, I've seen evidence that it has,
and I think the motives behind the pinning of any historical works should always be
strenuously questioned. I even have my reservations about Jordanis's work on the Goths,
but I often feel like we're constantly faced with the choice to either believe what
our ancestors said about themselves or to believe what modern scholars claim about our ancestors,
namely that their own scholars and historians were nearly all liars, exaggerators,
or simply stupid and confused, despite the fact that they were far closer to
these major events in both time and space, and of course that they were
existing within cultures that still had living traditions passed down through the generations that stemmed
directly back to these prior times and major events. Moreover, most of them
had no discernible motives to lie. It simply doesn't make sense to my mind,
the amount of material we have to throw out, and it wasn't their
nature to do that anyway. Just like I go right back to that same
movie, because the name of the movie is where you get the idea of
the invention of lying. Like, these people didn't do that. That's why
they were swindled so often. Being as powerful as they were militarily warriors,
tough people. They were constantly being betrayed and sabotaged by these little connivers in
order to believe this newly formed, freaking weasels forming modern conception is significant,
to put it mildly, In this video, I'd like to discuss the topic
of the genetic, cultural, linguistic, and spiritual connections between the branches of
this larger family tree and present a case as to why there is a great
deal more connectivity then modern academia and scholarship seems willing to admit. And here's
the thing too. Ammon was saying that he hopes it's the Palasgians, which
is another Scythian tribe, But from what he just showed us in that diagram
and how they branched out, and it seems like the core group was coming
from the Frisian territory. Why does it have to be Pelasgians? Is that
so that we aren't looking in the right spot? I just I have to
always constantly like analyze and you know, scrutinize what people say, especially when
they're trying to do it from an assumed position of academia. For sure.
Definitely, then because one the information is not available to us until we all
learn ancient Greek, and then we have to figure out whether or not that
ancient Greek was said with the specific intent or political aim or drive in order
to give us a foul impression of a religion or some other aspect of history.
And then you know, is it valid or is it just somebody trying
to corrupt something so that people don't look towards it anymore. Son, And
then also to then place that in a different area to pull away once again
the migratory tale of our ancestry. Very very many of these, I guess
variables are necessary to be like, really really looked at closely before taking anybody's
word for it. And I'd like to try to present a picture of how
these peoples seemed to see themselves, namely as a familial hierarchy or even dynasty
that gradually spread its wings across most of the world. A proposed to how
modern academics are attempting to aggressively reinterpret and reframe this past, where they attempt
to break apart and show every conceivable contrast and difference. In this video,
I will instead attempt to unify and speak to the striking similarities and beyond coincidence
commonalities. In an attempt to simplify and clarify, I'd like to focus on
a handful of key points, starting from the root language of Proto Indo European
that seems to lie at or very near the central and starting point of our
great journey as a people, and acts as some of the best evidence of
this interconnectedness, but also some ubiquitous events and storylines and themes that continually recur
across numerous myths and traditions and legends of our varied people groups across India,
per ancient consumer the Norse and Germanic peoples, the Celts, and the earliest
Britons, all the way to Biblical accounts. I've come to believe strongly that
when variations of a single story purveyed this many cultures and traditions, there's almost
certainly a seed of truth to them, and that it's only in bringing these
core elements together, piecing these puzzle pieces together, that we might hope to
make some real sense of things. The creation, the paradise, the flood
myth, the great progenitor or patriarch figure, the mountain on which the gods
are said to have resided the giants or Titans, the mixing of gods with
men, etc. Again, whereas modern academia seems obsessively focused on spotting the
differences and contrasts my own goal, wouldn't it be funny? And I think
there's some truth to this that maybe a colloquial metaphor an idiom meaning somebody of
high stature. There were giants in those days, men of renown right that
it was nothing to do with height so much as like, you know,
super giant, but you know, relative to like eight foot tall or whatever.
But at the whole spinning of the tail of Enoch and all that stuff
having been completely misunderstood, I think that's kind of interesting. Oh will be
to speak to the commonalities across all of these traditions, an attempt to show
that not only do we likely represent a singular family, but that this singular
family seems to have had a relatively singular history stretching back far enough, a
history that obliterates the modern conventional model of these completely disparate and unconnected civilizations supposedly
springing up in relative isolation, whose incredible similarities might be blaned away as mere
coincidence or fluke. A technical term often used for my viewpoint here is hyper
diffusionism, a term I would define as the recognition that a single tree of
related peoples spread across the majority of the world and is responsible for most of
the languages we speak today, the bulk of the innovations and technical achievements of
the past, the majority of the monuments and structures still extant, stretching from
South America to China and beyond. And it's often paired with the idea that
this singular people may ultimately be a remnant of another civilization that seems to have
been largely destroyed as a result of massive cataclysm. And this hyper diffusionist perspective
is one that's been rejected more and more aggressively in the post World War II
era, in large part, I would suggest due to its being politically incorrect.
This singular history helps explain countless things modern historians both fail to explain and
thus choose to completely ignore the massive mining operations in places like North America in
ancient times. The striking similarity of both construction methods and resulting structures across how
they lie is the perfect way to back engineer as to who is lying and
for what purpose, and then you kind of get to see who the controllers
are. It's pretty daunting because of how deeply embedded this lie is throughout everywhere.
