Attention. You're listening to the Tod Huff Radio show, America's home for conservative
not bitter talk radio. The advised the content of this program has been documented
to prevent and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean to
the right. Here's your conservative but not bitter host Todd Huff. Yes,
my friends, conservative not bitter. Indeed, maybe a tad bit of a
bad voice today. Still, I'm not sure exactly what is all going on
here, but it will loosen up, I think as the program goes along
today, here to guide you, Here to help give you some hope and
some direction to do through these tumultuous times. You know, some of the
things I see on social media being posted and so forth, folks, there's
a lot of pessimism out there. And I get it. I get it.
We have to be realistic, we have to look truth in the eye.
But I want to reiterate what I said on this program yesterday, and
that is that we are winning a lot of these arguments, these political excuse
me, these these cultural arguments. We are winning in spite of the seven
pillars of propaganda. We are winning in spite of the deception. We are
winning in spite of the well the all out assault on truth, we are
winning in the marketplace of ideas. We are winning. Now that's got to
translate to wins on the political battlefront. That's got to translate into actual not
just election wins on an election day. No, no, no, my
friends. That is that is so far beyond where we're so far, I
should say, beyond that point. We are to a point, my friends,
that we should no longer be misled, or we should no longer be
impressed by mere rhetoric, by mere promises by people going out on the campaign
trail. Folks, we are in the midst, as I've said before,
of a cold civil war. This is a dueling battle of ideologies. One
of them is rooted upon truth. One of them is rooted in the Constitution,
in the founding principles. The other is built upon lies and deception.
One of those needs to have these seven pillars of propaganda working in harmony with
one another to deceive Americans from knowing the truth, from fearing things they shouldn't
fear, from becoming comfortable with things they should not become comfortable with, for
example, causing people to be stirred into a frenzy over the dangers of climate
change, how we're going to destroy this planet because we're driving around in diesel
powered and gas powered vehicles. They want you to be terrorized and terrified by
that. But when it comes to the growing government, which is the greatest
killer, by the way, the greatest killer of people on planet Earth in
the twentieth century was over sized, out of control, massive, oppressive,
vindictive, all consuming government, killing over one hundred million people. That is
our biggest That was our biggest threat in the twentieth th entry. That is
our biggest threat here in the twenty first century as well. It's why we
need candidates. You know, I had a video we're on TikTok. You
know, I never thought I would say these things. Slowly but sure and
surely growing on TikTok. There's clips of this program on that platform. One
of those got flagged recently, a couple of days ago, maybe over the
weekend, I don't remember, for violating community standards, and it was for
making, by the way, comments similar to what I'm making right now,
which is saying that the biggest threat that we face and I stand by this.
I stand by this. TikTok moderators, if you're listening to this right
now, go ahead and take the video down. Go for it. It
shows your desperation, It shows just how much what I'm saying is true.
The greatest threat that we face in this country today, the greatest threat that
we face is the government itself is a growing out of control government. There's
all sorts of facets to this. It's a danger that the average citizen does
not understand this, or doesn't care about this, is more concerned about what's
trending on TikTok than who is in the White House, who is in Congress.
That's of course a danger. There's lots of dangers that kind of fuel
this overall problem, which is we have people who are asleep at the wheel,
who don't know what's going on, who care more about who's on Dancing
with the Stars or who's winning American Idol or whatever these other shows are called.
And I've got no problem, by the way, none of that.
I don't have a problem with any of that. I've got a problem when
we put too much, When anyone puts all their focus on entertainment, or
all their focus on pop culture, or all their focus on something else,
that distracts from addressing and paying attention to the real problems going on in the
world today, and almost all of these problems not all look, folks,
we live in a fallen world. We live in a fallen world. Enter
this world through the choices of human beings, and we are all dealing with
those consequences. Yet today they're not going away. They're not going away.
Will never be completely made right here in this world. We have to wait
until the next world, by the grace of Jesus, the justice of Christ
and God Almighty. But we're never going to get out of that reality,
that realm here. That is what we are stuck with. Right The Founders
understood this to a point. They said, in order to form a more
perfect union, they knew that they would never have a perfect union, that
we would never have a perfect government and culture and society. Of course,
that's not possible this side of heaven. But we should continue to strive to
be better, to have better laws, to have dare I say, fewer
laws. Dare I say, to look for better people to run parts of
our government. But we've gone the opposite way. We've gone the opposite way
for far too long, and the corruption and the greed and the power and
the money, and the God only knows what else. I mean, some
of you have ideas and so forth as to what's really going on there.
