The captain, one of the foul should show a shot, the should the
shore show the sho number five, the showing place and the shoul All right,
what's up? Welcome Today we are going deeper into a text that I
just got around to finally getting through. And if you saw today's Lord Voldemort
the fourth Hour, then you got to see a little bit of a breakdown.
We didn't get too deep into this text. We tied it into Tavistalk
because it's it's a perfect overlap with what we talked about in the last live
stream over here with Coleman's Tabstalk text, and today we're going to be getting
into a new text that is very relevant due to its approach to religion,
spirituality, the arts, esthetics, mysticism, woo mysticism. Who what was
Huxley all about with this book? Now, if you think back to all
the different Laurel Canyon streams that we've done the history of the Hippie movement,
of the history of the nineteen sixties counterculture movement, you know that we covered
a lot of texts that are critical of the mainline narrative as to how that
movement, that scene came about, the scene of the sixties, the scene,
the It Girls, the scene. We know that a lot of those
individuals came from important families, most notably Jim Morrison's dad is Admiral Morrison involved
in the Gulf of ton Keen fake Flag of it It And that's one confirmed,
one factual history. But we know a little. We know less about
the background to Huxley's involvement in Esselyn and how there's a direct connection between Esselyn
and Tavisto. We cover that in the last live stream. But it's becoming
more and more apparent to me now that I dive deeper into the writings Aboutics
Huxley. So previously, you know, I'd only read Brave New World in
Perennial Philosophy, which print philosophy is really about the coming emergent New World religion.
But this one seems to be helped in terms of letting us understand that
that's also connected to Imcultra as well. That's because this is a kind of
pre Mkultra, British version of Mcaultra that Huxley seems to have brought to the
West in many ways. Again, he went and worked at Lyn, and
I've never been to Esselin like at the stopped and got out and meditated and
bathed nude or whatever. But that's what they do. They remember Jamie's laughing,
I never bathe nude. I'm a never nude. I bathe I bathe
in Daisy Dukes because I'm I never nude. But mescalin is okay, So
back, So what the heck's going on here? So nineteen fifty four,
Alta Sexy comes over to attend an American Psychiatric Association's meeting in LA and he's
hanging out in Hollywood crazy, and so he does mescaline in nineteen fifty three.
So this is years before sixties counterculture. And if you know, if
you remember in Esultic Hollywood, I talked about how a lot of the fifties
actors were tripping balls before anybody else was. So Carry Grant, he was
doing acid in the fifties, way before anybody in the sixties. Hate Ashbury,
Laurel kenyon See was doing it. And the same thing with with Huxley.
He's chilling partying in LA in nineteen fifty three and he decides before going
to this event that he's going to experiment with mescalind until he records his whole
trip experience. And so we get a you know, DMD trip report,
except it's mescalind trip report from Aldas Huxley. All the goofuses on the internet
on YouTube love to give you their trip report seeing the clockwork, elves,
etc. And uh, in fact, I've even given you one of those,
not the not that I did it, but you know what I mean.
Remember that video and a lot of people didn't realize that was a joke
video, which to me is really funny. But do you remember this.
I think that video is pretty funny. And then Tristan, beautiful Tristanna,
came back with his own remember that, remember this one right here? Do
your report. So there's that if you want to watch that later. But
that's not what we're talking about to day. We're talking about the doors of
perception. This comes from William Blake talking about the doors of perception being cleansed
so that you can see true reality. And I didn't know what to expect
in this book. But the more that you read Huxley, the more you
realize, Okay, he's actually much more of a mystical religious thinker than you
would think. Now his non a mystical religious thinker in a good sense.
He doesn't present anything close to the true religion, but he's insightful because he's
kind of the paradigmatic image of what we would think a perfect world religion creator
type of person would be and would do. And this is another one of
those texts that perfectly fits into those categories. Again, we'll probably do perennial
philosophy eventually, because that's also an important text, But maybe we'll just eventually
work our way through the whole Huxley Cannon. I don't know. It's not
that they're that great, it's just that they are relevant to what we talk
about. Now. The first thing that blew me away was like, within
three pages, guess what he talks about? You got it? The a
word that I won't say, But why does he talk about that? Like
three pages in it's an odd drug reference. Within a few pages. Everybody
can see that, hopefully, And so he's now he doesn't say that he's
getting it from humans, but he does say that, but probably a spontaneous
in the human budded Interesting why did he bring that out? That's weird anyway.
But then he talks about William Blake and he says that Blake is this
sort of archetypal mystical artist figure. And I'm sure you guys all know everybody
loves the esoteric and you know universalist alchemical themes that we see in Blake's stuff
everywhere, and you've all probably seen the I guess it's his idea of God.
I'm not sure, but it's like the it's not. It's like the
Great Architect of the universe, right, William Blake's great Architect of the universe.
You can see him designing things in this sort of gnostic It's a gnostic
idea of the architect, right, the great Architect of the universe. Because
you'll notice that he's he's designing using a square, because an architect is different
than a creator, and so Aristotle and when I think in the metaphysics,
first to God is the architect. And of course, ever since then esotericists
and occultists who have attempted, in various means and ways to purport promote the
idea of eternal creation rather than creation of nothing. If if Christian doesn't come
to be out of nothing, then it must have always been. And if
it's always been, then what gives things form and design? Well, God
must just be some kind of supreme architect or the great architect of the universe,
which is what Freemasonry, of course calls God. That is not actually
the right God because God is not a great architect. He does not work
with pre existing preternal matter. It's a Greek doctrine, it's not a Christian
doctrine. Of course. I think this is Leviathan or you know, Blake
Drew all of these things, but and they're famous, but they've also got
a lot of weird esoteric stuff. I think he was kind of a party
man. You know, he liked to have fun in every single way.
I think he was. If I recall, wasn't he kind of pa n
sexual kind of guy? Is that right? Who talks about I mean,
do we just have slowboys that invade the chat? I don't mean slowboy whiteboard,
I mean swift wind. What are you talking? I'm literally showing you
the actual text. Did I say anything about ancient philosophers? We're working through
a book, dummy. It's like people in the chat, the people,
the people who comment on stuff. I just have to wonder, like,
what is wrong with you? People? Like maybe I can hope that you're
not an actual person that you're just some sort of AI program that's sent to
annoy right operation annoyance operations, slow boy annoyance. But I just like,
what are you talking about? Who talks book? Did I say ancient scholars
talk about never said that. I'm citing his book, dummy. I mean,
what is wrong with you people? I just the stupidity of people on
the internet and their comments. They're like, it has to be some coordinated
low IQ operation. We lecture through books on this channel. Man, if
you can't handle books, if you never read a book, you don't know
what that is. This is another channel for you. Go to another channel
where they're over there talking about makeup. Go watch your makeup channels. There's
a million of those. Go watch I don't know, minecraft channels. You
can go watch your little friends play Minecraft. We read books over here,
so back to doors of Perception. So there's a lot of references, and
he felt I think he likes to drop names and drop hints and throw things
in and he'll do that quite often. But yeah, and the premise,
as we said, is that he's gonna give you his philosophical account of his
mescaline journey, his trip, and he's gonna drop tons and tons of philosophical,
literary, and visual arts references because he's gonna start looking through an art
book that he buys at a drug store while he's on his mescaline vision quest,
and then as he comes down, then he ends it with his assessment,
and it turns out to be just nothing but propaganda for why we need
a drug revolution, right. This needs to In fact, he even argues,
I couldn't believe this. He actually says we might even need to have
state mandated mascaline trips. He says that so that you can be initiated.
And he also deals quite a bit in this book with schizophrenia, which I
was surprised to see because i'd seen that come up in some other places where
he does talk about dissociation and schizophrenia and artistic genius will come up quite a
bit in this text. It's not a very long text either. I think
it's about is it one hundred pages, not even at eighty And I think
in part two, by the way, this will be a half and half.