And no greater evil occurred than World War one and two in recent times
to totally devastate and change how we look at everything the world. The discovery
of a certain out of place genetic type of human being in the most far
flung locations where they're not meant to have lived, and the worldwide spread of
the branches of a single Proto Indo European root language and its derivatives and branches,
among so many other things. Let me read this to you. To
this day, all we have, I say, all we really know about
these fascinating people is what we can read in the logs of the Spanish that
visited the northern Andes. Probably the most famous quote about the Cloud people comes
from the Spanish conquerors Pedro Sieza de Leon. He wrote that the Cacopoia were
the whitest and most handsome of all the people that I have seen, and
their wives were so beautiful that, because of their gentleness, many of them
deserved to be the Inca's wives, and to also be taken to the Sun
temple. Lorolana, another Spanish conqueror, wrote a similar description and also stated
that the Cloud people were much taller than the Spaniards and had extremely light skin
and blonde hair, pointing to the fact that they were of European ancestry,
not Mediterranean. These facts continue to puzzle modern day scientists, as there is
no evidence of previous European genes being present in this area of the world before
the Cloud People, which again the mound builders Scythians created mounds to bury their
dead. What do you see and what did you see all over North America
South America right more evidence to their influence and their presence there. Firstly,
let's discuss the topic of language, and a lot of those Spaniards, those
conquistadores were maybe Spanish sounding names, but they were Sephardic Jews, a lot
of them, and they operated like them too. When you get to how
they treated the tribal people that they encountered and how they took their children,
and YadA, YadA, YadA, same story. Sanskrit is a fascinating language
and a language that very likely lies nearer to the root of the proto Indo
European language spoken before this tree branched off throughout the entire world than nearly any
other surviving tone. The oral tradition of Sanskrit speaking peoples was remarkably similar to
the Bardic tradition, and that the most important stories and worthwhile histories and myths
and legends and tales would be memorized and voiced by an exceptional individual who'd been
trained to carry out precisely this task from his earliest days, at times memorizing
massive songs or stories or myths, and not just the words, but their
particular manner of delivery, including tone, cadence, intonation, pacing. In
their wisdom and foresight, these traditions even created certain rhythm and structure to the
speech or song, seemingly to make it easier to remember exceedingly long texts or
songs. But you remember what Ammon said about ancient Greek and the mythos It
was sung, Well, this predates, So where do you think it?
Game? Where do you think that influence came from? Also, far harder
to corrupt or change them in any way, to ensure it would be handed
down essentially intact and unchanged across the generations, so that a child may be
hearing the exact same song or tale as his great great great great great grandfather.
This cultural lineage has been broken, of course, in our day,
though perhaps not irrevocably so. Thankfully, though this is a topic for another
time. Countless great thinkers from let me read this one too. This is
William Jones. The Sanskrit language. Whatever be its antidi, the Sanskrit language
would ever be, its antiquity, is of wonderful structure, more perfect than
the Greek, more copious than the Latin, and more exquisitely refined than either
prior ages. Marveled at just how strangely familiar Sanskrit felt in comparison to their
own European tongues, with many, especially German scholars, hailing it as possessing
an exceptional purity and power, clarity and cleanliness. Of course, this was
the same language spoken by the Aryan peoples that swept into India, ultimately irresponsible
for authoring what seemed to be some of the oldest works in our tradition,
such as the rig Veda. But it may surprise you to know the wealth
of connections between Sanskrit and modern Lithuanian. Lithuanian is considered, oh I'm part
Lithuanian as well, to be the closest living sister language of Sanskrit, and
it's apparently preserved many features of Proto Indo European that have changed or disappeared in
other Indo European languages. For example, a recent dictionary published shows a stunning
one hundred and eight words that are identical between both languages. Both Lithuanian and
Slavic peoples have retained the same names for rivers, for example, as Sanskrit.
Even more importantly, most scholars and linguists tend to rank Lithuanian, due
to its conservative and unchanging nature, as quite probably the most similar still excellant
language to the Proto Indo European root, the seed or tree trunk that lies
at the center of the multitude of linguistic branches now spread across the world.
Most scholars seem to agree that the closest relatives of our ancient Proto Indo European
root tongue are Lithuanian, Sanskrit, Ancient Greek, Latin, Gothic, and
Old Irish, with perhaps an honorable mention to Old Church Slavonic, a Vestin,
and Tikerian. If we consider the geographical range covered by these thicker branches
of this singular route, this hyper diffusionist frame should start to make some sense.
In my own personal opinion, it's simply undeniable. Looking at the word
aryan itself is I believe a fascinating glimpse into this interconnectedness, in large part
because it was almost certainly the racial or ethnic designation used by this subset that
would later go on to spread so far and wide. Its cognate and Proto
Indo European was heroes or hereos, which initially simply meant kinsmen. I like
how I said, a member of one's own group is what a hero is,
So I'm gonna read this one or here says. The word hero or
heroes derives from the Proto Indo European herios, meaning protector or defender. That's
not what I said on the last one said member of one's own group.
But this word evolved into the ancient Greek heroes meaning hero or demigod, which
was borrowed into Latin as heroes plural. From Latin, the word entered various
languages such as Old French hero, Middle English heroes, and modern English hero.
The word heroine, meaning a female hero, was formed in English in
the seventeen sex by adding the feminine suffix i to hero. The word heroism,
meaning the qualities or actions of a hero, was formed in English in
the seventeenth century by adding the suffix ism to hero. The word heroic,
meaning brave or noble like a hero, was formed in English in the sixteenth
century by adding the suffix icee to hero. But what's the takeaway here is
that it was somebody who was a strong individual, one member of one's own
group, meaning they live by their own you know, noble decree. Basically
that's what set them apart, or member of one's own group. But would
of course go on to evolve into a term of great respect and admiration in
our modern hero for an exceptional or courageous individual. Areya or Aryan also most
frequently meant noble or esteem or distinguished or even best. But would go on,
Hey, what do you know the word hero in Aryan mean almost the
same thing. Isn't that something to mean lord or ruler or master? Likely
because as the Aryan people spread far and wide, they traditionally took up positions
of great power and influence, including in lands in which they weren't the majority
population at times. So think about that World War one and two were fought
against the heroes, the heroes of the world. Yeah, that's awesome,
right, I'm seeing that in sarcasm. The Luians, who lived around the
region of ancient Troy, seemed to be an early example of this, and
the Matani seemed to be another, And in fact, a treatise that uses
Sanskrit words was discovered in the archives of the Hittite capital of Bogas Kui.
