1
00:00:14,919 --> 00:00:19,320
What is up, fellow Thermo nuclear
a Eppers. I am Damn Valley coming

2
00:00:19,359 --> 00:00:22,480
at you with what will be a
very swift intro. We're getting into the

3
00:00:22,519 --> 00:00:27,079
second half of our Western Conference podcast
where Grant and I I'm delivered our biggest

4
00:00:27,120 --> 00:00:31,239
question for each team we try to
talk ourselves through it. We did the

5
00:00:31,879 --> 00:00:36,719
Dallas Mavericks, Denver Nuggets, Golden
State Warriors, Houston Rockets, LA Clippers,

6
00:00:36,719 --> 00:00:39,719
Los Angeles Lakers, and Memphis Grizzlies. In the first podcast, we

7
00:00:39,759 --> 00:00:43,719
have the Minnesota Timberwolves, New Orleans
Pelicans, New Orleans Pelicans, excuse me,

8
00:00:44,079 --> 00:00:49,359
Oklahoma City thunder, Portland Trailblazers,
Phoenix Suns, Sacramento King, San

9
00:00:49,359 --> 00:00:52,399
Antonio Spurs, and Utah Jazz.
In this podcast, check out the first

10
00:00:52,439 --> 00:00:55,679
part if you haven't already, I
hope you enjoyed this one and very quickly

11
00:00:55,840 --> 00:00:58,039
just subscribe to us if you haven't
done it already. If this is your

12
00:00:58,079 --> 00:01:00,520
first time, checking us out via
podcast, Spotify, Apple, throw us

13
00:01:00,520 --> 00:01:03,359
the permanent sub and a rating and
review, Shout us out on Twitter,

14
00:01:03,439 --> 00:01:07,840
retweet our promos. Word of mouth
really helps us as well. If you're

15
00:01:07,879 --> 00:01:11,239
watching on YouTube for the first time, please consider hitting that subscribe button,

16
00:01:11,319 --> 00:01:14,519
liking the videos, commenting on them
to maybe help the algorithm love us back

17
00:01:14,560 --> 00:01:19,359
and this community continue to grow.
Let's get into our biggest question for every

18
00:01:19,439 --> 00:01:23,359
NBA team in the Western Conference,
part do we are on too? Man?

19
00:01:23,359 --> 00:01:29,239
This pace is terrible? The Minnesota
Timberwolves, look, I have so

20
00:01:29,239 --> 00:01:32,840
many questions about I want to take
the low hanging fruit and go with the

21
00:01:32,920 --> 00:01:36,280
vibes, but I think we just
have to go with is the offense gonna

22
00:01:36,280 --> 00:01:41,319
click? They're nineteenth in points scored
per possession right now. That is not

23
00:01:41,400 --> 00:01:46,400
good. Seventeenth and three point attempt
rate and twentieth in three point percentage.

24
00:01:47,120 --> 00:01:51,680
There are you can expect, like
some I'll call them progressions to the mean

25
00:01:52,000 --> 00:01:53,640
on this team, but I do
think it's the kind of a problem that

26
00:01:53,719 --> 00:01:59,439
Jade McDaniels is sixth in three point
attempts for them, and yeah, he's

27
00:01:59,519 --> 00:02:01,159
hitting them at a thirty six point
one percent clip, but like you need

28
00:02:01,159 --> 00:02:04,920
if you're gonna have him on the
floor, like two point six three point

29
00:02:04,959 --> 00:02:07,120
attempts per game in nearly thirty minutes
is not going to do it for me.

30
00:02:07,520 --> 00:02:10,000
And you're not playing some of the
other guys who you know are gonna

31
00:02:10,039 --> 00:02:15,360
jack it up heavy minutes. You're
also run into some line up staggering issues

32
00:02:15,360 --> 00:02:19,439
where it's okay, we just can't
we can't play Kyle and understand Rudy Gobert

33
00:02:19,599 --> 00:02:23,360
together. And then the minutes are
so. When Towns and Gobert on the

34
00:02:23,400 --> 00:02:27,039
court, they have a one oh
four point four offensive rating, which is

35
00:02:27,080 --> 00:02:30,120
in the eighth percentile. They're shooting
thirty point eight percent from deep in those

36
00:02:30,120 --> 00:02:35,879
minutes. When Towns plays without Gobert, surprise, surprise, those lineups are

37
00:02:35,879 --> 00:02:38,520
shooting and scoring better. They're also
giving up a one nineteen point four defensive

38
00:02:38,599 --> 00:02:44,639
rating. They've barely been a net
positive in those minutes. When Gobert plays

39
00:02:44,680 --> 00:02:50,000
without Towns, the Timbers are minus
eight points per one hundred possessions with a

40
00:02:50,039 --> 00:02:53,719
one oh four six offensive rating,
which is again in the eighth percentile.

41
00:02:53,639 --> 00:02:57,240
And the defense, by the way, which I found interesting during those minutes,

42
00:02:57,319 --> 00:03:00,159
was barely average. I think when
you look at the lineup contact in

43
00:03:00,240 --> 00:03:02,960
some of the games that I've seen, there's just they're asking him to do

44
00:03:04,039 --> 00:03:07,560
a lot during those like it's not
just because Towns is off the floor,

45
00:03:07,599 --> 00:03:09,879
but the offense doesn't look like it's
humming, and then you're asking Towns to

46
00:03:09,919 --> 00:03:15,199
really uplift like a group defensively.
And the solution is just it has to

47
00:03:15,240 --> 00:03:20,599
come internally because you can't do anything
externally. I guess you could move d'anzel

48
00:03:20,680 --> 00:03:23,159
Russell. I know that some people
have made jokes that can they make another

49
00:03:23,159 --> 00:03:27,360
deal with Utah where they get my
comedy and it's just like I know d'anzel

50
00:03:27,400 --> 00:03:30,639
Russell's expiring and commedy has that,
you know, huge partial guarantee next year.

51
00:03:30,919 --> 00:03:35,000
I don't think the Jazz are doing
it. Would have to be Conley,

52
00:03:35,120 --> 00:03:38,439
and I think another salary like I
don't, they wouldn't do it straight

53
00:03:38,520 --> 00:03:40,520
up in my opinion. And deanzel
Russell, I don't know if he fixes

54
00:03:40,520 --> 00:03:45,360
everything like Anty Edwards can talk about
or people can talk about his lack of

55
00:03:45,439 --> 00:03:47,080
dunks and then he can talk about
how he likes to play with the floors

56
00:03:47,080 --> 00:03:53,800
based out his perimeter shooting has suffered
more than his interior volume at least,

57
00:03:53,919 --> 00:03:59,680
and so you're counting on him to
make And that's, by the way,

58
00:03:59,680 --> 00:04:02,680
that's why you make It's not because
you thought Towns and Gobert first and foremost.

59
00:04:02,680 --> 00:04:06,159
We're gonna be this dominant Twin Towers
pairing. You make the Gobert trade

60
00:04:06,199 --> 00:04:12,000
because you believe Andy Edwards is making
the leap that shake Gilgi Alexander's making right

61
00:04:12,039 --> 00:04:14,919
now, and he's not. He's
just not. And even if you thought

62
00:04:14,919 --> 00:04:18,040
it was gonna be a hair below
like you know, MVP caliber, like

63
00:04:18,120 --> 00:04:23,040
you were still counting on him to
make a leap into top fifteen, top

64
00:04:23,079 --> 00:04:26,680
twenty five player territory, and he
just hasn't done that yet. And I

65
00:04:26,759 --> 00:04:30,959
understand there's warts here. I also
wonder how much Karl Anthony Town's missing,

66
00:04:30,920 --> 00:04:34,279
like so much of training camp in
the preseason while he was sick, how

67
00:04:34,319 --> 00:04:41,319
that goes into it. But like
this team just doesn't have an offensive rhythm

68
00:04:41,600 --> 00:04:43,959
or identity. It feels like when
you go back and watch a lot of

69
00:04:43,959 --> 00:04:46,480
their half court possessions, there's just
so much like, well, what is

70
00:04:46,839 --> 00:04:50,480
happening here? And why are they
standing around? They can't They're not getting

71
00:04:50,480 --> 00:04:54,600
into the foul line a ton,
They're turning the ball over a bunch,

72
00:04:54,680 --> 00:04:59,160
and then that is definitely impacting.
Look they are as we record this,

73
00:04:59,279 --> 00:05:01,680
they have they rop There's no way
this is accurate. They are so they're

74
00:05:01,800 --> 00:05:05,920
nineteenth in defense now after being I
know, Gobert miss time set account or

75
00:05:05,920 --> 00:05:11,120
but now they've dropped to nineteenth in
defense, and some of that just comes

76
00:05:11,160 --> 00:05:14,800
back to you know, when you
are missing a shot. This is not

77
00:05:14,879 --> 00:05:18,720
a team that you're depending on to
get back right now. They're twenty fifth

78
00:05:18,800 --> 00:05:21,680
in points lout per possession though after
they make a shot, which is very

79
00:05:21,720 --> 00:05:28,920
troubling. I'm just the offense is
not. I guess I never expected to

80
00:05:28,920 --> 00:05:31,920
be super seamless, but the Town's
Gobert fit has been more finicky than I

81
00:05:31,920 --> 00:05:38,639
ever would have expected, and I'm
wondering aside from okay, Anthy Edwards just

82
00:05:38,720 --> 00:05:44,439
eventually makes that huge leap, like
how are you getting better here offensively?

83
00:05:44,759 --> 00:05:48,519
And I don't necessarily know the answer, like Towns has room to play better.

84
00:05:48,519 --> 00:05:50,639
I want to make that clear.
This isn't just Anthy Edwards fault.

85
00:05:50,720 --> 00:05:56,399
I think Gobert has probably been like
the one who's had to adjust the least,

86
00:05:56,519 --> 00:06:00,680
but also probably because the entire team
is adjusting to him other than necessarily

87
00:06:00,720 --> 00:06:03,079
the other way around, just because
he's such a specific offensive player. And

88
00:06:03,120 --> 00:06:09,000
so I'm you know, you can
officially color me concerned about the Timberwolves offense.

89
00:06:09,720 --> 00:06:14,120
Yeah, it's it's weird too because
you just look at their effective field

90
00:06:14,120 --> 00:06:17,279
will percentage, they're eighth, right
and and and based on where they're getting

91
00:06:17,319 --> 00:06:20,480
their shots, they could be seven
that those you know, there's nothing way

92
00:06:20,519 --> 00:06:27,199
out of whack there, So it's
just and then like that's like shockingly high

93
00:06:27,240 --> 00:06:30,680
based on like how it's looked,
right, it's just the and how it

94
00:06:30,800 --> 00:06:35,000
sounded. Because every time you read
a John Krasinski article, you know,

95
00:06:35,439 --> 00:06:39,160
three out of four of them have
player quotes they're talking about like there's just

96
00:06:39,199 --> 00:06:42,879
no heart, there's no you know
where there's no there's no grit, there's

97
00:06:42,879 --> 00:06:46,720
no all this like coach speak stuff. But it's like it's undeniable when you

98
00:06:46,720 --> 00:06:50,040
watch Minnesota play that I don't know, yeah that we're doing are we really

99
00:06:50,319 --> 00:06:54,480
I hate to do like the vibe
check. But it's just that that is

100
00:06:54,560 --> 00:06:58,040
part of what it feels like.
I think if you're I mean, if

101
00:06:58,079 --> 00:07:02,839
you're trying to be solution oriented,
there just isn't there isn't a fix other

102
00:07:02,920 --> 00:07:10,199
than patience and trusting that in all
the things that you thought were true three

103
00:07:10,279 --> 00:07:14,639
months ago can still be true,
which is just that there's so much talent

104
00:07:14,720 --> 00:07:18,480
here, it's a big adjustment offensively, some of the some of the underlying

105
00:07:18,519 --> 00:07:21,959
stuff suggests like, you know,
I think we're gonna be okay if we

106
00:07:23,079 --> 00:07:26,000
you know, take care of the
ball, you know, do some more

107
00:07:26,240 --> 00:07:29,639
offensive rebounding should be better if you
have Gobert in there and there's like size

108
00:07:29,680 --> 00:07:31,439
and length, you know, and
athleticism across the rest of the roster.

