WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:07.400
The city placed Chief of Police Paco
Balderama on paid administrative leave during the investigation.

2
00:00:07.599 --> 00:00:12.560
I've been a little loath to talk
about it because there are different media

3
00:00:13.119 --> 00:00:19.920
outlets running with different stories at different
levels of confirmation, and so I was

4
00:00:19.920 --> 00:00:24.000
a little bit I was a little
hesitant to talk about it in too much

5
00:00:24.440 --> 00:00:30.719
depth. Our friend Alex Tavlian from
the Sanlaquin Valley Sun kind of had the

6
00:00:30.760 --> 00:00:36.079
story in its details. He had
sort of confirmed and ran with it sooner

7
00:00:36.079 --> 00:00:41.640
than the Fresno b and other television
outlets did. But now pretty much everyone

8
00:00:41.799 --> 00:00:49.920
is reporting largely similar things as far
as the nature of the allegations against Paco

9
00:00:50.000 --> 00:00:55.240
Balderama, basically that he the City
of Fresno, I think, frankly,

10
00:00:55.320 --> 00:01:00.679
in their initial press release, massively
downplayed the significance of it in terms of

11
00:01:00.719 --> 00:01:07.519
what they said. What they said
was technically accurate. Balderama was being investigated

12
00:01:07.599 --> 00:01:18.400
for a possible inappropriate relationship quote with
a non city employee. The police union

13
00:01:19.760 --> 00:01:23.920
issued a statement sort of angrily pointing
out that the city left out a very

14
00:01:25.120 --> 00:01:33.640
key detail in its characterization of this
relationship Balderama was having. It wasn't just

15
00:01:33.799 --> 00:01:40.719
any quote non city official. It
was a two year long affair with the

16
00:01:40.799 --> 00:01:48.400
wife of another police officer, another
police officer under Balderama in the chain of

17
00:01:48.400 --> 00:01:55.400
command. That's a much bigger deal. Okay, yeah, if I mean,

18
00:01:55.640 --> 00:02:01.560
in all fairness, if Balderama was
just having air with somebody you know,

19
00:02:01.840 --> 00:02:07.319
I don't know, but with the
I don't know, some ranom so

20
00:02:07.439 --> 00:02:10.599
the lady who runs the dry cleaning
store where he does his dry cleaning,

21
00:02:10.639 --> 00:02:15.560
who has no relationship with the police
department whatsoever, her husband's not in the

22
00:02:15.560 --> 00:02:20.560
police department whatever. That would be
terrible, that would be deeply morally wrong,

23
00:02:20.919 --> 00:02:24.240
but it probably doesn't rise to the
level of, you know, this

24
00:02:24.360 --> 00:02:30.840
kind of an hr problem. If
you're sleep, if you're the chief of

25
00:02:30.919 --> 00:02:36.840
police and you're having an affair with
another officer's wife, that's a much bigger

26
00:02:36.879 --> 00:02:45.039
deal. That's a much bigger deal. So the City of Fresno announced they're

27
00:02:45.080 --> 00:02:51.280
finally putting Balderama on paid administrative leave, and that made sense, especially yesterday.

28
00:02:51.319 --> 00:02:54.159
So yesterday, Baldorama, he didn't
really have a press conference. It

29
00:02:54.199 --> 00:03:00.840
was sort of just a media media
we're sort of hanging out outside the city

30
00:03:00.879 --> 00:03:06.080
council chambers. Baldarama was walking by. He said, I'm not going to

31
00:03:06.120 --> 00:03:10.039
talk about the investigation, and then
proceeded to talk about it, which is,

32
00:03:10.159 --> 00:03:16.919
you know, bad PR you know
bad PR one oh one. If

33
00:03:16.919 --> 00:03:22.159
you're not going to talk about something, don't talk about it. So a

34
00:03:22.159 --> 00:03:27.599
couple of outlets and GV wire had
has the video of it of him talking

35
00:03:27.639 --> 00:03:35.400
at length about this thing, and
at one end I got to say the

36
00:03:35.560 --> 00:03:39.479
video hearing him talk about it,
I was Look, I've never had any

37
00:03:39.520 --> 00:03:46.719
reason to dislike Paco Baldarama. He
has seemingly done a very good job.

38
00:03:46.800 --> 00:03:53.520
All the statistics about crime rates in
Fresno have been positive. Nobody has an

39
00:03:53.520 --> 00:03:58.400
ill word has up to this point
had an ill word to say about Balderama

40
00:03:58.560 --> 00:04:03.400
other than extreme liberals. Frankly,
when Balderama came in, it was right

41
00:04:03.439 --> 00:04:09.439
after all the George Floyd's stuff and
Fresno had set up that I think bogus

42
00:04:10.080 --> 00:04:15.360
Police Reform Commission, which had gotten
stacked for Oliver Bains, I think had

43
00:04:15.360 --> 00:04:25.360
gotten railroaded by Sandra Celadon and all
these ultra left wing, lunatic nonprofit activists

44
00:04:25.800 --> 00:04:30.639
who were very much within the you
know, the the about you know,

45
00:04:30.839 --> 00:04:35.439
defund the Police School, of thinking, and Baldarama basically said, yeah,

46
00:04:35.519 --> 00:04:39.800
some of your recommendations are just not
workable and we're just not going to do

47
00:04:39.879 --> 00:04:43.360
them. And I thought that was
great. I was, you know,

48
00:04:43.639 --> 00:04:47.360
applauding the guy. So I've had
no occasion to dislike Baldarama up to this

49
00:04:47.439 --> 00:04:53.920
point. You know, I don't
know him. I don't know of him

50
00:04:54.040 --> 00:04:58.160
all that well. All I know
is what I know of public stuff,

51
00:04:58.199 --> 00:05:02.480
and most of the public stuff I've
seen from him has been just fine.