Excavations in Elmarna in Egypt have yeld to the fact that about the middle of
the second millennium BC, kings and princes with typical Vedic names were ruling in
the region of modern day Syria. Tutmost the fourth married a daughter of Artatma,
who was the king of the Matani kingdom in the Upper Euphrates River area,
and during this time in Egyptian history, the ruling aristocracy of Egypt seemed
to be of mixed Egyptian and Matani ancestry. The ethnic and cultural overlap of
people stretching from Egypt and the levant through sumer and into ancient India and Persia
was immense in ancient times. The pioneering Scottish polymath, scholar, professor,
and explorer Lawrence Austin Waddel, thought to possibly be the inspiration behind the Indiana
Jones figure and famous for his theory that sumer Egypt, India and except it
corrupted the shit out of Indiana and g owns who goes on and on remember
the trope I hate Nazisjia were essentially something of a singular empire across vast stretches
of the most ancient period of recorded history. Even believed the Sumerians, or
perhaps at least a ruling caste in Sumeria, spoke Sanskrit, and his evidence
that the king's lists published by these people groups are actually different variations of the
same list with the same individuals listed is a fascinating possibility to consider. Waddell,
in his work Makers of Civilization in Race and History, claims that Sargon
the Great and Menace both repeatedly call themselves and surviving documents gout or got and
he believes this much like the people group referenced by the Sumerians as the Guti
were the same people who would later come to be known as the Goths.
And he tells us quote and significantly, the princes of this Gothic dynasty over
forty three centuries ago already use, as we shall see, the especially Gothic
titles of Duke and Earl. Al Right, guys, I'm gonna have to
step away for a second because I think some you know, about the kidney
stone thing. I think I might have to go, yeah, do something,
but it'll continue to play. Waddell goes on to state, quote,
Thus the real date for the first Aryan or Sumerian kings becomes about three three
hundred and seventy eight BC, and the real date of Menace, the founder
of the first dynasty of Egypt, becomes about twenty seven three BC. He
continues, quote, A vast deal of what has hitherto been looked upon as
prehistoric and mythical becomes historic, and real heroes who have been raised into gods
again take form as men, and as history early Aryan kings of relatively fixed
dates gods and demi gods of the ancient Greeks and Romans, Egyptians and Hittites,
Persians and Indo Aryans as well as of the Goths, Scandinavians and Germans,
ancient Britons, Irish and Englo Saxons such as Zeus, Jove, Jupiter,
Indra, Prometheus, atmu adamu Adam ad or Odin Cuadell continues quote on
comparing these early kings lists with those of the Sumerians and Mesopotamia, I observed
that the latter documents also recorded in the self same chronological position the dynasty of
King Jin or GUNI or Sargon the Greek, bearing substantially the same names and
titles in the Indian lists and in the exact same order, and that the
names and order from Sargon's son Manus onwards were identical with those of Menes dynasty
of pharaohs on their own Egyptian monuments. Mines or Maanj in his Egyptian inscriptions
usually bears the title of Man the Warrior, and in the Sumerian kings lists
and in his own inscriptions in Mesopotamia, the son and successor of Sargon the
Great is styled as Manas the Warrior, and the last king of this dynasty
bearing the same name in both Sumerian and Egyptian inscriptions has his name significantly written
on his own Egyptian inscription by the self same Sumerian pictographic signs as in the
Sumerian kings lists, and I'm sorry in his own inscriptions as Sumerian Emperor in
Mesopotamia. It should also be noted that one of the most common myths,
legends, or historical accounts of prior Ais is that of a garden paradise of
sorts, a land of milk and honey, in which a population lived in
peace and in great harmony and order and tranquility, surrounded by plenty. This
theme is found in several traditions, and in the Biblical tradition, the original
garden paradise is called Eden, and the Sumerian term for a plane or step
just so happens to be ed in, similar to the spelling of the Scottish
eden burgh. Is there a definitive connection here, It's hard to say,
but considering how central Sumerio was with regard to the earliest explosion of quote civilization,
it shouldn't be so easily dismissed. If what Waddell implies is true,
even partially, so, it changes our entire understanding of history completely and forces
us to see things through a new framework. A darkness, A darkness fell
is what this is saying. Babylon was inverted, flipped on its head by
people who would choose to corrupt and destroy mankind during a great period of peace.
And so it goes with this priest craft. Though importantly, when I
cite Waddell or similar figures, I don't mean to insinuate that I agree with
his every claim. But what's so frustrating about modern scholarship is that it's become
so incredibly dogmatic, so reflexively defensive, that they'll pour over the work of
a pioneering thinker like Waddell, the broader picture he so clearly paints and points
to, and the hundreds of fascinating possibilities he brings to the table as possible
proofs. They'll then find the one or two technicalities they feel they can most
convincingly argue against, laser focus on these, and then treat the entire issue
as if dealt with, as if they completely debunked the broader narrative or storyline
by disproving to their liking some narrow claim or singular element within it. Or
they'll make something up and then argue that that's not true. They did that
with a video that came out and I think the timestamp is like two thousand
and seven or two thousand and six about a guy with a weak voice,
weasily little dude in a it looks like a lecture hall talking about the fun
vacs, the fundamental vaccine and how they were going to transmit it through like
flu shots or whatnot, or flu quote unquote virus which doesn't exist. But
and the way they quote unquote debunked it and fact checked it was to say
that's not Bill Gates. Well, nobody said it was. They said it
was and then said it wasn't right. They made that statement in the negative
and said that's not Bill Gates. So therefore everything that that person said in
that particular video is no longer of any value, right, But that that
trumps everything that was going on there. That makes it all invalid, because
no, you don't understand that's not nobody fucking said it was Bill Gates.
