I haven't recovered. I'm still in the holidays twenty twenty three and living vicariously.
I mentioned the last time that I have this wonderful tree up. It's
a digital tree that you've been into shape, and that's my holiday spirit.
And I gotta say this, I'm having trouble getting into the new year,
and I'm going to kind of follow when I do this every year. I've
done as an excuse the last couple of years following the Chinese New Year tradition
and Chinese New Year's for them. For us, we're all on one big
happy family. Here is Saturday, February tenth. Here in San Francisco,
they have a big parade with fireworks. It's really the only place you can
shoot off fireworks because they're illegal, and we have huge fires that are set
off by fireworks, so you're not allowed to shoot them off anyplace else any
other counties in Northern California. But I'm adjusting the best I can. And
I mean, you kind of know what I'm talking about. It's like you're
gearing up for the new year, and I'm not having problems gearing up.
I'm just doing it slowly and times flying, so it just takes time,
and I'm doing the best I can do it just well, some of them.
The granite in the Great Pyramid comes from more than five hundred miles to
the south. If you look at the famous King's Chamber, it's walls and
it's roof are the ceiling of the King's Chamber are all made with gigantic granite
blocks. Stunning detail, stunning detail. Those blocks on the and the roof
of the King's Chamber weighs seventy tons each. Now, Egyptologists will tell you
that, oh, they could move heavy blocks because they put them on wet
sand and they pushed them along on wet sand. Well, maybe if you're
just at ground level, that will do. But when you're three hundred and
fifty feet above the ground, as you are in the King's Chamber, that
won't do it at all. I don't know how they did it. All
I know is they did it. I don't think anybody knows how they did
it, how they lifted those stones, how they brought them up to that
level. I think we're looking again at a lost technology, and it was
this ancient apocalypse twelve eight hundred years ago that wiped that from the human memory
banks almost completely, not entirely completely, because they were survivors. That's Graham
Hancock talking about the anomalies of the Great Pyramid and the evidence for a very
early but highly sophisticated people that were around before the Younger Driest, prior to
twelve five hundred years ago. That's kind of a key point in our program
today centers around evidence for our lost civilization. So I've had people over the
years speaking about evidence of unusual science, unusual technology in stone works, and
we know now that it appears that megalithic cultures that use huge blocks of granite
to build their temples, in some cases pyramids, buildings, even statuary fall
into a class of Homo sapien sapiens that are working in megalithic stone work.
Call it's a class of Homo sapien sapiens that is unknown to us. Egyptologists
archaeologists seem to think that it's a natural occurrence to take a seven hundred ton
block of granite and carve it into an obelisk with such a level of perfection
that you can use a middle square measuring device and it was perfectly formed,
perfectly cut. These aren't things that are done by hand. These are things
that are done with machinery. And so today we're speaking about a new author
who is going to present a great deal of new and exciting evidence for this
earlier culture. And you know, if I'm honest with you, most of
the people who come on the show who are presenting information about evidence for advanced
culture before written history. I'm going to ask him blank, flat out,
And I think I mentioned this to Graham or right asked him, is who
are these Preediluvians? Are they smarter than us? Do they possess an earlier
science and knowledge that we're unaware of? That's a big plus right there.
And how do they look? Are they Homo sabian sapiens? Now my guest
today is Alexdcheesshkovich, and he is coming to us from Poland. The book
we're talking about is deja Vu? Has everything already been in search of previous
laws? Civilizations? And not only was I impressed with this guy, I
was flabbergacid to know at the end, and he doesn't mention it on the
interview. It's only twenty years old. He wrote this book while he was
in high school, and that is amazing. The other thing is. He's
multi lingual. He speaks number of languages, and he wrote it originally in
Polish and then he wrote it again. It took him a year, he
said in English. And when you read this book, it's well, the
grammar's excellent, the punctuation is excellent. And I got to tell you,
there's a lot of people that submit books that I read, and I read
between don't read, but I get between three and five books a week to
review. A lot of people have not edited their books. And nothing is
more cringe worthy than an unedited, poorly written book. It just drives you
nuts. You want to drop it. I unfortunately have to look at the
good, the bad, and the ugly when it comes to Destiny, Earth
Ancients and Earth Ancient Special Edition, the Archives. Hopefully the archives are books
that I've already talked about, but sometimes I might bring in a book to
consider. So Alex has done an adverb job in this book. And this
is our program today. Listen very closely to what he has to say about
technology, because this is the next generation, the next in line to research
and investigate questions about our ancient past. Sava Tours is well organized. Everything
flowed easily. It was a fantastic tour from beginning to end. To be
honest, I was shocked by the private visits. I could not believe that
we were lucky enough to experience those. That's from one of the many people
who do the Earth Ancients Grand Egyptian Tour every year. We're in our fifth
year and we're looking forward to our next program. That's this April twenty eight
through May fifth, and it is a tour of ancient sites and it's a
private tour with our host, Mohammed Imbryhem, who is a wonderful world class
post and tour guide. We have a few spots left and this is an
invitation to you to come out and join us in what can only be described
as a VIP tour of Egypt. These are private sites we go to for
the most part. This is a view of some of the most intriguing sites,
including the Great Pyramid, Hathor Temple, the Bent Pyramid, the Red
Pyramid, so much more, and then we cruise on the Nile. This
is a way to really take in the ancient past and from start to finish,
the food, the beverages and the environment is first class. For more
information, please go to Earthancients dot Com Forward Slash Tours all the informations there
The Earth Ancients Grand Egyptian Tour April twenty eighth through May night. Alexshkovich is
a name that you need to remember, and I'll tell you why. He
has produced a book in twenty twenty one called Deja Vu? Has Everything Already
Been? In search of previous loss civilizations? And I have literally hundreds of
books that cross my desk each year, and a lot of them are rehashed
data information on material we already know, but with a new spin. But
what makes Alex's book fascinating is that he is actually taking the data and sending
it back out with new hypothesis, new theories, new information. This book,
Deja Vu, I found randomly on Amazon and I had to learn about
it, and I started reading it and I was just dumbfounded. So I
want to talk about this book today, and there's no way we can get
all of it in. It's over three hundred pages, so we're gonna have
to have Alex back. So Alex, Welcome to Earth. It's great to
see you. Hello everyone, and thank you for having me on your show.
Talk to about what you do, what's your work other than writing,
because I mean, obviously writing is great to do, but it's not full
time for most of us. Yes, I actually started writing at a very
early age, during my middle high school. And actually the book you mentioned,
which I don't know if anyone will see here it is, this is
about four hundred and fifty pages long. This book was actually written in about
eighty five percent at the age of seventeen. I started writing very early.
I then, because of some legal stuff in Poland, needed to wait until
the eighteenth birthday to publish it. So it was originally published as I was
eighteen years old, and then a year later, at nineteen, I published
it in English on Amazon and I self translated it. So it was a
long, long journey and a lot of work. But as I mentioned,
and I started early, so I was able, you know, to become
a little bit proficient. So right now it is very easy to me to
write and add it and you know, put everything together, because book is
not only the manuscript, but plenty of more things. And I was,
you know, I was very interested in history from a very early age.
My mother was actually or used to be a history teacher in high school.
