Or O? Or? Or? Or? Or? Or? Or?
Okay? Yeah, please, that' s it. Now don' t
turn on my lusteren me I' ll learn my light. Welcome everyone who
' s coming here I' m going to my light, my light yaly,
it' s my light, my light and you' re absolutely right.
Whenever I think of light, I think of light. Ras The truth
is, yes, there, yes, he' s absolutely right. We
could tell her a lot of things, but she' s absolutely right.
Welcome from this Monday, June 10th. Thank you for being here, Thanks
to our moderators, Ahorita, is he and gentleman, thank you for being
here, for helping us, Thank you all are members of this channel.
Thanks I saw you Daniel, thanks Elie hear Angelo. This Friday we'
re having a show about the Eric series. We' re gonna be with
Juan and saltar talking about Eric, but, well, I' ll tell
you the schedule later and so on. But for you to have it ready,
it' s going to be very interesting. Sounds good, sounds good,
or yes, Dr Mel Sounds good. Today we have issues like here.
I got them. I have them here today We' re going to
talk about this Suarez lawsuit, with Hector Suarez, with Laura Zapata. We
have this Paco thing. To be in the interview with the actor who plays
Paco Estalle. It' s very interesting. The truth is quite interesting and
well, let' s talk. What he answers is that it was a
lawsuit and well, let' s talk, of course, also about RBD
and this pleitazo that brings no because it is already coming to Ephraim. Efrad
Baby arrived and already arrived has delay but already arrived welcome to Efrad Baby Hi
Girls, how nice to see you on this Monday, on this Monday,
Hey I was telling you that if we are going to talk, let'
s talk, let' s oxy Sars with the topic of the RBDs,
let' s start with that topic of the RBDs. And all this is
happening between them. And you know what I think is going on. And
you guys, well, you' ll tell me if you think the same
thing, but I don' t think you' re talking straight between them.
It seems to me or I' m wrong to see you tell us.
I don' t think they' re talking straight. But I also
think that much to my regret, because everyone knows that they love there has
not taken a clear stance. And I think there are moments of life in
which, with grief we have to be clear and direct and frontal. Those
blankets of being yes, not that they don' t, they don'
t put me in trouble. We already have a problem. Let' s
work on the problem, let' s face the problem, and I think
the trouble with your colleagues is the one there. He hasn' t put
out a clear stance, I mean, yes, but no, but no,
I mean, it suddenly seems like yes and then no longer, and
then yes and then no longer, of course and now no longer. He
liked it there because then, just as already, he does not have a
clear position, because neither will the others have it. Yeah, they kind
of talk in half. No, but the fact is that the real factor
is that a short stockings is a complete lie and when we let it be
seen it is diffusely, because it is already worth a hat, because we
are giving way to suspicion. I love to pay then that' s what
' s going on. Totally because, besides, their partners are looking angry.
Yeah, they' re going mad, I mean. I saw the
interview with the two of them and very prudent because they love her very much.
The two are Maite Perroni and Christian Chavez and Christian gum A have interviewed
them. Arriving at the airport, Christian looks a little more angry. No
and well, finally, when this gentleman stole everything from Christian from YouTube anahi
he didn' t say anything. We' re talking. This gentleman is
Mr Guillermo Rosas. Guillermo Rosas, that is, we already have antecedent that
there has been very much on the sidelines and I understand that we have to
be politically correct until wrong things happen. If you' re seeing someone doing
the wrong thing, what you have to do there. You' re the
wife of a governor. You are the wife of a person who is left
to the policy of a governor, that is, please, for ethics.
What I would have to do now is hold a stand and say I'
m with them or I' m with him, but it' s this
thing of wanting to be neutral. It looks ridiculous and I love nahi a
lot, uh, yes, that is I particularly love her, but she
looks ridiculous to the attitude and mite dogonis also looks reispidone already saying because we
did it very well until we did it very badly. Of course because,
besides, the story of us being robbed again, that is, it'
s very ugly to be robbed again. History repeats itself and now with the
people they thought they had to trust. This is how serious it is that
twenty years later he steals from someone who swore to them that it wasn'
t going to happen. And it' s very ugly that they give you
to tell them here don' t hit me because it hurts and then they
stick their finger in, because they do. That' s because they'
ll be robbed again. But a person who is with her friend because maybe
in the beginning, she was surprising. No, but this is already the
second time and almost in the same circumstances, not exactly, because in fact
I' m going to tell you one thing. In my opinion, I
think it' s even worse, because now you do talk. Let'
s say the word of a real fraud, that is, money theft.
