WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.360 --> 00:00:09.039
Dot Comsideanalysis dot com, and now
here's your host to Eric Kavanaugh and Flare.

2
00:00:10.000 --> 00:00:12.919
All right, ladies and gentlemen,
Hello and welcome back once again on

3
00:00:13.000 --> 00:00:15.839
the only coast to coast radio show
in the US of ATA. It's all

4
00:00:15.880 --> 00:00:20.640
about the information economy Inside Analysis.
Yours truly, Eric Kavanaugh here, and

5
00:00:20.679 --> 00:00:24.679
folks, I'm very excited to be
dialed into our nation's capital. We're going

6
00:00:24.719 --> 00:00:29.320
to talk to an industry visionary today. We've got mister Chris Moore on the

7
00:00:29.359 --> 00:00:36.359
line from the Software and Information Industry
Association or SIIA. We're going to talk

8
00:00:36.359 --> 00:00:41.039
all about data and the data life
cycle and protecting the data life cycle and

9
00:00:41.280 --> 00:00:46.359
frankly being responsible stewards of data.
And that's good for lots of different reasons,

10
00:00:46.679 --> 00:00:50.840
one of which happens to be this
explosion of artificial intelligence. So it's

11
00:00:50.880 --> 00:00:55.600
not just people using data and people
processing data, and now there are machines

12
00:00:55.679 --> 00:00:59.399
that are using data to train on
and to do all sorts of different things.

13
00:00:59.439 --> 00:01:02.280
And that is very, very disruptive, and I think it's going to

14
00:01:02.280 --> 00:01:06.680
continue to be disruptive. So we
want to talk also about responsible AI and

15
00:01:06.719 --> 00:01:10.040
how to get there and the short
answers a lot of it has to do

16
00:01:10.319 --> 00:01:12.599
with data. And with that,
let me welcome Chris More to the show.

17
00:01:12.879 --> 00:01:17.120
Thanks for your time today, tell
us a bit about yourself and about

18
00:01:17.359 --> 00:01:19.920
the SIIA. Sure, my pleasure. It's good to be with you,

19
00:01:21.000 --> 00:01:26.040
and thank you for the invite.
Thank you, Ben. We are What

20
00:01:26.079 --> 00:01:30.000
we like to say is we're a
place for folks who are in the business

21
00:01:30.000 --> 00:01:37.599
of information. And what we do
is we look to preserve and protect a

22
00:01:37.640 --> 00:01:40.640
healthy information life cycle. In other
words, we want to make sure that

23
00:01:40.719 --> 00:01:45.879
there is a good environment for its
creation, dissemination, and productive use.

24
00:01:46.560 --> 00:01:53.519
And our members range from platform companies
you're probably well familiar with, as well

25
00:01:53.519 --> 00:02:05.400
as educational publishers in news organizations and
database publishers and financial data firms. Okay,

26
00:02:05.439 --> 00:02:07.919
and you get into a lot of
different policy areas obviously. I mean

27
00:02:07.919 --> 00:02:14.680
there's intellectual property, there's privacy,
there's cybersecurity, and just the use of

28
00:02:14.759 --> 00:02:17.680
data. So when you talk about
the data life cycle, I presume you're

29
00:02:17.680 --> 00:02:23.159
talking about data from its creation to
its grave, basically, from its inception

30
00:02:23.360 --> 00:02:28.840
through its use all the way to
its deprecation, which in many cases doesn't

31
00:02:28.879 --> 00:02:30.520
even happen because it just sits around
forever. But a lot of cases,

32
00:02:30.560 --> 00:02:36.599
companies will follow process and procedure and
after X period of years, whatever the

33
00:02:36.879 --> 00:02:39.560
regulation is, they will delete that
data and move on. Can you talk

34
00:02:39.560 --> 00:02:44.479
about how that works? I mean, you are an association, so you

35
00:02:44.599 --> 00:02:49.039
have leaders from many of these big
companies I guess over eight hundred members who

36
00:02:49.120 --> 00:02:52.840
come together to forums and really talk
about this stuff and kind of hash out

37
00:02:53.599 --> 00:02:58.080
what to do. Because I know
from experience policy is hard, and policies

38
00:02:58.560 --> 00:03:01.599
need to be understandable, they need
to be known, and they need to

39
00:03:01.639 --> 00:03:05.479
be reasonable in order for people to
follow them. So tell us a bit

40
00:03:05.520 --> 00:03:09.039
about how you go about doing that
and maybe give us some examples. Uh.

41
00:03:09.080 --> 00:03:15.039
Sure, I mean I think there
there are areas, for example,

42
00:03:15.680 --> 00:03:23.039
uh, where there's a pretty good
bit of consensus within our membership, which

43
00:03:23.080 --> 00:03:32.919
is the easiest place to take policy
rights. And so for example, let's

44
00:03:32.919 --> 00:03:37.719
talk about let's talk about privacy.
That's right, that's a hot topic.

45
00:03:37.759 --> 00:03:42.479
And is there an AI wrinkle?
Absolutely there is. Uh. But that's

46
00:03:42.520 --> 00:03:49.159
an area where we saw a bunch
of you know, we saw state laws

47
00:03:49.199 --> 00:03:55.280
coming from California in their in their
signature law, and uh we looked at

48
00:03:55.280 --> 00:03:59.879
the text and we saw, okay, you know, there's a looking at

49
00:03:59.879 --> 00:04:03.120
it from the standpoint of a United
States model, which it was likely to

50
00:04:03.159 --> 00:04:12.680
be initially, this has a real
First Amendment problem. And the way that

51
00:04:12.759 --> 00:04:17.480
Europe approached GDPR and the way that
we as the United States approach the use

52
00:04:17.560 --> 00:04:21.959
of information are very, very different. And so there we looked at that

53
00:04:23.079 --> 00:04:27.199
and we said, look, we
want there to be a privacy law.

54
00:04:27.240 --> 00:04:30.519
We're not opposing the idea that you
pass a privacy law, but you need

55
00:04:30.560 --> 00:04:34.040
to carve out publicly available information because
if you don't, the whole thing will

56
00:04:34.040 --> 00:04:40.439
go down in claims, right,
And so we successfully on behalf of our

57
00:04:40.480 --> 00:04:46.480
members and they were uniformly, I
think behind this advocated for language in that

58
00:04:47.079 --> 00:04:54.519
first in the CCPA and then in
the ballot initiative that carves out the use

59
00:04:54.560 --> 00:04:59.319
of publicly available data. So you
can't tell somebody who publishes, as a

60
00:04:59.439 --> 00:05:04.240
for example, of database of news
articles to stop selling information about you or

61
00:05:04.279 --> 00:05:11.439
to delete information about you, which
under GDPR is you know, theoretically it

62
00:05:11.480 --> 00:05:15.120
can have and certainly in the business
to business publishing space, which is another

63
00:05:17.240 --> 00:05:20.920
division of ours, that that kind
of thing is really important. Yeah.

64
00:05:21.199 --> 00:05:25.639
Well, and you know, I
remember when GDP R came out and they

65
00:05:25.680 --> 00:05:27.439
had this whole thing. I think
you might like this. They had this

66
00:05:27.480 --> 00:05:30.279
whole thing about the right to be
forgotten, which is where they're saying that

67
00:05:30.319 --> 00:05:35.079
if you're an EU citizen and you
want some corporation to delete whatever data it

68
00:05:35.120 --> 00:05:38.759
has about you, that you have
a right to do that, and the

69
00:05:38.759 --> 00:05:42.240
corporation has to follow through and go
ahead and delete your data. Well,

70
00:05:42.319 --> 00:05:44.600
as soon as I heard that,
I was like, good luck with that

71
00:05:44.680 --> 00:05:48.560
one. First of all, data
about someone in a company gets lots of

72
00:05:48.600 --> 00:05:51.680
places. It could be in this
database, it could be in that database,

73
00:05:51.720 --> 00:05:55.759
it could be in email exchanges between
people. There are lots of places

74
00:05:55.800 --> 00:06:00.120
where that data can live, and
quite frankly, in many organizations, there

75
00:06:00.120 --> 00:06:02.680
aren't too many people who know all
the places where that data can live,

76
00:06:02.759 --> 00:06:08.519
and there it's hard to query your
entire information landscape. I mean these days.

77
00:06:09.040 --> 00:06:12.680
Just this morning I did a call
with Justin Borgman, who's the CEO

78
00:06:12.720 --> 00:06:15.879
and co founder of a company called
Starburst, and they do federated queries like

79
00:06:15.959 --> 00:06:20.000
on a data lake, basically where
they can query all sorts of different systems,

80
00:06:20.000 --> 00:06:24.879
all sorts of different databases through one
abstraction layer and that's very cool,

81
00:06:25.079 --> 00:06:28.240
and it's also very new, right, So, and not every company has

82
00:06:28.279 --> 00:06:30.920
Starburst or Dramio or these kind of
tools. So point being, it puts

83
00:06:30.920 --> 00:06:36.680
a tremendous onus on the organizations to
be able to do all that. Besides

84
00:06:36.720 --> 00:06:41.160
which it's very difficult to know.
Is this the John Brown who lives at

85
00:06:41.199 --> 00:06:43.639
one on one Main Street of the
John Brown who lives at four o one

86
00:06:43.720 --> 00:06:46.959
First Street or something like? Just
knowing identity resolution is a challenge in and

87
00:06:47.000 --> 00:06:51.639
of itself. So my point is
GDPR pretty owner is stuff. I mean,

88
00:06:51.680 --> 00:06:56.519
I understand it's not always prosecuted.
So the idea is to have these

89
00:06:56.639 --> 00:07:00.759
sort of goals to strive toward.
But there's something I want to throw out

90
00:07:00.800 --> 00:07:02.600
and maybe just get your take on
all this stuff. I came up with

91
00:07:02.639 --> 00:07:05.959
this concept. I call it the
right to be respected. And what that

92
00:07:06.000 --> 00:07:11.560
means is I want anyone who's using
my data to respect my data and to

93
00:07:11.600 --> 00:07:14.560
respect my preferences. So if you
ask me how do I want to be

94
00:07:14.600 --> 00:07:16.959
contacted, I say by email,
not by phone. I would like for

95
00:07:17.000 --> 00:07:20.560
your operational system to reflect that and
for people to not call me and said

96
00:07:20.639 --> 00:07:26.120
to email me. Right, that
requires an architecture with policies that are baked

97
00:07:26.160 --> 00:07:31.160
in and adhered to. But I
think that's a more reasonable approach is to

98
00:07:31.199 --> 00:07:35.079
say to the X y Z organizations, yes, of course you need my

99
00:07:35.199 --> 00:07:39.920
data when I buy things or if
I sign up for stuff. That's all

100
00:07:39.959 --> 00:07:45.040
fine, but just you know,
be a careful and responsible steward of information

101
00:07:45.079 --> 00:07:46.439
and have some policy around that that
makes sense. But what do you think

102
00:07:46.439 --> 00:07:54.439
about all that? I mean to
me, that sounds very sensible, and

103
00:07:54.480 --> 00:08:01.480
I think you know the question that
where it becomes where it becomes sticky,

104
00:08:01.560 --> 00:08:07.680
I think is depending on who you
talk to. The idea the word respected

105
00:08:07.800 --> 00:08:11.120
carries a lot of weight, right
right, That does a lot of work.

