Attention. You're listening to the Todd Huff radio show, America's home for conservative
not bitter Talk radio. Be advised. The content of this program has been
documented to prevents and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean
to the right. Here's your conservative but not bitter host, Todd Huff,
Conservative not Bitter. Indeed, my friends, you have tuned into America's son
for conservative not bitter talk. It's my pleasure to be here today. You
know a couple of things I want to get today. I want to talk
a little bit about this mccarth excuse me, the Matt Gates motion to vacate
the chair. I want to talk a bit about that. I also want
to talk a bit about the southern border. My friends. We've actually border
security has won the political debate. We've actually won on this issue. Now,
I know we haven't won in reality. I just mean that this is
too much for even anyone on the left to basically defend any longer. People
want a secure boarder. This is something that we can actually agree on.
It's just that there's games being played for a couple of different reasons, or
a couple of potential potentially different reasons anyway, we'll get to that in due
course. If you want to be part of the conversation, you can email
Todd at todd huff Show dot com. You can also text three one seven
two one zero two eight three zero. Just make sure you include the appropriate
amounts of adoration and praise, which candidly is pretty high. It is pretty
high. So let's talk about this motion to vacate. So there is a
battle that has been brewing in the Republican Party for some time. There is
a battle, by the way, that is brewing within the Democrat Party.
And these battles are by and large the same, it's just on different ends
of the political spectrum. And the Republican Party, the battle is between what
we would call, I suppose the establishment Republicans, maybe the moderate Republicans,
maybe the rhino Republicans, versus the conservative or limited government types or more libertarian
types of Conservatives or more libertarian types of Republicans, I should say, in
the Republican Party. And on the left, on the Democrat side, the
battle is between the radical left and again the degree that moderate I would say,
the liberal Democrats. There's not there's not many sitting moderate Democrats in Washington.
In fact, I don't know if there's any right now. A lot
of those folks were pushed out of office, the moderate Democrats, the blue
dog Democrats, the Reagan Democrats. Those folks were pushed out of office.
A lot of them were pushed out during the Obamacare vote. I know several
of them felt the impact here in the state of Indiana and elsewhere across the
country. And there was this basically, the blue dog Democrat who is insistent
that here she has a home of the Democrat party is candidly way wrong.
They have so much more in common with people like me and you than they're
ever gonna have in common with these radical leftists. But anyway, so both
parties have within themselves this battle for control. Again. This is the left
versus the liberals. And let me talk about that for a minute. Some
people use those terms interchangeably, and those are not interchangeable. Terms in my
world are the way that I intend them to be to be used. So
let's start with what a liberal is. You know, a classical liberal,
if you go back and understand terminology, a classical liberal is actually what a
conservative is today. And that's not what we mean today when we use the
word liberal, but a classical liberal is what you would call someone who's a
limited government, freedom loving conservative libertarian type today. So, but that word
had morphed into being in common American political vernacular to mean those who want to
be liberal with I guess the types of social programs and s services and so
forth that are provided by our government, and so liberal in the I guess
in the sense that there would be you know, when given the choice between
having potentially too little or too much, then let's give liberally, as I
bump the mic here liberally, or give more than maybe we should. Let's
always err on the side of more. And this, of course, is
where the term bleeding heart liberal originated, which means if you never have any
desire to say no to any problem because you care so much, or the
virtue signaling is the temptation, I guess to virtue signal is there to where
you want to show the world I care so much that I want to spend
someone else's hard earned tax dollars on this particular issue or problem or whatever.
Then that's where the term came from. And so but a liberal is not
necessary, I would say, a liberal doesn't A liberal doesn't hate this country.
They they want to push it to the max. As far as what
the government should be doing. They actually want to blast way past the line.
They've never seen a problem that the government can't solve. I think that
they have a problem with understanding the proper role and function of government, the
proper role of what an individual should be responsible for versus what society is responsible
for, and so forth. A liberal always tends to excuse the behavior of
the individual, blaming society, therefore saying that we have to somehow make amends,
pay more money, provide more services because they care the problem needs to
be fixed, and so forth, and it's the job of the government to
do that. But they don't hate America as founded. They do again push
it to its limits. They push it past its limits. They talk about
the Constitution being a living, breathing document. I don't want to give them
a pass and to say that there's no danger in the things that they teach
or anything like that or believe. I just want to they don't openly hate
this country, at least as I define and use these terms. However,
so that's group one. So they still they don't. They don't. They
might think that workers aren't being paid enough, or they might be thinking that
the wealthy needs to be punished, but they're not prepared to drive a well,
the death knell into capitalism. They don't hate this country. There's things
about it that they're embarrassed about. There's problems there, but they haven't crossed
the line into radically wanting to transform this place into something different. That,
my friends, is what the left is. The left, the radical left.