Last time they saw their faces, they fought, they badly put together their
contract, they didn' t like it and everything. But here it is,
it' s something that you' re already adults. It' s
already a very important tour, there' s already a lot of money involved
and it must be gacho, no, but things are happening. It'
s been sent to me. It' s the picture, but already in
the afternoon the simi doctor turned out again so they are already, so things
are happening. Yeah, Mattel announced that there is, according to your doll
turn, things are happening, but I don' t think there' s
a tour again, that' s if things were the statements they said.
One of the things he did anahí, reacting about this, of the statements
of Miite Perroni and Christian Chavez, was to tweet and say they are pure
gossip, they are pure gossip and they have little practical memory. Something like
that. More words, more words, less, but it' s practically
what anahí says. So, then, tell your colleagues that they have put
in audits, that they feel disappointed, that they are pure gossip, because
they are not to be a father, no, and that they have a
bad memory, because it is well known to everyone that Maite Perroni in DRIRVD
for anahí, that is, Maite Perroni was recommended by Anai, as well
as Christian, because anahí saved him from a very unfortunate event, yes,
that is, and that is what the public was pointing there as an answer,
no or as support to naí because they do see that An There really
does have a great fandom and then they certainly put the memory thing. How
they can forget and talk about this thing you' re saying. How can
Christian forget, But as you say, it doesn' t say very clearly
what it is either, because you told us that it would rather seem that
she is saying that it is false that there has been a fraud where she
is involved and not necessarily that it is false what she said, for example,
in this case Christian, because Christian, because neither said anything, He
just said how you do look upset, but insisting a lot that the legal
will be dealt with in the corresponding spaces. I don' t have much
to say if we are brothers, if we have our chat our group,
where we communicate and we remain family in families there are problems. I don
' t know what it means. Everything like a vague little, makes no
concrete accusation and does not express itself directly on anahí in any sense. Not
then, as you say and as lupito says, because this leaves everything the
same and giving way to speculations, that this is the great thing of speculations
and I will tell them he told it to peace, because if someone walks
there, I sure am, but to me, as Fan and how they
fan there because as Lupita, I surely counted myself the man of anahí in
my heart. It disappoints me that I no longer have a real stance,
that is, it generates me, it breaks my heart as Fan, because
I want that I would expect her to have a position of forgiveness. He
won' t be too hard for her to go out directly and step up
a posture. Because I' m gonna tell you one thing. I think,
the position expected and here we go again, psychology of the masses.
The expected position is, therefore, that it is on the side of the
clear group and, therefore, against this person they accuse. But as it
is said, he has had or has a friendship with him. I think
his place is complicated. No, it' s complicated, but it is.
I think the Tweeth was super over. He wanted them to forget things.
I mean, that was no longer the case. Yes, because I
had helped with some things. But this is another issue. This is an
economic issue, It is a topic that has to do with the labor,
not with the personal, not with what you helped me here tell us the
chat, because yes, it is good person, as Angelo says, but
it is good person, nahi, but what you think it is here,
it is not good person, it is taking a position, it is to
commit to what you are going to commit because, besides that it is a
great project, that is that it is an important group, that moves masses,
they talk to each other we are brothers, they love us as brothers.
That' s how they define themselves. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
no, and that' s what by then, I mean, that they
forget things. It won' t be a subtle form of itself, taking
a then subtle stance against the group Yes, I see it as what it
is. I see it that way it counts as more than taking a stand
against the group. It' s me that' s right because what I
do is not bad, because I helped you once then that' s why
it should be wrong. Why don' t I defend this one, sir,
if I' ve acted very well under other circumstances. But this is
another circumstance, because of the good deeds of anahi no one doubts them.
