Using free speech to free minds. You are listening to the David Knight Show.
As a clock strikes thirteen, it's what day is it? Wednesday?
It's Mayday, May Day, May Day. We have lots control here.
You're of our Lord twenty twenty four. Well, today we are going to
try to explain what is happening with the campus wars. We see the Palestinian
squatters coming. Yes, we all kind of saw this in the buil,
didn't we. After a few days three and a half billion dollars for refugee
resettlement as part of the Israel package. Well, now they're pushing really hard
to They want you to believe that they're concerned about what's happening on the college
campuses, and yet they're going to do massive migration of Palestinians coming into the
country. We'll also take a look at the USDA. It's doing a real
power play to take away meat and milk with this bird flu stuff. And
there's another big power play going on with the Green Agenda. ESG may be
gone, but hope remains for black Rock and Larry Fink that he can get
in on the ground floor of a power scam. We'll explain that to you
as well. Well, let's begin with the campus war stuff. I liked
what babelin Bee had. They said the world Washington horror last night is a
large group of indoctrinated, woke extremists destroyed a woke extremist indoctrination center Columbia University.
It's been this way for a long time. I guess now we're concerned
because it's not just about destroying America, although it is. It's very much
about destroying America. But you know they've I'll show you what they did to
the George Washington statue. It's very much about this hatred and the groups that
are using this. Both groups are about destroying America. But for the longest
time, this kind of hatred and vitriol. It's not okay to be white,
But now that it's not okay to be Jewish, we got to do
something about it. That's the issue here, and the thing that we got
to do about it is we've got to shut down free speech. No shut
down. These indoctrination centers don't cut off their money, although some private donors
have. Now, let's shut down free speech. They will always use these
manufactured problems to impose a solution that is an even bigger problem. We didn't
see this coming, said one official. After spending decades of brainwashing young,
impressionable people into volatile, savage revolutionaries. We're shocked to see them unleash such
volatility and savagery while trying to launch a revolution. We wish there'd been some
warning signs students engage in the violent attack. One of them said, I
owe everything to this place. I could never have grown into the angry,
destructive, violent person I am without the education I received here. Can you
help me set this place on fire, folks. Is not just the universities,
it is also America that they want to set on fire. As a
matter of fact, one person went to their encampment and this is what they've
done to the statue of George Washington at George Washington University. Is not Columbia.
This has spread to a lot of different college campuses, but you know,
George Washington University, that's where we go to get our Supreme Court justices.
Is the statue of George Washington. George Washington University's campus. And this
statue happens to be in the middle of the pro Palestinian encampment. On the
university. Yeah, I look at that. They like him as much as
they do Roberty Lee. Yeah, everybody. Yeah, so genocidal warmonger.
He is a colonizer. I guess, free Palestine. Bring them here to
get free stuff. That's what we want to do. We want to bring
Palestine to America. We wanted that kind of unrest in America, don't we?
All they do. So, you know, these protesters have been doing
this for a long time, but they were when you look at the this
particular thing here are they doing this for humanitarian reasons? I mean, I'm
seeing a lot of people out there saying, well, this is you know,
defending these draconian measures against them. And there's multiple layers on this onion.
What is right and what is wrong? And what is the response the
correct response to what is right and what is wrong. For the longest time,
these humanitarians that are out there and camping to save people from this continued
attack on a civilian population, they were absolutely apathetic or they were cheering the
attacks on a civilian population by Hamas back in October. And when you look
at these colleges and these GOP virtue signalers like traders Mike Johnson. When you
look at all this stuff and the Jewish donors who now decide that they can't
fund these revolutionaries anymore. They had no problem funding them as long as they
hated America and white people, and as long as it was not okay to
be white. But now as they're seen as white, as they're scene as
the colonizers, oh, we got to stop funding them. They were apathetic
or supportive. They were giving lots of money to these people who are trying
to deconstruct and destroy America, America's history and other things like that. They
liked that. That was just fine. But don't get anti Jewish, or
we'll cut off your money. See, this is the problem. Is this
really about the murder of civilians in October or long extended murder of civilians in
Gaza? Is it really about humanitarian issues we have with both Hamas and with
the Israeli government under Netanyahu? We have geopolitical leaders who've got their own agenda
just like ours. Got to understand what these people get us involved in wars.
They don't care about you. They've got a political agenda, and there
you are expendable. As a matter of fact, if somebody you know,
grotesquely murders you or mutilates you or rapes you or whatever. All much better
because now they've got some something to motivate other people about, to get other
people involved in supporting this war. So yeah, let's bring on the atrocities
we can use that. We're gonna absolutely use that. They don't care.
Amasu doesn't care about the Palestinians there in Gaza, and Netahu doesn't care about
the Israelis now he used them as guinea pigs just most recently with this pandemic
stuff. But any leader who escalates war like Biden doesn't care about his own
people. Biden doesn't, as he keeps poking the nuclear bear. He doesn't
care about Americans at all. He's got his underground bunker and he's got his
political agenda, and the rest of us be damned. He doesn't care about
any of us. And Yahu doesn't care about any of his people, and
the Hamas leaders don't care about their people. This is not about humanitarianism,
so get that off the table. If it was about humanitarianism, they'd be
having peace talks, that'd be working to try to stop the wars in Israel
and in Ukraine instead of increasing the funding to them. If this is about
humanitarian issues, they'd be closing the border. If it's about being loyal to
their own people, they'd be doing things like closing the border and stopping the
wars. But it's not about any of that stuff. So do they have
a goal and kicking off this chaos? Yes they do, Yes they do,
because we see that whether it is climate change mcguffin, or whether it
is the pandemic mcguffin, or back to the climate change mcgofn, or whether
it's to the war mcguffin, or whether it's to the college campus war mcguffin.
It's always about going after your speech, isn't it that interesting? No
matter what the problem, they've always got the same solutions, just like the
climate stuff. You know for eight or nine years, the world is going
to go into a new ice age. Well, this is what we got
to do. We got to reduce a number of people. We've got to
get rid of cars, and on and on and on, shut down the
power plants. Wait, wait, we got it wrong. It's going to
be not a global ice age, but it's going to be global warming,
and the globe is going to melt. Okay, the solution is still the
same. We've got to kill all the people, kill all the cars,
and you can't. You know, it's always the same. They always have
the same goal, they just have a different mcguffin to get there. As
soon as people realize that there's no lions on the highlands of Scottish Highlands,
then you've got to get another mcguffin. It doesn't work anymore. So we're
constantly moving this around, but it always comes back to shutting down the free
speech. And so the media is filled with this, and quite frankly,
when I look at these protests, I know more see them as being anti
war peace protests. As I see a Satanic temple display set up in at
Christmas in the Indiana. Was it Indiana, I think, or Idaho?
I don't matter anyway, one of those states that begins with an eye when
somebody sets up a Satanic display. There's the faux little thing which looked like
these Palestinian protester encampments of the college campuses. When somebody sets up sometimes that's
I'm sorry, that's not a religion. They say they don't believe in that,
right, Well, this is not about what they say. It's about
either these college protests and I see all these people. I've got an OpEd
piece here from Dennis Cacinach and he's on the Free Thought Project, and he
writes this OpEd piece about isn't as horrible these people are reactionary and shutting down
free speech on college campus. It's like, I'm sorry, they don't believe
in that one iota. These are the most censorous tyrants I've ever seen in
my life. These people who are in college and are the very people who
are out there with these protests. They hate free speech more than anybody I've
ever seen. They don't tell me this is about free speech. Don't tell
me that the Satanic Temple is about religion. They don't believe that. They
admit they don't believe it. They hate God. That's why they're doing it.
These people, you know, this is not about free speech, but
they will use it to attack free speech. They will make it about free
speech and then they'll use it to shut it down. That's what the Republicans
are doing now. And so some people are asking, well, we know
that Soros is organizing this, is he perhaps organizing this so he can get
conservatives like Trader Mike Johnson and Governor Abbott to join the call for censorship,
really wanted to fix it. The real problem is just the colleges themselves.
Cut their money off, stop subsidizing them. We had colleges before they were
subsidized by the government, and guess what, the government subsidies have made them
into Marxist seminaries by design. Just like we were talking about yesterday with Alex
Newman, the book that he wrote. You want to understand what the Marxist
agenda is for education, and that's especially true of college. College is really
where they indoctrinate the teachers. And so you know, they go to K
through twelve, they love school so much they want to be a teacher,
so they go to college, and then they turned them into Marxist revolutionaries and
then put them back in as teachers. They get the next generation, they
radicalize them far more than they were ever radicalized in college. And then those
people go to college and now by this time we've got college more radical and
they graduate these teachers and they come back in Loo. I know a lot
of people that I knew in music when I was taking a lot of music
classes when I was a music major before I became engineering major, and you
know, there is no live music anymore. So these people just kind of
kicked back and became teachers, and they become radical, really radical LGBT,
radical leftists, Marxists and everything, just from going through the regular school system
and the same college that I attended. But it's the institutions, and so
why do we continue to fund these institutions. Instead, they're going to continue
to fund them, and then they're going to use them as a justification for
a new method of censorship. As I reported the other day, the monitor
program from the Department of Education, and they've done something similar to this on
phishing ships where people have to pay for a government monitor to watch them and
report it everything that they do. And it's a tremendous expense, but you
know that's what they're going to do. That's what they're talking about doing.
So in Columbia University, the protesters have taken over Hamilton Hall. Maybe they
could do a musical about that or something. A group of anti Israel protesters
at Columbia University have seized the historic Hamilton Hall. Well, it's obviously got
to be racist and horrible, right if it's historic, it's American history.
It should be destroyed. What's the problem here? Smashing windows, unfurling an
entifada benner, and refusing to leave, protesters stormed and occupied the building on
the main campus of the Manhattan University after smashing their way into the school.
The occupation came nearly twelve hours up to the deadline of two pm on Monday
for protesters to leave or to face suspension. So they double down. So
people are comparing it to January sixth, because everything is about polarizing the public,
isn't it. Oh, look, you know, mostly peaceful, but
you know they're going to let that go. They're you know, torturing people
from January the sixth, And I understand that as they said, I don't
like you don't like the policy that's happening. Well, you know, free
speech says that there's a lot of different things that you can do. Free
speech you should be able to do. You should be able to write about
it, you should be able to post it on social media, should be
able to have debates on college campus. Do they like that when people come
in that they disagree with that they allowed debates on college campus. No,
these people have been radicalized to shut down anybody that they disagree with on any
particular topic. It's just now the topic that they're talking about is anti Semitic,
and so now the university, the people who big donors, wealthy Jewish
donors, are well, we're not going to give them any more money.
But they had no problem when they shut down debate, when they attacked Americans,
American history, white people on campus, that was fine, keep giving
them money. There's something really wrong about all of this, folks. We
should not be sucked up into this left right civil war that they're trying to
create. But here's Elise Stephanic out of New York holding a press conference.
She says, the world is watching as the leadership of our so called elite
colleges and universities continue to fail to condemn anti semitism and protect Jewish students on
campus. But she and her ilk never cared to stop the funding of these
Marxist seminaries, attacking America, Americans, white people, the rest of the
stuff they have been pushing out, hatred, civil war, division, censorship,
the rest of the stuff. She had no problem with it, did
she? Until it became Jewish? And I'm not saying it's okay to do
it. They should have stopped it a long time ago. What I'm saying
is they've got some other cards here. They're not showing destroy America. That's
fine, that's the goal actually is to destroy America. So last night the
pro Hamas anti Semitic mob took over an academic building. The university leadership has
lost control, and so that's part of what she had to say. Well,
let's just change this a little bit. For the last several years,
the pro Marx climate alarmist, anti freedom mob has taken over academic buildings and
the university leadership has lost complete control. And the Republicans are just fine to
continue to fund that at the state level, at the federal level, but
she says, and we as House Republicans will now hold them to account.
Right now, We've got to do something about it, really really destroy America.
That's fine with the GOP, as we see with a border issue and
Trader Mike Johnson, it's fine if you want to destroy America. Don't destroy
Israel though or anything else like that. We got money for foreign wars,
so but nothing for the border. You want to destroy America, that's okay.
But if it's anti Semitism, now we've got to stop it. Why
why the double standard here? Columbia students a lawyer as a Jewish student unnamed
because it is going to be attacked by this Marxist mob. The attorney of
an anonymous Jewish Columbia student who issued issuing the university allegedly not providing a safe
educational environment, says his client is having to deal with calls for genocide while
attending school, And his lawyer says, well, it's fine to debate how
Israel should have responded to the AMAS attacks. Is it fine? I mean,
I've been seeing that called anti semitism. Don't you say anything about Netanyahu
or the government, the political government of Israel, Well, that's anti semitism?
Is it fine to talk about it? Should be. You've got Jews
who are in some of these protests in some of these universities, maybe not
Colombia, I don't know, but some of them even did passover Satyr during
these protests. You've got a lot of Orthodox Jews who don't agree politically with
Netanyahu. You've got the country is about roughly fifty to fifty divided itself for
and against net Nyahu before this stuff started. But they've got stuff out signs
and statements like death to the Jews again, the death of America. That's
okay, Death of the Jews, however, that is not okay. Why
is it that we have this double standard? Long live hamas, globalize the
entafada. And these are statements that are allowed on Columbia University that the lawyer
has put in in terms of this case thing. You know, you've allowed
a very dangerous environment. They have cultivated a very dangerous environment against America for
a long time. Why is it now we care? Only now? Only
now? And so this is the article from Dennis Kucinich. The anti war
movement erupts as college students reject the establishment's support for genocide, much like the
anti war protests of the Vietnam era. And I agree, I think it
is very much like it. And I have to say I think those were
very very counterproductive. Growing up in a conservative family that would have normally have
been very opposed to the Vietnam War, the Vietnam protesters. Basically, I
watched with the adults in my family these because of these Vietnam protesters, my
family, which would have normally had a rational response to war, resupported the
Vietnam War. The Vietnam War was anti Imai American, just like these protesters
were anti American at the time. It's not pro American. Send people off
to die for no reason, soldiers to go and bede a country that you
don't know anything about the history of that you don't understand to create this false
idea of a Domino theory, to base all of this stuff on a false
flag about the Gulf of Tonkin. And I understood because I looked at it,
and these people hated America. But what they didn't realize was that our
government hated America as well. Our government hated America so much that it would
rob us of money and it would rob us of the lives of good young
men for no reason at all. Robert McNamara had no idea what he was
doing. Neither did jfk or Lyndon Johnson or Richard Nixon, any of those
people. None of them. One of them cared about Americans or they would
not have gotten us involved in that war. So when I look at all
of this stuff, to me, it's deja vu all over again. You
want to stop what's going on in Gaza. This is the wrong way to
do it, just like it was a wrong way, uh to stop what
was going on in Vietnam with these Vietnam War protests. It pushed it got
people to push back against it. The way people are pushing back against it
now is they're going to you know, the Conservatives are not going to support
Hamas, but they will support the attacks, the Soros attacks on our free
speech. That's what they'll support in reaction against this very predictable so as percentage
says peacefully exercising a constitutional right, well, I don't know, mostly peaceful.
