WEBVTT

1
00:00:02.240 --> 00:00:11.000
Little radical fundamental principles of freedom,
rational, self interesting and individual wants.

2
00:00:13.960 --> 00:00:20.440
This is the Uran Brook Show.
All right, everybody, welcome to you

3
00:00:20.519 --> 00:00:31.280
on book show Thursday equals twenty stop
that beats me. Okay, all right,

4
00:00:31.559 --> 00:00:37.079
Um, anyway, today we've got
an exciting show I think for everybody.

5
00:00:37.200 --> 00:00:42.320
Let me just make sure that the
stuff works. Okay, now it's

6
00:00:42.359 --> 00:00:50.920
still give me once and continue every
once in a while, everything has to

7
00:00:50.960 --> 00:00:53.799
be we whatever. All right,
there we go. All right, We've

8
00:00:53.840 --> 00:00:58.840
got Greg with us today. Um, and I'm excited. I know many

9
00:00:58.880 --> 00:01:04.000
of you are too. And I've
been anticipating asking questions. So we're going

10
00:01:04.040 --> 00:01:07.159
to dedicate most of the show today
to answering your questions. So feel free

11
00:01:07.200 --> 00:01:12.719
to come up with um with questions. As I said, anything that I've

12
00:01:12.760 --> 00:01:17.959
said during a show, ask a
philosopher that well, this is your opportunity

13
00:01:17.959 --> 00:01:21.560
to ask a philosopher. And we're
gonna we're gonna start by covering a bunch

14
00:01:21.560 --> 00:01:25.319
of different topics and then and then
cover you. So, um, I'll

15
00:01:25.359 --> 00:01:27.319
introduce great quickly. But I think
you all know Greg. But he's a

16
00:01:27.359 --> 00:01:33.560
senior scholar philosophy at the Salem Center
for Policy at the McCombs School of Business

17
00:01:34.319 --> 00:01:38.599
at UT Austin UM. He holds
a Bring Him Fellowship for the Study of

18
00:01:38.599 --> 00:01:44.359
Objectivism at the Center and as a
director of the Centers Program for Objectivity and

19
00:01:44.439 --> 00:01:49.959
Thought, Action and Enterprise. Hey, Greg, it's good. Oh,

20
00:01:49.959 --> 00:01:53.840
thank you, thank you. That
is that is high praise. So I

21
00:01:53.840 --> 00:02:00.159
appreciate that. Um. Let's see, so Greg actually does listen. It's

22
00:02:00.159 --> 00:02:04.719
the podcast. I'm I and I'm
I'm honored by that by that fact.

23
00:02:04.719 --> 00:02:08.560
So it's it's really it's really nice. So let's see. You know,

24
00:02:08.599 --> 00:02:13.879
I tended when was it? I
can't even tell a month or two,

25
00:02:14.000 --> 00:02:17.719
two ago, two months ago,
something like that. I attended a seminars

26
00:02:19.240 --> 00:02:23.439
at the Center, at the Selim
Center on on racism. So you do

27
00:02:23.479 --> 00:02:29.599
these workshops periodically, tell us a
little bit about the format that thinking about

28
00:02:29.719 --> 00:02:31.919
behind it, you know what the
purpose is, and then we can delve

29
00:02:31.960 --> 00:02:37.520
into the actual topics. Experiment with
the format from time to time. But

30
00:02:37.560 --> 00:02:46.080
the idea is to get UM people
together to talk through a topic. And

31
00:02:46.240 --> 00:02:50.879
there are several different types that we
do. U. One, can can

32
00:02:50.919 --> 00:02:59.479
you ever be hear what's going on
downstairs? My son's that's fine. One

33
00:02:59.639 --> 00:03:02.080
format is what I call kind of
like a pow wow kind of conference that

34
00:03:02.120 --> 00:03:07.960
it's not really good temperate, but
where people are relatively aligned in the premises

35
00:03:07.000 --> 00:03:12.400
that they're coming to the issue from, usually as objectivist or objectivist sympathetic people,

36
00:03:12.400 --> 00:03:15.120
and where just trying to think through
an issue, get our you know,

37
00:03:15.639 --> 00:03:20.080
process new information on it, or
thicket through. And the workshop on

38
00:03:20.199 --> 00:03:24.199
racism was like that. I have
another workshop on what I'm calling work to

39
00:03:24.240 --> 00:03:28.439
be Done in ethics coming up in
a tople of weeks, and most of

40
00:03:28.479 --> 00:03:30.759
the ones I've done this year have
been like that. Others of the workshops

41
00:03:30.759 --> 00:03:35.960
are ones where I just try to
get together a broad range of people,

42
00:03:36.039 --> 00:03:40.479
usually including some objectivists besides myself,
working on a topic the future interest,

43
00:03:40.919 --> 00:03:45.400
and those tend to have a format
more where there are works in progress being

44
00:03:45.400 --> 00:03:49.439
discussed and something like that. I
organized the conference says it was last epidemic

45
00:03:49.599 --> 00:03:55.039
year on work and well being,
the role of you know, career in

46
00:03:55.360 --> 00:03:59.439
one's well being. There's a whole
literature on well being in philosophy, which

47
00:03:59.439 --> 00:04:01.439
I think is interesting, one of
the more interesting things going on, and

48
00:04:01.479 --> 00:04:04.639
it doesn't talk that much about career
and work, and so that the idea

49
00:04:04.719 --> 00:04:10.240
was to bring those those topics together. We had people who are known for

50
00:04:10.240 --> 00:04:14.599
their writing home O beating there and
from a range of ideological perspective on that

51
00:04:14.599 --> 00:04:18.360
one. The one on racism that
the Uran ur apt was. The occasion

52
00:04:18.519 --> 00:04:24.639
was the Cists anniversary of Rand's essay
on Racists written in nineteen fifty three.

53
00:04:25.079 --> 00:04:27.920
Um, and you know, it
seemed to be the city's anniversary of the

54
00:04:27.959 --> 00:04:30.040
Civil Rights Act, which was one
of the things she writes about in that

55
00:04:30.279 --> 00:04:33.720
in that essay. And I had
the sense there's just a lot to say

56
00:04:33.879 --> 00:04:38.040
to kind of there's a lot of
thinking that needs to be done about what's

57
00:04:38.040 --> 00:04:42.199
happened in the last sixty years,
what to make of the claims Rand made

58
00:04:42.279 --> 00:04:45.720
in hindsight and recommend what things were
she predicting that actually occurred, How did

59
00:04:45.720 --> 00:04:49.680
it it fit with it? Um? And so I just got um the

60
00:04:49.720 --> 00:04:55.079
most of what I think, where
the smartest people with objectivism together on that

61
00:04:55.160 --> 00:04:58.800
of people who have in one way
or another special interest or knowledge about this

62
00:04:58.839 --> 00:05:01.040
topic. That there's some students.
I was working those fewer people who were

63
00:05:01.040 --> 00:05:08.160
around, and we were just kind
of talking the issues through and hoping that

64
00:05:08.279 --> 00:05:12.360
that will put us all in a
better position to comment on this issue in

65
00:05:12.680 --> 00:05:15.399
particularly next year and sixty four.
Right, that's just going to be a

66
00:05:15.480 --> 00:05:18.800
lot of occasions for this, I
hope. So let me ask you,

67
00:05:18.920 --> 00:05:24.160
so, So my guess is that
a lot of people listening are thinking,

68
00:05:25.199 --> 00:05:29.600
I mean, racism, what's there
to talk about? Isn't this isn't this

69
00:05:29.720 --> 00:05:33.920
pretty a clear issue? We're against
it? And I man wrote the essay

70
00:05:34.399 --> 00:05:40.360
and you know, and why why? What are the kind of the subtle

71
00:05:40.600 --> 00:05:45.279
or the or the complicated, or
the things we really need to talk through

72
00:05:45.360 --> 00:05:49.079
and think that are relevant right now, relevant today that we have to have

73
00:05:49.160 --> 00:05:54.879
a position on That's non that's not
obvious. Well, one thing is part

74
00:05:54.920 --> 00:06:00.120
of what really impressingly about I rand
As I was writing the copanion dynagram and

75
00:06:01.079 --> 00:06:08.120
or editing the companion, but but
co writing the chapter on her commentary on

76
00:06:08.160 --> 00:06:12.519
the events of her time, is
that she didn't just have opinions on abstract

77
00:06:12.639 --> 00:06:16.279
issues racism's bad, communism, a
fan or whatever. She had a story

78
00:06:16.360 --> 00:06:19.360
of what was going on in the
world, what issues were important, what

79
00:06:19.560 --> 00:06:23.720
trends were there, what things were
coming to for what was the effect of

80
00:06:23.800 --> 00:06:27.920
this election in knocking this issue out
of the headlines to this other one.

81
00:06:27.959 --> 00:06:30.839
I mean, she had a real
kind of take on the history of her

82
00:06:30.879 --> 00:06:33.360
time, and that was motivating her
to choose the issues that she chose to

83
00:06:33.439 --> 00:06:38.959
talk about, to emphasize them and
the emphasize others, and to have the

84
00:06:39.079 --> 00:06:43.160
take she had on I would vote
for to give an election when the election

85
00:06:43.199 --> 00:06:45.879
didn't matter, and when it did, and what other things matter, and

86
00:06:46.680 --> 00:06:50.480
understanding the role of race and racism
in American politics over the past sixty years

87
00:06:50.519 --> 00:06:55.000
and before um is I think something
really word and I think, would you

88
00:06:55.199 --> 00:07:00.519
think rethink the role I was playing
in politics in her time better? With

89
00:07:00.639 --> 00:07:03.879
some hindsight we saw how some of
these movements developed. But also I think

90
00:07:03.959 --> 00:07:08.879
she made a lot of um,
she makes some predictions about what we should

91
00:07:08.879 --> 00:07:13.480
expect to happen. Is to say
that I think are not enough heated.

92
00:07:13.879 --> 00:07:17.879
So my sense growing up was that
people tend to regard racism as the left

93
00:07:18.040 --> 00:07:26.399
issue, and they treat it as
um whatever time you know, you're you're

94
00:07:26.439 --> 00:07:29.319
you're talking in They treated that as
it was a real problem in the past,

95
00:07:29.519 --> 00:07:31.480
is fixed now and and all the
things people want to do about it

96
00:07:31.560 --> 00:07:34.680
now are bad, and they're bad
because there's not a problem anymore. There's

97
00:07:34.680 --> 00:07:42.839
a problems been fixed for most of
them, and that that kind of feeling

98
00:07:42.879 --> 00:07:45.319
about it was the way people have
acted about it in the eighties that I

99
00:07:45.399 --> 00:07:47.000
was married with, in the nineties
and the two thousands and now, And

100
00:07:47.079 --> 00:07:50.879
I just don't think that it's a
plausible position, and it's not a position

101
00:07:50.959 --> 00:07:56.879
that I think is in keeping with
what she says in that article. So

102
00:07:57.199 --> 00:08:01.120
she thinks that as you make your
laws more race conscious, and in particular,

103
00:08:01.639 --> 00:08:05.920
as you developed towards a more and
more of a welfare state, what

104
00:08:07.120 --> 00:08:11.519
you should expect to see is increasing
racial animosities, and that it should be

105
00:08:11.680 --> 00:08:16.959
particularly hard on the groups who are
the minorities who are the victims of historic

106
00:08:16.079 --> 00:08:20.360
precudices. And I've come to think
that that's true. Not everything that people

107
00:08:20.480 --> 00:08:24.800
who are on about racism these days
claim is real is real, and their

108
00:08:24.839 --> 00:08:28.199
solutions to it are usually things that
are going to make the problem worse.

109
00:08:28.680 --> 00:08:33.879
But if one has the kleinditive sense
everything got fixed sometime in nineteen sixty four,

110
00:08:33.879 --> 00:08:37.159
in nineteen seventy two, well,
I don't think that's realistic. And

111
00:08:37.200 --> 00:08:41.919
I think if you think about what
the fixes we're supposed to be laws that

112
00:08:43.120 --> 00:08:50.960
force people to integrate in their private
businesses, laws that really pervert employment contracts

113
00:08:52.000 --> 00:08:56.320
and education and so forth. You
wouldn't expect those to talk about. But

114
00:08:56.480 --> 00:08:58.519
moreover, there were things in the
culture that were really good and pushing in

115
00:08:58.600 --> 00:09:03.720
an a racist direction, such that
people were set up with Jim Crow weren't

116
00:09:03.720 --> 00:09:07.840
going to tolerated anymore. And and
so I think there's it's not like every

117
00:09:07.879 --> 00:09:09.840
single ball A lot was right about
the civil rights movement, as well as

118
00:09:09.879 --> 00:09:13.679
some things that were wrong with the
laws that came out of it and with

119
00:09:13.759 --> 00:09:20.039
the direction it tooks. It's a
kind of complicated historical thing going on where

120
00:09:20.080 --> 00:09:22.320
there's a movement that has a lot
of good at it and some significant bad

121
00:09:22.360 --> 00:09:28.039
and that gets worse over time,
and understanding its effects on the country,

122
00:09:28.080 --> 00:09:31.960
having effects of the laws of it. And also there's something this is going

123
00:09:33.000 --> 00:09:39.600
beyond Ram's piece, but there's a
questions to why the movement of the nineteen

124
00:09:39.639 --> 00:09:43.200
sixties and early nineteen sixties was framed
in terms of civil rights, which I

125
00:09:43.240 --> 00:09:45.919
think is a good and positive framing, and a lot of what they were

126
00:09:45.960 --> 00:09:50.559
advocating for was good and a lot
better than what happened advocated for in terms

127
00:09:50.600 --> 00:09:52.519
of racial justice earlier than that or
later in that, and so there are

128
00:09:52.600 --> 00:09:58.000
questions about why that was happening,
and you know how to understand this development.

129
00:10:01.080 --> 00:10:05.679
Yeah, and you know, clearly
we're living in a period in which

130
00:10:05.519 --> 00:10:09.879
racial issues have become you know,
more of an issue, more of a

131
00:10:11.000 --> 00:10:16.519
problem, and they really all around
us would obviously be alm in twenty twenty

132
00:10:16.600 --> 00:10:22.440
and everything around that, and you
know, understanding where that comes from,

133
00:10:22.759 --> 00:10:26.279
critical race theory, understanding where that
comes from with the context for that is.

134
00:10:26.600 --> 00:10:33.639
And yeah, political sides are around
racial issues, Um, how little

135
00:10:33.720 --> 00:10:37.600
of what's suggested a solutions to them? Our solutions. I think you see

136
00:10:37.639 --> 00:10:43.279
this in so many issues. We've
become factualized and tribalized, and um,

137
00:10:45.080 --> 00:10:48.320
things are perceived as being pro or
anti some group as most the pro or

138
00:10:48.360 --> 00:10:52.679
anti sub principle, and it ends
up, you know, harming every yeah

139
00:10:52.919 --> 00:10:56.039
one of the people. Yeah,
good, Sorry. There are certain kinds

140
00:10:56.080 --> 00:11:01.480
of law and institutions though that when
they're in a society, are going to

141
00:11:01.720 --> 00:11:09.440
tend to um madnify the effects of
prejudices people have that they're not they're not

142
00:11:09.519 --> 00:11:13.480
there explicit for you, but they're
their prejudices that they're you know, maybe

143
00:11:13.480 --> 00:11:18.759
not willing to express openly, and
that will tend to UM preserve status for

144
00:11:18.879 --> 00:11:22.559
people who are politically connected and knowledgeable
about how to use the political system and

145
00:11:22.919 --> 00:11:28.639
preserve lack of access to to um
opportunities from people who don't. Uh.

146
00:11:28.720 --> 00:11:33.919
And what kinds of things are like
that? Well, um, the biggest

147
00:11:33.080 --> 00:11:37.879
is a public education system where you
take a major factor of the economy and

148
00:11:37.960 --> 00:11:43.159
a major factor of people's lives and
something that's to do with a very personal

149
00:11:43.240 --> 00:11:46.440
value that people cherish my kids and
how they're going to rage and you collab

150
00:11:46.480 --> 00:11:50.519
and devise it, and so you
make it that there's this system that's stoling

151
00:11:50.559 --> 00:11:54.679
out education to everybody m at a
collective you know, and there's collective decision

152
00:11:54.759 --> 00:11:58.799
making about it. You can't come
in and choose where you're going to go

153
00:11:58.960 --> 00:12:03.679
unless you do at a mani pulative
us system. And whatever prejudices and fears

154
00:12:03.720 --> 00:12:11.000
and worries and concerns people have are
going to they've got client together there.

155
00:12:11.279 --> 00:12:13.320
And what's going to happen is that
people who are good at getting politically connected

156
00:12:13.360 --> 00:12:18.240
are going to be able to get
something that semi good for their kids and

157
00:12:18.320 --> 00:12:20.240
people who are are not going to
be able to do. Likewise, when

158
00:12:20.279 --> 00:12:24.480
you have laws that are non objective
and unenforceable, unenforceable at scale, like

159
00:12:24.519 --> 00:12:28.000
a war on drugs, what's going
to happen is it's going to get enforced

160
00:12:28.080 --> 00:12:31.639
more on the people who are going
to make less of us think about it

161
00:12:31.679 --> 00:12:35.080
getting encoursed on them. They have
less access to high pricavoitism. So there

162
00:12:35.120 --> 00:12:39.120
are kinds of predictable things in the
system. And then when you have the

163
00:12:41.120 --> 00:12:48.960
process of hiring an association sets that
it's made litgic litigious around hiring and firing

164
00:12:50.000 --> 00:12:52.159
of people of protected groups, what
you're going to get is a lot of

165
00:12:52.559 --> 00:12:58.480
box checking around bath so that everybody
is trying to be diverse in a politically

166
00:12:58.559 --> 00:13:05.399
correct, socially acceptable way and nobody
is free to you're the kind of real

167
00:13:05.559 --> 00:13:09.639
entrepreneurial work that would be involved in
having the most productive workforce you could have

168
00:13:09.759 --> 00:13:15.480
that integrates categories of people that weren't
well integrated into it in creative, dynamic

169
00:13:15.559 --> 00:13:18.919
way. And so I think you
see a lot of features in our economy

170
00:13:18.000 --> 00:13:24.960
that you would expect to cause kind
of stagnation and resentment on issues where there

171
00:13:24.000 --> 00:13:26.960
had been a lot of prejudice,
and I think that continues to exist.

172
00:13:28.120 --> 00:13:31.679
Is not the main story or the
whole story of the twentieth century or twenty

173
00:13:31.720 --> 00:13:33.879
first century, but it's one of
the factors that are there. And I

174
00:13:33.960 --> 00:13:39.559
think rather they're reacting to claims of
persistent or institutional racism by saying there's no

175
00:13:39.679 --> 00:13:46.399
there, there, there's nothing that
these are maybe misconceptualizations worth thinking about what's

176
00:13:46.399 --> 00:13:50.039
actually going on here. Which of
the unjust policies we're already familiar with might

177
00:13:50.120 --> 00:13:54.799
be involvetimism and how do these things
play out? So that's one of the

178
00:13:54.879 --> 00:13:58.159
things I've been thinking about, it
having a racism And this all comes out

179
00:13:58.200 --> 00:14:03.240
of kind of the analysis of a
mixed economy and the politics pool. And

180
00:14:03.720 --> 00:14:07.279
once you have a mixed economy,
it's just a question which tribe you associated

181
00:14:07.360 --> 00:14:13.279
with to get your leverage. And
one of the tribes that people associated with

182
00:14:13.480 --> 00:14:20.399
is a racial tribes or color skin
tribes because they've viewed that way in because

183
00:14:20.840 --> 00:14:26.360
it gives them a big gives them
a leverage. It's really really you're talking

184
00:14:26.360 --> 00:14:30.120
about this in an article in Nations
Unity. Yeah, is one of our

185
00:14:31.360 --> 00:14:37.320
not enough read pieces. Yeah,
and it's interesting because you don't think of

186
00:14:37.559 --> 00:14:41.559
Inanda's being concerned about a nation's unity, right, And she has this perspective

187
00:14:41.559 --> 00:14:48.480
and unity that is quite interesting and
quite um and really important, particularly today

188
00:14:48.639 --> 00:14:54.960
when we're seeing such a disunited United
States in the in the article on races

189
00:14:56.000 --> 00:14:58.720
of which she talked about groups that
have come to act because their own destroyers

190
00:14:58.759 --> 00:15:05.559
and business then are often by advocating
types of policies that um, you know,

191
00:15:05.000 --> 00:15:11.320
end up getting them persecuted more.
And um she thinks the leaders of

192
00:15:11.399 --> 00:15:15.039
the civil rights movement are you know, giving the business leaders a run for

193
00:15:15.120 --> 00:15:18.919
their money on that front. Uh, in nineteen twenty three when he's right,

194
00:15:20.039 --> 00:15:26.519
this is Martin Luther Kings, which
you know M Marcus Garder L Yeah,

195
00:15:26.519 --> 00:15:31.600
I mean relatively speaking, these are
good guys. Yeah, it's compared

196
00:15:31.600 --> 00:15:33.879
to anything we have today. These
are good people. Um. But I

197
00:15:33.919 --> 00:15:37.879
think there's she's making some point.
Yeah, there's a lot. You can

198
00:15:37.919 --> 00:15:41.879
see a lot about it in history. Well. I found I found the

199
00:15:41.039 --> 00:15:46.559
workshop really valuable, um, partially
because a lot of history came out that

200
00:15:46.639 --> 00:15:50.840
I wasn't familiar with. And I
got to meet Isaiah Slade, who I

201
00:15:50.960 --> 00:15:54.240
later interviewed on the show, which
I thought was was terrific and he was

202
00:15:54.320 --> 00:15:58.159
a good yeah, just a lot. I really enjoyed getting can He's such

203
00:15:58.200 --> 00:16:03.279
a right guy that's really gotten going
and we stopped it and yeah, and

204
00:16:03.360 --> 00:16:07.080
a real future intellectual who's going to
have a voice out there, I think

205
00:16:07.159 --> 00:16:11.000
so. I think that's that's important. And having somebody like that at the

206
00:16:11.120 --> 00:16:15.919
workshop is incredibly valuable because his knowledge
of objective he's still young, he's still

207
00:16:15.000 --> 00:16:22.159
new to objectivism in many regards.
Having him the exposed to everybody is incredibly

208
00:16:22.240 --> 00:16:26.200
It goes both ways. We benefited
from him, and I'm sure he benefited

209
00:16:26.200 --> 00:16:30.279
a lot from exposure to some of
the leading objectivist to intellectuals. In part,

210
00:16:32.200 --> 00:16:33.960
there were some weather problems that Austen
to follow the game. He ended

211
00:16:34.039 --> 00:16:37.519
up staying out here for the better
part of a week after that a week,

212
00:16:37.600 --> 00:16:41.320
okay, a lot more time interacted. There are a number of really

213
00:16:41.559 --> 00:16:49.879
right young people who I think are
coming to philosophical and political issues in a

214
00:16:49.919 --> 00:16:56.039
way that's deeply influenced by objectivism and
apart from all of the political tribes,

215
00:16:56.120 --> 00:17:00.720
and um, I think this is
doing that. Not the only one,

216
00:17:00.759 --> 00:17:04.079
but Mohammed was also at that conference, and you know, I've been talking

217
00:17:04.079 --> 00:17:11.160
a lot about stuff. So um, you said you have some you have

218
00:17:11.200 --> 00:17:15.160
a workshop coming up on ethics,
and yeah, so tell us a little

219
00:17:15.160 --> 00:17:18.359
bit about what the goal is and
where you see kind of the work on

220
00:17:18.440 --> 00:17:22.559
ethics going from here. The next
workshop we're doing is going to be next

221
00:17:22.680 --> 00:17:25.880
not just coming with him, but
the weekend after, and it's on work

222
00:17:25.960 --> 00:17:30.640
to be done in ethics, and
it's mostly academics with a background an objectivism,

223
00:17:30.680 --> 00:17:36.240
including students, but also some people
who are do more popular writing.

224
00:17:36.880 --> 00:17:40.440
And we're getting together to read some
of the you know, some sets of

225
00:17:40.599 --> 00:17:45.160
articles in contemporary athts, somebody objectivists, most not, and get a kind

226
00:17:45.200 --> 00:17:51.400
of read on some of the literatures
that are out there. And basically from

227
00:17:51.440 --> 00:17:55.519
each topic we're covering with the workshop, I'm dividing it into two sessions,

228
00:17:56.000 --> 00:17:59.200
and the first one is just like, can we get to the bottom of

229
00:17:59.279 --> 00:18:02.480
this issue and figure what we think
is right and on there? What's the

230
00:18:02.559 --> 00:18:06.279
truth here? The second one,
the survipolions work to be done an athletics

231
00:18:06.400 --> 00:18:10.279
is Okay, what kind of writing
projects might there be here? Primarily I'm

232
00:18:10.319 --> 00:18:12.759
thinking academic kind of writing just because
of the people, but also popular writing.

