1
00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:04,719
Hey child, I'm here. I
appreciate you coming on tonight. I don't

2
00:00:04,759 --> 00:00:07,879
want to make it like you're just
any other caller. We want to make

3
00:00:07,919 --> 00:00:13,160
it special for you. He is
Charles Mockler of the Clips and Dip podcast.

4
00:00:13,800 --> 00:00:17,079
I think we got a new one
coming on the YouTube tomorrow, joining

5
00:00:17,160 --> 00:00:20,399
the show after the Clippers win on
eleven to one oh two. Follow him

6
00:00:20,440 --> 00:00:26,719
at Chuck Mockler on X Charles,
your biggest takeaway from this performance from the

7
00:00:26,719 --> 00:00:30,480
Clippers? I know a lot of
people were doubting them after being down fifteen.

8
00:00:30,559 --> 00:00:33,240
It felt like Groundhog's Day. It
was going to happen again. Denver

9
00:00:33,320 --> 00:00:38,560
was going to dominate, and then
they figured it out. Uh Am,

10
00:00:38,560 --> 00:00:44,880
I crazy for My biggest takeaway is
a little more belief in tylu Is That

11
00:00:44,960 --> 00:00:49,759
a crazy takeaway to take on this
game. He made some good rotation choices.

12
00:00:50,399 --> 00:00:53,240
We saw the usual, you know, we stuck with you know,

13
00:00:53,439 --> 00:00:57,920
Harden for like the five to eight
minutes or whatever the first but things went

14
00:00:58,000 --> 00:01:00,000
a lot better when he was making
when he was kind of pulled the strings

15
00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:03,159
lineup wise. So my hat thought
to Tyler while this one he split up

16
00:01:03,239 --> 00:01:07,040
James Harden and Russell Westbrook, which
we talked about. There's no shade on

17
00:01:07,120 --> 00:01:11,519
either of these players. They just
can't play together right now, this current

18
00:01:11,640 --> 00:01:15,280
version of the Clippers. So I
like a lot of what Tyler did.

19
00:01:18,480 --> 00:01:21,560
Yeah, that's my biggest takeaway.
We needed this win. They're back at

20
00:01:21,640 --> 00:01:23,959
five hundred, which is a little
tough, you know, when you take

21
00:01:23,959 --> 00:01:27,000
a step back and look at the
whole thing. But this, hey,

22
00:01:27,000 --> 00:01:30,439
it feels good. First time since
January twenty twenty two. So we'll take

23
00:01:30,480 --> 00:01:34,079
where we can get it. How
about Daniel Tice. I thought the game

24
00:01:34,159 --> 00:01:38,760
really turned when he came in.
The hustle plays he made to end the

25
00:01:38,799 --> 00:01:42,439
first quarter, and I know they
were still down fifteen, but he was

26
00:01:42,480 --> 00:01:46,840
playing really good defense on Nikola Jokicic. I mean, he had his worst

27
00:01:46,879 --> 00:01:51,120
shooting performance of his career, and
it started with Daniel Tice. If he's

28
00:01:51,120 --> 00:01:56,680
Tuzubas wasn't effective early, he certainly
was late. But Tys being undersize like

29
00:01:56,719 --> 00:02:00,239
that and giving that level of effort, I don't think anyone expected him to

30
00:02:00,280 --> 00:02:05,319
be this good in the Clipper's uniform. No, And it was funny he

31
00:02:05,439 --> 00:02:08,439
kind of sparked a bit of the
offense from the Clippers him and Harden had

32
00:02:08,439 --> 00:02:12,680
a little pick and roll going when
things were not going well, and I

33
00:02:12,719 --> 00:02:15,439
think that was I think Tys got
his first bucket off that. But no,

34
00:02:15,520 --> 00:02:22,120
I mean eleven boards'll excuse me,
yeah, eleven boards total, five

35
00:02:22,280 --> 00:02:25,319
offensive rebounds from Tyson. This was
his best game as a Clipper for sure,