These are people that hate the United States of America. These are people
who seek to break the system so as to remake America into something that is
more palatable for their preferences, ideally something that's socialistic. Dare I even say
communistic. They believe the government should have ultimate say. They don't like the
concept of limited or actually, excuse me, I should say enumerated you know
rights that we have. They don't. They don't. They won't openly come
out and say this, but they think instead of what we have. When
you look at the Bill of Rights, for example, when you look and
you see that the Bill of Rights are a list of inherent freedoms that we
have been given by our creator. That the writers of the Constitution actually took
a moment to just define some of those. They want to say that people
should have that government has responsibilities back to the citizens, or that the citizens
of a country are entitled to other things that cost other taxpayers money. This
is why they talk in terms of democracy and not an individual liberty and freedom
or a constitutional republic. They don't want to talk about the right. They
talk about minorities and minority rights and how minorities they would argue being targeted by
systemic racism or anything else. But they're talking about a group of minorities because
again they're trying to put together a majority by assimilating or I should say,
not assembling, I should say groups of minorities that actually in total surpass some
other it become the majority basically, and so and so this is this is
You won't hear them talking about the of the true minority, which is the
individual. You won't hear them talking about those things. They use these things.
They weaponize language, they weaponize thought, they weaponize the government. They
are completely content with using any means at their disposal to cause havoc and chaos
within our system. Because a broken system requires something to replace it. A
broken system requires the quote unquote experts, right, the self appointed experts to
come in and to provide solutions on how to deal with something that's broken.
And they want to position themselves as the experts and low and behold, what
do the experts always tell us? The experts always tell us that what is
required to fix a problem is more government, less liberty, more tax dollars,
more control for them. And that's the direction that they want to go.
So that's a fight between those two factions in the Democrat Party today.
Now I'm happy to tell you, I'm happy to tell you that we have
that that is the fringe minority. But but as you've heard me talk about
here before, those folks in the radical left actually hold the levers of power
in the seven pillars of propaganda. This is where things like well the government,
for example, if you look at some of the people, look at
some of the people in the FBI, right, I mean, these are
people who have either become well, as the term goes, useful idiots or
people who are bought into the notion that we need to push this thing,
this system, to the point where it breaks, just as I said previously,
so that they can present something as a solution that's different, different from
what we have in our founding and more in line with what a tyrant would
want. Or they're ideologically they're either a useful idiot or they're an ideologue who
is pushing for that to be the end result. And you can see,
you can see with some of the people just in the FBI who I mean,
their behavior is on stage for anybody to see who wants to see it,
from James Comey to Peter Struck to fill in the blank. I mean,
you can go to James Clapp or I know it D and I.
There's plenty of people to list, but there's a whole bunch of people,
even in the bureaucratic state, that are nameless, faceless individuals who are pushing
for this thing constantly. So they have control in government, in the bureaucratic
state, they have control in media. This is where people like George Soros
and George Soros a son is at Alex. I think it's Alex Soros coming
into the picture, buying media outlets, buying I think they've bought a ton
of radio stations and so forth. And of course the intent is to control
what's in the media narrative, to control what people are hearing to set a
priority on which bits of information the American people need to hear about. And
so you can go on down the list from media and government to Hollywood to
all the other seven pillars of propaganda, and the left controls it so that
big Tech right, they control those platforms, they control those different pillars,
if you will, and they make it appear like there's a lot more than
than there really are. So that's going to be relevant in our conversation when
we talk about the border. In a moment, we'll put that aside for
a minute, and well, I've got to take a break. But there's
a similar problem or fight happening in the Republican Party as well, and that
fight has led to the ouster or the potential auster, the attempt at ouster
of Speaker McCarthy, and I want to paint the picture as to what's going
on there as well. I think if we understand these things, we'll have
a clearer picture of what's really going on and really, more importantly, how
to fix those things. So time out is in order. My friends,
you are listening here to conservative not better talk. I am your host,
Todd Huff. We'll pick it up right where we left uf on the other
side of the break back in just a minute. Welcome back, my friends.