Of course no one doubts them, but yes the doubts of the other lord,
and then that you go there with this bonomousness that you have and with
this good reputation that you have and all that we love you, this lord
hides behind you, for it is what is not father, because besides,
so simple that would say ok so eh. If I were there on the
hypothetical, if I were there, I wasn' t, I' d
say okay. My brothers in life, as I already know, do question
William' s handling. I' m gonna stay neutral because I love you
both. I' m going to maintain a silent posture while everything settles down.
He loves them very much, but he likes it there too. Last
time, birthday, congratulations. Now he put on the tweet that they forget.
I mean, I' m disappointed with the particular thing there because it
' s really like a four- year- old girl, they forgive and
I love you very much and I hope you don' t block me,
but I' m sure it doesn' t matter what I' m saying
or yes, because that' s very close to what people say to her.
But I mean, I' m disappointed as a fan. I'
m disappointed because if they' re a phenomenon, Anai should have a stand
and if it' s going to be neutral, say I' m neutral,
but I' m neutral, I mean, I' m going to
do this Vienna, in this lawsuit, I' m going to keep quiet,
but I' m really quiet or I' m going to be right
here. Thank youÉli the twitter a. That' s exactly how it
was. It' s not just gossip, it' s absolutely fake.
Unclear answer, Sadly, memory is being lost. I think it refers to
seeing, but I also think the unclear answer to which she refers, which
is that of Christian Chávez. It' s a little cautious of Christian Chávez,
because I' m not going to lift waves to throw you or declare
loudly and loudly what I think is happening. I mean, I' d
rather get things fixed. No, because it' s better to wait and
say prudently and be unclear and wait for the results of audits and so on
and so on and take a fixed stand to accuse and suddenly put it there
when you still don' t have the evidence. I think it was more
than unclear prudent, but you know that I believe that at this point,
at some point someone will come out for the heart have broken. Eh,
surely at some point someone will come out with a broken heart because John there
realizes that Guillermo did steal from him or if he did not steal them they
would be the ideal scenario for everyone that I don' t believe, honestly
I don' t believe it, because he, I mean, it'
s more than obvious that they already came out and that there are already bad
things, that is, there' s no more he wants, there'
s already evidence, there' s things that are wrong, I mean,
that' s just waiting. If you' ve already seen that there are
things that are wrong, because she puts it in a position. It has
already been proven that yes, at least, the events are wrong. Look,
Daniel says he does. He found Christian Chávez' s position incendiary,
because it is as if it was very delicate. It' s a very
delicate matter, because it has involved the if something puts and you know it,
Daniel, and you know it the people that we like, the stories
and the dramas and the novels and the trims and so on, if one
thing is strong is to combine with a relationship a personal relationship, then emotions
mix, because if it was just a working relationship, it was my manager
and it let me down and it took us six months to get to know
it. There have been many cases, such as Dana' s case,
Dana' s case, Dana Paola' s case, with this woman who
wanted to collect it. But, well, there' s not that much
excitement there, because there isn' t one here, not here they call
each other brothers. I insist that is, yes, there is a very
strong friendship relationship and this makes it even more dramatic. Notice that I don
' t feel like setting Christian' s position on fire. I think it
' s like that reckless lupit. But within that recklessness, I think it
is very prudent, because, possibly and from what is seen in the light
of facts and interviews. Both Miite and Cristian are trying to be prudent at
a time when they are given that they already want to be. They'
re already gonna remember me if they' re not gonna blow up in a
couple of weeks. And this is going to be one thing that' s
going to be in control and let' s hope that they break my heart
because they pray the truth, you think their pita put things on. That
would be the thing of putting things on the table and talking straight, point
point and no way what your priority is. There, your group brothers,
or you are in this one, Mr Rosas, because maybe for you,
it means more than you that group I rebed well, because say it point
and already what it says here mage leticia to Martínez Lozano is not understood as
ana there that does not take position. Yeah, he was, too,
she abused herself. What they' re saying is that she wasn' t
abused, but that there she' s conspired with him. That' s
the serious thing, that' s the truth you' re accusing her,
because as she doesn' t accuse, as she doesn' t remember and,
on the contrary, defends it, because then she no longer conned us
to others, that is, she no longer cheated on Dulce, Maite and
Christian and Christopher. She went out, so what a father. No.
