WEBVTT

1
00:00:15.519 --> 00:00:20.960
From Powerline blog dot com and produced
by Ricochet dot Com. This is the

2
00:00:21.039 --> 00:00:37.960
Powerline Show with your host Steve Hayward. If anyone ever asked me to name

3
00:00:38.000 --> 00:00:43.039
the ten best journalists in America today, spots numbers one through five on my

4
00:00:43.119 --> 00:00:47.840
list are the same person, Heather
McDonald. Heather is always must reading when

5
00:00:47.840 --> 00:00:52.600
she appears frequently in City Journal and
other outlets, writing about a wide range

6
00:00:52.600 --> 00:00:58.079
of current social problems. She's always
fearless and uncompromising and telling the truth in

7
00:00:58.200 --> 00:01:03.000
reporting uncomfortable facts and challenging the conventional
wisdom. She caught early the forces leading

8
00:01:03.079 --> 00:01:07.400
to the defund the police movement in
her book almost ten years ago, The

9
00:01:07.400 --> 00:01:11.959
War on Cops. She also caught
early the perversities of the diversity, equity

10
00:01:11.959 --> 00:01:15.760
and inclusion industrial complex you might call
it, that is now rampaging through American

11
00:01:15.840 --> 00:01:19.760
universities and other institutions. And now
she's out with a brand new book,

12
00:01:21.400 --> 00:01:26.680
When Race Trump's Merit, How the
pursuit of equity sacrifices excellence, destroys beauty,

13
00:01:26.920 --> 00:01:30.719
and threatens lives. As I mentioned
the Heather at the beginning of our

14
00:01:30.760 --> 00:01:36.200
conversation here, I'm sometimes scared to
pick up her newest books because they're so

15
00:01:36.280 --> 00:01:40.719
prescient about the bad news and things
that are coming our way. Let's turn

16
00:01:40.760 --> 00:01:47.760
to that conversation right after these brief
messages from our sponsors. Well, Hi,

17
00:01:47.840 --> 00:01:49.959
Heather, how are you? You
have done it again with your new

18
00:01:51.000 --> 00:01:53.560
book. And I have to say
that I'm kind of scared to get your

19
00:01:53.560 --> 00:01:57.879
new books. And here's why.
I remember when you wrote the War on

20
00:01:57.959 --> 00:02:00.920
Cops here almost ten years ago,
and then things got immediately worse. You

21
00:02:00.920 --> 00:02:05.920
know, within a few years we
had defund the police and total disarray of

22
00:02:05.959 --> 00:02:08.639
policing in the America right now.
Then you followed it up with the diversity

23
00:02:08.719 --> 00:02:14.159
delusion, and immediately that whole business
ratted it up to a whole new level

24
00:02:14.199 --> 00:02:17.400
of insanity. And now you're out
with when Race Trump's Merit, And like

25
00:02:17.439 --> 00:02:20.960
I say, I'm almost afraid to
open it because I'm afraid things are going

26
00:02:21.039 --> 00:02:23.400
to get worse. But I mean, I'm being a little facetious, but

27
00:02:23.439 --> 00:02:30.080
not entirely. Heather. You have
once again brought your ferocity and diligent journalistic

28
00:02:30.120 --> 00:02:36.240
skills to exposing something that is really
quite depressing. But let's start to say,

29
00:02:36.400 --> 00:02:38.159
well, I can I can?
I have to choose between either being

30
00:02:38.240 --> 00:02:43.560
pressent or being totally ineffective, and
I don't know which one. You know,

31
00:02:44.400 --> 00:02:46.240
Well, well we'll come to all
that. I mean, there's a

32
00:02:46.240 --> 00:02:52.960
great value always in telling the truth, but without effect, well it could

33
00:02:53.039 --> 00:02:54.680
be worse. Let's just say,
let's imagine it would have been worse if

34
00:02:54.680 --> 00:02:59.800
I hadn't if I hadn't spoken out. So that's that's some solace. Maybe.

35
00:03:00.080 --> 00:03:02.639
Well, I think there's always great
value and have when some having someone

36
00:03:02.800 --> 00:03:07.360
organized the truth for all the people
out there who suspect in their bones and

37
00:03:07.360 --> 00:03:10.400
then their instincts that something's wrong.
So that's why it's a useful public service,

38
00:03:10.479 --> 00:03:15.639
even if the powers that be resist
listening to what and acting on it.

39
00:03:15.680 --> 00:03:17.439
But we're gonna come to that at
the end about what remedies should be

40
00:03:17.479 --> 00:03:21.960
thought about. So where are we
here? I mean, I guess I

41
00:03:22.000 --> 00:03:25.599
should ask you hard to do.
But you know, when race Trump's merit

42
00:03:25.680 --> 00:03:29.560
I guess I'll put this way.
I've been picking up for several years now,

43
00:03:29.759 --> 00:03:35.439
the elite opinion turning on meritocracy.
Whole stream of books, you know,

44
00:03:35.599 --> 00:03:38.800
titles like you've probably seen some the
meritocracy trap, the meritocracy myth,

45
00:03:39.639 --> 00:03:44.479
the tyranny of meritocracy. That was
the late Lonnie Winier's book about all this,

46
00:03:44.639 --> 00:03:50.960
and it was pretty clear that the
subtext was the problem of racial groups,

47
00:03:51.039 --> 00:03:54.800
especially blacks, falling behind, and
we need to dismantle meritocracy, a

48
00:03:54.919 --> 00:03:59.680
creation originally of liberalism, if we're
going to remedy this. So that's sort

49
00:03:59.680 --> 00:04:01.479
of my own opening bid, and
go ahead and give me a couple of

50
00:04:01.479 --> 00:04:05.479
your opening bids. Yes, it's
absolutely it's all about race. You can

51
00:04:05.520 --> 00:04:12.319
have diversity or you can have meritocracy. You cannot have both. And the

52
00:04:12.360 --> 00:04:18.160
only reason that we're turning on meritocracy
in this country is because meritocratic standards have

53
00:04:18.279 --> 00:04:25.839
a disparate impact on blacks. They
Blacks do poorer at tests of academic skills,

54
00:04:25.839 --> 00:04:30.439
not because those tests are racist,
they are not, they're objective,

55
00:04:30.519 --> 00:04:35.279
they're color blind, they're constitutional.
But because blacks academic skills are much lower,

56
00:04:35.800 --> 00:04:41.920
and you know that's a separate issue, then that one should deal with

57
00:04:41.959 --> 00:04:45.879
that, But one should not deal
with that by tearing down maritocratic standards.

