WEBVTT

1
00:00:02.439 --> 00:00:14.160
It's the Lockdown Podcast Network, Your
team every Day. Let's dissect a predictive

2
00:00:14.240 --> 00:00:18.120
Cincinnati Bengals draft board and talk about
where we might do things a little bit

3
00:00:18.120 --> 00:00:29.600
differently. You are Locked On Bengals, your daily Cincinnati Bengals podcast, part

4
00:00:29.640 --> 00:00:36.240
of the Lockdown Podcast Network, Your
Team every Day, by Bengals fans and

5
00:00:36.280 --> 00:00:40.759
welcome to another episode of the Lockdown
Bengals podcast, part of the Lockdown Podcast

6
00:00:40.799 --> 00:00:44.880
Network, covering your team every day. I'm Jake Lisco, He's James Rapine.

7
00:00:44.920 --> 00:00:49.039
We're your hosts of this podcast.
You can find it on YouTube anywhere

8
00:00:49.039 --> 00:00:51.719
you get your podcasts. And if
you're new to the show, join the

9
00:00:51.759 --> 00:00:55.600
tens of thousands of other Bengals fans
making us part of their everyday routine.

10
00:00:55.920 --> 00:00:59.039
All you out there making us your
first listen, we appreciate every single one

11
00:00:59.079 --> 00:01:02.840
of you who do those things.
Today we're going to review a Cincinnati Bengals

12
00:01:02.840 --> 00:01:07.519
big board, predicting what we think
the order might look like as the Bengals

13
00:01:07.519 --> 00:01:10.799
are setting their board over the course
of this week and next week leading into

14
00:01:10.799 --> 00:01:14.920
the draft. Today's episode brought to
you by Monopoly Go, and as a

15
00:01:14.920 --> 00:01:19.519
big fan of Monopoly Go, the
mobile hit twist on Classic Monopoly. You

16
00:01:19.560 --> 00:01:23.280
can join your friends. You can
download Monopoly Go now for free on the

17
00:01:23.319 --> 00:01:29.280
App Store or on Google Play.
And James on Wednesday Night Over on Cincinnati

18
00:01:29.280 --> 00:01:34.920
Bengals Talk You Me. A bunch
of Bengals draft analysts Mike Santagata coach,

19
00:01:36.079 --> 00:01:41.640
Matt Minnick, Joe Goobberry, Patrick
Carlyle, Draft Guy, Jared your Guy,

20
00:01:41.680 --> 00:01:46.239
Andrew Fox Miller were together looking at
a Bengals big board. Did I

21
00:01:46.280 --> 00:01:49.719
miss anybody? Did I forget?
Oh? You nailed it. I'm shot

22
00:01:49.760 --> 00:01:53.319
everybody. I wouldn't have nailed it. I'll be honest. I would have

23
00:01:53.359 --> 00:01:56.920
had to look at the roster to
make sure it's you know, it's it's

24
00:01:56.959 --> 00:02:00.640
like remembering every draft pick in the
moment, right It's It's tough to do,

25
00:02:00.760 --> 00:02:02.879
but you nailed it. It was
a lot of fun. We put

26
00:02:02.920 --> 00:02:08.520
together what the big board could look
like, what we think the Bengals big

27
00:02:08.560 --> 00:02:12.400
board looks like. In round one. If you're watching on YouTube, we

28
00:02:12.439 --> 00:02:15.240
have a list here and the round
one guys one A, one B,

29
00:02:15.319 --> 00:02:19.840
one seed. Those are ranked in
order. The second round two A,

30
00:02:20.000 --> 00:02:23.599
two B, two C they're not
ranked in order, but the tiers are

31
00:02:23.639 --> 00:02:25.759
about what we think the Bengals would
be. But it was a lot of

32
00:02:25.800 --> 00:02:30.120
fun and just full disclosure pat ourselves
on the back. Last year, Miles

33
00:02:30.240 --> 00:02:36.199
Murphy was the highest player remaining on
our predictive Bengals board when they took Miles

34
00:02:36.280 --> 00:02:38.960
Murphy. So hopefully we can go
two for two this year in a year

35
00:02:39.080 --> 00:02:43.800
Jake that Let's be honest here,
a lot of people focused on the trenches

36
00:02:43.840 --> 00:02:46.039
when we were setting the board.
The trenches, certainly in round one were

37
00:02:46.080 --> 00:02:51.080
a hot topic, and I'm sure
they will be today as well. Yeah,

38
00:02:51.080 --> 00:02:57.280
there were a discussion around positional value
taxes for interior offensive linemen and positional

39
00:02:57.360 --> 00:03:02.439
value boosts for offensive tackles. And
just to reiterate what you're talking about here,

40
00:03:02.479 --> 00:03:07.520
we've got six tiers essentially that we're
looking at. We've got the first

41
00:03:07.599 --> 00:03:13.400
round split into three categories. We've
got the second round split into three categories,

42
00:03:13.479 --> 00:03:15.960
A, B, and C.
A being the guys that you're not

43
00:03:15.039 --> 00:03:19.400
expecting to be available to you,
the guys that you think are going to

44
00:03:19.439 --> 00:03:22.400
go before you but you need to
rank in case they do fall. The

45
00:03:22.439 --> 00:03:27.319
guys that you're clearly picking ahead of
everybody, ahead of the next bucket the

46
00:03:27.360 --> 00:03:31.039
top third or so of the first
round. And we didn't include quarterbacks here,

47
00:03:31.080 --> 00:03:35.199
of course, because we don't think
there are quarterbacks on the Bengals board

48
00:03:35.199 --> 00:03:38.879
in the first round. But assuming
there will be four quarterbacks, you want

49
00:03:38.919 --> 00:03:43.280
to make sure you have eighteen players
that you're comfortable with. You have them

50
00:03:43.360 --> 00:03:46.879
ranked from one to eighteen, so
you know who the top guy is.

51
00:03:46.199 --> 00:03:50.680
You've gone through all your tie breakers, you've figured out Okay, maybe there's

52
00:03:50.680 --> 00:03:53.840
a positional value tie breaker, So
the tackles that we might have tied with

53
00:03:53.879 --> 00:04:00.319
a Byron Murphy, or maybe if
you're a Johnny Newton, those guys are

54
00:04:00.360 --> 00:04:04.000
ahead, or maybe you like the
corners, maybe the tackles by positional value

55
00:04:04.000 --> 00:04:09.240
are a little bit ahead. Even
if they're film grade or whatever, their

56
00:04:09.319 --> 00:04:15.520
overall grade will be the same.
So the idea here is to get that

57
00:04:15.680 --> 00:04:20.360
process done and hashed out. And
like James said, we think the first

58
00:04:20.439 --> 00:04:25.639
round in order of what we think
the Bengals will do, not necessarily what

59
00:04:25.639 --> 00:04:29.120
we would do, but based on
their history, just starting at the top,

60
00:04:29.160 --> 00:04:30.879
and we're not going to spend a
lot of time in the one A

61
00:04:30.040 --> 00:04:33.480
category because we don't expect any of
these guys to be available to the Bengals.