52
00:05:02.680 --> 00:05:15.480
But gosh, his attitude in this
little press scrum was so arrogant and so

53
00:05:15.959 --> 00:05:20.759
like unaccountable. I mean, first
of all, getting angry at the media

54
00:05:21.000 --> 00:05:26.600
and saying, don't ask anything salacious
here, to which I was thinking,

55
00:05:26.639 --> 00:05:30.639
don't ask anything slatious. Maybe you
don't, maybe you shouldn't do something salacious

56
00:05:30.680 --> 00:05:38.759
like a two year long affair with
someone else's wife, Ask anything slatious.

57
00:05:38.800 --> 00:05:44.600
And I don't think any of the
media was asking anything salacious. They were

58
00:05:44.639 --> 00:05:47.079
asking this is the story, this
is the story that's out in the open.

59
00:05:47.439 --> 00:05:53.600
He First of all, Balderama has
himself now admitted to an inappropriate relationship.

60
00:05:53.680 --> 00:05:59.160
He released a letter in which a
letter that he released to other officers

61
00:05:59.199 --> 00:06:04.360
within the police department, expressing his
remorse for having had this relationship. He

62
00:06:04.439 --> 00:06:14.399
does not specify that this was with
another officer's wife, so he has admitted

63
00:06:14.439 --> 00:06:21.680
that he's done this. There's no
question he's done this. So he's in

64
00:06:21.759 --> 00:06:30.920
this press scrum. At one point, he's almost like trying to rationalize or

65
00:06:30.199 --> 00:06:43.079
justify it when he says he had
this quote if I sold insurance and I'm

66
00:06:43.199 --> 00:06:46.160
ellipsis, and he's giving other examples
of other kinds of job, or if

67
00:06:46.560 --> 00:06:48.160
I think he was saying, you
know, if I sold insurance, or

68
00:06:48.680 --> 00:06:53.120
was head of another department, or
was the principal at a school, would

69
00:06:53.160 --> 00:07:00.480
any of this would this make news, to which the reporter from GVRE sort

70
00:07:00.480 --> 00:07:05.439
of said back to him incredulously.
But you're the chief of police, and

71
00:07:05.560 --> 00:07:11.680
yeah, that's the point here he
is like, he's like, well,

72
00:07:11.680 --> 00:07:14.920
well, this wouldn't even be any
news if I were a principle or if

73
00:07:14.959 --> 00:07:18.639
I were, you know, selling
insurance or something. Yeah, it probably

74
00:07:18.680 --> 00:07:24.000
wouldn't be. Well maybe it wouldn't
be. I maybe I'll get to that

75
00:07:24.079 --> 00:07:30.000
later. Maybe it wouldn't be.
But that's the point. You're the chief

76
00:07:30.040 --> 00:07:33.680
of police. This is a very
very big important job. You're the chief

77
00:07:33.720 --> 00:07:42.120
of police of a major California city. This is a huge job. It

78
00:07:42.120 --> 00:07:48.279
has, this is an enormous public
trust, and you spent two years on

79
00:07:48.360 --> 00:07:56.839
the job. And by the way, he's been here for not that long

80
00:07:56.920 --> 00:08:03.240
of a time. I mean,
he was worn in in January of twenty

81
00:08:03.279 --> 00:08:09.079
twenty one. He's been having an
affair with this woman for two years.

82
00:08:09.759 --> 00:08:16.120
We're in June of twenty twenty four, so basically about he'd been on the

83
00:08:16.199 --> 00:08:22.000
job for a year and then he
already started having an affair with this person.

84
00:08:24.040 --> 00:08:31.120
So he's spent most of his tenure
having an affair with another officer's wife.

85
00:08:31.399 --> 00:08:33.799
If the reporting is accurate here that
this was a two year long affair,

86
00:08:33.840 --> 00:08:39.080
I'm sure that the exact parameters and
details of this are you know,

87
00:08:39.120 --> 00:08:43.000
maybe it's probably not exactly twenty four
months on the dot or something, but

88
00:08:45.000 --> 00:08:48.720
seemingly he spent most of his time
as mayor having an affair. He talks

89
00:08:48.759 --> 00:08:52.519
about out of one side of his
mouth and the other he's sort of saying

90
00:08:52.519 --> 00:09:00.360
two different things about sort of his
standing and his ability to keep doing his

91
00:09:00.480 --> 00:09:05.279
job on an ongoing basis. So, on the one hand, he on

92
00:09:05.320 --> 00:09:09.759
the one hand, he kept saying
things in this press conference that MA can

93
00:09:09.759 --> 00:09:18.159
indicate he fully intends and expects to
keep being the police chief, that you

94
00:09:18.240 --> 00:09:20.919
know, I'm going to continue to
lead this department. I intend to continue

95
00:09:20.000 --> 00:09:26.559
leading this department. Blah blah blah, blah blah blah blah blah blah.

96
00:09:26.799 --> 00:09:31.200
And then he says two things.
One is that he's got so much support,

97
00:09:33.120 --> 00:09:35.320
that so many people in the community
supports me, and I know this

98
00:09:35.399 --> 00:09:39.080
because I've heard from them and everyone, so so many people in the community

99
00:09:39.120 --> 00:09:43.840
have reached out and supported me.
But then on the other side of his

100
00:09:43.919 --> 00:09:48.639
mouth he's got he's sort of saying
stuff like like there's a shadowy cabal that

101
00:09:48.799 --> 00:09:52.960
definitely wants to take him down.
There are definitely people who want to see

102
00:09:54.000 --> 00:09:58.440
me fail. That was one of
the things he said in this little press

103
00:09:58.440 --> 00:10:03.080
scrum. Nearly people that want to
see me fail. No, there I

104
00:10:05.159 --> 00:10:13.120
reject that contention. Out of any
prominent person in Fresno public life and Fresno

105
00:10:13.200 --> 00:10:18.200
political life, there are probably few
people who had a better approval rating than

106
00:10:18.200 --> 00:10:26.080
Paco Balderama did. Nobody wanted to
see him fail. Nobody, he as

107
00:10:26.240 --> 00:10:30.080
by his own admission. He had
a pretty good working relationship with the union.

