Attention. You're listening to the Todd Huff radio show, America's home for conservative
not bitter talk radio. Be advised. The content of this program has been
documented to prevent and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean
to the right. Here's your conservative but not Bitter host, Todd Huff.
You know, on yesterday's program, My friends, we spent a lot of
time talking about a pole. I shouldn't say a lot of time. I
think the first segment we talked about a poll that was released by the Washington
Who I was two. I thought two groups Washington Posts. I thought it
was something else here. Hey, yeah, ABC, Washington Post. There's
headlines. I didn't see this until until after yesterday's program, but apparently the
Washington Post. It's just I can't even explain to you the level of deception,
the level of duplicity, the level of just their lack of desire,
interests, concern for the truth. There's completely I mean, one hundred percent,
one hundred percent these folks do not care. It's not that they're trying
to tell you the truth and then they're trying to just you know, nudget
their direction a little bit. No, no, no, no, no,
no. This is complete, made up, fantasyland bull crap. If
if you ask me, headline here, Washing WAPO. The Washington Post disavows
its own poll showing Trump up by ten. This article says the Daily Caller
News Foundation, but I think it was nine. The Washington Post. The
article says, cast doubt on its own poll with ABC it cast out on
its own poll. This I just let that sink in. Why did they
even release the poll? Why didn't they just manipulate the data as they probably
as they quite possibly have who knows at some point in the past. This
one says it was fifty two forty two. I saw fifty one forty two
either way, nine or ten points. Trump leads Biden in this ABC News
Washington Post poll. Now they're out there saying, Washington Post, ABC News,
they're saying, hey, this post, this poll may just be an
outlier. Don't get two worked up about it. Don't get two worked up
about it. In fact, my friends, there are two There are two
parts of a survey. There's multiple parts, but there's two mathematical, scientific
parts of a survey that I want to talk about. I used to work
in a marketing firm and we did surveys. We did typically customer satisfaction surveys,
but I remember one time doing a survey that was political in nature.
We were hired as a third you know, a third party to conduct to
conduct surveys. And there is a thing called the confidence what the margin of
air and the confidence factor the con confidence interval, I believe is what it's
called confidence factor maybe anyway, So the plus a minus x percent, that's
the margin of air. That means that when you conduct a survey, since
you're doing a random sampling and you're not asking one hundred percent of the people,
you have to make some sort of what do you want to say,
like predictions projections, you have to guess. In the case of who's going
to vote in an election, you have to decide who is a likely voter.
Sometimes a poll will be registered voters, Sometime a poll will be all
Americans, and it could vary between those groups of people. But if you're
wanting to know the outcome of an election, you should probably start with likely
voters. And you're going to have to make assumptions which of these voters is
going to actually cast their ballots, how many what's the ratio or the percentages
of these groups and how they're going to vote, and then you get your
your poll and all of those things come together and say there's a plus or
minus two, three, four, five percent, whatever it is margin of
error. That means, if the poll shows forty three percent of Americans are
going to do X, that means you can add five percentage points. If
the margin of error is five percent, you can say, well it could
we up to forty eight percent or down to thirty eight percent. Forty three
plus five is forty eight, forty three minus five is thirty eight. So
that's the range. That's the range. That's the amount of error that we
have to allow for so that we can you know, these things can't be
pinpointed because you know, again it's not polling every person. We don't actually
know what's going to happen. Maybe we've undersampled over sample. There's a whole
myriad of things that we had to deal with. And the second thing is
called the confidence factor or interval. I think it's factor, but it's been
a while. The confidence factor means usually it's a ninety five percent confidence rate
of confidence or confidence interval or factor, which basically means if you conducted that
poll one hundred times ninety five times, you should see results that fall within
the margin of error. So, again, in our hypothetical, if thirty
eight to forty eight is that range of margin of error, if you conducted
this exact survey one hundred times ninety five times, the data would fall between
thirty eight and forty eight. Five of the one hundred times it would fall
outside of the margin of error. So what ABC and Washington Post is suddenly
saying, So think about this. Have you ever heard this in the history
of polls. Have you ever heard a polster a group that when they release
their data they say not just to be sure, since this poll doesn't show
what we wanted to show. We just want you to know that this is
probably an outlier, meaning it's probably in that group of five percent that says,
hey, it's not within really the true margin of error. It's something
that happens five percent of the time, and it's typically five percent, I
believe in most polls, sometimes it could be ninety that it would fall according
to research, according to claims, within that margin of error. So now
they're out there actually casting down on it, telling the American people, ah,
you know, it's just our own poll here. You can't put too
much in it. You shouldn't. You shouldn't put too much stake in this,
my friend, So kind of ironic, kind of ironic that that's the
response, that's the response to what's going on in the world of polling.