36
00:02:27,240 --> 00:02:30,439
but hey, we needed it.
It happened to come and side with

37
00:02:30,479 --> 00:02:35,759
a night when Yokic was incredibly cold. But when ty started playing good defense,

38
00:02:36,080 --> 00:02:38,599
then it felt like when things were
getting a little shaky, Zoo would

39
00:02:38,639 --> 00:02:42,599
come back in. And Zoo picked
up his defense on Jokic late in the

40
00:02:42,599 --> 00:02:46,080
game, I thought, which was
nice. So no hass off to Daniel

41
00:02:46,120 --> 00:02:49,800
Tys. I said he wouldn't be
an outside threat, but tonight he kind

42
00:02:49,800 --> 00:02:53,520
of proved me wrong. Uh so, yeah, I mean a lot of

43
00:02:53,560 --> 00:02:55,840
things had to go right tonight and
they did. And like I said,

44
00:02:57,039 --> 00:03:00,360
we will take it a couple more
for you here before we get out.

45
00:03:00,319 --> 00:03:04,280
We don't got to play him out. I don't think it is. Ain't

46
00:03:04,319 --> 00:03:07,800
the Gomp show, not Mikell.
I don't know. Yes, I messed

47
00:03:07,879 --> 00:03:09,400
up. I thought we were gonna
get out earlier. I do that often.

48
00:03:09,759 --> 00:03:14,759
I'm sorry Zach could give us a
couple more minutes, Buddy, I'd

49
00:03:14,800 --> 00:03:20,199
appreciate it. James Harden and Russell
Westbrook and Russell only playing sixteen minutes in

50
00:03:20,240 --> 00:03:23,759
this one. But there were a
lot of people that questioned coach lou in

51
00:03:23,840 --> 00:03:27,960
going back to what you were talking
about with him earlier in this performance and

52
00:03:28,000 --> 00:03:30,400
the way he was pulling the strings
and punching the right buttons at the right

53
00:03:30,400 --> 00:03:34,439
time. He went back to James
Harden even though Russell Westbrook had his best

54
00:03:34,479 --> 00:03:38,439
stint early in the fourth quarter,
and it worked and it was the right

55
00:03:38,520 --> 00:03:44,199
move and the Clippers offense was humming
down the stretch. Yeah, this is

56
00:03:44,520 --> 00:03:46,560
This is the part of the game
where I don't think Tyler gets put up

57
00:03:46,599 --> 00:03:51,759
credit, where when the feel is
off, you notice it. You know,

58
00:03:51,879 --> 00:03:53,719
when there's a lineup change that doesn't
work, he really don't it.

59
00:03:53,800 --> 00:03:57,759
Well, there's one that worked.
I think a lot of the times we're

60
00:03:57,800 --> 00:04:00,599
all content with the fact that worked, and we don't get credit to the

61
00:04:00,639 --> 00:04:06,039
fact of when the change was made. So, yeah, that was I

62
00:04:06,599 --> 00:04:11,599
will say, it's not, you
know, the most secure position to be

63
00:04:11,639 --> 00:04:15,120
in. I would like to see
a bit more of a process from the

64
00:04:15,120 --> 00:04:19,439
Clippers offense. Maybe dictating these kinds
of changes late as opposed to vibe or

65
00:04:19,560 --> 00:04:24,519
energy or something like that. But
Ty got it right tonight and things are

66
00:04:24,600 --> 00:04:28,120
trending up for the Clippers. The
wins have been good, so I'm hoping

67
00:04:28,120 --> 00:04:33,879
we get a little more less feel
decisions and more pattern based decisions for this

68
00:04:33,959 --> 00:04:40,720
offense late. He is Chuck Mockler. Follow him on x at Chuck Mockler

69
00:04:41,199 --> 00:04:45,600
with the Clips and Dip podcast.
One more for you here, Chuck,

70
00:04:45,639 --> 00:04:47,600
your guy Kobe Brown. I mean
he hit the three pointer to tie the

71
00:04:47,639 --> 00:04:53,240
ball game. Hey, hey,
I didn't want to say anything, but