That' s what I think has them angry and with all that they are
repeating a story of the past time that there earned more from others, that
is, it' s like the character was stronger, but Wow. That
could have been because that was the circumstances, but here, not here in
contract, there could have surely been a contract, because of the popularity she
has and everything she represents here is not. You' re talking about lies
right now, not rinsing, and there' s no clarity in those accounts.
And that' s horrible. That' s terrible. Oh no,
that' s ugly, that' s barbarity or a word. Here we
are, all three of us. As for peace. We' d have
a problem like that and I' d say oh, no, I'
m gonna be in the middle of it. I don' t know anything.
I don' t know anything, I wouldn' t be mad.
It' s not like it didn' t even go out like this that
the three of us were. I would have a person thing not then steal
us. But you said I' m on his side. But how,
then, if he stole from us, he supposes he stole all three of
us, not because you' re on his side or whoever he was.
It wouldn' t be logical. We' re a group and he'
s supposed to rob all three of us because you' d defend him Ah,
surely you knew something Ah, you' re in complicity with him.
That gives many, This leaves many suspicions, for hear hear. And changing
the subject to see they interviewed Mr Duarte, Roberto Duarte, who is the
actor who plays Paco Stanley in the series of who killed him the Amazon Prime
that to me, in person, seemed a great job of the lord.
Actually, I really liked the performance. Maybe the one I liked the least
is Belinda' s, but in general, yes, Belinda' s didn
' t love it. But in general, because actors who had their character
studied very well. And but what Roberto Duarte said, because he studied it
not even under the stones. Yeah, look what I liked because he said
he thought it was such an important job for him that he didn' t
want to do a superficial interpretation, even though he was a very well-
known pacoestar character and obviously trusting his director, but he wanted to do this
as if getting in the skin, that sometimes we' re used to hearing
that kind of commentary on actors, because in Hollywood that ay fulanito went to
jail for a few months because he was going to play a convict and that
he does as much work previous to be able to understand his personality that he
is going to interpret. So he says he wanted to know what Paco Starli
looked like, but it strikes me. The title they put on the interview.
To the interview is Jordi' s, but the Millennium takes up and
the note writes it to imperalta and there he says that he counts on which
psychological pathology was based to interpret for law cost. I got a little strong
that statement because, because we can no longer know today we can never know
if Paco will be there and had a pathology as such. But of course,
what he did have are a lot of very obvious features and I think
he refers to that and it' s okay, he has no obligation to
handle perfectly terminology that' s not within his scope and yet it seems to
me that he' s doing well. When he points out that he was
reviewing this personality and makes an association that became a father to me. It
says, then, that Paco this law interpreted Don Juan Tenorio on many occasions
and does not say him And now it does not seem a coincidence. It
seems to me that there was something there linked to his personality. Why do
I consider. In light of what I' ve been reviewing and reading,
he says I read a lot of psychology and suddenly he also makes a comment
like that that I didn' t get almost a master' s degree and
I said well, not either, but it' s okay. That is,
it means that what father did not seek to do a good analysis work
and then he says that he thinks that Don Juan was a character who tired
him very well, because he genuinely identified himself with this figure of Don Juan.
He talks about a number of things. He talks about saying that he
found it interesting to have found aspects, but he does say psychological pathology.
I' m not sure he had a pathology, but he talks about the
edipus complex He talks about the Elektra complex that, by the way, Freud
never recognized that, but it was something that Jung Fredje mari tried to complement.
And but, well, Jung does use this from the lyrics complex,
we conanalysts practically or not. But it says and there is a Don Juan
complex that I am convinced that it had paco to be him and when I
understood it and reviewed some of the characteristics, it was when I could understand
a lot more of what he was like. So, well, that'
s like a thing that' s said, it' s not a typology,
it' s not classified as a Don Juan disorder, but it'
s talked about as a Don Juan syndrome, which would be a combination of
narcissism with aspects of antisocial personality disorder, which we' ve already talked about
a lot here, because there has to be narcissism for there to be antisocial
personality, which is the one that thinks it can go over anything, including
the law and the rules. And that' s very interesting from the point
of view of this man we were talking about on Friday reviewing the series,
who seemed to feel at some point that no one was going to do anything
to him, that they couldn' t do anything to him and that he
could say that his chicharrons thundered everywhere until it didn' t happen. Then
I became very father to him to tell all this, which he began to
read and investigate, and the association also seemed very remarkable to me. Of
course, he made the Juan Tenorio and even says about the different versions of
Juan Tenorio. He doesn' t talk about that well, he' s
like the comic tenor. I understand. I don' t know if he
ever did a classic tenor, but he says the dramatic structure of Don Juan,
says whoever you want, that of Tirso, of Molina, that of
Moliere, even that of Motzart. And there I saw the structure of the
character and I find brutal the coincidences between the character and to cost it.