58
00:04:45.920 --> 00:04:50.279
But if these standards did not have
a disparate impact on blacks, we would

59
00:04:50.279 --> 00:04:55.879
not be tearing them down. We'd
be perfectly happy to live with a meritocratic

60
00:04:56.120 --> 00:05:02.600
society, and we would be content
that people, some people succeed at certain

61
00:05:03.120 --> 00:05:10.560
areas of life more than others through
dint of effort and innate talent. When

62
00:05:10.600 --> 00:05:15.720
I look around at our world today, Stephen, I see the myth of

63
00:05:15.839 --> 00:05:25.040
racism and the problem of ongoing racial
disparities as driving almost everything that I find

64
00:05:25.079 --> 00:05:30.160
troubling. Yeah, so now you
pick up on I guess what an Aristotelian

65
00:05:30.199 --> 00:05:33.160
would call the proximate cause, or
in modern terms, the tipping point of

66
00:05:33.160 --> 00:05:38.319
this, which was the formalized doctrine
of disparate impact, going back to the

67
00:05:38.360 --> 00:05:42.759
famous Duke Power case of what the
nineteen seventies, and so now, I

68
00:05:42.759 --> 00:05:45.959
mean the popular version of this now, which you know well, is Abrahm

69
00:05:46.040 --> 00:05:50.839
Kendy saying that any disparity between the
races is proof of race caused by racism,

70
00:05:50.839 --> 00:05:56.439
and is proof of racism. But
that disparate impact doctrine has really settled

71
00:05:56.480 --> 00:06:01.720
in like a squatter, right,
and it's driving everything exactly. It's no

72
00:06:01.879 --> 00:06:06.519
longer a legal doctrine. It's simply
a cultural construct. All you need to

73
00:06:06.560 --> 00:06:13.800
do now to take down any individual
or any institution is to label that institution

74
00:06:13.879 --> 00:06:15.399
or that individual white. I mean, you can see the New York Times

75
00:06:15.439 --> 00:06:20.560
doing this. It's a very handy
journalistic tool. You just slap white in

76
00:06:20.600 --> 00:06:25.040
front of an official's name and oh
my god, he's evil, or you

77
00:06:25.120 --> 00:06:30.399
say to it that an institution is
majority white, and that raises a very

78
00:06:30.480 --> 00:06:34.240
deep cloud of suspicion and disparate impact. As you say, began as a

79
00:06:34.279 --> 00:06:40.639
court case. It was a way
of expanding the reach of civil rights statutes.

80
00:06:40.720 --> 00:06:47.600
They originally the sixty four sixty five
Civil Rights Acts only penalized intentional discrimination.

81
00:06:47.759 --> 00:06:54.040
So an employer who was intentionally saying
I don't want to hire qualified blacks

82
00:06:54.439 --> 00:07:00.720
as police officers or as tech workers, and had a test for employment,

83
00:07:01.319 --> 00:07:06.240
he would run a foul of civil
rights statutes and would be guilty of discrimination.

84
00:07:08.399 --> 00:07:12.720
But by the seventies there was less
and less of that type of discrimination

85
00:07:12.800 --> 00:07:18.040
going on, and so to keep
the whole civil rights enterprise going, you

86
00:07:18.199 --> 00:07:25.199
now had the idea that an employer
could be completely color blind, non discriminatory,

87
00:07:25.279 --> 00:07:31.959
have no racial animus. But if
his criteria for employment negatively impacted blacks,

88
00:07:32.040 --> 00:07:36.399
if he had a test, say
for a firefighter, that said,

89
00:07:36.439 --> 00:07:43.040
well, we want you to be
able to read chemical instructions for using your

90
00:07:43.079 --> 00:07:48.600
firefighting chemicals. And blacks failed that
reading test at a higher rate than whites,

91
00:07:49.040 --> 00:07:53.800
even though the test was color blind
and was not intended to discriminate.

92
00:07:54.079 --> 00:07:57.319
You'd have to throw off the test, which is absurd. And we've seen

93
00:07:57.360 --> 00:08:01.600
this go on for decades. We've
had decades now of lawsuits against firefighting exams,

94
00:08:01.639 --> 00:08:07.240
police exams on the simple ground that
blacks don't do as well. So

95
00:08:07.240 --> 00:08:09.800
we throw out the tests, we
open the floodgates, we bring in less

96
00:08:09.920 --> 00:08:16.399
qualified individuals. That has a huge
negative effect. But now, and and

97
00:08:16.439 --> 00:08:20.399
so you had the disparate impact.
This was the Supreme Court case, as

98
00:08:20.399 --> 00:08:26.519
you say, affirming this idea.
It's spread into federal regulations, it's spread

99
00:08:26.519 --> 00:08:31.279
into statutes. But now it's simply
the way we observe the world. And

100
00:08:31.759 --> 00:08:35.080
so all it takes is to say
that, well, blacks do less well

101
00:08:35.159 --> 00:08:39.960
on the Medical College Admissions test.
You don't have to bring a lawsuit.

102
00:08:39.600 --> 00:08:43.879
You just say, well, if
they do less well on the MCATs,

103
00:08:43.759 --> 00:08:48.720
they have the MCATs have a disparate
impact on blacks. Let's get rid of

104
00:08:48.759 --> 00:08:52.720
the MCATs. Yeah, yeah,
I mean it now reverses the presumption.

105
00:08:52.759 --> 00:08:54.440
I mean it used to be the
burden of proof is on the government to

106
00:08:54.559 --> 00:09:00.799
prove that you'd intentionally discriminate it.
Now I mean, this is unfolded.

107
00:09:01.559 --> 00:09:03.240
It's not the central focus of your
book. But the way this works now

108
00:09:03.360 --> 00:09:09.159
is as if there's a statistical difference
between the composition of your workforce and the

109
00:09:09.200 --> 00:09:13.240
local demographics of the community, you
just presume to be discriminating, and now

110
00:09:13.279 --> 00:09:16.600
you have to prove your innocence.
You have to prove a negative right.

111
00:09:16.679 --> 00:09:18.639
And it's gotten very perverse. But
now it's spread, and this is the

112
00:09:18.679 --> 00:09:24.159
interesting part of your book, is
it's spread into the cultural world. And

113
00:09:24.279 --> 00:09:28.519
here I want to connect was most
interesting about the way head McDonald is looking

114
00:09:28.519 --> 00:09:31.679
at this problem and the way other
people have a lot of people talked about

115
00:09:31.759 --> 00:09:37.279
woke capitalism they call it, and
big business gave billions of dollars to Black

116
00:09:37.320 --> 00:09:41.600
Lives Matter, and they're bending over
backwards for diversity and so forth. The

117
00:09:41.679 --> 00:09:45.200
heart of your book is the effect
this is having on culture, on the

118
00:09:45.320 --> 00:09:50.679
arts. And I have a couple
of theories on this, one the general

119
00:09:50.879 --> 00:09:54.320
and then one specific to you.
My general one is that the theoretical problem

120
00:09:54.399 --> 00:10:00.000
here beyond disparate impact, or at
the heart of it is runaway egalitarianism,

121
00:10:00.240 --> 00:10:03.360
equal opportunity. Equality is not sufficient. We have to have equity, which

122
00:10:03.399 --> 00:10:09.600
means equal results. But the other
thing is and here because I know that

123
00:10:09.679 --> 00:10:13.399
if we actually lived in a non
insane world, Heather McDonald, you would

124
00:10:13.440 --> 00:10:18.639
be a literary critic or a cultural
critic, and we'd beat you alongside Lionel