This is one of these riot things again, challenging government policies. Look,
the way you challenge a government policy, it's not by defacing private property,
defacing statues, historical statues, they don't have anything to do with your
agenda. It's not by defacing and defecating on campus. It's by debating.
Oh but we can't have debates anymore because the same mob will attack anybody they
disagree with. Right, have a civilized debate you want to talk about you
want to challenge government policies, Well you don't get out there and you know,
do what these filthy radicals are doing. It's counterproductive. I've never agreed
with these types of protests because I'm just too conservative. Huh So anyway,
and we got Speaker Johnson wants to make the same mistakes that they did at
Kent State as well. Yeah, let's use forced to shut this down.
And they're not going to have any debates. It's not going to be any
free speech. The universe. Cities are the problem. The universities have been
the problem against free speech for a long time. And Dennis Cassinich, who
was a congressman, said he referenced in his op ed piece here. He
referenced Kent State University, he said years later, where four people were shot
when in the confusion and some National Guard soldiers shot at the crowd and killed
four students. Years later, he said, as chairman of a Congressional oversight
subcommittee, I quietly probed the Kent State shootings, and I learned, as
had others before me, that a suspected FBI asset on campus. Oh you
mean an undercover guy. You mean somebody who was maybe an agent provocateur,
right, very much like they've all January six is nothing new. And if
you knew anything about history. You would have told people like I did stay
away from January sixth, And there's people like Alex Jones who knew the history,
and he he told people to go, told people to go. Judas
Goat amazing to me. Anyway, They had a suspected FBI asset on campus
who was taking pictures of protesters. He found himself suddenly surrounded by students who
believed him to be an informant, and he drew his gun. He may
have fired shots in the air which were mistaken as an attack on the Ohio
National Guard, which unfortunately had been ordered to campus by the governor, and
the guard returned fire, killing four students. So the f behinded it instigated
it, according to Denniskacentage, perhaps right. The Federal Bureau of Instigations says,
unfortunately, the FBI did not cooperate with my request to investigate this,
giving more credence to testimony that says that they did it right. They don't
want to be investigated in any of this stuff. They did not cooperate with
my request for further search of records to determine the precise role of its informant,
and my term in Congress came to a close So who fired the first
shot? Was it someone acting as an agent of the government. Was it
an agent provocateur as we have seen the FBI do over and over and over
and over again. And so Life site News talks about the plight of Christians
in Gaza. Hell on Earth, says an insider inside the overlooked plight of
Christians in Gaza. So here's the question. Do we care because they're Christians?
Do we only care because they're Christians? Do we not care because they're
Christians? Right? The issue is that when we look at this, the
prolonged attack on a civilian population is not defiable. It's not justifiable in war.
There's different ways to respond to the Hamas attack, and this response has
clearly been rejected. It offends the basic moral sensibilities of people worldwide for an
obvious reason. It is obviously immorl Yeah, people understand that, you know,
somebody initiates an attack kills in a civilian They most people, unless they're
highly politicized like the college campus kids, would condemn that. Most people did
condemn what happened in October. But then when you want to when you use
that to accomplish some other goal, like removing the people. When you use
that to have a prolonged, sustained civilian attack, then people understand that that
itself is also wrong. And so this individual who is talking about the Christians
in Gaza, he says that this organization that he's with, he says,
they don't want their stand with the people of Gaza to fement anti Semitism or
Jew hatred. But at the same time, it does not want the fear
of criticism to silence the group into what he calls an anti Arab prejudice.
See, the problem is, I don't see any love or understanding or interest
in peace. And these protests in Colombia or these other college campuses. Do
you think that they're all about love and understanding and let's have peace. What
do we need to do to stop this? Is it about that? No,
it's not about that. Let's not pretend it's about that. And let's
not pretend that the Israeli government or the American government are about that either.
Neither one of those sides are about that. They've all got their own little
legenda. You know, the Marxist and the George Sorows people. You know,
they want chaos, they want civil war. They want censorship. Israel
and the US want land, they want war, they want endless war,
they want to sell weapons all the rest. That's what's going on here,
folks. That's why I have not jumped into this stuff before. I'm disgusted
with all these people, just like I'm disgusted with Biden and Trump, and
they're so called pandemic and they're mass murder of people with the jabs. Now,
don't get caught up into this Republican versus Democrat, jew versus Palestinian stuff.
These are not the issues that they're really concerned about. And you can
discern this from looking at what they're doing and what they're not doing in any
of this. The idea that a Jewish student, they say in life site,
it's a Christian who is there in khaza. The idea of the a
Jewish student walking across Harvard Yard has to be accosted by mob because an American
student who's Jewish gets accosted by mob as he's walking across the college campus is
absolutely shameful and it is despicable, he said. But at the same time,
it is shameful and despicable that we are indifferent to the sufferings of the
people of Gaza, and why, he says, why are we and different?
Is it because they're Arab? Is it because they're predominantly Muslim? What
is it that has silenced us? He says, And so that is a
question. You know, everybody wants to appeal to the humanity, the compassionate
people for their fellow man in most cases. And yet it's not about that
at all. It's not about that all, Mark Levin. We own this
country, he says, And he thinks pro Palestinian protesters should be rounded up
and deported. Who's the we? Who's the we? Trump said? The
Jewish lobby owns Congress And rightfully so said Trump. So these are the people
Mark Levin who he's spoken out against some of this college campus stuff, but
not with the level of vitriol that he is now. So the people who
were donating to these colleges, they were fine with all this destruction of our
society, hatred of our people until the jacob A mob that they financed came
for them. Isn't always that way. Just like roboesphear these people who fund
and who lead this movement, and those are the people who were you know,
the donors who were giving money to Harvard and Columbia and everything. They
were the ones who were pushing all this stuff. And eventually the mob comes
with the guillotines for them. Levin says, round them up, deport those
who are here on student visas, arrest the others. Put out their names
and photos so everyone knows who never too highre Oh, well, I thought
he didn't like cancel call. Oh, well, we are red blooded Americans
and we own this country. They don't. He said, well, he
never called for this before. He never called for these people who hated America.
He said it's not okay to be white. He never called for them
to never be able to get a job or anything like that, or to
be deported or jailed and so on zero Hedge. There's an article there from
somebody who goes by the name of Blue Apples, and his idea is that
this is actually George Soros, and some of these people are actually using this
in order to advance their agenda of eradicating free speech, controlling sweet speech.
And they've been able to get As I mentioned before, people like Trader,
Mike Johnson and Abbott, who you know, will join in with them They
were all about protecting free speech on campus until they didn't like the free speech
on campus. You see, free speech is speech. If you don't support
speech that you don't like, you don't support free speech, do you.
I don't like what they're saying, but I will defend their right to say
it, because if we don't, we won't have any free speech either.
And so blue apples because you know George Soros, and as I point out
in the last couple of days, yeah, he's you know, we've got
the receipts. How he's been contributing to these organizations that are basically running these
Palestinian protests. I also pointed out, which I haven't seen anybody else,
to draw the connection to the district attorneys, for example, the University of
Texas, where Abbott wanted everybody arrested just like Mark Levin. Well they did.
They arrested fifty seven people, and half of them had absolutely no connection
to the university. All of them were let go without charges by the district
attorney, who was supported and given massive amounts of money by George Soros to
get elected. And so these are the goals of sorrows to eliminate free speech
and the First Amendment. As this writer says, by provoking the reactionary response
against these college protests, Sorrows has seemingly further fortified the pro Israel lobby's position
by manipulating America's right wing into aligning with it, and in doing so,
exposing a hypocrisy over the issues of free speech and free assembly as a means
of anti establishment activism. We're seeing this hypocrisy all over the place. We
had occasional cortex was going along. I had some of these Palastinian protesters come
after her, and you know, she basically said, well, you know,
we like the protesters because they make people feel uncomfortable. They made her
feel uncomfortable, and she got real sassy with them, speak and with her
boyfriend and get chands off of me type of thing. You know. You
know, it's difficult to accept the principle of free speech when people are saying
stuff that you really hate, isn't it, And you want to just call
what the speech that you hate. You want to call it hate speech and
shut it down, don't you? And even more, you want to,
just like Mark Levin says, you want to arrest those people. You want
to punish them. It's not enough to silence them anymore. Now they've got
to go to jail. And that's what DeSantis did in order to get money
from Israeli backers. He signed a bill saying, we're going to make a
felony out of hate speech. Well, we either have the First Amendment or
we have hate speech. You can't have both. If you have any hate
speech laws, especially if you're going to put people in jail for that,
then you don't have free speech. In response to college protests against Israel's Warren
Gaza, the mainstream right has become the embodiment of everything they stood against in
twenty twenty, embracing calls to deny protesters their First Amendment rights in support of
the neocon axis, is self proclaimed greatest ally Israel. See, they want
to destroy property, they want to obstruct others who were there on college campus.
That's not free speech. You can punish that type of stuff. Like
I said before about the Satanic temple, they don't believe that, they don't
have religion, they don't have any beliefs. They're just trying to attack Christianity.
These people, and I've seen these protesters before as well. What do
they do Do they ever want to debate you? Right, You've seen over
and over again. I've done it myself, but you've seen other reporters do
it. Walk up to them say tell us get out of here. You
conservative racist, I don't want to talk to you. And now you know
what are they? They're racist, but they don't want to debate. They
just engage in name calling and censorship. When Karen was protesting at an abortion
clinic and she's standing there with a sign, abortion is black genocide, right,
and so Antifah shows up, first time we ever saw Antifah. They
show up and there's a guy there and he comes up with a black sign,
doesn't say anything. He just wants to silence what you have to say.
He doesn't want to debate. He doesn't want to engage in free speech.
He wants to engage in censorship. And so he takes his black sign,
he puts it in front of Karen's sign. She moves her signed down,
he moves his sign down, she moves her sign up, and so
the goring up and down, up and down. They don't want to debate
anything. They just want to label everybody as stuff. There is no debate
going on here. So why would the GOP respond and say we're going to
shut down free speech. There is no speech going on. There is criminal
activity that's going on. They're destroying property, They're obstructing and threatening other people.
Maybe attacking other people, I don't know, but they are intimidating,
obstructing other people. They are destroying public property and private property. Isn't that
enough? Oh it's not enough because the agenda is not about it's not about
the thing that you see. It's about something else. And it always is,
isn't it. It's always about something else. So now the GOP is
calling the stuff. I'm calling for hate crime legislation, calling for censorship,
calling for monitors. They'll always make two mistakes rather than admit to one.
The original mistake is the college, or sending your kids to the college,
or sending our money to the colleges. Stop sending our money. Look,
if these people want to set up at Marx's asseminator, I'm okay with that,
as long as they don't get government money. As long as they don't
start destroying private property that type of thing. They can be as hateful of
white people or Jewish people, whatever they want to be. I just don't
want to be forced to give them money. But instead they're going to continue
down this path. The political establishment behind the deep state, the permanent Washington,
the globalism, whatever else you want to talk about. It takes to
undermining the national sovereignty of the United States, and it has now regained control
of the right. What used to be the partying on the left with the
ADL and Southern Priory Law Center, Now we've got DeSantis and Christy Gnome.
Anybody who wants to run for a vice president or president, they got to
appease the Jewish lobby that's very politically politically powerful and financing, and so they
have to say what they want and what they want to Their shame is to
censor our speech. What is the matter with a country like Israel that can't
win in an open, free society, They have to censor what we're doing.
It puts them in the same box as pharmaceutical companies in the American Medical
Association and the frauds who are running this climate change stuff, the u NIPCC,
they're all the same. They're not going to let you talk or debate
amongst yourself, even let alone debate them. They won't even all all we
are above talking to you, and by the way, you can't talk to
each other either. It's always the same, isn't it. And so they
kind of show really what they're made of determining on how they whether or not
they support free speech or not. It's the same thing we've seen over and
over again. George Soros seems to taking a page out of M. A.
Rothschild's book by funding both sides of the Israel Palestine conflict in order executor
divide and conquer strategy. Well, that's also what our government does. We
fund both sides as well, don't we. So this monitor bill, bipartisan
bill, would create anti Semitism monitors at college campuses. Why didn't they ever
think about this when they were doing anti American stuff, right, they have
somebody monitoring that. Well, no, we know what that is. We
know that's being pushed out by the Biden administration, Homeland Security, all the
rest of it. They're pushing out the critical race theory. They're pushing out
that kind of stuff as well as the grooming of kids. So we don't
have any anti American monitors. Nobody say, hey, I saw a bunch
of lies about the Founding of America, the sixteen nineteen project. You should
take a look at that. This is what's happening at this college campus.
No, we have to do that. And when we do that, they
shut us down, don't They should have been shut down a long time ago.
But they didn't care when it was anti American. They only care when
it is anti Semitism. House Speaker House Trader Mike Johnson has called on Biden
to send in the National Guard, and so has Netanyahoo, though he's also
telling us what to do. This leader of a foreign government, of course,
and so they've come up. Listen to this. They call it the
Columbia Act. Don't you love it when they come up with these phony acronyms
like the Patriot Act and stuff like that. Well, here's the Columbia Act.
It stands for college oversight and legal updates, mandating bias investigations and accountability.
That's why these congressional aides get the big box, isn't it. Yeah,
come up with that kind of garbage, empower the federal Department of Education,
which should not even exist, to impose a third party anti semitism monitor
in any college or university receiving federal funding. The monitor would be appointed by
the secretary of this unconstitutional Department of Education. The terms and conditions of the
monitorship would be set by this secretary, and the expenses of the monitorship would
be paid for by the particular college or university that has been selected for monitorship.
So they will decide if you need to be monitored, and if you
do, you'll have to hire a monitor to come there and talk about it.
But the only thing they're not concerned about anti Americanism, not concerned about
racism. They're not concerned about the insanity that is being put through to come
after the college kids or minors or anything. No, it's only going to
be about anti Semitism. That's the only thing they care about. Failure to
comply with the monitorship would result in the loss of federal funds, because always,
folks, it's the fiat currency that backs up the Fiat orders. Just
as we saw with Trump, just as we saw with Biden. I'm going
to cut off your money if you don't do this, or here's some money,
do what I say. Bribery and blackmail using fiat currency are fascist government.
And it's not just there of course it is also the border, which
was nothing was done about the border. Now think about this for a moment.
