Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Night Show.
As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Friday, the fifteenth of September. Here
of our Lord, twenty twenty three. Well, today we're going to take
a short break from politics and we're going to talk about the implications of technology.
But actually technology has now become political, hasn't it. It has now
become a political weapon. Of course, technology is just a tool, but
it depends on who wields it and for what purpose. And so we're going
to take a look at some of the tools that they're creating. We can
imagine how it can be abused and based on who is creating it and who
will control it, and get a glimpse as to where these people are going.
We've always misunder estimate, as Bush would say, the evil and men's
hearts and the technology and their hands will be right back. Well, we'll
begin when the example of what is happening as artificial intelligence is taking over journalism
if you will, for profit. This is one of the reasons this is
being put in and we had an amazing example of this and unfortunately it was
part of an obituary. So this is not to make fun of the person
who died, Brandon Hunter, the former professional basketball player, but it's to
show what artificial intelligence is doing. As you have Microsoft turning over their sports
section to AI, and I just want you to remember that it was Microsoft
they came out with news Guard, right, they're gonna guard us against disinformation,
misinformation. You know, it's going to be very truthy. And then
of course they also came out with Election Guard. Election Guard is operated on
a ten million dollar grant from DARPA. So you have the intelligence community,
the Pentagon running our elections. If you hadn't noticed by now, but it
is so in order to I'm wondering how NewsGuard is going to rate this Microsoft
site. It's actually called race track. But of course there's no human identified
in this. The byeline says a story is by editor. Just call him
ed for short, I guess. And so here's the title about the death
of Brandon Hunter. Brandon Hunter useless at forty two. What now they took
this down, but of course you can always find the archive of these things.
And that's why they're going to take down the Internet archive. They want
a memory hole everything. I'll just read it where he's very brief here,
former NBA participant participant Brandon Hunter, who beforehand performed for the Boston Celtics and
for Orlando Magic, has handed away, handed away. I guess it meant
passed away right on the age of forty two. I mean the English is
just it's like a non English speaking person. I remember years ago Karen's brother
as an artist, and he would participate in photoshop contests and stuff like this,
very very creative stuff that was done. And this is about a decade
ago. Actually it's even longer than that, so maybe about fifteen twenty years
ago, and it would never be allowed today, but they would have different
themes and they would have people do joke photoshop stuff, and one of the
themes that they did over and over again was English. You know when you
get these instructions for some things made in China and they don't quite get the
instructions correct. And that's what this reminds me of the one I'll never forget
what somebody made a tombstone or so it said, many saddenings for this extinguished
gentleman. And that's the way this thing reads. So he was handed away
on the age of forty two, as introduced by Ohio Males basketball coach M.
A. L. E. S. Jeff Bowls on Tuesday. Hunter
initially a extremely regarded high school basketball participant and again a highly regarded, not
an extremely, not an extremely, but a extremely highly regarded. They high
school is one word that they put in there, not two words. He
achieved vital success as a ahead for the Bobcats. They're trying to get out.
Well, we'll show you what the original one was that it copied,
because that's another key part of this. Not only is the corporations don't really
care about anything. You know, here's Microsoft that created news Guard. They
don't care about any of that stuff. And they also don't care about plagiarism.
Because this is what this is is outright theft and all that artificial intelligence
did. It told a story and it sprinkled it's misconceptions about the English language
throughout it. He earned three first team All MAC Convention alternatives and led the
alternatives and led the NCUBA in rebounding throughout a senior season. Hunter's expertise led
to his choice because the fifty sixth General decide within the two three NBA draft.
Throughout his NBA profession, he performed in sixty seven video games over two
seasons and achieved a career high of seventeen factors. Seventeen factors and a recreation
and opposition to Milwaukee Bucks in two thousand and four. Well, so what
did this originally come from? Not only is it incredibly stupid sloppy work,
but it's actually plagiarism Microsoft's ms N news portal for sports racetrack Uh huh yeah,
kind of like a warp speed version of the news a garbled, seemingly
AI generated article yeah right, that derided Hunter as useless in his headline.
One person said AI should not be writing obituaries. Pay your writers, MSN,
and one person said the most dystopian part of this is that AI,
which replaces us, will be as obtuse and stupid as this translation. Yeah,
maybe AI should stand for autonomous idiocracy. And but for the money men,
they said, they don't care. It's enough. It's enough to have
something like this just to put the content out, and Futurism comments and says
it's not the first time that Microsoft, a major backer of chat, GBT
and open AI, has embarrassed itself. Where AI generated content on MSN,
it made headlines last month after publishing a similarly incoherent AI generated travel guide for
Ottawa, Canada that bizarrely recommended that tourists visit a local food bank, and
then they deleted that article as well. The article was not published by an
unsupervised AI, said the senior director at Microsoft at the time. In this
case, the content was generated through a combination of algorithmic techniques with human review.
Really, well, it's hard to believe that a human would not see
something like that. The full story is that back in twenty twenty, MSN
fired the team of human journalists responsible for vetting content published on its plindform.
As a result, as Futurism reported last year, the platform ended up syndicating
a large number of sloppy articles about topics as dubious as bigfoot and mermaids,
which is then deleted after we pointed them out on their about us page.
It ensures the content that we show aligns with our values through human oversight.
Futurism said that strains credibility take the original publisher of the piece on Hunter's death,
a publication going by the name of Racetrack. Red flags abound, starting
with the fact that its articles are bylined simply by the anonymous editor, and
despite having almost one hundred thousand followers on Facebook, the site's content gets almost
zero engagement. There probably just people going for a laugh. One particularly ridiculous
article profiles a quote Corridor of Fame. See, it's been told it's gonna
copy this stuff from other people and plagiarize it, but it's got to make
a few changes. So instead of calling it a Hall of Fame, it
calls it a Corridor of Fame. And so in this article about Corridor of
Fame, they profiled a football player that they called Pleasure Taylor, which is
actually the NFL Hall of Famer Joy Taylor. So you change hall to corridor,
and you change Joy to Pleasure. That makes perfectly good sense. You
know, we went to China, what was it about fifteen sixteen years ago,
I don't know, but you know, we went there to adopt our
daughter. They had you know, piracies and aim of the game there and
plagiarism and copyright stuff, and I actually had to I bought this thing.
I thought it was so hilarious they had. It was a pair of pants
for a little girl, and it had Mickey and Disney on there, you
know, so it's clearly a copyright violation. And they called it the Disney
Bird Sanctuary was what it was supposed to be about. But you know,
it's an excuse for you to buy some merchandise with Mickey and Miny on it.
And whoever put that stuff on there for them in English had a wicked
sense of humor because underneath the Disney Bird Sanctuary it put they put a manifestation
of ignorance and greed. And that's what this is. Uh. Microsoft and
their racetrack articles are manifestation of ignorance and greed. Upon closer examination, the
articles aren't just divisibly low quality, but they're also play drives. Take the
about Hunter's death. It follows the exact same structure as a TMZ sports story
about his death. Here's the first line of TMZ's right up, they say
former Boston Celtics and our Celtics. I guess it is. And that's the
other thing too, You never know exactly had a kind of Americanized way to
say it, or did you say it the way that the other people do
in the native way? Anyway, the Boston team, the Orlando team player
Brandon Hunter has died, Ohio men's basketball coach Jeff boll said Tuesday, he
was just forty two years old. Now, this is the way as it
went through and made some crucial changes so that it didn't look like plagiarism.
Former NBA participant, right, instead of player Brandon Hunter, who beforehand performed
for the Boston Celtics and Orlando Magic has handed away again not passed away,
but they had said died on the age of forty two, as introduced by
Ohio Males basketball coach Jeff Bowls on Tuesday, instead of Ohio men's basketball coach
Males a basketball coach. And then here's the next two paragraphs the TMZ story.
Hunter, a standout high school hoops player in Cincinnati, was a star
forward for the Bobcats, earning three first team All MAC Conference or MC Conference
selections and leading the NCAA and rebounding his senior year before being taken with a
fifty sixth overall pick in the two thousand and three NBA draft. He played
sixty seven games over two seasons in the association, scoring a career high seventeen
points against the Milwaukee Bucks in two thousand and four. But then when you
run it through the autonomous cityocracy machine, it comes out Hunter initially a extremely
regarded high school student, in other words, instead of a standout high school
hoops players good ball participant in Cincinnati. So he was a standout high school
hoops player in Cincinnati, achieved vital success as a ahead for the Bobcats.
They say was a star forward. I guess that's what ahead, right,
They say Afford they translated as adad, and then they say he earned three
first team All MC Convention alternatives, which they just copied directly, and then
led the NC Double A in rebounding throughout his senior season. Hunter's expertise led
to his choice because the fifty sixth general decide within the two thousand three NBA
Draft, which means that before being taken as a fifty sixth overall pick.
Yeah, just it's when you think about this, think about intelligence involved here,
and this is a perfect illustration of what people have been saying. It's
just kind of like, you know, grabbing the stuff in and rehashing it,
plagiarizing it and reorganizing it and then changing words that are synonyms, but
within the has no sense of the overall context in which these words are used,
so instead of a forward, I say and ahead. Instead of men,
I say males. Right, except it comes into total gibberish, they
said everywhere else we looked on other racetrack articles on MSN clearly ripped off from
other publishers. The pleasure tailor item is evidently mangled version of a blob by
cold War cold Wire. Rather, a story about potholes in the UK is
a butchered version of a piece and autocar, and a post about tennis star
Novak Djokovic is lifted from Tennis World. So again that's one aspect of it.
But you know what neither the human nor the AI will talk about or
investigate is why he died suddenly? Dude, that's the elephant in the room
as well. And we can get distracted with this fake stuff out there,
but they don't want to ask why he died suddenly? Why so many athletes
are dying suddenly who don't realize that Trump's shot has damaged their heart like a
major heart attack. And so we have artificial intelligence, So how's it going
to be used? Well, the IRS says it's going to use it to
bust tax cheaters. Oh, isn't that a pleasant thought, as if the
irs we're not insolent and enough and apathetic enough and coming up with nonsense over
and over again to come the mind numbing the way they take your tax return
and they essentially changed into something like artificial intelligence does in the first place.
And now they're going to have of the AI do a deep dive on people's
tax returns, all these imagined in fractions that they're going to find. And
that's a big part of it. You know, it's not just the army
of people, eighty thousand new I R S agents, but it's also the
fact that you know, Biden wanted eighty billion dollars, which is I think
like something like seven times what the current what the current entire budget of the
I R S is. This increase it with an amount that is seven times
what the current budget is, make it eight times bigger. The Republicans,
being small government people themselves, I said, no, will only make it
five times bigger, and patted them on themselves on the back for that.
Well, given an increase that is five times bigger, so it'll be six
times as big as it is instead of eight times. That's your difference between
Democrats and Republicans. And so when this is looked at in this article by
Maggie Harrison, she's not concerned about this. She actually kind of is excited.
Oh, these really super rich people are finally going to get their come
up. It's right. She has no understanding of the way this whole thing
is set up, and no understanding of the history of the income tax code.
The income tax when it was first came out, it was about income.
It wasn't about work, it wasn't about wages. It was about income.
It was about investments only, and it was targeting the one percent of
the one percent only. And then at World War Two, they said,
well, we're gonna put it, make it a temporary wage tax for the
duration of the war. And at the end of the war they didn't take
it away. Instead of what they did was they started putting out on their
annual instruction sheet that they would mail to you, so thank you for voluntarily
participating in this thing. If you don't voluntarily aticipate in it, they send
the men with guns at you. Right, So the whole thing has been
and as we all know, they come after everybody at every level. And
that's the way these government programs metastasized. But she doesn't think that's going to
happen with this, No, not at all. You thought AI was only
being used to eliminate the jobs of the working class. Will sounds like maybe
it's going to be used against the wealthy for a change. There we go.
Yeah, that envy. They can always use envy to push their socialism
in their Marxism and a Monday press release, the IRS announced that part of
the renewed effort to ensure fairness and to crack down on the filthy rich cheaters.
Right, and that's the headline that she has here. IRS says it's
using AI to bust zillionaire tax cheats and the subtitle is honestly go off IRS
and otherwords, go for it. Yeah, I want to see these rich
people squirm less. You're worried about the tech being aimed at the poor,
he said. The release says this is what the IRS and the government says.
You can trust this quote the groundbreaking collaboration among experts and data science and
tax enforcement. We'll focus primarily on taxpayers with annual income of over a million
dollars and more than two hundred fifty thousand dollars in tax debt in addition to
large corporate bodies. Well, isn't that nice. So instead of artificial intelligence,
it goes out and plagiarizes articles that have been written by somebody else,
traditional journalism that's gone out and repackaged government press releases and press releases from other
people. I'm serious. I used to write the press releases for the Libertarian
Party back in the early nineties and was involved with the campaigns of some of
the candidates, and we'd put the stuff out. If it was ever picked
up by the press, they would pick it up and they would never call
us. You know, we would make statements about what was happening. You
know, this taxes has this history, and it's this big and it's equoted
to that. You know, we'd make all kinds of statements like that,
and they would never call us to question us about any of this stuff or
to verify any of the details that we were expecting they would. Instead,
they would print it or they wouldn't, and if they did print it,
they would just plagiarize it. And that's what she did with this IRS press
release. She repackages that into an article and wraps her envy around it.
It's what she did, the IRS will open examinations of quote, seventy five
of the largest partnerships in the US unquote, and according to the IRS,
she says again, she's just quoting the IRS. She's it's no wonder that
suits in the corporate office. It's like, we can get rid of these
people. I can find ai that can regurgitate press releases from the government.
If that's the way we're going to write stories right on average, cording to
the IRS, these partnerships retain more than ten billion dollars in assets. Okay,
So here's a question for her. You believe this, you believe the
story that the IRS is giving you. So let me just ask you this.
If they're going to go after seventy five of the largest partnerships in the
US, why do they need artificial intelligence? You know, why do they
need so much computing power? Why do they need so many people? Well,
here's the answer, lady, Because it isn't about the rich, you
know, the the zillionaires, as you put it, it's about all of
us. This is going to be used against Americans. They need all of
these people, and they need all this artificial intelligence because they've got a lot
of tax returns to look at, and they've got a lot of money to
steal. Another example the plagiarism of AI. The A V clubs AI generated
articles are copying directly from IMDb. It was a site, the AV Club,
and they said, it used to be a bench I've never noticed this
before. It used to be a benchmark for pop culture writing on the net.
Now it is a private equity ghost town pumping out AI generated listicals instead
of articles listicals. The company that bought it, Go Media. With the
fallout, the Go editorial director Merril Brown sent out an internal memo instructing staff
to ignore the criticism. Was this a memo that was sent to artificial intelligence?
By the way, don't just ignore this criticism. Don't bring it back
into some of your articles. To calibrate your expectations. They said, here's
a disclaimer that the company's articles by the AV Club bought. They even say
quote this article is based on data from IMDb, the Internet Movie database.
Quote text was compiled by an AI engine that was then reviewed and edited by
the editorial staff. These stories were produced with the help of an AI engine.
In other words, they admit that it was copied directly from IMDb,
and it wasn't. I won't give you any examples of this, there's plenty
of them in this article. But the actuality is is that they didn't you
begin with that information, they didn't add anything to it. They didn't even
rewrite it in this particular case, like microsofted when they turned it into English,
they just put it back out exactly as it was, which brings us
to the alien mummies in Mexico. When I saw that, I thought it
was hilarious. I said, look at this, it looks just like ET.
How could that be? You did Steven Spielberg know something even to the
You know, ET had three very long fingers, if you remember, and
a thumb. This one had a thumb and two very long fingers. I
guess it was too difficult for them to make that third finger. But this
is something that was a dog and pony show for the Mexican Congress. But
I think it's a perfect metaphor for both the artificial intelligence and the UFO stuff
that is floating around now in the media. Really is I think, and
these people who have been doing you know, they I don't know if this
guy was purposely trolling. He's done this type of thing before. I don't
know if he was purposely trolling the people in Washington, the UFO people in
Washington, but if he wasn't doing it on purpose, he sure did a
great job inadvertently. And they were very upset about this. And I said,
oh, look, he's discrediting what we're doing here. No, he's
showing what you're doing here. You were just a little smarter. You didn't
produce a model. He said, well, you know, I gotta tell
you we found bodies, but I can't tell anything else about it now.
He actually produced a little a little literally produced a couple of little bodies that
looked like ET and came up with some stories about DNA testing and things like
that. But he's been caught doing fraud before. But again, he was
allowed to do this with a Mexican Congress. And I am just imagining that
Senator John Kennedy from LA just can't wait for this guy to come on to
his committee. And because he's always doing stuff like this or Jim Jordan,
you know, he's getting a lot of attention for this if he hasn't come
on. These are non human beings, are not part of our terrestrial evolution.
They had said. Former Navy US Navy fighter pilot Ryan Graves, who's
been pushing the UFO stuff, said, this is a huge step backwards for
this issue. Yeah, they've done a great deal to try to make this
look serious, even calling it UAP instead of UFO, because now it's very
different. Right if you talk about UFOs, this type of thing we just
saw with the Mexican Congress is typically what people want, so they got to
rebrand it, relabel it, and this guy's stunt has set them back truly
has Well, we're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back.
You're listening to the David Night Show. But I want to continue a little
bit longer with a tech stuff. And by the way, in the third
hour, we'll have a doctor Shiva I do who will be joining us,
and he'll be doing a joint stream I think of the program when he joins
us. But again, going back to the new textiles that have been designed
by the National intelligence, the intelligence community, the Director of National Intelligence,
funded by ARPA, which is the intelligence equivalent to DARPA, the Defense Advanced
Research Projects, and of course there's another one about biology and that's BARDA.