So let's pick up where we left off. Let's talk about let's talk
about the battle for control of the Republican Party, and let's talk about what
that means and how that is manifesting itself. Of course it could be there's
more to this, but how it could be manifesting itself in this battle to
remove Speaker McCarthy as Speaker of the House. So, just as there is
a battle for control of the Democrat Party, there is control for the battle
for control the Republican Party. And you have the rhino types. You have
the country club republican types, establishment republican types, even liberal Republican types.
And then you have those who are more conservative libertarian who want to actually see
the government govern as it was intended well as it was intended to do right.
And so this is where you have a fight, if you will,
over say spending. You know, the conservative types, the limited government types,
the libertarian types say this is way out of control. Whatever we are
dealing with, whatever the short term pain is of a shutdown, whatever that
might be, that is simply a microcosm of what tiny, tiny, insignificant
microcosm in comparison to where this spending is taking us in down the road.
Right, this so whatever short term pain we have to endure now is worth
it, because the problems created by a government that's spending out of control is
going. I mean, we're talking about massive, major, life altering sorts
of scenarios, right, We're talking about the collapse potentially of the dollar down
the road, or the collapse of just our system of government. Again,
I'm not saying these are right on the doorstep, but the signs are all
there, right, the problems. It's like, it's the way I think
about it is, if you're let's just say you're pre diabetic, and you
look at all of the you know, the warning signs and so forth,
You've got a choice to make. You can either take the steps that are
necessary to stop or to get out of that pre diabetic range, find a
healthier weight lifestyle, a one C level or whatever. Right, that's option
number one. Now that's gonna that's has some short term pain, right,
there's some short term pain involved with taking those steps. Maybe it's dietary changes,
maybe it's exercising, maybe it's any number of things, but there is
some short term pain. But what do you avoid? You avoid in the
worst case, And I mean it's some really bad things can come from diabetes.
And I'm not saying it can't be managed or anything, but you know,
I'm just painting the picture of to try to give you an analogy as
to what's really going on here. So there might be some pain and discomfort
and things we don't like in the short term to get healthier to avoid the
prediabetic stage. But if you take full blown, unchecked diabetes to its extreme,
I mean people have had to have limbs, you know, parts of
their body amputated, and you can get into massive problems with I mean,
you can be on dialysis and any any number of things. Vision. There's
all sorts of symptoms that that can come, some massive health problems and things
that really take away the quality of life or even even can end to life.
And so when you look at that, that's what we're looking at as
I see it. When we look at the financial fight that we have today,
are we going to take the necessary steps to get back into shape?
And by the way, we're way overweight metaphorically speaking. Here It's not like
we got to lose five pounds. I mean, we gotta be on we
gotta be on the version of America's Biggest Loser, that's all. That's what
we've got to be on. We've got to be on some extreme diet.
We're gonna have to have a team of dietitians, a team of trainers.
We're gonna have to have weightlifting put into the routine. We're gonna have to
probably start training for triathlons, gonna probably have to have people like David Goggins
on site screaming at us to get I mean, this is serious work,
right. I'm not just saying we have to lose five pounds for the class
reunion or some such thing. I'm saying we've got to get back into shape.
And it's gonna it's gonna hurt, it's gonna suck, candidly. But
the alternative, the alternative is disastrous. The alternative could lead to I mean
some of those examples I mentioned earlier up to an including death metaphorically here right,
when we look at the the economy, and so that's what this fights
about. When you so you have the people who want to see government restored
to its original intent. You're going to see people who are you know,
want wants to move away from massive debt and deficit spending. In the fiscal
year that just ended in two thousand twenty three, fiscal year twenty twenty three,
we were a trillion dollars in the red for that year's income and expenses.
If you look at it that way, revenue tax, tax revenues versus
money going out. It's projected that in fiscal year twenty twenty four, which
has just gotten underway here for a couple of days, it's projected that we're
going to be twice that in the red. Two trillion dollars in the red,
and trillion has what twelve zeros behind it. That's a big number.
