WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.200 --> 00:00:06.400
If Biden is reelected, we as
a community need to be prepared to have

2
00:00:07.400 --> 00:00:18.800
an arsenal of legal resources because four
more years of this critical crypto agenda just

3
00:00:18.879 --> 00:00:24.120
means there's going to be more enforcement
actions, more lawsuits. And while the

4
00:00:24.199 --> 00:00:29.879
industry has gotten many favorable results over
the past couple of years, I don't

5
00:00:29.879 --> 00:00:40.079
think these attacks are going to slow
down. This content is brought to you

6
00:00:40.119 --> 00:00:45.280
by v chain, which is a
leading enterprise grade Layer one public blockchain spearheading

7
00:00:45.399 --> 00:00:50.600
a digital revolution from a sustainable,
highly scalable smart contract platform. The v

8
00:00:50.679 --> 00:00:55.799
chain blockchain has many unique features,
which makes it an ideal choice for Web

9
00:00:55.880 --> 00:01:00.439
three applications. V chain is working
with many great enterprises such as PWCGVONCI,

10
00:01:00.600 --> 00:01:06.680
BMW, and Walmart China. Most
recently, they partnered with the Boston Consulting

11
00:01:06.760 --> 00:01:12.640
Group to build a revolutionary decentralized application
ecosystem. I'm a big believer in this

12
00:01:12.719 --> 00:01:17.239
project. I have been since twenty
eighteen. I've been a VET token holder

13
00:01:17.319 --> 00:01:22.560
for years, and this blockchain is
highly scalable, great with security and speed,

14
00:01:22.719 --> 00:01:26.000
and it has low energy consumption.
If you'd like to learn more about

15
00:01:26.120 --> 00:01:30.920
v chain, please visit vchain dot
org. Link will be in a description.

16
00:01:30.359 --> 00:01:36.120
Welcome to the Thinking Crypto podcast,
your home for cryptocurrency news and interviews

17
00:01:36.159 --> 00:01:38.799
with me. Today's Perian Boring,
who's the founder of the Chamber of Digital

18
00:01:38.840 --> 00:01:42.400
Commerce. Perran, great to have
you back on, Hey Toddy, you

19
00:01:42.400 --> 00:01:48.000
going to be here, Perryan.
There's so much going on in the crypto

20
00:01:48.000 --> 00:01:51.280
industry. Yes, we have bigcoin
breaking new highs and all that, but

21
00:01:51.640 --> 00:01:55.719
as it relates to politics and regulations, there's so much going on and I

22
00:01:55.719 --> 00:01:59.400
have a lot of questions for you. Let's start with Kraken, because Krackin

23
00:01:59.519 --> 00:02:04.280
filed and to dismiss against the SEC
with their lawsuit, You and the folks

24
00:02:04.280 --> 00:02:07.280
in the Chamber filed in a me
case to support them, and then you

25
00:02:07.359 --> 00:02:12.479
had eight state attorney generals backing Kracking. Now I would love to get your

26
00:02:12.479 --> 00:02:16.919
thoughts on the entire situation there.
Yeah, it is an extremely interesting case

27
00:02:17.080 --> 00:02:21.199
to watch, and for those who
have been following, you know, most

28
00:02:21.240 --> 00:02:27.560
of the major cryptocurrency exchanges in the
United States have all received enforcement actions from

29
00:02:27.560 --> 00:02:30.080
the SEC, and a lot of
them are in the middle of litigation,

30
00:02:30.240 --> 00:02:34.879
so this is all going to the
courts. Just to kind of summarize in

31
00:02:35.000 --> 00:02:38.360
general, you know, very high
level what this is all about. It

32
00:02:38.400 --> 00:02:45.080
really comes down to the SEC trying
to expand its jurisdiction as far as it

33
00:02:45.120 --> 00:02:49.400
can get its tentacles into the cryptocurrency
space. So kind of the age old

34
00:02:49.479 --> 00:02:54.400
question and the age old debate,
and this precedes Chairman counselors SEC is where

35
00:02:54.479 --> 00:03:00.759
is the line, you know,
what cryptocurrencies are considered a security and which

36
00:03:00.800 --> 00:03:06.000
ones are not? And Chairman Gensler
is really saying that, well, all

37
00:03:06.039 --> 00:03:10.560
of them are, which of course
is it is not correct. So and

38
00:03:10.599 --> 00:03:15.199
then they came after Crack and you
know, saying you're you know, you're

39
00:03:15.240 --> 00:03:21.919
trading and you're listing essentially unregistered securities. So now they're in litigation over that.

40
00:03:22.639 --> 00:03:27.919
So they have filed emotion to dismiss
what they're asking the court to just

41
00:03:28.039 --> 00:03:36.120
completely dismiss the entire case because of
how faulty the SEC's arguments are. And

42
00:03:36.240 --> 00:03:39.439
you know, one of the biggest
faults with the you know, the SEC's

43
00:03:39.520 --> 00:03:46.800
analysis is there's no limitation doctrine,
so where does where does the end start?

44
00:03:46.840 --> 00:03:49.800
So there were some like really funny
conversations about like, hey, well

45
00:03:49.800 --> 00:03:53.719
if this you know, if this
logic applies to cryptocurrency. That means that

46
00:03:53.840 --> 00:03:58.800
like you know, anything that could
appreciate in price would be considered a security.

47
00:03:58.840 --> 00:04:01.520
So like, are my beanie base
these unregistered securities? What about like

48
00:04:01.599 --> 00:04:04.719
my Nike shoes? Like you know, some people, you know, sneakerheads

49
00:04:04.719 --> 00:04:09.120
buy those, save them and they
may sell for more money in the future,

50
00:04:09.159 --> 00:04:12.800
Like are those down securities? Of
course not. So that's really what

51
00:04:12.840 --> 00:04:15.879
it's come down to. So they've
filed emotion to dismiss our amicist brief supports

52
00:04:15.959 --> 00:04:20.879
cracking, and we really just you
know, agree with that notion that it's

53
00:04:21.680 --> 00:04:29.360
it's legal analysis of cryptocurrency is deeply
flawed, and if the SEC wants to

54
00:04:29.600 --> 00:04:33.399
expand it, well, the SEC
cannot expand its jurisdiction and the courts need

55
00:04:33.480 --> 00:04:40.879
to enforce that. Only Congress has
the statutory authority to tell the agencies what

56
00:04:41.040 --> 00:04:45.720
their uh, their uh their reyatory
powers are and what they apply to.