So you know, they've got. That's why I say, just as Eisenhower
warned us about the military industrial complex, he also warned us about the research
and academic part of that. You know, people typically drop that off,
but that was the other part of it, and how they were going to
take over all research and weaponize it against us. And this article from Ldren's
Health Defense actually goes into a little bit more detail showing some of the slides
that they were putting out. I think it is interesting that their cover story
is that it's about better health monitoring? Is that what the intelligence agencies are
really about that? I mean it's like, you know, looking at this
Boston Dynamics thing, we look at it, you know what they're doing with
that. But no, it's there to help little old ladies across the street,
right because we just don't have enough boy scouts anymore. So this is
not about better health monitoring. It's a ludicrous cover story. That's not their
mission. And when you look at their slides and pull this up, Travis
and show this slide they have, they talk about integrated audio, video and
jail location sensor systems. There's no biometric sensors in this. Instead, what
you see with their thing, and this is almost, you know, like
a satire smart epants. Perhaps it is a satire, except that they've said
that they've had twenty two million dollars, they've awarded research contracts, and they've
got companies like Nautilus Defense and others. If it wasn't for all of this,
and if it didn't, you know, the fact that it didn't come
out of the Pentagon, I think they're pulling our legs, but actually they're
monitoring our legs and everything else. And they do call it epants and smart
self monitoring and reporting technology smartypants, But they say that it's sensing events and
they're specific about this. Again, I'm assuming that this is true. I
mean, these people have done stranger stuff in the past sixty minutes of verbal
conversation that it can record of a fifty five degree field of view, three
hundred and sixty monochromatic photographs. In terms of looking, so it does listening,
looking, and locating. It doesn't sound to me like it's about health,
does. It sounds like it's something produced by the spat It can do.
It can also do optical character recognition o CR. Reading of twelve point
text and said two minute monochromatic video and then determining location over the course of
one hour without reliance on satellite navigation. SRI International, m I T A
RETA have received undisclosed amounts to develop this technology. And this is from an
article in the intercept, so multiple people have talked about this. It's official
government release. It does sound like a satire, especially with the name Smarty
Pants, but it appears to be real. And what is fake is any
cover story. Smarty Pants program director d Awesome Cagel trace the inspiration for the
program to a desire for better health monitoring options for his diabetic Yeah, talking
about how they're going to put the products into diapers. This is why Judge
and Politano said, CIA wants to get into your pants and to diapers into
mask and I could definitely see that. You know, you want video,
you want audio, and you want to trace people put it in the mask,
even to the extent that other people are looking at. Of course,
this kind of surveillance is something that is being done without people's consent, privacy
and the age of big data and the Internet of things, and we're going
to see a lot of this type of stuff because five G that Trump was
so manic about getting out. If you remember that the only thing that we're
concerned about was not our health, not about surveillance. But it is the
infrastructure for surveillance. And it's one of the reasons why the US government was
so concerned about five G being based on top of Chinese technology and companies and
chips. They want to be control of all the spying in this country,
not the Chinese. So they're spending billions of dollars for this, and of
course who knows how much they're spending because when you look at the Intelligence Agency
CIA, they've got a big black budget. They make lots and lots of
money from selling drugs, from human trafficking, from blackmail and all the rest
of this stuff. I mean, who knows how much money they really have
and you're not going to see any of that. They don't report it on
their IRS tax forms. I think we need to have an electronic Privacy Bill
rights as the bottom line, regardless of what this is or when they're going
to rule it out, according to John Whitehead, and he's exactly right.
He said, most judges don't understand this. Most are either so pro government
or pro police that they're going to do anything to get around it and to
say that it is constitutional, he said. Realistically, there is no way
to escape it. So the only hope that we have, says John Whitehead,
is if enough people will get vigilant for freedom and we can establish some
kind of electronic privacy bill of rights. It will limit what these people can
do or have some real penalties because they don't pay any attention to the Constitution.
But I think it's important if you had an electronic bill of rights,
it would at least identify this for people what the issues are. But there's
no interest at all in Congress. This is going to have to happen,
as John Whitehead pointed out, from the bottom up, from the grassroots,
up from you and I up. He said, education precedes actions. So
I'm telling people to get educated about what's going on and to understand this,
and that is why we covered it. And as all of that is happening,
Wall Street Journal says, well, it's now finally time to add some
smart tech to your dumb home. Really yeah, you see, smart technology
is for dumb people, not for dumb homes, but for people. Smart
lights, smart locks, smart thermostats are ready for primetime. Thanks to a
new era is about that err o r of cooperation among tech giants and a
new software standard they're cooperating. The new standard is called matter matter, the
matter of the universe, the matter of their of their their artificial universe that
they are creating. Well, you might want to think twice about that if
you look at what happened in Las Vegas this last week. Over a dozen
MGM hotels and casino properties have halted their back end computer systems due to an
ongoing and severe cyber attack that was initially reported on Sunday, But it's much
much bigger than that. Nothing is working in these hotels. Guests are if
they can check in, and people are still trying to check in. With
all this chaos that's going on, You've got guests who are already there who
are locked out of their room because everything has been smartified. We've been smartified
and everything under computer control. So when somebody hacks in and takes this system
over, oh, they own everything. And so, as Wall Street journalist
say, it, now is the time. Now go out and buy those
smart appliances and all that, you know, the ring camera, so the
government can constantly watch you and all the rest of this stuff. Now is
it time to get all that stuff. So every single subsystem with MGM hotels
and casinos, every single substance system, their payments were offline. And I
didn't realize just how many hotels are owned by MGM. I knew about the
big green one that's there, and because we were there once. We used
to go to Vegas for business conventions and stuff like that. Back when we
had the videos stores. It was it was hardy. So we must be
pretty low down on the list because the convention every year was in August.
Go to Vegas for an August but the heat. But computer systems at all
MGM properties have been shut down for the immediate future until this issue is resolved.
The gaming tables are not working, the slot machines are not working,
the ATMs are not working, the doors are not working on the motel rooms,
so restaurants are cash only. See when the system goes down, and
this is one of the reasons I'm talking about this. I don't really care
about the casinos and Vegas and you probably don't either, but when the system
goes down, and it will go down. I mean, when you look
at this, it's going to be an act of war. Whether it's from
the outside or whether it's an inside job. They are going to take down
this the digital infrastructure that we have because you look at how dependent everybody is
on it. Right now, it's being done for ransomware by criminals, but
once the state actors start getting involved in this, it's going to be really
big. You don't necessarily even have to have an EMP to do that kind
of damage, and if it's done by state actor, they're not interested in
restoring anything if they get the money back. MGM's hotels where the Aria,
the Cosmo, the Bellagio, the MGM and the Mandalay Bay, they have
all of those and they are all shut down. At the MGM Grand eighty
percent of slot machines were down because of a network era. We can spell
it there as er A instead of R R O R many reports of a
ransomware attack. One person says, I wonder how long they can hold out
before they pay. Commenting on this, another one says, it's chaos at
MGM. Ordinary keys are opening all rooms as if they were master keys.
The first they get locked out, then now the keys work and they work
on everybody's room. But look for the homeowner. The big threat is government
and they maybe eventually robbers, you know, maybe somebody's really really wealthy.
The robbers will work on their smart stuff to get in. But anyway,
they still have long, long lines for people trying to check in, which
is really amazing. No matter how many times you can see these types of
problems. And that's why it's so difficult to get people to care about surveillance
and what the government is doing is because even when you see it breaking down,
people still want to believe in this system. And so they want to
believe in this so badly that they're still checking in to the Vegas hotels and
they can't check him back this computer sit down where they think they're going to
do when they get in. It's clear published reports have only scratched the surface.
Reported at ten point seven million people affected, and sources say that the
data breach actually contained records of two hundred million people, financial records apparently of
people who had bought stuff. They now have that. So that's the MGM
hotels in Vegas. Toyota. Toyota production grinds to a halt due to an
epic IT failure or was it a hack? It's hard to tell. You
know, they may have tried to cover this up because they don't want to
make it look like their fair game and that they had to pay blackmail.
But their story about how this happened doesn't really help them too much. Their
story about what happened, if true, if it wasn't a hack, if
it was what Toyota says happened with their supply lines, that's even more ridiculous,
even more incompetent. One of the world leading automakers recently had to suspend
operations in twelve of its fourteen Japan based factories due to a massive IT failure,
resulting in daily production loss of approximately thirteen thousand cars per day. So
twelve out of fourteen shut down. So again, when we look at this,
when are foreign hackers going to attack our infrastructure or when will it be
something like this? They said, this happened because of planned maintenance. They
said, the company has confirmed that the root caused the problem was its database
servers running out of storage space. Seriously, you didn't see that happening,
and they said that because it was based on that. They said, we
would like to reiterate that this system malfunction was not due to a cyber attack.
It was due to our overwhelming stupidity. The malfunction, they said,
had a domino effect on the production ordering system, rendering it incapable of planning
and executing any production tasks. Then what exacerbated the situation was that both the
main and the backup servers operated on the same system. Oh okay, well
then it's not a backup, is it. They're not infinitive each other,
and they ran out of this space. Yeah, that doesn't really help,
does it. And then finally, when you take a look at where these
people want to go, they want to hack not just our homes and our
cars or factories or infrastructure, they want to hack our bodies. And that
is the key thing. And so this is a c net article that there's
a couple of months ago they were talking about bionic eyes and the subtitle of
it was we could be able to manipulate our own reality, you know,
so let's have some bionic eyes, and they talk about two different ways that
they would do it. Now, of course, neuralink is looking at this
and saying, well, if we can hack into your brain, then what
we can do is we can put give you some visor that you wear,
and then that can transmit this information to your brain. But then, of
course that means the Neuralink's approach to get into your brain, they actually have
to open up your head, your skull and put this chip literally on top
of your brain. These people have a different approach. Instead of opening up
your brain, they want to open up your eye and put a chip in
your eye. And so they call this the science eye. They said,
it'll be implanted on top of your eye, or inside and or inside the
eyeballs of human patients who are suffering from diseases. One of the reasons that
they talked about this liked it so much, was because it involves a couple
of different things. It involves this neuralink type of technology and electronics along with
some genetic modification of you. Isn't that great? Isn't technology wonderful? As
I said, they shot off a brief demo to these reporters of a kind
of vision that someone with science I might have, and it was just kind
of red pixels dancing around a screen, a view of a street and of
humans waving their hands. And they said, so to make sense of this,
we first need to deliver a gene to a specific region of the eye
and demonstrate that it can generate electrical signals and regions of the brain responsible for
controlling sight. And then to explain their idea of the eye, the writers
of this scenet articles say, your eye and your brain are involved in a
frantic dance enlivened by a storm of light and electrical signals. Isn't that nice?
It's some science for arts and lovers, you know, poets, very
poetic. This dance has been honed by millions of years of evolution. What
absolute nonsense, I mean, how can you look at something so detailed as
the human brain and the human eye? Even Darwin with his crude primitive understanding
and his crude primitive tools. You know, remember when we went to the
British Museum, Travis, and we went to the Darwin exhibit, and they
had a shrine, a little shrine to Darwin. And he didn't even have
a good microscope. He had like a you know, Sherlock Holmes magnifying glass
that he's looking at stuff with. It's like, no wonder. He thought
that life was spontaneously generating out of ponts, out of stagnant water. All
he had was this little microscope. He had very primitive tools, and he
had a very primitive understanding. But even Darwin referred to the eye and he
said that that's complicated enough without really understanding all the inner workings of the eye
like we do today. He said, that is so complicated, hard for
that to evolve. He thought that was a real problem with this theory of
evolution. But these people have swallowed a whole They don't think it's a problem
at all. And so, you know, they talk about the fact they
have these different cells which are shaped like rods and cones. They contain molecules
known as opsins, and this is something it took me for a very long
time to understand. I had a seventh grade science teacher, and you know,
they she was how do I describe I won't go into that. It's
but she was very, very proud of what she did, and she taught
an advanced science class. And I got put into that because when I was
in elementarys. At elementary school, I was all about science. I was
trying to get everything i could. I'm right off to the Oak Ridge Nuclear
Labs and everything out, all these different things, getting my sisters science books,
from college and stuff and reading through them, and my teachers in fifth
and sixth grade thought that was something they should put me in the advanced science
class. And she got me completely out of science. She turned me off
at science completely. And one of the first things that happened, and it
was a real surprising thing, she said, you know so, And she
was coming at this as an ardent evolutionist, so we kept hitting heads with
it because I was an ardent creationist. And it took me a while to
really understand why she said what she did. She asked people, She said,
so, why do nocturnal animals see better at night than they do in
the day, or see so well at night? And I knew because I
had read my sister's textbooks about you know, what is in the eye,
the rods and the cones, and how our eyes are different from animals,
especially nocturnal animals. And I said, well, they have more rods than
they do cones, and and she said, what what are you talking about?
You know, and just did her best to try to humiliate me in
front of the class. Her answer, which I couldn't even understand the circular
logic of it, Her answer was they see better at night because they come
out at night. That was her evolutionary mindset. You see, the fact
that they wanted to go out at night meant that they generated eyes that could
see at night. Wow. Yeah, After first I thought it was the
dumbest answer I could ever see. And then as I got older, I
started to understand where she was coming from, and it got even dumber,
you know, because you if you understand the details of this, you see
the creator again. Like I said, even Darwin said it was a black
box. He didn't know anything about rods and cones. Now we have a
situation. The cones allow you to see things in greater detail, and they
allow you to see color. The rods are typically not focused on color,
they're not focused on detail, but they do movement better. And so we
have and they talk about this because they're using in their experiments, they're using
eyes from rabbits. And they said, well, in the rabbit's eyes,
the cones that they have or in a few strips here and there, whereas
for our eyes, the cones are in a pit that is directly behind the
center of the eye. So when you look directly on something, you're going
to see it in detail. You know, we pick up movement from the
side because we have cones on the side. And it's one of the reasons
why when you are, you know, out and it's low light conditions,
you don't want to try to look directly at whatever it is. You want
to look off to the side a little bit and you can see it a
little bit better. Anyway, Yeah, because she was an eolutionist, it
was determined by what you know. They could see better at night because they
wanted to see better at night. They could see better at night because they
went out at night, and because they went out at night, somehow their
eyes just changed like that, completely dismissing the detail of it, the amazing
detail of it. Look, the best scientists, Christian scientists, people like
Francis Bacon, people like Isaac Newton, people like John Clerk Maxwell, they
saw themselves, as they saw science, as discovering what God had done,
the great engineer, the great designer, the great scientist. They were looking
for the intelligence in it. And in one of the reasons that we have
evolved as a society is because we don't want to see that intelligence, and
so we become fools and genetic diseases. They said abnormalities and the photoreceptor in
the retina lead to their death. And so what they're trying to do is
too they said, but you know, you still have the processing ability of
the brain. Of course, you know the brain just happened as well as
you know, we don't really understand how that happened. And so again trying
to genetically manipulate and get some of these signals there, using electronics to somehow
feed this end of the brain. And that's what they're doing. Different approaches
to it, depending on whether you are taking the Elon Musk approach or the
approach that these people are doing. The vision restoration for early patients will not
be a miraculous return to twenty twenty. Twenty twenty vision not the year twenty
twenty. Don't want to go back there again. If we're going to set
the way Back machine or the or the Deloian, we don't want to go
back to twenty twenty. But it will help them make sense of their world.
The sensation will be a kin to site with much less fidelity in order
to get a higher solution image. Human retina contains more than one hundred million
photoreceptors in each eye, but this will only have maybe about a million,
so one one hundredth of what it has there isn't that interesting? You know?
The amazing design and construction of our eyes, of our brains. You
know, when they try to mimic the human brain, they talk about the
computing capacity. How can it operate so fast? How can it have so
much capacity, so much density and not generate a lot of heat and all
the rest, which is going to be a big issue. I think with
that chip setting directly on your brain, I won't be signing up for that.
I don't know who's going to sign up for that. Anyway, they
continue to just look the other way, just like they look the other way
with DNA, and they go in and start messing with it. Yeah,
they discover this thing and then jump in. And a number of companies are
experimenting with different techniques besides Neural Incol, besides this company. So that's all
we have to look forward to. But the key thing is that, as
this article points out, and seeing that instead of restoring vision, perhaps imagine
a science eye that is implanted in a person who has perfect vision, and
it might stimulate the brain in such a way the person sees specific images or
places that really are not there. It is an idea exemplified by the posters
that line the hallways of Science Core, artwork jokingly referred to as propaganda.
They said they have an abstract piece, so one of them caught my eye.
It's an abstract piece featuring a series of colored nodes in the shape of
brain, and underneath it it reads alter the brain, alter the reality.
You see, this is fundamentally about transhumanism and about virtual reality. The guy
at Science Core who gave his p presentation signed off with see you in the
matrix. So what they're pushing us into his transhumanism virtual reality? And as
you look at this article from Technocracy News scientists re engineer the brain to alter
human addiction and his comment on this article that he published there, He published
it with a comment re engineering the brain to try to alter human behavior has
begun to emerge as a new frontier in medicine, they said. And then
his comment is, beware this knife cuts in both directions. You know,
all technology does. All technology can be used for good or evil. It
depends on who wields it, who controls it, who develops it. And
guess who wields controls and develops technology. Now the military industrial academic complex that
Eisenhower talked about, and that's what we should be concerned about. As they
go through this particular one, they say, well, you know, when
you things that you get addicted to, and it can be a lot of
different things, you know, of course, you know, sex, drinking,
drugs, gambling, pornography. So they all flood the brain with surges
of dopamine, and so people like the way that that makes them feel,
so they do that behavior again. But then what happens is the brain starts
to produce less and less dopamine each time. So that's why you keep pushing
things on and on. It's what Oliver Anthony was trying to explain, and
Joe Rogan kept shutting him down, you know, about pornography, about alcohol,
about all add of all these. Joe Rogan foolishly saying, well,
it happens to some people, that happened to me. Of course, you
know, I can handle this stuff. I can handle you know, sex,
drugs and rock and roll and all. You know, I don't have
a problem with any of that stuff, and you know some people do.
But you know, if you're listening to me, you can probably handle it
as well, Oliver, and he said, no, you know, it
just it it gets you, and then you're looking for something else that's bigger,
you know, whether you're looking for harder drugs or you're looking for harder
pornography or something like that. It's an iterative thing. And so their observation
the scientists said, well, here's a mechanism that we see there. You
know, Parkinson's disease dopamine, which is used not just to produce pleasure,
but you know, it's a it can be used to help the body function.