125
00:10:18.639 --> 00:10:22.440
Trilling and Northward Fry. And the
reason I say that is is that one

126
00:10:22.519 --> 00:10:26.679
part of radical ideology I've always thought, and I think you can actually find

127
00:10:26.679 --> 00:10:31.519
this and obscure writings of Marx if
you go far enough, is the idea

128
00:10:31.600 --> 00:10:37.039
that society can be organized without tragic
outcomes. In fact, Marxism actually contemplates

129
00:10:37.039 --> 00:10:43.120
here and there that death itself could
be conquered in the Marxist utopia, and

130
00:10:43.639 --> 00:10:46.000
an awful lot of literature i've heard
you talk about it, especially the Greek

131
00:10:46.039 --> 00:10:50.480
classics, are all about the fact
that human life is essentially tragic. Of

132
00:10:50.480 --> 00:10:54.559
course, treating tragedy is an individual
thing. Once you start treating people as

133
00:10:56.159 --> 00:11:00.279
members of groups, then the whole
element of a tragic sense of life that

134
00:11:00.360 --> 00:11:05.240
ends with all of us dying disappears
and it's completely warping our sensibilities. Now

135
00:11:05.240 --> 00:11:07.840
that's a whole mouthful, but I
know that you're equal to it because of

136
00:11:07.879 --> 00:11:13.159
your fine tune sensibilities about culture.
Well, weird a question, Heather,

137
00:11:13.240 --> 00:11:16.759
I said, I want to try
some questions you don't usually get. But

138
00:11:16.200 --> 00:11:20.919
anyway, No, I think it's
a great question, and I'm trying to

139
00:11:22.320 --> 00:11:26.879
think if I agree with it,
because I would say that the left's narrative

140
00:11:28.080 --> 00:11:31.879
about American history, I mean,
maybe it points to some kind of utopian

141
00:11:33.080 --> 00:11:37.159
end, but I would say it
is in one sense far darker and far

142
00:11:37.240 --> 00:11:43.039
more tragic than the traditional American history
because it is all about oppression. I've

143
00:11:43.039 --> 00:11:50.279
actually been on a big reading project
of black history, sixteen nineteen project.

144
00:11:50.279 --> 00:11:54.440
Then for fun, I decided to
go to Howard Zinn's People History of America,

145
00:11:54.480 --> 00:11:56.360
which I never read before, which
is quite bracing. I enjoyed it

146
00:11:56.440 --> 00:12:01.919
far far more than the sixteen nineteen
project because it wasn't so damn narcissistic.

147
00:12:01.960 --> 00:12:05.559
I mean, at some point there's
there's some things I agree with the sixteen

148
00:12:05.600 --> 00:12:09.399
nineteen project, and that I do
think that the American traditional conservative American narrative

149
00:12:09.600 --> 00:12:15.720
is a bit of a whitewash.
I am struggling at this point, and

150
00:12:15.799 --> 00:12:24.399
I have not resolved this of how
to how to integrate America's very very long,

151
00:12:26.080 --> 00:12:31.720
gratuitous cruelty and nastiness to blacks with
the story we tell about ourselves.

152
00:12:31.759 --> 00:12:37.320
And I don't know whether every statement
we make about American history needs a footnote

153
00:12:37.720 --> 00:12:41.480
to say, but see blacks,
you know, as a counterexample. So

154
00:12:41.480 --> 00:12:48.039
so, but the sixteen nineteen project
kind of freed me a little bit of

155
00:12:48.080 --> 00:12:52.879
my torment because it became so narcissistic. You know, it is not the

156
00:12:52.960 --> 00:12:56.679
case that everything is about black oppression. That's what the sixteen ninety project.

157
00:12:58.000 --> 00:13:03.279
Howard sin was much more interesting,
much more interesting. I liked the you

158
00:13:03.320 --> 00:13:07.960
know, the primary sources and history
from the bottom up. And he's obviously

159
00:13:07.000 --> 00:13:16.000
an outright communist. He hates every
aspect of success, of capitalism, of

160
00:13:16.039 --> 00:13:20.120
economic exchange, of freedom of private
property. But it's sort of it's much

161
00:13:20.159 --> 00:13:24.519
more honest. And Marx's categories are
more interesting than identity ones. But in

162
00:13:24.559 --> 00:13:33.639
any case, I would say that
the left narrative of constant oppression is pretty

163
00:13:33.720 --> 00:13:39.559
dark as well. And so you
know, you can do things by group,

164
00:13:39.720 --> 00:13:43.360
and that doesn't mean you don't have
a tragic sense of life. And

165
00:13:43.600 --> 00:13:50.960
I also I've never quite understood the
conservatives trying to discredit the idea of progress,

166
00:13:52.480 --> 00:13:58.279
because certainly we do believe in progress, at least of the technological,

167
00:13:58.320 --> 00:14:03.639
scientific, and material sort. So
um, so that that distinction is not

168
00:14:03.759 --> 00:14:07.480
quite clear. But but as far
as like the arts necessarily breeding a tragic

169
00:14:09.039 --> 00:14:15.360
understanding of life, um, yes, I guess that's not necessarily. What

170
00:14:15.480 --> 00:14:20.159
I get from the arts. What
I get from literature and from music is

171
00:14:20.440 --> 00:14:31.720
insight into human feeling and experience and
history, human types, human struggles that

172
00:14:31.799 --> 00:14:37.720
I would never have access to on
my own. And whether the bottom line

173
00:14:37.720 --> 00:14:43.600
of all of that is tragic or
simply revelatory, I'm not quite sure.

174
00:14:43.639 --> 00:14:48.600
But there's certainly a lot of joy
and sublimity in the arts, but but

175
00:14:48.720 --> 00:14:54.720
also a lot of humor and irony
and wit yea, So so I'm I'm

176
00:14:54.759 --> 00:15:01.799
not sure about that. Which way
what leads us to a tragic understanding of

177
00:15:01.879 --> 00:15:07.240
humanity? And what is a defiance
of that? So why do you think

178
00:15:07.320 --> 00:15:13.559
that progressives reject a tragic view of
life? Maybe it's just that we are

179
00:15:13.639 --> 00:15:18.200
tragic right now, or we are
maybe you're maybe you would differ between tragedy

180
00:15:18.759 --> 00:15:24.279
and oppression, that that may be
different. I don't know, yeah,

181
00:15:24.360 --> 00:15:28.679
I mean, I didn't want to
cross you up with a big roundhouse a

182
00:15:28.759 --> 00:15:31.799
crazy question. I don't think it
through two. I mean, I guess

183
00:15:31.840 --> 00:15:37.960
what I think is that if you
are oriented towards suffering situations. I think

184
00:15:39.000 --> 00:15:43.480
of Kenneth Minogue's famous definition and liberal
mind of the Liberals are oriented towards suffering

185
00:15:43.519 --> 00:15:48.480
situations, and they want to alleviate
suffering, and they get carried away with

186
00:15:48.519 --> 00:15:54.720
the idea that progress and political power
and redistribution can relieve all suffering situations.