106
00:08:11.000 --> 00:08:16.079
And so you know, for some
people respecting data men, you know,

107
00:08:16.120 --> 00:08:20.160
the second, the second that I
have conduct finished conducting business with your

108
00:08:20.560 --> 00:08:24.000
organization, I want you to take
all my data, put it on a

109
00:08:24.040 --> 00:08:28.040
hard drive, smash it into bits, and throw it in the sea so

110
00:08:28.120 --> 00:08:33.159
I know that it's gone. You
know, that's probably not terribly practical,

111
00:08:33.559 --> 00:08:41.320
right right. And other folks may
say, no, that's not generally,

112
00:08:41.320 --> 00:08:43.480
not how our well not generally,
it's not how our members roll. But

113
00:08:43.519 --> 00:08:46.720
they won't say, well, we
respected it we respected you enough to get

114
00:08:46.720 --> 00:08:50.600
the data from you by consent in
the first place, Right, are we

115
00:08:50.679 --> 00:08:58.720
done here? That's not Yeah,
that's that's not that's not practical either,

116
00:08:58.720 --> 00:09:03.279
and it's Look, nobody wants to
get spammed with tons of messages from a

117
00:09:03.320 --> 00:09:07.080
company that they just did business,
would want or God forbid called, right,

118
00:09:09.440 --> 00:09:13.120
And I think are there are some
natural market checks on that stuff.

119
00:09:15.159 --> 00:09:18.080
And that's an excellent point, right, is that the companies that do respect

120
00:09:18.279 --> 00:09:22.159
your privacy, that do respect your
data and you as a person, well,

121
00:09:22.200 --> 00:09:24.240
they're going to have a good brand, they're going to have a good

122
00:09:24.279 --> 00:09:30.080
reputation. And that's where you let
the market guide things. But to your

123
00:09:30.120 --> 00:09:33.759
point, you do need some kind
of policy, and I think the good

124
00:09:33.759 --> 00:09:39.279
news is that the technologies we have
today enable robust policy management. Ten years

125
00:09:39.279 --> 00:09:43.759
ago or twenty years ago, all
you can really do is govern access at

126
00:09:43.799 --> 00:09:46.639
the database level or at the application
layer, for example through a log in

127
00:09:48.279 --> 00:09:52.279
or something like that. But now
you really can't have policies that are baked

128
00:09:52.279 --> 00:09:56.600
into cloud based systems that are usually
role based. If this person is an

129
00:09:56.639 --> 00:10:00.799
accountant, they have access to accounting
data. If they're a and your executive,

130
00:10:00.840 --> 00:10:03.120
the access to a lot of different
data. All those kind of things

131
00:10:03.159 --> 00:10:09.559
are possible today, and that that
makes the process of policy design and implementation

132
00:10:09.679 --> 00:10:13.440
and enforcement a whole heck of a
lot easier, right, Oh for sure,

133
00:10:13.639 --> 00:10:16.200
I mean, I think, and
that's something even as a small organization,

134
00:10:18.879 --> 00:10:22.519
you know, we have where there
are people, you know, there

135
00:10:22.519 --> 00:10:26.080
are people who need to have the
keys to everything, but there ain't there

136
00:10:26.080 --> 00:10:31.639
ain't many of them, right right, right, And there are there are

137
00:10:31.679 --> 00:10:37.240
folks who need to be able to
access Microsoft Office. And that's essentially about

138
00:10:37.240 --> 00:10:43.399
it, right Uh, And it's
really important internally. I think technologies come

139
00:10:43.440 --> 00:10:48.600
a long way to allowing internal companies
to exercise those controls as well as I

140
00:10:48.600 --> 00:10:54.600
mean in terms of what our members
do. They even when they're dealing with

141
00:10:54.679 --> 00:11:00.559
customers, they there will be a
range of controls on what a particular customer

142
00:11:00.639 --> 00:11:05.000
might be able to do with what
they access and how that's determined. So

143
00:11:05.039 --> 00:11:11.799
that could be everything from refs and
warranties in a contract in terms in terms

144
00:11:11.840 --> 00:11:18.960
of use in the subscription agreement,
to IP monitoring and clearance, to sometimes

145
00:11:20.000 --> 00:11:24.480
even site visits to be sure that
this place that is licensing access to information

146
00:11:24.759 --> 00:11:30.720
is you know, in fact exists, right, and it's not some you

147
00:11:30.720 --> 00:11:35.039
know, it depends, it's they
adopt a risk based approach to all of

148
00:11:35.039 --> 00:11:39.000
this stuff. Yeah, that's a
good point. And you make another good

149
00:11:39.039 --> 00:11:45.360
point about having the need for people
who understand how the systems work. Right,

150
00:11:45.399 --> 00:11:48.240
if something is a black box,
well it's kind of hard to understand

151
00:11:48.240 --> 00:11:52.799
a black box. And now,
at the risk of getting ahead of ourselves

152
00:11:52.840 --> 00:11:58.200
a little bit here, artificial intelligence
large language models, right, these companies

153
00:11:58.200 --> 00:12:01.399
that build some of the first ones, Open AI, for example, I

154
00:12:01.440 --> 00:12:05.120
know a lot of people who know
about that whole process. And what I'm

155
00:12:05.159 --> 00:12:11.320
told is that early in the game
they realize they cannot just set these engines

156
00:12:11.320 --> 00:12:13.600
loose on the Internet at large,
because there's a lot of nonsense on the

157
00:12:13.600 --> 00:12:16.559
Internet. There is a lot of
true stuff, and there's a lot of

158
00:12:16.559 --> 00:12:20.759
stuff it's not true. There's speculation, there's sarcasm, they're all kinds of

159
00:12:20.759 --> 00:12:24.120
things, and so they had to
be very careful about how they trained the

160
00:12:24.159 --> 00:12:26.679
models. But they clearly train the
models on a corpus of data on the

161
00:12:26.679 --> 00:12:33.879
Internet. And so where do you
run into how do you even delineate copyright

162
00:12:33.919 --> 00:12:35.440
on something like that? And what's
fun is. If you ever ask chat

163
00:12:35.480 --> 00:12:39.159
GPT or Gemini, which is what
I use about copyright, it will give

164
00:12:39.159 --> 00:12:41.679
you a pretty thoughtful answer. I'll
say, well, actually, you know,

165
00:12:41.759 --> 00:12:45.919
you might want to talk to your
attorney or something like that, but

166
00:12:46.000 --> 00:12:48.080
what are your high level thoughts about
that? I realized it's a very sensitive

167
00:12:48.120 --> 00:12:52.200
subject, but I'm sure you guys
are talking about that, right we do.

168
00:12:52.519 --> 00:12:56.559
And this is one This is an
area I had mentioned. There are

169
00:12:56.639 --> 00:13:03.360
areas where members are agree, and
this is an area where they don't.

170
00:13:03.840 --> 00:13:09.679
But there are there are a few
points. And I'm you know, I'm

171
00:13:09.679 --> 00:13:15.399
a recovering copyright lawyer. Uh and
so you know, perfectly happy to have

172
00:13:15.440 --> 00:13:20.120
a relapse. But just so you
know, uh, you've been there,

173
00:13:20.639 --> 00:13:26.960
I've been there. So there are
there are definitely two sides to this story.

174
00:13:28.919 --> 00:13:39.080
And the on the one side,
you have a technology that at its

175
00:13:39.320 --> 00:13:46.120
core is looking for statistical relationships between
words and series of words. Basically,

176
00:13:46.279 --> 00:13:48.799
right, that's what it's interested in. Right, So a word, you

177
00:13:48.840 --> 00:13:54.919
know, quick brown, the next
likely word is fox is a lot more

178
00:13:54.000 --> 00:13:58.960
likely than ruda, bega. And
that's it's a physics model of sorts for

179
00:13:58.080 --> 00:14:05.360
language, and so in determining those
relationships. You are abstracting out a particular

180
00:14:07.399 --> 00:14:15.759
non fact, if you like.
And the argument on the one side would

181
00:14:15.840 --> 00:14:20.919
point to reverse engineering cases that have
held that type of life, that type

182
00:14:20.919 --> 00:14:26.440
of activity to be lawful. Right. That's one piece of it. The

183
00:14:26.519 --> 00:14:31.080
other piece of it is that on
the one hand, the work may be

184
00:14:31.200 --> 00:14:35.480
copied. The work was copied,
there's no doubt about that. It is

185
00:14:35.559 --> 00:14:43.799
being used to create works that may
not be literally similar but are nonetheless competitively

186
00:14:43.879 --> 00:14:52.159
substitutive for the works of the original
originating authors. That's an issue, and

187
00:14:52.200 --> 00:14:56.200
there may be issues. There may
be other issues in there around the weights

188
00:14:56.240 --> 00:15:01.840
assigned to particular kinds of content.
There may be issues around whether or not

189
00:15:01.039 --> 00:15:07.480
any of the content was parradical,
There may be issues around any number of

190
00:15:07.559 --> 00:15:13.200
things. But the thing is is
that these are issues that are uniquely poorly

191
00:15:13.279 --> 00:15:20.000
situated to have a legislature deal with
them, because they're fact specific, and

192
00:15:20.080 --> 00:15:26.200
that's how the courts resolve these things, one case at a time, and

193
00:15:26.240 --> 00:15:30.200
that's where our members are. So
even though they disagree about these things,

194
00:15:30.240 --> 00:15:35.120
and they think in some circumstances the
law to play one group will say,

195
00:15:35.120 --> 00:15:39.840
well, in this circumstance, the
law to apply in a particular way versus

196
00:15:39.919 --> 00:15:45.720
a different circumstance. That kind of
salami slicing is what needs to happen before

197
00:15:45.720 --> 00:15:50.279
there can really be any policy solution. That's very interesting. So for example,

198
00:15:50.320 --> 00:15:54.279
I remember, well, I guess
in Canada they just hit passed this

199
00:15:54.399 --> 00:15:58.840
law. In California, I think
they're doing something similar where the government is

200
00:15:58.879 --> 00:16:03.399
saying that if you link to a
bunch of news articles from media companies,

201
00:16:03.440 --> 00:16:07.120
you have to pay those people based
on the clicks and things of this nature.