And so they had identified a gene that produces a protein that encourages dopamine
production. So this guy said, I wonder if, because dopamine is there
with this addiction stuff, if I could use that same approach. And we've
got some animals, some monkeys and stuff like that that we've gotten addicted to
alcohol, evidently sent around listening to the Joe Rogan podcast or something, and
so they're addicted to alcohol. So they gave them this genetic modelification. Their
body produced more dopamine and that stopped their addiction. So what do we have
to be careful about with this? Well, obviously the government or people who
want to control you, Someway or the other corporations, government, you name
it. They could basically use this dopamine as some kind of a Pavlovian response.
Right. You know, we can turn off the dopamine for you,
or we can turn it back on you. Just do what we say.
That type of thing, that's a really dangerous, dangerous thing. And so
as we look at technology, and remember we began with the artificial intelligence writing
actually not writing, but just copying and making stupid substitutions, plagiarizing with stupid
substitutions, an obituary. Now we have senators who are calling for government to
hand out licenses to artificial companies because you know, we've got to control this
stuff. We've got to make sure it's not harmful, especially in elections,
and so we will hand out licenses for this. And you know how this
is going to turn out. It's going to turn out the same way as
big pharmaceutical companies and big agricultural, big Agra, big pharma. It will
be regulatory capture, and they will also capture our elections. Right. They
want to create a new government agency, and this is coming from Josh Holly
and a bunch of Democrats, and it's Josh Holly and the Democrat leaning Susan
Collins in Maine, along with Chris Coon's, Amy Klobuchar, Richard Blumenthal.
And so these people want to create a new government agency to control artificial intelligence
and to license it. The newly minted legislation that has been called Protect Protect
Elections from Deceptive AI Act. And so the question is, when you create
this new bureaucracy, what's going to keep these solons who are set there at
the guardians of truth and elections? What's going to keep them from manipulating elections?
Who watches the watchers? The agual question. You give these people this
kind of control over artificial intelligence, and the corporations become the deputized state for
election control and propaganda and the rest of this stuff. We know that's what's
going to happen. They say that the legislation maintains safeguards for satire, parody
and news broadcasts. Oh really, it'll be shut It'll be used to shut
down any news, any opinions, and it will push out its own propaganda.
We know exactly what is going to happen with this. They will require
government licensing for firms that develop artificial technologies, and they will be regulated quote
unquote, just like the FDA regulates Fizer MODERNA. That's the really scary thing
about this, one last thing, rise of the robo umps, robotic umpires.
This is something's happening in minor league baseball. They don't want to talk
about it, but some people have noticed what is happening. And I think
it's an interesting metaphor for what the government wants to do with artificial intelligence,
because they do want to make artificial intelligence the umpires for everything. AI will
be the umpire for your speech, AI will be the umpire for your conduct.
AI will be the umpire for a religion and for politics. Is that
a Minor League Baseball's Triple A level. An experiment took place this year that
Major League Baseball apparently doesn't want reporters writing about. And the key question is
why not Major League Baseball has tested an automated ball strike calling system. Yeah,
the AI is going to call the balls and strikes in this game,
but they want the AI to call the balls and strikes and everything. So
I said, this season at all thirty ballparks and Triple A Minor league baseball's
highest level in most weeks. During the season, fifteen of those ballparks hosted
six game series. In the first three games, the ABS, the automated
Ball Strike system, supposedly determined balls and strikes, with the home plate umpire
receiving the Hawkeye tracking system's rulings via a tiny earpiece and relaying them to everyone
in the stadium via traditional hand signals. The whole idea of ABS, they
said, is that a fan would not even notice that it was being used.
Do you understand this is how they maintained the pretense of human control.
That would just have this human down there with feeding him the stuff in his
ear, the same way they've been running the news media too, right,
I think a broadcast news Holly Hunter and I can't remember the actor's name,
a great film. It really enjoyed that before I got into the business.
I thought it was a great film. It kind of even better after I
got into the business. But you know, somebody feeding them information instead of
them. You know, it's not enough that they got a teleprompter, but
they're also feeding them information. Look, that's it, and it's going to
be the pretense. They'll have a pretense of human control. Just as we
began this and said, you know they've got we got human editors who are
looking at this stuff. No, you don't. No, this is obvious
that the AI is just copying it and making really stupid substitutions to make it
look like it's not just pure plagiarism. So that is what we have to
look forward too. Well, when we come back, we're going to talk
about immigration and id we'll be right back making sense common again. You're listening
to the David Night Show. We just saw this comment on Rock Fan from
Audie m R r R and Modern Retro Radio. Thank you very much that
it was very generous. He left to tip thank you. I appreciate that
he had a comment about what is happening in New Mexico. So I'm gonna
switch over before we go to immigration and ID S, I'm gonna switch over
to Second Amendment update and his comment the silver lining and New Mexico governors tyrannical
overreach is that she inadvertently woke up her whole state, if not the whole
nation. People are finally starting to remind politicians who they work for. Yes,
absolutely, and that's an Audie with Modern retro Radio, Thank you very
much. I appreciate that. Also on rock Fan, thank you for the
tip, truck driver Ron, I appreciate that, thank you. And on
Rumble, thank you for the tip. Damnage says, if I got hit
with a ransomware attack, I tell the ransomer to just keep the information because
I'm broke. They'd take one look at my bank information, it'd feel bad
for me and just grant my access back. Yeah. Yeah, what we
have to be concerned about is our own government. I think that's the thing
that we need to be concerned about, and we'll talk about that as a
matter of fact in this Second Amendment thing here. But again, mack down,
this is a aw R. Hawkins, who writes on Brybart smacked down.
Temporary restraining order has now been issued against the new Mexico governor's concealed carry
ban. She's getting slapped back by everybody again. You know, the Democrat
mayor, the Democrat district attorney there where she tried to impose these things and
say, well, we're not going to honor even your concealed carry permits,
not gonna let it happen, just arbitrarily, and the absurd idea that's going
to be based on protecting public health. No. Hey, if I can
say that this is about help, I can do whatever I want to.
The police chief there appointed by the Democrat mayor. So the mayor said no,
district attorney said no, the police chief appointed by the mayor, and
so forth this, you know, working for the mayor said no. The
sheriff who's elected there and who has also gotten money from every town, a
big gun control thing run by Bloomberg. Even he said no, even David
Hogg said no. And now the courts have said no. It's gonna blow
back big time. And this is what I think is even more important.
You know, I talked to a guy, Ralphord Jesse has the program Gun
Guy, And I think what's even more important is that by standing up for
our rights in one area, we start to stand out for our rights and
other areas. People are sick and tired of this public health emergency order.
They need to be worried about the other MacGuffins, like the climate, the
other things like that, but you know, they've seen through this and they're
sick of this public Health Executive Order stuff and how broadly it's been used.
And so gun Owners of America one of two organizations you had a national association
for gun rights than Gun Owners of America. Gun Owners of America has secured
a temporary restraining order with their lawsuit the judge right now, the temporary restraining
order is an oral order, so there's no written decision from the judges.
Just no, you can't do that. She's not going to win. And
just let me show you this because as I've said from the very beginning,
I said, you know, she's I think, got a bit of a
Napoleon complex. A lot of these women, do you know, there's something
we talk about somebody who's extremely short, like Napoleon, and they want to
show people whose boss right, so they get really authoritarian. And I've seen
this a lot with these women, especially Democrat women. They democrats have an
authoritarian bent to begin with, but especially the women, and especially a woman
who has as short as she is. I kind of thought that I had
heard somewhere that she was pretty short, and it turns out she's only four
foot ten. Here she is standing next to a police officer who is seven
feet tall. Now, first of all, public health emergency. They're both
wearing masks, so you know, this has taken some time in the last
three years recently. But the police officer there is seven feet tall and she's
four foot ten, so she comes up to about his elbow. Maybe we
need to exile her to Elba with the Napoleon. So we've had The Ninth
Circuit Court has now rebuked lawmakers there in California and granted an injunction against a
California law that wanted to target gun marketing. Gun marketing and what they said
was a California law ostensibly aimed at restricting the marketing of firearms to miners infringes
on the free speech rights of adults, according to a three judge panel on
the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Judge Kennethley ruled that a law forbidding the
marketing and advertising of firearms that quote reasonably appear to be attractive to miners unque
is likely to infringe on the First Amendment, given that the statute is so
broadly written that advertisements aimed at adults who can lawfully purchase a farm would be
swept up in its provisions. So, in other words, they were trying
to kill the First Amendment so they could kill the second Amendment so they could
kill the people who manufacture the weapons. I should say, right, and
he saw through it. He said this. He said, there is no
evidence in the record that a miner in California has ever unlawfully bought a gun,
let alone because of an ad. Kid goes in, we should do
that. You should have just like Christmas story. If Ralphie go in,
yeah, I'm like liked to buy a Red Rider rifle, the real thing.
You know, Sure, kid, what do you want? I think
the alphas would kick him out the door. Norah, has the state produced
any evidence that truthful ads about lawful uses of guns, like an ad about
hunting rifles and junior sports magazines your shooters. They haven't offered any evidence that
that encourages illegal or violent gun use among miners. Simply put, California cannot
lean on gossamers of speculation to weave an evidence free narrative that it's law curbing
the First Amendment. Quote significantly une demands more than good intentions, I'm sorry,
significantly decreases unlawful gun use among miners. The First Amendment demands more than
good intentions and wishful thinking to warrant the government's muzzling of speech. So far,
so good from this decision, but listen to what else he had to
say. He said, the state has many tools at its disposal to address
juvenile crime involving guns, but it quote cannot ban truthful ads about lawful firearm
use among adults and miners unless unless here's that caveat, unless it can show
that such an intrusion in the First Amendment will significantly further the state's interest in
curtailing unlawful and violent use of firearms by miners. So if they produce lies
by somebody like Faucci, for example, you know, you get the firearm
equivalent of Fauci, and you produce a bunch of slick lies, and you've
got a guy who's really slick. Every time you call him out on it,
you know, he pivots and he says, well, you know,
I wasn't talking about public health and group health. That was talking about individual
health. And you know that type of thing like we just saw him.
Do you got somebody who's really good in terms of lying. If you can
show that it's going to work with somebody like Faucci, well then you can
destroy people's natural god given rights, because he puts that unless unless you can
show that an intrusion into the First Amendment will significantly there are the state's interest
and curtailing unlawful violent use of arms by miners. Now here's what the state
was created to do. According to our founding documents, Constitution, decorational independence.
These people swore to uphold. The state was created first and foremost not
to keep us safe, but to keep our God given rights safe, to
protect our individual liberty. It's a big problem. Now, I said,
you know, we'll get to how they're going to some of the danger in
terms of labeling people. Here's a very dangerous thing. A New Jersey city
is going to expand their controversial gunshot detection system where they one million dollar grant.
Oh yeah, that's how it all comes right, yea, just like
we had the public health emergency and Trump was granting everybody money for this and
that. You know, well, here's what FACCI says, and here's the
money to do it. FACI says this, here's the money to do it,
right, Simon says, and Trump pays for it. Well, so
the federal government gives them a million dollars grant in Newark, New Jersey City
Council as approved expanding the city's shot Spotter system. Critics question the value of
the detection system like that, They said it occasionally mistakes car backfires or other
booms for gunshots, saying they can lead to over policing of neighborhoods. Well,
the real issue is that it's kind of like swatting, isn't it.
You know, we're people for a prank. They call up and say,
hey, you know there's a crime going on here, and you know,
they describe the crime in a way they're going to get the swat team called
on that location, and so the police show up with the swat team.
People have been killed on both sides of this thing. It's a very dangerous
thing to flag something that is a serious crime that is happening. And as
they say, the critics say, when spot shot Spotter generates a false alert,
police are deployed to an area and may treat everyone like there as a
suspect shooter, even when no shooting has even taken place, And that's the
real issue now. In response, the company says, these things are ninety
seven percent accurate. But I've seen that. You know, when you look
at speech transcription programs. Ninety seven percent accuracy is garbage. You better be
better than ninety seven percent accurate. Yeah, it's so, you know,
if you look at things like let's just go back to the Boeing seven thirty
seven max. Right, it was nine nine point nine percent accurate in terms
of not crashing. They had eight two hundred flights and only two of them
crash, But you had in each of those two hundred and fifty people lost
their life. But hey, it's rare, you know, and its accuracy
rate is actually pretty high in terms of not failing. You know, it's
non failure rate. And so when you're talking about something like this that could
get people shot because if they hear that there's gunshots going on, and this
is something that is done automated, and they give it to humans who review
this, you know, just like you got human editors and human umpires who
are second guessing the AI on all these different things, and you know,
they look at this and they say, well, yeah, it looks like
that's for real. So these guys go out, locked and loaded, ready
to shoot. They see some kid playing and we you know, this is
not a theory. This has already happened even without it being called in as
a shot by some shot spotter. You please pull up and there's a kid
playing with a toy gun, and they jump out of the car and execute
him because somebody called it in. Do you think they're gonna do if somebody
called in with a shot spotter and kids just walking around. He's got a
stick and he's gonna pew pew pew. Right, And so then that brings
us when we're talking about firearms, brings us to hunter Biden indicted on federal
firearms charge. Isn't that interesting? They went full kin star on this.
I've talked about this for a long time. You kin star. Oh,
this guy is so conservative, you know this, this strong Christian prosecutor that's
out there. We're going to get him on that sleazy Bill Clinton. He's
got all these allegations, credible allegations from many, many women about violent sexual
assault and rape. He's got very very credible allegations about financial crimes and corruption.
And then there's this consensual affair that he's got with Monica Lewinsky and and
that's not a crime, but they found that he committed perjury when he was
talking about that so we'll go after him for perjury. We'll forget all the
rapes and violence, sexual assault, We'll forget massive corruption and criminal actions done
by the Clintons. No, Ken Star said, I'm going to take a
look at that perjury that he committed lying under oath. Same thing is happening
here. The Biden administration needs to be seen to be doing something, and
so you know, they by coming after him with these gun charges, they
can stay away from any of these this financial corruption that would implicate the big
guy. The big guy and that level of corruption. So this is actually
the safe thing for them to do. I remember this is a federal charge,
so his papa could could excuse him for any of this stuff. Maybe
he won't because I think one aspect of this may be one of the advantages
for Biden is that mister gun control Joe Biden could be seen by the Democrats.
Yeah, I'm you know, we got a control gun so much,
I'm even going to control it. When my son illegally buys a gun and
lies on his form, that's what we're talking about. It's very very similar
to Bill Clinton. You know, Bill Clinton committed perjury about something that was
consensual and so Hunter Biden committed perjury on his form there, it's gun form.
Hunter Biden knowingly made a false statement certifying that he was not an unlawful
user of or addicted to any stimulant, narcotic or drug something. He's pretty
much an awful, unlawful user and addicted to all may that's the you've said
any if at all, you know, yes, uh I am, I'm
addicted to all of these things. And when you look at the overarching hypocrisy
of all this, the big guy, Joe Biden is the daddy of some
of the most harsh criminal aspects of the drug war, civil asset forfeiture and
the rest of this type of mandatory minimums things like that that came after end
users. So Biden has destroyed our legal system, corrupted the police, and
imprisoned a lot of people by going after the end user, which is something
they never did during alcohol prohibition. You know, they went after the people
who were making it, selling it, not the end users really, and
so they changed that a rent And that was Joe Biden who did that,
and he's proud of it. Joe Biden, who's been there always on gun
control and pushing it everywhere. And so here's a guy, his son who
is who violates the gun laws, who violates the drug laws that his father
has put in there. He flaunts both of these things. He does it
for years, and only as they are beginning an impeachment process do they get
serious about indicting him. But the millions and unpaid taxes, Oh, I'm
not going to pay attention that, even as Biden is, you know,
exploding the size of the IRS. They don't care about the millions and unpaid
taxes by Hunter by Biden, about the corrupt foreign involvement and the bribery and
the corruption with foreign governments. They don't care about any of that stuff.
No, they're going to weaponize the IRS, just like they weaponize the war
on drugs, just like they weaponized their war on the Second Amendment. And
he is going to continue to accelerate and explode the IRS as they get a
complete pass on all this stuff. I mean, that is the that crime
is as obvious as the way he purchased this firearm. It's just a fact.
Where did this money come from? And you didn't pay taxes on this.
This is why you have so many rest whistle blowers have come out.
Yeah, don't you know, make tens of millions of dollars and you don't
pay any taxes on it. That's an objective fact. And they're every bit
as much as this form that he lied on. But they're going to give
that a pass. Well, we're gonna take a quick break and when we
come back, we will take a look at immigration and I d we'll be
right back. The seed that our whole boys there that go, we're all
can see feed it with our devotion. Boys call it the liberty tree fits
at tall old tree and the strong old tree. And we are the sons
just be are the sons, the sons of liberty, liberty, it's your
move. You're listening to the David Night Show. Well, we have a
judge that has ruled the DOCCA program created by Obama is illegal. Who knew
when you have an executive order that actually came from his his Attorney General,
Janta Paulitana, When you have an order coming from the executive branch saying we're
not going to enforce the law, who knew that that would be illegal?
These people took an oath as a part of their as a condition of their
being in office. They took an oath to defend and protect the Constitution but
also to enforce the laws. And then they come out and say, well,
I've decided I'm not going to enforce the law. But the interesting thing
about this is how this hot potato keeps getting passed around from politicians to courts,
to politicians to courts. Nobody wants to do anything about data. A
ruling from a federal court has concluded that Obama's program to protect the illegal aliens,
the Deferred Action for childhood arrivals, is illegal. They never took action,
they don't plan on taking any action. These are you know, you
can come into the country. Now, this isn't the next step. And
of course, you know, we had the anchor baby thing. If people
who are not citizens of the United States, if they come in and they're
not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, the legal fiction that if
they have a child here, because that's the ways defined in the fourteenth Amendment,
you know. But they were very clear about that because they want to
give citizenship to the newly freed slaves. They said, if you were subject
to the jurisdiction, But then they also pointed out that if you're here legally
as a representative of a foreign country or something like that. Your children don't
become American citizens because they're born here while you are here legally. These are
people who are here illegally and their citizen and their children should not become citizens
either. But then they extended it. They said, okay, so if
you come over here illegally before the age not just being born here, but
you know, you come here before the age of whatever, and I don't
remember what the age was, seventeen maybe or something like that, then you
can stay. That was what Obama said. We're not going to enforce the
immigration laws against anybody who comes here illegally below a certain age as a child.