109
00:07:32,199 --> 00:07:35,600
Stop turning it over so much,
which is maybe the first thing you point

110
00:07:35,639 --> 00:07:41,240
to the other twenty third right now
and turnover percentage. If you're looking for

111
00:07:41,279 --> 00:07:44,519
signs that there's an adjustment period and
they haven't quite figured it out. Nobody's

112
00:07:44,560 --> 00:07:46,839
sure where to be, when to
move, where to get, Like that's

113
00:07:46,879 --> 00:07:51,639
that's a sign. I think that
that's just true that these guys are not

114
00:07:51,720 --> 00:07:57,000
comfortable together yet. So yeah,
if we put the vibe check aside,

115
00:07:57,839 --> 00:08:01,600
I just uh, And this is
an unsatisfying answer because you know, we're

116
00:08:01,600 --> 00:08:05,560
trying to solve the problem or answer
the question, but it's like there's just

117
00:08:05,720 --> 00:08:11,560
there's enough talent here it should make
sense together the offensively that you know that

118
00:08:11,639 --> 00:08:16,519
this will be a top ten offense, Like it just I don't. Maybe

119
00:08:16,519 --> 00:08:20,000
that's maybe that's like just being too
dismissive of some of the stuff we've seen

120
00:08:20,040 --> 00:08:24,839
so far. But we're also fourteen
games in. There's a lot of a

121
00:08:24,839 --> 00:08:28,920
lot to go, and I think
Edwards is the one I'm concerned about,

122
00:08:28,959 --> 00:08:31,720
to be honest, because the leap
feels like it should have happened, and

123
00:08:31,759 --> 00:08:37,559
it's we've seen nothing of the sort. I'm not so concerned about the dunks

124
00:08:37,559 --> 00:08:41,039
because he is getting to the rim
about as much as ever in terms of

125
00:08:41,120 --> 00:08:46,879
frequency a percentage of his field goal
attempts. It just feels like he should

126
00:08:46,879 --> 00:08:50,200
be set up with a great screener
now in Gobert, to get some easy

127
00:08:50,200 --> 00:08:56,159
ones, and those aren't really materializing. So I'm concerned. I just think

128
00:08:56,639 --> 00:08:58,600
I just keep coming back to the
talent, and it's just difficult to integrate

129
00:08:58,639 --> 00:09:07,039
someone like Gobert, who just but
Utah had number one offenses all the time.

130
00:09:07,159 --> 00:09:09,679
With Gobert and Volved, I just
well, they had they had guys

131
00:09:09,679 --> 00:09:11,759
who could hit catching shoot jumpers,
which right now the Timberwolves do not.

132
00:09:11,879 --> 00:09:16,759
They're they're in the bottom four of
catching shoot effective field good percent it right

133
00:09:16,799 --> 00:09:18,919
now, which is that's really bad. It's very much testing the theory that

134
00:09:18,960 --> 00:09:22,480
if you have Karl Anthony Towns,
you have a great offense, just full

135
00:09:22,480 --> 00:09:26,240
stop, which used to be the
case generally speaking. When he was on

136
00:09:26,279 --> 00:09:28,240
the floor, it's like a tray
young. It's the tray young thing.

137
00:09:28,279 --> 00:09:33,000
If he's not on the floor.
No, that's yeah, it's a tough

138
00:09:33,000 --> 00:09:35,879
one. I'm if this were piece
of what is it, piece or panic,

139
00:09:35,919 --> 00:09:39,240
I'd still be preaching peace. But
it's it's a concern for sure.

140
00:09:41,240 --> 00:09:46,000
We have the New Orleans Pelicans next, we're gonna get more specific. Do

141
00:09:46,039 --> 00:09:50,320
they need to trade a pick slash
picks for a rim protector? It's you

142
00:09:50,360 --> 00:09:56,679
know there there's We've we talked about
Zion's defense. Uh, last time we

143
00:09:56,720 --> 00:10:01,519
recorded. I think it's a problem. It's not the only problem, but

144
00:10:01,559 --> 00:10:05,200
it's part of a situation where you
know, the opponents are getting to the

145
00:10:05,320 --> 00:10:09,240
rim, you know, way too
often. I think New Orleans was in

146
00:10:09,320 --> 00:10:13,080
the bottom ten, twenty third when
I when I did the stats. But

147
00:10:13,120 --> 00:10:16,919
they're making everything. They're shooting seventy
point four percent at the rim. Pelican's

148
00:10:16,960 --> 00:10:20,440
opponents are twenty seventh in the league. So yeah, it's Zion. He

149
00:10:20,559 --> 00:10:24,440
doesn't stay in front of anybody.
He can't navigate a screen. But it's

150
00:10:24,480 --> 00:10:28,279
not like, you know, CJ. McCollum is some shutdown guy there.

151
00:10:28,279 --> 00:10:30,840
It's kind of you know, anytime
we talk about bad room numbers, it

152
00:10:30,879 --> 00:10:33,840
is a lot of the perimeter defense. It's not just the fact that the

153
00:10:33,879 --> 00:10:37,559
Pelicans. You know, Valanciunis is
not a good room protector. Larry nance

154
00:10:37,720 --> 00:10:39,960
Junior is a really good player,
and he's closing games for them, but

155
00:10:41,039 --> 00:10:45,480
he's also not someone that's gonna single
handedly clean up all the messes that are

156
00:10:45,519 --> 00:10:50,879
happening in terms of blowbys and stuff. The other trickle down effect is if

157
00:10:50,919 --> 00:10:54,120
you're not defending the rim, you're
siphoning a bunch of extra bodies down there.

158
00:10:54,159 --> 00:10:56,240
Everybody's got a foot in the lane
to try to help, and opponents

159
00:10:56,960 --> 00:11:00,759
are missing a lot of threes,
but they're getting a lot of threes.

160
00:11:01,759 --> 00:11:03,480
So New Orleans right now is top
ten in defense, or it was when

161
00:11:03,480 --> 00:11:07,919
I did these numbers. I don't
think that's gonna last because if you don't

162
00:11:07,919 --> 00:11:11,679
solve the rim stuff, you're going
to continue to surrender some high value threes

163
00:11:11,559 --> 00:11:16,440
and they're gonna start going in.
So then it's like, well, you

164
00:11:16,440 --> 00:11:18,759
know, the Pelicans have ten firsts
in the next seven drafts. You could

165
00:11:18,759 --> 00:11:24,600
throw together the salaries of Demonte Graham, Jackson Hayes. I throw Valan Tunis

166
00:11:24,600 --> 00:11:28,240
in there. I don't think that's
gonna be your likeliest move, but that's

167
00:11:28,240 --> 00:11:31,600
a big number. I think you
just pissed off the entire Pelicans fan base

168
00:11:31,679 --> 00:11:33,879
by saying, look, I'm trying
to fix the team. I'm trying to

169
00:11:33,879 --> 00:11:37,399
address a weakness. Garrett Temple too. You got like forty ish a little

170
00:11:37,440 --> 00:11:41,000
less than forty million in salary you
could piece together, not saying you should

171
00:11:41,000 --> 00:11:43,840
spend all that on a rim protector
for a team that's really good as it

172
00:11:43,919 --> 00:11:50,799
is and might just be like a
schematic tweak away from being passable. You

173
00:11:50,840 --> 00:11:54,039
know, are you looking at Miles
Turner, is Jaka Peartle someone you're gonna

174
00:11:54,039 --> 00:11:56,559
go for. I mean, do
you go get Mo Bamba from the Magic

175
00:11:56,600 --> 00:12:03,480
and say, like, hey you
anymore? I just think just zooming out

176
00:12:05,200 --> 00:12:09,639
if you're gonna finish games or play
good teams with Zion ce J McCollum,

177
00:12:09,840 --> 00:12:13,399
and Ingram is. Ingram's the best
of those three, but he's not perfect.

178
00:12:13,559 --> 00:12:16,000
It's hard for guys with his frame
to get around screens. He's just

179
00:12:16,080 --> 00:12:18,440
there's just too many limbs that are
too long and too easy to catch on

180
00:12:18,440 --> 00:12:22,159
a screen. If those are guys
are going to be out there, Herb

181
00:12:22,240 --> 00:12:26,000
Jones can't guard everybody, and then
Valentinis just isn't good enough to turn it.

182
00:12:26,039 --> 00:12:30,840
So that's why they're playing nance a
lot, just I mean, because

183
00:12:30,840 --> 00:12:33,879
you're getting more mobility, more passing, more other stuff. It's the sort

184
00:12:33,919 --> 00:12:37,559
of offset. So is do you
is now the time? Do you?

185
00:12:37,639 --> 00:12:41,559
Do you? Wait? Do you? I mean they're probably just gonna get

186
00:12:41,519 --> 00:12:46,000
when but Nama when the Lakers pick
swaps and it's field this over the summer.

187
00:12:46,559 --> 00:12:50,480
But it's it's an issue for a
really good team, So I think

188
00:12:50,480 --> 00:12:54,039
it's worth sphighlighting and asking like how
you how you improve this and what you

189
00:12:54,120 --> 00:12:56,519
what you're willing to give up to
do it? Do you think Rudy Gobert

190
00:12:56,559 --> 00:13:01,159
is available? I'd rather have a
victor. Look, I'm with you,

191
00:13:01,240 --> 00:13:05,200
and I've long been of the mind
that they should just go out and get

192
00:13:05,240 --> 00:13:07,159
Miles Turner. I think even if
you believe Joanna sound shown this is the

193
00:13:07,200 --> 00:13:11,679
better player overall, reasonable to this
point, because especially the ability situation,

194
00:13:13,039 --> 00:13:15,480
Miles Turner is just such a better
fit. I'll go out and do it,

195
00:13:15,519 --> 00:13:16,720
and it's not going to cost you
a premiere first round pick. At

196
00:13:16,720 --> 00:13:20,240
this point, it's pretty clear.
Just go out and get it done,

197
00:13:20,440 --> 00:13:24,240
and then maybe you're sending Jannah sound
Shoot to somewhere else we're getting actual value,

198
00:13:24,399 --> 00:13:26,120
like for because I think Jana sound
Shoot is the first round pick.

199
00:13:26,120 --> 00:13:30,720
There's a little steep for Miles Turn
at this point. I'd just be curious

200
00:13:31,120 --> 00:13:33,080
and he might not do it because
they're probably waiting to see if the Lakers

201
00:13:33,120 --> 00:13:35,799
will go up there too first.
I would do it. I would also

202
00:13:35,799 --> 00:13:41,799
counter with do you know what I
would try before making a trade's giving Zion

203
00:13:41,919 --> 00:13:45,240
the ball in the half court and
having him run a fucking pick and roll.

204
00:13:45,480 --> 00:13:48,679
Yeah, they're not doing it and
they've never done it, like absurd

205
00:13:48,799 --> 00:13:52,200
volume. And it's the other issue
is just like even give him the ball

206
00:13:52,240 --> 00:13:56,159
more in the front court, especially
when you're trying to bust up zones.

207
00:13:56,600 --> 00:14:03,360
He is averaging lets. I'll do
it this way. Five percent of his

208
00:14:03,399 --> 00:14:07,720
offensive possessions are coming as pick and
roll ball handler touches. His last full

209
00:14:07,720 --> 00:14:13,440
season twenty twenty one, that number
was closer to fifteen percent. His pick

210
00:14:13,480 --> 00:14:16,039
and roll possessions per game if you
want to do it that way. They've

211
00:14:16,080 --> 00:14:18,799
been cut like they've been thirded one
point it was three point two, then

212
00:14:18,799 --> 00:14:22,559
it's one point one. Now I
know you have CJ. I know you

213
00:14:22,600 --> 00:14:26,600
have brandon Ingram, But like those
guys, especially knowing the spots they like

214
00:14:26,679 --> 00:14:28,759
to get to on the floor,
they're not necessarily the ones that you want

215
00:14:28,840 --> 00:14:31,879
to attack, like the teeth of
those defenses. I think brand Ingram has

216
00:14:31,879 --> 00:14:37,080
improved enough off the ball where you
can prioritize Hey, just give it to

217
00:14:37,440 --> 00:14:41,360
Like I don't. I'm the people
in charge of New Orleans have forgotten about

218
00:14:41,399 --> 00:14:43,600
basketball more than I will ever know. I recognize that. I don't.