187
00:15:54.759 --> 00:15:58.240
And at some point there, you
know, I think there's much to be

188
00:15:58.279 --> 00:16:02.200
said for the reform liberal tradition.
Confidence is not one of them. That's

189
00:16:02.240 --> 00:16:06.200
an all the long story. Um, let's let's press on a little bit

190
00:16:06.399 --> 00:16:07.799
a tangent of this. Though.
I agree with you about Zin by the

191
00:16:07.840 --> 00:16:15.279
way, that that the categorical and
wholesale rejection of him by conservatives was a

192
00:16:15.360 --> 00:16:18.360
mistake. By the way, someone
else who thinks that is Bill McClay,

193
00:16:18.720 --> 00:16:22.600
the historian. Really yeah. I
had a long talk of Bill about that,

194
00:16:22.679 --> 00:16:23.840
and he says, yeah, there's
there's more to. I mean,

195
00:16:25.120 --> 00:16:29.039
you can think you think Zinn's conclusion
and orientation is defective, which I think

196
00:16:29.039 --> 00:16:32.360
it is, and he makes some
factual mistakes, but it's readable. There's

197
00:16:32.360 --> 00:16:34.559
a reason that thing caught on the
way it did. It's very readable,

198
00:16:34.639 --> 00:16:41.440
engaging history. And but let me
let me sharp at I know you're familiar

199
00:16:41.440 --> 00:16:45.559
with the passage from du Boys where
he says, what I read Shakespeare and

200
00:16:45.600 --> 00:16:48.600
I winced not. Yeah, I'm
not sure you know a modern day du

201
00:16:48.639 --> 00:16:53.200
Boys can say that today because we're
now categorically rejecting that great tradition. That

202
00:16:53.279 --> 00:16:57.480
that was the larger context of that
question. I was asking you, Well,

203
00:16:57.519 --> 00:17:02.720
he says Shakespeare wins is not you
know he doesn't Boys. Yeah.

204
00:17:02.759 --> 00:17:07.880
Yeah, it's that these great authors
aureally as an Aristotle and Shakespeare and Dumat

205
00:17:07.960 --> 00:17:12.759
and Balzac do not WinCE at him, that he is able to enter the

206
00:17:14.480 --> 00:17:19.440
pantheon of human thinking without the color
line, without prejudice, and so it's

207
00:17:19.480 --> 00:17:25.880
a it's a mutual engagement. But
but he you know, he does not

208
00:17:26.000 --> 00:17:30.559
feel rejected by these greats. But
yes, absolutely, I mean that Dubois

209
00:17:30.680 --> 00:17:37.240
quote which brings tears to my eyes
every time because it's spoken from a world

210
00:17:37.400 --> 00:17:45.480
that was still keeping people like Duboys
out, even as tragically. It's like,

211
00:17:45.839 --> 00:17:51.880
you know, something Shakespearean with the
cross paths, whether Romeo and Juliet

212
00:17:52.000 --> 00:17:57.759
or a Tello, these ironic moments
where the messenger has not seen. You

213
00:17:57.839 --> 00:18:02.359
know, you look at the pictures
of the nineteen forties and fifties and you

214
00:18:02.440 --> 00:18:08.480
see La Fitzgerald and Duke Ellington and
Nat King Cole and Louis Armstrong dressed to

215
00:18:08.519 --> 00:18:15.640
the nines, you know, with
hats on and suits and abiding by bourgeois

216
00:18:15.720 --> 00:18:19.400
values at a time when America was
not letting them in by and large,

217
00:18:19.440 --> 00:18:25.279
you know, the individuals, yes, but but still the bulk of society

218
00:18:25.400 --> 00:18:32.200
was still involved in gratuitous putdowns.
Now it's the opposite, it is the

219
00:18:32.400 --> 00:18:34.400
it is the opposite. We have
to be able to say that. I

220
00:18:34.440 --> 00:18:38.680
can say both. I can say
we were white supremacists. And now the

221
00:18:38.759 --> 00:18:42.599
reality is black privilege today, it
is not white privilege. So now we're

222
00:18:42.640 --> 00:18:52.279
here with open arms when every single
institution is bending itself into knots, twisting

223
00:18:52.279 --> 00:18:56.240
itself into knots to hire and promote
as many blacks as possible, And then

224
00:18:56.240 --> 00:19:00.880
you have this oppositional culture in the
black community. That means that they're not

225
00:19:00.920 --> 00:19:04.920
prepared to take advantage of those opportunities
on equal terms. They only get in

226
00:19:06.000 --> 00:19:11.440
through lowered standards. So it's it's
a terrible you know, ships crossing in

227
00:19:11.480 --> 00:19:15.720
the night. So but in any
case that that quote breaks my heart,

228
00:19:15.839 --> 00:19:25.559
it brings tears to my eyes,
and yet it is not described our understanding

229
00:19:25.640 --> 00:19:32.359
of the Classics for decades. Now. This is what just infuriates me about

230
00:19:32.440 --> 00:19:37.559
the Academy, that these literature professors, art history professors, music professors,

231
00:19:37.559 --> 00:19:45.440
who all we ask of them is
that every fall they say to students,

232
00:19:45.079 --> 00:19:51.559
here is greatness. Here is where
you will learn things that you would otherwise

233
00:19:51.880 --> 00:19:56.240
never know in your narrow, petty
lives. You will you will be able

234
00:19:56.279 --> 00:20:04.880
to bask in language of exquisite richness, profundity, precision, clarity you would

235
00:20:04.920 --> 00:20:08.680
never otherwise get it. Come and
take my classes instead, they're saying,

236
00:20:10.640 --> 00:20:14.559
we need trigger warnings. You know, the professors are agreeing to trigger warnings.

237
00:20:14.599 --> 00:20:18.640
These are works which are toxic.
If you're of the wrong race and

238
00:20:18.759 --> 00:20:26.880
sex, you should read only through
the lens of anger and resentment. And

239
00:20:26.960 --> 00:20:33.799
so nobody really the appetite for the
Classics and the rhetoric around them is all

240
00:20:33.880 --> 00:20:41.240
about anti racism and anti misogyny,
and it is an absolute betrayal and we

241
00:20:41.279 --> 00:20:48.640
should fire every single humanities professor who
is not willing to sign a statement that

242
00:20:48.759 --> 00:20:53.519
says I believe in my tradition.
It is a tradition of beauty, accomplishment,

243
00:20:53.559 --> 00:21:00.000
and greatness. And I will do
everything I can to teach students why

244
00:21:00.039 --> 00:21:03.920
they should be down on their knees
in gratitude before these works. Yeah,

245
00:21:03.240 --> 00:21:07.839
let me try. It's not exactly
a parallel to the voice. But you're

246
00:21:07.839 --> 00:21:14.759
write in your book about Lynn Manuel
Miranda Groveling after he received criticism for his

247
00:21:14.839 --> 00:21:18.559
movie In the Heights about the Hispanic
neighborhood in New York because he didn't have