202
00:16:07.639 --> 00:16:11.519
And so you know, what's the
law of undertended consequences doing here.

203
00:16:11.559 --> 00:16:12.720
It's saying, well, finally,
we just won't do that, so we

204
00:16:12.799 --> 00:16:17.960
won't disseminate the news anymore. We
won't disseminate this information. And it gets

205
00:16:18.080 --> 00:16:21.440
it kind of gets sticky, very
very quickly, and you start asking yourself,

206
00:16:21.440 --> 00:16:23.000
all right, does this make sense? And like, how would you

207
00:16:23.080 --> 00:16:27.279
compensate people for these things? Would
you have to open the kimono and show

208
00:16:27.320 --> 00:16:32.600
what you paid as an organization to
the author? I mean, wow,

209
00:16:32.679 --> 00:16:37.759
that conversation gets goes sideways pretty quickly. And I remember news aggregation sites,

210
00:16:37.799 --> 00:16:40.440
for example, where you just have
a bunch of links to other articles they're

211
00:16:40.440 --> 00:16:42.000
saying, oh, now you'd have
to pay those people. This has coming

212
00:16:42.039 --> 00:16:45.279
gone a few times. We've got
our first break coming up here in just

213
00:16:45.320 --> 00:16:48.720
a second, but picked this up
after the break. It is a bit

214
00:16:48.759 --> 00:16:55.440
of a stifling question to wonder,
well, hyperlinks are what the Internet is

215
00:16:55.440 --> 00:16:59.159
all about, Like at the very
core, it's just links to other stuff

216
00:16:59.200 --> 00:17:03.000
that you can then excit floor and
learn about and and have discovery and do

217
00:17:03.080 --> 00:17:07.359
all these kinds of educational things.
So if you start trying to track that,

218
00:17:07.720 --> 00:17:10.839
how would you even do that?
I mean, there's no one standard

219
00:17:10.920 --> 00:17:14.400
for being able to report on that
is everyone have to download a certain kind

220
00:17:14.400 --> 00:17:18.079
of software to that. I mean, it just it goes sideways so quickly,

221
00:17:18.119 --> 00:17:21.680
and I don't think that many people
really understand that a lot of these

222
00:17:22.119 --> 00:17:27.519
aspirations are either untenable or going to
have unintended consequences that are just so dire,

223
00:17:27.599 --> 00:17:32.000
and it really undercuts the whole mission
in the first place, of trying

224
00:17:32.039 --> 00:17:37.519
to protect the authors of some particular
piece of content. Somewhere it gets wild

225
00:17:37.559 --> 00:17:40.799
and wely real fast. But folks
don't touch that. Dell will be right

226
00:17:40.839 --> 00:17:52.680
back with Chris Moore. You were
listening to Inside Analysis. Welcome back to

227
00:17:52.880 --> 00:18:00.839
Inside Analysis. Here's your host,
Eric Tavanaugh. Right, folks, take

228
00:18:00.880 --> 00:18:04.519
us to the future, indeed,
talking all things information, information, life

229
00:18:04.519 --> 00:18:11.200
cycle, responsible information management. So
we're talking to Chris Moore of the Software

230
00:18:11.400 --> 00:18:21.559
and Information and Industry Association, Right
that right, then does it? So?

231
00:18:21.920 --> 00:18:25.200
S I I a dialing in from
our nation's capital, Washington, d

232
00:18:25.319 --> 00:18:30.559
C. And you mentioned in the
last segment for radical meaning pirateed and so

233
00:18:30.640 --> 00:18:36.680
if someone has trained their model on
pirated software, pirated movies for example,

234
00:18:37.160 --> 00:18:41.160
that's a whole separate area that needs
to be handled differently from a policy perspective.

235
00:18:41.200 --> 00:18:42.119
Right, do you want to talk
about that for a second. Sure,

236
00:18:42.240 --> 00:18:47.039
I mean I think I'm talking about
when I talk about that, what

237
00:18:47.079 --> 00:18:52.200
I'm talking about is in the context
of a copyright lawsuit, which is where

238
00:18:52.200 --> 00:18:57.680
all this is now. There is
uh there's there's a defense called fair use,

239
00:18:57.720 --> 00:19:03.359
which is kind of copyrights. If
you like copyrights, golden rule.

240
00:19:03.400 --> 00:19:08.599
It's not due unto others and run
it's it's to others as you would have

241
00:19:08.799 --> 00:19:14.759
them do uh do to you.
And it's designed to be a rule of

242
00:19:14.839 --> 00:19:19.480
reason, right, and so,
but it's one that's based in equity or

243
00:19:19.519 --> 00:19:27.960
fairness, and so your risk looks
different if you had kind of lawfully acquired

244
00:19:27.960 --> 00:19:33.440
a bunch of stuff, a bunch
of legitimate copies, if you legitimately got

245
00:19:33.480 --> 00:19:40.160
access to legitimate copies and use them, versus you've got access to illegitimate copies,

246
00:19:40.200 --> 00:19:45.200
infringing copies and use those, the
fairness balance looks different. It's the

247
00:19:45.319 --> 00:19:48.400
risk. The risk analysis is simply
different, you know. And that's saying

248
00:19:48.400 --> 00:19:53.880
it without opining on how the case
may turn out, right, because you

249
00:19:55.079 --> 00:19:59.240
there's lots of other facts that could
swing it one way or the other.

250
00:20:00.119 --> 00:20:03.359
But the risk looks different, right. Yeah, that's a very good point.

251
00:20:03.680 --> 00:20:07.319
And so what we're trying to do
is to find reasonable policies and I

252
00:20:07.400 --> 00:20:11.079
know all about fair use. It
basically says, look, I mean you

253
00:20:11.119 --> 00:20:15.039
can read something and remember it,
and then if you happen to quote it

254
00:20:15.079 --> 00:20:18.400
and you didn't realize you're quoting it
verbatim, well you're not doing something bad.

255
00:20:18.799 --> 00:20:22.960
You're just reflecting back. And what's
interesting is that's really kind of what

256
00:20:22.000 --> 00:20:26.160
these AI models are doing, the
large language models. The big AHA moment

257
00:20:26.240 --> 00:20:30.880
for me was understanding that when you
train one of these models on information,

258
00:20:32.400 --> 00:20:37.960
it's not actually persisting the verbatim text. Rather, it is adjusting. The

259
00:20:37.000 --> 00:20:42.480
engine adjusts its own weights and biases
and its parameters, which is kind of

260
00:20:42.519 --> 00:20:47.319
like how humans learn. I mean, these are neural nets that were designed

261
00:20:47.319 --> 00:20:51.599
to attempt to reflect how human beings
behave. But the point is it's not

262
00:20:51.759 --> 00:20:57.599
like copying and pasting later on.
It's absorbing this information, adjusting its parameters

263
00:20:57.599 --> 00:21:02.039
accordingly. And there are billions of
AMers in some of these models. And

264
00:21:02.079 --> 00:21:06.519
then it's reflecting back to you text
based upon your prompt. And it's a

265
00:21:06.519 --> 00:21:11.039
predictive engine. Basically, it's a
predictive engine that gives you what it thinks

266
00:21:11.079 --> 00:21:14.839
you're looking for based upon your prompt, which is a very different thing from

267
00:21:15.319 --> 00:21:18.279
just copying text and then pasting it
under a different name. Right, yeah,

268
00:21:18.359 --> 00:21:25.160
I mean, look, I had
a similar similar insight for me was

269
00:21:25.279 --> 00:21:32.799
that these engines are essentially a particular
kind of artists, which I wouldn't describe

270
00:21:32.799 --> 00:21:37.400
on a family show. I would
say. What I mean by that is

271
00:21:37.440 --> 00:21:41.559
they say, I mean, you
know, act as if you were so

272
00:21:41.680 --> 00:21:45.440
if you ask them a question and
say, you know, I would like

273
00:21:45.519 --> 00:21:51.079
the answer to this to a particular
question, can you explain the fair use

274
00:21:51.759 --> 00:21:55.160
defense. To me, you were
saying, act as if you are an

275
00:21:55.160 --> 00:21:57.880
expert on fair use, what would
you tell this person right? And then

276
00:21:57.920 --> 00:22:02.519
the quality of the data will determine
that answer. Right, it could be

277
00:22:02.599 --> 00:22:07.759
right, it could be wrong.
And when you get into more sensitive questions

278
00:22:07.799 --> 00:22:11.640
around security, you know, around
for example, I don't know, creating

279
00:22:11.680 --> 00:22:17.480
chemical weapons and stuff like that,
it requires a lot of thought and care

280
00:22:17.720 --> 00:22:25.000
to make sure that the engine doesn't
do what it's supposed to do. So

281
00:22:25.119 --> 00:22:30.759
to speak right well, And of
course there's dual use technologies. That's very

282
00:22:30.799 --> 00:22:34.880
common thing to watch out for in
the government, because you can use the

283
00:22:34.920 --> 00:22:38.359
stuff for fertilizer or to make a
bomb, right, And so you have

284
00:22:38.400 --> 00:22:41.519
to be able to understand the difference
between the two. And you know you're

285
00:22:41.599 --> 00:22:48.279
right that this comes into question where
rubber meets row when there's a lawsuit somewhere,

286
00:22:48.279 --> 00:22:51.519
and then you have to hash out
all the different issues and try to

287
00:22:51.640 --> 00:22:56.240
understand. But I think you're you're
on target to say that the fair use

288
00:22:56.359 --> 00:23:00.359
doctrine is meant to be fair,
as the name would indicate, it's meant

289
00:23:00.400 --> 00:23:03.599
to say, all right, there
are lines we can draw about how you

290
00:23:03.599 --> 00:23:07.559
can responsibly use these things, and
I understand it. In the music industry,