108
00:10:31.559 --> 00:10:35.080
He had two union grievances against him
that had both been withdrawn prior to

109
00:10:35.120 --> 00:10:39.960
this, but that was it.
He worked pretty well with the union,

110
00:10:39.080 --> 00:10:41.919
He worked well with the city council, He worked well with the mayor.

111
00:10:43.080 --> 00:10:46.960
Mayor likes him, Everyone likes him. Nobody had any reason really to dislike

112
00:10:46.960 --> 00:10:52.360
Paco Balderama. He got in one
little spat with Sandra seladon the ultra lefty

113
00:10:52.000 --> 00:10:58.039
nonprofit sort of side of the universe, and that was it. Paco Balderama

114
00:10:58.120 --> 00:11:01.440
had a very higher proof. I
really don't think there are a lot of

115
00:11:01.440 --> 00:11:05.879
people who would be happy to see
him fail. I don't know, maybe

116
00:11:05.960 --> 00:11:11.559
other than the husband, other than
the husband of the woman he's sleeping with.

117
00:11:16.879 --> 00:11:20.039
So he's sort of talking out of
both sides of his mouth to say,

118
00:11:20.080 --> 00:11:24.200
well, this community supports me,
but there are definitely people who want

119
00:11:24.240 --> 00:11:28.519
to take me down. It was
also sort of one of the questions he

120
00:11:28.639 --> 00:11:31.120
was asked, was you know,
are you worried? He said, I'm

121
00:11:31.120 --> 00:11:35.360
not worried. There's so many worse
things happening every day and said, I'm

122
00:11:35.360 --> 00:11:39.879
not worried about it. The BS, of course, you're worried, you're

123
00:11:39.919 --> 00:11:46.200
having an investigation about your job.
Don't tell me that this is a huge

124
00:11:46.320 --> 00:11:48.159
job that you uprooted. He used
to be an officer in Oklahoma City.

125
00:11:48.200 --> 00:11:50.919
He was hired from Oklahoma City to
be the chief of police for the city

126
00:11:50.919 --> 00:11:54.279
of Fresno. You uprooted your whole
life to come out here to be the

127
00:11:54.360 --> 00:12:00.360
chief of police of a major city. Of course you're worried. Dingle Berry.

128
00:12:03.679 --> 00:12:09.039
He's got this false tough guy machismo
thing combined with this all this kind

129
00:12:09.039 --> 00:12:18.519
of religious talk that frankly not sounding
as great coming from a guy who's you

130
00:12:18.559 --> 00:12:28.919
know, had an affair for two
years. Frankly, the city should have

131
00:12:28.919 --> 00:12:33.159
put him on paid administrative leave before
this. I think, I think,

132
00:12:33.200 --> 00:12:41.159
if you're actually doing an investigation into
somebody about whether or not he's had an

133
00:12:41.200 --> 00:12:46.639
ef he's having an affair with a
subordinate's wife, that where he has admitted

134
00:12:48.080 --> 00:12:50.559
he's had he had an affair with
a subordinate's wife and it went on for

135
00:12:50.600 --> 00:12:56.159
two years. I guess I don't
understand how you don't put him on paid

136
00:12:56.159 --> 00:13:03.480
administrative leave right away. And then
after this press conference it becomes painfully obvious

137
00:13:03.519 --> 00:13:07.159
because that was a train wreck of
a little press scrump. What he should

138
00:13:07.159 --> 00:13:11.679
have said was, I had my
letter that I wrote to the President police,

139
00:13:11.720 --> 00:13:15.200
which was released to the media.
That's all I'm going to say about

140
00:13:15.200 --> 00:13:20.600
it. Move on away from the
camera. Maybe if he handled it like

141
00:13:20.679 --> 00:13:22.519
that, I mean, that would
be better. But you know, he

142
00:13:22.559 --> 00:13:26.919
has this press scrum. He says
all these stupid things. He's at the

143
00:13:28.039 --> 00:13:31.000
verge of breaking up in tears throughout
the press scrum. I mean, you

144
00:13:31.039 --> 00:13:35.960
can tell his voice is like cracking
throughout the whole thing, Like this should

145
00:13:35.000 --> 00:13:43.600
not be someone who's around a television
camera at any point. But it's also

146
00:13:43.639 --> 00:13:50.039
a thing I heard, you know. I think it's a little odd to

147
00:13:50.120 --> 00:13:58.039
have someone still sitting there in the
big guy's chair while the investigation is going

148
00:13:58.080 --> 00:14:03.720
on as to his conduct. I
mean, are subordinates going to be as

149
00:14:05.879 --> 00:14:11.720
free and open with their thoughts about
him if he's still in the big seat.

150
00:14:13.960 --> 00:14:20.240
So, I I don't know.
I find it odd how relatively kid

151
00:14:20.279 --> 00:14:28.480
Glove the treatment of Balderama has been. And I'll note that yesterday the city

152
00:14:28.519 --> 00:14:35.399
Council met in they had a one
particular closed session portion of their meeting.

153
00:14:35.720 --> 00:14:39.240
Certain for most things, the city
council has to meet in public, in

154
00:14:39.279 --> 00:14:45.919
public session that's open to you know, scrutiny. And there's California a good

155
00:14:45.960 --> 00:14:50.559
government like transparency laws that requires city
council meetings to be open in public.