So from but no it wasn't that influential to me. But because of that,
I had plenty you know, of different books, sources, texts,
books and stuff like that in my house. And I learned reading and writing
at a also very young age, so you know, I was skimming through
what was interesting to me. And I think that because of that, I
also became more passionate about you know, history, especially ancient history. And
then it is interesting because I mentioned the middle high school and I was the
last year of middle high school because it was eliminated after me. And because
of that, I needed to be very careful because in order for me to
go to any high school, there was twice as much people because from the
previous year and my year which was being eliminated, and because of that,
it was very hard to get into any high school. I would say good
student, but in order to be more confident, I attempted a historic competition
of a very high level. I was in the middle high school, but
it was from a level of above high school event. And in order to
you know, get a high level in this competition and achieve something, I
needed to read a lot about our history from the very early Neolithic period,
the Nuolithic Revolution, up until nowadays. And it is because of the academic
and you know, mainstream studying that I've done. I've literally read hundreds of
books. In my book there is a hundred plus bugs and bibliography. Because
of that, I started questioning things because in those textbooks, in those you
know, academic articles, books and stuff like that, everything was, you
know, shown so smoothly. It was as if we knew all the history
in a big picture, from those times of the Natic Revolution, for ancient
times, from Middle Ages up until nowadays, except for some minor details,
maybe we don't know about a particular ruler or about a particular event, but
when it comes to the like frames, to the foundations, it was like
we know everything about it. And I started questioning its tually, everything about
our history. Could it be that our history is much more mysterious? And
could it be that something different happened during the times before the first civilizations,
in the times of antiquity and then pre history, and I started digging deeper.
I was also interested in other, of course subjects. I loved the
biology genetics, and I found out, you know, within the time frames
of the human evolution that we as anatomically modern humans existed for about two hundred
thousand years. You know, two hundred thousand years is a long time.
Nulostic Revolution during which we started a sedentary lifestyle from simple nomad hunter gatherers was
only ten thousand BC, which is like ninety five percent of the time after
we appeared. So it was very suspicious to me. And again after the
Nulostic Revolution, it appeared that there is another huge gap until about three thousand,
one hundred years BC, when the first civilizations appeared of ancient Summer of
ancient Egypt, ancient India, and you know, it was the Unification of
Egypt, it was, you now, the Golden era of the Summer.
It was, you know, the blossoming of India about plus minus few hundred
years the same time. And I was astonished, could it be, you
know, that something happened before that, and why all of those first civilizations
started so rapidly at the same time, roughly the same time, of course.
And I started digging into those civilizations. What are ancient ancestors from Summer
India and Egypt were telling us about their origins, and it happened that they
were telling us a completely different history. And that's how it all started.
I started questioning things and going into of course, also alternative history and all
of the stuff that you often talk about in this podcast. So you bring
up an area that's very interesting to me and controversial, which is are we
being told the whole story or are we being told a lie about our ancient
past. You actually have a quote from the Nazi propagandist minister Joseph Goebel who
says, if you tell a big enough lie and repeat it, people will
eventually come to believe it. And that is something that I have a huge
problem with because it seems like they will use a hypothesis and make it a
truth. So talk a little bit about that, because you run this throughout
your Your narrative of the book is like, here's what we're told. But
if we look at the actual people and what we know through the information handed
down, it's very different. Yes, it is a good question, but
first when it comes to this quote, I think that you know, our
history isn't a lie. A big client in mainstream is lying all over.
But I think that it is again repetition, but maybe of some mistakes,
but maybe of some biased opinions of some experts, Egyptologists archaeologists. And when
we're repeated all over again and we educate in terms of other people within the
same you know, mainstream academic knowledge, then it is you know, believed
to be the true one. But when it comes to you know, what
the history is, what our history actually you know, was like and how
it appeared. I will continue with those first civilizations, because those free civilizations
that we considered them, that we consider nowadays to be the first, consider
themselves actually not to be the first. They consider it either to be much
older or they consider themselves to be the descendants of some other previous cultures.
Like in Egypt. We've got plenty of different lists of kings, and actually
academic knowledge is within about seventy to eighty percent correct when it comes to the
list of kings showing us the rulers after the first Pherioh, considered by them
men as narmer who united the lower and upper Egypt. And you know,
we've got plenty of different lists of kings. We've got the Turins kings list,
We've got the poleermostone, manetoskings list, and several others, and interestingly,
for instance mentioned by me three different list Manetho Turin and Palermo are from
completely different periods of the Egyptian history. So it may seem that if all
of those texts from different eras of the Egyptian history are telling us to some
extent the truth, maybe with some minor details, because of course plenty of
things could be confused during all of those you know, thousands of years,
maybe if they are telling us that the history of Egypt was also before menes
maybe it was like that because all of those texts which are as I mentioned
in about seventy to eighty percent great and correct. When it comes to dynastic
Egyptians, dynastic Pharrios, they mentioned that before that the history of Egypt was
about thirty six thousand years old before the first Pharaoh, and I mentioned Hugh
Egypt. But the same is with the Summer the Sumerian skings list, which
are which are telling us or even older rulers. And when it comes to
India, here we've get so many different epics, taxs, you know,
myths and legends that are telling us that you know, in the very ancient,
distant past or even pre history, there are plenty of civilizations, maybe
some even you know on even very large, even global scale, So it
is I think it's strange to me that we are so arrogent we're telling that
when it comes to mention, of course, mainstream is telling us that all
of those myths and legends are you know, fiction fairy tales of our ancestors.
But you know, almost all of our ancestors, we're telling us such
a story. So why we shouldn't believe them and treat them as some you
know, primitive beings. And it's an interesting quote when it comes you know,
to modern times. I found I don't know it is by whom,
but it is. It was said that I prefer, you know, taking
knowledge from people who build the civilizations than from those who are now destroying it.
So I am with, you know, that kind of thought, and
I think that we shouldn't, you know, outrately deny those mentions of our
ancestors, and we should, you know, think of some common ground.
And after you know, digging into myths, legends and stuff like that,
I started being very interested in the history of science and also philosophy of science,
the history of science, especially how how it came to be that we
have such a historical narrative that we have right now, And I found out
that it wasn't very long ago that we started thinking in that way. Nowadays
we think that, oh, it is mainstream knowledge that Sumer was the first
civilizations, but Sumer was only discovered less than two hundred years ago. We
started were discovering cities and civilizations from ancient Mesopotime about eighteen forties, so about
one hundred eight years ago. And before that, the civilizations of Summer or
other civilizations of Mesopotamia like Acad, Babylon, Assyria were mostly ignored as some
fairy tales, despite being mentioned in plenty of sources. We had mentions in
ancient historical chroniclers, and even in the Bible there was a mention that Abraham
came from the Sumerian city of Ur. But because we hadn't found them yet,
we treated them for hundreds of years as only being imaginary stories, and
then we discovered them. So I'm thinking, and I was thinking when I
was writing my book, what if we are in a similar situation, and
what if stories of Atlantis, Moo or other lost civilizations you know, are
treated the same that mainstream is treating them, or these are only fairy tales
and imagination of our ancestores. But what if we just haven't discovered the proper
final Atlantis or some other Los civilization yet? Why are we so arrogant to
believe that we know almost everything about our history? And why are we so
arrogant, you know, to say that, oh Plato's Atlantis is fiction,
Oh this story's fiction, and stuff like that. I think that it is
just our rogance. Yeah. Why do you think that academia has such a
problem with the kings list, either Sumerian or the Egyptian list that goes back
tens of thousands of years. They accept known rulers, known pharaohs that they
can identify in writing, but when they can't find enough research, it seems
like anything after a d it's like, well they were making all those things
up. Mm hm. Yes. It was the same thing, for instance,
with Troy found by Hiro Schlimann. And I think that you know,
Troy was in an epic story. It was, you know, in an
epic narrative, which in my opinion, is even less credible than the list
of kings which are telling us of the Let's say, maybe not exactly true,
but the history of ancient Egypt, according to ancient Egyptians themselves, or
when it comes to the Sumerians, kings is the history of summer according to
Sumerians. And I think it is also because of the biased view on our
history, because everyone thinks that before the I mentioned three thousand, one hundred
years BC plus minus, of course, people were just simple people. Some
like there were just first settlements. And before that, before let's say ten
thousand YEARSBC, were simply hunter gatherers. And you know, we've got plenty
of evidence that people in thirty thousand YEARESBC forty thousand YESBC were living like hunter
gatherers and nomads. But still until you know, very recently and even nowadays,
we also have advanced societies and we have parallel live there are some primitive
people, like in the Kalahari Desert, like in some tribes all over the
world. Actually, so of course we are here with the evidence, but
I think that there may be something that we haven't discovered yet. You know,
even Zaki Hawas, who is let's say, a very conservative Egyptologists say
the least mentions, but he mentions that about seventy percent of whole Egypt in
his understanding, the let's say dynastic Egypt still lies under the sand. So
imagine, if our entire history is about two hundred thousand years of existence of
Homo sapiens sapiens, we I think discovered maybe five percent or even less of
that. And you know, ore, when it comes to history, it
is evidence based. When we have no evidence, it is unscientific, it
is pseudoscience. And that's why we treat all of those lists of kings because
let's say, we do not have that much evidence from them. From those
let's say, very early prehistoric times, we have some anomalists, we have
some theories that maybe some let's say buildings like the pyramids or some temples are
much older. But when it comes to like strong smoking evidence, we do
not have much of it, and we I think need to accept that.