Since this book also has heaven and Hell attached to it, we'll do
heaven and Hell in the part two for subscribers also the part two to the
Doctor Coleman Tavistock book that will be either tomorrow or the day after for subscribers.
If you're a paid subscriber you get access, of course, so all
of the part two's going back several years. Now. Yeah, we're going
to get into all the wild, crazy, weird things, the delusion that
characterizes Huxley's Doors of Perception, and if you don't know, this would be
where the Doors the Band gets their name, And to me, that just
further kind of suggests manipulation because of course the Laurel Canyon scene, as we've
seen, as Dave McGowan has shown in his book Weird Scene Selly Canyon,
is very much an establishment promoted revolution. But so he says that, all
right, I've taken my mouscule in and it's kicking in, and I'm starting
to look around at things and I'm noticing, and he says, maybe I'm
going to be able to see into pure being. So he immediately gets into
philosophical ideas and he talks about the word that Meister Eckhart, one of these
mystical Latin texts, talks about thetikite, that is the business of things that
is the being of platonic philosophy. He says, I'm going to I'm beginning
to think that now I'm going to be able to see and peer into reality.
Now that it's kicking in, I'm going to be able to see being
in itself. I'm gonna have this beatific vision. So he'll actually refer multiple
times too the beatific vision, and he says, my eyes have traveled across
the rows to the carnation. From that he's talking about looking at a vase
with flowers in it. This is the beatific vision, the cheat Ananda,
the being awareness, bliss that for the first time I understand right, not
through words and syllables, but the thing itself, the deingon Zick, which
you'll later refer to, which is from Kant. He says, I read
once in Suzuki's essays about the dharma body, right, the dharma body of
the Buddha is another way of saying the mind or the suchness or the void
or the godhead what so. And he will continue to use the phrase suchness,
which, as you can see, is really an incoherent notion because he's
actually identified it with several things that don't make sense. Dharma body, which
he loves. He says this because he thinks this sounds really cool and sophisticated.
And do you the diamond body? Do you This is like, you
know, yogurt pants chicks on Instagram would love to say, Dharma body A
lot of us, by the way, kind of sounds like David Ike too,
right, the Dama body. But he's equated this vision of what the
essence of things are with what he calls mind, suchness, void, and
Godhead. Well, that doesn't make any sense because those things are mutually exclusive
and different things. Mind is not the same thing as being. Mind is
not the same thing as the void or the abyss. And God's Godhead or
the divine nature of the divine essence is certainly not the abyss. And it's
not mind, and it's not being unless you believe in absolutely mine simplicity,
which he apparently adheres to in some loose sense, because throughout his mystical writings
and throughout perennial philosophy, his approach to the divine is a reunion unification with
the one. It's a neo platonic merging pinosis. And that's precisely because he
has adopted a lot of mystical texts, not just meister Eckhart, but also
that pulls from cobbalistic notions. Right that there's some notion to where God is
the void right the dayat the Abyss, this kind of stuff that's nothing to
do with the idea of apathetic and cataphatic theology, which you actually he will
mention that later on. So you'll notice that a lot of these terminology specific
phrases and things that are you know, unique to say, Orthodox Christianity or
or even you know, Acquintas or something like that, they get retooled and
repurposed to mean sometimes synchrotous things, sometimes completely incoherent things, and sometimes things
that he's just sort of making up on the spot to sound cool. He
says that as this feeling of the trip came on, as it was really
starting to kick in, he said, I started to notice that I was
bypassing normal dimensional relations. Some of the words. He says, I wasn't
interested in space and time, those which were prior to this in my foreview,
everything to me would be related via space and time. He says,
space and time get put into the background, and now the symbolic and immediate
existential correspondences are what speak to me. The immediacy of experience that he talks
about with achieving the suchness right being in itself. He says that the created
order and everything around me began to be transfigured. Odd religious language again,
and he says that I noticed and could see the inner light of the beings
of all beings. Now this is odd because this kind of sounds like,
you know, it's a form of neoplatonism. It's kind of loosely similar to
divine exemplarism. But the funny thing is that when he starts to talk about
the divine mind and how everything seems to be perhaps I'm grounded in the divine
mind, he does not give God the power of this divine mind. He
actually says that our minds are the mind at large, and he keeps using
this odd phrase, the mind at large, which he means I think,
universal mind, or perhaps he means it in the center in some neo platonic
sense of the intellect or the second principle out that proceeds from the monad in
neoplatonism, news or mind. But he doesn't really say that this divine mind
that undergirds and underlies and grounds everything is a personal God. It's rather some
mystical plane of existence, some kind of multiverse, perhaps even because he actually
says that we inhabit different worlds based on our perception and based on what what
things are, removing the doors of our perception and opening them and removing the
valve he talks about. So he says that we would have omniscient experience if
we didn't have a five sense we had of a the way David Ike says
it limiting and filtering our experience. And so he says that what the mescaline
does is that it doesn't just limit the valve of experience in this narrow way,
it opens it up and it can cleanse the doors of perception. So
the doors of perception are you the valve that you have that limits the intake
of external stimuli that come to you through your five senses. This is then
a bypassing and an attempt to see reality not with a filter but directly direct
perception. So there is this grasping after the vision of light, which of
course that's orthodox theology, that's hesikia, which is God himself. But here
they flipped it and they've confused it and they're confusing created light with uncreated light.
And that's what all of the world religions do, all the monistic religions,
right, they believe that the experiences that they have in the noetic realm
or in the spiritual realm, which is I think that the drugs do open
a doorway to that that is that's not equated to God. The spiritual realm
is not identical to God, and that's what confuses them. And I think
it's in that Book of the Guru, the young Man and the Elder this
comes up where he says that when the Eastern religious mystics meditate, they do
tap into the spiritual realm, but it's the created spiritual realm that's inhabited by
angels, humans, demons, not that's not God itself or himself, and
that's the confusion. They're confusing a spiritual realm that's created with the uncreated still
and really all pagan religions, world religions, polytheistic religions do the exact same
thing. But there's another reference that I'm supposed he didn't mention Leibnitz, but
he says that he quotes some philosopher that he knew at Cambridge doctor C.
D. Broad, and Broad says that the true epistemology that we should have
is this one where ultimately every human being would be able to know all things
at once if they didn't have a limiting faculty of sense perception, the reducing
valve of the brain, he calls it. And we would be able to
bypass that if we could tap into these other realms, the other dimensions more
consistently, because then, he says, we become minds at large. We
are potentially mind at large, knowing all things and seeing all things. So
and just think how metaphysically out there this is right. This is somebody hailed
by modern you know, modernity, and this is all just mystical gibberish.
If you believe in science and rationality, which all of his family promoted scientism.
Basically, why am I supposed to believe in all this mystical gibberish of
tapping into other worlds through drugs. Wouldn't that be religious sky Daddy level nonsense?
Now, he says that the creator order will be transfigured. You can
bypass all this, and each one of us is potentially the mind at large,
she says. Then he goes on to say that we would be able
to look at anything in creation, a tree or rock, a chair,
and we would be able to see that all is in all and all is
all. So the move to monistic pantheism and the potentiality of omniscience, your
mind is actually a divine mind. He says that this would for me resolve
the one in the many. He actually mentioned that the one in the many
later on, so he's aware at least of these kind of basic philosophical problems.