57
00:04:45.879 --> 00:04:48.439
They can't just utilize orly say okay, now we oversee this. That's just

58
00:04:48.519 --> 00:04:53.120
not how the rule of law works
in this country. And so they're trying

59
00:04:53.160 --> 00:04:57.040
to like assert that jurisdiction you know, crack and saying we need to dismiss

60
00:04:57.040 --> 00:05:00.720
and then we don't want the courts
to kind of endorse the because only Congress

61
00:05:00.800 --> 00:05:04.920
can give that type of authority to
any regulatory agency. We don't want to

62
00:05:04.920 --> 00:05:10.519
set it back legal president. So
we filed our brief on Tuesday, and

63
00:05:10.560 --> 00:05:15.680
then on Thursday there was another brief
that was filed with a attorneys general.

64
00:05:16.439 --> 00:05:21.279
Their brief was not in support of
either the plaintiff or the defendant. They

65
00:05:21.279 --> 00:05:26.160
were really just filing on their own
behalf as a friend of the core.

66
00:05:26.759 --> 00:05:32.800
But their core argument did coincide with
the exact same arguments we were making.

67
00:05:32.839 --> 00:05:38.680
They weren't necessarily getting into it.
You do we support this or support that.

68
00:05:38.759 --> 00:05:43.120
It's more we're the states, we
have jurisdiction in this space. We

69
00:05:43.360 --> 00:05:48.439
don't want the courts to endorse the
SEC expanding its jurisdiction without congressional authority,

70
00:05:48.480 --> 00:05:54.680
because that then completely messes up the
entire regulatory framework for the federal government as

71
00:05:54.720 --> 00:06:00.800
well as the states. And again
that policy making needs to happen with Congress.

72
00:06:00.360 --> 00:06:05.120
So it's really rare that you would
see attorneys general get involved at this

73
00:06:05.360 --> 00:06:15.000
level of a case, and it
was extremely positive overall for them. While

74
00:06:15.000 --> 00:06:19.120
they didn't you submit a brief necessarily
on behalf of krack In. It did

75
00:06:19.240 --> 00:06:24.639
endorse a lot of the exact same
things the cryptocurrency industry is making, including

76
00:06:24.759 --> 00:06:30.959
US and krack In, and it
really just shows that the SEC's approach to

77
00:06:30.000 --> 00:06:36.480
cryptocurrency is flawed. Yeah, absolutely, Imperian. I would love to get

78
00:06:36.519 --> 00:06:41.199
your point of view as to what's
happening in DC as it relates to the

79
00:06:41.240 --> 00:06:46.759
SEC and how Democrats and even Republicans
are viewing the SEC now because they got

80
00:06:46.759 --> 00:06:50.680
called arbitrary and capricious in the Gray
Scale case. In the Ripple case,

81
00:06:50.720 --> 00:06:55.879
they lost a significant part of that
lawsuit obviously still going on. In the

82
00:06:55.920 --> 00:07:00.639
debt Box situation, they got the
judge threatened to sanction SEC lawyers, and

83
00:07:00.839 --> 00:07:04.680
you have the sa B one to
one, which the Government Accountability Office said

84
00:07:04.839 --> 00:07:10.240
is unlawful. So has the point
of view of what Gary Aganser and the

85
00:07:10.319 --> 00:07:14.480
SEC are doing. Has that changed, especially on the democratic side. Yeah,

86
00:07:14.519 --> 00:07:18.240
it's it's an interesting discussion to have. And the Securities and Exchange Commission,

87
00:07:18.240 --> 00:07:23.160
as well as most of the other
regulatory bodies, they weren't political.

88
00:07:23.240 --> 00:07:31.439
They weren't originally created to be these
vehicles to execute a political mission. Most

89
00:07:31.439 --> 00:07:36.160
of the commissioners at the Securities and
Exchange Commission today don't have actually any experience

90
00:07:36.240 --> 00:07:42.759
working in the security space. They
are political appointees. It didn't used to

91
00:07:42.800 --> 00:07:46.439
be like that. It used to
be very boring, you know. You

92
00:07:46.480 --> 00:07:50.600
know, the conversations were you know, really technical, you know, ensuring

93
00:07:50.759 --> 00:08:00.560
that companies were following the properate disclosure
requirements. But it's transformed over the which

94
00:08:00.600 --> 00:08:05.800
is why personally I'm a proponent of
like full political reform in this country and

95
00:08:05.879 --> 00:08:11.480
this is just kind of one one
example of that. But it's turned very

96
00:08:11.519 --> 00:08:16.240
political, and so obviously the Democrats
are in charge, you know, with

97
00:08:16.279 --> 00:08:22.439
the Biden administration. Chairman Gensler was
you know selected by the President to serve

98
00:08:22.720 --> 00:08:28.480
in this role, obviously confirmed by
the Senate. But you know, a

99
00:08:28.480 --> 00:08:33.720
lot, a lot of what we
see at the SEC and other agencies is

100
00:08:33.919 --> 00:08:39.200
there, uh, you know,
effectuating a mission that's driven politically. Uh.

101
00:08:39.440 --> 00:08:45.879
And that's really disruptive to to the
markets. And that's why you know,

102
00:08:45.960 --> 00:08:50.759
you see like really big shifts from
administration to administration, which is also

103
00:08:50.879 --> 00:08:56.559
extremely disruptive to the market. So
this is you know, it's turned very

104
00:08:56.600 --> 00:09:00.480
political. Uh. We would like
to see it get back to you know,

105
00:09:00.679 --> 00:09:05.559
more of a technical agency and leave
the politics you know, somewhere else.

106
00:09:05.279 --> 00:09:07.240
What do you think about And I
don't know if you've seen this,

107
00:09:07.440 --> 00:09:13.960
but Warren Davidson's restructuring the SEC act, I think it makes logical sense where

108
00:09:15.639 --> 00:09:18.519
you know, it's more balanced and
less political. Have you seen that I

109
00:09:18.679 --> 00:09:22.240
have? That's you know, definitely
a part of you know, these key

110
00:09:22.320 --> 00:09:30.639
themes of instead of having a chairman
and this particular administration, Chairman Gensler is

111
00:09:31.279 --> 00:09:35.919
really running the organization through the chairman's
office. But it's meant to be a

112
00:09:35.919 --> 00:09:41.559
commission where you have five commissioners and
you have a chair but each commissioner plays

113
00:09:41.440 --> 00:09:46.799
a significant role in the oversight of
the SEC. And that's really not how

114
00:09:46.799 --> 00:09:52.360
it's being done in practice today.
So what Congressman Warren Davidson is putting forward

115
00:09:52.480 --> 00:09:58.679
is something that would put it back
towards more of like a typical board structure

116
00:09:58.720 --> 00:10:05.120
where you have multiple you know,
commissioners or board members who can level each

117
00:10:05.159 --> 00:10:09.120
other out in the event that politics
start getting involved. And of course you

118
00:10:09.200 --> 00:10:13.200
have you know, a certain number
that are appointed by a Republican, a

119
00:10:13.240 --> 00:10:16.840
certain number that are appointed by Democrats
to try to make it less political.

