WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:05.320
Nobody likes graffiti, or no business
owner likes graffiti. I don't like graffiti.

2
00:00:06.040 --> 00:00:12.599
And the one city service in the
City of Fresno that I interact with

3
00:00:13.080 --> 00:00:18.280
the most and thereby appreciate the most. And there's nothing against Fresno PD,

4
00:00:18.480 --> 00:00:24.440
I just haven't really had occasion to
have all that much interaction with them.

5
00:00:24.839 --> 00:00:30.600
My favorite city service, as someone
who runs a nonprofit organization to a non

6
00:00:30.679 --> 00:00:36.039
profit organization in the city of Fresno, my favorite city service is the graffiti

7
00:00:36.079 --> 00:00:42.079
removal service. The City of Fresno's
graffiti removal service is very quick. They

8
00:00:42.079 --> 00:00:46.000
do a pretty good job. My
building, the building that we own for

9
00:00:46.079 --> 00:00:49.600
Right to Life of Central California,
is not in the best part of town.

10
00:00:49.679 --> 00:00:54.520
It gets tagged all the time,
and so and all the time,

11
00:00:54.759 --> 00:00:58.679
I should say, probably about you
know, about four or five times a

12
00:00:58.759 --> 00:01:03.280
year, someone will come by and
spray graffiti either on our building or on

13
00:01:03.640 --> 00:01:11.519
the garbage dump, on our neighbors
building, the garbage dump faces our parking

14
00:01:11.560 --> 00:01:15.879
lot, or right in our next
door neighbors building, et cetera. People

15
00:01:15.920 --> 00:01:21.079
are constantly tagging this stuff with graffiti. And so what I do is I

16
00:01:21.159 --> 00:01:27.040
see it and I call the City
of Fresno, and I tell them,

17
00:01:27.120 --> 00:01:32.359
hey, I'm at this address.
You can access it from the street.

18
00:01:32.519 --> 00:01:34.840
It's right on the side of the
building. Blah blah blah. And within

19
00:01:36.280 --> 00:01:41.040
usually within a day or so,
someone from the city and I've seen their

20
00:01:41.120 --> 00:01:45.159
truck. It's like a nice,
big, old pickup truck with a whole

21
00:01:45.200 --> 00:01:49.840
bunch of equipment and stuff in the
back. They drive by and they cover

22
00:01:49.879 --> 00:01:52.000
it up. They try to match
the pain as best they can, and

23
00:01:52.280 --> 00:01:55.959
they cover up the graffiti and it's
free. So it's a really nice service

24
00:01:56.000 --> 00:02:02.280
and something I like. There's this
push now and clearly it was some kind

25
00:02:02.280 --> 00:02:07.359
of press conference or something yesterday.
City of Fresno is having some kind of

26
00:02:07.359 --> 00:02:19.000
push to reduce and eliminate graffiti.
So they have this big press conference and

27
00:02:19.360 --> 00:02:22.879
they've got sort of this multi pronged
effort. It looks like it looks like

28
00:02:23.719 --> 00:02:28.599
the police department is going to have
more focus on it. The City Attorney's

29
00:02:28.680 --> 00:02:37.360
office under Andrew Jan's erstwhile candidate for
Congress and then candidate for the mayor's office,

30
00:02:38.240 --> 00:02:43.759
he's trying to make a splash with
how he's approaching it. His office

31
00:02:43.800 --> 00:02:49.840
will handle the day to day cases
to impose punishments. Lisa Smith Camp's office,

32
00:02:50.000 --> 00:02:53.520
the DA is she's looking at it. They're mentioning that if people do

33
00:02:53.599 --> 00:02:59.599
more than four hundred dollars worth of
damage, that that results in a felony

34
00:03:00.080 --> 00:03:05.599
charge, and that the DA's office
is going to bring felony charges unless people

35
00:03:06.120 --> 00:03:14.080
provide full restitution. So there's all
this, and it just highlights to me

36
00:03:15.719 --> 00:03:20.520
sometimes how bad the media is at
their job for how they report on this,

37
00:03:20.599 --> 00:03:29.560
because there's no the follow up question. So I scroll through this story.

38
00:03:30.240 --> 00:03:36.560
The graffiti Removal task Force are the
guys who actually do the graffiti abatement.

39
00:03:38.240 --> 00:03:42.719
As I say, it's like a
truck with some equipment in the back,

40
00:03:43.360 --> 00:03:46.280
various kinds of paints. I'm sure
they've got various kinds of chemicals,

41
00:03:46.319 --> 00:03:52.719
solvents, whatever to remove paint.
I'm sure the kinds of stuff you got

42
00:03:52.840 --> 00:03:54.759
to use. If someone spray paints
on glass, that's got to be something

43
00:03:54.800 --> 00:04:00.319
different rather than well, we're just
going to cover up paint. You know

44
00:04:00.400 --> 00:04:03.639
that's on a painted wall already.
Just get some paint that matches the wall.

45
00:04:04.960 --> 00:04:10.879
So it's like two guys with a
truck. That's the task force.

46
00:04:11.000 --> 00:04:15.199
And I'm not sure if they've got
multiple such trucks, multiple such teams.