But it's evil and dark and it's not good. That's not, by the
way, that is not a blanket accusation about anyone who works in the government,
because there's certainly fine people who do. That's not the point. The
point is. The point is the further up the ladder you go, the
more power that you have, the more likely it is true that there's something
nefarious. I'm not going to say that that's the case one hundred percent because
I can't possibly make that statement, but it it oozes out of every pore
of our federal government. And the problems are massive, and the problems at
some point, at some point if are no matter who if if it's going
to remain the same no matter who's in power, then we're in a really
really bad predicament. Right right now. We have the choice. Some would
say the illusion of a choice, which I'm sympathetic to that, but again
I'm not a pessimist. I think that the reason if we do or insofar
as we have the illusion of choice I would say that we can do something
about that. We can hold these jokers and clowns and people who love to
walk around in darkness. We can hold these folks accountable. Look, we
don't have to be Look, I'm off for being civil and you know appropriate.
But folks, if people have violated the trust and have abused their power,
then there should be no question they don't. They are not fit for
office. They're not fit for any office. They're not fit for your local
school board, they're not fit for governor of your state, town council.
I don't care what the position is running a little league sports organization. If
they're corrupt, it's not just because of that corruption and that and that evil.
They should not be in a position where they're in any position of power,
not until, well maybe not ever, and only if, if at
all, they demonstrate that they've had that remedied, they've repented and completely done
a oneint eighty from where they've gone before. But the simpler path is to
say, if you've violated the trust of the American people, you're done.
You're done in office, We're done with you. And that's where we do
come in. And of course we got problems and questions about what about elections
and all this sort of stuff, And there's still plenty of election reforms I
think that need to happen. I mean, I the more I the more
I think about it, and you know, even understand some of the things
that are that are going on. For example, I think it was Arizona.
I think it was Arizona had fifty six hundred people that only voted in
a federal election in twenty twenty and they couldn't verify their identity five six hundred.
That apparently that we know of what else is out there, I don't
even know. I don't even know. It seems obvious to me that you
need photo ID, And I said, well, that's that's These things are
glaringly obvious. But I'm just stating the obvious because apparently half the world thinks
that that statement alone is racist for whatever stupid reason that they can concoct.
But having a photo ID and honestly probably going back to paper ballots, I
know that that puts us back, seems like it puts us back into the
stone ages. But we should all understand, especially in this highly digital world
that we live in. I mean, we all get what we just had
updates for those. I'm on I have an iPhone and there was a vulnerability
found in the latest version of whatever it was, iOS whatever, so they
sent out a new software update because of vulnerabilities. Well, vulnerabilities and elections
should concern every person, no matter who you're voting for, because we should
want to know whoever we vote for, whatever that tally is, and whatever.
All the other problems that go into why people are choosing terrible candidates and
so forth. Put all that, like, let's just fight about that.
Let's just have the arguments about that instead of having to wonder what else may
be going on here. If there's a vulnerability, it needs to be it
needs to be cut off. I just I mean, this is patently and
blatantly obvious to me, and so we have real problems. I think.
Actually, I know that we're winning some of these arguments, maybe even many
of these arguments. It has not translated into many political victories yet, and
I'm not predicting that it will. I'm just saying that the American people are
pushing in unison largely, massive amounts, massive majorities are in agreement on securing
the southern border, stopping that thing. From being an open sieve. People
are over out of control spending. Now, the problem, of course comes
down to when you start looking at which things to cut. Then people begin
to have a problem because if it affects them, they don't want it there.
But what if we really just said, look across the board, we're
gonna cut one or two whatever it is, a couple of percent, one
or two percent. This, by the way, is what businesses have to
do. This, by the way, is what your household had to do.
When Biden inflation drove the price of gasoline through the ceiling. When other
well, when inflation drove the cost of food to astronomical amounts, you had
to do the same thing. You had to cut budgets. You had to
cut areas that you didn't want to. Maybe there were some you couldn't cut.
Maybe you couldn't find a way to cut your utility bill, so some
of you might have turned the heat down a degree. I don't know.