120
00:10:18.000 --> 00:10:20.519
But you know, it's it's a
it's a good proposal and I think you

121
00:10:20.559 --> 00:10:26.120
know the spirit of that we certainly
agree with. And you know, ultimately

122
00:10:26.159 --> 00:10:28.080
we need to get politics out of
the radio story process in order to have

123
00:10:28.399 --> 00:10:35.000
an efficient, efficient markets. Now, let's talk about what some would call

124
00:10:35.120 --> 00:10:37.679
SAB one two one. I've been
calling SAB one to one, but on

125
00:10:37.799 --> 00:10:41.960
the House, in the House Financial
Services Commute, I think they voted to

126
00:10:41.039 --> 00:10:45.480
repeal this, but it has to
make its way to the House floor to

127
00:10:45.480 --> 00:10:48.879
be voted on. I would love
to get your take on that, and

128
00:10:48.279 --> 00:10:54.039
do you have any idea when that
vote may take place. Yeah, So

129
00:10:54.679 --> 00:10:58.840
SAB one twenty one. This is
the Staff Accounting Bill to enter SAB SAB

130
00:10:58.919 --> 00:11:03.519
one twenty one. These are custody
rules that were issued by the SEC on

131
00:11:03.759 --> 00:11:09.399
digital asset custodians. And what they
say is that if a custodian is holding

132
00:11:09.879 --> 00:11:13.480
a cryptocurrency like bitcloin on their balance
sheet, then they have to have one

133
00:11:13.559 --> 00:11:18.759
hundred percent reserves of another asset like
cash. These are completely unworkable. Uh,

134
00:11:20.000 --> 00:11:24.120
this really makes it financially, there's
no business case there. It completely

135
00:11:24.200 --> 00:11:30.799
you know, makes it really unworkable
for and this applies to institutions. So

136
00:11:31.000 --> 00:11:33.480
are you know our biggest custodians in
the world, this is who This really

137
00:11:33.519 --> 00:11:39.600
applies to banks, uh, in
order to you know, custody digital assets.

138
00:11:39.639 --> 00:11:43.080
It's really you know, makes it, you know, financially impossible.

139
00:11:43.080 --> 00:11:48.080
They're totally unworkable, and it's proven
to keep institutions out of the cryptocurrency space.

140
00:11:48.639 --> 00:11:54.240
So you know, from my perspective, as we continue to grow the

141
00:11:54.279 --> 00:11:58.360
cryptocurrency space, I mean our work
here at the Chamber of Digital Commerce,

142
00:11:58.399 --> 00:12:01.519
we're working to promote the acceptance and
use of this technology. We want to

143
00:12:01.559 --> 00:12:07.200
support the adoption of course, obviously
done in a responsible way, but this

144
00:12:07.440 --> 00:12:11.080
does the opposite of that. As
we continue to grow and mature, there's

145
00:12:11.600 --> 00:12:22.320
corporations and institutions and bigger players who
need to have institutional appropriate custody solutions in

146
00:12:22.440 --> 00:12:26.519
order to engage in our space.
Without that, you're not going to see

147
00:12:26.559 --> 00:12:30.639
institutions in our space in a meaningful
way. So it's kind of like a

148
00:12:30.679 --> 00:12:37.000
way to prevent adoption of certain types
of actors in our community. So we

149
00:12:37.200 --> 00:12:39.759
have once this came out, we
were obviously advantly against it. All our

150
00:12:39.840 --> 00:12:46.679
members are and We did a lot
of work on the Hill to educate members

151
00:12:46.720 --> 00:12:52.519
of Congress that hey, our biggest
institutions in the world. Here are the

152
00:12:52.519 --> 00:12:56.759
biggest institutions that we serve here in
the United States. They are not going

153
00:12:56.799 --> 00:13:01.000
to be able to compete globally with
these types of draconian requirements on them.

154
00:13:01.039 --> 00:13:05.720
We need to make sure our institutions
can can compete and they can't with this.

155
00:13:05.639 --> 00:13:13.720
So that led to the Government Accountability
Office the GOO doing a review of

156
00:13:13.159 --> 00:13:18.919
the staff accounting Bulletin one one.
They just shoot a report late last year

157
00:13:18.159 --> 00:13:24.039
that found that the SEC have violated
yet again the Administrative Procedures Act and the

158
00:13:24.080 --> 00:13:31.600
way they rolled these out, and
therefore Congress can nullify or repeal it's Top

159
00:13:31.639 --> 00:13:35.799
one twenty one. So a couple
of weeks ago, our last month,

160
00:13:35.039 --> 00:13:41.279
a joint resolution was introduced in both
the House and the Senate to nullify or

161
00:13:41.320 --> 00:13:48.840
repeal these rules. That passed the
House Financial Services Committee last Thursday with bipartisan

162
00:13:48.919 --> 00:13:52.559
support. That's really big. So
we're talking about politics, right, So

163
00:13:52.039 --> 00:13:56.279
you know, the SEC is obviously
run by someone who's appointed within a democratic

164
00:13:56.279 --> 00:14:01.559
administration. A lot of times the
Democrats they want to support their party so

165
00:14:01.600 --> 00:14:05.200
they don't want to be critical for
them to vote in support. Yeah,

166
00:14:05.559 --> 00:14:11.039
not one but three Democrats vote in
support of a Congressional Review Act, essentially

167
00:14:11.080 --> 00:14:16.279
saying, hey, the CEC,
like you guys did this wrong. Is

168
00:14:16.480 --> 00:14:20.240
major, extremely difficult to do in
the political environment that we work that we're

169
00:14:20.320 --> 00:14:24.600
operating in, which just goes to
show the egregiousness of what's happening at the

170
00:14:24.639 --> 00:14:31.120
SEC today. So that's past House
Vigil Services Committee. It needs to go

171
00:14:31.200 --> 00:14:37.559
to the floor because it had bipartisan
backing, its likelihood of passing the House

172
00:14:37.679 --> 00:14:43.559
is quite high, and then it
will go to Well, there's already been

173
00:14:43.840 --> 00:14:50.720
a joint resolution issue are introduced concurrently
in the Senate that only needs two Democrats

174
00:14:50.799 --> 00:14:56.120
to pass the Senate, so we
can get this done. It won't be

175
00:14:56.279 --> 00:15:01.720
easy, but it is attainable and
achievable, and our staff is working around

176
00:15:01.799 --> 00:15:05.879
the clock to secure the votes to
full repeal these owner's rules on the crypto

177
00:15:05.960 --> 00:15:11.679
space. And I saw, if
I'm not mistaken, the banks Collective group

178
00:15:11.720 --> 00:15:15.120
of banks did send a letter,
I don't know if it was the SEC

179
00:15:15.279 --> 00:15:18.559
talking about this that they can't pussy
like bigcoin ETFs. If I'm not mistaken,

180
00:15:18.600 --> 00:15:22.960
I'm not getting confused here. Part
of it is stop one to one

181
00:15:22.159 --> 00:15:26.720
wouldn't allow them to do that?
Is that correct? It's it has proven

182
00:15:26.879 --> 00:15:33.919
to deter all the institutions, including
banks, from offering custody solutions. And

183
00:15:35.000 --> 00:15:37.440
of course, you know they don't
want to be limited of you know,

184
00:15:39.080 --> 00:15:43.360
what types of assets they can custody, So the banks are against this.