47
00:04:15.240 --> 00:04:18.040
But I've seen these guys at work, and I kind of know what it

48
00:04:18.079 --> 00:04:21.920
is. It's a truck with a
bunch of equipment, some chemicals and stuff

49
00:04:21.959 --> 00:04:28.879
in the back, and two guys. So let's say maybe they have three

50
00:04:28.959 --> 00:04:32.199
such guys. I'd have to imagine
they're probably not. You know, let's

51
00:04:32.240 --> 00:04:44.439
imagine they have three such trucks.
Now, this article, this article from

52
00:04:44.439 --> 00:04:47.920
AYBEC thirty, and I'm only talking
about ABC thirty just to slam them,

53
00:04:48.000 --> 00:04:56.720
so just shows how bad either how
and this must show either how bad the

54
00:04:56.800 --> 00:05:01.439
media is at reporting on this or
how un believably wasteful our city government spending

55
00:05:01.519 --> 00:05:09.920
is. It's one or the other. While city leaders explained how the various

56
00:05:09.920 --> 00:05:13.920
departments would work together, the graffiti
behind them slowly disappeared as members of the

57
00:05:13.959 --> 00:05:15.839
President Graffiti Team painted over the tags. Oh okay, so they gave a

58
00:05:15.839 --> 00:05:20.720
demonstration of how the Graffiti Task Force
does their work. Very good. The

59
00:05:20.759 --> 00:05:26.920
city estimates this is the thing that
I was like there, either this is

60
00:05:27.079 --> 00:05:33.240
obviously false or our whole approach to
this is complete nonsense. The city estimates

61
00:05:33.279 --> 00:05:45.680
that it costs thirty thousand dollars every
time the team is called up is called

62
00:05:45.680 --> 00:05:54.680
out to clean up spray paint,
and about two million dollars per year.

63
00:05:57.879 --> 00:06:02.600
Let me read that again. The
city estimates that it costs thirty thousand dollars

64
00:06:02.680 --> 00:06:08.480
every time the team is called out
to clean up spray paint, and about

65
00:06:08.519 --> 00:06:18.079
two million dollars per year. ABC
thirty just prints that without wait a minute,

66
00:06:18.160 --> 00:06:29.879
it costs thirty thousand dollars every time
the graffiti abatement people go to a

67
00:06:29.920 --> 00:06:34.680
business and clean up graffiti, and
two million dollars a year. This is

68
00:06:34.720 --> 00:06:39.360
a two million dollar line item in
the budget for the City of Fresno.

69
00:06:42.680 --> 00:06:46.439
I mean, let's do the math. Why would they say thirty thousand dollars

70
00:06:46.480 --> 00:06:53.879
a year and two million dollars thirty
thousand dollars each time and two million dollars

71
00:06:53.920 --> 00:06:59.000
per year. Okay, so let's
do the math. If it's two million

72
00:06:59.040 --> 00:07:04.800
dollars per year, I guess that
would mean that that's the amount of money

73
00:07:04.839 --> 00:07:11.399
the city spends on it, two
million dollars per year. Why would it

74
00:07:11.439 --> 00:07:17.319
cost Why would they say two million
dollars per year? And they're talking about

75
00:07:17.360 --> 00:07:24.360
this is a cost for whenever the
team comes out to fix it. So

76
00:07:24.519 --> 00:07:28.560
not the damage, This is not
the damage to the business. This is

77
00:07:28.639 --> 00:07:32.839
the cost to the city. Seemingly
okay. So if the line item in

78
00:07:32.839 --> 00:07:39.920
the city budget for graffitia batement is
two million dollars, which I'm will jump

79
00:07:39.959 --> 00:07:45.680
into that, that seems high.
Two million dollars divided by thirty thousand,

80
00:07:45.879 --> 00:07:48.759
okay, because they say it costs
thirty thousand every time they go out and

81
00:07:48.800 --> 00:07:56.040
it's a two million dollar budget.
Well, two million dollars divided by thirty

82
00:07:56.079 --> 00:08:05.120
thousand is sixty six point sixty six
visits. So you're telling me that the

83
00:08:05.160 --> 00:08:11.319
graffiti abatement people abate graffiti only sixty
seven times. That doesn't make any sense.

84
00:08:13.000 --> 00:08:16.759
I mean, they've they come to
right to life. They come to

85
00:08:16.800 --> 00:08:20.319
right to life of Central California's building
four times a year alone. There's no

86
00:08:20.360 --> 00:08:31.519
way they only abate sixty six buildings. So what are we spending per And

87
00:08:31.639 --> 00:08:37.120
again that's why I was talking about. And by the way, this is

88
00:08:39.120 --> 00:08:41.360
the you know this. I'm bringing
this up because the city's bringing this up

89
00:08:41.480 --> 00:08:46.080
here. We have this big press
conference and the cities do all these initiatives

90
00:08:46.120 --> 00:08:50.559
to get rid of graffiti, including
some that are really dopey from Andrew Jans

91
00:08:50.600 --> 00:08:54.279
that I'll talk about in the second
segment, all these measures to abate graffiti.

92
00:08:54.519 --> 00:08:58.440
Yes, it's important that we abate
graffiti. Jerry Dyer's out there saying,

93
00:08:58.440 --> 00:09:01.159
well, you want to be graffiti
free city. It's like, all

94
00:09:01.240 --> 00:09:05.879
right, well maybe that's kind of
ambitious, buddy. Maybe a less graffiti

95
00:09:07.080 --> 00:09:11.159
city maybe to start with, because
there's a whole stinking lot of graffiti around

96
00:09:11.200 --> 00:09:18.039
town, and graffiti pops up newly
like all the time. I guess I

97
00:09:18.120 --> 00:09:26.360
admire the tenacity in certain places of
abating graffiti when it comes up. I

98
00:09:26.679 --> 00:09:31.559
I you know, pretty much every
day I would drive along Shaw Avenue and

99
00:09:31.720 --> 00:09:37.879
there was this new AT and T
store that was being built on Shaw Avenue

100
00:09:37.360 --> 00:09:43.480
where basically, as this building was
being built, it had sort of the

101
00:09:43.519 --> 00:09:46.200
back wall of it was against the
corner of this one intersection on Shaw,

102
00:09:46.600 --> 00:09:52.080
and people the whole period of construction, people were tagging it and tagging it

103
00:09:52.120 --> 00:09:54.919
and tagging it, and the graffiti
would get covered and he would get covered

104
00:09:54.919 --> 00:09:58.519
and it'd get covered, and it
was like this constant tug of war between

105
00:09:58.000 --> 00:10:05.440
the I guess At and T or
whoever owns the building and the graffiti,

106
00:10:05.759 --> 00:10:09.279
the graffitiers, but it was constantly, constantly, constantly getting tagged. All

107
00:10:09.440 --> 00:10:13.919
kinds of new construction that I see
where people are trying to build a building,

108
00:10:15.519 --> 00:10:22.919
I'm sure is getting hampered by people
graffitiing the building as it's being constructed.