And he says that when I did mascaline, I saw the one in
the many and the many and the one right. And sometimes if you're in
the circles of drug people and a hallucinogenic psychedelic cold, they'll talk about solving
the world, dude. And that seems to be in my I mean,
that's I think what he's talking about. He's talking about looking and peering into
reality as steered to the chair and the wicker patterns, who blow in my
mind, dude, And he says, I started to realize that this was
a sacramental view and vision of reality. That's an interesting choice of phrases because
that would suggest then that he thinks that LSD. Masculine things are actually sa
and he will later on the book actually appeal to Native American religious traditions and
say that they're superior and that we should look to that because these are that's
their sacrament. He knows about Pyote, and he says that one thing I
noticed that you could make apparrelel to John Locke, he says, is that
when I was beginning to look into the essences of things and see them for
what they are, he says, I noticed that the secondary qualities were more
important to me than the primary qualities. That's from John Locke. That's the
Enlightenment philosophy of primary qualities being things like mass, position, dimension, weight,
right, and then the secondary qualities being things like the color, the
appearance. And he says that the appearance and the colors of things were much
more prominent than their position than their their mass. They're the molecules that make
them up right, probably Mary versus secondary qualities. So he will sprinkle this
discussion consistently with various philosophers. But what I what I start to notice after
rereading Brave New World. As you guys know, we dissected every chapter Brave
New World with quite frankly together. So go check those out if you haven't
watched those. What I noticed is that there's actually a lot more esoteric and
sex magic stuff going on with Huxley than I noticed before. And why would
that be? Why would why would why would he be talking about that?
He's much more of a pseudo mystic than I remembered. I remembered him,
Okay, Brave New World and his family talks about evolution all the time,
and so it must just be a bunch of sciencey stuff. No, it's
a bunch of religious pseudomysticism, neoplatonism, and I would suspect occultism and cabalah.
He will, and I think that he'll drop these phrases like he mentions
the mystical order of the Rose at one point in this book, or he
says the mystic Rose when he's talking about reality and he mentions he'll mention Luciferianism
at one point. I forget the exact phrase that he used, but it
was something like the mystic Rose and it made me think, Okay, well,
he has an interest in Rosa Crucianism, and I think he mentions Rosa
Crucianisms in another text as well, probably in perennial philosophy, and that would
make sense because a lot of the people in his circles were into similar types
of ideas, such as the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, ritual magic,
all this kind of gibber jabber British intelligence of cult creation controlled stuff.
Now remember him. In Doctor Richard Spence's book, he goes into detail discussing
the history of Crowley's relationship to British intelligence. But what I forgot I didn't
realize. Guess who he partied with, Altos Huxley. They went and partied
to the same parties together, and this of course backs up in part doctor
Spence's theory that Crowley's drug diaries influenced Huxley, which then influences m celtrum.
But lo and behold, they were actually parting together, and I think Maxwell
Knight was coming going to those same parties, by the way, So if
you have the Doctor Richard Spence book, he talks about this here on page
two twenty five. So again just really solidifying that they're all running in the
same circles, with Maxwell Knight of course being the basis for m in the
Bond series. So James Bond's handler is m that's based on Maxwell Knight,
real British intelligence operative that Ian Flumming knew about. And they're all hanging out
together and partying together. And presumably then they're all doing the same drugs together,
aren't they They're all having the same trips together. Now, Huxley goes
on in the Texas say it's kicking in. It's getting really intense. When
I'm looking at the chair, I see the thing in itself, the dingon
zick. That's Kantian language for bypassing primary and secondary qualities. So he's referring
to Enlightenment philosophy, the barriers, the boundaries that were set up in Enlightenment
philosophy such that we can never get out of the trap of radical empiricism.
Right. Kant said in the Prologominate to Any Future Metaphysics that David Hume had
really destroyed metaphysics, and so if there was ever going to be science again,
it would have to have a grounding and a basis in metaphysics, or
else we're stuck in our own minds. So Kant writes Prologoma a Future Metaphysics,
they try to resolve this question that David hu imposed and thus that primary
secondary quality stuff, because Kant says, all you ever know is the phenomena,
those secondary qualities. You never get to the thing in itself, the
primary qualities, or the primary substance, or the corepuscles or the copuscularianism of
this time period. You can never really and we know it. So now
we're stuck in skepticism. And Huxley is intentionally saying, I'm bypassing and solving
Kant's dilemma by now looking at the thing in itself via the sacrament of pay
of mescaline. And he's saying, I can now do all of this metaphysics
via mystic perception. I see the truth directly. And he says, let
me give you some other examples of who else sees truth directly, Artists,
geniuses and mad men. Now wait a minute, I know we talk about
the artist as if he is inspired and a kind of a mad man.
Okay, yeah, maybe to a degree, but there's not clearly there's a
difference between an artist and a total schizo, right, I mean, but
he actually sort of combines these and he says that there's not a whole lot
of difference between the artists and the schizophrenic, so there is a consistent acceptance
of dissociation in schizophrenia because he knows that in a lot of people who do
these kinds of things, there are bad reactions and they end up in the
end up schizophrenics, people that do too many hallucinogens, people that are traumatized
and do these things. But he says, let's look to the arts and
I'm gonna show you true being, true essence. So there's a very existentialist
element here to him. By the way, you guys, you would hit
like and share. I'm testing out this Friday afternoon stream because I was kind
of blown away that we got a thousand on at like nine o'clock on various
shows. So I think I'm just going to keep doing like the eight o'clock
nine o'clock streams, because for whatever reason, two, three, four,
or five o'clock streams get half of the views that I nine pm stream gets.
That's crazy. So we'll continue to do these later streams because I guess
there's just too many people are still at work, and half of the country
is still at work. They're not off yet in the US, so welcome
everybody. We are doing a deep dive into the doors of perception and what
Huxley's religious mystical theology really really is. Of course, more of that is
in perennial philosophy, but we'll start to notice that perennial philosophy goes very well
with this text. And in my copy there's an essay that's attached which is
the second half of this book, which is Heaven and Hell. So there's
Doors of Perception in Heaven and Hell, which again refers a lot to Blake,
and it's pulling from Blake's divorce marriage of Heaven and Hell. And then
C. S. Lewis pulls from it as well, and he has the
Great Divorce. And then there's Huxley's pulling from the thing which is heaving her
health. So all of these texts ironically relate together. But this also relates
to the third of C. S. Lewis's Space Trilogy, if you remember
that, So remember so if you're if you're just coming into this, we're
covering Doors of Perception about Huxley from nineteen fifty four. And if you would
like to hear the rest of this talk, subscribe to my website or to
my Rock fin and you will get access to all of the archives going back
five years. The link is in the show description to get access to that.
So he says a little weird piece of irony. He says that while
I was on this masculine journey, we needed to take a trip down the
road to the drug store. While we're in La, right, So he
says, we're in La and I'm on this quote natural drug he says,
but we went to a place called World's Biggest drug Store. And he says,
and I was just kind of blown away walking in as we drove over
there, and as we walked in, and he says, I lost my
place. Yeah, he says, I could see infinity in the folds of
cloth. I could see the sea was part of the Red Sea was parting
when we were driving through traffic. So he keeps making all these mystical religious
associations to what he's seeing as they're going to the drug store. And then
he says, when he go to the drug store, Oh and Heed discree,
here's other wild part of the inn. He says, as we drove
across La, he said, it was to me, it was like a
kind of Eden again religious imagery. He says that I was beginning to think
that perhaps the masculine journey would be the answer to how human beings would be
able to return to Adam and Eve's beatific vision, they could see the essences
of creative things. They could see directly into things in Eden because they weren't
falling so odd references. Again, So, for him, mescaline LSD is
is what the Eucharist is, the place that the Eucharist holds right in orthodox
theology, in the history of Christianity. For him, the New Sacrament is
essentially mescaline. And he really truly seems to believe that this is the answer
that modern man seeks to bypass the entrapment in materiality that he has. Now,
it's true that some people do this, people that we know, right,
people that we've had interviews with friends of ours, you know, they've
talked about, Oh, I was really you know, atheist. I was
stuck into you know, just stuck down in the material world, dude.
And then I did it and it broke my attachment to physical reality and I
got into mysticism and esoterists. Many people have this journey. So, and
I'm not knocking those people. That's a pretty common thing that happens to a
lot of us, and these kinds of substances can do that. But that
doesn't mean that because they can do that, or because it led to something
good for you, that everybody needs to be doing that, right. That's
the fallacy of his logic here. And by the way, this is very
similar to a later text that I think. It's just kind of a retracement,
a restatement of this. You'll notice it. A lot of these texts
get referred to and rewarded and restated by other goobers in the psychonaut sphere.