And if you look, in fact, if you look at the Real Clear
Politics average of polls, which I'm not a fan of this, it takes
an average of certain polls and it tries to then say collectively, these polls
pulled together show that Trump is The last I checked, it showed Trump was
up half a percentage point, and I think that was last week. Anyway,
we're still EON's away from actual election day. I mean, it's what,
well about thirteen months away now, just a little over a year away
from the general election. So you can begin to understand some things. You
can certainly know that the American people are not happy with Biden this administration.
They're not happy with the economy, they're not happy with the open border,
they're not happy with him face playing at various places, whether he's on his
bicycle on stage, giving a graduation speech at the United States Air Force Academy,
whether he's walking up the stairs of Air Force one, whether he's trying
to put together a coherent sentence. The American people are not happy with what's
going on in this country, and the facts remain no matter how much they
want to spend this Inflation massively shot up under Biden's watch. And you know
I say this on well, I say it on this show. The good
bad Guy takes clips of this show, puts them on social media, and
then people will chime in, you don't understand anything about inflation. Inflation is
a worldwide phenomenon. Da da da da da. I mean, you can
have your own opinion. You can think I'm wrong, that's fine, But
I follow the school of thought on inflation that was taught by great economists like
Milton Friedman. Milton Friedman unequivocally, without any hesitation, without any uncertainty,
in a very crystal clear way. Milton Friedman says inflation falls solely at the
feet of the federal government. The federal government is the only group that can
actually create inflation, because inflation is a specific phenomenon. Inflation means that there's
too much money in the money supply, and who creates the money supply indirectly.
I suppose, I mean through the government, the FED, and that
whole banking system. But the bottom line is states don't do it. You
don't do it. The international community doesn't do it. Multiple nations might be
doing this themselves, and they are. It's actually, you know what,
it's a sign of It's a sign of governments. It's a sign of governments
trying to hide the true cost of their programs, of the cost of running
government from the people that they have been elected by or represent or whatever.
These various governments are around the world. These governments are trying to hide the
real cost. So instead of raising taxes on people, they produce more money
than the economy justifies. They create more money that represents value that was created
in the economy than actual value created in the economy, thereby causing an imbalance.
Economies always seek an equilibrium, and so it says, well, there's
too many dollars and not enough value, so everything is going to have a
rise in cost because we've got us somehow, there has to be a way
for that to equalize and find balance, an equilibrium. That's what causes this.
It's not because another country in the world is doing that. It puts
us into that particular situation. It certainly can cause us to well use that
as a scapegoat or as an example of somebody to follow. But the bottom
line is this falls on our government. Who's leading this government right now,
it's the left, It's Biden, it's the Democrat Party. The American people
have had enough of this, have had enough of this, So it's not
shaping up very well for the for the left, they're disavowing their own polls
now because it shows Trump leading by almost ten points. Biden's out there still
making more silly remarks. I don't know if you heard him try to say
the name of LLL cool J. Mama said, knock you out. Biden's
up there. I don't even know L cool l J cool J LLL or
something like that is what Biden called him. It's just everywhere you turn,
it's silly, ridiculous stuff. And again, you know, it doesn't matter
to me if really on its own that Biden, you know, gets LLL
cool J's name wrong. But what matters is this is they they want to
associate with people in pop culture, to connect with the low information crowd.
And if they can't even do that, with Biden. Right, they can't
even do that. They were able to do that with Barack Obama. Right.
Obama would work out with the Chicago Bulls and all this stuff, and
people would talk about me and this guy could have been an NBA player,
but he chose to be president of the United States, right, And people
like that. People think, Man, we got a guy in the wine
house. It's got a great fadeaway jump shot. He can cross you,
over, break your ankles, take you to the whole anytime he wants.
That is cool, right, people like that. Now, we got a
guy out there who can't even pronounce properly LLL Cooljay's name. It's just what
is good? I defy you what is good? There's nothing that is good.
We've got Democrats Senator Bob Menendez, he's being called on to resign after
being indicted on federal bribery charges. We've got that out there. We've got
the Republican Party that says that the Biden family, listen to this, received
more than thirty million dollars. Well wait, hold, let me rephrase that.