These are things people have to do, right, These are things that people
have to do. Maybe you cut Netflix right, maybe you don't take certain
trips, maybe you travel less to save on gas. I mean, there's
a number of ways to do this. This is what average people and average
companies. Heck, even average states are forced to do all the time.
The federal government should do that. People are in agreement with the stuff,
But yet nothing happens for a whole myriad of reasons, and they all go
back to the seven pillars of propaganda. These folks that are dividing people,
trying to divide and conquer, mislead, deceive, amplify the voices that there's
fewer, but they're more radical, and they are in agreement with the folks
that are leading the seven pillars of propaganda, these leftist voices, these lovers
of big government, they amplify those voices. They silence voices like yours,
like mine. They don't like truth. They operate in the darkness. They
have an excuse for every reason why they can't do the blatantly obvious thing.
But yet they tell us so they can lower the sea levels and fifty to
one hundred years. Enough, enough of the nonsense. The average American knows
this, I'm telling you, and you know this. Yes, there's some
lunatic in your family that lives down the street or that works in the office
who doesn't know these things. But for every one of those people, there
are twenty or maybe more people who have what we call common sense in a
rational mind and aren't convinced of something that makes no sense because some expert spews
it, because they read it on TikTok or saw the video on TikTok,
or read it on Twitter, or whatever the case may be. There's plenty
of reasons, my friends, to be optimistic, but we're also at this
perilous point. We're on this precipice. We stand on this golf in twenty
twenty four. Is that gap Now, that's just the beginning. That's just,
of course, hopefully if we win that election, regaining the levers of
power in the government, we got to get to work immediately, serious work,
serious work. In ways be ready too. There's going to be a
This tension and turmoil is going nowhere. The only way to get rid of
this. It's similar. It's it's analogous to what's happening in Israel and Gayza
and Dude, I misunderstand. I'm not comparing people's actions with terrorists. I'm
simply saying I'm simply saying the desire of those terrorists is to do something.
The only way to stop them. Ultimately is to defeat them. There are
people here who have a desire to accomplish something, and that is to grow
this government, increase its power, enrich themselves, and live in corruption.
The only way to stop that is to defeat them politically, to defeat them
in the marketplace of ideas, to win this argument, to win these elections,
they have to be soundly defeated. They are a danger, a clear
and pleasure present danger in this nation. Yes, it's time to take a
time out, quick time out, my friends. That being said, I
wanted to do that off the top of there's some things I want to get
to in the news starting next segment. There's a couple of soundbites I want
to get to. Time permitting, of course, and anything we don't get
to you can always go to todt have show dot com see the stack of
stuff. Some interesting stuff out there, my friends. But timeout is in
order to type my friends back here in just a minute. While I'm back,
my friends. The war on truth abounds in so many ways, in
so many places, is waged by so many. I will say, some
I think are genuinely just naive or ignorant, but some are actively at war
with truth, and of course they're at war with truth because they want to
push us in a direction of their ideology, which if they were being truthful,
they know that does not correspond with truth and with reality the way that
we're supposed to be living this side of heaven. So anyway, let's talk
here. Here's one example. Well, this is on the View, Yes,
I know the View. This is what is her name, Sarah Haynes.
She's the one that also hosts that show I watch. Sometimes there's some
game shows she's on. Anyway, she is on here. They're talking about
abortion. They're talking about when life begins. She's trying to draw analogies to
explain, to explain how there are Well, she wants to basically say,
if you want to follow, if you're a Christian and you cite God's will
because of life being formed a conception, then you have to I guess,
not take care of people, not give them medication as they end, as
they reach the end of life, which of course is completly illogical, but
nonetheless that's what we've come to expect when listening to the View, and right
or wrong, I mean, people listen to this garbage. So I want
to play it. I want to play this, I want to talk about
this. This is a couple of them will be chiming in here, but
the vast majority of this is going to come from Sarah Haynes as she talks
here about this issue of abortion, the beginning of life, and how that
and her messed up perception of reality relates to one another. Here it is
well in this example, This example should be one of the easy ones,
because this actually also risked her future fertility, and she wants to grow her
family more, and of course the baby is going to pass all those things.
But it's also not a universal truth when life begins. One example is
they're Jewish women suing in Kentucky because according to Jewish law, a fetus is
regarded as part of a mother's body until it begins to leave the womb.
People aren't doing this late, like this is not something where they're sitting around
engaging in this. Only one percent of abortions occur after twenty weeks. Ninety
three percent occur in the first trimester. And I tend to think when people
say, well, it's God's will, it's a miracle, it's life.