For example, Food of the Gods by Terrence McKenna. Our friend Terrence,
who listens only to the toadstool, did you know that when I play super
Mario cart I only use toadstool because I believe in the mushroom. Food of
the Gods very similar to Huxley's text, and I would imagine they're all pulling
from the same stuff. So Terence McKenna wrote this in nineteen ninety two.
Another similar text would be The Psychedo Experience by Tim Larry, which we also
that analysis of because in the same text he talks about seeing the inner light
of things and seeing the seeing the created light, and compares it to a
kind of a Luciferian enlightenment. But again, the delusion is that all of
these people think that created light or created spiritual beings are God. There's angels,
there's demons, there's humans, and none of those are God. And
to worship those things, or to worship created even the spiritual realm itself,
to worship that is a kind of idolatry. And the world religions, we
would say, are deluded precisely in that way. And when we read you
know, his text, Leary's text, if you guys, remember again he
pulls from a lot of cobbalistic stuff, neo platonic stuff. We're because the
Tibetan journey into death is likened both by Huxley and by Leary to the drug
trip. That it's very similar and that you can encounter these beings and that
ultimately it's about passing beyond the abyss, the void, the aon and when
you come back, you're initiated. We did a whole lecture on this.
Okay, we're not gonna redo that. Now he's doing the same thing very
parallel. By the way, there's a bunch of As I read this book,
I noticed a bunch of songs cite this Undernour's egos, full rotating hips.
Right, that's so back is siding doors perception. There's a lot of
places where he talks about the non self. This the non the self and
the non self, which I think he's just referring to non being um like
is he They might be giants now the Self called Nowhere because know that one
that's a classic they might be giants song. And as I'm thinking about it's
on John Henry, I'm not gonna play it because it'll ding the freaking you
know what algorithm copyright thing. But uh yeah, go listen to Self called
Nowhere and see if you think that this is pulling from doors perception. Back
is pulling from doors perception as well, I think, and I that seems
plausible because I mean, you know, back doors Doors they might be giants.
I mean they're very trippy musicians, right that. The albums are very
acidy, very trippy. I bumped into John Lynnell in a in the restroom
one time. By the way, we did the little the Little Pepe dance.
When you're going to the to the urinal and then like there's a dude
of the urinal and you're waiting, and then the dude walks away from the
urinal and you go this way, and he goes this way, and then
you're like ohh and you keep going in the same direction. And I was
like, oh, that's John Lennell. Or was it Flansburgh. I don't
remember. I think it was Flansburg now that I think about it, Okay,
I haven't thought about it. They might be giants in a long time.
It was Flansburgh. Yeah, So when I went to the bathroom,
we did a little Pepe dance trying to get around each other to the to
the toilet, and I would have said something I was but I was kind
of like, it's kind of like the time that I've bumped into Atlantis Morris
said at that hotel, and I was like, oh, I was gonna.
Didn't know what to say, like, oh, you're you're you're her,
Oh that's you, you're you're him? Yeah, Okay, look bye.
Like if you if you're out of place and you bump into you know,
famous or semi famous or prominent person and you and you don't expect it,
it will throw you for a loop and you're kind of like, uh,
that's it. That's how I am at least, right, And I'm
like, when you're not thinking about it, you'd be like, oh,
I would ask that person this, this, this, and I would ask
him about this, and then what how did you write this song? Or
wouldn't And then when you actually bump into somebody, you're like, who you
sound like an ank slow boy? Right anyway? Self called nowhere. I'm
like, wait a minute, that's doors of perception, under nourished egos,
full rotating hips. Is that back? Wow? Is that wow? Jamie?
Is that wow? The back song? Anyway? Never mind? If
you if you guys would hit like and share, yes, if you bump
into a medium famous person, you will be literally shaking. By the way,
if you guys want to support the show, you do so via the
stream labs function. You can use your use the super chat function in supportive
of stream labs. There, ask me a question and I will answer your
super chats. That's one of the key ways that we do this. And
people always ask you why do you have really long intros? That is to
give people time to come to the live stream. So part of the way
that we make a living is live streams, and part of live stream living
the super chats. That means that you asked me a question via stream labs.
By the you send a tip. Part of the way we make a
living, and so videos don't make any money, you see, That's why
we do live streams. But it's also a fun interactive thing where the audience
and I have a good old time. We have a good old time,
and I would have remind you guys too. Yes, So we have big,
big, big interviews coming up, big famous people, big old famous
people, fancy people, most famous living gangster. We had an hour and
a half. We have different conversations, but the interview is an hour and
a half. It will be on his channel. Wait till you guys hear
that we talked about everything. I think your name is dead. Yes,
of course I like that. Now. Debrah's a very you can you can
tell that back was in a Prince phase when he did Debra. Right.
Anyway, so we're back to Huxley. His pseudo eucharist is mascaline at this
point, right, And then of course later on the Sandags pharmaceutical Company,
Abby Hoffman, all these different characters they synthesize LSD or actually it's right around
this time LSD's getting synthesized. But I brought this up today on Lord Voldemort
in the fourth hour. You have to understand that this is not just old
Aldus out here experimenting and partying and having fun. I'm always in my prince
phase. Correct. This is an older British elite strategy, the British warfare
strategy that comes out of the British Empire where they did drug running and they
ran a giant opium empire. And did you know that the British East India
Company and the East India Companies and et cetera, that they would ship drugs?
Did you know that that's a big part of how the empire was built,
opium running. And then guests who just took over all those same lanes.
Of course, of course, the way I finally got this looking forward
to this, this is a classic Peterdale Scott. Peterdale Scott, the guy
who coined the term deep state. If I recall that is going to be
a fun one. Yes, the people in our government, they just took
over the old lanes, Golden Triangle, Golden Crescent. What else have we
got. We got some jewels coming up here Cia in Europe. That's gonna
be a fun one to do. Yes, I'm a good way through this.
Some gems in that one too. I mean we are. We got
the deck stacked, if you know what I mean. When it comes to
books, maybe we win, we win the contents we win. Now,
to be fair, we got some bays Lit analyzer. He's got a great
he's got a great background of books back there, David Patrick Kerry got a
great background of books back there, definitely. But when it comes to just
going book mad, book insane, book crazy, we do that very well
over here, I must say. Now, so Huxley, right, he
Cuxley is in this British Royal Society, British Intelligence, Tavistock circle. I'm
not gonna do Tavistock again. But we saw today right when Berns writes Propaganda
and he says that we're controlled by an invisible government. He's talking about Tavistock.
That's the invisible controllers that control public opinion. Who wrote the book public
opinion, Walter Lippmann Tavistock. So Huxley says, if we're gonna solve the
problems of Western man, it's gonna be pharmacological. Well hey, wait a
minute, I thought he was exposing brave New world. I thought he was
telling us the truth. But here he say, no, we need state
mandated drug trips. This is m Kiltra. You guys understand, this is
M Kiltra. It's all part of that, the doma ball a, the
domaball. It doesn't sound so foe deep. I mean, like, could
you have just so guys, if you're single, you want to go find
a yoga chick girlfriend on Instagram, just go talk to her about the Dharma
body, the DNA. What what is the Dharma body? Well, he
didn't even know. He just said, oh, it's the void and it's
like everything and it's like nothing and it's like the popcorn and its well,
dude, it's all of it, man, the void, the godhead,
the mind, the suchness. This is what people think is deep. He's
literally he says Dharma body like fifty times in this and I think what he
means is what was I think he means like the essence of a thing,
like the essences of creative things. I think that's what he means. And
he's calling that the beatopic vision, which is not what the beatritic vision is.
