Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Thursday, the eleventh of July. You're
of our Lord twenty twenty four. Well, we have some very interesting stories
today. It's amazing how our society is falling apart, especially when it comes
to air travel. The DEI is really having an effect, and we better
pay attention because it's spreading to all aspects of our society. Fortunately, we've
had some good moves to distance people from these kinds of mandates coming from Newsom.
You know, he's going to add twenty thousand dollars to the price of
a car. It was his plan and Virginia was in lockstep with it.
But they're going to move away from that. But we're also going to talk
about George Clooney making a very interesting move and is it connected to the Obamas.
It is kind of interesting to watch this pageant play out. But we're
going to begin with the news today, so we'll be right back. Stay
with us. Well, let me begin with a correction and this was a
point out to me by listener, and I've been calling Lawrence o'donald, Chris
O'Donnell. Well, well, you know, I don't know who these people
are, right Frankly, I've only paid attention to this guy. I'm not
sure, but I think he's on MSNBC. I've only paid attention to him
when he's done something stupid like he did this week, or when in the
past he did the stop the hammering thing. So I won't be hammering on
his Maybe I'll just refer to him as Odonell. But I would just point
out we all make mistakes, Steve, when you're sending this to me,
you spelled his last name in the top as O'Donnell with two ms, so
we all make mistakes. It's understandable. These are not very important. None
of these people are unless they do something like say, well, we should
have the entire staff supporting Biden when he's in a debate, because you can't
expect him to know anything. Nearly ten billion passwords have been leaked, and
what may be the biggest of these data sets ever. I mean they've leaked,
they've hacked everything. This is one of the reasons why we're going to
have Tony on I know that he's not as skeptical of cryptocurrency as I am,
and I don't wish them ill. I mean, fine, go ahead
and do it, if you want to do it, that's fine. I
just am concerned about anything that's online because it opens you up to all of
the clever thieves in the world. And there's a lot of really clever people
out there that are focused on how they can rip you off, and so
they can watch to see what you're doing, and they can steal passwords.
They've stolen they've stolen the hacking saw where from the CIA NSA Vault seven that
they used to disguise themselves look like other countries. They've gotten Pentagon data,
and they've hacked into the various financial rating companies over and over again so they
can get the most sensitive data, whether it's from a corporation, where there's
from a government. Don't know where this came from, but they called it
leaked. Actually it was hacked then leaked, and it was put up on
a online hacking form. They just put it out there for everybody to take
a look at it. Ten billion passwords, that's more than we got,
more than we have people on this earth, and of course a lot of
people and a lot of poor countries don't have passwords. That means that many
of us have multiple passwords, and you should have multiple passwords. Don't use
the same password for every site that you go to, use a different one
in case that site gets hacked. But the bottom line telling people you need
to use strong passwords for each of these accounts, well, that wasn't the
issue here. There might have been a strong password that was needed for the
people that got hacked, but it was probably something that they found going in
a back door, and these back doors are always set up there. Now,
the lesson to come away from with this is, first of all,
remember to regularly change your password, especially since if it's ten billion passwords,
they probably got all of our passwords out there to pretty much everything. They
just have to have the time to go through it. So make sure you
change your passwords. We have, as we're talking about surveillance, an interesting
story from Breitbart and they say the rolling the self driving cars are rolling surveillance
devices and they're China, and it's a concern if they're Chinese. They don't
talk about the concern that you should have from these billing surveillance devices if it's
made by an American company or if it's snitching about you to the government here
in America, which is really kind of strange. This whole article is about
how we have to hide this stuff from China. China is creating these self
driving cars, using all the cameras and everything else to do surveillance. It's
like they were telling during the Trump administration, Oh, we got to get
rid of Huawei, They're going to use five G to surveil on everything.
When they have five G, they'll be able to get everything about everybody.
And it's like, well, that means that you will too. The American
government will be able to do that. And what was really amazing to me
was that the mainstream media would tell people that your concerns about five G being
used for surveillance, as well as your health concerns about five G, they
were all unfounded. They were all a conspiracy theory. Well, there's been
a lot of research about the health stuff, and of course the government doesn't
want to do any research about that, roll it out no time. So
that's real. And then as far as the conspiracy theory that it's going to
be used to surveil you, that was being talked about at the same time
as a concern about China. Oh, we should never worry about the American
government surveilling us. Are you kidding me? I'd much rather have the Chinese
government surveiling me than the American government, for obvious reasons. They're closer to
you. The Chinese aren't going to send a SWAT team to your house under
some presumed violation, but the American government might. And so it's not just
the self driving cars either. They're so heavily laden with tech as well as
any car that has some kind of online connection can constantly spy on you.
Report that information. They can report it to the local police in terms of
how you drive, to your insurance company, to the government, about where
you're going. Everything is there, And yet wright part makes it all about
the Chinese. That's the only thing you should be concerned about as Chinese companies,
that's their autonomous vehicles on American roads. Concerns are growing about the vast
amount of data these quote rolling surveillance devices are collecting and the potential national security
implications. Yeah, the problem is is that our national security state doesn't care
about your security, doesn't care about your safety, doesn't care about your privacy.
It cares about their security and they keep everything from us while they demand
to know everything about us. Fortune magazine reports that in recent years, Chinese
owned companies have been quietly testing their self driving cars in American roads, particularly
in California. These vehicles, equipped with advanced cameras, sensors, mapping technology,
are capable of collecting massive amounts of data about their surroundings, including detailed
video footage and precise geospatial information. Never talk about geospatial intelligence, right,
these people will not talk about that. Why is that fastest growing part of
the intelligence community for the last twenty five years and it's where James Clapper rose
through the ranks and so forth. But no, this is only a problem
if China does it, because you know, if James Clapper does it,
it wasn't an intentional, Senator, not intentionally. We're not spying an Americans
intentional. Oh you, that's very intentional. Some Chinese self driving car companies
appear to store US data in China. This leaves the data accessible to the
Chinese government. And of course these large corporations that work hand in glove with
the government and have contracts with them, would never turn over your information to
the American government. Would they despite these concerns, there's a surprising lack of
scrutiny and regulation. They're going to have more regulation, but not of the
American government, not of the American companies. As I said at the top
of the hour, it is a good thing that Virginia was one of many
states that had linked themselves to California's arbitrary and excessive regulations about cars, and
they have now broken that link. That link was put in, by the
way, by Ralph Nolviam, the ku Klux Klan guy, the doctor who
explained to people, how, yeah, you could just you know, if
a baby survives the abortion, you just leave it over on the table,
let it die. Call about comfort kea, Yeah, that's right. Well,
Virginia has now decoupled from California's mandate requiring all new vehicles sold in Virginia
to be electric or plug in hybrid vehicles by twenty thirty five. This regulation
had been on the sales of new gas, diesel and traditional hybrid vehicles,
was put out by the California Air Resources Board CARB. It would have taken
effect as soon as next year, when thirty five percent of all model year
twenty twenty six cars sold would be required to meet California's definition of zero emission,
So beginning next year with the twenty twenty six model, because they'd leap
frog it by one year, they'd have to have thirty five percent of them,
but my twenty thirty five it would have to be one hundred percent.
This all stems from a twenty twenty one bill champion by then Governor Nolham and
his allies and the California Assembly directing the Virginia Air Pollution Control Board to adopt
regulations tying Virginia law to California's vehicle emission standards. And I've said many times
that the fight is local, isn't it. THEPA is trying to shut down
power plants with the emissions. They are trying to shut down farm They're trying
to shut down cars and all the rest of this stuff. But you can
make it even worse by doing what California is doing. They're moving even faster
and harder than the federal government is doing. Or you can say no thanks,
and we're going to nullify that. The previous administration Richmond put Virginia vehicle
policy in the hands of California. And what did Newsom do with it again.
This is coming back to Newsom, the guy that a lot of these
people are having the Civil War and the Democrat Party, a lot of them
want to put him on the ticket and the one or two spot. Under
the new California policy, selling any new gas, diesel, flex fuel,
or traditional hybrid cars and trucks would be unlawful and subject to severe penalties.
It would be devastating and will be devastating for drivers or small businesses. It'll
damage US national security. Consumers will be paying in these states where it remains.
But it's not going to happen now in Virginia unless they put a Democrat
government and he'll just do what northerm did. Put them back on that standard
again. But they'll have higher costs for new and used cars. Any compliance
penalties leveled on levied on automakers, and they go up to twenty thousand dollars
per vehicle would also be passed on to Virginia consumers. That's newsome. That's
Newsome. Will you talk about somebody that is really dangerous? And of course
when you look at the bench of the Democrats, it's hard to rank them
as one being better than the other, they're all pretty bad staying on cars
here for a moment. Volkswagen's shares stock prices have dropped as there's talk that
they're going to close a plant in Brussels. This will be the first time
they've closed a plant since nineteen eighty eight when they closed a plant in Pennsylvania.
This one in Brussels was manufacturing an electric AUTI. About three thousand people
lose their jobs. And when you look at what is happening to Volkswagen,
they're really kind of getting an evy whiplash, aren't they. First of all,
they were the ones that took it on the chin really hard. The
EPA claimed that they had cheated on their mission scandals. As I talked about
this many times with Eric Peters of Eric Peters autos dot com. We talked
about this years and years ago when it was happening. Nobody was harmed and
it was a really harmless thing. They said, no, you cheated on
your missions standards. So we're going to hit you with four billion with a
b four billion dollar fine, and they brought criminal charges against the executives and
all the rest of this stuff to make an example out of them. Why
well, Volkswagen had come up with a very very efficient diesel and they had
to shut down diesel. And Volkswagen got the message and they became one of
the biggest advocates of electric cars. And now they're getting the EV whiplash.
Four billion dollars, you better start making electric cars. So let's started making
electric cars and now they're going to have to drop shut down a factory.
It could lead to a loss of nearly three billion dollars seven billion dollars because
of political bureaucratic tyranny from the US government against the corporations, the German corporation.
But still this is a good example of what the federal bureaucracy costs us,
and it's going to cost us everything if we don't stop it. Analysts
have labeled AUTI as Volkswagen's biggest problem because they have an aging design of cars
that they haven't updated in a number of years. So they decided that they
would put out the upfront and have them be a leader in this move to
evs. And now nobody wants the EV and the question is is that going
to happen? Is the EV bubble, the EV jumping the shark? Is
that going to happen with artificial intelligence. I talked about this earlier this week,
and here's yet another analyst saying the same thing. So he's very concerned
that this fascination with that the stock market has with artificial intelligence and pumping so
much money into just a few companies. He believes it's going to be a
massive bubble. And of course the stock market hasn't really done that well except
for the AI connected companies. So AI is effectively useless. It's created a
fake it till you make it bubble that could end in disaster. James Ferguson,
and founding partner of the UK based macroeconomic research firm macro Strategy Partnership,
says that the AI exuberance has created a concentrated market bubble reminiscent of the dot
com era, or you say error r These historically end badly, he said.
Anybody who's of a certain age has seen this whole thing happen before.
He said, AI still remains I would argue, completely unproven, and I
fake it till you make it work in Silicon Valley, But for the rest
of us, I think once bitten twice shy may be more appropriate for AI.
Oh it actually rhymes. If AI cannot be trusted, then AI is
effectively, in my mind, useless. In other words, if it's going
to hallucinate about things, and that's the issue, wait until the effect of
cannibalism is seen and it's been talked about. It's been documented by a couple
of a couple of researchers at different places have come up with the same result
that as AI continues to generate more and more content on the Internet, they
said that as AI starts consuming AI content rather than consuming human content, it
starts to get radically dumber. So the hallucination is going to get even worse,
far worse, when it starts consuming synthetic AI data rather than human data.
It's very equivalent to what happens with cannibalism. When people start eating other
people, they wind up with things like mad cow disease. It was just
an article on drug yesterday about a remote tribe and they would they engaged in
cannibalism until very recently, just a couple of decades ago. What they got
rather than mad cow disease as they went blind and finally the people convinced them
to stop eating their dead relatives. Whenever somebody would die, they would eat
that person, and so they got them to stop doing that. But that's
what artificial intelligence is doing. Once it starts eating itself, eating its own
data, cannibalizing it, things are going to go downhill very rapidly. I
look forward to that day because the killer app for artificial intelligence is what I
spent time on yesterday, and that is surveillance, assassination. All of these
dystopian Orwellian tyrannical things that they have come up with, that's what it's used
for. So one of the reasons why the military has been developing this and
it's going to continue. That's the one thing I think that these people who
are looking at the AI being a bubble, maybe they're not factoring in the
fact that the government, which has funded this thing from the very beginning,
wants to continue to fund it because it becomes this automated Stasi, it becomes
using these swarms like I was talking about, or just using individual drones.
They can use them for assassination, use it for war. It's going to
be very important for that. Unfortunately, So forget in video charging more and
more and more for its chips, you also have to pay more and more
and more to run those chips on your servers. Therefore, you end up
with something that is very expensive and has yet to prove anywhere really outside some
narrow applications that it is actually paying for itself. Well, that's the problem.
It's not really there to help us. It's there to be weaponized against
us. But they may have a great app This is artificial intelligence. Scientists
are developing tools to decode what your dog's barks mean. Hey, look he's
train speak. Good that dog just say hither. Oh yes, my dog,
I just met you and I love you. Yeah, picks ours up.
Now they finally make that come true, and I got you know,
we always have this predictive programming. Well, finally it's going to be something
that's not all willing. Right. Well, the issue is, as many
people point out the comments of this story, Uh, anybody that's owned a
dog knows that the communication is everybody as much body language as it is barking.
They wag more and bark less sometimes, and so a few times you
get no warning when they throw up at two am, and they won't explain
it to you, even with an AI chip what they ate. But you
know they're always asking for bacon. You know that, so you don't have
to ask them why they want to eat. They want to gather more information
from the dog's vocalizations, such as it's age, it's breed, it's sex.
So I guess you know. AI can speak Cantonese. Will it be
speaking Pekinese? I don't know anytime soon. This is a good example of
the silliness of this, and this is being reported by the New York Post.