If it's God's will. On the way in, it should be God's will.
On the way out too. That brings into question are you taking heart
attack medication? Are you treating your cancer? Are you dying when you said
you should? Because if we're going to argue about life in, let's be
honest about life out. Don't go to the hospital if you're hurting because it
was God's will. Well, like, I don't like the inconsistencies and the
hypocrisy when people weaponize religion on this, and that's why we shouldn't be in
a theocracy question. The Party in many respects is sort of leaning on the
evangelicals for this argument. And I'm myself am Catholic. I have mentioned many
times on pro life. I've received a lot of hate mail for it.
That's my personal position, But there has to be a separation between Well,
I want to briefly so, there's lots of cans of worms. They opened
up there talking about theocracy, which of course is not if anybody's talking about
theocracy. It was Sarah Haynes there. What does it matter? What does
it matter what a particular religion's teaching is on when and she excited Jewish law,
which I don't even know if that's accurate. But nonetheless, what does
that have to do. That's actually that would actually be theocratic is if we
took any religions teaching and said, let's just automatically implement that. Know,
the issue, Sarah, the issue women on the view if you truly want
to understand this. And by the way they were talking about, they were
talking about a woman who was denied an abortion whose unborn child had a fatal
condition or a condition that was going to take the child's life. And so
that's the particular example that they were talking about there, and Sarah Hanes,
Sarah Hanes starts talking about confusion on the beginning of life. No, there's
no confusion, my friends, on when life begins. There just isn't.
Even in the example she cited. Even in that example, you know,
the word fetus means small child, small person, tiny person, And so
the whole argument is like, oh, it's not it's not a baby,
it's a fetus. Okay, so we're going to what is that Latin?
I think you go to the Latin and it's like saying, you know,
we're not gonna say it's a person in English, We'll just say it in
Latin or some other language, and no one will be the wiser, and
suddenly we make it seem like they're two different things. No, this it
is completely human. It is completely scientific. There is no ambiguity. This
is not complicated. This is only complicated for those who do not want to
accept that life begins at conception. Now I understand. I recognize that life
is not fully developed at conception. I understand that the egg and sperm cell
coming together, and of course there's a flash of light. Science has discovered
this. Science pro science here, my friends, we're all about science here
on this program. There's an explosion of light. The new life that was
formed from a living cell from the mother, a living cell from the father,
begins to replicate cellularly, begins to grow and develop, begins to take
that genetic code and start building a baby. That's what it does. And
we're supposed to pretend that that's not a life. I fully recognize that that
life is absolutely dependent upon the mother. Of course, I also have enough
sense to know that the baby wants the baby's born, that the life is
completely dependent upon somebody, usually the mother, usually the father, usually nurses,
usually somebody somebody's caring for the baby. I mean again, I would
say, what does that have to do with anything. It's it's as though
we're doing everything in our power when talking about this issue. And I get
it, I understand, I understand what's really at play here, And of
course they'll cite these extreme examples, which I'll admit sometimes are complicated. I
do. I understand it's absolutely complicated and just rife with just all sorts of
bad stuff when people are raped and things like it's just it's awful stuff.
I fully admit that. But as they even said, the vast, vast
majority my friends of abortions are simple decisions to engage in some form of birth
control after having conceived the child. That is the truth. I'm talking massive
amounts, massive amounts of it's overwhelming. It's in the ninety percents, that's
the ninety, well into the ninety percent of how many people, how many
people use abortion or think of abortion as a form of birth control. And
this has become, unfortunately, unfortunately, a pillar of the modern left,
a pillar of the modern left, arguing, screaming, screaming things that aren't
even true. My body, my choice. Of course, I agree with
that stept Forth in this case, is not your body. It's inside of
your body that complicates it. I fully recognize that, but is not your
body. It is the body of another human being. Well, that other
human being isn't fully developed to that other human being isn't whatever completely aware of
life. Well, of course, they don't know everything that we know.
Heck, my friends, a six month old doesn't know what a two year
old knows. A two year old doesn't know what a five year old knows,
a five year old doesn't know what a ten year old knows. And
these arguments are all arguments of degree. It is absolutely scientific. I don't
even need to mention my faith to point out that that is an unborn child.
