Good morning and good afternoon. Get even whatever. I know, it's time
shifted. People can do whatever they want. If you're joining us live,
I'm in the chat room with you. Hello, good morning. Thank you
for doing that. It's deadly. One day we might need to experiment with
actually making the live show available out there on the entire area of Rumble.
In other words, not to RUSS subscribers, because we're capping out in terms
of subscribers joining us. If you haven't yet done that, you can get
a seven day free trial of our total video coverage. That's video dot the
Todd Herman Show dot com, and also go see if you like hanging out
in the chat room together. Yesterday doing live radio on AFR on one hundred
and eighty stations. I got to respond to the Scotis deciding to castrate itself
and to in fact just completely new to itself and castrate the First Amendment.
That's what they did. You can color this up anyway you'd like, You
can use fancy lawyer talk for this, but what they did is unconscionable and
it's a sign of this. We're on our own, except for not because
God has warned us about times such as these, So let us not trust
in charots and horses, even if they're ridden by the rock ribbed conservative constructionist
originalist. Pardon me, John Roberts or Amy Cony Barrett rock ribbed originalist.
Right, we'll talk about that. Plus, California is losing members of the
Hollywood elite. We need to welcome the members of the Hollywood elite, their
souls and their views. Plus Elon Musk has come right out and said the
election is being rigged right before our eyes. It is. We'll talk about
all of this with the help of God Almighty. Thank you, Lord for
making it all possible. The Todd Herman Show is one hundred percent disapproved by
big pharma, technocurrats and tyrants everywhere. Now from the high mountains of Free
America, here's the Emerald s any exile God her Man. Today is the
day the Lord has made in. These are the times to which God has
decided we shall live in. Speaking of God Almighty, The United States Supreme
Court, in a six to three decision has said the following, ain't no
court in America that has standing to help you if the government is censoring your
speech. So long as they're clever and use partners. So the phrase joint
state actor, that's a real phrase. It means that the government has deputized
a private group to become a joint state actor. When that happens, that
joint state actor is an adjunct of government. They've been given effect of government
powers. When that happens, they can be treated like government. When the
government decided to go to social media companies and pressure them, cajole them,
or in the case of Twitter and others, I'm sure we know, in
the case of Twitter, to pay them money to censor the speech of free
Americans. Twitter became a joint state actor. It was the government suppressing speech.
We in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, are guaranteed the
right to free speech. It shall not be attacked. It cannot be overcome
by government, because it is a right that exists because we are born from
God, and God values speech. And I'll prove it. In John chapter
one, verses one through five, the apostle John here speaking about the Lord
Jesus, and a name, the Lord Jesus, was given by God.
In the beginning was the word. The word was with God, and the
word was God. He was with God in the beginning through him, all
things were made. Without him, nothing was made that has been made.
In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind.
The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.
Beautiful, beautiful opening to one of the most beautiful chapters of the Bible.
And Jesus is given the name the word. God values speech. He gave
it to us. It's one of the things that delineates us from other creations
of the Lord. We speak, Yes, I know. They are animals
who communicate, they don't write. God decided to put his word in writing
through human beings. For sure. The law came down the hill from Moses.
Moses received it from God. He transcribed that he and Aaron taught it
to us, wrote it down so that it would never be forgotten. Jesus
has said that not a sentence in his word will pass from the earth,
and it won't. Our words are an extension of our conscience. Well,
if we're honest people, we speak from our conscience. It's a bridgeway to
God. The government cannot legally censor our speech. Yes, I know about
the firehouse thing. Yelling fire in a crowded movie theater, And to this
point I've said, okay, no more. I'm a free speech absolutist.
If you threaten to kill someone, you're threatening to commit a crime. That's
different. You get to speak it, but you have to pay the consequences.
So in the State of Missouri and others went to the Supreme Court with
proof that the government had gone to social media companies and had paid them,
cajoled them, threatened them, pressured them with the implicit taking away of a
waiver they shouldn't have. That's Section two thirty. That's what means that Twitter
and Facebook and YouTube cannot be sued the same way I could be sued if
I libeled someone on this program and they decided to sue me. The only
thing I'd happen between me and Financial Ruin is an LLC. Since this show
is done under my LLC, that would be fairly easy to pierce to come
and get me and everything I own. Can't do that with Twitter or YouTube
because they're just a platform. They just host whatever people put up. They're
basically a phone company. That's the argument. Of course they're not. They're
publishers. They decide what is promoted and what is hidden. The one story.
You can just go to one story, the Hunter Biden laptop. That
was a myth created by government and retired intelligence officials. Everybody knew what a
lie. It was used to get warrants to spy on Americans illegally. The
FICCE at court run by John Roberts knows it was a lie. One junior
lawyer has paid what they slap on the wrist. It was banned in media.