248
00:21:18.640 --> 00:21:25.440
the right shades of color of the
Hispanic cast. And I'm you know you

249
00:21:25.519 --> 00:21:30.119
mentioned in Passing of Course that he
littlemo brand of Course burst on the scene

250
00:21:30.119 --> 00:21:33.799
with Hamilton, where he cast mostly
black actors playing the founding fathers, And

251
00:21:34.519 --> 00:21:37.599
I know it did attract some criticism
at the time when it came out,

252
00:21:37.640 --> 00:21:41.039
But I'm wondering, now, let's
see what you think, would he could

253
00:21:41.039 --> 00:21:45.880
he make Hamilton today? And would
he make it today? I'm actually thinking

254
00:21:45.920 --> 00:21:52.200
that that play now could not be
done. Why because it seems to me

255
00:21:52.240 --> 00:21:57.880
it's still an okay category of blacks
playing whites. What what what's the next

256
00:21:57.920 --> 00:22:03.079
step between after black's playing whites not
doing whites at all? You mean we

257
00:22:03.079 --> 00:22:07.920
shouldn't even have any representation of the
Founding Fathers. Yeah, I'm not so

258
00:22:07.960 --> 00:22:11.000
service that. I mean the way
I interpreted it was at the time was

259
00:22:11.160 --> 00:22:17.039
this is showing that why some conservatives
like to play this is showing that the

260
00:22:17.359 --> 00:22:22.799
teaching and intention of the Founding uh
was intended to be universal, accessible to

261
00:22:22.880 --> 00:22:26.880
anyone, right the way Lincoln thought
about it later on. Right, and

262
00:22:26.880 --> 00:22:30.240
and now if you think about the
lens of the sixteen nineteen project, which

263
00:22:30.319 --> 00:22:33.200
is you a moment ago or more
generally talked about, you know, anger

264
00:22:33.200 --> 00:22:37.359
and resentment or now the coin of
the realm, you wouldn't want a black

265
00:22:37.480 --> 00:22:44.720
cast reflecting favorably on Hamilton or any
of the other Founders, Right, I

266
00:22:44.759 --> 00:22:47.720
mean, that's that's what I'm thinking
about that. I say, yes,

267
00:22:47.799 --> 00:22:51.000
okay, that I agree with.
I was taking it because because what what

268
00:22:51.319 --> 00:22:57.519
tripped Lynn went Miranda up with the
in the Heights was the exquisite boundaries and

269
00:22:57.759 --> 00:23:03.759
barbed wire that are being put around
works based on skin color and ethnicity.

270
00:23:03.799 --> 00:23:07.039
I mean, it's just it's the
absolute crushing of human imagination and the ability

271
00:23:07.119 --> 00:23:14.039
to to for an actor to put
himself into a radically different time and character.

272
00:23:14.319 --> 00:23:17.279
So, but yes, on from
that extent. Now, I've never

273
00:23:17.279 --> 00:23:21.759
seen Hamilton's so I you know,
I'm I'm from Afar, and I know

274
00:23:21.839 --> 00:23:25.119
I have a few friends that couldn't
stand it because of the rap music,

275
00:23:25.119 --> 00:23:29.119
and I suspect I probably would have
been in that camp. But in any

276
00:23:29.119 --> 00:23:33.720
case, but but to the extent
that it is actually a celebration of the

277
00:23:33.759 --> 00:23:38.079
Founding, I think you're absolutely right. You know, it would it would

278
00:23:38.119 --> 00:23:44.240
have to be rewritten as the Founding
with slavery, you know, it would

279
00:23:44.240 --> 00:23:48.960
be sixteen nineteen as the Founding and
h something that we never got rid of.

280
00:23:49.359 --> 00:23:53.000
Yeah. Actually I think it's you
know, you can now watch it

281
00:23:53.039 --> 00:23:56.519
streaming somewhere. I think it's pretty
good. I didn't think the it's not

282
00:23:56.640 --> 00:24:03.079
conventional rap. It's actually Rick give
me away. It's it's much more conventionally

283
00:24:03.200 --> 00:24:07.079
musical than when you think of the
term rap, but sort of a blend.

284
00:24:07.240 --> 00:24:14.119
Anyway, we're thinking and I think
one thing you mentioned an Togo humanities

285
00:24:14.119 --> 00:24:18.680
professors who came into all this don't
stand up for their disciplines for whatever reasons.

286
00:24:21.200 --> 00:24:22.279
You know, I've seen a lot
of surveys I think you've probably seen

287
00:24:22.319 --> 00:24:26.559
them too, that show that well, I'll put it this way, very

288
00:24:26.559 --> 00:24:30.680
bluntly, part of the problem here
is white liberals. I see all these

289
00:24:30.680 --> 00:24:36.160
surveys that's showing that black opinion.
However, you want to test the questions

290
00:24:36.440 --> 00:24:40.720
is this isn't the right category,
but is not as far to the left

291
00:24:40.799 --> 00:24:44.440
as white liberals are. In other
words, the problem is Marin County and

292
00:24:44.559 --> 00:24:48.839
you know Westchester, and then in
fact, if you went by I think

293
00:24:48.880 --> 00:24:52.839
maybe even majority of what blacks think, they would be skeptical of a lot

294
00:24:52.839 --> 00:24:55.279
of what's happening. Do you pick
up any of that? I know you

295
00:24:55.319 --> 00:24:56.920
go to a lot of community meetings
and stuff and get out and do shoe

296
00:24:57.000 --> 00:25:03.960
leather reporting. Well, I've certainly
heard that argument made for years now,

297
00:25:03.039 --> 00:25:07.160
and to be perfectly honesty, I
think it's somewhat of a safe harbor for

298
00:25:08.359 --> 00:25:14.000
conservatives and that and I will say, I mean I have made a point

299
00:25:14.559 --> 00:25:21.000
in my police reporting of going out
into inner city meeting, community police meetings

300
00:25:21.160 --> 00:25:26.559
and giving voice to exactly the people
you're talking about, the good, law

301
00:25:26.599 --> 00:25:32.640
abiding, hard working inner city residents
who are terrified of the kids hanging out

302
00:25:32.680 --> 00:25:37.960
by the hundreds on the corner fighting
and the kids colonizing their lobbies, selling

303
00:25:38.000 --> 00:25:44.039
weed and trespassing, and they want
more officers. And there are some polls

304
00:25:44.160 --> 00:25:47.640
that, like, there was a
Quinnipiac poll in New York City that showed

305
00:25:47.680 --> 00:25:52.440
that a slightly higher percentage of black
voters in New York City than white voters

306
00:25:52.839 --> 00:25:59.319
wanted the police to enforce so called
quality of life or broken windows, public

307
00:25:59.440 --> 00:26:07.039
order of fans. So I know
that argument that having been said, I

308
00:26:07.079 --> 00:26:11.400
think I think it's somewhat of again
a whitewash to think that there is not

309
00:26:11.559 --> 00:26:18.880
a huge black support for victim politics. And we just had the election of