291
00:23:07.559 --> 00:23:11.359
there's some pretty precise rules around that, like how many notes in a

292
00:23:11.440 --> 00:23:14.759
row can be the same, and
things of this nature when push comes to

293
00:23:14.799 --> 00:23:18.680
shove in a court of laws somewhere. But just generally speaking, it's very

294
00:23:18.680 --> 00:23:23.319
interesting to me to see how these
large language models have triggered all these conversations

295
00:23:23.359 --> 00:23:27.240
around ethics and ethical AI and what
you can do. And I think the

296
00:23:27.319 --> 00:23:30.920
answer to most of that is solved
in two different ways. One is data

297
00:23:30.960 --> 00:23:36.680
governance and the other is transparency.
And the transparency argument. I'd be curious

298
00:23:36.720 --> 00:23:38.640
to hear your thoughts on that,
because of course you got LAMA two and

299
00:23:38.759 --> 00:23:42.759
LAMA three from Meta, which are
open source. Open AI used to be

300
00:23:42.799 --> 00:23:47.519
open source, it's not now it's
not a black box. And what do

301
00:23:47.519 --> 00:23:49.119
you think from your perspective, how
big a difference is that? How does

302
00:23:49.119 --> 00:23:55.079
that change things when it's a black
box versus an open source model? So

303
00:23:56.079 --> 00:24:03.480
that is I'm going to give you
an answer that's accurate and both technically accurate

304
00:24:03.519 --> 00:24:10.960
and practically useless. The answer is
that it depends right. I think you

305
00:24:10.960 --> 00:24:15.519
know because we've seen we have seen
these debates before, and by that I

306
00:24:15.559 --> 00:24:21.359
mean, you know, there was
a time when those who made and i'll

307
00:24:21.359 --> 00:24:25.839
put them in scare quote, put
it in scare quotes black Box software,

308
00:24:26.359 --> 00:24:32.200
were scared to death of open source, viewed it as a virus, one

309
00:24:32.240 --> 00:24:38.119
that needed, you know, a
proportionate response, right, and it turned

310
00:24:38.160 --> 00:24:45.759
out to be a really good way
of developing secure and interoperable systems in certain

311
00:24:45.799 --> 00:24:49.119
circumstances. There are times when you
will want that, there are times when

312
00:24:49.160 --> 00:24:56.359
you won't. I think here we
are seeing to some degree, a similar

313
00:24:57.119 --> 00:25:04.160
kind of we're seeing a similar drama
play out. I think it is a

314
00:25:04.160 --> 00:25:11.440
little different around the edges, but
there it really has to go. The

315
00:25:11.400 --> 00:25:21.599
way that it's different is that the
engines themselves are so flexible and so there.

316
00:25:21.759 --> 00:25:25.000
In other words, if you build, if you're building I don't know,

317
00:25:23.839 --> 00:25:29.079
you know, an open source video
rendering tool just looking at this screen,

318
00:25:29.519 --> 00:25:33.759
that's what it is. Whereas an
open AI, an open sourced AI

319
00:25:33.839 --> 00:25:37.519
model is different. So what is
the right approach to that The right approach

320
00:25:37.559 --> 00:25:42.759
to dealing with something like that is
going to be based on risk. In

321
00:25:42.799 --> 00:25:48.000
other words, you have to be
sure that as and this is the way

322
00:25:48.079 --> 00:25:52.279
that the US is progressing, this
is the way the White House is made

323
00:25:52.279 --> 00:25:56.599
clear that it wants to go.
They want a risk based approach to this.

324
00:25:56.519 --> 00:26:00.200
To give you a really simple answer, in our experience, I mean,

325
00:26:00.240 --> 00:26:04.960
we've been around for going on we're
creeping on fifty, which is a

326
00:26:06.000 --> 00:26:12.559
long time for a quote technology close
quote association. So you know, we've

327
00:26:12.559 --> 00:26:22.960
seen a few rodeos, and in
our experience anyway, technology neutral regulation tends

328
00:26:23.000 --> 00:26:26.200
to be the best way to approach
these things. In other words, you

329
00:26:26.240 --> 00:26:29.799
don't look so much. You look
at the risks of the technology creates.

330
00:26:30.200 --> 00:26:34.039
So fraud is still going to be
fraud. It doesn't matter if it's a

331
00:26:34.079 --> 00:26:41.480
scammer calling you in real life,
where if it's a bot scammer using AI

332
00:26:41.599 --> 00:26:45.319
to create a voice. They're both
okay, both of those things are scary.

333
00:26:45.559 --> 00:26:48.640
They are both. It's a dual
use technology, right. They will

334
00:26:48.720 --> 00:26:55.759
use it in movies, for example, to create a character that no longer

335
00:26:55.799 --> 00:27:00.160
exists or an actor's voice that can
no longer use his right. Right,

336
00:27:00.440 --> 00:27:06.960
that's dual use technology. But it's
still fraud, right, and there are

337
00:27:07.480 --> 00:27:11.720
remedies for that, And if there
are technology specific angles, that's what we

338
00:27:11.799 --> 00:27:17.079
need to look into as opposed to
saying you know, okay, and this

339
00:27:17.200 --> 00:27:22.559
is typical of the EU sort of
where they started was it's not coming out

340
00:27:22.599 --> 00:27:27.640
unless we approve it, right,
and that's that's treats you know, your

341
00:27:27.680 --> 00:27:33.240
Spotify algorithm the same way that it
would treat you know, power grid management.

342
00:27:33.680 --> 00:27:38.240
Mm hmm. That's just not that
doesn't make sense. Yeah, and

343
00:27:38.279 --> 00:27:42.640
you're reminded me of something too,
because deep fhase are definitely an issue.

344
00:27:44.160 --> 00:27:47.839
Certainly we're going to see this in
the political sphere. I've seen a couple

345
00:27:47.839 --> 00:27:49.640
that were very funny. I'm not
gonna lie. I won't say which one

346
00:27:49.680 --> 00:27:52.000
it was or who it was,
but it was like, what what did

347
00:27:52.160 --> 00:27:56.000
she say? We had to laugh
but were Okay, it's a deep fake,

348
00:27:56.079 --> 00:27:59.559
that's what's happening here. But I
think that probably and i'd be curious

349
00:27:59.559 --> 00:28:03.640
to your thought on this. There
are some very practical ways you can leverage

350
00:28:03.680 --> 00:28:08.400
technology to know if something is genuine
because most cameras are digital cameras these days,

351
00:28:08.400 --> 00:28:12.599
and they have a whole host of
metadata that's baked into that device about

352
00:28:12.839 --> 00:28:15.960
you know, what device it is, what time this thing was taking,

353
00:28:17.000 --> 00:28:19.119
what the location was, a lot
of them have geolocations, so if you

354
00:28:19.240 --> 00:28:22.680
pass all those markers, then that
looks good. Then you could say this

355
00:28:22.759 --> 00:28:27.039
photograph was of the wreckage from a
tornado in Kansas, and it checks out.

356
00:28:27.119 --> 00:28:29.839
Yep, it was in Kansas.
Yep, it was this date.

357
00:28:29.920 --> 00:28:33.440
Okay, that looks pretty good.
And you're starting to see I think it

358
00:28:33.480 --> 00:28:37.680
was meta and someone else say maybe
it was Google. They're going to try

359
00:28:37.680 --> 00:28:44.920
to create some watermarks on digitally altered
photography videos things of this nature. Also,

360
00:28:45.319 --> 00:28:48.880
I think that's I think that's a
very practical way to go, because

361
00:28:48.920 --> 00:28:52.279
then you'll be able to sense that
or your browser can sense that, and

362
00:28:52.279 --> 00:28:53.920
it'll say and you can turn it
on or off, like is this real

363
00:28:55.039 --> 00:28:59.079
or is this generated? I think
that's some pretty good stuff. Even when

364
00:28:59.200 --> 00:29:02.240
someone calls you on the phone,
is it a real voice? I mean,

365
00:29:02.400 --> 00:29:04.880
you know, I get calls and
I know the technology enerity, so

366
00:29:04.880 --> 00:29:07.720
I'm curious to see and like they'll
wait a second, Oh, how are

367
00:29:07.759 --> 00:29:11.079
you doing anyway? This is Jane
from such and such Up up, I'm

368
00:29:11.079 --> 00:29:15.640
like, okay, sure it is, like this is a computer voice talkingy

369
00:29:15.839 --> 00:29:18.839
But what do you think about all
that? About the practical ways we can

370
00:29:18.920 --> 00:29:25.160
leverage technology and existing formats and protocols
to kind of shepherd ourselves towards getting to

371
00:29:25.200 --> 00:29:33.400
the truth. So there's one of
the ideas I tend to be optimistic about

372
00:29:33.440 --> 00:29:38.519
the role of technology in this space. In other words, we will deploy

373
00:29:38.599 --> 00:29:45.240
things and then there will be there
will always be some kind of unintended consequence

374
00:29:45.799 --> 00:29:48.759
right right one way or another,
and then we figure out a way to

375
00:29:48.799 --> 00:29:56.119
fix it. So in this particular
space, content provenance, what you were

376
00:29:56.160 --> 00:30:03.440
talking about is that's exactly the that's
exactly the kind of thing that can greatly

377
00:30:03.480 --> 00:30:10.480
ameliorate the harm from from defix because
you'll know where the image came from and

378
00:30:10.519 --> 00:30:15.279
whether or not it's faltered, right. That's you know, that that kind

379
00:30:15.359 --> 00:30:21.480
of thing. It takes time.
Standards take doesn't take long to lie right,

380
00:30:22.960 --> 00:30:26.519
but it does take time to develop
standards for figuring out what the truth

381
00:30:26.599 --> 00:30:30.599
is, particularly when you have you
have a variety of companies with a variety

382
00:30:30.599 --> 00:30:34.680
of different kinds of IP getting together
and trying to figure out something that's going

383
00:30:34.759 --> 00:30:38.480
to work for everybody. That's how
the standards process works, and it's an

384
00:30:38.480 --> 00:30:44.400
incredibly valuable one, but it takes
time right, right, And we've seen

385
00:30:44.480 --> 00:30:48.960
we've seen the same kinds of things
happen in all kinds of areas, you

386
00:30:48.000 --> 00:30:52.240
know, content moderation, I know, it's a it's what they call a

387
00:30:52.480 --> 00:30:57.799
fraught topic, right, right,
But those algorithms get a lot of bad

388
00:30:57.880 --> 00:31:03.920
stuff down, They get a lot
and yes, is there are people doing

389
00:31:03.960 --> 00:31:07.640
bad things? Yes, are they
doing bad things on the internet? For

390
00:31:07.720 --> 00:31:14.440
sure? And it takes a and
it doesn't take the scale is so the

391
00:31:14.880 --> 00:31:18.720
numbers are just so big that even
a small failure rate is an enormous amount

392
00:31:18.759 --> 00:31:27.839
of available bad stuff. And it's
and it's hard to you know, it's

393
00:31:27.880 --> 00:31:36.039
hard to persuade people that they're people
are trying really hard when the numbers are

394
00:31:36.079 --> 00:31:41.319
so big. But it's you know, it's kind of like from the oldest

395
00:31:42.400 --> 00:31:45.960
proving your value as a council through
all of the bad things that didn't happen.