185
00:15:43.639 --> 00:15:50.399
It applies mostly to banks. But
these are draconian crypto rules and it and

186
00:15:50.440 --> 00:15:54.919
it's you know, it's going to
prevent institutional level adoption of cryptocurrency of these

187
00:15:54.960 --> 00:16:02.519
stay in place, and it already
is m question for you, And this

188
00:16:02.600 --> 00:16:06.919
might be a tough question to answer. We know Elizabeth Warren is working closely

189
00:16:06.960 --> 00:16:14.440
with Gary against and she's been the
one very vocal vocally publicly about being against

190
00:16:14.480 --> 00:16:18.080
crypto, forming an anti crypto army. This reports that she's sending Gary Against

191
00:16:18.080 --> 00:16:23.240
her questions and answers ahead of hearings
and things like that. However, do

192
00:16:23.320 --> 00:16:27.840
you feel both her and Gary have
lost some of the win in their sales

193
00:16:27.879 --> 00:16:33.440
with all these losses in courts,
all these bad optics, and then with

194
00:16:33.559 --> 00:16:38.960
the election coming up, could they
potentially phivot a bit or soften their stance.

195
00:16:40.759 --> 00:16:44.000
What do you think about that you
might see that. I mean,

196
00:16:44.080 --> 00:16:48.799
I think they've already done a lot
of collateral damage across this country. I

197
00:16:48.799 --> 00:16:52.720
think there's a lot of ground that's
already been lost. There's so many different

198
00:16:52.879 --> 00:16:59.000
crypto projects and innovations that Americans are
geofenced from accessing, you know, due

199
00:16:59.000 --> 00:17:02.279
to a lot of these efforts.
So in many ways, you know,

200
00:17:02.440 --> 00:17:07.319
they've won on a lot of fronts. As you know, Elizabeth Warren has

201
00:17:07.400 --> 00:17:12.519
introduced a bill that would effectively ban
in cryptocurrency today and there's nineteen co sponsors

202
00:17:12.559 --> 00:17:17.240
on that bill, so basically twenty
percent of the US Senate is on record

203
00:17:17.559 --> 00:17:22.839
of banning cryptocurrency. We've been very
loud about that. We also kind of

204
00:17:22.839 --> 00:17:25.599
feel like our backs are up against
a wall. Like if you're coming at

205
00:17:25.680 --> 00:17:30.359
us trying to completely wipe out the
entire industry, there's no other appropriate position

206
00:17:30.480 --> 00:17:34.079
for us to take as cryptocurrency advocates. And that's kind of why we've been

207
00:17:34.119 --> 00:17:41.240
so strong on this. But you
know, there is an election coming up,

208
00:17:41.680 --> 00:17:47.759
and it's it's it's interesting, So
this bill that Elizabeth Warren has spearheaded,

209
00:17:47.839 --> 00:17:51.640
you know, we've met with every
single you know, nineteen office one

210
00:17:51.680 --> 00:17:53.200
of the offices when we were like, hey, man, like this ain't

211
00:17:53.240 --> 00:17:56.960
cool, Like why why are you
trying to ban has like just tell us

212
00:17:57.000 --> 00:18:00.640
straight up, like what is this
about? And I won't tell you who

213
00:18:00.759 --> 00:18:04.200
said this, but what they told
me is that, you know, their

214
00:18:04.279 --> 00:18:10.799
boss basically just thought crypto was a
throwaway issue. That's the word they used,

215
00:18:11.079 --> 00:18:15.880
that you know, all they really
knew, all the senator really knew.

216
00:18:15.880 --> 00:18:18.720
And of course most senators don't even
send their own emails, so they

217
00:18:18.720 --> 00:18:25.200
don't have a great technical knowledge of
our space. We're working to improve that

218
00:18:25.240 --> 00:18:27.519
and we've made progress, but there's
still a lot of work to do on

219
00:18:27.559 --> 00:18:33.200
the education front. But you know, what this member office told us was

220
00:18:33.240 --> 00:18:37.480
that they, you know, all
they really knew was FTX and this huge

221
00:18:37.680 --> 00:18:41.759
you know, collapse and like no
one cares about crypto anymore. Like it

222
00:18:41.799 --> 00:18:44.799
didn't collapse, it's done. It's
a fraud. Like that was like what

223
00:18:44.839 --> 00:18:48.640
they actually thought. So they were
thinking, oh, yeah, you know,

224
00:18:48.759 --> 00:18:52.240
we'll do Elizabeth wore in this favor
and crypto is a throwaway issue,

225
00:18:52.319 --> 00:18:57.880
no one cares, no one's even
gonna notice, and and that's why they're

226
00:18:57.880 --> 00:19:03.400
on it. And We're like,
what, so we have to show Congress

227
00:19:03.440 --> 00:19:06.960
Krypto is not at the orow Way
issue. You made a mistake. People

228
00:19:07.039 --> 00:19:11.680
do care about their access to you
know, technology and financial technology, and

229
00:19:11.720 --> 00:19:17.680
don't take that away from people,
especially while we're going through such turbulent you

230
00:19:17.720 --> 00:19:22.160
know, economic and financial times,
you know, don't take options off the

231
00:19:22.240 --> 00:19:26.640
table, don't remove choices for Americans. So that's you know, that's what

232
00:19:26.720 --> 00:19:30.480
we're doing. And could you know, well, will Elizabeth Warren changed her

233
00:19:30.519 --> 00:19:36.480
tune now that you know the elections
are a couple months away? I don't

234
00:19:36.519 --> 00:19:38.359
know. To me, it doesn't
really matter. You know, we we

235
00:19:38.480 --> 00:19:42.519
know her position. She doesn't want
us to exist. She doesn't think we

236
00:19:42.559 --> 00:19:49.400
have a right to be here,
and we're obviously fighting back. You know,

237
00:19:49.480 --> 00:19:53.480
it's funny as you were saying about
these other senators who are banning,

238
00:19:53.759 --> 00:19:59.480
who are joining her in this,
but they don't have a clue. It

239
00:19:59.759 --> 00:20:02.720
makes me sad at the same time, but also optimisty because it's like,

240
00:20:03.000 --> 00:20:06.480
Okay, it's a lack of education
and they're just jumping on the ship with

241
00:20:07.039 --> 00:20:10.079
Elizabeth Warren. But you know,
you guys, for example, are in

242
00:20:10.160 --> 00:20:14.839
DC educating, building awareness. So
that's the good part. There's a solution,

243
00:20:15.000 --> 00:20:17.960
but it's just sad that it's like, oh, we don't know about

244
00:20:17.960 --> 00:20:21.640
this, but just follow Elizabeth.
That's exactly right. Yeah, I do

245
00:20:21.720 --> 00:20:23.960
think we can win this one.
I do think we can totally kill this

246
00:20:25.119 --> 00:20:29.319
bill, but it's going to take
the community's support. So again, there's

247
00:20:29.400 --> 00:20:33.319
nineteen members on this bill. It's
called the Digital Asset Anti Money Laundering Actor,

248
00:20:33.519 --> 00:20:37.400
S two sixty sixty nine. You
can look it up on Congress dot

249
00:20:37.440 --> 00:20:41.359
gov. You can look up the
list of nineteen Senators that are on it.