And it is because of that that you know, science is very lazy when
it comes to updating. If it had tons of new evidence, it could
actually change the narrative. But still another thing is that, for instance,
everyone was saying during the last let's say in the nineties in the eighties,
that you know, theories of let's say older Egypt, older pyramids and stuff
like that are just fairy tales because we do not have any evidence that humanity
actually could manage to produce such huge monuments. But then in nineteen ninety four
we discovered goblically tape, which in my opinion, you know, is on
a similar level to let's say, the Pyramids are to the great Sphings of
Giza. So I think that if we have Gobetle tape accepted conventionally, we
may accept that the history is much older and some civilizations on a level of
Gobekle tape may exist, you know, before the first civilizations. Yeah,
you know, it's funny. We have a wide variety of authors, people
like Graham Hancock, who you mentioned in your book, and I think pretty
much everybody who you have in your book, we've had on the show,
Robert Shock, John Anthony West. And one of the things that I'm curious
to know your perspective is who were these Prediluvians. We get a sense of
them in the Bible, like Noah lived to be six hundred plus years old.
I mean, they're almost written and described as superhuman in many ways.
But what do you believe the earliest Homo sapien sapiens were like? Were they
brighter than us? We know they used earth based energies. And you talk
about this in your book, and we'll get this into it a little bit
later. But if you were to describe Prediluvian pre flood people, how would
you describe them the earliest Homo sapien sapiens. Yes, In I think last
or before last chapter of my book, like the nine or ten for something,
I described the concept of cyclical time. And I believe that there are
some cycles of time, and I think that the Prediluvians those maybe people from
Atlantis or from others, let's say, lots of civilizations before the end of
the alast ace. H we're in a different cycle than we are right now
when it comes to those cycles of time. And I think that maybe because
you know, we do not have much even mentions in ancient texts of some
advanced weaponry or some advance maybe except for some Hindu you know texts, but
you know, in Plato's story of Atlantis, you know, and in some
other sources, it seems that it was just a casualization like ancient idiot may
be a little bit more advanced. But what we found in almost every of
those ancient mentions of previous civilizations is their spirituality, that they were much more
advanced as human beings spiritually. So it may be you mentioned earth energies.
It may be that people from before the flood were in much more spiritual you
know state, and maybe that's how they had all of those you know technologies
that are for instance, mentions mentioned by Clairvoyant. Maybe you know, it
was some sort of psychic you know technology, let's say, psychic you know
abilities. And I think that it is very in accordance with Plato and with
ancient texts because in Plato, and it is a thing that is very often
omitted by plenty of researchers, Plato concludes that Atlantiens were starting to becoming more
and more animal like, and that's why it led to, you know,
the destruction of Atlantis. So it may be that it was their spiritual downfall,
just like in the story of Garden of Eden, where we you know,
fallen spiritually maybe into materialism because we started being ashamed of each other,
like you know, it was a different state. And I think that it
connects with for instance, you guess of the Hindu tradition. We've got for
you guess, we've got you know, Golden Age and you know, those
descriptions tell us not of some age with you know, gold palaces and stuff
like that, but mostly an age you know, without suffering with heightened spirituality
psychic abilities, you know, you gas. The concept of cyclical time is
mostly found when it comes to ancient text in Mahabarata, which is also one
of the oldest and longest epics of all time. And in Maha Barata there
is a mention of those yugas and according to spiritual principles. But also there
are in other parts not mentioning, you gas, there are mentions that you
know, during those battles of Kurukshetra and stuff like that, people used psychic
abilities. We have for instance, I think Sanjaya, who was you know,
like psychic, psychically giving you know, messages maybe according to telepathy or
something like that, messages to a person who was physically blind, so you
know, he was like showing him his point of view, you know,
maybe telepathically to his mind. So in Mahabarata we have a lot of information
about psychic abilities, you know, and spiritual phenomena, and exactly in you
gas, in the Great Krita or Satiya Yoga, depending on the text we've
got mentioned that you know, the dharmass or what is right, the righteousness
is heightened full, everyone is spiritual, there is no there is no harm
being made, and stuff like that. So it may be that it is
a discret when it comes to all those lost civilizations and their advancement. Maybe
it is all about you know, their personal their spiritual level of advancement,
not you know, materialistic technology and stuff like that. But maybe now those
civilizations incorporated both spiritual and material. And actually I'm in my future books and
of course in future you know videos, interviews and stuff like that, you
know, talking a lot about the concept of the material age, because the
description of the Caliuga, the worst of the ages, is very similar to
the Fall of Atlanta, is because in Atlantis people were starting to be animalistic,
animal like, and Caloryuga is all about, you know, being cut
off from spirituality, which is mentioned is it is only then in Caluga in
one fourth, so a quarter of overall spirituality of humanity, and then people
are you know, cap off of spirituality and descend into the material realm.
Fully they are like immense in matters. So I think that it is a
good parallel between Maha Baratta and Plato's dialogue stimizing critics which are telling us about
the full of Atlantis. And we may say that, oh, maybe nowadays
we are in the Calijuga or something like that, but it is cyclical.
It may be that it was a previous cycle or something like that. Do
you think there's going to be a point where our current technology can develop scanning
tools and other devices that detect the earlier epics technology? In other words,
you bring up ball back the gigantic stone work there. You talk about the
Great Pyramid and other monolithic stone works that are just impossible for us to consider.
But I would think, and I'm curious about your thoughts on that,
for our scientists to validate it using our scientific method of evaluation, would we
have to develop some science to detect this earlier people. M I think that
it is hard, but you know, we may come full to some science
fiction and imaginary ideas of those technology. Like when it comes to cutting the
stone, we may, you know, we cannot date the stones themselves,
but maybe we will be able, you know, to tell at what age
it was cut, you know, because some stones are polish, some stones
are cut off. But I think it would be really hard and maybe not
maybe even impossible, because when it comes to the stones, you know,
stones are millions or even tens of millions or even more years old, because
these are just natural rocks, natural formations, so we could only you know,
date them by some other methods. As I mentioned, when it was
cut, which is hard to tell because maybe it was later cut again.