But he's calling seeing the essence of creative things to be a vision because
he actually says um as he starts to look through the art book. So
when he goes to the to the drug store, he says, I found
an art book. And I thought, I thought this was very ironic,
you know, because here I am on a drug and I'm in the drug
store and I start looking through an art book that I purchased, and it's
got you know, Sayson and Van Go and all this stuff. So the
this is the worst part of the book. This gets really boring because for
the next thirty or forty pages he starts doing some pretentious, as freak annoying
art analysis of Van Go Bot to CELLI, I mean, it's it's it's
insufferable, okay. And the other thing was that they should have put pictures
in this book, right, because I mean, nobody he knows all of
these art works that he is describing in text. Wouldn't it have been nice
for us to see the pictures that he's I mean, why would they not
put the pictures in there? I don't know. Maybe it would have cost
too much. But as he goes through all this pretentious bologna and nonsense about
I mean, it's distrust you not miss anything. He's like, well,
let me tell you what I see. When I stare at the folds in
the Cloak painted by So and so, I saw all reality. It's just
I saw Nirvana in the face of the eckr excuse me, in the face
of Sazon's paintings and Rembrandts. But it's just nonsense. It's a waste of
time. But when he comes back to reality, I guess you could say,
here's an interesting Listen to this section. After all of this art,
the dow Us and the Buddhists look beyond visions to the void and through the
void to the ten thousand things of objective reality. Because their doctrine was the
doctrine of the Word made flesh, what Christians should have been able to adopt
a similar attitude towards the universe, But because the doctrine of the Fall,
they found it very hard to do so. As recently as three hundred years
ago, it was a common expression of world denial. This is interesting because,
really, I mean, this is not true orthodoxy. It's probably the
case in the Latin tradition that he's talking about in the West of degenerate,
heretical, heterodox Christianity. The West did fall into a world denying situation.
And that's that's why you know, the Franciscans and all this kind of stuff.
Who are what are all these people saying? That's why Franciscan you know,
a sizy stuff got popular, is because Francis was reacting to world denying
theologies or whatever. And I mean, we're not yoakum if you are in
Franciscan stuff. That's all like Western dialectics and heterodox to us. But he
says quote, he's saying this is what the Western Christianity should have realized.
Is wrong? Is this quote? And he I don't know who this is.
I'm like called Lalamant. He says, Lalamant said, we should feel
wonder at nothing at all in nature, only the incarnation. Well, if
you believe in creation, then creation itself is a presignifier of the incarnation because
the logos is the creator. So if the Logos is the creator, and
if the Logos creator all of nature, and you believe in the doctrine of
the Logi, all of nature does manifest the logos. It is Christo centric,
but he is making an interesting point that creation in the West is not
related to Christ and so it's a old denying philosophy and that's what eventually it
leads to materialism, enlightenment, scientism, and atheism. But it goes on
to say that I started to notice, you know, in a lot of
the art works that I was looking at, that the artists were searching for
the dharma body. They were searching for the essence and the truth of things.
And they were doing this because they were working with the archetypal world.
So here we are back to platonism and neo platonism, right, And that,
in his view, the arts will lead us back sort of a Nietzschean
approach. Art will save man, beauty will save man. But what is
art is what are the archetypal forms? Right? Even if we adopt some
form of neoplatonism. Right, Oh, I'm no longer a materialist. I
don't believe in nihilism and chaos, right, I believe in order and hierarchy.
And I'm a metaphysical, you know, neoplatonic mystic. What does that
get you? And he says, schizophrenia most takers of mescaline experience the heavenly
part of schizophrenia. What mescaline can bring hell and purgatory. But only in
the case of those who have had bad recent experiences of depression or anxiety.
Would this result in a bad trip, he says. But he says schizophrenia
is similar to the experience because this is he starts going into the Tibetan Book
of the Dead, the experience of life after death, in the Tibetan Book
of the Dead, the experience of the void, all the stuff that is
in this book. He says, the trip that can occur a bad trip
is very similar to the experience in the Tibetan Book of the Dead, where
the departed soul is described as shrinking in agony from the pure light of the
void, and it even shrinks from the lesser lights. These are the spirits
or the angel of the beings of the demons. The soul then rushes headlong
into the comforting darkness of the self and is us reborn as a human being.
It's about reincarnation and that Book of the Dead. The schizophrenic is a
soul that is not only unregenerate, but desperately sick. His sickness consists in
an inability to take refuge from inner reality and out of reality as a sane
person does. In the homemade universe of common sense, the strictly human world
of useful notions, shared symbols, and acceptable conventions, the schizo is like
a man permanently under the influence of mascaline. Well, why would I want
to constant? Why would you want to state mandate schizo? But by the
way, did you know that? Did you know that the Tabisa Institute Standard
Research, they actually did put out dot comments on the implementation and the ramping
up of schizo in society. Guess what it worked. Society is getting more
and more a schizo and that is by design. And part of that is
because everybody is on a bunch of ridiculous drugs that will do nothing to help
them. And I'm talking about the pills, about the millions of people on
all of the pills, infinite pills, pills for this, pills for that.
That's the real drug problem. The real drug problem is not in America.
I'm saying medical THHC or No, it's alcohol and pills. Those are
the real drug problems in America. But the irony is that Huxley is part
of the reason that we live in that society. The pharmacological society is something
that he is pioneering and pushing here, you see. And the wild part
is that he's even talking about how a lot of this will induce schizophrenia.
And this section here, by the way, about fifty sixty seventy pages in
this is where he really gets into stuff that's really close to this, right,
And remember, Leary says, if you want to blame anybody for the
sixties counterculture, you know who to blame. I think it's this clip.
Let's see the CIA a total credit for sponsoring and initiating the entire consciousness movement,
counterculture events of the nineteen sixties, doctor Timothy Leary, the nineteen sixties,
Johnny, Did you hear that? Slow? People in the audience,
people that think that I just make up stuff and it's all conspiracy, did
you hear Let's play it again. He gives the CIA a total credit for
sponsoring and initiating the entire consciousness movement, counterculture events of the nineteen sixties.
Doctor Timothy Leary, the nineteen sixties Johnny apple Seed of LSD, the Cia
funded and did you know that. I don't know if that it might be
hard to find, but um, he was also a big devotee of Alistair.
But I don't see it anyway. He goes on to say, all
humanity at large will be able to dispense with artificial parent excuse me, that
all of humanity will be able to dispense with artificial paradises is unlikely. And
he's talking about big modern society and theme parks and maybe even drugs themselves as
paradises. He says that art, religion, carnivals, saturnalia, dancing,
listening to lectures, all of these have served, in the phrase of H.
G. Wells, as doors in the wall, doors of perception,
and for private ever to use. There have always been chemical intoxicans. And
then so as he starts to come down, he starts listing the drugs that
are acceptable in Western society, and he says, look, why is it
that we only accept in Western society tobacco and alcohol? He says, this
is odd, and in fact he says that it's probably the result of the
Roman Catholic Church and this kind of stuff as to why those are the only
chemicals that are acceptable he says that the church would have been a lot better
to be more into having mystical experiences through drugs. And he says, in
fact, they might have even been able to sell people on the Beatific vision
more if they had pushed drugs. And he says there are certain religious groups
and sects in America he says that would be far more useful or far more
likely to find a foothold in a spiritual movement of the future than any of
the classical biblical religions or whatever. He says. He says, my choice,
and this is something I'd never heard of. Let's if we can find
it is. He says that Native American traditions, now we know about that,
but he says that those will be a lot better because they have a
you could do podde But he mentions a weird cult and it's a Native American
Syncretist Christian evangelical thing. This is wild. I've never heard of this,
and I'm trying to remember the name of it, because he actually listed the
name of it. He called the Native American Church something like that. Yes,
I never heard of this. Have you guys heard of this? The
Native American Church. Let's see what we can pull up on that. Now.
Remember this is prior to the sixties. This is prior to the New
Age movement. This is the guy who you know, and of course Bolvatsky
and all those people too. This is the origin of the New Age movement.
The Native American Church. Interesting now it says church, So I thought
this something to do with Christianity. It is a syncretist religious syncratic movement and
it has a split from it called Big Moon Payote Big Moon. The FBI
man went to a long journey existed in Oklahoma. They did, they tripped
out, Okay, worship a Great Spirit. I'm just curious as a a
relationship to Christianity, some of the members seem to have a relationship to Christianity.