We've got war zone surveillance technology is now going to be put into some
of these Texas border towns, paid for by the federal government with a grant
from Homeland Security. So they will pay for this kind of stuff, but
they won't pay to secure the border. They'll pay to spy on Americans,
but they want to secure the border. They will push IDs for Americans,
but they want because you know, we don't want to have somebody who's here
illegally getting a job or voting or that kind of stuff. So you Americans
need to get an ID. Well, we're not going to do anything at
the border the people coming in. And so at the same time that trader
Mike Johnson is authorizing and extending FAIZA, he didn't just reauthorize it, he
made it far more extensive. At the same time that he's doing that,
he's also doing nothing for the border. And now we have the federal government
that's going to use the border issue to do surveillance, to authorize surveillance.
Big brother isn't just watching you, He's using your cell phone, smart watch,
wireless earbuds, your car entertainment systems, and your license plates to track
your location in real time. Just special intelligence has been the fastest growing part
of the American intelligence community since the late nineteen nineties. It's always about this.
And even though this is a very extensive article from an organization called not
US, just as you say, whether it's a left organization or right or
nobody will use the term geospecial intelligence. I find that fascinating in the same
way that nobody would ever talk about the NSA until Ed Snowden released those documents
a little bit before that. Some people were talking about it somewhat, but
it was just the press would not use business controlled. They would not talk
about the NSA. It was a no such agency and smile and that's as
close as you would get to it. They won't talk about geospecial intelligence,
even though they would typically have a convention with about four thousand people showing up.
And that's where James Clapper I got all of his promotions and accolades and
his political power. At least two tech communities along the US Mexico border have
purchased a product called Traffic Catch, which collects the unique wireless and bluetooth signals
emitted by nearly all modern electronics to identify devices and to track their movements.
And so that is your wireless earbuds, your car entertainment system, your cell
phone, your smart watch, all of that is being watched. Trafficatch is
unique so as a company for the following reasons. The ability to detect in
vehicle wireless signals and to merge such signals with vehicle license plates. This is
just another one of these problem solutions things. Let's not do anything about the
border. But because we've got that problem, I've got a solution here.
Let's spy on Americans, just like we spy on terraced abroad in foreign wars.
Combining license plate information with data collected from wireless signals is the kind of
surveillance that the US military and intelligence agencies have long used, and now they're
going to do it here domestically. So we continue to fund, with unlimited
amounts of money wars in Ukraine and Israel and trying to fund war against China.
We do nothing for the border. We do put in three and a
half billion dollars for people to be brought over from Gaza to live in America
and be fed by Americans and so forth. But we'll use all of this
to go to war with Americans and to treat us as the US military treats
foreign enemies abroad, to spy on us, not just spy on us without
warrants, but to extend this. This is why I call Mike Johnson trader
Johnson. He speaks for the military industrial complex. He speaks not for us.
He speaks for the people who are at war with us and call themselves
the American government. That's who. Mike Johnson is. Speaker for Webb County,
Texas, which includes the Laredo received funding under Homeland Security grant program called
Operation Stone Garden to purchase traffic hatch. Valverdi County also is buying it,
but they're doing it with a Texas state grant called Operation Loan Star. So
you know, FEDS are giving money for people to buy the state government is
giving money for people to buy have it. If I worked as a small
county sheriff, I would have probably caught something like two hundred percent more of
our criminals with just two of these boxes, said Aaron Brown, a former
CIA counter surveillance and digital tracking expert. Well, if only we had the
CIA here, we could just end all crime in America, except for the
fact that they're running the drug war always have been one of the biggest sources
of crime in our country. I wonder if he had if I was a
county sheriff, what would happen if I trace this stuff back to the CIA.
What would happen to me as a county sheriff. We know what would
happen. So anyway, Brown says he's built his own version of traffic Etch
from off the shelf components. He drives around the Washington area with it to
see what interesting information he can capture. He's not interested in bad people,
as Michael Hayden said, he is interested in interest in people. Collecting radio
emissions, called signals intelligence or they just call it sigent, was once the
purview of specialized classified military units or intelligence agencies, but with so much modern
technology emitting information that can be collected by anyone with an antenna, the practice
is becoming more widespread by both commercial and government entities. Use the name it's
geospatial intelligence. We'll be back. Tell Alex to add the APS radio skill
and have access to the best channels anywhere from country to blues, classic hits
to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy. Get
details at apsradio dot com. In a world of deceit, telling the truth
is a revolutionary act. You're listening to the David Knight Show, Welcome back
and Brian and Debb McCartney. Thank you very much for the tip. I
appreciate that. On Rockman, this is the day the Lord has made,
we will rejoice and be glad in it. So on one eighteen. Yes,
we used to have a song that we used to sing about thirty years
ago that pretty much had that verbatim on Rumble Ratisbro. Thank you for the
tip. The other part of a verify people ignore. The Fed already makes
people take an Israel loyalty oath to get contracts. Same thing will be for
anyone looking for a job in the future. Rumble No Dak eighty eight,
you look like Roberty Lee. Well, thank you. Take that as a
compliment. I mean, let me get that pose that he had in the
doorway. There were scowling at the people taking his photograph. I saw a
thank you was served to me on YouTube. I look for music and stuff,
and so there was, uh, there was this guy was surrounded with
keyboards in a U shape and he had him stacked high and stuff. And
you know, that got my attention because there were old classic keyboards. They
were synthesizers that had you know, loaded up with a patch chords and stuff
like that. And he had a melotron. Says like, oh, let
me hear this, and he was doing something that Genesis had done, and
he had a mini mogue on top of the melotron, you know, had
a hamm and organ behind him, all the usual stuff from back in the
seventies. And so I clicked on it and it's like, eh, yeah,
the music was kind of meh, you know, but the guy.
The guy had a long white beard and he had he was bald at the
top and then his hair was kind of bushy on the sides and everything.
I looked at it and I like, he really looks like Santa Claus.
So I wantly see anybody says second comment down and somebody said, I knew
that Santa kept all the best toys for himself. That's a great comment.
So yeah, you knows, we can't control really what we look like,
but you just have to go with it. Let's talk a little bit about
the Palestinian squatters. People are going to be brought in to the United States.
The White House, surprise, surprise, is considering welcoming some Palestinians from
war torn Gaza as refugees. Who would have thought it, you know,
three and a half billion dollars in there for that very purpose. Apparently,
you know it's in the discovered. Like I said, we didn't see it
for about a week, almost a week before that came out. We're so
focused on the other betrayals of Trader Mike Johnson. Oh, Democrats love him.
They've already announced that they're going to stand with him to shut down any
Republican efforts to get rid of him. He's the best deal they've ever had
anyway. The uh, yeah, it's great to have controlled opposition, isn't
it. Here's a guy, you know, from everything, he appears to
be this can deservative, Christian, Republican everything, and yet he's a hardcore
lefty. He's marching in lockstep with a Biden administration, Truck, Schumer and
all the rest of these people. The Biden administration is considering bringing Palestinians to
the US's refugees, offering a permanent safe haven to some of those fleeing from
war torn Gaza. This is the same administration, by the way, that
just after ten years of living here, a German Christian family who have a
lot of kids, and they were going to have their kids taken away from
them in Germany because they wanted to homeschool because they're Christians, and so they
left and they got refugee status, and that was through a couple of different
administrations, and yet Biden decided that they needed to be deported and it was
only when there was a big, massive outcry that they backed off of that.
But anyway, I guess you know, we're kind of the garbage dump
of the world here the way they want to treat us. Uh, we
have sent billions annually to Israel. What they do they send us their problems.
Uh. So we have a government that goes abroad, uh, creates
coups, starts wars, gets involved on both sides of every conflict, gets
everybody mad at us. And then we bring those people here. Why well,
because they want chaos and civil war. They want to have you know,
people that are gonna hate America, don't like this country at all when
everything starts going down. That's what this is all about. Uh, These
people who protect us from those the CIA, you know, that protects us
from those terrible terrorists like Tim Osmond. That's what they called Usama bin Laden
when he used to come visit them all the time in the Pentagon and at
Langley. He was Tim, then he became Osama bin Laden. Top US
officials have also discussed getting additional Palestinians out of Gaza and processing them as refugees.
Many of us believe that was always the purpose of the Gaza peer that
they're setting up there. Supposedly it was going to be there to bring food
to the people in Gaza. But whether it's going to be bringing food to
them or whether it's going to be used to bring them to us. And
while this is happening, alas is shelling it apparently, I mean, this
is the insanity of this. While the eligible population is expected to be relatively
small, says CBS News, do you believe that? Do you believe it's
just going to be a small number of people. It's just going to be
a small number of people. Why do you have three and a half billion
dollars. Theres to resettle certain Palestinians as refugees would mark a shift in long
standing US government policy and practice. Since its inception in nineteen eighty, the
US refugee program has not resettled Palestinians in large numbers. Over the past decade,
the US has resettled more than four hundred thousand refugees fleeing violence and war
across the globe. Fewer than six hundred were Palestinian. Oh, you're not
about one out of a thousand. I guess Democrats would likely support the move.
Of course, they want more voters, They want more congress people like
ilhan Omar. That's all we'll get out of this. We have two or
three congressional seats with all the people they could bring in from Gaza. You
know, there's millions of people there. So this is another way to accelerate
the cloud and pivot stuff, isn't it. To qualify to enter the US
as a refugee, applicants have to prove their fleeing persecut based on certain factors
such as their nationality, their religion, or their political views. But of
course, the Bide administration, as I said before, didn't care about that
when you got white German Christian homeschoolers. Oh no, no, you don't
get any refugee status and they would be attacked at Colombia as well. Anyway,
Yeah, the Democrats are going to favor this. As a matter of
fact, Jamal Bowman just couldn't contain himself. The guy who pulled the fire
alarm right to shut down debate. That guy Jamal Bowman, and got away
with it. He says he is fully quote fully in favor of resettling Gaza
migrants in the United States. Of course he would be should the United States
bring in people from Gazi said, we are a land of migrants, and
we are a land of asylum seekers. He said, the US has always
been an open home to those people. Well, I have no problem with
that. I do have a problem with the welfare state. This is a
problem I had with the Libertarian parties. I've said before I would always oppose
them. They would always be open borders. I would always say no,
not until you stop the welfare state. So we didn't need three and a
half billion dollars to bring in people through Ellis Island. They came in with
nothing except the clothes on their back. And desire to be free. Those
huddled masses yearning to be free, they're now huddled masses yearning for free stuff.
Big difference, makes all the difference in the world. People who want
to come here for the freedom, then like this country, people want to
come here for the free stuff. Guess what's never going to be enough.
They're going to look for free stuff from you two because they're squatters. So
you know, yeah, we're all about being an open home to those people,
unless they're white German Christians fleeing religion persecution, which case we want to
send them back three and a half billion dollars to supercharge mass migration from the
Middle East. That's not what I say. That's what Senator Eric Schmidt said.
He said, not only did the foreign aid package quote unquote foreign aid
foreign war do nothing to secure our own border, but it included three and
a half billion dollars to supercharge mass migration. The three and a half billion
dollars was granted to the Department of State. They are also using the refugee
funds to expand migration routes from many African and Muslim countries. In March,
they pulled in twelve thousand people from the Congo, plus sixteen seven hundred and
thirty two migrants from the Muslim countries of Afghanistan, where they love us,
don't They love us in Afghanistan, They love us in Syria too, and
in Pakistan and a rock. You see what this government of traders like Mike
Johnson is doing. Not a dime to protect our borders. But bring in
the barbarians that they've been bombing and killing for decades, who absolutely hate America.
They hate America as much as those radicals on Columbia in the Colombian campus.
They hate Americans. Let's bring them in as many as we three hundred
and three and a half billion dollars worth of them. Let's bring them in.
They hate America. They'll be very useful in this civil war they're trying
to engineer. Tucked into the folds of this aid package is three and a
half billion dollars for mass immigration in goos non governmental organizations builter that money through
the UN to the NGOs, or give it directly to the NGOs. Trader
Johnson, what a trader he is. So the cost has not just risen,
it has floated. This is a Reuters report says the PEER that they're
building there in Gaza will cost US taxpayers at least three hundred and twenty million
dollars to finish. This is double the early estimates which were floated earlier this
year. The figure, which has not been previously reported, illustrates the massive
scale of a construction effort that the Pentagon has said involves about one thousand US
service members, mostly from the Army and Navy. The cost has not just
risen, it has exploded, said Senator Roger Wicker, top Republican on the
Democrat led Senate Armed Services Committee. This dangerous effort with marginal benefit will now
cost the American taxpayers at least three hundred and twenty million dollars to operate the
PEER for only ninety days. Many government officials, especially from the Global South
countries, have highlighted Washington's contradictory approach to Gaza. On the one hand,
the US has been funding the Israeli military machine sending controversial weaponry like two thousand
pound bombs, while on the other hand, Biden has condemned the soaring civilian
deatholl Who would have thought that would kill civilians if we drop massive numbers of
two thousand pound bombs. Ironically, to some degree, the United States is
funding both sides of the conflict. It's not just Soros, It's not just
the Ross childs. That's the way the CIA does it, that's the way
the Pentagon does it. As always, they want eternal war and they want
eternal chaos. That's how they keep control. They're absolutely satanic. It truly
is amazing. So the Secretary of Defense was questioned by Matt Gates. Matt
Gates says, don't you think that putting this pier their account says boots on
the ground, and so he had. Lloyd Austin insisted yesterday under questioning that
stationing troops off of this pier leading to Gaza does not count as having boots
on the ground while it boots on the water. I guess I said right.
Didn't play with the semantics there while leaving wide open the possibility of a
live fire exchange with attackers on the ground. So mad Gates said, boots
on a pier, connected to the ground, connected to service members shooting into
Gaza doesn't count as boots on the ground, and Lloyd Austin, with a
straight face, it does not, does not. It's like James Clapper,
are you spying on asked by Ron Whyden, are you spying on the American
people in that search? One? No, no, center, not on
purpose? Oh yeah, right, at least one thousand US service members.
Now think about this. We had the Marines bombed in Beirut when Reagan was
present. How many were killed? About two hundred, Right, We've got
a thousand people here. Now, Reagan had the good sense to get acts
of these people always been fighting each other. They're going to continue to fight
each other. We don't need to get in the middle of this. For
whatever reason. I mean, he may have had some alternative motives. He
was being run by Bill Casey, who was a piece of work himself.