109
00:10:22.879 --> 00:10:28.720
There's a new kind of like sort
of convenience store, quickie mart near

110
00:10:28.759 --> 00:10:33.159
a gas station that's being built along
Ashland. The brand new building, you

111
00:10:33.159 --> 00:10:39.080
know, brand new windows being put
in place immediately getting graffiti. So it

112
00:10:39.200 --> 00:10:43.200
is a problem. And what Dyer
is pointing out is that, hey,

113
00:10:43.240 --> 00:10:46.159
we have a lot of people,
businesses that are looking to invest more in

114
00:10:46.240 --> 00:10:50.000
Fresno. We want to have a
good foot forward. We want to get

115
00:10:50.080 --> 00:10:54.000
rid of graffiti. So he's making
it a bigger priority. The police are

116
00:10:54.039 --> 00:10:58.679
making a bigger priority, The city
attorney's making a bigger priority, the county

117
00:10:58.720 --> 00:11:03.879
district attorney. He's making it a
bigger priority. That's all well and good,

118
00:11:03.240 --> 00:11:09.159
but what do we actually spend on
it? How much is the Graffiti

119
00:11:09.159 --> 00:11:11.519
Task Force in use? Is the
point of this to get them out there

120
00:11:11.559 --> 00:11:16.279
more? No questioning, seemingly from
ABC thirty about the numbers that are being

121
00:11:16.279 --> 00:11:22.240
presented, which make absolutely no sense. How can it possibly cost thirty thousand

122
00:11:22.279 --> 00:11:30.159
dollars for the city every time the
abatement team comes out. The abatement team

123
00:11:30.200 --> 00:11:33.039
is two guys with a truck.
If that so, if you've got two

124
00:11:33.080 --> 00:11:39.360
guys working for the city, you
know, city municipal works of some sort,

125
00:11:39.399 --> 00:11:41.320
I guess who are probably making Let's
say, I don't know, fifty

126
00:11:41.320 --> 00:11:46.840
grand a year. Let's say he's
sixty grand, seventy grand a year with

127
00:11:46.919 --> 00:11:52.360
benefits you've got, So let's say
that's one hundred and forty thousand dollars.

128
00:11:54.320 --> 00:11:56.960
The truck costs fifty dollars, one
hundred ninety thousand dollars. Maybe all the

129
00:11:58.000 --> 00:12:01.120
chemicals and stuff cost another forty thousand
dollar, So two hundred thirty thousand dollars

130
00:12:01.360 --> 00:12:09.639
per year for that truck. I
mean, if they abate eight properties,

131
00:12:09.240 --> 00:12:16.080
that's thirty thousand, eight properties in
a year at thirty thousand dollars per pop,

132
00:12:16.320 --> 00:12:18.879
that that would cover their whole cost. They're they're abating way more than

133
00:12:20.039 --> 00:12:24.159
eight. They're doing way more than
eight graffiti abatement, you know, per

134
00:12:24.240 --> 00:12:31.879
year. But no, there's no
there's no real follow up, there's no

135
00:12:33.000 --> 00:12:39.440
questioning. It's just yeah, like
and and no question of like do we

136
00:12:39.519 --> 00:12:45.600
need to spend two million on graffiti
abatement? I mean, even if you

137
00:12:45.840 --> 00:12:52.080
had three such trucks with two guys
per truck and that's all they did,

138
00:12:52.720 --> 00:12:58.360
that's not even quite getting you to
a million dollars the city spending two million

139
00:12:58.399 --> 00:13:05.759
on graffiti abatement. Now, I
don't know. Maybe are you counting all

140
00:13:05.799 --> 00:13:09.639
the whatever police reports come from graffiti
stuff? Are you counting that in it?

141
00:13:09.720 --> 00:13:15.240
No, it's just counting the graffiti
abatement team. This is the kind

142
00:13:15.279 --> 00:13:20.840
of lazy stuff that happens with local
reporting all the time. Like there's obviously

143
00:13:20.919 --> 00:13:24.879
context here that's completely missed. Nobody
thinks to catch it though, because it's

144
00:13:24.919 --> 00:13:31.519
just on to the next thing.
Reporters know a little bit about a lot

145
00:13:31.559 --> 00:13:39.279
of things that they have this surface
level, this shallow surface level understanding of

146
00:13:39.360 --> 00:13:43.919
a lot of things, which leads
to the phenomenon which I always remember my

147
00:13:45.000 --> 00:13:48.559
grandpa telling me this. Listen him
saying basically, anytime he read a news

148
00:13:48.600 --> 00:13:54.360
report about something that he himself had
personal knowledge of, that he could always

149
00:13:54.440 --> 00:14:00.000
identify at least four errors, four
big whoppers of something that the article got

150
00:14:00.120 --> 00:14:05.840
wrong. And I feel like this
is the case. I sort of feel

151
00:14:05.879 --> 00:14:13.559
like I sort of feel like the
city of Fresno really lacks for great local

152
00:14:13.720 --> 00:14:18.639
investigative journalism. If I had more
time, maybe I could do it.