250
00:20:41.519 --> 00:20:45.519
Colum show up to their town halls
and say, hey, why are

251
00:20:45.599 --> 00:20:51.200
you trying to essentially ban crypto?
They may not even realize that's what the

252
00:20:51.279 --> 00:20:55.440
bill does. You'll put them on
record that make them defend their position.

253
00:20:55.680 --> 00:21:00.240
And if they signed on to this
bill and they didn't realize it effectively bans

254
00:21:00.279 --> 00:21:03.759
crypto and that's not really what they're
supporting or endorsing, then tell them to

255
00:21:03.759 --> 00:21:07.279
get off the bill. If they
made a mistake, get off. They

256
00:21:07.440 --> 00:21:11.519
have, you know, the option
to do that, but we're gonna need

257
00:21:11.519 --> 00:21:15.559
the communities help to do that.
But prian, even with the Bitcoin's Body

258
00:21:15.599 --> 00:21:22.519
TIF approvals and big names like Fidelity
and black Rock involved. Is it Are

259
00:21:22.559 --> 00:21:26.440
these people such in a echo chamber
or in their own bubble in DC that

260
00:21:26.480 --> 00:21:29.680
they're not seeing that. I mean, I understand if it was like a

261
00:21:29.680 --> 00:21:33.000
small crypto company at launch at big
twenty TIF, but black Rock world's largest

262
00:21:33.000 --> 00:21:38.359
asset manager. Are they not aware
of that? Well? I think everyone

263
00:21:38.440 --> 00:21:42.119
is aware of the spot bitcoin ETFs
at this point because it was so highly

264
00:21:42.160 --> 00:21:51.359
publicized the launch. But despite the
ETF's launching earlier this year, and I

265
00:21:51.359 --> 00:21:56.359
mean, I'm just looking at your
bitcoin coop behind you, despite the price

266
00:21:56.440 --> 00:22:00.279
paying at like sixty four sixty five
at this time of recording, I'm March

267
00:22:00.319 --> 00:22:04.680
fifth, there's still nineteen members on
this bill right, Like, why haven't

268
00:22:04.720 --> 00:22:11.240
any of them removed their names?
So I do. I am extremely optimistic

269
00:22:11.279 --> 00:22:15.359
in the long run, but we
still have pretty significant battles that we're facing

270
00:22:15.440 --> 00:22:21.880
today. Sure, now, let's
say Biden wins the election on it for

271
00:22:21.920 --> 00:22:23.680
the folks those thing. I'm not
trying to say I want Biden to when

272
00:22:23.680 --> 00:22:29.039
I'm just saying in this scenario because
people get very upset of politics. But

273
00:22:29.119 --> 00:22:33.039
let's say Biden does win. Do
you see Gary Genser retaining his role or

274
00:22:33.119 --> 00:22:38.440
will he be swapped out. So
he's serving a six year term, So

275
00:22:38.759 --> 00:22:44.880
when his six years expires, I
think he can stay on for one additional

276
00:22:45.039 --> 00:22:48.079
year, but they would have to
break they would have to nominate somebody new.

277
00:22:48.160 --> 00:22:52.960
I don't know how long he would
he would stay, but he has

278
00:22:53.519 --> 00:22:57.960
you know, he has six years
that he can stay. But I think

279
00:23:00.440 --> 00:23:06.960
overall, if Biden is re elected, we as a community need to be

280
00:23:07.039 --> 00:23:15.200
prepared to have an arsenal of legal
resources because four more years of this critical

281
00:23:17.839 --> 00:23:23.440
crypto agenda just means there's going to
be more enforcement actions, more lawsuits.

282
00:23:23.799 --> 00:23:30.839
And while the industry has gotten many
favorable results over the past couple of years,

283
00:23:30.319 --> 00:23:37.759
I don't think these attacks are going
to slow down. So it's it's

284
00:23:37.200 --> 00:23:41.480
I think it would require, you
know, significant legal resources, and we

285
00:23:41.519 --> 00:23:45.559
should be prepared for that in the
event, in the event that is what

286
00:23:45.680 --> 00:23:52.359
happens. Yeah, absolutely, And
man, it's even though like you said,

287
00:23:52.359 --> 00:23:55.720
we're winning and we're fighting back,
it's costing a lot of money.

288
00:23:56.440 --> 00:24:00.200
Some of these companies have to pay
incredible amounts of capital to fight and with

289
00:24:00.359 --> 00:24:04.640
legal fees and so forth. Now, speaking of election, John Deeton is

290
00:24:04.720 --> 00:24:08.000
running against Elizabeth Warren. I will
love to get your thoughts on on what's

291
00:24:08.039 --> 00:24:15.640
happening there. Yeah, it's really
interesting. I'm glad that John is running

292
00:24:15.480 --> 00:24:26.400
because that's that's been a tough seat
the general. I guess idea or agreement

293
00:24:26.480 --> 00:24:33.599
is that this is a significant you
know, blue state and it's just you

294
00:24:33.680 --> 00:24:36.680
know, hard for a Republican to
win, which is why you know,

295
00:24:36.720 --> 00:24:45.519
there wasn't really any like real GOP
challenger to Elizabeth Warren. And I'm not

296
00:24:45.559 --> 00:24:49.799
totally sure how John ended up being
the person, but I'm glad he raised

297
00:24:49.839 --> 00:24:53.480
his hand, and I know he
he you know, he told me that

298
00:24:53.559 --> 00:25:00.480
he's putting his own money into his
race and his campaign because he you know,

299
00:25:00.559 --> 00:25:06.920
he believes that, you know,
he can win, and he believes

300
00:25:06.920 --> 00:25:10.359
we need somebody better in office than
you know, this woman that wants to

301
00:25:10.359 --> 00:25:14.559
ban Crypto, and I totally agree
with that. I do have a little

302
00:25:14.559 --> 00:25:21.400
bit of history with her, you
know, her her district when I worked