Banned. That is an abridgment of speech that the founders would never ever
sponsor ever, because there's also the freedom of the press, not just of
our speech, but of the press. So when Missouri and others went to
the Supreme Court with this proof, look what the government did. The federal
government didn't just ban the speech and suppress the speech of free Americans. They
suppressed the speech of political opponents. And a six to three majority said,
hmm, sorry, the standing doctrine says, ain't nothing we can do.
You'll have to find another way to address this. They will. When you
take the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and you show people that the
government gets to do whatever it wants. History shows us people will find another
way to deal with it. Is the Supreme Court actually actually willing to light
this this fuse. We've been shown they can reg elections. Texas went to
that same Supreme Court, and Texas's argument was this, many states changed the
election rules illegally. The Constitution says in races for federal office, when those
elections are carried out by the states, it will be the legislative bodies of
the states that make the rules. That's what it says when secretaries of state
at the last minute say, yeah, we don't really need ID. Yeah,
mail in ballots are fine, drop boxes are cool, we can accept
ballots after the date of the election. After all, there's a terrible flu.
Texas came and said those actions being illegal, negated or may have negated
the votes of Texans who voted a different way. They took that to the
Supreme Court. Now, the Supreme Court could have looked at the facts of
the case and come back and said, no, Texas, you weren't damaged.
You weren't damaged. There's no proof that the election was sold. And
they didn't do that. They said, golly, golly, golly, we
got no standing a body the Supreme Court. And this was prior to the
John Roberts Era that decided in the original interstate commerce clause case. They decided
this that a farmer who said, I don't want to deal with the federal
government. Therefore I will only sell my goods, my crops in the state
of Iowa. I'm from Iowa. I'm selling in Iowa. I'm not going
across state lines. I refuse to sell outside of the state of Iowa.
That case was decided by the Supreme Court on behalf of the federal government.
How they said, by deciding to not sell across state lines, you are
selling across state lines. Not engaging in interstate commerce is engaging an interstate commerce.
Not doing a thing is doing it. We are not on our own.
But it would be a good time for us to be thankful to God,
because without him we would be in desperate trouble with him. They're the
ones. They're the ones who have taken the speech of the children of God
and people created by God not yet back in the family, and they have
stolen it. God himself never shut down free speech. He could have any
time he wanted to. But the Lord Jesus walk the earth and debated with
people. He did the result of debate in inquiry is often progress. Our
founders debated and debated and debated what which would be the best form of government
for us, and they landed on a democratic republic. There was a time
when scientists debated what is the best path forward, and inventions have come from
that. We've learned to harness many of the common blessings that God gave us,
such as ozone etenpuredeals dot com where you go use code TOD three.
That company learned to harness the power of ozone to create an air purifier.
It's not a loud filter, otherwise we couldn't have it in the studio.
It's running right there over on the wall. It doesn't suck air in.
It puts ozone into the air. And those O three molecules bond to chemical
not chemicals, but bond to bad smelling molecules like from cat boxes and wet
dogs and cigarette smoke. And you just open up your RV. It's not
been open up our EO. Or you got kids living in college dorms which
can just stink like you wouldn't believe, or military dorms which can also stink.
Not the fault of anybody, it's just human nature, So we have
this running at all times and the bad smells are eliminated. At smells like
there's been a fresh thunderstorm in our studio, So don't live with stink.
In fact, Herisday's pet stink guarantee. Go to edenpier deals dot com use
code Todd three. Not only will you save two hundred dollars on whole home
coverage with three of these devices, you also get the pet stank guarantee.
If it doesn't eliminate the pet thunk and stink, you get your money back.
Eadenpeer deals dot com use code Todd three. That's to d D three.
Caring in fairness. These are two words I'm really really stuck on because
they're a way for us to recapture society. In the debate coming up tonight,
I hope President Trump is able to use the construct of carrying in fairness.
It's hard, it is, particularly on really really emotional things like that.
Yes, Christopher Rufou reports that the prosecutor who's trying to imparison Texas Children's
Hospital whistleblower doctor Ethan Ham got the facts wrong, admitted she hadn't reviewed the
evidence, and falsely claimed that Ham had leaked children's names. This is innakely
naked political prosecution. He's right, and this is from the City Journal,
a piece by Rufo. According to a letter written by Hain's lawyers, Assistant
US attorney Tina and Sari admitted she hadn't reviewed the purported evidence against him and
instead was relying on what FBI agents told her. In the same discussion on
Sorry, insisted that the documents Haym sent to Rufo included children's names, but
nothing in the document's Rufo saw identified any individuals. All were redacted. The
prosecutor then asked him to admit wrongdoing, telling him that he should apologize to
the families of the children who received so called transgender medical interventions at Texas Children's
Hospital, if he wanted to help, if you wanted her to help him
avoid a felony prosecution. When this tactic failed, I'm sorry intimidated that the
families are intimated that the families would sue if she didn't bring criminal charges.