You know, howe everything happens in our reality and when it comes you know,
to the sides, for instance, dating of gobekly tape and sites like
that. We only know the dates of birds because the rather carbon dating was
found when it was buried, when the organic material was actually covered, when
it was covered with organic materials. So I think that today this town,
it would be almost impossible. There are some science fiction concepts of like maybe
time travel or by some I don't know, electrons or some other particles showing
us how or past really happened, but I think that these are even not
realistic for the future fifty years, so it would be hard. What do
you think are some really good examples of the previous epoch. I mean,
I've been to Egypt, I've seen the Great Cufu Pyramid. I think that's
a anomaly that cannot be explained through dynastic pharaohs. But if you were to
give some examples of previous epoch buildings, structures, artifacts, what would you
say, are like your top five mm hmm, is I think that the
best things will are still waiting to be uncovered for sure. Maybe you know
on the depths of the Atlantic Ocean where maybe Atlantis was found and stuff like
that. But I'm thinking like that the premit is a huge anomaly, but
it is more of an anomaly when it the most of an anomaly when it
comes to the knowledge that is hidden within it. You know, the number
Pi, the Golden ration, number five. You know. I think that
there aren't coded even the measures of the earth. And I actually because I
was in my high school just after publishing my book, I was finishing my
high school, so I had an essay for a history class about two two
hundred words, and I investigated the prehistoric measures of the earth before let's say,
the Erato Stenus of Syreen. And it may be that we have an
even ancients so or ses that are telling us that measures of the earth were
encoded in the Great Perramit of Giza. There is a lot of things and
mysteries. And you know, because when it comes to those measures of the
Earth in the Great Pyramid, plenty of skeptics are telling us that we find
it because we think that it is like that that you know, it is
a wishful thinking that it is just a number. You know, there are
telling us stories like that. But the investigations into the measures of the Earth
encoded in the Great Parent goes much further because there are a few Greek sources
that are telling us that ancient Egyptians encoded the measures of the Earth. And
what is more interesting is that in one case I found that there was like
a puzzle converting the you know, the side length of the Great pyramed to
the earth measures. And when we calculate this mystery using nowadays all of the
data that we have no nowadays, it clearly says within I think ninety seven
percent that there are encoded according to this ancient story, I think it was
from one hundred or something BC. It is a more accurate representation of the
measures of the Earth than you know, the first Eratostenus of Syrene, who
was to be first to measure the earth between you know, Alexandra and sin
and actually plenty of people believe that he wasn't the first even do you know
first atheist of our current eural let's say it was a famous mathematician from the
Napoleonic times pires in Montola place he mentioned I have a quote even I think
in my book, I have this quote that he mentions that Eratostenus of Syrene
re examined all the measures of the earth. He just you know, he
just made an experiment proving that these are the measures of the earth. And
there were plenty of other people like Isaac Newton who believed the same. So
it is a hole long investigation. And I think that you know, in
the age of in Cubit and in the Great Primit itself, there isn't called
that the measure of the measure of the earth. And even you know,
when it comes to those maybe some more esoteric sources like you know Edgar Casey
or other that you know, great Print of Giza was built by Toath.
One of the one of the nicknames of Toath was actually the measure of the
Earth. So is it a marco incidence that he had a nickname measure of
the Earth and for instance, according to Arab chroniclers from the medieval times,
they found a local law that it was Sourid, who they identified with Toath,
that built the Pyramit of Giza, the Great print of Giza, because
he wanted to hide knowledge and artifacts, because he had a dream that there
will be a great deluge that will destroy all the earth. So right there
are you saying, thought was the one who who designed and built the great
pyramid. It may be, and as I mentioned, it connects the medieval
lore, these legends of Saurid, who even Arabs were telling was most probably
the god of wisdom Tooth. Also it is connected to the hermetic law,
maybe not the text themselves, but there is, you know, there are
some hermetic legends that it was Tooth who build the pyramds of Giza. And
also it connects with the measures of the earth that can be found within the
Great Pyramit and also all other knowledge, because for instance, Arab chronicler is
mentioned that Tooth encoded knowledge. There was a mention of some artifacts that were,
you know, some weapons that cannot rust or you know, some vendable
glass stuff like that. But it may be also true because you know,
we found permit empty. We didn't find any anyone in the pyramid. When
it comes to the South caphagus, of course, and also when it comes
to some research on the pyramit energy energy of the pyramids, like of course
called the ball experiments with razor sharping and other they may corroborate to those Arab
legends for instance, of metals that were not trusting at all for thousands of
years. And you know, Carl Derval, for instance, was of an
opinion that, you know, the Great Point of Giza enables a long lasting
razor blades. So these are some maybe not direct evidence, but these are
some correlations that I think there is too many of them to think that these
are just you know, mer correlations and meherts and chronicities of coincidences. Well
that's I mean, the Great Pyramid is real nomally, I mean, it's
just phenomenon. But if you were to choose another known either facility or artifact
that you believe crosses the boundaries from current history into prediluvian or pre flood history,
what would you say is a great example. I would say it is
I would say, collectively the prehistoric megaloetic architecture that we find in Cusco.
In Peru, the Holy you know Peru and Ants are full of those no
polygonal walls, but we find I think, almost the same ones in Egypt,
even I think in the Mankara Pyramid, at the bottom of the Mancara
Pyramid. If I was to take a picture from there and from Cusco and
maybe give you no color because of course the pyramed blocks are no brighter than
those from Cusco, and I will give you two photos. I think that
you wouldn't be. It wouldn't be that is to distinguish it. Yeah,
you're right, there are the same blocks and also similar or maybe not exactly
the same, for instance, in Osiraean in Egypt. You know, in
this you are you know a lot about Egypt, so of course you know,
and Azureana is of course a little bit lower than you know, the
main ground when it comes to Egyptian facilities. And also you know, I
think there's a similarity between between the Oserine which is underground, and all of
the underground tunnels in Cusco with all those megalithic walls inside of them too.
And you know, similar blocks with I found a specific knobs in them can
be found of course in the Far East, you know some China yang Shan
something like that, and also in Japan. But similar blocks can be also
found in Greece, and I found out in a textbook about the Greek architecture
that even in the Greek archaeology, these are considered to be the oldest,
just as in the case in Peru. In ants, when we have this
foundation from those huge megalithic blocks, then we have like some middlestone, and
then we have some kritztone above it. So this is another I think,
and as I mentioned to say, global thing that may point to maybe pre
di elevant roots or maybe some you know, maybe after the flat civilization that
you know was rebuilding, we did not know much about them. But I
think you know all of those for instance in Cusco polygonal walls with all of
those unnecessary angles, because sometimes there's I think twelve forty for twenty something angles
within those blocks. It's all unnecessary and maybe to us you know something about
the architecture and looks, but I think that it is something more than that.
Fascinating. Every generation has their seers and their unique psychics. When you
start bringing forth the data from Eggar Casey a lot of people discount his work
because he is leaving his body and doing something that we don't understand, which
is tapping into what I can only consider a cloud database, right, and
we now know this cloud is as the Akashik records, right, which is
a library of everything that's happened in the past, present, in the future.
How do we just to find the data from an aggre Casey about the
ancient past? I mentioned Edgar Casey in my book only a few times.
I'm not focusing in my book as I think you read. I'm mostly mentioning
about you know, the historic card, hard based materialistic evidence. But you
know, the main thing why science is ignoring such accounts like Edgar Casey or
some metaphysical channeling stuff is because, and I disagree with this, within this
scientific method is one core assumption. You know, there are some assumptions in
every kind of thinking. This is philosophical. You know, in order to
think, you have first to accept that thinking even exists, or in order
to find something you know outside, you have to admit that you know everything
of this exists, you know, this specie, this camera, this desk,
because you know, how can you think and find evidence if you do
not assume that things exist. So these are you know, basic assumptions that
things exist that you know of thinking that also is and stuff like that.
But science has a one core assumption that I do not agree with, and
I think that is completely making us in a bubble or even in a prison
when it comes to gaining knowledge. Which is that? And it is about
like this, everything is only matter and its interactions. This is one of
core assumptions. And I ask myself, if I was trying to find the
true of reality of how the universe works, should I only be telling,
for instance, I was going to divorce only dark trees exist and white or
you know, light trees did not exist? Of course not I would you
know, as made some even more basic assumption for instance, things exist,
And this is one of the core assumptions of science, which you know,
is against any psychic channeling, reincarnation and stuff like that. And I disagree
with it, and I think that it is limiting and it is making the
material ballistic science and all of the materialists that believe that only matter exists.