They believe in right walking. Many of the members believed that Jesus is
a manifestation of the Great Spirit, and it has elements of Protestant Christianity included
in it, as well as ceremonial peyote altars. Wow, this is pretty
well. They do recite certain Bible sections. I don't believe it's a large
group. What it said had how many members, I guess it is pretty
large. Two hundred and fifty thousand members. Interesting, and Huxley says that
this would be a better type of Christianity or quasi Christianity or pseudo Christianity for
America to adopt. Now that is interesting because this is showing us that these
Tavistock British intelligence figures, they want a religion that they control and they run
to be adjacent to and to promote their world government and in fact one of
their luminaries. As we've covered it, nobody knows about this book. This
is an obscure book. Jamie found it, she read it. We did
a whole livestream on this. H. G. Wells God the Invisible King.
This is the nineteen seventeen text. This is old and in this book
H. G. Wells was way out of his time, so this is
over one hundred years ago. He says that we got to get rid of
the Western conceptions of God, and we got to get rid of this,
you know, theological, dogmatic conception of God. He says that the religion
of the future, the religion of the future, will be a Luciferian New
Age religion. Our God is Prometheus, the Rebel, the rebel Angel.
Our God is Prometheus, the rebel, the lucifer figure. That's H.
G. Wells telling you in nineteen seventeen that the future religion would be Luciferian,
not atheism, Luciferianism, the free religion, the same religion that this
book is putting forward, and the same religion that his next or his religious
text, the Prada Philosophy promotes. Do you understand the continuity of agenda of
the Luciferian religion, which is a Neoplatonic, neo gnostic religion based around things
like the sacrament debilosity, and so the control structure of British East India Company
of opium and opium lanes and networks and intelligence operatives running that which the CIA
and the OSS and French intelligence and British intelligence took over. That control structure
of opium is updated now, not to the British Empire, to the corporate
empire which controls you through a big pharma. It's the same model of control.
Do you understand which is not the British Empire, It's the Bear Monsanto
Empire, the Eli Lily Empire. Does that make sense? This should be
obvious once you see this. If you see this, do you see this?
Did I not have the Native American thing pulled up this Now. I'm
not dissing Native Americans. I'm not dissing the people or anything like that.
I'm saying that Altos Huxley is saying that this should be a model religion for
the new world order, and that model religion is the same thing that these
people constructed, which you could say is the New New Age movement or Bolvatsky
theosophy, that kind of stuff, right, Bolvatsky's theosophy is the Fabian socialist
creation. That's affront for Fabian socialism and affront for theosophy, and theosophy is
the real origins of the future lucifer religion. Bolvatsky says the same thing to
the future religion. The future New Age is Luciferian, she says. And
she's not saying that because she's super smart. She's saying that because she is
an agent of the same people who made Alistair Crowley their agent. Same people
as this, same people, as this same power structure, the same group
social engineering, public opinion, running and controlling of the cults. No different.
Now, I know a lot of y'all have super Chat questions. Now
is the time when you ask me those bring your super chat questions. By
the way, tomorrow night we'll have Doctor John Coleman Part two either tomorrow or
nine, after the second half of his Tavistock book, which is really rare.
Enjoyed getting into that in depth, and I hope you guys enjoyed the
pseudo religious, pseudo mystic approach that in many places ironically grasps at things that
we find, for example, in Orthodox theology, the division of the divine
light, seeing the essences of created things, all oh, of Saint Maximus
and the logi seeing God directly. But of course we don't believe in the
Roman Catholic Latin doctrine of beatific vision of seeing the divine essence, all right,
that's actually a Neoplatonic originist doctrine. It's not Orthodox at all. But
we do believe in a vision of the divine energies, as Saint Maximus says,
and that's that's different from the Latin doctrine of seeing the divine essence and
having the intellect satiated. That's the timistic Roman Catholic doctrine. That is not
the Orthodox doctrine. But I hope, I hope you understand that a lot
of what you hear me talked about are talking about over the years, even
the stuff that we covered in the philosophy classes, the lecture that we did.
By the way, you can purchase my full twelve course thirty ish our
lecture of the history of Western philosophy from the Prestocratics to the Enlightenment up to
Nietzsche and post modernity. You can get that course right here. And yes,
by the way, guys, we will have philosophy class tonight for those
that purchased the tutoring option as we go back through the series, and tonight
I think is Batristic philosophy anyway, So Opie enjoyed this analysis of doors of
perception, and as I said, he goes on to mention the void.
Again, he goes on to mention the mystical rose, mystical rose, which
to me suggests he was probably toying with, or flirting with Rosicrucianism, which
many in the British Empire did have an interest in. You can go all
the way back even to the time of John D and the ritual magic of
John D, which I would say Huxley probably had an interest in those things.
As well, because a lot of what he talks about again very much
maps onto cobbalistic ideas and various Western hermeticis that like to capitalize on Eastern mysticism
as well as Western alchemy. For example, Crowley does that right. Crowley's
whole system was about wedding Eastern yoga and Eastern meditation with Western alchemy, hermeticism
and the Cabalah. Well, that's the same thing that groups like Rosa Crucians
were doing. And my guests would be that Huxley had some kind of initiatory
belief, whether that was Rosa Crucianism or something else that we don't know about,
or you know, just thought on his own he was initiated. It's
pretty clear that he consistently is dropping these kinds of terminology here and there,
and ironically even says that we should take a Quinas as a model, because
he says that, you know, Quinas quit doing dogmatic theology after he had
his vision, and he said that all of that he wrote was chaff,
and he says we should be like that. That's how he ends the books.
Perception. He says that's the equivalent of the drug trip man. So
you get a kind of a William James variety of religious experiences idea where all
the religious experiences are expressing the same thing. What so all this is the
argument of all the people think, Oh, well, you see because the
mystical experience of the Buddha and the Tantrist and the sex magic guy and the
butt sex magic guy, and oh, it's all the same. It's all
the same mystic because it's a mystical experience. Man, what if it's a
bad mystical experience? What if it's a delusion. So the assumption is just
that, oh, it's so good because the spiritual and spiritually goes good?
What about bad spiritual experiences? He even talks about some of them being bad.
Okay, well, what's the standard for good and bad? Then?
And did you notice that it devolves into multiverse stuff because as we'll see in
Heaven and Hell when we get to the second half of the bullet for those
who subscribe to the members section, Heaven and Hell apparently, in his view,
are these sort of realms that can be accessed via the drugs and via
other mystical states, and so they are perhaps regions in our heads that we
can go to. Worlds in our heads and then we're gonna also read.
By the way, there isn't an additional essay in my copy that was stuck
in the book called the Drugs that Shape Men's Minds. Now, remember Huxley
went on to Lyn Institute and Eslin became the brains behind the New Age movement.
And that's not accidental either in terms of Hollywood and pop culture, because
if you remember in Madmen, Don Draper at the end of the show goes
where Lyn and he becomes a new Ager. So the fifties culture gives way
to New Age stuff. Guys that would hit like and share, let's go
to we got super chats, we got questions through human eyes through in a
super chat. At the end last time, twenty bucks. Thanks Jay Dryer.
Okay, it's dire, there's no R there. I'm not mad,
but I oftentimes get called Jay Dryer, even by even when I go on
large shows that interview me and they're call me Jay Dryer, and I'm like,
there's no R, dude, Why do people think that my name is
Dryer? I mean, sorry, I'm having trouble hearing you. You hush
Siri. We don't like you. I don't want to talk to you.
Get out of here, hush. Where are we at? BMX nineteen sixty
six. Awesome stuff great? No, awesome great stuff, awesome great stuff.
I'm reading that like one phrase, awesome great stuff. Are you a
fan of awesome great stuff or no, Lamont Stigler, I say nothing for
five dollars. Hey, if you want to say nothing for five dollars or
even for one dollar, you can do it all day long. We will
accept those pay piggies, baby. Oh yes. And to remind everybody,
we will be going into a lot of new areas, new new domains.