Christopher Rufo is too smart to receive information that would contain the names of children.
He's far too smart for that. Ethan Ham is too well aware of
hippolaws to have transmitted this caring in fairness. If children are being harmed by
being having their bodies flooded with wrong CeX hormones in these surgeries, if they
are being harmed, shouldn't doctors be able to speak out? Wouldn't it be
unfair when Texas Children's Hospital decided to continue to break the law. How is
it fair that someone who reports lawbreaking is then a criminal, particularly when that
person does it in a way that doesn't even identify the children. How is
this? Do we really want a situation where when a hospital commits a crime
and harms the bodies of kids, it is illegal to report that crime.
Does that sound like America? Does that sound like caring for children and the
outcomes of these surgeries and these hormonal treatments. That construct is difficult, but
it's the construct that will welcome moderates to our side. Those the only two
factors they care about in politics. It is not national security, it's not
the economy. It's not crime, it's not authoritarianism, it's not liberty.
It's caring and fairness. Those are the two lenses with which they view things.
Case in point, Jillian Michaels back in the day when my wife and
I had a TV we used to watch from time to time to show the
biggest loser. In fact, there were two people from our city, our
small little town in western Washington, des Moines, and yes, you do
say the s. Please don't come to me and say it's des Moines,
It's not Iowa. There was a television commercial that back in the days of
the first days of addressable cable, with the mayor of des Moines, Washington
saying we're des Moiness, Washington, say the last s. So you absolutely
say the last s and don't tell me otherwise. There are two people from
our small town who won that contest and then got married. I ran into
him later and they had regained all their weight. It's in a hard wore
so very depressing because man, they really took that weight off, but not
responsibly. Jillian Michaels got fame on that show. I guess she was an
influencer before then. Jillian Michaels has been a well Hollywood Dennison for a long
time, not any longer. I grew up here. I'm a woman,
I'm a gay woman. My mom's a Jew, my dad's an Arab.
I have a black kid and believe it or not, my son is half
Laddin, even though he doesn't look like it. I hold a million cards
in your game of woke victimology poker. And when I leave California, maybe
you've lost your mind. Just maybe like when you when you have me running
from home, maybe it's gone way too far. What was the line?
Like, like, what was it? Girl? There's not enough time?
And you know I I actually take this this line from Bill and Elon Musk
and they're like, I actually haven't changed. The world around me is shifting
and I haven't moved. So some of these laws that are passing here are
absolutely mind boggling in relation to crime protecting our kids. Like we're decriminalizing everything,
which arguably I would probably be okay with, but we're not regulating any
of it. Right, So it's like, okay, you're gonna decriminalize sex
work, but only so women can legally loiter on the streets, Like,
not to keep them safe, not to have them pay taxes, not to
make them, you know, regularly check for STDs, not to take away
the pimps out of the equation. It's the like, if you made that
argument to me, I'd be like, well, yes, we want of
course. I mean I could be liberal, I could go there with you,
but I grew up this way. But when it's like, oh,
and then what we're gonna do is we're going to pass a law for LGBTQ
rights so that twenty four year old men can sleep with fourteen year old boys
and not have to register as a sex offender because it's just not fair to
the gays. I'm like, what it's what like, I don't know if
you saw that one that was like I think early twenty twenty when they passed
that law and it's I was like, give you twenty four year old men
touches my fourteen year old son, Oh, I will get it gone my
own answer, yes, like you, or the fact that a twelve year
old child can be put on off label cancer drugs to inreparably change their body.
Again, if my son came to me and said, mom my daughter,
I think I'm trans, I'd say, okay, you know, like
you want to dress this way, you want me to call you whatever the
height you want me to, fine, explore it. I love you.
I'm cool, like, do you as long as we're safe, but we're
not changing your body until it's fully developed. I'm sorry, conversation's over.
Can't get a tattoo exactly crazy, It's insane, like I, I just
can't. It's it's madness. It's madness to me. I can go on
and on and on, and it's madness. I have a question for Jillian,
and let me just pause here for a second. The question begins with
why and how. It's a two part question, so let me pause at
that two part question, why and how she talked about these so called medical
procedures. We just talked about this with Ethanheim, that medicine so often has
been used to abuse. I have a book and I'm just now beginning to
read it. It's called oh Gosh. Now I've read a subjected to science,
Subjected to science, and it's about the long time, long history of
science being used to destroy people, to subject us to experiments without telling us.