Anyway, at least a thousand US service members, we'd be building this artificial
floating peer and port that is supposed to support humanitarian aid deliveries to civilians and
goadza, but it may be the way they're going to bring people out of
there to the United States. Pentagon says it's coordinating with Israel's military to ensure
a protection of US troops and to anchor the peer to shore without violating Biden's
Thomas have no American boots on the ground. See there you go. Now
we will have Israeli soldiers standing there on the ground, and then you know,
we'll give them the ropes or chains or whatever to pull in this floating
pier and we won't be touching the ground. Yeah. Unidentified terrorist groups lobbed
mortar rounds at efforts on the location laying the groundwork for the pier while you
N officials were touring the area on Wednesday, reported The Wall Street Journal.
So Gates pressed Austin. He said, so, shots from Gaza on our
service members, and then in response, our armed service members shooting live fire
into Gaza. That's a possible outcome here, so that we can become the
port authority and run this peer. Is that right? The Simpsons there,
they're having a conflict in Bart basically tells her I'm just going to start walking
this way, swinging my arms, and if you don't get out of my
way, you're getting hit as your own fall. Yeah. That's right.
That's the way we conduct our foreign policy right there in a nutshell, isn't
it? He says. So Austin says, well, that's correct. I
expect that we always will have And then Gates cuts them off. He says,
don't you think that counts as boots on the ground, Austin, No
No. Gates then accused administration of misleading the American public. The Pentagon made
an artificial distinction between place seeing American troops on gods and soil and putting them
in harm's way, or increasing the likelihood of active conflict involving the US military
as a result of the Administration's Gods the policy, he said. Gates said,
I think you're going to find the American people have a different perspective on
that. Well, that remains to be seen. I mean, we seem
to be giving them anything and everything they want, don't we. We'll be
right back. Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing. Check out the Jazz
Channel at APS radio dot com and the APS Radio app and leave the stress
behind. You're listening to the David Knight Show well on Rockman. Thank you,
Syrian Girl for the tip, She says, thank you David for your
balanced presentation on the issue of importing millions of radicalized Palestinians into our already disintegrating
nation. A spy design, isn't it. Well, let's move on to
the attacks on our food supply by our own government. The us is now
going to test ground beef. Deja voo all over again, isn't it.
First they did it to the milk, Now they want to do it to
the meat. It's almost as if somebody had a program where they didn't want
us to have meat and dairy. Oh that's right, Bloomberg City Coon and
the c forty initiative of forty big cities now about one hundred cities who specifically
said we don't want you to have any meter dairy. This is amazing.
You see, the federal government is desperate to do this, and there's also
I think something of a turf war going on with the USDA. They're very
working, very hard to maintain their centralized control of meat processing. And you
know, there's this back and forth. You got the FDA and they have
the USDA. The USDA is there to control meat, and the FDA has
got pretty much everything else in terms of food supply. So I think there's
something of a turf war over the cows. So the USDA said that they're
collecting now samples of ground beef. Why why, Well, as I said,
we know, it's because they want to shut down meat and dairy.
But when you look at what they're telling people, if you're saying, well,
we went out and we tested the milk and yeah, we found some
viral particles there, but you can't get sick from this stuff, so why
would you continue to do this in the meat? Right What they said was,
well, we got these viral particles and because you cook it with pasteurization,
you're not going to get sick from this stuff. Well, I don't
know how many people are out there eating raw hamburger meat. I don't think
too many. This should not be an issue for them to be concerned about,
except that they have this other agenda that is out there which nobody wants
to talk about. It's amazing. We all know that's what it is.
I read for you some of the five hundred plus comments on this epic Times
story that zero Hedge put there, and they said, are you kidding this
clickbased stuff? And that was about the milk. So this is every day.
They all knew, every single one of them. I just went page
after page after page, very funny, mocking them, and they all knew
what this was about. You know what it's about. I know what it
is about. The public knows what it's about. That's why they've got to
keep their foot on our throat, constantly stopping us in the face over the
censorship stuff. And that's why we should see the agenda that is being pushed
forward with this campus wars. It's all about the free speech folks, anything
that they can come up with, anything and everything they can come up with
to shut down our free speech. So federal officials are seeking to verify the
safety of milk and meat. Now let me tell you the FDA, the
USDA, they're the threat to our food, not bird flu. The EPA
is the threat to our energy into our well being, not CO two.
It's these agencies, the USDA, the FDA, the EPA, they are
the threat. And so this article from Reiters talks about the PCR tests and
listen to the way they do this. So it was the FDA that did
the milk. Now the USDA is doing the meat. They said, the
FDA said on Friday, the preliminary results. I've listened to this gold standard
PCR tests. It's not a gold standard at all. It's a lying standard
that was established by FAUNCI. It's a misuse of Carrie Mollus's PCR test if
they could find this virus in you at all, and with PCR, if
you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody. It starts
making you believe in the sort of Buddhist notion that everything is contained in everything
else, right, I mean, because if you can model amplify one single
molecule up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do,
then there's just very few molecules that you don't have at least one single one
of them in your body. Okay, it could be thought of as a
misuse of it, just to claim that it's meaningful. It allows you to
take a very manuscule amount of anything and make it measurable and then talk about
it in meetings and stuff like it is important. It doesn't tell you that
you're sick, and it doesn't tell you that the thing you ended up with
really was going to hurt you or yeah, exactly right. And so we
have this interesting situation now where Reuters is saying the gold standard PCR test fools
gold showed pasteurization killed the bird flu virus in milk. And they also mentioned
the fact that the CDC, the who the FDA with their pc They all
say this doesn't present any problem to the food source. So why is the
USDA then jumping into this. Well, again, they've got a different agenda.
They're going to continue to try to use this. So the USDA,
the Department of Agriculture, is now going around looking at ground beef samples with
PCR tests that indicate quote whether any viral particles are present, says Reuters.
So what if they are? So what you can magnify anything, you know,
trillion times you can find anything. USDA's additional testing is appropriate to ensure
public health is protected and to stop the spread of animal disease. Who's saying
that a spokesperson for the Meat Institute. What is the Meat Institute? This
is a trade group of people who want to have a central, monopolistic control
of meat processing. They partner with the USDA, just like the pharmaceutical companies
partner with the FDA. You've got the Meat Institute, a trade organization of
these two big to fail centrally control central control of our of our meat processing.
So they're sucking up to the USDA, and it's part of why the
USDA is doing this. They've been called under you know question was I've mentioned
yesterday the Beef Act, the Prime Act that Thomas Massey has put out to
say, hey, if you're raising the cattle yourself, and you know have
a situation like Amos Miller, the Amish guy who's not selling this on the
open market. This is something that people have bought into private ownership of this.
You know you own this, it's on your private property. You should
be able to grow it and to process it yourself. No, no,
no, can't do that. That's a crime. It's a crime because the
meat institute wants the monopolist to control that. The USDA is going to make
these arguments for them to have. The USDA on Monday began requiring lactating dairy
cows to test negative for bird flu before moved across state lines, as officials
seek to contain the virus. This is the danger of the administrative state.
This is the danger of the bureaucracy. This is the danger of regulation without
representation. There should be debate on something like this. It should be there
by our electric representatives. If you have something like this, it should be
debated. It should be challenged in court. If they do something unconstitutional like
this, So here's another example of the abuse of the Commerce Act in the
Constitution. This is the Commerce Act is something that they've used to say,
well, we don't need to have an amendment to the Constitution to prohibit alcohol,
We're just going to use the Commerce Clause. Well, the Commerce Clause
was there when they felt that. It was when everybody felt that it was
necessary to have the Eighteenth Amendment to prohibit alcohol. So that's a specious argument
in the first place. But the Commerce Clause is also superseded by the Tenth
Amendment, which says, if you aren't explicitly given these powers, those powers
remain that of the state and of the people. So that made it clear.
That's one of the reasons why everybody agreed that they needed to have an
amendment to prohibit alcohol. But now they prohibit anything and everything they want with
the Commerce Clause. The entire drug war is resting on that legal argument that
is false. And so you see that the Commerce Clause, which is originally
there to keep one state from essentially doing a trade war on somebody else.
No, we're not going to take anything from this neighboring state. We don't
like them. It was there to create open and free trade, and yet
it is now used for exactly the opposite purpose all the time by the federal
government. We're going to restrict and prohibit things. We're going to restrict trade.
Here they're restricting the movement of cattle. If they haven't tested negative with
a PCR test that has been blown up to absurd heights. So the if
this was going to happen, this should be a law passed by elected representatives
challenged in court instead, because we have a regulatory state that is out of
control, and the President likes it that way, the Congress likes it that
way, the court system, judiciary system likes it that way, the Supreme
Court likes it that way. They all like it that way. They want
them to be in control because the government can move very quickly, and because
they don't have any accountability for what the federal government is doing. It's not
my fault the regulatory agency did that. I don't have any control over them.
Well, if you're not going to get control of then why am I
even bothering with federal elections? Which is why I don't bother with federal elections
except to explain to people why they need to understand where the threats are coming
from, the nature of the threats, and how you need to start pushing
back against them, preparing for yourself, your family, working at the community
level, perhaps maybe the state, but especially the community level. And so
the USDA began requiring lactating counts a test negative before they could be moved across
state lines do anything they want. CDC can come in and say, well,
I know you've got a contract about rental stuff, and we told everybody
you can't go to work. We're going to take your business down anything.
So if people can't pay for their for their rent or for their mortgage,
you can't evict them, you can't foreclose on them, aren't we good guys?
Now we're the ones who shut down your business. But don't worry.
For a temporary amount of time, we're going to keep you there, which
just basically extends the misery right, extends the bankruptcy to landlords who private landlord
own forty five percent of the property, at least they used to before Trump
and the Deep state did their thing. The Department of Agriculture said this weekend
the testing is not required for cows that are shipped over state lines directly to
slaughter facilities. Those cattle only need documentation showing that they were inspected by a
veterinarian. Now soon that will be injected by a veterinarian. And this is
why they are going around testing ground beef. If they can find any harmless
particles through magnification of any viral particles that they're looking for, you better believe
that they're going to require it for shipping them across state lines to be used
as meat, because that's what this is about. It's an attack on meat
and milk. This is a move by the USDA to make sure that every
cow, every chicken, and so forth is going to be have an RFID
tag on it and is going to have to have a vaccination record. So
they get that stuff into you through the food supply, and they're going to
make sure that nobody processes any of these animals unless they are vaccinated, and
they're going to have complete control of our food supply. That's what this is
about. The USDA is now saying any positive PCR tests for retail or slaughter
samples will be evaluated for a live virus. What does that even mean?
And I had a listener, Roy who sent this to me I mentioned,
I said, so are viruses live? Are they dead? I mean,
do they even exist? You know? That's the other part of it.
Is there such a thing as a virus? Is it just an intellectual construct
that we use to try to describe what we see happening with disease or is
it something that's really there. If it is there, is it a live
or is it dead? And he writes there's an ongoing debate about whether the
viruses should be considered truly live or not. Viruses lack many of the key
characteristics typically associated with life, such as the ability to reproduce independently or to
carry out metabolism on their own. However, they do possess genetic material DNA
or RNA, and they can replicate, and they can evolve by taking over
the cellular machinery of a host organism. By the way, you know,
when you define it that way, the genetic code injections, the mRNA injections
were viruses themselves, weren't they. Yeah, they they reproduced. That was
the way it was described. Moderna said to Trump, well, now we
don't. We can do it right away because we don't have to manufacture this
stuff. What we do is we give it to you and your body will
manufacture it. Right, your body will manufacture it because they're going to hijack
the cellular machinery. They're going to reprogram you the genetic code. Injections will
So from that kind of a definition, they're injecting you. They say,
this is what the way modern described it. They're injecting you with a virus.
Most scientists do not consider viruses to be alive in the traditional sense because
they're completely inert and acellular. They don't have cells outside of a host organism.
Viruses are essentially just strands of genetic code and closed in a protein code.
So just as okay, they put it in a protein code. So
we had strands of genetic code they were encapsulated and polyethylene glycol they're pegulated.
So again, the virus was a vaccine or the vaccine was a virus.
Either way right it was I said, the bioweapon is the vaccine, the
virus is the vaccine. It's a genetic code wrapped in coating. Anyway,
they cannot independently reproduce, metabolize, grow, or respond to environmental stimuli on
their own. When a virus or an MR and a vaccine enters a suitable
host cell. However, it takes over the cell's machinery to produce more viral
particles, at which point it could be argued that the virus transitions into a
living state by being able to metabolize and to replicate using the host's resources.
Ultimately, whether viruses are classified as living or not is somewhat semantic. They
possess some lifelike characteristics, but they lack many fundamental traits that we associate with
cellular life. Many experts view them as existing in a gray area between living
and non living, or as highly complex molecular machines, lying at the edge
of what we consider life to be complex molecular machines. Well, we don't
believe in God. Right, DNA code replicating, error correcting, all this
other kind of stuff, but we don't believe in God. Even though it
took people decades to try to break that code. We don't believe that.
You know, we'll listen for repeating signals from space, the search for extraterresso
intelligence. We will deny that DNA is comes from information comes from an intelligence.
Anyway, the debate continues to most agree viruses blur the line between living
and non living things. Thank you boy, that's very good. Yeah,
you know, the debate also continues as to whether or not they exist,
or whether or not that is simply an abstraction to try to explain away,
to try to explain diseases. Either way, we know that this PCR test
is absolutely blunked. The guy who designed it said so. And if we
blow up something by a trillion times again. You know, in the past,
I've used the analogy of taking a telescope, looking at the telescope and
thinking that the Moon's about to hit the Earth because it looks so big.
I mean, it's just ridiculous what they're doing with the PCR stuff. So
last week the USDA said that it had found bird flu and lung tissue sample
from an asymptomatic dairy cow. The dairy cow wasn't sick. Oh, but
we're not going to let people have this. They said. It was sent
to the slaughter from an infected herd. The animal did not enter the food
supply, according to the department. Now think about this, Why were they
looking for lung tissue samples from this cow? Well, it was an infected
herd that was sent to them. So they chop up all the cows in
the herd, and in one cow, in one lung sample, they use
the PCR tests, magnify it by trillion times or whatever the number of cycles
are, and they find some of this virus. They said, in the
lung tissue. The cow wasn't sick. Do you understand how insane this is?
And quite frankly, it is no less insane than the nonsense that they're
doing about CO two. CO two is also based on absolute total junk science,
absurdity, irrational thinking, uncritical thinking, and it is accepted uncritically by
the public because it's pushed to them by the press. And another safety study,
USDA will cook ground beef containing a virus surrogate a virus surrogate at different
temperatures to assess how it inactivates the virus. The USDA, it sees this
bird flu viral stuff as their ticket for control. They're on this to an
amazing extent. They said, cooking meat to a safe internal temperature kills bacteria
viruses. So why is all this about going around with the PCR test again,
It is so that they can track and trace everything, so that they
can say you've got to vaccinate your food. Colombia, not university, but
the country rejected the import of beef and beef products coming from the United States.