233
00:18:14.200 --> 00:18:18.160
Um. And one of the things
I'm trying to reinforce somewhat for myself

234
00:18:18.240 --> 00:18:22.240
but for everyone else there too,
is that there's two separate bits of thinking

235
00:18:22.279 --> 00:18:26.880
you need to do, like what's
true? And then now, okay,

236
00:18:26.960 --> 00:18:29.559
what can I write on this?
Who's the audience I would be writing for?

237
00:18:29.880 --> 00:18:32.640
What are their premises already? What
you know, they're not coming out

238
00:18:32.720 --> 00:18:34.559
from the same perspective I had.
And um, there are a few young

239
00:18:34.640 --> 00:18:37.240
red students who who are interested in
as it who are going to be part

240
00:18:37.240 --> 00:18:40.960
of this. But also, um, you know so little the philosophers.

241
00:18:41.000 --> 00:18:45.319
If you guys are familiar with UM, we'll be there and we're just going

242
00:18:45.359 --> 00:18:49.920
to be sort of strategizing what areas
are worth researching more, what projects might

243
00:18:49.960 --> 00:18:56.000
be for writing. And this has
meant to kind of inspire work going forward.

244
00:18:56.559 --> 00:19:00.640
And and here do you mean you
know, theory in terms of something

245
00:19:02.440 --> 00:19:07.160
expanding on what Rand has already written
on ethics in terms of theoretical stuff or

246
00:19:07.359 --> 00:19:12.759
application application to culture politics. Most
of what we're doing at this workshop is

247
00:19:15.799 --> 00:19:18.240
theory stuff in meta ethics. What
is human well being? Like, what

248
00:19:18.480 --> 00:19:22.279
is the role of reason in life? There's an interesting work being done on

249
00:19:22.359 --> 00:19:25.400
that and now and the weston is
how can we engage with it? How

250
00:19:25.440 --> 00:19:27.519
can we um you know, get
some trap to us at work. But

251
00:19:29.160 --> 00:19:33.759
there are also two fields where there
are a number of people doing more applied

252
00:19:33.880 --> 00:19:37.480
work in ethics. One of them
there are concentrations. One of them is

253
00:19:37.599 --> 00:19:44.440
bioethics and medical athets, just a
few people who have found issues doing early

254
00:19:44.519 --> 00:19:47.880
in their careers doing work on that. And the other is business ethics.

255
00:19:48.000 --> 00:19:51.759
And as it happens, just who
is available for this conference. Most of

256
00:19:52.000 --> 00:19:53.480
the business as its people can get
here in the medical asths of people.

257
00:19:53.480 --> 00:20:00.799
But so we're doing a period issues
in medical ethics and bioethics. Well yeah,

258
00:20:00.799 --> 00:20:03.559
I have a follow up by Zoom
or something on the business. Well

259
00:20:03.880 --> 00:20:07.720
yeah, I mean the bioethics is
fascinating. I mean, I was I

260
00:20:08.440 --> 00:20:11.240
mentioned today the Audicle today and on
the show The Audicle. I don't know

261
00:20:11.240 --> 00:20:17.440
if you've heard the news show this
morning about the uh they're taking a skin

262
00:20:17.559 --> 00:20:21.960
cell and turning it into a I
mean, it's fascinating stuff and gene editing.

263
00:20:22.119 --> 00:20:26.160
I mean, there's so much that
is going to happen that is going

264
00:20:26.200 --> 00:20:30.039
to push the boundaries of how we
think about human beings, about reproduction,

265
00:20:30.200 --> 00:20:34.839
about design of babies. I think
in the next twenty thirty years. Yeah.

266
00:20:34.839 --> 00:20:38.599
I remember when the mouse stem cell
study first came out. Yeah,

267
00:20:38.599 --> 00:20:44.279
because my wife and I were trying
to get pregnant and trying by artificial meats

268
00:20:44.279 --> 00:20:47.160
and the problem was getting enough egg. Yeah, we could just do this.

269
00:20:48.519 --> 00:20:52.119
It's off and now they they could
do it, you know male.

270
00:20:55.759 --> 00:20:59.119
Yeah, I think so, and
and but also raises ethical issues. So

271
00:20:59.240 --> 00:21:03.920
I think it's a it's an exciting
time to be in that field as some

272
00:21:03.039 --> 00:21:07.920
of these boundaries of being being pushed
in terms of in terms of what and

273
00:21:08.039 --> 00:21:14.640
how how to pursue this research.
It's also the ones that just connected to

274
00:21:14.720 --> 00:21:18.759
what we're doing a conference. One
thing that I don't really understand too well

275
00:21:18.920 --> 00:21:23.599
is in Europe how some of the
doctoral programs and post docs work. Is

276
00:21:23.640 --> 00:21:27.759
that people kind of in America,
you you get accepted to a program and

277
00:21:27.799 --> 00:21:30.240
you find someone who will agree to
be u dissication to provis when you write

278
00:21:30.240 --> 00:21:33.640
a dissication. But some of what
happens in Europe is you're accepted into a

279
00:21:34.000 --> 00:21:38.359
particular program to work on a particular
project. Often that's a cross disciplinary and

280
00:21:38.480 --> 00:21:42.200
there are a couple of people who've
been through the OAC who have are in

281
00:21:42.279 --> 00:21:49.839
these kind of programs and their doctoral
research is associated with some ongoing multidisciplinary project

282
00:21:49.920 --> 00:21:57.519
to do with bioles and research on
environmental contaminants into what effect they might have

283
00:21:57.640 --> 00:22:00.440
on health and what ethical that you
have, or there are a couple of

284
00:22:00.480 --> 00:22:04.680
different things that it's not the person's
own project then, but there are really

285
00:22:04.839 --> 00:22:07.640
issues in the project and they're thinking
about how do I, you know,

286
00:22:08.079 --> 00:22:11.200
find work to do, how do
I do things affect it within these contacts,

287
00:22:11.200 --> 00:22:14.279
And there are a couple of people
with found the opportunities like this.

288
00:22:14.359 --> 00:22:17.319
So I think it's it's worth our
getting our act together to think about what

289
00:22:17.359 --> 00:22:22.000
does it look like to apply the
objectives deficits. Yeah, absolutely all right.

290
00:22:22.039 --> 00:22:25.880
So we've got a few questions I
think here on on the on the

291
00:22:26.119 --> 00:22:32.079
racism issue, surmainers will just jump
into those. Adam, Yeah, we

292
00:22:32.160 --> 00:22:34.319
can talk, we can we can
go in and out of the questions.

293
00:22:34.720 --> 00:22:40.400
Um, Adam has a question.
Um, thank you, Adam. That's

294
00:22:40.559 --> 00:22:45.720
very generous of you. Uh.
Did did rand discuss a delineate between racism

295
00:22:45.039 --> 00:22:52.599
hating someone based on race versus prejudice
that is coming across a menacing looking person,

296
00:22:52.640 --> 00:22:57.440
um, you know, being a
grandmother in the dark. Alley does

297
00:22:57.519 --> 00:23:04.359
the view? Does does she view
pre judgment versus racism um of an individual

298
00:23:04.519 --> 00:23:10.720
based on a class such as age, race as rational? Um? She

299
00:23:10.839 --> 00:23:14.720
doesn't. Can my knowledge talk about
that in the article on racism. She

300
00:23:15.039 --> 00:23:22.119
has a very wide conception of racism. So it's a it's it's basically ascribing

301
00:23:22.240 --> 00:23:27.519
more moral characteristics to people based on
their lineage. Um. So it's not

302
00:23:27.640 --> 00:23:32.079
even you know, black, white, or or as large as what you

303
00:23:32.160 --> 00:23:34.720
might call a raise the Japanese,
the English or whatever. If you you

304
00:23:34.759 --> 00:23:38.119
know, think he's from a good
family and therefore his dreams or sting,

305
00:23:38.160 --> 00:23:41.200
he's probably a venture or whatever.
You know, that's um, that's the

306
00:23:41.240 --> 00:23:45.559
same the same thing he that called
family values the kind of meni racism.

307
00:23:45.799 --> 00:23:48.920
And so one of the things we
talked about is, you know, okay,

308
00:23:48.200 --> 00:23:52.599
granted the business broad kind of racism, of biological determinism, what are

309
00:23:52.640 --> 00:23:56.960
the other concepts that we um,
you know, my call racism and how

310
00:23:56.960 --> 00:24:00.400
do they relate? Um? But
she does. If you're talking about snap

311
00:24:00.599 --> 00:24:03.920
judgments, you might make them somebody
there from they're hearing. She certainly does

312
00:24:04.039 --> 00:24:07.359
talk about it them. I mean
she thinks that's what an emotion, right,

313
00:24:07.640 --> 00:24:11.119
It's a snap assessment. You have
them something based upon you know,

314
00:24:12.000 --> 00:24:18.920
automatically calculated by your subconscious, based
upon um, you know what appears to

315
00:24:19.000 --> 00:24:22.839
you, and you could have them
for people, and the various things about

316
00:24:22.839 --> 00:24:27.240
them can trigger you and people.
I don't think those emotions as such are

317
00:24:27.279 --> 00:24:33.319
either rational or irrational, but you
have to think about how to act on

318
00:24:33.400 --> 00:24:36.440
them. Can you trust them?
You can't regard them as a source of

319
00:24:36.519 --> 00:24:38.680
knowledge. You might have to act
on your emotions and you know, if

320
00:24:38.680 --> 00:24:41.559
you have a split second decision to
make that to what they're therefore, but

321
00:24:41.680 --> 00:24:45.440
you need to recognize that they're not
accurate. And I think now this isn't

322
00:24:45.480 --> 00:24:51.160
something Rand says herself. But if
you're in a situation you're in a career,

323
00:24:51.200 --> 00:24:53.240
for example, where you're finding that
you often have to act on snap

324
00:24:53.400 --> 00:24:56.799
judgments. You know, someone who
runs in differing buildings and us direct be

325
00:24:56.880 --> 00:25:02.319
people or a police officer or whatever
it might be, then you might really

326
00:25:02.400 --> 00:25:06.160
want to think about what you can
do to uh, you know, tune

327
00:25:06.200 --> 00:25:08.440
these kind of snap judgments to be
more accurate, And I think it's a

328
00:25:08.440 --> 00:25:14.119
psychological question what you can do and
what works and what doesn't do exactly well,

329
00:25:14.160 --> 00:25:17.200
I think I think part of what
he's asking is, so if you're

330
00:25:17.759 --> 00:25:21.920
if you're in a dark alley and
you're in a city where, uh,

331
00:25:22.279 --> 00:25:26.599
you know, disproportionately crime is committed
by uh, you know, black people.

332
00:25:26.680 --> 00:25:30.599
Let's say so members of particular ethnicity
or raise or something, and somebody

333
00:25:30.640 --> 00:25:38.680
of that ethnicity approaches you, is
it irrational to take into account that ethnic

334
00:25:38.759 --> 00:25:42.880
background or that color skin in deciding
whether it across the street or to run

335
00:25:42.920 --> 00:25:48.279
away or to do whatever, whether
that's the emotion or whether rationally if you

336
00:25:48.440 --> 00:25:56.519
if you're thinking it through, Yeah, if we're talking about you have time

337
00:25:56.559 --> 00:26:00.440
to make a rational assessment that are
you're trying to think it through? You

338
00:26:00.680 --> 00:26:06.519
always have so much other information besides
the color of their skin and their physiopommy,

339
00:26:06.880 --> 00:26:08.559
how are they walking and they're moving
to a two quickly or slowly?

340
00:26:10.160 --> 00:26:11.400
How are they dressed? This is
going on? What you know? Are

341
00:26:11.440 --> 00:26:17.160
they looking right at you? We're
looking away? And I suspect that people

342
00:26:17.319 --> 00:26:23.119
are overinfluenced by racial sey types of
these things. But of course you should

343
00:26:23.119 --> 00:26:27.359
take it down all the information you
have. I just wonder that people sometimes

344
00:26:27.599 --> 00:26:32.079
think that's what they're doing, and
it's time yea, and they they come

345
00:26:32.119 --> 00:26:34.799
to snap decisions or they or they
base their decisions on emotions. They're not

346
00:26:34.880 --> 00:26:41.400
actually using reason in making those coming
to the conclusions. Right, thank you,

347
00:26:41.720 --> 00:26:47.359
Adam. We've got another Adam.
The other says immigration laws have been

348
00:26:47.519 --> 00:26:52.720
historically interwined with racism, especially anti
Asian racism. Why are obstacles to immigration

349
00:26:52.839 --> 00:26:57.880
so seldom integrated into the discussion of
racism. I think that's a really good

350
00:26:57.920 --> 00:27:00.839
point. It's a good point on
a few levels. Um. So,

351
00:27:00.960 --> 00:27:06.000
further way, we have the Chinese
exclusion app which was awful, and um,

352
00:27:06.079 --> 00:27:10.000
you've had other you know, the
whole history of debates over immigration have

353
00:27:10.119 --> 00:27:14.559
had to do with with with race. Um. But also there's another way

354
00:27:14.759 --> 00:27:18.119
to the fact. If you have
laws on the books, let's say that

355
00:27:18.240 --> 00:27:25.039
you can't racially discriminate, right,
Um, then I think that bad is

356
00:27:25.039 --> 00:27:33.000
a reason for people to be less
open to immigration. They suppose you think,

357
00:27:33.079 --> 00:27:37.480
for example, that people coming over
from a certain Muslim country are likely

358
00:27:37.559 --> 00:27:40.079
to bring their value their people from
the health or whatever it is. There's

359
00:27:40.119 --> 00:27:42.440
some place where you think their culture
is bad, the people who are coming

360
00:27:42.519 --> 00:27:47.319
over from this place are going to
bring their culture and in et ceteras,

361
00:27:47.400 --> 00:27:51.000
it's it's it's it's somehow going to
be bad, whether you're right or wrong

362
00:27:51.119 --> 00:27:53.839
on that. Right, But suppose
you have that kind of concern, well,

363
00:27:53.960 --> 00:27:56.720
it's a lot different. We're gonna
have to deal with them. Don't

364
00:27:56.759 --> 00:28:00.799
don't hire these kinds of people if
you think because they're there, you can't

365
00:28:00.880 --> 00:28:02.960
keep them out of the country.
To some of the people who want to

366
00:28:02.960 --> 00:28:04.319
be able to whole deal with them, and then let's similar to the event,

367
00:28:04.359 --> 00:28:07.440
it's no, it's not your problem, right, Um, But if

368
00:28:07.440 --> 00:28:11.799
you're forced to be blind to these
kinds of same considerations that you yourself,

369
00:28:11.839 --> 00:28:15.960
whether correct and you're in concent correctly, um think are relevant to hiring once

370
00:28:17.000 --> 00:28:19.200
the people are in the country.
Um that I think you know, there's

371
00:28:19.240 --> 00:28:22.640
a reason to worry that people are
being shoved down your throat. The less

372
00:28:22.720 --> 00:28:27.799
you are free to build the association, the more lawsibility there is the resentment

373
00:28:27.839 --> 00:28:32.519
of people being in a feeling you're
feeling like they're voice. These issues are

374
00:28:32.640 --> 00:28:37.039
really connected, and I think most
of the opposition, or very much of

375
00:28:37.119 --> 00:28:41.200
the opposition to immigration does come from
racial prejudices, and I think you are

376
00:28:41.240 --> 00:28:48.039
unjustified and getting wrong. UM.
Nevertheless, I think this dynamic UM plays

377
00:28:48.079 --> 00:28:55.759
into all right, So UM,
so let's talk about some of the other

378
00:28:55.880 --> 00:29:00.000
workshops that are coming up. There's
the ethics on that's in a couple of

379
00:29:00.039 --> 00:29:03.599
weeks, and then what follows that. So we have two that we're doing

380
00:29:03.880 --> 00:29:07.240
in June that you're coming out for. Ye a few other people are on.

381
00:29:07.480 --> 00:29:11.160
I usually talk about these publicly better
than we So UM. One is

382
00:29:11.359 --> 00:29:15.359
on philosophy of economics, and the
occasion for that is there are a couple

383
00:29:15.440 --> 00:29:21.559
of UM people in graduate programs and
economics are going into economics, and I

384
00:29:21.680 --> 00:29:23.920
believe we're going to get robbed tar
out for that last they booked the good

385
00:29:25.480 --> 00:29:30.440
and we're going to talk about kind
of UM issues at the intersectional philosophy the

386
00:29:30.519 --> 00:29:36.440
connomics that are of particular interest to
objectivists or people as a background and objectivism

387
00:29:36.920 --> 00:29:40.799
particularly given the kinds of economics that
they're they're likely to study and they're going

388
00:29:40.839 --> 00:29:44.000
to study them. And then the
other one that's connected to that only and

389
00:29:44.079 --> 00:29:48.559
that there's a lot of common interests
is uh we want to get some people

390
00:29:48.599 --> 00:29:52.920
together to think about the role of
UM, probability, mathematics, statistics in

391
00:29:53.079 --> 00:30:00.359
good reasoning, and we used to
go right and Rome with that. There's

392
00:30:00.359 --> 00:30:06.920
a lot of emphasis on Bayesianism in
the pencilcle rationalist community coming out of Silicon

393
00:30:07.039 --> 00:30:08.319
Vallee and outs, where a lot
of these people are very influenced by called

394
00:30:08.400 --> 00:30:15.039
Paper and UH and others UM.
Of course the docific influence on them as

395
00:30:15.039 --> 00:30:18.640
a kind of transmission belt for paper
people who've read this book. There have

396
00:30:18.720 --> 00:30:22.079
been some UH some books, so
I thinks have a lot right about them,

397
00:30:22.160 --> 00:30:26.839
Like there's a book The Scout Mindset
by I forget her name on it

398
00:30:26.960 --> 00:30:33.759
rationally rather than defensively UM. But
there's a lot of UM ways that they're

399
00:30:33.799 --> 00:30:36.920
thinking about using probability that I finally
got to do the hest of others and

400
00:30:37.000 --> 00:30:40.440
seem like there's something right about them, but also something's wrong about them.

401
00:30:40.480 --> 00:30:44.279
And so I know you've had the
same observation and others have it. And

402
00:30:44.440 --> 00:30:48.480
probability has been discussed by objectivist epistemologists
here and there over the years, but

403
00:30:48.640 --> 00:30:52.400
not I think really gone to it
up depth about And so this is the

404
00:30:52.440 --> 00:31:00.519
gathering of people who either know epistemology
well and who are know the use of

405
00:31:00.599 --> 00:31:10.160
staffs well for one reason or not
to do with Ye. Yeah, I'm

406
00:31:10.200 --> 00:31:14.319
looking forward to both of those.
I mean, the the stat one also

407
00:31:14.880 --> 00:31:19.079
kind of rose to my attention because
I read Pinker's book on rationality and and

408
00:31:19.240 --> 00:31:27.480
really for Stephen Pinker, rationality thinking
generally comprises of basically doing probabilities, or

409
00:31:27.559 --> 00:31:33.839
big chunk of what he considers thinking
is getting the probabilities right. And and

410
00:31:33.960 --> 00:31:37.200
I know a lot of people who
think that way, and almost all of

411
00:31:37.279 --> 00:31:44.240
them people in the financial world,
where you do a lot of probabilities,

412
00:31:44.759 --> 00:31:49.400
and who are good poker players.
Again, because poker is a probability game.

413
00:31:49.480 --> 00:31:56.039
It's it's it's about knowing the probabilities
of every hand. And that intersection

414
00:31:56.119 --> 00:32:01.960
about what it what, what it
what? What constitutes? What epistemological status

415
00:32:02.000 --> 00:32:07.640
does probability have? I think is
very interesting. UM. And in some

416
00:32:07.880 --> 00:32:13.640
cases some of what people are suggesting
are talking about around probability. UM.

417
00:32:14.039 --> 00:32:17.960
In case where I don't think it's
literally correct, UM strikes me as a

418
00:32:19.119 --> 00:32:23.720
kind of two concrete version of something
that is correct. More attracted, like

419
00:32:24.000 --> 00:32:28.559
when you're doing a certain kind of
thing you want to attract probabilities literally and

420
00:32:28.680 --> 00:32:31.400
think about, well, how often
did my predictions come out? Did all

421
00:32:31.400 --> 00:32:35.559
those things I thought were thirty percent
likely to you know, two third of

422
00:32:35.599 --> 00:32:37.400
them come out right or not?
And then how am I little adjustment?

423
00:32:37.559 --> 00:32:40.319
Is the kind of thing um,
the scott All exam you're talking about about,

424
00:32:40.640 --> 00:32:45.000
UM, that kind of thinking seems
to be just right for certain kinds

425
00:32:45.079 --> 00:32:47.920
of things. Yes, if you're
making predictions, for example, UM.

426
00:32:49.200 --> 00:32:52.799
For other kinds of thinking, I
think it's not plausible, but there is

427
00:32:52.920 --> 00:32:57.720
something that you need to be doing
that that to kind of you know,

428
00:32:58.039 --> 00:33:00.160
that's the version of it in some
fields. What's the word? You know?

429
00:33:00.240 --> 00:33:02.960
Another what's the abstraction? What did
it look like to be checking integrating

430
00:33:04.000 --> 00:33:09.920
your work over time, error checking
UM and and UM and refinding your methods

431
00:33:10.000 --> 00:33:15.400
of knowing and judging? Yeah,
I mean, I think I think there's

432
00:33:15.599 --> 00:33:20.880
there's a lot there's a lot of
work to be done in that area that

433
00:33:21.039 --> 00:33:23.839
objectives haven't yet done yet. You
know, there's there's been some relationship to

434
00:33:23.920 --> 00:33:25.799
it, but there's a lot of
work to be done. Yeah. Great.

435
00:33:27.319 --> 00:33:30.759
The literal stats you know you need
to use not just you put a

436
00:33:30.880 --> 00:33:32.440
number on your hunches, which you
have. There's too much of what goes

437
00:33:32.480 --> 00:33:37.680
on congressionality community, but where you
know you're actually doing regressions and things.

438
00:33:38.160 --> 00:33:42.000
Um, you know what's good and
bad use of statistics, and you you've

439
00:33:42.000 --> 00:33:45.240
had some shows on us that have
been I have been really good. Yeah,

440
00:33:45.319 --> 00:33:46.960
I mean I'm I'm I think i'm
I'm fairly good at catching some of

441
00:33:47.000 --> 00:33:52.480
the bad uses of statistics. But
but move on a practical level. But

442
00:33:52.640 --> 00:33:54.359
again there's there's a lot of thinking
and there's a lot of you know,

443
00:33:54.440 --> 00:33:58.400
they have been There has been a
lot of work done by non objectivists about

444
00:33:58.440 --> 00:34:01.599
how to lie with statistics and how
statistics can be a distorted and a lot

445
00:34:01.640 --> 00:34:07.200
of that work is is good work. It's um, it's true. Apollo

446
00:34:07.319 --> 00:34:10.760
Zeus says, any duke, Yes, any any I know any duke?

447
00:34:10.800 --> 00:34:14.880
Any duke is she? She won
the world Championship with poker a couple of

448
00:34:14.960 --> 00:34:19.400
times. She's the most famous female
poker player. And I have I have

449
00:34:19.559 --> 00:34:23.239
a book here signed. She's a
she's a friend, so she's a character.

450
00:34:23.679 --> 00:34:28.400
She would be interesting to talk to
her about statistics and how how she

451
00:34:28.599 --> 00:34:31.000
runs the odds in her mind as
she's playing poker. I mean you need

452
00:34:31.079 --> 00:34:36.480
a unique mind to do that.
Uh, I know. Do you play

453
00:34:36.559 --> 00:34:39.360
poker? Great? Well, no, well I don't play it. Well.