We're talking about what the person's telling us is going on, and they're using
vaccines in order to transmit, you know, to try to attack the VMAT
two gene in people and cut off and sever their teather with God. That
was the that was the point of the of the information in that video.
But this isn't how things work, of course. To give a quick example,
if a detective comes to me offering one hundred proofs that a man is
behind a given murder and I managed to disprove one or two of these one
hundred proofs, I've not destroyed his case by doing so. The burden of
proof, to some degree is still on me to provide compelling reasons and or
a more compelling case to dismiss the broader claim. Figures like Waddell are so
valuable because he provides such a mass of incredibly intriguing proofs, each single one
of which seems immensely valuable to any open minded individual seeking to get at the
truth of the matter. Approaching these things as many present academics seem to do
as if one is a lawyer arguing for or against a given position is absolutely
not the ideal, and it seems the incentive and disincentive structures built into modern
academia cultivate precisely this lawyerly and dogmatic behavior, and thus essentially churn out defense
attorneys for the most conventional status quo politically correct or socially acceptable narratives. Dogmatic
and partisan lawyerly approaches aren't conducive to uncovering historical truth, to put it mildly,
especially when all of these quote lawyers are on a single side of the
ideological fence. And it should be added that Waddell was not only a respected
scholar and professor, but one of the first men to actually spend time in
these regions like India and Tibet, for example, to meet and talk to
people, to learn their spoken languages and to decipher their written languages. I've
long felt that a multidisciplinary skill set and approach is absolutely crucial if we ever
hope to truly unravel these mysteries and understand our past, because developing a broader
context picture is a must. It's been disappointing, but not the least bit
surprising to see that not only do modern scholars disagree with the man, but
that they don't even bother to offer counters to his opinions and instead don't dare
mention his name or his ideas anymore, acting as if this man who is
once the foremost scholar of the history of the region, never existed. If
we are operating under the theory that the simplest explanation is most likely to be
the correct one. The idea of a relatively singular people lying at the root
of so many incredibly similar cultures, languages, and civilizations makes far far more
sense to my mind than the idea of all of these peoples emerging relatively independently
with such similar myths and legends and traditions, such similar languages and cultures.
And this simplest explanation is the one that doesn't require that we throw out such
a vast number of ancient historical accounts in favor of modern speculations and derivative accounts
and what seems to be highly partisan and dogmatic reinterpretations. When modern scholars claim
that the Goths originated in Sweden, for example, fair enough, they've certainly
had a long standing connection to Sweden, But what do they mean by originated?
Did they spring from the soil fully formed? This doesn't happen, of
course, So where were they before this, for example? And why aren't
we all more curious? Next, let's briefly discuss spiritual conceptions, which segue
nicely from the topic of language. Virtually everywhere we look Amongst ancient cultures and
histories, we'll find the concept of the all Father in Vedic Diospetur, in
Greek Zeus Petar, and Roman it was Jupiter Anu in the Sumerian tradition,
maybe a Raalda in the Oral in a book variant of these. It's my
opinion that the numerous instances of Sun worship are related to this idea, although
worship is a tricky word here. I don't think they were actually veneration,
seeing this materially existing fiery ball as the sum total of God, but rather
the clearest manifestation of His light and power and creative and nurturing energy in our
material realm. Ancestor worship and the worshiping of archetypal deities has always made perfect
sense to me in this same regard. Again, the term worship shouldn't convey
images of people devotedly believing that these ancestors, or these archetypal gods, or
the end all be all of creation, or the singular creative force behind it
all. But it's all important to understand that the concept of a God that
flows and courses through all creation and in a sense is all creation, is
impossible for our minds to fully and rationally grasp. It's a bit like looking
at a pure white light, completely lacking in any differentiation or contrast. Our
minds need individuation, We need things to grasp. If we added some black,
we might create something of a yin and yang differentiation, and immediately things
can become clearly recognizable. Or if you separate this white light into primary colors,
these are things we can easily and readily understand and grasp. And perhaps
if we were able to honor each primary color in precisely equal measure in this
analogy, and as derivatives and outgrowths of the one pure white light, we'd
achieve a slightly better holistic understanding of our creator, whose total nature defies language
and defies perfect conscious understanding. The danger, of course, taking any one
of these colors as the god all, or taking any singular archetypal concept as
the utmost in my belief, this leads to disjointed and asymmetric thinking and thus
disjointed and unbalanced being, and calls us to straight from the center point.
It does seem to me that the further back we look evidence of a singular
conception of father or an all Father or other words, the Zoroastrian tradition in
Persia clearly speaks to this. Works like the Bagavat Gita masterfully speak to the
singular nature of God. The later Germanic people speak of an all Father,
just as the or Linda book speaks of Roalda Jesus speaks of his father.