This is the outside globalist pressure. But as they say, even Reuters
says, there are no known cases of bird flu and beef cattle so far,
no cows died except for the ones that they kill, just like the
chickens. No, they're not sick, but we tested them with the PCR
tests. So we're gonna have to kill million of your chickens here or many
more. The human case in the current outbreak was a Texas farm worker who
suffered conjunctividis following exposure to dairy cow's Is this a characteristic of flu conjunct dividis
pink eye? Yeah, I go. I didn't realize just how close I
came to dying when I was a child. Pink eye in first grade because
we've got gnats in our eyes. They didn't have air conditioning in Florida.
You can imagine how miserable that was when I went to elementary school. So,
yeah, I had pink eye a couple of times because they'd leave the
windows open because it's so hot, and you know, as a little kid,
you would rub the gnats into your eyes or something. Anyway, conjunct
dividis, I guess I nearly died. I had measlets, chicken pox,
all those things. How did I survive? I don't know. So are
they even sure that the conjunct dividis is from this? And if you got
one guy who claims that he got conjunctivide us from this stuff, even if
he whether he did or not, so what, it's not serious. But
you're going to kill millions of chickens and you're going to exercise all this control
over tracking and tracing cattle everywhere, vaccinating all the cattle. By the way,
when we talk about mandatory vaccines in Australia, Perth, there's a police
officer who refused the vaccine mandate. He took it all the way to their
Supreme Court and unfortunately he lost. He lost. As a matter of fact,
two of them, a West Australian Police officer Ben Falconer and police staff
member Les Finley, both unvaccinated, sought to challenge whether the Police Commissioner had
the authority to infringe on employees bodily integrity by ordering them to be vaccinated against
COVID as a condition of employment. So the court Supreme Court determined that the
vaccine mandate was justified due to the extraordinary emergency of the COVID pandemic. Well,
so there we go. If if somebody declares an emergency, whether anybody's
died or gotten sick or not, then that's it. There is no protection
of individual rights. There's no rule of law. It's all swept away,
constitution suspended. Well, always said it's going to come through FEMA, didn't
we Well we did, except you know, just take the vaccine. It's
nothing but sugar water, said Alex when push came to shot right. The
purpose of the litigation was to discover what rights we have over our bodies in
the workplace, and the judiciary and the government have given their perspective on that
today, said one of the police officers. In other words, we have
no rights. We have no rights. For me, I'm going to be
torn to pieces by my employ and I'll be sacrificing my career. I welcome
that. It's a necessary good. I want people to carefully observe what happens
now and what happens to my colleagues, he said. So the Biden administration
is being criticized by Breitbart because they are allowing a PPE factory, no protective
personal equipment, the kind of stuff that remember Trump used the emergency defense things.
They were going to commandeer industries and we're going to create factories and all
this other kind of stuff running through the Department of Defense. They did that
to create ventilators. Well they also did it to create a factory to manufacture
things like rubber gloves and masks and things like that. Well, here's a
rubber glove factory. And Breitbart is very, very concerned about the fact that
Joe Biden is going to let yet another factory languish. It was meant to
provide Americans with critical medical supplies, bright Bart, it wasn't a pandemic.
Stop pushing the fear four years later, pushing fear of China, pushing fear
of pandemics. I am sick of the conservative press doing this as well.
They know better. They want to push fear, they want to push a
China war and said, well, he's going to cut down this thing that
has critical medical supplies in case we've got yet another one of these horrible pandemics.
And people from Breitbart Nolty. John Nolty and others are just just panicking
about this stuff. All through the pandemic. People aren't wearing the mask,
people aren't getting the vaccine. Now Biden is shutting down a PPE factory.
So you know, here's the news by Bart in case you haven't gotten the
news. Do you realize that it's not just rubber gloves and masks, so
that we're going to be buying from China. We're going to be buying all
the evs from China. We're going to be buying everything that is manufactured because
they're shutting down our energy supplies here in the United States while they're building them
without any restrictions in China and India. The Paris Climate Accord that Trump left
in place did nothing to shut it down. That Mitch McConnell and not a
single Senator, not Rampaul, not Mike Lee, nobody did anything to shut
down and to call the bluff of the Paris Climate Treaty. Nobody did anything
to call that bluff. And so as a result, everything's going to be
made in China, steel, rubber gloves, cars, evs, all this
stuff because we won't be able to compete with them when they have cheap,
readily available power, and we got the Grimlins in this country shutting everything down.
I'm going to talk about the power play coming up here. That old
Larry Fink of Blackrock it's getting involved in. Oh he's rubbing his hands with
glee at the World Economic Forum telling everybody, Hey, everybody's gonna be short
of power. We can get into this thing right now. We can get
in on the ground folk, destroy the existing power grid, get in on
the ground floor. And not only that, you know, not only will
we have a monopoly on the power, but it'll be so scarce we can
charge them whatever we want. Oh yeah, as such a crime. And
they're getting away with it. It is absolutely insane and on rumbles, Strumfort
says Tony Fauci does not mind going right up in front of the people who
pay a salary and lie directly into the camera. And that's a quote from
Kerrie Mollis. That's right. Yes. By the way, Travis is reminding
me to remind you that you can find the Roku channel if you search for
the David Knight Show on the Roku app, or if you search the David
Knight Show Roku and your search engine should be able to take you there.
And if you have Roku and you watch it there, please remember to give
us a five star rating thumbs up. Whatever it is you know like the
show. If you like the show, please do it helps us to get
visibility there, so and wherever you're watching it, please like the stream.
This We fight upstream all the time to get people to find us. It
has been a constant struggle of being silenced and pushed off the Internet. So
it is a big help to us. Doesn't cost you anything except just a
little bit of time. So if you would do that, that would be
a big help for the show. During the pandemic, the and this is
the way they put it the federal government, No, during the pandemic.
It was a Trump administration that granted one hundred and twenty three million dollars to
this company, blue Star, for the plant and for an adjacent glove making
factory. But with inflation the cost of energy and billing materials going up,
the CEO said that he needs sixty million dollars more to hook it up to
utilities and one hundred and seventy million more to build the glove factory. This
is the link with which Breitbart will go to criticize Biden. They will pretend
that there was a pandemic. They'll pretend that this kind of government subsidy and
crony capitalism and misallocation of resources is a good thing if it's done by Trump,
and it's a bad thing if it's shut down by Biden. For whatever
reason. It is this crazy. Does anybody at Breitbart really understand what's going
on? They just they've become such absurd partisan hacks. They're like CNN,
except on the other side. It's amazing. He said he never got the
additional sixty million, and the addition one hundred and seventy million after the first
one hundred and twenty three million. He said the Biden Department of Defense told
him the contract was over something he did with Trump. So we're going to
shut this down because you know, Trump versus us. But think about that
coming from the Department of Defense, you know, and yes, we know,
the pandemic was about the military doing this stuff. It was medical martial
law. The military was very much involved in all of Operation Warp, speed
running it, delivering the stuff and all the rest of the stuff. But
it really was about Trump using this defense appropriation stuff. That's why it was
running through the Department of Defense because he was doing it not just for the
rubber gloves, but even more to his shame, he was doing it for
the ventilators that killed people. That's why I say, want to look at
Peter Navarro. Yeah, it was. It is absolutely political persecution. But
if anybody deserves that, he does because he killed a lot of people with
those ventilators, and he still is saying that it was a good thing.
If we don't call out people like that, they're going to keep killing people.
Like I said before, it's like having a shooter on top of the
building and you don't want to warn people. Oh well, yeah, but
you know he's killing people. He's up there. But he's part of the
club that I was in. You know, I was in this club Young
Republicans or something, and this guy is shooting people off the rooftop and and
he's got a MAGA cap. So I don't want to draw anybody's attention to
the fact that he's killing people up there. Yeah, let's not talk about
that. The who amendments revisited. This is from Brownstone and they're talking about
the IHR. These other things that are coming out of the Pandemic Treaty,
They're coming out of the WHO of the World Health Organization. But I think
that we really need to do something Jay and Jessica, as I said,
since this thing saying, let's get letter writing programs and try to get people
on our side at the state level to start pushing back against some of this
Model State Emergency Health Powers Act that was put in, and that really is
true. I mean that we could cut the legs off of this stuff at
the state level if we removed some of the authority that the state governments gave
themselves after model legislation was sent out to them in December of two thousand and
one. So we need to think about what we can do with this.
I'm thinking I'm going to set something up and show people what the Model State
Health Emergency Powers Act is in the background of this, so itud helps people,
I think, to understand the germ games, a long term plan of
this stuff, but also more importantly to see a way that we can fight
back against the World Health Organization, against the Pandemic Treaty, against these new
regulations and do it at the local level. That's where this stuff has to
roll out if we put some legal restrictions on these public health departments local and
state that were given these extra powers based on nine to eleven, based on
the anthrax faults, flag attack, based on Dark Winter back in two thousand
and one, sent out this model legislation. We need to repeal that stuff
at the state level. So we need to start contacting some people about this
stuff everywhere, and maybe we can put something together that people can use.
So thank you Jane Jessica for that idea. It's worth remembering that the pandemic
was synonymous with influenza for the longest time. When you go back and you
look at the WHO fifteen years ago, we devote a future post so the
people here at Brownstone in this article with details of the Dance of the Seven
Veils. No, actually it's a dance of seven definitions and timelines, which
you know, you could call it the Dance of the seven Veils, I
guess. And then you know, after that you have a solome cuts our
head off and puts it on a platter, doesn't she. But they said
we can prove this once the red button had been pressed back in two thousand
and nine twenty ten, the go was automatically given for the distribution of stockpiled
antivirals and the rollout of pretested pre pandemic vaccines which arrived too late to halt
the worn the waning pandemic, but not too late to cause rare and nasty
harm in children, catalypsy, narcolepsy. Things like that, the antiviral stockpile
was created and still is there at great public expense. When we expose the
extensive reporting bias and the ghost writing affecting the tamaflu trials, we publicly asked
the WHO whether they had read the clinical study reports or trusted mega journal articles
when making policy, and we never got a straight answer. Then the British
medical journals Deborah Cohen discovered that the relevant WHO guidelines were written by some Pharma
KOLs Key opinion leaders who had contributed their names to the Tamaflu publications. The
Council of Europe and the French Senate made a lot of noise, but it
was also forgotten. Isn't that the case? Always somebody finds out about this.
I remember the Italian member of the Larder Legislature was screaming in the summer
of twenty twenty. Look at this You know, these these numbers about people
dying is all bogus. You're killing people with these measures and anything. It's
just screaming. Not finally somebody will listened to it. They just moved him
out of the way. Moved him out of the way, very much like
you see the member of Parliament who has been blowing the whistle on deaths with
a jab, Andrew Bridges. Do you think people are now coming around because
you've been fighting to have this debate for quite a while, haven't you.
The evidence flaws is pretty considerable eighteen months ago and not THEO spoke out.
I mean it's overwhelming though every week there's more evidence paper out last week in
Japan of a clear leak now between people who had the boss and the Increasement
councilor we know why is the sp Boughty the Simian virus. Forty promoter regions
that Fison didn't dispose are in their vaccine. So I mean there's clearly with
promoting council. And so are you seeing more MPs now than before coming to
now? No, the MPs have put their hands in the blood up to
their armpits. Most of it they have put at thousands, hundreds of thousands
of letters saying that the vaccines are safe and effective over the last few years.
There's a general election coming later this year, and they really want to
hold the line and still after the general election, because there is we're both
sides of the house. There's so much political capital that the vaccines are safe
and effective, which they're neither safe nor effective. Now we're thrown afflic a
cert de party or tweeting that a leading cardiologist has said that that we're the
vaccine role out is the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust. I'm afraid
I think it's gonna be bigger than the Holocaust, because I think we're going
to be somewhere between ten and twenty million people have been killed. Bobby's experimental
vacciems world Lage and Honey still got a um Well, I think Diogenes can
stop looking for an honest man. I think we found one. One one
in the UK in Parliament. They kicked him out because he said that cardiologist
said it's going to be like a Holocaust, like the Holocaust. He wasn't
denying the Holocaust, he was saying it was going to be a massive murder
like that. Andrew Bridges said, well, it's actually going to be more
than that. Don't criticize Israel, even if it is true. You will
be punished by that. And that's why they use that as an excuse.
Again, anti Sysmatism has now become the accusation that they throw against people,
just like racism. You're racist, you're anti Semitis any Semitic, and we're
going to cancel, You're going to censor you. Do you really I got
to say to people who are Jewish, do you really want to be associated
with blanket censorship. I don't think you do. I think it's a very
foolish strategy. Nevertheless, what he had to say said, well, are
the other politicians who are joining it? No, No, they got their
hands in the blood. They got their hands in the blood all the way
up to their armpits. He said. I've said for the longest time,
it's like the Agatha Christie thing murder on the Orient Express, except this is
murder on the Warp Speed Express. They all had a hand and killing,
and they are all going to hang together to try to shut this down.
We should make sure they all hang together in other ways. Sixty four page
International Health regulation document has a lot in it. As they said, they
said, here's the few gems that we selected for their fragrance. The word
shall appears three hundred and sixty four times in just sixty four pages. In
other words, about six times per page you have the word shall. They're
talking about ordering us. They've got orders for us. Everything. Here is
an order. You must do this, You shall do this. You should
also be aware that there will be an implementation committee with a chair and all
of the other paraphernalia of bureaucracy and observers monitors. You think maybe these same
people, you know, the people put you have to pay for your monitors
and they go on the fishing boat. So now you're going to have to
pay for your monitors at the college. You think they might do that to
us as well. Well, yeah, probably would. As a matter of
fact, when they talk about this, they said, we suspect we know
who will pay for this. Here's a list of observers, and this is
from the document. They say, for the purposes of attending and addressing the
IC committee. Reference to observers is understood to refer to the Holy See,
the Vatican Palestine. Gavvy. That's the vaccine organization that Bill Gates has put
through the Vaccine Alliance Gavvy, the Vaccine Alliance, the Order of Malta,
the Order of Malta, like the get the Freemasons in here, whatever,
The International Committee of the Red Cross, the International Federation of the Red Cross
and Red Crescent Societies, the inter Parliamentary Union, the Global Fund to Fight
AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria because you know they love these PCR tests. I
guess, the United Nations and other intergovernmental organizations with which the WA show has
established effective relations under Article seventy of the Constitution, the European Union and non
state actors and official relations with who. And they sarcastically said, well,
they forgot to include Freemasonry. Spector in Monty Python's traveling circus is insane,
absolutely insane. They do have the Order of Malta in there whatever. In
the Holy See of the Vatican and Bill Gates. Bill Gates gets right up
there at the front. And Palestine. Why is Palestine up there at the
front, you may ask, Well, the the decision instruments that constitute a
public health emergency of international concern are things like this. Let me read some
of these to you. This is again from the IHR. If it is
a number of cases and or a number of deaths for this type event large
for the given place, time, or population, Well it wasn't when they
declared the global I mean, you know handful of people in China that were
said to have died with a positive PCR test, essentially nobody dying in the
United States when you had Alex Tzar declare the emergency from a health scientific perspective,
Trump did it on March the thirteenth to release the money, but there
still wasn't any epidemic anywhere, let alone a pandemic anywhere, no deaths.