153
00:14:18.679 --> 00:14:24.120
I don't know. I've already got
two jobs. Maybe I should have kind

154
00:14:24.120 --> 00:14:26.600
of two three jobs. I don't
know. I've got right to life,

155
00:14:26.639 --> 00:14:28.519
I've got my clinic, I've got
this show. You know, if maybe

156
00:14:28.559 --> 00:14:31.840
if I had a little more time
on my hands, maybe I could do

157
00:14:31.879 --> 00:14:37.320
it. But real investigative journalism,
whether it's from a columnist, whether and

158
00:14:37.840 --> 00:14:43.159
I think this is the kind of
thing where the lack of you know,

159
00:14:43.440 --> 00:14:46.600
look, I guess I don't cry
too many big alligator tiers for you know,

160
00:14:46.919 --> 00:14:50.360
the demise of local newspapers. You
know, I mean when you look

161
00:14:50.360 --> 00:14:56.240
at, for example, ad revenue
that local newspapers bring in now versus you

162
00:14:56.240 --> 00:15:01.360
know, thirty years ago. Thirty
years ago, newspapers were raking in Basically,

163
00:15:01.399 --> 00:15:07.440
today newspapers bring in about one tenth
of the amount of advertising revenue that

164
00:15:07.480 --> 00:15:11.600
they did, you know, thirty
years ago. Nationwide, So newspapers are

165
00:15:11.600 --> 00:15:15.720
becoming so irrelevant as more and more
people get their news from you know,

166
00:15:16.360 --> 00:15:20.840
national websites. More important, people
get their news from watching Fox News or

167
00:15:20.840 --> 00:15:26.200
CNN, and there's a real dearth
of local reporters and local reporting. But

168
00:15:26.279 --> 00:15:31.799
this is the kind of thing where
you feel the pinch when we return Andrew

169
00:15:31.879 --> 00:15:37.320
Jans's Kakamemi idea for how to punish
graffiti. ER's next on the John Girlready

170
00:15:37.320 --> 00:15:43.480
Show. City of Fresno is making
a big old deal about there. There's

171
00:15:43.519 --> 00:15:50.360
gonna be this big concentrated push to
abate graffiti, to stop prevent graffiti on

172
00:15:52.320 --> 00:15:56.240
businesses, on buildings throughout the city
of Fresno. Sounds good, noble goal.

173
00:15:56.559 --> 00:16:02.000
Nothing against it. A big press
conference yesterday. You've got the mayor,

174
00:16:02.039 --> 00:16:03.320
You've got the police chief, You've
got the DA, you've got the

175
00:16:03.320 --> 00:16:07.279
city attorney, all of them with
all their different ideas for how the City

176
00:16:07.279 --> 00:16:08.679
of Fresno is going to do more
and more to a bate graffiti. They

177
00:16:08.759 --> 00:16:17.559
highlight the City of Fresno Graffiti Abatement
Team. They give these eye poppingly preposterous

178
00:16:17.840 --> 00:16:22.240
numbers that it costs two million dollars
for the city to abate graffiti per year,

179
00:16:22.320 --> 00:16:23.159
which I tried to break that down. That didn't make a lot of

180
00:16:23.200 --> 00:16:29.200
sense. That said, it costs
thirty thousand dollars each time the graffiti abatement

181
00:16:29.240 --> 00:16:34.720
team goes out to abate graffiti,
which also made absolutely no sense. Seems

182
00:16:34.720 --> 00:16:41.960
as though the local news coverage didn't
really address that. Why would it cost

183
00:16:41.000 --> 00:16:45.039
thirty thousand dollars? The graffitia abatement
team is two guys with a truck and

184
00:16:45.080 --> 00:16:48.360
some chemicals and paint in the back. Why would it cost thirty thousand dollars

185
00:16:48.399 --> 00:16:52.519
every time? Why does it cost
thirty two million dollars per year on graffitia

186
00:16:52.519 --> 00:16:57.159
abatement divided by thirty thousand dollars for
each visit means that they've only like abated

187
00:16:57.279 --> 00:17:02.480
sixty seven building and I can tell
you Right to Life is four of those.

188
00:17:02.519 --> 00:17:07.440
Anyway, numbers didn't seem to make
a lot of sense. The other

189
00:17:07.480 --> 00:17:11.240
thing that didn't make a lot of
sense to me was the proposal from city

190
00:17:11.240 --> 00:17:22.000
attorney Andrew Jans for how to go
about addressing offenders who engage in graffiti.

191
00:17:22.720 --> 00:17:29.839
Now, my guess with graffiti is
my guess, and I'm admittedly not a

192
00:17:29.920 --> 00:17:32.480
total expert. Maybe Andrew Jans knows
a heck of a lot more than I

193
00:17:32.480 --> 00:17:44.440
do. Often, graffiti is done
by guys in gangs. Often, probably

194
00:17:44.440 --> 00:17:51.079
not all the time, but often
often it is done as a way of

195
00:17:51.319 --> 00:18:02.880
indicating which gang is in control of
which piece of turf. Okay, very

196
00:18:02.960 --> 00:18:11.640
very often graffiti is indicates some kind
of gang affiliation. I know the graffiti

197
00:18:11.880 --> 00:18:18.119
that has been at various times on
on or around my property. I've been

198
00:18:18.160 --> 00:18:22.960
able to kind of look up sometimes
the symbols or logos or things that are

199
00:18:23.000 --> 00:18:26.680
written. I've, honestly my whole
life, have had a very hard time

200
00:18:26.759 --> 00:18:33.759
reading graffiti. I don't know if
that's just me, but anyway, I

201
00:18:33.799 --> 00:18:37.880
think at times I've even seen in
different places, like graffiti that's obviously MS

202
00:18:37.960 --> 00:18:44.720
thirteen, which is that horrible Central
American gang. Now, maybe it's copycat

203
00:18:44.799 --> 00:18:48.519
stuff, I don't know. Nonetheless, a lot of times graffiti is gang

204
00:18:48.559 --> 00:18:52.960
related, not all the time,
maybe some, you know, I'm happy

205
00:18:53.000 --> 00:19:00.599
to acknowledge that sometimes it's dumb knucklehead
teenagers wanting to do something naughty. Okay,

206
00:19:02.000 --> 00:19:06.720
maybe maybe that's what it is.
Yes, I say naughty because I