Even Buddhism and speaking of Dharma, recognizes a singular all pervasive law, and
a singular order behind all things. I've come to believe that a great deal
of these now varied beliefs ultimately emerged from a single route, and just like
the variety of cultures and languages that arose due to time and geographical separation,
differences in understanding and interpretation of belief arose. Similarly, Doctor Churchward, in
Signs and Symbols of Primordial Man, holds that the ancient Druids quote were undoubtedly
descendants of the ancient Egyptian priests who came over and landed in Ireland and the
West of England, and who brought with them their religious doctrines and taught and
practiced them here. The Tuatha Didnan, the princes or descendants of Diatinion,
the Fire God or the Sun who came to Ireland were of the same race
and spoke the same language as the Furbuls or the Fomarians. Possessed ships,
knew the art of navigation, had a compass or magnetic needle, worked in
metals, had a large army thoroughly organized, a body of surgeons, and
a Bardic or druid class of priests. These druids brought all their learning with
them, believed and practiced the eschatology of the Solar doctrines, and came from
Egypt. End The connection and overlap between Druid, barred a scene and Magi,
even Pythagorean and Zoroastrian, is extensive, again seemingly testifying to a great
deal of interconnection across a vast territory, and the connection of the Celts to
ancient Egypt also seems extensive and formerly well documented. As wild as this may
sound to the modern ear, this was a topic much more casually discussed by
historians of prior eras. It's unfortunate that I don't know quite enough about languages
and the broader field of linguistics to make more definitive determinations with regard to etymological
connections. Here, But I find it fascinating that so many ancient works,
especially dealing with spiritual matters, speak of the waters or the breath of God
that moves through all things. Lawrence Waddell even speaks of whom he believes to
be the first ever Aryan king, as having the royal title of quote bestower
of the waters of life. The Orlanda book speaks of Iowa. The fascinating
Colbrin Bible speaks of Awen. The ancient Germans had a term called iwi and
forgive my pronunciations meaning vital force or life. This is also said to be
the language root of the prefix ae as an as here or as used as
part of ancient Germanic names like athel red or Ethelbald, which essentially marked them
out as nobility. There also seems to be a strong connection between names like
Adele or Adole and names beginning with Atl or at h. These are said
to indicate nobility, but also, according to many accounts, to signify a
quote covenant. Names like Athena or Athens, Atharic, Athelstan a naming convention
as commonly used by the Goths, as it seems to have been by the
Fhriyans or Phrygians and later Anglo Saxons. There may well be an indirect connection
to Atlantis buried here, as well as a connection to the atl naming device
hot Land, as used by the ancient South American peoples, as exemplified by
their bearded and fair skinned civilization, bestowing god Kexlquadal, who was said to
have arrived from the ocean on a craft resembling dragons or snakes, which of
course might bring to mind Phonetian and Viking ship designs. These connections may sound
a bit wild to some on their face, but from the perspective of the
larger context picture, I assure you they seem anything. But I've long been
fascinated with both Ae and atl when used in names of either individuals or places,
it seems to simultaneously have a strong connection to both physical water and a
spiritual conception of waters and the gods and the nobility. And to return to
the idea of the seer for a moment, many have speculated that this may
have a direct connection to the modern name Azerbaijan, as this region certainly correlates
with where these gods or illustrious men were meant to have once resided aes or
ees is the root of how Germanic peoples and even Old English referred to God
or the plural god men perhaps who may well have been ancestors. I don't
understand that sans By, who have been the oldest priesthood around since quote time
in memorial, they are such close homological resemblance to this essay, and it's
they both terms have influenced by the pro Indo European root and part mironus.
We're no longer certain how this word sounded, but asure, which means life
force or spirit. Next, I'd like to speak to another controversial subject,
made controversial post World War Two because hyper diffusionist and the politically incorrect. In
all of my years pouring through historical accounts, I've come across what I feel
is overwhelming evidence of an ancient aristocratic cast that seems to have been accepted as
the rightful rulers and governors and even many peoples of different backgrounds in exceptional cases.
And it's deeply interesting how interconnected these two terms aristocracy and aryan seem to
be. This lineage would go on to spread across vast distances peoples and cultures
with the march of time. But we constantly find it being wreckgized by populations
and nations and touted by those who possessed it across virtually all histories. Zoroasfrance
scholar Farhengmayer puts it this way in speaking to ancient Persian Aryan practices. Quote
implicit in the references to ancient Arians in the literature is the development and establishment
of a national governance through the establishment of a hereditary kingship and a royal line.
In this system of governance, Aryan kings had a sacred responsibility to protect
the people, establish and uphold the law, encourage human development, and lead
the progress of society to a better life. When Rian kings maintained this sacred
trust and ethical compact what in modern days we call a social contract, they
were said to rule and grace in keeping with their far enough, you can
you can tell when he you know, recorded a session at different time,
because you can hear how the the voice changes a little bit. The contrast
between the attempt at wholly benevolent rulership episodes of the history of the de Larussi
right the Russian so frequently found in Aryan peoples and cultures relative to and contrasted
with figures like Nimrod or Ninus or the traditional conception of the tyrannical asiatic ruler
is certainly a stark one. The latter is ravenous, parasitic, insatiable,
and seemingly wholly self interested. The former, in its ideal, was intended
to see himself as something of the father of a household or nation or his
people, and his success was their success. That's hugely important. That's for
you a difference as well. But that idea, why does communism want to
destroy family so badly? Why do they want to destroy the children? Might
want to just break up the family. The mother that has a different role.