219
00:14:43,600 --> 00:14:46,840
I don't want to oversimplify it,
but like hey, gives eye on the

220
00:14:46,879 --> 00:14:50,759
ball and tell him to go and
look. There are nights where it's he

221
00:14:50,799 --> 00:14:54,559
doesn't look the same, where it's
just sort of like he's bailing out before

222
00:14:54,559 --> 00:14:56,679
you get to the rim or taking
these weird, tough angled layups. Is

223
00:14:56,720 --> 00:15:00,519
it a symptom of oh, he
doesn't look the same. Is he still

224
00:15:00,600 --> 00:15:03,240
dealing with the what do you have
like a hip issue earlier? Is he

225
00:15:03,320 --> 00:15:05,399
just not all the way back from
his foot injury. Is something materially changed

226
00:15:05,440 --> 00:15:09,360
here or is this just a matter
of under exposure, Like it's let's do

227
00:15:09,440 --> 00:15:15,320
this more. And so I think
before you make a trade. This sounds

228
00:15:15,360 --> 00:15:16,720
stupid to say, because they're ninth
in offense, by the way, like

229
00:15:16,799 --> 00:15:20,240
you're we're talking about their defense,
their defense, but the defense matters a

230
00:15:20,240 --> 00:15:24,120
lot less if you get up to
first in offense, right, like you

231
00:15:24,159 --> 00:15:28,360
can you can juice the differential that
way. Look, but here's the other

232
00:15:28,399 --> 00:15:31,919
thing is that they're twenty fourth.
They're half court offense is fourteenth, but

233
00:15:31,960 --> 00:15:35,399
they're twenty fourth and efficiency after they
grab their own miss so like that's supposed

234
00:15:35,440 --> 00:15:39,200
to be. I'm just I'm just
saying, like more of Zion in certain

235
00:15:39,240 --> 00:15:45,039
situations. And if, if,
however, you are concerned about maybe him

236
00:15:45,120 --> 00:15:48,559
sort of leveling off offensively a little
bit, then you go out right now

237
00:15:48,879 --> 00:15:52,559
and you you get Miles Turner because
it's important, it's imperative that your defense

238
00:15:52,600 --> 00:15:56,679
becomes playoff proof. And right now, I'd just be curious to see whether

239
00:15:56,799 --> 00:16:00,799
it is they've had they've been the
team that's had like well maybe not the

240
00:16:00,799 --> 00:16:03,039
most ups and downs. It feels
like they were on this high. Just

241
00:16:03,279 --> 00:16:06,679
we were certainly not a Pelicans how
to start the year, and now they've

242
00:16:07,360 --> 00:16:11,960
like they dropped and then maybe now
they've plateaued a little bit. Yeah,

243
00:16:11,240 --> 00:16:14,240
oh this is me. I'm like
waiting, like, well, what was

244
00:16:14,279 --> 00:16:18,679
Grant was Grant doing? I'm the
Oklahoma City Thunder Now I was going to

245
00:16:18,639 --> 00:16:22,000
do the And we've talked about on
the podcast. Should Shay Gilgras Auxander be

246
00:16:22,039 --> 00:16:26,440
in the MVP discussion? The answer
is yes, I understand there's a certain

247
00:16:26,480 --> 00:16:29,679
you need to be, like between
the top five and a top five and

248
00:16:29,720 --> 00:16:33,039
top twelve player. I'm gonna let
everyone in on a little secret. That's

249
00:16:33,039 --> 00:16:37,120
exactly what say Gilgras Alexander is right
now, the thunder of outscored opponents by

250
00:16:37,120 --> 00:16:40,960
thirty three total points with him on
the court. The Mavericks have outscored opponents

251
00:16:40,960 --> 00:16:44,039
by thirty two points with Luca Nanchich
on the court. Those are not perfect

252
00:16:44,039 --> 00:16:47,720
comps, but I think you could
pretty clearly make the case that Dallas is

253
00:16:47,720 --> 00:16:51,039
supporting cast at the top. Dorian
Phinney, Smith, Christian wood Spencer,

254
00:16:51,080 --> 00:16:56,000
Dinwoody is preferable to lu Door,
Josh Giddy and Alexey Polkashevski. However,

255
00:16:57,399 --> 00:17:02,720
oh what Basketball refer his pages going
off in the background, fucking basketball reference

256
00:17:02,759 --> 00:17:10,160
adding AutoPlay ads. My actual question
is, does alex Say Pokassevski belong in

257
00:17:10,160 --> 00:17:12,880
the most improved player discussion? And
I'm not trolling. We know how I

258
00:17:12,920 --> 00:17:18,480
feel about Poku. Since he's his
last four games after he missed a couple,

259
00:17:18,799 --> 00:17:22,599
he is at fourteen point eight points
to assist, one point zero steals,

260
00:17:22,640 --> 00:17:26,200
two point five blocks, shooting fifty
two point nine percent from three on

261
00:17:26,240 --> 00:17:30,680
four plus attempts and sixty two point
five percent on twos. He is contesting

262
00:17:30,799 --> 00:17:33,880
a shit ton of shots at the
rim. Opponents are shooting under sixty percent

263
00:17:33,880 --> 00:17:37,759
against him at the rim, which
in his role and given his frame,

264
00:17:37,920 --> 00:17:40,720
is huge. Now when you watch
him, this is me looking at the

265
00:17:40,839 --> 00:17:44,640
entire season, not just the last
four games. He is so much more

266
00:17:44,960 --> 00:17:48,440
complimentary. He understands his body,
he understands how he's supposed to be used

267
00:17:48,480 --> 00:17:53,119
within the offense. He is active
on defense. He's become this reliable floor

268
00:17:53,119 --> 00:17:57,160
spacer for them and someone who's going
to give you some emergency self creation.

269
00:18:00,720 --> 00:18:04,440
My actual Alexei Pokachevski question is were
like it's not is he gonna be in

270
00:18:04,440 --> 00:18:07,839
the most improved player discussion. I
think Shay is more likely to win it

271
00:18:07,880 --> 00:18:12,720
than him. It's do they have
another long term viable I don't want to

272
00:18:12,720 --> 00:18:17,440
say building block, but on the
same level as just like if you view

273
00:18:17,559 --> 00:18:22,559
lu Dort as a keeper, you
should view Alexei Pokachevski as a keeper to

274
00:18:22,559 --> 00:18:26,039
this team, Like is he part
of the next good iteration of the Thunder?

275
00:18:26,079 --> 00:18:27,960
Because I don't even want to phrase
it. Is he more than just

276
00:18:29,000 --> 00:18:33,039
this novel concept? I think,
look to me, maybe maybe that is

277
00:18:33,039 --> 00:18:34,880
a fair question. I thought we
got there at points last year, like

278
00:18:34,920 --> 00:18:37,400
from when he came back in February
after he was out of the lineup for

279
00:18:37,400 --> 00:18:41,039
a little bit. He played really
well. But I feel like if you

280
00:18:41,079 --> 00:18:44,559
want that to be the question,
find whoever's listening to this, like is

281
00:18:44,720 --> 00:18:48,920
like Poku feels like like this is
a real player for the future for the

282
00:18:48,920 --> 00:18:52,440
Thunder. Is my question, and
I'm it's a weird question to ask because

283
00:18:52,519 --> 00:18:55,440
I have an answer to it,
but like it's one I wanted to phrase

284
00:18:55,480 --> 00:18:59,559
to someone who's maybe outside of like
my Poku bubble. Yeah, no,

285
00:18:59,640 --> 00:19:04,599
that it's it's a great question.
I think in terms of improvement. When

286
00:19:04,640 --> 00:19:07,920
he when his first year in the
league, he was one of the most

287
00:19:08,000 --> 00:19:14,400
damaging players anywhere. Like he just
I mean, shot twenty eight percent from

288
00:19:14,440 --> 00:19:17,960
three, took four point six of
them per game, shot thirty four percent

289
00:19:18,000 --> 00:19:21,759
from the field. Like this guy's
playing rotation slash starting role for parts of

290
00:19:21,759 --> 00:19:23,839
his rookie season, most of which
he was eighteen years old for by the

291
00:19:23,839 --> 00:19:30,039
way, So from coming from there
to now, like he's a plus defensive

292
00:19:30,039 --> 00:19:33,519
player, like just he's he is
a he is a value add on defense

293
00:19:33,599 --> 00:19:37,680
and the ball is going in on
offense thirty seven percent from three, forty

294
00:19:37,680 --> 00:19:41,680
six from the field, blocking shots, still playing twenty four minutes a game

295
00:19:42,200 --> 00:19:45,240
overall, but like he said,
has just been much better. I think,

296
00:19:47,440 --> 00:19:52,079
Like and he's he's not twenty one
yet, so he's a plus defender

297
00:19:52,640 --> 00:20:00,400
with offensive upside, just shy of
averaging double figures in scoring and like is

298
00:20:00,720 --> 00:20:04,319
helpful just just just there, take
out like the length, take out the

299
00:20:04,599 --> 00:20:10,079
man. Like he's an interesting guy
as a seven super mobile, seven foot

300
00:20:10,119 --> 00:20:14,799
guy. Where do you play him? The opportunities and potential is you know,

301
00:20:14,880 --> 00:20:18,920
off the charts theoretically for what types
of lineups you could build that involve

302
00:20:18,000 --> 00:20:22,799
him, especially if he's gonna be
like a major shoplocker. Just being his

303
00:20:22,839 --> 00:20:29,319
age and being a plus defender with
his frame is like absolutely, he's He's

304
00:20:29,359 --> 00:20:32,920
a piece that is a long term
piece. There the only other guy I

305
00:20:32,960 --> 00:20:34,799
think, you know, and it's
obviously early. I think, you know,

306
00:20:34,839 --> 00:20:38,640
Giddy is potentially going to be pretty
good. I don't see like star

307
00:20:38,799 --> 00:20:42,599
upside for him. I think Jalen
Williams is really good. Are is gonna

308
00:20:42,640 --> 00:20:45,680
be really good. He had a
bunch of spot up threes last night off

309
00:20:47,319 --> 00:20:51,599
believe it. They could use that, believe it or not, SGA drives.

310
00:20:52,039 --> 00:20:53,799
There were a few of those,
and he kept generating open wing threes

311
00:20:53,880 --> 00:20:59,240
for guys. Williams I think has
the frame to be like a switchable you

312
00:20:59,240 --> 00:21:03,440
know, combo forward slash wing.
He has on ball skills. He's a

313
00:21:03,440 --> 00:21:07,680
good three point shooter. He really
had his first you know, stretch derailed

314
00:21:07,720 --> 00:21:11,079
because he got just nailed in the
face and fractured his orbital I think,

315
00:21:11,119 --> 00:21:14,880
and so he's going with a mask
right now. But I have a lot

316
00:21:14,920 --> 00:21:18,279
of hope for him. But yeah, Polkus, he's not He's twenty years

317
00:21:18,319 --> 00:21:22,599
old. Still you got another month
or so. It turns twenty one the

318
00:21:22,640 --> 00:21:27,079
day after Christmas, and he's like
a good, helpful NBA player, grant,

319
00:21:27,119 --> 00:21:32,559
and he's not surrounded by a whole
lot of like high end NBA talent.

320
00:21:32,680 --> 00:21:34,920
So yeah, I think, you
know, people are gonna say,

321
00:21:34,920 --> 00:21:38,519
we're just focusing focusing on, you
know, the last little stretch. But

322
00:21:38,759 --> 00:21:41,640
I think he's legit. I think
he showed it last season. People just

323
00:21:41,640 --> 00:21:45,440
weren't sold because it was so roller
coaster. He still he was before.

324
00:21:45,640 --> 00:21:49,240
I mean, he was bad,
but also just like that was the you

325
00:21:49,319 --> 00:21:52,359
drafted him sort of knowing that,
and they've they've seemed to showed patients.

326
00:21:52,400 --> 00:21:56,799
I will say, there's an alternate
reality in which chet home Run doesn't get

327
00:21:56,799 --> 00:22:00,680
injured. What does that mean for
him this year? But I do think

328
00:22:00,680 --> 00:22:03,319
now I'm like, wow, Chet
Homegrin and Poku up front, because it

329
00:22:03,319 --> 00:22:07,039
doesn't look like they're gonna be in
the Weban Yama sweepstakes unless they really,

330
00:22:07,319 --> 00:22:08,680
you know, they have to.
They have to flip a switch and turn

331
00:22:08,720 --> 00:22:11,880
it all the way down. But
like that, look, I don't know

332
00:22:11,920 --> 00:22:15,279
how good Chet Homegrin would have been
right off the bat, And again,

333
00:22:15,279 --> 00:22:18,720
could he have impacted the opportunity poke
who's getting now I'm all of a sudden

334
00:22:18,759 --> 00:22:23,440
just like I might. I'm like
Josh Giddy might be the player who I'm

335
00:22:23,440 --> 00:22:27,680
like sixth highest on on the Thunder
right now when you look at Dort poku

336
00:22:27,599 --> 00:22:33,640
Uh, Shay chet home Grin,
Jaylen Williams. Maybe maybe maybe that's pushing

337
00:22:33,680 --> 00:22:37,680
it. But like I'm I'm infinitely
intrigued by by this team and I didn

338
00:22:37,759 --> 00:22:40,480
want to throw in a fun chase
that though really quickly just beast think most

339
00:22:40,480 --> 00:22:42,759
people who are not Thunder fans might
have been expecting to hear about him.

340
00:22:42,799 --> 00:22:48,960
There have been two hundred and seventy
three players this season who have appeared in

341
00:22:48,960 --> 00:22:52,240
at least ten games. Luca don
Chich is the only player with a higher

342
00:22:52,240 --> 00:22:57,160
share of his buckets coming unassisted.
Meanwhile, Shay's efficiency is just through the

343
00:22:57,240 --> 00:23:00,440
roof, which leads me into very
quickly the fine sat. Among everyone to

344
00:23:00,480 --> 00:23:06,200
attempt at least thirty five pull up
jumpers, only Steph and KD have higher

345
00:23:06,200 --> 00:23:08,559
effective field goal percentage on them.
Say has been a monster. Also,

346
00:23:08,599 --> 00:23:15,160
I love that Steph just comes up
like every efficiency this the other than Steph

347
00:23:15,160 --> 00:23:21,039
except for him that's gonna be my
new qualifier forget arbitrary like volume benchmarks,

348
00:23:21,279 --> 00:23:26,039
except except for Steph He So I
watched a lot of that Thunder game last

349
00:23:26,119 --> 00:23:30,359
night. He's unguardable, like he's
just you can't you know, there's no

350
00:23:30,400 --> 00:23:33,599
stat I mean except the Brazilian drives
per game. He's gonna lead the league

351
00:23:33,720 --> 00:23:37,240
for what the third year in a
row. Now, you cannot stay in

352
00:23:37,279 --> 00:23:40,079
front of him, and if you
do stay in front of him, you're

353
00:23:40,119 --> 00:23:41,920
off balance and he turns around.
It hits a little weird pull ups that

354
00:23:41,960 --> 00:23:45,599
you're talking about. It's just it
doesn't make sense in a in a league

355
00:23:45,599 --> 00:23:48,319
obsessed with three pointers, and he's
hit a bunch of big threes this year,

356
00:23:48,359 --> 00:23:52,640
but he does not shoot a lot
to be able to get to the

357
00:23:52,720 --> 00:23:57,119
bucket when everybody knows that's where you
want to go. It's just I can't

358
00:23:57,119 --> 00:24:00,960
remember someone like him, like with
his side as in frame that could just

359
00:24:00,000 --> 00:24:06,160
get to the basket. However many
times he wants per game. It's unbelievable.