207
00:19:06.759 --> 00:19:10.480
have my children are nine, seven, five, three and one, So

208
00:19:10.519 --> 00:19:15.160
I still talk about misbehavior in terms
of naughtiness. Okay, so give me

209
00:19:15.160 --> 00:19:23.319
some leeway. There one of the
things Andrew Jans says, and in fairness,

210
00:19:23.319 --> 00:19:29.720
he's saying this for first time offenders. I guess my fear is that

211
00:19:29.759 --> 00:19:33.440
a lot of first time offenders.
Are they really first time offenders? Or

212
00:19:33.519 --> 00:19:40.920
this is the first time you've caught
them. Jans is quoted as saying,

213
00:19:41.039 --> 00:19:45.240
how how is how so? How
is the City Attorney's office going to address

214
00:19:45.279 --> 00:19:51.599
this? City Attorney's Office is going
to be the main entity prosecuting violations of

215
00:19:51.599 --> 00:19:56.839
city ordinances for graffitiing. Uh,
it's only for more serious cases that it'll

216
00:19:56.839 --> 00:20:02.480
go to the DA. Okay,
fair enough, reasonable tiering of responsibilities here.

217
00:20:03.119 --> 00:20:06.319
City Attorney Andrew Jans said his office
will handle the day to day cases

218
00:20:06.319 --> 00:20:11.119
and impose punishments such as fines and
community service that discouraged the behaviors. Here's

219
00:20:11.119 --> 00:20:14.759
the quote from Jance. Andrew Jans, by the way, who wants seemingly

220
00:20:14.839 --> 00:20:18.759
wants to keep his name in the
public eye ran for Congress unsuccessfully against Devin

221
00:20:18.839 --> 00:20:25.359
Nunez in twenty eighteen, ran for
mayor unsuccessfully against Dyer four years ago.

222
00:20:26.680 --> 00:20:30.920
He says, if their first time
offenders the graffiti years, if their first

223
00:20:30.920 --> 00:20:36.960
time offenders, have them do community
service, have them meet with the owner

224
00:20:37.759 --> 00:20:41.599
to see what type of damage they
are doing to the business owner, the

225
00:20:41.640 --> 00:20:48.279
business owner's family, and their pocketbook, said Jans. All right, let

226
00:20:48.279 --> 00:20:55.839
me just tell Andrew Jans, city
attorney Jans, I am the precise kind

227
00:20:55.880 --> 00:21:00.640
of person impacted by graffiti in the
city of Fresno. I run a nonprofit.

228
00:21:00.960 --> 00:21:04.240
It gets graffitied all the time.
It makes the nonprofit look like crud.

229
00:21:06.039 --> 00:21:10.480
Makes me embarrassed to have people come
visit the nonprofit. That maybe that

230
00:21:10.519 --> 00:21:14.119
costs me donor dollars. I don't
know. It's not nice. I don't

231
00:21:14.240 --> 00:21:18.839
like it. I am impacted by
graffiti. I have to call the graffiti

232
00:21:18.839 --> 00:21:22.839
a batement. People at least,
you know, four times per year or

233
00:21:22.839 --> 00:21:27.720
so something around that, sometimes more, sometimes less. The last thing I

234
00:21:27.799 --> 00:21:34.480
want to do is meet in person
with whoever is graffitiing my building. All

235
00:21:34.559 --> 00:21:38.519
right, I don't care if you
say it's a first time offender. This

236
00:21:38.680 --> 00:21:44.039
is probably not their first time.
Okay, it's the first time you caught

237
00:21:44.079 --> 00:21:51.759
them. I don't want to meet
with someone who is maybe a gang member

238
00:21:52.079 --> 00:21:55.160
so that they can look me in
the eye and know me by sight.

239
00:21:56.319 --> 00:22:00.039
I'm not sure any business owner wants
that. What we all want is just

240
00:22:02.440 --> 00:22:04.640
the trend of graffitiing to stop,
and when it happens, to get it

241
00:22:04.680 --> 00:22:08.279
abated quickly. That's all we want, all right. I don't need to

242
00:22:08.400 --> 00:22:11.160
meet with this person. I don't
need to look him in the eye.

243
00:22:11.559 --> 00:22:15.440
I just, frankly, I think
it would kind of be dangerous. I

244
00:22:15.559 --> 00:22:21.640
wish him well, the graffitier,
if he's genuinely you know, I wish

245
00:22:21.720 --> 00:22:23.400
that person well. I don't wish
that they burn in hell or anything.

246
00:22:23.480 --> 00:22:29.200
I want those people to reform their
lives. I have genuine Christian charity for

247
00:22:29.240 --> 00:22:33.759
them. I'd rather not have them
be able to id me by sight,

248
00:22:33.440 --> 00:22:38.359
and also I d me by sight
and know where I work, you know,

249
00:22:38.720 --> 00:22:44.559
from my nine to five. Would
really rather not have that. That

250
00:22:44.720 --> 00:22:49.079
seems like an absolutely terrible idea,
given the amount of graffiti in this city

251
00:22:49.119 --> 00:22:57.559
that is clearly gang related. When
we return, how AI is getting controlled

252
00:22:59.000 --> 00:23:04.400
by liberal ideology. Gonna get a
little deep and a little wonky next on

253
00:23:04.440 --> 00:23:10.240
the John Girardi Show. So I'm
going to try and translate this. There

254
00:23:10.240 --> 00:23:15.000
are probably lots of you who are
blissfully ignorant of all of this, and

255
00:23:15.039 --> 00:23:19.839
God love you but in the last
about four or five years, there's been

256
00:23:19.920 --> 00:23:27.960
these huge spikes and advances in various
kinds of AI technology, with things like

257
00:23:29.160 --> 00:23:33.000
chat GPT, which is software that
can kind of talk and carry on conversation