454
00:34:39.719 --> 00:34:45.440
I enjoy it because of the banter. I enjoy harassing the other poker

455
00:34:45.519 --> 00:34:47.360
player and trying to get under their
skin. But other than that, I'm

456
00:34:47.360 --> 00:34:51.639
not a very good poker player.
There was a period when the app store

457
00:34:51.679 --> 00:34:55.000
first came out of the iPhone,
one of a couple of apps, and

458
00:34:55.039 --> 00:34:59.480
I was playing it a lot as
I was doing it bad, trying to

459
00:34:59.480 --> 00:35:02.400
get mind dog that I got better
at it then. And I remember I

460
00:35:02.440 --> 00:35:06.760
went to I was at Vegas for
something, and I sat at the table

461
00:35:06.840 --> 00:35:08.920
and just kind of sad. I'm
hardly bad until I had a really good

462
00:35:09.000 --> 00:35:13.039
hand and one a few hundred dollars, and then I'm said, I'm never

463
00:35:13.119 --> 00:35:22.079
playing games. Yeah, well that
reminds me. I should pitch okon to

464
00:35:22.199 --> 00:35:24.039
this crowd. You guys should all
come to okon. And one of the

465
00:35:24.199 --> 00:35:27.679
one of the fun things we do
with okon is played pocus. So there

466
00:35:27.760 --> 00:35:32.159
was a poker tournament, which is
a lot of fun. That's true.

467
00:35:32.320 --> 00:35:37.239
That's true. And I do play
in the ocon games and I do try

468
00:35:37.280 --> 00:35:39.920
to get under people's skin, and
I think I'm quite effective at it.

469
00:35:40.079 --> 00:35:43.199
It's a lot of fun. There's
a lot of bands that goes on,

470
00:35:43.400 --> 00:35:47.039
which is which is fun? Um. So with the economics the philosophy ecnonomicis

471
00:35:47.079 --> 00:35:55.239
give us some um idea of topics
that are kind of cross between economics and

472
00:35:55.679 --> 00:35:59.719
UH and philosophy. I mean they
can think of one obviously, with with

473
00:36:00.039 --> 00:36:06.199
well up talk coming, he famously
wrote an article about objective value and the

474
00:36:06.280 --> 00:36:12.840
objectivist conception of objective value versus the
Austrian conception of a subjective value series of

475
00:36:13.039 --> 00:36:16.840
value in economics that Healy relate to
the philosophical series of value. That's one

476
00:36:16.920 --> 00:36:20.920
topic. I need input of other
people. And one of the thing that

477
00:36:20.960 --> 00:36:23.400
about to sending email out about to
a few people is what other topic?

478
00:36:23.920 --> 00:36:32.039
There are some others? Um.
A lot of the the economists that are

479
00:36:32.119 --> 00:36:37.639
good, A lot of the Austrians
and others are attracted to anarchism and some

480
00:36:37.719 --> 00:36:40.039
other ideas that are an audious objectivism. Why use that and how do we

481
00:36:40.159 --> 00:36:45.119
understand how we navigate that? Um? What about the views of human nature

482
00:36:45.199 --> 00:36:49.400
that are often assumed in economics,
like human beings are maximizers and so forth?

483
00:36:49.719 --> 00:36:52.840
Is that true? It's not true? Okay, well then um is

484
00:36:52.880 --> 00:36:55.840
it wrong? Let it be In
economics it's an approximation that's good enough for

485
00:36:55.920 --> 00:37:00.519
certain purposes, not for others.
How does what you say? What about

486
00:37:00.599 --> 00:37:05.760
the ways that are kind of like
uasai economic that people try to model things

487
00:37:05.920 --> 00:37:08.679
like in for example, public choice
theory or various types of game theory that

488
00:37:08.679 --> 00:37:13.440
are applied to foreign policy for real
politics, it's just a valid kind of

489
00:37:13.559 --> 00:37:15.840
method or not as they valid in
some cases about in other cases? How

490
00:37:15.880 --> 00:37:20.840
does it relate to a more principled
ways of thinking about our policy? Whew?

491
00:37:20.840 --> 00:37:23.079
You take seriously go to an evil
behind a lot of these things,

492
00:37:23.119 --> 00:37:28.880
a kind of assumption that there's a
particular way that people are motivated and that's

493
00:37:28.960 --> 00:37:32.440
kind of uniform across people. But
that's not true. So how much does

494
00:37:32.480 --> 00:37:35.760
it matter if that's not true?
And for which of these cases does it?

495
00:37:36.039 --> 00:37:38.719
What would an economics that took more
seriously position and the diversity of values

496
00:37:38.760 --> 00:37:45.440
look like? What is value formation
and how does that relate to a series

497
00:37:45.480 --> 00:37:52.000
of value with the economics Going back
to Tar's work a paper, to what

498
00:37:52.119 --> 00:37:59.679
extent do you find how is rend
view of value distinctive, particularly with regards

499
00:37:59.679 --> 00:38:02.639
to that it's not all some fixthed
end that you just calculate the means to

500
00:38:02.760 --> 00:38:06.880
some end that we all share people
of different values, some rational and some

501
00:38:07.039 --> 00:38:09.199
irrational. What it did for value
to irrational? I was it formed?

502
00:38:09.800 --> 00:38:14.079
Um? And so forth. Yeah, I mean, I think when you

503
00:38:14.159 --> 00:38:20.920
read what is Capitalism, it's astounding
how epistemological that auticle is. And so

504
00:38:21.039 --> 00:38:27.159
there's a whole question about the relationship
between epistemology and economics, whether it's around

505
00:38:27.199 --> 00:38:32.679
objective values. Um. Also,
I think it's interesting to talk about the

506
00:38:32.880 --> 00:38:40.679
whole behavioral economics literature, the the
the biases, the Colman and others who

507
00:38:42.159 --> 00:38:47.519
have documented kind of biases that people
have UM in the economic behavior to the

508
00:38:47.880 --> 00:38:55.760
numbers and math and rationalitics, statistical
devices also, as it turns out,

509
00:38:57.119 --> 00:39:02.880
bridging conversations, but some of the
work being done by the people as advices

510
00:39:02.920 --> 00:39:10.119
and research interested. Yeah. Yeah, yes, the whole behavioral biases thing

511
00:39:10.280 --> 00:39:14.960
is is a big deal in academia
and in a lot of different fields.

512
00:39:15.159 --> 00:39:19.639
I mean, um, um,
Okay, let's let's go back to the

513
00:39:19.719 --> 00:39:27.559
questions um Andrew asks can Gregg expound
in man's life as the ethical standard and

514
00:39:27.760 --> 00:39:32.280
each man's life as his purpose.
All those two principles in different contexts,

515
00:39:32.519 --> 00:39:38.559
are they connected? I think they're
connected. So for each person his own

516
00:39:38.679 --> 00:39:44.239
life is his purpose. That's equivalent
to his happiness being his purpose. But

517
00:39:44.760 --> 00:39:50.599
because happiness is the emotional state you
feel when you're succeeding and living in your

518
00:39:50.599 --> 00:39:52.480
life is going well, when you're
living in a way, it's going to

519
00:39:52.599 --> 00:39:58.920
sustain your time when your your joints
are non contradictory because all your values are

520
00:40:00.079 --> 00:40:04.639
this interaction. UM. So that
is the purpose as an individual's life or

521
00:40:04.679 --> 00:40:08.960
happiness, the standard of man's life
UM. And the standard is abstract where

522
00:40:09.000 --> 00:40:14.760
the purpose is concrete. The standard
is like a principle for a now a

523
00:40:14.840 --> 00:40:20.400
type of thing human beings that you
use to create a particular thing a life

524
00:40:20.440 --> 00:40:24.280
for yourself. So in if you're
if you're a doctor, that's um,

525
00:40:24.440 --> 00:40:30.119
you know, um operating on somebody's
body. Um. Your goal is is

526
00:40:30.239 --> 00:40:34.800
that person's health, right, that's
what you're trying to achieve, but you

527
00:40:35.079 --> 00:40:37.719
work out how to achieve it by
the standard of human health. You know

528
00:40:37.119 --> 00:40:39.920
what a spleen is for in general, if it's for anyzing And now the

529
00:40:40.280 --> 00:40:43.639
arts meant to work in general,
it's for a human being, and you

530
00:40:43.840 --> 00:40:49.039
use that knowledge to guide you to
help fix up this particular person um Likewise,

531
00:40:49.159 --> 00:40:52.800
you use knowledge of human life in
general, what kind of thing it

532
00:40:52.920 --> 00:40:57.880
is, what components it needs to
um to make your own life better,

533
00:40:57.920 --> 00:41:00.280
to make your to make a human
life for yourself. The one thing I

534
00:41:00.400 --> 00:41:05.239
want to kind of add to that
that's maybe a little less obvious that has

535
00:41:05.320 --> 00:41:09.079
been more and more parted by taking
on this topic lately, is and which

536
00:41:09.159 --> 00:41:15.039
isn't is obviously suggested by the medical
analogy, is how much creativity is involved

537
00:41:15.280 --> 00:41:20.079
in coming up with a life for
yourselves in the in the end, in

538
00:41:20.159 --> 00:41:22.840
pursuing your own life. In the
healthcare case, you might think it's there's

539
00:41:22.880 --> 00:41:25.679
one way the organizers of us to
function, and if yours are and I'm

540
00:41:25.679 --> 00:41:30.719
going to try to steer them into
that nature or you know, apply drugs

541
00:41:30.840 --> 00:41:34.639
or surgery is needed to get it
into that niche. And it's all the

542
00:41:34.719 --> 00:41:38.079
same for everybody. But what makes
a human life work is much more abstract

543
00:41:38.239 --> 00:41:43.559
than that there is at a concrete
level, though one way we all live

544
00:41:44.840 --> 00:41:46.480
to get that there's one way that
human means if you have to go very

545
00:41:46.559 --> 00:41:50.920
extract. You have to be rational, We have to be productive, we

546
00:41:51.039 --> 00:41:53.400
have to be purposeful. Therefore,
our lives have to be organized around goals,

547
00:41:53.760 --> 00:41:57.400
not have half begaun Those goals have
to be productive, at least the

548
00:41:57.440 --> 00:42:02.199
central one. Otherwise you're going to
quickly run those resources and then everything would

549
00:42:02.239 --> 00:42:06.599
pulling against one another. We need
to be justin at the other version.

550
00:42:06.639 --> 00:42:10.159
But these are every's every abstract you
can you know, you know, hurting

551
00:42:10.199 --> 00:42:15.559
the sheep or writing philosophy books or
composing a symphony or you know, baking

552
00:42:15.599 --> 00:42:17.119
a loaf of bread, and you
know, and any of these things to

553
00:42:17.239 --> 00:42:21.920
be your your avocation or a parent
or whatever, and you can still deal

554
00:42:21.960 --> 00:42:29.320
with these principles. So a lot
of what's involved in making your own life

555
00:42:29.360 --> 00:42:31.760
for yourself is figuring out coming up
with a life to yourself. One of

556
00:42:32.119 --> 00:42:37.280
the cardinal values for endous purpose and
purposes your choice of the happiness which your

557
00:42:37.320 --> 00:42:40.599
reason is going to proceed to achieve. And I don't think that choice is

558
00:42:40.639 --> 00:42:45.679
just you choose happiness as opposed to
unhappiness or not making a choice at all.

559
00:42:45.840 --> 00:42:47.880
No, you choose like this,
this is what my life's going to

560
00:42:47.920 --> 00:42:52.599
be about. And the principles of
ethics. I think it is sort of

561
00:42:52.679 --> 00:42:57.880
like the principles of composition, Like
if you're making an artwork, or you're

562
00:42:57.880 --> 00:43:00.639
going to make your own specific artwork. You're writing at my shrug, you're

563
00:43:00.639 --> 00:43:05.039
painting the Mona Lisa, you're writing
this song, or who's sculpting the data.

564
00:43:05.079 --> 00:43:08.639
There's some particular sculpture you're making with
a theme and everything integrated around that,

565
00:43:09.000 --> 00:43:14.719
And the principles of art are about
how to do that, how to

566
00:43:14.920 --> 00:43:19.840
make whateverything you're making wells that it
functions as a sculpture, as an artwork,

567
00:43:20.119 --> 00:43:22.480
And likewise, the principles of ethics, or how to make a human

568
00:43:22.519 --> 00:43:25.800
life to yourself, what principles does
it have to have to hang together into

569
00:43:25.880 --> 00:43:30.800
a self sustaining all that will sustain
you across the human life then able to

570
00:43:30.960 --> 00:43:37.360
live a able you to be happening. All right, thank you, Andrew.

571
00:43:39.719 --> 00:43:44.400
Oh wow, okay, this is
from India. Hello from India.

572
00:43:44.760 --> 00:43:47.159
In Rand's novels, people are black
or white heroes of villains, but in

573
00:43:47.239 --> 00:43:52.000
the real world a person's psychology,
knowledge and context make it difficult to slot

574
00:43:52.079 --> 00:43:58.000
them. So young readers get confused
and can be obnoxious to which people around

575
00:43:58.119 --> 00:44:01.159
them, and he thoughts, this
is funny because we're actually just talking about

576
00:44:01.199 --> 00:44:07.400
this before the show started, about
how young objectivists have a hard time categorizing

577
00:44:07.480 --> 00:44:14.039
people and they treat them in appropriately
as a consequence of this. Yeah,

578
00:44:14.639 --> 00:44:16.880
I don't think you could overstate the
extent to which it's true. In Ram's

579
00:44:16.960 --> 00:44:22.199
novels, there were complex characters Um
Gail Wine and hero or villain, well

580
00:44:22.639 --> 00:44:27.599
elements of each, Even Guy Frank, an overall bad guy that has some

581
00:44:27.719 --> 00:44:31.599
real redeeming characteristics that set him apart
from um, from some of the other

582
00:44:32.119 --> 00:44:37.840
um weird and throughout most of the
novel, right, a hero but acting

583
00:44:37.880 --> 00:44:42.480
on the wrong critical than Datney Hacker
for that matter, I'm acting self destructively.

584
00:44:42.760 --> 00:44:45.719
He's the guiltiest man in the room. What a different disco, A

585
00:44:45.800 --> 00:44:49.320
room that includes Jimmy Tacker, right, yeah, and all kinds of really

586
00:44:49.400 --> 00:44:57.960
artable. So it's not, Um, there's more. It's not everyone's all

587
00:44:58.039 --> 00:45:01.039
black or all white in her novel. Um, it's that the gray that

588
00:45:01.119 --> 00:45:06.000
there is, the complexity is resolvable
down into bits of black and white,

589
00:45:06.519 --> 00:45:12.159
kind of like with yourn shirt and
uh, and you don't need that many

590
00:45:12.199 --> 00:45:15.239
steps to do the resolvent In real
life, I think it's a lot more

591
00:45:15.320 --> 00:45:19.480
complicated, a lot more steps,
a lot more subtle. Piece. I

592
00:45:19.519 --> 00:45:22.960
think it is ultimately resolvable into this
act was good or bad, This aspect

593
00:45:23.000 --> 00:45:27.400
of this person's character is good or
bad. This part of their life,

594
00:45:27.719 --> 00:45:30.239
their professional life, their family life, their romantic life, that whatever is

595
00:45:30.280 --> 00:45:34.800
good or bad. But it takes
work to sort those things out, and

596
00:45:34.920 --> 00:45:37.119
that it might be, you know, pretty small compartments you have to get

597
00:45:37.159 --> 00:45:39.639
down to to get to where they're
pure water or pure or the other.

598
00:45:40.000 --> 00:45:44.639
And there's a lot of thinking about
how the different factors interact. But I

599
00:45:44.719 --> 00:45:47.239
think that's true, and it's you
know, it's part of what one learns

600
00:45:47.280 --> 00:45:52.079
and learning how to judge people.
Ran past an article on the cult of

601
00:45:52.119 --> 00:45:55.719
moral brain is that talks a bit
about that well, And I think I

602
00:45:55.800 --> 00:46:00.760
think for young people who've just been
exposed to objectivism and just study objectivism,

603
00:46:00.199 --> 00:46:05.960
it is objectively very difficult. You're
you're trying to do the kind of work

604
00:46:06.000 --> 00:46:07.920
that Greg described, but you don't
have the experience. You're sixteen, seventeen,

605
00:46:08.000 --> 00:46:13.039
eighteen twenty, you don't know exactly
how to do it, and it's

606
00:46:13.320 --> 00:46:21.760
it's very easy to um make mistakes
and to be obnoxious, to treat people

607
00:46:21.840 --> 00:46:25.840
in ways they don't deserve in because
you don't just don't have the context and

608
00:46:27.039 --> 00:46:29.480
you don't have the knowledge of how
to applied. But part of how you

609
00:46:29.639 --> 00:46:34.320
learn is by failing at it.
It's by doing it and trying and falling

610
00:46:34.519 --> 00:46:39.400
flat on your face. And it's
not like people who don't have idealistic philosophies

611
00:46:39.519 --> 00:46:45.920
to draw the objectivists do any better. They regard everybody is missed and ready,

612
00:46:46.000 --> 00:46:50.079
don't have very high standard, try
to go along to get along,

613
00:46:50.280 --> 00:46:52.840
and you know, often mess up
their lives doing it. World judgment is

614
00:46:52.920 --> 00:46:59.920
really important. A lot of people
don't make, don't pronounce pristiculously wrong moral

615
00:47:00.039 --> 00:47:02.840
Texicans because they're too cowardly to make
more of this at all. And you've

616
00:47:02.920 --> 00:47:06.320
got to, you know, it's
an important part of life to make them,

617
00:47:06.559 --> 00:47:08.440
not only to shout them from the
rooftop, but to be thinking about

618
00:47:08.480 --> 00:47:10.440
the people you need. What's good
about it, what's bed about it,

619
00:47:10.440 --> 00:47:14.199
what's good about it, what's better
about What do I want to emulate and

620
00:47:14.920 --> 00:47:17.280
myself of his actions and support him
doing it? And what things do I

621
00:47:17.360 --> 00:47:23.400
want to not and um, and
you know that's you know, most people

622
00:47:23.440 --> 00:47:30.000
aren't doing that anymore. And one
of the things that objectivism makes theories you

623
00:47:30.119 --> 00:47:32.000
need to do it, but then
once you recognize the need to do it,

624
00:47:32.360 --> 00:47:36.519
are to do it? Well,
need to learn it. Yeah,

625
00:47:36.559 --> 00:47:39.599
and young people, young people stumble
around doing that until they figure it out.

626
00:47:40.400 --> 00:47:45.639
Um, and it's hard, all
right, let's see Michael asked design

627
00:47:45.719 --> 00:47:52.199
rans epistemology break down. If we're
all schizophrenic or do some schizophrenic people know

628
00:47:52.440 --> 00:47:59.000
how some deep at some deep level
that then not registering reality as it actually

629
00:47:59.199 --> 00:48:04.880
is. I don't know. I'm
not sizophendics so far as I know.

630
00:48:05.400 --> 00:48:08.840
I think if if everybody were schizophendic, who would be quite a bad situation

631
00:48:08.880 --> 00:48:15.440
would be in. I assume or
understand that there are degrees of schizophrenia.

632
00:48:15.480 --> 00:48:20.639
There are people who are in the
midst of a psychotic episode and can't make

633
00:48:20.719 --> 00:48:23.760
sense of anything around them, or
or only can with the utmost of effort,

634
00:48:23.880 --> 00:48:27.079
and you know, a kind of
heroic struggle. And there are other

635
00:48:27.159 --> 00:48:34.840
people who occasionally have you know,
who aren't in that situation, and you

636
00:48:34.880 --> 00:48:38.239
know, maybe occasionally have a hallucination
but can tell that they're hallucinations. I

637
00:48:38.480 --> 00:48:45.920
assume there are milder and more intense
forms and milder and more intense episodes.

638
00:48:46.119 --> 00:48:51.480
If we take the kind of most
intense kind of thing, we're having hallucinations

639
00:48:51.519 --> 00:48:53.920
and can't tell what's true from what's
false, and what's real from what's not.

640
00:48:54.280 --> 00:48:58.800
Then yet any epistemology is inefflatable in
that pend sad you're not in control

641
00:48:58.880 --> 00:49:01.119
of your mind, you're not able
to um, and there's they're very little

642
00:49:01.159 --> 00:49:06.400
activity said to you, and if
there was, you wouldn't be able to

643
00:49:06.440 --> 00:49:08.719
process it and take it in.
And so that's not what epistemology is for

644
00:49:09.320 --> 00:49:15.280
for um. I'm sure there are
you know, milder or borderline cases,

645
00:49:15.400 --> 00:49:19.679
or you know, cases where people
are suffering from serious mental illness but not

646
00:49:20.239 --> 00:49:23.360
so serious that they're all the time
unable to be in touch with reality,

647
00:49:23.480 --> 00:49:29.519
where then you know, epistemological guidance
is development to them to help them understand

648
00:49:29.559 --> 00:49:31.800
what's going on with them and what
kind of help they might mean to seek

649
00:49:31.880 --> 00:49:36.840
and what to do. But it's
um, you know, difficult and tragic

650
00:49:36.920 --> 00:49:38.960
situation, but a little and it's
not very well understood. I don't think,

651
00:49:39.280 --> 00:49:44.440
and I don't think all the gradations
are are well, I don't understand

652
00:49:44.480 --> 00:49:47.320
them, and I'm not sure how
all the professionals. Yeah, and this

653
00:49:47.480 --> 00:49:51.400
idea that Waltz getsophrenic is a little
episode. All you have to do is

654
00:49:51.440 --> 00:49:53.440
look around the world, assuming we're
seeing the world as it is, and

655
00:49:53.599 --> 00:49:59.320
see skyscrapers and and uh and advanced
technology and iPhones and things like that,

656
00:49:59.400 --> 00:50:01.679
to know that some somebody at least
does not schizophrenic. Otherwise none of this

657
00:50:01.800 --> 00:50:06.960
could be created. What would it
mean to say we're all Ye means a

658
00:50:07.000 --> 00:50:10.000
particular condition? Does that even mean
the same thing as psychotic or crazy?

659
00:50:10.039 --> 00:50:15.599
You're you're seeing things, it's a
particular diagnosis. Yeah, um that you

660
00:50:15.760 --> 00:50:19.800
you know, you need to know
something about it to make you can't If

661
00:50:19.840 --> 00:50:22.559
everybody has it, then nobody doesn't
mean any Yeah, and it has to

662
00:50:22.639 --> 00:50:25.800
contrast with something normal, And if
we're all schizophrenics, there is no normal.

663
00:50:25.880 --> 00:50:35.599
Maybe, so it's it's yeah,
it's Liam asks what gives philosophy Vieto

664
00:50:35.719 --> 00:50:43.480
power over scientific claims? Yeah,
I mean I would love this Vieto power

665
00:50:43.719 --> 00:50:47.480
language, as though we philosophers are
apparent, But there is some truth to

666
00:50:47.599 --> 00:50:52.280
it. And so a little at
phrase Harry's sometimes maybe I remember, Harry,

667
00:50:53.719 --> 00:50:59.000
do you think about it? Is
that philosophy's role is to integrate our

668
00:50:59.079 --> 00:51:01.480
knowledge. It's to bring it all
together into one's You have a lot of

669
00:51:01.519 --> 00:51:07.039
different special sciences studying different things,
but you have to have a kind of

670
00:51:07.039 --> 00:51:10.360
perspective on how does knowledge fit together, What are the ultimate fundamentals from which

671
00:51:10.360 --> 00:51:15.519
all of these sciences branched out,
and what holds the multidimcently have an overview

672
00:51:15.599 --> 00:51:24.480
perspective on the world. And if
something sucks that it contradicts the fundamentals on

673
00:51:24.599 --> 00:51:30.800
which all knowledge is based, and
or if it would and or it precludes

674
00:51:30.960 --> 00:51:37.079
knowledge from integrating, then there must
be something wrong with it. And so

675
00:51:37.239 --> 00:51:42.079
in that sense, it's it's philosophy's
job to mind the integration and the fundamentals.

676
00:51:42.320 --> 00:51:45.880
It's philosophy's job to point out when
one of these kinds of errors is

677
00:51:45.960 --> 00:51:47.079
made. It So in that sense, you know, you would take it

678
00:51:47.119 --> 00:51:52.199
as veto powers the one to call
out. But I don't think it's job

679
00:51:52.599 --> 00:51:55.800
therefore is to say, you know
what, the mechanics is out, this

680
00:51:57.000 --> 00:51:59.760
branch of evolution is out, this
thing or whatever, like you know,

681
00:52:00.119 --> 00:52:05.039
to throw scident, take your disciplines
out. It's job is to say something's

682
00:52:05.079 --> 00:52:08.360
wrong here, This thing as it's
being formulated, et cetera, is wrong.

683
00:52:08.639 --> 00:52:13.519
Maybe it's a it's just an error
in formulation, and there they are

684
00:52:13.559 --> 00:52:15.679
a real important truth here that just
needs to be kind of cleaned up or

685
00:52:15.679 --> 00:52:19.960
disinbbu with it. Maybe the whole
field is garbage made. But that's not

686
00:52:20.079 --> 00:52:22.800
the kind of thing philosophy can tell. It can just tell if you're saying

687
00:52:22.840 --> 00:52:27.639
there's no such thingious cause and effect, if you're saying that we are deterministic

688
00:52:27.760 --> 00:52:30.199
puppets and therefore that we can't know
anything. If you're saying, um,

689
00:52:32.079 --> 00:52:35.480
that we're not in touch with who, we can't be in touch with reality.