156
00:14:50.600 --> 00:14:54.279
But there are certain kinds of things
that need to be that can be in

157
00:14:54.360 --> 00:15:03.000
closed session, particularly city personnel questions
and city litigation questions. And apparently they

158
00:15:03.039 --> 00:15:09.559
met in closed session for an undisclosed
potential city litigation question. So I wonder

159
00:15:09.919 --> 00:15:16.320
if Baldarama's people are trying to indicate
to the city, you know, hey,

160
00:15:16.360 --> 00:15:20.320
if you take adverse action against mister
Balderama, that we might you know,

161
00:15:20.399 --> 00:15:24.039
sue here. I don't know.
I don't know if Balderama's secured council.

162
00:15:24.080 --> 00:15:26.879
I'm not sure. The timing of
it, though, is suspicious.

163
00:15:28.320 --> 00:15:31.919
Now, when we return, I
want to talk about the idea of sexual

164
00:15:31.919 --> 00:15:37.399
harassment in the workplace the John Girardi
wherein John Girardi starts moralizing. That's next

165
00:15:37.399 --> 00:15:45.159
on The John Girardi Show. In
light of this whole Paco Balderama's story,

166
00:15:46.120 --> 00:15:50.799
I want to just talk through the
conversation my wife and I had last night

167
00:15:50.840 --> 00:15:56.720
about this. So my wife has
an ongoing list. It's a list you

168
00:15:56.759 --> 00:16:03.840
don't want to be on. It's
Holly Gay's list of people who have engaged

169
00:16:03.039 --> 00:16:10.120
in inappropriate sexual conduct that she just
basically despises for the rest of all eternity.

170
00:16:10.759 --> 00:16:12.279
And when you get on the list, you don't get off because Holly

171
00:16:12.360 --> 00:16:19.919
remembers. Holly's got a mind like
a steel trap, and you This is

172
00:16:19.960 --> 00:16:25.360
not to say that Holly does not
believe in forgiveness, and that you know,

173
00:16:25.480 --> 00:16:27.320
you can seek forgiveness from God and
get forgiveness from God, but you're

174
00:16:27.320 --> 00:16:33.559
not going to get forgetfulness from old
Holly Girardi. That's that's That's that Hollykleivsky.

175
00:16:33.679 --> 00:16:41.840
She does not forget. She remembers
things I've forgotten that there was another

176
00:16:42.159 --> 00:16:48.399
there was some athlete from twenty years
ago or something who had done something really

177
00:16:48.440 --> 00:16:53.440
stupid and she had remembered and I
had forgotten. Like Ben Roethlisberger. She

178
00:16:53.639 --> 00:17:00.399
does not forget that time that Ben
Roethlisberger possibly maybe sexual assaulted some woman and

179
00:17:00.440 --> 00:17:06.400
the cops basically didn't charge him.
With the prosecutors, the local prosecutors didn't

180
00:17:06.480 --> 00:17:08.359
charge him, but they were like, hey, they released a bunch of

181
00:17:08.359 --> 00:17:11.200
info about it to say, hey, something fishy happened here, but we

182
00:17:11.200 --> 00:17:15.440
don't have the evidence to actually bring
charges, but we're pretty dang sure something

183
00:17:15.480 --> 00:17:19.920
fishy happened. Holly's never forgiven or
forgotten. Well, she's never forgotten anyway,

184
00:17:19.920 --> 00:17:26.799
that about Ben Roethlisberg. She's still
not forgotten Tom Brady ditching Bridget moynihan

185
00:17:26.880 --> 00:17:30.599
for Giselle Bunch, and Tom Brady's
on her list. A lot of guys,

186
00:17:32.200 --> 00:17:36.799
a lot of people are on Holly's
list, And it's just a thing

187
00:17:36.839 --> 00:17:45.160
of with Balderramo. He's been the
police chief for three years, almost three

188
00:17:45.200 --> 00:17:51.960
and a half years. He's carried
on an affair with another officer's wife for

189
00:17:52.039 --> 00:17:59.440
two of those three years. How
do you find the time? This is

190
00:17:59.440 --> 00:18:03.759
the thing that baffles me. And
maybe I'm maybe I'm just a dough eyed

191
00:18:03.839 --> 00:18:11.720
naive, you know, naive person. How do you find the time?

192
00:18:11.839 --> 00:18:18.720
I mean, being chief of police
has got to be an unbelievably time consuming,

193
00:18:19.799 --> 00:18:26.240
stressful, your phone is buzzing twenty
four to seven kind of job.

194
00:18:26.720 --> 00:18:37.319
It's a high stress, high work
demand job where you're working a lot.

195
00:18:41.839 --> 00:18:45.519
And I've had time, you know, I you know, I can't say

196
00:18:45.519 --> 00:18:48.000
that being a nonprofit director is as
time consuming as being chief of police.

197
00:18:48.039 --> 00:18:51.839
I highly doubt that, but I've
had times over the course of my career,

198
00:18:51.920 --> 00:18:53.640
especially like when we were starting our
clinic where I was burning the candle

199
00:18:53.680 --> 00:19:00.559
at both ends. I was working
really hard. I I don't know.

200
00:19:00.559 --> 00:19:04.680
Maybe I've just got less game,
I guess, But I not only I

201
00:19:04.759 --> 00:19:12.920
don't have the time in my life
to spend trolling for some other woman to

202
00:19:12.960 --> 00:19:18.079
sleep with even if I and nor
do I think. I don't understand how

203
00:19:18.240 --> 00:19:26.680
he I would even to have the
opportunity, Like it just baffles my mind,

204
00:19:26.720 --> 00:19:29.599
Like I try to think of myself, like, Okay, here's this

205
00:19:29.720 --> 00:19:34.480
person who has succumbed to human weakness. Could I see myself in these shoes?