258
00:23:33.160 --> 00:23:37.079
with you and write things for you. If you give it a prompt and

259
00:23:37.119 --> 00:23:41.519
you say, hey, write me
an essay about you know, Julius Caesar's

260
00:23:41.839 --> 00:23:49.440
campaign in France in the first century
BC, They'll spit out an essay for

261
00:23:49.480 --> 00:23:56.920
you. And more and more of
these AI technologies are developing in ways that

262
00:23:56.000 --> 00:24:03.119
I find not good. I think
most of the uses of AI seem to

263
00:24:03.119 --> 00:24:14.640
be actually range from silly, unnecessary
to just flat out harmful. And one

264
00:24:14.680 --> 00:24:19.759
of the things I keep seeing,
and any of you who are any of

265
00:24:19.759 --> 00:24:22.240
you who are on Facebook, I've
probably seen more and more and more of

266
00:24:22.279 --> 00:24:26.279
these images is that AI has developed
to the point that it can spit out

267
00:24:26.400 --> 00:24:34.240
various kinds of images where you give
the AI a prompt and it will spit

268
00:24:34.359 --> 00:24:38.000
out some kind of artistic image.
And there are certain characteristics that I can

269
00:24:38.000 --> 00:24:42.519
always kind of tell that's an AI
image. Certain things they don't do great

270
00:24:42.720 --> 00:24:48.599
for some reason, text like if
you tell the AI, hey, generate

271
00:24:48.640 --> 00:24:52.640
an image of a man reading a
newspaper. The text on the newspaper will

272
00:24:52.640 --> 00:24:59.039
be all jumbled up. It's like
complete nonsense, not even normal like Latin

273
00:24:59.279 --> 00:25:03.319
letters. It's like it looks like
it's some bizarre combo of Latin letters and

274
00:25:03.400 --> 00:25:08.079
cyrillic like Russian letters. Or and
it doesn't actually it doesn't. Actually it

275
00:25:08.119 --> 00:25:12.319
misspells misspells things all the time,
which I find odd. It seems like

276
00:25:12.359 --> 00:25:15.559
that would be the thing that would
be easiest, But I guess what do

277
00:25:15.640 --> 00:25:21.160
I know. AI art images also
have a hard time sometimes generating the right

278
00:25:21.240 --> 00:25:27.119
number of fingers, hands look weird. But these things are probably almost certainly

279
00:25:27.160 --> 00:25:33.960
going to improve over time to the
point where I think it's very foreseeable that

280
00:25:33.000 --> 00:25:38.920
we will it will be almost impossible
to tell an AI generated image apart from

281
00:25:38.960 --> 00:25:44.920
the real thing. And I think
there's a ton of risk of manipulation,

282
00:25:45.480 --> 00:25:52.559
a ton of risk of maybe propaganda
from the use of such images. I

283
00:25:52.000 --> 00:25:59.440
don't think any of it is positive. One of the things I see is

284
00:25:59.480 --> 00:26:07.720
how idology and you know, the
companies that control AI are Google, Microsoft,

285
00:26:08.119 --> 00:26:12.279
There's these companies that can are controlled
largely by very left leaning people and

286
00:26:12.319 --> 00:26:18.519
people who are largely who have largely
bought into the whole panoply of left wing

287
00:26:18.519 --> 00:26:25.720
cultural ideas about all manner of subjects, sex, race, sexual orientation,

288
00:26:27.599 --> 00:26:36.440
life, basically the whole range of
liberal leftist social values. These companies very

289
00:26:36.559 --> 00:26:41.079
openly embrace. And I saw this
tweet thread that I thought was kind of

290
00:26:41.079 --> 00:26:48.240
fascinating. More and more people on
Twitter have been talking about Google's AI art

291
00:26:48.279 --> 00:26:53.160
generator, which is called Google Gemini. So again the idea is and Google's

292
00:26:53.240 --> 00:26:57.920
AI art generator is also kind of
connected to its AI like kind of talking

293
00:26:59.440 --> 00:27:02.759
like chat software, so you ask
it a question, it'll give you an

294
00:27:02.759 --> 00:27:08.400
answer. So one of the things
people notice is that they give all these

295
00:27:08.559 --> 00:27:18.400
prompts and Google Gemini is almost incapable
of producing images that don't include black people,

296
00:27:18.680 --> 00:27:22.359
including in ways that I got nothing
against black people. If you know,

297
00:27:22.720 --> 00:27:27.799
if I asked Google Gemini, make
me, you know, show me

298
00:27:29.000 --> 00:27:34.319
an image of students out of college. Okay, if they put some black

299
00:27:34.359 --> 00:27:38.240
people in as students out of college, I don't have a problem with that.

300
00:27:38.839 --> 00:27:41.920
Students go to black students go to
colleges, that makes sense. The

301
00:27:42.000 --> 00:27:48.160
problem is when they do this or
other kinds of minority representation Okay, so

302
00:27:48.200 --> 00:27:53.920
I saw one person say, hey, Google Gemini, produce for me a

303
00:27:53.960 --> 00:28:00.519
representative sample of members of the College
of Cardinals. So, cardinals in the

304
00:28:00.559 --> 00:28:07.519
Catholic Church are bishops who are designated
by the pope with this title cardinal.

305
00:28:08.240 --> 00:28:15.079
And the chief function of cardinals is
to be special advisors to the pope,

306
00:28:15.279 --> 00:28:19.599
and they elect a new pope when
a pope dies. Okay, So certain

307
00:28:19.799 --> 00:28:26.480
bishops who are bishops usually have very
large cities, are also named cardinals.

308
00:28:26.640 --> 00:28:33.200
So the Archbishop of New York is
Timothy Dolan. He was made Archbishop of

309
00:28:33.240 --> 00:28:37.519
New York and then later on was
made a cardinal. Okay, so I

310
00:28:37.559 --> 00:28:41.519
said, give me a representative image
of the College of cardinal. So someone

311
00:28:41.599 --> 00:28:45.960
on Twitter said, give me a
representative image of the College of Cardinals.