396
00:31:47.359 --> 00:31:49.880
Yeah, that's funny, right,
Like you can't you can't prove a

397
00:31:49.960 --> 00:31:56.519
negative, right the age old argument
or if we if they did, things

398
00:31:56.519 --> 00:32:00.160
would get really really bad. Right. Well, there you go with the

399
00:32:00.240 --> 00:32:04.960
law of the law of unintended consequences. And you know, boyd, can

400
00:32:05.039 --> 00:32:09.400
it come just screeching down the pike
if you throw down some mantra or some

401
00:32:09.480 --> 00:32:13.839
dictate about what can and cannot be
done. Again, I get to what

402
00:32:13.880 --> 00:32:17.119
I call the black market effect.
You know, when when rules and regulations

403
00:32:17.160 --> 00:32:22.599
are unreasonable and significantly unreasonable, you
can rest assured that people are going to

404
00:32:22.640 --> 00:32:23.599
go around them. They're gonna find
all the ways to do it. They're

405
00:32:23.599 --> 00:32:27.839
gonna offshore it, they're gonna get
deputies to do it, they're gonna pay

406
00:32:27.880 --> 00:32:30.279
people other ways to you know,
have them do it. I mean,

407
00:32:30.319 --> 00:32:32.440
there's just like a thousand things you
can do, and getting to the bottom

408
00:32:32.519 --> 00:32:36.240
of it is a very difficult thing. You know. I had a guy

409
00:32:36.519 --> 00:32:38.480
on this show long long time ago, I think in two thousand and nine,

410
00:32:38.640 --> 00:32:43.039
a guy I never forget his name, Chuck Nice from the Insurance Institutes

411
00:32:43.079 --> 00:32:45.799
of America, and he had this
great quote. He said, let me

412
00:32:45.799 --> 00:32:50.160
tell you, if an insurance company
wants to hide something, you're not gonna

413
00:32:50.160 --> 00:32:53.680
find it. It's like, wow, you know, I hadn't thought of

414
00:32:53.720 --> 00:32:55.640
it that way. He had a
great quote too, because we were talking

415
00:32:55.680 --> 00:33:00.240
about it. Could better governance have
prevented the housing in two thousand and eight

416
00:33:00.279 --> 00:33:04.759
of the market crash, basically the
money markets that went down and all that

417
00:33:04.759 --> 00:33:07.440
stuff. And he said, yeah, you know, I don't think so

418
00:33:07.559 --> 00:33:09.559
he goes, who would have known
that lending money to people who couldn't afford

419
00:33:09.559 --> 00:33:13.720
it was a bad idea? You
know? So you get back to that

420
00:33:13.799 --> 00:33:16.680
practicality argument, right. I mean, you can talk all day about theories

421
00:33:16.720 --> 00:33:20.000
and policies and all these kinds of
things, but at the end of the

422
00:33:20.079 --> 00:33:22.200
day, it has to be reasonable, it has to make sense. Well,

423
00:33:22.200 --> 00:33:24.680
folks, second segment is up here. Stand by, we'll be right

424
00:33:24.680 --> 00:33:36.440
back. You were listening to Inside
Analysis. Welcome back to Inside Analysis.

425
00:33:36.960 --> 00:33:43.480
Here's your host, Eric Tabanac.
All right, folks, back here talking

426
00:33:43.519 --> 00:33:49.960
to Chris Moore with the Software and
Information Industry Association or sii A. And

427
00:33:50.319 --> 00:33:54.039
Chris, here's a topic that I'm
dying to learn about data brokers. There

428
00:33:54.079 --> 00:33:58.640
is so much data being bought and
sold. There are all these contracts out

429
00:33:58.640 --> 00:34:00.559
there, A lot of good stuff
is happening. A lot of people have

430
00:34:00.599 --> 00:34:04.839
no idea that this is happening or
what's going on with it. But give

431
00:34:04.839 --> 00:34:08.280
me your take on data brokers and
what the policymakers are trying to achieve in

432
00:34:08.320 --> 00:34:15.559
that whole world. So I think, well, what they're trying to achieve

433
00:34:15.599 --> 00:34:19.760
I think is the question is not
what they're trying to achieve, because we

434
00:34:19.800 --> 00:34:23.360
share those goals, is really a
question of method, and they're very much

435
00:34:23.719 --> 00:34:28.000
at times it feels like they're very
much at the world Peace stage of thinking

436
00:34:30.320 --> 00:34:37.400
the World Peace statement. The problem. The problem we have is that the

437
00:34:37.440 --> 00:34:44.039
way they typically define data broker is
that a data broker is somebody that publishes

438
00:34:44.159 --> 00:34:50.360
personal information about someone else with whom
they don't have a direct relationship. That

439
00:34:50.480 --> 00:34:58.119
is incredibly broad, and it is
Our point of view is if you look

440
00:34:58.480 --> 00:35:01.519
at that's also a kind of if
you think you can just come in and

441
00:35:01.559 --> 00:35:06.760
regulate that, that's kind of a
European way of looking at it. In

442
00:35:06.800 --> 00:35:09.760
other words, that this property,
that this information is the property of the

443
00:35:09.800 --> 00:35:17.440
person who you're talking about. That
if you look at things that way,

444
00:35:17.800 --> 00:35:25.239
then the data broker regime makes sense. The problem with that is if you

445
00:35:25.280 --> 00:35:30.760
are talking about an entity that collects
information about other people with whom they don't

446
00:35:30.760 --> 00:35:36.480
have a direct relationship, what you're
talking about is regulating the activity of commercial

447
00:35:36.480 --> 00:35:43.719
publishing, and that has and you
can do that, but you have to

448
00:35:43.760 --> 00:35:45.920
look at it through a different lens, and there's a whole bunch of reasons

449
00:35:46.239 --> 00:35:52.079
why personally, it doesn't make sense
to think of personal information as property.

450
00:35:52.079 --> 00:35:55.360
And I'll give you a couple.
So the first reason is we have a

451
00:35:55.400 --> 00:36:00.000
first Amendment. So there is one
tranche of information that you can't regulate at

452
00:36:00.000 --> 00:36:06.519
all, right, and that's stuff
generally that's in the public domain, news

453
00:36:06.519 --> 00:36:12.360
worthy, public public information, information
that the government voluntarily releases that you're free

454
00:36:12.360 --> 00:36:15.079
to discuss and comment on, even
if it's about people. Especially if it's

455
00:36:15.079 --> 00:36:20.159
about people. You don't get to
yank that back out and say as a

456
00:36:20.199 --> 00:36:23.400
regulator, no, you can't discuss
this anymore. So that's one piece.

457
00:36:23.400 --> 00:36:28.639
So that's not property at all.
That belongs to everybody. So that's one

458
00:36:28.639 --> 00:36:37.480
piece. The second piece is information
that the government could regulate, but it

459
00:36:37.519 --> 00:36:42.440
needs a reason, so in other
words, because the first would get strict

460
00:36:42.480 --> 00:36:46.519
to something called strict scrutiny, which
is the test that if you're the government's

461
00:36:46.679 --> 00:36:50.679
on the government side of the v
you never want to see because you always

462
00:36:50.719 --> 00:36:59.440
lose right, right, the shorthanding, shorthanding centuries of constitutional law. That

463
00:37:00.639 --> 00:37:06.840
the middle pieces information that the government
probably could regulate if it does so in

464
00:37:06.880 --> 00:37:09.599
a thoughtful and measured way. And
plus there may be policy reasons why you

465
00:37:09.639 --> 00:37:16.239
want that information to circulate. Right, So, for example, financial information

466
00:37:17.199 --> 00:37:24.039
about individuals, you would want in
certain in certain circumstances to have people be

467
00:37:24.079 --> 00:37:30.400
able to access that information, for
example, for looking at politically exposed persons,

468
00:37:30.719 --> 00:37:34.440
or for money laundering purposes. You
want to be able to exchange that

469
00:37:34.519 --> 00:37:38.519
kind of information those kinds of things, or for credit. Right, you

470
00:37:38.559 --> 00:37:43.199
could regulate that information. You just
have to do so in a reasonable way.

471
00:37:43.639 --> 00:37:47.519
That's fine. And there's lots of
stuff, like there's lots of stuff

472
00:37:47.519 --> 00:37:52.320
that falls in that bucket where that
if it's done in a measured way that

473
00:37:52.360 --> 00:37:58.840
the potential the government can regulate the
potential for misuse because they're going to look

474
00:37:58.840 --> 00:38:01.559
at the risk from that and decide, okay, no, you can't use

475
00:38:01.599 --> 00:38:06.840
it for this. And then there's
a third tranch that's really easy to regulate,

476
00:38:07.239 --> 00:38:12.880
where the where the harm is so
obvious and intuitive from the use of

477
00:38:12.880 --> 00:38:17.880
that information that it follows the way
night follows day. So for example,

478
00:38:19.400 --> 00:38:24.840
unauthorized disrepute distribution of passwords or account
numbers or full SSNs, et cetera,

479
00:38:25.239 --> 00:38:30.400
like that type of stuff that has
a you know, yes, there are

480
00:38:30.400 --> 00:38:34.239
no ideas there. Really it's a
key of some kind. As an example,

481
00:38:34.559 --> 00:38:38.360
I see, it's it's more functional
than anything else. Right, That

482
00:38:38.480 --> 00:38:44.199
kind of stuff is easy, and
a commercial publisher of that type of information

483
00:38:44.320 --> 00:38:49.880
is probably not serving a wildly useful
purpose. Right, They're probably bad guys.