62
00:04:33.639 --> 00:04:38.319
We think that the Bengals would still
value any of the big three wide

63
00:04:38.360 --> 00:04:44.240
receivers ahead of anybody else in this
class. And there was some discussion about

64
00:04:44.240 --> 00:04:47.920
those receivers versus Joe Alt and that
being very interesting, hearkening back to the

65
00:04:47.959 --> 00:04:54.680
Penne Suol versus Jamar Chase discussion,
Would they do that again even though they

66
00:04:54.680 --> 00:04:58.720
already have Jamar Chase on the roster. Obviously, we ultimately landed on yes,

67
00:04:58.720 --> 00:05:00.079
we think they would, But I
do think that was one of the

68
00:05:00.079 --> 00:05:04.839
more interesting questions we discussed in this
group. Yeah, for sure, really

69
00:05:04.879 --> 00:05:11.920
interesting and I think sort of the
tie breaker is And I know there's a

70
00:05:11.920 --> 00:05:15.600
lot of talk about how deep this
receiver class is, but we really got

71
00:05:15.600 --> 00:05:21.680
into it on the stream after the
Big three. Everyone has something, there's

72
00:05:21.759 --> 00:05:27.800
a flaw, award, a whatever. All these receivers have something wrong where

73
00:05:28.439 --> 00:05:30.279
it's at least a slight concern.
And there are a lot of guys I

74
00:05:30.360 --> 00:05:34.480
like in this class, but these
top three are just so unique and so

75
00:05:34.600 --> 00:05:38.360
different, and so I think the
Bengals would go with one of them.

76
00:05:38.720 --> 00:05:42.480
We do have those three and Joel
ahead of brock Bowers, but we have

77
00:05:42.519 --> 00:05:45.839
Brock Bowers in the one A category, ahead of any of the offensive tackles,

78
00:05:45.879 --> 00:05:50.319
ahead of any of the cornerbacks,
ahead of Byron Murphy or Johnny Newton.

79
00:05:50.480 --> 00:05:57.000
And I think that that would be
debated amongst a lot of different people

80
00:05:57.519 --> 00:06:00.759
right listening, and a lot of
people would agree. And I think a

81
00:06:00.759 --> 00:06:02.759
lot of people are out on brock
Bauers because of the positional value, and

82
00:06:02.879 --> 00:06:06.160
I do. I think it is
interesting and it would still be even if

83
00:06:06.199 --> 00:06:10.480
Brock is higher on their board,
It would still be a real debate if

84
00:06:10.519 --> 00:06:16.120
the top offensive lineman and say one
b Olufashanu made his way to eighteen and

85
00:06:16.160 --> 00:06:20.360
Brock made his way to eighteen.
The path to that happening where both guys

86
00:06:20.399 --> 00:06:26.120
is there are there is next to
zero like it's probably not going to happen,

87
00:06:26.519 --> 00:06:30.079
but if it did, I think
that that would be a really tough

88
00:06:30.639 --> 00:06:33.199
decision for the Bengals, and it
was for us as we debated it.

89
00:06:33.480 --> 00:06:38.240
Yeah, we moved Olu Fashanu from
the one A group to the one B

90
00:06:38.399 --> 00:06:42.040
group because to everybody that was discussing, we thought that there was a clear

91
00:06:42.079 --> 00:06:44.800
gap between the blue tippers, the
guys that we have in the one A

92
00:06:44.920 --> 00:06:47.680
group and the guys that we have
in the one B group, including Fashionu,

93
00:06:47.720 --> 00:06:51.000
although we also all agreed that Fashionu
would be the top of one B

94
00:06:51.560 --> 00:06:56.079
if he were available to the Bengals. He fits what they want to do

95
00:06:56.920 --> 00:07:00.560
in a lot of ways and brings
athleticism that a guy like jac Latham doesn't

96
00:07:00.600 --> 00:07:06.600
necessarily bring, but also has the
pass protection experience and the pass protection production

97
00:07:08.079 --> 00:07:12.240
and tape in college to say,
you feel really good about his fit in

98
00:07:12.279 --> 00:07:15.959
a Bengals offense that asks a lot
of their tackles in pass protection. That

99
00:07:16.079 --> 00:07:20.199
being said, we eventually kind of
got to the point where we thought,

100
00:07:21.040 --> 00:07:26.000
yeah, they would take brock powers
over any of these offensive tackles. I'm

101
00:07:26.040 --> 00:07:30.079
still not sure about that personally.
I still think that some of them could

102
00:07:30.160 --> 00:07:34.079
be very close, and fashion U
probably leads the way there. Maybe they

103
00:07:34.519 --> 00:07:39.639
like Fuaga a lot more than we
think they do, too, we have

104
00:07:39.759 --> 00:07:43.120
him at the bottom of this group
of tackles. I'm not one hundred percent

105
00:07:43.160 --> 00:07:46.279
convinced that that's the case either,
but based on what we think we know

106
00:07:46.399 --> 00:07:49.560
about them, we made arguments and
we'll get there. When we discussed the

107
00:07:49.600 --> 00:07:56.959
one BE group, but the big
takeaway was outside of Joel, We actually

108
00:07:57.040 --> 00:08:01.120
think that the Bengals would pick the
tight end despite positional value or whatever you

109
00:08:01.160 --> 00:08:05.279
want to argue, because he's still
a blue chipper who can still make a

110
00:08:05.360 --> 00:08:11.920
huge difference for this offense over the
tackles. Yeah, for sure, and

111
00:08:13.000 --> 00:08:18.439
he's rare. He's hard to find, and that's the element too in a

112
00:08:18.600 --> 00:08:22.959
shallow tight end class. That's exactly
what this year is. The top of

113
00:08:22.000 --> 00:08:28.839
it is as good as we've seen
in a long time. I mean,

114
00:08:28.000 --> 00:08:33.200
I think brock Bauers it would be
higher on the Bengals board than a Kyle

115
00:08:33.279 --> 00:08:35.799
Pitts potentially if they were both coming
out at the same time. Now maybe

116
00:08:35.799 --> 00:08:39.919
not, but I think so when
you look at the profile. Now,

117
00:08:39.919 --> 00:08:43.639
he didn't test, and so that
is concerning when you don't have that.

118
00:08:43.399 --> 00:08:48.519
But man, was he productive at
Georgia and they do have the GPS numbers

119
00:08:48.559 --> 00:08:52.879
and all of those things to look
at. So it's a debate that I

120
00:08:52.960 --> 00:08:58.039
hope the Bengals one. I know
they're having two and have already had two.