Man, We're gonna break on through the other side, dude. Because I
am looking forward to this book again, I'm good ways into it. But
like I said, we're wait, We're waiting to get Patrick wood On.
I really want to get into this one too, because not a lot of
people know about CIA operations in Europe except for I mean, we all know
about Gladio because we've been talking about Gladio. But this looks like a great
text as well. And I've been wanting for a long time to get into
that Latin South America stuff, right, CIA operations in Latin South America,
Central America because people don't really talk about that much. We all know about
around contra. I hope, I think. But let's go deep into this
stuff that is going to be it's gonna be a trip man. And remember
these are mainline intelligence, university studies and texts. These are not tenfold conspiracy
books. This is University of California Press. Okay, this is I don't
know what press, but it's an academic text. Who published this, I
don't know what that is, what publisher that is. But people need to
understand that we don't work from typically theory texts. We work from mainline scholarship
and academic texts. And so you can't handle that if you're still such a
normy that you think that what you're hearing is conspiracy text when I'm literally reading
to you from academic text. This is not the channel for you. You
are slow boy. Go to another channel, Go watch your Minecraft channel,
go watch your fortnight channels, go watch your sports ball. This is not
for you. Have you ever done LSD? Yes, I've done videos on
my bad trip report. Ye. Mine will not be the first one that
comes up if you just type in bad trip report, this one. I
did have a Kitty on there. I thought that was that was a funnier
looking picture. But this one I thought was a little more I catchy.
So there if you want my bad trip. So no, I didn't do
a lot of drugs. I did LSD a few times, have bad experiences
or I had one bad experience, and you know, it just it's it's
a pseudo spirituality. It's all kind of a synthe to me, it's a
synthetic replacement. It's just a delusion. It makes people think that they're super
smart genius is solving the world, and it's not the things that the discoveries
that everybody comes to. It's like ancient paganism world one dude, Oh wow,
you discovered what every ancient world religion has said for thousands of years,
and you believe that you're solving the world and you're so deep. Anyway,
you guys remember it, hit like and share next question. DC Woodworking,
Thank you, DC. By the way, I followed you essay had a
nice uh, a nice looking profile, a lot of cool crafts. So
shout out to DC Woodworking. I followed him on Instagram. Five dollars Thank
you for your based analysis. God bless thank you so much. Guys,
please support the channel with questions, answers, super chats, whatever. Remember
also that we have an amazing show sponsor with Chalk dot Com, and chalk
dot com has literally the best supplements out there. I mean, I've been
taking chalk for over a year, year and a half and you guys can
all tell right, we've we've we're over energized every time we do a live
shop. Why is that? Well, because I've been taking various chalk supplements
and I love to experiment. I use my own body as a mcultrom mind
control, body control, Doma body, the Dama body. Oh, I've
got the Dama body right, And I use chalk as an experiment on my
Dharma body to make it more dharma. Doesn't that sound spiritual? It sounds
so mystical Doma body. Do you to touch my Doma body? Domb?
I feel like if I talked to Russell Brand, I could say what do
you think about the Dama buddy, and he would know, Like he would
totally know what I'm talking. He would talk for an hour about the Drma
body if I mentioned it. I don't even know what it's supposed to be
meant about. Drma body. But what I do like is supplements like Action
two point zero. And if you are, you know, everybody's always tired,
they're always wanting more energy. And there's a lot of pros to coffee.
I mean, I'm a coffee addict, but sometimes coffee doesn't really work,
especially if you're like super you know coffee, you know, coffee anonymous
addict like myself, Like eventually it doesn't do anything. But what about supplements
that are like stimulants to give you the advantages but none of the defects.
And that's really what Chalk aims to do with Action two point zero is to
promote a natural, you know, energy source that will help you out with
an I mean, you take it, you're gonna feel it within about forty
five minutes, right, And so the dose on the bottle says three.
Even of course you can do up to six if you really want, like
super energy. I don't know if I would go that much, but the
you know, they have doctors over a talk, that's what they say.
It uses an extract called rhodelia or excuse me, rodeola, excuse me.
It's a wild harvested Siberian extract and it includes what they called phytochemicals that give
mood, focus, clarity, and energy boosting accentuators. You're gonna get nitric
boost two hundred thirty percent, You're gonna get extra blood flow, oxygenation,
immune support. Right. All of that is what Action two point out does.
It's really good for that. So we're kind of looking at some of
the other ones that I've not pushed a lot because we all know, like,
I'm a big fan of the ton ketae. I mean, that's one
proven to boost testosterone. I mean I do take it on an almost daily
basis, and I've been doing that for a long time and it really does
work. Again. Ton Catale tonk at one hundred chok dot com use the
promo code j A Y five zero to get fifty percent off. I highly
recommend go over to cchoq dot com chalc dot com. The promo is linked
in the show description. That is our show sponsor. They're an awesome red
pilled based company. We have been huge fans of them, big supporters.
If you want to keep me going, then get those products that will keep
you going and keep chalk going. That's the best way to support me as
well. Subscribing to the website. So get on over there and try out
the Chalk Action two point zero. Try out the Seven Wonders. Try out
the Sheila Jit from Mental Focus and Clarity. Try out the Action two point
zero. Try out the Ashwell Ganda. They've got it all, and it's
not just for dudes in terms of testosterone ladies. They've also got stacks for
ladies. You can get a whole bundle over there again. Promo code JAY
five zero a Y five zero fifty percent off or JAY five three lafe JAY
five three lafe that is fifty three percent off recurring subscriptions at Chalk dot com.
Put that in and then you'll get those coming every month. You won't
have to wait, you won't have to put all that info in. You
know, Oh, I forgot to order it this. It'll just start coming
on a regular basis. And I guarantee you that you're gonna love Chalk dot
com. I get people texting me pictures of it. Images. Oh I've
been taking it. I love it all the time. Choq dot com.
Use the promo code J fifty fifty percent off or J fifty three LAFE for
recurring subscriptions Wintertime Blues twenty dollars. What do you think of accelerationism? You
know, I think that also sounds very tavistocky. You know, as we
said, doctor Coleman pointed out that the famous text by Spangler, Decline to
the West, that's not supposed to be a weaponized journal of how to destroy
cultures. It's just him looking at the patterns, and then Tavistock says,
let's speed that up and destroy Western civilization to bring in our technocracy. Okay,
Wellington, House, Lippmann, Twynbee. That's what they were doing.
And accelerationism, to me, sounds like that sounds like what Tavistock would like,
like an more advanced version of Tavistock. You said, Nick Land's book
Dark Enlightenment or Curtis Yarvin. I'm familiar with these people because psyop Cinema,
I think was doing some shows relating to the theories and the approach of Nick
Land. But I've not read Nick Lands, so I can't speak to that.
But no, I don't think that we can participate in intentionally collapsing society.
I mean, that's to me, that's demonic. Now I am familiar
with neo reaction because a lot of people who like my stuff are Curtis Jarvin
fans, and they like all that. But I've not delve deeply into it.
But I've I've heard good things. I've not looked deeply into the theories.
I remember Alex, I think had Curtis Yarvin on not too long ago
after me. So I listened to that interview. Thank you for pulling me
out of delusional gnosticism. Hey, great to hear that wintertime blues. Also,
the Doors need a bass guitar. I don't think the doors are still
around, but you could audition for the doors if you want to. I
count deleted ten dollars. Thank you for teaching us. Jay, I don't
need drugs. I don't need drugs attained wisdom. I can tune into your
shows. Yeah, that's an appreciated aphorism equipped there. I don't need drugs.