I don't have to mention it. Now. I will say that my
faith requires that I acknowledge that my faith requires that I protect human life.
But so does common sense and logic and reason and just general decency. And
so this, my friends, there the deception and the deceit that is required
to continue to push some of these ridiculous arguments is massive. Again, there
are legitimate things we could argue about when it comes to abortion, but when
life begins is simply not one of them. If they were being truly legitimately
sincere. The the the argument should revolve around whether or not at what point
someone are we going to extend all rights to all humans at any stage.
Right If they want to say that they don't think someone before this stage should
have a right, I'm not agreeing with that, by the way, I'm
just saying that's the only way that they at least have some way of arguing
this. To say it's not a human being or not alive is not honest.
And then, of course, comparing this, which we'll get to that
out. I'm along this segment, but comparing this to taking care of someone
in the later stages of life who may have developed heart problems or cancer or
whatever is just intellectually dishonest to the nth degree. Time out in order my
friend sits eight back here in just a minute. Welcome back to my friends.
It pays to be prepared. Pays to be prepared. It pays to
be prepared. If you're going to talk about an issue with a friend,
it pays to be informed. It pays to be prepared. If you're going
to try to make a difference in your community, it pays to be prepared.
Preparation is key. Preparation is wise, and my friends, it is
wise to have some preparation in mind to take some steps in the event of
some sort of a natural disaster, some sort of a power outage, God
forbid, a food shortage, supply chain problem, whatever the case may be.
It pays. It's wise. It's smart to just have You don't have
to prepare for twenty years of cataclysmic events. That's really not even well,
very difficult to do, let's say that. But you need to be prepared.
It's just wise. What we've seen these past few years, what we're
dealing with, things that are on the horizon. You get it. So
why don't you take this opportunity to go to four patriots dot com the number
four Patriots with an S and check out their three month foods apply. These
three month food supply options include breakfast, lunch, and dinner options. They
last for twenty five twenty five years, quarter of a century. For any
Bernie Sanders supporter who's tuned in here, I'm just having fun. Take it
easy. They come in stackable storage totes, and you can have what you
need in the event of some sort of a problem, which could again range
from a power outage and natural disaster, something much longer, something much maybe
worse, something involving. I'm not a fearmonger, but it's just wise something
that maybe impacts the power grid or another pandemic or fill in the blank,
I don't know. For patriots dot com, that's the number four. Patriots
with an s dot com use promo code huff my last name to save ten
percent on your first order for Patriots dot com promo code huff. So before
the break, we were talking about the view, talking about this issue of
abortion, argue about when when life begins, and then Sarah Haynes actually said
that if you're going to be someone who wants to talk about the you know,
God's will as a Christian or some other religious person, if you want
to say that, hey, God's involved on the front side of the beginning
of life, then you also, she says, you can't do anything to
interfere with the end of life. That is beyond intellectually dishonest. That is
beyond intellectually dishonest. No one is ever she's arguing for the termination, the
termination of a human being, of that person's life in the womb. That's
what she's arguing for and so because someone says you can't terminate a child's life
in the womb, she says, well, to be consistent, then you
can't give someone who's at the end of their life cancer treatment because that's God's
will as well. Well, let me ask you this, Sarah, should
we eat? Should we eat according to your logic, according to what your
expertise is here pertaining to the will of God? Should we eat? I
remember, as a young man I used to read book. There was a
book of quotes that I read, and I don't know where I've put this
thing, but it was one of my dearest possessions of a young fella.
And I remember, I remember there's a quote, and I'm going to butcher
it a little bit, but you're going to get the gist of it.
The quote said something along the lines of this, he who wants milk should
not sit in the middle of the pasture expecting the cow to back up into
him. And there is so much truth to that. You know, we
are if you really want to understand. I mean, she's opening up this
discussion of religion, of our relationship to God, God's relationship to us.
Since she's opened it, I'll go ahead and chime in on what on really
what God has has told us. The Bible says that we're His workmanship and
we're created to do good works basically alongside him. We are we are,
we are to commune with and participate with God. This idea that says,
Okay, God started it, Now you just sit back and do nothing and
just die. I guess if you hit your finger with the hammer, don't
take a leave or a tail and r or anything like that. No,
no, no, you just got to suffer because that was the will of
God. How how intentionally stupid is that? I mean, if you have
a means to help yourself, that doesn't mean you don't have those means.