121
00:08:58.240 --> 00:09:01.960
I hope it's some that we see
on Draft night where he makes it

122
00:09:01.000 --> 00:09:05.799
to eighteen with one of these other
high one be trench players because it's just

123
00:09:05.840 --> 00:09:09.879
an interesting dilemma, interesting debate,
and you want the best players to fall,

124
00:09:11.000 --> 00:09:13.559
and he would be one of the
best players that could realistically fall.

125
00:09:13.960 --> 00:09:20.000
Daniel Jeremiah saying, by the way, on a conference call on Wednesday with

126
00:09:20.320 --> 00:09:24.679
the media that he does before the
drafts that the Bengals that's a throw a

127
00:09:24.720 --> 00:09:28.960
parade pick if Brock Bauers fell at
eighteen. Obviously, we had Dan Brugler

128
00:09:28.000 --> 00:09:31.799
on earlier this week. Make sure
you check out that entire interview, and

129
00:09:31.879 --> 00:09:35.759
he said, oh, well,
that's a no brainer if he fell to

130
00:09:35.799 --> 00:09:39.720
eighteen. I don't think either guy
expects Brock to be there, but if

131
00:09:39.720 --> 00:09:43.039
he did, it's hard for me
to envision a scenario where he's not the

132
00:09:43.080 --> 00:09:46.159
top guy on their board. That's
right. I think that they could talk

133
00:09:46.200 --> 00:09:52.559
themselves into one of the tackles they
could. We're still making educated guesses here,

134
00:09:52.600 --> 00:09:56.759
but this is how we think it
would shake out as the Bengals.

135
00:09:56.759 --> 00:09:58.679
I think at this point, their
first round board is set. They've eliminated

136
00:09:58.720 --> 00:10:01.240
all the are going to eliminate from
the board, that's the first thing they

137
00:10:01.279 --> 00:10:05.639
do. They've probably stacked the first
round, they've probably gotten into the second

138
00:10:05.679 --> 00:10:09.720
round, and they probably are quite
a ways into this process now. These

139
00:10:09.720 --> 00:10:13.840
meetings happening over the last week.
We'll continue our discussion of this big board

140
00:10:13.840 --> 00:10:20.399
getting into the one B group in
more detail coming out next. Today's episode

141
00:10:20.519 --> 00:10:24.639
is sponsored by Yahoo Finance. Wouldn't
it be great if you could see all

142
00:10:24.639 --> 00:10:28.080
of your investment and retirement accounts in
one place? With Yahoo Finance, you

143
00:10:28.120 --> 00:10:33.720
can consolidate views from multiple accounts into
one hub and access the expert analysis you

144
00:10:33.759 --> 00:10:37.720
need to tend to your entire portfolio
with confidence. If you have a Schwab

145
00:10:39.120 --> 00:10:41.440
account where you're managing your investments in
a four oh one K with Fidelity,

146
00:10:41.440 --> 00:10:46.279
you can put them into Yahoo Finance
to consolidate them and see them all in

147
00:10:46.320 --> 00:10:48.440
the same place. And for more
than twenty five years, going back to

148
00:10:48.480 --> 00:10:52.679
when I started looking at stocks for
the first time, Yahoo Finance has been

149
00:10:52.879 --> 00:10:58.279
the brand behind every great investor,
whether you're seasoned or looking for extra guidance.

150
00:10:58.320 --> 00:11:01.120
They have the extra tools and analysis
you need in one place as the

151
00:11:01.240 --> 00:11:07.039
number one finance destination, producing a
holistic look at the financial news cycle,

152
00:11:07.080 --> 00:11:11.960
including breaking news, editorial perspectives,
analyst rankings, independent research, customizable charts,

153
00:11:11.960 --> 00:11:16.000
and so much more. For comprehensive
financial news and analysis. Visit the

154
00:11:16.000 --> 00:11:22.840
brand behind every great investor, Yahoo
finance dot com, the number one financial

155
00:11:22.120 --> 00:11:28.399
destination. That's Yahoo finance dot Com. Today's show is also brought to you

156
00:11:28.519 --> 00:11:31.360
by Schultz Jewelers and Mother's Days right
around the corner, which means you,

157
00:11:33.080 --> 00:11:37.120
yes, you have to get the
Schultz Steelers and whether it's for mom,

158
00:11:37.159 --> 00:11:39.279
whether it's for wife, whether it's
for both. Well, they have matching

159
00:11:39.399 --> 00:11:46.639
permanent bracelets. You can get each
other's birthstones on your bracelets. Affordable unique

160
00:11:46.679 --> 00:11:50.519
gift starting at forty five dollars.
Heck, send the wife to Shuld Stewelers

161
00:11:50.519 --> 00:11:54.720
so she can get her mom something
awesome like matching bracelets. Have a wide

162
00:11:54.759 --> 00:12:01.519
selection of Sterling silver, a silver
gold filled solid gold professional candid photos by

163
00:12:01.559 --> 00:12:05.440
the way, where you could take
your mom there and get the photo with

164
00:12:05.480 --> 00:12:09.000
your matching bracelets. The point is
is Schultz Stroulers is going all out.

165
00:12:09.080 --> 00:12:13.320
They are huge Bengals fans, Matt
and his team, they've been doing this

166
00:12:13.879 --> 00:12:18.240
for years and years and years,
and they're really close to pay Course Stadium

167
00:12:18.279 --> 00:12:22.000
that's right there at twenty two Oho
two Dixie Highway and Fort Mitchell five minutes

168
00:12:22.360 --> 00:12:26.639
from the bridge into Kentucky. You
can check them out online at Schultzdiamonds dot

169
00:12:26.639 --> 00:12:31.840
com. That's s E h U
l Z Diamonds dot com. And get

170
00:12:31.879 --> 00:12:35.039
your mom, get your wife,
get everyone ready for Mother's Day with Schultz

171
00:12:35.200 --> 00:12:39.720
Jewelers. Because when it has to
be perfect, it has to be Schultz

172
00:12:39.720 --> 00:12:46.440
Steelers. Let's get back into this
second group, James the one B category

173
00:12:46.600 --> 00:12:54.200
here starting with Olu Fashanu, Amarius
Men's second, JC Lathan third, Talifuanga

174
00:12:54.240 --> 00:12:58.960
fourth. We went with four straight
offensive tackles in this group. And you

175
00:12:58.039 --> 00:13:03.480
might notice that fought Neu was not
one of those names mentioned for those listening

176
00:13:03.519 --> 00:13:07.080
and not watching on YouTube. He's
actually in the one C group because our

177
00:13:07.120 --> 00:13:11.600
group wasn't convinced that the Bengals see
him as a tackle and that he could

178
00:13:11.720 --> 00:13:16.720
make a seamless transition to the NFL. He could be the number one guard

179
00:13:16.279 --> 00:13:20.960
on the board, and in fact
he is. Eventually we'll get there,