690
00:52:35.480 --> 00:52:39.199
If you're saying we're all schizophrenic.
Uh, something's gone wrong. Ye,

691
00:52:39.639 --> 00:52:44.079
Now what exactly? And what might
be salvageable from what you're saying?

692
00:52:44.159 --> 00:52:47.719
What might be a tremendous value that's
gotten, you know, mixed up into

693
00:52:49.599 --> 00:52:52.760
a hash with some other things.
You can just this conclusion that you really

694
00:52:52.800 --> 00:52:57.480
need someone's depend get real expertise in
the field to sort of out and tell.

695
00:53:00.000 --> 00:53:07.039
So KFEX thank you k X for
the fifty dollars Kfex says um popping

696
00:53:07.079 --> 00:53:08.599
in just to say thank you,
Greg. Your woke made it easier for

697
00:53:08.679 --> 00:53:14.840
me to understand objectivism and better apply
its ideas to my life. Your old

698
00:53:14.880 --> 00:53:20.480
can talk a few years ago.
Principles and post of values is absolute gold.

699
00:53:21.639 --> 00:53:27.960
Thank you. Yeah the women didn't
know. Oh yeah, yeah,

700
00:53:31.840 --> 00:53:35.199
that was a good talk. It
was a good It was a fun confidence.

701
00:53:35.239 --> 00:53:37.039
I enjoyed that confidence. It was
a nice theme for the confidence.

702
00:53:40.440 --> 00:53:45.679
Okay, Greg, are you're still
glad you voted for Biden? He just

703
00:53:45.800 --> 00:53:49.800
announced he'll be running for second term. Do you actually think Trump has a

704
00:53:49.920 --> 00:53:54.239
chance of winning? Um? I
don't know. Yeah, Trump has a

705
00:53:54.320 --> 00:53:58.800
chance of me I mean, he
won once. There's a sizable number of

706
00:53:58.880 --> 00:54:05.159
people who love him no matter why
he does. And I think he's less

707
00:54:05.199 --> 00:54:08.199
than fifty fifty shot would But if
he's the nominee and he's not certain to

708
00:54:08.280 --> 00:54:10.239
be, then I want to go. He's pretty likely to be, so,

709
00:54:10.320 --> 00:54:14.719
yeah, he definitely has a shot
of running and um, and I

710
00:54:14.840 --> 00:54:16.440
hope he doesn't. Am I glad
I voted for Biden? Yeah, I

711
00:54:16.519 --> 00:54:21.920
think he was an easy choice.
Biden's awful. He did a bad president

712
00:54:22.400 --> 00:54:25.760
but he's been a bad president in
pretty typical ways. There are a couple

713
00:54:25.760 --> 00:54:29.119
of things he did that are worse
than I expected, but not by much,

714
00:54:29.760 --> 00:54:31.760
and a couple of things that are
better than I expected, though again

715
00:54:31.880 --> 00:54:36.280
not by much. He's crummy.
I wish he wasn't president, but given

716
00:54:36.360 --> 00:54:39.719
the options we have or he might
be, he's better than most of the

717
00:54:39.760 --> 00:54:44.760
people on the left who could have
been the Democratic nominee, and he's better

718
00:54:44.800 --> 00:54:54.159
control. Yes, Um, I
like numbers asked. Is it a sanction

719
00:54:54.920 --> 00:55:01.440
to work with an alco capitalist like
Brian Kaplan? Um, I have worked

720
00:55:01.440 --> 00:55:04.039
with him, as you said,
I've done it, did a podcast with

721
00:55:04.119 --> 00:55:07.519
and you're gonna do a debate with
him in a dat I don't think sanction

722
00:55:08.039 --> 00:55:13.920
is and work with or binary in
that way. Either someone is you know

723
00:55:14.000 --> 00:55:15.960
such that they're not to be sanctioned
so you have never never have anything to

724
00:55:16.000 --> 00:55:21.920
do with them, or um uh, you're doing something to do with an

725
00:55:21.920 --> 00:55:27.280
attention in them. I think it's
much more. You think about what is

726
00:55:27.360 --> 00:55:31.199
the meaning of this interaction? What
am I saying by having this interaction was

727
00:55:31.280 --> 00:55:36.039
this person? Um? What am
I endorsing about them by doing that?

728
00:55:36.159 --> 00:55:39.440
And in what contexts, and so
I do think it's a sanction if you're

729
00:55:39.480 --> 00:55:45.760
working with an atarcho capitalist in any
way or even debating with them in any

730
00:55:45.840 --> 00:55:51.199
way that carries the implication. Here
we are people who are fundamentally aligned,

731
00:55:52.800 --> 00:55:58.719
but we have what we regard as
a you know, uh, intramural difference,

732
00:55:58.760 --> 00:56:01.440
you know, a fairly trivial price
between us within our team. Fundamentally

733
00:56:01.519 --> 00:56:05.960
we're together, but then there's this
issue of difference that we have, and

734
00:56:07.119 --> 00:56:12.360
then we're having that issue out.
And when I interact with America capitalists,

735
00:56:12.360 --> 00:56:17.039
I very much try to explode any
implication to that thing. I interact with

736
00:56:17.159 --> 00:56:21.280
them in the way that I would
interact with a Marxist. There might be

737
00:56:21.400 --> 00:56:23.280
some things on which we agree,
but there are a lot of things on

738
00:56:23.360 --> 00:56:29.159
which we don't, and I don't
take the agreements is fundamental to disagreements,

739
00:56:29.559 --> 00:56:34.559
except for the agreement that this kind
of intellectual exchange is worth having in this

740
00:56:34.719 --> 00:56:38.000
context. M Now Capitlan' is an
interesting case because he's not there. There

741
00:56:38.039 --> 00:56:44.639
are America capitalists who I think are
fundamentally about mealism and tearing things down,

742
00:56:44.800 --> 00:56:49.440
and that's their kind of thing.
Um. I think that's kind of what

743
00:56:49.519 --> 00:56:52.760
dominates the Music Institute at this point, and I think it was what dominated

744
00:56:52.880 --> 00:56:57.599
rossbarg is the kind of leading light
of it. I don't think that Brian

745
00:56:57.679 --> 00:57:00.920
Kaplan as that kind of person in
his motivation. Um, and so I

746
00:57:01.280 --> 00:57:06.199
like where I don't like other people
that I you know, I think brans

747
00:57:06.280 --> 00:57:09.519
politics the way I think of the
politics, and some of the kind of

748
00:57:09.599 --> 00:57:13.599
leptists that I deal with, you
know, are good on this or that

749
00:57:13.679 --> 00:57:15.639
issue. I am excitful want this
of that issue, but really well on

750
00:57:15.800 --> 00:57:22.840
other issues. Good. Yeah,
I was gonna I was gonna say that

751
00:57:22.000 --> 00:57:27.719
it's it's sanctioned is not exactly that. And as you said, not all

752
00:57:28.079 --> 00:57:30.800
and alc capitalists are the same.
I mean, there are some people that

753
00:57:30.880 --> 00:57:34.159
you wouldn't want to do anything with, you wouldn't want to engage in any

754
00:57:34.239 --> 00:57:37.119
kind of debate with, because there's
such nihilists, and there are others that

755
00:57:38.000 --> 00:57:44.360
like byan that that I think that
you can actually engage with on certain issues.

756
00:57:45.079 --> 00:57:49.519
Let's a Richard ask, is there
a branch of philosophy that deals with

757
00:57:50.039 --> 00:57:55.960
meaning, like a combination of teleology, exiology, and semantic clarity. Can

758
00:57:57.039 --> 00:58:06.199
you point to any references about meaning
for filling higher needs flirt too, senses

759
00:58:06.239 --> 00:58:12.880
of meaning at least at work here. So philosophy of language in the twentieth

760
00:58:12.960 --> 00:58:17.159
century, and then this kind of
moved into philosophy of mind in the late

761
00:58:17.199 --> 00:58:22.480
twenties and twenty first century talk a
lot about what it is for a word

762
00:58:22.639 --> 00:58:25.000
or a proposition to be meaningful,
kind of semantic, to content, to

763
00:58:25.079 --> 00:58:30.119
kind of stuff, and so in
that sense, you know, those brands

764
00:58:30.239 --> 00:58:34.400
of philosophy do that. I think
they tend to do it in a way

765
00:58:34.480 --> 00:58:37.519
that's too detached from aistemology. So
they kind of think like, there's something

766
00:58:37.559 --> 00:58:40.920
that happened to refer to be meaningful, all right, now it's meaningful,

767
00:58:42.000 --> 00:58:45.840
is it's true? Whereas I think
that meaning is something that you ab strapped

768
00:58:45.960 --> 00:58:51.000
out from the activity of knowing.
And the thing to be studying is the

769
00:58:51.039 --> 00:58:52.960
activity of knowing things. And if
you're in the business of trying to know

770
00:58:53.119 --> 00:58:57.599
something, sometimes you have something that
is a theory that's false, and it

771
00:58:57.679 --> 00:59:01.280
has meaning because of the role it's
playing and being based on certain evidence and

772
00:59:01.599 --> 00:59:05.599
projecting in a certain way, but
it gets it wrong into it it's false.

773
00:59:05.920 --> 00:59:07.480
And I think that this is an
important to understanding what's wrong with the

774
00:59:07.559 --> 00:59:13.880
arbitrary. And I think it's an
important thesis of it follows from the objectivisty

775
00:59:13.920 --> 00:59:17.719
of knowledge that semantics and epistemology are
deeply connected. Now that you ask them,

776
00:59:17.800 --> 00:59:22.840
I think you mean by meaning here
not just the meaning of words,

777
00:59:22.960 --> 00:59:25.360
though you mean to include that,
but having a life be meaningful and things

778
00:59:25.440 --> 00:59:32.159
like that, UM, having your
life be directed on things. And I

779
00:59:32.199 --> 00:59:37.320
don't think there's a name branch of
philosophy that does that, but pragmotism as

780
00:59:37.360 --> 00:59:42.000
a school of philosophy, not as
the you know, do whatever works kind

781
00:59:42.000 --> 00:59:47.159
of pragmotism, although they're related,
but pragmotism is the school of philosophy UM

782
00:59:50.800 --> 00:59:54.760
talks a lot about human activity,
including goal directed activity and so forth,

783
00:59:54.880 --> 01:00:01.519
and the processes of having meaning with
being connected to that. So you can

784
01:00:01.599 --> 01:00:07.400
see in kind of pragmatist authors UM
a sense of how these kind of things

785
01:00:07.440 --> 01:00:14.239
can be related. And UM,
someone like Bob Brandam, who's a blossom

786
01:00:14.280 --> 01:00:17.000
professor at Pittsburgh where I study,
would be an example of someone who who

787
01:00:17.159 --> 01:00:21.840
thinks along these lines. UM.
Now, I think I don't mean to

788
01:00:22.000 --> 01:00:24.719
endorse this kind of view, but
I do think there are connections. Knowledge

789
01:00:24.800 --> 01:00:29.119
is for the same of action.
I think meaning comes out of knowledge and

790
01:00:29.199 --> 01:00:31.440
knowledge consider it is there for the
singers, I think there's there's it's right

791
01:00:31.519 --> 01:00:37.960
to see a connection between these things. Um. The the pragmatists really stress

792
01:00:38.119 --> 01:00:43.079
mental activity and would be the activity
of the whole organzas to your activity in

793
01:00:43.159 --> 01:00:46.719
the world as the source of all
of this, um, But in a

794
01:00:46.800 --> 01:00:52.199
way that makes it subjective. So
it's it's it's mental activity creates meaning,

795
01:00:52.800 --> 01:00:55.639
uh, create purpose, et cetera. But there's not a kind of basis

796
01:00:55.679 --> 01:01:00.440
for that in reality, UM,
And I think you do. You think

797
01:01:00.559 --> 01:01:04.639
this is a subjectivist side. The
other side of the alternative tends to see

798
01:01:05.719 --> 01:01:09.039
meaning involves passively hitching yourself to something
which is a source of meaning of what's

799
01:01:09.039 --> 01:01:13.119
good or another. And I think
the right alternative visit you do have to

800
01:01:13.159 --> 01:01:17.280
findos make meaning for yourself both a
sunantic meaning and purpose of meaning, but

801
01:01:17.519 --> 01:01:20.719
you do it in a fact based
way. There's a way to do it

802
01:01:20.760 --> 01:01:22.880
in the fact based way, including
based on the facts that give rise to

803
01:01:22.960 --> 01:01:30.920
the need for this whole activity.
But I don't know of UM where you

804
01:01:30.000 --> 01:01:35.400
can find much retailians and read some
of the pathetist authors for a sense of

805
01:01:35.440 --> 01:01:38.159
how they think these issues fit together, and maybe somewhat of the literature and

806
01:01:38.239 --> 01:01:42.800
well being in philosophy, which I
mentioned earlier. I think is one of

807
01:01:42.840 --> 01:01:47.519
the more interesting things going on connecting
to philosophy these days. They's some talking

808
01:01:47.559 --> 01:01:52.000
about meaning in life. So what
do you What do you views the relationship

809
01:01:52.039 --> 01:01:55.480
between meaning and purpose meaning in the
in the mall sense, in the in

810
01:01:55.599 --> 01:02:01.679
the purposeful sense. Um I mean, I think the purpose is a kind

811
01:02:01.719 --> 01:02:06.519
of more technical term in philosophy.
Is I use this meaning it a little

812
01:02:06.559 --> 01:02:15.639
bit more metaphorical, but part of
you can find meaning in what you're doing,

813
01:02:16.199 --> 01:02:19.480
right, And I guess you can
find purpose in what you're doing,

814
01:02:19.519 --> 01:02:27.639
but it means something different. I
think the more connected your activities are two

815
01:02:27.800 --> 01:02:32.360
purposes that you understand and wholeheartedly endorsed
for good reasons, and that you are

816
01:02:32.400 --> 01:02:37.679
the happiness that you've chosen to pursue
with your life. The more meaningful you

817
01:02:37.800 --> 01:02:40.559
find your life, the more meaningful
you find what you're doing. It doesn't

818
01:02:40.599 --> 01:02:45.199
just seem like one damn saying after
another that I've got to do, but

819
01:02:45.159 --> 01:02:49.880
as it's infused with the sense of
this is part of the life I've chosen

820
01:02:49.920 --> 01:02:52.639
to live and you want to try
to make as much of your life as

821
01:02:52.719 --> 01:02:59.880
possible like that. And then there
are shortcuts to meaning, shortcuts to seem

822
01:03:00.159 --> 01:03:02.840
like there's some point to what you're
doing. Shortcuts to purpose, which involves

823
01:03:04.440 --> 01:03:07.559
in effect secondhandedly to ticking over a
purpose or pretending it's a mystic pull both

824
01:03:07.599 --> 01:03:10.280
from the blue thing of the book, the purpose driven life, where your

825
01:03:10.320 --> 01:03:15.199
purpose ends up to be a slave
to God or you know, almost cult

826
01:03:15.239 --> 01:03:19.000
where your purpose is to serve humanity
and the whole well. And then Jodan

827
01:03:19.039 --> 01:03:22.760
Peterson uses meaning constantly, kind of
as an intrinsic something out there that you

828
01:03:22.880 --> 01:03:27.440
need to find. You have to
find meaning. Yeah, and I think

829
01:03:27.559 --> 01:03:30.360
that's that's wrong. I think the
giving this is one of the things um

830
01:03:31.360 --> 01:03:35.559
Gli did and Howard or To talk
a lot about in the Fountain Gap,

831
01:03:35.760 --> 01:03:38.000
and that they bond over right,
the idea that people looking for meaning they

832
01:03:38.039 --> 01:03:42.239
have to find myself and so forth, and they're looking outside of themselves.

833
01:03:42.440 --> 01:03:47.599
It's it's something you need to create, but not in the subjectivist way where

834
01:03:47.639 --> 01:03:51.599
anything you create you know you're going
to write without capital letters or whatever,

835
01:03:51.639 --> 01:03:54.239
and that's the meaning of your life. You have to create a human life

836
01:03:54.960 --> 01:03:59.440
and a life for yourself with the
kind of creature you are, and whatever

837
01:03:59.599 --> 01:04:02.639
meaning they're going to be is going
to exist in the context of that system,

838
01:04:03.880 --> 01:04:08.199
that life which if you're going to
create it, if you're gonna it's

839
01:04:08.199 --> 01:04:11.599
either debt if you're going to have
it, Yeah, purpose for you?

840
01:04:11.679 --> 01:04:15.239
What I mean you have to absert
the features features based on the final organism

841
01:04:15.320 --> 01:04:19.440
you are and the fact that you've
rise to this whole enterprise. Right.

842
01:04:19.639 --> 01:04:26.119
Andrews asked why are social issues dominating
political discourse? And how big of a

843
01:04:26.239 --> 01:04:30.960
national schism do you think a bull
the bullshit issue will create? Um?

844
01:04:33.599 --> 01:04:39.280
So, what was the first petion? How? Why are social issue dominating

845
01:04:39.320 --> 01:04:44.800
political discourse? Well, in part
because of the political tribes don't disagree on

846
01:04:44.960 --> 01:04:54.800
others. So, I mean in
the two thousand in the twenty sixteen election,

847
01:04:56.320 --> 01:05:00.800
which candidate was more anti capitalist?
I think Trump was. But it's

848
01:05:00.840 --> 01:05:04.000
just edging it out. I mean
Hillary reads no capitalists. But there's so

849
01:05:05.559 --> 01:05:10.800
there's so little difference in their days
of economication. Ye, And there's no

850
01:05:11.000 --> 01:05:14.840
difference on their views like issues regarding
rights, uh not in general. You

851
01:05:14.880 --> 01:05:17.800
know, one particular field, the
Democrats are better on reproductive rights, and

852
01:05:17.840 --> 01:05:21.280
the Republicans are better on certain economic
rights, although not all of them.

853
01:05:21.880 --> 01:05:27.400
UM, like mineral rights for example, they're better own um. And the

854
01:05:27.519 --> 01:05:30.760
Democrats are worse on certain technologies,
you know, fossil fuels and the rights

855
01:05:30.800 --> 01:05:34.159
to do what one will with them, but you know, probably better on

856
01:05:34.239 --> 01:05:40.000
biodap, although not by So it's
like it's it's on issues of rights and

857
01:05:40.159 --> 01:05:43.840
things. On issues of political principle
and issues of the economy, they're not

858
01:05:44.159 --> 01:05:45.400
very different from one of them.
You have to measure it in the parts

859
01:05:45.400 --> 01:05:49.679
of pavilion or parts pervilions to get
even the like AOC versus you know,

860
01:05:50.360 --> 01:05:55.840
um, whoever you call a centrist
Republican now um um, what's his name?

861
01:05:56.320 --> 01:06:02.119
The speecher, um McCarthy, Democratic
Democratic Um. There's just not that

862
01:06:02.280 --> 01:06:06.400
much difference on the economic stuff,
on the right stuff on the other issues.

863
01:06:06.519 --> 01:06:12.239
So how do you, you know, get attention and get your people

864
01:06:12.280 --> 01:06:16.400
to vote out the other person.
It's it's personal attacks and it's um cultural

865
01:06:16.480 --> 01:06:20.360
issues. And I think this is
the case on both sides. There's um

866
01:06:20.920 --> 01:06:27.079
a kind of flocking two issues where
you can vilify not just the other people,

867
01:06:27.159 --> 01:06:30.679
but other blocks of voters or make
it seem like there's a kind of

868
01:06:30.719 --> 01:06:33.920
menace in the country and a certain
of people who are these people with their

869
01:06:34.000 --> 01:06:39.679
guns or these people with their drag
shows or whatever it is, and um

870
01:06:39.840 --> 01:06:45.280
and illicit discussed reactions. UM.
So I think that's that's why it happened.

871
01:06:45.360 --> 01:06:49.199
How people will abortion to be its
stuff, I don't know. UM.

872
01:06:49.360 --> 01:06:51.840
I mean, it has been an
excuse in the country for a long

873
01:06:51.960 --> 01:06:57.440
time. But I think part of
what we're seeing is that the support for

874
01:07:00.159 --> 01:07:04.920
the banning of abortion is a lot
weaker than the anti abortionists thought it was

875
01:07:05.840 --> 01:07:12.119
so long as they didn't so long
as the structure of the court was such

876
01:07:12.239 --> 01:07:15.599
that anti abortion laws couldn't get upheld, there was a lot of enthusiasm for

877
01:07:15.880 --> 01:07:21.000
f a symbolic gesture passing these laws
that pretend that that embryo is from the

878
01:07:21.079 --> 01:07:28.320
beginning? Are you know, are
full fledged people um that see no difference

879
01:07:28.360 --> 01:07:30.960
between um. You know, as
I go from the thirty two year old

880
01:07:31.440 --> 01:07:35.920
um, those kind of laws were
very popular when you know, it didn't

881
01:07:36.000 --> 01:07:41.440
cost anything to pass them affect anyone, just like repealing Obamacare was very popular

882
01:07:41.480 --> 01:07:45.199
when it wasn't actually going to get
repealed. Um, once you should have

883
01:07:45.239 --> 01:07:48.840
been that's not I'm not meeting them
in those at the middle. But then

884
01:07:48.880 --> 01:07:51.519
as soon as it actually happens,
when the laws get them to effect,

885
01:07:51.840 --> 01:07:55.800
then it turns out that a lot
of people, including a lot of Republicans,

886
01:07:55.920 --> 01:08:00.440
don't don't want them, don't want
these laws. More So, I

887
01:08:00.519 --> 01:08:04.599
don't know will the Republicans moderate.
I think insofar as it's going to be

888
01:08:04.639 --> 01:08:08.960
a schism over this, it's going
to be within the Republican Party between the

889
01:08:09.079 --> 01:08:12.880
people who are you know, diehards
on this issue. We want to ban

890
01:08:12.960 --> 01:08:15.840
all abortions in the Matagua and we
don't care if it acrost us votes and

891
01:08:15.000 --> 01:08:19.840
the people who are who are not
and um. One of the more positive

892
01:08:19.880 --> 01:08:24.640
things I could say about Trump,
who somewhere like to task if he's not

893
01:08:24.760 --> 01:08:28.560
a die heart about this issue.
He was an opportunist anti abortion and now

894
01:08:28.640 --> 01:08:30.760
he's you know, opportunists on telling
people to back away from him. And

895
01:08:31.199 --> 01:08:35.520
if that side of the Republican Party
wins out over the Religi decided that I

896
01:08:35.560 --> 01:08:40.560
think will probably end up with a
lot of states moving to something more like

897
01:08:40.640 --> 01:08:44.720
a European model where you have,
um, you know, less of abortion

898
01:08:44.800 --> 01:08:47.560
freedom than you ought to, but
not these better crazy art being laws in

899
01:08:48.079 --> 01:08:53.199
six weeks love well and an abortion
pill laws, which is even which is

900
01:08:53.239 --> 01:08:58.279
even worse. All right, James, A long time to get to that

901
01:08:58.359 --> 01:09:00.119
better place, even if we do
didn't do it. Yes, I agree,

902
01:09:00.199 --> 01:09:05.399
it's gonna there's no easy path there
because so many people have committed themselves

903
01:09:05.439 --> 01:09:10.600
to a certain position. Um.
And it's and it's again it's associated with

904
01:09:10.680 --> 01:09:15.760
the tribe. One thing that's striking
to me is how few people view this

905
01:09:15.960 --> 01:09:19.399
as an issue. There a few
people with an objectivism thinking about it.

906
01:09:19.479 --> 01:09:25.680
About Yeah, this as an issue
in twenty sixteen, in two thousand and

907
01:09:25.720 --> 01:09:30.439
eight, um or whatever, twelve
all the different I have viewed it as

908
01:09:30.479 --> 01:09:33.199
a significant issue for a long time. I thought we were a justice or

909
01:09:33.239 --> 01:09:40.239
two away for a losing row.
Um. I thought that the first well,

910
01:09:40.279 --> 01:09:43.680
and to this day I think there
are a lot of a lot of

911
01:09:44.239 --> 01:09:48.399
even objectivists who think Trump's greatest achievement
is the Supreme Court. So I just

912
01:09:48.520 --> 01:09:54.279
don't think people put enough weight on
this issue of abortion. Particularly man don't

913
01:09:54.319 --> 01:09:57.680
put enough weight on this issue of
abortion. And of course, the person

914
01:09:57.760 --> 01:10:00.880
who put the most weight on it, and a US the importance of this

915
01:10:00.079 --> 01:10:03.079
to some extent is I manned.
I mean she didn't vote for somebody like,

916
01:10:03.520 --> 01:10:09.039
I mean, Ronald Reagan right now
seems like a saint. He seems

917
01:10:09.079 --> 01:10:14.319
like, you know what, wouldn't
we give to have a Ronald Reagan running

918
01:10:14.359 --> 01:10:18.039
for president right now? And yet
I didn't vote for him because primarily because

919
01:10:18.119 --> 01:10:23.640
not only, but primarily because of
this issue of abortion. Yeah. Part

920
01:10:23.680 --> 01:10:26.760
of that that we should recognize and
thinking about is what he represented me.