Yeah, developing AI to analyze vocal vocalizations and animals is hindered by the
lack of publicly available data. Yet they don't have anything to copy. That
makes it a real problem for AI when they don't have anything to copy out
there. Well, from dog whistles to whistleblowers. We have a whistleblower saying
that the FBI is abusing security clearance processes to purge out conservative agents. Yeah,
we didn't know. Did you know that the FBI is actually politicized?
Wow? Not a news story, but just some more whistleblowers. We've known
this for a long time. I've interviewed Steve Friends, kind of a dog
bites man story. I'm just surprised there's any conservative agents left to purge.
That's right, yeah, exactly exactly. This might have been the last one
out the door. He's gonna talk to the press about it. The Security
Division of the FBI is abusing security clearance approval to oust agents believed to be
politically conservative, according to a whistleblower complaint received by The New York Post.
They reported that the unidentified whistleblower alleges that the nation's top law enforcement agency.
Who would that be? Are they talking about the FBI? Oh? Yeah,
I guess they are suspends or evokes clearances of agents on the basis of
their political affiliations or their lack of a Trump shot an MRA vaccine. How
about that? Why is that so important? Well? I think the vaccine
is a test. I think the vaccine is a test. Is a test
of your discernment. If you have no discernment, that's even better. But
if you do have discernment, are you servile? Will you do something that
you know is not in your best interest that may inflict self harm? Will
you do that in order to keep your job? If an FBI employee,
if it's a certain profile as a political conservative, they're viewed as security concerns
and unworthy to work at the FBI, says a whistleblower. The outcomes of
clearance investigations were often predetermined by the division's acting Deputy Assistant director and the acting
Section chief responsible for security clearance investigations. They often overrule the line staff.
This is coming from above from political appointees because the FBI has been completely politicized,
and has been from its inception. It's just that it's so politicized they
don't even care anymore, so they overrule the line staff. They even dictated
the wording of documents and the clearance process. What you're going to say about
somebody, that's pretty amazing unrumbled DGA, says David. Imagine these lunatics on
the left claiming that their dog is LGBT. That's right. Well, actually
we add some what's it the BBC I think did some kind of a documentary
talking about homosexuality and nature or something. It's there. They'll never never stop.
The other of them already claim their dogs are vegan. That's right,
that's right. Yeah, nothing too insane for these people. They are utterly
detached from reality that they don't live on the same planet. No, no,
they don't. I didn't have it down here to talk. But it
made me think when you're talking about the people who think that their dogs are
vegan, the sad story of oh, what's the guy's name? The played
Batman dating Jennifer Lopez. I don't keep up with Hollywood anymore anyway, his
daughters one of them, and it's made it a round of a lot of
different Yeah, aflic I, flic I have like, didn't he sell insurance
or something somewhere? Ben affleck uh uh. His daughters are like college,
just getting out of high school and going to college. And one of them
is will not take the mask off. Now she has become ocd about this
mask. Won't take it off, and she went down and lectured La City
council or something wanting mask mandates back. So and then the other one,
the other daughter said transitioned to a male at the funeral of her grandfather because
it was all about her. You know, I mean the insanity in Hollywood
that comes out of this. I mean again, you know, don't envy
people because they are beautiful or rich or famous or whatever. Those are snares.
You know, they take people who do have talent, and uh,
it just enslaves them to this insanity and even worse for their family. Well,
getting back to the FBI, the FBI has used the clearance process as
a means to force employees out of the FBI by inflicting severe financial distress,
suspending their clearance, suspending them from duty without pay, requiring them to permission
to take any other job while stuck in this unpaid limbo, and delaying their
final clearance adjudication indefinitely even years. Same stuff they're doing to the military.
You know, who wants to work for the federal government anymore after the way
they treat people, It truly is amazing. And of course the people are
going to be left behind after they've purged everybody out of the FBI and the
military that have any self respect or you know. And it's not even conservative.
I want to look at this. The Conservatives are out there talking about
how harmful the vaccine is, and yet they support the father of the vaccine.
And when you look that, this is all coming out again at the
House Judiciary Committee run by Jim Jordan, who will continue to vote for bills
to build a give massive amounts of money to the FBI to build a brand
new headquarters and all the rest is they keep funding them and giving them record
amounts of money, and at the same time they hold these hearings and talk
about how horrible this agency is, but they never even restrict the amount of
money they give them. Well, we're gonna take a quick break, and
when we come back, we're going to talk more about DEI. I saw
a great acronym explanation for what DEI stands for. It doesn't stand for diversity,
equity and inclusivity. It stands for didn't earn it. That's the way
that you need to remember that. That's the best acronym I've seen yet for
DEI. We're gonna take a quick break. We'll be right back. Liberty,
it's your move. And now the David Knight Show, Welcome back.
I'd like to remind people if to like the broadcast, if you're watching live,
if you're not watching live, please like it. Wherever you're watching it,
downloading it. That really does help us to get the word out.
Also, we have coming on tomorrow we have Gerald celenty and if you would
like to get a subscription to his Trends journal, you can save ten percent
off with the code Night. These are very uncertain times. We're going to
be talking to Tony Rtterman of Wise Wolf Goal later today also, David and
I Goal will take you there. But they're very uncertain times, and it's
good to have some wise opinions. And Gerald has been excellent at forecasting trends.
He said, I don't make predictions. I don't do the timing of
it, but we know where the trends are. And so it's an excellent
publication. He does it on a weekly basis. It's a big online magazine.
All the articles are hyperlinked, and so again if you'd like to save
ten percent off of Trends Journal at Trensjournal dot com. I just used the
code night. We're going to get back into DEI a vast didn't earn it.
Bureaucracy is negatively impacting the US military, says a study coming out of
Arizona State University. Well, we all knew that as well, didn't we.
Wait, you mean a military comprised of gay guys and women isn't an
optimal fighting force? I would deem that coming. I would say that if
the priority ties everything to sex, if sex is the preoccupation of their life
and everything revolves around that, I would say that they really aren't focused on
their job. And that's what I would say about all of these people in
all of these different positions that Biden has put them in. You know,
Sam Britton, is he really focused on nuclear wasters? He focused on what
that lady over there is wearing, and can I steal her luggage and get
one of these other dresses that looks really good? I bet she's got some
great stuff in her luggage. It's crazy. It's crazy to make that the
number one thing in your life. It's just as disqualifying as if I don't
know somebody that was addicted to crack cocaine or something. Oh wait, hunter,
I mean these kinds of addictions are disqualifying. And as they focused on
the DEI this has been a long time coming. They started rolling this stuff
out, talking about unconscious bias that oh, yeah, you're not real.
You don't even realize just how racist you are. But I realized because of
your skin color that you have unconscious bias. And then intersectionality, where they
would look at immutable characteristics of people. As a matter of fact, you
know what your sex is or your gender because of the same thing, and
you know, they would look at that, and they would look at your
skin color and all these other things, and of course your sexual orientation,
and these things could be positive or negative. And so they would check these
boxes and then they would rank people by how many of the quote unquote good
boxes were checked and how many of the bad boxes. That was intersectionality,
Arizona State, says, the massive DEI bureaucracy, it's training, its pseudo
scientific assessments are at best distractions that absorb valuable time and resources at work.
They communicate the opposite of the military ethos, for example, that individual demographic
differences come before team and mission. Well, it's even worse than that,
because it's about people who didn't earn it. It's about removing merit, the
idea of merit out of our society. Equal opportunity is a good thing.
Everybody. We should have equal opportunity. But that's not what they're talking about.
They're talking about equity, and it's a very different thing. Equity means
that they're going to force results based on their intersectionality and these other metrics,
but not based on people's performance. And that's why the wheels are literally coming
off of everything in our society. Now, they said at Arizona State's report,
the founders of our nation understood and feared a politicized military. Well,
actually they feared a standing army. Now standing army will become politicized, that's
the key. But a permanent standing army is the problem. History has shown
them that a politicized army easily becomes a tool of tyranny. The armed forces
of the US have proudly upheld this long tradition of separating mission from politics,
I said, But the surest way to eliminate the concerning trends that we have
identified and the growth of race and sex based scapegoating and stereotyping in the US
military, it's to all together end the DEI bureaucracy. There. However,
until such a time as the executive didn't happen with Trump, or the legislative
branches didn't happen with Republican majorities under any of these speakers, including the one
that's there right now, Machiavellian Mike. So until such a time as these
Republicans, because the Democrats love this stuff, do anything about it, choose
to end it, we are going to have to advocate for change, they
said, well, just to give you an idea of how insane this is.
In Germany, they just had a swat team, multiple swat teams do
multiple raids at homes of individuals because they said they had made misogynistic comments on
social media, comments that were critical of women in general, I guess,
but they rated them with swat teams and we got a clip of one of
those raids. There. The meaning is now in order, we all know
there's girls good a party that day and not one of us wasn't. Right
now, what do you say if we form a loop club and call it
the Heeman Warders Club, Spot Team, he Man Woman Haters Club. Well,
we've got to get these guys right now. Now we go from little
rascals to Brazil. That's where you are here right now. This is the
society we're talking about. Going from a joke about the he Man Woman Haters
Club to and I'll make a joke about that. Don't talk about the he
Man Woman Woman Haters Club on social media. You'll get rated by the Nazis
that are still in Germany. Evidently, isn't that insane? And yet we
look at the effects of did not earn it, didn't earn it. We
have this just as last week. Here's a recap of just as last week.
We've had a going seven fifty seven losing its wheels as it takes off,
another one a boarding takeoff due to a tire failure. And then we
had a near miss in Syracuse. And that's just in one week now.
The Boeing stuff. The CEO made it very clear that his number one mission,
his top priority, was DEI didn't earn it. And maybe that's because
Boeing is a military contractor. But the wheels are literally coming off because merit
doesn't matter. But then when you look at the air traffic control, here's
why it happened with the I call it a near hit. I don't know
why people say a near miss. It seems like the wrong way. Look,
well, they nearly missed. Oh you mean they hit? Now,
this is really kind of I think it's better described as a near hit.
You know, there's certain things like that. When when my daughter was learning
English, she'd you know, grown up in China, and instead of saying
my nose is dripping, she'd say my nose is dropping. It's like,
okay, well that kind of makes sense, you know, so you have
these these different things, A near hit, near miss, who knows,
But there's what happened in Syracuse, and it was wait before we get to
that, Well, yeah, we'll show that first. Uh, this is
what happened up in Syracuse. This is somebody has footage. Look at that
they hit each other but they didn't fortunately, And they zoomed in on that.
Somebody has this going in their car. Look at that. It's amazing,
amazing how close they got. And then they did a special report about
it as well, it is one more time. Well, I guess it
doesn't go into that report. Maybe I gave you the wrong one. Yeah,
that's just repeating here. There was an explanation and a computer animation that
was an eclipment. I think I'll put the wrong one in there. But
it's not even that. It's just getting on a plane that's a big issue.
Take a look at what is happening now with TSA adamant and insisting that
they're going to get a face scan. You know, it was all voluntary
and we'll just make it go quicker for you. It'd be great, so
you can volunteer to get a face scan. Now they're trying to browbeat people
into getting it at all times. And this woman has an organization where she
tells people how to opt out of this and what you can do if you've
got a TSA agent who is going to try to force you to do this
all she's got a mask on if you go through yeah to take it.
Says that I don't have to supposed to right there, I'm I going to
talk to somebody. I know the procedure if you want me to talk to
me, or I want to help me opting out of viomental theft and facial
recognition tech at the US border with a US passport entering from a different country
into the US. For those of you who don't know, my name is
y Khong. I do anti oppression and liberatory work, but also I do
tech justice work, and I talk a lot about consent and opting out of
biometric theft and facial recognition tech. Now I have global entry, but this
applies also if you just have regular re entry into the United States as a
US passport holder. In this video, I encountered an agent who flat out
lied and said, you have global entry, you have to have your photo
taken. That is not true in past videos, I've talked about how a
lot of the times agents will make it difficult. This is one of the
taxes they use, is they will just lie. Now at this link,
I've created a downloadable wallet card that you can print out and carry with you
to the airport that has all of the policies of not only CBP but also
TSA. And in this case, the CBP regulations were printed and in a
poster format right in front of that agent's desk. So while he was lying
to me, I said, actually, no, it says right here that
I don't need to take a photo, and I had to keep going a
little bit. You can hear that to wish, he replied, and I
quote Sweet Jesus. And then once you realize that I knew my rights,
he went along with what he was supposed to do with the script, which
is they have to get a reason about why you want to opt out,
and I just try to tell them as little as possible, because you shouldn't
have to tell them more than you want to. So again, what does
this tell me? It tells me that we should try to opt out as
much as possible, because they are making it intentionally difficult for us not to
the more of us that opt out as many times as possible, we alert
them and let them know that we are not going to just accept biometric theft.
So as always, then when you can opt out, opt out,
opt out, right, Yeah, very amazing. And so again she comes
into the airport, she's got to ask on using it, not because she's
afraid of the Germans, because she doesn't like the German tactics here the Stasi
police. The website is keep beyond dot com and she's got information there.
But isn't that interesting that he is so adamant that he's got to have her
face scan, telling her that she's got to, and she said, you
know it's not always the case. But right next to him was a poster
saying you don't have to do this. They got very angry, and he
says, well, I have to put down a reason why you're not doing
it. So he knew, he knew he was, he knew that it
was optional, and he says, well, I got to put down reason.
Well, put down because I don't want to. So yeah, I
always say opt out, and quite frankly, I opt out out of the
scanners. I wanted to make it as difficult for them as possible when I
had to fly. I don't have to fly anymore. I mean it would
be good if I went to events and things like that, but I have
decided that I'm going to opt out of the airline industry and its entirety.
I have absolutely no plans to fly ever again. Well except for one song,
bad Corn when this life is over. Flyway to Home, Oh God,
Celestial Shore, fly Away, help me out. One fly Away,
go Glory Fway. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, we
have had George Clooney step into this in a big way. And it's interesting
because Hollywood, like Clooney, like Katzenberg, people are very angry with him.
They said they've been covering for Biden. They've been telling us that there's
not really anything wrong when everybody could see that there was something wrong. And
it was just a few weeks ago that George Clooney was doing a fundraiser.