They say the Biden family received more than thirty excuse me, received thirty
million dollars more than the bank records they have been provided thus far have shown
from these cushy deals with foreign business associates. Through this alleged Hunter Biden Joe
Biden president bribery paid to play situation. What is good out there? They're
sitting on the verge of an impeachment, an impeachment that Kamala Harris tries to
tell us is due only two only to the Republican's fear of taking Biden head
on because of his great success record. Are you kidding me? What in
the world. By the way, there's a story in the stack of stuff.
I'm just gonna mention it. You can read it if you want.
I've got it entitled on our stack of stuff. It says this Biden's border.
There's a colon. Thenz Whalen man allowed to illegally enter the US,
but not his pet squirrel. So they've drawn the line. I wondered where
the line was going to be drawn. I wondered who could not come across
our open, poorous border. And I think we found the line. The
line has now been found at pet squirrels. And wait until that may change
if they find if there's a federal program for squirrels they'll let that squirrel.
In fact, they can register this squirrel to vote, which may be what
they're working on right now. They will be all over this this squirrel,
The squirrels family will be imported, his distant relatives. Anybody who is friends
with the squirrel can come in if they can register this little fellow to vote,
and if they can get him on some social program where he would thank
the government for his existence and thereby be a dutiful little squirrel citizen here in
the country, or non citizen for that matter, and cast his vote for
the radical left in the Democrat Party. So all kinds of crazy things going
out there on out there, and none of them are good for the Biden
administration. But I'm gonna take a break timeouts, and definitely, most importantly,
none of them are good for you, my friends, None of them
are. Now. Personally, I hope you're having personally great success. But
when it comes to the things that are happening in our federal government, none
of those things has anything to do with it right now, candidly, because
it is a well, we'll say dumpster fire, another term jumped into my
head, but I'm not going to say that on here. Quick time out,
though my friends plenty more to get to today. You're listening here to
conservative not Better Talk. I am your host, Todtuf back here in just
a minute. Welcome back, my friends. I saw another poll. I
don't want to get too much into polls. You know, polls. As
I've said on here before. I don't want to say this again because I've
we've gone into this in detail in the past. But polls are a tool.
That's what a poll is. A poll is a tool, nothing more,
nothing less. It's not the gospel truth. It's not one right as
we went through last segment. But it's a tool, right. It gives
us some information, some information, it gives us, So it's it's worth
noting. Especially and this is where it gets tricky, especially if the poll
is conducted with integrity, if correct assumptions are made and so forth. That's
that's where good things can happen and you can really trust it. That's why
these campaigns actually trust their internal polling more than these other outfits, because polls
a lot of times are used to manipulate American opinion more so than actually to
report on it. In my opinion, so be that as it may but
there's a poll out there that says that I think it was twenty eight percent
of Americans. Twenty eight percent of Americans believe that the outcome, the counts,
the tallies of the upcoming election cannot be trusted. So it's slightly more
again for any Democratic socialists in the audience today, slightly more than one in
four Americans they don't trust the results, which is inexcusable that we can get
to this point because and I'll tell you why if I actually I actually had
a question, and I get this on occasion, but i've I've again,
I've I've made it clear that short of God making it very clear I needed
to do this, I'm not. I have no interest in doing this.
But I had someone out say to me, you should you know, run
you should run. You wish you would reconsider this or whatever, short of
thing for office, No, I'm not going to do that again, short
of God really calling me to do so, I don't feel that in the
slightest, I feel like this is exactly what I should be doing. But
the if I was elected, I would think, if you were elected,
I would think if people with integrity were elected and you and you saw numbers
like this, and you saw one in four people or slightly more said we
don't trust what you're telling us in the in the vote, in the vote
tallies. I can think of nothing more important. Now, there's obviously issues.
I'm not saying that there's not other important issues, but as far as
you have to have the consent of the governed, and if the governed is
telling you we don't know if we've given you our consent, that seems to
be a very high priority. And what you would do, what I would
do is open, you know, actually answer questions, not tell people they
can't talk about it, not people, Not tell people if you mention it,
you're going to be shut down. I wouldn't be partner on social media.
I wouldn't have an administration that would partner with the big tech social media
and tell them the things I don't want to see on there. I would
want to be able to address those concerns. And I know that this is
a bit of a it's well, it's nowhere near where things are today.