I've said on here before. I think we need to change the words million,
billion, and trillion to make them sound like or look like when you
write them out so drastically different from one another, because they're multiple, they're
multiples of a thousand of each other. A thousand millions is a billion,
a thousand millions is a thousand billions is a trillion, A million millions is
a trillion. Thing about that So anyway, anyway, so this is the
fight within the Republican Party. You've got a group of Republicans who are a
little bit more measured than the Democrats are as far as spending goes. But
they're really not super interested in that, you know, stopping the direction that
we're on. They're more about managing managing the disease right, managing the diabetes
that they've assumed that we are going to metaphorically get here, and so they're
fine with that. They're fine with that. This would be people, by
the way, like Mitch McConnell, like Mitt Romney who's not running for re
election, like Todd Young, like Lisa Murkowski, like Susan Collins, and
those were all all that I mentioned. There were sinners, But like Kevin
McCarthy too, he's in the House, and so in the House there's a
more of a divide there is. There are actually quite a few or a
decent amount of people who say that they're conservative. They want to see this
country get back on the right track financially, fiscally, constitutionally, all this
stuff, and but the problem is there's still not enough. There's still not
enough. And so if you go back to January when we were when they
were fighting over who the speaker was going to be. They tried to set
up rules to accommodate for that. They tried to set up rules that would
kind of in a way box McCarthy inn so that he had to at least
be willing to work with, meet with, negotiate with, try to find
solutions, you know, include that these conservative limited government types in the discussion.
And so they they set up some rules that they thought would help that.
And you know, to a certain amount or to a certain extent,
I think that that's probably happened. But it's of course not who Kevin McCarthy
is. And when push comes to shove, when push comes to shove,
when McCarthy's feeling the heat, when McCarthy's feeling the heat for telling the American
people and when it comes to these government shutdowns, we gotta go on a
diet, we gotta start working out. And Americans say, I don't want
to go on a diet. I like sitting on my couch, I like
eating bomb bonds. I don't care that I'm pre diabetic. Right, that's
down, that's tomorrow's problem, that's not today's problem. So as McCarthy feels
the heat, from that, he thinks, man, what the heck,
guys, You guys can make that argument all you want, But I'm just
I'm not built for that. I'm not. McCarthy would say, I'm not.
I just don't believe it, or I don't care enough about it.
It's easier to capitulate and to give in, right. The heat is too
much for me to bear. And so that's what's happening, and Matt Gates
being one of these look and I don't want to get into the personality stuff
up because there's a whole there's a whole nother route you can go with that.
McCarthy's out there saying this is personal between he and Matt Gates. Matt
Gates doesn't personally like him. He wants to personally remove him as speaker.
He never was on board with Speaker McCarthy, and fairness, I was never
completely on board with Speaker McCarthy. You can go back as well. Many
of you were not completely on board with Speaker McCarthy. And by the way,
by the way, I don't look at it that way. I look
is Speaker McCarthy fully on board with the ideas and the things that need to
be done. That are constitutionally sounded and in the best interests of the United
States of America and the taxpayer, the American citizen. So I'm not for
or against the guy. I'm for the people who want to advance the cause
of liberty, advance a return to the constitution, advance policies and spending to
the point that it actually lives in reality. And that's not what we're having
right now. And that's not McCarthy's fault, because he is coming from a
position of reason and logic. But he's not prepared to die on that metaphorical
hill because because it's just too easy. There's still not enough political pressure.
I guess internally, there's not enough Republicans in that House that are going to
demand that this is what we do, or there's not enough people in that
Republican House to actually say we are going to effectively force the issue here,
We're going to force the fact that we're going to go on a diet and
start working out and not continue blind laid down this path into oblivion. There's
not enough, and so Gates is basically calling McCarthy's bluff to a point,
I guess are basically calling him out for his lack of falling on the side
of this debate, the side this side of this battle for control of the
Republican Party, because McCarthy has chosen the elitist side, the country club or
side, the rhino side, the liberal Republican side. Matt Gates says,
that's fine. If that's the side you've chosen, then you've you've crossed a
line with being able to work with us on this side. So I want
a new speaker. Now there's certainly the personal aspect and all those other things
as well, but that being said, that's what's going on in the House,
and so Matt Gates is called for is going to be He's made made
the motion known that he's going to try to vacate the chair and we'll see
what happens, because now we could go back through the entire thing that we
had back earlier this year where we were determining who the speaker would be,
though McCarthy may certainly have the votes and we not get to that point.