She's trying to compare the intentional taking of an unborn of the life of an
unborn child to treating someone who's dying to try to extend their life to stop
the disease. Is she arguing that disease is a good thing? Is she
arguing? Is she arguing that disease is sent by God directly to inflict anyone
that has it? Is that? What I mean, none of this makes
any sense to me? And then the truth be told, it doesn't make
any sense to her either, because the fact remains. And the older I
get and the more I listen to this nonsense, the more I come to
the realization and the belief that ultimately what causes people to not want anything to
do with a faith in God is because they want to live a life that
they know is contrary to what that God expects. I believe. I'm not
saying there's no confusion, there's no legitimate questions, but I think at its
core, at its core, and there's some Christian apologists who say some of
these things, and I'm gonna take a break one of them, Frank Turik.
I think he asks, if Christianity was true, would you be a
Christian? He asked that to people, And if they say no, then
that's and I think that's the truth that a lot of these folks. And
again it's your Choice's the individual's choice. I'm not saying anything to that.
I'm just saying, don't distort it. Just just state the realities, state
the truth, State the facts as to what you really mean. Don't try
to play this game of make believe moral equivalencies. It is not anywhere remotely
close in any sense whatsoever to compare treating someone with cancer to terminating the life
of an unborn child. That is either the stupidest thing I've ever heard,
or that's someone who's being intentionally deceitful to try to confuse and deceive people,
or to give people an excuse right to give people an excuse for not actually
embracing the truth, because truth is tough sometimes truth, folks, The truth
is, if we want to get right down to brass tacks, the truth
is that all of us are broken. The truth is that. That's why
I think so many people reject the Gospel is because it says, hey,
something's wrong with you. For in something's wrong with me. It's called sin,
and we all suffer with it, suffer from it. Sometimes we suffer.
Sometimes the things we suffer not because of our own mistakes. Some of
it's because of the brokenness that's been created by everybody else's mistakes. It's not
easy to deal with truth sometimes, but it is best. What's the other
option, living in denial, living in lies, using a government and the
seven pillars of propaganda to deceive people into believing your delusional worldview so that you
can exist in a way, or you try to exist in a way where
you're not faced with the reality twenty four hours a day, seven days a
week, three hundred and sixty five days a where the year that you are
living a delusional life. I, my friends, are some people that think
that that is the solution. I'm telling you, it motivates people in ways
that I think those of us who really try to embrace and seek truth do
not understand, do not fully comprehend. They have run from it so far.
They don't want anything to do with it. They want their way,
they want their lifestyle, they want their choices without any of the other ramifications,
without any guilt, without any anything else. That's how you get abortion
as a form of birth control. Timeouts in order the long wind that hear
this segment, my friends, sits back in a minute. Welcome back,
my friends. I don't have a lot of time to go into the other
examples I had, but they are in the stack of stuff totefshow dot com.
Just go to the stack of stuff you will find let's see, you'll
find an article in there about al Gore blaming the mental health crisis going on
around the world. On of course, you know the answer to this climate
change. Climate change is contributing to the mental health crisis. We have Adele
out there saying that she obviously has success because she's white, even though there's
a lot of people who excel in her industry who aren't white. But since
when does that sort of thing matter to those who do not want to embrace
truth and reality. We got Mitt Romney out there who says he would not
well, he thinks the Biden son hunter has been involved with some bad things,
but he would not vote to start an impeachment inquiry. It's not very
shocking. And I had another one here as well. I'm gonna have to
take a break. You can see it at the Stack stuff Todd Toughshow dot
com. Gotta take a time out though, my friends, back in a
minute. All right, my friends, I found the other article. You're
gonna love this. It's in the stack of stuff. Doctor Fauci being interviewed.
I don't know what was he interviewed on. It doesn't matter, it's
all the same. He was being interviewed and was asked about his faith.
He said he no longer attends church. He says he identifies as Catholic,
but he doesn't go to Catholic church anymore. He was ray baptized as a
baby, a child, he was confirmed, got married in the church,
he says, but he doesn't need to go anymore because his personal ethics,
his personal ethics are enough. How did he say this. I think my
own personal ethics on life are I think enough to keep me going on the
right path. And I think that there are enough negative aspects about the organizational
church that you're very well aware of. There he is. Doctor Fauci does
apparently have a God complex. But anyway, I've got to go. My
friends, have a great day. We will see tomorrow. SDG