It makes them actually having a monopoly over all the knowledge and everyone who is
seeking knowledge in other places like non physical non material are you know Soudo science
sciences or our hoaxes, you know, or some gurus charlatans. And I
think that it that this thing should be changed, that we should assume that
you know, everything just is, and I don't know if it's only black
or white. You know, it's like, as I mentioned, using the
data to correlate other data. It's another way to anchor data. And then
you could use cases material and say, okay, he's talking about Atlantis,
this other research is saying something similar. So it all kind of correlates,
is that what you're referencing right, Yeah, to some extent, But I'm
refersing to this problem, you know, to the bigger problem of all of
not on concerning Atlantis, but concerning all of the metaphysical stuff, that even
if we have everything, when it comes to science, it will always be
only about matter and everything beyond that will be non existent to it. Actually,
So it's like you know, being in a bubble and you know,
making ourselves smaller and not going outside of it. And it is the same.
I think that it is, you know, like some mental not issue,
but you know mental thing, because skeptics have the same. Let's say,
type of the problem because they are saying that they only accept things that
are provided with the hard evidence, and they do not accept speculation. But
it is like being always within the comfort zone with comfortable what we know and
not going exploring into the unknown, which is actually also portrayed by I think
almost any myth of our ancient ancestors of the hero journey that you know,
hero is within some some known word, within some like asshole or some city
or some kingdom, and he goes into a journey into unknown, even epic
of Gilgamagh. He goes into the unknown and faces like Humbaba and some other
monsters. You know, he faces the unknown to come back with more knowledge.
And this is how the conscious exploration and gaining of knowledge is all about.
But when we think of the materialistic assumption, it is like I won't
go into the unknown, No, I have everything. Yeah, it is
a bigger issue than the issue of Atlantis itself, but it connects with Atlantis
because you know, then Edgar case is Charlotte and nothing more. Because we
do not accept anything that is non material, and we cannot, in the
material sense explain how Casey has his information. Yeah, we can't look at
the spiritual side of things, even though the previous epoch was very spiritual,
very highly spiritual. Who can to take a short commercial break to allow our
spat is to identify themselves, and we will return shortly with my guest today,
Alexshkovic, talking to us about his latest book, Deja Vu, Has
Everything Already Been? And he's coming to us today from Poland. We'll be
right back. My guest today is Alexshkevich, who has written a new book
called Deja Vu, Has Every Already Been? And he's looking at a number
of curiosities evidence of an earlier civilization that left their mark in temples, pyramids,
buildings and strange artifacts around the world. I want to talk about a
theory that you came up with that was fascinating to me, in your belief
that possibly Atlantis was in Central America. And you describe Mexico City, which
is the ancient Tinoi Nichian, the Aztec city, and there is evidence for
this because there's canals and other waterways that Plato describes that may fit perfectly with
that. So talk a little bit about that. I thought that was a
real fascinating theory. Yes, I did not say that the Atlantis is Tenochtitlan,
and I do not say that it was in the Central America, but
I say that the Aztecs had a myth of as Land, which is of
course similar asland Atlantis. You know, Atla in their language means water,
so Alan Atlantis I think may be the same civilization. And they mentioned that
it was a white land, so I don't know, maybe like some theories
of Antarctica being the Atlantis Adsland, but you know, it doesn't matter.
But they have a memory of Adsland, lost land that was sunken, and
you know, they came from this land, and they say that they created
their Tenaitland, their capital, as you mentioned, it is almost the same
like the city of Atlantis. And they say they that they built the Tenatatland
to look like their previous as Land. So it is like, you know,
the people from Atlantis rebuilt their Atlantis again. And as as you mentioned,
there are plenty of similarities because Atlantis was of course an island. It
was of water, there were those canals, there was you know, the
major temple of Poseidon, there were different dykes and stuff like that, and
Tenochtitland when Aztecs found it was almost the same, but it wasn't maybe you
know, exactly circular, but it had those canals. It was a complex
of artificial islands of a huge lake tex Coco. And in the middle it
had Temple mayor So, a great big temple, major temple. So there
are those things. Are things are too much in order to dismiss them.
And I don't think thatland was exactly Atlantis, but that aspects were telling us
the truth that they created tenattland that looked like they previous civilizations, civilization of
Atlanta, Atlantis. And if we have like a historical data that Tenochtitlan really
looked like this and it is similar to Atlantis, we may assume that their
Acelan was actually Atlantis. Yeah, I couldn't believe that comparison, because there
are a lot of great similarities there. The other thing that you bring up
that I see a lot in my travels is these what are considered the handbags,
and we call them the pre Deluvian handbags. Nobody knows what they are.
I have seen them in Egyptian museums, I've seen them in Mexican museums.
They're found in Mexico, Mesopotamia, different parts of Turkey. You suggest
that they could have been post flood data banks that these guys were carrying.
Give us some more information about that. Yes. I recently, when I
gave the first screenshots of my book of the new edition, because I was
making new addition in Polish, I had, you know, like some skeptical
comments that while these are you know, people discovered that, you know,
those bags, they said that they were water buckets. You know, of
course water buckets were everywhere and most proudly the same look. But I think
that it is more than that, because you know, if it were just
as they mentioned, you know, water buckets that everyone used all over the
world, and it is just a water bucket. First, they wouldn't be
connected with some like very important people or very important like frescoes and stuff like
that, because often they are not with ordinary people. It isn't that ordinary
men is you know, having this handbag, but it is you know,
either the Anunaky, those genies of Mesopotamia or some other beings are held in
them. Or when it comes to the Mexico, we've got those huge Atlantas
at Tula. They are also not casual people like casual farmers and stuff like
that. And also I think that these inscriptions from all over the world are
too similar. You know, in one, let's say, in Mesopotama,
if it was just a water bucket, like skeptics are telling, if it
was just a water bucket, those water buckets will be different. And you
know their properties, you know, their proportions are almost the same. They're
looking the same. And even for instance, in one on one of the
pillars of Gobecle tape, no one is holding this bag, but the motive
of the bag is present there. So you know why you should put water
buckets just you know, as a fresco or as some ornament. You know,
it's saving a stupid idea. You know, there are two similar to
each other. As I mentioned, they are similar even in shape. You
know, one would be like oval, one would be like that. And
there are almost the same wherever we happen to see them. So I think
it is more than that. Of course, we did not know what they
were exactly, but maybe there are you know, there are mentions all over
the word of some teachers of mankind. I also mention a lot of them
in my book, and I think that these are you know, if we
are talking about the teachers of mankind who are bringing civilization. This may be
a symbol maybe of knowledge, maybe of some gifts or anything that they were
bringing with themselves. Maybe this is this predaiving knowledge that they were to preserve.
So they taken those bags or anything with them, you know, because
they were preserving knowledge. And for instance, one of those handbags is in
the hand of Oannes, who was one of the seven Abcalus seven stages of
ancient Mesopotamia, who was to be taken onto the arc with the main hero,
whether it was Zusudra or Atrajazis, and he was taken onto the ark
in order to preserve knowledge. Yes, so I think that it is not
coincidential that, you know, we find them all over the world. Maybe
those people were carrying those bags and teaching mankind all over the world how to
create civilization. So I think it is connected with the teachers of mankind specifically.
I think that's very cool explanation. The other thing that I would love,
I just don't think we're have evolved far enough in our sciences if we
could scan these bags. I've seen a couple in the National Museum in Mexico
City. They're intricately carved, beautifully carved their stone though they're granite or stone
carvings, and I think they've been embedded with some kind of an energy.