But that's what Gates is trying to do. Like him, love him,
hate him. I'm just trying to paint the picture of what's going on,
and it all stems from these ideas and these beliefs that are at war or
at odds with each other within the Republican Party and also within the Democrat Party.
And I'm going to pause because the next what's remaining of the show,
I want to talk about how the Democrat ideological differences within their party is manifesting
itself on another issue. It's just interesting and I think it's helpful to understand.
It makes it easier to converse and so forth, and to just have
a I guess, an understanding of what's really going on. So that being
said, I'm a little bit long to segment. Quick time out. You're
listening here, my friends, to conservative not better talk back here in just
a minute. Welcome back, my friends. So let's talk a little bit
about what I want to spend the rest of the program talking about, which
is this issue of illegal illegal immigration. I mentioned off the top that we
have reached a point in this country where the open border policies that we have,
and make no mistake, we have open border policies, and make no
mistake here as well, the administration is actively ignoring the laws on the books,
issuing their own memos and rules and interpretations and rationale and so forth as
to why they can just arbitrarily refuse to enforce border law. That's what's going
on. It's not because suddenly there's no laws about who can come across the
border. This is what the left wants you to think about. This is
what the media what you to think is happening. It's not the case.
It's not the case at all. It's gotten so bad, in fact,
that governors and mayors across this city, this country, and blue states and
blue cities, they've actually been complaining Governor Hocal, state of New York complaining
saying that we need limits on immigration. Now, wait a minute, we
do have We do have these sorts of things. We have a legal process.
The problem is you can't limit how do I say this, You can't
limit. Okay, you have an open border, so we have limits on
how many people are coming in the process the country legally, that's not the
issue here. We have a problem with people who are coming across the border
illegally or who are working the system so as to take advantage of it.
And again, I understand why people want to be here. I've said this,
I'm incredibly consistent on this. I think the left is very inconsistent.
The way they talk about this country, the way that they describe it as
absolutely being horrendous. I don't know why in their worldview there shouldn't be one
single person coming to the border. In fact, they should all be fleeing
south or north. They should be getting out of here as quickly as possible.
If they were consistent and actually acted consistently in regards to what how they
talk about their country, they would be fleeing. There would be a mass
exodus of people from this country. If they're the way that they paint this
country is actually accurate, people would not want to be fleeing to come here.
But people do want to come here. I understand why they want to
come here. This is still the greatest country on earth. This is still
the land of the freed, and there are tremendous opportunities here, right,
I understand that. But we are breaking the system. We are being completely
haphazard with the system. We are having no regard whatsoever for the system,
and so and so it's gotten so bad again that these governors and mayors are
actually saying, hey, we've got to have something here. Well, you
can't limit something that you're not trying to enforce at all. You can't limit
people crossing the border illegally if you say we have an open border. And
that's what's happening. And so it's gotten so bad that they have to,
of course acknowledge even the Democrats are having to acknowledge this. I think,
folks, we've clearly won on this issue, and I know we haven't won
in reality, because again, the seven pillars are propaganda. The people that
are in our government, the people that are in the wine house, people
that are in the media are pushing things that either our lies and misconceptions,
or they are outright using their power to continue to metaphorically flip the bird of
the American people and say this is what we're going to continue to do while
they take the podium, and of course they tell us something else. They
blame Trump, they blame something else, or they say that they can't do
anything about it, while want Republicans come in and work with us on how
to fix this. None of that's true. There are laws on the books
that the Biden administration is outright refusing to enforce. This is what's happening.
And so this stems from you begin to see a divine. Now you begin
to see the radicals who are in control, who are content with allowing these
things to happen, because again, what is the intent of the radical the
radical left. Their intention is to break this country so that it has to
be fixed. And when it's fixed, quote unquote fixed, it will be
fixed to be more socialistic, more communistic, whatever, more tyrannical, more
big government. It's not going to be less government. It's not going to
be more liberty or less taxes. It's going to be more control for them,
less freedom for you. And they are trying to deliberately break this because
they don't like this country's That is a factor for the d that is the
driver for the radical left. There are papers and things on this stuff.