303
00:25:21.440 --> 00:25:30.000
on the Hill, Scott Brown was
the Massachusetts from from uh, Massachusetts,

304
00:25:30.319 --> 00:25:37.039
and she had challenged him when I
was working on the Hill, and and

305
00:25:37.119 --> 00:25:41.720
I watched that race very closely when
she originally won, and Scott Brown only

306
00:25:41.839 --> 00:25:48.599
lost by a couple of percentage points, so it was a closer race than

307
00:25:48.640 --> 00:25:53.680
what I think people realize. But
you know, I think it just goes

308
00:25:53.759 --> 00:26:03.519
to show that the American people do
not want people in office that are taking

309
00:26:03.559 --> 00:26:08.079
away their access to any type of
technology, and that they don't want you

310
00:26:08.119 --> 00:26:14.079
know, that they want better options
than people who are who are trying to

311
00:26:14.119 --> 00:26:18.519
limit their access to to options for
choice for sure. Look, I know

312
00:26:18.559 --> 00:26:22.680
it's going to be an uphill battle
for John. Elizabeth Warren has got her

313
00:26:22.759 --> 00:26:26.480
war chest. She's got a lot
of notoriety, branding and so forth.

314
00:26:26.559 --> 00:26:32.920
But John at least has a lot
of I think the entire asset class of

315
00:26:32.920 --> 00:26:38.200
crypto behind in the industry and crypto
holders, and maybe the macro factors of

316
00:26:38.200 --> 00:26:42.279
what's happening with the Biding administration in
the border and all the other problems we're

317
00:26:42.319 --> 00:26:48.240
dealing with. Uh, maybe John
has a chance here and it would be

318
00:26:48.279 --> 00:26:52.440
amazing if he's able to unseat her. Yeah, yeah, it would.

319
00:26:52.599 --> 00:26:56.440
It would be an incredible victory for
you know, anyone in the crypto space,

320
00:26:56.480 --> 00:27:03.079
but also just people who are proponents
of freedom for sure. The other

321
00:27:03.119 --> 00:27:08.799
thing that we saw pop up recently, the EIA bringing up energy fut again.

322
00:27:08.839 --> 00:27:11.839
I feel like it's twenty seventeen.
It's like deja vu. I don't

323
00:27:11.839 --> 00:27:15.319
know, maybe every four years they're
going to bring this up when the price

324
00:27:15.400 --> 00:27:18.839
is going up. We saw the
Texas Blockchain Council launch a lawsuit they won

325
00:27:18.880 --> 00:27:22.559
that. We'll love to get your
thoughts on this is this another Elizabeth Warren

326
00:27:25.000 --> 00:27:27.400
agenda to try to you know,
stop bitcoin mining and things like that.

327
00:27:29.000 --> 00:27:36.680
It was, it absolutely was.
I shared a clip on my Twitter account

328
00:27:36.720 --> 00:27:41.200
just a couple of days. It
was a post that Brian Morgenstern had shared

329
00:27:41.519 --> 00:27:45.519
and it was in exchange with Elizabeth
Warren and the EIA, that's the Energy

330
00:27:45.680 --> 00:27:51.799
Information Administration, and it's Elizabeth Warren. Really, I mean she's pressuring the

331
00:27:51.839 --> 00:27:56.440
EIA, you know, in a
congressional hearing, saying, you know,

332
00:27:56.720 --> 00:28:00.599
you need to issue this mandatory survey. She says, tech talk off times

333
00:28:00.599 --> 00:28:03.240
clicking like we we you know,
we need to get this information so we

334
00:28:03.319 --> 00:28:07.319
can you know, address you know, our concerns with cryptocurrency mining. So

335
00:28:07.440 --> 00:28:11.720
this absolutely, I mean, from
you know, my opinion, was a

336
00:28:12.000 --> 00:28:21.079
politically motivated effort. What this was
is you know, an emergency mandated survey

337
00:28:21.359 --> 00:28:27.160
on eighty two bitcoint and cryptocurrency mining
companies. Uh, and it was it

338
00:28:27.200 --> 00:28:32.640
was a mandate, so if you
don't respond, there would be charges of

339
00:28:32.880 --> 00:28:37.200
thousands of dollars a day if you
don't respond to the survey, and it

340
00:28:37.319 --> 00:28:44.799
required them to fill out some extremely
sensitive information. The kind of interesting thing

341
00:28:44.880 --> 00:28:48.079
here is that you know, mining
is you know, uh, happening on

342
00:28:48.119 --> 00:28:53.119
a blockchain. You have more information
about cryptocurrency mining than any other type of

343
00:28:53.160 --> 00:28:59.200
minding you could think of. Uh, there's a lot of data that has

344
00:28:59.359 --> 00:29:03.759
publicly to anybody, So why do
they need, you know, this type

345
00:29:03.759 --> 00:29:08.279
of information from the from the industry. We're not against data collection, we're

346
00:29:08.319 --> 00:29:15.680
not about sharing information, but we
are we are absolutely against the government abusing

347
00:29:15.720 --> 00:29:22.279
its powers. The way this emergency
order was issued did not follow the appropriate

348
00:29:22.480 --> 00:29:29.759
process. So our you know,
the teams of lawyers that we worked with,

349
00:29:30.319 --> 00:29:34.160
they found at least six mistakes that
the EIA made. You have to

350
00:29:34.240 --> 00:29:38.319
check a bunch of boxes in order
to issue a mandated emergency survey. You

351
00:29:38.359 --> 00:29:41.480
know, you have to prove there's
an actual emergency. They said it was

352
00:29:41.559 --> 00:29:45.480
cold in Texas and that was the
emergency despite you know, they're not really

353
00:29:45.480 --> 00:29:51.519
being any issues with the grid.
And then there's other you know, procedural

354
00:29:51.559 --> 00:29:53.440
things that have to be done,
and we found there was at least six

355
00:29:53.680 --> 00:29:57.720
things that they just criteria they didn't
meet, So that's why there was a

356
00:29:57.799 --> 00:30:03.400
lawsuit. So the lawsuit was filed
by the Texas Blockchain Council and Riot.

357
00:30:03.440 --> 00:30:10.319
They were co plaintiffs. We later
joined as a plaintiff as well, and

358
00:30:10.759 --> 00:30:18.839
the EIA settled with us and we
were initially given a temporary restraining order,

359
00:30:18.960 --> 00:30:22.640
So that happened on Friday, two
fridays ago. That day the survey was

360
00:30:22.680 --> 00:30:27.599
due, so that temporary restraining order
was issued, so all the mining companies

361
00:30:27.720 --> 00:30:32.599
were told, you don't have to
file today, and then that was made

362
00:30:32.640 --> 00:30:37.839
permanent. Last Friday, we reached
a settlement with the EIA. They agreed

363
00:30:37.880 --> 00:30:42.319
to cancel the survey and the survey
could come back in the form of a

364
00:30:42.400 --> 00:30:49.519
notice of comment and wool making process
so they could do lawful data collection.