Now the father is just some idiot, right that. Why do they
do that? Because that's the core strength of any people. And when an
entire nation or an entire tribe or whatever you want to call them a people
have a communal family bond, there's that's an almost impenetrable thing. And that's
why the erosion by the priestcraft occurs. Is highly speculative, admittedly, and
a product of educated guesswork and intuition based on an attempted summary and distillation of
the many accounts I've been able to find and read over the years, but
I feel like I've seen evidence that this lineage split into two major groups,
as I've hinted at past videos, which might be represented by a wagon wheel
on one hand and a ship's helm or wheel on another, because one group
was one that we might call essentially land based and perhaps best represented by Royal
Scythian or lineages like the Gothic, Amal or Balthy ruling lines, and the
other sometimes referred to as sea kings, whose genetic lineage we almost certainly have
evidence of today in the R one b U one O six haplogroup, and
this latter group opens up a fascinating chapter of history. Those peoples we've come
to lazily refer to as Phonetians as an all too broad blanket descriptor the earliest
manifestations of whom were almost beyond any shadow of a doubt of R one B
lineage and have a strong connection to those peoples we call Celtic today, but
perhaps equally strong to this R one b U one lineage, which most consider
Germanic in contrast to its being Celtic, but in my view, it may
well be both. This is one of the many reasons I took the Orlanda
Book so seriously and still do, as it seemed to tally so clearly with
what I'd long assumed to be the case, and helped fill something of a
historical void and black hole with regard to peoples whose history almost seems to have
been erased to some degree. Ancient Athens, especially in Hellenic and pre Hellenic
times, seems to have been very clearly one of the ancient epicenters of this
sea going aristocracy, which is yet another thing that may lend further credence to
the Orlanda, as well as the fact that the final or present day epicenter
of this R one b U one O six lineage seems to essentially be in
or near modern Friesland. It says. It should be noted that the earliest
and most major settlements or incursions into Britain show an extremely strong Frisian genetic connection,
as do those, interestingly, of many of the earliest settlements in America,
especially around New York formerly New Amsterdam. Also, we can't forget that
a man by the name of ika Inca in the Frisian orlanda book set sail,
never to be written of again. And then we have the incas right,
is that a coincidence? And it would make sense that there wouldn't be
anything written of him anymore if he didn't go back right, So, and
then you have that cloud people story that we just heard about. It's pretty
interesting and may well represent the people group that provided the seed population that helped
launch the vast ocean going trade empires, both the English and the Dutch,
and correlated seemingly so heavily with the ocean and coastal mastery of the Norse and
Vikings. But to avoid too much digression, I'd like to discuss the wealth
of histories that tie the most ancient form of those peoples we've come to call
Celts to Anatolia, Phoenicia, Egypt and this broader surrounding region, and there
are many. What seems to occur more often than not is that these will
be dealt with one by one by academics in isolation from the broader context picture
and dismissed by these modern scholars as wild and fanciful. But this becomes much
much harder to do when you see how many varied accounts there are, and
how these accounts don't seem fabulous in the least in their totality, but rather
matter of fact, and how so many of these seem to speak of several
different facets of this Celtic and ancient Phoenician connection, indicating that they can't all
spring from one root lie or misunderstanding or exaggeration. Again, calling it a
Celtic Phoenician connection may be a misnomer, as these ancient mariners seemed to possess
R one B elements that seamlessly straddle the line between both Celtic and Germanic,
and so often the more ancient separation between these two peoples can seem a bit
forced and artificial. But perhaps calling this lineage majority Celtic and minority Germanic might
be fair. After all, the number of descendants that spring from R one
b U one O six specifically are certainly vastly outnumbered by their descendants from much
larger R one B families. And yet wherever U one O six roamed in
particular, power and success and seemingly a high level of general competence seemed to
follow, the Phoenicians, or those we've chosen to lump under the import options
are easily one of the most important and fascinating keys to our collective history,
and I've come to believe strongly that they were initially and yet didn't remain a
singular and relatively homogeneous people group, either ethnically or culturally speaking, but rather
picked up a very foreign element along the way and thus gradually became something very
different over time as result. Interestingly, the Aura Linda speaks of Phoenicia being
used almost as a deportation area and as a refuge for their criminals and cast
offs, and rather matter of factly in speaking of the slave would make a
lot of sense, especially when we consider who claims heredity to these Phoenicians lightly
later, and also indicates that they are the same people. But they were
the ones that were cast out, So they became the thieves, they became
the pirates, they became the child abductors and human traffickers, the drug traders,
same as it ever was after that, right, but also the practitioners
of very dark magic. They were completely corrupted by that or Phoenicians calls them
a qual I mean, just look at Carthage quote Bastard Race, and it's
mentioned openly in more than one account or side on. I mean pick a
place that the Phoenicians picked up the practice of slavery at some point and subsequently
began freely mixing with the peoples they'd enslaved, which may help explain this even
as early as Homer's time, the description of some Phoenicians. Oh and by
the way, mixing with the people who would totally make it again, not
a did the tribe who calls themselves a race and religion would not be true.
It would be a mixed multitude, as they say. And again,
as I'd stated before, and I've argued, it's not a race, it's
a convenient race, because then they can say that the chosen ones. You
can't claim ownership of being chosen unless you have some kind of ethnic you know,
commonality, right, So it kind of it's necessary for them to claim
that you have turk, you have all kinds of stuff mixed in with that.
It's with darker skin or hooked noses seemed common, but it's likely the
vastness of their trade routes that best explain this phenomenon. In the course of
their mercantile operations, they have encountered a multitude of different peoples and cultures,
and likely even acted as the vehicle for their movement to distant locations. More
often than not, it's simply inevitable in a case like that of the Phoenicians,
in which they traveled and traded and mingled so far and wide, that
if such a people don't have an extremely strict or disciplined code of conduct or
powerful and deeply rooted cultural traditions, they're simply bound to degenerate. And I'm
going to say that, even though people like Amine want to say that the
epitome of everything is ancient Greek, I think this is a falling away from
the more pure frisian if esque type of society. And whether or not their
language was intricate and wonderful and all that other great stuff, that all might
be true, but that might lend, you know, it might be owed
to what came before it, before it became you know, hellenized in a
sense, because I think at that point you're already looking at the corruption,
pretty deeply and very widespread of this type of the drugs, the cult,
the the strange rights and rituals, the black magic, the magic at all.