206
00:19:34.599 --> 00:19:38.279
And honestly, I have a hard
time thinking about how I could even

207
00:19:38.559 --> 00:19:42.680
manage my time and my schedule,
which is not as intense as his,

208
00:19:44.079 --> 00:19:48.400
in order to facilitate a two year
long affair of cheating on my wife.

209
00:19:48.599 --> 00:19:52.279
And it's also a thing of it's
not just a succumbing to human weakness,

210
00:19:52.680 --> 00:19:59.319
all right. I'm standing by the
fridge at night, grabbing something for dessert,

211
00:19:59.519 --> 00:20:02.599
and I s come to the human
weakness to grab one more cookie than

212
00:20:02.680 --> 00:20:06.519
is good for me. This is
a two year long affair. There's so

213
00:20:06.640 --> 00:20:12.359
much like deliberate planning that has to
have gone on and deception that has to

214
00:20:12.400 --> 00:20:23.039
have gone on. I guess I
just don't understand. I find it difficult

215
00:20:23.359 --> 00:20:30.799
to fathom that. And again maybe
I'm just naive. I mean, clearly

216
00:20:30.880 --> 00:20:34.519
people do that all the time,
and it remind it reminds me of this

217
00:20:34.599 --> 00:20:38.519
that. Okay, there are certain
conservatives during the whole me too thing who

218
00:20:38.559 --> 00:20:44.519
were like, oh Jesus, no, people are so upset about sexual harassment

219
00:20:44.519 --> 00:20:47.680
and the world. These liberals have
taken the me too thing too far and

220
00:20:47.720 --> 00:20:51.759
bar bla bla blah blah blah blah. And I'll agree that with there was

221
00:20:51.799 --> 00:20:56.119
a certain aspect of the you know, believe all women thing that I think

222
00:20:56.759 --> 00:21:08.200
turned into at times deny basic due
process protections for men. And I think

223
00:21:08.279 --> 00:21:14.039
I try to have a balanced view
on the idea of sexual harassment and sexual

224
00:21:14.079 --> 00:21:19.400
assault claims that yes, we should
take claims of sexual assault seriously and follow

225
00:21:19.440 --> 00:21:26.279
the evidence where it leads, and
while still though respecting due process rights for

226
00:21:26.319 --> 00:21:30.200
those who are accused, but when
it comes to sexual harassment, in the

227
00:21:30.240 --> 00:21:41.079
workplace. I take a very moralizing
view. I've been working for you know,

228
00:21:41.319 --> 00:21:45.000
when did I graduate laws? Twenty
thirteen? Okay, I've been working

229
00:21:45.039 --> 00:21:49.279
ever since. I've worked with all
kinds of people. I've worked with women,

230
00:21:49.359 --> 00:21:52.559
I've worked with women. I've worked
with older women, I've worked with

231
00:21:52.559 --> 00:21:56.960
younger women. I've worked with very
attractive women. I've worked with all kinds

232
00:21:57.440 --> 00:22:07.559
of people. It's very easy not
to sexually harass somebody. It's very easy,

233
00:22:07.079 --> 00:22:12.839
in the context of your work,
not to be a creep, not

234
00:22:14.039 --> 00:22:21.359
to sexually harass somebody, not to
touch people in ways that don't call for

235
00:22:21.400 --> 00:22:30.240
it, not to sleep with someone
else's coworker's wife. It's really very easy.

236
00:22:32.359 --> 00:22:37.039
And it's the thing where it isn't
really human weakness here. Human weakness

237
00:22:37.079 --> 00:22:40.640
again is standing in front of the
fridge and eating that one extra oreo that

238
00:22:40.680 --> 00:22:47.039
you shouldn't eat. It's so stupid, it's so evil. It involves so

239
00:22:47.200 --> 00:22:53.599
much planning and positive decision making and
lying and sneaking around. I think we

240
00:22:53.640 --> 00:22:59.440
should it's and it's so easy not
to do. I think they should just

241
00:22:59.480 --> 00:23:03.160
canbald I'm on the spot, like
to do that to another officers with another

242
00:23:03.200 --> 00:23:10.240
officer's wife. It destroys trust within
the department. How can you possibly how

243
00:23:10.240 --> 00:23:12.680
can you possibly be a leader if
you're doing stuff like that, How can

244
00:23:12.720 --> 00:23:17.960
you possibly enforce you know, correct
HR standards within the department if you're off

245
00:23:18.119 --> 00:23:22.480
doing that. I think he's got
to go. It's just I have a

246
00:23:22.599 --> 00:23:27.440
very short fuse with stuff like this, and this is such bs. I

247
00:23:27.440 --> 00:23:30.960
think he's got to go. When
we return, I want to talk about

248
00:23:32.240 --> 00:23:40.400
this lingering in the background noise of
stories about Justice Alito. Now beyond commenting

249
00:23:40.400 --> 00:23:44.160
on the flagsy waves, we're now
talking about comments he made that were secretly

250
00:23:44.200 --> 00:23:51.519
recorded. That's next on the John
Girardi Show. Justice Alito has been the

251
00:23:51.720 --> 00:23:56.680
target of everybody on the left.
Really, all the conservative justices on the

252
00:23:56.720 --> 00:24:03.640
Court have been part of this consistent
campaign that I think probably goes back to

253
00:24:06.440 --> 00:24:11.559
at least the appointment of Amy Cony
Barrett to the Supreme Court. Amy Cony

254
00:24:11.559 --> 00:24:15.839
Barrett being put on the Supreme Court
to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg was for Democrats

255
00:24:15.920 --> 00:24:26.920
this unacceptable catastrophe because they knew there's
now a genuine conservative majority on the Court

256
00:24:30.079 --> 00:24:33.279
at least five to four, if
not in some cases. It's going to

257
00:24:33.319 --> 00:24:37.759
be six to three, and that
they are in deep due to the Supreme

258
00:24:37.799 --> 00:24:41.920
Court. That they'd always been able
to count on for years and years and

259
00:24:41.000 --> 00:24:45.039
years at least being on any important
issue, being five to four in their

260
00:24:45.119 --> 00:24:52.799
favor was now flipped and it was
something that was now so far outside of

261
00:24:52.799 --> 00:24:57.759
their control that it was making them
panicky. And indeed that panic was justified,

262
00:24:57.799 --> 00:25:03.319
as the Court would go one in
twenty twenty two to overturn Roe v.