Yeah, that' s very interesting. Look at the show and I think
what' s interesting about all these interviews they' ve done to the actors.
Yeah, the characters, well, it' s interesting to the originals,
to Mario Besares, to Paola, that' s fine. But the
actors because it' s a way of seeing that real- life character from
another point of view, not as searching it to be able to interpret it.
That' s good, very interesting. I think it would also be
very interesting to look for something that Luis Gerardo Méndez has declared for because there
is a lot to get out and above all he because the one who at
last, the one who remains, the one who is badly left in that
series already said it here, because it is Mario Besares, but without a
doubt they do not help him at all. I want to clarify something.
When we did the analysis on Friday here about chapter five and six, Dr
Abel and I put in a little foot video and so on. But that
was because, indeed, within the series, the actor who plays well the
character of Attorney Villanueva, who is he would be in real life Villarreal.
In the series he says that he got a little bit, that is,
all the elements served me to accuse us. It was the leg, broken,
the look, you danced, but the bathroom, but you didn'
t get out, but it' s against you. There was a contradiction,
no, but it wasn' t me I don' t know who
' s guilty. The truth neither knows me nor interests me to accuse anyone.
It' s talking a little bit about the show and what happened there.
Yeah, put that little piece that they play in the show, that
scene where they look. Here it is in the program and it is supported
in this way and this the prosecutor was the villain' s. You said
villainreal is that villainreal is in the series. I' m sorry. Besides,
what I was saying Monday is a vision from what' s going on
in the series. Yeah, of course it' s not that he spent
his life anymore It' s the theory that the series wants to put forward.
Sure, but even though I' m gonna know I don' t
even have the file and I don' t know. And the only thing
I think has gotten the documentary as much as the series, is to fuel
the fire of speculation. Again everyone we' ve seen in the series,
we can all tell what our theory is. On the record channel, thank
you, thank you very much, Jessica. On the disc channel are interviews
with all of them. Thank you, thank you very much. Disca,
because you have to go to the disc channel that is also great, because
well Mira says angel crazy daring. If I was Mario Besars, I'
d go to Tibet, because not only is he not going to go to
Tibet, he' s going to go into the house of the we go
or is it how come he comes he sticks his head into the mouth of
the wolf, that is when, but you' re everyone, every one
I hope he' s very smart? I was thinking about him and I
hope he' s very smart by then. Yeah, yeah, well,
I' m really prepared, because imagine everything they' re gonna be saying
to him, asking, judging. It' s going to move a lot
there and at the same time, it' s hard not to touch on
it because that' s why they' re putting it in, because there
' s got to be this controversy. That' s the subject that'
s going to attract attention. Listen and I' m sorry that I,
thanks to to tontualizing the name, pointing out the name, is that you
know what happened also in this series that I didn' t, no,
I didn' t reach how to integrate in my mind well that some of
them changed the name and others not exact. That makes me very confused.
No, no, he wouldn' t have had the same mela, so
it' s okay, it doesn' t matter. And the other day
I was saying the name of another actor instead of Luis Gerardo Méndez. I
said Luis Gerardo bus manás me favor, but good happens to all of us.
There' s nothing more Efrain hear, but what fear. In the
house of the pomos I was thinking the day that comes several vicers that arm
a curve of life and put pictures of the period with paco. He'
s gonna do more. I mean, remember, that was what you remember
when it was the famous house that Frida said I don' t want to
go in, because the contract says it' s gonna dig my whole life.
I don' t understand this contradiction of going out and telling the media.