360
00:24:07,880 --> 00:24:11,000
I have the Phoenix suns, so
it's a it's a I couldn't decide.

361
00:24:11,039 --> 00:24:14,480
So I have sort of two questions
that are related. So one is

362
00:24:14,799 --> 00:24:17,480
so we can agree that, like
depth is an issue. Now, part

363
00:24:17,480 --> 00:24:21,079
of that's injury, is part of
that's crowd or not being there. Part

364
00:24:21,119 --> 00:24:22,880
of that is maybe they're just going
to be generally careful with guys like Chris

365
00:24:22,880 --> 00:24:29,680
Paul. So, so do you
solve that issue where you're just you don't

366
00:24:29,720 --> 00:24:33,960
want to be pulling guys like Dwayne
Washington had twenty one points last night out

367
00:24:33,960 --> 00:24:36,200
of nowhere. You don't want to
be relying on that, right, So

368
00:24:36,240 --> 00:24:41,960
you need just more production from people
not named Devin Booker. So is it

369
00:24:41,039 --> 00:24:45,160
a trade that makes sense to upgrade
the depth or and this is something I've

370
00:24:45,160 --> 00:24:48,240
been kind of fixated on for a
couple of years. Can we just ask

371
00:24:48,279 --> 00:24:53,279
a little more from Michael Bridges because
he's been really so his assists are up

372
00:24:53,319 --> 00:24:56,920
right, So we'll talk about the
trade in the second because you're better at

373
00:24:56,920 --> 00:25:00,920
that stuff than I am. But
for Bridges, he you know, he

374
00:25:00,960 --> 00:25:03,799
adds little bits every year. I'm
sure you and I have talked about,

375
00:25:03,880 --> 00:25:06,039
like, oh, he can put
it on the floor once or twice and

376
00:25:06,319 --> 00:25:10,039
get to a pull up. His
assist rate has grown. He's in the

377
00:25:10,039 --> 00:25:12,680
seventy third percentile this season. That's
good four point three per game going into

378
00:25:12,759 --> 00:25:17,720
last night. That's also good for
a wing. But he just is still

379
00:25:18,599 --> 00:25:22,400
You watch him and it's almost never
the case, like none of his threes

380
00:25:22,480 --> 00:25:25,960
are self generated, very few of
his twos have been self generated, just

381
00:25:26,000 --> 00:25:29,039
for his whole career and that hasn't
changed this year. And when he gets

382
00:25:29,079 --> 00:25:32,000
the ball, he's looking to move
it. He's not looking to get in

383
00:25:32,079 --> 00:25:34,200
his bag, which normally that's great, but on a Suns team, where

384
00:25:34,359 --> 00:25:38,039
you might start to need some of
that, it'd be interesting to just kind

385
00:25:38,039 --> 00:25:41,359
of let him explore the space.
One point one six dribbles per touch,

386
00:25:41,839 --> 00:25:47,279
which like, without context, that's
hard to look at, but just understand

387
00:25:47,359 --> 00:25:49,720
that on the Suns there are a
lot of guys that have no business dribbling

388
00:25:49,759 --> 00:25:52,880
more than that. That dribble more
than Bridges does. You know the guys

389
00:25:52,880 --> 00:25:57,400
are up around four, you know, you know, the hardened russ outliers

390
00:25:57,400 --> 00:26:02,880
are way up there. But you
know, Booker Paul sure, But Bridges

391
00:26:02,960 --> 00:26:07,559
I think I think has more And
I don't know if it's fair to ask

392
00:26:07,640 --> 00:26:11,920
him to like tap into it now
because that probably won't be his role when

393
00:26:11,920 --> 00:26:15,440
the Sun's are whole. It would
still be nice. So is it do

394
00:26:15,519 --> 00:26:18,119
you look to him? Do you
look to someone else eight and I think

395
00:26:18,240 --> 00:26:22,319
has been kind of disappointing, maybe
it's him, or do you just go,

396
00:26:22,519 --> 00:26:25,359
all right, we gotta go get
Max Strusse, or we gotta go

397
00:26:25,440 --> 00:26:29,960
get Eric Gordon, Harrison Barnes.
See if the Pistons are ready to finish

398
00:26:30,039 --> 00:26:34,839
the stopover for Bogdanovich. I just
you know, nobody, nobody's like hoping

399
00:26:34,920 --> 00:26:38,759
to trade a Crowder type, like
a combo forward that can score and do

400
00:26:38,839 --> 00:26:44,079
a little bit. But the Suns
have to, especially with Cam Johnson out,

401
00:26:44,480 --> 00:26:47,799
So do you go that route?
Do you give up some assets to

402
00:26:47,880 --> 00:26:49,200
do that? Or do you wait
for guys to come back and hope you

403
00:26:49,240 --> 00:26:53,400
get some internal improvement? And I
don't know the answer. I think Bridges

404
00:26:53,480 --> 00:26:57,240
is capable of more, but you
also you got to do something with Crowder

405
00:26:57,319 --> 00:27:02,599
too, So I don't know.
Yeah, the thing with Bridges and I

406
00:27:02,640 --> 00:27:06,920
love Michael Bridges, and I somehow
still think he's underappreciated on defense, but

407
00:27:06,960 --> 00:27:10,400
that's not the discussion here. I
wonder if he's been maxed out. He's

408
00:27:10,440 --> 00:27:14,160
been at over seventeen points per game
over his past four he's ratcheted up his

409
00:27:14,240 --> 00:27:17,640
scoring an aggression basically since Cam Johnson
went down, which is good. I

410
00:27:17,759 --> 00:27:21,319
just it gets to a point where
to expect him to be a lot more

411
00:27:21,400 --> 00:27:26,039
offensively is almost unfair. And I
think Cameron Payne has done a good job

412
00:27:26,079 --> 00:27:27,720
stepping up since the Cam Johnson injury
for them. And a big thing with

413
00:27:27,759 --> 00:27:32,839
Phoenix is they don't look deep on
paper and they're definitely shallower at the top

414
00:27:32,880 --> 00:27:36,720
of the roster, but like their
bench as like they've had players really step

415
00:27:36,799 --> 00:27:38,440
up for them. Now, with
all of that said, the answer to

416
00:27:38,480 --> 00:27:42,319
me's not DeAndre Atan anymore. I'm
more out on him offensively than I am

417
00:27:42,359 --> 00:27:45,039
Michael Bridges, and I'm not out
on either of them. They're both really

418
00:27:45,079 --> 00:27:48,920
good players. I do think the
ship is sailed on both being anything more

419
00:27:49,079 --> 00:27:55,519
than situate. Like they're really good
offensive players who are just not going to

420
00:27:55,519 --> 00:28:00,119
be self starters and or consistent self
starters. And that's fine, so you

421
00:28:00,160 --> 00:28:03,680
need to make the trade. The
issue with them is I don't even know

422
00:28:03,720 --> 00:28:07,559
what Crowder's value is, and even
given like let's say you're trading let's say

423
00:28:07,599 --> 00:28:11,160
Crowder had a better close to the
year last season, who are you getting

424
00:28:11,160 --> 00:28:14,839
for Jay Crowder. This is a
situation where you need to give up first

425
00:28:14,880 --> 00:28:18,799
another salary to really make a splash. And to do that, I think

426
00:28:18,799 --> 00:28:22,000
you do need to wait for the
trade market to develop. Like, yeah,

427
00:28:22,000 --> 00:28:25,200
could you maybe get Julius Randall from
the Knicks for no first round picks

428
00:28:25,200 --> 00:28:29,039
and just salary filler? Sure?
But I you know, I know Sam

429
00:28:29,039 --> 00:28:33,839
Cooper the Timeline podcast who that podcast
is fantastic because I feel like he's borderline

430
00:28:33,880 --> 00:28:36,640
joked about Julius Randall and Phoenix,
but he's also been kind of intrigued by

431
00:28:36,680 --> 00:28:41,920
it. And if I'm the Suns
and I've seen Julius Randall play work,

432
00:28:41,480 --> 00:28:45,480
I don't want to say play put
play in air quotes defense this season.

433
00:28:45,519 --> 00:28:48,200
I want him all the way away
from my team at the moment. So

434
00:28:48,240 --> 00:28:51,799
you have to wait for the trade
market to develop. And that's just tough

435
00:28:51,920 --> 00:28:55,759
right now. And I just feel
like you can't make the slap dash trade.

436
00:28:55,799 --> 00:28:57,279
And even if you were willing to
go the route of and he's banged

437
00:28:57,359 --> 00:29:02,079
up right now, but identify Cody
Martin. That's probably really good pick up

438
00:29:02,119 --> 00:29:04,200
for this team. He's not trade
eligible yet, So you are getting to

439
00:29:04,200 --> 00:29:06,920
a point we have probably have to
wait to the middle of the year.

440
00:29:07,200 --> 00:29:08,960
Are they good enough to weather that
storm? Depending on how much time CP

441
00:29:10,079 --> 00:29:12,640
three misses on top of Cam Johnson, on top of not having Jay Crowder.

442
00:29:14,039 --> 00:29:17,680
I don't know. I think though, they're sort of in this weird

443
00:29:17,680 --> 00:29:21,160
position where the trade market is not
conducive to making a move. You can't

444
00:29:21,240 --> 00:29:22,960
rush into anything because, look,
you do have to evaluate this against the

445
00:29:22,960 --> 00:29:26,799
backtrap of what's gonna happen with Kevin
Durant in Brooklyn. So if you are

446
00:29:26,880 --> 00:29:30,000
going to make a trade, you
probably shouldn't. Now is not the time

447
00:29:30,359 --> 00:29:33,559
to trade the distant first round picks
unless it's a no brainer. If all

448
00:29:33,559 --> 00:29:34,839
of a sudden, I don't even
I don't even know who the answer is

449
00:29:34,880 --> 00:29:37,759
because I don't want to throw a
name out there and people get pissed.

450
00:29:37,799 --> 00:29:40,799
Yeah, if if Shay was available, which he is not because he is

451
00:29:40,839 --> 00:29:45,119
the thunders Timeline, yes absolutely,
but like it gets harder if it's okay

452
00:29:45,119 --> 00:29:48,200
Gary Trent Junior is available in Toronto, Like, are you gonna want to

453
00:29:48,240 --> 00:29:49,599
give up more than just your first
round pick this year for him? No?

454
00:29:49,720 --> 00:29:52,759
Because you probably want to wait out
the Kady situation or other situations,

455
00:29:53,200 --> 00:29:56,240
so you could lean further, I
guess into like, well, do you

456
00:29:56,279 --> 00:30:00,599
try and get like just a defensive
pickup and we're just gonna slaw or opponents

457
00:30:00,640 --> 00:30:03,720
that way, like add another wing
type, like a like another Jay Crowder

458
00:30:03,759 --> 00:30:07,920
type who's better than Jay Crowder.
Sure, I do think they're in this

459
00:30:07,200 --> 00:30:11,000
like weird spot where they almost have
to wait out the market. I would

460
00:30:11,000 --> 00:30:15,079
say the one name that's been mentioned
a bunch of times, and I'd just

461
00:30:15,119 --> 00:30:18,799
be curious with the opportunity cost is
to get him, Like does Eric Gordon?

462
00:30:18,880 --> 00:30:22,559
Is he like the nice middle ground
where it's if you're not you're getting

463
00:30:22,599 --> 00:30:25,160
him maybe without giving up a first
round pick. At this point, if

464
00:30:25,200 --> 00:30:26,519
it's the first round pick, I'm
not doing out of it, like you

465
00:30:26,559 --> 00:30:30,039
know, to make sure it's not
really gonna kill you. So it's a

466
00:30:30,039 --> 00:30:33,359
fake first rounder. I mean that's
yeah, I just want to start to

467
00:30:33,440 --> 00:30:37,559
jump back in. But like this
isn't a knock on Bridges at all.

468
00:30:37,599 --> 00:30:40,839
It's not like I'm saying he's underachieving. I think we both are about as

469
00:30:40,920 --> 00:30:42,400
high on him as we can be
on a on a role playing guy.