72
00:04:53,279 --> 00:04:56,680
he was. I think what was
the Was he a team best plus seven

73
00:04:56,720 --> 00:05:00,439
teen or something insane like that,
which I think goes to show how important

74
00:05:00,519 --> 00:05:04,240
the plus minus stats are. No, sorry, he was the second best

75
00:05:04,240 --> 00:05:08,920
plus minus on the team behind Norb. We didn't talk about Norb, but

76
00:05:08,959 --> 00:05:12,439
he had a phenomenal game offensive weight
when the Clippers really needed it too.

77
00:05:12,560 --> 00:05:17,600
But no Kobe Brown plus seventeen.
It makes no sense how PJ. Tucker

78
00:05:17,920 --> 00:05:21,319
had his plus minus staffs. Thank
Kobe Brown has his plus minus stats.

79
00:05:23,000 --> 00:05:27,959
I think we all know that.
Maybe Kobe Brown or a beer coffee needs

80
00:05:28,000 --> 00:05:30,959
to take those PJ. Tucker butt
it and the Clippers will not be worse

81
00:05:30,600 --> 00:05:35,920
for the wear. Paul George knocked
down some huge three pointers in the second

82
00:05:36,000 --> 00:05:40,519
half, But the one shot where
I went, Okay, Paul George has

83
00:05:40,560 --> 00:05:44,439
it going tonight. It was that
bailout three pointer on the left wing OVERKCP

84
00:05:44,600 --> 00:05:47,879
at the end of the shot clock. Absurd. And then he was hunting

85
00:05:48,000 --> 00:05:51,959
for those three pointers in the fourth
quarter, and when he hit that second

86
00:05:51,959 --> 00:05:56,759
one, the Clippers never looked back. That was when they took the lead

87
00:05:57,160 --> 00:06:00,000
and took control the ballgame. But
the confidence, I'm wondering how much that

88
00:06:00,040 --> 00:06:03,959
game winning three pointer did for him
against the Golden State Warriors on Saturday,

89
00:06:04,319 --> 00:06:09,879
and just that carryover effect because I
felt like you know that he was brimming

90
00:06:09,879 --> 00:06:14,839
with confidence in the fourth quarter from
distance. I do respect how you didn't

91
00:06:14,879 --> 00:06:17,959
say was something born from back?
I could see what I already did on

92
00:06:18,000 --> 00:06:23,360
Saturday. You mean I already did
on Saturday. I tweeted at you,

93
00:06:23,759 --> 00:06:26,759
was something born out of this victory? How can you deny it? Chuck?

94
00:06:26,800 --> 00:06:30,800
After what happened tonight, the Clipper
first of all, the Clippers pad

95
00:06:30,839 --> 00:06:33,920
account is all three of us.
It's not just me, No, you're

96
00:06:34,000 --> 00:06:40,560
I don't think you're totally wrong.
I think a part of you is correct

97
00:06:40,560 --> 00:06:45,399
in that. It was nice to
see the confidence from Paul George lift the

98
00:06:45,439 --> 00:06:47,000
rest of the team because that,
you know, the Clippers do go as

99
00:06:47,040 --> 00:06:50,120
far as two of the three goes, as much we want to get into,

100
00:06:50,680 --> 00:06:56,120
you know, the stay in wars
between you know, Hard and Westbrook.

101
00:06:56,240 --> 00:06:59,199
The team goes as far as Paul
George and Kawhi Leonard takes them.