Here he is this palth there you standing right next to Biden, because you
know, you have to get behind somebody before you can stick a knife in
their back. So there's Biden flanked on either side, George Clooney, Julia
Roberts, and there's Obama. Now Julia Roberts hasn't waited in on this,
but the other two have quite a bit. And as people were saying,
George Clooney is now put out an op ed piece talking about how, yeah,
you know that guy that was there a few weeks ago when we had
that fundraiser and they raised thirty million dollars, thirty million dollars for him.
He says, yeah, that guy that was the same guy that we saw
at the debate, and he really needs to step down. I really love
him. He's a great guy, you know, as Mark Anthony said,
Brutus is an honorable man. Right he stuck the knife in. But yeah,
this is the pals of Joe Biden. As people said, if you
if you want a friend in Washington, get a dog, even if he
doesn't have the collar that speaks in English. You want to get a dog
if you want a friend in Washington. And so he has come out,
as I said, he wrote an op ed piece. And remember again it
was just a few weeks ago. We talked about it, how he had
to be helped off of the stage. Here he is, he doesn't know
to leave. As you see this happening at so many different events, and
so Obama way, he was quite a bit and then he says, Okay,
it's time to go. He's just kind of frozen there on the stage.
He grabs him by the arm leads him off. As we've seen the
Easter Bunny Jill, the Italian Prime minister, and now this is Obama leading
him off, putting his arm around him, helping him to get off the
stage and find his way. Well, they were asked the Press Secretary Jean
Pierre KJP, let's say, asked her what's the matter with him? She
said, that's just a cheap fake. The people are manipulating that they're taking
that clip out of context and everything. Well, no, we can see
what it is now. He says that Biden is the same man at the
debate that he was at that fundraiser, and so now he's admitting it.
And he actually said as part of his op ed piece that he put out,
he said that Joe Biden I was with three weeks ago at the fundraiser
was not the Joe Big Deal Biden of twenty ten. He wasn't even the
Joe Biden of twenty twenty. But he was the same man we all witnessed
at the debate. Wow, you mean it was this Biden now the Obama
part. Okay, so Hollywood, A lot of people in Hollywood, a
lot of these big financial backers, are out there saying, well, you
know, we didn't know any of this stuff, and of course they all
did. And then John Favreau, who is one of the kind of inner
circle of Brock Obama. They call him the Obama Bros. He confirmed what
George Clooney said in his op ed piece about Biden's physical condition and mental condition.
Former Obama advisor John Favreau broke his silence concerning Biden's mental fitness on Tuesday.
Isn't this interesting the Obama connection? I mean, is this kind of
the way they maneuver this stuff so they can get big mic in. There
may be some truth of that. The question, though, is will they
be able to do this, because you know, Biden still has the lovers
of power, whoever it is that is controlling him. But this is what
Favreau said. He said it was not surprising to any of us who were
at the fundraiser. He said, I was there. Clooney was exactly right,
and every single person I talked to at the fundraiser thought the same thing,
except for the people working for Biden, or at least they didn't say
that. And you know, every single person in the Democrat Party and the
American public might think that. But guess what if the people who are part
of this Biden collective don't want to go, it's going to be pretty hard
to get them out of office. I mean, what are they going to
do. They're going to do like a protest in Washington and maybe march through
the Capitol Building. We know how that the video ends. Snowy. John
Favreau, member of the group often referred to as the Obama Bros during his
tenure in the White House, said this during an appearance at CNN. Well,
they have to have a charismatic star to sell all this stuff. They
needed charismatic stars to sell you, Biden, and now they need a charismatic
star that's going to sell you the next step. Somebody put together this video,
which is excellent. So, although I wish I were here with better
news, the fact is that you and I are sitting here today because this
will be your last week of employment. This is not an assessment going to
try not to take this personally, Well, I just had a bad names.
Yeah, he's doing that. That blank's there, that he's got there.
I don't remember the name of that movie. It was a movie that
George Clooney was. He was this person they brought in to fire a lot
of people, right, that's his job. He goes from place to place
when they're having mass layoffs and he brings some people in one by one.
So they masterfully put that through. Well, you know, you might lose
your job if you say something negative about Biden. George stephanopflis who was very
highly connected in the Clinton administration in the White House there and then went to
ABC News and has been there since he left. Since the Clinton White House,
there's reports that he was threatened that if he didn't take back and off
the market, off the cuffery mark about Biden, that he might be fired.
That's pretty amazing. George Stephanoppolis is one of their key people, threatened
with being taken off the air if he didn't clarify his position on Biden's ability
to serve another four years. They might bring in George Clooney and have George
Clooney have that talk with George stephanoppholis, I just had a bad night.
The ABC host gave his blunt assessment of the president's performance in a brief interview
when he was ambushed on Tuesday, he was asked on the street in Manhattan
if Biden should step down. He responded, I don't think he can serve
four more years. Oh, because you see, he had just had that
interview that aired over the weekend. He had the first interview with Biden after
the debate, and it was a recorded interview. It was not a live
interview. He should have known. I guess that ABC wanted to make Biden
look as good as possible, and that was the whole point of not doing
it live. And then somebody asked him on the street and he just made
the mistake of telling them the truth. You're not supposed to do that as
a mainstream media journalist. It's supposed to sell the agenda or whatever. Don't
tell people the truth. Stephanieffel has appeared to quickly regret his off the Coffy
Market. Offered a statement of regret after he was allegedly issued an ultimatum.
He said, earlier today, I responded to a question from a passer By,
I shouldn't have. ABC News issued their own statement and said George expressed
his own point of view and not the position of ABC News. But as
The Daily Mail says, what the two statements didn't reveal was the alleged crisis
that Stephanophulis's nine words kicked off. At the highest level of ABC News.
Division President Deborah O'Connell called a panicked meeting with advisors and executives on Tuesday night,
including public relations consultants. It was reported an insider said to Radar Online,
this was a full fledged crisis and it exploded with far reaching reverberations.
She is then said to have hauled Stephanopoulos into a private meeting where she gave
him an ultimatum, apologize or be yanked off the air. Now why is
this important? I mean, this is internal politics of these mainstream media organizations
that are based online. I think it's important because it shows the power that
still is possessed by Biden. And as I said from the very beginning,
I think that certainly there is movement within the Democrat Party and it was there
from the very beginning because they scheduled this first debate so incredibly early. As
I said after the debate, I said, normally these debates don't happen before
the convention because normally you have a primary, and normally, if it's a
contested primary, you have one person besides, you got somebody that's out front
pretty far, and you got somebody else who's in a second place, and
there's questions as to whether or not he might be able to do something or
she at the convention, and so they keep that tension there, if for
no other reason than to get people to watch the convention. But that didn't
happen this time. This time, they did it several weeks before the very
late Democrat convention. The Democrat Convention was set up so late that they had
to make special arrangements with Ohio and some other states to make sure sure that
Biden would be on the ballot, because they're supposed to have an officially inaugurated
candidate by a certain date and the convention wasn't even going to take place by
that day. Typically what happens is the convention is earlier, the debates are
later. You usually have the convention, and then you have and that's sometime
in late July or early August for both of the parties. Then you'll have
the first debate at the end of September, then a second debate in the
middle of October, and a third debate at the end of October, just
a few days before the election. That's not happening this time. So there's
something going on within the Democrat Party. There is some move to try to
muscle him out, some way to do this kind of miny primary, this
primary blitz and stuff like that. But I stick to one I said,
I'm still convinced that there's enough power there in the White House where they can
intimidate ABC News and get them to threaten to fire Stephanopflis for a comment that
he made on the sidewalk. There's a lot of power there. There's a
lot of power that can be wielded against the media, a lot of power
that can be wielded, especially within the Democrat Party. And I think they
know that they're trying this new novel way to do this, but I don't
think they're going to pull it off. Quite frankly, you can expect the
Trump campaign and the JOEP to seize on this. You can also expect the
White House to avoid ABC News moving forward. See Biden will never set down
with Stephanopflis ever again. So that's some of the people who talked to Daily
Mail. Biden made it through the twenty two minute ABC News interview on Friday
without any major blunders. Well, what the Daily Mail doesn't tell the readers
is that it was recorded and edited to make sure that they minimized the blunders.
He did have blunders. He didn't have any major blunders because it was
not live and so, as Real Clear Politics says, and I Joe Biden's
cognitive issues are destined for the memory hole. I think that's right. I
think he's staying. There will be no reckoning among Democrats and their media lapdogs
regarding their years long effort to hide President Biden's mental decline. No one is
going to lose their job precisely because that is their job to cover up,
to spend false narratives, to lie to people. That's one of the most
interesting things about this when you see people like Fetterman say, well, at
least he's not a liar. You know, he may be mentally impaired or
whatever, but he's not a liar. Well, you're lying about his mental
impairment. You've been lying to people about that. You finally admitted the truth
of that. But anyway, they're going to keep doing it. And if
it becomes clear that Joe's not going to go, the party and the propaganda
outlets will quickly pivot. They will discuss his physical Discussions about his physical mental
capacities will be shoved down the memory hole. And of course, I think
you see this already happening with ABC News. They've already done that. They've
already made that pivot, he said. Voters, they'll tell people, well,
you know, voters already know about his limitations, so what's the point
of continuing to talk about it? He said. Late night comics such as
Stephen Cobert and Jimmy Kimmel will probably try to make his ramblings kind of lovable.
That's exactly what I said, Just like Wag the Dog, He's going
to be old Shoe, the lovable old shoe, the affable underdog. Even
though this guy is one of the most authoritarian dictators I've ever seen in my
life. All of his life, he absolutely, absolutely despises the idea of
natural rights. He got into a fight with Clarence Thomas over that. When
Clarence Thomas was in his confirmation hearings. He hates the Bill of Rights,
he hates natural rights, he hates the Declaration of Independence, he hates all
that stuff the guy has had. He is the person who is responsible more
than anybody for having things like civil asset forfeiture, mandatory mens for gun bands,
and all the rest of this stuff. One of the most tyrannical,
dictatorial politicians I've seen in my life, and yet they're going to portray him
as this kindly old man people are making fun of. They're going to pull
the sympathy card because we all have had relatives who have had dementia of some
sort that's part of aging, and so they're going to make him the sentimental
favorite. He'll be kind of lovable, you know, Joe says the darnedest
things, doesn't he. News coverage instead will seek to make the contest about
Trump and his fitness for office, and he will oblige them by being his
usual vicious, narcissistic self. And so you know, he's going to be
out there throwing insults at people. You know, poor old Joe. We
know that he's got these aging issues, and they will use that the vicious
narcissism of Trump to tell everybody that he is the authoritarian and he is.
You know, they both are a good example of this, as they pointed
out in Real Clear Politics, Joy Read who said, if it's Biden and
a coma, I'm going to vote for Biden and a coma to keep Hitler
out of the White House. We've already seen Whoopi Goldberg say I don't care
if he poops his pants. I'll still vote for him. Poopy Goldberg is
going to support him no matter what. The real mystery going forward, what
other tricks do democrats in the establishment media have up their sleeves to turn things
around? And who is it that's trying to benefit from this? Is this
the Obamas? When you look at this, having are thrown the kitchen sink
at Trump, it's hard to imagine that some new narrative about his evil nature
will sway undecided voters. Well, I don't know about that. We'll have
to see it. I mean, there is a tremendous amount of power.
If you don't think they've got a lot of power, just take a look
at Ben Affleck's daughter, take a look at many people that you know that
are still scared and hiding behind a mask and want to demand that from other
people. The power of propaganda is absolutely astounding. Yeah, but in some
time, feel free to give me some comments about what do you think is
going to happen with us and who what is behind this? But one last
thing here before we take a break. Biden's costliest publicity stunt yet is going
to be dismantled permanently. Yeah, that's that Gaza peer thing. You know,
Biden truly is without peer? Is that thing has had so many problems?
Well, they put it back together again one more time to show that
they can take it down instead of it being taken down by a storm or
any or just falling apart. But it is the perfect metaphor, isn't it,
of not just the Biden administration, but of course the whole federal government,
the bureaucratic failure, the unnecessary complications and expenses. I had to achieve
a goal that maybe wasn't even something that we should be involved in. The
pier built by the US military to bring humanitarian aid to Gaza. And again
one of the biggest Rube Goldberg pieces of nonsense we've ever seen that a military
veteran who was in logistics talking about how silly the whole idea was, unloading
it on another pier, putting it on a boat and trucks and that type
of thing. They coming to this thing and then driving several football fields to
put it on there because we can't use we're not going to be allowed by
our supposed allies Israel to actually park the stuff there and give people food,
or even to just drive through the road that they blocked. Right, why
don't you use your political clout to tell your political friends to let us give
food to people. That's your mission. Oh, well, we'll build this
peer thing weakness, complicated bureaucracy and the inability to do anything at all.
It'll be reinstalled, actually it was reinstalled yesterday. They'll use it for several
days and then pull it out completely so they don't get embarrassed anymore. Well,
we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. Stay
with us making sense common again. You're listening to the David Night Show.
Well, before we leave politics, I have to show you this clip,
and it is a visual clip. Maybe you've seen it, This clip of
Maxine Waters and she's being interviewed and she doesn't realize that she's on screen,
So it's a two up shot, right person who's talking to her, and
Maxine is setting there. What I think is funny, actually that most people
have not talked about is why they didn't cut away when they saw it.