365
00:30:49.799 --> 00:30:56.240
So this is not totally over,
but this was another example of a political

366
00:30:56.279 --> 00:31:02.440
attack on the cryptocurrency industry, the
government, you know, abusing its powers,

367
00:31:03.039 --> 00:31:07.000
and as Americans, you know,
as individuals, as users, as

368
00:31:07.079 --> 00:31:14.079
consumers and companies. It is our
job as Americans to protect our rights because

369
00:31:14.119 --> 00:31:15.680
nobody else is going to do that
for us. That is our duty as

370
00:31:15.720 --> 00:31:21.039
Americans. So when there's government overreach, when the government is not following the

371
00:31:21.119 --> 00:31:25.960
laws that pertain to it, when
you have governments that are abusing its powers

372
00:31:26.559 --> 00:31:33.480
or violating the rights of Americans and
Americans businesses, we must push back.

373
00:31:33.799 --> 00:31:37.799
That's when the courts get involved.
And the courts have been you know such

374
00:31:37.519 --> 00:31:42.599
you know, thank god they're there
because this was one example where the court

375
00:31:42.640 --> 00:31:45.640
stepped in and said, hey,
you did not you know, you didn't

376
00:31:45.640 --> 00:31:51.519
follow the process. You can't do
this. So it's our job, it

377
00:31:51.599 --> 00:31:56.119
is our duty as Americans to push
back when our rights are being violated.

378
00:31:56.480 --> 00:32:01.000
And you know, we did that, and we're glad that justice was served

379
00:32:01.039 --> 00:32:06.640
and rule blah was restored. Absolutely. I was about to say the same

380
00:32:06.680 --> 00:32:08.680
thing you were saying, that thank
goodness for the judicial branch, right,

381
00:32:09.039 --> 00:32:15.119
and that we have the three branches
of government. Uh, you know,

382
00:32:15.119 --> 00:32:16.839
going back to school, I never
really cared about it, like, oh,

383
00:32:16.920 --> 00:32:20.680
yeah, we have three branches of
government. But now care understand how

384
00:32:20.680 --> 00:32:24.559
you see why why why? Yeah? Yeah, for sure, and uh,

385
00:32:27.039 --> 00:32:30.000
kind of a question for it.
This is maybe a bit philosophical,

386
00:32:30.039 --> 00:32:37.599
but why do you think we're seeing
all of these issues with Elizabeth Warren and

387
00:32:37.640 --> 00:32:40.720
the SEC and and the things they're
doing breaking the law. Is it that

388
00:32:42.079 --> 00:32:45.319
they're desperate and they're trying to move
fast and you're dropping the ball in certain

389
00:32:45.319 --> 00:32:50.240
spots, or they're just trying to
see if they can push things as far

390
00:32:50.279 --> 00:32:53.319
as they can, even though they
again hit in court and for example,

391
00:32:53.319 --> 00:32:58.720
in the debt box situation, right
SEC the judge threatening to sanction the SEC

392
00:32:58.799 --> 00:33:04.200
lawyers they lied, And then with
the EIA unlawful, sa B unlawful.

393
00:33:04.480 --> 00:33:09.640
What do you think is happening there? It's hard to know, you know,

394
00:33:10.079 --> 00:33:15.599
it's hard to and there's just so
many layers. You know, who

395
00:33:15.759 --> 00:33:21.759
ultimately was calling the shots at these
agencies, you know who was who actually

396
00:33:22.240 --> 00:33:25.440
knew what was happening. You know, we didn't just say, hey,

397
00:33:25.519 --> 00:33:30.000
let's sue the IA and launch a
lawsuit the next day. I mean,

398
00:33:30.039 --> 00:33:32.960
we reached out to the Department of
Energy and the AA. We had several

399
00:33:34.000 --> 00:33:37.720
meetings with them ahead of time,
just to say can we work this out?

400
00:33:37.799 --> 00:33:39.640
Like, do you guys understand that
you didn't follow the process, like

401
00:33:39.880 --> 00:33:44.440
or can we negotiate this? Like
are there any other options? We're not

402
00:33:44.640 --> 00:33:47.319
happy. We will sue if we
have to, but like, you know,

403
00:33:47.400 --> 00:33:52.960
let's have a conversation before we start
getting involved in litigation. And it

404
00:33:52.079 --> 00:33:57.000
was pretty amazing that despite the fact
that we had multiple meetings, you know,

405
00:33:57.039 --> 00:33:59.640
half the time you get in the
room and that the people you're talking

406
00:33:59.640 --> 00:34:01.759
to agencies have absolutely no idea who
you are, what you're talking about.

407
00:34:01.960 --> 00:34:06.319
They just got kind of shoved into
a meeting and they didn't have the background,

408
00:34:06.880 --> 00:34:10.440
so it's hard to know what exactly
is going on. You know,

409
00:34:10.559 --> 00:34:15.320
governments are not the most efficient.
You know, they're not known for being

410
00:34:15.440 --> 00:34:21.679
efficient, so you know, there's
a lot of layers of bureaucracy. But

411
00:34:22.079 --> 00:34:24.199
it's you know, that's why I'm
stressing. You know, it's it's our

412
00:34:24.360 --> 00:34:34.679
job to you know, protect our
rights because they are being attacked and we

413
00:34:34.760 --> 00:34:37.719
don't. You know, if we
don't do that, then we have we

414
00:34:37.840 --> 00:34:43.079
have everything to lose. But my
best guess it's it's it's political. It's

415
00:34:43.280 --> 00:34:49.800
driven by politically motivated factors, and
that's not how it's supposed to be.

416
00:34:50.519 --> 00:34:54.679
Wow, you're absolutely right that we
got to fight to maintain these rights because

417
00:34:54.760 --> 00:34:58.480
yeah, I mean I just look
at these things and I'm like, what

418
00:34:58.519 --> 00:35:02.199
the hell is going on? Like, even if you're trying to stop something,

419
00:35:02.679 --> 00:35:07.360
you know at least abide by the
law man, Like, you know,

420
00:35:07.519 --> 00:35:10.400
that's the most like ironic thing.
And it's crazy how many times you

421
00:35:10.440 --> 00:35:15.719
know, I've seen this now where
the regulators want to put rules on us,

422
00:35:15.920 --> 00:35:21.639
new rules and regulations on us on
industry, but they're not willing to

423
00:35:21.679 --> 00:35:27.360
follow the rules that apply to them. It's like, how hypocritical can you

424
00:35:27.440 --> 00:35:32.320
possibly be? Right? Unbelievable.
Well that with that said, we've got

425
00:35:32.360 --> 00:35:37.000
a couple of bills in the House
to in the Senate. Patrick McHenry is

426
00:35:37.000 --> 00:35:39.440
trying to push things through. We
saw Janet yelling about a month ago,

427
00:35:39.960 --> 00:35:44.599
made the statement in front of the
House as well as saying we need to

428
00:35:44.639 --> 00:35:49.079
pass stable coin and cryptoregulations. I
think Jerome Palace testifying today and tomorrow he

429
00:35:49.159 --> 00:35:52.679
might talk about stable coins. What
is what do you is your outlook?