921
01:10:26.880 --> 01:10:32.119
Yeah. The good about Ronald Reagan
was in a way happening anyway he needed

922
01:10:32.159 --> 01:10:38.039
to figure told us, but there
was a real pro market, anti status

923
01:10:38.159 --> 01:10:42.119
backlash. And you can see that
we had thatcher when we had Fraiture.

924
01:10:43.039 --> 01:10:46.439
It was this kind of international thing
that was happening. Reagan was the guy

925
01:10:46.439 --> 01:10:49.560
who would call us around in America. He could have been around someone else,

926
01:10:49.640 --> 01:10:54.199
or so we might have thought.
UM. And part of what is

927
01:10:55.000 --> 01:11:00.399
legacy is I think the central isn't
those those at liberties that are associated with

928
01:11:00.560 --> 01:11:05.000
him, which we're looking for a
political champion, but the merging of that

929
01:11:05.319 --> 01:11:10.239
with UM, with religionism, and
it might have been that just where the

930
01:11:10.319 --> 01:11:12.800
culture was was that that was only
what was going to happen, and you

931
01:11:12.840 --> 01:11:15.680
know it's the wather Agian. It
would have been someone else. But whether

932
01:11:15.760 --> 01:11:18.920
that's true or not, that's what
his cannibisiating represented historically. That's what he's

933
01:11:18.960 --> 01:11:27.439
winning the Republican primary represented historical.
Um. And that's um that I think

934
01:11:27.640 --> 01:11:31.800
was she was such as for her, Yeah, I mean she recognized that

935
01:11:31.880 --> 01:11:36.560
he was bringing them all majority the
Christianity deep into the Republican Party and entrenching

936
01:11:36.600 --> 01:11:42.239
it there. And um, that
turned out to be one hundred percent right.

937
01:11:42.319 --> 01:11:45.720
I mean it's it's it's amazing the
age of mediocrities or that it's really

938
01:11:46.319 --> 01:11:50.439
um shocking to read that and just
how how I mean she said things like

939
01:11:50.520 --> 01:11:55.000
in nineteen eighty like, you know, don't call me a conservative. I

940
01:11:55.039 --> 01:11:57.760
don't want to be associative with these
people they're trying to do with the Iatola

941
01:11:57.960 --> 01:12:03.520
to Iran. Yeah, um,
ye know she was not a moderate on

942
01:12:03.680 --> 01:12:08.319
this kind of issue. No.
But as to the point I think that

943
01:12:08.479 --> 01:12:13.239
the I liked the previous Supreme Court. I liked the court with Kennedy.

944
01:12:13.520 --> 01:12:17.000
Ye, it wasn't gonna stick for
very long. Um, And uh,

945
01:12:17.479 --> 01:12:21.319
you know, it just so happened
that the forces were arrayed in the place

946
01:12:21.399 --> 01:12:28.079
that kept him a relatively good status, where the best part of the Republican

947
01:12:28.159 --> 01:12:31.239
appointed justices acted to stay on the
worst part of the Democrat appointed justices,

948
01:12:31.279 --> 01:12:34.000
and the best part of the Democrat
of what you justices act to stay on

949
01:12:34.079 --> 01:12:36.880
the worst part of the Republican apport
justice. We have to see where the

950
01:12:36.960 --> 01:12:41.039
new equilibrium is. There were some
good things about this court, but some

951
01:12:41.239 --> 01:12:45.479
really bad things, and see where
where it shakes that. But but the

952
01:12:45.600 --> 01:12:50.119
overturning of Roe was I think a
real horror. And part of what was

953
01:12:50.159 --> 01:12:56.399
so horrible about it is that it
did it while casting shade on the lockman

954
01:12:56.560 --> 01:13:01.439
or like you could imagine a kind
of conservative who at least is applutting.

955
01:13:01.479 --> 01:13:06.319
The better things about conservativis own path
wants to bring that bath but is in

956
01:13:06.399 --> 01:13:11.359
different to socialism. But what it's
saying is just like we realize there are

957
01:13:11.399 --> 01:13:13.960
no rights in the economic realm,
there's no right to your body either,

958
01:13:14.439 --> 01:13:18.159
and that is really disgusting. Yeah, and Alito has a special physic health

959
01:13:18.199 --> 01:13:23.720
for that. Yeah, Alita things
particularly bad. It will be interesting what

960
01:13:23.800 --> 01:13:28.319
they do tomorrow, because we should
hear tomorrow about the abution pill um,

961
01:13:29.359 --> 01:13:31.079
and the fact that they had to
delay it means there's a debate going on.

962
01:13:31.279 --> 01:13:34.439
I thought there was a chance that
unanimously would they would throw out the

963
01:13:34.520 --> 01:13:39.520
Texas ruling. UM, and expecting
they will end up throwing out the deist

964
01:13:39.560 --> 01:13:45.119
ruling. But I expect so too. Yeah, exactly, Um, James

965
01:13:45.239 --> 01:13:48.000
says, when is it fair to
say you're in a light boat scenario and

966
01:13:48.119 --> 01:13:55.359
can initiate force for your own survival? When when free speech is When is

967
01:13:55.399 --> 01:14:04.319
it when free speech is abolished?
This strikes for me is too yeah abstract

968
01:14:04.600 --> 01:14:08.720
to really answer this way. You
know, it's not like you so so

969
01:14:08.880 --> 01:14:14.079
you're in USSR and free speech has
been abolished, at least you don't just

970
01:14:14.199 --> 01:14:15.720
start killing people left and right.
And you've got to think about, like,

971
01:14:15.880 --> 01:14:20.079
what specific situation are you in where
you think that you can Um.

972
01:14:20.960 --> 01:14:24.840
You don't want to give your vibe. It's you know, it's zero sum

973
01:14:25.600 --> 01:14:30.119
and um. There are some situations
on the untatorship where it happens, but

974
01:14:30.600 --> 01:14:36.640
not most of them, not most
of the time, all right, Clough.

975
01:14:36.760 --> 01:14:40.800
For something to be a lifeboat scenario, it has to be short lived.

976
01:14:41.319 --> 01:14:45.119
It has to be a kind of
emergency where UM, if only you

977
01:14:45.239 --> 01:14:48.840
get out of this situation, you'll
be able to go back to living a

978
01:14:48.920 --> 01:14:54.239
normal life by normal by the normal
rule, and something makes it impossible in

979
01:14:54.319 --> 01:14:57.399
this situation, which you can get
out of by doing it. So if

980
01:14:57.439 --> 01:15:00.880
you're at in a situation where like
you're at the boarder and you can escape

981
01:15:00.920 --> 01:15:03.880
the USSR or North Korea or wherever
by doing this thing that would otherwise be

982
01:15:03.960 --> 01:15:08.199
immoral and would involve harming someone else, and then once you're on the other

983
01:15:08.279 --> 01:15:12.239
side, you know, our life
starts again. Those are the kind of

984
01:15:12.279 --> 01:15:15.479
situations where we can come up with
examples and weigh them. But if it's

985
01:15:15.680 --> 01:15:19.119
you know, you're going to go
on being a slave in a slave can,

986
01:15:21.199 --> 01:15:26.319
that's not an emergency scenario. That's
a scenario where life just impossible and

987
01:15:26.640 --> 01:15:30.520
morality maybe doesn't apply, but not
in the way of a life boat.

988
01:15:30.560 --> 01:15:35.199
Exceptions that you can exceptional contingencies and
you can end and if we'll get back

989
01:15:35.239 --> 01:15:39.000
to the business of living. I
mean, it strikes me that the question

990
01:15:39.119 --> 01:15:43.800
really is asking when is it okay
to start of revolution because it brings in

991
01:15:43.880 --> 01:15:45.399
the free speech issues, So you
know, when when do we get to

992
01:15:45.479 --> 01:15:50.880
the point where we can initiate force
in order to liberate ourselves, And I

993
01:15:50.960 --> 01:15:57.119
think, yeah, good, I
think that's right. But then then I'm

994
01:15:57.760 --> 01:16:05.319
very skeptical of revolutions by force.
I think they're very rarely necessary. When

995
01:16:05.359 --> 01:16:12.079
they're possible, yeah, um,
you need to have enough people to win,

996
01:16:12.520 --> 01:16:14.399
and not just to win, but
that are going to be able to

997
01:16:14.479 --> 01:16:19.000
cohere and create a stable system of
government afterwards. And I can only really

998
01:16:19.079 --> 01:16:24.119
think of one case in history where
I'm searching it was justified, and that

999
01:16:24.239 --> 01:16:28.159
was the American Revolution. And that
wasn't a whole bunch of people rising up

1000
01:16:28.199 --> 01:16:35.199
becoming That was local governments declaring themselves
independent of another wider government that they were,

1001
01:16:35.479 --> 01:16:40.560
you know, um, you know, in subservient too. And I'm

1002
01:16:40.600 --> 01:16:45.680
sure there are probably other cases like
that. I just uh where where that

1003
01:16:45.840 --> 01:16:48.439
where that might be similarly justified.
The other ones I can think of,

1004
01:16:48.479 --> 01:16:51.119
though, weren't actually violent. They
were protest movements or things like that.

1005
01:16:51.640 --> 01:17:02.640
Um. Usually freedom has come about
by relatively slow transition and then the creation

1006
01:17:02.760 --> 01:17:09.159
of some kind of parliamentary body body, and that parliamentary body then asserting its

1007
01:17:09.159 --> 01:17:13.439
authority over an autocratic like give the
parliament versus the king, and things like

1008
01:17:13.560 --> 01:17:20.039
that rather than guerrilla warfare type things. Maybe it could happen, but you

1009
01:17:20.119 --> 01:17:24.039
know, it's hard to come up
with a case almost all the time.

1010
01:17:25.640 --> 01:17:30.680
The fact that you need to use
guerrilla kind of warfare tactics shows that you're

1011
01:17:30.760 --> 01:17:35.319
not in a place that is capable
of free government if you want. There's

1012
01:17:35.319 --> 01:17:42.399
not a population table. Yeah,
fed help, I asks, since IOE,

1013
01:17:42.640 --> 01:17:47.279
have you noticed in university philosophy course
teaching the idea of induction and unit

1014
01:17:47.439 --> 01:17:53.520
measurement emission as Peacoff is spoken on, like in logical leap and acoms of

1015
01:17:53.600 --> 01:17:57.720
induction. Well, since he was
published before I was born, So yeah,

1016
01:17:57.880 --> 01:18:02.359
I wasn't in a position to observe
before that changed afterwards. I don't

1017
01:18:02.399 --> 01:18:08.479
think it's widely read by people in
philosophy department, so I don't think it's

1018
01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:16.000
had that kind of an influence.
Um, I'm talking about whether they're positive

1019
01:18:16.039 --> 01:18:20.159
or negative trends in views about induction. But I don't think I Qui in

1020
01:18:20.239 --> 01:18:25.119
particular has has been a cause of
that. And he doesn't really talk about

1021
01:18:25.159 --> 01:18:29.760
induction. I mean it has a
couple of promising remarks and cantalizing things,

1022
01:18:29.840 --> 01:18:32.880
and particularly in the appendix and and
their ideas that that letter you know,

1023
01:18:33.039 --> 01:18:39.000
later letter Pika later used to develop
a theory. But um, you know

1024
01:18:39.560 --> 01:18:45.119
it's not that's not an IVF.
Clark asks, do any academics you work

1025
01:18:45.199 --> 01:18:51.079
with in philosophy departments have the slightest
respectfuying RAND? All Your students more interested

1026
01:18:51.119 --> 01:18:59.880
in RAND than they would decade ago. Yeah, so they're they're definitely academic.

1027
01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:03.760
I've worked within philosophy departments who have
respect for program. A handful of

1028
01:19:03.800 --> 01:19:11.680
people in particular stand out UM,
the U and people in other departments too.

1029
01:19:11.680 --> 01:19:24.239
You can how much, since,
of course sometimes UM students students in

1030
01:19:24.359 --> 01:19:28.920
classes where I teach her are usually
and I never teach a whole class course

1031
01:19:29.000 --> 01:19:31.640
on ortias. You know, we're
teaching the curve of figures views on the

1032
01:19:31.760 --> 01:19:35.520
topic, and she'll be one of
them. Are often very receptives find her

1033
01:19:35.680 --> 01:19:41.960
interesting, including people who aren't antecedently, you know, predisposed to like her.

1034
01:19:42.000 --> 01:19:44.479
That its politics don't align or whatever. It's not, of course all

1035
01:19:44.520 --> 01:19:46.880
poligens UM. It's hard to tell
how much they're influenced by thinking I like

1036
01:19:46.960 --> 01:19:50.640
her, momos the professor, while
although I'm surprised by how often students don't

1037
01:19:50.840 --> 01:19:55.439
know which you see endoor civities.
I know, I try not to tell

1038
01:19:55.520 --> 01:20:00.960
them. I think I could restell
um. But generally students, you know

1039
01:20:02.079 --> 01:20:05.000
a lot of students see something positive
with her, and then I think take

1040
01:20:05.079 --> 01:20:11.439
on some of her ideas. Um
are they how do they come to me?

1041
01:20:11.520 --> 01:20:15.319
Though I haven't noticed a big difference
in the time I've been teaching in

1042
01:20:15.079 --> 01:20:20.000
whether the streaments are antisedingly interested in
Manum. Usually, you know, at

1043
01:20:20.079 --> 01:20:24.920
least some people will ask, will
be familiar with, some will positive views,

1044
01:20:24.920 --> 01:20:30.039
and some wile afte interviews okay,
quickly they usual most of them want

1045
01:20:30.079 --> 01:20:33.159
to read and roll of work of
fiction that they won't see the connection to

1046
01:20:33.199 --> 01:20:41.600
what we're really right away, So
you know, doesn't dominate the special Michael

1047
01:20:41.640 --> 01:20:45.560
asks, are you overall optimistic about
ability to spread objectivism and gradually change the

1048
01:20:45.640 --> 01:20:49.640
culture? Do you think you will
see real positive change in your lifetime?

1049
01:20:55.039 --> 01:21:01.359
Yes, but not as objectivism exactly. So I'm optimistic about and this is

1050
01:21:01.399 --> 01:21:10.359
the same thing matter anyway, I'm
optimistic about the ability of objectivists to move

1051
01:21:10.479 --> 01:21:16.079
the conversations in the right direction,
to make the conversation better and whatever.

1052
01:21:16.159 --> 01:21:19.359
By the conversation, I mean,
like if you look at how the way

1053
01:21:19.439 --> 01:21:25.439
people talk about energy now is no
diiceably better because of the ideas that Alex

1054
01:21:25.640 --> 01:21:29.600
has has been advocating for it.
He's become a big name in the field.

1055
01:21:29.640 --> 01:21:31.960
But even people who don't maybe don't
know his name, like you'll see

1056
01:21:32.199 --> 01:21:38.119
just better talking points about energy better, the viuser you know, discussion is

1057
01:21:38.159 --> 01:21:40.880
just better. Do to his influence
and do the his useful objectives. And

1058
01:21:40.960 --> 01:21:44.319
I think if you look in the
field of intellectual property, you'll see how

1059
01:21:44.399 --> 01:21:48.520
a mossubs influence. I think already
I mentioned a well being literature in philosophy.

1060
01:21:49.760 --> 01:21:55.840
Already that literature has been influenced indirectly
by high Rand in positive directions by

1061
01:21:55.880 --> 01:22:00.600
people who were sort of semi objectivists
or had an objectivist phase but with it

1062
01:22:00.720 --> 01:22:03.359
but retain certain ideas. And I
think, um, there have been some

1063
01:22:03.520 --> 01:22:06.319
good popular books on well being that
you know, to have an influence on

1064
01:22:06.359 --> 01:22:12.439
people's lives that indirectly there's some of
that market. I think there's a potential

1065
01:22:12.600 --> 01:22:15.439
that will be more and more about
it. Likewise in some different fields in

1066
01:22:15.680 --> 01:22:20.520
philosophy that is once written in you
know, academic corners, but also you

1067
01:22:20.640 --> 01:22:25.279
know, outside of them, so
I think, you know, it comes

1068
01:22:25.399 --> 01:22:30.319
through people having particular influences on particular
fields that don't look like one and one

1069
01:22:30.319 --> 01:22:34.720
of this is objectivism, but you
can see if you look deeper how it

1070
01:22:34.840 --> 01:22:39.359
is having influence. Um. And
then eventually I think a lot of that

1071
01:22:39.439 --> 01:22:44.479
I talked to, Oh, there's
a whole school here of objectivist intellectuals who

1072
01:22:44.520 --> 01:22:46.439
are seeding a lot of this and
behind a lot of this and stuff where

1073
01:22:46.880 --> 01:22:56.000
um. But I think that I
I think I will see the when they'll

1074
01:22:56.039 --> 01:23:00.239
start to be a recognition of that
fact that a lot of positive changes coming

1075
01:23:00.319 --> 01:23:04.039
from the same intellectual or a lot
of change with people that it's positive or

1076
01:23:04.079 --> 01:23:10.800
not that I think is coming from
the game indectual family yep, right,

1077
01:23:10.920 --> 01:23:15.520
Richard ass is the US undergoing a
cultural revolution where leftist ideology and filtrates media,

1078
01:23:15.560 --> 01:23:21.119
academian law, for example, derivatives
of critical race theory have at least

1079
01:23:21.199 --> 01:23:28.079
some visibility today. I think the
questions one hundred years later, I think

1080
01:23:28.159 --> 01:23:32.399
it happened. It happened a long
time ago. In addition to influencing what

1081
01:23:32.520 --> 01:23:35.960
did you say, law, media
and other things, it's influenced the churches,

1082
01:23:36.239 --> 01:23:40.399
It influenced the parenting. It influenced
a whole lot of other things,

1083
01:23:41.560 --> 01:23:45.000
and it's busy. It's metastasized a
long time ago. One hundred years.

1084
01:23:45.000 --> 01:23:49.600
Maybe it's too much, but certainly
by the sixties it had and some of

1085
01:23:49.680 --> 01:23:53.840
it, you know, more than
a hundred years ago. I think now

1086
01:23:54.039 --> 01:23:59.760
the same kinds of ideas are all
over the place, and they're reproducing themselves

1087
01:24:00.000 --> 01:24:05.079
all over the place in pulpits,
in conservative think tanks, in left distinct

1088
01:24:05.119 --> 01:24:11.640
tanks, and university departments with you
know, minor variations, just like the

1089
01:24:11.760 --> 01:24:16.680
same ideas were reproducing themselves amongst fascists
and communists in the early twentieth century with

1090
01:24:16.880 --> 01:24:20.039
minor variations. It wasn't the fascist. We're all getting in from the communist

1091
01:24:20.039 --> 01:24:24.600
because the communist stolf From the fact
there was an overall direction where it started.

1092
01:24:24.680 --> 01:24:27.720
I think, well, I don't
know, because the Hagel was perparse,

1093
01:24:27.840 --> 01:24:30.000
but the and fist of all these
people, but these kinds of well

1094
01:24:30.079 --> 01:24:35.359
springs of bad ideas had gotten into
all the main organs of the culture,

1095
01:24:35.880 --> 01:24:40.520
including the organs that see themselves as
opposed to one another, and the process

1096
01:24:40.640 --> 01:24:45.319
by which they fought one another was
just adopting slight variations of one another bacause

1097
01:24:45.359 --> 01:24:49.399
I don't think there's a kind of
particular acceleration where bad leftist ideas are moving

1098
01:24:49.439 --> 01:24:54.479
from campus to other parts of life. They've been there and they're developing alone

1099
01:24:54.479 --> 01:24:59.119
their trajectory there, both in left
and right basket. Now, if we

1100
01:24:59.199 --> 01:25:04.399
talked about se sific ideas, like
the particular ideas about the environment or about

1101
01:25:04.439 --> 01:25:09.199
diversity at particular ways of looking at
idea, then you can charge the force

1102
01:25:10.079 --> 01:25:13.840
of this particular idea spread from campus
to this place at this time. But

1103
01:25:14.479 --> 01:25:18.000
I don't think that's the main story
of what's of what's happening with the culture.

1104
01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:25.960
I think the mainjories is things that
are deeper wrong that did ultimately,

1105
01:25:26.159 --> 01:25:30.760
you know, spread from academic continustions
outboard, but that the bulk of that

1106
01:25:30.840 --> 01:25:34.800
work was done a long time ago. All right, Hopa Campbell asks,

1107
01:25:35.279 --> 01:25:40.479
is there anything? Is there anything
you think Roan could be doing better?

1108
01:25:43.720 --> 01:25:49.720
Maybe I should answer that or anything. Friends, I really like this show.

1109
01:25:50.079 --> 01:25:57.840
Um, I think it's um certainly
the best regular programming you know from

1110
01:25:57.880 --> 01:26:03.239
an objectivist projective. But that's such
a damning by day praise. If it's

1111
01:26:03.239 --> 01:26:06.399
a low bar, there isn't you
know anything anywhere near in the league of

1112
01:26:06.439 --> 01:26:11.840
them. I think it's really important
that, um, that this is happening.

1113
01:26:12.560 --> 01:26:14.800
Um, so I think it's a
fantastic show. But I'm sure you

1114
01:26:14.880 --> 01:26:17.640
know when I when I noticed something, I'll you know it's in the emails.

1115
01:26:17.920 --> 01:26:21.760
Yes, he does with you on
that. Ye, thank you great

1116
01:26:21.880 --> 01:26:27.359
as a pet peeve about the pronunciation
of one or two words, so maybe

1117
01:26:27.399 --> 01:26:31.600
that. I'm sure there a lot
of my pronunciation is terrible. I can

1118
01:26:31.720 --> 01:26:38.880
only see things all right, Ian
says, is the ivanced society still active

1119
01:26:38.920 --> 01:26:45.560
and engaging with non objectives philosophers?
Yes, but we're trying to figure out

1120
01:26:45.640 --> 01:26:48.560
what to do with it because and
how to change what we do with it

1121
01:26:48.840 --> 01:26:56.680
going forward, because I no longer
think think the kinds of programs we would

1122
01:26:56.720 --> 01:27:03.279
have there are the best forums or
engaging with unobjectivist philosophers. UM. Only

1123
01:27:03.319 --> 01:27:06.199
you that we've now sound better forms
you. We're doing it. So I

1124
01:27:06.319 --> 01:27:11.520
mentioned the kinds of conferences that I
put on in terris M. I just

1125
01:27:11.560 --> 01:27:15.000
put on an amangdis put on where
it wasn't about I ram is anything at

1126
01:27:15.000 --> 01:27:16.920
the IMAM society guess to be was
just about a topic. And we had

1127
01:27:16.960 --> 01:27:21.359
some objectivists and non objectivist philosophers engaging
over the topic. I found that when

1128
01:27:21.439 --> 01:27:27.359
we've done that kind of thing,
more good has come up with than when

1129
01:27:27.439 --> 01:27:30.760
we did the kind of programing we
do with the RS, where we would

1130
01:27:30.800 --> 01:27:32.960
have you know, somebody right about
I'm ramm the continent. We have a

1131
01:27:33.000 --> 01:27:36.880
commis stolar company to talk about it. That format of program So I think

1132
01:27:36.920 --> 01:27:43.319
there's other kinds of given the kind
of opportunities that there are now, there

1133
01:27:43.359 --> 01:27:47.720
are probably other kinds of programming that
it's better for the RS sessions to be

1134
01:27:47.760 --> 01:27:54.399
focused on. That's where you know, advantages versus that style of session.