I guess somebody in the control room was having a good time watching her start
to adjust her wig and so if you're listening on audio, check it out
somewhere. But I just had to show this. This is Maxine Waters and
I don't know how this woman. I mean, first of all, I
look at it, it's like, why didn't they cut away from her and
the control room? Secondly, kudos to this woman who is interviewing her,
who just keeps talking as if there's nothing unusual happening. She's watching Maxine wig
outs. They've seen President Biden, they've lived through his presidency. They've also
seen former President Trump. They've lived through his presidency. They've heard these arguments
about democracy, about the fate of the Trump is not only winning, but
winning increasingly by a larger margin. So what is the plan among Democrats to
change that trajectory? It sounds like you're talking about saying and doing all the
same things. But do you believe that something needs to change. I think
we need to keep working. Well, that one bee had the perfect response
to it, they said. Maxine Waters announces that she's leaving the Democrats to
join the Whig Party. Something in her headspace really shifted, set an aide
that the old party was no longer the right fit. After trying to make
repeated adjustments to make her old party work, Waters decided that it was time
to give up and to join the Wigs so she could put her fresh look
on an old party. So that it has been a long time the Whigs
were on top of things. But I feel that I know and I'm confident
that I know how to fix the Wigs. Though the move caught pundits off
guard, sources in the party stated that they long knew of Water's affinity for
Wigs. They said, it's no secret that she's been on Team Wigs for
years. And I said a congressman on condition of anonymity, she's just waiting
for the right moment to make her parting move. It really looks good for
her. Well, you know, we can laugh about that, And yet
the big discussion is we come up into the deeps aches for Trump, and
you know the party that the Republican National Convention. I guess we should say
the Trump National Convention. He's replaced the party now that's going to begin on
Monday, and the question is whether he's going to announce the said he's going
to announce his VP choice before it, just before it, But now he's
made some medications that he might wait until the convention itself to make it more
dramatic, to try to get people to watch it, I guess. But
as they're talking about the three rumored top candidates, and it's been for quite
some time, everybody's been saying, well, he's going to pick either Bergham,
the governor of North Dakota, or Marco Rubio or Jade Vance. And
so you're seeing stuff in mainstream media about how well you know he he likes
the way that Burgham looks. He looks very rugged and everything, you know,
and he looks very presidential. I guess you could see him on Mount
Rushmore. So maybe he'd go with Bergham. Well, if he goes with
Bergham, it's going to because be because Bergham's been participating in this Summit CO
two pipeline, one of the most absurd boondoggles, crony capitalism, nonsense I've
ever seen in my life. And the Summit CEO has been at mar A
Lago along with the North and South Dakota governors. They're going to pump CO
two across the country so they can sert it into the ground in North and
South Dakota. Well, you talk about wasteful green projects, greenwashing, corruption,
The Democrats don't have anything that's any better than that. Yeah, that's
as ridiculous as anything goes. So you know, Bergham is also a billionaire,
so you know he can bring money to the campaign, but they don't
talk about that. They talk about his looks. Maybe he could get a
wig, you know, who knows, And then they talk about well,
I don't know that. This is the article going around multiple mainstream media science
yesterday, picked up by the Drudge Report and everything. I don't know if
he's going to pick jd Vance because he doesn't like beards, and so then
you have Brian kill me. So I pronounced his name. Brian is the
reason that I'm doing an early morning show. I'm not an early morning person.
You know. When it came time to pick what time we're going to
do the show. I was driving in one morning and I heard Brian on
the radio, and I was going to be on a lot of different radio
stations that said, that's the guy I want to compete against. He's got
anything to say. So he gets an opportunity to talk to Trump, what
does he ask him about? And does he ask him about the vaccines or
the lockdowns or the gun control by executive order? No, he doesn't ask
about any of that stuff. Instead, what he does he asked him about
I've heard you don't like beards? Are you going to pass over? Jd
Vance? Because then he goes, oh, no, I like beers.
I think it makes him look like a young Lincoln. Young Lincoln. Well
maybe if he was about a one hundred pounds lighter and a couple of feet
taller, he might look like a young Lincoln. But and so then the
third one, oh, before we leave Jade Vance, the left of mainstream
media is going back and finding comments that they all have made about Trump that
were negative. And they found a comment from JD Vance where he's on an
interview and it was about I think she was a stewardess, some a woman
on a plane I think she was a stewardess, claimed that Trump had groped
her and that type of thing, and so they asked him. He said,
well, I don't know. He says, it's a he said,
she said, He goes, who are you going to believe the woman or
the guy who always tells the truth? Very sarcastic mark. So it remains
me seen if I mean Trump would have known that, It's not that he
didn't know any of this stuff. So, you know, when you look
at these issues, they've all said things, especially Rubio because he was running
against Trump back in twenty sixteen. But then of course there's also the issue
that many people pointed out that you if you follow the constitution, which I
don't know. Are we going to start following the constitution again in this country?
Why would we do that? I don't know. But if you say
that we're going to we're going to follow the constitution, well then you can't
have both the president and vice president be from the same state, and both
Rubio's Florida and now Trump's residence is there, so that kind of knocks Rubio
out. So it takes it back to really, I guess Bergham and Jade
Vance. My guess is, since there's been so much written about JD.
Evance, that that's probably who he's going to pick. The other thing is
he's also picked his son, Trump Junior is supposedly really good friends with Jade
Vance, and of course Trump Junior has a beard as well. I don't
know, so, you know, maybe that'll be what happens. Who knows.
I think maybe when it comes to this deep steak, he might be
playing JD. Tress who knows instead of three D or four D Tess.
But we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. Tony
is having some Internet issues. He may not be able to join us.
But I've got a lot to talk about here. So we're going to take
a quick break and we hope that Tony can come in. But we'll be
right back. In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary
act. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, let's talk a
little bit about fines and fires we have. As I said earlier, Volkswagen
is now going to possibly lose another three billion because they decided that they would
bow to the pressure of the US government after they got hit with four billion
dollars in fines. Now they got hit with three billion dollars four billion dollars
because the government didn't like what they're doing, three billion dollars because consumers don't
like what they're doing, don't want the ev So GM is going to have
to pay one hundred and forty six million dollars in penalties for emission violations on
six million older vehicles. They're not getting hit with a four billion dollar fine,
but it's one hundred and forty six million. This week, it was
reported that GM will have to fork over one hundred and forty six million penalties
due to six million of its older vehicles not complying with emissions and fuel standards,
according to the AP. The report said that the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, by the way, these are the same bureaucrats that are giving passes
to these self driving cars that keep having crashes. The National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration said that these model years failed to meet federal fuel economy standards. The
EPA found that GM pickup trucks emit over ten percent more CO two than initially
claimed, and this is exactly what they had come after a VW four for
four billion dollars. These vehicles consume more than ten percent stated on the window
stickers, but will not be repaired or have their MPG ratings adjusted. EPA
Administrator Michael Reagan said, our investigation has achieved accountability and uphols an important program
that is reducing air pollution and protecting communities across the country. Now, actually,
that same guy has appeared in statements and denied that the EPA is banning
vehicles at all. You know, in the same way that Biden administration,
even with their mandates, was denying that they mandated the vaccine. Why didn't
force anybody to get it? I just told them that if they didn't gave
them a choice, you know, you get it or you lose your job,
that type of thing. But I didn't force anybody. Well, the
EPA is not forcing anybody either, right handing out hundreds of millions of dollars
or billions of dollars in fines to companies and then making clear that they're going
to put them out of business if they don't restrict their choices of the consumers.
The issue arose from a testing procedure change that was implemented by the EPA
in two thousand and sixteen. In other words, it's an issue that would
have just gone away on its own, but the government needed to take its
bureaucratic pound of flesh first, writes Zero Hedge. The EPA's enforcement action effects
about six million GM vehicles, including Chevy Tahoe, Cadillac Escalade, Chevy Silverado.
GM will forfeit credits that were used to meet emission standards, with an
estimated resolution cost of four hundred and ninety million dollars. So with the losing
credits as well as the additional fines, nearly half a billion dollars, but
they're still getting off cheap compared to Volkswagen. And again, this is all
not about anybody being endangered, just as CO two is not endangering the world.
These emissions have been cleaned up in the same way that you can clean
up emissions from a coal power plant. They've got their own agenda, and
we should be very concerned about what these people want to do to us.
Rivian, meanwhile, has become the provider for Amazon. They had a deal
with Rivian, the electric truck company, and they came up with customized Amazon
delivery vans. Unfortunately, the Rivian delivery vans keep catching fire at Amazon distribution
centers while they are being charged. They've had quite a few of these.
What is still unclear it's whether professionally installed chargers like these Rivian units are prone
to the same issues as level two chargers that are plugged into home outlets.
They put them into the dryer outlets the two twenties. But again, this
is the same government that has spent over seven billion dollars to do seven charging
stations. And then as you see what is happening at Amazon, as they
charge them, they're bursting into fire. So it is a as we've seen
with evs. These people are going to force this stuff through. This is
part of the Biden agenda. It's actually it's the Democrat agenda in general.
It is not simply Biden or Newsome. This is the entire Democrat party that
is trying to push us through. And the Republicans will not lift a finger
to stop it. If we want to stop this, it's going to have
to be stopped at the state level. We'll be right back and defending the
American dream. You're listening to the David Knight Show, All right, welcome
back, and we've talked a lot about the shifting sand under our feet of
the petro dollar and how the Saudis are moving away from supporting that. Recently,
we had at the G seven a want to talk about confiscation of about
three hundred billion dollars of Russian assets, and there was a disagreement amongst those
that were at G seven. The United States wanted to just steal all of
it, and some people in Europe said, well, let's just take the
interest, and they had a compromise. And yet it turns out that there
was more to it than that, Bloomberg reports. So the Saudis were threatening
to sell European bonds if the Russian assets were going to be confiscated. So
what we got right now is exactly the opposite of the petro dollar geopolitical power
that we used to have. Now we've become just these petty thieves and blackmailers,
and everybody sees US government for what it is. In May, the
EU had approved a US backplan to use profits and interest generated from Russian assets
to help arm Ukraine. However, that was a sharp reversal from the previously
proposed plan, one that was heavily promoted by Zelensky and Ukraine to confiscate all
of the three hundred billion dollars in Russian assets that were in Western banks,
and many people were wondering what prompted that reversal. Well, now we know,
and as Bloomberg notes, the Kingdom's finance ministry said some g seven counterparts
of its opposition to the idea which was meant to support Ukraine, with one
person describing it as as a veiled threat. Most of the three hundred billion
dollars in frozen Russian assets were held in Europe, particularly in France, Germany
and Belgium. What makes today's report from Bloomberg even more interesting from a geopolitical
fissures perspective. It means that as a result of its ability to spark a
liquidation panic in Europe's unstable bond market, Saudi Arabia has far more leverage than
Ukraine or the virtue signaling Western media. You say, it's kind of interesting
because part of this is because of their vast wealth that they got from selling
the oil that we discovered, we pumped, we refined, we gave them
the money, We created the machines that need the oil, and all the
rest of this stuff. But nevertheless, they have that power that is there,
and a tremendous amount of accumulated wealth. But I think oil is still
very important everybody part. So we don't need it anymore, that is about.
It's on its way out and all the rest of this stuff. I
don't believe that's the case, not at all. I think that they tried
to move too quickly. Their plans to switch to these other more expensive renewables
aren't working well, and they have to continue with oil, or at least
until they get some technical issues ironed out. Then they can fleece us.
But the technical issues are so bad that they have to stay with oil.
That means that the Saudis still have a great deal of leverage, especially with
their accumulated wealth. And so it's clear that when Putin comes to shov,
actually they said when push comes to shove, but it was actually when Putin
comes to shove, that the Crown Prince is firmly in Vladimir's corner. Back
in April of twenty sixteen, the New York Times reported that Saudi Arabi had
threatened Obama when he was present at that time, threatened to liquidate the seven
hundred and fifty billion dollars in US treasuries that had owned at the time that
would have spawned a bond market crash. They threatened to sell all of that
all at once if Obama found them responsible for the September eleventh attacks. Well,
now you know why they haven't released these documents. Not that I believe
that the Saudis pulled this thing off. They may have been accomplices to it,
but that's probably what they have in the nine to eleven papers that Obama
didn't declassify. Trump didn't want to declassify, Biden doesn't want to declassify,
and so momentum was building to follow through. They'd made the Saudis the fall
guys for this stuff. I think it was an inside job. I always
have. They wanted to make the Saudis the fall guys for this. So
and you have a lot of families, nine to eleven families who want a
compensation from the Saudis and so forth. I said, if you do that,
if you continue down that road, we're just going to dump all of
our US bonds, will crash the market. Rest of the stuff. So
they've done this type of thing before, And it says here in the article
I said well, there's two points to pull out of this that are bigger.
While the number one, While the petro dollar may or may not be
dead, its leverage is a pale shadow of its former self. In fact,
the only leverage goes to those who still own US paper and can threaten
to dump it at will. So if you hold a lot of bonds like
the Southeast, it's worked out the other way. They've got the leverage against
US, and it's only going to get worse as we go further and further
into this massive debt, as we add a trillion dollars every hundred days,
as Trump and Biden have established this number two, weaponizing the US dollar,
as irrelevant as it now may be, weize it against Russia was a catastrophic
decision that will reverberate for years. It is what Biden will be remembered for.
Quite frankly, I think it is going to be the biggest failure of
his administration. I mean, we've seen visible things like the chaos and the
incompetence with the Afghan Afghanistan pull out or the peer that we were just talking
about, but it's going to be the financial collapse of the petro dollar and
the other things that he's going to be remembered for Goldman Sachs. By the
way, Goldman Sachs has failed the fed's stress test, and there are some
other banks that are on shaky ground as well. So Goldman Sachs actually failed
the fed's stress test that they put back in two thousand and eight. They
came up with an annual stress test that runs looks at the bank's books and
runs a series of simulated possibilities, and the test is different for each one
of the banks depending on their different portfolios. And Goldman Sachs failed miserably.
Find data from this year's results can be reviewed on the fed's website. By
the way this article, you can find this article with links to that website
at winepressnews dot com. If you want to get into the details over they
got a chart there, but most of it you can find by clicking on
the link. By coincidence, the Financial Times rote an important piece just last
week talking about the results for Goldman Sachs. They suggested that Goldman Sachs was
attempting to change the stress test results that the Federal Reserve had done. Wine
Press reminded readers, they said, in our last article about this that Goldman
Sachs continues to have the worst credit performance of the group of banks, the
big ones, the two big to fail banks. If you page through the
individual bank stress test results, you'll see Goldman Sachs is clearly the outlier in
the group in terms of assumed credit and counterparty risk losses through first quarter of
twenty twenty six. Now you know why they get involved in the Trump administration.
For example, the previous CEO left Cohen, they gave him an advance
on his golden parachute, gave him a quarter of a billion dollars so that
he could become I think he was a chief of I forget what he was.
It was high position in the Trump administration, chief of staff, I
think anyway. That's why they had so much political involvement in the Trump administration.