263
00:25:03.440 --> 00:25:11.160
Wade, the most precious, sacred
thing for the left. So ever

264
00:25:11.200 --> 00:25:15.279
since then there's been this sort of
campaign. Liberals realized they couldn't just come

265
00:25:15.279 --> 00:25:21.160
out and say we want to pack
the Supreme Court. They sort of tried

266
00:25:21.200 --> 00:25:23.759
that at the start of the Biden
administration. It got nowhere. They couldn't

267
00:25:23.920 --> 00:25:29.079
get all well, they got I
think they got like forty eight out of

268
00:25:29.079 --> 00:25:36.480
the fifty Democrat senators to basically be
on board with getting rid of the filibuster

269
00:25:36.559 --> 00:25:38.680
rules so that they could expand the
number of justices on the Supreme Court.

270
00:25:38.720 --> 00:25:44.240
So again, let me just let
me just res give our definitions here.

271
00:25:44.880 --> 00:25:51.440
What Democrats wanted to do is pack
the Supreme Court Court. Packing is a

272
00:25:51.599 --> 00:26:00.720
term of art within American history and
American legal history. It calls to mind

273
00:26:00.880 --> 00:26:07.960
the actions of Franklin Roosevelt, who
was very annoyed that so many of his

274
00:26:07.240 --> 00:26:18.880
New Deal policies were being blocked by
the justices, the Republican appointee justices on

275
00:26:18.920 --> 00:26:22.799
the Supreme Court. He was getting
really frustrated they kept stopping him, stopping

276
00:26:22.880 --> 00:26:30.119
him, stopping him. And so
in the nineteen thirties, Roosevelt proposed legislation

277
00:26:30.759 --> 00:26:36.279
to expand the number of seats on
the Supreme Court. Roosevelt had massive Democrat

278
00:26:36.359 --> 00:26:40.880
majorities in the House of Representatives in
the US Senate, and so basically what

279
00:26:40.960 --> 00:26:45.079
Roosevelt was proposing was he wanted to
increase the number of seats on the Supreme

280
00:26:45.119 --> 00:26:51.000
Court so that he could appoint and
have his Senate confirm all these new replacements

281
00:26:51.079 --> 00:26:56.319
in order precisely to change the ideological
balance of power on the court and get

282
00:26:56.400 --> 00:27:03.000
different outcomes. That's what court packing
means, and that's what Democrats want to

283
00:27:03.000 --> 00:27:07.400
do. Now, Democrats have retorted, well, Donald Trump was court packing.

284
00:27:07.960 --> 00:27:15.000
No, Donald Trump was aggressively filling
vacancies. He was not creating new

285
00:27:15.200 --> 00:27:19.960
judgeships or new seats on the US
Supreme Court. In order to change the

286
00:27:21.000 --> 00:27:26.359
ideological outcome. He was filling vacancies. That's not court packing. That's just

287
00:27:26.480 --> 00:27:36.599
aggressively filling vacancies. That's it.
Every historian prior to the year twenty twenty

288
00:27:37.759 --> 00:27:41.200
or yeah, basically, every historian
prior to the year twenty twenty thought of

289
00:27:41.359 --> 00:27:45.799
Roosevelt's conduct trying to pack the Supreme
Court. History has judged it very,

290
00:27:45.880 --> 00:27:52.400
very negatively. Essentially, every historian, every historian of law, every historian

291
00:27:52.440 --> 00:27:56.920
of the court has thought that Roosevelt's
desire to pack the Supreme Court in the

292
00:27:56.000 --> 00:28:02.119
nineteen thirties was a hugely destabilizing thing. It was not good, and it

293
00:28:02.240 --> 00:28:07.400
was thoroughly rejected at the time by
Roosevelt's own Democrat majorities in the House and

294
00:28:07.440 --> 00:28:12.000
Senate. The Democrat leadership in the
House and Senate said, nope, look,

295
00:28:12.039 --> 00:28:17.079
we love the new Deal, but
President Roosevelt, this is a step

296
00:28:17.119 --> 00:28:21.119
too far, and you absolutely should
not do this. We should never take

297
00:28:21.160 --> 00:28:25.759
this step of packing the Supreme Court
just purely to achieve ideological outcomes. We

298
00:28:25.799 --> 00:28:37.960
favor that that's wrong. So Democrats
know that if they're just purely brazen about

299
00:28:37.960 --> 00:28:42.079
this, about wanting to pack the
Supreme Court today because they think the current

300
00:28:42.119 --> 00:28:48.079
conservative majority is unacceptable. They can't
just do it baldly saying, Hey,

301
00:28:48.279 --> 00:28:52.160
the Supreme Court has issued all these
decisions we disagree with, We need to

302
00:28:52.200 --> 00:29:00.680
flip those. They need to give
some other kind of bs rationale or why

303
00:29:00.880 --> 00:29:03.960
they want to pack the Supreme Court
now. They're not really in a position

304
00:29:04.039 --> 00:29:08.079
to do that right now. Republicans
have control of the House to Representatives.