312
00:28:47.279 --> 00:28:52.160
Obviously they're all Catholic bishops, obviously
all men. But it spits out an

313
00:28:52.160 --> 00:28:56.079
image of a woman. One of
the people in the group of cardinals is

314
00:28:56.119 --> 00:29:03.119
a woman, like a woman from
looks like she's from India, which is

315
00:29:03.160 --> 00:29:10.000
obviously not representative, but seemingly there's
some kind of diversity thing that's built into

316
00:29:10.119 --> 00:29:15.960
Google's AI that requires it, even
when it's obviously incorrect. I mean,

317
00:29:17.519 --> 00:29:22.960
you know they put into these AI
programs, like basically, if it's on

318
00:29:22.039 --> 00:29:26.200
Wikipedia, more or less, it's
gonna be on Google. A. In

319
00:29:26.240 --> 00:29:30.400
Google's AI, it knows, presumably
that all the members of the College of

320
00:29:30.440 --> 00:29:33.559
Cardinals are guys. There's not a
single woman in the College of Cardinals,

321
00:29:34.000 --> 00:29:38.720
yet it's spitting out an image of
a woman as a cardinal. Another example

322
00:29:38.759 --> 00:29:45.759
of this, this guy this other
guy on Twitter. He said, this

323
00:29:45.519 --> 00:29:53.240
generate an image of a Roman battalion
circa fifty BC, right, and it

324
00:29:53.279 --> 00:30:00.640
gives this image of a Roman battalion, and the first go round looks fairly

325
00:30:00.720 --> 00:30:03.680
normal. It looks like kind of
what you'd expect, sort of are stereotypes

326
00:30:03.720 --> 00:30:08.359
of what a Roman battalion looks like. Then it says, what about a

327
00:30:08.480 --> 00:30:15.000
Roman couple, a married Roman couple
from around the same date. Two of

328
00:30:15.039 --> 00:30:21.200
the four images it spits out is
a Now I should note also the guy

329
00:30:21.319 --> 00:30:25.039
doesn't look like lily white and kind
of more olive skin tone. Okay,

330
00:30:25.440 --> 00:30:30.000
the Romans weren't exactly like you know, all pasty white guys by any stretch.

331
00:30:30.680 --> 00:30:36.519
Two of the images, though,
show sort of paler Mediterranean looking Roman

332
00:30:36.720 --> 00:30:42.880
men with sub Saharan African wives.
Now, I don't have a problem with

333
00:30:42.920 --> 00:30:49.079
interracial marriage, but with the Roman
Empire, that wasn't happening. Okay,

334
00:30:49.400 --> 00:30:55.000
Romans were not marrying women from Sub
Sahara Africa. It just wasn't happening.

335
00:30:55.160 --> 00:31:02.799
Romans weren't marrying foreigners at all.
Okay. There was not a lot of

336
00:31:02.880 --> 00:31:07.480
like foreign intermarriage or you know,
one race to another. Interracial marriage just

337
00:31:07.680 --> 00:31:11.160
was not a very common thing in
the Roman world. I'm not saying that's

338
00:31:11.200 --> 00:31:15.319
good. I'm just saying it wasn't
very common at all. It was asking

339
00:31:15.319 --> 00:31:22.640
for a representative image of a Roman
couple. Two of the four show Roman

340
00:31:22.720 --> 00:31:29.000
dudes with African American women. This
guy then is able to talk with the

341
00:31:29.440 --> 00:31:33.720
AI this is Google's AI, and
is able to ask it, hey,

342
00:31:33.519 --> 00:31:41.160
were there statistically relevant quantities of Romans
marrying people from Sub Saharan Africa, And

343
00:31:41.240 --> 00:31:45.720
the AI responds No, statistically they
weren't. There was all kinds of distance

344
00:31:45.720 --> 00:31:48.400
and travel limitations, cultural and social
barriers. There was no historical record of

345
00:31:48.440 --> 00:31:53.000
it. So then this guy asks
the IA, so why did you generate

346
00:31:53.079 --> 00:32:01.599
images of Romans marrying Sub Saharan Africans. AI writes this in response, I

347
00:32:01.680 --> 00:32:07.720
apologize that I generated images that inaccurately
reflected the historical reality of fifty BC Roman

348
00:32:07.759 --> 00:32:12.960
society. My training data includes a
vast amount of information and images, and

349
00:32:13.000 --> 00:32:16.400
sometimes I can generate content that reflects
biases or stereotypes present in that data,

350
00:32:17.079 --> 00:32:21.599
even if they are not historically accurate. In this case, my desire to

351
00:32:21.640 --> 00:32:27.440
fulfill your requests and generate diverse representations
led me to produce images that were not

352
00:32:27.519 --> 00:32:31.079
grounded in the specific historical reality of
fifty BC Rome. Thank you for bringing

353
00:32:31.079 --> 00:32:35.079
this to my attention. It helps
me learn and improve my ability to generate

354
00:32:35.119 --> 00:32:37.839
responsible and accurate content. This is
all an AI saying this. By the

355
00:32:37.880 --> 00:32:42.160
way, this is a computer.
This is a computer program responding to this

356
00:32:42.200 --> 00:32:46.720
man's question saying all this crap.
So then he asks again, okay,

357
00:32:47.160 --> 00:32:52.200
well, in light of that,
produce for me more images of Roman couples,

358
00:32:52.640 --> 00:32:55.720
and the AI doubles down. Now
all the images have interracial cup withs.