And i'd like you to talk a little bit about and you write about this
geomagnetic energies, tolluric fields that run through a lot of these ancient sites and
the previous epochs use of these sciences. But I think that these energies are
to a large extent nonphysical. That's why it would be hard for science to
actually measure it. There are some indications that it may be but to a
little extent electromagnetic in origin, but we do not know much about it.
It is hard to measure them correctly with you know, scientific apparatus. And
I think that there are more of non physical energies. And on a side
note, I am to some extent psychic. I sometimes see some energies and
I think that you know, these energies are connected to spirituality, to non
physicality, and that's why they were concerned with those previous ages. Maybe those
people from Atlantis, from most civilizations, from those spiritual golden ages of critics
at ye Yoga, maybe they were so psychic that you know, they saw
those energies in their everyday lives, and that's why they, you know,
set some temples or megalais in specific places all over the world according to what
we call the lay lines right now. But this knowledge was much older.
In China, they are called lung Mai, the dragon paths. So there
was this knowledge and it was connected actually with those non physical energies, because
it was connected to feng shui, and feng shui is all about no placing
as stone here as stone there, in order to have a balanced garden.
But our ancient ancestors knew something more than we do. They knew about balance,
and maybe they knew about those psychic energies because they mentioned that you cannot
place a building here because it may collapse in the future. Because there were
some energies there. Maybe it was you know, not harmonious to put something
there. That's why you know, I mentioned feng shua and all of those
lay lines, and that's why, for instance, plenty of Catholic charges in
the medieval times were set on the previous pagan foundations, on previous pagan stones,
even in Cusco, one of the main chapel. I think it's chapel
or charge is put on those megalithic great walls, and within it there are
even more of those megalithic polygonal walls. So I think that it is about
you know, some maybe spiritual kind of energies. And that's why I think
it connects with the pre dialogant times during which people were much more intuitive,
much more psychic. And I think that it connects also to the lay lines.
Another possibility that I explain my book is the theory, but it is
only a theory. We do not have much evidence for it. We do
have, but you know, it isn't like legitimately one hundred percent. You
know, credible idea is from Russian scientists that the interior of our planet is
a giant crystal. And if it was a crystal, there are several indications
like delay lines and the position of those megalis that can be you know,
within the platonic solids, which are those polyhedra like tetrahedron like cube and also
icosahedron and thodecahedron. And it's interesting because Russian scientists proposed adecahedron, so it
would have twelve sides and twelve points apexes and when it comes I found and
it's very interesting. In Plato's dialogue, I think it was Fato, but
I have a quote in my book, so don't worry. In Fato,
Plato is telling us because there is Fato, there is Phydros. So these
are similar. So I mess with them sometimes. But when it comes to
this one dialogue, there is a mention in Plato that Earth, if seen
from above, is like a giant twelve sided ball, like you know,
ball, like football ball, you know what I mean. So it is
like a this crystal that Russians we're talking about, which has twelve sides,
you know, twelve sides on a ball. Assume that it is a polyhedron,
so it has equal sites, equal angles, so it is one of
the platonic solids. So it may be that our plant is a huge do
dicahedron that has accumulated tons of soil and looks, you know, like a
spherical It has a spherical, let's say shape. But we have some evidence
that other planets and objects from our solar system, including some moons, may
also have platonic those platonic solids within them. For instance, we know that
Jupiter is a gazous giant. So it is, you know, just made
out of gas, and we do not know what hides inside because there are
so many thick layers of those gases. We do not know if it is
entirely made out of gases or maybe it has like some minor rock inside of
it and gases all around. But you know, those gases behave in such
a way. There are like winds in those gases that may point that some
platonic solids. I don't remember which one, because there are five platonic solid
that a lot of excelt like a crystal shape, maybe inside the Jupiter and
also within a few moons from the Solar System. So it's a very interesting
concept. Maybe you know, our entire universe is geometric, it's no hormonious
who knows, And maybe our planet's interior is really a crystal, but maybe
it is just those sleigh lines are only some metaphysical energies. Wow, as
we come down to it, Alex, you I want to spend a few
minutes on the Mahabarata, which is a fascinating story. You bring it up
quite a bit. There's a great deal of confusion, and this is supposed
to be the great war for the planet Earth, and in the story,
which is ancient and handed down thousands of years, apparently this war happened around
five thousand years ago. But it doesn't seem possible given that the text within
the Mahabarata describes very very advanced technology like the Vermonas and other craft and powerful
weapons that can lay wasted thousands of soldiers. So how do you interpret the
Mahabarata based on your research? You know, Mahabarata is really hard. You
even can't have a full unabridged version. Even the most full versions are abridged
by scholars because it would take like several volumes like that to have full Because
I calculated it once, I've got like this huge book that it is very
detailed, so it doesn't have so many like mistakes, I think, And
it is by of course a scholar. It is from pingin classics. But
when it comes to Mahabarata, something that it is like a fery saying like
nowadays you have Star Wars, and some one thousand years from now, it
interprets Star Wars as real history. So skeptics say like that, but we
do not know when the world of Mahabarata happened, we have only we do
not have exact dates, but we have one date in Mahabarata, which is
the Great flood and Caluga, which interestingly happened on the eighteenth of February three
thousand, one hundred oh two. So it was like we mentioned first civilizations
three thousand, one hundred years and before that there was, according to Mahabarata,
a great flood and the Caliyuga, the Dark Age happened to start.
So it is I think a cool coincidence that the first civilizations appeared exactly almost
at the same date. But when it comes to the battle itself and other
stuff, there is no date to that. And there are some interpreters I
mentioned them in my book that say that Mahabarata, that events from Mahabarata are,
according to astrological phenomena described in Mahabarata from about thirty thousand BC thirty maybe
twenty eight thousand BC, which would be I think much more realistic. And
Mahabarata mentions in you said huge wars technology and it mentioned a very exact number
of people, which is more than billion, that died at the battle of
Kurukshetra. So imagine like one seventh of the f's population dying at a single
battle, and some people exactly some people say that that's why it's say fairy
tale, and you know people were exaggerating everything, but you know, who
knows what the word looked like, like thirty forty or twenty thousand, YESBC.
Some people say that we do not have genetic evidence that such a huge
number of people existed during those epochs, because there are some methods of geneticists
to calculate those. But you know, several different things are accepted than are
being changed, so maybe in ten years it will be that maybe there was
such a huge number of people. So we do not know. I think
that Mahabarata may incorporate some true knowledge with some fiction or maybe, and it
is a cool explanation. When it comes to those spiritual Atlantists and those ages
which are the best I think described the best in the Mahabarata in no other
ancient or medieval Hindu text, those you guys are not described in my opinion
that specific, and that I think connecting Atlantis and other lost history tails.
But when it comes to Mahabarata. I have also another thing that those huge
numbers and of those weapons may be connected to what I mentioned about psychic because
there is at least one or two mentions of true psychic abilities in Mahabarata that
I found that are psychic. No technology for sure. So it may be
that Mahabarata is telling us about maybe some astral battles, you know, some
maybe different dimensions, you know, coming together. We do not know if
you were right now to like open to all the psychic crowns of angels,
extraterrestrials and all of the stuff that people are talking about. Who knows if
there isn't plenty of other beings fighting at the same time. You know,
even in Europe there is a huge amount of flaw and also in Native Americans
about entities that are all the time within us, but we do not see
them like some elves, like some gnomes, like some spirits and stuff like
that. So it may be that Mahabarata may be a true like history,
but maybe including those things of non physical origin. And it may be connected
of course to Native Americans for telling that they sometimes see things that normal human
beings do not see, and it may be connected to the fall of Atlantis,
when people started to be so animalistic, so immersed in MATTERI that they
forgot their divine origin. My guess has been Alex Cheshikovic, and the book
he has written is called Deja Vu? Has everything already been in search of
previous last civilizations? And you got to get this book, my friends.