That's how you make a lot of money. So I had people like
Steve Manuchin, former Goldman Sachs guy had and many others, and of course
Bannon himself, former Goldman Sachs banker. Goldman in some ways fared better on
the stress test than it did on its own, which is interesting. They
run their own test. Their own tests looked even worse than the Federal reserves
stress test, they said, and they had to disclose that last week because
they're a publicly run company. Financial Time said it's internally run stress tests predicted
a bigger drop in revenue and larger trading losses and an economic downturn than the
one run by the Central Bank. Other large banks like City Group were able
to negotiate the stressed scenario losses imposed by the fed's test. Goldman missed the
target completely and ended up below the minimum capital level for the bank. So
look at their investments. They run them through simulated scenarios to see if following
those scenarios, if they'll still be solvent, and Goldman wasn't. Each test
is different for each bank. That's your test results suggests how the FED views
a given banks business model. Morgan Stanley has a slightly bigger derivatives book than
does Goldman, but rarely reports a significant credit loss. Goldman, however,
under the new CEO David Solomon, is shoveling money into the furnace in terms
of credit losses, even with an eleven percent gross loan spread. And so
it's not just the big banks that are there. We also have the risk
as if you have seen the documentary The Great Taking, This is talked about
in that documentary, the fact that your stocks and bonds have been put in
jeopardy by some very manipulative maneuvers that have not been made public. That's a
key thing to understand and I think one of the key things to understand about
it. And of course it's a documentary that's done by a former head fund
manager, an investment banker, David Rogers Web and he talks about the things
that were put in in order to be able to legally confiscate all of your
stocks and bonds if there is another financial collapse or crisis. And the remedy
for this is actually at the state level. Imagine that here we are again.
We've got a global problem. We've got a massive problem. You're not
going to get anybody in Washington to fix this, but we already have some
states that are moving to stop this. The Great Taking film is an effort
to raise awareness about what is happening with this, and the document the efforts
that are underway to stop it. The largest financial crime story and history,
a global scheme to seize all of the world's securities and a financial collapse.
Are they incompetent or are they trying to create a financial collapse. So this
scheme is made possible by the fact that everyone's stocks and bonds have been secretly
used as collateral on financial contracts called derivatives, not once, but ten times
over. When you go back and look at the big real estate bubble that
happened in two thousand and eight, of course it was derivatives. Do people
realize that their mortgages have been securitized and mixed together and I don't know,
nobody knew what was happening with that they did it without people's permission. Well,
they've done it in a much much bigger way. There's always these derivatives.
That's one of the reasons why when you look at things like gold and
silver ETF or even bitcoin ETF, why make a derivative out of something?
I think it is always so that they can play these kinds of dishonest games
that we're seeing here. The covert use of the client assets collateral enabled the
creation of a financial bubble the likes of which the world has never seen.
And this has been done without anyone's permission and without anyone paying, without paying
anybody a fee for using your stocks as collateral on other people's trades. This
was all discovered by David Rodgers, a former investment banker hedge fund manager.
He discovered the legal mechanisms put in place to allow the two big defail banks
to originate derivative contracts, to have priority to your stocks ahead of you,
and a bankruptcy hearing during the event of a system wide collapse. He has
uncovered a legal structure legal structures rather that have been put in place to achieve
the goal of owning nothing and being happy. All securities that everyone owns are
being legally encumbered, putting them at risk of being lost during the next market
downturn. All done with about the knowledge and consent of the clients and the
nineteen nineties. This fraud was legalized by the nineteen ninety four revision of Article
eight of the UCC, the Universal the Commercial Code in the United States,
later harmonized into law in European countries EU countries between two thousand and five and
twenty fourteen, so c US and Europe. A new legal construction was created
with this nineteen ninety four UCC revision, called a securities entitlement, so instead
of outright owning stocks. Now we are just a contractual claimant upon securities called
securities entitlement holders. And the two big defail banks that utilize our securities as
collateral on derivative contracts are considered to be secured creditors to our securities. So
they've maneuvered this around, using the UCC to make themselves secured creditors and us
not. That's the bottom line. And they did it through the UCC.
Now there's something that can be done. In response to his book, efforts
are underway in states throughout the United States to correct the problem by striking problematic
lines of the nineteen ninety four UCC revision. So very similar what's happening with
CBDC, for example, you had, in an underhanded way, they put
out model legislation. Seen that before, right with a pandemic. After nine
to eleven, they put out model legislation, give your public health bureaucracies all
these different powers, and they quietly did. And so they put out some
more model legislation to prepare for this financial takedown. And they said, you
know, they made some changes to support a central bank digital currency and to
ban crypto that they see as a competitor to it, and Christinoms said she
had vetoed it. She said, I saw this thing coming up in sentidence
out there with another two dozen states. They have pushed this through another couple
of dozen states. But then you had DeSantis in Florida say, well,
we're going to do the opposite. We're going to change the UCC code.
But rather than legalizing CBDC and criminalizing and banning crypto, we're going to do
just the opposite. We're going to recognize crypto and ban CBDC. So you
can change the UCC code at the state level, and you can shut down
some of these financial tricks that they're trying to pull on people, this financial
trick of creating this new legal thing they call a securities entitlement, which is
basically to give them a superior position when everything hits the fan, when they
pull down the pillars of the temple, then they are the ones who have
standing over you. Well, that was done through the UCC, a revision
of the UCC, so it can be undone through a revision of the UCC.
And again I come back to the fact that how do we stop You
have to understand what the global agenda is and then you have to fight it.
At the local level. That's what these people said. Plan think globally,
act locally. Well, if we understand what they're doing globally, we
can stop it locally. You're not going to stop it in Washington. Do
any of these people care? No, they don't. They won't do anything
about any They'll hold hearings, maybe they'll make some campaign promises when they're running
for office, and they will do nothing at all. Democrats are full onto
all of this stuff. The Republicans will make you some empty promises and do
absolutely nothing. Well, just been told that Tony can't make it. He
can't get his internet to work. So I've got a lot of economic news
I still want to cover. I'm not finished yet. Some comments and questions,
let's see solid Cender says, has David written a funeral dirge? Well,
actually, funny, you should ask something kind of like that. I
don't know, I don't know why you would notice that. On Rumble,
Georgia Boy says, if you speak of chimtrails, you're labeled a nut.
But think back to your childhood and seeing planes without a smoke grid behind them
in all directions. Yeah, I'm the nut. And of course we've seen
closer pictures of this stuff not coming out of the engines, but you know,
coming in other places. So we've got a lot of pictures showing it
being sprayed out on rumble moonhawk. I say, we drill our own oil
and buy from other countries only to build up our reserve, deplete their supply,
and have friendly commerce. You know we have. And I'll just grab
it here. I've talked about this many times, you know these magazines,
Time Magazine and Newsweek. Let's see pull it in this way. Back in
nineteen seventy nine, you know, we're running out of oil and we've got
an energy crisis. And as they were saying we're going to be out of
oil and of natural gas by the mid nineteen eighties, because it was the
end of nineteen seventy nine, but even then they said, we have six
hundred and sixty six years of coal. I guess they're trying to demonize it
even then six six six. Yeah, we got we've got more coal than
the Saudias have got oil. And we've got a lot of oil as well.
But they're just trying to gas light people. Isn't that interesting how that
phrase fits there? Gas light us in the thinking that we can't use it,
we're all going to die. I know, we're going to have to
get past this lie, this climate. Mcguffin Rock Fan, Dustin Helm,
thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that. And on rock
Fan, Jason Barker says, going back to the password breach, eight billion
of them, this is bound to happen intentionally to push biometrics instead of password.
Yeah, I'm sure they'll use it. That's a good point, Jason.
Those are compromised as well, So a physical thing, a mark,
will be the two factor authentication. This will be done to secure your bank
account. This is where the mark of the Beast comes in. Real id
and id dot me are already set in stone with deadlines. The id ME
requires a face scan. It'll be required to do your taxes online. Yeah.
They always tried to do that once and they only backed off because it
was a tech bottle night nightmare. Nobody could actually get access to it.
So they're going to work on it. Get some of the tech bugs eyed,
but that's where they're going. You're absolutely right, Jason Barker Nights of
the Storm on Rumble Princess Wrong. Thank we already lost our homeland. I
live in a read mostly rural state. It's unreal how many illegals are here
working in factories, et cetera. And tons of people from Africa, yeah,
and tons of people from the Middle East, tons of people from China.
It's everywhere, everywhere. On Rockheat time, I was in a airport.
We were waiting for a flight. This migrant manager and his group of
migrants came up and two of the guys were just Africans in brand new track
suits, brand new cell phones, brand new shoes, brand new hat,
all designer. They're just like cool. Yeah, And a lot of people
have engaged them, Oh what is your group? And I've seen a lot
of clips of people engaging this. That's that's happening all the time, because
I've seen several engagements where people were talking to them and you know, they
well, I'm not going to talk to you about this. Yeah, that's
our government doing. It's secret. It's national security. Yeah, you're undermining
our country for your job. Security is what this is. Selling us out
on the fifth Column, Rock Fan Amos Pool, thank you very much for
the tip. I appreciate that the legal definition of reset reset is the dishonest
possession of goods obtained by another by way of theft, robbery, fraud,
embezzlement, and the knowledge that they were obtained that way. Absolutely right.
I'm gonna take a quick break and when we come back, we're going to
talk about the Great Monetary Pivot of twenty twenty four. Will be right back.
They're doing what in the place they named after me? Good thing.
I have the David Knight Show to keep me informed on the plots of these
traders. Making sense common again, this is the David Knight Show. Yeah,
the Great Monetary Pivot of twenty twenty four. What is happening with this?
Well, this is coming from International Man. In the wake of the
two thousand and eight financial crisis of FED bought broad interest rates down to zero
percent, held them there for years. Then in late twenty fifteen they started
a rate hiking cycle that lasted until the repo market turmoil in late twenty nineteen.
If you can get this chart up, pull this up traves a great
monetary pivot at twenty twenty four, because it truly is amazing to see how
they have manipulated the market. Inflation subsequently hit a forty year high in twenty
twenty two, forcing the FED into another rate hiking cycle, one of the
steepest in history. In just eighteen months, they hiked rates from about zero
percent over five percent, where they remain today. And that's what it looks
like there. Folks look at that go straight down and as a matter of
fact, they smoothed out the curve when you look at what they did,
and they don't show what they did. Back in two thousand and six where
they started creating this, they were raising interest rates by quarter of a point
every month, I believe it was. And so it's just this their step
case, going straight up until they got the top and then collapsed everything.
And then when everything collapsed, they immediately take it back down to zero,
leave it there for years, then move it up very rapidly, then drop
it down to zero again, and then move it up even faster at three
quarters of a percentage point each time they re evaluate it. It's unbelievable how
they have created this roller coaster for our economy. And as he points out,
gold has called their bluff. When you look at that roller coaster that
has been set up, it truly is amazing how gold has been stable and
gradually increasing. That is the key thing is that it as it is withstood
that war, as Tony calls it, at war against the Fed and their
fiat currency, at war with gold. One of them has to be established.
And so it's not just the fact that they have changed the UCC code.
They have also has come out at one of the banks that recently collapsed,
one hundred and nine million dollars in custom deposits vanished. This is not
what it was taught. What Web was talking about in the Great Taking and
using that that's what they're going to use when they collapse everything. This is
a story that's about three weeks old. Not only are the accounts locked,
but users are unable to withdraw any of their cash, a total nightmare scenario.
The company is claiming it's a problem between two middleman providers, but it's
extremely concerning whenever you can't get your money out of a bank or out of
a savings app. I'm absolutely not claiming that they're insolvent or that they're going
under. In fact, they claim that they're not. But they will say
say this, but I'll say this, I saw the very same thing happened
before a crypto brokerage Celsius went under. I was actually live tweeting and covered
the story as it happened. They announced a glitch with withdrawals. I immediately
advised everyone to transfer their funds off of the platform, and the company claimed
all was safe, all was good. Then just hours later they'd collapsed.
Is the same scenario happening here? I don't know. I hope Naughtisa,
but sadly it looks as though my initial gut reaction was right, CNBC said.
Ledgers of the failed fintech middleman Synapps show that nearly all the deposits held
for customers of the banking app YadA or Yoda I guess Yotta went missing weeks
ago. According to one of the involved, a network of eight banks held
one hundred and nine million dollars in deposits for YadA customers as of April eleventh.
Evolve Bank and Trust said the bankruptcy court letters filed late Tuesday Thursday,
about a month later, the ledger showed just one point four million dollars and
YadA funds held at one of the banks. Evolve said these are regularities and
Synaps's ledgering of YadA end user funds are just one example, the many discrepancies
that Evolve had observed. The CEO of YadA and the co founder said,
in response to the article that Synaps has said in court filings that Evolve held
nearly all YadA or Yoda customer deposits. Evolve and Synaps disagree over who holds
the funds and who's responsible for the frozen accounts. So again this has been
going on back and forth. Who owns it, where did the money go?
And this is what happened when they create these multi levels, you know,
sometimes they do it with securitization. Sometimes they have these new financial tech
instruments that are out there. According to the Snap's trial balance report provided on
May seventeenth, there are one hundred and twelve million dollars worth of customer funds
held at Evolve. Well, again, one of the things he says,
we never imagined a scenario like this. We never imagined that no regulator would
step in and help it. So he said, this is a fight between
Synaps and Evolve. But you got all these customers, eighty five thousand of
them are locked out of their accounts, over one hundred million dollars of stuff,
and none of these financial tech companies or FDIC insured for example. This
is all the risk. It's one of the reasons why when we look at
what is on the horizon and we know this is already happening. Began with
Saudi Arabia and the fact that the Petro dollar is now being leveraged against us.
Essentially all of those chickens have come home to roost. We said,
okay, well you support us by buying bonds. Well, now all these
bonds that they've bought have become this sort of damocles that is hanging over our
heads as the government, the federal government and its devious plans decided that they
could use the dollar as a weapon. Well, turns out that weapon is
now being used against us. So that's one aspect our entire financial system.