310
00:26:19.000 --> 00:26:26.480
Brandon Johnson in Chicago in a runoff
election against Paul Vallas, both Democrats,

311
00:26:26.640 --> 00:26:33.039
both very liberal Democrats, but Paul
Vallas, the white run runner up,

312
00:26:33.000 --> 00:26:38.480
was more pro law enforcement than Brandon
Johnson, the black candidate, who had

313
00:26:40.279 --> 00:26:45.759
before been explicitly defund the police,
which I think is somewhat of a irrelevant

314
00:26:45.759 --> 00:26:52.200
category because we've had de facto defunding. You don't have to be explicitly for

315
00:26:52.319 --> 00:26:57.480
defunding to not have an incredibly pernicious
effect on policing if you pursue the narrative

316
00:26:57.480 --> 00:27:03.160
that policing is racist. And Brandon
Johnson certainly pursued that narrative. But the

317
00:27:03.200 --> 00:27:10.559
greatest votes for Brandon Johnson came in
the highest crime areas of the city,

318
00:27:10.880 --> 00:27:15.799
which are overwhelmingly black. And so
it is a real, real puzzle.

319
00:27:17.160 --> 00:27:23.160
And one can say that it is
not for me to speculate why this is,

320
00:27:23.359 --> 00:27:30.759
but one can just look empirically and
note that it is possible to be

321
00:27:30.480 --> 00:27:37.839
the most victimized by uncontrolled crime,
which can only as far as we know

322
00:27:38.079 --> 00:27:45.559
from decades of comparing police response with
social service response and greater government funding and

323
00:27:45.640 --> 00:27:52.279
more welfare and social workers up the
gazoo, the only thing that works is

324
00:27:52.400 --> 00:27:56.240
police absent reconstruction of the black family. The police were but these communities would

325
00:27:56.319 --> 00:28:03.480
rather put up with crime than vote
for somebody who is pro law enforcement,

326
00:28:03.559 --> 00:28:10.480
because that means giving up on the
narrative that the police are somehow racist.

327
00:28:10.559 --> 00:28:14.759
So, yes, white liberals are
the problem, but it's it's not as

328
00:28:14.839 --> 00:28:22.559
if they're imposing an ideology that is
strongly resisted by the black community. Yeah,

329
00:28:22.680 --> 00:28:26.000
yeah, I mean I did notice
that too, and was disturbed by

330
00:28:26.160 --> 00:28:30.400
that those results, although I did
also notice that it was a close election

331
00:28:30.480 --> 00:28:37.119
and Johnson did very well on the
Upper east side of Chicago, which,

332
00:28:37.160 --> 00:28:38.960
in other words, the closer you
got to Northwestern University, the better he

333
00:28:40.000 --> 00:28:42.599
did. We know who lives up
there, and I don't know. The

334
00:28:42.680 --> 00:28:48.279
voting behavior and sort of ethnic loyalties
and voting is something that puzzles a lot

335
00:28:48.279 --> 00:28:52.559
of people in a lot of domains. And if I were you, if

336
00:28:52.559 --> 00:28:55.799
I were you, you could now, you know, raise against me the

337
00:28:55.880 --> 00:29:02.319
fact that all groups, by differing
majorities, don't want racial preferences. So

338
00:29:02.519 --> 00:29:10.160
that's another example on your behalf right. But but I would just say the

339
00:29:10.200 --> 00:29:17.039
black activists and the black faculty in
universities are just as bad as the white

340
00:29:17.079 --> 00:29:23.000
faculty and the students. The black
students are wielding the power that they have

341
00:29:23.200 --> 00:29:29.920
by being black as much as they
possibly can. Yeah, so, oh

342
00:29:29.960 --> 00:29:33.240
sorry, No, go ahead,
Well, okay, I'll start drawing toward

343
00:29:33.279 --> 00:29:37.559
a conclusion and summarize for listeners that
they want to read the central chapters of

344
00:29:37.599 --> 00:29:40.799
your book, where you go through. I mean, I think we're all

345
00:29:40.880 --> 00:29:47.039
familiar with stories reading in the media
of cultural institutions caving into, you know,

346
00:29:47.200 --> 00:29:49.680
sort of absurd levels of racial consciousness, you know, dismissing the dosince

347
00:29:49.720 --> 00:29:55.039
of the Art Institute of Chicago,
and but you have cataloged so many of

348
00:29:55.079 --> 00:29:57.720
them, it makes me realize that
this is much more. In other words,

349
00:29:57.720 --> 00:30:02.480
those things we occasionally read about or
not isolated examples, is sweeping the

350
00:30:02.680 --> 00:30:06.680
entire or cultural artistic artistic landscape.
Is that? I think that's not an

351
00:30:06.680 --> 00:30:10.480
overstatement to put it that way.
No, it's absolutely not an overstatement.

352
00:30:10.720 --> 00:30:15.720
There's not a single there's not a
single arts institution that is not under relentless

353
00:30:15.759 --> 00:30:21.279
constant pressure to program on the basis
of race, to hire, on the

354
00:30:21.319 --> 00:30:23.799
basis of race, to fund raise, on the basis of race to put.

355
00:30:23.799 --> 00:30:33.160
It makes its board of trustees racially
proportionate, and many people are getting

356
00:30:33.160 --> 00:30:37.640
out. I mean, there's theater
directors, heads of theater organizations are quitting

357
00:30:37.720 --> 00:30:44.599
right and left because the pressure coming
from their funding organizations and their own staff

358
00:30:45.200 --> 00:30:48.960
is so overwhelming and it makes their
job absolutely impossible. It's not what they

359
00:30:49.480 --> 00:30:55.839
went into theater for, which was
to expand human possibilities of the imagination,

360
00:30:55.920 --> 00:31:00.279
and now they're being told to shrink
it through the realities of race. And

361
00:31:00.559 --> 00:31:04.519
it's happening. I mean, the
museum world is just utterly disgusting. I

362
00:31:04.559 --> 00:31:10.039
mean, there's some shows I write
about the metropolit Museum of Art that has

363
00:31:10.440 --> 00:31:14.559
mounted a show that is the cancelation
of all art in order to make the

364
00:31:14.680 --> 00:31:23.160
argument that an abolitionist sculpture, a
work clearly intended to protest against slavery,

365
00:31:23.359 --> 00:31:27.880
is, in fact, according to
the Metropol Museum, a pro slavery,

366
00:31:27.920 --> 00:31:33.799
white supremacist work. In order to
make this completely counterfactual argument, requires the

367
00:31:33.920 --> 00:31:40.079
met to lie about every aspect of
art history. To claim that an artist

368
00:31:40.200 --> 00:31:45.559
not naming his model is racist.
Artists when that model is black, when

369
00:31:45.680 --> 00:31:52.480
racist. When artists have not named
models forever. It requires the Metropolitan Museum

370
00:31:52.519 --> 00:31:59.480
of Art to claim that portraying the
nude is racist when the model is black.