I understand that, but that's what a reasonable person would do. A reasonable
a reasonable person would not say sit down and shut up, don't ask the
questions. And comply that is not the consent of the governed. So there's
that out there as well, right there. That's a that is a major
concern. And when you factor in this, sixty nine percent of Republicans don't
believe don't believe that Biden was elected at legitimately sixty nine percent, folks,
it's I mean, it's crazy numbers. Seventy percent of Republicans don't believe Biden
was legitimately elected. You got a massive problem in this country. So it's
not just that twenty eight percent say we're not going to trust it next time.
If we have a series of events and fall out like we did after
the twenty twenty election, that twenty eight percent is gonna be fifty percent or
forty five percent or sixty percent or some such number. Anyway, the other
reason that there's this is partly partly to blame to the other reason that those
numbers are high is because Hillary Clinton still to this day cannot admit that she
lost in twenty sixteen. She can't bring herself to do it. And of
course why would she. I mean, these are you know. C.
S. Lewis, the great Christian apologist and thinker called sin excuse me.
Pride the great sin, the great sin of pride, and that's at some
level, at some level, I mean he's I would say he's spot on
correct, because the great sin of pride is the one that decides whether or
not whether or not I am going to humble myself and ask the God of
the universe to forgive me, or insist that I'm right, insist that he
has no jurisdiction over my life, and discontinue living in as though I'm God.
That's really C. S. Lewis is spot on right there. So
I mentioned Hillary because she's on some silly little show. No she's I don't,
it's not a She's on stage with Jensak. I just have the audio
here, and Jensak asks her about about Putin. Now, Putin is still
the boogeyman when it comes to the twenty not just twenty sixteen, but now
twenty twenty four election as well. She's talking with Hillary. Hillary. Now,
remember if Trump gets Remember what Trump's been indicted for. Remember what all
the Americans who have tried to share their concerns about the results, The evidence
of corruption, voter fraud, election fraud, two thousand mules, all that
stuff. How those folks have been silenced, myself included, for simply having
questions, raising concerns, pointing out anomalies, things that should be concerning to
average, everyday Americans, and your silence for this. Now, we can't
mention that at all. But Hillary has got a complete green light to complain
and moan and groan as much as she wants about the twenty sixteen election.
And again that Vladimir Putin did steal it. Then, although she didn't say
it, the way to the way to present that is to say Putin tricked
Hillary voters into voting for Trump by using Pokemon go ads and Facebook ads and
maybe some Twitter ads. That's the whole argument. It's patently ridiculous, it's
absurd, it's it's insulting to the people who really do try to steal elections.
They think, oh, that is not how we do it, my
friends. No, no, no, we actually do what I said from
the beginning, what you've known from the beginning. The way to steal an
election is to somehow get into a machine, is to change the counts,
is to duplicate ballots. It's not to have a marketing and advertising campaign that
is not how you do that. As I've said before, and i'll say
again, I'll take a break and then i'll play Hillary after that break.
If that is what changed outcomes. If a marketing firm, if Putin's people
in Russia putting together Facebook and Pokemon go ads were this successful, every company
in America would be beating down their door to have them come in and run
their marketing campaign, because that's the sort of thing that businesses would want.
Every single person running for office would want them to do an ad campaign.
I'm not saying to do an ad campaign designed on trickery, as this narrative
is saying that it is. Instead, just don't use trickery, just do
the same tactics to get people to engage and to persuade them to do something.
That's what politicians would want, that's what marketers would want. Anyway,
here's your chance, by the way, to hear from those who partner with
us. As I take a quick time out. You know, I haven't
said this in a while, but you know the advertisers on this program may
not agree, may not agree with everything that I say, but what you
know, they absolutely should and I hope you give them consideration when shopping and
looking for your own personal solutions and so forth, things that you need in
the marketplace. Timeouts in order that my friends, you're listening here to conservative
not better talk. I am your host, Todd Huff back in mere moments.
I'm back to my friends. So Hillary's out there with Jensaki, still
still out there painting Vladimir Putin as the reasons she lost in twenty sixteen and
telling us that he's going to do the same again in twenty twenty four.
Here she is with Jen say, this is on Jen Saki's program Inside.
What is this inside with Jinsaki? Inside? Of course, she's on the
inside. She's a radical leftist. She's right at home with these folks who
have political powers. She is, she's the definition of inside. Anyway.