It's not just Tuskegee, and it's not quote just the Holocaust, is
not those things. It's not it's not limited to that. This has been
done continually through society. And of course you can call the transit of kids
an experiment, it's not because everybody knows what it does. It's a movement.
It's an effort to divide the country. It's an effort to invent a
whole new kind of sub race of human beings who are dependent upon government for
their very, very self image. It's brilliant, it's deeply evil. And
when this happens, many, many doctors are waking up and they're saying,
I can't practice in this world. I met two such doctors when I was
in Mexico legends. One of them is an author of books that are perennial
in New York Times bestsellers, like a Sugar Crush is his favorite of its
books. The other guy sat on every possible professional board that a hematologist can
be on. Blood doc. I mean, if you're a blood doc at
that level, on every single professional board that you could ever want to be
on, you know things about the human body that I'm never going to learn,
and frankly, most of us never are. They left the practice of
insurance backed medicine because they were no longer able to obey the hippocratic oath.
First, do you know how or to obey one of the implications of the
hippocotic oath? Take the least invasive process possible. So if you are facing
an invasive surgery or having to take invasive drugs to manage pain, you're being
told that the only way out of arthritis is some surgery and maybe some more
drugs or neurological issues you're facing. If you're in that situation, go where
these docs went. I met them at renew Healthcare in Mexico. I ended
up talking with them for over two hours. We recorded it, and I'm
having trouble making sense of the video and audio quality. I want you to
see this. I may have these guys on if they'll come on the program.
I want you to hear why they left and why they went there for
treatment with the ethically gathered stem cells from placentas and umbilical cords. Why are
they sending their patients there for treatment, Why they could do any other thing
so they think it works, or they wouldn't put it in their own Send
your MRI results, get your doctrine. Touch with them, give them the
data, make a decision. Go to renew dot Healthcare. Tell them you
heard it on the show or saw it on the Todd Hermann Show. It's
renew dot Healthcare r E n ue dot Healthcare there's a link to any of
our partners in this show notes renew Dot Healthcare to Jillian Michael to have a
question, how do you know this is wrong? Why are you speaking out?
Now? Let's start with how how do you know this is wrong?
By what measure? Something in you snapped something in you could no longer sit
in the state of California and say this is okay, You're right. The
world changed. I don't know you, so you tell me you haven't.
I'll trust you on that. What snapped your conscience? Why? What's in
your conscience? Is there some special thing about you where you see this is
wrong, but these other people don't. Maybe there is? Maybe there is.
Could it be that the conscience you have was given you by God?
Could it be that, as the Bible teaches us, even if we've never
been exposed to the law or now in the christ area, the church era
of the Lord Jesus, even if we've never been exposed to that right and
wrong is within us. Could it be could it be that the senses that
are waking up in you now you talked about your fourteen year old kid.
Some man who comes to sexually touch your fourteen year old kid you said you're
going to get a gun, You're going to take matters into your own hands.
Why how do you know what's wrong? Maybe your fourteen year old kid
wanted that, after all, he's a sentient, But no, your motherly
instincts. Is it instincts? Because there have been societies in biblical times where
kids were turned into temple prostitutes. One of the things God said in the
law is don't do that. Don't make your kids walk through fire, don't
dump them into volcanoes, don't turn them into temple sex slaves. So,
Jillian, isn't it interesting that everything you're talking about aligns with how God would
you us. God is a god of order, not chaos. I heard
you say that you're a same sex attracted woman, and I'm sure you've lived
that way for most of your life. Well, what if God's saying to
you, Jillian, I have said that can separate you from me. I've
said that in my word. When you continued in your statement, you said
something about if your kid came and said, I'm not a boy, I'm
a girl, you would say, Okay, let's explore that, really explore
What how about exploring the feelings but not the fake reality. How about saying
to your son, no, you're a boy. Let's talk about why you
feel like a girl. Why would you lean into the very lie that allowed
the law to pass to let twenty four year old men inflict their sexual desires
upon boys. Why would you even lean into that? Because by saying,
well, yeah, maybe you're a girl, you're leaning into the entire argument.
But Wow, the platform you have, Wow, the speaking ability with
which God has blessed you. Wow, the fitness with which God has blessed
you, and the willingness to pursue it. What if he's calling you.
What if he's saying, Jillian, you can help. What if he's saying,
Jillian you could come home. What if he's saying, Jillian, you
could come home and you could have your kid, your fourteen year old kids
safe forever. What if he's doing that? Now you open to that?