470
00:30:42,440 --> 00:30:45,480
But like just looking at the stats
that do it for me. Are you

471
00:30:45,519 --> 00:30:49,119
know he's been He's it's true.
Shooting percent is sixty four point five percent

472
00:30:49,200 --> 00:30:53,599
this year over sixty is like you're
a superstar. Now. The problem is

473
00:30:53,640 --> 00:30:57,279
his usage rate is fifteen point seven
percent, and it's basically hovered from twelve

474
00:30:57,319 --> 00:31:00,799
to fifteen for his whole career.
Let's just like bump that to like twenty

475
00:31:00,799 --> 00:31:04,240
two percent and you can have a
fifty nine percent, you know, true

476
00:31:04,240 --> 00:31:10,319
shooting and suddenly you're a twenty point
scorer on above league average efficiency. You

477
00:31:10,319 --> 00:31:12,559
know, that's not that's not the
way forward for the Suns as like a

478
00:31:12,640 --> 00:31:15,920
championship threat, because you know,
you've got Booker, you've got Paul,

479
00:31:15,960 --> 00:31:19,119
You're gonna have other options. But
like for now, I don't know.

480
00:31:19,200 --> 00:31:22,519
I think I think he's got it
in him. I think he could do

481
00:31:22,559 --> 00:31:25,680
it. I just maybe, And
again, sorry, you have to also

482
00:31:25,759 --> 00:31:27,680
guard the best guy on the other
team all night too, But we just

483
00:31:27,720 --> 00:31:30,920
need you to get us twenty as
well. Like I get it, that's

484
00:31:30,920 --> 00:31:33,079
a lot, But I just think
I think he's that good. It's I

485
00:31:33,119 --> 00:31:37,160
just wonder if he's wired that way, and it's always that's obvious. He's

486
00:31:37,200 --> 00:31:42,400
not of all their perimeter players.
This includes I'm talking, I'm all of

487
00:31:42,440 --> 00:31:45,519
them who like people who have the
ball, people who don't. He puts

488
00:31:45,519 --> 00:31:49,079
more rim pressure than anyone else.
I think forty percent of his looks this

489
00:31:49,119 --> 00:31:52,960
year coming at the rim. Just
so much of that stuff is happening away

490
00:31:52,960 --> 00:31:56,799
from the ball, and I would
say that like Cam Johnson or Cameron Payne.

491
00:31:56,880 --> 00:32:00,160
Even if Tory Craig sometimes is more
wired to get to the basket the

492
00:32:00,160 --> 00:32:04,680
ball in their hands already not off
like cuts off ball movement, then mchaal

493
00:32:04,720 --> 00:32:07,000
Bridges is and that's not I think
mcail bridge a fantastic player, like he

494
00:32:07,079 --> 00:32:09,279
might be a top fifty player in
the NBA, which is really hard to

495
00:32:09,319 --> 00:32:14,559
do. I'm just curious whether he's
he's wired that way, and I don't

496
00:32:14,559 --> 00:32:16,079
know who the trade target is.
I understand why you'd want to wait it

497
00:32:16,119 --> 00:32:20,240
out, but just the A lot
of it's going to depend on one when

498
00:32:20,240 --> 00:32:22,039
does Chris Paul come back and to
what does he look like, because we've

499
00:32:22,039 --> 00:32:24,759
seen the scoring and shooting regression from
him, been fine as a passer,

500
00:32:25,640 --> 00:32:29,599
so it's a it's a huge question
for them, and I don't I don't

501
00:32:29,599 --> 00:32:30,920
have a perfect answer. Surprise,
surprise, that's the whole nature of this

502
00:32:31,000 --> 00:32:37,119
exercise. We are onto the Portland
Trailblazers and my question for them is this,

503
00:32:37,319 --> 00:32:40,200
we I was wrong about them.
I called them, I like I

504
00:32:40,319 --> 00:32:46,480
smashed there under. They are tenth
in points allowed per possession? Is this

505
00:32:47,240 --> 00:32:52,759
for real? And when you look
at they're expected field goal percentage based off

506
00:32:52,799 --> 00:32:57,759
where they allow their shots, they're
twenty ninth right now in the league.

507
00:32:57,960 --> 00:33:04,319
And so that's despite them have a
top ten defense. They allow too many

508
00:33:04,319 --> 00:33:07,240
looks at the rim. They're twenty
seventh there, and then they are in

509
00:33:07,279 --> 00:33:12,400
the bottom six in the sheriff opponent
shots coming from three, and then you're

510
00:33:12,480 --> 00:33:15,720
like digging into okay, well they've
gotten lucky anywhere their tenth in rim protection,

511
00:33:16,039 --> 00:33:22,359
which is just like okay, they've
also they're eighteenth in three point like

512
00:33:22,640 --> 00:33:25,000
opponent three point percentage in twenty second
when you're looking at above the break,

513
00:33:25,319 --> 00:33:30,039
so like they haven't. Opponents are
shooting thirty seven point one percent on non

514
00:33:30,119 --> 00:33:35,720
corner threes. That numbers not lucky. I would say they've gotten where they've

515
00:33:35,720 --> 00:33:39,119
gotten the if you want to say
the luckiest teams are not hitting any of

516
00:33:39,160 --> 00:33:44,160
just there in between looks against Portland. They're at thirty four point six percent

517
00:33:44,240 --> 00:33:47,480
on short mid rangers, thirty seven
point four percent on log mid rangers,

518
00:33:47,839 --> 00:33:52,200
and they're shooting I guess you could
say thirty six percent on corner threes.

519
00:33:52,240 --> 00:33:55,839
Feels a little bit like lucky,
like that number will go up. So

520
00:33:57,599 --> 00:34:00,720
it's just I my aunt there is. I don't know what I do think

521
00:34:00,759 --> 00:34:06,440
helps them. Is it for those
they have more athleticism just on the perimeter

522
00:34:06,480 --> 00:34:09,079
In general, when you look at
this team and how they are defending,

523
00:34:09,079 --> 00:34:14,119
with the players with Jeremy Grant,
Josh Hart there, even like Shandon Sharp

524
00:34:14,159 --> 00:34:16,519
has done this a bit. I
also think you've seen it more from Anthony

525
00:34:16,639 --> 00:34:21,039
Simons and Damian Lillard as well.
Not to say those guys are good defenders,

526
00:34:21,079 --> 00:34:24,719
but when they've been playing I do
think esthetically it looks a lot better

527
00:34:24,760 --> 00:34:30,239
for them. They are like they
are going to make it a point to

528
00:34:30,280 --> 00:34:34,320
get set after they make a shot
on offense, Like that is the they're

529
00:34:34,360 --> 00:34:37,119
not sort of like just lollygagging their
way back. And that's where I think

530
00:34:37,159 --> 00:34:40,440
their defense has just done just a
really good job. And I also think

531
00:34:40,480 --> 00:34:43,880
even when they're missing a shot,
like when you're looking at a Josh Hart

532
00:34:43,880 --> 00:34:45,400
when you're looking at Jeremy Grant,
like those are guys who are willing to

533
00:34:45,440 --> 00:34:49,920
get back. I think Lollard and
Anthony Simons have done a lot better in

534
00:34:49,920 --> 00:34:52,079
that situation too. They're able to
slow down their opponents even when they don't

535
00:34:52,119 --> 00:34:57,480
have the most efficient like defensive stances
there, so they're at least forcing opponents

536
00:34:57,519 --> 00:35:00,079
to burn through more of the shot
clock even though Portlands missed a shot of

537
00:35:00,079 --> 00:35:04,880
their own. I think that's important. You still look at the personnel some

538
00:35:05,000 --> 00:35:07,280
of the what the bench mobs have
done, Jesse's winslow at center, and

539
00:35:07,320 --> 00:35:13,519
you just wonder, You just wonder, is this it's not the entire season.

540
00:35:13,599 --> 00:35:17,800
I think what they've done on offense
where they are like they've underachieved quite

541
00:35:17,800 --> 00:35:21,320
frankly to be on offense. And
how much does that have to do with

542
00:35:21,360 --> 00:35:24,320
like Damian Lillard missing time. I
you know, I don't know, but

543
00:35:24,400 --> 00:35:29,039
nineteenth and points scored possessions not where
you would expect this to be flip flopped

544
00:35:29,039 --> 00:35:31,800
at the very least, nineteenth and
defense tenth and offense is the defense real

545
00:35:32,880 --> 00:35:40,159
It's one of the weirdest sort of
shot distribution slash accuracy puzzles to put together

546
00:35:40,599 --> 00:35:45,360
because like you said, there's not
anything. You know, it's really easy

547
00:35:45,440 --> 00:35:49,559
if oh, this defense has been
top five, but opponents are making twenty

548
00:35:49,639 --> 00:35:52,079
six percent of their threes, it's
like, well, okay, then that's

549
00:35:52,119 --> 00:35:57,679
not gonna last. So some of
yeah, and some of the outlier shooting

550
00:35:57,679 --> 00:35:59,760
stuff is in the mid range,
which is sort of like who cares as

551
00:35:59,760 --> 00:36:04,239
long as you're like, it's not
there's just aren't generally high value shots anyway,

552
00:36:04,280 --> 00:36:09,639
I think I think it's hard for
me to imagine the Blazers finish the

553
00:36:09,719 --> 00:36:16,159
season with a defense that is one
better than league average and two I think

554
00:36:16,280 --> 00:36:20,239
just based on it. So then
it's like I'm just looking at where the

555
00:36:20,280 --> 00:36:22,639
shots are that they're surrendering. And
then you know, so like you said,

556
00:36:22,960 --> 00:36:27,800
they give a huge share at the
rim twenty seventh and opponent riom frequency

557
00:36:27,960 --> 00:36:30,920
twenty fourth an opponent three point frequency. Just where are the shots coming from?

558
00:36:31,440 --> 00:36:37,960
So like nothing has to get too
wonky for the current defensive ranking and

559
00:36:38,000 --> 00:36:42,320
defensive rating to come down. Just
those shots will just go in at league

560
00:36:42,320 --> 00:36:44,840
average rates. It's not like,
you know, teams need to heat up,

561
00:36:44,960 --> 00:36:47,519
which could totally happen too right,
Like the shooting just could be way

562
00:36:47,559 --> 00:36:52,960
better. So they feel like a
like a twentieth ranked defense to me,

563
00:36:52,039 --> 00:36:57,519
like fifteen to twenty feels like about
right, which is like, you know

564
00:36:57,800 --> 00:37:00,480
that's gonna come down. But I
think, like you said, the offense

565
00:37:00,599 --> 00:37:04,519
is going to be better. Interesting, I think so. I think of

566
00:37:04,599 --> 00:37:08,119
the Blazers and the Nuggets off seasons
as somewhat similar because they both basically added

567
00:37:08,159 --> 00:37:13,639
like two defense first guys Jeremy Grant's
more than that, but between and Peyton

568
00:37:13,679 --> 00:37:15,920
hasn't played. So maybe that's another
factor, is get Peyton out there a

569
00:37:15,920 --> 00:37:21,119
little bit more. Maybe some of
that defensive stuff really does look more sustainable

570
00:37:21,159 --> 00:37:24,320
and they generate turnovers and all that
stuff. If it's like a buy or

571
00:37:24,360 --> 00:37:30,159
sell Portland's defense, I have to
sell it. But I think I think,

572
00:37:30,199 --> 00:37:34,400
like there's a chance, I guess
that they're league average, but it's

573
00:37:34,440 --> 00:37:36,960
not. They're not. They're not
this good. I don't see that.

574
00:37:37,960 --> 00:37:40,159
I honestly don't know. I'm not
going to bet against them being league average

575
00:37:40,199 --> 00:37:44,480
at this point though, Yeah,
right that which for Portland historically, that'd

576
00:37:44,519 --> 00:37:46,400
be great like that if you're downside
of the bottom five and they just have

577
00:37:46,480 --> 00:37:51,119
all these like really rangy wings and
perimeter players. Now if for not having

578
00:37:51,119 --> 00:37:54,280
that for so long, they are
way more athletic than I can then I

579
00:37:54,320 --> 00:37:58,440
can remember like in any of the
Lillard Ara teams, for sure, there's

580
00:37:58,440 --> 00:38:01,400
just more balance, more speed,
more all that kind of stuff. This

581
00:38:01,440 --> 00:38:07,440
is a good contrast to go into
my team, which is the Sacramento Kings,

582
00:38:07,840 --> 00:38:12,920
and so like, the only question
you can ask is the streak going

583
00:38:12,960 --> 00:38:16,079
to end? The longest playoff drout
in the league. You know this,

584
00:38:16,280 --> 00:38:21,119
they've been gunning for like the tenth
seed. The eighth seed would be great,

585
00:38:21,360 --> 00:38:23,239
but they've been gunning for that forever. It's a win now organization.

586
00:38:23,719 --> 00:38:30,039
They've sacrificed future picks, they traded
Yris Haliburton, so like it really matters.