180
00:13:20.000 --> 00:13:24.159
you'll see the number one guard.
But he played left tackle in college,

181
00:13:24.840 --> 00:13:28.799
and even if he profiles to a
guard in the NFL, like maybe you

182
00:13:28.799 --> 00:13:31.480
think Fuaga does, at least Fuaga
did play right tackle. And that's why

183
00:13:31.519 --> 00:13:39.080
Fuaga is in that group. But
from the inexperienced question marks of Amarius Mims,

184
00:13:39.279 --> 00:13:45.080
the athleticism question marks for JC Latham, the positional question marks for Tali

185
00:13:45.159 --> 00:13:48.440
Fuaga. That's why we ended up
with this order with fashion who on top,

186
00:13:48.519 --> 00:13:52.200
even though he was a left tackle
who would need to transition to right

187
00:13:52.200 --> 00:13:54.240
tackle for the Bengals. Even though
there might be some run blocking concerns,

188
00:13:54.600 --> 00:14:01.080
some development required for the young tackle. All these guys either have athleticism,

189
00:14:01.240 --> 00:14:05.799
youth experience, and there's one thing
missing out of that group for all of

190
00:14:05.840 --> 00:14:11.039
them as we tried to stack these
four. Sure, yeah, just a

191
00:14:11.120 --> 00:14:16.440
hair just a little bit of an
issue here there. I think it's it's

192
00:14:16.440 --> 00:14:22.159
interesting our listeners certainly and viewers know
how I feel about Amarius Mims in the

193
00:14:22.240 --> 00:14:26.919
upside. But Olu Fashionu, and
I'm glad I'm saying the name right now,

194
00:14:26.960 --> 00:14:31.840
thanks to Dan Brugler by the way, in correcting me because I said

195
00:14:31.840 --> 00:14:37.039
it wrong earlier in the show.
But past blocking, that's what the Bengals

196
00:14:37.039 --> 00:14:41.159
are looking for. Can you come
in and be an awesome pass blocker?

197
00:14:41.919 --> 00:14:45.000
And I think he's ready to go
in that area, and so, yeah,

198
00:14:45.080 --> 00:14:46.759
does he need to learn right tackle
as well. Sure, but they

199
00:14:46.759 --> 00:14:50.240
can work him on both sides.
It would certainly be nice to have someone

200
00:14:50.240 --> 00:14:54.200
who can play both sides and he
doesn't need to start right away. That's

201
00:14:54.240 --> 00:15:00.200
the other element here with all of
these guys. They don't need the guy

202
00:15:00.639 --> 00:15:03.840
that comes in, and not that
any of them have a low ceiling,

203
00:15:03.039 --> 00:15:07.600
but that is ready to go now. But if he maxes out, he

204
00:15:07.639 --> 00:15:11.919
isn't an all pro or he isn't
a pro bowler like you want to try

205
00:15:11.960 --> 00:15:15.600
to find that with this pick.
If you're going offensive tackle. And that's

206
00:15:15.639 --> 00:15:20.879
why to me, fashion U and
Mims are they just have a really really

207
00:15:20.960 --> 00:15:24.440
high ceiling. So does JC Latham, by the way, and I think

208
00:15:24.440 --> 00:15:26.519
the Bengals are going to love Latham. There's also a chance that he falls.

209
00:15:26.840 --> 00:15:31.720
Wouldn't shock me if he fell to
eighteen, and so that's the order

210
00:15:33.759 --> 00:15:37.559
with a guy like Fuaga, who
you're right, maybe he is higher.

211
00:15:37.879 --> 00:15:39.679
But I think if you're the Bengals
and you can get any of these four,

212
00:15:41.279 --> 00:15:43.919
you feel really good about it.
And I think that's why they lead

213
00:15:43.960 --> 00:15:46.799
the way and are ahead of a
Byron Murphy who is as popular. I

214
00:15:46.840 --> 00:15:52.639
think he's the most popular Bengals target
right now, I pick eighteen. You

215
00:15:52.679 --> 00:15:56.759
just look at these mocks. Dan
Brugler mocked him. I just the fans

216
00:15:56.600 --> 00:16:00.759
that have mocked him on social Would
you agree with that? As of now,

217
00:16:00.759 --> 00:16:03.240
I don't have any metric backing.
That's just what I've seen, But

218
00:16:03.279 --> 00:16:06.799
it feels like Biron Murphy is the
most popular pick right now for the Bengals.

219
00:16:06.960 --> 00:16:10.919
Yeah, the vibes are Murphy.
And there's some vote splitting among the

220
00:16:10.960 --> 00:16:12.879
tackles. That's part of the problem. If you have well, it's going

221
00:16:12.960 --> 00:16:17.559
to be one of these four tackles, they are going to get, say,

222
00:16:17.879 --> 00:16:22.279
nineteen percent of the vote, and
maybe bier Murphy gets twenty one percent

223
00:16:22.279 --> 00:16:23.559
of the vote or whatever it is, and bier Murphy ends up being the

224
00:16:23.600 --> 00:16:27.279
most popular because you're splitting the vote
so much among the tackles. If we

225
00:16:27.360 --> 00:16:32.639
had one crystallized offensive tackle prospect put
it had to have a bier Murphy.

226
00:16:32.679 --> 00:16:37.679
Well, we saw in our Bengals
bracket a couple of weeks ago bier Murphy

227
00:16:37.679 --> 00:16:41.120
did not emerge victorious at that point
in time. Maybe the results would be

228
00:16:41.120 --> 00:16:45.919
different today as sentiments change over time. But you're right, the top of

229
00:16:45.960 --> 00:16:49.360
the tackle listing is largely based on
upside. I think that Fashion New and

230
00:16:49.480 --> 00:16:53.639
Men's have the most upside. Men
certainly the most outside out of this group

231
00:16:53.639 --> 00:16:56.240
of tackles. But I think any
of those, like you said, James,

232
00:16:56.399 --> 00:16:59.759
our guys the Bengals would be happy
with. And a good point that

233
00:17:00.240 --> 00:17:03.000
Joe Goodbury made on the show last
night when we were discussing this live on

234
00:17:03.119 --> 00:17:08.839
Cincinnati Bengals Talk, was that one
of these guys is likely to be available

235
00:17:08.880 --> 00:17:12.640
to the Bengals, maybe too,
depending on where the corners go, depending

236
00:17:12.680 --> 00:17:17.839
on who. The surprise in the
top seventeen is that we haven't anticipated,

237
00:17:18.559 --> 00:17:21.880
but we're not really sure which one, like any of them could fall.