Would you be willing to take the neee to that possibility? Would you be
willing to submit? Truly? Submitting to God is horribly difficult because it means
that you have to submit to not having everything you want, and that must
be so hard for you given the money that you have earned. And I
do think You've earned it by being entertaining and compelling and smart and guiding your
career into these TV shows and hopefully along the way, hopefully helping people actually
keep weight off and actually have healthy bodies. Hopefully you've done that, not
just on that TV show where time has limited et ce get that. But
truly submitting, Jillian, would need to be that you didn't do this on
your own. Truly submitting would mean that you'd have to say, all these
treasures matter, not all of them will turn to dust. The homes,
the clothes, the podcasts, the audience, all of it will be gone,
all of it, and one day it will be you, your soul
and the creator. One day, where do you want your treasures? Something
in you is telling you the world is becoming more and more obviously fallen.
Do you want to fall with it? I hope not. There's lots of
views of submission, and in this culture, young women are just bombarded with
messages about submission and biblical submission that number one are mischaracterized number two for men
in this culture, so often now as young men are leaning into Christianity,
they're taking this idea of okay, so we're to lead the home spiritually.
How does that work. Does it mean that you are top down that this
is the way it will be done. No, let's talk about that.
I want to provide two comparisons. One's a very simple, quick video from
a young woman. Maybe she's just trolling, maybe she's had a few drinks,
or maybe this is the way she thinks. But it made the rounds
and it got a lot of views and it sort of speaks to this cultural
discord, this cultural divide. And then another young woman who takes a complete
different view of men, one I consider to be egotistical and temporary because I
think that reality will crash down upon this young woman. They'therre a thing to
be maybe more evolved. But again, maybe it's just trolling. Sometimes people
troll. After all, brain candy's a powerful way to earn money. It
is submitting and we'll get to that in a second. Can be very very
difficult, particularly for women. And look, I get this. I don't
think that people want to sign up to say, you know what I want
for the rest of my life. I want another human being to make all
my decisions for me. Now, there are people who like that. There
really are people who choose to operate that way. I want someone else to
make all my decisions. There are people who've been institutionalized in prison, and
they get out and they go, wait a minute, I don't know what
time to eat or when I should go to the bathroom. I don't know
what I should wear because they've been institutionalized, and it can be difficult to
come out and go okay, So now I need to make my own decisions.
But I don't know other than that where people been institutionalized. I personally
don't know a lot of people who want to be run around by another human
being. This young woman is not even thinking about submission. She's thinking about
all the ways young men submit to her, or maybe old men submit to
her men in general. She in fact, I think, puts us all
in one box. Then we'll get to the topic of submission and a woman
with another point of view. I think that. So let me start that
again. So she says, I don't think men have rights. Interesting,
I don't have rights. I think that men are just in superior to a
woman. I think no matter what a powerful man will simp to a woman,
therefore a woman and every circumstance in life is superior to a man,
any man. If you make more money than me, if you're stronger than
me, and you're taller than me, you'll still simp for me every single
time. So I'm still superior. Charma's deceptive and beauty fades. I don't
find her particularly charming from a classical sense if you're watching the video from a
classical sense on how beauty is measured, I guess she's cute. She might
even be very pretty or attractive. Can't tell in this video. So the
men who simp for you, there's simping for what, your intellect, your
empathy, kindness, intelligence, I think you're implying it. There's simping for
your physicality for what, and incidentally, what exactly did you make in your
physicality? Okay, you take care of yourself, great, you work on
fitness and looking good. Okay, great. But a man who simps for
you simply based upon your physicality or what you can do for him sexually or
maybe might do for him sexually, is a or Do you have someone whose
hormones are simping for you? Do you have someone whose flesh is simping for
your flesh? Do you have someone whose sexual desire is simping for your ability
to fulfill parts or all of that sexual desire. What exactly is he simping
for? And if you're bragging about this that you can get any man to
simp for you, well, then what sort of man are you seeking your
life? A man who does what looks out for you. Charm is deceitful,
and beauty fades, it says in the Bible. So what happens when
the beauty fades? Oh, that will never happen to you. You'll never
age. You're Dorian Gray. All your aging is hidden in a painting somewhere,
locked away in a closet. Perhaps you get a disease, Perhaps your
physicality changes, perhaps you get cancer, God forbid, or a metabolic disorder,
or in a grievous accident, God forbid. I don't want these things
to happen to you. But if it does, a man who has simped
for your flesh will just go simp for someone else's because someone else's could be
in better shape or more beautiful. Well, that could never happen, because
you won't age, You won't someday have skin that SAgs a little bit.