587
00:38:30,079 --> 00:38:31,239
This is the only thing that matters
is are they going to be a

588
00:38:31,280 --> 00:38:35,239
playoff team? Is the streak going
to be over? And you look at

589
00:38:35,400 --> 00:38:38,679
so answering that is not just like
a yes or no for me. The

590
00:38:38,800 --> 00:38:44,400
question that most informed that going into
this year is how's the defense going to

591
00:38:44,480 --> 00:38:46,840
be better? Because the offense is
good, like it's it's legit. I

592
00:38:46,840 --> 00:38:51,679
think you got Kevin Herder could do
way more with the ball than he was

593
00:38:51,719 --> 00:38:55,039
allowed to do with the Hawks,
and he's an awesome secondary playmaking type.

594
00:38:55,239 --> 00:39:00,400
Dearn Fox is about as good as
he's ever been. Right now, Bonus

595
00:39:00,400 --> 00:39:02,880
and Herder are working great together.
Sa Bonus is a very good offensive player.

596
00:39:04,480 --> 00:39:06,800
My thoughts on him, I think
are pretty well chronicled, is like

597
00:39:07,000 --> 00:39:09,719
he can't be a major piece of
a team that wins in a meaningful way

598
00:39:09,800 --> 00:39:15,599
just because of defense and doesn't stretch
the floor, but like the offense will

599
00:39:15,599 --> 00:39:19,639
be good. Malik Monk is inefficient
but brings a ton of energy and is

600
00:39:19,679 --> 00:39:22,280
like the just the right kind of
guy to lead second units and kind of

601
00:39:22,360 --> 00:39:27,360
keep you in games and like win
you a couple. So Keegan Murray can

602
00:39:27,360 --> 00:39:30,199
shoot it, he's been cold,
he's hit the mini rookie wall. Harrison

603
00:39:30,199 --> 00:39:32,320
Barnes will shoot. A better offense, good defense. So getting back to

604
00:39:32,320 --> 00:39:37,679
the Portland thing. So the Kings
right now are allowing an effective field goal

605
00:39:37,719 --> 00:39:40,159
percentage of fifty six point seven percent, which is twenty ninth in the league.

606
00:39:40,199 --> 00:39:44,920
That's bad. Based on the shots
they're allowing, they should be sixth

607
00:39:45,320 --> 00:39:49,920
in effective fieldical percentage allowed, which
is wild. Most of that is because

608
00:39:49,920 --> 00:39:53,039
they don't let you shoot threes,
and their rim protection has been okay,

609
00:39:53,079 --> 00:39:55,440
Like when you get to the room
against Sacramento, there's not a lot of

610
00:39:55,440 --> 00:40:00,599
resistance, but they're being you know, fringe top in the middle of the

611
00:40:00,639 --> 00:40:05,039
pack and just keeping you away from
the room. And they're like top five

612
00:40:05,400 --> 00:40:08,159
in terms of forcing opponents to take
mid rangers. So like all that Mike

613
00:40:08,199 --> 00:40:12,320
Brown stuff, that's Mike Brown has
coming as a head coach. He's changed

614
00:40:12,360 --> 00:40:15,199
the types of shots that are allowing. Defensively, it seems like the defense

615
00:40:15,239 --> 00:40:22,880
should be real, but I just
like cannot get over you're centering your defense

616
00:40:22,960 --> 00:40:29,480
around Sabonis in the middle. Keegan
Murray's a rookie. Darren Fox has not

617
00:40:29,559 --> 00:40:34,239
defended consistently at all since he was
a rookie and was like the hungry rookie

618
00:40:34,239 --> 00:40:37,559
thing, like generating steals, that
kind of thing. This has probably been

619
00:40:37,559 --> 00:40:40,679
his best defensive year since his rookie
season, though, which is what happens,

620
00:40:40,719 --> 00:40:45,360
which happens a lot, like a
guy comes in and scraps and then

621
00:40:45,400 --> 00:40:49,519
realizes he's good and then like doesn't
happen so that the scrapping kind of goes

622
00:40:49,559 --> 00:40:53,760
away. He's been better, so
I think I have to answer my own

623
00:40:53,800 --> 00:40:57,239
question, and I'm putting it off
because I don't want to say this.

624
00:40:57,880 --> 00:41:01,400
But I don't think the streak ends
this year. I don't think it does.

625
00:41:01,599 --> 00:41:05,159
I think even would you, So
you don't count the play in as

626
00:41:05,199 --> 00:41:07,000
the streak ending? No, no, no, no, you gotta the

627
00:41:07,039 --> 00:41:12,159
plan is not. It doesn't matter. So like if you're just going down

628
00:41:12,199 --> 00:41:16,199
the list of the teams, they
gotta finish ahead of Houston Lakers, Spurs,

629
00:41:16,679 --> 00:41:20,719
cool, Like I think that's that's
realistic, But they have to be

630
00:41:20,719 --> 00:41:23,519
better than both the Thunder and the
Jazz, and we're just talking play in.

631
00:41:24,360 --> 00:41:29,519
I don't think whatever. I mean, I just don't see if it

632
00:41:29,559 --> 00:41:31,960
was one or the other. Fine, but then we're still just talking play

633
00:41:32,079 --> 00:41:36,559
we're not talking actually making the playoffs. So I don't think the streak ends.

634
00:41:36,559 --> 00:41:44,559
And I think it's just because their
defense is it's gonna be better because

635
00:41:44,599 --> 00:41:46,400
of the shot locations they're allowing.
But it's still like, is this more

636
00:41:46,480 --> 00:41:51,039
than a bottom five like bottom seven
defense? I don't know, And then

637
00:41:51,079 --> 00:41:53,519
you need the offense to be like
two or three, and I just I'm

638
00:41:53,519 --> 00:41:58,559
not sure that kind of upsides there. I think that's fair. They're allowing

639
00:41:58,599 --> 00:42:01,039
seventy percent shooting at the him in
thirty nine percent of shooting from three.

640
00:42:01,159 --> 00:42:05,920
I can't tell the rim protection makes
sense when you look at the lineups that

641
00:42:05,960 --> 00:42:09,559
they're playing. Yeah, no,
I think some of it is. Sabonis

642
00:42:09,599 --> 00:42:15,880
is the main culprit on rim accuracy
opponent rom accuracy. But it's like sometimes,

643
00:42:15,920 --> 00:42:17,960
you know, like we just talked
about Pokashevski blocking almost two shots of

644
00:42:19,039 --> 00:42:22,440
game. Sometimes if you have like
some wings or some range of your guys

645
00:42:22,440 --> 00:42:24,760
that can come in and help out, you know, weak side stuff.

646
00:42:25,280 --> 00:42:29,960
Murray's not that guy. Barnes isn't
that guy. I mean, Davion Mitchell

647
00:42:30,000 --> 00:42:32,239
plays harder on defense than everybody,
but he's not He's the last guy that's

648
00:42:32,239 --> 00:42:37,440
gonna affect shots at the rim.
So I just I hate to say it,

649
00:42:37,480 --> 00:42:39,480
but I don't see it. Who's
the second pest defender on this team.

650
00:42:39,480 --> 00:42:42,800
If we're just gonna presuppose, well, it's not presupposed, but like

651
00:42:42,840 --> 00:42:45,559
Davion Mitchell's number one, I will
say, look to their credit, like

652
00:42:45,599 --> 00:42:51,599
the Fox Herder, Barnes, Murray
Sabonis lineup, because actually it has like

653
00:42:51,599 --> 00:42:54,400
it's only allowing it's one hundred point
eight points per one hundred possessions. Like

654
00:42:54,400 --> 00:42:59,360
that's an the eightieth percent times at
least their top end lineup that succeeded there.

655
00:42:59,639 --> 00:43:02,000
But like you look at this team
and it's is like, it's certainly

656
00:43:02,000 --> 00:43:05,360
not Harrison Barnes this year. I
think you, like, is it Terrence

657
00:43:05,440 --> 00:43:08,440
Davis. He's looked, yeah,
but he just doesn't play a ton.

658
00:43:08,760 --> 00:43:13,159
I think I think Monk has actually
had some like really disruptive minutes, but

659
00:43:13,159 --> 00:43:16,400
he's not like a hold the fort
defender. He's just playing harder on both

660
00:43:16,400 --> 00:43:22,000
things. You say, I don't
know, is it Is it just Harrison

661
00:43:22,039 --> 00:43:24,920
Harrison Barnes has had like the worst
start to a season ever, but at

662
00:43:25,000 --> 00:43:28,880
least you sort of know he'll be
in the right place, which is a

663
00:43:28,920 --> 00:43:30,960
low bar. But I mean,
there's just there's just aren't defenders on this

664
00:43:31,000 --> 00:43:35,000
team. I mean to me,
like, do I think the Kings might

665
00:43:35,119 --> 00:43:38,559
pivot into another like quick tank and
run this group back by trading like trading

666
00:43:38,559 --> 00:43:43,079
Harrison Bars. It's like trading Harrison
Bars might be anti tank at this point,

667
00:43:43,480 --> 00:43:47,639
right, yeah, And no they
will not could go ever, that's

668
00:43:47,679 --> 00:43:52,840
not happening, So I don't know. I don't have an answer here either.

669
00:43:52,880 --> 00:43:55,960
I don't know what their pathway towards
internal defensive improvement is, and I

670
00:43:55,960 --> 00:43:59,960
don't know. They already gave up
a first round pick in the Herders,

671
00:44:00,239 --> 00:44:04,000
which is fine because it's inoculated against
disaster, but that does make it harder

672
00:44:04,000 --> 00:44:07,119
to go out and pull off another
trade. Now, what they could do

673
00:44:07,800 --> 00:44:09,960
is we already talked about this team, is if you're willing to take back

674
00:44:10,440 --> 00:44:15,199
like a salary that maybe Phoenix doesn't
want, you get Jay Crowder as part

675
00:44:15,199 --> 00:44:19,320
of that equation. Replace him with
Place Harrison Barnes with him. Your defense

676
00:44:19,400 --> 00:44:22,639
is upgraded. I don't know how
much better you get. I also like

677
00:44:22,760 --> 00:44:24,920
Island. I guess Landry Shammitt,
and you want another guy who chucks threes

678
00:44:25,000 --> 00:44:29,599
and they got enough of those types. Understand Jay Crowder for Harrison Barnes,

679
00:44:29,599 --> 00:44:31,840
Like, is that the move?
I mean I might consider if I'm Sacramond,

680
00:44:31,920 --> 00:44:37,519
given how inconsistent slash poorly Barnes is
playing. How sure if you said

681
00:44:37,559 --> 00:44:42,119
to me, you gotta you gotta
bet on either Harrison Barnes or Jay Crowder

682
00:44:42,559 --> 00:44:45,840
who's gonna be better? Like starting
today? I don't know if it's a

683
00:44:45,840 --> 00:44:47,880
no brain or that Crowder is better
for sure, like if you end the

684
00:44:47,920 --> 00:44:52,000
season stats, yeah, but because
Barnes start has been so bad. But

685
00:44:52,599 --> 00:44:55,199
I think defensively, the answer is
pretty clearly Crowder and this team doesn't have

686
00:44:55,239 --> 00:44:59,480
to concern itself with offense. That's
yeah, right, that's fair. That's

687
00:44:59,519 --> 00:45:06,000
fair. Let's move on to the
San Antonio Spurs. My question is not,

688
00:45:06,760 --> 00:45:08,840
since I kind of already tackled that
in another podcast, is not is

689
00:45:08,880 --> 00:45:13,239
Keldon Johnson an All Star? I
don't think we need to dig too much

690
00:45:13,239 --> 00:45:15,320
deeper into their bigger picture, just
we need more samples from you know,

691
00:45:15,360 --> 00:45:22,159
they tried Jeremy Sown at point guard
basically against the Warriors. That what about

692
00:45:22,199 --> 00:45:24,480
is what? Yeah? For super
fun for the Warriors. I will,

693
00:45:24,519 --> 00:45:32,440
however, say, did we undersell
how good the highest end outcome for Devin

694
00:45:32,519 --> 00:45:37,280
Vassell? And this is as someone
who thought Devin Vassell was really good,

695
00:45:37,400 --> 00:45:40,159
and so I want to make it
clear I don't mean this in the sense

696
00:45:40,480 --> 00:45:45,320
that I think he or even Keldon
Johnson for that matter, is going to

697
00:45:45,480 --> 00:45:51,400
run in offense. But Devin Vassel
this season nineteen point five points forty one

698
00:45:51,440 --> 00:45:55,079
point one percent three point shooting on
seven point three attempts, doesn't get to

699
00:45:55,079 --> 00:45:59,679
the foul line a ton, but
he's averaging three point five assists per game.