238
00:17:21.920 --> 00:17:25.359
You've seen fashionw fall, You've seen
Men's fall, You've seen Latham fall,

239
00:17:25.359 --> 00:17:29.359
you've seen Fuuaga fall. You just
don't know which one, but likely at

240
00:17:29.440 --> 00:17:36.519
least fall, Fashion New fall.
To me go protect Joe wee b oh

241
00:17:36.640 --> 00:17:41.759
sorry good, I'm good man,
I'm good. I'm just trying to This

242
00:17:41.799 --> 00:17:45.200
is the time of year, like
within a week at the draft, where

243
00:17:45.240 --> 00:17:51.880
you try to will things, speak
things into existence, and sometimes it works,

244
00:17:52.359 --> 00:17:56.720
sometimes it doesn't. For me,
Fashion New is as big of a

245
00:17:56.759 --> 00:18:00.480
home run pick in it. I
think more realistic, by the way than

246
00:18:00.480 --> 00:18:03.920
brock Power's following. So I think
there's at least four teams in on brock

247
00:18:03.039 --> 00:18:07.200
So fashion is someone I'm trying to
will to the Bengals at eight, and

248
00:18:07.240 --> 00:18:11.160
we could see both guys picked in
the top ten. That just could be

249
00:18:11.200 --> 00:18:15.119
the way it goes. That being
said, I'm trying to will it,

250
00:18:15.160 --> 00:18:18.160
and you got to be real with
it, I could kill it. Where

251
00:18:18.200 --> 00:18:22.400
I'm going with this is there are
other options in the one B category that

252
00:18:22.519 --> 00:18:26.000
we like it tackle and we think
there's great upside to tackle, and one

253
00:18:26.000 --> 00:18:27.720
of them could be available to the
Bengals. It's just going to depend on

254
00:18:27.880 --> 00:18:33.519
what they're valuing and where they're most
comfortable. Are they most comfortable with Latham's

255
00:18:33.039 --> 00:18:40.960
lack of testing and apparent lesser degree
of athleticism than Fuaga or Mims, Or

256
00:18:41.039 --> 00:18:45.759
are they more uncomfortable with Mims's lack
of experience even though the ceiling is infinite

257
00:18:47.200 --> 00:18:49.200
and the tape is pretty good when
he's on the field, It's just an

258
00:18:49.200 --> 00:18:55.720
experience topic. That being said,
we're still on the same page where we

259
00:18:55.799 --> 00:18:59.680
think plan A is offensive tackle and
that any of these guys will be ahead

260
00:18:59.680 --> 00:19:03.680
of by Murphy or either of the
corners who are next after Buyer Murphy in

261
00:19:03.799 --> 00:19:10.480
this group. Yeah, and so
just to give especially our audio listeners,

262
00:19:11.000 --> 00:19:15.960
fashion New Mims, Lathan Fuaga,
then Murphy, Tarian, Arnold quinnan Mitchell,

263
00:19:15.960 --> 00:19:18.839
and you could flip those two.
It might be Mitchell and then Arnold,

264
00:19:18.880 --> 00:19:22.839
who knows, and then Layatu Latu
and Dallas Turner. That's our one

265
00:19:22.880 --> 00:19:30.160
B group and that's probably the next
Bengal unless they go with Troy Faitanu,

266
00:19:30.519 --> 00:19:33.200
which I think is interesting. That's
the one guy in one Sea that I

267
00:19:33.240 --> 00:19:36.519
look at and I'm like, ooh
at eighteen, I could see it,

268
00:19:36.599 --> 00:19:38.519
and at the same time he might
not even make it to eighteen. So

269
00:19:38.880 --> 00:19:45.039
let's continue the conversation. We'll discuss
one C and then what you and me

270
00:19:45.319 --> 00:19:49.279
might change about this board coming up
next. Today's show is brought to you

271
00:19:49.480 --> 00:19:53.519
by Monopoly Go and we've all been
there either as a player as a fan.

272
00:19:53.720 --> 00:19:56.640
It's halftime in the scoreboard. Well, it's not looking good, you're

273
00:19:56.640 --> 00:20:00.960
feeling low and you're not sure if
you are your team can pull out a

274
00:20:00.000 --> 00:20:03.480
win. But that's when you dig
deep, lift your head up and say

275
00:20:03.480 --> 00:20:07.240
to yourself It's time to get back
in the game, and that means you

276
00:20:07.279 --> 00:20:10.759
pull off some bank heist and take
as much of your friend's money as you

277
00:20:10.880 --> 00:20:15.599
can. That's right. The smash
hit mobile game Monopoly Go is here,

278
00:20:15.680 --> 00:20:18.640
and it lets you compete with your
friends to get the most riches and the

279
00:20:18.680 --> 00:20:22.960
biggest empire. It has a ton
of new twists on the game of Monopoly

280
00:20:22.000 --> 00:20:26.559
that you love. It's on your
phone. You can play anytime with leader

281
00:20:26.559 --> 00:20:30.440
boards to compare your progress, play
on countless dynamic different boards, and you

282
00:20:30.440 --> 00:20:34.240
can smash landmarks with a wrecking ball. You can even work with your friends

283
00:20:34.240 --> 00:20:37.240
to crack open community chess, and
much much more. So. Get back

284
00:20:37.279 --> 00:20:41.279
out there, put on your game
face and download Monopoly Go now free on

285
00:20:41.279 --> 00:20:48.599
the App Store or Google Play.
One big thing that I'm not sure we

286
00:20:48.680 --> 00:20:52.359
have right here talking about things that
we might need to massage. Still,

287
00:20:52.400 --> 00:20:55.279
as we're looking at this, Dallas
Turner kind of sticks out to me as

288
00:20:55.319 --> 00:20:57.680
a player who doesn't fit what they'd
like to do at the edge position.

289
00:20:57.759 --> 00:21:02.960
He's kind of there because we're expecting
him to be the potentially first defensive player

290
00:21:03.039 --> 00:21:07.319
picked in the top. Yeah,
but we have Jared Verse here in the

291
00:21:07.319 --> 00:21:10.920
one C group and Cooper Degen in
the one C group, and Troy Fontanu

292
00:21:10.920 --> 00:21:14.319
in the one C group, and
heck even Johnny Newton in the one seed

293
00:21:14.359 --> 00:21:19.160
group. And are we for all
of these guys, Maybe maybe Newton,

294
00:21:19.240 --> 00:21:22.880
but for some of these guys,
you can see some of them ahead of

295
00:21:22.960 --> 00:21:26.839
Dallas Turner for the Bengals based on
what they like to do. And font

296
00:21:26.839 --> 00:21:30.759
new and Verse are the two that
stand out to me is as more for

297
00:21:30.759 --> 00:21:33.880
for either positional value or the type
of player they like at the position,

298
00:21:33.799 --> 00:21:37.400
more Bengally ahead of Dallas Turner.
But once we get to this one seed

299
00:21:37.400 --> 00:21:41.039
group, we're kind of looking at
backup plans. And that's the idea here

300
00:21:41.119 --> 00:21:45.160
is that you have eighteen players in
one A, one B because of where

301
00:21:45.160 --> 00:21:48.519
you're picking as the Bengals, and
then if something goes really crazy or you