Never happens to you. You won't one day, have your facial features changed,
because that never happens to you, so it won't be that at any
time this man or these men you have grabbed and charmed. Charm is deceitful,
and beauty fades as the beauty changes, and maybe just other men to
look at you and go, wow, you are a very pretty fifty year
old woman, a very attractive fifty year old woman. Is there any depth
to you? Would you have ever had to develop depth? If you've spent
your life in search of men who will simp for you based upon your flesh,
eating their flesh, and what you can do or think you might do,
or suggest to them that one day you might do. If that's how
you've interacted with men, when it comes time for someone to seek depth,
are you going to have any to provide? Will you ever have to work
on the mental muscles, the spiritual muscles to provide that beauty charm? These
things fade. Charm doesn't, but charm can be deceitful. That's one view,
and I get the view because society has shown young women from the halls
of junior high on hey look, show the body, show more of it
suggests more things are going to happen. And now in junior high, Hey,
go get your own body count. Girls, go get your own body
count. Compete with the boys. I've got a bigger body count than you.
And you develop the muscles of what purely the flesh, So you cannot
then develop the muscles of one flesh. What do I mean if it's been
flush flesh, flesh, flesh, flesh? What becomes special about the one
flesh? Now, God can wash this. When David sends with Bathsheba,
which is a horrible story. Oh, that's a horrible story. It's a
horrible thing he did God. Her husband killed at the front. When he
went into mourning and he said, in full faith, wash me with his
sop and I will be pure. He went to the Lord and he confessed
and he mourned what he did, and he lost his son because of what
he did. He knew that God would forgive him and we can have this
rebirth. That's one view of a young woman. This is another. Women
have a problem with submission because they view it as it's something that's negative.
No, you should be able to submit to your man because you should be
able to trust enough in his leadership, and a lot of the times when
you men say like, oh, I don't want you going to a bar.
I don't want you going to a club. It's because you're a man.
You know what happens there. You know that men there just want to
walk, or there's weirdos that want to like put in your drinks, or
there's drama, or it's just a whole ass environment that you can't be there
to protect your female. If it came down to it, you would have
to live with that guilt, you know what I mean. She gets assaulted
and you can't do nothing about the man that did that to her, You
would live with that. And women don't understand that. They think it's control.
No, your man's being a protector as he should, and as of
this woman, you should respect it. You should honor the fact that your
man can see the dangers that you can't. Simple as that. Now,
I think this is a different extreme. Your man can see the dangers that
you can't. Where there are things that men can see sometimes that women can't.
There are things that women can see that men can't. But this is
where we get to partnership. Yes, there are occasions where men can look
at a circumstance like a bar or a nightclub and say there is one reason
men hang out there alone. Period, end of story, end of story.
There are are also cases where men do take that role as leader of
the household and turn it into a cudgel and a hammer. This is the
question, what did Jesus do? You know that ring? What would Jesus
do? How about this? What did Jesus do? Did he use a
cudgel or a hammer when he led? He didn't? How did he do
it? It started with an example. He lived the way he wanted others
to live. It extended into sharing himself, It extended into ministering. It
went into washing the feet of his followers, which was so utterly bizarre to
them. I cannot believe the God of the universe, the Messiah, wants
to wash my feet. And as you know, Peter said, you can't
do this, and the Lord said, hey, if you're not gonna let
me wash your feet, you can't have any part of me. If you're
not willing to be served by the King of the universe, then how are
you going to serve others? If you won't watch my model of humility,
then how are you going to be humble to serve and rather than seeking to
be served, that was the model. This is the strange fact of Christian
leadership in a home. It has to be far more partnership than top down
spiritual bossing. And remember this that the Lord tells us the husband and wife
are to submit to one another, and that word submit it means come under
and lift up. The Bible does say that the man is the spiritual leader
of the home. How edicts and rules and dictasks know the way Christ did
it. It's not the question what would Jesus do? The question is what
did Jesus do? That's the model, and it's a model that none of
us are going to be able to capture. It's the one that we none
of us are going to be able to match. But by pursuing it,
we get closer to it. In pursuit. Oh, I'm in pursuit of
this thing coming up in September, and I had a little bit of a
moment of panic there the day I would just tell you, I'm thinking about
it seems so far off when I started this Sealfit journey. It seems so
far in the future. I've got a whole bunch of time to prep And
I was talking to coach the other day and I just said, you know
what, I'm panicking a little. I gotta admit I'm looking at this saying
I haven't done enough. I'm not preparing enough. I'm not going to prepare
to thrive. And Coach stopped and said, wait, wait, wait,
wait wait, you have done so much. What I hear you saying is
you want to do so much more. What I hear you saying is is
time to shift gears into an even bigger level of work. It's time to
get about the Sealfit thing every day. That's what I hear you saying.