1135
01:27:54.439 --> 01:28:00.439
But that's something that the steering community
is deliberating about it thinking about. Uh,

1136
01:28:00.760 --> 01:28:01.880
I don't know how much I say. My own prefforts would be that

1137
01:28:02.039 --> 01:28:09.760
more of the papers at the a
RS conferences will be in the nature if

1138
01:28:09.760 --> 01:28:13.600
I'm rant scholarship, and maybe we'll
have multiple people with a background than her,

1139
01:28:13.720 --> 01:28:18.199
rather than whether their objective has been
people spend considerable time thinking about her,

1140
01:28:18.760 --> 01:28:21.479
and um, the other kind of
mobage been taking place in the other

1141
01:28:21.560 --> 01:28:30.399
world. But we'll see partly what
opportunities ye good, Let's see Harpocollins Campbell

1142
01:28:30.000 --> 01:28:35.399
asks, Um, did you see
Stephen Hicks debate with Craig Biddle about whether

1143
01:28:35.399 --> 01:28:40.960
the objectivism is the statics and system? I saw an ad for it.

1144
01:28:41.319 --> 01:28:45.319
I didn't know what happened yet.
Yeah, I think it's still it's still

1145
01:28:45.399 --> 01:28:46.760
going to happen. I don't think. I don't think it's happened already.

1146
01:28:47.960 --> 01:28:55.039
Yeah. Are you planning on seeing
it? Um? I assume it's at

1147
01:28:55.039 --> 01:28:57.680
a conference that I'm not going to. I don't know. I mean,

1148
01:28:57.720 --> 01:29:02.840
if it's time YouTube by my watch
it, Okay. I don't think.

1149
01:29:03.199 --> 01:29:05.279
I think I know where I stand
on those issues. I think I know

1150
01:29:05.319 --> 01:29:09.159
where both of those people stand at
it, and I don't know. You

1151
01:29:09.239 --> 01:29:13.199
know, I wouldn't expect to learn
much, but I sometimes feel a professional

1152
01:29:13.279 --> 01:29:15.600
responsibility to keep up on things like
this. So if you know, if

1153
01:29:15.640 --> 01:29:18.079
I see a link to a YouTube
video, but I'll probably watch it.

1154
01:29:19.399 --> 01:29:25.520
Uh, Michaels, Did we have
any radical individualist presidents or were they all

1155
01:29:25.960 --> 01:29:34.159
collectivists of varying degrees? I think
you know, Washington, Adams, Jefferson,

1156
01:29:34.199 --> 01:29:40.560
and Madison were pretty damn good in
their different ways. Um. Each

1157
01:29:40.600 --> 01:29:44.479
of them had had problems, and
I wouldn't call them collectivists. I would

1158
01:29:44.560 --> 01:29:46.039
say they were all individuals. I
would say that Lincoln is. I think

1159
01:29:46.079 --> 01:29:49.439
Lincoln is primarily individual factors. Though
he made some mistakes, there are some

1160
01:29:49.520 --> 01:29:53.880
things he did wrong. Um,
I'm sure there are some of those,

1161
01:29:53.960 --> 01:29:58.760
Hugo Quinn to see Adams. I
think I'm not a kind of historian.

1162
01:29:58.840 --> 01:30:03.039
I don't know all of the figures. But um, already too many presidents

1163
01:30:03.079 --> 01:30:11.960
I think, well after Linking,
maybe Cleveland, maybe Cleveland even yeah,

1164
01:30:11.960 --> 01:30:14.760
I don't know that much about even
even some of the better ones turned out

1165
01:30:14.920 --> 01:30:17.520
really bad. Like Coolidge is often
thought of by my appolist is very good.

1166
01:30:17.520 --> 01:30:20.840
But Coolidge presided over the national relation
of the airwave, which is all

1167
01:30:20.920 --> 01:30:26.119
the worst things done. And um, I think it was terrible in immigration,

1168
01:30:26.279 --> 01:30:29.680
right, wasn't Coolidg's terrible in immigration? I don't know where. Okay,

1169
01:30:30.159 --> 01:30:32.439
I thought the Big Immigration Act was
passed on the Coolidge in the twenties,

1170
01:30:33.359 --> 01:30:40.439
the first one that really blocked blocked
immigration. It would makes sense time

1171
01:30:40.479 --> 01:30:44.359
wise, but I'm not about so
there's no you know, other than I

1172
01:30:44.479 --> 01:30:53.159
know the early American presidence pretty well. Um yep, um, let's see

1173
01:30:54.000 --> 01:30:59.039
Liam says. If Trump wins the
nomination and gets absolutely destroyed in the general

1174
01:30:59.079 --> 01:31:02.239
election by an eight two year old
demanded, man, will we see a

1175
01:31:02.359 --> 01:31:09.159
real shift in the GUP towards a
more rational limited government party? I don't

1176
01:31:09.159 --> 01:31:15.319
know. I'd like to think so. We to some extent we thought when

1177
01:31:15.399 --> 01:31:17.720
Biden won this in twenty twenty,
that would happen. I thought that,

1178
01:31:17.840 --> 01:31:20.800
I mean, when it was as
close as it Why it wasn't that close,

1179
01:31:21.479 --> 01:31:25.760
but when it was as close as
it was, rather than a blowout,

1180
01:31:26.119 --> 01:31:34.359
Um, yeah, I mean when
Trump won the Republican domination in twenty

1181
01:31:34.439 --> 01:31:39.359
sixteen, I think it showed that
America was a less good country than most

1182
01:31:39.399 --> 01:31:42.840
of us thought it was. Ye. I think it's still historically a great

1183
01:31:42.880 --> 01:31:45.720
country. It's still better than any
plays out. But I thought we were

1184
01:31:45.760 --> 01:31:50.479
going to do that yea. Um, And given that he won that,

1185
01:31:50.680 --> 01:31:54.600
given that it was possible from to
both win the nomination and then when the

1186
01:31:54.680 --> 01:31:58.800
presidency, but even winning the nomination, I think it's a more important thing.

1187
01:32:00.079 --> 01:32:04.319
Um. Nothing else that's happened since
should be too surprising. Um,

1188
01:32:04.720 --> 01:32:09.680
nothing feeling that happened with him?
Who surprised me? Since then? A

1189
01:32:09.720 --> 01:32:12.760
country that's willing to vote for him
once couple be willing to vote for him

1190
01:32:12.760 --> 01:32:17.000
again. And I think everything that
happened, people who were surprised by it

1191
01:32:17.079 --> 01:32:23.359
were kidding themselves. I think the
response to COVID, the response to losing

1192
01:32:23.600 --> 01:32:28.039
in in in twenty twenty, all
of that was baked into what we knew.

1193
01:32:28.119 --> 01:32:32.800
He was the kind of mean one
the nomination. So what will snap

1194
01:32:32.880 --> 01:32:36.920
people out of him? I don't
know. I don't think there's a kind

1195
01:32:36.960 --> 01:32:41.920
of moment where everybody's just going to
change their mind. I think it would

1196
01:32:41.920 --> 01:32:46.680
be a gradual, you know,
gradual transition away towards more positive values.

1197
01:32:47.520 --> 01:32:53.119
Um, if someone on the right
arises making a more positive case for something

1198
01:32:53.159 --> 01:32:57.840
about it, you could imagine,
you know, Jimmiscott or Nicky Henley or

1199
01:32:57.920 --> 01:33:02.279
someone h doing something. We haven't
seen much of it yet, And um,

1200
01:33:03.680 --> 01:33:08.920
I don't know when that will happen. I don't think Biden's unpopular ens

1201
01:33:09.760 --> 01:33:13.119
that he's not going to have a
I think he probably willing to get to

1202
01:33:13.239 --> 01:33:15.560
Trump, but I don't think he
would have the kind of blowout that's had

1203
01:33:15.600 --> 01:33:18.159
a proportion to would happen before.
Maybe the Trump people will just kind of

1204
01:33:18.199 --> 01:33:23.239
get tired of, you know,
losing over and over again and they'll go

1205
01:33:23.359 --> 01:33:29.319
home. But um and I think
that that's probably more likely what will happen,

1206
01:33:29.399 --> 01:33:33.039
and that you know they will be
these conversion experiences, But I don't

1207
01:33:33.039 --> 01:33:39.039
know, and I don't know the
times again, ye Liamos asks and if

1208
01:33:39.119 --> 01:33:43.760
Trump wins the second term, will
he be able to get anything done?

1209
01:33:43.880 --> 01:33:48.439
Or will the GOP morph into a
full fascist, populist reactionary party. Are

1210
01:33:49.000 --> 01:33:53.720
yeah, an no. More that
it does that, the more likely he

1211
01:33:53.760 --> 01:33:57.039
will be able to get the kind
of things I've done that would be would

1212
01:33:57.039 --> 01:34:00.239
be terrified. But we should be
asking these kinds of questions about um,

1213
01:34:00.720 --> 01:34:02.399
you know the Democrats too, What
would make them change their minds? They

1214
01:34:02.439 --> 01:34:09.479
get better? Um? So I
don't know. I think it's it would

1215
01:34:09.479 --> 01:34:13.119
be a very bad thing for the
country if you want again, um,

1216
01:34:14.000 --> 01:34:18.600
certainly versus someone like Biden, there's
a lame milk toast. Um uh.

1217
01:34:18.840 --> 01:34:24.279
And I mean he's pathetic and in
corrupting various ways and and bad, but

1218
01:34:24.880 --> 01:34:29.960
all within normal bounds. If it
were someone like Bernie Sanders, you could

1219
01:34:30.359 --> 01:34:32.159
you know, see like it's a
new load for the last n the new

1220
01:34:32.239 --> 01:34:33.720
load for the right. And what
are you going to make of it.

1221
01:34:34.159 --> 01:34:41.920
But that's not the case with Biden. He's this same old contemptible jump that

1222
01:34:42.239 --> 01:34:45.640
all presidents left and right at them
for for decades. Some of his people

1223
01:34:45.680 --> 01:34:48.640
are worse than they have but you'd
expect that, right, because the whole

1224
01:34:48.680 --> 01:34:54.039
movement is moving left right is petially
bad. I think the worst. I

1225
01:34:54.079 --> 01:34:58.439
know, um, but you would
expect. I mean, there's always that

1226
01:34:58.520 --> 01:35:00.279
are in worse people within the administ
patients. There were some good people within

1227
01:35:00.319 --> 01:35:04.680
the Trump like actually good people,
and certainly some people who were better than

1228
01:35:05.399 --> 01:35:10.880
would have been the alternatives. Definitely
a Democrat administration, but you know,

1229
01:35:10.920 --> 01:35:16.000
again likewise on some issues there are
better people than the Democratic Okay, next

1230
01:35:16.039 --> 01:35:23.239
few questions all by Wick Zong uh
So. Wick asks, you guys have

1231
01:35:23.439 --> 01:35:28.039
viciously criticized Trump over the last seven
years. Thank you we have. Is

1232
01:35:28.079 --> 01:35:35.000
it appropriate when he is persecuted by
the entire system he is a victim victims,

1233
01:35:35.079 --> 01:35:39.399
nothing to about, Yeah, and
it doesn't exonerate you from the evil.

1234
01:35:41.960 --> 01:35:45.920
Maybe deserves his victimhood status, right, I mean I don't think yeah,

1235
01:35:45.359 --> 01:35:48.039
but um, I don't think that's
the story of them in general.

1236
01:35:48.640 --> 01:35:58.920
But no excuse. Yeah, So, I you know, I certainly don't

1237
01:35:59.079 --> 01:36:03.319
regret and tend to continue to criticize
and viciously as long as he's in politics.

1238
01:36:04.079 --> 01:36:08.600
Well, what is important to not
do and to make sure that we

1239
01:36:08.640 --> 01:36:12.479
don't do it, That we should
keep ourselves honest about in our hatred or

1240
01:36:12.520 --> 01:36:15.600
Trump, which I think is just
that I think one should Adam is not

1241
01:36:15.880 --> 01:36:23.760
to use it as a justification for
being soft on accepting of evils that present

1242
01:36:23.880 --> 01:36:28.600
themselves as opposed to it, just
as opposition to those evils shouldn't make one

1243
01:36:29.079 --> 01:36:33.279
soft on sympathetic to again or to
anything else that that pops up and you

1244
01:36:33.359 --> 01:36:39.039
know, classifies itself as writer or
anti lab It's very easy to fall into

1245
01:36:39.920 --> 01:36:45.720
kind of team sports and politics,
and I think one has to recognize that

1246
01:36:45.800 --> 01:36:50.399
we're in a world where the culture
and the political culture is bad and broken

1247
01:36:50.439 --> 01:36:54.720
and wrong, and as a result, all the major movements are going to

1248
01:36:54.760 --> 01:36:58.319
be bad, and some of them
are going to be worse than others at

1249
01:36:58.399 --> 01:37:03.439
certain times. It's not that there's
like some permanent political faction that's good and

1250
01:37:03.439 --> 01:37:10.119
it's for the good in a country
that has two dominant political parties or two

1251
01:37:10.119 --> 01:37:14.399
dominant political faction, which is how
any country with voting tends to shake out.

1252
01:37:15.399 --> 01:37:17.479
You know, either there are two
parties as in our country, or

1253
01:37:17.600 --> 01:37:20.439
in a parliamentary system there are many
parties, but to tend to be the

1254
01:37:20.479 --> 01:37:26.680
down on. What you have to
think about is not which party is good

1255
01:37:26.760 --> 01:37:30.359
or which is evil. You have
to expect that the country is going to

1256
01:37:30.399 --> 01:37:31.880
be in the hands of one party
sometimes in the hands of the other party

1257
01:37:32.199 --> 01:37:35.159
the other time. And if you're
thinking about your life over a lifetime,

1258
01:37:35.600 --> 01:37:38.920
it's not that one of those is
going to win and the other is gonna

1259
01:37:38.960 --> 01:37:41.880
lose. It's that power is going
to be shared and switch back and forth.

1260
01:37:41.920 --> 01:37:45.119
And what you have to focus on
is which things are making one or

1261
01:37:45.159 --> 01:37:49.000
the other or both sides worse or
bad. And there have been periods where

1262
01:37:49.119 --> 01:37:54.479
both sides have been getting better on
significant issues. Both sides went from being

1263
01:37:54.640 --> 01:37:58.640
not really pro free trade to pretty
prow free trade over the course of the

1264
01:37:58.680 --> 01:38:01.800
seventies through the nineties. Now both
sides being anti creature, right, that's

1265
01:38:01.960 --> 01:38:06.199
that thing kind of happened. Both
sides went to being pretty pro abortion from

1266
01:38:06.239 --> 01:38:10.960
being anti abortion or from abortion being
illegal in the country over the course of

1267
01:38:11.039 --> 01:38:14.439
the sixties in the seventies. Now
one side has gone to being really anti

1268
01:38:14.520 --> 01:38:19.520
abortion and maybe maybe they'll start to
retreat from that on various issues, you

1269
01:38:19.640 --> 01:38:26.279
know, one side will get better
or worse. And what I'm more focused

1270
01:38:26.359 --> 01:38:30.840
on, you know, is what's
going to make the Republicans a little bit

1271
01:38:30.840 --> 01:38:31.600
better or a little bit worse,
or a lot better or a lot of

1272
01:38:31.880 --> 01:38:36.119
And likewise, for the Democrats,
so Bernie Sanders winning the nomination or something,

1273
01:38:36.479 --> 01:38:40.000
or AOC becoming Speaker of the out
of Company, it would be a

1274
01:38:40.079 --> 01:38:43.279
really bad thing or the factions that
it would make, it would empower the

1275
01:38:43.359 --> 01:38:45.279
worst side of the Democrat and the
Democrats are going to be half of who's

1276
01:38:45.399 --> 01:38:54.119
ruling us for the foreseeable future.
Whereas you know, moderate milk toast candidates

1277
01:38:54.159 --> 01:38:59.520
who are good on abortion only moderately
bad relative to Republicans on the economy,

1278
01:39:00.279 --> 01:39:02.720
Um, don't have much to say, you know, like nothing, practice

1279
01:39:02.800 --> 01:39:06.000
duckings are you know, the best
we can hope for from the Democrats,

1280
01:39:06.039 --> 01:39:09.880
and so we should be hoping for
it and from the Republicans. It's the

1281
01:39:09.960 --> 01:39:14.239
same thing. Do you get people
like that or do you get real nialist

1282
01:39:14.319 --> 01:39:18.640
destroyers and uh, and do you
get you know, people like a Paul

1283
01:39:18.760 --> 01:39:21.199
Ryan or someone like that, who
has you know, some good ideas in

1284
01:39:21.319 --> 01:39:28.159
some fields and and nothing in most
others, or or do you have someone

1285
01:39:28.239 --> 01:39:32.880
like a Trump? And it's that
distinction that matters much more than distension between

1286
01:39:32.920 --> 01:39:40.279
the Democrats and the Republican to win
the particular Yeah, green Um wake us

1287
01:39:40.319 --> 01:39:45.880
asks, what's your evaluation if charm
Charles Murray's work on race? Um,

1288
01:39:46.359 --> 01:39:50.520
I think charms Murray's contemptible, not
primarily because of his work on race,

1289
01:39:50.840 --> 01:39:57.479
although I think his work on race
I've been I read The Belt Curb very

1290
01:39:57.600 --> 01:40:00.439
very long time ago. I don't
remember all the details. I don't finding

1291
01:40:00.720 --> 01:40:06.600
I didn't find it first races,
But I think there's a general deterministic mindset.

1292
01:40:06.680 --> 01:40:13.000
He has a kind of thinking that
we're made mostly by our biology,

1293
01:40:13.600 --> 01:40:20.439
and a real and not by our
choices, and a real collectivist dick impulse,

1294
01:40:20.800 --> 01:40:25.319
but running throughout his thinking. And
I'll tell you the thing that most

1295
01:40:25.439 --> 01:40:29.239
horrified me when I read it by
Murray, much more than anything he said

1296
01:40:29.239 --> 01:40:31.479
about race. Again, I think
he's wrong and bad and a lot of

1297
01:40:31.600 --> 01:40:34.640
things he says about race, But
this is the thing that most concerned me.

1298
01:40:35.319 --> 01:40:42.720
Wasn't his book coming apart where He
was bemoaning the fact that if you

1299
01:40:42.840 --> 01:40:46.479
were really smart, way back in
the day, whenever he thinks it was

1300
01:40:46.680 --> 01:40:50.479
good m a smart man, you
know, you go to college with other

1301
01:40:50.560 --> 01:40:55.479
men, but there'd be no women
there. And you go back to your

1302
01:40:55.920 --> 01:41:00.880
hometown and find the smartest girl in
your you know, hometown who wouldn't be

1303
01:41:00.079 --> 01:41:06.039
that smart, and you get married
to her and have kids whose intelligence would

1304
01:41:06.039 --> 01:41:09.800
be average, maybe a little bit
raised by your intelligence, but brought down

1305
01:41:09.880 --> 01:41:12.880
by your wife. And if you
were a really smart women in the town,

1306
01:41:13.279 --> 01:41:15.039
you know whatever, you bury the
local farmer. But now that women

1307
01:41:15.159 --> 01:41:19.640
go and get educations to the smartest
men find the smartest women, and they

1308
01:41:19.720 --> 01:41:23.760
can come together and they can be
super smart and have super smart kids,

1309
01:41:23.920 --> 01:41:26.560
and then there won't be in there
for people in the country who won't be

1310
01:41:26.720 --> 01:41:30.800
very stupid able. And he why, I think it's silly to think that

1311
01:41:30.840 --> 01:41:34.159
that that happens, is what's happening. But to the bemoaning of the fact

1312
01:41:34.479 --> 01:41:41.000
that intelligent people can find one another, that's disgusting, it's despicable. And

1313
01:41:41.199 --> 01:41:44.800
if if you think something like that
is happening, you're like, finally the

1314
01:41:44.960 --> 01:41:47.399
best of you know, smartest,
most ambitious, most, whatever positive try

1315
01:41:47.479 --> 01:41:53.039
you think you have of both genders
are able to develop themselves to the utmost

1316
01:41:53.079 --> 01:41:56.680
and get to know one another,
and you regard that as anything less than

1317
01:41:56.760 --> 01:42:01.239
a past it wonderful thing that any
possible downside of which he is marginal and

1318
01:42:01.319 --> 01:42:06.920
could easily be dealt with. I
think he's there's something really spiritually despicable about

1319
01:42:06.960 --> 01:42:12.600
that, and I think of him
as this kind of decrepid, envious,

1320
01:42:12.760 --> 01:42:17.720
collectivest soul strolling around through the earth, spreading his sick misery. So that's

1321
01:42:17.760 --> 01:42:20.079
when I think of him spiritually.
Now, what do I think of his

1322
01:42:20.199 --> 01:42:29.600
figures? He's not I find what
he's There's something odd in this kind of

1323
01:42:29.680 --> 01:42:32.239
fixation on IQ, a lot of
which I think is kind of bogus.

1324
01:42:32.319 --> 01:42:36.560
The science. I think there's something
strange about the way it's driving his work.

1325
01:42:36.600 --> 01:42:43.720
I think the things that that John
mcwater has written in response to him

1326
01:42:43.760 --> 01:42:47.880
about about it, I think are
largely right and have a kind of wisdom

1327
01:42:47.920 --> 01:42:53.640
to them. On the other hand, he's treated as a kind of evil

1328
01:42:53.800 --> 01:42:57.880
non person who anyone talking to is
therefore, um, you know, continning

1329
01:42:57.920 --> 01:43:00.239
some kind of thought crime or whatever. And I think that's awful. It's

1330
01:43:00.319 --> 01:43:04.720
awful that there was violent when he
spoke at Middlebury, and that's totally unacceptable.

1331
01:43:05.920 --> 01:43:09.079
On the other hand, the response
to it by saying, well,

1332
01:43:09.119 --> 01:43:12.119
he's you know, wonderful and one
of us because other people don't like him

1333
01:43:12.239 --> 01:43:15.239
is not the right response to that. But um, you know, he's

1334
01:43:15.439 --> 01:43:18.279
one of these kinds of people.
I don't regard him as any kind of

1335
01:43:18.319 --> 01:43:23.039
an ally in the fight or freedom. Um. I don't regard him as

1336
01:43:23.239 --> 01:43:28.800
as pointing to staffs that are otherwise
hitting that people don't know. Everyone knows

1337
01:43:28.840 --> 01:43:32.239
there's a lot of uh, you
know, disproportionate racur prime and African American

1338
01:43:32.279 --> 01:43:36.079
community and so forth. That's not
you know, some great revelation. Um.

1339
01:43:36.359 --> 01:43:39.319
There are a lot of questions about
why and what to do about it.

1340
01:43:39.399 --> 01:43:44.399
But I don't think he should as
much. I don't know. Um

1341
01:43:44.600 --> 01:43:49.319
from Wick again, what do you
think about Fire defending Amy Wax? Um?

1342
01:43:51.159 --> 01:43:59.000
This one I find a little more. It's a similar issue in a

1343
01:43:59.079 --> 01:44:03.720
way. So I think LAX's views
are also pretty contemptible. Yeah. I

1344
01:44:03.960 --> 01:44:11.319
think Fire's conception of free speech in
general, much wider than the Lax issue,

1345
01:44:12.000 --> 01:44:15.039
is mistaken. There are things that
they're very good on, but they

1346
01:44:15.159 --> 01:44:18.319
don't think they really understand the issue
of free speech. They come out of

1347
01:44:18.439 --> 01:44:23.319
the free speech movement of nineteen sixty
five, the kind of protests at Berkeley

1348
01:44:23.319 --> 01:44:27.399
into the fourth which ran condemned at
the time for the very reasons that are

1349
01:44:27.439 --> 01:44:30.720
relevant now. They're one of their
kind of things that all the kind of

1350
01:44:30.880 --> 01:44:33.680
free speech folks down from the ones
that fire are very proud of was the

1351
01:44:34.079 --> 01:44:40.239
acoused defense of the Nazis right to
march it Skokie. But the Nazis didn't

1352
01:44:40.279 --> 01:44:44.359
have a right to march it Scipe
if not a moral right, and the

1353
01:44:44.600 --> 01:44:46.840
laws shouldn't be set up to have
that right. Now, if we're going

1354
01:44:46.920 --> 01:44:50.319
to let everybody else launch, you
can't just exclude the Nazis until in that

1355
01:44:50.439 --> 01:44:56.319
sense it's true, But there's a
kind of sense that free speech means everybody

1356
01:44:56.399 --> 01:45:00.600
being tolerant of everything, and therefore
when somebody's idea, thought, speech are

1357
01:45:00.680 --> 01:45:05.800
intolerated by some party, that therefore
that group is a persecuted minority like that

1358
01:45:05.880 --> 01:45:10.960
other questioner asked about Trump and people
should rally to their side, and I

1359
01:45:11.039 --> 01:45:14.640
don't think that's true. It's not
a violation of anyone's free speech, not

1360
01:45:14.680 --> 01:45:16.000
to want to have dinner with them, not to want to talk to them,

1361
01:45:16.279 --> 01:45:18.560
not to want to debate them.
To regard to this, beyond the

1362
01:45:18.640 --> 01:45:24.920
pan and some of the things that
Wax has held, I think should place

1363
01:45:25.000 --> 01:45:30.359
her outside of most pans that said, she has tenure at a university.