302
00:21:48.640 --> 00:21:52.680
trade back, then that's why we
have the one C group. Yeah,

303
00:21:52.880 --> 00:21:59.440
and all right, So it's just
to establish it because I say it wrong

304
00:21:59.519 --> 00:22:02.799
too, So I just looked it
up in the Beast to confirm. So

305
00:22:02.880 --> 00:22:07.960
Troy Filutanu is to me it would
be ahead of Dallas Turner, and it's

306
00:22:08.039 --> 00:22:11.559
it's kind of the the tie break. I would have him in in the

307
00:22:11.599 --> 00:22:15.519
one B column where it's like,
all right, maybe Byron Murphy's gone,

308
00:22:17.240 --> 00:22:21.480
maybe the medicals don't check out for
mems and and the rest of the offensive

309
00:22:21.480 --> 00:22:25.880
tackles are gone. Well, Filotanu
is a great option and he is versatile,

310
00:22:25.920 --> 00:22:27.480
and who knows, maybe they play
him inside to start. I doubt

311
00:22:27.480 --> 00:22:30.920
it. I think they would take
him at that spot, thinking all right,

312
00:22:30.960 --> 00:22:33.839
he can be a quality right tackle
for us for years to come,

313
00:22:33.839 --> 00:22:37.400
and maybe as early as this season. So that's the one that really stands

314
00:22:37.440 --> 00:22:44.720
out. I could feel people wondering
about Johnny Newton, and it's it's really

315
00:22:44.759 --> 00:22:48.799
been since the combine. The NFL
is lower on Johnny Newton, not just

316
00:22:48.799 --> 00:22:53.039
the Bengals, the NFL lower on
Johnny Newton than social media consensus, than

317
00:22:53.160 --> 00:23:00.599
draft analysts outside of NFL media or
NFL media, but outside of NFL rooms,

318
00:23:00.599 --> 00:23:03.440
in front offices, scouts, etc. And So I think it's interesting

319
00:23:03.759 --> 00:23:08.200
because there's not much doubt on our
end. I think that Johnny Newton's gonna

320
00:23:08.160 --> 00:23:11.920
be a really really good player,
maybe a great player, But do we

321
00:23:11.960 --> 00:23:17.000
think he's realistic at eighteen for the
Bengals, Probably not. He could be

322
00:23:17.000 --> 00:23:19.200
a trade down candidate, which is
why we have him in one CE for

323
00:23:19.279 --> 00:23:26.599
the Bengals. But obviously I I
would be surprised if most of our listeners

324
00:23:26.599 --> 00:23:30.680
wouldn't take Johnny Newton over a handful
at least a handful of those one B

325
00:23:32.519 --> 00:23:36.160
prospects that we've listed and discussed.
Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if he's

326
00:23:36.359 --> 00:23:41.400
certainly ahead of the corners. I
think the poll we did during the bracket

327
00:23:41.480 --> 00:23:44.160
showed that he was the head of
Byron Murphy as well, even if it

328
00:23:44.240 --> 00:23:48.400
was you know, ten percent or
so. I think from that voting group

329
00:23:48.920 --> 00:23:55.920
more prefer Newton than prefer Murphy.
So he is a one see because we

330
00:23:55.960 --> 00:24:00.000
think that's where the Bengals would be. But if it were us, Newton

331
00:24:00.160 --> 00:24:02.759
is one of those that would definitely
be higher. If it was US,

332
00:24:02.839 --> 00:24:07.359
maybe Tyler Goeiton would be in the
two group, But as we were discussing

333
00:24:07.359 --> 00:24:11.480
this yesterday, Tyler Goyiton the end
of one seed. Just so for our

334
00:24:11.519 --> 00:24:17.759
audio listeners, the one seed group
is Troy Faotanu, Cooper Degene, Jared

335
00:24:17.839 --> 00:24:22.799
Versus Johnny Newton, Nate Wiggins,
and Tyler Goeiton, And we ended up

336
00:24:22.839 --> 00:24:27.279
moving Degene up a little bit,
especially with Louanna Rumo's praise of Iowa defensive

337
00:24:27.319 --> 00:24:32.799
players. His testing was really good
at his pro day. He's probably just

338
00:24:33.240 --> 00:24:38.599
a good outside corner and corner.
If you like Arnold and Mitchell, it's

339
00:24:38.640 --> 00:24:42.079
easy to argue that maybe the Bengals
would like Cooper de Gene as well,

340
00:24:42.119 --> 00:24:47.200
and we think they will like Arnold
and Mitchell. So Tyler Go sneaks into

341
00:24:47.200 --> 00:24:48.920
one seed because we think if they
traded back at the back of the first

342
00:24:49.000 --> 00:24:57.920
round for the traits perspective, size, athleticism, strength, it's easy to

343
00:24:59.039 --> 00:25:02.799
argue that that is one of the
guys they would put into a trade back

344
00:25:03.039 --> 00:25:07.680
grouping. But Fatanu, to your
point, James is the one that I

345
00:25:07.720 --> 00:25:11.519
could see sneaking into one Bee and
even Verse ahead of Dallas Turner. Or

346
00:25:11.519 --> 00:25:15.359
maybe Dallas Turner is just too high
and we should be switching Baltu to one

347
00:25:15.440 --> 00:25:19.359
Bee and Turner behind Verse or something
like that. In one C. Yeah,

348
00:25:19.720 --> 00:25:25.119
and that's that's probably fair, and
I actually think that's that's realistic.

349
00:25:25.119 --> 00:25:30.079
But that's the beauty of having the
roundtable that we had. But yeah,

350
00:25:30.119 --> 00:25:33.480
I think Fautano would be higher.
I agree with you Verse and there wasn't

351
00:25:33.519 --> 00:25:38.279
much debate about Verse being the better
fit. It's so that I would be

352
00:25:38.319 --> 00:25:41.480
surprised, though, I'd be surprised
if they go edge regardless. I think

353
00:25:41.519 --> 00:25:45.039
that's the one position. Like corner, people would be a little bummed,

354
00:25:45.599 --> 00:25:49.359
but I think edge it would be
really like wow, really that's the route.

355
00:25:49.599 --> 00:25:52.519
And so if they get to that, I think, and we haven't

356
00:25:52.519 --> 00:25:55.799
talked about this much, but I
think that's like the trade down scenario,

357
00:25:56.160 --> 00:26:00.319
Yeah, where they try to move
down because edge will be in demand and

358
00:26:00.599 --> 00:26:03.359
so someone might want to move up
and get one of these guys. So

359
00:26:03.880 --> 00:26:07.279
hopefully these edge players just go and
it pushes the offensive tackles down the board,

360
00:26:07.319 --> 00:26:11.200
pushes the corners down the board,
and obviously Byron Murphy and Johnny Newton

361
00:26:11.200 --> 00:26:15.519
down the board. You want Johnny
Newton to fall to round two and be

362
00:26:15.799 --> 00:26:18.640
stick out like a sore thumb like
he has in some of these mock drafts,

363
00:26:18.640 --> 00:26:23.480
even though it's unrealistic. But yeah, overall, this one s it's

364
00:26:23.559 --> 00:26:27.440
like one emergency. It's the emergency
scenario where you don't have a trade back.