Then this has the event the potential to have a high public health impact.
And here's examples of what they would consider to be a high public health impact.
So if things like this were to happen, the who believes that they
should have shall have let's just say that shall have the authority to lock us
down. An event caused by a pathogen with high potential to cause an epidemic.
Oh, it's got potential for an epidemic. It's not an epidemic.
An indication of a treatment failure of an emerging antibiotic resistance so if their drugs
don't work, that's one of the signs that they could lock us down.
We got lots of drugs that don't work. Event represents a significant public health
risk even if no or very few human cases have been identified. So in
other words, it's got a potential and it's also significant health risk even though
we've not identified any cases and nobody's died. You see how they're redefining a
pandemic. The cases are reported amongst health staff, or the population is at
risk, especially vulnerable people, refugees, people have a low level of immunization,
children, elderly, undernourished, the poor, LGBT trainees, furries,
you got furries are at risk with this stuff. Something about it just multiplies
with furries. I don't know concombatant factors that may hinder or delay the public
health response, such as unfavorable weather conditions because climate change. I know nobody
has died yet, but you know that's one of the things that we and
if there's climate change, it's a pandemic anyway, right, an event in
an area with a high population density, an event, what is the event?
Because they've already ruled out the fact that somebody has to be sick or
dead from this, the spread of toxic, infectious, or otherwise hazardous materials
that may be occurring naturally or otherwise. See, it's very urgent for us
to do something to stop this stuff at the state level, because you and
I know that nothing is going to be done by Trump or by Biden.
Nothing will be done by the Congress, whether it's Democrats or Republicans, to
stop any of this stuff. The Senate will pretend that this is ratified,
even without doing a ratification. They're going to betray us on this like they
have everything else. They're going to betray us on this, just like they
did with a Paris climate accord, just like they did with the decorations of
an emergency in twenty twenty. And so they said, well, here's the
way this will probably work. We regret to tell you, ladies and gentlemen,
there were currently in a public health emergency because at least three of these
conditions are currently met. And that's like I was saying, you know,
we got drugs that don't work on rhinovirus and on the para influenza virus.
We got some things out here that don't work. And even though nobody's really
dead or dying, and we don't have an epidemic, certainly not a pandemic.
A pandemic is an epidemic everywhere. Right, we don't have an epidemic
anywhere. That's not a pandemic. But we have the potential for this because
we know of some things out there for which they have drugs that don't work.
That's pretty much every disease and sickness. They've got drugs that don't work.
So get ready for another round of lockdowns. Apart from all these marginal
issues, all else is okay. So who cares about sovereignty? Certainly not
the who. Yeah, don't get fooled again. Elvis the Beetle and the
Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the Oldies channel at APS radio dot
com. Sh H, you're listening to the David Knight Show. Well,
let's talk about the power play by Larry Faink and Blackrock and these various governments
that are trying to use the the climate mcguffin to control us. On Rumble
BWC C six A D nine, Psalm twenty seven twenty seven. The Lord
is my Light and my salvation. Whom shall I fear. The Lord is
the strength of my life. Of whom shall I be afraid? Absolutely right,
and that's what we need to come back to. There is no reason
for us to fear or panic about anything. Really. You know, we
just had that bishop who was attacked by that squatter, one of the newcomers,
and he said in the hospital, he said, I forgive him.
He had a lot more to say about that. Yesterday, I said,
when he came out, he had a white action in his eye, and
I didn't know what that was about. But he has now said he's lost
his eye. But in essence what he said he was he was speaking in
another language. Is why I don't have the clip here with subtitles. But
essentially what he said was, I would it's a small price for me to
pay. He said, Christ paid far more than that for me. And
he said, and I gladly give my eyes to Muslims if they could understand
what the truth is and see God's forgiveness. To paraphrase what he was having
to say. He has really stood strong in all of this, and he's
also stood for free speech. As you have the Australian government trying to censor
X and not show the attack. People need to see the attack so they
can understand the forgiveness. Not they So the US is pledging to completely ban
coal. Earlier this week, all G seven nations agreed to shut down their
coal plants by twenty thirty five at the latest. We've got less than ten
years, folks. Isn't that interesting. I've shown many times the news Week
and Time magazine from nineteen seventy nine where they said we're going to be out
of oil and natural gas by the mid eighties, but we've got six hundred
and sixty six years of coal. Well, we got it, but they're
not going to let us choose it within the next ten years. They're going
to shut it down, So that includes the United States. We still have
in the United States more than two hundred coal fired power plants which could be
operated cleanly. That's an additional expense that they wouldn't require of China or India.
But we could still do it because we have the fuel. But no,
they're going to shut them down. And of course, when the G
seven nations get together and agree to shut everything down within the next ten years,
that does not include China and India. Because of the Paris climate accord
which exempted them. And again the people who believed all this climate nonsense and
the alarmism were very alarmed. They said, this is about global warming.
How are you going to give the two biggest countries to pass on all this
stuff. All you're doing is transferring money and economic power to those two countries.
They got it right about that. They can't see the rest of the
stuff, but they certainly saw that with clarity. And yet you had Kerry
say that he and Obama had self ratified this treaty, and Trump played along
with it, did not get rid of it, even though he was told
to, well, I'll get rid of it after the twenty twenty election,
he said, and he did, and then immediately Biden put it back in.
But he left it there for the entire four years that he was in
office, because you don't want to interrupt any of these plans. You say,
you could declare that it's done, and then a month later Biden puts
it back in. But it would have been a problem if Trump would have
been a problem for the globalist if Trump would have shut it down for four
years. So wasn't it nice that he just didn't do it? For some
reason? I'm sure it wasn't a betrayal of us or anything like that.
In the background. I'm sure Trump would never betray us to the globalist because
we all know how opposite he is of the globalist. You'd have to be
crazy to think that Trump was on the side of the globalist by looking at
everything that he did. Anyway, So, as New American points out,
China and India are putting up new coal plants faster than the West is shutting
theirs down. This is not about what they say it's about. It's never
about what they say it's about. And so now an interesting dynamic has come
up because they're talking about artificial intelligence in Silicon Valley. They've given up on
manufacturing steel and all the rest of this stuff, and they don't care.
However, their data industry is very power intensive, and so Silicon Valley AI
is running on Eastern coal. So it's article from Epic Times, and they're
right about that. That is what is powering. It's eastern coal that is
powering the artificial intelligence and everything else that these computer technocrats are doing. It's
also powering the American government and it's surveillance state and what it is doing to
store and everything that has ever happened on the Internet, so that once they
get to fast enough computers, once they get quantum computing or something like that,
they can go back in and get everything that everybody's ever done that they
could attack somebody for. So they've been storing all this stuff at great expense,
great expense in terms of money, but especially in terms of energy and
water storing it and desert places and using all the water, more water than
a town would use, more power than a town would use. Forget about
crypto mining. They want data mining for artificial intelligence then for the CIA.
So it takes a lot of energy, says up in times to run those
hot servers and the air conditioning that is needed to keep them cool. Artificial
intelligence requires even more servers and energy, as Real Data reported Silicon Valley VIZ
with San Francisco as the AI capital of the world, and so far California
remains ahead of everyone else, including communist China and the race for AI dominance.
So the problem for them is that when it comes to making anything,
whether it means that you're going to manufacture cars, or you're going to manufacture
steel, or you're going to manufacture large language models. You got to have
cheap energy. Cheap energy is not just about our economy, it's not just
about our quality of life. It is also about our life expectation as well.
And so the attacks on our energy are an attack on every aspect of
our lives in our society. So where would San Francisco and Silicon Valley AI
companies, conscious of the need of energy from such renewable sources as wind and
solar energy, where would they get the energy for their AI servers? Where
they get them from California energy companies, especially from Northern California's PG and E.
Well, actually no, they're getting this many of them. And there's
massive servers that are setting up in the Virginia area which are being run on
coal from West Virginia. So I pointed out California imports most of their energy,
so they can virtue signal about how they're going to shut down coal all
the rest of the stuff, but they're going to import their energy. Energy
Internet data centers are fueling the drive to an old power source coal. That's
the headline from the Washington Post just two weeks ago, and so the dateline
there was out of Charlestown, West Virginia. It reported surveyors are eyeing space
for yet another power line next to the property, a line that will take
electricity generator from coal plants in West Virginia to address a drain on power driven
by the world's Internet hub in Northern Virginia thirty five miles away. That's right,
it is the world's Internet hub. Seventy percent of global digital traffic going
through this Internet hub that's in Northern Virginia, and that's being run on coal.
They're massive data center with computers processing nearly seventy percent of global digital traffic.
Are gobbling up electricity at a rate officials overseeing the power grid say is
unsustainable unless two things happen. Number one, they've got to have several hundred
miles of new transmission lines be built, slicing through neighborhoods and farms in Virginia
and three neighboring states to get to the coal. And also, number two,
they have to have antiquated coal powered electricity plants that have been scheduled to
go offline will need to keep running. You shut those things down, you're
gonna shut down not only global digital traffic, but you're also going to take
a big hunk out of are the spies in Washington, DC. This is,
by the way, the best and the only argument that I've ever seen
for stopping coal is stop the government. These people they just they're not that
smart. You know, They've got the these long range plans about how they're
going to control us, but they really can't manage it, can they.
So all this stuff is being processed in northern Virginia, the center of the
US government and a major location for these server farms, and you know,
so they're and in California, where they want to shut this stuff down,
they're the ones who are most dependent on coal hy well, because just like
with a factory, you can't cycle the power up and down, you can't
have brownouts and all the rest of this stuff. You've got to have solid,
solid, continuous power. And that's true if you want to manufacture steel,
and it's even more true perhaps if you want to manufacture your data mining.
You've got to have dependable, solid, steady state power. And you're
not going to get that from solar or wind. So, with Amazon Web
Services pursuing a thirty five billion dollar data center expansion in Virginia, rural portions
of the state are the industry's newest target for development. That growth means big
revenue for the localities that host the football field. Size buildings, lots of
power, lots of air conditioning, big buildings. Aloud and collects six hundred
million dollars in annual taxes from Amazon's computer equipment inside these gigantic buildings. Prince
William is the second largest market. It collects one hundred million dollars per year.
It's going to viscerate their tax base. It's going to destroy their economy
if they shut down the coal and so what is their response to all of
this, Well, Larry Fink understands it. Larry Fink the CEO of Black
Rock, and he was explaining this to people at the World Economic Forum about
how they all make money off of this. He said, the next AI
trade, because that's what's been driving the stock market is artificial intelligence. He
said, the next trade on AI is going to be the power to run
the AI. He said, there is going to be a big shortage of
power. So as Biden and these others are trying to short power, he's
going long on power. Now is he turning to coal? You might guess
maybe they would with a name like Blackrock go for coal, but no,
actually, you know he does mention the coal stuff, but perhaps it's going
to be nuclear anyway. Artificial data center is the electrification of the economy,
and on shoring trends will result in a major upgrade of the nation's power grid,
except that they're trying to destroy the power grid. And of course he
has been a part of this with his ESG stuff, and so now that
they've taken ESG away, he's got a new strategy. Didn't take him very
long. We can do a power reset, we can tear down the existing
power infrastructure and grid, and then the climate cult corporations can do that,
and then you know, they come back around with this new power and of
course it's not going to be enough for all this, so we'll have to
kind of ration this. And the way we'll ration it is by charging people
a lot more money. So let's destroy the existing power structure that's out there.
We'll put everything on the grid, destroy the inputs into the grid,
but we'll take over these new ways to generate power that'll be approved by the
government as the only source. We'll be in on the ground floor of that.
And because there'll be a shortage. We'll be able to charge people premium
prices for it as well. He says, I do believe that to properly
build out AI, we're talking about trillions of dollars of investing in power,
so data centers today could be as much as and he said this actually two
hundred megahurts. I saw that, and I thought was he talking about He
meant to say megawatts? He said, mega hurts. I went back and
looked at the tape because I did they get that wrong when they transcribed it.
No, he actually said mega hurts. And then he said something,
but we're going to need jigawats Marty. He did actually get to gigawatts.
He said, Now they're talking about data centers being one gigawat. He said,
that's enough to power a city, he said, Or are you going
to send you back in time? Either way? Actually, I prefer to
go back in time. He pointed out. They spoke with a head of
one tech company who said their data centers currently require about five gigawatts or jigawatts
depending on who is a professor or or I guess hurts right, If it's
I, it's Larry Fink it's five gigahertz. If it's the professor from back
to it's five jigawatts. But anybody else would say five gigawats of power.
He said, by twenty thirty, the same person told me that the number
could jump up to thirty gigawatts. The amount of power that's needed to use
AI has a huge impact on society, said Fink. Oh isn't an amazing
insight. He realizes that now after working so hard to shut it all down
with the SG, now it's important, and now we need to pay him
after he's destroyed stuff. Yeah, if this is a situation, if all
of a sudden, you know, you got these massive projects that are going
to be using that are using five gigawatts now going to be using thirty gigawatts
by twenty thirty. Maybe it's not a good idea for us to put all
of our cars on the grid. Maybe it's not a good idea for us
to put off all of our cooking and all of our heating and all the
rest of the stuff. Maybe we shouldn't be putting everything on the grid,
you think, Oh no, that works out for him too. He then
asked, so where's the power going to come from are we going to get
it off the grid? And what does that mean for elevated energy prices?
And you could just see him rubbing his hands together like a like a frisky
little fly or something. Right think then said this is a huge investment opportunity.
He said. The world is going to be short power, short power,
he emphasized, and to power these data companies, you can't have intermittent
power like wind and solar. You need dismatchable power because they can't turn off
and on these data centers. I've played for you the presentation thing that I
did with the graphics and stuff fifteen fifteen years ago when we were fighting the
first renewable energy mandates in Colorado, and I showed, you know, by
expanding the size of the different power plants to show what they were putting out.
You know the fact that you've got intermitted power coming out of wind and
solar and you have to back that up and make it steady state. So
what were they using to back up the virtue signaling power of wind and solar.