I have Jasonholses Okay, I'll take it. Kevin Farrell five dollars and
says nothing. It's okay. You gotta say nothing. Live you Floria Row
ten dollars. Do you have any planned lectures on the foundations of EU and
NATO, bro We've done a bunch of those when we lectured through the Milner
Fabian text that got into the establishment of NATO. Right um Joan Razzi as
Milner Fabian conspiracy book. There's a we did a whole lecture on the founding
of the EU. There Daniel Esslan's book Biburg covers the founding of the EU
out of Biburg. So we have we have done that. But thank you
for that. So go check out those lectures. But I mean I will
continue forever lecturing on these topics. So sure, Anonymous five dollars. How
is Luciferian as a neoplatonic or gnostic, Well, because if you're a Christian,
then you believe that all of the heresies of the first seven centuries,
in the first first ausand News the first seven ecumenical councils are motivated typically by
Hellenic and Neoplatonic presuppositions. So whether it's Arianism, Unimianism, Nestorianism, monophysitism,
they all have an underlying neoplatonic assumption about simplicity, divine simplicity, organism
as well and nasticism, although it does differ with neoplatonism because Plotinus wrote against
the Gnostics. There's a lot of commonalities that they still share. Where they
differ is the status of this world. Is this world a bad prison world,
or as the Gnostics said, somebody to flee from? Or is this
world just kind of the lowest of the emanation, the lowest of the worlds.
According to Plotinus, Plato doesn't seem the Luciferian. No, Plato's theology
and doctrine is one the Luciferian doctrine, and it is a rule by oligarchy
by the time of the law. Is the Council of Night is an oligarchical
intelligence deep state that runs Magnesia. So he modifies the theology of the republic.
You said, Luciferian Gnostics are about self denying and abandoning the world,
not all of them. So there's not one Luciferianism, not one Gnosticism.
I mean, dude, I'm telling you they themselves say this. So,
I mean, what do you think Luciferianism is if it's not coming out of
Neoplatonism and ostis, of course it is. I mean, go read the
Sinitio Glue book on Plethon and Byzantium. He shows with a direct lineage that
Neoplatonism and Byzantium is the origin of the esoteric philosophy of Um. I just
went blank, freaking the who's the enlightenment Jewish philosopher? Uh, the Pantheus
Jewish philosopher. I just want to blink. Anyway, he's he influences them,
and the Jacobins, the aluminous Jacobins, are directly influenced by Plethon.
You didn't know this. I've been talking about this for years. Go back
through all my platonic lectures. Spinoza, thank you. Yes, So Spinoza
is influenced Bython. Plethon had a secret society maintaining Neoplatonism in Byzantium, and
he trans He transmits that mystical tradition which Sinesio Glue identifies as Luciferian to Spinoza,
who then influences Hegel and the Hermeticists, the Rosa Crucian, same stuff.
So I'm coming at it from a Christian perspective, and I'm telling you
that all of those systems are Luciferian in their essence. So you're just failing
to understand the nuances that it's not as simple as Sutanism is evil and self.
It is self worship. Platonism is self worship ultimately, because all delusions
are self worship. Doesn't mean that there's no truth in Platonism. It means
that the ultimate philosopher king is an antichrist figure ten man, ten dollars,
Thank you, doctor Dre. California knows how to party. Well, I
guess Huxley thought California knew how to party because he's either doing masculine before anybody
else. Right on that goofy tie on that GOOFTI one dollar? Do you
plan on having children? So, Jamie, we don't believe is able to.
And I've answered this many times. We don't try not to, but
we don't know that Jimmy's able to. So Byzantia's three dollars day, Gayer,
I'm the first in history of Western civilization to reverse a name. Did
you know that? You got mill Neman? But I don't know that you're
the first to do that because I've been I've been been doing that for a
long time myself. Guys, how are you doing? What's up? What
are y'all talking about? So we mentioned these books and then people come in
they have no idea what we're talking about talking about this book radical Platonism and
Byzantium I can't spell. This book traces neo Platonism to the Enlightenment and Renaissance
her or she her Meticism and in the Enlightenment scientific revolution, and he specifically
ends the book talking about Spinoza and the Illuminati. Okay, do you know
the Illuminati or an actual historical thing. Do you know that they based their
stuff on an atheistic platonism? Go read the book all right if you would
hit like a share. Remember that we also have other cool sponsors like Grand
Theft World. That is, you know, not just our podcast. There's
also other podcasts that are amazing, excellent and really cool and will enlighten you,
especially if you don't know much about how the world really works from a
geopolitical perspective. You know, we focus a lot on educating people and engaging
in education, education for the masses in a format in a way that's better
than and the university brainwashing system. And you can get that education through myself
and through our affiliates and our buddies and our friends like rich Or Grove over
at Grand Theft World. Right, amazing podcasts you're talking about weekly installments of
seven hours of hard hitting geopolitical and philosophical education, information, learning to become
self sufficient, learning to become an entrepreneur, learning to become your own man.
How do you do that? Will you start with education? Okay,
it's not just education. You got to put it into action. It's not
just becoming a nerd and learning a bunch of facts and spitting them out.
You have to apply this to your life. How do you do that?
You do that by taking the education and then using that to start your own
business, to become an entrepreneur, to become your own man. A lot
of you out there have never thought about doing that. I never thought about
doing that. I didn't think I could run a business and write books and
do all this, And then I decided to try it out. And a
lot of you haters, and a lot of you people out there who have
never done any of this stuff. You whine and complain all daylong about everybody
else, but you don't do these things yourself, So you don't get out
there and try these things. I'm here to tell you to go out there
and try try to start your own business. Try to do your own thing.
Try it out. If it doesn't work, move on to something else,
No big deal. So what But rather than sitting around and whining and
complaining and bitching about other people and how their mean or whatever. No,
you do your own thing, when you have invested and made money, when
you've started a business and had success, then we'll listen to you whine and
bitch and complain because we'll know you're in a position to do it. But
you anonymous whining complaining people. You need to step up. You need to
do your own thing. You need to create instead of constantly bitching and tearing
down. What have you created? Well, Richard Grove is there to help
facilitate that, and he's been at it for many years and he's a great
guy, and we love Richard Grove. You know, Richard was part of
the inspiration for what I did. There's a lot of people, but Richard
played a role in that. So I'm going to tell you get on over
two rockfin and subscribe to Grant the World and start your education right now.
Start learning to become self sufficient, become sovereign, become self educated. Because
we can't really rely on the traditional education, the legacy education system even more,
it's pretty much completely co opted and completely for the most part, a
brainwashing operation. So but the advantage is that you know, with willpower and
with your own focused intention, you can learn these things on your own.
And Richard is there to help facilitate that, and you can do that by
his courses over Autonomy University. One of those courses I taught is the history
of Western Philosophy, and we're gonna be teaching multiple courses later on this year.
Next course is going to be Global Elite book series. I'm gonna turn
that into a course. Then I'm gonna do a lecture series on geopolitics and
espionage boo yeah, look for that later this year. Remember two, get
tickets guys to the show that we're doing in Nashville with Courtney, big live
event, a lot of big name people there. You will recognize these people
here. Get your tickets to that June third and fourth. It's a two
day event in Nashville. Tickets are right there. That's before our California event.
There's the tickets for that. And also we'll be doing a live event
in Hollywood with Jamie Kennedy, Jammie Kennedy of Scream fame, So come meet
Jamie Kennedy, get your scream gear, get your scream masks signed, get
your b rad gear, get your Malow boots, a CDs signed. If
you get tickets there it's a five hour event, not Jamie's at the end.
Five hours, mainly me and Jamie Hanshaw. Then Jamie Kennedy closes out
with stand up. Everybody loves our events. They're like parties. Get your
tickets right there too, live in La. Get the tickets now, secure
your place. See those tickets. Get them. You get me doing comedy,
thirty forty five minutes of madness, insanity and nonsense. Then you get
Jamie doing a lecture on Hollywood. Then you get me doing a lecture on
philosophy. Then you get Jamie Kennedy Boom Wow crazy. Go get those tickets
right now and subscribe to get the second half of this. It'll be later
this week when part two goes up, because we got to do part two
of the John Coleman stream from a couple of days ago.