365
00:26:29.079 --> 00:26:33.599
A board just falls a certain way
and so Failutanu and Verse. They're

366
00:26:33.640 --> 00:26:38.279
probably slightly higher than that. Definitely, Fiutanu. I feel pretty comfortable saying

367
00:26:38.319 --> 00:26:42.559
that because if you're the Bengals,
would you really turn down the top offensive

368
00:26:42.559 --> 00:26:45.680
lineman on your board, And there's
a realistic chance that he is the top

369
00:26:45.720 --> 00:26:49.599
offensive lineman on their board in some
scenarios, and maybe he's just your left

370
00:26:49.599 --> 00:26:55.200
guard and maybe you have a pro
Bowl left guard and that's just what he's

371
00:26:55.240 --> 00:26:57.160
going to be for you. And
if you're comfortable with that, then you

372
00:26:57.160 --> 00:27:02.400
would pull the trigger and it would
give you an upgrade for your starting five

373
00:27:03.079 --> 00:27:07.400
right now, whereas one of these
tackles you maybe upgrade you're starting five if

374
00:27:07.440 --> 00:27:08.759
you think he's better than Trent Brown. If you think that, and I

375
00:27:08.799 --> 00:27:12.880
think that any of those guys in
one B should be really pushing and should

376
00:27:12.920 --> 00:27:15.759
be Trent Brown for a starting job. I said that last night too.

377
00:27:17.279 --> 00:27:22.319
Maybe it makes you better, but
you maybe haven't improved all five of your

378
00:27:22.400 --> 00:27:26.519
spots or whatever it is, unless
you think Trent Brown can play left guard,

379
00:27:26.519 --> 00:27:30.279
which I'm not so sure about.
But the more we've talked about this,

380
00:27:30.359 --> 00:27:32.640
James, the more I think that
maybe we just have too many players

381
00:27:32.640 --> 00:27:37.559
in one B because we were trying
to get eighteen players into the groups between

382
00:27:37.559 --> 00:27:41.799
one A and one B plus the
four quarterbacks, and maybe there just aren't

383
00:27:41.799 --> 00:27:44.920
that many guys. Maybe both of
those edge players should be in one C

384
00:27:45.680 --> 00:27:49.240
and then be seen as backup plans. Although we know the Bengals value edge

385
00:27:49.640 --> 00:27:55.519
and having a potential first round duo
on the edge, if they develop and

386
00:27:55.559 --> 00:27:59.200
become the players we think they should
be, would be a weapon for this

387
00:27:59.319 --> 00:28:03.119
defense, no doubt about it.
I don't think that they're the primary or

388
00:28:03.200 --> 00:28:07.079
secondary plan for the Bengals. So
maybe those guys should just be both Latu

389
00:28:07.200 --> 00:28:12.759
and Turner in one see wouldn't wouldn't
shock me. That's why they're at the

390
00:28:12.799 --> 00:28:18.319
bottom of the one B group,
And if that did happen or it was

391
00:28:18.359 --> 00:28:22.359
that way on the Bengals board,
I do think it would make sense because,

392
00:28:22.400 --> 00:28:27.480
again this draft, it feels like
you need to take the swing to

393
00:28:27.599 --> 00:28:34.799
try to land this awesome trench player, and unless Brock falls or unless the

394
00:28:34.839 --> 00:28:40.519
trench guys are gone, it's pretty
much it's that simple. Doesn't it feel

395
00:28:40.559 --> 00:28:42.799
that simple? I don't think you're
considering a corner or an edge player.

396
00:28:42.839 --> 00:28:47.119
I think you're taking a tackle unless
you view one of these guys as a

397
00:28:47.119 --> 00:28:49.759
guard like Fautano as a guard.
But I think you're taking an offensive lineman

398
00:28:49.960 --> 00:28:55.079
or an interior defensive lineman unless unless
Brock Bowers falls are one of the big

399
00:28:55.079 --> 00:28:57.559
three receivers fall. If that guy
is there, you're taking it, and

400
00:28:57.640 --> 00:29:00.839
that's what the Bengals are hoping.
Yeah, I think unless there are six

401
00:29:02.039 --> 00:29:07.079
offensive linemen and a defensive tackle picked
before the Bengals pick, and that's where

402
00:29:07.119 --> 00:29:10.279
you can see them going corner,
which is why we have the corners where

403
00:29:10.319 --> 00:29:12.680
we do. I agree with you, James. Let's quickly talk about some

404
00:29:12.759 --> 00:29:15.920
of these guys in the two category. You might have noticed, and we

405
00:29:15.920 --> 00:29:19.559
didn't have any other receivers in the
one group, including ad Mitchell, who

406
00:29:21.039 --> 00:29:26.079
our guy, Mike Santagaa at Bengals
Sans on Twitter was arguing fervently in favor

407
00:29:26.160 --> 00:29:29.839
for and Brian Thomas Junior, both
in the two A group, Jackson Powers,

408
00:29:29.920 --> 00:29:33.559
Johnson, Graham Barton, some interior
offensive linemen in that group as well,

409
00:29:33.880 --> 00:29:37.759
in addition to Corner kool Aid McKinstry. But we didn't really have any

410
00:29:37.880 --> 00:29:41.759
huge arguments last night that any of
these guys should be pushed up into one

411
00:29:41.799 --> 00:29:45.720
seat. We were kind of in
agreement that if and as expected, the

412
00:29:45.759 --> 00:29:49.079
first three receivers go, the Bengals
are not really targeting a first round wide

413
00:29:49.119 --> 00:29:55.920
receiver this year, given that the
other two options and Mitchell and Thomas primarily

414
00:29:56.599 --> 00:30:02.039
don't really tick all their boxes and
they have some pretty established patterns of wide

415
00:30:02.039 --> 00:30:06.519
receiver and what a storyline here,
And I do think they're going to take

416
00:30:06.519 --> 00:30:11.119
a day two wide receiver, especially
since they have three picks. When do

417
00:30:11.160 --> 00:30:15.640
they decide to make the exception to
the rule right and odds are they're going

418
00:30:15.640 --> 00:30:18.200
to have to And maybe it's at
forty nine, Maybe it doesn't work and

419
00:30:18.240 --> 00:30:22.799
it doesn't fall to them where they're
not in on Troy Franklin or Lad Maconkey

420
00:30:22.880 --> 00:30:26.720
because of size or because of production
or because of how they project those guys,

421
00:30:26.839 --> 00:30:32.359
or Ricky Pursol because of age or
because of that they think he's a

422
00:30:32.400 --> 00:30:34.839
slot only or whatever the case is. Xavier Laget only one year of production.