Well, they were using coal, using coal, natural gas and things
like that. So as those would fail or go out, you would ramp
up and speed up the coal stuff. So instead of the coal running at
steady state, it's going off and on and off and on, higher and
lower, higher and lower. And as you pointed out, it's just like
your car. If you're driving your car steady state on the highway, you're
going to get your best mileage. But if you're in the city, stop
and go, stop and go, stop and go, get you use more
energy, and you also have higher emissions, don't you. And so it
was counterproducted and it was stupid, and it's still stupid fifteen years later,
except now Larry Fink has figured out how to make a fortune, more money
than anybody will ever make off of this stupidity. They're not smart cities,
they're stupid cities. Everything that's labeled as smart as stupid. He said,
you need to have dispatchable power because they can't turn off and on these data
centers, just like a factory. So what kind of clean, reliable energy
could he be hinting at? Well, Sarah H says maybe nuclear, right,
And they said back in twenty twenty December twenty twenty, we had an
article by Uranium. Is this the beginning of the next ESG craze? The
federal government is expected to continue restarting shuttered nuclear power plants in the coming years.
Well, you know, that's fine. As one person said, I
forget who said this quote talking about nuclear power plants. That's one hell of
a way to boil water. And it's a very complicated, a very dangerous
way to boil water. And it also has other unsolved problems, like what
do you do with the sment nuclear waste besides just leaving it there for a
thousand years for somebody else to figure out the problem while they try to protect
it from any accidents. I'm kind of an old fashioned guy. I think
we got to have the problems worked out before we force people to use electric
cars running off of lithium batteries, or before we force people to use nuclear
power. If we don't have these things worked out, it's not that these
are not problems. They can't be solved. But why don't we before we
go in into it in such a big way, why don't we try to
solve these problems. No, no, we're just going to roll into it.
So you know, a lot of people are looking at this thing.
I can't afford to live right because what are they doing they're ramping up.
You look at the inflation on food, at the inflation on power. It
truly is amazing. If prices were only rising at three and a half percent,
we wouldn't really be caring about it. But we know that that's much
higher because we know how they've manipulated the inflation calculations. Fox Business is reporting
the cost of energy is up thirty six point nine percent. It's up thirty
seven percent, just like food, right, And of course they'll always come
back. They'll play games with things like computers. It's one of the things
that they use to manipulate the inflation down, saying, oh, the computer.
The new computers are selling for about the same amount of dollars that they
did before, and look they're faster, so we're going to say that the
price is actually the effective price has actually gone down. They play those types
of games. But we know that when it comes to food and to energy,
the things that we absolutely must have, that there's been a tremendous amount
of inflation. And so with this kind of infla you need to have some
kind of personally, some kind of a hedge against that gold, bitcoin,
something like that. There was an article about a Chipolte sandwich that was something
like thirty seven dollars forty pieces of chicken McNuggets in California, where Newsome has
artificially raised the price of things, they're with messing with a minimum wage because
I think he's trying to push people into AI and robotics. Anyway, A
forty piece order of chicken McNuggets, two orders of large fries twenty five bucks
there, so we all, you don't need me to tell you about the
prices of things everywhere. We know what is happening with inflation, so we're
going to see a lot more inflation when it comes to power. It's amazing
to me to see how similar this is in so many different ways in the
nineteen seventies, except that instead of Opek coming in and trying to punish us
because we were allied with Israel, so they decided to punish the United States.
But of course it created a global situation of stagflation. And it always
kicks off with the energy. If you mess with the energy, that's like
a value add attacks of everything that people do because everything is being transported multiple
times, and so that is at the heart and that's the very first thing
that Biden did when he took office immediately started attacking energy production, and so
a lot of shuttered nuclear power plants could be turned on, says the director
of the US Energy Department's Loan Program's office. There's a couple of nuclear power
plants we probably should and can turn back on. Well, if they turned
them back on, where are they going to get the uranium for the fuel?
Because at the same time, you've got the American government, the federal
government, at the same time, they're saying, well, maybe our way
to get out of this problem that we've created is to start up these nuclear
power plants. But the same Biden administration wants to ban uranium from Russia.
Officials from the White House National Security Council, the Department of Energy, and
other top level officials have discussed reducing reliance. Oh, there we go,
reliance on Russian uranium imports. They will never allow us to use the coal
to make that up, though, right, And why would we rely on
stuff from China when they're burning coal and we're not allowed to use coal when
we got coal resources that are as much, if not more so, than
China. China is getting its coal from North Korea, other places. Like
that. We've got a lot of coal, but we're not going to be
allowed to do that, and we're not going to be allowed to import Russian
uranium. How much of our uranium do we get from Russia? Well,
twenty four percent, so about a quarter of it. So you know we
got seventy five percent, we take twenty five percent off. You know,
when you start doing that with everything, pretty soon you don't have anything that's
working. You know it could still do it, but we're going to have
to charge you a lot more. And then when it comes to producing this
domestically, if we want to produce uranium domestically, don't you know that the
EPA and another dozen industries will come bureaucracies will come in to shut down domestic
production of uranium. You know they're going to find something because this is not
about CO two. This is about shutting this country down, just like what
we saw with a Trader Johnson. You know, it's not about peace,
it's not about winning any wars. It's about making sure that we've got another
group of people that we can bring in to make even more chaos here in
the United States. We'll be right back. Tell Alexa to add the APS
Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere, from country to blues,
classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to
enjoy. Get details at APS radio dot com. You're listening to the David
Knight Show. Let's talk a little bit about money, and let's talk about
bitcoin, because I think that's a great story. I've had this for a
couple of day before I get to it here. But there was a few
years ago Janet Yellen was as chair of the Federal Reserve. She was giving
testimony in Congress, and as she was talking, there are a couple of
younger guys in the back and she's talking about what she's going to do with
the economy. They wrote down on the yellow pad by bitcoin and held it
up over her shoulder, kind of photo bomber. There there's a picture.
Isn't that great? By bitcoin? Now here's where it gets really interesting.
That pad where they just that yellow pad where they wrote by bitcoin has now
just sold at auction for one over one million dollars. They sold that bad
for about sixteen bitcoins, says zero Hedge. I think that's the ultimate revenge,
isn't it The report notes. So the sign quickly became iconic and the
crypto community, symbolizing the industry's revival. Bitcoin's price soared from about twenty three
hundred dollars to a peak of nearly seventy four thousand in March, boosted by
major financial firms like Fidelity and black Rock. As retail interests came around,
early bitcoin memorabilia like the pad regained popularity, they said, NFTs, well
not so much. Isn't that an irony? Right? Well, all this
stuff with the NFTs and all the you know, I'll buy that meme or
whatever. That is a piece of paper on a yellow pad with that thing
scratched on it. That becomes maybe one of the most valuable pieces of memorabilia.
And it's paper, it's paper like their currency. So the page with
a sign drawing was removed. Go down, show that other picture that's a
little bit further down. I guess that's the one. Yeah, I guess
that's the picture that they put up for the purpose of the auction. And
you've got you've got people on either side of that holding it with white gloves
by bitcoin scratched on there. The page of the sign drawing was removed from
the notepad shortly after the hearing. It has since been reattached with clear archival
wire. That's the description from the auction and the picture from the auction.
It was created by Christian Langallis, a twenty two year old intern at the
Cato Institute during and he showed it during a twenty seventeen House Financial Service Committee
hearing featuring Janet Yellen. It was fed chair then she's now the head of
the Treasury Department for Biden. After being televised, Langellis was escorted out.
The auctioned item, described as quote ink drawing on lee pad, also includes
his notes from the session. There you go. That's even gets his notes
there where he's scribbling there, that's even better. He's got all these bonuses
in there. And in Zimbabwe, their new gold backed currency the sixth time
they've tried to redo the currency. They call it the zig Zig sounds like
a cartoon character was always desperate. The American Institute for Economic Research says.
During the peak of its two thousand and eight hyperinflation, Zimbabwe experienced a catastrophic
economic downturn characterized by the issuance of billion and trillion dollar banknotes, and of
course we had Jack Lawson who does the the Civil Defense Manual you fined at
Civil Defensemanual dot com. He was actually in Zimbabwe. He used to live
there, used to fight the Marxist that were there, the Marxist one and
then destroyed the currency. He has a trillion dollar Zimbabwe note for what it's
worth, which probably nothing, worthless, just you know, trillion. It's
just like a PCR test, you know, the trillion dollar magnification of Zimbabwe
dollar. It's kind of like the forty cycles, the one point one trillion
times magnification of whatever it is that you're looking for your PCR tests. They're
not the gold standard, as Reuters is saying, it's garbage, but now
they're trying to get to a gold standard. So Zimbabwe has a new gold
back coin. Their inflation is currently now at fifty five percent. It's not
as big as it used to be, but it's still pretty bad because they
are Marxists, you know, like Biden and the rest of them. So
they have they've had a resurgence of inflation currently a fifty five percent. They've
had to return to the US dollar, to the euro, to the South
African rand, as de facto currencies and the necessity of using large physical stacks
of bills to purchase basic commodities like bread and eggs. Here's an idea instead
of doing a gold back currency. Once you have this Cato Institute intern,
do a bunch, right, he's got more paper on that yellow pad and
he can write on by bitcoin and just start hitting that out to people and
you can use that as currency. On April the fifth, a new currency
was announced, the zig and it's supposed to be like zimbabwe gold, but
I think it sounds like Ziggy, the cartoon character. So because this is
a joke, isn't it. I mean, they're the Marxist economy and the
Marxist government and when it comes to finances, they truly are a joke.
The Ziggy marks a sixth attempt there Zimbabwean government and the central bank to introduce
a currency unit that sets its monetary house in order. Well, you're going
to have to get rid of the Marxists, not just add a zig,
because whenever you put a zig, they always zag in the marketplace. Stagflation.
Sagflation is back, and how do we get that? While we get
it by attacking the energy supply same way we got it in the nineteen seventies,
except this time I think it's going to be a lot worse. I
think Jeryl Slint is right. It's he's been saying this for years. Not
going to be stagflation. It's going to be dragflation. And of course a
lot of that had to do with Janet Yelling, who was in place of
the FED while Trump was present. You know, I tell you what,
there is such an important difference between Trump and Biden. You want to know
the difference in the economist. You can have Janet Yellen in as the FED
chair under Trump, or she could be head of the Department of the Treasury
Department under By there's your big difference. What chair is Janet Yelling gonna set
in? Or the CIA? Right, you can have Bill Barr, the
George H. W. Bush partner to rebuild a CIA after the church here
at committee hearings. Or you can have Gena Haspell, who worked with George
W. Bush to lie us into the Iraq war based on torture. Now,
which Bush CIA official do you want in your administration? Well, Trump's
got to pick. You can pick one of two CIA traders, one of
two Bush administrations. That's that great. So stagflation is back, maybe dragflation.
And again this is by design and by Janet Yelling and the fdi C
has now seized control of Philadelphia's republic First Bank. They said it's due to
overexposure to real estate. That would be a commercial real estate which is at
the center of the banking collapse, as we've been talking about for so long.
By the way, you know, you can get Gerald Slinty's Trends Journal
at a ten percent discount if you use the code night that's at trendsjournal dot
com. He's been talking about this for the longest amount of time that it's
going to be you know, dragflation. There'll be commercial real estate bust,
and that commercial real estate bust is going to drag down the banks. It's
all happening just as he said. And then of course, you know,
he'll tell you what he sees coming, even if he doesn't like it,
he'll and he's been very accurate about that. Which city has the most billionaires
in twenty twenty four, Well, it used to be China. That's another
thing we've talked about for the longest time, the fact that China was in
the catbird seat until they killed themselves with the zero COVID initiative. And of
course you know they're going to do that because China has always been the beta
test site for the globalist agenda. They've always been on board with it.
When it came to depopulation, they jumped in there, did exactly what Kissinger
and the globalist wanted them to do, the one child policy and all the
rest of this stuff. They did everything just like everybody else this time around.
As we were talking about yesterday, that was the one thing that Kit
Nightly at Offguardian dot Org in the UK said, he said, that was
a real tell, wasn't it That all of the governments around the world were
doing exactly the same thing at exactly the same time. That was a real
tell that it was fake, that it was organized, that it was a
conspiracy. That's what I've been saying all along. They're marching in lockstep,
every single one of them. It doesn't matter if it's Trump or Trudeau,
it doesn't matter if it's communist China or Trump. They're all doing exactly the
same thing, this zero COVID stuff. And so now that they did the
zero COVID stuff. They've shot themselves on the foot. It used to be
that the city that had the most billionaires in it was in China, in
Beijing, and now that has fallen to fourth place. Shanghai is in fifth
place, Hong Kong is in seventh place. One two and three is New
York, London and bum Mumbai. So when you look at the twenty cities
that have the most billionaires, China is dropping down very rapidly. And of
course they've been at the forefront of everything that the globeless want, including the
IDs, the social credit stuff, which they did that first and then that
got copied by everybody with the vaccine passports. The social credit system in China.
Duandan's criminal, academic, and medical records will feed into her score,
as well as state security assessments. Her shopping habits will be another measure.
Her score could even change in real time depending on what she puts in her
trolley. Buy a lot of alcohol, suggests dependence, lose a couple of
points. You see how they're laying the foundation for us. Now suggest responsibility,
Yeah, get some green stuff, late on mortgage payments or your tax
return, lose a lot more. Yeah, Now that's why they're seeking to
manage and watch everything that we buy. You know, just grab it at
Amazon and just walk out, and the thousand people who are watching you in
India being played paid slave wages to spy on you and write down with your
buck. They will then pass that report along and of course eventually they'll get
it to where they can have the computer recognition of that. But that's what
this is all about. They're rolling out that system, and they're trying it
in China, and surprise, surprise, they even had the traffic light system
red, yellow and green for people of the pandemic stuff. It's exactly the
plan that they laid out and practiced there. And so when we look at
what is happening, whether we're looking at inflation and the loss of purchasing power
and loss of being able to set aside your labor for being able to use
it in the future, or whether we're looking at ways to control you and
to monitor you. If you want financial transactional privacy, you're going to have
to go with cash, or you're gonna have to go with gold or something
like that. And if you want against their inflation, you go with gold
or bitcoin or something like that. But gold checks all those boxes. The
long gold trade still has a lot of positive structural things going for it.
Gold is alone at the top. And this is article from zero Hedge,
And of course usually this is done by people who have a gold system that
they're selling, but it's not always that way, and it's not that way,
and this when you look at volatility, the roller coaster effect, and
all the rest of this stuff, it is gold has been pretty steady,
and you don't want to have something that truly is a roller coaster. We're
going to take a quick break and when we come back, we are going
to talk about some of the issues around abortion, a lot of stuff happening
with that, as well as other political issues that are happening. But before
we leave this and take a break, I just want to remind people that
if you want to get gold and silver, Tony Ardiban of Wise Wolf Goold
has set up Davidknight dot Gold. I'll let him know that you're coming from
this program. He's done a lot to support this program over the years,
and so Davidknight dot gold will take you to Tony Ardibin's Wise Wolf Gold.