Here, here's this exchange between her and Hillary Lamer Putin has obviously you're a
friend, you're a friend in mine. He has intervened in our election in
the past. It's not something as you experienced firsthand. It's not something we
talk about a lot. Do you give her something that when I listened,
when I listened to this before, I didn't catch that part she said,
it's not something we talked that much about. She said, look, we've
we've my goodness, I just wanted you to hear for I don't know how
I ever looked that we don't talk about this much. You've got to be
kidding me. Jin Hillary's at every speech. Hillary gets up on stage and
she says, you can be the best candidate and get the most people to
vote for you and still not be given the presidency. I would know.
I mean, I'm paraphrasing, but you've heard her say these things every single
speech. Come on, Jen, even you can't be that far inside as
to not understand what that sounds like to the rest of us on the outside.
Give me a b I'm gonna recute it. And notice too, by
the way she does say. She does say your friend Vladimir Putin and they
joke. But if you remember, do you remember, And I talked about
this a long time ago, but she's the one Hillary when she was Secretary
of State after the Bush administration, she took the Staples reset button to them,
remember that she wanted to reset Russian relations, and then all these things
have happened since that point in time. So who else is to blame for
this? I mean, if what they're saying is true. Who else is
to blame for this? I'm sorry, I'm I'm gonna let this play for
a minute, but I just can't get over that. They want to They
want you to believe. They don't talk about this very much. They've got
you know, they're they're above this, my friends. They don't want to
get into this. They don't want to make it about that. They're not
They're not sore. They're not sore losers. Right, Their voters didn't they
didn't request service dogs. They didn't have adult coloring pages, they didn't cancel
college courses, they didn't have cry ins. None of that happened in their
revisionist history. Because they are big boys and big girls putting on their appropriate
big boy and or big girl pants to deal with the Hillary loss of twenty
sixteen. This is just unbelow. I'm gonna let this play for a minute.
This is remarkable. Mayor Putin has obviously you're a friend, you're a
friend of mine. He has intervened in our election in the past. It's
not something as you experienced firsthand. It's not something we talk about a lot.
Do you fear that that is something that could be happening for twenty twenty
four, and do you think we should be talking about it more? Well,
I think we should be talking about it more because I don't think despite
all of the uh, you know, deniers, there's any doubt that he
interfered in our election, or that he has interfered in many ways in the
internal affairs of other countries, funding political parties, funding you know, political
candidates, buying off you know, government officials in different places. So that
is his opus, you know, his opus operandi, in the sense that
he hates democracy, he particularly hates the West, and he especially hates us,
and he has determined that he can do two things simultaneously. He can
try to continue to damage and divide us internally, and he's quite good at
it. And sadly, he has a lot of apologists and enablers in our
own country, people who either don't see the danger or dismiss it out of
hand, or maybe agree with some of the positions he's taken on certain things,
including his barbaric invasion of Ukraine and so dividing us and then trying to
seize territory in such a brutal way to try to expand his reach to try
to restore the Russian Empire, if not the former Soviet Union. That is
who he is. I said that I can't take any more of this.
First of all, we're supposed to believe that they don't talk about it,
and that, of course is the draw. That's a subtle way of saying,
we don't you know, we don't get into it. Trump's the gadget's
out here talking about this at every turn. Give me a break. They
have talked about this religious since two thousand and sixteen. Number one, Number
two. Let me ask you another question. If if Putin is using ads
to try to divide the American people, and let's just say for a minute
that he is, let's say that he's trying to do that, let me
ask you this, why is it home? Man? I know I'm gonna
get pushed back for this, not from the vast majority of you, but
from some people who don't understand what is Why is it worse for one person?
Let's just take names out of out of it for a minute. If
the objective is to divide and thereby conquer the American people, or therefore topple
the American government, or therefore remake America into something else. Why is it
acceptable for one person or one group of people to engage and set activity but
not for another individual. Why, in other words, why is it worse
when Putin does it? When the left engages in this behavior. The media
engages in this behavior all day, every day by virtue of their waking up
in the morning and taking a breath, because they are so corrupt, because
they are so compromised, because they are so completely biased. Why is it
okay for them to do it? Why is it okay for the media,
the Democrat Party, the radical left to push a narrative on Trump four years
that's been proven demonstrably time and time again to be completely fabricated and nonsensical.