The fact that they had planned this for a very long time, going back
to the mid nineteen nineties, they secretly put into the UCC code measures that
would allow them to get ahead of everybody else and to confiscate everything when they
deliver took it down. Yeah, you'd have to look at this and say,
are these people that stupid or is this deliberate? And then finally you
have these online tech companies where you don't actually physically hold anything, and you
know a lot of finger pointing going on, but what is really going to
happen with it. You've got three parties involved here and they're all blaming each
other, and still everybody is locked out of this because it's not a bank,
it's not anything else. That's why when you look at it, I
think that the way that you should think of this is as wealth insurance.
And when you look at gold and silver, that is something that you hold.
It is something that once you get it and it's private, they don't
have any knowledge about that. And unlike even cash, which is great,
the cash can also be manipulated and other things can happen with it. So
it's a head against all that. It's a hedge against all of these conspiracies
to steal everything. I think it's very important to have that there. And
of course Tony sets up why is wolf and you can find it David Knight
dot Gold. He's got the Wolf Pack, So you can do this on
a gradual basis, and you can gradually accumulate gold and silver. You can
get the advantage of group buying by being in wolf Pack. But of course
Tony can handle any transactions large or small, gold or silver, he can
handle those at wolf Pack. He can also help you with a gold or
metal IRA, gold or silver IRA. We're gonna take a quick break and
we'll be right back. You're listening to the David Night Show. Well,
we have a California bill that was set up to curb child sex trafficking.
But the legislators in California has said that this is going to be unfair to
LGBTQ people. Really, what is that? What is that about? I
guess the responsibly okay groomers have they declared what they're really about. And of
course we see this happening in the schools all the time. It is absolutely
grooming. California bill that would increase penalties for child sex trafficking and solicitation of
sex from miners has received backlash from activists, claiming that it would unfairly target
the lgbt community. It also might target the government schools where a lot of
these people will operate. The bill was authored by one Republican and two Democrats
in the California State Senate. It would make it a felony offense for adults
who are eighteen years of age or older to solicit or pay for sex from
a minor. We believe that this bill takes an overly punitive approach, said
those who oppose with it. Who oppose this, they said, we're particularly
concerned that the harsher penalties proposed in this bill will disproportionately impact marginalized communities,
especially members of the LGBT community. WOW in its original form, they attempted
to make the act of soliciting or engaging in any act of commercial sex of
the minor a felony. However, amendments forced on the bill earlier this year
by Democrats in the Senate watered down the language. They excluded sixteen and seventeen
year old children from the bill's additional protections. And of course we've seen a
lot of individuals like Alan Derschwitz arguing for lowering the age of consent. If
you look at everything that is happening in the schools, I've argued from the
very beginning this idea that kids have the maturity to decide that they want to
mutilate themselves sexually, well, then of course, if these kids can decide
that, if they can decide what gender they are, even before they can
read or write, you know, when they're in kindergarten. We've had a
lot of people, some parents claim, oh, yeah, my child has
already chosen their gender, even though they can barely talk. How absurd that
is. But if you're going to maintain that fiction, then of course you
can say that kids who are very young can also consent to sex. So
I said from the very beginning that this transgender agenda applied to kids, and
all this gender grooming and gas lighting that is happening in the schools is really
ultimately about pushing towards pedophilia. Here we have democrats in the Senate saying that
if you were going to put in bills now this is about this is about
prostitution or trafficking, we should say, but there's not anything in here about
consensual quote unquote consensual sex with minors. We've always held the position as a
society that miners cannot consent to sex, just like they don't have the maturity
to drive a car, or to have alcohol or tobacco or guns or many
other things, or vote. But no, we are going to try to
remove that away for sex. Pretty clear what people want, isn't it.
What the purpose of this is In July twenty eight, twenty three, the
Public Safety Committee blocked SB fourteen, a bill that was introduced that would have
made the trafficking of children in the state a serious felony. No, that
shouldn't be a felony at all, should it, folks. It is.
One of the things that they said was it's not just that it's going to
come after LGBT. They mentioned that, but they also said poor and minorities
will be punished and so forth. And we do know that when you have
rich people like Epstein, like Trump, who are engaged in pedophilia, that
they never get punished. None of the clients of Epstein, nobody wants to
look at that, and so that part of it. The Democrats are right,
But it is an effort to legitimize and to cover up for pedophilia.
And the other part of the transgender grooming of kids is to push them towards
virtual reality, towards this furry thing. That's the other path that has got
multiple purposes. So they're right about saying that only the poor will be punished
for this, because the rich people are going to go right through. Well
when we talk about abortion, and that's going to be talked about a great
deal with a Republican convention, this's become a fight as well as the fact
that they have taken a very, very soft position on gun rights. Who
would have thought that when Trump was the very first president to do gun control
by executive order, who would have thought that the Trump National Convention would take
a soft line towards protecting the Second Amendment. But of course they do.
So when you talk about abortion, the question is how should we handle this.
I think that it is legitimate for us to use government to stop people
from committing murder, but I think that murder is also and that kind of
law enforcement is also a state issue. And as I said, from a
pragmatic standpoint as well as a constitutional standpoint, there's no authority for the federal
government to get involved. And if they do get involved and prohibit it,
the Democrat states will ignore that prohibition, and then when the Democrats get in
and legalize it at any age, the Republican states will go along with it.
So that's why I oppose any federalization of abortion at all. But it
ultimately comes down to a one on one. It ultimately comes down to getting
people to understand what it really is. I said in the past that I
had not ever thought about it personally, and most people don't think about it
until maybe it is something that they find themselves unexpectedly expecting. And never had
that situation. But what happened to me was when I was running for Congress,
I was asked that question over and over again, and I had the
standard libertarian line, well, I don't think the government needs to be involved
in people's personal lives. Let everybody to determine this for themselves. But at
that time, they began partial birth abortion. And when I saw what partial
birth abortion was, I started to realize, they've been lying to me all
this time. These people are okay with murdering a full term baby. Perhaps
they've got another agenda, And so I started looking at that, and to
me, that was the thing that came out of my little run for Congress
was it really opened my eyes up to this whole abortion thing. And so
the people with Live Action have filmed themselves going on the street and doing men
on the street interviews with people, asking them what their position is on abortion,
recording that and then showing them a short video that is about four or
five minutes long. Now I'm not going to show you the video. If
you want to see what this video is that changed their minds, you can
see that. You can see the video at what is abortion dot com.
When you go there, there's tabs and they have an obgyn who will explain
in clinical terms what the abortion is. And it is horrific. But I
still think that the most effective one of these is the procedure that cartoon one
that did. There's one of them right there and as you can see that
that lady there is an obgyn and so they have the dn E abortion.
Then you can click and they've got another doctor who explains suction DNC abortion,
another one that talks about abortion pills, another one that talks about induction and
so forth. But I still think that the procedure, which was narrated by
the actor who played Hercules, Kevin Sorbo, and it was based on the
experiences of an ultrasound technician who went in. He didn't know that this was
an abortion, and it was the first time he saw it, and he
saw what was happening inside the womb, and he described the baby's efforts to
pull away as the baby's limbs are being ripped off one by one just horrific
and it was quick, it was animated and very very powerful. I've played
that a couple of times on the show. I'm not going to play that,
and I'm not going to play one of the what is abortion dot Com
videos, But I want you to see the reactions of the people on the
street, because, folks, if you want to stop the murder, you've
got to educate people, first of all, to the fact that it is
murder. They've been lied to by the government, and so I think it's
very important that they be shown the truth and that really is going to free
them up. Let me find this here. Where is the video? Let's
see, do we not have it? After all that lead up here?
Yeah, here we go. Okay, this is how their minds were changed.
Ultimately, I'm more towards my body, my choice. Everybody has a
choice. I think if it's what you need to do, then do it.
It's the woman's right to choose. Be the choice of the woman.
I do believe in women's rights. I think that women should have the right
to choose whether or not they want to abort the children. It's certain circumstances,
you know, make you up to do that until childbirth. I believe
all the way up until birth, but eight months, eight months, you
know, probably the first six months especially, I'm for abortion. If a
woman's been raped through you there's just incest or something like that, I think
that you have the right to make decisions about their body, your own body.
Absolutely. Yes, here's a video. I love your thoughts on You
don't want to see this. That's that. It's pretty horrific. I didn't
think they did it like that. I didn't know any of that said.
I never saw a video like that about how to received you from I don't
agree with that. I don't think it's right that they got to go through
all that because someone didn't want them. It changed my mind about the time
frame there. Do you consider yourself strongly pro life now? Yes, I've
watching that video, Like my opinion changed. Always kind of thought it was
just like a little seed that they kind of scope Out'll say that your original
stance on abortion has changed. Yes, after seeing that video, one hundred
percent. I will be against abortion for sure. That stage, I didn't
know the child was like fully developed, So that's that's definitely not a good
stage to have an abortion. The Yeah, but the baby is always alive
after conception, and that's why abortion does killing us a human being. Well,
after seeing that video, yeah, you went from thinking abortion should be
available till births and maybe being banned at month three. I mean to be
completely blown. I was kind of thrown for a loop. Say the video
changed your mind about abortion? Yes? I did. I'm sorry you all
right? Them? Fine, them fine. My mom went through five abortions
before she decided to keep me. That's crazy, like pulling off the limbs
and stuff. Because my sister like just had the baby. Everybody was forcing
her to have an abortion, and she held her ground. And now,
of course everybody loves the baby. She had the baby. It could have
been me ling anybody else walking around to it. It's not like a designer
handbag. Oh maybe I'll keep it or not. Now I'm going to educate
my friends and whoever's asking about abortion. Every life deserves a life aportance.
You never know what to chod, maybe curl and don't just kind of take
a life that hasn't got the chance to develop yet. I hope you guys
watch the video if it's linked or anything, and the video helped change your
minds all about abortion. One hundred percent text me or whatever a link to
that video. I'm a high school principal. That's a live and they're destroying
and they haven't even got a chance to the baby to see what's live all
about? Like they have no choice? All right? What is abortion dot
com? And you can see that video that changed their minds, that put
that one woman in tears. But again and also the procedure, I want
to shift gears here and talk about the power of prayer. It's a very
powerful video that I saw a man who suddenly had a tumor and he had
stage four melanoma. He had a tumor on the side of his face that
had grown so huge so they couldn't say out of his right eye. He
could barely eat, and the doctors said there was nothing they could do for
him. So many times we say, well, this person hasn't even got
a prayer. He has the last thing that we try so many times,
and it is. This story is very, very amazing, and I want
to talk about this after it, but I'll just let them tell the story.
This is his wife. They have pictures of him before and after,
the people who were praying for him, and many different churches around that town.
This is again, chemo wasn't an option. They couldn't operate on him.
He was at stage four and you won't believe how large this tumor got.
When you're going to the doctor and you hear nothing encouraging, that's when
your faith it's going to have to stand. In November twenty twenty, Jerlyn
Baker's husband David started having constant nosebleeds. Doctors removed a polyp from his son
is cavity, but soon after things got worse when his face began to swell.
I thought he's got an infection, and I told him we need to
contact the doctor quickly. The results of a CT scan shocked the family.
David's brother in law, Chuck Denny, was there. They told him he
had stage four nasal cavity melanoma. The options they gave him, they said,
surgery wasn't an option, calls, the facial dispairment would be too massive.
They told us that that there was really nothing that they could do.
Kimo wasn't for that type than he had. I'd never seen anybody heel of
cancer. Every time I heard the word casser it was a disk settles and
I feel unless God moved, I feel like David would know he wasn't gonna
make it. You know, my first thought was in my teaching, is
that we need to move into a fast and seek God and see God heal
him. David's face rapidly swelled to the point where he couldn't eat or see
out of his right eye. Pastor Mark Gilbert remembers the many prayers from multiple
church locations and beyond. Both church families was praying for David, and there
was a multitude of other people. It wasn't just our churches. David used
to be a pastor himself, so there's a lot of people that he knows
that was praying for him in different areas of the country, just believing God
for the turnaround in his life. Several times a day we would pray together,
and there was times that you felt like he was just lost for words.
You felt like that you were only repeating yourself because you were worn out.
You were worn down from this sickness. His condition just kept getting worse.
But the prayers at that point we didn't see much. This was swelling
inside of his mouth as fast as it was on the outside, and he
couldn't hardly eat. It was just terrible, and we knew that we were
facing a horrible storm in life. On Easter morning, doctor Tom Retnfro and
his wife Sid were visiting their church for a special prayer service. Remembering her
husband's own miraculous healing from cancer. Sid was moved with compassion to pray for
David. When I prayed for David, I don't touch people's head. I
normally just touched their shoulders. But I did touch his face because I wanted
to be very specific and very direct. I remember standing there and I thought
it's going to come off into her hand because you could feel such a presence
of God's spirit, not greade a prayer that my dad had prayed. By
this time tomorrow, this side of your face will look like this side of
your face because that prayer had worked for my dad. The day after Easter,
something amazing happened. He said, there's a change in my face.
Do you see it? I said, I've already seen it. I looked
at my wife and I said, I see a change in my face.
She said I do too, but I was afraid to say anything. So
we decided to go eat with her family again, and we said, well,
let's just see what they have to say. And they all seen me
and they said that thing's shrinking. And it was just a matter of days
it was gone. David's humor vanished, and doctors later confirmed he is now
cancer free. The Beggars are forever thankful to God for answering their prayers.
There's many people that has got a diagnosis like David, and I feel like
they saw death. Maybe they prepared for death. But I'd say don't give
up. I'd say take his word into your spirit and I'd say believe it
with everything you've got because it's what we done. What I wouldn'ess David up
close and personal with him. I mean, it just boosted my face.
I mean, I know God can do anything, big, little, it
don't matter. He can take a move in anything. I felt jubilant when
I saw the picture and the tumor was gone and he had a normal face.