And then they added that they got away with that that all right,
it's worked for babies that are born here. It's worked for kids who come
here, you know, up to just under high school age. So now
let's try the adults. And when they did that, finally the Republicans pushed
back and then, oh, you know, when you have Obama's rule there,
Trump campaigns against that, against Dhaka and against the open borders and all
the rest of stuff. But when Trump becomes president, what does he do
nothing nothing. It doesn't say, well, that was Obama's executive order.
Now here's my executive order, countermanding that didn't do it. Just pretended that
that was now the new law of the land, you know, like a
Supreme Court decision about when you can kill a baby. So he just pretended
that was a new law of the land, and so that he wouldn't have
to actually take any responsibility for it. He sent it to the courts,
and the courts said, yeah, you can't do anything about that. We'll
see, folks. I tried, but I can't do anything, he said,
Trump and so pretend he couldn't do anything about it. So now you
got a judge who says, well, it's not it's not legal, of
course, because the Department of Justice has come out flagrantly saying they're not going
to obey the law. But now this judge says, but I'm not going
to do anything to deport anybody. That's the hot potato. That's why they
keep passing this thing back and forth. And this is how we wound up
with having judicial supremacy, with a regulation without representation, a bureaucracy that rules.
Supreme Congress doesn't want to take the heat for doing certain things, so
they kick it over to the bureaucracy. If the bureaucracy gets it wrong,
then they come in like their heroes and say, no, we'll fix that,
we'll fix that, but they don't want to take the heat for it.
And of course the other aspect of it is is that by creating these
bureaucracies they can grow the government so quickly. They couldn't grow the government that
quickly if you actually had to go through a parliamentary process with your elected representatives.
By the way, that's why, that's why the founders said laws will
be passed by legislature and we'll have these rules and so forth, because you
don't want somebody just going out and writing up rules over and over again.
And you know, all they do is post it and they take comments and
it doesn't matter if most of the comments don't like their rules. They go
through a commenting period and that's it. Now we're going to do what we
want because we're the experts. And so we have taxation without representation, we
have regulation without representation because nobody wants to take responsibility for it, just like
this judge. He says, Docca is clearly illegal, but I'm not going
to do anything about it. Same judge ruled in twenty twenty one that the
program could continue, but at that time banned new applicants from joining. And
so you found that the Biden administration's scheme to codify the program through the writing
of new regulations that is illegal, he said. But this is now expected
to go to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the appeals judge said at
that point in time last year, he said, DACA creates a new class
of otherwise removable aliens who may obtain lawful presence, work authorization and associated benefits.
And he said Congress determined which aliens can receive those benefits, and it
did not include DACA recipients among them. And so this is something that goes
back eleven years twenty twelve and then Trump, according to this article from W
and D, Trump tried to take it down starting in twenty seventeen. Ha
ha, just another example of people who will push this Trump fakery. Nothin
but fakery. Well, I can't do anything about it. I tried.
The deep state is just so difficult to deal with, you know, just
but you like me again, I'll fix it. Next time. Then even
more dangerous and crazy is this idea about the border where you have I Patch
McCain, Dan Crenshaw and several Republican candidates who want to invade Mexico. Maybe
that's the only way we'll get our border protected, right, we just stop
these wars in Afghanistan and rock Trump like you said you're gonna do, bring
the troops home. Just set them on the border. You don't have to
attack anybody anything, just be there. It's like, no, it can't
come across, you know that type of thing. We'll guard everybody's borders but
our own. But maybe if we start a war with Mexico, maybe then
we'll guard our borders. Who knows. The hawkish wing of the Republican Party
isn't backing down on its hopes of involving you know, the US and a
new long term foreign military conflict rights the New American heightened emotion surrounding the two
of the hottest button issues, immigration and drug crisis some in the GOPC and
opening for directing the electric's desire for action into a military foray. And of
course that would include candidates like DeSantis and Ramaswami and a bunch of others.
Crenshaw is chairman of the House Task Force to Combat Mexican Drug Cartels, and
he is trying to make this a bipartisan port for his new war the ipatch
McCain. The immediate reaction from Democrats has been you can't just go invading Mexico,
he said, And it's like, stop being an ignoramist. That's not
what anybody is talking about, said Crenshaw. I envisioned the same kind of
military intervention we use all over the world. Isn't that what we do all
over the world? In didn't we just go in and invade these places,
you know, like Syria? Were we invited into Syria? Are we working
with the government of Syria? No? Where it's entirely led by the host
nation. You know, that's the kind of military intervention we use all over
the world is entirely led by the host nation. Did you realize that?
Did you realize that our intervention in Afghanistan was entirely led by the host nation?
They have an Afghan government that you know, they install it says,
yeah, we're running this thing. It's kind of like the human umpire with
the robot calling the balls and strikes or the same thing in Iraq. You
know, look, we got an Iraqi government that we put in here after
we invaded, after we get the government out, or Syria, and so
in the mind of Crenshaw says, the new American US involvement in Mexico would
be similar to the operations that have been conducted in Colombia that the American troops
going on joint missions. It also wants the US to provide Mexico with close
air support if they're operating an ice DID regions. But despite assurances and overtures
to the Democrats, Crenshaw would not take unilateral American military action, something that
several other well known Republicans have already been pushing for. And he says,
I'm not going to take that off the table. And you have this,
as Politico points out, the New American quote sentence said, We've had a
lot of senators and presidential candidates who said we want to take unilateral measures here
and whether or not the Mexican government likes it, yeah, We're gonna come
in there for their own good and for our own good. And Crenshaw said,
yeah, and I'm not going to take that off the table. So
We got to Santis who says he's open to using drone strikes against Mexican drug
cartels. We got Senator Tom Cotton, who was proposed sending in Special Operation
Forces, and he said, if Mexico doesn't want to help, quote,
so be it. Unquote. We don't care whether or without them. Vivek
Ramaswamy envisions launching a quote shock and awe military campaign against drug cartels. Asa
Hutchinson pushing for the deployment of American forces south of the border. Lindsey Graham,
of course, Lindsey Graham. I never saw a war that he didn't
want to send people to or start. Lindsey Graham and John Kennedy Louisiana,
who just got all of his attention for reading pornography books in the Senate and
that type of thing. How many times do they have to be done right
before we do anything about it? At this point, that's just grandstanding for
attention really to read that. But anyway, John Kennedy, he pulls stunts
like that. You know, when they had their their UFO hearings, then
y'all better lock your doors. I can't tell you what we said inside,
but I just tell you this you better lock your doors anyway, He introduced,
along with Lindsay Graham, a bill to declare nine cartels as foreign terrorist
organizations and to authorize the use of military force against them. And of course,
you know this authorization for the use of military force they passed in the
wake of the inside job of nine eleven. That's been used for no least
seven wars that we know of, and who knows how many secret wars that
we don't know, the unknown unknown wars of Rumsfeld. The cartels are at
war with US, poisoning more than eighty thousand Americans with fentnyl every year,
said Crenshaw. What about those poppy fields in Afghanistan? Crenshaw, what about
that? Should we be concerned about the fact that when the American government went
into Afghanistan that drug production there exploded and you had the entire time we were
there, record crops of opioids coming out of Afghanistan and always more than ninety
percent of the world's supply coming out of that one country while we were there,
not before and not after they took it down. Should we be concerned
about the use of crack cocaine that the military and intelligence agencies inflicted on Americans
because they needed some money for their secret wars. You want to talk to
me about fentonyl You want to talk to me about any of this stuff,
your corrupt war on drugs. This is not the way to handle these addiction
things. Again, I've had people on retired law enforcement, retired judges and
prosecutors and everything that were part of this. They didn't want to talk about
it until they retire, because it's just like this stuff with the corruption our
medical profession. When you talk about it, you'll get retired one way or
the other. So they wait until they retire in their own turns, and
then they talk about it. But they all know that this is a it's
a spiritual issue, it's a medical issue. It is not a law enforcement
issue. And they've been proven that that's right, because for over fifty years
now we have failed. Was it fifty two years I think it was in
nineteen seventy one that the war on drugs began. I think it's been fifty
two years now of failure. And what it is produced are things like fentyl.
You get more and more concentrated forms of whatever it is that you're trying
to prohibit it's produced things like fentanyl, has produce things like crack cocaine,
and of course so has our criminal government. And so when Dan Crenshaw wants
to address what happened with the poppy fields in Afghanistan, then we can talk
about going into Mexico. My concern would be that this government going into Mexico
might have the same kind of results as they did in Afghanistan. Of course,
you know, start manufacturing it on a much bigger scale than it is
now. Whatever synthetic drugs are making in Mexico. Yeah, let's talk about
the military's war of drugs on Americans. Let's talk about the intelligence communities war
of drugs on Americans. Oh no, the Mexicans are the problem. The
Mexicans are just trying to make money out of this war on drugs that we've
done. It's just part of I'm not excusing anything they do. I'm just
saying that you're always going to have the al capones and the drug Mexican drug
cartels are going to take advantage of a policy that is doomed to failure.
Prohibition is doomed to failure in the same way that if they're ever successful in
terms of prohibiting the Second Amendment and prohibiting guns. You're going to see the
same thing happened with guns. You're gonna have an explosion and gun violence.
You're gonna have an explosion and development of guns and innovation and guns because there's
not going to be any controls whatsoever on it. New American says, policymakers
must consider the danger that invading Mexico would turn out like America's recent incursions into
the Middle East, particularly Afghanistan. I would say, like Syria for example,
After all, it wouldn't just be traditional warfare, it would be guerrilla
warfare. Yeah, they would come in. You know, this is something
when Ramaswami says this, you know what naivete shock and awe. You mean,
like we did in Iraq. That's the easy part. The difficult part
is the asymmetric warfare that comes after that. You know, we have a
kind of asymmetric warfare where we got all the planes and we got the smart
bombs and all the rest of the stuff, and we can do shock and
awe. That's easy, but then you got to put boots on the ground
and then the shock and awe starts that Oh wait a minute, you know,
this is going to be this long war of attrition and ambush and guerrilla
fighting and all the rest of this stuff. And we have lost every one
of those asymmetric wars, every one of them, but nobody wants to learn
about it. Yeah, and Ramaswami hasn't learned anything from it either. Just
as an Afghanistan, American troops would be subject to regular attacks and bombings in
the American public would be regularly be tuning into news to learn of more service
men and women being killed in a potentially decades long conflict with no end in
sight, just like an Afghanistan until you get thrown out. And so with
all that happening, right, these people who don't want to have any ID
for the people who cross over the borders, they don't want to have any
ID for the people who go into the voting boosts, but they want all
of us to have IDs for everything, and especially just like with DSA,
Europe is positioning itself as an a lead position to push the boundaries of world
government. And this is what's happened with ursus Lavander Leeden, the European Union
President, giving a speech at the G twenty and New Delhi, India last
week or so, and so she's all about universal worldwide digital identities and tracking
and controlling everybody. The future will be digital, she said. Today,
I want to focus on AI and digital infrastructure, and she doesn't mean Internet
for you. That's going to be a part of it. But when she
talks about digital infrastructure, she talks about the vaccine, passports and things like
that. And crucial question is how to harness a rapidly change technologies. He
said. AI has risks, but it also offers tremendous opportunities. He's got
tremendous opportunities for them for surveillance, tremendous opportunities for propaganda, tremendous opportunities for
control. And they want to control the AI, as I said in the
US, you know, we've got to have this stuff licensed. You're gotta
have a license to use this stuff. We can't just have anybody out there
coming up with AI. Yeah, we're gonna use AI to tell everybody that
this is this is authoritative, this is coming from the computer. I got
a print out here. You just do what it says and we'll build in
the biases as we wish. She said, I believe that Europe and its
partners should develop a new global framework for AI risks. You see, here
comes the AI mcguffin, Oh, we gotta threat. We got, we
got trouble right here in River City. We got a virus that are coming,
and we got that climate change is gonna kill us all, just like
the virus. Just say, you still got Trump? You know, he
falls back into that every time somebody questions him about don't question me. The
entire world was gonna die. Whatever I did was to save the entire world.
No, you killed people, Trump, nobody, nobody was dying.
This wasn't a pandemic. Is your medical rules, your You killed businesses with
your lockdowns. You kill people with your medical rules and your bribery in the
hospitals, and you kill people with your shot You and Biden. Everybody said,
well, he's Biden the mandate these things. No, tell me that
Trump wouldn't mandate. This is what I see all the time. I like
it comments from people, Well, don't you realize that that Trump didn't mandate.
No, he just produced the poison and let Biden stick it in everybody's
arm. No, Trump had already said, and that's why I played that
all the time of the show, going back to Maya, twenty nineteen,
measles. Gotta get the shot. Gotta get that shot that's going around.
It's really bad, Gotta get this measles. Measles. And I've said so
many times that that we is old enough that like me, he had measles,
got over it. It was extremely rare, as a factious say,
and it truly was extremely rare that somebody would have any serious reaction to measles,
people like Trump, people like me. We've got natural immunity and measles.
We had it, and it ain't going around. And you don't need
to take away people's medical decisions about their bodies or their religious objections to measles.
But he was perfectly willing to do that for measles. Do you think
that when Trump talks about this virus, he's selling this idea that this virus
was the worst thing since the nineteen eighteen flew. You think that if he
you know, he's going to take that narrative, we got a pandemic here
and it's going to kill everybody like a nineteen eighteen. If he's willing to
take away people's medical choice and their religious objections over measles. You don't think
that he would have done it for this thing that he continues to say,
the greatest plague that mankind has ever faced, and he saved us from it.
How'd he save us with his vaccine? He wouldn't mandate that like you
did for measles in twenty nineteen. Come on, So we got the AI
mcguffin that's coming, We're gonna have an UFO mcguffin that they will use as
well. So think about how many different existential We're only three years into the
twenty twenty decade and they're just throwing one so called existential threat at us after
the other, you know, from a pandemic to the climate, to artificial
intelligence. And then they're going to come with UFOs as well, and so
Ursulavander Leyden says, we would need to have a similar body to the IPCC
for climate that's the UN body, the International Panel for Climate Change or Climate
Control. I forget what it's in, but that's the lying bureaucracy of the
UN that has been the font of lies about climate change for decades, and
so we want to have something that lies to us to make this a global
panic situation. We need to have a global situation like we do for climate
she says, and make it about artificial intelligence. And here we need additional
outreach to the scientists and the entrepreneurs and the innovators. They need to provide
the knowledge on the risks posed by AI as well as the potential benefits for
humanity. And they've already done that in the United States. That's why you
had Sam Altman, CEO of Open AI, and also coincidentally pushing what she
wants, you know, problem solution. Look at this, I have this
wonderful AI. Oh it can just solve everything, can cure cancer and all
the rest of it. But it can also be very dangerous. And so
to make sure that it doesn't get dangerous, we're all going to have to
get an idea and identify ourselves and all of our activity has to be monitored
by the government. That's the bottom line. Oh and by the way,
says Sam Altman, only people like me should be able to do artificial intelligence.
And so that's what she's saying as well. We have to have all
you technical people come and we'll have dog and pony shows where you can scare
us about AI. And then we can give you monopoly on it because you'll
work hand in glove with us, our deputized state. She said. Also,
we need a digital public infrastructure, and again she's not talking about people
having internet access. India, she says, has achieved remarkable success in rolling
out its digital public infrastructure. What did they do Well, Bill Gates wanted
everybody to have an ID and they had their odd Hart system and they came
in with the poor people who were dependent on the government for welfare and dependent
on the government for medical care. Well, you're not going to get anything
from us unless you take that number. You'll not buy or sell or get
welfare and universal basic income unless you take number the mark of the beast.
That's the Gate system. That's what they did in India, and that's what
she is saying they want to do worldwide. She said. The trick is
to build public digital infrastructure that is interoperable and trusted. Let me give you
one example, she said, you're all familiar with the COVID nineteen digital certificate.
Well, the EU developed it for itself and actually it's origin. As
I point out when I have that, I play that commercial that we got
about the common man. I talk about the Commons project, that common project
and the common past, that was a creature of the World Economic form.
They laid that out there and other people created The European Union created their version
of it. But essentially they put that together for people as a blueprint.
Other people implemented their own version of it. And so she said, the
EU developed this, and the model was so functional and so trusted that fifty
one countries on four different continents adopted it for free. They won't charge you
for your chains. Yet today the who uses it as a global standard to
listen to this cynicalhood. They use it as a global standard to facilitate mobility.
They use it to block mobility, just the opposite, These people such
liars. Yeah, yeah, we use it to facility like protection racket,
you know, from the mafia. Here to protect you, you know from
me. I'm going to facilitate your mobility. Here, you get the ID,
you get the mobility, otherwise we're going to block you. Yeah,
I'm just in the same way that they didn't mandate these vaccines for anybody.
No, no's your choice, you know. And so she calls all this
the one future, So as the one future is the single global government as
that a conspiracy theory when they keep telling us that's exactly what they want to
do, and so is the Epic Times pointed out, the Group of twenty
nations agreed on a plan in India to impose digital currencies CBDCs and digital IDs
on their respective populations, because that's what the CBDC is, you know,
just like Sam Altman, the AI guy going around, you know, taking
screenshots of people's eyes to get a biometric you know, retinal scan or whatever
it is that he's scanning with the eye and then tying that in to the
currency, and the currency is your global ID. When Mark Zuckerberg was trying
to do that with his Libre project and his white paper, he said in
the middle of it, this will become a de facto global ID. You'll
give me the power and I'll do this. You know, you give me
the money, I'll deliver these people on a single plat as silver platter two.
So the group side of the discussions are already underway to create international regulations
for cryptocurrencies. But of course that's not the band cryptocurrencies. We just want
to regulate them. Yeah, you do it from the inside. You do
it with chaos, and you do it iteratively, and that's what they're doing.