700
00:45:59,800 --> 00:46:02,639
And once they traded Derek White last
year, his you know, the

701
00:46:04,159 --> 00:46:08,519
number of ball screens that they sent
his way went up. And it's definitely

702
00:46:08,599 --> 00:46:15,639
the case again this season. When
you look at his possessions, twenty seven

703
00:46:15,639 --> 00:46:19,840
point two percent are coming as the
pick and roll ball handler. There are

704
00:46:20,239 --> 00:46:23,920
forty six players who finish at least
five pick and roll possessions as the ball

705
00:46:23,960 --> 00:46:30,840
handler per game. Right now,
that's yo fairly substantial. Devin Vassell ranks

706
00:46:30,960 --> 00:46:36,039
fourth and points per possession here at
one point one two. Only in front

707
00:46:36,039 --> 00:46:40,199
of him or Tyler Hero, Donovan
Mitchell and guess who, Steph car Steph

708
00:46:40,239 --> 00:46:47,400
Curry. I thought some other guy. Yes, So I'm looking at the

709
00:46:47,400 --> 00:46:51,440
way he's playing. It'd be cool
if you could get more on ball rim

710
00:46:51,440 --> 00:46:52,639
pressure from him. I think he's
someone who can move away from the ball.

711
00:46:53,000 --> 00:46:57,760
But this is someone who, when
we really start to talk about it,

712
00:46:58,119 --> 00:47:04,320
did we give him a mcaal bridges
like higher than mcaal bridges ceiling.

713
00:47:04,360 --> 00:47:07,639
I mean, I think we gave
him the ceiling of mcaal Bridges, but

714
00:47:07,000 --> 00:47:12,320
he is doing more with ball screens
than probably mcaal Bridge has ever had a

715
00:47:12,320 --> 00:47:14,760
lot of that could be opportunity.
I know the way that the Suns were

716
00:47:14,760 --> 00:47:21,679
built, but did we undersell how
good Devin Vassell might be for I'll speak

717
00:47:21,719 --> 00:47:24,239
for myself, I absolutely did.
I just thought I slapped the three,

718
00:47:24,480 --> 00:47:29,039
you know, the three and D
label emphasis on the three. He seemed

719
00:47:29,079 --> 00:47:32,000
like a catch and shoot type earlier
in his career. You know, you'd

720
00:47:32,039 --> 00:47:37,360
see flashes occasionally, but like again, so this is the first year of

721
00:47:37,400 --> 00:47:40,639
his career and his role has demonstrably
changed this season, and it's because he's

722
00:47:40,719 --> 00:47:45,599
capable of it. But he's only
his two point baskets right first two years,

723
00:47:46,039 --> 00:47:49,880
basically two thirds of them were assisted. This year forty one percent of

724
00:47:49,920 --> 00:47:52,519
them are assisted. So that ties
into the pick and roll accuracy, which

725
00:47:52,559 --> 00:47:57,800
what you're seeing a lot of is
he's a deadly mid range shooter this year

726
00:47:58,079 --> 00:48:02,000
fifty three point three ten to sixty
feet between sixteen and three point line fifty

727
00:48:02,039 --> 00:48:07,000
eight point eight percent, and he's
shooting like a decent percentage of his shots

728
00:48:07,039 --> 00:48:09,360
from that range. So what that's
telling me is if he's getting around the

729
00:48:09,360 --> 00:48:14,039
screen he's totally fine being the guy
that takes one dribble and pulls up and

730
00:48:14,280 --> 00:48:16,719
and like, yeah, we we
just talked about like shot location data for

731
00:48:16,840 --> 00:48:20,840
team defense and how you know,
if you get a team to take a

732
00:48:20,880 --> 00:48:23,760
pull up mid range shot, like
pretty good defensive possession. That's not true

733
00:48:23,760 --> 00:48:28,199
for Devin Booker. That's not true
for you know, any number of Steph

734
00:48:28,239 --> 00:48:30,679
Curry, CJ. McCollum. There's
it's not true for certain guys that are

735
00:48:30,679 --> 00:48:36,119
gonna make that shot. And the
Cell looks like he's gonna be that guy,

736
00:48:37,199 --> 00:48:39,039
which is which is just wild to
me. And like you said,

737
00:48:39,079 --> 00:48:43,639
is his numbers. I mean,
he's only playing thirty point nine minutes per

738
00:48:43,679 --> 00:48:45,199
game. If you go to per
thirty six, he's like twenty three,

739
00:48:45,280 --> 00:48:50,920
five and four, and he's twenty
two years old. So Marry says age

740
00:48:50,960 --> 00:48:54,159
twenty two season. He just turned
twenty two before the year. Like we

741
00:48:54,199 --> 00:48:58,199
could get our Basketball Reference filters out
if we wanted to, but like,

742
00:48:58,280 --> 00:49:01,719
I'll take I'll take that perty six
from a guy who's also suddenly just showing

743
00:49:01,719 --> 00:49:07,159
that he can be an on ball
threat. I think it's fair. Like

744
00:49:07,199 --> 00:49:09,480
I'm really high on Kelton Johnson.
I think it's a question. I think

745
00:49:09,519 --> 00:49:13,119
it's a question of which of those
two, you know, do you like?

746
00:49:13,199 --> 00:49:15,960
If Johnson's been the team USA,
he's kind of, I think,

747
00:49:15,079 --> 00:49:19,880
been regarded as the more productive or
higher, you know, ceiling guy.

748
00:49:20,199 --> 00:49:22,559
I'm going to have a conversation now
in Vassell. For sure, I think

749
00:49:22,599 --> 00:49:27,119
this year Johnson's scoring more. But
what we've seen from Vasell is like,

750
00:49:27,159 --> 00:49:30,239
oh, he's he's a different kind
of player than we thought he was,

751
00:49:30,320 --> 00:49:34,119
which I think is the question you're
asking. I think, for sure we

752
00:49:34,440 --> 00:49:37,800
sold him short and he's just gotten
way better. Do you know who?

753
00:49:37,840 --> 00:49:42,599
I'm wondering if he could become and
I think Bradley Beale No, okay,

754
00:49:42,639 --> 00:49:47,280
wow, can he become Chris Middleton? Oh that's fun. I like that.

755
00:49:47,519 --> 00:49:52,280
I'm wondering if he if that's too
high, because I don't I think

756
00:49:52,320 --> 00:49:57,320
one Chris Middleton is ridiculously good and
people still kind of undersell it. I

757
00:49:57,320 --> 00:49:59,920
think his last contract had a lot
to do with that, which is just

758
00:50:00,000 --> 00:50:02,840
stupid. When I look at Chris
Middleton, I'm like, Okay, that

759
00:50:02,920 --> 00:50:07,480
dude can anchor offensive units entirely on
his own. We don't know that Devin

760
00:50:07,559 --> 00:50:10,519
Vessel can do that, yet at
the same time, the units Chris Middleton

761
00:50:12,039 --> 00:50:15,239
is anchoring on his own like those
are like he's playing a lot of his

762
00:50:15,280 --> 00:50:17,239
minutes with Janie or Drew when he
hasn't played this season. We know that,

763
00:50:17,280 --> 00:50:22,719
thank you everybody, But like Devin
Massell very much would have to be

764
00:50:22,760 --> 00:50:24,719
the guy right now in Santita.
We know it's Trey Jones, like that's

765
00:50:24,719 --> 00:50:29,400
who they prefer to have really oversee
their offense when he's healthy. But can

766
00:50:29,440 --> 00:50:32,119
Devin Missell then turn into them where
it's like, oh, you trust him

767
00:50:32,159 --> 00:50:38,159
with maybe one mediocre creator around him
to really jack up your offense. Where

768
00:50:38,239 --> 00:50:42,440
Chris Middleton is better than that.
But like we're talking about, oh,

769
00:50:42,440 --> 00:50:44,880
he could have been mcl bridges three
D, like should we have been more

770
00:50:44,880 --> 00:50:46,519
looking at where it's Chris Middleton who
was way more than a three and D

771
00:50:46,679 --> 00:50:52,960
player. So just to make the
comparison Chris Middleton's age twenty two seasons first

772
00:50:52,000 --> 00:50:54,760
year with the Bucks, now he
was like sort of the Pistons gave up

773
00:50:54,800 --> 00:51:00,599
on him, but sort of literally
did. He was a starter that year,

774
00:51:00,679 --> 00:51:05,159
right this is twenty thirteen fourteen.
Looking at his per thirty six is

775
00:51:05,199 --> 00:51:07,800
percentages are a lot like Vassals forty
one percent from three, but he's at

776
00:51:07,840 --> 00:51:12,119
fourteen point five points, four and
a half boards, two and a half

777
00:51:12,159 --> 00:51:16,199
assists. So at this phase Middleton
did not have Vacells like on ball stuff,

778
00:51:16,239 --> 00:51:20,559
his facilitating, you know all that. And it's not like those Bucks

779
00:51:20,599 --> 00:51:22,880
teams were great yet, right,
so like Jannie was not anything close to

780
00:51:22,920 --> 00:51:28,159
Yannis yet you don't get up to
the Vacells level of numbers what Vassell is

781
00:51:28,199 --> 00:51:31,400
doing right now until you get Middleton
to like age twenty six, and the

782
00:51:31,400 --> 00:51:37,880
Bucks were good by then. So
I mean, the Middleton comparison is legit,

783
00:51:37,039 --> 00:51:40,199
I think, and it's it's kind
of similar because similar size, just

784
00:51:40,280 --> 00:51:45,559
not like nuclear athleticism. Middleton is
relatively speaking, like not an athletic wing,

785
00:51:46,000 --> 00:51:49,599
but and Vasell's got a little more
of that. So yeah, that's

786
00:51:49,639 --> 00:51:52,079
a that's an interesting comparison. I
think there's a lot too that we will

787
00:51:52,119 --> 00:51:58,159
close this out with the Utah Jazz. So obviously, h this is another

788
00:51:58,239 --> 00:52:02,679
kind of Lakers situation of like,
oh boy, do they we's just in

789
00:52:02,719 --> 00:52:06,719
the sense that we've belabored the Jazz
to this point, like is it real?

790
00:52:06,920 --> 00:52:07,880
Was the question forever. It's like, yeah, it's kind of real.

791
00:52:07,920 --> 00:52:13,039
We were past that. Uh.
The question I have is where will

792
00:52:13,079 --> 00:52:17,400
the regression come from? The obvious
answer is you trade half the roster,

793
00:52:19,079 --> 00:52:22,039
But that's not happening yet. You
know, at least at least, you

794
00:52:22,079 --> 00:52:25,159
know, we got to get to
December fifteenth for there to be you know,

795
00:52:25,239 --> 00:52:28,360
just a little more activity. We're
not going to see a bunch of

796
00:52:28,360 --> 00:52:31,079
trades right now. The other reason
where will the regression come from? Is

797
00:52:31,119 --> 00:52:35,400
the question and not you know,
when do they pack it in? Is

798
00:52:35,440 --> 00:52:42,239
like it's too late, It's already
too You're like, we were wondering how

799
00:52:42,239 --> 00:52:45,199
do they tank? Can they tank? Like when when they have to hurry

800
00:52:45,239 --> 00:52:46,960
up because they're running out of time? Did you see this stat from Kevin

801
00:52:46,960 --> 00:52:52,360
Pelton, So you go back like
the last twenty ish years and teams in

802
00:52:52,400 --> 00:52:57,559
his database. These are his proprietary
numbers with Utah's preseason win projection, which

803
00:52:57,559 --> 00:53:00,280
he had them at like thirty four
ish wins, which was way high higher

804
00:53:00,320 --> 00:53:05,280
than consensus. Right, looks pretty
smart, right now that start this hot

805
00:53:05,599 --> 00:53:09,159
with the Jazz's current record, they
almost always win fifty games, so they

806
00:53:09,159 --> 00:53:14,199
go on to win fifty for the
year. The other thing is they almost

807
00:53:14,280 --> 00:53:19,719
always make the playoffs. They almost
always win around like, so the Jazz

808
00:53:19,760 --> 00:53:22,800
have to go like ten and fifty
nine the rest of the way to even

809
00:53:22,840 --> 00:53:25,039
be in the conversation for you know, the best lottery odds, which we've

810
00:53:25,039 --> 00:53:29,639
discussed our fourteen, Like, they're
not that great. It can't happen.

811
00:53:29,639 --> 00:53:31,800
It's too late. It's too late. They've already won too much and they're

812
00:53:31,840 --> 00:53:35,639
not going to be able to change
it. So where does the regression come

813
00:53:35,679 --> 00:53:39,360
from? For me, it's just
like there's a decent chance this winds up

814
00:53:39,400 --> 00:53:43,679
being a bottom five defense, which
like, sorry, Jazz fans, like,

815
00:53:43,800 --> 00:53:45,320
I think the offense is great.
A lot of its sustainable. I

816
00:53:45,320 --> 00:53:50,199
think Markenen's awesome. They have a
ton of like capable offensive NBA players.