102
00:07:00,439 --> 00:07:04,439
So when you see Paul George's confidence
lift the rest of the team, it

103
00:07:04,519 --> 00:07:09,399
makes you happy. There was some
points in the game where we were working

104
00:07:09,439 --> 00:07:13,199
a little too hard for shots for
the two made guys. I think that's

105
00:07:13,199 --> 00:07:16,800
going to get ironed out. But
you're right, something was potentially bored out

106
00:07:16,839 --> 00:07:21,399
of that three from Paul George.
I love how they responded after being down

107
00:07:21,480 --> 00:07:28,000
with some days off and rest and
whatnot. So here's to the thing being

108
00:07:28,040 --> 00:07:30,920
bored growing up, I guess will
be the best thing I could say off

109
00:07:30,959 --> 00:07:36,199
of that. I'm a big kid, no hug on yet. All right,

110
00:07:36,240 --> 00:07:40,600
all right, they need to win
in Utah, another place they have

111
00:07:40,680 --> 00:07:46,639
struggled, but Kawhi Leonard quietly now
over the last couple of fourth quarters.

112
00:07:46,680 --> 00:07:50,839
He was four for four in the
fourth on Saturday, and he was three

113
00:07:50,959 --> 00:07:56,720
for five in the fourth tonight with
some big shots over Jamal Murray. It's

114
00:07:56,800 --> 00:08:00,839
been one of those things that Clippers
fans have been a little bit irked by

115
00:08:01,000 --> 00:08:03,439
just Kawhi Leonard not closing well enough. The last couple of games. He's

116
00:08:03,480 --> 00:08:07,040
been awesome. Yeah, I mean, I think I talked about it that

117
00:08:07,040 --> 00:08:11,319
after one game when I was on
here where it was just like he's going

118
00:08:11,360 --> 00:08:15,800
to figure it out. It was
fine. He made eight shots to night,

119
00:08:15,920 --> 00:08:20,240
three of them in the fourth quarter. Kawhi, even when he's still

120
00:08:20,360 --> 00:08:22,600
ramping up. You know, I'm
not going to pretend like he's had a

121
00:08:22,680 --> 00:08:28,519
consistent stretch of games and where he's
been elite the whole time. Is still

122
00:08:28,959 --> 00:08:33,279
a top fifteen player in this league. We have been spoiled, I would

123
00:08:33,279 --> 00:08:35,440
say, with how many games in
a row of Paul George and Kawhi we

124
00:08:35,559 --> 00:08:39,840
have got. But we're lucky that
he's ramping up right now. I think

125
00:08:39,879 --> 00:08:43,200
everything is going to come into play
what it really needs to. I wish

126
00:08:43,279 --> 00:08:46,480
that they were better than five hundred
obviously with this ramp up schedule, but

127
00:08:48,120 --> 00:08:52,000
there was never any real reason to
be concerned about Kawhi. Yeah, it's

128
00:08:52,000 --> 00:08:56,799
just steady as she goes with Kawhi. Clippers win one eleven to one two

129
00:08:58,120 --> 00:09:03,879
here at Crypto dot Com Arena over
the Denver Nuggets. Finally you can relax,

130
00:09:03,000 --> 00:09:07,159
take a deep breath. They not
just beat the Nuggets, they beat

131
00:09:07,240 --> 00:09:11,279
now the defending champions tonight, and
they were fully loaded. I think we'll

132
00:09:11,279 --> 00:09:16,240
have a fully loaded podcast tomorrow night
with clips and dip. Chuck. We'll

133
00:09:16,240 --> 00:09:18,600
talk to you then on the YouTube, my friend. Thanks for doing this

134
00:09:18,639 --> 00:09:22,279
tonight. Hey, thanks for having
me happy. I can come on after

135
00:09:22,320 --> 00:09:26,120
a win. Yeah, well,
is that a shot at Will? Okay,

136
00:09:26,200 --> 00:09:28,600
I'm gonna take that as a shot
out. No, no, no,

137
00:09:28,600 --> 00:09:31,480
no, come on. Will thought
he had it in his contract that

138
00:09:31,559 --> 00:09:35,120
whenever the Clippers win he gets to
come on. When after the Clippers lose,

139
00:09:35,240 --> 00:09:39,039
you have to come on and explain
it. So that's rough for you.

140
00:09:39,159 --> 00:09:41,720
I hope you get paid, you
know, hazard payer or something like

141
00:09:41,759 --> 00:09:43,799
that. All right, Chuck,
thanks for doing this tonight,