They're doing it from the inside. It's a global id system and mark
of the beast system. Who would have thought two thousand years ago? Who
would imagine that people would be able to globally stop you from buying or selling
anything? And you know, who could imagine such a thing two thousand years
ago? I couldn't even imagine it, you know, fifty five years ago
as a kid. Yeah, we didn't have satellites yet. Oh, this
has got a you know church I went to. Oh, it's got to
be metaphorical. You know, it's symbolic. No, keeps becoming more and
more literal, doesn't it. Let me catch up on some of the comments
that are here. Thank you so many from so many people on rock Fan.
Greg Funt, thank you so much for the tippy, says, my
brother has been a big fan for a long time. I agree, Well,
thank you. That's really kind. On rumble, mister Kishan g thank
you for the tip, he says, Good morning David and I and Crew.
I know your dislike for Trump, but I don't see any other candidates
that are capable of doing the leadership except for RFK. Thanks and get Eric
back on the show. I will, we need to. We went a
period of time there because we were gone. I think it's a little bit
longer than usual. We'll get him on a regular basis. Well again,
I'll just say that, you know, it's a big mistake to put hope
in Washington for your future, and it's an even bigger mistake to put the
hope in the presidency for the future. So we need to put hope in
local government. We need to build the mechanisms for our survival locally, and
that means pay more attention to whoever your local sheriff, and your local city
council and your local mayor and all these these elections are far, far,
far more important than who's in the White House. Just look at twenty twenty.
We had up in the White House, and the people who protected us
from Trump and his policies in many cases were at the local level, and
also at the local level and the state level, people could make Trump's policies
even worse. So you're better focus there. That's where your focus should be,
not on Washington, not on the presidency. On rock Fan, Angry
Tiger, thank you very much, good to see you there. He said.
The drug war turned a lot of normal people into felons, yes,
taking away their Second Amendment rights. The apparatus to remove a gun felony federally
exists, but it is not funded. Therefore, you cannot get your Second
Amendment rights back if you were convicted federally. Well, that's important to know
again. Knights of the Storm angry Tiger Jason Barker, who I've also seen
a comment and a tip from earlier today. There, take a look at
the Knights of the Storm. You'll get there schedule as well as guards schedule,
many other schedules of a lot of people that do a lot of good
work that you can trust. Rock Fan Angus Mustang, thank you very much
for the tip, he says. The inmates are running this island. Yep
on rock Fan James s thank you for the tip. And I see a
note that doctor Shiva's delayed until eleven fifteen, so we won't be doing that.
At the top of the hour, I'm going to take a break though,
and when we come back, we're going to take a look at some
additional financial issues. I thought it was kind of interesting that Tucker Carlson went
down to Argentina and interviewed the guy that has made a lot of and I've
got some things to say, not about the Tucker interview, I haven't seen
that, but about Javier Malai and also about what it looks like to live
in a country that has rampant, runaway inflation. So we will be right
back, Liberty, it's your move. And now the David Night Show,
Well, let's talk about one hundred and twenty four percent inflation, whereas that's
the official story, as its actually worse than that, then they tell you
it's highest level since nineteen ninety one. And Argentina soaring prices which rose more
than expected, are forcing hard hit shoppers to run a daily gauntlet to find
deals and cheaper options as price hikes are leaving big differences from one shop to
the next, with scattered discounts to lure shoppers. Yeah, the shoppers have
become hoppers, hopping from one place to the other. In August, monthly
inflation readings of twelve point four percent. That's just month over month increase in
prices, a figure that would be eye watering even as an annual figure in
most countries worldwide. But that is happening on a month to month basis,
pushing poverty levels past forty percent. That's the key. You see that kind
of inflation, people get poor, and I know what that was like.
Again, we didn't come anywhere close to this, but I was. I
was in college when the nineteen seventies inflation hit, but it was still going
strong and hitting with the high interest rates and the rest of stuff. It
had not stopped for a couple of years after I got out of college.
So pushing priory levels past forty percent, stoking anger at the traditional political lead
ahead of October's elections. And again it was was it last week or two
weeks ago? I can't remember that I interviewed the financially I think it was
last week. And again the book Economics and the Fifteen Lessons on twenty pages,
number one bestseller there and the author Axel knew Javier Malai. I went
on a hunch that he would know him. Turns out they're good friends.
It's so hard, said one person. Each day things cost more. It's
like always racing around the clock, searching and searching. I said this woman
as she was shopping for groceries and the outskirts of Buenos Aires. She said,
you buy whatever is cheaper in one place, and then you go to
the next place and you buy something else. A central bank analyst poll released
after the data forecast and inflation would end the year above one hundred and sixty
nine percent, a sharp hike from a sestiment a month earlier of one hundred
and forty one percent. It predicted monthly inflation of twelve percent in September and
nine percent in October. And so Argentina is in this cycle of economic crisis.
So how did they get there? The central bank? And this is
what Javier Malai points out. He said, you know, you get into
this situation because of the central bank. Some central banks are worse than others.
And so his solution to it since nobody wants the pace, so nobody
will take it, nobody in China. And of course it's a big,
a big part of this discussion is should we you know, we should use
somebody else's currency because ours is gone and nobody will take it, and it
is just in free fall, and so that is the obvious solution. But
the question then became, which is not a question that anybody would have asked.
A couple of years ago, do we go with China or do we
go with the US. At this point the answer is still the US,
but it could be China. Now when we look at this, just in
case you think everything is different in this country, you have an analyst saying,
well, we need to see some pain. We've got to have unemployment
jump to forty to fifty percent. This is what they're thinking is in other
words, they're not looking at the welfare of people in these countries. Instead,
what they're looking at is their wealth and their power and to manipulate things.
So Jeremy Grantham, hedge fund manager, speaking in a conference in Sydney,
said, in my view, he says unemployment has to jump forty to
fifty percent. In my view, we need to see pain in the economy.
We need to remind people that they work for the employer and not the
other way around. We're got to show them whose boss, right Quite frankly,
you know, this guy's got the mind of chairman mal I mean,
that's that was the purpose of the Great Leap Forward. You know, I'm
going to show these people whose boss. That was the purpose of Stalin's Holommeadar.
I'm going to show these people whose boss we need to show remind them
they work for the employer and not the other way around. The tradees.
The trades have definitely pulled back on productivity. They've been paid a lot to
do not too much in the last few years, and we need to see
that change. Crack the whip. This guy is like and it's like these
old robber barons, the mister Potter from It's a Wonderful Life. Well,
let's look a little bit at Javier Malai. And there's also something here not
only about what is happening in terms of economics and an economic shift, but
also what is happening in terms of a political shift. And that is the
basis of this article from the American Conservative, because they're talking about the international
New Right. You hell, are these labels right? Are you all right?
Are your new right? Are you Christian nationalism? Are? I mean,
we have all these different labels that are put out there, and the
labels, for the most part, don't really mean much. For the most
part, it's just a means of controlling discourse, of taking the high ground
rhetorically and that type of thing. So we always have to be careful about
it. Don't put too much into labels. They're weaponized always and created by
your opponents usually, But take a look at what is behind this. He
did have some interesting observations about what is going on politically and about the alliances
that are forming, because the money is really kind of a reflection of that.
So the victory of Javier Malai and the Argentine presidential election open primary took
the political world by storm. And again, you know, we talked about
that a little bit with an Axel Kaiser and his you know, the author
of that book. He is a self confessed an archo capitalist, famously known
as El Poluca. I guess as you've pronounced that way the wig because of
his hair. And when I, when I interviewed Excellent, said, well,
you know, Wall Street Journal does an article about this guy, and
you would think that if being the Wall Street Journal, they want to talk
about his economic policies, But all they wanted to do was to talk about
his hair. And so I said, I want you to tell me what
it's on his mind. His eccentric hare, he claims, is combed only
by the invisible hand. He goes to barber named Adam Smith. I guess
he rose to stardom as a radio host and a frequent TV guest, while
Argentina's a kind to me collapsed under rapid evaluation, three digit inflation and rising
poverty. And then here's the background. Of course, you know, we
all know about Evita Perone because of the musicals and stuff. You know,
don't cry for me. Argentina avida was what that was called. And if
you've got a Marxist in politics, and you got a corrupt regime that goes
on forever and ever, you can bet that they're going to do Broadway plays
and musicals and movies about it. For eighty years, the Argentine political landscape
has been dominated by the Pernesmo, a big tent movement created by one Domingo
Perone after World War Two as a nationalist and populoust third way between Soviet communism
and Western capitalism. But it took a hard left turn in two thousand and
three with President Nestor Kirschner, a close ally of Hugo Chavez infidel cast.
So it might appear obvious why a populous uprising seems set to thrust a libertarian
into power in Argentina, But as the American Conservatives Bradley Devlin has asked,
and of those that might not seem obvious, I think it's what they meant
to say. How does a libertarian that wants to end the Argentine Central Bank
and to privatize state assets, how does that fall into the umbrella of the
international new right, which is typically more skeptical of capitalism and less scared of
wielding state power. The new right, a populous right, a national conservatism,
or whatever you want to call it, remains a new phenomenon, he
said, And it doesn't have a unified ideological or conceptual foundation. And so
what is really happening here? Again, I don't care about the narratives there
or the labels, whether they're used to shape the narratives. So they interviewed
in the American Conservative, they interviewed a close ally of Malai, and his
name is Augustine Lage, and so they asked him the question. They said,
why did he win in these primaries and why is he now leading in
the polls for the presidential thing? They said, Well, the PARNESMO was
a catch all populist movement, so it was populous, but it was populous
with leftist socialist economics. And highly centralized government control. And so he said,
it has dominated Argentine politics for eighty years, and now it's twenty first
century socialism. They manipulated public opinion through public TV and radio. They bought
journalists, they bought the movie industry, they bought the schools, the universities
through intellectual groups paid by the state. And again this is exactly what the
plan has been in America. The plan for this for the early twentieth century
Marxists is not about a violent revolution per se. It's about first marching through
the institutions. You know, we're talking about how the Marxists are trying to
create a race war here, and that is true. But part of that
is that's really only possible after they've marched through the institutions, like we just
mentioned the news media, entertainment, schools, universities, that type of thing.
Then they're able to go to war with us. They had the march
through the institutions. They have now accomplished that, and that's why all these
institutions, including corporations, are now weaponized against the values, the history,
the culture, the laws of our country. There was a group of citizens
who waged the culture wars as we could as much of a culture war as
we could. We wrote books, we gave conferences, we gave workshops,
we hosted debates, We used our social media. We did podcasts, we
created YouTube channels, we wrote on Twitter. See this is you do what
you can. You know that they're going to censor you, you know they're
going to shut you down, but you do what you can, and that
information does get out to some degree. And even though they get most of
it, what gets through is still very powerful because it's the truth, and
because people are so hungry for the truth, and so I have to keep
telling myself. And you know, all of you who are involved in this,
you know, Jason Barker and Angry Tiger and guard all of you.
When you're looking at this, it is you know, even though it's difficult
to break through with this stuff, we have to keep we have to remember,
and we have to understand. And this is a good example of this
in Argentina that what gets through is going to be very powerful and people are
really hungry for the truth. They know they're being lied to. Just like
the people on Stalinist Russia knew they're being lied to. They said there's no
truth in Pravda, which meant truth and there's no news, and as Vestia,
which meant news. They knew they were being lied to, he said.
Some of them were able to get into mainstream media, and that is
the case with Javier Malai. He managed to get into the systems media due
to the intrinsic characteristics of his personality. He's got a very TV like personality,
the hair right, so he said, our culture war began to be
successful in terms of public opinion and the limits of public discourse, he says,
and at a certain moment, Javier Malai decided that it was time to
reap the fruits that we had been sewing, and so now it was time
to reap the fruits through an electoral struggle by creating a political party. And
the political party that they've created they called Liberty Advances. That's good, This
is very important. Understand Malia's victory in the primary public opinion in Argentina has
turned to the right in such a way that the other two political alliances had
to opt for figures as far to the right as their own spaces would allow.
That's interesting. So we had three parties that were there, he finished
first, but the other two parties, even though they are left wing,
they moved as far to the right as they could and they still came out
second and third. So they says the bull Rich is the most right wing
that exists within the Juntos El cab Cabio. The center right coalition MASA is
the most right wing that exists within Kirsch and Narizmo. He says, you
don't have to have any political talking in the name of social He says,
this is what the election looks like here. You don't have any politician talking
about social justice. You don't have politicians talking in the name of social and
collective rights. You do not have politicians talking about redistribution of wealth in Argentina.
You do not have politicians in the campaign talking about leftist cultural issues.
You do not have politicians at this moment raising feminist flags or mu decolor flags,
are using so called inclusive language that we're seeing everywhere in the United States.
Because these people are running from shop to shop trying to find food with
a little money that they've got that is constantly losing its value. They got
serious there. You see. It's one thing when you look at all of
this stuff that is happening that he just mentioned, you know, social justice
and you know redistribution of wealth and reparations and the LGBT stuff. These are
first world problems when people don't have any real problems. But I think it's
bigger than that, quite frankly. You know, as a Christian, I
think I look at those things as a test because I understand that our blessings
come from God, and this is this is the test. You know,
are we going to follow God? Are we going to follow the culture?
Are we going to speak up and stand on that, or are we going
to cave on that? This other stuff is downstream from it, you know,
the politics and all the rest of stuff is downstream from that. But
anyway, getting back to this, he said some basic numbers that may be
useful for readers who want to understand this. We're already headed towards one hundred
and fifty percent inflation. We have forty five percent of the population below the
poverty line. Six of ten children do not eat every day. We have
a fiscal deficit, we have a huge devaluation of the currency. The country
has two million more poor people every year in a country of only forty two
million people. That's amazing. He says, we have about one hundred and
sixty different taxes, and we have one of the highest tax pressures in the
world. And so they said, well, something they asking another question.
They said, something that has confused people in the US is that although he
is allied with a New Right and he claims to be an admirer of Trompany
endorses both scenario, he seems to be cut from a different cloth, doesn't
he. In the US, the populist right shares a certain level of skepticism
of the free market and of capitalism, while Malay is a confessed an ourco
capitalist on a theoretical level and a libertarian in practical terms. So how does
he fit into this New Right? This is what I think is interesting when
he starts talking about the different labels that we have here and we need to
start thinking about this in different terms. You know, these labels are very
superficial, and these labels are used to cloud I think what's going on.
In the same way they talk about people who are the blue states and the
red states. Red is always the color of the Marxist So of course they
didn't want us to make that connection, so they called conservatives and libertarians.
They called them red, and we foolishly went along with that. So the
New Right is an effort to articulate three sectors that in principle would seem to
be incompatible libertarians, conservatives, and patriots or sovereigntists. He said. Not
all libertarians, conservatives, and sovereigntists are compatible with the New Right. For
example, a progressive libertarian does not fit into the New Right. But the
most important libertarian politician in history, Ron Paul, was allied with conservatives and
was completely opposed to the abortion agenda. So that others more dogmatic, who
can only read politics under religious classes, these would not belong in this In
many cases, they said, finally have the patriots or the sovereigntists, and
on the other hand, you have the statists who do not confuse love for
the homeland with love for the state. Right, So that's the key thing,
key difference, you know, confusing love for the state with love for
the homeland. He says, for example, now that it's going to look
different in different places. In the case of Spain, it is expected that
the one who's going to take the lead in the alliance will be somebody who
is a sovereigntist. Or somebody from the patriotic sector, because the problems affecting
Spain have to do with the EU government in Brussels, with illegal immigration,
and with a government that has a twenty thirty agenda ministry. And he said
in the United States, something relatively similar could be said. In addition,
the United States has a geopolitical situation or a confrontation with China that calls for
protecting American industry from unfair competition against a political force that uses slaves to generate
wealth. Now, in Argentina, it is expected that under the economic conditions
of the country in the last twenty years, the sector that is going to
be capable of articulating and leading the new right will be libertarian. In other
words, there that's more of an economic approach to take. But here's the
key thing, and here's the key thing that is missing in our approach here
in America, and that is any kind of intellectual, philosophical principle basis.
That's what we're missing with Trump. That's the big danger of the MAGA movement.
And I said for the longest time, you know, even when you
go back to the Tea Party, that's fine, you know, Tea Party
meant tax enough already, But how do you want what do you want to
do? Do you want to lower spinning? Do you want to lower taxes?
If you don't understand what your basic philosophy is, what is government actually
supposed to look like? And we never had that and we don't We don't
have that from Trump either. There is no clear concise vision and there certainly
isn't any adherence to any principles. Well, I see now that we have
doctor Shiva Ado Ray that is ready. So we're going to take a quick
break and we are going to connect with him and we will be right back.
The common man. They created common Core and dumbed down our children.
They created common Past to track and control us. Their Commons project to make
sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man
as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created
in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That
is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation,
deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything
from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to
hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at the David Knightshow dot
com. Thank you for listening, thank you for sharing. If you can't
support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Thee David Knightshow dot
Com. All right, welcome back and joining us now is doctor Shiva.
Iya do Ray. And we'll say hello to the people who are on his
live stream who are also following us. And of course he is running for
present and he's done so many different things. And he was as we were
connecting while this commercial break was going on our program, he was saying,
you know, let's let's follow up on what a real leader looks like.
So what does a real Thank you for joining us, doctor Shiva, and
what does a real leader look like? We're talking about what is happening in
Argentina, what is happening in America with Trump? Well, David, I
think if you look at in my sense of real leadership is there's three elements.