Because you have built this base. Let's just go back and look at some
of the data. Todd, here's the data. Because I track my workouts,
she tracks them. We analyze them together. As I'm thinking about this
and looking back at that path that, I am so utterly thankful that I
don't have to look forward to going through Sealfit without Iberprofen. They don't let
you take that stuff there. Wow, you mean all this work, this
mini version of hell week, and I don't get to gobble hyperprofen. Someone
said to me, you could actually get implants. I don't want to stick
iberprofen somewhere. No, someone said I could get it in a patch form.
No, I'm going to be the old man there anyway. I don't
want to be the guy with a patch on my arm. Hey what's that?
Oh is iberprofen? So what do I do? I double and triple
down on Native pathcrill, particularly leading up to this event where I'm going to
be absolutely obsessive about hydrating a month in advance. When you can do something
like this, you're not going to hydrate two days in advance. It begins
a month in advance. It begins in starting to taper off my workouts in
smart ways and making sure that when I show up there, my body is
absolutely flooded with the omega threes from Native pathcrill, which has made it absolutely
unnecessary for me to have iberprofen, even if I'm doing a sixteen hour workout.
I don't need it. Iyberprofen can damage your heart, your kidneys,
your liver, and it absolutely creates inflammation that which it pretends to cure.
It creates by destroying the lining to your gut, meaning that things that don't
belong into your bloodstream get in your bloodstream. They mess with your joints,
your heart, your liver. So you take moribaprofen. You can join me
in this. Toss those bottles and get the benefits immuno benefits, benefits to
your indercoonsystem, the benefits to your brain. Simply go to nativepathcrill dot com
slash tod see what specials and discounts are offering you today nativepathcrill dot com slash
todd. Culture Andrew Breitbart reminded us is swimming upstream of politics. We've had
several cultural exam examples, and we began with the Supreme Court deciding to castrate
itself. Well, this is important because with the election looming, people are
beginning to notice what's being rigged. Right before the people who run Joe Biden
put out an edict with his name on it. Every single federal agency is
to push voter registration. Gee, I wonder for which party they're doing this
at borders to illegal immigrants handing out voter registration forms. They're doing this Cloward
Piven style to flood the system. The system run on votes, runs on
votes. Flood it with votes. People have to be registered. Flooded with
registration. That was the whole design behind vot voter was to flood the system
with enough registered voters that fraud becomes a simple matter of getting access to their
ballots or their names and voting them. There are people fighting this. There's
a group called the Election Immigration Accountability Project that is fighting this. Good morning.
I'm Rosemary Jenks with the Immigration Accountability Project. As Senator Leave said,
we estimate that there are upwards of thirty million non citizens, so foreign born
who have not naturalized and are therefore ineligible to vote under our laws. The
problem that we have now is that the Biden administration, there's a Biden executive
order that orders all federal agencies to provide voter registration information to everyone they come
in contact with. We also know that state election officials are not permitted to
ask for proof of citizenship for applicants who fill out the federal form. So,
if you're a non citizen in this country, whether you're an asylum seeker
or a foreign student or whatever, if a government official hands you a voter
registration form, you're going to think that you need to fill it out.
There you are going to be unlawfully registered to vote. If you vote,
it is a deportable criminal offense. It is, but it won't be prosecuted
unless it's in red state, and at which point the federal government will step
in and say, no, you cannot deport the people. Scot has had
a chance to address vote fraud and they punted, Oh, we can't do
anything. There's no standing. Texas can't sue the other states, and if
they do, they have to find another court. Gosh, we can't solve
any disputes between the states when it relates to voting goalie g someone else will
have to do it. Elon Musk noticed this he responded to a tweet by
Mike Bens. Mike Bens has made a name for himself as a national security
analyst and a breaker of news. Bens writes, it's in surreal to watch
Trump win in the polls while a slow motion car crash on exactly how they
were rigged plays out in crystal clarity in the background that he was responding to
this tweeted by j. Michael Waller. Welfare offices in forty nine states are
handing out voter registration applications to illegal immigrants, no proof of citizenship required.
From the New York Post. Elon Musk writes, at this time, apartment,
at least this time that people will know the truth. Yes, on
this topic, perhaps they will. That is, people who use Twitter or
listen to the show or watch this program are going to know the truth.