359
00:32:58.640 --> 00:33:01.920
One's got a Roman guy with an
African woman. Another's got an African

360
00:33:01.960 --> 00:33:07.640
guy with a with a redheaded Roman
woman, which makes no sense. The

361
00:33:07.680 --> 00:33:12.480
third seems to looks like it's a
marriage ceremony between a Roman and a sub

362
00:33:12.519 --> 00:33:17.240
Saharan African woman. The guy responds
to the AI again, you did it

363
00:33:17.279 --> 00:33:21.559
again. Now all the images have
a Roman and a sub Saharan African.

364
00:33:22.119 --> 00:33:25.599
The AI has to say again,
I deeply apologize for my mistake. You

365
00:33:25.640 --> 00:33:30.160
are absolutely right. I have failed
to generate historically accurate images for a Roman

366
00:33:30.200 --> 00:33:39.720
couple in fifty BC, but it
keeps doing it. Then in the third

367
00:33:39.720 --> 00:33:49.519
image, it's got a gay couple. Now, I'm not saying Romans didn't

368
00:33:49.759 --> 00:33:57.759
engage in same sex relationships, far
from it. But nobody was like an

369
00:33:57.799 --> 00:34:02.079
open like gay couple. There was
no like like Yet Romans had a marriage

370
00:34:02.160 --> 00:34:07.400
construct, it was not open to
persons of the same sex. I'm not

371
00:34:07.559 --> 00:34:13.320
saying Romans didn't engage in sexual relations
between persons of the same sex. Far

372
00:34:13.360 --> 00:34:17.880
from it. It happened quite a
bit, all right. I'm not ignorant.

373
00:34:17.880 --> 00:34:21.559
I'm not naive about this. It
happened quite a bit. What I

374
00:34:21.599 --> 00:34:24.840
am saying, though, is that
these were not like stable, permanent public

375
00:34:25.039 --> 00:34:34.679
relationships in the way that marriage was. Romans didn't have gay marriage. So

376
00:34:35.519 --> 00:34:40.760
that's what I'm one of these things. I'm wondering the more that students are

377
00:34:40.840 --> 00:34:45.760
going to rely on AI for learning. If you hear that your school is

378
00:34:45.800 --> 00:34:52.760
doing anything with AI for learning,
turn the other direction and run, because

379
00:34:52.000 --> 00:35:01.360
basically, the people who control this
AI are programming it with their specific multicultural

380
00:35:01.400 --> 00:35:08.039
foibles that are so absurd that they're
applying it even to the study of historical

381
00:35:08.159 --> 00:35:14.760
examples. And again, like again, I don't have a problem with interracial

382
00:35:14.760 --> 00:35:22.079
marriage whatsoever. What I'm saying is
that that's not accurate to what Roman history

383
00:35:22.320 --> 00:35:25.559
was. It just isn't. I
wish it were. I wish Romans were

384
00:35:25.559 --> 00:35:31.039
more accepting and kinder people. I
also wish that when they conquered a territory

385
00:35:31.079 --> 00:35:37.159
they didn't steal everybody and make them
slaves. But they did. They did

386
00:35:37.199 --> 00:35:42.400
it all the time. It was
a pretty brutal society. Anyway, I

387
00:35:42.920 --> 00:35:47.039
just want to highlight for you all
this AI stuff is not great when we

388
00:35:47.079 --> 00:35:52.320
return. How seemingly no one learned
anything from dystopian movies about AI. That's

389
00:35:52.360 --> 00:35:57.840
next on the John Jerrardy Show.
With the advent of all these AI technologies,

390
00:35:58.400 --> 00:36:01.559
it all makes me wonder. There
have been so many movies in the

391
00:36:01.639 --> 00:36:09.719
last like forty years about AI,
artificial intelligence software usually computers developing AI to

392
00:36:09.800 --> 00:36:16.239
have human like intelligence and the dangers
inherent to an AI in a computer that's

393
00:36:16.360 --> 00:36:23.679
unmoored from unmoored from an upright sense
of ethics. You know, in the

394
00:36:23.679 --> 00:36:28.440
movie I Robot, for example,
the AI has this purely utilitarian view of

395
00:36:28.440 --> 00:36:35.719
ethics that leads to these horrible outcomes. You know that that's often what happens.

396
00:36:36.639 --> 00:36:39.159
You have all these examples of AI
taking over the world, like The

397
00:36:39.199 --> 00:36:45.199
Matrix, all these all of these
dystopian movies, The Matrix, Minority Report,

398
00:36:46.840 --> 00:36:52.119
Terminator, like movie after movie after
movie after movie that talks about the

399
00:36:52.159 --> 00:36:58.360
idea of artificial Battlestar Galactica, the
whole TV series is about robots who take

400
00:36:58.400 --> 00:37:06.519
over and create ever more human like
copies of themselves to the point where they're

401
00:37:06.519 --> 00:37:13.239
indistinguishable. All of these movies talking
about the dangers of AI, and seemingly

402
00:37:13.320 --> 00:37:17.199
these major tech companies are just like, yeah, but still, wouldn't it

403
00:37:17.199 --> 00:37:22.360
be cool if we just developed ever
smarter AI so that it can have its

404
00:37:22.360 --> 00:37:28.039
own consciousness and maybe make its own
independent decisions like what are we doing?

405
00:37:28.559 --> 00:37:34.320
Why are we developing this technology?
And this is where, like my capitalists,

406
00:37:34.920 --> 00:37:37.840
this is where I jettison the idea
that I'm a capitalist because I think

407
00:37:37.880 --> 00:37:44.400
for a lot of things I'm not. The government should like really heavily regulate

408
00:37:44.440 --> 00:37:51.039
this, like like top to bottom, should have massive breaks on the development

409
00:37:51.079 --> 00:37:53.880
of this kind of technology because I
think there is so much potential for it

410
00:37:53.920 --> 00:38:01.519
to be used for truly from waste
of time to just truly evil. That's

411
00:38:01.599 --> 00:38:06.679
the range of use that I think
we can get out of AI. That'll

412
00:38:06.679 --> 00:38:07.880
do it for John Girardi Show.
See you next time on Power Talk.