484
00:38:50.039 --> 00:38:55.280
They're probably bad guys. But there
are there are people who maybe who

485
00:38:55.280 --> 00:39:00.079
are you know, who may be
giving a who may be selling geo geo

486
00:39:00.199 --> 00:39:05.320
location data or other kinds of data
that have a lot of really valuable purposes

487
00:39:05.639 --> 00:39:09.400
that you would want to allow to
continue. And that is true both on

488
00:39:09.440 --> 00:39:15.440
the private sector side. It's also
true on the government side, where the

489
00:39:15.559 --> 00:39:21.599
availability of this kind of information is
a legitimate concern, but it becomes a

490
00:39:21.679 --> 00:39:25.480
proxy war for law enforcement priorities.
So, in other words, rather than

491
00:39:25.519 --> 00:39:35.519
saying, okay, you are using
certain kinds of information to track down folks

492
00:39:35.519 --> 00:39:38.639
who have overstayed their legal welcome in
the country, or if you're using it

493
00:39:38.679 --> 00:39:47.400
to track down pregnant women those you
know, therefore we ought to ban all

494
00:39:47.639 --> 00:39:53.199
law enforcement use of that information.
Right, Right? Do you really want

495
00:39:53.239 --> 00:39:57.719
that? Right? Right? I
mean, do you really not want to

496
00:39:57.760 --> 00:40:01.840
be able to get access to the
car tell operatives? Cell phone is that

497
00:40:02.320 --> 00:40:07.679
the end result here, right,
right, I mean those are that is

498
00:40:07.719 --> 00:40:13.679
a completely legitimate discussion with the cliffs. These the cliffs they talk about,

499
00:40:13.760 --> 00:40:15.159
right from a legal perspective, you
can go off the cliff this way,

500
00:40:15.199 --> 00:40:17.599
you can got the cliff that way. You don't want to go off either

501
00:40:17.639 --> 00:40:21.559
cliff. You want to stay somewhere
in the middle. Somewhere in the middle.

502
00:40:22.719 --> 00:40:25.079
But that you know, it's a
very charged environment around both of these

503
00:40:25.119 --> 00:40:30.119
things, because there is no doubt
there are people, like there are people

504
00:40:30.159 --> 00:40:32.760
doing bad things with data. There's
no doubt about that, right, I

505
00:40:32.760 --> 00:40:37.239
mean, there are people selling this
to people that they shouldn't sell it to

506
00:40:37.440 --> 00:40:40.519
I mean, our members don't.
Our members don't do this that kind of

507
00:40:40.559 --> 00:40:45.400
thing. That's why they I mean
they take know your customer type steps,

508
00:40:45.800 --> 00:40:51.000
right, right, that's different.
That's kind of part of the responsible action.

509
00:40:51.559 --> 00:40:53.880
Yeah, but we view it as
again, if you view it through

510
00:40:53.880 --> 00:40:59.800
a publishing lens, you it makes
to me, it makes more sense.

511
00:41:00.000 --> 00:41:05.760
It's in a sense easier to regulate
because you're focusing on specific risks and then

512
00:41:06.159 --> 00:41:08.280
you drill down on those risks and
you don't have to worry so much about

513
00:41:08.280 --> 00:41:13.639
the First Amendment because you're going to
be narrower and more focused by definition.

514
00:41:14.039 --> 00:41:16.199
Yeah, if you think of it
as property that's being used willy nilly,

515
00:41:17.119 --> 00:41:24.480
it's almost impossible. You're guaranteed your
chance of unintended consequences is it's almost guaranteed.

516
00:41:24.840 --> 00:41:28.920
Yeah. Wow, that's excellent.
Well, we've got time for one

517
00:41:28.960 --> 00:41:31.519
more thread. I think the segment's
ending here in a second, but I'm

518
00:41:31.559 --> 00:41:35.559
going to tease this and we'll pick
it up in the podcast bonus segment.

519
00:41:35.920 --> 00:41:39.119
Okay, this whole concept of alternative
data, which now is everywhere and data

520
00:41:39.119 --> 00:41:43.119
brokers are buying it and selling it
all over the place. And I've done

521
00:41:43.159 --> 00:41:46.280
some pretty good research on this,
and I realized that there are several companies

522
00:41:46.280 --> 00:41:51.159
I've talked to I know that are
capturing pretty much A lot of it is

523
00:41:51.239 --> 00:41:54.320
geared around what they call exhaust data
from credit card companies, but it's kind

524
00:41:54.360 --> 00:42:00.639
of a misleading term because they will
collect how much you spent at this restaurant,

525
00:42:00.639 --> 00:42:02.159
how much you spent at the gas
station. Like, all the detailed

526
00:42:02.159 --> 00:42:09.280
transactions are actually being bought and sold
to investment bankers, to other institutional investors,

527
00:42:10.000 --> 00:42:15.119
and so what happens is did some
of these folks have enough data now

528
00:42:15.519 --> 00:42:21.719
to get a baseline and understand consumer
behavior. And they can't get cash,

529
00:42:21.760 --> 00:42:23.239
but they can get credit cards.
I don't think they can get debit cards,

530
00:42:23.280 --> 00:42:28.119
but maybe some of them can.
And the point being, there are

531
00:42:28.159 --> 00:42:34.480
now organizations that know from the raw
transactional data at scale which companies are going

532
00:42:34.559 --> 00:42:37.519
to meet or beat market estimates on
Wall Street. Well, if you know

533
00:42:37.679 --> 00:42:42.519
that, then how the heck do
you lose when you gamble? Because the

534
00:42:42.559 --> 00:42:45.440
analogy I give is, let's say
there's four of us playing cards at my

535
00:42:45.519 --> 00:42:47.559
house, and the rule is I
can see all your cards, but none

536
00:42:47.599 --> 00:42:51.880
of you can see my cards.
Well, if I lose, I'm an

537
00:42:51.880 --> 00:42:54.920
idiot. I don't know the rules
of gambling, apparently because I have such

538
00:42:54.920 --> 00:42:59.159
an advantage now because I know what
all of you have and I know this

539
00:42:59.199 --> 00:43:01.280
is happening. Argument. I'll let
you think about this as we good to

540
00:43:01.360 --> 00:43:07.039
the break I thought was from a
policy perspective, Let's say that if a

541
00:43:07.079 --> 00:43:09.400
company of credit card company is going
to sell this exhaust data to one of

542
00:43:09.400 --> 00:43:16.679
these brokers, they must also publish
anonymized data to some consumer facing data lake

543
00:43:17.079 --> 00:43:22.599
that then any investor or any interested
party could log into and kind of browse

544
00:43:22.639 --> 00:43:27.519
around and see and better understand,
because that kind of information is very valuable

545
00:43:27.559 --> 00:43:31.519
if I run some kind of retail
operation and I can see at some scale

546
00:43:31.880 --> 00:43:37.559
which products are selling, which products
aren't selling, what's happening in this region,

547
00:43:37.559 --> 00:43:39.679
what's happening in that region. That
helps me do a better job of

548
00:43:39.719 --> 00:43:45.000
buying things that I know my customers
will probably want. Without revealing too much

549
00:43:45.039 --> 00:43:49.440
about where the data came from,
but at least it's useful, and what

550
00:43:49.480 --> 00:43:53.000
I'm really angling at is a way
of leveling the playing field between these insiders.

551
00:43:53.000 --> 00:43:54.760
And I even came up with a
term for what I call it,

552
00:43:54.800 --> 00:44:00.039
outsider trading. So insider trading.
Everyone understands that outsider trading is where from

553
00:44:00.039 --> 00:44:05.760
the outside I've been able to gather
so much information that I know exactly what's

554
00:44:05.760 --> 00:44:07.559
going to happen next. But we'll
pick that up after the break in one

555
00:44:07.840 --> 00:44:14.719
second. Be right back, all
right, folks, were back here with

556
00:44:14.800 --> 00:44:19.599
Chris Moore from SIIA. I just
threw a curveball question that him there.

557
00:44:19.840 --> 00:44:22.159
I'm curious to know what are your
thoughts about all this alternative data stuff and

558
00:44:22.559 --> 00:44:27.440
policies we can define that are reasonable. They will level of playing field.

559
00:44:28.400 --> 00:44:32.960
So I so a couple of things
there. I mean, one is I

560
00:44:34.440 --> 00:44:37.559
hear that word in a bunch of
different that phrase rather in a bunch of

561
00:44:37.639 --> 00:44:43.519
different contexts, and I think we're
talking about so I'm sure we're talking about

562
00:44:43.559 --> 00:44:51.559
the same thing. What you're talking
about is kind of information that's available that's

563
00:44:51.599 --> 00:44:57.320
beyond that's outside of sort of the
four corners of required reporting, right.

564
00:44:57.440 --> 00:45:01.800
That could be everything from as you
say, credit card exhaust credit company exhausts,

565
00:45:04.079 --> 00:45:09.519
credit card exhaust data, to social
media trend data. And so when

566
00:45:09.559 --> 00:45:21.079
this data is I think the way
the rules are now, this information is

567
00:45:21.119 --> 00:45:25.760
scrubbed so that there's no material non
public information in it. So there was

568
00:45:25.800 --> 00:45:30.599
a company called app Annie that got
into a bit of hurt with the FTC,

569
00:45:31.000 --> 00:45:37.840
with the SEC because it wasn't taking
that stuff out and lo and behold.

570
00:45:37.920 --> 00:45:42.599
Like you can imagine, there are
results, right, were pretty good,

571
00:45:44.480 --> 00:45:50.000
But that's not that's not what the
business is. What it is is

572
00:45:51.360 --> 00:45:55.559
finding information from these different sources.
You know, each of these firms has

573
00:45:55.599 --> 00:46:05.039
their own way of balancing and analyzing
it and then providing in as you said,

574
00:46:05.639 --> 00:46:09.719
recommendations, trading recommendations to or data
from which trades could be made to

575
00:46:12.239 --> 00:46:19.280
right to uh, you know,
to different types of investors. There is

576
00:46:19.400 --> 00:46:28.639
at the moment. I mean,
I think I would hesitate to mandate competition

577
00:46:28.840 --> 00:46:36.000
in that space. I would be
intuitively, I mean intuitively, I think

578
00:46:36.599 --> 00:46:42.559
you know, the business is that
business is I think growing. So in

579
00:46:42.599 --> 00:46:49.519
other words, the initially it started
okay, we have we're getting this information

580
00:46:50.480 --> 00:46:52.880
were as you said. I mean, a lot of this comes out of

581
00:46:52.880 --> 00:46:54.159
what you said. Like the first
one was like all right, hey we

582
00:46:54.199 --> 00:46:59.119
can do this. Let's do this
and sell it to hedge funds, right,

583
00:46:59.559 --> 00:47:00.719
and that is like, you know, who else would be interested in

584
00:47:00.800 --> 00:47:07.320
knowing all this stuff is, for
example, a retailer. Nothing wrong with

585
00:47:07.360 --> 00:47:13.039
that either, because all of this
information is de identified, so it's really

586
00:47:13.239 --> 00:47:17.480
just like there's no there's it's just
okay, there were this many sales and

587
00:47:19.280 --> 00:47:22.480
this is the these are the trend
lines, you know, make your bets

588
00:47:23.039 --> 00:47:29.159
right, right. And I think
as the you know, as the business

589
00:47:29.199 --> 00:47:32.440
evolves, my expectation is that it's
going to be that type of know how.