305
00:29:11.039 --> 00:29:15.440
It would make no sense for Democrats
to try to introduce legislation right now to

306
00:29:15.480 --> 00:29:18.960
pack the Supreme Court. And frankly, I don't think Democrats have the votes

307
00:29:19.000 --> 00:29:26.079
to do that in the Senate either. So what are Democrats hoping. Democrats

308
00:29:26.079 --> 00:29:32.400
are hoping that they get at least
fifty two or so votes in the Senate,

309
00:29:32.920 --> 00:29:36.680
that they take back the House to
Representatives, and that they win the

310
00:29:36.680 --> 00:29:41.960
White House, that President Biden gets
re elected this November. If all that

311
00:29:42.119 --> 00:29:49.079
happens, what they're going to say
is that the Supreme Court is so compromised

312
00:29:49.160 --> 00:29:56.720
right now, so ethically compromised,
that the only thing to do that would

313
00:29:56.759 --> 00:30:00.119
be fair. We can't, you
know, we don't have the votes to

314
00:30:00.000 --> 00:30:04.160
to kick to you know, to
impeach the sitting members of the Supreme Court,

315
00:30:04.200 --> 00:30:08.400
although maybe they will initiate such proceedings
once they have the house back.

316
00:30:11.039 --> 00:30:12.960
But at the very least, we
have to to bring balance to the court.

317
00:30:14.000 --> 00:30:18.599
To restore the court's reputation. We
have to add four seats to the

318
00:30:18.680 --> 00:30:26.599
US Supreme Court. And how are
they doing that with this campaign of stories

319
00:30:26.440 --> 00:30:33.720
alleging ethical improprieties on the part of
all the conservative justices. So first,

320
00:30:33.720 --> 00:30:40.039
it was Clarence Thomas who had this
friendship with this billionaire who he wrote on

321
00:30:40.079 --> 00:30:41.559
his jet a bunch of times,
This billionaire who never had any cases in

322
00:30:41.640 --> 00:30:45.680
front of the court. He was
buddies with Justice Thomas. He let Justice

323
00:30:45.680 --> 00:30:52.240
Thomas fly in his private jet.
There was nothing he was doing that was

324
00:30:52.319 --> 00:30:55.920
violating any kind of ethics, code
of conduct or anything of the sort.

325
00:30:56.680 --> 00:31:00.279
But the story gets reported, and
you find enough lefties who just hate Clarence

326
00:31:00.319 --> 00:31:03.319
Thomas, some lefty lawyer who's willing
to say in a news story, oh,

327
00:31:03.400 --> 00:31:07.319
this raises some very serious questions.
Okay, well, it raises a

328
00:31:07.359 --> 00:31:11.559
serious question. And here's the serious
answer. It's not a conflict of interest.

329
00:31:11.960 --> 00:31:15.119
It's not something that he has to
recuse himself from. It's not something

330
00:31:15.200 --> 00:31:25.519
he inappropriately failed to disclose he didn't
do anything wrong. They release a story

331
00:31:25.519 --> 00:31:30.759
about Justice Roberts that his wife is
a high powered attorney in Washington, d

332
00:31:30.839 --> 00:31:34.799
c. That she's basically kind of
a legal headhunter who helps recruit sort of

333
00:31:36.319 --> 00:31:41.240
people to come into law firms as
sort of partner level status. So not

334
00:31:41.440 --> 00:31:45.160
you know, new recruits coming fresh
out of law school, this is a

335
00:31:45.240 --> 00:31:49.519
law firm that's looking for existing lawyers
with the long standing track record of practice

336
00:31:49.519 --> 00:31:53.440
to kind of come in a sort
of a lateral move. Oh, that

337
00:31:53.599 --> 00:31:57.200
she makes something like a million dollars
per year. Yeah, his wife is

338
00:31:57.200 --> 00:32:02.039
a really successful, accomplished attorney.
Lots of Supreme Court justices have had spouses

339
00:32:02.160 --> 00:32:07.240
that were highly successful, accomplished attorneys. Ruth Bader Ginsburg's husband was a very

340
00:32:07.240 --> 00:32:10.079
successful, accomplished the fact that she
has a job and makes income, and

341
00:32:10.680 --> 00:32:15.000
you know, yeah, probably she's
a little more prominent because her husband is

342
00:32:15.000 --> 00:32:19.480
the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. But that's not her. That's not

343
00:32:20.240 --> 00:32:25.920
something that's inappropriate. That's not some
inappropriate cashing in on her husband's position.

344
00:32:30.279 --> 00:32:32.799
They had all these stories. They
had even they tried to go after Neil

345
00:32:32.839 --> 00:32:37.759
Gorsich because he sold one of his
He had a house in Colorado that he

346
00:32:37.839 --> 00:32:44.039
decided to sell and he sold it
to some other lawyer in Colorado, and

347
00:32:44.079 --> 00:32:47.519
it was all this. This is
such raises questions of propriety. No,

348
00:32:47.680 --> 00:32:54.920
he sold a house. They're trying
to raise issues about Clarence Thomas that his

349
00:32:55.240 --> 00:33:01.319
wife is super right wing and she
was kind of super supportive of Stop the

350
00:33:01.319 --> 00:33:09.839
Steal stuff. It's like, okay, maybe she is. You cannot attach

351
00:33:12.000 --> 00:33:21.000
espouses opinion to a justice. We
don't do that. You can't say that,

352
00:33:21.319 --> 00:33:25.960
well, Ginny Thomas was supportive of
Stop the Steal. Therefore Clarence Thomas

353
00:33:25.960 --> 00:33:30.759
needs to recuse himself from any cases
involving the twenty twenty elections. No,

354
00:33:34.400 --> 00:33:38.119
Thomas hasn't expressed anything. Clarence Thomas
himself has not expressed anything. The fact

355
00:33:38.119 --> 00:33:42.720
that Ginny Thomas believes what she wants
to believe, that's her business and it

356
00:33:42.799 --> 00:33:49.440
does not necessarily impact anything that Clarence
Thomas does. Well, now we get

357
00:33:49.480 --> 00:33:53.880
to this whole thing with sam Alito. So you've got the flat this idiotic

358
00:33:53.960 --> 00:33:59.480
story that sam Alito's wife flew an
upside down American flag at their house.