When I see David now, I think about the benevolence of God,
the mercy of God, that God in this state of David's life, in
his older years, that God has proven his faithfulness to him. Well,
I'm thankful that you know what happened that God heal me. I'm thankful for
that. I've never doubted what God was capable of doing. I've always believed
that he's the healer that he can. He can heal cancer, he can
heal heart attacks, he can heal anything that's affected me, and he can
take care of it if we'll just believe him and walk in his word and
not let doubt and unbelief because that stops the hand of God. But I'm
very thankful. Well, I have a commentary on rumble. I'm seller's prayers
are powerful. I'm relying on prayer right now in my life. Thank you,
David for this encouragement. Needed it. Yeah, And that's the thing,
you know, when you look at this, what is that so many
times people will pray about something and we don't necessarily get what we want because
that's not what prayer is. Prayer is not a demand that we make on
God. But as you heard them talk about that, he heard his brothers
say it really boosted my faith to see this go away as people were praying
for it. And another person said, every time I see him, I
think about the mercy of God. His face swollen way out to the side,
unbelievable couldn't even eat. And so what is the purpose of God's miracles,
Because again, David Baker is going to die. I mean, his
life has been spared, but eventually he's going to die. It is about
a God that we can trust and his word that we can trust to know
that we are going to live forever, that it'll be a better life,
that it will last forever, a better life forever, and we can trust
that. And God gives us these signs to build our faith, to build
our trust. And I hope you've had a situation like that. If you
haven't, you should trust in that. You should ask God for things,
even small things can build your faith. And that's why when we were facing
all of these mandates, people were looking at losing their jobs, their careers
because of vaccine mandates. So I wanted to talk to people about the diary
of George Mueller, who had an amazing number of prayers for major things,
for minor things, he would see God provide something that he would they would
not have any food for the orphanage that he was running. And all of
a sudden there's a knock on the door. Guy says, yeah, my
milk wagon broke down. Here in the street. It's all going to spoil.
Let me give it to you. It's like wow. Then another knock
on the door and the guy's there with bread, you know, and so
it's just but I've seen that, and I know that you have too.
If you've been praying, you will see that in ways that cannot be explained
to coincidence, and certainly that can't. There is a really good book if
you would like to look at this, that I would recommend besides George Mueller.
Again, he kept a very detailed diary of his entire life. He
began just as a pastor. He was concerned for the kids that were on
the street. He was in Victorian England the middle of the eighteen hundreds,
the time that Charles Dickens writes about, we had a lot of kids who
were just roaming the streets because of the poverty. And he started taking some
of them in and providing for them. And he didn't have any money.
He just stepped out in faith and did it. And God kept bringing more
people in and it was an amazing story and a lot of things that happened,
and he kept a detailed diary of it. And when he died there
were thousands of people in that town. Again, population of towns was smaller
than in Bristol, England, and they all turned out because his life was
a testimony that God is present and still acting in our lives. It wasn't
something that happened millennia ago. It wasn't made up stories. It's real.
And when you see these types of prayers, answered, that's the importance of
that, and that's why God does these types of things. And at least
Struggle had an interesting book that's called The Case for Miracles, and in it
he talked about how the more educated people were and the more money they had,
the less likely they were to believe in miracles, with one exception,
and that was physicians. He said in that book, he said in a
two thousand and four survey, they found that fifty five percent of physicians believed
in miracles. Because when people get desperate and they reach out, that's when
God will many times work and show people that the reality of His presence.
And I'll just tell you a little bit about the book. It's set up
in a different parts case from miracles. First of all, he begins by
giving the case against miracles, and he goes to somebody who doesn't believe any
of it, and he makes his case. In part two, he talks
to the guy who was the author of a two volume book called Miracles The
Credibility of the New Testament, Accounts and Miracles Today. This is a guy
who came from a church tradition, one of the mainline churches. I think
it was Presbyterian, but they didn't believe in signs and wonders any of that
kind of stuff. He took a very academic approach to it, and he
would only put in things that he could validate from physicians and from witnesses and
other things like that, and he filled two large volumes. I've got those
books. I got to bring them and show them to you. But it
is pretty amazing. It is case history after casestry and references of that.
And again he's not coming from a you know, signs and wonders type of
thing, which a lot of people are familiar with as a TV evangelists,
you know, really showy stuff. You'll see Benny hen take his jacket off
and whisk it around and have people fall on the floor. When I look
at that, I honestly think that that is a it's a Satanic trick to
make people, to get people to be cynical and jaded and to think that
none of this stuff is real, phony stuff like that. But there's real
stuff that is out there, verified stuff. And again that book is Miracles,
the credibility of the New Testament, accounts of miracles today. And then
he goes to a doctor and a missionary. They talk about dreams and visions,
ways that God is moving in areas of the Muslim world, for example,
where maybe they can't get access to a Bible. I had, you
know, we had the pastor from South Africa who had had the encounter with
Nelson Mandela, Peter Hammon, and he goes into areas where there's Marxist governments,
very authoritary Marxist governments, or radical Muslim governments, and he said,
you know, he's coming from a traditional reform tradition that he said that was
never a part of it. But he said, I've seen amazing stuff that
is done there as a testimony of God, just to open people's eyes and
open their hearts. The next part he talks about the most spectacular miracles.
He said, you know, when we stop and think about it, creation
that is there, that we all see every day one of the most miraculous
things. And as science finds out more about our universe, about our planet,
about our bodies, that miracle is documented more and more, the miracle
of Jesus' resurrection. And then he has some interviews on how many mainline Christians
are embarrassed to recognize miracles. They don't want to go there because to them,
they have been raised on an Enlightenment view that it's all about rationalism and
science and all the rest of the stuff, and they feel that they're going
to look stupid if they talk about the supernatural. And then finally he talks
about the problem of miracles that are prayed for but don't happen. Like I
said, God's purpose is not our intended purpose. We may be looking for
something that is going to help us, and of course we always are,
we're told to ask for that, but we also know that this life is
just preparation and witness, a training ground, if you will, to understand
and to connect with God. And that's really what the purpose of these answered
prayers are. You know. I think it's very sad when we look at
politicians like Trump who says he doesn't need any forgiveness or look at scientists like
Ray Kurzwell, I'm going to talk about here in just a second, these
people who love this world, who fight for every scrap they can get in
this junkyard, and they miss the real beauty of what God has prepared for
them, and they will miss the real beauty of what God has prepared for
our immortal souls. And so let's talk a little bit about kurzwew because Kurzwel
is seeking his own form of immortality. This is an articles on Daily Mail.
They call him a tech profit because he predicted the iPhone years in advance,
and he makes alarming forecasts for years. Well, you know, I
mean the there's other people. George Gilder had predicted the iPhone. It was
kind of a you know, you could put the pieces together and you could
look at the trajectory of technology and you can make predictions like that. But
Kurzweil's predictions are way out there, because Kurzweil embraces the technocracy and this whole
idea of immortality through science. Before I get into that, let me catch
up with some of the comments so that people have made here on Rock fin
rahul Mitro, Where can I find that video on abortion? I need to
share that what I just showed was on Live action and it was let me
go back and find this here. The website was what is abortion dot com.
I don't remember where the procedure was, but you might be able to
find the procedure on YouTube. In terms of hang on a second, here
a different document. I'll look it up and I'll tell you in a minute
when we come back, because I'm gonna lose my place here. I'll try
to tell you where the I think it's live action dot org. That's where
they had the article about people who'd had their minds changed about abortion, but
the actual videos that they were showing them about the different abortion procedures that you
can find at what is abortion dot com? Moonhawk says, women who don't
want to kill their own babies amazing. Yeah it is, isn't it amazing?
The power of propaganda and the power of the media and the social media
and the entertainment industry and the politicians. We underestimate just how influential it is.
Many people would always look at Mattison, Oh, I'm not affected by
these TV commercials, The silly you got the Jolly Green Giant and mister Clean
and all these other things like that, that's silly, that's not going to
influence my purchasing, And yet it does. They do it because it works,
and they do it because they repeat this over and over again. Away
before there was the propaganda of Gebels, there was the propaganda of Edward Burnees,
who helped Woodrow Wilson get us into a war, and after World War
One, Edward Burnese really helped Madison Avenue create the advertising world that they do.
So, yeah, they can get us to inject ourselves, to put
a mask on our face, even when it's absurd. We know that that's
not going to retain the air. They tell us that the viruses are smaller
than air and so forth. None of that made any logical sense. Your
mask doesn't protect you, it protects other people. All of that stuff,
none of it made any sense. The six foot distance and all the rest
of the many of us were laughing about that, but they kept repeating it.
And look at how many people, the vast majority of people bought into
that. By end of that kind of stuff, even to the extent of
killing their own children on rumble ap rumble seat, and they also need to
know the satanic and business end of the profit that is attached to killing these
babies. That's absolutely right. But of course if you expose that, as
David Lyden did with the Center for Medical Progress, you get La La Harris,
Kamala Harris came after the whistleblower. That seems to be a continuing pattern
in our society, doesn't it. If you expose torture by the CIA that
lies us into the Iraq war, well you're the one who goes to jail,
not the people who led us into a war, not the people who
did the torture or covered up the torture. No, Gina Haspell, who
did all that gets promoted by Trump to be the head of the CIA.
So yeah, they always come after the whistleblowers. They fire the whistleblowers,
put them in prison, just as they did David de Lyden. They're trying
to and they have been after him since he first did that about eight or
nine years ago when he showed them doing murder for hire. And as part
of the discovery, we found out that it was Fauci the NIH that was
the customer of a lot of that murder for hire. There's our own government
paying for that, and then creating these humanized mice that they could experiment on
after they got the parts of the babies. It's really horrendous. Yeah,
and I think that is one of the most important things. So Laala Harris
when she was Attorney General, she came after David Lyden in the Center for
Medical Progress, and then she got elected as Senator. Javier Bicera took her
place. Now he is head of HHS, head of the very organization that
was buying the baby parts productive murder. And of course they were It wasn't
that there was an abortion and then oh, well, we've had an abortion,
so let's put these body parts to good use. No, they were
looking for specific ages of these children, and they would make arrangements so that
they were ready to move those organs right away, and they would induce labor
and kill these babies by vivisection by removing the organs so that if they were
to pull the baby apart, as they typically do or use chemicals or something
like that, they would damage what they're trying to extract, so they would
have the baby born and then killed by vivisection. It really is horrendous.
It's truly amazing. Rational Lampooner, I wish David had a working web page
where he would post links to all resources and reference and videos present daily so
many more could share God's truth. Yeah, we probably should try to put
that up on substack or something. It's just it takes me a long time
to put this stuff together. It takes me a long time to do the
description, just to go through and say, well here at this point we
start talking about this. But yeah, we probably could put that up and
give people the links to that. It's already a sixteen hour day on rock
Fan. Jason Barker, responding to rational lampoon or, I set up a
form to do just that. Nobody uses it. Oh okay, well there
we go, and where is that is that? Well tell us where that
is, Jason, and maybe we can get some people to use it.
On rumble m Sellers, you read that one about prayers. So let's go
to Ray Kurzweil, and he is somebody who's been talking about the singularity.
He has heels as probably not through the lockdown, but in general they would
have annual conventions where people talk about the singularity. What is the singularity.
Well, that's when he thinks we're going to merge with machines. And of
course he's not the only one. Most of these powerful people in the technocracy.
He's been brought into Google, but most of the people who are in
the technocracy, people like Peter Teel, he's very much involved in the Singularity
movement, as is Elon Musk. They're a very unique group, you know,
they're not easily pigeonhole. They have some aspects of Marxism and some aspects
of fascism and things like that, but it is its own thing. Technocracy
is its own thing, and we're talking more about that. But we're going
to take really a quick break here and we'll be right back. Boys,
we're all can see with our devots and boys, call it the liberty a
tree. It's a call long tree and the storm of the tree. And
we are the sons, Yes, we are the sons, the sons of
liberty. Liberty, it's your move. You are listening to the David Knight
Show. All right, Ray Kurzweil a successful inventor and technologist, but now
he has made a true idol out of technology, the Singularity. As I
mentioned, this is where they think man and machine are going to merge.
They see knowledge, technology, and science as the things that are going to
give us eternal life. They worship that as a religion. He's now got
a new book called The Singularity Is Near. He said humans are going to
fully merge, with AI now becoming immortal cyborgs by twenty forty five. He
also predicts that advancements in AI will make it possible to resurrect loved ones and
to connect our brains to cloud technology, in which he calls the fifth Epic
of human intelligence. Well Is claim to fame is that he predicted that a
computer would beat somebody at chess by nineteen ninety eight. Of course, I
think what is meant by that. They don't in the Daily Mail. It's
not just going to beat somebody. I'm sure that computers beat a lot of
people before nineteen ninety eight, because a lot of people are not very good
chess players. I'm one of them, but I used to have a computer
chess game that could beat me much earlier than that. But I think he's
talking about one of the chess masters. What he says is that baby is
born today will be just graduating college when the singularity happens. Well, there
you go, Travis, So got a lot of work to do, don't
we that little guys, You're going to have a fight on his hands,
isn't he. Nanotechnology will enable these trends to culminate and directly expanding our brains
with layers of virtual neurons in the cloud. I see just the opposite happening.
I see singularity, but an idiocracy that's happening here. As we merge
ourselves with the technology, we're getting dumber and dumber. We've merged ourselves with
our phones, and we've merged ourselves right out of society, he says.
In this way, we will merge with AI. These are the most exciting
years in all of history. He said. Well, if true, it
reminds me of the Chinese curse. May you live in interesting times? And
of course their character for crisis consists of two characters, one character that represents
danger and the other one that represents opportunity. And that really is where we
are. We are in a crisis. So, as I said, he's
predicting that the dead will come back to life. Think about what this guy
is talking about, he says, at first, in the form of simulations
which will replicate a person and then we will physically bring them back to life.
Again, what do these people who are pushing transhumanism and the singularity,
what do they think they are? What are you? Well, Christians believe
that we're body, that we're soul, that we're spirit. A soul will
be the mind and the emotions. But what do they think that we are?
They don't because they are one hundred percent materialistic. They don't believe in
anything that is immterial, and yet those are the most important parts of us.
He wants to bring back his father, he said, who died when
he was twenty two years old, and so he began using AI to try
to bring back his father. What's an interesting term. Why would he use
Where is his father now? If he's going to bring him back, where
is he He doesn't think that his father is a soul or a spirit.