You know, there's a clear vision, there's a scientific or philosophical framework
that you can communicate to people on why that vision should be supported. And
then the last pieces of practicality or what we call the engineering. You know,
how do you execute on that vision? Because it's good to talk about
stuff, but you've got to be able to execute on it. And this
is true I think in any endeavor, right, if you're serious about something,
if you're an entrepreneur of a very clear vision, you have to have
some physics or science how you're going to achieve that vision, and there's a
material reality of how you execute it. That's right, and to me,
that's those are the sort of the three foundation. If you tie that into
our the foundation of our country, you know you've got a clear articulation of
the view of the general view of what government's purposes, and the declaration of
independence, and then you got the plan and the framework of how you're going
to achieve that in the Constitution. And we seem to just that doesn't really
matter anymore. We just do whatever we think is going to make us popular
or give us a fame, fortune and a following. Right. Yeah,
I think you nailed it. And the reason this has happened is I think
you mentioned this about how Hollywood essentially finds characters you see, to run their
operations. They have the front You may have seen that swarm video I did,
David if you haven't, you should check it out. It's a fifteen
minute video that I really explain. You know what the swarm is. It's
not really a swamp because it means it's a geographical location. And what's important
when you go through that, you really understand that the forces of power,
profit and control have people who are just interested in power, right, the
hundred university presidents, you know, the let's say those people were involved in
the nonprofits like Clinton Global Initiative, right, all these kinds of people.
Then the other people are interested in just profit maxim maximization of profit at any
cost, right, which includes the central banks, you know, the probably
two thousand leaders of the major CEOs. And then front facing is you have
the way to control the masses, and the controlling of the masses involves the
obvious establishment. You know that everyone says, oh, yeah, they're evil,
right, the Clintons or which is by and large people sort of understand
that. But the more I think the insidious people are that not so obvious
establishment, the Trumps, right, the Joe Rogans, the Carlson's as I
like to call them. Right, And we're going to talk about our interaction
with Alex Jones you know, and it's important of a candidate conversation. I
stopped going on Alex's show and you had a falling out with him, and
I think it's important for the public to understand why we sort of don't support
that anymore. And it's a deeper discussion which follows into this obvious and not
so obvious establishment and they've What's really happened, David, is they've gotten so
good now the swarm itself evolves, it's intelligence evolves. So they're watching,
you know, you know, the behavior of our movement, that the fact
we're getting on the ground and handing out leaflets, right, they're watching that.
You know, we're relentlessly exposing Kennedy, We're relentless exposing Trump. And
in response to that, they see they have enough data. Wow, people
are starting to follow doctor Shiva. They're starting to absorb his content, and
so immediately they'll manufacture these people actually mouthing back our positions, but to lead
people back into the establishment. But that dynamic is what people need to get
educated about. But coming back to what you were saying, David, is,
yeah, the founders had a clear They actually had sort of a classical
philosophical framework, right, coming out of sort of classical liberalism philosophy right right
at the period of the Enlightenment. Then they had the engineering because these guys
were engineers and surveyors and architects. You know, Jefferson could build stuff.
Franklin was an inventor. You know, Washington was a surveyor. They actually
had to build real things with their own hands, not like outsourcing to others.
So and then they had a very clear vision, right, which was
there were inalienable rights. This is quite profound. And because they were builders
and they were scientists and they were visionaries, they materialize all of that.
You know, they said, okay, you're going to balance the power.
I mean that when you look at the documents that they wrote, they're like
engineering diagrams to me, you know, they're like prints, they're specifications.
There any of these fellows here could I mean, I can't think Trump even
writing one sense of the Declaration of Independence or constitution, right. I can't
think of Booby Kennedy doing any of this, you know, so what we
have it would kind of read like chat GPT, you know, it's they
would be trying to plagiarize something I talked about that earlier. It's really kind
of a joke. It can't turn it into English type of thing, you
know, and it's a plagiarizing in and then translating it into English. That's
what they would probably do. But that's a key thing. You know,
they had a vision, a clear vision. You know, the government is
there to protect our rights. That's the principal mission of the government. They
set up a framework to do it and to guard against as much as possible,
but of course it has to be enforced by us. And then it
was their character that was the other part of it, and that was a
big part of it, you know, the character that you could believe these
people to follow through and to execute what they talk about. That's the thing
that is that's why people become so cynical. We see that crucial element seems
to always be missing. Even if somebody's got a great plan, they don't
execute on it. They do exactly the opposite. And they were told that
it's forty chest. Don't worry, he's still on our side. He's lying
to the other people, not to us, Right, yeah, I think
what's happened, David to this character piece, what's happened is a degeneration of
these basic fundamental values. And the degeneration piece has been to convince people,
look, our leaders ultimately reflect our consciousness. This is my view, you
know. So they convinced people that your personal integrity and your public integrity can
be two different things. There's an interview with this fool Booby Kennedy as I
call him, and that's what we should call him. And I call him
that because I want people not to have respect for these people. And the
interviewer starts talking about how you know herschel Walker, you know, said one
thing and does another thing. Right, He said he was against for pro
life and then he had various abortions or his own uncle who killed a woman.
Here, Ted Kennedy. So Booby's squirming and he goes, well,
let me tell you your personal integrity and your public integrity are two different things.
Wow. The people quote unquote to Megan Kelly, So you have people
telling you to your face. This is the new their new ethos. I
can do anything what I want. I can hire prostitutes, I can you
know, have relationship with them when my wife is pregnant. I can pay
them off. I can travel with Epstein on his plant I can travel with
Epstein, but Christian evangelicals will still think I'm a redeemed good, you know,
saved human being. Right, So they have manipulated people to lowering their
standards at such low levels, David. And so what needs to happen is
you have to set the standards high and you cannot compromise. And those people
who come you build a movement around that, and then like a magnet,
you bring more and more and more filings over right. But if you if
you compromise to the thirty percent of people have no integrity. In my view,
you know, are resistors. Fifty percent of people are watching which way
the wind blows. Their ethics are based on which way the wind blows.
And there's twenty percent who will always stand firm. And my view is,
you don't count out of the fifty percent, You don't count out of the
thirty You completely don't even argue with the thirty even, you know, But
you mobilize the twenty with the highest values in our case, truth and freedom
and health right, and you educate those people. You educate those people that
you should have a really vicious you know, you have to be like a
Doberman to those thirty percent of the people. And these numbers, by the
way, David, many many years ago, and I was like twenty nine
years old. I was running a company called Echo Mail, and I was
invited to speak to the top twenty five hundred General Motors executives, all right,
with a guy that I shared the stage with, the very, very
wise guide by the name of Price Purchett. He was one of the world's
leading organizational theorists and and GM was having major problems in and he got up
on the stage and he said, look, thirty percent of people in your
organization. And by the way, he had studied all different organizations, pigmy
cultures, aboriginal cultures, you know, nonprofit organizations, fortune one thousand companies,
and he always noticed thirty percent of people are complete resistors. They will
always never want to do anything. Okay, fifty percent of people are the
fence sitters, he called him, and then twenty percent are the change agents.
And he said the biggest mistake change agents make they spend ninety percent of
their time arguing with the thirty percent, and they burn themselves out. So
he said, you have to be like a doberman at those thirty percent you
have to viciously annihilate them because they will destroy your organization. So in my
view, Trump, Booby, Kennedy. You know, now they have this
other brown nos, Brahmin, big Pharma, bullshit, Vivike the snake,
right, and they tool see Gabbard another one, right. They manufacture these
people, and these people are typically the ones that, you know, the
eight billion people are taught to say, well, but you know, they
did say some nice things. David, David, why are you attacking Trump?
You know he did work hard for us. You know, Booby didn't
do this and that, And those are the people that are used to manipulate
the other fifties. So it becomes it's not just that they'll say, well,
sometimes they don't even have to come up with something nice about their candidate.
They just tell you how awful the other guy is. You know,
you don't want this other guy. You take anybody other than that guy.
So you know, let's go with this. And they always give you a
choice, you know, say you're b it's dialectic this flyer. We came
up with a lesser of the two children. Yeah, and that's become the
focus, the core of the campaign. So what is the vision that we
have, David, a very clear vision truth, freedom, health, and
notice I don't use the word and it's truth health, it's a composite structure.
So vision wise, you need all those three because without freedom you can't
do any real science to get to truth. And without truth you can't really
understand what's good for your economic health, physical health, infrastructure health. And
without health you fundamentally have no way of fighting for freedom of truth. You
don't have to wear with all, you don't have the strength. So in
my view, all those three have to exist. So that's a clear vision,
the philosophy and the science of that, David. You know, at
the time of the time of our founders, you know, they were coming
off the Enlightenment, right or the period of great new findings in chemistry and
science, et cetera. So these people were very moved by science, right.
The physical sciences were being you know, physical chemistry was coming with the
work of Lavasier and all these kind of guys, right, So they had
a physical sense and they had a deep curiosity. So they were including scientific
philosophy some of you know, classical philosophy, right, and then they so
here in the we live today, David, when you step back in the
world a very complex systems. Now, the systems we have today really didn't
exist. You know, in seventeen seventy six, we didn't have a transportation
system, we didn't have healthcare systems, we didn't have election systems. Right,
was much simpler. So it was only the nineteen hundreds and the nineteen
fifties at the science of systems came. So so system science, which is,
by the way, what the elites learn. George Soros is one of
the leaders in the field of reflexivity theory. So if we want to be
a leader in today's world and you don't understand how systems work at a scientific
level, you're just a moron, okay, because someone else is going to
tell you what to do. Right. So, as a system scientist who
studied this for years, in order to achieve that vision of truth, freedom,
health, and to really do a system's overhaul, that's what we're at.
You need to have a foundational understanding of system science. So we now
educate people on that. David. It's not only for the hallowed halls of
MT. And then the engineering is you have to get on the ground.
There's no other way to change the world anymore. Because social media completely controlled
by the elites. The First Amendment is destroyed. On November sixteen, twenty
eighteen. Trump is the one who signed SISA into law. The Cyber Security
Infrastructure Security Agency, as my lawsuit revealed, is the one that allowed the
unholy alliance between government and social media companies to destroy the First Amendment. Trump
did unanimously voted by every member of Congress, by unanimous consent by every member
of the Senate. So everyone needs to understand that all of these people were
involved in destroying the First Amendment. They passed a law which your bridges our
freedom of speech, and what does the First Amendment say? Congress shall pass
no law to bridge freedom of speech. That's what they did, brought to
you by Trump. That's right. Yeah, And you got back and you
look at sissa. You know the way I pronounce it. But you know
they used to always be sispah, Right. They tried over and over again
to get CISPA through there. What was the p why'd they take it out?
Well, because that was protection, right, and we all know that
what it was protection for was for the corporations. We're going to be protected
from any liability when they spied on us as the deputized state, and so
when they finally got it through, they took that out and pretended that wasn't
really what it was about. It's about protecting us. It's always about protecting
us in it when they enslave us and they they withrow the Constitution, it's
always about our protection and our safety. But that's the subversion that was there
from the very beginning. And of course, you know, going back to
twenty and eighteen, that's when they first started openly colluding and censoring on a
massive scale. And uh, and it's it's been that way ever since.
I mean, I can't even get I've been kicked off so many times off
of YouTube. I don't even bother to get on anymore. I just you
know, go to Rumble and other places like that. Because the last time
I got kicked off, she was because I had I thought, well,
let me just put up some Christmas music that I did for the program,
and I have, you know, music that I do is for a little
bit of a break that's about a minute. So I had several Christmas songs
I put up. That was it. It was just Christmas music, and
they banned me after six months, no explanation, So I can't even put
music up on YouTube. I'm I'm a bad person. What's happening is anyone
who gets massive visibility by the mainstream media or what I now call the grifter
media inc. You know, the Joe Rogans, the Carlsons, the James
O'Keefe's right, you can go down the list. It's a grifter media they
are. And they may even say negative stuff against them, right, that
is allowed because that's a fake dialectic that they're creating. Anyone who exposes that
swarm is shadow band. Yeah, that's right. And you know, I
know this at a very personal level because in twenty twenty, as you you
know, as we've shared before, when they you were one of the few
people to cover it when they when I was thrown off Twitter for exposing the
government backdoor portal into Twitter in twenty twenty, which Glenn Greenwall and Carlson concealed.
Tucker, Carlson concealed it, he had all of it. They waited
two years to delay the truth that was a limited hangout, was a CIA
intelligence operation that Tucker did with the intercept. That's what really happened. Then
Elon Musk, another goon of the establishment, was brought in to essentially sugarcoat
and make the Conservatives think, now Twitter was a safe place, yes,
and all the Conservatives fell into line denish to SUSA another opportunist, come bag,
okay, James Woods, every one of them. They started bowing down
to Elon. And now you have Isaac Walter, Isaacson doing a big biography
on him, who, by the way, comes out of the Aspen Institute,
which is like this with the wf Right. So they are creating their
false heroes. So now they have their neo media swarm, Tucker Crlson,
Elon Musk, Joe Rogan and these people promote the dialectic. So you Booby
Kennedy who says, oh, Elon Musk is fighting censorship when he knows he
came to all, he came to all of our lawsuit hearings. He knows
a backdoor portal still exists. He knows Elon has done nothing. He knows
Elon and government are like this space six billion dollars Elon got he got what
one point five billion dollars from government to make Tesla profitable, and the Section
two thirty. Immunity ensures that Twitter so elon Musk where government ends at elon
Musk. Nobody knows. So all of these guys are part of the swarm.
And when you expose them is when they shadow Vanue. They put you
into what now, it's a digital cage. They let you on Twitter,
but they control it. Right, the censorship ten point zero? Right,
what's great, David? The good news is this, and I want to
share the good news because in twenty twenty we got our stuff out to about
a half a billion people. There was a time when the censors hadn't it
up right. So now when they make us invisible, David, we have
so many people saying, wait a minute. Doctor Shiva is the one who
ran the Firefauci campaign. Why is Megan Kelly now covering it? Wait a
minute. Doctor Shiva is a one who talked about the immune system and how
you need to boost natural immunity. Doctor Shiva is the one who discovered the
backdoor portal. Why did Carlson wait two years? Why isn't anyone of him
interviewing him when he's probably the most qualified candidate to become president. He's got
all the degrees, he has a science, he has an engineering as a
vision, and that active invisibility that they're doing David, in my view,
it's going to destroy them and it's a good thing. Yeah. Now,
added to that, we encourage people to get on the ground, because when
people get on the ground, they can't manipulate this. We tell people in
a simple way, old school, take a bumper stick or put it on
the back of your car. One hundred thousand people see it. So we're
encouraging people to make them empower themselves to think, to fight and to heal,
and no one else is going to do it. And then we've given
them the operating system to do that. David. You know, all the
science that I could still be just a professor at MIT teaching, right,
we've taken it out of there and brought it to the masses. So that's
what's exciting, David. So and I think it's important that we get out
that we transcend these systems. As you point out, you know, when
you look at the electoral system. I got involved with third party stuff thirty
years ago as idealistic enough to think that maybe we could make a change with
it, and I found out just how control the two party system is from
ballot access to debates to the rest of stuff, and it's only gotten worse.
And so they control this from the inside very rigidly. I mean,
just take a look at what is happening with the debates, even what is
happening with the debates between the different candidates and how they're being shut down.
I think it. You know, the Democrat Party has taken it to a
new level to protect Biden as we're going through all this. But that's the
way they can manipulate these things from the top down, and that's how they
control who even gets on the think they're doing something even more insteady of David.
What's happened is if you look at the Democrats or the Republicans, typically
they have the obvious establishment wings, right, let's say the bushes or on
the right or the bidens, they're getting the swarm is actually getting more intelligent,
David, And we need to understand this so we don't get fooled by
Booby Kennedy because he's a complete bullshit. Let me expoke why if you go
back to nineteen eighty four, you remember Jesse Jackson, right, remember him?
He was running for president, right, So they had the obvious establishment
which was Reagan, and let's say the obvious establishment candidate, which was what's
his face Mondale. They had the wings of the right, which were like
the emerging Tea Party, and they had the wings of the left, the
wings which which sometimes will talk against the establishment, like Jesse Jackson would say
stuff against Mondale and he was building a quote unquote a movement. At the
last minute, Jesse Jackson brings all of his votes and he says, look,
we need to choose a lesser of two evils. Okay, And the
left and the right have been doing this. What's happened recently if you look
at the Sanders that was his job. Sanders did that in twenty sixteen for
Hillary. He took all the young volunteers and got, oh yeah, Hillary,
she's part of the establishment, you know, did that thing even though
he's with them, says all the words to act like he's anti establishment,
and then at the last minute he gives all of his votes to Hillary Clinton.
All right, this selection Bernie. Typically they wait until like November to
do that or October. Bernie's already done that, right, So in my
view, they don't have and not so obvious establishment on the left. That's
where Kennedy comes in. Kennedy, literally, David, I can show you
word for word, has spies come into our campaign literally steal our content word
for word. And so they are setting him up and potentially tool see Gabbard
to come in to be that new not so obvious establishment mouthing all the stuff
and being the alternative to the quote unquote the democratic left wing. Okay,
And I think one of the things about Kennedy that has bothered me the most
is, you know, this this new book that he's done, which is
all about the Wuhan lab And I see this, as I did from the
very beginning, as as a move to legitimize all these pandemic actions, to
say, hey, this is a real pandemic and it's the Chinese, and
we got to go get the Chinese because the Chinese are the enemy of the
establishment. And so to me, that was a real establishment move of misdirection
because you know, again forgetting let's ignore the vaccine and stuff like that,
let's focus on the Wuhan. I think that is a real revelation of where
he's coming from. When you're talking about, you know, being a fake
composition that really is well, David, They're both connected because remember the Kennedy's,
there's two threads that go through the Kennedy's. They were the really the
purveyors, the beginners of pioneers of global imperialism, you know, US imperialism.
John Kennedy was not fighting the military industrial academic complex. There's a wonderful
video that just came out. If you look at the Kennedy's on the imperialist
front, Kennedy was an absolute imperialist right and then but they the camelot mythosis
created forgetting the fact that he was a reckless idiot. He blew up.
He created one of the biggest blunders with PT. One oh nine. You
know, he wasn't even allowed to go into the Navy. His father had
to get him in, you know, Joe Kennedy. And then when after
he was shot, because it was a mob war my view, one mobster
fighting against another mobster, they had to make him as though he was fighting
against the establishment, when in fact, four weeks before he dies or is
assassinated, he says, we must stay in Vietnam. He wanted to escalate
the war there. The video just came out. Okay, then they make
the brother seem like Robert Kennedy, the father of Booby, seemed like he's
some peacenick. He's giving a massive talk on the floor of the US Senate,
completely supporting lbj's escalation of the war. And then Booby is a multi
tongued snake. When he launches his campaign, he says, we are in
Ukraine quote unquote for all the right reasons, and he goes, however,
I'm against regime change. Oh, but I want to thank my son who
went and fought there. Well, he's the one who endorsed Hillary Clinton three
times, who's a mistress of regime change right everywhere she went. She's the
one who did the regime change in So that's just on the imperialist front.