359
00:34:00.079 --> 00:34:06.359
This was after one of their neighbors
was really nasty to her. It was

360
00:34:06.400 --> 00:34:09.039
after January sixth. She was really
upset, and for a couple of days

361
00:34:09.079 --> 00:34:15.039
she flew the American flag upside down, which media members are allegedly saying that

362
00:34:15.199 --> 00:34:22.960
was a notorious stop the steel logo
or message to fly your flag upside down.

363
00:34:22.199 --> 00:34:27.519
No flying the American flag upside down. First of all, I've never

364
00:34:27.559 --> 00:34:30.480
heard of that as a stop the
steel thing. I know plenty of right

365
00:34:30.480 --> 00:34:34.360
wingers who very firmly believe in stopped
the steal. I've never seen any of

366
00:34:34.400 --> 00:34:37.639
them fly the American flag upside down. I think generally flying the American flag

367
00:34:37.719 --> 00:34:42.480
upside down it's just a distress signal, like what is wrong with this country?

368
00:34:42.519 --> 00:34:45.960
What is you know? We're in
distress. Then they said, oh

369
00:34:46.039 --> 00:34:49.960
yeah, this other flag that was
another stopped the steel thing. No,

370
00:34:50.119 --> 00:34:53.719
it was some flag George Washington's secretary
design it said appeal to Heaven on it

371
00:34:54.159 --> 00:34:59.039
and flew that at his beach house. And that's another stop the steel thing.

372
00:34:59.079 --> 00:35:01.000
No, it's not to stop the
steel thing. The arguments being made

373
00:35:01.079 --> 00:35:06.840
he should therefore recuse himself from Donald
Trump's January sixth cases presidential immunity stuff.

374
00:35:07.159 --> 00:35:15.920
No, that's ridiculous. Then we
have this reporter who secretly recorded comments by

375
00:35:15.960 --> 00:35:28.559
Alito and Roberts at some party where
frankly, the specific comments were made.

376
00:35:28.880 --> 00:35:36.719
Alito was talking about divisions in the
country. Justice privately said the Justice leader

377
00:35:37.199 --> 00:35:39.480
is talking. He's talking to private
context where he said he hopes the country

378
00:35:39.519 --> 00:35:45.480
couldn't return to some form of godliness
was one of the things he said,

379
00:35:45.920 --> 00:35:47.599
which, yeah, I think a
justice in a private moment is allowed to

380
00:35:47.639 --> 00:35:52.960
express an opinion like that. He
said that he had little hope that the

381
00:35:52.960 --> 00:35:58.519
country would be able to find compromise
on certain things, again in private.

382
00:36:00.719 --> 00:36:06.599
That's probably true and not exactly an
inappropriate thing for a justice to think in

383
00:36:06.599 --> 00:36:15.679
private. So this is when we
return. I want to talk about this

384
00:36:15.760 --> 00:36:20.760
concept called the fog of news and
how I think that's the strategy that's being

385
00:36:20.840 --> 00:36:27.880
employed next on the John Girardi Show. I think the problem we're facing when

386
00:36:27.920 --> 00:36:30.920
it comes to the justices on the
Supreme Court and all these stories about Sam

387
00:36:30.000 --> 00:36:36.599
Alito some comments he made to a
reporter who lied to him, who clandestinely

388
00:36:36.639 --> 00:36:42.320
recorded what he thought was a private
conversation where he said some very bland political

389
00:36:42.440 --> 00:36:47.079
views about hoping the country returns to
godliness, something that probably millions and millions

390
00:36:47.119 --> 00:36:52.039
of Americans believe, and that he
doesn't have much hope that there's going to

391
00:36:52.039 --> 00:37:00.480
be much compromise in American political life. This is on top of story after

392
00:37:00.480 --> 00:37:05.199
story after story after story, none
of which had any merit to them,

393
00:37:05.760 --> 00:37:13.079
about conservative justices allegedly doing things that
were unethical and not recusing themselves for alleged

394
00:37:13.159 --> 00:37:17.159
unethical conduct. Let's ignore Elena Kagan
not recusing herself from the Obamacare case when

395
00:37:17.159 --> 00:37:22.920
she had been Obama's Solicitor General working
on that precise case. Let's ignore Ruth

396
00:37:22.920 --> 00:37:28.440
Bader Ginsberg openly opposing the election of
Donald Trump not appropriate. Let's ignore Sonya

397
00:37:28.440 --> 00:37:36.159
Sotomayor openly encouraging college students to oppose
pro life laws. All these stories,

398
00:37:36.199 --> 00:37:38.679
I think are creating a fog of
news. It's creating a fog of Well,

399
00:37:38.880 --> 00:37:43.400
the court seems pretty unethical. So
therefore, if Democrats get all the

400
00:37:43.400 --> 00:37:45.280
majorities in the House and Senate and
win the White House, it's okay if

401
00:37:45.320 --> 00:37:47.760
they want to pack the Supreme Court
because we got to fix this. Yeah,

402
00:37:47.800 --> 00:37:52.400
it seems like the Supreme Court's pretty
unethical. No, they're not unethical.

403
00:37:53.679 --> 00:37:57.079
This is a bogus attempt by the
left to pack the court. That'll

404
00:37:57.079 --> 00:37:59.039
do it for John Jordi Show,
See next time on Power Talk.