423
00:30:36.000 --> 00:30:38.160
I mean, we could go down
all of the lists here of these

424
00:30:38.200 --> 00:30:44.200
guys and it's like, all right, well, and even Brian Thomas Sands

425
00:30:44.279 --> 00:30:45.720
is like, yeah, he doesn't
run a lot of routes. Do they

426
00:30:45.720 --> 00:30:49.119
think they could teach him a full
route tree and it works, Yeah,

427
00:30:49.160 --> 00:30:55.480
maybe, is it worth using at
eighteen? Probably not? And so that's

428
00:30:55.519 --> 00:30:59.400
what's going to be really interesting to
me. They know they need a receiver.

429
00:31:00.000 --> 00:31:03.000
Wouldn't shock me if they doubled down
at receiver with a Day two and

430
00:31:03.000 --> 00:31:07.000
a Day three pick. But where
do they address it? Because most likely

431
00:31:07.160 --> 00:31:10.920
more times than not, if they
take a receiver on Day two, and

432
00:31:11.000 --> 00:31:14.200
I think they will, it's going
to be there's going to be at least

433
00:31:14.200 --> 00:31:15.839
one exception, one thing that they
don't hit, whether it's weight, size,

434
00:31:15.880 --> 00:31:19.599
production age, and so which one
are they willing to bend on or

435
00:31:19.640 --> 00:31:23.680
for which guys? That's the question. And when they make these draft picks

436
00:31:23.720 --> 00:31:27.519
next week, we'll talk about how
the players they've picked either fit or don't

437
00:31:27.559 --> 00:31:30.720
fit into their historical trends. And
it's a big part of what we do

438
00:31:30.759 --> 00:31:34.119
and we try to predict what the
Bengals will do, is we look at

439
00:31:34.119 --> 00:31:38.599
what they've done and we have a
pretty good feeling for the kinds of players

440
00:31:38.599 --> 00:31:42.680
they pick and when they pick them, especially in the first round and more

441
00:31:42.759 --> 00:31:47.039
so at some positions than others.
They start to make exceptions the longer the

442
00:31:47.079 --> 00:31:48.799
draft goes, which is why you
see such a big group of receivers.

443
00:31:48.799 --> 00:31:52.960
For example, in that two B
group, if you're watching on YouTube,

444
00:31:52.960 --> 00:31:56.200
Troy Franklin, Lat mccacky's AVI worthy
is avier to get key on Coleman,

445
00:31:56.279 --> 00:32:00.359
Ricky pursll All in that two B
group and just some defensive lineman, some

446
00:32:00.400 --> 00:32:06.160
offensive tackles and some more defensive linemen
in two C. But we'll have this

447
00:32:06.279 --> 00:32:09.160
out, it'll be published. You'll
you'll see it on Twitter. In it's

448
00:32:10.519 --> 00:32:15.240
it's wild though, like Franklin size
Maconkie size productions. If you're worthy,

449
00:32:15.279 --> 00:32:21.079
obviously size he weighs as much as
your right leg. Kean Coleman runs as

450
00:32:21.119 --> 00:32:24.400
fast as your right leg. You
know, it's it's It is interesting because

451
00:32:24.480 --> 00:32:27.640
I could see them being in on
some of these guys. I just don't

452
00:32:27.640 --> 00:32:30.240
know who, because there will be
exceptions. Just a hammer at home.

453
00:32:30.920 --> 00:32:36.759
Coleman and Brendan Rice are the day
two wide receivers that look like they fit

454
00:32:36.960 --> 00:32:40.880
what the Bengals profile is the most. And then there's the Washington wide receiver,

455
00:32:43.519 --> 00:32:46.279
Jayleen McMillan, who visited Millan is
the other one. But there is

456
00:32:46.319 --> 00:32:51.160
there is a yellow flag on McMillan's
profile for the Bengals too, So no

457
00:32:51.160 --> 00:32:54.480
matter what, like you said,
though, like that's that's not They don't

458
00:32:54.559 --> 00:33:00.920
usually go for six, so it's
tough. Even even last time it was

459
00:33:00.039 --> 00:33:06.680
a younger player and a bigger slot
than Tyler Boyd. Sure, and that's

460
00:33:07.200 --> 00:33:10.359
do they want to take a slot, Not that he's necessarily a slot only,

461
00:33:10.400 --> 00:33:15.359
but maybe I think it's it's so
interesting because we know they prioritize wide

462
00:33:15.400 --> 00:33:20.680
receiver. There isn't a perfect or
many perfect targets put it that way,

463
00:33:20.960 --> 00:33:23.119
and I have done some scenarios where
it just didn't make sense to take the

464
00:33:23.160 --> 00:33:27.880
receiver for whatever reason. And there
will be scenarios where the Bengals look at

465
00:33:27.920 --> 00:33:32.079
and they say, you know what, we'd rather take Coolan McKinstry or I

466
00:33:32.119 --> 00:33:37.039
don't know, kings Leysuamatia because he
falls, and they don't go wide receiver

467
00:33:37.079 --> 00:33:39.160
in the second round. And then
the third round comes around, maybe they

468
00:33:39.240 --> 00:33:44.000
go tight end and running back or
something, or another defensive tackle or something.

469
00:33:44.079 --> 00:33:50.240
So there are scenarios. Yeah,
certainly one of the names we're watching

470
00:33:50.240 --> 00:33:52.799
there in the two C group,
but there are scenarios where they don't go

471
00:33:52.880 --> 00:33:57.240
Day two receiver. We just think
that it's not one of the necessarily one

472
00:33:57.279 --> 00:34:00.000
of the most likely, but it
does exist. This list will be out

473
00:34:00.039 --> 00:34:02.640
there, Like I said, it'll
be on the socials, It'll be published

474
00:34:02.680 --> 00:34:06.880
in its entirety. You can find
it on probably Joe Goodbarri's Twitter page,

475
00:34:06.880 --> 00:34:08.599
on my twitter page, on James's
Twitter page. It will be out there.

476
00:34:08.960 --> 00:34:12.480
Hopefully this gives you an idea of
the process we went through and some

477
00:34:12.519 --> 00:34:15.559
of the discussions. We had that
full video on Cincinnati Bengals Talk. But

478
00:34:15.920 --> 00:34:20.239
that's going to do it for this
episode of the Locked On Bengals podcast.

479
00:34:20.280 --> 00:34:24.360
The draft is next week. Until
then, thanks for listening, who day

480
00:34:24.920 --> 00:34:30.159
and having a good one. Hey, Prime members. You can listen to

481
00:34:30.199 --> 00:34:37.519
this Lockdown podcast at free on Amazon
Music. Download the Amazon Music app today.