That would not be that would not drive so they've they kind of wandered
off in a way already it degraded. Even though they might have high culture,
that doesn't mean they weren't a degradation as far as spiritually and morally and
ethically from their origins. And I think that's what you see when they migrate,
is that there's a degradation that occurs, and then some really profound degradation
when you see like the Phoenicians and things of that like that, and to
eventually come to serve money and personal gain above all else, and thus to
gradually watch their culture disappear and morph into something very different, and I would
suggest, very hollow. It's said the Greeks began to use the term Phoenician
for anyone that manipulative, engaged in quote sharp dealing, for deceptive practices.
Late Carthage, for example, has come to be known largely for its perfidy,
its child sacrifice, and its almost complete lack of art, of high
culture, of martial prowess, and of general grace and refinement. An unnatural
hodgepodge nation that would gradually come to be dominated and controlled by a merchant class
oligarchy, which the Romans finally and mercifully would eventually put out of the misery.
A great deal of valuable research has finally seen the light of day just
before the publishing of this video, throwing significant weight behind the theory of an
exceedingly strong connection between modern Europeans and an Indo European past, helping liberate our
history from the tiny pockets of forested Europe so many modern academics seemed intent on
wholly confining two. The bulk of the latest findings center around the all important
yam Naya, from whom the corded War seemed to largely descend, and who
might be said to be one of the best labels or definitions of the core
of this Indo European people whom we formerly called Aryan prior to World War II,
making it so dangerously unfashionable regardless of where one falls on the countless specifics
of this they had to demonize it forever. And when you actually get into
the true history of that man and that war, like we did with the
Europa series, especially episode four, I mean, there's nothing, there's nothing
there there, you know what I'm saying. There's nothing for them to hang
all this hatred on. It's just straight projection of what they were doing to
them as they were hunting them into extinction. And yet we have such a
flipped up, upside down an inverted perception of things. It sucks story that
remained to be definitively determined. I believe were finally at the point in which
the broader strokes can be voiced with some confidence. As historian Will Durant well
phrased it, and speaking of the Indian branch of the Aryans, quote,
the invasion and conquest of these tribes by the Aryans was part of that ancient
process whereby periodically the North has swept down violently upon the settled and pacified South.
This has been one of the main streams of history on which civilizations have
risen and fallen, like epical undulations. The Aryans poured down on the Dravidians,
the Achaeans and Dorians, upon the Cretans and Jeans, the Germans upon
the Romans, the Lombards upon the Italians, the English, upon the world.
Forever. The North produces rulers and warriors, the South produces artists and
saints. End quote. It's certainly true that one of the most obvious themes
running through the entirety of the ancient historical record is that of a people to
the north, full of energy and vitality and impressive competence and ability, going
where they pleased when they pleased, and either felling or creating nations and empires
in their way. Modern scholarship seems to be finally coming close to acknowledging this,
however slowly and be grudgingly. But I think many are even still missing
a key point. But with a spin, you see, it doesn't matter
what comes to the surface, it matters how they spin it and try to
reinforce what they've already claimed. That's when they're in control of the information and
how it's spread. They're in control of how it's spoken to. These warlike
invaders are constantly portrayed as brutish and brutal destroyers as opposed to creators warriors.
And once again, look at Germany World War two, what were they portrayed
as portrayed as but never cultivators or builders. I think this misses the idea
that these waves of Indo Europeans emanating from what seems to have once been a
central core, had been striking out into this great unknown for as long a
period as we have any history, and that there were countless such waves.
In fact, these waves seemed to compound and build upon one another. In
other words, an early wave might have pushed into an India or a Greece,
only to then be followed a few hundre years later by yet another wave
of genetic kin, yet of people whose culture may now appear more wild,
untamed, even brutal, because the perspective of the more settled peoples of the
earlier wave had gradually changed with time and a different mode of living. There's
an absolutely fascinating domino effect created by these waves, which we might even say
extended all the way to the time of Attila and ginghis Khan. In some
sense, as will cover in the next videos, a cyclical dance in which
brother and cousin peoples cascade upon and push one another ever further, and expansion
and population pressures gradually push this family across the majority of the known world.
One thing is certain the story of the Indo European people, who almost certainly
spring from a relatively singular route not more than a mere five to six thousand
years ago, perhaps after some massive cataclysm caused a major reset in major population
Bottlenet. Yes, it is perhaps the single most incredible, fascinating, powerful
and important story in human history. And it's a story that the vast majority
of remains to be told, a story that only now we're beginning to pick
up the traces of to cobble the pieces together. Can you not see how
the Abrahamic trio does its best to muffle muffle out because nothing is important prior
to it, right, it's a way of completely not even just it's shifting
the focus away from this and who's in control of the Abrahamic three and to
formulate into some coherent narrative. It's safe to say that no family of people's
has been more consequential, more impactful, more adventurous, and courageous and all
pervasive. It was that's you they're talking about. Majority of us out there,
that's you they're talking about. So take some take some pride in this,
Okay, feel good about where you come from for once, especially Germans
out there, you fellow Germans out there, you fellow Italians out there,
you fellow Europeans out there. And that's not to put anybody else down,
but I mean, we should understand who we are before we start trying to
figure out other people. I would, I would think, and they should
do the same for themselves. Everybody should be restoring their culture. It's just
the physical gifts of a larger stature that led to their success. These were
true pioneers, inventors, and that uniquely curious and energetic type that always and
everywhere pushes the envelope with a burning, innate, insatiable desire to explore,
to understand, and in my opinion, to create what they saw as a
just and natural order and the conditions for a longer term flourishing in their way.
In my opinion, we are collectively standing at the earliest stages of and
taking our first steps toward piecing together what I believe may be the most interesting
story in the world. And the more we come to understand here, the
more we'll ultimately come to understand about ourselves, about our journey, our own
character and wiring, our heritage, and perhaps even our very direction and purpose.