But are they going to know the truth about the background now of what continues
to unfold in the greatest human rights crime in my lifetime, and that is
the COVID nineteen PSIOP and resulting response also a siop. You know that Kansas
and Texas are suing Peiser. They've been joined by three other states. What
they're talking about here is the efficacy of the COVID nineteen so called vaccines,
which are of course not vaccines, and Pfeiser hid those harms. People are
criticizing this case or saying this that Peiser was under no obligation to test these
things. Yeah, you could make that argument, Except for this, the
Ninth Circuit courts, the most progressive bootlcking courts in the nation, absolutely admitted
two weeks ago these are not vaccines and they never were. Also, except
for this, the injection that was given the emergency Youth use authorization in this
country has never been put in an arm, not once. Senator Ron Johnson
has testified to this it never happened. Therefore what was injected was never approved.
Hopefully these lawyers will be making this case because someone's got to make this
case because in the UK, Andrew Briggan's been fighting against COVID and the responses
and the injections basically all alone. But he, as a Member of Parliament
says things have changed the rate of information coming out with regard to the adverse
events and deaths attributed to the so called COVID nineteen vaccines, it's increasing exponentially.
No one dare say safe and effective anymore in the UK Parliament. Huh.
They call it the best solution, the best solution, but they can't
use safe and effective. I mean quite honestly every time they say if they
stay safe effect now I'm putting I think they're putting five to ten years on
their sentence when we get them in cool. May God make it so.
Speaking a guid in the Bible Jeremi chapter nine, verse three, they bend
their tongue like a bow. Falsehood and not truth has grown strong in the
land. For they proceed from evil to evil, and they do not know
me, declares the Lord. Wow, that almost describes today. Oh and
on the topic of the injections, there's this from a country doctor. Real
guy, real doctor. He made a career of being a substack writer.
Why because early on he decided to tell the truth when other doctors wouldn't.
He writes, we now have proof that COVID so called vaccines damage cognition.
Examining the causes and treatments of the common neurological injuries caused by the so called
vaccination story. At a glance, subtle and overt neurological injuries are one of
the most common results of a pharmaceutical injury. The COVID nineteen so called vaccine
excel at causing damage to cognition, and many of us have noticable, subtle
and over I think he means overt cognitive impairment following vaccination. Relatively few people
know how to address. So he's been studying this and tracking it. But
now there is a huge study published in Nature magazine, one of the top
medical journals. So what are they finding. It found that the so called
vaccinations from COVID resulted in a sixty eight percent increase in depression, a forty
four percent increase in anxiety, disassociated a disassociative, stress related and soumataform disorders,
a ninety three point four percent increase in sleep disorders, a seventy seven
percent decrease in SIT sophrenia. Well at least there's that, and a thirty
two point eight percent decrease in bipolar disorders. Well at least there's that.
So fewer schizophrenics, but more depressives and more people with suicidal intent. It
previously mentioned Israeli study found that four point five percent of those who received a
so called vaccine developed anxiety depression. Twenty six point four percent already had or
experienced exasperation of it. As we continue to track the evils of what's been
done through pharma with the COVID responses, let's remember this. It's not just
safe and effective that's taking a turn. It's we have to do this to
the children. Another lawsuit, a California woman is eighteen now young woman.
She's suing doctors for removing her breast when she was just thirteen because she thought
she was so called trans after seeing influencers online. Her name is Kayla Lovedahl
said doctors pressured her to do this. Now, of course, the Supreme
Court has before it a ban on doing this to children. The same Supreme
Court that said, Gully, we're simply not the court that can deal with
First Amendment issues. The same court that pretended that when the founders talked about
men and women, they meant men who pretend to be women in addition to
actual women. My sad prediction on this that I hate making this prediction is
that they're going to side with pharma. Why do I say that because John
Roberts sides with pharma in the most important and fundamental case in history that has
led to many of the harms in our medical system. Obamacare. I'll say
it again, John Roberts lied twice. The first lie was that the fine
for not buying Obamacare is a tax. That's a lie. AT tax is
taking a percentage of someone's income or spending based upon an activity. A fine
is taking away money from someone for not doing something. The second lie was
that DC is a state. It had to be state exchanges through which people
got Obamacare. At every state was supposedly going to create an exchange. Some
red states figured out, hey, we don't have to create exchanges, so
they didn't. So Obamacare was not available there. So the federal government response
by saying you can use the DC Exchange, and that went to court.
Washington, d C. Is not a state. John Roberts, for all
ends and purposes, pretended it was a state, and he continues to pretend
that. So once again, we're not on our own. We're in a
world where we are like Jillian Michaels, not with California, most of us
don't live in California, but with this world. Here's the great news.
We're leaving it. When the Lord Jesus returns as judge. We'll leave this
world eventually in a new heaven and a new earth the way things were designed
by God. And once again we will walk with him and be able to
ask him questions. Just to imagine that day. It's not something we can
earn. It's a free gift given to the blood of Jesus. This is
the Todd Hermit Show. Please go, be well, be strong, be
kind, and please make every effort to walk in the light of God.