1364
01:45:30.880 --> 01:45:35.880
There's a ten year contract that specifies
under what terms she could be fired or

1365
01:45:35.920 --> 01:45:41.079
not buyed to. So for it
that those kind of contracts, for better

1366
01:45:41.199 --> 01:45:44.880
or worse, be respected, I
think it's important to be part of how

1367
01:45:44.960 --> 01:45:51.880
you defend your rights is through contracting
and making contracts with you know that you

1368
01:45:51.960 --> 01:45:59.600
can rely on it. And so
if it turns out that attempts to dismiss

1369
01:45:59.640 --> 01:46:02.880
Amy run afoul of her contract,
then she should be defended and it made

1370
01:46:02.880 --> 01:46:05.439
sense or fire to defender. And
I don't know that's an issue of exactly

1371
01:46:05.560 --> 01:46:12.119
how their contract is written, but
some of the things I've heard her say,

1372
01:46:13.479 --> 01:46:17.600
I think they're incompatible with being with
being a teacher. If you're teaching

1373
01:46:17.720 --> 01:46:21.880
people and you're saying publicly like my
Asian students are this way and my Black

1374
01:46:21.960 --> 01:46:26.760
students are that way. Even if
that's true, it's not, it's not,

1375
01:46:26.840 --> 01:46:29.840
which I don't think it is,
but it's not. You have certain

1376
01:46:29.880 --> 01:46:35.079
responsibilities to about how you discuss the
people who you're teaching or in your charge

1377
01:46:35.079 --> 01:46:38.359
in that sense, but I think
are part of taking on that kind of

1378
01:46:38.399 --> 01:46:41.880
a job, and I think that
some of the comments made a violation of

1379
01:46:42.000 --> 01:46:47.520
that. And she's part of a
really ugly current in American thought that starts

1380
01:46:49.920 --> 01:46:57.119
later after the Civil War, where
you get a certain kind of distortion of

1381
01:46:58.079 --> 01:47:02.720
liberalism that comes to think that freedom
is and a respect for freedom and I

1382
01:47:02.760 --> 01:47:08.520
wanted to vote for the system that
will keep us free is part of some

1383
01:47:08.760 --> 01:47:14.039
special feature of white Europeans and only
white Huropeans having, can have, or

1384
01:47:14.079 --> 01:47:17.039
are likely to ever get, and
so that the key to keeping the free

1385
01:47:17.159 --> 01:47:23.560
nation is to make it unfree and
get rid of freedom of association in various

1386
01:47:23.560 --> 01:47:27.439
ways so as to keep it white. That is I think a really horrible

1387
01:47:27.720 --> 01:47:30.840
of you that have a really horrible
history was related to some of the horrible

1388
01:47:30.920 --> 01:47:33.520
laws that we talked about before,
and it's what whacks as Defendom is a

1389
01:47:33.600 --> 01:47:38.760
proponent. And I think it's been
a real mistake on the part of advocates

1390
01:47:38.800 --> 01:47:43.840
of free speech that they've not just
said, you know, it might be

1391
01:47:43.920 --> 01:47:48.079
wrong that this horrible woman get fired, given her given her contract and the

1392
01:47:48.119 --> 01:47:53.199
principle of which are waning universities,
but the regarding her as an ally or

1393
01:47:53.199 --> 01:47:56.520
a friend. And I was at
the Stamford Conference on Academic Freedom where she

1394
01:47:56.720 --> 01:48:01.039
was, and I was bothered by
how friendly reception she got. By even

1395
01:48:01.079 --> 01:48:06.199
now, I think you should know
that. Were you concerned about the financial

1396
01:48:06.520 --> 01:48:13.600
about financial prospects when you chose an
intellectual career? Yeah, but I had

1397
01:48:13.680 --> 01:48:17.399
reasons to be less and I had
to the first thing, Like, when

1398
01:48:17.399 --> 01:48:26.319
I went into college, I had
the sense that you have to go somewhere

1399
01:48:26.640 --> 01:48:29.760
and get some degree in something that
sets you up for some job. But

1400
01:48:29.840 --> 01:48:31.239
if you get the wrong degree and
you can't get a job in that thing,

1401
01:48:31.520 --> 01:48:34.600
you know, so you end up
in the Bowery somewhere. And I

1402
01:48:34.640 --> 01:48:39.319
didn't quite literally do that, but
it's kind of the premise I was operating

1403
01:48:39.399 --> 01:48:44.239
more and after my think I told
this story before, maybe even on the

1404
01:48:44.279 --> 01:48:47.560
show, but after my freshman year
in college, by which time I was

1405
01:48:47.680 --> 01:48:54.520
very interested in philosophy and I got
out of trumb I got a job through

1406
01:48:54.560 --> 01:49:00.359
a camp agency, basically doing the
lowest kind of data entry thing you could

1407
01:49:00.399 --> 01:49:03.399
do at an office. It was
it was an office that was it was

1408
01:49:03.439 --> 01:49:09.680
part of the ATAM data And I
realized that not well run, this data

1409
01:49:09.720 --> 01:49:12.159
that I'm entering is going to be
obsolete by the end of the summer when

1410
01:49:12.159 --> 01:49:15.520
I was supposed to be done entering
it. Plus I'm moving data from a

1411
01:49:15.600 --> 01:49:18.600
moving sort whatever. So I ended
up writing some scripts to automate that job.

1412
01:49:19.239 --> 01:49:23.039
I didn't have any particular background in
programming. I learned a little bit

1413
01:49:23.079 --> 01:49:26.800
of programming when I was a kid
and then forgot it. And you know,

1414
01:49:26.880 --> 01:49:29.840
it wasn't the language as I was
using that, but its just I

1415
01:49:30.239 --> 01:49:31.119
was thinking, like, this isn't
the way to do things. I was

1416
01:49:31.159 --> 01:49:34.520
paying attention to why I was being
asked to do when I was doing,

1417
01:49:34.600 --> 01:49:39.119
how it was fitting into the larger
workflow. What could I do to make

1418
01:49:39.119 --> 01:49:41.960
it better? Right at this?
And I ended up getting basically promoted to

1419
01:49:42.039 --> 01:49:45.279
writing other programs to do other things
like that. And I just paid a

1420
01:49:45.319 --> 01:49:49.640
lot of attention to, like what's
going on at this business, who's good

1421
01:49:49.640 --> 01:49:53.960
at their job and who isn't,
who's recognized for being good at their job?

1422
01:49:53.960 --> 01:49:58.239
But it was what's making this place
run? And I realized, yeah,

1423
01:49:58.359 --> 01:50:00.319
I could do well here, I
could get promotions here, I can

1424
01:50:00.319 --> 01:50:02.840
go work, or I can go
to another company and do something like this.

1425
01:50:03.119 --> 01:50:08.000
The things that are making me able
to add value aren't that I have

1426
01:50:08.159 --> 01:50:11.600
this degree or this piece of paper
or this particular piece of knowledge, but

1427
01:50:11.760 --> 01:50:14.680
that I'm being rational. I'm thinking
about what the point of this work is.

1428
01:50:15.199 --> 01:50:17.840
And it makes sense. It's like
at Les Sharp says, there's the

1429
01:50:17.880 --> 01:50:21.159
mind, and the mind makes things
work, and it's not always a person

1430
01:50:21.199 --> 01:50:24.560
at the top. And you can
find a place to add value. And

1431
01:50:25.119 --> 01:50:29.000
the next summer one of my best
friends did the same thing. You can

1432
01:50:29.079 --> 01:50:32.399
have a job also data entry at
another place. Found things he could you

1433
01:50:32.640 --> 01:50:35.399
learn to code and you knew less
about putting a good idea, was pulling

1434
01:50:35.439 --> 01:50:39.439
me up, how do I do
this function or whatever? Wrote some software

1435
01:50:39.439 --> 01:50:41.560
for them, did some other things, ended up as a vice president of

1436
01:50:41.640 --> 01:50:45.079
that company, and then went on
left with the CEO of that company to

1437
01:50:45.159 --> 01:50:48.199
go found another company and had a
you know, a good career in business.

1438
01:50:48.279 --> 01:50:51.159
And and I just had the sense
that oh, if you think,

1439
01:50:51.239 --> 01:50:55.840
if you're thoughtful, if your industrious, if you're looking for opportunities, there

1440
01:50:55.880 --> 01:50:59.760
are ways to work your way up
and make money. So I'm not it's

1441
01:50:59.800 --> 01:51:01.319
not life. I'm gonna be a
bomb at the philosophies of work out.

1442
01:51:01.359 --> 01:51:06.199
And moreover, the one thing,
given my interest in my skill sets that's

1443
01:51:06.279 --> 01:51:12.800
really fostering what's good about what I
value in myself and makes be able to

1444
01:51:12.880 --> 01:51:15.239
do this is possible. So I'm
not losing anything my study. And so

1445
01:51:15.359 --> 01:51:18.960
that was my first decision when I
was in college, that may be very

1446
01:51:19.039 --> 01:51:24.079
confident in pursuing a philosophy major and
thinking that the philosophy is relevant and I

1447
01:51:24.119 --> 01:51:26.319
can find a way to use it
in business, but I need to or

1448
01:51:26.359 --> 01:51:29.479
in some other field. And then
the other thing that made me more confident

1449
01:51:30.279 --> 01:51:31.840
is by the time I was in
graduate school and getting out of graduatedool,

1450
01:51:31.840 --> 01:51:36.079
there are more and more opportunities through
handsom and through a RII to do work

1451
01:51:36.159 --> 01:51:42.039
as an specifically objectivist intellectual. There
was interested I ran that a market for

1452
01:51:42.880 --> 01:51:47.880
or non for work on her that
made possible none inventional scholarly for your path.

1453
01:51:48.239 --> 01:51:51.000
And most of my work has been, you know, in one way

1454
01:51:51.079 --> 01:51:55.840
or another part of that. So
I realized that that existed, and I'm

1455
01:51:56.039 --> 01:52:00.239
very pleased mind and grateful for those
opportunities. But I also like all the

1456
01:52:00.279 --> 01:52:03.479
market and so that that was you
know, possible, and that influenced some

1457
01:52:03.600 --> 01:52:06.439
decisions about how open I was on
what I work for, what things I

1458
01:52:06.479 --> 01:52:11.560
wrote, not saying that every decision
I need with right or perfect or my

1459
01:52:11.600 --> 01:52:18.399
career it is you know, part
of being productive is thinking what is there

1460
01:52:18.399 --> 01:52:20.560
a market for? How can I
make there be a market for the things

1461
01:52:20.680 --> 01:52:26.119
I wanted to yep um, which
says why should we criticize the right?

1462
01:52:26.239 --> 01:52:30.199
When the left dominated the major institutions
academia, media, Hollywood, tech,

1463
01:52:30.279 --> 01:52:36.079
medical establishment, et cetera. I
don't understand the question, and the last

1464
01:52:36.640 --> 01:52:42.920
dominated some institutions, the rights dominates
others. They're both important factors in the

1465
01:52:43.079 --> 01:52:46.560
culture, and they feed off on
another. They're not enemies. They're part

1466
01:52:46.600 --> 01:52:55.399
of one system by which ideas propagated
and and take hold. And why should

1467
01:52:55.479 --> 01:52:59.920
we in particular criticize the right that
is me and your because the people who

1468
01:53:00.079 --> 01:53:05.560
are apt to listen to us already
are more aware of constrong with alec Yeah,

1469
01:53:09.079 --> 01:53:13.600
why do you give so little credit
to Christian tradition when many good ideas

1470
01:53:13.720 --> 01:53:17.119
arise from it? Though the good
ideas I influenced by Greek philosophy, they

1471
01:53:17.199 --> 01:53:25.920
still manifested itself in this tradition.
I don't think. I'm not convinced any

1472
01:53:26.000 --> 01:53:33.520
good ideas didn't come from that treasure. Whatever dominant type ideology there is,

1473
01:53:34.119 --> 01:53:39.800
whether it's a religion or a philosophy, other ideas that are around independent of

1474
01:53:39.880 --> 01:53:43.159
it, will get a created to
it and maybe spread or passed along with

1475
01:53:43.319 --> 01:53:45.520
it, wrapped up in it.
And there are some good ideas that got

1476
01:53:45.760 --> 01:53:50.880
spread and wrapped up with Christianity and
some people's minds, you know, sandwich,

1477
01:53:50.920 --> 01:53:54.119
but I don't think any of them
come from it or were developed because

1478
01:53:54.159 --> 01:53:56.920
of it. There might be some, I'm not you know, closed to

1479
01:53:57.000 --> 01:54:00.079
that possibility. I could think of
some possible ones, truly, if you're

1480
01:54:00.119 --> 01:54:05.520
interesting. But I don't really think
the good ideas that having come from it,

1481
01:54:05.520 --> 01:54:10.039
and I don't think it gets credit
for the you know, things that

1482
01:54:10.159 --> 01:54:13.520
traveled along with it, despite being
contrary to its nature. And the same

1483
01:54:13.600 --> 01:54:17.159
goes for Islam, and the same
goes for Judaism, and the same goes

1484
01:54:17.399 --> 01:54:20.640
for Eastern religions that you know,
I'm sure the same thing is true of

1485
01:54:21.279 --> 01:54:29.359
in Hinduism and Buddhism and so forth, and the same goes for various you

1486
01:54:29.439 --> 01:54:33.520
know, nominally secular creeds like Marxism. You could say all certain intellectuality goes

1487
01:54:33.520 --> 01:54:38.159
along with that, or interesting history
goes along with that, and those things

1488
01:54:38.199 --> 01:54:41.479
are true, and it's good that
people are interested in arguments during history,

1489
01:54:41.560 --> 01:54:45.560
but it's not due to anything about
Marxism. It's just those things gets hyped

1490
01:54:45.600 --> 01:54:49.279
into some people's you know, got
tied up with Marxism. But some people

1491
01:54:49.279 --> 01:54:54.000
and some people's passed through those good
things for through it, but not for

1492
01:54:54.119 --> 01:54:58.520
any reason. You know. That's
you to what's distinctive about bad ideology.

1493
01:54:58.560 --> 01:55:00.760
The same with Christianity, same with
this long say with Junias. That's how

1494
01:55:00.800 --> 01:55:06.359
I think about that um as you
say, anything good, It's possible in

1495
01:55:06.479 --> 01:55:16.760
my mind that had some role in
UM in breaking down um views of anate

1496
01:55:16.840 --> 01:55:21.720
different innate differences among people that justify
authority, just of my political authority,

1497
01:55:23.039 --> 01:55:26.960
that we each have it in an
individual relationship with God and as therefore were

1498
01:55:27.000 --> 01:55:30.119
all equal in our connection with God
being a metaphor or all equal in our

1499
01:55:30.159 --> 01:55:35.279
connection to reality and um et cetera. There's a kind of egalitarianism in Christianity

1500
01:55:35.319 --> 01:55:42.239
which I think is overall bad.
But UM was perhaps in some contexts a

1501
01:55:43.199 --> 01:55:49.039
UM, you know, counter force
to UM a kind of tribal worship of

1502
01:55:49.119 --> 01:55:53.399
power or chieftains, and you know, maybe had some others that I'm not

1503
01:55:53.520 --> 01:55:59.279
convinced of that, but I can
see some case from So speaking of Christian

1504
01:55:59.439 --> 01:56:04.119
governments almost all theocracies run by empowered
lasses for almost all of its history,

1505
01:56:04.479 --> 01:56:08.760
makes me think that whatever elements might
have been compatible with that. So,

1506
01:56:09.439 --> 01:56:15.199
you know, hitch hikers not saying
the sexual to the s kfax ass As

1507
01:56:15.239 --> 01:56:17.600
a follow up, speaking Christianity,
what's the origin of the idea that Christianity

1508
01:56:17.680 --> 01:56:23.840
is the foundation of individualism? I
hooded in the Wild recently and have been

1509
01:56:23.920 --> 01:56:29.880
wondering about it since. UM there's
a period where ran sympathetic to this idea.

1510
01:56:30.840 --> 01:56:33.600
I think it's in UM. In
Roles Wild, they're Lane and it

1511
01:56:33.880 --> 01:56:39.560
is about Patterson somewhat UM, maybe
more Lane than than Patterson. UM.

1512
01:56:39.640 --> 01:56:45.800
But in some of the kinds of
intellectual libertarian intellectuals, some of the Paul

1513
01:56:45.880 --> 01:56:51.319
themselves libertarian individuals, intellectuals of the
forties. UM. I don't know where

1514
01:56:51.319 --> 01:56:57.560
it originally comes from. You can
see, I mean, there is a

1515
01:56:57.760 --> 01:57:00.880
real individualism in lock and Locke is
a Christian and some of how he puts

1516
01:57:00.920 --> 01:57:04.960
it is tied up with um,
not really Christianity so much as a kind

1517
01:57:05.000 --> 01:57:11.520
of general seism that he has.
He is a Christian, but the parts

1518
01:57:11.600 --> 01:57:15.279
of it that he draws on in
his political writings are much more generalized views

1519
01:57:15.279 --> 01:57:17.960
about than as a specifical as Christian. So there is you know, that

1520
01:57:18.159 --> 01:57:24.800
history of it developing, Um a
lock. You know how how locks he

1521
01:57:24.840 --> 01:57:28.239
has developed and were received. That's
like you developed, But I haven't traced

1522
01:57:28.520 --> 01:57:34.239
the claim who first was saying in
and grabbedto Christianity and how to describe.

1523
01:57:35.399 --> 01:57:39.960
Brand's kind of interesting on this because
she if you look at her early notes,

1524
01:57:40.880 --> 01:57:45.159
Um, when she's first writing,
she's these Christianity. It's like the

1525
01:57:45.439 --> 01:57:48.560
enemy. It's the perfect kindergarten for
communism. She wants to see may be

1526
01:57:48.720 --> 01:57:53.960
known as the harshest critic of religion
and the greatest enemy and so forth,

1527
01:57:54.039 --> 01:57:56.600
and it's a source of all hypocrisy. It's just, I mean, you

1528
01:57:56.800 --> 01:58:01.800
can't imagine them who are anti religious
rum around the late forties, early fifty

1529
01:58:02.079 --> 01:58:09.600
fifties, Um, she's you know, still about religious anti religions, still

1530
01:58:09.600 --> 01:58:19.600
an atheist and still very fiery about
that, but allowing that um, Christianity

1531
01:58:19.720 --> 01:58:25.079
might have been important spreading individualism,
that she might have more in common with

1532
01:58:25.159 --> 01:58:27.479
some of the better christianstinuers. She
came to have a lot of respect for

1533
01:58:27.800 --> 01:58:31.560
appliments, for example, Um.
And but you know, by the mid

1534
01:58:31.760 --> 01:58:38.800
sixties and certainly into the seventies,
she became very interned about professional religionists taking

1535
01:58:38.840 --> 01:58:43.920
over the conservatives movement. As a
communist at the liberal movement, she thought

1536
01:58:43.960 --> 01:58:45.800
those things for analogists, she thought
it was happening, though it had happened

1537
01:58:46.159 --> 01:58:54.319
by the time of Reagan. And
you don't find anything positive about religion after

1538
01:58:54.399 --> 01:59:01.600
that. Uh. Paulo asks,
have you read The Senses as Perceptual Systems

1539
01:59:02.359 --> 01:59:11.800
the book? I assume so,
if you mean Gibson's book, then yes.

1540
01:59:12.079 --> 01:59:16.640
But Manning, I mean like twenty
years ago. Okay. Leam asks,

1541
01:59:17.239 --> 01:59:23.239
yep, Will so security be the
first major socialist system to be privatized

1542
01:59:23.720 --> 01:59:28.600
since it's going bankrupt much sooner than
expected and it's the easiest way to transfer

1543
01:59:28.720 --> 01:59:33.479
it to private system. I have
no idea. Yeah, I mean I

1544
01:59:33.680 --> 01:59:40.680
doubt I doubt it. I think
it's one of the last uh Ian asked,

1545
01:59:40.880 --> 01:59:45.960
have you read much about the Niana
n y a y a school of

1546
01:59:46.039 --> 01:59:53.000
Indian philosophy which had a strong emphasis
and epistemology. No. Interestingly, I

1547
01:59:53.159 --> 01:59:58.960
heard an interview about it just earlier
today, M book. It was recently

1548
01:59:59.000 --> 02:00:02.840
translated, um, and then the
book seemed interesting, But I haven't read

1549
02:00:02.960 --> 02:00:06.840
much about it. I don't know
very much about Indian or Chinese philosophy.

1550
02:00:08.920 --> 02:00:13.159
UM. I think they're worth someone
studying, and they're worth my you know,

1551
02:00:14.079 --> 02:00:15.079
learning a little bit more than I
do, maybe a lot more,

1552
02:00:15.119 --> 02:00:18.039
but starting with a little. But
you know, a lot of things they're

1553
02:00:18.039 --> 02:00:21.319
worth looking into, and there's always
a much science. I don't know what

1554
02:00:21.399 --> 02:00:28.039
I'll get doing. Kfax asks Alex
Epstein is doing great wook and energy policy,

1555
02:00:28.119 --> 02:00:30.560
but which industry would you like to
see the next Alex take on?

1556
02:00:36.479 --> 02:00:42.680
I don't really love the question.
It so much depends on the person and

1557
02:00:42.800 --> 02:00:45.439
what they know about and have a
passion for it, you know. But

1558
02:00:45.960 --> 02:00:48.039
some industries where I think something could
be done, and I'm trying to help

1559
02:00:48.159 --> 02:00:53.359
some things get done. One is
healthcare, and I'm planning. I have

1560
02:00:53.439 --> 02:00:57.119
a group of people beating the talk
about the healthcare industry and planning to type

1561
02:00:57.119 --> 02:01:00.199
of confidence about it. UM.
So healthcare is the point. UM.

1562
02:01:01.560 --> 02:01:05.279
Probably finance would be good. UM. And you know Run has done some

1563
02:01:05.720 --> 02:01:09.840
something that you wrote down together with
the books on finance. I think there's

1564
02:01:09.840 --> 02:01:13.359
a lot more that could be done. This kind of you clearly vilified industry

1565
02:01:14.000 --> 02:01:20.920
UM and important to most people don't
don't recognize UM tech like AI and I

1566
02:01:21.079 --> 02:01:26.520
get it. It's hard to UM, they're not in the same sense as

1567
02:01:26.720 --> 02:01:31.279
you know, you need a very
different approach to the industry said than the

1568
02:01:32.119 --> 02:01:36.680
it's not that they're seeing as the
villains exactly also progressive, you know more

1569
02:01:36.680 --> 02:01:42.399
and more they are. UM,
it's more where you need to be doing

1570
02:01:42.520 --> 02:01:49.039
is reframing the issues UM that the
industries Contenderal, which in Galaxy has done

1571
02:01:49.039 --> 02:01:53.920
a lot of the industry imagery.
I kind of sense a kind of challenge

1572
02:01:53.960 --> 02:02:00.479
involved in the tech industry is just
different, less more measurements to be changed

1573
02:02:00.640 --> 02:02:06.319
to port the strateud of yea,
yeah, I agree with those. Mark

1574
02:02:06.840 --> 02:02:11.760
says, UM, what is going
on with the Salem Center and similar think

1575
02:02:11.800 --> 02:02:15.239
tanks right now and what would be
some ways to get involved and take to

1576
02:02:15.319 --> 02:02:26.479
action UM muture what counts as a
similar think tanks as I think that the

1577
02:02:26.520 --> 02:02:31.800
Salem Center is kind of eclectic.
It's a group of academics on campus who

1578
02:02:31.880 --> 02:02:38.800
have views outside of the mainstream,
which views aligned with one another on being

1579
02:02:39.319 --> 02:02:43.479
pro capitalism and pro free markets,
but not necessarily on much out So there

1580
02:02:43.520 --> 02:02:45.479
are some people work there I agree
on a lot of other things on people.