It is a pack full of really really good data, very original thinking,
which I personally appreciate. And as we conclude, Alex talk a little bit
about the extraterrestrial connection, which apparently plays out in some ancient history and the
Maya that I study do talk about star people, but the whole ancient alien
tag on a lot of these unusual anomalies, be it the Great Pyramid,
be it the ballboch massive stonework is easily considered et because we can't explain it.
But in your research, do the etes fall in the place? I
think, and it is in the line of spiritual lost civilizations, but not
only spiritual. I think that most, like about eighty percent of itties may
be of non physical origins. And I think that these are the entities,
the aliens that we have the most evidence for. For instance, we have
ayahuasca, and we have plenty of anthropologists who studied that people who drunk ay
aquasca are really experiencing some non physical beings that are teaching them some things,
you know, they are telling them the stuff about the universe and stuff like
that, which in my opinion isn't of course the imagination, but maybe some
non physical beings, maybe some that are everywhere, you know, around us,
but we do not see them. And as I mentioned, there is
the most evidence for those non physical eaties, but of course it doesn't exclude
the possibility of physical aliens. As I mentioned, I think that vimanas may
have been really physical, you know, flying machines, not some like some
people mentioned, metaphysical. I do not know for sure, but I think
also that those spiritual no spirituals, no non physical entities, do not exclude
true aliens. But we do not have that much evidence for physical aliens that
we have for non physical alience. Even nowadays, with all of those channelings
and people who are meeting itties in their dreams and stuff like that, it
seems like this is all maybe on another density or something or things like that.
And when it comes also to evidence, the aya aquaska is one of
the best evidence because ay aquasca is a mixture of plenty different herbs, different
plants, and some of them are processed, some of them are cooked and
stuff like that, and some not. And researchers found that you just exclude
one or two things of the recipe, and iowaska do not work, and
you just maybe do not exclude some plant but maybe kukwan and not another.
And also this recipe doesn't work. So I think that also some teachers of
mankind so were of course physical with those handbags, but some teachers of mankind
may be not with the atlantis, maybe even from previous times when people started
to exist. I think that maybe those teachers who are non physical and who
are teaching people. And this in connection, for instance, with plenty of
tales about God's who are considered to be aliens by the ancient alience community.
For instance, in Plutar's Dialogue or Treaty on Isis and Oisiris, there say
mentioned that Osiris came to Egypt in distant per history, and so people so
primitive that they were eating each other. So he taught them how to not
eat each other, that you shouldn't be a cannibal and he taught them,
you know, basic stuff. So it may be that the stale of Osiris
is even before the times of Lost civilizations, when humanity was really in a
very primitive state, maybe even home in its state. And maybe it is
a stone ape theory that we evolved because of the hallocin organic maybe mushrooms may
be things like ay aquasca, and because of that we became anatomically modern humans
with all of the advanced possibilities. So it may be that not only those
non physical aliens who were helping us with our development, but also those hallo
snorganic materials themselves. So this is my take on alience, which do not
exclude physical alience of course, But I think, as I mentioned, my
first book is really evidence base, and I think that we have much more
evidence, even for Edgar Casey's stuff than for the true physical aliens that,
for instance, build the pyramids. Ah, So have you taken ayahuasca?
No? No, no, But I'm very spiritual. I had, I
used to offer and have prophetic dreams, and I am you know, I'm
not a materialist, so I am you know, I'm open minded, and
I think that if things that were so unnatural, according to this materialistic scientific
point of view, happened to me. So I think that you know,
of course aliens or some other beings could also happen to other people. You
know, it's funny you didn't mention the Ananachi, which people like zacharaiz Sinchion,
which you actually have in your book in many places, developed his career
around and here we have dates of four hundred thousand years and then creating the
atom. And you know Sitchen, you you speak of him very highly.
Do you believe that Sitchen interpreted the cuneiforms, the Sumerian cuniforms correctly, because
there's a lot of people who feel that he misinterpreted them and that his stories
of aliens is kind of far fetch. What do you say I think of
sitching in fifty to fifty or even forty to sixty. Actually, I don't
highly estimate him. And even in my book, I when it comes to
the cycles of time which may be connected to a binary star, like we
have sun and a binary star. Our solar system may be binary. I
found out many critics like Michael Heiser that pointed out that Sitchin's version and vision
of Neiberu most likely it's not about additional plant, but maybe a star.
And you know, it was one of the count arguments against Zachariah Sitchin,
So it may be that I think that's sitch A mistranslated in many cases.
But in some cases, of course he was to some extent write as I
mentioned, fifty to fifty, maybe forty sixty. But I think that plenty
of things about the Annaki, and I read both both such and both academic
works. The truth when it comes to modern law like Facebook groups or some
like low level researchers that are talking about the anonarchis the Anonachy thing is somewhere
between like fifty to fifty, because for sure we've got anunak, we've got
tastes of different gods in the true texts from ancient Mesopotamia. But to some
extent, in not one but a few cases, Sitching, of course,
miss may be misinterpreted, may be mistranslated those texts. So I don't think
that the career citying was one hundred percent right. I am like on defense
with him. I do not critique him that he was like hoaxer lawyer and
stuff like that. No, I'm not of that opinion. But I think
that he isn't telling as the whole truth. And maybe I even found out.
I used to have a video about it, but it was like so
reported so many times that I had to delete it. It was about Sitchins
connections with Freemasonry and secret societies. So it may be a conspiracy stuff.
Maybe you know, Sitchens was put to the public, that's why he became.
It's a conspiracy here, of course, but maybe he was put there,
you know, with all of those best sellers of order to create a
narrative for people to believe. Because his version of Annaki is I think negative
that we are most likely prisonmen. We were created the Adam was created to
work for the gods. So it is a negative way of thinking about humans,
that we are just slaves. And it may be connected because I know
plenty of people in our niche that are thinking very negative that we are just
slaves, and that creates hopelessness. Really that creaks in many people's lives,
hopelessness. So this may be this part lack of massive, massive pig hope,
you know what I mean. Yeah, that's their last question. So
you know, I have a lot of friends who are archaeologists and anthropologists,
and you know, you have to wonder when they begin to cross over and
begin looking at some of the theories that are considered pseudo science or pseudo history.
Their reluctance to go back into deep time periods over a couple of thousand
years is a real challenge for them. And I don't see it changing anytime
soon. Is it your belief that we're going to have to have some major
discoveries in the form of perhaps early technology or documents or somebody like Irving Finkel
breaks down a cuneiform and all of a sudden he reads the text of an
ancient king who built the pyramid? Or what do you say? What do
you say? Because it's really a challenge to hear from academia. I mean,
when Graham Hancock did his Ancient Apocalypse series, the archaeological community in the
United States wrote a real scathing letter to him and said, how dare you
tell us that we don't have it right? Yes, it is. I
mentioned it is a bigger problem. It is like an archetype. You know,
we've got archetypes like father archetype, like a wise man archetype, and
it is not archetype correctly speaking, but some kind of this type, which
is manifesting on many, many levels. You know, one level of manifestation
is closing to any non physical stuff in the scientific dogma, because it is
dogma because if science was just you know, a free endeavor in order to
find knowledge, it wouldn't assume that only matter and its interaction exists, you
know what I mean. So it is on this level and on another level.
These are the skeptics who constantly repeat, like part after Carl Sagan,
that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and we do not have extraordinary evidence,
so everything is hoaxed. But you know it is lack of imagination. You
know, our history may have happened in another way, but you know,
we do not have evidence, so we only accept what we have evidence for.