371
00:31:59.640 --> 00:32:02.519
When the nude, the white nude, has been the basis of Western

372
00:32:02.640 --> 00:32:07.160
art for five thousand years, when
there are hundreds of thousands, if not

373
00:32:07.440 --> 00:32:14.240
millions, of portrayed white nudes out
there in states of undressed, far more

374
00:32:14.279 --> 00:32:19.599
revealing than in this one statue that
the MET is trying to deconstruct. I

375
00:32:19.640 --> 00:32:23.839
mean, this is an art museum
so dedicated to anti racism that it means

376
00:32:24.000 --> 00:32:32.440
tearing up and imposing a completely counterfactual
narrative on its own collections. Yeah.

377
00:32:32.519 --> 00:32:37.400
Yeah, that's the term I use
for this is this is utter nihilism on

378
00:32:37.440 --> 00:32:40.799
top of everything else. All Right, one more big question and then a

379
00:32:40.920 --> 00:32:45.240
very short question and I'll let you
go, Heather. The big question is

380
00:32:45.640 --> 00:32:50.279
your last chapter is called Saving Meritocracy, Saving a Civilization, and you know

381
00:32:50.400 --> 00:32:54.039
you quote someone early in the chapter
saying it could take fifty to one hundred

382
00:32:54.119 --> 00:32:59.400
years things Actually he didn't say this, but my translation is things almost happy

383
00:32:59.400 --> 00:33:00.759
to get worse where they can get
better. And then you have a few

384
00:33:00.799 --> 00:33:06.680
suggestions that maybe we need some forceful
political interventions. But what can be So

385
00:33:06.720 --> 00:33:08.400
I'll just restate the question, what
can be done to turn us around?

386
00:33:08.440 --> 00:33:13.559
What should be done to try and
turn us around? Well, yes,

387
00:33:13.759 --> 00:33:16.079
and it's you're not putting words into
his mouth. He absolutely said that.

388
00:33:16.519 --> 00:33:22.240
This is an oncologist talking about why
nobody can speak out in his own profession

389
00:33:22.279 --> 00:33:27.359
and why he's not willing to speak
out against the lies that that medicine is

390
00:33:27.480 --> 00:33:30.079
racist because they're all terrified of losing
their jobs. So he said it's going

391
00:33:30.119 --> 00:33:35.000
to take fifty two hundred years.
The entire medical system is going to have

392
00:33:35.039 --> 00:33:37.960
to collapse and be rebuilt because nobody
right now is willing to stand up and

393
00:33:38.000 --> 00:33:43.200
defend it. So we'll all have
to, you know, give up on

394
00:33:43.240 --> 00:33:46.799
Alzheimer's cures or cancer cure as while
we're trying to make our labs happy and

395
00:33:46.839 --> 00:33:52.960
diverse. It's it's an absolute betrayal
of what scientific method has been, which

396
00:33:53.000 --> 00:33:58.160
is about the scientific method, not
about scientists. It's not about the race

397
00:33:58.200 --> 00:34:04.559
and identity of scientists, believe me, in any case. So it's coming

398
00:34:04.599 --> 00:34:07.440
down. Everything is coming down.
I mean, people have their heads in

399
00:34:07.480 --> 00:34:12.639
their sands. Everything is coming down. If we allow racism to be the

400
00:34:12.679 --> 00:34:20.119
only allowable explanation for racial disparities.
As long as Kendy has the final word,

401
00:34:20.199 --> 00:34:23.480
and any racial disparity is the result
of racism, and you can't say

402
00:34:23.480 --> 00:34:28.280
anything else, the left winds,
it is all coming down. My book

403
00:34:28.280 --> 00:34:35.679
provides the alternative explanations, which is
massive academic skills gaps, massive crime gaps.

404
00:34:35.960 --> 00:34:38.239
So where do we start? Even
though we were saying that now disparate

405
00:34:38.280 --> 00:34:44.679
impact has leaped out of the legal
sphere into the culture at large. Nevertheless,

406
00:34:44.760 --> 00:34:51.280
one should of course start a president, presumably Republican, but if he's

407
00:34:51.280 --> 00:34:53.159
a Democrat. Good, you know, welcome to the fold. Guy.

408
00:34:54.280 --> 00:35:00.320
Get rid of every disparate impact regulation
in the federal government executive branch that you

409
00:35:00.400 --> 00:35:07.039
can rewrite the regulations, take disperate
impact out, take it out of the

410
00:35:07.119 --> 00:35:13.559
federal agencies. Right now, the
federal science agencies make race and sex more

411
00:35:13.559 --> 00:35:19.440
important criteria in federal science granting than
they do scientific merit. Get rid of

412
00:35:19.480 --> 00:35:22.599
that. I mean, the hundreds
of millions of dollars that are coming out

413
00:35:22.599 --> 00:35:28.599
of the NIH, the National Science
Foundation, the CDC, the Department of

414
00:35:28.719 --> 00:35:32.880
Energy, all around intersectionality and diversity
is sickening. That can all come out

415
00:35:32.880 --> 00:35:37.840
with the stroke of a pen.
He should pressure Congress get rewrite statutes,

416
00:35:37.880 --> 00:35:44.960
take disperate impact out. But then
when that ends, when the policy changes,

417
00:35:45.239 --> 00:35:49.239
you've done them all. It's still
going to take courage, and it's

418
00:35:50.000 --> 00:35:55.679
gonna take something for individuals within institutions
to stand up and say I'm not racist,

419
00:35:55.760 --> 00:36:00.599
my colleagues are not racist, my
institution is not racist. How you

420
00:36:00.679 --> 00:36:04.960
overcome the fear gap of people that
are worried about losing their jobs is very

421
00:36:05.039 --> 00:36:09.360
tough. I came up with just
some proposal of, you know, maybe

422
00:36:09.360 --> 00:36:16.239
a central organization that whenever anybody was
willing to sort of be cannon fodder and

423
00:36:16.960 --> 00:36:22.280
stand up and speak the truth,
this organization, in theory, would leap

424
00:36:22.320 --> 00:36:28.639
to his defense with the data that
would explain why, you know, the

425
00:36:28.760 --> 00:36:36.639
Google engineering department is not thirteen percent
black, or why a medical school student

426
00:36:36.679 --> 00:36:39.840
body is not yet thirteen percent black. But but they're getting there by getting

427
00:36:39.880 --> 00:36:46.440
rid of all meritocratic standards. And
so what I find missing in our current

428
00:36:46.559 --> 00:36:53.920
discourse are people that are willing to
broach breach Rachel etiquette and actually give the

429
00:36:53.960 --> 00:36:59.559
facts about and that it makes Americans
very, very uncomfortable. We are so

430
00:36:59.599 --> 00:37:05.639
far from being white supremacists that we're
willing to put up with these fictions that

431
00:37:05.800 --> 00:37:09.199
white are the threat to blacks,
not other blacks, and that whites are

432
00:37:09.199 --> 00:37:13.760
the threat to Asians, not blacks. We say all these things in the

433
00:37:13.800 --> 00:37:19.599
face of video to the contrary,
and we're so much not white supremacist that,

434
00:37:20.400 --> 00:37:22.519
you know, if I get up
and tell the facts about crime,

435
00:37:23.360 --> 00:37:27.760
white conservatives will come up and say, well, you know, that makes

436
00:37:27.760 --> 00:37:30.320
me feel very uncomfortable. You really
don't You shouldn't talk about those facts.