It' s just that I don' t want it to relive,
it' s that I' m going to sue because I don' t
want it to relive, because they' re going to revictivize me for later
you' re going to have to go give your life to a TV show
that, besides, isn' t handled with all the ethics, because it
' s a reality. They have no obligation, as it is the profile
of reality. That' s what they do and I' m getting more
canda for the best. I think even I' m going to see him,
because he' s already getting flashy for saying something. Already the series
left you warm the theme, the case, of course I want to see
now. Next. Today I wrote to him and here I was told I
was bitten. I want more, it goes, well, in the case
of celebrities it goes to but more. Surely, it' s going to
come out more. It' s just that it' s also true that
such dramatic emotional experiences are very difficult to overcome. I do not know what
process each of them has had throughout the time of so many years that they
have passed. But what is impressive, and that is a reality, is
that even though all those years have passed and even if a good therapeutic process
has been carried out for this because for the time being post- traumatic stress
they must have had. In addition to many other things, each one does
re- read each time, that is, the sensation, the emotional experience
is re- edited every time you make a lot of noise. It'
s not the same as an interview that is going to relive many things that
see it on the screen recreated and repeated and go to police and someone said
yes they are very complicated and because the human being has so many aspects playing
inside his mind that also who knows how they are seeing it every time or
how they are re- editing it each time or re- writing each time.
So sometimes it' s no, I don' t want no more.
Now I' m gonna say it. Well, now I' ll
say what I never said. Now we' re gonna say it act.
In addition to the economic factor, it has a lot of weight and that
' s why people like Paula during it said it with all their lyrics.
I' m going to make my channel because if everyone is going to monetize
with my story, now I want to monetize too There is that economic factor,
but it also moves everything else, everything emotional and how people are looking
at you or have looked at you all this time, and what you want
it to end up in. No, because in the end, because every
time time the time advances and in a given moment we are all going to
go and there is not this little narcissistic thing about how I want my story
to stay there exactly. I don' t know exactly, well interesting.
Let' s go a decomps story is more decomposed, more and more,
with more men don' t continue to pepper it, salt and everything fucking
goes a lot of condiments and so that always but well they hear. Let
' s now talk about this topic and this topic seemed interesting to me to
take it and I' ll tell you why Laura Zapata after the elections.
We' re not going to talk about elections anymore I' m not going
to talk about election preferences. I' m going to talk about this topic,
this discussion between them, sorry, Ephraim to cover you up, but
says Laura Zapata and you already doubled the hands, true hair. What a
shame with your dad what he' d say I' d give you a
scotch, I liked you for Chicken. We laugh Yeah, I' ll
fuck you up That' s what she says It seems very risky. No
and then, Hector answers Laura Zapata after writing me and blocking me immediately I
answer you with great pleasure and affection. What my dad would say about you
that you' re ridiculous, what a shame with my dad you think watch
the video. What a pity for you to remember that here we commented on
this video of Laura Zapata singing some stanzas of the national anthem and calling for
war and so on. What I' d say about what happened my dad
taught me to accept reality and that when you want to control what' s
out of your control. That ends up controlling you Look at the election results.
He controls you absolutely. He laughs I will face what comes with intelligence
and not with the viscera. You could really use IT to do the same
thing instead of capitalizing on making a fool of yourself. You are the hamerir
of all Mexico and rightly and then shows, like Laura Zapata, it blocks
it regardless of what is in dispute between them and others and of each other
' s political preferences. And there' s one thing and I estimate it
at Zapata time, and because you know it here, I estimate it.
But there is one very delicate thing and I also speak from my own experience.
It' s very bold, very risky, reckless, and deeply stupid
for anyone to assume that they knew your father more than you did yourself.
That' s telling Hector that your father is to see. How can you,
Laura Zapata, assume that you knew the relationship of Hector and his father,
better, better than himself, Hector. How do you suppose what you
know what Don Héctor Suárez would think and how do you suppose it' s
forgiveness, but with what balls you dare speak for Father Hector to the same
Hector, I find everything silly and sorry. But yes, it' s
like losing your sanity a little bit. Don' t be what you think,
because it' s too out of place, unnecessary to defend something if
you wanted to defend it, because look. There are several things there.