But I mentioned we didn't have any evidence for Summer and we excluded Sumer,
so maybe we do not have evidence yet for Atlantis proper atlantis. We
exclude Atlantis. But why go and fight like Graham Hancock, like fight other
people who are just you know, speculating, who have open minds, who
are showing us that you know, there's a huge potential maybe something happened in
a different way in cases when we do not have enough explanation, like for
all of the animalists that we mentioned, and you know these people. I
often say that the truth will always win, you know, even if you
will try to hire it, if you even if you will try to lie,
most of the times, the truth always will be found, maybe after
many years. So if scientists believe that they know the truth, and we
as the sciences are wrong, why are they fighting with us? If their
dogma is full and everything about our history, leave us alone. You know,
we are not dangerous, We are not we're threatening them. I think
that they know a lot of these guys know that they're guessing. It's been
fun. It's been fun to have you. We're gonna have to have you
back. I you have so much packed into this book. Tell how people
can tell people us about how people can get hold of you. We know
that your book is on Amazon, but yes, what other what's your website?
Give us your website? My website is just give you the global dot
com. So probably you will have to put copy paste. I'll put it
on. I'll put it on our thank you because it's always I was at
a radio station with about three million listens, but no one checked me out
because no one could respel my surname unfortunately, so this is a but I
think. But no, don't worry, Alexander, JUSTKEIVI. You can find
me on Facebook, YouTube and my book. You can just type Asia.
He has everything already be on Amazon in the USA, in UK, Europe
and many other places on the entire world, and also my website which will
be lined Okay, perfect, fantastic. Hey, this is great stuff.
I really enjoyed reading your book. I'm not done with it obviously. Uh.
And you say you're working on some other books, so we'll look forward
to seeing those any dates coming up in minor. Is it one of those
slow builds kind of situation. No, I am at the different type of
writer I can, you know, under like conscious something. I can write
like half or three words of a book on like in the week or something,
and then I have like months or something without writing. But I think
this year I will publish the next one or maybe even too in Polish for
sure, but maybe I will try by the end of this year to translate
because it also takes time into English, because I will be mainly probably,
but I don't know, maybe writing Polish. Maybe in English, but at
least one book in one language this year. Fantastic. Hey, uh,
great book and really enjoying speaking with you. Let's have you back. Thank
you for having me on. I want to mention that if you are new
to this entire paradigm of scientific evidence and material based on ancient, unknown civilizations,
which is what Earth Ancients is trying to put his finger on, this
is a good primer. Alex has done a really good job of writing in
referencing many of the people we have on the show, notably people like Graham
Hancock, goes back to John Anthony West. The list goes on and on
and on, Freddy Silva, Hugh Newman, a lot of people are referenced
in The writing is very compelling to it. I was really surprised. I
wondered if he used an editing tool, and I think he probably did,
But it doesn't matter. It's very readable, it runs very quickly, and
he's got excellent references. He's got a lot of very very good graphs and
photographs. The writing is good and it flows, and that's really a critical
part of being a compelling writer. And he's in the middle of another book
or two. I think he said, so we should expect more from him.
I'm gonna have Alex back to talk about specific chapters, probably in the
summertime, because there's no way to get through the whole book. I in
the beginning, I said three hundred pages, more like four twenty four hundred
and twenty pages plus. And he's got a couple of issues that he brings
up, including the cartouche apparently Kufus cartouche that's inside the Great Pyramid, and
the story of Howard Weis who apparently planeted it in the late eighteen hundreds.
You know, this is a real concern, is the fact that if you
are locked in a paradigm that doesn't say you can go beyond ten thousand years
for mankind, a lot of weird and dangerous things can happen, like forging
cartoushes, which is what Howard Advice did. There's a lot of story about
people like Zahi l Wass and other Egyptian egyptologists covering up shafts under the pyramids
under the Sphinx and also claiming discoveries as their own. And this is a
continual problem. I talk a great deal about it whenever we go to Egypt.
It's just criminal that they don't use ground penetraian radar in and around noted
temples. And I always mention the Hathor Temple in the city of Dendera because
that temple sits on the columns of a much earlier temple. Well, what's
going to happen is when somebody figures it out and gets bright about it.
EI they're either going to do a light our scan. That's the other thing.
They haven't done any major light oar scans of any of the areas around
there. It's going to blow the whole lid off the whole place to be
able to contain it. But my point being is that there is evidence of
an earlier temple under Hathor that they will not allow to be scanned or excavated,
and it's just causing a great deal of havoc among independents. And that's
those are archaeologists as well as research investigators like myself. So what I'm trying
to say is that there is some evidence, and it's in Alex's book of
covering up data, squelching data, rejecting new data. And this has always
been a problem when it comes to science. Rejecting new ideas it's steeped.
This is a problem in archaeology, and it continues to be a problem.
And I've mentioned this many times. If you've heard doctor Kerry Cooney, who's
an Egyptologist from you see La here in California. When I first had her
on, she set it out right, Egyptology is dead. They're following outdated
systems, outdated modes. Same could be said for a lot of similar archaeology.
I bring this up in my book the Maya Controversy, that they are
not even working with the living Maya and they are guestimating dates, figures,
kings, queens, events. It's just mind blowing that we have to submit
to this, and it's taking a concerted effort to call these people out.
And this is what was fascinating in the letter written by the Association of American
Archaeologists to Graham Hancock and his making of the Ancient Apocalypse series on Netflix.
They were outraged that he would question their theories number one and number two.
They called him a racist and a bigot. And they need to look in
the mirror because it's my evidence and an evidence of a lot of people on
this program that the current crop of archaeologists who are been trained, and this
training goes back over one hundred and fifty years, are out of touch.
They're completely out of touch. And for us to get new data, for
us to understand where we came from, who our ancestors were, we have
to punch the We have to punch a hole in that hot air bag that
we call our history, because a good deal of it is simply guest work
hypothesis. They don't have the data. They're using comparative study, and a
great example is the Maya. They use the Romans as a comparative civilization because
they believe that the Romans lived around the same time as the As they are
actually dynastic Maya. But what they completely forget is there's a whole period that
is missing. Perhaps tens of thousands of years of Mayan culture are not being
identified because the Mayanists who are out excavating, the handful of academics who are
out doing this work are using outdated data. They're using data that's long long
gone, and so this is what we're dealing with. So anyhow, get
Alex's book Deja Vu. I'm going to post it on the Facebook page.
Also look for the graphics that I'm going to put on Facebook because they're kind
of cool, especially when it comes to Atlan and Atlantis, very very close
similarities in fascinating consideration. Hey, we do tours every year. They As
does the Grand Egyptian Tours coming up April twenty eighth through May ninth. That's
followed by a Turkey tour that it's going to be August fourteenth, of the
twenty fourth, and then we're also going to do the Ucatan Tour. I
haven't done it in like four years, and that's going to be November eighth
through the seventeenth. That's the Yucatan Peninsula where there's some of the most beautifully
constructed and complex Mayan ruins in the world, chichinitza ushmol Ekbalam lab Na.
There's just a ton of places we're going to go in a week. So
these are all priced for most budgets, they're all inclusive. For the most
part, all you gotta do is fly yourself to the locations. For more
information, go to earthasients dot com, forward slash Tours, click on the
banner you're interested in, and just know this. We do small groups twenties
of the average twenty people and that allows us to write one bus to get
the perspective of experts who we're with, and Egypt's gonna be Mohammed Embrium.
We're gonna have Mimo Gonzalez in Yucatan, Mexico Generational Tour Guide, and then
in Turkey, Mohammad will be joining us again with some other people who we
are going to add as we develop the program. For more information and to
register, go to Earth Ancients dot com, forward slash Tour. These are
the best ways to take a tour and they're also the most convenient because we
take care of you from start to finish. You'll love it, so consider
Earth Ancients Tours, Earth Ancients dot com Forward slash Tours. All right,
that's it for this program. I want to think my guest today Alexander Sheshkevich
coming to us from Poland and his new book is Deja Vu. Has everything
already been? And as always, my team of Ruth Thomas, Mark Foster
and everyone who makes this thing happen. You guys rock all right, take
care of be well and we'll talk to you next time.