As dark as things may seem right this moment, our journey is far
from over, and in fact, it may well be that we are just
getting started. We have work to do, but that shouldn't be daunting,
that should be inspiring, all right, a couple of two three things,
and then we'll be closing this out a little bit early so I can prepare
for going out with JESSEEPI. Over on the FTJ media side. I'm also
broadcasting over there too. There's something called the Flood that's going on right now.
It's another show from I believe the source would be sfr FTJ Media,
but it's on the FTJ remedia right now. It's a live stream the Flood.
It's called Feurer Friday. I thought that was kind of funny, stealing
away my audience because I'm not trying to compete with anybody anyway. Let's go
over to well, was I going to show you stuff? Definitely stuff,
all right? So in the Patreon as we were talking, and I actually
dropped a couple of these links as well into the live chat here on Rumble.
But I put I put out, isn't that cool? I'm not I'm
not prude, all right. So it says waddle Waddell, right, Lawrence
Waddell, the guy that they were talking about, Lawrence Austin Widdell. I
found a few books of his that so the first one up on top,
which should be the last one I posted, but this is the origin of
the area Afflabat. I had to be careful how I wrote it on Patreon,
but there you have it, ninety eight pages. It's a short read.
Might be someplace to start. The British Edda, which is a This
is actually a zip file with four pdf files and four parts. Right,
that one is definitely something you want and check out. And then Makers of
I had also cut this down just because I didn't want to write all but
Makers of Civilization in Race and History and this is one of many books by
Lawrence Bodell, and that one is seven hundred and something pages. So this
is where the meat and potatos are. Right. Every time we do these
shows, if I can find the free PDFs as we're watching, I try
to do that. So if you see me moving around and doing things,
it's because I'm trying to provide the resources of references that they are bringing up
in conversation during their documentary or whatever you want to call that. And looks
like we picked up another free person there. That's good, right, So
there you have it. There's more stuff on here. There's lots of PDFs
on here now, okay, okay, And if you before I close down
the live chat. There also check out the two links. So the makers
of Civilization in Race and History is up there, and so is the area
and origin of the alphabet in the live chat for Rumble. Okay, that
way, you can just click them if you want them. And I think
that goes direct. I don't think that goes to archive dot org. First.
I think that's just supporting the thing. But I think it goes right
to that PDF page that you can download the direct connect. Like when you're
on your phone and there's something that says pdf find it and you click it
and already starts to download it. Yeah, something like that. All right,
So there we go. We're gonna be on FTJ shortly here with you
know who. So it's gonna be fine. Let me see if I can
should show you where it is should be should be saved here? Wait,
is that the wrong one? That's good? Uh? Yeah, it's sorry,
I don't I don't freaking know it's whatever. All right, So anyway,
let's go back over here real quick. We have to show you this
beautiful thing. All right. I'm moving. I'm leaving on the twentieth to
go to New York that's eight days from now. I have to I have
to make a huge amount of hot sauce and bring the San Diego before that's
over. That might interfere with next week's broadcast, just so you know,
but give sendgo dot com backslash b A A L B U S T E
R S Okay, Please support the show. Please support the show if you
want to do it through Patreon. These are all in the descriptions for Rumble
and for FTJ Media as well. The only place you don't see these things
is on Twitter because there's no body of type that you can put in with
a stream. So if you're on Twitter and you're interested, go check out
the Rumble or the ftjmedia dot com backslash channel backslash Ballbusters, which I also
have in the description of Rumble. Now, so all of you out here
listening, go make a log in and subscribe over to FTJ Media. It's
the reincarnation of josh u TV, but made even better with more support,
and it's going to be the new force to be reckoned with because it's a
real free speech platform, which means these silent these voices will not become silenced
despite all their efforts. Because they control all the other platforms, so they
decide when to shut you off. That's not going to happen over here.
So just understand that when everybody starts to disappear, look for them on FTJ
mediu and you know it would be the best way to do that. Start
your count over there now and start you know, maybe even watching from there
if the if the stream is uh is solid. The only problem with that
is if you want to right now with the live chat, you'd have to
be on Rumble for me to see what your comments are. Okay, so
there's that. So disguiselimits, Patreon dot com, backslash disguise d I S
g U I S E the limits. All right, this is another way
to support the show. You can go to PayPal dot e backslash ball Busters.
You can do it that way directly, or you can go to that
GoFundMe that's in the description as well. That's also another way to do it.
Try and think, just buy me a coffee. There's all these other
ways to do to help the show. Okay, all is appreciated. I
have this thing, like I said, I'm going to be doing so ten
days out in New York with my daughter. I haven't seen my family in
forever. Should be interesting, should be good, should be a nice bonding
experience. I can't wait personally, but also at the same time, I
can certainly wait six hundred lifetimes before getting on another plane after all the freaking
craziness that's been going on. Don't feel too confident about that. If anybody's
looking for a Perthday gift for me, this would be great. August twenty
eighth. But anyway, so this is a breaking intensive course, second edition
by Hardy Hansen and Gerald m quinn. So there you go, paperback,
don't get the hardcover, that would be cool. Anyway, There you go,
and I think we're good. I can only have ten minutes before I
have to get back on so I can't drag this out too long. You
guys have a wonderful day. All that's always appreciated. Thank you for showing
up, Thank you for caring about this stuff that I find is very important
and I hopefully do too. And it doesn't I hope everybody understands too that
if you're green, brown, orange, or whatever, this is not saying
that there's something better than you. It's just this is what I am.
So this is what I'm interested in, what you are. You should be
interested in too, in finding out the truth about because they were lied about
you too. They lied about everybody to make us small, to make us
insignificant, and to make us barbarians so that only they are the enlightened,
chosen people. That's what you have to remember. Let's reunite and restore our
own cultures together and together become allies against the true evil. Love y'all. Bye,