And now going after China, trying to create the dialectic that it's US versus
China, right when you know that both of these organizations have worked together against
people. Right. If anything, the whole concept of bricks is a new,
not so obvious establishment to move the trillionaires are going to move capital out
of the US to these emerging markets, you know, destroy the US and
bring them back. So, now, if you go look at the vaccine
thing. You'll see the same thread of what a scumbag he is. Go
back to John F. Kennedy. He's the one who created the nineteen sixty
two Vaccination Act, which created all those corrupt institutions in government. But most
importantly, it said government has a right to come into your physical body.
That was done by John Kennedy, all right, nineteen sixty two. Then
twenty four years later, people are getting injured. They're filing lawsuits legitimately in
the third branch of government called the judiciary in federal cases. Ted Kennedy,
the guy who murdered a woman here in Massachusetts and got away with it.
Booby's uncle, John Kennedy's brother, is the one who was a co sponsor
of the Senate side of the bill to create the nineteen eighty six National Vaccine
Injury Program, which basically said we're going to protect big Pharma. You can't
go to the judiciary and sue, you must now sue within a new government
entity, more government. Yes, that they put under Health in Human Services.
The incisive thing that people need to understand about Booby, he's a freaking
snake. What he says. You know, you know, when I got
into the medical freedom movement. I realize all these contradictions. Wait a minute,
Hillary Clinton three times here in Massachusetts, he came and endorsed his own
nephew, who's pro rapidly for vaccine mandates in twenty twenty. Then at his
own home, right, he'd like to have a RNA jab. But more
interestingly is everyone needs to actually look at what he's saying. He's saying,
I believe he said this. We have a live on video. I'm for
full vaccination of all Americans. I've vaccinated all my kids. And then he
proceeds this. That's the first part of the video, and then the second
part of the video is even more damning if you really study it. He
says. What does he say? He goes, we must he attacks the
CD seeing all these organisms that got created by his uncle. But he goes,
he's going to Now getting back to the very important word to use,
create safe vaccine safety. Whenever we hear the word buzzword safety, it means
more government. More government's going to get into like we talked about what happened
after nine to eleven. Right, yeah, absolutely, and really get the
other part of this that I talked about. The different mcguffins. They always
have some kind of a crisis that they used to scare, so it doesn't
really matter what it is. As Hitchcock said, right, the mcguffin doesn't
matter because the multi se alkin or whatever it could be, climate change.
But they always use that to achieve their objective. And he's a true believer
on that kind of stuff, and he has pushed that very hard. And
you hear him say the kind of things like, well, you know,
we wouldn't have to worry about getting rid of fossil fuels, have just stopped
the subsidies, and yet you look at the subsidies that are there for the
green stuff, you know. And he believes that government is in the sense
of the old style of Democrat selling the idea that government can solve our problems.
But I like what you were talking about before in terms of the Kennedy's
and the different you know, crime families shooting it out. You know,
today right now, at this point in time, we haven't had any physical
assassinations or anything. We had this law fair thing that's going back and forth.
And I saw an interesting thing from James Carville, the old Democrat strategist,
and he said, how did we get so lucky for them to impeach
Biden? They love this stuff. And I've always looked at this and I
said, you know, they can't be so dense and so stupid that they
don't understand how they're building up up. They want to build Trump up by
the indictments and that that makes him, uh, you know, the the
avatar, the messiah for the followers of Trump. And now Carville is saying,
all right, now, they're going to do it for our side,
for Biden, me really, and they both will send emails and they both
will like ten fifteen million bucks those emails. They got it down to a
racket. Yes, what's interesting. What's interesting, David is over the last
you know, two years, I've had to even though you know I knew
to hung out with Trump, you know, I had the meetings with them.
You know, he thinks I'm amazing and all this, I've had to
expose him, you know, hard. We've had to expose the fact.
You know, over the last six months, I'm saying, wait a minute,
you Trumpers, you they would make the excuse. Oh. Trump had
to protect Fauci, right, or he couldn't fire Fauci. And then but
when we shared with him. Look, here's a commendation award he gave yeah,
all hours before he left. Now, Megan Kelly didn't do anything about
that, and part of the swarm too, So you have to wonder why
she's suddenly doing this interview. That was another theatrics that they just did two
nights ago, making her bring because I think Carlson has lost all this credibility.
So now they need to create a new MSM person as though who's unbiased,
So they bring her in. She asked, why didn't you fire Fauci?
Why didn't you you know, why did you give in this commendation word?
Oh, I didn't give it to him. But they're creating the new
dynamic. It's pure theater. A week ago, Trump said we will not
comply. He says, when I'm back in office, I will get rid
of these vaccine and mask mandates. But precisely was saying, oh, I
can't get rid of them. That's what the governors forced me to do.
So they have this down. David to this point, I think you're saying,
with the Biden whatever impeachment pure theater. It is, so it is,
it's a pure theater. And even when, you know, even when
she talks to him about Faucci, she repeats his excuses, well, I
you know, it'd have been too controversial or I don't have that power,
that type of thing. And yet it wasn't. You know, he didn't
bother him when he fired Coomy. You know, everybody said, oh,
you can't do that. The FBI directors are appointed for ten years. He
fired him. He didn't even put all the money for both sides, Yeah,
exactly. And then he did the same thing with He did the same
thing with Andrew McCabe. I mean, the bottom line is that the swamp
is under the executive branch. You know, you can fire these people,
and he chose not to do it, and even ran a campaign video which
I've played here many times, where he campaigned on his obedience to Faucci.
It was a super cut of Faucci talking about how, yeah, every time
I told him to do this, he did it, you know, And
basically it was really kind of an emasculating thing to say that he did everything
that Faucci told him to do when he told him to do it. But
that was his campaign. But he had the top of the text to this
amount to contribute to the Trump Pence campaign and all the rest of the stuff.
I mean he campaigned on that, gave him the medal, all the
rest of the stuff he could. He could have done that, but he
chose instead to turn over the government to Fauci. And as I said earlier
in the program, I don't buy the idea even of the mandates. I
said, uh, in the run up to the election, I said,
people are going to these guys have different ways of approaching. You can offer
character, you can offer sticks to get people to do this kind of stuff.
And we saw that really with the wine when he offered a million dollar
bonus of people to take the vaccine. I said, Trump is going to
run it out that way. He's going to run it through the corporations.
And a lot of the stuff that Biden did was through corporations. He did
have outright mandates, but Trump also supported mandates back in May of twenty nineteen,
mandates for MMR vaccines, and he said that's going around. You got
to get it. And so you know, I don't have any problem believing
that he would do it. Twenty twenty one, he was the pharma's ad
man. Yes, I got the FDA to do this. He was supporting
Operation Warp Speed. Yes, Eiser's revenue was you know, had lost twenty
five billion. He's a one of I mean, just look at the facts.
He took a million dollars to his inauguration campaign from Fiser. I mean,
the data is just in front of us. The issue is David,
that that thirty percent of people who are the quote unquote MAGA cult members.
Right, We're never gonna be able to change them. But we're finding,
David, the more we expose Trump and Kennedy, like we do open houses
every Thursdays, we're finding now a whole set of people who were coming who
are truly enlightened people. Well, they need to understand. They need to
understand that. Look, I'm going down the list. I said, you
know, what do you think about the lockdown? What do you think about
being called non essential? What do you think about the trillions of dollars training
people for universal basic income? What do you think about the vaccine all the
rest of the stuff. It's like, but you support the guy who still
brags about all that stuff and who still, you know, tries to tell
you that the pandemic was real and it's the most dangerous thing we've ever had.
That's the cognitive dissonance, and there is hope. I think that the
people can transcend that, but we also have to transcend the part partisanship as
well. Well. What's happening, David, is a more we expose like
a doberman, these guys, the Trump's. It initially creates cognitive dissonance,
but we're finding a subset of people who are actually I wish I had some
of these recordings. People are saying, you know, doctor Shiva, I
really hated you for cursing out Boobie Kennedy. But you know what, for
two days I didn't have sleep because everything you said was true and I had
to self reflect. And that's why I'm part of supporting your campaign in your
movement. So we're starting to get these very very enlightened people, David,
and those are the people that you can build a solid movement on. You
say, and that's what's happening. That's a good thing. But I think
it's a good time to transition to Alex Jones. Sure, yeah, yeah,
we got about five minutes. I don't want to do a clickbait thing
here. What people said would talk about that. Yeah, yeah, So
I mean, maybe you should just start David and all sort of hop in.
But I contacted David to everyone listening, because I have the interviews I
did with you, David. When I know I did interviews with Alex and
Owen and you yours was very, very thoughtful. You know. The last
time I did an interview with Alex, I you know I was in there.
This was in the heat of twenty twenty twenty twenty one, where I
was leading exposing Fauci, leading, exposing Booby Kennedy's complicity. He was supporting
lockdowns and it's fascinating Kennedy and this clan, the swarm literally goes finds another
Indian guy from East Asia got called outar Buttar I called him and he called
me up and he wanted and I wanted to have me to do a live
with him. And I said, look, why are you supporting Kennedy when
he supported Hillary Clinton, who was part of Monsanto. And he goes,
well, you know, Booby's doing a lot of good things. I said,
you know, you're a star, you know, and he goes,
what did you call me? So anyway, that was a conversation with boutar
Alex as me on his show, and Alex and I are talking about exposing
Kennedy, which is what he should be doing if he's really wanting to help
people. Suddenly he Sayshiba, I'm now going to bring ROGI wutar on and
I want you to have it out with him like he wanted to do a
Jerry Springer with me. Yeareak and I go, you know, Alex,
I'm here to educate people about what's going on. I said, I'm not
playing the game, and Alex said, you you have to do my show.
You know we have I have the right to free speech. I go,
you can, but I'm not doing this. That was the last time
ever was on Alex's show because I realized that he wasn't about building a movement,
that he was about at best entertaining people, but not about getting to
the root of the evil. And more recently, when my swarm video got
like forty million views, David, it went everywhere. He took my Swarm
video, put it on Info War's website and then on the bottom of the
fold he's promoting Kennedy. Okay, So that's why when you realize Alex is
part of the swarm. Okay, he's part of this, that's right.
So I think I think to everyone listening. David was on Alex's show,
and David, maybe you can share briefly with what happened while you decided to
break off, because I think it's an important piece people should know. Yeah,
it's very you know, you go back and you look at the movement
around Sandy Hook to try to push through massive gun control, and you know
that's where the Sandy Hook lawsuit came from and that type of thing. But
it was it was an all out push. They kept going with more and
more sensational stuff and that's how they they got entrapped with that. But he
really was pushing at that point in time to try to stop gun control.
But I noticed a big change and what happened within for wars. But and
that really kind of came about with Trump. You know, with Trump,
that was his ticket to fame and fortune and following, and he became a
sycophone at that point in time. He had always been independent prior to that.
And and you know, as I looked at Trump through the first three
years or so, typical president says one thing doesn't another, it doesn't follow
through on what he has to say. People project what they want on these
presidents. But that type of thing was was usual, but twenty twenty was
a whole other level. It was the worst thing, in my opinion I've
seen my entire life in terms of politics, the biggest attack on our country,
on the constitution, on our liberties I've ever seen. And from the
very beginning of this, because I had followed the types of you know,
the weaponizes gain a function and things like that that I think is a very
very dangerous thing that should be stopped. And I talked about it going back
to twenty fourteen. Allison Young at USA Today did a very long expose about
that. It's a real problem. It was shut down at that point in
time, but Fauci and Francis Collins continued to do their research domestically, and
they also set up the Wuhan Institute. And so when this stuff started buzzing
around but China, I said, you know, this, this wet lab
thing is absolute nonsense. But did they really have something to escape out of
Wuhanna. So we need to keep an eye on that. But it was
clear from January on that they were hyping this into some kind of a global
pandemic where they didn't even have a body count, and don't cut us off.
It just we'll just extend this, Travis. Well, they didn't have
a body count, but they were coming up with the same procedures. Remind
people, it was January six, if you that's when they said. You
know, they showed pictures in China people suddenly falling down. Right, it's
very these dramatic pictures this virus, and this virus was now coming to the
United States. That's what you're talking about, that's right. Yeah, Yeah,
that was so incredibly fake. And then and then their reaction to this
was something that had been practiced in the United States by the intelligence agencies for
twenty years, going back to Dark Winter, which was two months before nine
to eleven. And then you had nine to eleven. The week after nine
eleven, you had the anthrax attack, and two months later, Congress sent
out a bunch of legislation to the States and said, give yourself the power
to a public health emergency to take everything from everybody, lock everybody down until
we get an experimental vaccine and they're going to be required to take it.
So we knew all of this stuff I knew it, Alex knew it,
and Mike Adams knew it. All of us knew that. When I saw
that, when I saw the falling down, I saw the other stuff.
It's like, okay, so it usually clared, David. What you're saying
is everyone knew that this whole wuon thing and this was basically a psy op
that was going on, and internally, even Alex knew that. I absolutely
believe that they We had talked for years about the games of panic and how
they would skew the statistics and all the rest of this stuff from a CDC
to get people do the annual flu vaccine thing. And as a matter of
fact, you know, Mike Adams had been involved in that as well,
and Mike Adams directly challenged me on that. So, oh, David Knight
doesn't know anything about math and all the rest of the stuff. It's like,
I've got an engineering degree. He says he's got a science degree,
but he doesn't say what it's in. He doesn't say where he got it
from. I'll tell everybody where. I got mine from University of South Florida
and an electrical engineering. Look, it's not rocket science, and it wasn't
even necessarily about the numbers. We were talking about how they manipulated the numbers
that they had done every year on an annual basis, But it was clearly
what their pattern of behavior and what they wanted from these simulations, and they
all knew about that, and so when they started selling this stuff, it's
like, you know, I pushed back on that. We had loggerheads,
and I started calling out Mike Adams my name, and yet Alex was giving
him the show on a regular basis, you know, like, which is
not a position that I had. But Alex would do three hours, and
you have a guest host, and so you just had Mike on all the
time. And he did the same type of stuff with me that you told
me he did with you, in terms of dumping somebody on unexpectedly. And
I was told by someone that i'd interviewed that I didn't watch Alex's programs because
I, you know, I had enough to do to create my own stuff
for a three hour show. And they said, yeah, Alex is telling
people that this isn't the bad vaccine, that the bad vaccine from the Gates
wants a really bad one. Trump is playing forty chess and he's he's not
doing that. I didn't believe, but let me just let me just state
that. So, so Alex was saying he was basically supporting Trump's fauci vaccine.
He was saying, this isn't as bad, This isn't as bad as
what Gates and the and the other people are because Trump is in there.
He's pulling it back, you know, like fifth dimensional chess, and he's
really his vaccine is not going to be as bad. So he's promoting that
stuff again to cowtow to the Trumpers. And I didn't believe that until one
day I was on. I didn't even respond to the guy. And then
one day I'm on the show with him. He wents to me come in
for a short segment or whatever. At the end of the segment as the
music is playing in the last thirty seconds and we're going out, you know,
he comes back on and he said that, and I didn't have it.
It cut me off. I didn't have a chance to respond to Alex,
say, David, what did he exactly say? Well said, well,
this is not the bad stuff. You know, you got a Trump
is there. He's keeping this under control. That type of I am paraphrasing
it. I don't have the exact quote, but he that's exactly what he
did. He sold that same line I'd been told that he was talking about.
But then it got worse because when we got to the when we got
to the election, and of course you know the new rules that the new
scam, I should say, the new corruption of the twenty twenty election was
based on what Trump did in terms of walking everybody down and doing it on
a vote by mail. And so then when we get to the election.
Two days after the election, Steve Pachenik, who was a guy who I
always had a lot of problems with, Steve Pachenik. Steve Pachenik was somebody
who he had a long history with a CIA. He was a consultant to
Tom Clancy. He's a great rack on tour and fiction writer, but in
these types of things, and that's how Alex used him. And he was
somebody who in reality had been involved with Operation Gladio, which is a major
false flag operation in Italy, the Red Brigade and these other things there were.
It was a NATO operation. The Prime Minister Aldo Moro was kidnapped and
he was executed by his kidnappers. But before that happened, Steve pa Chennik
was sent by Henry Kissinger to go talk to the kidnappers and supposedly let him
in to talk to the kidnapped Prime minister. And what the Italian government said
after they did an investigation afterwards, the Italian government said this is a false
flag operation. But Chennik came in and he talked to him, and Aldo
Moro knew that this that this was a false flag operation. He gave the
order to kill him. And so this is the background of this guy that
Alex has all the time. And it was a second time I had interviewed
him. He came on just before just as I had my first show,
and then I had when I had my own separate three hours show at Info
Wars. And then two months after that started in twenty seventeen, you had
the shooting in Las Vegas. I've been interviewing people all week about the shooting
in Las Vegas. And he comes on and he's supposed to come on for
two segments. He missed the first segment. He comes on with a second
segment and tried to stand back me to say that nobody had died at Las
Vegas, and I said, I don't believe that. I said, I
don't believe the official story, but I don't believe that nobody died. I
know why you're doing that, you know. And so I never had him
back on again. But two days after the election of twenty twenty, Chic
said, no one died in the Las Vegas show. That's right, that's
right. He's pushing the idea. And the reason he did that, of
course, is to try to destroy my credibility, try to get me in
trouble because all of the stuff about Sandy Hook had already hit, you know,
that was already a lawsuits. So he tries to pull that game on
me. And so two days after the election, he went on with on
Thursday. After the election, on Tuesday, he goes on with Owen Shroyer
and he says, this is a sting. He said, Trump knew everything
that was going on. He's working with Sissa, right, we were talking
about earlier. He's working with Sissa. They created a blockchain, watermark ballot,
and they've got quantum computing. It's just throwing out all this unrelated buzz
you know, buzzwords and terminology that didn't make any sense whatsoever. And he
said, and not only that, but we've got we know these people were
that cheated on the election, and we got twenty thousand National Guard troops that
have fanned out all across the country and they're the arrest of area. He
started, He's had that two days after the election, and no one's response
was Steve, I would if I if you were here, I'd just kiss
you right on the lips. I mean, no question about any of that
stuff. It was absolutely absurd, and so I pushed back against that heavily
on my show. On social media. I was told by Daria you know
that Steve Achenik called Alex and said he wanted me fired for that, and
so I but I kept on because Alex kept having him back on and that
had a lot of impact. Rush Limbaugh talked about that, and you had
Clarence Thomas's wife sent a text to Mark Meadows and said, I hope this
is true. It was. It went viral and it was giving everybody this
hope. And that was the well spring from which stopped the steel came.