Read Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals. That's a book. There's another paper that
I can tell you about after. I just got to take a time out
here. But this is what's going on, and it's manifesting itself with the
Democrat Party. You've got Clinton out there saying and even Bill Clinton, former
president right of the United States, out there saying that this is unsustainable.
You've got Democrats like again Hocol, You've got mayor Adams in New York City
saying the same thing. You've got people all over the Karen Bass Los Angeles
all saying the same thing. This is unsustainable, and it's even so bad
that it's forcing some of the leftists with political power who have to get reelected.
Some of these folks are leftist. Karen Bass is a leftist, but
it's gotten so bad that she needs her position, and the will of the
people is not for open borders, so she's got to make it look like
we got to fix something, and that's what she's saying. And so the
point is these battles within the parties, they are creating problems that we're dealing
with in real time. And you factor in the deceit and the lies and
all that stuff that happens in politics and through the seven pillars of propaganda and
deceits, and you can see we have a massive problem. Meanwhile, the
rest of us, normal Americans with brains and sins, are saying, why
don't we secure the border, Why don't we secure the border, Why don't
we actually do something to stop this? We can't. We might disagree with
how many people should be allowed to come in legally, but there is no
one outside of a radical leftist who's either completely insane or who wants to break
our system. Nobody wants to have purely open borders. Given the setup that
we have that we have today, given the realities that we have today,
in a bit of a nanny state, and so forth, it's just unsustainable.
You cannot sustain this. It will be broken, which is what they
want, so they can replace it with something that is more closely aligned with
their broken worldview and ideology. Quick time out, my friends back here in
just a minute. Welcome back, my friends. By the way, here
we are heading Well, we're in the fourth quarter. I've been saying heading
into the fourth quarter for so long that I've forgotten that we have actually arrived
here. We are in October. We are in the fourth quarter. And
you may be you may be in a position to where you are evaluating your
health insurance needs. Whether those health insurance needs are as an individual, maybe
you are responsible for a group health plan at your office, maybe it's your
company, Maybe it's your responsibility at someone else's company, but that's something that's
on your radar. I did see that health insurance premiums are set to expand
or increase I should say the most. I believe they said the most that
they've increased in the past decade. I think I saw five to eight percent
on average. Is the increase in premiums that we are about to see heading
into twenty twenty four. So it's a good time just to see what's going
on. And so let me recommend if that describes the world that you live
in, If you think maybe you're paying too much for insurance, or you
just want to see what else is out there, you want to make sure
that you get a comprehensior review of what is available to you today, then
I encourage you to reach out to my friend Eric Wilson at I Sell Health.
I Sell Health has been helping clients in this country throughout the country since
two thousand and four. They specialize in individual health group health. They also
help with some medicare as well. Eric's an expert as it pertains to the
Affordable Care Act. He's been featured in a lot of interviews. We've e
been spoken with him on this program as well. Doesn't mean that he likes
the Affordable Care Act. It just means that he understands it can help you
and his clients navigate that. So if you need help with these things,
if you just want to see if you're getting good rates, if you want
to see what's available. Author I know, I know the hesitation when it
comes to health insurance. You think I don't want to mess with this.
You know, I understand. But sometimes especially when costs go up, especially
when you've had some bad experience with your insurance agency or insurance company, provide
eier. It just warnts a discussion. Eric can have that conversation with you,
no cost, completely free. You can go to his website I sellhealth
dot com. That's I sellhealth dot com. Or you can call Eric Column
directly eight one five three seven two one three six three. Let me give
that number one more time eight one five three seven two one three six three
Quick time out my friends back, you're in just a minute. Welcome back,
my friends. By the way, it would mean the world to me
if you haven't done this already, I encourage you to sign up four hour
free email column or free column, which by the way, is now syndicated
at the stream dot org, but you can get it for free by signing
up on on our email list. It goes out every Wednesday, so that
we'll go out sometime today. You can go to tohufshow dot com. Just
enter your email address and you'll start getting each weekly edition of the comment or
Sued Me Conservative not bitter column. My friends, but I've got to go.
Music's telling me it's time to wrap up. Have a great day, STG.