How is he going to bring him back? Well, he created what he
calls a rep of his father by feeding an artificial intelligence system with his father's
letters, essays, and musical compositions. Well, that's not really any different
than somebody having an audio or video recording of somebody. I mean, we
can all go back and look at old movies, and we don't usually think
about the fact that everybody there is dead. But we watch classic movies all
the time. It seemed very much alive to us, don't They always there?
And that's he's not doing anything that's any different than watching an old Jimmy
Stewart movie or something. Right, probably not as detailed as that, but
that's not Jimmy Stewart. Remember our daughter when she came back, and she
was about five years old when we adopted her, and she, Karen,
likes white Christmas and a lot of Bing Crosby movies, so she was watching
Bing Crosby movies and at some point she asked, you know, where is
he or something said, well, he's dead, and I was like,
oh, oh, you know she was, and then she asked about somebody
else that was in the movie. Of course, these movies fifty sixty years
old even at the time, maybe older. And you know, after about
two or three of these, to go all dead, all dead, you
know, And that's that's the way it is. And yet the reality is
they seem very alive to her, probably more alive than Kurzweil's replicant of his
father. He says, we're already creating them through digital activities, enormously rich
records of how we think and of what we feel. But he said,
we're going to do it with more realistic living bodies. So we're going to
take DNA and we're going to grow them back, and then we will merge
that biological body with technology. He said, by the end of the twenty
twenties, he expects highly realistic non biological recreations of people and then living bodies.
As a matter of fact, you know, when we talked about creating
these non realistic, non biological, realistic, non biological recreations of people,
he said, we're creating enormously rich records of what we think and what we
feel. So is he going to go back in scrape social media and recreate
a replicant of somebody from social media posts? Are we going to have some
really mean zombies walking around? Because that's what happens with people on social media
and we start posting anonymously, it brings out the worst in people. Imagine
creating zombies from social media postings. He says. Eventually the replicants may even
be housed in cybernetically augmented biological bodies grown from DNA of the original person,
and by the twenty forties, he says, it'll be possible to make a
copy of a person. Well, again, it isn't going to be that
person, and who knows how accurate that copy is going to be. By
the way, Jason Barker says, the link is Nights of the Storm dot
com, forward slash form and again, a lot of good resources at Nights
of the Storm that Jason and Angry Tiger have put together. They've got a
they've got a schedule of a lot of different talk shows that are there,
when they are, what day they are, what time they are. So
it's a great resource for a lot of different things. So there's the forum
on Nights of the Storm and you can see the different archives that are there
on rock fan Rational. Lampooner says, David, I know you're working at
capacity. I'm thankful for you. Might scale daily showback to one or two
hours. Three hours of content daily is too much for a small outfit,
but you do God's work well. Thank you. I appreciate that. If
I did scale it back, I think I would probably once I go through
and have to I go through so many different websites. I wind up with
so much content that it's you know, I'd be thrown away a lot of
stuff every day if I only did two hours, you know, and I
kind of have to go through that many different websites. I could edit it
down, but going through and just collecting them is very time consuming, and
so I think it would be better to do like a four day work week.
So I don't know, I might just might start doing like an open
Mike Friday and ask me anything questions on Friday. I think that would be
something that would real move. Is we're going to do gaming streams and we're
going to make you play video games. I'm going to turn you into a
real twitch streamer here. Yeah, yeah, I'm sure everybody will turn in
to watch those epic fails. When's this old guy play video games? Reaction
speed of Joe Biden something like that. So getting back to this imagined immortality
here backed up by huge leaks for huge leaps forward and health treatment. You
see how Pollyanna he is about all this stuff. Yeah, medicine has worked
so great for us. I wonder if this guy's gotten all jabbed up.
Yeah, if we look at vaccines. He says. By the way,
he said, by twenty thirty, we will have AI biological simulators. They
will do all the clinical testing in just hours rather than years. Well,
this problem has already been solved by Fauci. You know, you don't have
to do years worth of testing. You just do disruption from the inside and
you do it iteratively and then you're done. Right, Oh, I haven't
done any Where's this guy ben leading to new drugs and to longevity treatments.
Well, you know, we've had these biological simulators around for a while.
That's part of the problem. You hear people talk about doing something in vitro,
Well, that's doing it in the glass. So they do some tests
of drugs and stuff like that. They might do them in a vial.
You know, you got a bacteria something you want to see if this stuff
kills a bacteria, that's fine. Then you take it to another level.
You can do it inside the person's body. That would be in vivo.
See if whatever you're giving them kills the bad stuff and leaves you alone.
That type of thing, then they call it in silica. Right, And
what that means is that they're just in a computer model how well did computer
monels work out for us during the lockdown? Oh, I've got these two
really smart people and they showed me this simulation and so I'm locking everybody down.
That's what Trump did you know? We had that simulation from the Imperial
College of London and they couldn't get the same answer twice with the same input.
But they just picked which one of the outputs that they liked and they
went with that. Yeah, so well to all the drug testing with this.
So that's one of the reasons why Hugo to Garris wrote his book The
Art Like Wars, because he said, Kurzweil is just too Pollyanna about this
stuff. He thinks that all this stuff is going to work out, It's
going to work out for good. And you go to Garris is not even
a Christian, but he looked at this and he said, it seems to
me like a lot of things could go wrong with this. I think what
is going to go wrong with it is really what he titled his book art
Like Wars Artificial Intelligence wars that as people realize what these elites are doing,
what Clash, Schwab and others are planning to do, that people are going
to push back, and perhaps it'll be a violent thing. He thought that
it would be a violent thing, and he thought that the technical elites with
their superior weapons would fight back, that it would be gigadeath. That may
be what is in the future. Who knows either way. What these people
trying to do is build a tower of babbel gpt, because that's really what
this thing is, he says. Freed from the enclosure of our skulls and
processing on a substrate that is millions of times faster than biological tissue, our
minds will be empowered to grow exponentially, ultimately expanding our intelligence millions fold.
Well, you know, they've got a lot to a lot of work to
do, because when he talks about how the substrate could be millions of times
faster than our biological tissue, it's one of the amazing miracles about what God
has built and created, and that is the fact that so many calculations can
be done by the human brain and not generate the kind of heat that they're
looking at. There's a sometimes as they try to model this, it becomes
even more astounding what God has created. But let me just before we run
out of time, here there was interesting article on dissenter thoughts about the idolatry
of American politics, and he said, you know, when you look at
what is happening in politics, he says, I don't know how God can
make it any clear that he's cursing his people or their idolatrist trust in pagan
politicians, no matter what party they're from. He says, we now have
the two parties. Really, he says, the party, but it's actually
two parties that openly celebrate and promote sexual perversion and death, and the party
that it best tolerates this perversion of death. Nobody with actually biblical worldview has
any chance whatsoever of getting elected to any high office in this country. Again,
another reason is why you focus on local elections. You do have a
chance of getting people with character in at the local level. And just like
I mentioned before, you do things like change the UCC code at the state
level and other things like that to block this globalist elitist plan. He said,
there might be a district here, or they're scattered around, but it's
nine nine and a half percent. He said, it's not mysterious. It's
exactly what God has always done to weed out the pretenders to purify his true
children. He said, that's the part that kills me. When I talk
like this, people act like I'm speaking some sort of alien language, he
said, professing American Christians are far more American than they are Christian. He
says, it's all a product of our ease and comfort. And let's face
that, the American dream is about ease and comfort, comfort, convenience,
choice, comfort being the lack of hardship, convenience meaning that everything we need
is available right away, and an endless variety that to things to choose from.
Many people called it affluenza. He said, God's people are showing that
when presented with this ease and comfort, it will displace Christ as lord of
their life. And again, it was a much bigger challenge for Solomon to
face prosperity, tons and tons of wives, you know. So again it
is always wealth, sex power, and it was more than the wisest man
could handle. Most Christians throughout history, including biblical history, had no comfort,
no convenience, no choice about anything, and yet they were towering giants
of the faith. Just look at George Miller that I was signed about.
It was always dirt poor. He gave away everything that he ever got,
I mean even when he was a pastor. I did was stick a box
in the back of the church, never talked to anybody, never passed a
plate, never asked for money. They just put it back there. So
are true worshippers of Christ. Now this is about politics. None of this
is even about the United States. It's all about God cleansing his Son's church
as a body and as individuals. And this is not some radical new teaching.
It only sounds that way to Americanized Christians who have only ever known ease
and comfort. The US Constitution the Bill of Rights are noble documents. They
represent a system of government that most closely aligns with Biblical principles, more so
than any other government in history. Yet the trouble is that they rely entirely
on the private conscience of those under its rule in order to function. And
if you don't have men of character, they are not going to follow that.
On rumble pro alphae, says mister Knight, please rename your show.
Drop any affiliation you had with the Info Wars theme. The chest Knight could
be seen as a symbol for the New World Order. Go back and restream
on YouTube. Also, well, no, that's possible. If you've been
watching this program, you know that I've been kicked off of YouTube multiple times.
I even had my channel that was just Christian music kicked off, no
explanation, So getting on YouTube is not I didn't choose not to be on
YouTube. They chose not to have me on YouTube. What I chose was
not to tailor what I talk about to what they demand, and so as
a result, we're on different platforms. In terms of my name and the
chess piece. You know, people can if they look hard enough, they
can probably find whatever good or bad symbolism they want to find in anything.
It's a play on my name. It's a chess piece. That's all it
is. I'm not really if people want to read something else into it,
that's their problem. Let's talk about Christian nationalism though, because you know,
yesterday the A and David kind of looks like a pyramid, so we might
be in trouble there too. You may just have to change your name,
and the V is an upside down pyramid, so that has to go as
well. That's right, Yeah, we if we've merged those two over,
it makes like some kind of a Masonic thing. You know, air med
up Aramid down. Anyway, the let's talk a little bit about speech that
Josh Holly gave had the Heritage Foundation. They had something they called the National
Conservative Conference that com that con and it was about Christian nationalism. You know,
I when look at it, I you know, are we trying we
are we trying to use Christianity or are we fighting against the efforts to you
know, are we trying to use Christianity to get what we want? In
other words, it's kind of a politicized prosperity gospel. Right, Well,
you know, it works really good if we have a Christian society. We've
had a lot of people who said that. Most recently we've had Richard Dawkins
who said that. He said, yeah, you know, I would definitely
as they're filling up the country with Muslims. He said, I would pick
Christianity any day of the year, you know, any day of the week
or whatever, over over Islam. And he goes, I really like the
you know, the church cathedrals and the the Christmas stuff and all the rest
of this stuff. I really like all that. He likes a lot of
the fruit of Christianity. But I didn't like the tree, you know,
as as Doug Wilson pointed out, he says, yeah, I love those
apples, but I don't like that orchard. Let's cut down those trees.
It really uh, you know, you can't have the fruit of Christianity without
the root of Christianity, which is christ. You can't have the fruit of
Christianity if you make this all about materialism and you don't have the supernatural power
that is behind it for the Christians. And so, like Dawkins, you
got a lot of people who from a political standpoint, you know, just
just like you've got Joel Austin out there telling people, well, you give
me a lot of money, and God's going to give you back even more
money, right the prosperity gospel, and makes it all about material money and
wealth, and you know, the typical American stuff about ease and comfort and
affluence and that type of thing. And then you've got the politicians like Josh
Holly who look at this and say, well, we would like to have
an orderly society where everybody is behaving nicely and cooperating together and all that kind
of stuff. So I'd like to have that fruit. And so let's make
that, you know, the thing that we're going to strive for. And
throughout this long speech that they reprinted, that's really what he's talking about.
He's talking about how wonderful it is to live in a society where people are
faithfully following Christ and his guidelines. But he doesn't want to talk about God,
and so it really is a political version of the prosperity gospel that you
see from people like Joel Lostity. And he begins talking about it by talking
about Augustine in his City of God. I've mentioned that briefly at other times.
As Rome was destroyed, Augustine was in North Africa and he said,
and a lot of people were saying, well, that's it. You know,
Rome got soft because of all these Christians, and look at what's happened
now, It's just collapsed in of itself. It's Christianity is a fault.
And he's so he said, no, that's not the case. And so
he wrote the City of God, and he contrasted the City of God with
the City of Man. He said, in the City of Man, you're
going to have people going to be focused on love of self. Are we
like that? They're going to have a lot of division and conflict. They're
going to have temporal concerns. They're going to be focused on the here and
now, and they're going to have contempt for God. So do we sound
like the City on the hill, the shining city on the hill? Or
do we sound like the city of Man when you look at those four things
there? I think we check all of those boxes. And he gets it
wrong because he says, you know, the city of Man. These problems
that we have of society, they come from human desires, from human reason,
the destructive nature of ambition. How we pursue power, he said,
while Augustin said all nations are constituted by what they love. His philosophizing actually
described entirely new idea of a nation unknown to the ancient world, a new
kind of nationalism, if you like, A Christian nationalism organized around Christian ideals,
A nationalism driven not by conquests but by common purpose, united not by
fear but by common love. A nation made not for the rich or for
the strong, but for the poor and spirit for the common man. Where's
Christ in that unics? He doesn't talk about it throughout this. Instead,
we are a nation that is forged from Augustine's vision. He said, some
people say I'm calling America a Christian nation, and so I am. And
some will say I'm advocating for Christian nationalism, and so I do. Is
there any other kind that is worth having? The truth is, he said,
Christian nationalism is not a threat to American democracy. Christian nationalism founded American
democracy, and it is the best form of democracy yet devised by man,
the most just, the most free, the most humane, praiseworthy, and
so forth. Everything that he has focused on is secular. It's just that
instead of you your money or your house or your new car, whatever leaches
who with a prosperity gospel, what he's looking at is a political affluenza,
political peace and that type of thing. Nowhere does he talk about how lives
were changed. Nowhere. Yeah, the city of Man the city of God,
said Augustina, are going to be intertwined. They're not going to be
separated until judgment. The wheat will grow up amongst the tears. But we
have to ask ourselves what we personally are rooted in. Is it in politics,
is it in this world? Or is it in Christ? Thank you
for joining us. Good day, The David Night show is a critical thinking
super spreader. If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Night
Show, please do your part and try not to spread it. Financial support
or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread. Father
people have to trust me, I mean trust the science. Wear you mask,
take your vaccine, don't ask questions using free speech to free minds.
It's The David Night Show.