And so Alex is down and stopped the steal with Ali Alexander, an ex
con man and ex convict, and you know, so they're running this thing,
and you know, I know I was opposing that, and I opposed
it all the way up to the point where I was fired. And of
course that week I was fired on Monday. That was when the electoral colleges
had David So because January sixth was that January six yeah, I was well,
December fourteenth was the monday that they turned in the votes from all the
different electoral college things. And I said, look, you know it's over
with folks. You know, whatever legal challenges or if they could have gone
there were five states that had Republican legislatures. It was razor thin. They
could have made a case for that, they didn't. So it isn't going
to happen. I said, this is nothing at this point but an obvious
grift. And so that Thursday I was fired and I continue and I began
this program the following Monday, and I continued to warn people about that.
I said, look, January the sixth is a trap, I said,
is going to be filled with agent provocateurs. There's nothing that can be accomplished.
Do not go to it. Washington, DC is dangerous and so forth,
And I said that every day, and my program going back the morning
of January sixth, my program ended before that started. I told people,
I say, get away from there, don't you know, And so you
know, I oppose that stuff from the very beginning. But I knew exactly
what that was all about. But David, what's interesting is the week prior
to that, January sixth, I was invited to give a talk, you
know, on what had occurred in our election, which was a real stuff,
chain of custody, signature verification, Mike Lindell and all these bozos another
disinformation. Yeah, all sorts of out there hid the real issues. And
this is what I think happens. There are real substantial issues, then these
clowns come and do a double whammy. They make money off talking crap like
Ali Alexander, you know, and then they mislead people away from the problem.
So I remember on January six we had a bus, you know,
that we were thinking of sending. And at the last minute, on January
third, I remember fourth I saw this freaking screwball, Ali Alexander, and
he hit in twenty eighteen one of our screwy volunteers to try to bring him
in as this guy doesn't smell right. And when I found out he was
read leading stop the steal, and then I saw him at the White House.
That's when I put it all together and I realized Trump was full of
that this was an operation and I haven't shared this to too many people.
And literally we had a busload of people and I called it off, and
all Trumpers were really angry with me. Oh, doctor Shiva, why aren't
I said, something is going to happen there. I said, this fool,
Alie Alexander is a scumbag and he's going to do something. And we
had a number of young people who probably be in jail right now, and
many of their parents called me, say, doctor Shiva, thank you.
But I could see Trump was with Alie Alexander. Stopped the steal was a
mon making organization, Yes, and Trump took all of my material, the
real stuff, and they juiced it up and they made about a half a
billion dollars. Well, if you go back and you're looking, it was
even Roger had a film crew that was falling him around and so they've even
got him filmed saying this is great. We're gonna make so much money out
of this. It's gonna be like falling off a log, and that's what
it was about. It was simply, it was about making money and building
audience. And what could be accomplished by giving money to Alex, you know,
to hold these rallies and stuff. Nothing and nothing could have been accomplished
on January sixth. It was all done by mid December. And like you,
I understand how elections are rigged. And as I said before, it
begins with the ballot. It begins with the bates, and it begins with
all the rest of stuff, how closed the political processes. But then it
also goes through all of the electronic stuff. And for years I had covered,
you know, how easy it is to hack into voting machines and various
things like that. They've had voter village at Defcon and black Hat Conference and
so forth. They've demonstrated how vulnerable these machines are. But Trump added a
whole new level of vulnerability with a vote by mail. I'm going to mail
out the ballots to everybody, and for him to complain about that and the
other thing that I was angry about. On the morning of January sixth,
I said, okay, so yesterday January the fifth, we had the runoff
in Georgia, not a single thing was changed about how the election was done
in Georgia. And look what happened. They just turned the Senate over to
the Democrats. And of course, even though we don't have a pandemic going,
we still have our elections are going to be run under those pandemic rules
that Trump put in. Now, tell me that's not a double cross.
That makes me furious when I look at that, I think. I think,
David, the key thing that you just brought up is they have two
goals. Make as much money as possible and get as much visibility as possible.
And people really need to understand this. It doesn't matter. It's all
theater to them. Yes, you get indicted, great, more money,
more visibility, Yeah, okay, Megan Kelly interviews me, more money,
more visibility, whatever happens, they get more money and more visibility. And
then there are other scoundrels like Booby Kennedy and Vivake the Snake. All of
these guys fault. It's part of the swarms ethos, screw people over,
create fake dialectics, make in fact, make these events take place. So
I came to the conclusion that Trump made a lot of money. When I
met with him, you know, he after all of this, he did
a big shout. I goes, oh, I want to thank doctor Shiva
who did all of this work. Yeah, I did all the work for
him so he could have the credibility to make that money. And when I
met with him for two hours, when I left and he had just endorsed
David in Massachusetts. This is last November. A guy who committed the election
fraud against us and Trump invited me to Marlago. I didn't go. My
assistant wrote him an email saying, we respectfully refused to come because you just
endorse someone did the election fraud. Again, it's our campaign. When I
went down there, because I was down in Miami, people begged me,
oh, doctor Sheva, go, doctor she would go. You should give
Trump a chance. Don't be so hypercritical. That two hour meeting was clearly
you know it was in a small room. He looked like an actor in
the back room. Okay, very frail. Do you know what the fuck
is going on? Frankly a moron? Okay, raising me apologizing why you
endorsed this guy? Taking notes of my sound bites that he could use in
his next speech. That's what that meeting was. And I left realizing this
guy's just a hollow shell. He's a puppet and what he cares about.
So he kept asking me, David, in that meeting at least twenty times,
what do you want for me? Like izo I'm some sycophant, I
said, I don't want anything from you. Two weeks later, I said,
you know what, that guy raised a lot of money off me.
Why didn't we set a real election systems Integrity Institute up? Because Harvard Stanford,
they have all their intellectuals always saying nothing's happening. So I went back
to him and I said, look, you made a half a billion dollars.
Why didn't you set aside some of this for this institute? Didn't want
to give one penny David. No. If you look at the people who
have been coindided with him, it's a very foolish strategy because he's not giving
them any money. He made the first day, I think he made four
million, The next day he made three. But it's like first couple of
days he made seven million dollars. But he's not paying for any of his
codefendants legal fees. He is Finally, after a couple of weeks, he's
going to hold a fundraiser from them, but he's not going to give him
any of his money, you know, and that's a very dangerous thing if
these guys are gonna swing, you know. I think that's the whole reason
that they indicted so many people. They want to get them to testify against
him. So there's a real game of thrones. I mean, these people
are out there there. It's even though he has been built up into this
anti globalists, which he is not. He gave the globalists everything that they
wanted. He even gave people training for universal basic income. Look at how
many people don't want to go back to physical work, you know, they
want to work from home or not work at all, and you have as
they make demands for them to go back to work, they just quit.
And so he gave people a taste of this, knowing what was going to
happen. Spend all of that money just from the financial side, but he
did everything that the globalists wanted to do. He's doing the same stuff that
you know, people like Boris Johnson and Emmanuel Macron and Justin Trudeau and all
the rest of it. They're all doing the same thing. But Trump,
we're supposed to believe, is the anti globalist, He's just the the you
know, the fake professional wrestling version of this, and so people need to
understand that it is just to show and you know, he's all these people
are in it for themselves, and I just this is the thing, though,
I hope that we don't have, as I've said, a civil war,
because I keep seeing people get more and more polarized and partisan in this
thing, not looking even after themselves. It's only simply about Trump, and
you really see this about January sixth. I don't care what happens. I'm
gonna go defend Trump, and I don't want to make him the Mason Dixon
Line of a new civil war. And that's what they're trying to do.
And that's that's something we've got to be very concerned about. Yeah, I
think getting back to you know, when I titled this conversation why David Knight
left Alex Jones, you know, a conversation. I think the key thing
here is Alex Jones represented himself as some independent journalist, but at the end
of the day, he fell in line with the globalist front man, which
is what Trump was and what happened he should you know, once you know
who Ali Alexander is. I mean, you're just gut instinct. You look
at that guy. He looks like a snake, Okay. And I was
very very fortunate listen to my gut instinct, David, and he pulled the
plug on that bus. A lot of people would be in jail right now.
And I believe that entire January six was an operation by Trump for the
swarm too, as a honey pot to find all of these people, bring
them in, and to jail them. That's white thesis, Okay. And
probably fifteen years from now someone will do an Academy Award winning movie which you'll
show that. You know, we'll just look at what happened, look at
the results, regardless of what his intentions were, look at how he responded
to all this, and how he let these people swing. You know,
he could have pardoned them before he left. He didn't pardon them. He
didn't pardon Julian Osange. You know, he pardoned the criminal, white collar
criminal, friends and family of his son in law and other people of that
ILK, but he didn't do anything for the people who laid their lives on
the line for him, nothing at all, and he doesn't care about the
rest of the world that he's unleashed this poison. He continued to promote that
until only about four or five months ago, that you know, it's the
greatest thing ever produced my mankind. It's a miracle as a moonshot, all
the rest of this stuff. No, it's killing people, and we all
know that. The amazing thing to me is the cognitive dissonance of the people
who know that. And I've seen it over and over again by political commentators
who hate the vaccine, and they hated the fact that Trump would promote it,
but they would say, Trump, You've got to stop promoting this.
It's like, why would you give him just reject this guy? You know
it's a lie. Do you think that he's that dishonest or is he that
stupid? And why would you then, you know, keep giving him this
advice. I mean, I saw that advice coming from Alex Jones, from
Wayne Allen Root over and over again, all of these different commentators that you
got to stop promoting the vaccine. People hate that. It's like, why
do people hate that? Let's talk about why they hate. It's because it's
killing people, you know, stop that. It's just amazing to me.
What I'm saying, David is they're giving him advice, not the benefit of
others, but to maintain their own credibility because they know they have an individual
was part of the swarm, and they're making money off of it. Alex
made a load of money promoting Trump. Okay, all these follow the money,
and you know when I had to do the just like I had to
expose Kennedy, you know, all these women were like, oh, you
should work with Bobby. We want to donate you a lot of money.
This is guy's full I could have played that game, but I can't.
Yeah. Right, Oh, you know talk about the money. You know,
it came out with this lawsuit that he had, the Sandy Hook lawsuit.
Record amount of money that he made the spring of twenty twenty betraying this
company, this country. Just amazing to me. I mean, I knew
he was making a lot of money because they said, well, you know,
the storable food. People can't keep up with it. And it's like,
well, you know, who knows what Trump is going to do to
us next, so we need to prepare, you know, have some storable
food or whatever, but her made a record amount of money, and then
of course he finished it up again at the end of the year with the
election stuff, just like Trump. Did you know hundreds of millions of dollars
Trump made. Yeah, it's basically using these crises to perpetuate them without any
solution and manipulating people. Yeah, crises, those solutions. They do not
want to build a movement to address the fundamental issues. They want to perpetuate
the crisis because they make money talking about the crisis. That's why when I
look at Carlson when he was at Fox News, he's texting people David and
Will end on this right, It's like it's like another Alex Jones. You're
texting internally like what you just shared, telling people there is no election fraud.
Then he sees some aga movement wanting that news, goes out shares it
and the reason that Fox. I don't care about Fox, But what what
Carlson did was tee up Fox to lose probably four billion dollars in trouble damages
because they had enough data. The fact it would have been defamation with malice,
right, because he internally knew that he didn't believe any of this stuff.
Well, then, of course it was also the Rayps. It was
also the Rayps stuff. You know, they fired him the day after his
sixteen minutes did the Rayps thing because they're going to get serious about it.
But you can see with Darren Beaty at Revolver, with Alex, with Tucker,
the rest of these people, they focused on Reyps. Why would they
focus on Reps. Did Rayps make hundreds of millions of dollars getting people to
go to to Washington on January sixth? No? Did they go there because
ray Epps told them to go there? No? If ray Epps is an
agent provocateur. And again, the place was riddled with it. And you
knew that there was going to be riddled with it. You look at anything
that the FBI does with all that stuff, you knew that was going to
happen if you had an ounce of sense, and of course these people all
did know it. That's what makes it so bad. They knew that it
was going to be filled with agent provocateurs, but they wanted to fill their
pockets with money. They didn't really care what happened to these people. But
you know, just in the same way that you're talking about Carlson. I've
seen the same type of stuff behind the scenes. I know what these guys
think and I know what they say. I know what they think and say
about Trump, and it's come out occasionally. You see the videos released of
Alex going off on it. But I know what that stuff is about.
It's fake and they don't say what they believe. They betray the country,
and they do it so they can make a lot of money. It's just
that I think it's really Look, whether it's Alex Jones, Carlson, Donald
Trump, all of these people, they actually hate America. That's how we
have to It's a very clear line. They do not love this country.
They do not stand for these values. They may say they do, but
you look at their actions, yes, they do not. You know,
Tucker Trump could have led all those people. He could have pardoned those people
instead. Pardon Jared Kushner's father, right, who hired a prostitute to blackmail
his own wife. Yeah, that's the kind of people he pardoned. Right.
He's the one who told people I will follow you. It's in words,
I would follow you to the capitol. He had the other way,
right, So all of this theater, everyone needs to pretend this is literally
like w W E theater and don't you get that? And by the way,
David, you know who who is Donald Trump's agent? Who has the
guy from wrestling that McMahon or what? Who is it? Ry Vanuel?
Emanuel? You know part of the Rahm Emmanuel who owns ours Agency? And
Endeavor who owns UFC who just bought w WE? Is it one who is
Trump's agent? Okay? So all of this is theater. It is.
Once people get that, they're going to get very very angry, once they
really understand how they're being played. Trump it wanted to be an actor.
He's an actor, Okay. Alex is an entertainer. Carlson is a CIA
frontman. All right, these people don't give a damn about you. And
the only way forward Alex, you know. Closing, I just want to
say, look, the reason I decided to run was we need to build
a movement. And I decided to run because we can use the chaos that
they're doing to direct people back to you. And everything I say to this
is about empowering you. You have to understand truth, freedom and health,
they're interrelated. We have to build a bottom up movement and I'm one of
us. Why isn't one of us always there? And they do not want
to give visibility to us. So the only way out I keep telling people,
Alex is I mean, I'm David, is I tell people to go
get this bumper sticker, because when they do this and they peel it and
they put it on their wind shield. Some people just take it and they
leave it on their dining room table. But when they do that, it's
a physical act that they're doing of activism. We have open sourced all of
our flyers. Of flyers start with the fact that the US life expectancy is
going like this, so your children is going to die younger than you.
And it's not the vaccines. It's a systems problem that goes back sixty years.
It's a you know, from an engineering standpoint, David, it's a
set of things right. And then we teach people who is a swarm and
that they have to get educated and they have to go on the ground.
They have to become warriors and scholars. So that's what we're doing, David,
and that's why our campaign is very fascinating because I'm seeing this evolution of
people. We're getting over the Trump getting over the Alex Jones is getting over
the carl Sins and everyone we get over David is like a razorblade to the
swarm. You know, once you've found out that you've been to see once
you come to that, realize it's difficult to get people to admit that they've
been fulled. But once you realize, right they pull that wool over your
eyes, well they're not going to do it to you again, and you
become really angry about that. And I know that from a personal experience.
It's been great talking to you, doctor Shiva, and give us your website
where people can find you. Yeah, so Shiva should go people, I
should go to Shiva Shiv a numeral four president dot com and you can,
you know, get these bumper stickers. Right, That's the main thing I'm
getting. We want to get millions of these out there. And if you
go to the download section, David, people can get this flyer. You
know, I go out to the train station. I give them out at
least once a week. We have everyone out there. We want to get
millions of these out. The other thing is people can go to Truth Freedomhealth
dot com and that's where they get the training David. The scientific training they
get basically engineering systems training, David, that they don't have to pay hundreds
of thousands of dollars for, but they and we have a community. Our
model is you take the course, you can give it away as many children.
You get to be a philanthropist. So it's really a learned, teach
and serve model. And the last thing is I tell people to go to
vashiva dot com slash orientation. We do an open house every Thursday's at eleven
am and eight pm, for example, and it's their educational open houses.
Yesterday we talked about noise pollution, how noise affects the physiology, and we
went through that, and in the morning we talked about the real costs of
gun violence, the real costs beyond left and right. So they're very and
we take systems approaches to this, so people break out of the dialectics,
they actually see things what they are and what the solution is. David,
Well, that's a key thing. We got to break out of that,
you know, Gilly and dialectic, the dichotomy, the false dichotomy that they
give us. We've got to break out of this party system and we need
to focus on ourselves, on our community, and not so much on Washington.
We need to keep an eye on Washington. We need to understand what
these guys are up to. But they don't have the solution. They are
the problem, always have been. Thank you so much for joining us.
It's been great. Well, thanks for sharing everything. Thank you, be
well, thank you. That's right, thank you, And so that's our
program for today, about a half hour over. But thank you so much
for joining us. Have a good weekend. And no, it's uh.
Apologize for the language. I know some people had some issues about that,
but you know, it is. It is what it is. I did
not realize that's kind of I would have said something to him about that and
before we started. But thank you so much for joining in, and have
a good weekend. We'll see you know on Monday, hopeful. Let me
show you the day the night show you can listen to with your ears.
You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you
can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Knightshow right now.
Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else, You can
find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at the
David Nightshow. Dot com that's a website.