817
00:53:51,400 --> 00:53:54,320
Opponents get into the rim way too
often. Jazz are allowing you know,

818
00:53:54,360 --> 00:54:00,559
their twenty fifth in that stat opponent
three point shooting number five and accuras number

819
00:54:00,559 --> 00:54:05,239
three in corner three accuracy. I
just like, and you go through the

820
00:54:05,320 --> 00:54:08,360
roster, you're really going to continue
to defend with the lineup that has for

821
00:54:08,519 --> 00:54:14,760
a lot of the game some combination
of you know, Mike Conley Jordan Clarkson,

822
00:54:14,960 --> 00:54:20,400
Malik Beasley, Marken and Kelly Lennock, Colin Sexton, like none of

823
00:54:20,440 --> 00:54:24,880
those guys except maybe a younger Conley
I think had positive defensive reputations. And

824
00:54:24,920 --> 00:54:28,639
Conley, you know, it's not
his fault, but he's had a couple

825
00:54:28,639 --> 00:54:30,960
of bad playoffs in a rowka and
stand front you guys, he's older,

826
00:54:30,440 --> 00:54:37,239
so the regression will come from the
defensive side. The problem is the Jazz

827
00:54:37,280 --> 00:54:40,760
already just seem like a team that
if you don't do anything really are gonna

828
00:54:40,760 --> 00:54:46,360
win conservatively like forty six games like
and they could win significantly more than that

829
00:54:46,440 --> 00:54:50,679
like that. That's just what the
stats. It seems crazy to me,

830
00:54:50,880 --> 00:54:54,360
but historically that's just that's just where
we are. That's their start. Combined

831
00:54:54,400 --> 00:54:59,440
with what their preseason projections based on
the numbers and the talent on the roster,

832
00:55:00,000 --> 00:55:01,639
it's like, it's too late that
you can't you can't tank it now,

833
00:55:01,760 --> 00:55:06,000
sorry, guys, you miss you
miss your Winbanyama window. And is

834
00:55:06,000 --> 00:55:10,280
that something they need to apologize for. Maybe that's the question, like how

835
00:55:10,280 --> 00:55:14,760
happy are you Jazz fans that this
is the state of the French And that's

836
00:55:14,800 --> 00:55:21,119
a serious Jazz fans were in my
mentions concerned that they wouldn't tank this year,

837
00:55:21,360 --> 00:55:23,199
and I think there was some folk
there was On our last YouTube video

838
00:55:23,280 --> 00:55:28,400
we tackled the Jazz. We didn't
extensive I don't know what we were talking

839
00:55:28,400 --> 00:55:30,280
about, but it was an extensive
dive and people were mad that we were

840
00:55:30,280 --> 00:55:35,400
talking about the tanking aspect. It
was a real debate amongst Jazz fans.

841
00:55:35,400 --> 00:55:37,880
I'm with you. We say it's
too late. That's almost framing it as

842
00:55:37,920 --> 00:55:40,280
well, then this is a bad
thing. They missed their window. I

843
00:55:40,320 --> 00:55:44,800
just don't know if it's a bad
thing. Because you own Minnesota's future draft

844
00:55:44,840 --> 00:55:49,119
and that team, it's sort of
rickety. But if a fan, or

845
00:55:49,119 --> 00:55:52,079
even if an analyst, and but
I know there's like a disdain for the

846
00:55:52,119 --> 00:55:57,400
way national analysts probably like us,
will analyze individual teams. But I do

847
00:55:57,480 --> 00:56:01,639
also think it's fair to say if
the endgame is to be a sustainable title

848
00:56:01,639 --> 00:56:07,119
contender this season in theory, I
don't want to say hurt you, but

849
00:56:07,199 --> 00:56:10,480
delays that because this is not You're
like, if you think that this is

850
00:56:10,519 --> 00:56:15,159
sustainable, it's not sustainable unless you
go out acquire a star to augment it.

851
00:56:15,239 --> 00:56:19,000
And I think that's to me.
This that's to me where this is

852
00:56:19,000 --> 00:56:22,960
different. This is not let's say
the Pistons before they had Jade and Ivy

853
00:56:23,039 --> 00:56:29,400
or Kade, where they didn't have
all these extra draft picks. Utah has

854
00:56:30,880 --> 00:56:35,360
malleability in the sense that if they're
just so much better and this they win

855
00:56:35,440 --> 00:56:37,480
forty six games this year, it's
not, oh, we have to resign

856
00:56:37,559 --> 00:56:42,360
everybody. Yeah, Jordan Clarkson as
a player option, but Mike Conley's Parsley

857
00:56:42,400 --> 00:56:45,679
guaranteed Molik Beasley as a team option. By the way, you could actually

858
00:56:45,960 --> 00:56:51,119
strengthen your roster if you want,
rather than doubling down on what you already

859
00:56:51,119 --> 00:56:54,880
have. Necessarily Now, to me, I would default towards I would have

860
00:56:54,920 --> 00:57:00,320
bottomed out gone after the Weben Yama
Scoop Scoot Henderson's we've stayed. Can they

861
00:57:00,360 --> 00:57:04,239
get im in like player like that? But the fact that they're this good

862
00:57:04,239 --> 00:57:07,320
already it is too late. I
just I don't think that's necessarily a bad

863
00:57:07,360 --> 00:57:09,400
thing. There are Yeah, I
can't be damaging. You look at sort

864
00:57:09,400 --> 00:57:15,440
of the one or two offseason success
that Phoenix had with your like the where

865
00:57:15,440 --> 00:57:17,639
the three guards. They thought that
was the great idea, But also just

866
00:57:17,679 --> 00:57:21,960
like, look what happened with the
Nuggets, Like they trade Mellow and they

867
00:57:21,960 --> 00:57:24,159
have that one of the most random
fifty five plus win that we're fifty plus

868
00:57:24,159 --> 00:57:28,800
win seasons that I can remember.
After that, they were still able to

869
00:57:28,840 --> 00:57:30,280
mind talent on the market. They
eventually, you know, you got Jamal

870
00:57:30,360 --> 00:57:34,320
Murray. I think he ended up
being seventh, But like you were able

871
00:57:34,360 --> 00:57:37,559
to mind talent out of the draft
and you got better a little bit more

872
00:57:37,599 --> 00:57:40,440
gradually, but you were still good
a lot of that time, like you

873
00:57:40,480 --> 00:57:46,119
were never truly bottoming out. I
don't think this is the worst It can't

874
00:57:46,119 --> 00:57:50,320
believe the worst case scenario, because
you're fucking winning and it's been a joy

875
00:57:50,360 --> 00:57:52,360
to watch. But I don't think
it's as I do believe there are some

876
00:57:52,400 --> 00:57:55,239
fans, and I think it's fair
who were concerned and would prefer the tank.

877
00:57:55,320 --> 00:57:59,280
I think that's I think that's fair. But for anyone who thinks that

878
00:57:59,320 --> 00:58:02,679
this is actively damaging, that pushes
it way too far for me. Even

879
00:58:02,679 --> 00:58:07,400
if you think there's like a transience
to the way the roster is built,

880
00:58:07,400 --> 00:58:09,519
which the final thing I'll say there
is that's just the fact of the matter.

881
00:58:09,760 --> 00:58:14,280
It's Ryan Markan is twenty five,
context is twenty three. You just

882
00:58:14,400 --> 00:58:17,519
drafted Walker Kestler. What is at
BAJI But like between talent Horton, Tucker

883
00:58:17,519 --> 00:58:21,760
and Conley and even Jordan Clarkson,
who's a little bit of like this roster

884
00:58:21,880 --> 00:58:24,199
is transy, Like it's it's fine
to say, but it's also it's really

885
00:58:24,199 --> 00:58:29,199
good. That's the thing I think. If you're a Jazz fan and you

886
00:58:29,239 --> 00:58:31,320
don't really care that much about the
rest of the league, you probably still

887
00:58:31,320 --> 00:58:35,079
know who Wemban Yama is, but
all you want to do is like two

888
00:58:35,199 --> 00:58:38,440
three times a week watch the Jazz. Yeah, this is great, this

889
00:58:38,480 --> 00:58:43,760
is great. You're happy with this, and like you're happy with it as

890
00:58:43,800 --> 00:58:50,519
an alternative to the possible pretty unlikely
promise had this gone the other way of

891
00:58:50,599 --> 00:58:58,920
getting a transcendent talent who you know
might might years from now be the best

892
00:58:58,920 --> 00:59:02,280
player on a championship team. But
there's like so many ifs, but me

893
00:59:04,280 --> 00:59:07,000
having no skin in the game as
a Jazz fan, the difference. The

894
00:59:07,119 --> 00:59:10,559
difference now is that you're you asked, like how should they should they feel

895
00:59:10,599 --> 00:59:14,440
bad about it? Or should should
this be viewed as like a mistake?

896
00:59:15,800 --> 00:59:22,360
If you're talking about a draft headlined
by Anthony Edwards or Kaide Cunningham or Palo

897
00:59:22,440 --> 00:59:29,079
bank Caro even who's been great.
Right, then maybe maybe it's okay that

898
00:59:29,119 --> 00:59:31,239
they're not tanking. But I really
think I think, you know, this

899
00:59:32,159 --> 00:59:36,480
could be wrong, probably will be
wrong. I just think when Binyama is

900
00:59:36,480 --> 00:59:38,639
someone that, like, whatever you
have to do to maximize your chances of

901
00:59:38,679 --> 00:59:44,679
getting him, you should do it, unless by doing so, you like

902
00:59:45,039 --> 00:59:51,480
scuttle a potential like really deep playoff
run or championship pursuit. Like if it's

903
00:59:51,519 --> 00:59:54,280
that or when ban Yama, then
go try to win two playoff rounds and

904
00:59:54,320 --> 00:59:57,960
see what happens, you know,
try to make the finals what like.

905
00:59:58,119 --> 01:00:02,199
Do that. But if it's we
win forty nine games, nobody really takes

906
01:00:02,239 --> 01:00:07,000
us that seriously. We might win
around and then the roster gets totally changed

907
01:00:07,000 --> 01:00:09,840
and all these guys are gone.
That was a cool year. But I'd

908
01:00:09,920 --> 01:00:15,000
rather have a chance or my best
chance at Wembanyama or even Scoot Henderson,

909
01:00:15,079 --> 01:00:19,920
because who's just getting totally underdiscussed as
a really really one of the best lead

910
01:00:19,960 --> 01:00:22,239
guard prospects we've seen in a long
time. He was my spicy cake.

911
01:00:22,320 --> 01:00:25,559
Is that if he was like a
few inches taller. They everyone will be

912
01:00:25,559 --> 01:00:30,199
smitten with him over Victor woman Yama. If he were in any of the

913
01:00:30,239 --> 01:00:32,400
last three drafts, I think you
could make the case that people like it's

914
01:00:32,440 --> 01:00:37,639
just Wemban Yama is a once in
a whatever, at least in the eyes

915
01:00:37,679 --> 01:00:42,280
of everybody who has an opinion about
it, just a just a transformational general,

916
01:00:42,320 --> 01:00:47,400
all the asianals, he's all the
Asians generation in international, the T

917
01:00:47,559 --> 01:00:52,039
shirt right there, all the more. But yeah, I just I get

918
01:00:52,039 --> 01:00:55,199
it. It's got to be conflict. There's gotta be like a real conflicted

919
01:00:55,320 --> 01:00:59,039
jazz fan base. But I get, I get, I get either side.

920
01:00:59,159 --> 01:01:00,760
If it were me, i'd I
would have wanted women yaa. But

921
01:01:01,000 --> 01:01:05,960
and look, if you're looking at
the top two, it's assuming you could

922
01:01:05,960 --> 01:01:08,960
finish with a bottom three record.
It's a twenty seven point four percent chance

923
01:01:08,960 --> 01:01:13,159
of landing in the top two.
That is not insubstantial. Right, That's

924
01:01:13,159 --> 01:01:16,880
big, that's big. Yeah,
that's all we got though, So boy,

925
01:01:16,960 --> 01:01:21,840
how long did we take? Almost
a two hour? More? Thank

926
01:01:22,119 --> 01:01:25,039
thank you everybody for listening to the
only the Western Conference portion of our biggest

927
01:01:25,079 --> 01:01:29,400
questions. I'm sure Dan will chop
this up somehow. A God, I

928
01:01:29,440 --> 01:01:31,079
hope so, I don't know if
I could listen to all this, that's

929
01:01:31,119 --> 01:01:34,519
gonna do it for us this week. We'll do the East next week.

930
01:01:34,920 --> 01:01:38,960
Thanks for listening. Remember guys or
guys and gals. Anybody in the discord,

931
01:01:39,000 --> 01:01:42,760
however you'd like to be referred to, Remember to download, subscribe,

932
01:01:42,800 --> 01:01:45,679
comment, interact with us, Engage
with us. We've got all of our

933
01:01:45,719 --> 01:01:50,599
socials and you can join our discord. Information for that's on the YouTube and

934
01:01:50,679 --> 01:01:53,400
podcast description. Rate us, review
us, give us five stars, give

935
01:01:53,480 --> 01:01:57,079
us like fourteen stars if you can
figure out a way to do that.

936
01:01:57,239 --> 01:02:00,840
Tell your friends and enemies. I
would like to close, as always by

937
01:02:00,880 --> 01:02:06,800
apologizing Jared Allen and on behalf of
Dan and also meet because I like to

938
01:02:06,840 --> 01:02:09,800
shout out to the one and only
Frank Milogy the solution to We were trying

939
01:02:09,760 --> 01:02:13,119
to figure out how the Mavericks can
be less dependent on Luca