437
00:37:30.599 --> 00:37:37.360
Yeah, well, I'm sorry.
I am not going to obey that etiquette

438
00:37:37.360 --> 00:37:40.239
any longer. It's too late.
The hour is late, Steve. Because

439
00:37:40.719 --> 00:37:46.920
the left dominates the discourse with phony
facts, it can hold those phony facts

440
00:37:47.000 --> 00:37:52.960
can only be rebutted with actual truth, and we have to start telling the

441
00:37:52.079 --> 00:37:57.119
truth. Yeah, all right.
Exit question A short one, I think,

442
00:37:57.679 --> 00:38:00.760
which is what's next for you?
You know, I began somewhat tongue

443
00:38:00.800 --> 00:38:02.559
and cheap, but only partially so
that I'm always scared of what you're gonna

444
00:38:02.559 --> 00:38:07.480
take up next, because you're ahead
of the curve on really disastrous trends.

445
00:38:07.440 --> 00:38:10.159
And I know you're working on promoting
this book that's just brand new, but

446
00:38:10.400 --> 00:38:15.000
you have something on the drawing board. Is there a chance that Heather McDonald

447
00:38:15.119 --> 00:38:19.039
might take up for example, the
gender war is currently going on. There's

448
00:38:19.079 --> 00:38:23.239
also a high quotation of insanity.
Well, you know, I think about

449
00:38:23.320 --> 00:38:27.800
that a lot. Actually, I
sort of feel like there's already being taken

450
00:38:27.920 --> 00:38:32.760
up. But I do have certain
views and hypotheses about what's going on.

451
00:38:34.559 --> 00:38:39.159
I think it has not really been
observed that part of this absolute insanity,

452
00:38:39.320 --> 00:38:44.800
I mean it is. It is
truly the craziest thing that human beings have

453
00:38:44.960 --> 00:38:47.880
ever done and thought about and claimed, I think, in all of our

454
00:38:49.000 --> 00:38:52.320
history. And I'm not a fan
of a lot of myths, you know.

455
00:38:52.480 --> 00:39:00.840
I'm a radical secularist, a radical
materialist, radical and peerless empiricist.

456
00:39:00.480 --> 00:39:06.280
Uh So, a lot of sort
of spiritual metaphysical claims I find as idiotic

457
00:39:06.360 --> 00:39:09.800
as much of the left. But
this one takes the cake. But it

458
00:39:10.000 --> 00:39:19.159
does certainly fall in the long human
history of of of a discomfort with mind

459
00:39:19.239 --> 00:39:22.559
body dualism, and revulsion towards the
flesh. You know. So I see

460
00:39:22.679 --> 00:39:31.360
these these these just insane self castrators
in part in the long tradition of of

461
00:39:32.400 --> 00:39:37.079
flagelence of our shirts, people trying
to scourge the flesh. You know.

462
00:39:37.159 --> 00:39:43.840
It's a it's a yeah, exactly. It's a discomfort with the body,

463
00:39:43.920 --> 00:39:47.280
with carnality, with sexuality. And
we saw it, you know, with

464
00:39:47.480 --> 00:39:52.519
anorexia, with cutting, and now
we have cutting off one's genitals, uh

465
00:39:53.480 --> 00:39:58.599
or are trying to you know,
de sex oneself. It's a it's absolutely

466
00:39:58.679 --> 00:40:02.639
bizarre, and it is also this
has been observed. I think is that

467
00:40:04.440 --> 00:40:09.440
if you can get the public to
go along with the idea that males can

468
00:40:09.519 --> 00:40:16.079
get pregnant, you have people utterly
under your control. I mean, there's

469
00:40:16.360 --> 00:40:23.400
there's no aspect of truth in the
world that you cannot simply rewrite to suit

470
00:40:23.519 --> 00:40:29.360
your will. Um And and it's
also just a deep, deep hatred of

471
00:40:29.519 --> 00:40:35.639
everything traditional and bourgeois. It also
grows out of just a profound hatred for

472
00:40:35.880 --> 00:40:43.039
the biological, heterosexual, two parent
family. And so you know, this

473
00:40:43.280 --> 00:40:46.679
began with feminism, grew with gay
rights. You know, I think that

474
00:40:46.880 --> 00:40:53.440
truth to be a trojan horse.
Frankly that were I mean, I just

475
00:40:53.679 --> 00:41:00.400
wonder why at this point, what
are we celebrating with gay pride marchese.

476
00:41:00.840 --> 00:41:05.079
You know, as I say,
being female is not an accomplishment. I

477
00:41:05.159 --> 00:41:08.519
don't. I don't go around saying
female I deserve, you know, plaudits

478
00:41:08.559 --> 00:41:15.679
for that, and being gay is
not an accomplishment. But I think it

479
00:41:15.880 --> 00:41:23.280
was ultimately about more attack on bourgeois
normalcy as opposed to wanting to expand the

480
00:41:23.400 --> 00:41:29.960
reach of bourgeois normalcy. So well, Heather, whatever you take up next,

481
00:41:30.159 --> 00:41:32.920
we'll look forward to it with some
fear and trepidation, but always eagerness

482
00:41:34.000 --> 00:41:36.199
for how well you do it.
Thanks very much, Heather, and good

483
00:41:36.280 --> 00:41:38.159
luck. Thank you so much,
Steve. It's great talking with you.

484
00:41:42.840 --> 00:41:45.559
Don't go away. We've got a
PostScript for you right after these messages.

485
00:41:47.880 --> 00:41:52.360
All right, a couple of last
things before we go. We barely scratch

486
00:41:52.400 --> 00:41:54.559
the surface with Heather in that conversation, so by all means, get her

487
00:41:54.639 --> 00:42:00.199
book book mark, also her appearances
at City Journal and the other outlets where

488
00:42:00.199 --> 00:42:04.679
she appears frequently. She's amazingly prolific. We'll be back this weekend as usual

489
00:42:04.800 --> 00:42:08.440
with all three of the regular bartenders
at the three Whiskey Happy Hour. And

490
00:42:08.719 --> 00:42:13.159
also, since we're trying to step
up our game and attracting advertising support so

491
00:42:13.280 --> 00:42:15.480
we can expand the podcast, I
guess this is the point where I need

492
00:42:15.519 --> 00:42:21.639
to encourage people to go on iTunes
or whatever podcast platform they use, give

493
00:42:21.719 --> 00:42:23.960
us a five star rating, etc. Etc. That helps us attract more

494
00:42:23.960 --> 00:42:28.199
of an audience. It also helps
us get new guests. I suppose,

495
00:42:28.360 --> 00:42:30.760
in any event, don't forget to
milk the soft power dividend and let's go

496
00:42:30.880 --> 00:43:02.639
Brandon, Bye bye, everybody.
Ricochet joined the conversation