Why is that okay? Why is that okay? If it's not okay for
Putina? Putin's not American tied. So so, But if the issue is
to divide people for the purpose of getting them to do things that are not
in their own interests collectively, but instead are the interests of the person who's
doing the manipulation, then does it really matter. I mean, understands he's
outside of our country's He's someone that is, I think, in many ways
interested in rebuilding the former Soviet Union. I have no I'm under no illusion
as to who Vladimir Putin is, but I also understand. I also understand
that if your intention is to use tactics and techniques to divide the American people
so that they would empower you further, forgive me for also thinking that it's
semantics to say that Putin's the only one that we should care about doing that.
I care about people doing it who are in positions of political power,
who are in positions of media control, who are in positions of the seven
the seven pillars of propaganda, as we call them. People who are in
the media, People who are in government, not dis elected officials, but
those who are in the bureaucratic state. People who are running academia, teaching
kids to hate their country, to hate their parents, to hate traditional values,
to hate how they were raised, to hate capitalism, to remake this
nation that's something different than what our founders made it to be. To cause
people too well to believe falsely that rights come from government and not from our
creator. In fact, many of these clowns and jokers would say, there
is no creator, So what's that even mean? Government is the one who
grants rights. We just need to have the right people in power so that
you have the right rights. So some of these clowns talk democracy, they'll
tell you is what matters. They don't talk about the republic. They don't
talk about the rights of the individual. They don't talk about the rights truly
of the minority. Now they'll talk about how conservatives want to target racial minorities
and stir that pot and get as much hatred and angst there gend up as
possible. But nothing could be further from the truth. I think it could
be further from the truth at all. But yet this is what they do.
This is what they peddle in and do, and they meddle in elections
day in and day out without any sort of repercussions. I'm not defending anything
Putin did do. I think it's been dramatically overstated. And I think it's
preposterous to think that pokemon goads can trick Hillary Clinton voters into voting for Trump
in the last days before the election. That's patently ridiculous and absurd to me.
And if Putin's doing this stuff, I think we should try to stop
it. I think we should, by the way, try to stop all
of that. But then I also look at our own White House, and
I look at the evidence that suggests that Hunter Biden was peddling his own dad's
political influence to enrich himself and his family potentially to the tune of fifty million
dollars doing what I still doing? What tell me what they're doing? Because
Hunter Biden's such a brilliant lawyer, is is that what we're going with?
What type of law is he practicing, What sort of insight does he have?
What sort of strategy and success record does he have that justifies all of
this money being poured his way when his dad just happens to be vice president
of the United States. Pray tell, I would love to hear it,
because it doesn't make any sense. There's a lot of red flags, a
lot of questions that need to be asked, but they don't care about those.
Instead, they want to continue to go after the boogeyman, Vladimir Putin,
who no one is on the side of Putin. By the way,
it doesn't mean that, it's just that I don't can't get into that right
now. Don't know if it gets a break timeouts in order. You're listening
here to conservative not better talk back here in just a minute, not a
lot of time here, But I do want to say this. I do
want to say this. If you know a lot of people say, boy,
I don't have enough time to explain this. But if we are being
fed lies and misinformation so that we vote for people, so that we vote
for people that they desire, then what is the difference who it comes from?
My friends? We should demand transparency and truth and objective information from these
jokers and clowns, and of course we're not going to get it. So
I'm just out of timer. So whether it's the media or Putin or whoever
else a politician, it's reprehensible. The lying and corruption have to stop.
But I gotta take a break, quick time out back in a minute.
I'm back, my friends. You want to be prepared in the event of
a natural disaster. That can be a power outage, that could be a
food shortage, that could be any number of things created by the government that
currently runs this country, or of course you could come in the form of
a tornado, flood, hurricane. You know the risks, But if you
want to be prepared, encourage you to check out four patriots dot com.
The number four Patriots with an S four patriots dot com. You can look
at a variety of ways that you can be prepared up to and including food
supplies, and you can check out their most common Their most popular option,
which is a three month supply of food the last twenty five years, has
breakfast, lunch, dinner options. They come in stackable storage totes. You
can check it out at four patriots dot com. The number four Patriots with
ans dot com. Use promo code huff to save ten percent on your order
four patriots dot com promo code huff. Check them out save today, folks.
Unfortunately, that's about all the time that we have today. But wherever
the deception comes from, wherever the deception comes from, it's a bad thing.
Deceivers are just as bad coming out of Moscow as they are coming out
of Washington, DC, your statehouses, a political party, what have you.
Now. I know that the ramifications the consequences can be dire when dealing
with foreign countries, the folks, that can be dire when dealing with a
massive out of control government here in our country as well. But I've got
to go. Thanks for listening. SDG