1581
02:02:45.720 --> 02:02:48.399
You know, it's it's not all. It's not all one thing,

1582
02:02:48.880 --> 02:02:53.960
um. I think in general,
the two things you can do for a

1583
02:02:54.079 --> 02:02:58.039
group that you're interested in, whether
it's the Salem Center by program half,

1584
02:02:58.039 --> 02:03:00.880
the Saling Center or the Center in
general, or any other group worthin tank,

1585
02:03:01.159 --> 02:03:04.359
is you can follow them and see
what programming they have and what you

1586
02:03:04.439 --> 02:03:06.880
might want to get involved in.
So in our case, you could follow

1587
02:03:06.920 --> 02:03:10.399
our YouTube channel and you can see
what comes up on the YouTube channel and

1588
02:03:10.520 --> 02:03:12.800
watch it. You could get on
our mailing list, which you could do

1589
02:03:12.840 --> 02:03:15.000
with Sale and Center got organ You
can get mailed about our events and cut

1590
02:03:15.039 --> 02:03:18.720
out to them and so become a
consumer of their content. And then if

1591
02:03:18.760 --> 02:03:23.399
you really value the content, I
want to get more involved. You could

1592
02:03:23.560 --> 02:03:29.680
donate money or you could volunteering tool
and one opportunity that they might do that

1593
02:03:29.680 --> 02:03:32.520
will depend on the the organization.
We don't have a quite a volunteering program.

1594
02:03:32.600 --> 02:03:35.399
But if somebody you know, road
and said I'd like to help you

1595
02:03:35.439 --> 02:03:39.600
guys out, what can I do? Depending on when it was out there,

1596
02:03:40.119 --> 02:03:45.720
we get an idea. Um Marcus
says, asks our thoughts on the

1597
02:03:45.800 --> 02:03:51.880
Austrian School, and then you're twenty
twenty three, twenty four plans thought somebody

1598
02:03:51.880 --> 02:03:57.319
Austrian School. I'm not an economist. I'm not that knowledgeable about economics,

1599
02:03:57.359 --> 02:04:00.880
so I don't know how much to
you I am really qualif I could say

1600
02:04:00.880 --> 02:04:06.880
about it what I've read of on
mesas in particular, and to a lesser

1601
02:04:06.920 --> 02:04:11.720
understand how I've learned from and think
there's some wisdom there are there are also

1602
02:04:11.840 --> 02:04:15.760
some philosophical errors. UM. I
found Rob Tar's piece which you mentioned before,

1603
02:04:16.359 --> 02:04:20.520
on a series of value and the
different schools of economics and Particulmunia stakes

1604
02:04:20.560 --> 02:04:26.960
on the Austrians very suggestive and in
you know, inspiring of thoughts. But

1605
02:04:27.039 --> 02:04:30.840
I don't know enough about all the
thinkers in the school too, um,

1606
02:04:31.359 --> 02:04:34.720
you know, to to be certain
everything about this about an expert on it.

1607
02:04:35.399 --> 02:04:39.640
UM. I think it's it's kind
of tragic that this kind of thinking

1608
02:04:39.640 --> 02:04:45.039
about economics has gotten tied up with
anarchism, as it has largely through through

1609
02:04:45.119 --> 02:04:49.359
Rothbart and when they were deeper causes
of that than just the influence of this

1610
02:04:49.640 --> 02:04:54.840
this I'm a linking figure. I'm
not sure I could think of some things

1611
02:04:54.920 --> 02:04:59.279
that might be um because that's sort
of a general fut about it. And

1612
02:04:59.439 --> 02:05:02.079
and the sort of popular Australian writers
they tend to always be predicting to include

1613
02:05:02.680 --> 02:05:11.279
and you know be you know stopped. Yeah, all right, Action Jackson.

1614
02:05:12.399 --> 02:05:15.479
The other one, Oh your plans
for twenty twenty three, twenty four.

1615
02:05:15.439 --> 02:05:19.159
So for the next year I'm teaching. I'm teaching a few classes that

1616
02:05:19.560 --> 02:05:27.199
Texas. Up course of the year, I'm going to We're probably having a

1617
02:05:27.279 --> 02:05:31.359
conference on healthcare policy in the fall, precise states to be determined in personnel,

1618
02:05:32.079 --> 02:05:36.199
that's something I'm looking into. Conference
ethical issues in the spring, and

1619
02:05:36.319 --> 02:05:43.239
probably some smaller workshops and um,
I don't want to into all the ny

1620
02:05:43.279 --> 02:05:48.880
projects papers and books that I want
to be off the door. So Action

1621
02:05:49.000 --> 02:05:54.600
Jackson says, Nice Gibson SG back
there. Who are some of your favorite

1622
02:05:54.640 --> 02:06:00.560
guitar players and or bands? Well, that's only one they want to any

1623
02:06:00.640 --> 02:06:04.600
over there that's out of shot that
I have a lot of guitars UM some

1624
02:06:04.840 --> 02:06:12.479
of my favorite with guitar players and
band UM well favorite bands of Pinos.

1625
02:06:12.520 --> 02:06:17.720
I don't think there's any comparton him
the overall musicianship and influenced UM. But

1626
02:06:18.479 --> 02:06:21.560
I really I play a lot of
blues. I listened to a lot of

1627
02:06:21.600 --> 02:06:30.560
blues and I like UM blues players
particularly, I love Peter King and who

1628
02:06:30.640 --> 02:06:33.239
lets understand Albert and Freddie. I
love the money Waters bands and al with

1629
02:06:33.319 --> 02:06:40.520
Wolf bands, Little Walter UM.
For that's kind of where my guitar playing

1630
02:06:40.720 --> 02:06:44.720
influenced kind of tastes in music are. That's the kind of music I mostly

1631
02:06:44.760 --> 02:06:48.159
play. That's musically UM. Also
about Dylan UM, the band that is,

1632
02:06:48.199 --> 02:06:55.680
the Leave on Home, Robbie robertson
band UM particular guitar players UM all.

1633
02:06:55.720 --> 02:07:00.520
Since there's an SG there, I
should mention UM Jan Alman and now

1634
02:07:00.880 --> 02:07:08.159
Derek Trucks both SG players at least
in slide you really fantastic players. On

1635
02:07:08.319 --> 02:07:12.720
seeing the Jesse Trucks band sometimes in
May when they come to Texas. UH,

1636
02:07:13.279 --> 02:07:15.680
people playing now, I think he's
the best guitar player in the end

1637
02:07:15.680 --> 02:07:23.960
of Blues, Influences, Trucks um
Action. Jackson also asks are there any

1638
02:07:24.079 --> 02:07:29.560
blogs you frequently visit or recommend reading
resources? How about something you think we've

1639
02:07:29.640 --> 02:07:32.399
never heard of? Any topics resources, news, economics, tack, etc.

1640
02:07:33.560 --> 02:07:40.159
Wow, um oh sub stack these
days yeah. Um. And then

1641
02:07:40.199 --> 02:07:46.880
I read and or listen to some
of very wise and stuff um The Dispatch

1642
02:07:47.439 --> 02:07:53.239
particularly. I really like their legal
podcast with sarahs Gary David French, which

1643
02:07:53.319 --> 02:07:57.760
is called Advisory Opinions. Whether one
degrees or disagrees with their particular takes on

1644
02:07:57.840 --> 02:08:00.680
the look, they're very kind of
informati about what is going on on the

1645
02:08:00.880 --> 02:08:03.359
dock end and one of the legal
issues that are that are coming about.

1646
02:08:05.039 --> 02:08:11.239
Um. So I listened to that
podcast a lot. Um. Oh we

1647
02:08:11.319 --> 02:08:15.439
talked about Richard Hanania. Oh yeah, Richard we were talking about before.

1648
02:08:15.479 --> 02:08:20.520
He's associated with the with the sales
up there, um, but really mostly

1649
02:08:20.640 --> 02:08:24.239
independent after the intellectual something gives talks
here once in a while, his his

1650
02:08:24.600 --> 02:08:28.760
blog and some staff. I guess
it's been really good in the past few

1651
02:08:28.800 --> 02:08:33.119
months. On a surprising number of
visually only got onto it a few months

1652
02:08:33.119 --> 02:08:37.720
ago, but almost everything I've read
by him has been been really interesting.

1653
02:08:37.239 --> 02:08:43.760
Um on different particular issues. This
is a podcast ring the blog, but

1654
02:08:43.000 --> 02:08:46.279
there's a podcast, the History of
Philosophy podcasts, but I think it's really

1655
02:08:46.840 --> 02:08:50.359
valuable on the history of philosophy,
uh, and some of them too.

1656
02:08:50.479 --> 02:08:56.760
Indian philosophy. He has a main
podcast stream that's the history of Western philosopy,

1657
02:08:56.760 --> 02:09:00.359
but then he has a secondary one
that I think already did these three

1658
02:09:00.520 --> 02:09:03.680
Indian Philosophy now is doing the history
of a Mechanic philosophy, and then it's

1659
02:09:03.680 --> 02:09:07.000
going to be the History of of
Asian philosophy of East Asian TWENTIESE West.

1660
02:09:07.279 --> 02:09:11.000
And it's you know, a little
twenty minute episodes on different subjects, but

1661
02:09:11.079 --> 02:09:15.680
they're very good ways just on a
little bit about a lot of different things

1662
02:09:15.760 --> 02:09:18.319
and think about what we might want
to read more about. UM. That's

1663
02:09:18.399 --> 02:09:22.920
in philosophy. My friend Nat Typeman
has a podcast book Elucidations, which is

1664
02:09:22.920 --> 02:09:26.159
a really good philosophy podcast. UM, Like, I listened to a fair

1665
02:09:26.279 --> 02:09:31.159
number of that's really good. And
then will interview people from widely different specializations,

1666
02:09:31.239 --> 02:09:37.000
different areas and get them talking in
a way that makes what they're working

1667
02:09:37.039 --> 02:09:41.359
on accessible to all my audience.
And I find that really interesting and valuable

1668
02:09:41.399 --> 02:09:43.600
exercide that I have my record.
So those are some of the podcasts I

1669
02:09:43.720 --> 02:09:48.439
listened to. I listened to more
podcasts than I read blogs. Um,

1670
02:09:48.039 --> 02:09:56.000
when I'm reading is mostly books or
a newspaper. Sabrice says, for most

1671
02:09:56.079 --> 02:10:00.319
people, your identity is the less
the least important thing about out you.

1672
02:10:01.119 --> 02:10:05.359
Training kids to make identity the most
important thing in their life seems like a

1673
02:10:05.479 --> 02:10:09.760
path back to the Bronze Age.
Well, I mean, I think if

1674
02:10:09.800 --> 02:10:13.720
you really think about what your identity
is, it's crucially important to you.

1675
02:10:15.000 --> 02:10:18.439
But it's not being white or you
know, half Jewish, half Italian by

1676
02:10:18.520 --> 02:10:22.880
descent, which I am, or
or you know, middle class or something

1677
02:10:22.960 --> 02:10:24.960
like that. Your identity is that
you're a human being with a mind,

1678
02:10:26.560 --> 02:10:30.840
and then a mind that focused itself
on certain values and made your life about

1679
02:10:30.960 --> 02:10:33.520
certain things. That I has certain
virtues and yeah, okay, this other

1680
02:10:33.600 --> 02:10:37.880
stuff is true of you, and
it might be relevant in various ways,

1681
02:10:37.920 --> 02:10:41.239
but it's not the ceter thing.
Um. There's a really nice piece on

1682
02:10:43.119 --> 02:10:48.479
identity and education and developing an identity
by Matt Bateman on the web page of

1683
02:10:48.600 --> 02:10:54.479
Montessorium. Montessorium is a think tank
associated with with Higher Round and Matt Batement's

1684
02:10:54.479 --> 02:11:00.399
a philosopher there and he and I
were involved with a kind of the group

1685
02:11:00.479 --> 02:11:05.560
that was discussing through identity issues as
they came up in education and one of

1686
02:11:05.600 --> 02:11:09.960
the albums of that with Matt writing
this essay and one of the point he

1687
02:11:09.039 --> 02:11:13.479
makes it know, adentity is important. It's wrong to think of your identity

1688
02:11:13.920 --> 02:11:16.199
as about whether you're gainor's tread or
black, or while you're old or young.

1689
02:11:16.920 --> 02:11:20.159
It's you know, those things have
some role, but they're they're a

1690
02:11:20.199 --> 02:11:28.479
minors. Good HELLI let's see Gail
says healthcare needs much attention. Thank you,

1691
02:11:28.560 --> 02:11:33.680
Greg, and you'on and then well
end was Zach saying love the interview,

1692
02:11:33.159 --> 02:11:37.760
thanks for this, Thank you,
Zach. All right, two plus

1693
02:11:37.840 --> 02:11:41.520
hours as usual. Um, there's
a lot, a lot of lots of

1694
02:11:41.600 --> 02:11:46.439
questions, thank you. Oh one
more thoughts on the new University of Austin.

1695
02:11:46.960 --> 02:11:50.720
Will you be working with them?
Um? I mean I don't have

1696
02:11:50.840 --> 02:11:56.199
any relationship. I don't have any
professional relationship with them as of now.

1697
02:11:56.079 --> 02:12:01.039
I have some I know people who
do. UM thoughts on them. I

1698
02:12:01.520 --> 02:12:05.399
like the idea of forming a new
university. I like the idems. You

1699
02:12:05.399 --> 02:12:11.319
don't like the president universities trying to
do it better M and H in particular.

1700
02:12:11.439 --> 02:12:13.479
I think one of the things that
you want to have when you form

1701
02:12:13.560 --> 02:12:20.319
a new university is a good attitude
towards the diversity of ideas being you know,

1702
02:12:20.439 --> 02:12:24.560
shared on campus and being discussed.
However, they don't think they have

1703
02:12:24.640 --> 02:12:28.159
too much more than that yet,
and I think they need a lot more

1704
02:12:28.159 --> 02:12:33.039
than that. I think they need
a view about what's gone wrong with the

1705
02:12:33.119 --> 02:12:37.119
other universities. They need a view
about what is their value propositions that they're

1706
02:12:37.119 --> 02:12:41.159
offering people, how they're going to
give them a superior education, and then

1707
02:12:41.479 --> 02:12:46.159
how they're going to organize their their
company and their business, and they're hiring

1708
02:12:46.239 --> 02:12:50.319
practice and so for us to solve
the problems and as other universities to to

1709
02:12:50.720 --> 02:12:54.399
be, you know, to not
be to their life and maybe just rebooting,

1710
02:12:54.560 --> 02:12:58.640
you know, like you just start
something that's exactly the University of Chicago,

1711
02:12:58.960 --> 02:13:01.279
but you started again to day.
You know, maybe that would help

1712
02:13:01.319 --> 02:13:05.159
you. Just like when you reboot
your computer or do a new load of

1713
02:13:05.199 --> 02:13:07.439
the operating system, you get out
of a lot of problems. Maybe that

1714
02:13:07.520 --> 02:13:11.680
helps, and maybe they will do
something like that. But it seems like

1715
02:13:11.720 --> 02:13:13.479
they're not they happy that there's going
to be a new kind of university.

1716
02:13:13.560 --> 02:13:18.199
They don't seem to know much about
what it is. When I had conversations

1717
02:13:18.279 --> 02:13:20.560
with the founder of it, it's
happened that, you know, with him

1718
02:13:20.760 --> 02:13:22.960
a bunch of people at one point, and we were talking about them.

1719
02:13:22.960 --> 02:13:28.000
In the things they didn't have answers
to surprised me. I would have thought

1720
02:13:28.039 --> 02:13:31.399
they would have been a more worked
out view, for example, on tenure

1721
02:13:31.439 --> 02:13:33.800
and what's rather wrong with it and
how you're going to try to solve the

1722
02:13:33.880 --> 02:13:41.239
problems it's meant to solve. And
the other thing that bothered is when you

1723
02:13:41.359 --> 02:13:46.319
looked at who they initially had as
advisors, was a really good list and

1724
02:13:46.399 --> 02:13:48.279
had a lot of people. I
liked it at a Stephen Pinker was among

1725
02:13:48.359 --> 02:13:52.319
them. Lead the moue with among
these people. Have a lot of respect

1726
02:13:52.439 --> 02:13:56.640
for them. But then when they
made their first hires, I wasn't as

1727
02:13:56.680 --> 02:14:00.880
impressed with who they hired. And
one of the first hires was I forget

1728
02:14:00.960 --> 02:14:03.840
her name, Brett Weinstein's wife.
Yeah, was a biologist and the main

1729
02:14:03.960 --> 02:14:09.960
thing she was on about there was
um something kind of blackish um to do

1730
02:14:09.079 --> 02:14:13.560
with the with the pandemic. I
forget if it was UM that internected was

1731
02:14:13.640 --> 02:14:18.079
the wonder drug or something else,
but something that that was kind of all

1732
02:14:18.199 --> 02:14:22.000
she was talking about in the news
about UM. It didn't strike me as

1733
02:14:22.199 --> 02:14:26.439
a promising first hire in a science
department. Whatever one thinks about the particulars

1734
02:14:26.479 --> 02:14:31.520
of the politics about about that drug, it wasn't UM. And it felt

1735
02:14:31.600 --> 02:14:37.159
like it was becoming a kind of
UM refugee camp for the cancel, which

1736
02:14:37.600 --> 02:14:41.359
is not a recipe for being a
good school. Even if there needs to

1737
02:14:41.359 --> 02:14:46.399
be refugee camp for the cancel,
UM, that's not enough. And and

1738
02:14:46.640 --> 02:14:50.920
I think around that same time,
Stephen Picker backed out the initiative, and

1739
02:14:50.119 --> 02:14:54.640
I think that that was sad that
I think UM he was a kind of

1740
02:14:56.439 --> 02:15:01.319
good influence on it, so UM, and I think he might have been

1741
02:15:01.880 --> 02:15:05.119
just guessing, might have been uncomfortable
with that higher I don't. I don't

1742
02:15:05.119 --> 02:15:09.319
know. So they're trying to do
something very hard. I think it's good

1743
02:15:09.359 --> 02:15:13.399
that someone started new university. I'm
rooting for them, but I've not been

1744
02:15:15.760 --> 02:15:18.960
as impressive i'd hope to be with
the steps I've seemed so far. And

1745
02:15:18.520 --> 02:15:22.399
but hopefully they'll creek up in really
good um or at least competitive with the

1746
02:15:22.479 --> 02:15:26.239
other university. And maybe if they
don't, but they manage to Greek something

1747
02:15:26.279 --> 02:15:28.880
that at least, you know,
as some students, it'll be an inspiration

1748
02:15:28.960 --> 02:15:31.800
to other people to try something else. Until we guess play really good?

1749
02:15:33.600 --> 02:15:37.039
All right. Finally, Kfax says, how much of a super chat donation

1750
02:15:37.199 --> 02:15:43.439
would it take to get Greg to
shred or gently play something on the live

1751
02:15:43.520 --> 02:15:48.880
stream you're on. That's up to
you. How much? How much to

1752
02:15:48.000 --> 02:15:50.680
be how happy to play? Do
it? Play? Play a little bit

1753
02:15:50.760 --> 02:15:58.119
and we'll make that the exit music
for the show. Can you hear this?

1754
02:15:58.600 --> 02:16:05.600
One's not? All right? Maybe
loud enough? Can you hear it?

1755
02:16:05.319 --> 02:16:15.279
Don't play something is now? Really
no? You'd have to put the

1756
02:16:15.439 --> 02:16:22.039
mic. Yeah, all right,
but I don't think. Oh right,

1757
02:16:22.600 --> 02:16:28.760
pay up k Facts. I don't
know fifty bucks. Come on, let's

1758
02:16:28.880 --> 02:16:35.239
let's make it to eight hundred bucks. Where's k Facts? He does that

1759
02:16:35.399 --> 02:16:46.760
and he disappears on us zoom is
noise isolating out. I think we get

1760
02:16:46.799 --> 02:17:01.399
the volume up enough, we can
do it. I'm all right, this

1761
02:17:01.600 --> 02:17:09.639
is a treat, guys. Yeah, yeah, might be ours there we

1762
02:17:09.719 --> 02:17:16.719
go, Kay, Facts just paid
up and Hugh came in and all right,

1763
02:17:16.840 --> 02:17:20.680
so we've got a whole array of
supporters. Now, thank you,

1764
02:17:20.799 --> 02:17:35.399
kay, facts can hear it at
all? Nothing? Greg? Can you

1765
02:17:35.479 --> 02:17:39.600
hear me? Because we can hear
you, Greg, Greg, Greg,

1766
02:17:39.639 --> 02:17:52.159
Greg, Greg, Greg Greg.
He can't hear us, Greg. He's

1767
02:17:52.239 --> 02:17:58.079
jamming and he can't hear us.
No, can hear they can hear anything

1768
02:17:58.120 --> 02:18:05.600
from the guitar. It's interesting.
Is your mic directional? Can you direct

1769
02:18:05.719 --> 02:18:16.760
it? Can you put it right
in front of the all right, nopem

1770
02:18:18.200 --> 02:18:22.239
gut tar channel. Any any advice
on how we can get this to work.

1771
02:18:22.200 --> 02:18:39.760
That that I heard something there?
Now one more try you guys can't

1772
02:18:39.799 --> 02:18:50.840
hear anything right now? All right, it's a zoom it's a zoom filter.

1773
02:18:50.000 --> 02:18:54.319
I think I think it's a problem
with zoom. I think that if

1774
02:18:54.520 --> 02:19:00.680
they assume it's noise, I guess, and they filter it out. You

1775
02:19:00.799 --> 02:19:03.639
have to said, zoom sound to
professional music. I don't know how to

1776
02:19:03.719 --> 02:19:18.719
do that. I'm looking. I'm
looking at audio settings. Yeah, I

1777
02:19:18.760 --> 02:19:24.239
would go to instead of auto,
I would I would get rid of auto

1778
02:19:24.120 --> 02:19:30.479
performance. Yeah, put like yeah, try that. I'm trying that.

1779
02:19:31.200 --> 02:20:11.319
I'm gonna fighter in the house and
see here. Last I still can't hear

1780
02:20:11.360 --> 02:20:20.559
anything. It's weird hear that.
No, no, you can't hear anything.

1781
02:20:22.559 --> 02:20:24.799
All right, well then for some
reason we can't no matter what I

1782
02:20:24.879 --> 02:20:31.040
do, So I apologies, but
um we tried. Guys. Sorry,

1783
02:20:31.879 --> 02:20:35.440
you'll have to come to ocon.
Maybe maybe Greg will do performance better at

1784
02:20:35.479 --> 02:20:45.440
okon there you go, all right, Thanks Greg, uh, thanks to

1785
02:20:45.559 --> 02:20:48.120
all of you. Thanks with the
super chat is. Thanks kay facts,

1786
02:20:48.559 --> 02:20:52.760
so you can fulfill your your wish. Um I guess I owe you some

1787
02:20:52.920 --> 02:21:01.440
free super chat answers um and um
ok left out a guitarist. People were

1788
02:21:01.440 --> 02:21:05.559
asking favorite guitarists, so maybe in
lieu of playing I'll just mentioned one or

1789
02:21:05.600 --> 02:21:15.000
two others. Yeah, I really
um like periods of music when new things

1790
02:21:15.040 --> 02:21:18.040
are coming together that happened before.
And one of the periods I like a

1791
02:21:18.159 --> 02:21:24.479
lot of music the period when sort
of white kids in Chicago were getting into

1792
02:21:24.559 --> 02:21:28.520
the black blues music was being played
in the clubs and they started to be

1793
02:21:28.680 --> 02:21:31.399
kind of integration and cross pollination.
And one person to come out of that.

1794
02:21:31.479 --> 02:21:35.000
But I really like is Mike Bloomfield, the guitar player. Particularly he's

1795
02:21:35.000 --> 02:21:39.399
playing on the first two Butterfield Blues
banned albums. So if you look at

1796
02:21:39.440 --> 02:21:41.399
the Pull Butterfield Louse band. The
album is called the Pull Butterfield Close Band

1797
02:21:41.440 --> 02:21:46.040
on the album East West. I
really like the guitar player, so if

1798
02:21:46.079 --> 02:21:48.559
you can't hear me, you could
hear him means a lot better at the

1799
02:21:48.600 --> 02:21:54.440
same good Well, Thank you Greg, This is uh, this is a

1800
02:21:54.520 --> 02:22:01.959
real pleasure. And thank you guys
for all the super check questions and for

1801
02:22:01.719 --> 02:22:05.760
being here. And I will be
back sometime tomorrow. I don't know what

1802
02:22:05.879 --> 02:22:09.079
time. Tomorrow is a crazy day, but I will be doing a news

1803
02:22:09.200 --> 02:22:13.079
round up at some point tom on. Then over the weekend we'll have some

1804
02:22:13.280 --> 02:22:18.399
additional shows. Have a great night. It's late over here already. Have

1805
02:22:18.520 --> 02:22:22.000
a good night. Greg. I'll
see you soon, I guess in a

1806
02:22:22.040 --> 02:22:28.559
couple of months. And I'll see
you all of you guys tomorrow. Bye

1807
02:22:28.559 --> 02:22:31.760
everybody. Ye