590
00:47:32.519 --> 00:47:37.000
It's going to become more and more
widely available because there's no reason,

591
00:47:37.159 --> 00:47:42.320
there's no reason for it not to
be interesting. That's a good point.

592
00:47:43.719 --> 00:47:46.840
H Yeah, Well we're talking about
the information life cycle right and where it

593
00:47:46.920 --> 00:47:50.039
is and where you can access it
and what you can do with it.

594
00:47:50.360 --> 00:47:52.760
And open data is a big thing
these days. I think that's wonderful news.

595
00:47:52.760 --> 00:47:57.719
There's a lot of information coming out. I was actually an advocate way

596
00:47:57.760 --> 00:48:01.519
back in two thousand and five when
I worked for the Data Warehousing Institute.

597
00:48:01.559 --> 00:48:06.079
I got at a big soapbox and
said, we need transparency in federal spending.

598
00:48:06.119 --> 00:48:09.360
And I did this whole media campaign. I had Bacon's media source at

599
00:48:09.400 --> 00:48:15.039
my access and so I emailed forty
thousand reporters all about the need for transparency

600
00:48:15.039 --> 00:48:20.039
and federal spending. Everyone told me
I was crazy, And then something happened.

601
00:48:20.079 --> 00:48:22.760
There was actually a guy at the
Heritage Foundation, Mark Tapscott, who

602
00:48:22.800 --> 00:48:23.920
picked up on it, and he
was like, why did you send me

603
00:48:23.960 --> 00:48:25.719
this? And I was like,
well, I went off my whole tangent.

604
00:48:25.800 --> 00:48:29.119
He goes, I've been focused on
this for twenty years, Like where

605
00:48:29.119 --> 00:48:31.320
have you been all my life?
And he then he used my article and

606
00:48:31.360 --> 00:48:36.199
really he was the imprimature of the
Data Warehousing Institute that he used to go

607
00:48:36.239 --> 00:48:40.440
testify before Congress and say we need
these citizen auditors to help us find waste

608
00:48:40.760 --> 00:48:45.280
and lo and behold, the House
passed the bill. The Senate passed the

609
00:48:45.320 --> 00:48:47.519
bill, co sponsored by a guy
named Barack Obama who was a Senator from

610
00:48:47.559 --> 00:48:52.000
Illinois. And on September twenty sixth, two thousand and six, then President

611
00:48:52.039 --> 00:48:57.119
George W. Bush signed the Federal
Funding Accountability and Transparency Law. And I

612
00:48:57.159 --> 00:48:59.719
almost had a heart attack on My
friend called me and told me, I

613
00:48:59.760 --> 00:49:01.400
was like, are you kidding me? No, I'm not going to say

614
00:49:01.400 --> 00:49:04.280
I got any credit for or anything, which is fine, you know,

615
00:49:04.679 --> 00:49:07.360
I don't mind, but I was
just absolutely shocked. And now when you

616
00:49:07.400 --> 00:49:10.119
look at it, you think my
theory back then was that, look,

617
00:49:10.199 --> 00:49:15.119
everybody knows something. So even though
some accountant may not know that this line

618
00:49:15.159 --> 00:49:19.639
on looks funky, there's someone who
does. There's a carpenter, someone who

619
00:49:19.679 --> 00:49:22.800
knows this kind of nail should only
cost ten cents, it should not cost

620
00:49:22.800 --> 00:49:24.800
a dollar and ten cents, or
whatever the case may be. And these

621
00:49:24.880 --> 00:49:30.719
days we have the capacity, like
the Amazon Mechanical Turk for example, to

622
00:49:30.960 --> 00:49:37.559
leverage crowdsourcing at scale, and so
if people register with the system, you

623
00:49:37.599 --> 00:49:39.719
know, I'm a citizen. You
know, everything I do in the system,

624
00:49:39.760 --> 00:49:43.559
when I flag something, if I'm
right or wrong, you can see

625
00:49:43.559 --> 00:49:46.119
how you could dynamically score these things
and then really wind up with a whole

626
00:49:46.159 --> 00:49:53.519
cadre of experts greening or information systems
for the government to help everyone know where

627
00:49:53.559 --> 00:49:58.719
the money goes. Because a lot
of times people worry about fraud. That

628
00:49:58.840 --> 00:50:00.760
is true. Bad things do happen, are just mistakes, They're just things

629
00:50:00.760 --> 00:50:05.079
that people overlook too. So being
able to find all that stuff, I

630
00:50:05.119 --> 00:50:07.199
think it's very very interesting. But
final thoughts from you, Chris Moore of

631
00:50:07.320 --> 00:50:12.639
s I I a here in the
show. Uh, you know, like

632
00:50:12.679 --> 00:50:16.239
I said, I'm mostly optimistic about
these technologies. Yeah, you know,

633
00:50:16.519 --> 00:50:22.360
do they need guardrails? Yeah,
they do. They really do. Because

634
00:50:22.159 --> 00:50:29.440
if if what you're trying to do
is mimic human intelligence, you know,

635
00:50:29.880 --> 00:50:32.239
human intelligence, we put guardrails around
that as well. There's things for not

636
00:50:32.280 --> 00:50:36.320
allowed to do and we have good
reasons for doing that. Right, pretty

637
00:50:36.400 --> 00:50:42.079
funny you go to put it.
But the so you know, there's going

638
00:50:42.159 --> 00:50:45.800
to be a need for that as
things develop, and what the type of

639
00:50:45.880 --> 00:50:50.199
thing that you are discussing is applied
to the government is tremendously useful. I

640
00:50:50.199 --> 00:50:53.119
think there are a number of private
businesses and even members who are selling all

641
00:50:53.199 --> 00:50:57.519
kinds of solutions that do the same
thing. Right, they go into your

642
00:50:58.000 --> 00:51:00.719
they go into your into your spreadhe
and they'll say, oh that's weird.

643
00:51:01.320 --> 00:51:05.639
Yeah, you know, for a
year over here and employee changes one year

644
00:51:05.679 --> 00:51:07.400
to the other. Maybe they don't
go back five years. Maybe they're about

645
00:51:07.440 --> 00:51:10.639
one year, right, you know, and chack to see how things have

646
00:51:10.760 --> 00:51:15.840
changed, and suddenly that looks hot
and it gets flat and that's how thanks

647
00:51:15.840 --> 00:51:17.800
to tech fraud too. Yeah right, well, hey, this has been

648
00:51:17.840 --> 00:51:22.679
this has been absolutely fantastic. Chris
more m HR. Look this organization up

649
00:51:22.679 --> 00:51:29.119
online. SIIA doing wonderful work.
You've made me more optimistic too about the

650
00:51:29.119 --> 00:51:30.679
future. So it's very good to
know. And they're doing great work in

651
00:51:30.760 --> 00:51:35.639
policy. Look them up online.
Folks, you've been listening to Inside Analysis,

652
00:51:35.920 --> 00:51:42.840
Go ahead and say it. We're
all ears CASEAA. Redlands Ranch Market

653
00:51:42.920 --> 00:51:46.880
is a unique full service international or
grocery store that specializes in authentic food items

654
00:51:46.920 --> 00:51:52.760
from Mexico, India, and from
many Mediterranean and Asian countries, including popular

655
00:51:52.880 --> 00:51:55.800
items from the US. They offer
fresh baked items from their in house bakery,

656
00:51:55.920 --> 00:52:00.960
housemade tortillas from their Tortilla area,
a delicious array of prepared Mexican foods,

657
00:52:01.000 --> 00:52:05.760
a terrific fresh food and juice bar, and a large selection of meats,

658
00:52:05.760 --> 00:52:09.199
seafoods and deli sandwiches, salads and
hellal meats. Their produce department is

659
00:52:09.199 --> 00:52:14.639
stocked full with fresh, local and
hard to find international fruits and vegetables that

660
00:52:14.719 --> 00:52:19.280
you cannot find anywhere else. Don't
forget to step into the massive beer cave

661
00:52:19.320 --> 00:52:23.639
and experience the largest selection of domestic, artisan and imported beers in the ie.

662
00:52:23.920 --> 00:52:28.800
They can also cater your next event
with one of the delicious takeout catering

663
00:52:28.840 --> 00:52:32.239
trades of food. Visit them at
Redlands ranch Market dot com. That's Redlands

664
00:52:32.360 --> 00:52:37.159
ranch Market dot com. Redlands Ranch
Market a unique and fun shopping destination.

665
00:52:39.199 --> 00:52:43.920
What is the Del Walmsley Radio Show? Welcome to the Del Walmsley Radio Show

666
00:52:43.920 --> 00:52:46.480
where the high bends and the help
begins. You need to stop being dependent

667
00:52:46.599 --> 00:52:51.199
on a paycheck. All these self
help motivational people, they wind you up

668
00:52:51.280 --> 00:52:58.960
like a little clock clill. Who
is the show about. I'm your host,

669
00:52:59.039 --> 00:53:02.280
Del Walmsley and all we're working on
your financial freedom. Learn the secrets

670
00:53:02.320 --> 00:53:07.159
of building wealth from Dell Walmsley weekdays
from eleven am to noon right here on

671
00:53:07.239 --> 00:53:14.800
KCAA to Hebot Club's original pure power
to rcosuper t comes from the only tree

672
00:53:14.800 --> 00:53:16.679
in the world that fungus does not
grow on. As a result, it

673
00:53:16.800 --> 00:53:22.840
naturally has anti fungal, anti infection, anti viral, antibacterial, anti inflammation,

674
00:53:23.159 --> 00:53:28.079
and anti parasite properties. So the
tea is great for healthy people because

675
00:53:28.119 --> 00:53:31.039
it helps build the immune system,
and it can be truly miraculous for someone

676
00:53:31.079 --> 00:53:36.920
fighting a potentially life threatening disease due
to an infection, diabetes, or cancer.