430
00:35:53.119 --> 00:35:57.480
Do you think we get stable coin
regulation at least this year? Or the

431
00:35:57.519 --> 00:36:05.440
election is just too messy right now. So my prediction or my guess before

432
00:36:05.719 --> 00:36:09.239
Janet Yellen's testimony on stable coin bill
becoming law was like fifty to fifty.

433
00:36:09.239 --> 00:36:15.840
It's a coin toss. It's you
know, it seems that a deal has

434
00:36:15.880 --> 00:36:19.840
been made between Democrats and Republicans on
the bill. That's the hardest thing.

435
00:36:19.920 --> 00:36:22.800
So if you can get that,
you likely can move it through the legislative

436
00:36:22.800 --> 00:36:30.119
process. But what's complicated for stable
coin bill is that stable coins is not

437
00:36:30.239 --> 00:36:32.679
the priority of Congress today. I
mean, if you just spend five minutes

438
00:36:32.760 --> 00:36:37.440
looking at the mainstream media, we've
got a border crisis, We're involved in

439
00:36:37.519 --> 00:36:40.360
multiple wars. Right, there's like
just big the government is not properly funded.

440
00:36:40.679 --> 00:36:45.639
They're finding about much bigger things,
and that's taking time on the legislative

441
00:36:45.679 --> 00:36:49.800
calendar. So it's stable coin's got
to be a high enough priority that they

442
00:36:49.800 --> 00:36:52.800
can fit it into the calendar to
get it done. Fifty to fifty shot.

443
00:36:53.079 --> 00:36:57.679
But after Secretary of Yellen testified just
a couple of weeks ago, she

444
00:36:57.880 --> 00:37:02.440
called to get a stablecoin build done, which that to me, I would

445
00:37:02.480 --> 00:37:07.840
say, that's going to help increase
that prioritization of a stable coin bill.

446
00:37:07.920 --> 00:37:13.199
So I'm now like a seventy five
percent chance of getting it done. There's

447
00:37:13.239 --> 00:37:16.159
no there's no for sure that's going
to happen. There's just so many factors

448
00:37:16.199 --> 00:37:21.760
that go into what gets on the
legislative calendar every day they're in session.

449
00:37:22.639 --> 00:37:25.400
But it is looking pretty optimistic.
And again, the hardest thing is just

450
00:37:25.400 --> 00:37:32.000
to get you know, the politics
all aligned House and Senate Democrats, Republicans,

451
00:37:32.199 --> 00:37:38.559
and the White House or the administration, and that stuff appears to be

452
00:37:38.719 --> 00:37:44.480
in line. So can it move? We will know soon. Final question

453
00:37:44.559 --> 00:37:49.119
here for you. Yesterday there's news
that the SEC blocked or delayed I should

454
00:37:49.119 --> 00:37:53.400
say, the blackrock Ethereum s BOTYTF. The next deadline is May twenty third.

455
00:37:54.119 --> 00:37:59.440
What do you think we see to
eat ETF this year? Well,

456
00:37:59.480 --> 00:38:04.159
we would love to see one.
We you know, we it took ten

457
00:38:04.239 --> 00:38:07.360
years to get a bitcoin ETF.
I mean, and and just to answer

458
00:38:07.599 --> 00:38:10.920
the question very you know, directly, it's hard to know. I mean,

459
00:38:12.000 --> 00:38:15.880
I don't think anyone really knows,
I mean, nobody really knew when

460
00:38:15.960 --> 00:38:21.119
the spot bitcoin ETFs we're going to
get approved except Gary Gensler himself. I

461
00:38:21.159 --> 00:38:25.280
really really hope it doesn't get drawn
out in the same way that spot bitcoin

462
00:38:25.400 --> 00:38:35.480
ETFs did. But we believe that
paved the way for additional cryptocurrency spot ETFs,

463
00:38:36.360 --> 00:38:39.880
but the politics are not on our
side for this one, and Chairman

464
00:38:39.960 --> 00:38:45.480
Genzler went down kicking and screaming at
the approval of spot bitcoin etf. So

465
00:38:45.960 --> 00:38:50.280
if history is a guide, you
know there there there might be more more

466
00:38:50.280 --> 00:38:53.559
of a battle to get it done
as opposed to just the normal pgatory process

467
00:38:53.679 --> 00:38:58.360
that ETFs go through. Well,
we're going to drag them to court again,

468
00:38:58.480 --> 00:39:00.360
right and uh, the way to
want to go, we'll give them

469
00:39:00.880 --> 00:39:07.079
it doesn't take that. Yeah,
Perrian, all is a pleasure. I'm

470
00:39:07.079 --> 00:39:08.920
really appreciative of what you and the
folks at a chamber are doing. How

471
00:39:08.960 --> 00:39:15.079
can folks support the Chamber of Digital
Commerce. Yeah, well thanks for asking.

472
00:39:15.280 --> 00:39:19.400
We're hosting a conference on May fifteenth, the DC Blockchain Summit. We'd

473
00:39:19.440 --> 00:39:22.800
love to invite everybody to join us. You can go to our website at

474
00:39:22.840 --> 00:39:30.199
Digital Chamber dot org or DC Blotchingsummit
dot com and then a more tangible way

475
00:39:30.320 --> 00:39:35.239
on how you can support the important
education and the advocacy work that we do

476
00:39:35.360 --> 00:39:37.960
every single day. But again,
we need the whole community to help us

477
00:39:37.039 --> 00:39:43.239
to really take the community to the
next level of adoption. We're hosting Blockchain

478
00:39:43.440 --> 00:39:47.119
Education Day the day after on May
sixteenth, and so if you sign up

479
00:39:47.119 --> 00:39:52.719
for Blockchain Education Day, we will
take you to Capitol Hill to go meet

480
00:39:52.760 --> 00:39:57.719
with your elected officials so you can
tell them directly about why this technology is

481
00:39:57.719 --> 00:40:04.320
important to you and to support spport
policies that help grow and foster our community

482
00:40:04.360 --> 00:40:07.559
here in the United States. So
come to the DC Bloxching Summit participate in

483
00:40:07.840 --> 00:40:14.199
Boxing Education Day. That's May fifteenth
and May sixteen. Awesome, Prian,

484
00:40:14.280 --> 00:40:16.360
thank you so much for joining me. Thanks Tony, good to be here.