You can buy gold or silver there, large or small amounts. You can
be a part of wolf Pack and set aside a fixed amount each month that
you would like to save of gold and silver, and you can take advantage
of the buyers club that is there because he's got over a thousand people now
doing that. So that's one way to buy small amounts on a regular basis
and still have the buying power as if you were making a large transaction.
A way to get more with lower fees. So we're going to take a
quick break. Remember Davidknight dot gold take you to tony Ardband will be right
back. Interested in a curated list of the finest classical music, find it
now at APS radio dot com. Sh Liberty, It's your move, and
now the David Knight Show. Well, I just saw this article and it
really struck me. A newborn baby found dead in a trash can on the
campus of the University of Tampa. That's where Karen and I met fifty years
ago, had our first date on Saint Patrick's Day, nineteen seventy four.
It's just amazing to see something happen like this in place that you know,
and of course they point out the police said, you know, there's a
lot of resources for somebody who doesn't want a baby. You can put your
baby up for adoption, you can surrender a newborn under the safe Haven's law
in Florida as well as other things. But instead this person killed it.
So now the police are going to be looking for them. Now, what
is the difference really, when you stop and think about it, between that
and the murder of babies who are at full term. I've talked many times
about the Democrat who is a pro life radical, you know, left Democrat,
but she's pro life, and she didn't find the dead babies in a
trash can. She found them in some trash that was being taken from the
abortion center to be incinerated. She found it in Washington, d C.
They're trying to put her in jail. She put her name on the ballot
in a couple of states as a presidential candidate so she could run this ad
without having it be shut down. Because they can't stop this ad showing what
a newborn baby that is killed at an abortion center, babies that easily could
survive on their own, what it looks like a secular progressive activist. Last
year, I recovered the remains of these five babies from an all term abortion
center in Washington, d C. These are the phases of a genocide supported
by Joe Biden and my own Democratic Party. We can provide for the working
class and resist this extremism. I'm challenging you to never vote for a pro
choice Democrat again. I'm Theresa of Akovinac, pro life Democrat running for president
of the United States, and I approved this message. Yeah, I prove
that message as well. It's horrific to look at that, but people need
to look at that and understand what this truly is. She said abortion is
murder, and of course Bill Maher is very typical of the Democrat Party.
Yeah, I kind of is murder, and I'm okay with that, he
said. And so what's the difference, Oh, the mother gets to decide
whether the baby loves or not. Right, and you have Gavin Newsom at
the same time all this stuff is happening. Gavin Newsom has put together a
commercial and even the mainstream media is criticizing him for how phony it is.
Talking about how mothers in some states can't get an abortion, shows a young
woman who is handcuffed to a hospital bed as he's telling them, you know,
come to California to get your abortion. Isn't that amazing? Truly is
amazing. I guess he's also fine with what is kind of murder. Well,
the question is that the Federalist asked, can we fix a culture if
it is hostile to raising children? Elon Musk, who has his designs of
technocracy, he still wants to have a lot of people. I guess he
wants to be able to send them to Mars and other places like that.
But can we fix the culture that is hostile to raising kids, that is
hostile to educating them? Really, in a sense, a new book came
out of Family Unfriendly. I looked at this and I thought, well,
that's this is an article written by the Federalists talking about this book by Tim
Carney, and I thought, well, I'll get him. I want to
talk about it. But we have some points of disagreement here. All the
ways in which our laws and culture sure are discouraging family formation. Much of
it we would agree with, he says. Back in December, a viral
video series on TikTok celebrated the Dinks the dual income no kids lifestyle, glorifying
their ability to take European vacations to go crazy with bulk purchases at Costco to
splurge on their pets. He said, At first, I thought it was
a joke, though as a Federalist executive editor helped me to understand these unabashedly
materialistic young American couples were quite serious. They really believed the freedom they enjoyed
not having children was a superior form of life to the supposed drudgery that defies
the lives of us hapless parents. You know, that's a lie that is
sold by the media, by the culture to people that you'll be happier without
kids. And I got to say, nothing could be further from the truth.
Anybody who's had kids knows that knows what a joy that is is.
And yet we're sold this secular materialist vision of what happiness is, and it
is a lie straight out of the pitovel. Timothy Carney, a happy father
of six, does not view children as an obstacle to human happiness, but
rather the means of achieving happiness, both for individuals and for society at large.
When compared to the fathers of the nineteen seventies, the dads of today
are far more involved in their children's lives yet amazingly, mother's weekly parenting loads
since that time have increased by about fifty percent. Carnie also blows a hole
in the claim that kids are too expensive by observing that wealth the Americans are
just as likely as middle class parents to have a few children, not one
driven primarily by financial factors is the issue, but also by cultural ones.
In other words, it's not just the money thing. And of course they'll
hit people with money at plan parent had tried to talk them into killing their
children. But I think that one of the things in the Federalist and perhaps
in his book, that they're ignoring. Here are the medical issues, you
know, the things that have been done to us through our food, especially
through medicine, through vaccines and other things like that as a kind of sterilization.
But there is a big cultural gap, you know, the they've done
a great job of making sure that the majority of women don't want to have
a family, don't want to have kids. So where you're talking about things
in terms of raising kids like travel and sports require massive printal commitments, No
it doesn't. That's another thing that's been sold to people. I know that
we had relatives and they were every time We've talked to them. They had
kids at the same time we had kids, and they were constantly shuffling one
child to one sport, and well, I got to go because I've got
to pick them up at that one. I got to drop the other one
off of that, and i can don't have any time to talk. It's
like, we're just not going to do that. And we didn't do that.
We weren't going to make our family a slave to getting the kids around
in these different sports. And that's what you have to look at. You
have to set your own priorities instead of being pressured by society. Well you
got to go to the good school. Oh well you got to have them
in this sport and that sport and the other sport. No, you don't
need to do that. Much of what is passed out there as a real
issue for people not to have kids are these artificial must dos that are on
all of this that are put on people. He also says helicopter parenting exhaust
parents and also discourages larger families. Well, again, you know, we
used to tell the kids to go outside. That's what Karen was just saying
the other day. She said, well, she's a kid, mom would
say it's a sunny day, get outside, get out, go go go.
Well, take the kids away from a parent like that today for no
good reason. You don't see kids playing outside anymore. Why there's no good
reason for that, the helicopter parenting, and of course all that is driven
by fear campaigns. People are afraid let their kids be outside. So he
encourages This is why I say he's I got my issues with him. At
first, I thought, oh, this guy would be a good guy to
have on talk about. You know, he's got big families. He thinks
that's a good idea, And I was surprised that the federalists didn't take him
to task with this because he encourages the idea of the fifteen minute city.
It's like, what what you want to put your kids in that kind of
an environment? Well, I like the fifteen minute city where schools and playgrounds
and corner stores are all fifteen minutes away from home. And then it gets
worse. He urges the federal government to sell off a small portion of its
land holdings so that developers can build homes to solve these housing credit no.
No, And then he comes in and says and we need to have like
they do in Europe. The government needs to reward people to have kids.
Wait a minute. We started out by talking about the fact that people were
so focused on money that they didn't want to have kids. And so now
we're going to come in and pull that in by saying, well, we'll
help you with the money. We'll ease some of that pain so that you
can have kids. Folks, we've got to break the materialism. It isn't
enough to say, well, you like money, I'll give you some money
to have some kids. No, you've got to break the materialism. You've
got to break the mindset of a love of money. That's the issue here.
Did people in colonial times when there was gigantic families and we subdued the
continent with the big families, did they get paid by the government to have
kids? No? No, do we have to do we have to pay
people for this? Or maybe you know even JFK said if we cut taxes,
the rising tide will lift all of the boats. Help out. Instead
of saying we're going to give money to people and we're going to help them
partner, we're going to come in and partner with them, which is rfks
saying, well, you know, if we want to stop abortions, we
need to understand that we got to do. We go to the government's got
to step in and help parents to raise the kids, and so we need
to come in and get with them at an earlier age and give them more
support with more programs and all the rest of the stuff. No, no,
you want to do things like get government out of people's lives, instead
of finding ways to get government further entangled, instead of using government to send
in all that money with all the strings attached. Don't let them tie you
up with those financial things. Have the kids because it's a good thing.
Have the kids because you want to spend time with them. I Have the
kids because you want to take them with you to heaven. You know,
all these different there's a lot of different reasons to have kids. Not because
the government's going to help you out with the expenses. Not because we've got
government bribes, because then the government's going to be bribing you later to harm
them. We've seen that everywhere. One would think it'd be easy to persuade
young adults to abandon Costco Pizza Knight in favor of bringing a new life into
the world to abandon that so that you could pursue an adventure that, while
terribly taxing, is also incredibly exciting and rewarding. And yet, either that
pizza truly is incredible, or we're dealing with a culture that is so morally
impoverished, so truly blinkered by self worship and self protection that is unclear,
what if anything could rouse them from their dogmatic slumber. Well, that I
agree with from the Federalist. So you know, as we're talking about all
this and r F K Junior talking about what he would do with abortion,
how it's a tragedy, but he's not going to stop the mutilation of children.
He was interviewed by Ben Shapiro on abortion, and Ben Shapiro challenged him
in a good way. I got a lot of things I disagree with Ben
Shapiro on, but he was able to get an interview with rf K Junior,
So good for him. He won't talk to me, but he said
he might believe quote that every abortion is a tragedy, but not enough for
him to do anything about it. That's the comment from faith Wire. He
says, for me, a woman has to make that choice for herself,
said RFK he says, I believe every abortion is a tragedy, but he's
not going to stop it, just like Bill Maher believes that it's murdered.
But he's okay with that as well. So when you look at this,
he's got a little bit he's got more moral authority than most of these libs
that are out there because they demanded that you wear masks and do you do
lockdowns and you do jabs, and they forget about your body your choice.
No, we're not gonna do anyth that, however, you know, and
he stood for your body and your choice. However, the problem is is
that when you talk about abortion, it is not your body, it is
somebody else. Shapiro interjected that abortion is not just a tragedy, but it
is a crime against the child because the child has an independent interest. Kennedy
said he understands Shapiro's perspective, but he doesn't agree with it. Kennedy said
did say abortion is a tragedy, but he failed to explain why he believes
that. Why is it a tragedy? Is it because you're ripping these kids
apart? As we saw on the and the and the pictures there. Shapiro
pressed Kennedy to say when he believes the unborn child has independent human rights and
should be protected from abortion, to which Kennedy said, no woman would choose
to abort her unborn child eight months into pregnancy unless there were extenuating circumstances,
noting that no one in their right mind would do that. Well, that's
not true. We began with the woman who throw the baby undo the trash.
We began with pictures of babies that were beyond eight months. No woman
in the right mind would do that. Well, that's true. You know,
we will never outlaw murder. I mean, we have it. It's
not legal, but we'll never stop it. With loss. There will always
be people who are not in the right mind. There will always be people
who will do that. They'll always be people who claim that there's extenuating circumstances,
And you will always have people who will be willing to kill other people
for money. We see that with big pharmaceutical companies, we see it with
planned parenthood. There's a lot of people who will kill for cash. He
says, I have tremendous respect for you, Kennedy told Shapiro for having absolute
moral clarity on that position, but I think it's more nuanced and complex than
that, but he won't say what you see. See, the thing is
is that right and wrong is simple and does come with moral clarity. If
you have a standard, what is your standard of morality? RFK shows that
he doesn't have one. His ethics are situational, which is to say he
doesn't have him. Trump condemned Kennedy as totally anti gun and all the rest
of the stuff. But again, you know it was Trump who did the
precedent of gun control by executive order. I want to stay on the abortion
stuff. A jailed pro lifer says she was kept in solitary confinement for twenty
two days and they left the lights on twenty four to seven. These are
some of the people who are being politically persecuted by the Biden administration. It's
just is amazing to me what the Biden administration is doing to people like like
this and the January sixth people. There was only a few of them who
are violent, But you look at one thousand or so people that they're going
to keep in jail for the rest of their life the way they've been tortured
in jail. But these are people with a face Act. They were not
harming anyone. As a matter of fact, they were trying to keep babies
from being ripped apart. A jailed pro life prisoner was paraded in court in
full shackles. Is that necessary, like she's some kind of you know,
serial killer, cannibal or something. Heather I Donnie, a defendant in the
Washington d c. Face trials, twenty two days a solitary confinement. She
said she was allowed to walk outside in her cell only for two hours in
the middle of the night each day, and that the lights of her cell
were continually kept on. She's been in prison since she was convicted last autumn,
but she has more convictions in line because of the fact that we're involved
in multiple cities. Just like this lady who was in a communist concentration camp
and she's in a wheelchair. She's in her eighties, and she says she's
reconciled the fact that the Biden administration is going to put her in jail for
the rest of her life. Fellow pro life advocate cal Zastro, who joined
her in another traditional pro life rescue in Tennessee and has also been convicted of
violation of the Face Act, the whole Life site news that when when I
Donnie was brought into the courtroom for a trial in Nashville, the US Marshall
had the middle aged woman shackled at the wrist, the waste, and the
feet like a dangerous criminal. The marshals in the federal government does that to
as a way of vengeance. They did that to Congressman George Hansen. Remember
he took on the irs and they dieseled him. They put him in shackles
and put him in a car and moved him around all the time, just
destroyed his health. And of course, when it comes to the thing of
keeping the light on all the time, the federal government did that. Jefferson
Davis after they caught him, kept the lights on all the time, never
to try to keep him with sleep deprivation. And there are now international rules
to fight against that. When she was brought in with all these shackles on,
the judge was shocked. He ordered them removed, and the US marshals
had the arrogance to only remove one risk to let her write, and the
insistence of the indignant judge, they took the shackles off of both risks,
but the marshal left the bars around her waist, in her feet. This
is your government. This is your government. This is how close we are.
It's totalitarian dictatorship. We've got thank you for listen. Staring of biased
and false neooze has become all too common social media. First unfortunately, the
exactly and this is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to
our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous
to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely
dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is
extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. Break
free from the usual script with a David Knight Show, a fresh perspective bringing
you genuine insights on current events. But if the show is going to stay
on the air, we'll need your continued support. Sharing the show, subscribing
and even just hitting the like button all help. And if you found our
show helpful, please consider donating and becoming a part of a community that values
the truth because independent, listener funded news, untouched by corporate globalist agendas,
is extremely important to our liberties.