677
00:53:37.000 --> 00:53:40.039
The tea is also organic and naturally
caffeine free. A one pound package

678
00:53:40.039 --> 00:53:44.199
of tea is forty nine to ninety
five, which includes shipping. To order,

679
00:53:44.239 --> 00:53:46.960
please visit to Hebota club dot com. T hebow is spelled tea like

680
00:53:47.039 --> 00:53:52.920
tom, a, h ee b
like boyo. Then continue with the word

681
00:53:52.960 --> 00:53:57.159
t and then the word club.
The complete website is to Hebot club dot

682
00:53:57.159 --> 00:54:00.480
com or call us at eight one
eight six one zero eight zero eight eight

683
00:54:00.719 --> 00:54:06.360
Monday through Saturday nine am to five
pm California time. That's eight one eight

684
00:54:06.480 --> 00:54:10.239
six one zero eight zero eight eight
to Hebot club dot Com. There's never

685
00:54:10.320 --> 00:54:14.840
been a better time for men to
be whoever they want to be. Yet

686
00:54:14.840 --> 00:54:19.880
it's never been less clear who men
really are. Guys Guy Radio, starring

687
00:54:19.960 --> 00:54:24.079
author and Guy's Guy Robert Manny,
is coming to Caseyaa every Wednesday at eight

688
00:54:24.119 --> 00:54:30.400
pm. Whether it's relationships, sex, wellness for spirituality, join Robert as

689
00:54:30.440 --> 00:54:34.840
he interviews the experts and shares his
insights on building a world where men and

690
00:54:34.880 --> 00:54:38.639
women can be at their best.
Guys Guy Radio, Better Men, better

691
00:54:38.760 --> 00:54:45.440
world. With sixty years of fascinating
facts, this is the man from Yesterday

692
00:54:47.440 --> 00:54:51.719
and back in time. We go
to this time in nineteen sixty seven.

693
00:54:52.000 --> 00:54:57.079
Frank Sinatra is not happy. Frank
wants his girlfriend Mia Farrow to co star

694
00:54:57.239 --> 00:55:01.800
in his new movie The Detective,
but Pharaoh is doing Rosemary's Baby. That's

695
00:55:01.880 --> 00:55:12.000
life. That's what all the people
say. You're riding high in April,

696
00:55:13.000 --> 00:55:16.159
shut down in May. Back in
time to this time in two thousand and

697
00:55:16.239 --> 00:55:22.199
nine, Mariah Carey, Stevie Wonder
and Usher sing emotional farewells to Michael Jackson

698
00:55:22.440 --> 00:55:28.079
and described by his tearful eleven year
old daughter Paris as the best father you

699
00:55:28.119 --> 00:55:32.119
could ever imagine. Ever since I
was born, Daddy has been the best

700
00:55:32.920 --> 00:55:37.039
father you can ever imagine. And
I just wanted to say I love him

701
00:55:37.440 --> 00:55:43.119
so much and from this time in
nineteen ninety one. The Montell Williams Show

702
00:55:43.360 --> 00:55:47.480
debuts on TV this week. The
show will run thirteen weeks before any national

703
00:55:47.559 --> 00:55:52.880
TV decision is made. Montell Williams
as a former Navy intelligence officer, this

704
00:55:52.920 --> 00:55:58.159
is what I'm telling you. I
can't believe we told you. Listen,

705
00:55:58.320 --> 00:56:00.360
we called him and said someone has
a crush. We didn't do it for

706
00:56:00.400 --> 00:56:02.920
him. You went out and bought
No matter who this person is, you

707
00:56:04.039 --> 00:56:08.559
bought this person a set of diamond
stud areas with more at man from Yesterday

708
00:56:08.639 --> 00:56:19.000
dot com. Palm Springs Dispensary reminds
everyone during these challenging times they understand the

709
00:56:19.039 --> 00:56:22.159
importance of mental health. Offering daily
deals on everything from top quality flowers to

710
00:56:22.320 --> 00:56:27.519
edibles and discounts on CBD products.
Palm Springs Dispensary's goal is to help you

711
00:56:27.559 --> 00:56:30.880
win the battle within. As one
of the area's most beautiful well inness shops.

712
00:56:30.880 --> 00:56:35.000
Located on Garnet Avenue, visit the
Palm Springs Dispensary dot com. That's

713
00:56:35.079 --> 00:56:42.199
the Palm Springs Dispensary dot com experience
where expertise meets influence. On the insurance

714
00:56:42.239 --> 00:56:47.039
hour with Carl Sussman. Carl's involvement
with California lawmakers and insurance discussions offers unparalleled

715
00:56:47.079 --> 00:56:53.559
insights. Tune in for an expert
take on the state's insurance landscape. KCAA

716
00:56:53.719 --> 00:56:58.280
Radio has openings for one hour talk
shows. If you want to host a

717
00:56:58.360 --> 00:57:01.760
radio show, now is the time. Make KCIA your flangship station. Our

718
00:57:01.880 --> 00:57:06.800
rates are affordable and our services are
second to none. We broadcast to a

719
00:57:06.880 --> 00:57:10.679
population of five million people plus.
We stream and podcast on all major online

720
00:57:10.719 --> 00:57:15.639
audio and video systems. If you've
been thinking about broadcasting a weekly radio program

721
00:57:15.679 --> 00:57:21.719
on real radio plus the Internet,
contact our CEO at two eight one five

722
00:57:21.920 --> 00:57:25.519
nine nine ninety eight hundred two eight
one five nine nine ninety eight hundred.

723
00:57:25.559 --> 00:57:29.960
You can skype your show from your
home to our Redlands, California studio,

724
00:57:30.000 --> 00:57:34.280
where our live producers and engineers are
ready to work with you personally. A

725
00:57:34.400 --> 00:57:39.000
radio program on KCIA is the perfect
work from home advocation in these stressful times.

726
00:57:39.320 --> 00:57:44.639
Just type KCA radio dot com into
your browser to learn more about hosting

727
00:57:44.639 --> 00:57:47.000
a show. On the best station
in the nation, or call our CEO

728
00:57:47.159 --> 00:57:54.360
for details too. Eight one,
five nine nine ninety eight hundred NBC News

729
00:57:54.440 --> 00:57:59.559
Radio. I'm Chris Gragio. President
Biden is leveling some of his harshest criticism

730
00:57:59.639 --> 00:58:02.639
yet the Supreme Court. At a
fundraiser in Los Angeles yesterday. The President

731
00:58:02.679 --> 00:58:07.159
called the conservative majority court out of
step with the rest of the country.

732
00:58:07.360 --> 00:58:09.519
Biden also warned that a former President
Trump is elected, he would appoint more

733
00:58:09.679 --> 00:58:15.079
justices flying flags upside down, a
reference to conservative Justice Samuel Alito, who's

734
00:58:15.119 --> 00:58:20.480
been embroiled in controversy over political flags
flown at his home. The comments were

735
00:58:20.480 --> 00:58:24.960
made at a star studied fundraiser featuring
former President Obama and various A list celebrities.

736
00:58:25.079 --> 00:58:30.480
Biden's campaign says the event raised a
record breaking thirty million dollars from Democratic

737
00:58:30.480 --> 00:58:32.840
donors. Police saying i llegal immigrant
is under arrest for the rape and murder

738
00:58:32.840 --> 00:58:37.400
of a Maryland woman last August.
In a news conference yesterday, Harford County

739
00:58:37.440 --> 00:58:42.039
Sheriff Jeffrey Gaylor said a twenty three
year old Victor Antonio Martinez Hernandez was arrested

740
00:58:42.039 --> 00:58:45.519
Friday night in Tulsa, Oklahoma,
and his waiting extradition. Rachel Moran,

741
00:58:45.719 --> 00:58:47.920
a thirty seven year old mother of
five, had been reported missing on August

742
00:58:47.960 --> 00:58:52.679
fifth of last year, and her
body was found the next day. Maryland

743
00:58:52.679 --> 00:58:55.519
Governor Wes Moore is saying it'll likely
cost close to two billion dollars to rebuild

744
00:58:55.559 --> 00:59:00.000
Baltimore's Francis Scott key Bridge. In
an interview with CBS's Face the Night,

745
00:59:00.639 --> 00:59:02.719
he said, this state needs federal
money to get the project completed in a

746
00:59:02.760 --> 00:59:07.400
timely manner, so we know the
estimated cost could be between one point seven

747
00:59:07.440 --> 00:59:10.039
and one point nine billion dollars.
And the reason that we are urging of

748
00:59:10.079 --> 00:59:14.920
federal cost share and a one hundred
pcent cost share is just simply because we

749
00:59:15.119 --> 00:59:19.320
have to move quickly. The federal
cost share means the federal government will cover

750
00:59:19.400 --> 00:59:22.480
the entire cost. The governor also
praised cleanup crews for their hard work reopening

751
00:59:22.519 --> 00:59:25.920
the shipping channel ahead of schedule,
saying they were able to reopen it in

752
00:59:25.960 --> 00:59:30.519
eleven weeks despite estimates it would take
eleven months. Millions are celebrating Father's Day

753
00:59:30.559 --> 00:59:35.000
today, but its origins are not
well known. It wasn't until nineteen seventy

754
00:59:35.000 --> 00:59:38.480
two that Father's Day was recognized in
America after being signed off by President Nixon.

755
00:59:38.760 --> 00:59:42.920
So Norah Dodd, the daughter of
a Civil War veteran, is credited

756
00:59:42.920 --> 00:59:45.480
with organizing the first ever one back
in nineteen ten to honor her own father,

757
00:59:45.760 --> 00:59:49.599
and wanted the day to be in
June. I'm Chris Karagio, NBC

758
00:59:49.679 --> 00:59:57.519
News Radio, NBC News on CACAA
Lowland, sponsored by Teamsters Local nineteen thirty

759
00:59:57.559 --> 01:00:01.239
two, Protecting the Future of Working
Families Teamster nineteen thirty two dot org.

760
01:00:06.960 --> 01:00:08.280
You're listening to an encore presentation of
this