The first is neither there is a right to question a person because he says
what he has said in relation to the event he is talking about, because
it has already happened, as we are saying, that is to say,
there is already a result and he says ah such, such, such,
such as I want or as why you are going to go to the profile
of that person to claim that he is not fighting and to say, for
so I tell you who you want me to say, because then, since
you do not say what I want, say or do the things I want,
that you do, then you are wrong and your dad would be ashamed
of you why you get your exact dad attacked, first, I attack you,
not to say what I said, nor to invite an uprising against or
I what I know. And besides, I use your father' s figure,
who is no longer alive. And that I, as you say,
affirm that I know what I would think and that I would reject you,
because I know more that is, that has no place, that has no
place. I never give you much respect. You' re a very high
respecter of me. Like he tells a man over 50 years old, your
dad would give you a scotch about what you' re talking about, how
you assume it' s a father- son relationship. That' s why
it would be of absolute respect. The point that now Zapata has already shown
us that she is an irasible woman, that she does have problems, that
I hope at some point she will start generating something to seek her own peace,
with all peace, because it is not possible that something like what is
happening in the country, which, although it affects us all, is controlling
her in that way, as Héctor Suárez says and makes me ruin. What
Laura does makes me mean and in her words, because she' s a
very exquisite woman, who all the time says she' s a mesquite,
who reads a lot, she makes me super vulgar, that' s to
go messing with someone' s dead dad. It makes me a vulgarity and
it makes me absolutely ruinous. And I think what' s going on with
Laura is that she' s really out of hand with the situation and she
' s kicking everywhere, I mean, she' s so mad at what
happened, they' re a real tantrum. But this one I' m
going to do one thing. Hector Suárez Gombz, whom I also cherish very
much and want well, is a very passionate man, is a man of
convictions. Well, the reality is that you don' t go to me
I think it' s very clear, because you' re not going to
sing the anthem on a show and raise a banner and we' re going
to fight for us. No, no, you' re not. There
are other ways to raise your voice, perhaps to question the next government.
How are all governments, no more this and the previous fifty or all that
this country has had. But why are you going to get into this relationship.
I insist yes, no. Besides, I think something most people saw
in this discussion. Besides, that sends you the message of aggression. I
' m not telling you violent enough. It does seem to me and this
indisputable lack of respect and then it blocks you from answering it. Then why?
Why? You do something like that and then you don' t want
the replica that you imagine isn' t going to be the nicest one for
what. And then there are most people. I read some of the answers
they gave her, because they were ego- supporting my because also for something
you follow up, because if you don' t like what she does,
you don' t follow it. That' s the real pure one.
Also that does that, uh, sorry, that, that' s idle
and pretty dumb. But good everyone loses their time and valuable in what they
want and it is a pity, but good their right. But most of
them support him. But there were some who did comment that Gomis' response
was, therefore, somewhat aggressive because, because he told him ridiculous. There
' s another part. I think that' s why my dad couldn'
t stand you. Of course, what my dad says to him had made
you ridiculous and what to do is king, right? But, but,
but because he already got angry and I think that somehow, through that,
what he is wanting to manifest is that I do know, I did know
my dad and he would say this in you because I knew him, because
I lived with him many years. I worked with him, I lived with
him, I was with him until his last days. You don' t.
So, that' s the sadness of it being exposed. It'
s very complicated, really, it' s very difficult. One that more,
I wish everything could be arranged through healthy, respectful and peaceful dialogue.
But all people also have a temperament, and Hector Suárez Gomiz' s temperament
is well known. As you well say, I couldn' t have expected
a reaction. No Tilia or let' s see Laura talk about it,
because not Ephraim and I later something that since the last time we talked about
Lino wanted to say and I didn' t say it to Laura. I
don' t expect so much from Laura and I don' t expect so
much because I' ve seen her give so many hate speeches that she doesn
' t realize, because she' s in another reality. I mean,
Laura lives on another planet, in a very strange bubble and her mouth.
We' ve seen a lot of hate speeches like that about the little ones,
that she doesn' t realize, because she hasn' t deconstructed herself
and she has an obligation to do it, because she says that she sounds
very educated woman and that she seeks to be exquisite every day. Then she
should seek to change those hateful spells. It' s good and not thinking
the same way, but it' s not hate speech and what you'
re doing with these jokes. Now they complain that Hector answered him and I
who said it is a lady, a lady does not behave like that.
Laura, I don' t mean you have something very delicate, you mess
with something very delicate that' s my family. Not you will answer totally
out of reality. And Victor' s answer is an answer that he has
the right to give, because with grief the lady can knock on a door.
If they come and kick you, what are you going to stay like,
because she' s a lady, you don' t answer or be
clear. And besides, Laura, don' t be a coward, don
' t block it, you throw the first stone at us. But what
you can' t. And I believe in the personal, I think that
having unmovable radical positions is not healthy, it is not of a healthy mind,
it is not a critical mind. Critical thinking is necessary. Critical thinking
is necessary in any society to be civilized, critical, analytical thinking. But
that' s not the radicals, either from your left or right, of
any of the radicals. No, and I think he' s already taken
a radical stance along with other commentators or journalists. I don' t know
how you guys totally see it. We are in a very radical moment,
sadly for all sides, and that is the sad thing. As Mexicans,
we should stop those radical ways, of thinking because happiness and I tell you
with traps is in the balance in everything we do and if we put ourselves
in this mine, let' s all kick with everyone, because it'
s going to end, as Laura said after tasting the cute, that is,
the war cry, because not exactly s ay apart. He says you
' ve already folded the hands like no, also as if he could modify
something like I don' t know, I mean, I don' t
understand the meaning, because of that kind of phrase and you already doubled the
hands. That' s what I like you for, because what I hope
is done is that you expect me to do something about what you expect to
shit this or not contained in your answer and it' s a super mega
passionate quate and so on, but I think it' s wise. What
you need in this country is peace. Point like this you may like it
or you still don' t start Claudia Shimon. When it starts, then
we will see and we will be able to criticize it from the first of
October or the two and then we will continue there. But not yet then,
well, because he won the point is over. Well, listen to
us guys. It' s time to say goodbye. This Monday, June
10th. Before I say goodbye, I' ll make one more, one
more warning. Thank you for being here with us, for joining us member
subscribers. We' re going to have another membership program soon, or we
' re going to have another membership program, because we haven' t had
a membership program to meet on a day this week. I' ll let
you know we' re going to have, of course, the women coming
back leaving a print with straw that we' ve already read about her.
But well, let' s be your story and let' s go with
the broken souls, the one that what we' ve been recommended we'
re going to have creates your life too and he' s coming we'
re going to have this program about the Erik series and well, all we
' re going to have on this channel and thank you for being here now.
I thank you infinitely to bulls who connect, follow us, leave us
comments, tell us. That is and I thank you infinitely because I am
not the ninety- nine point, nine percent this channel. Yes, I
delete comments. Yeah, and I' ve said that since he started from
history to history, no one can invite anyone to his house to insult him.
That' s then, if you' ll excuse me if I delete
comments from you, that is, if you see me deleting comments, I
won' t read them. No, I won' t erase, of
course, yours. But yes, who comes to assault me in personnel,
to tell me about my father, by the way, of course, of
note is that it is a personal attack and I have it with this.
It started from this false note in the magazine you give notes, From that
date, start the personal attacks in this and in history, in history,
constants against constants, constants, messing with my personal life and my family tons.
For this, I offer you an apology, because I will delete those
comments, not everyone else' s, of course not welcome all, and
thank you for accompanying and for your support and for being here with us every
day. Thank you very much, Dr Amel. Yes, I totally support
you in that lupita and I share that idea as well and because, as
Ephraim said, we have to look for happiness beyond what life sometimes puts us
as obstacles and I remembered that beautiful song he sang or Alberto Castro, and
I would like to say goodbye with that. Happiness is a way to navigate
this life, which is the sea. So let' s be happy.
See you tomorrow exactly. Thank you very much Ephrad by girls people all,
excellent week and already tomorrow to the best women of way way Ya. Now
yes, now yes, thank you all very much. And we' ll
see each other in half an hour, in history, in history. Thank
you all and join us for being here with us and seeing us, let
' s go.