Using free speech to free minds. You are listening to the David Knight Show.
As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Monday, the twenty fifth of March.
You're of our Lord twenty twenty four. Well, that's not for whom
the bell tolls. It tolls for thee We see even being a young,
pretty rich and you know, big future ahead of her, small has a
start over the family. Cape Middleton now comes down with cancer. This is
the end of all mankind. Doesn't matter whether you're a king or pauper.
But is there something else involved? Does this also tell us about what is
happening with the JAB Very interesting to see how the media is reporting this and
what they're afraid to say, given the fact that the ground had already been
polluted with a lot of nonsense conspiracy theories about her disappearance. We'll talk about
that first. We also have a solution to squatters from somebody who's been there,
done that. I know. It's quite simple, actually, so stay
tuned. We'll tell you how to protect your home. We'll be right back.
He has had a listener, Robert write me. They're talking about autism
and measles. He says, you know, you're one of the few people
who talks about autism anymore. That's used to be something we talked about a
great deal because there was a tremendous correlation between that and the increase in vaccines.
You know, seventy some odd vaccines. I think it's seventy two that
kids have to get at an early age. No other country comes close to
that. And there's been an explosion that has corresponded to that explosion and autism,
and so Robert writes, he says, the thought occurred to me is
I was listening to your show where you talked about one out of ten thousand
deaths, their numbers, their suspicious numbers, as we said, they claimed
that prior to their measles vaccine, this is a dangerous thing because one out
of ten thousand people are dying. Well that's much. That is not that
high for most diseases, quite frankly. And were they dying with measles or
front measles? What were the other complications, What was the situation of the
people who died who got measles? We don't have any information about that.
In addition to it, those are are going to be people who have had
you know, the hospital is going to know about them or have had something
to do with it. So all of these numbers are suspicious. The same
thing he points out that we saw with covid or we don't know if people
died with a PCR test that was positive, or if they died from any
particular disease that one in particular, or was it just flew Was it respiratory
illness? Was it neglect from the hospitals. The hospitals actually caused this with
their ventilator treatment and rem desavir and other and neglect and do not resuscitate orders
and all the rest of this stuff. They're paid to kill people, they're
paid to give them not treatments that had never been done for respiratory illnesses before,
and they had the expected result quite frankly, but again, even if
it is a PCR test that is positive. I spent a lot of time
last several years talking about the PCR tests and how suspect they were when they
were magnified with a number of cycles that they've got here one point one trillion
times magnification as the as Carrie Mollis, who invented it and got the Nobel
Peace Price, Nobel Prize and science. As he said, you can't prove
that AIDS is caused by a virus, not with my PCR test. You
can't, he said, and he went to debate Fauci. He took Fauci
on and they purged him because Fauci was pushing the AIDS and HIV connection at
the time, and he was using the PCR test to do it, and
carry Mollis is pushing back real hard, and some other scientists were and they
were canceled, just we saw with the people who got in the way of
the vaccination agenda this time. And so the PCR test was suspect. The
way it was used with suspect. All of this was suspect. But nevertheless,
when you look at let's just take it at their word, one out
of ten thousand deaths, as he pointed out, well where are we with
autism? He said, The number is for autism range from one out of
one hundred to one out of thirty. Okay, so let's just go with
their numbers. Let's say that you really do have a chance of one in
ten thousand of dying from measles, but you got a one in thirty chance
of getting autism. Which one would you choose. Oh, sorry, we
don't care about your informed consent. We're not going to talk about those numbers.
And even if you know those numbers, we don't care. You're just
a conspiracy theorist. No consent, I don't care what you think. You're
going to give the MMR JAB to your kids or you know, as Trump
said, it was really going around. They got to get it, you
know, no religious exemptions, no medical exemptions for anyone. Got to get
that thing right, no exemptions whatsoever. Well, the is as our remember,
says Robert, when I first heard Trump's own son was autistic? Where'd
you hear that? I bet you heard that from Alex Jones. You got
Trump really annoyed with him by saying that Baron was autistic. I don't know
if he is or not. I'm not interested in spreading rumors like that.
I don't know, you know, I think to me, you know,
the same people would say stuff like that, like Alex would say that,
well, rage when somebody says it makes a diagnosis of you know, Trump's
psychological conditions from a distance or something like that. They'll also embrace the diagnosis
of Biden has been senile though, that's that's pretty obvious. That's that's really
out there. We're gonna sleeve. But nevertheless, you know, when you
start doing a clinical diagnosis of things. They had people who were accusing very
Goldwater, of all people. You know, the way they smeared Goldwater was
to say that he was unstable, say about Trump the uh, but they
said he was unstable on other things. And afterwards they came out and you
know, the American Psychiatry Association or whatever their official name is. So we're
not going to do that anymore. You don't make any It's unethical to make
these diagnoses unless you have examined that person specifically. So whether or not Trump's
son has autism, it was sold by alex Oh, yeah, Trump knows
about and and Trump was selling his vaccine skepticism. He sold his vaccine skepticism
big pharmaceutical companies by bringing an RFKG to Trump Tower. That's how he bid
his price up. He got a million dollars from Pfizer a loan, and
then he put in as the head of HHS. Alexis are the CEO of
ELI Lilly alex Azar was the one who spearheaded all this pandemic and lockdown stuff.
So yeah, he says, he said, I remember in twenty sixteen
to talk about Trump's son being autistic. He said, Sureley, I hoped
something will be addressed. Perhaps he will all sign a team, perhaps he'll
have an investigation, Maybe they'll reverse course, he says, nothing. In
fact, just the opposite, choot up the entire population with another vaccine that's
never been tested, another novel way to do this. And if you think
that these people are going to change anything because one of their family members dies,
you really don't understand the mentality of the elite. Do you think the
royal family's going to come out in opposition to the visor of moderna vaccines?
She had one or the other. They they know it was one of those
two, but they don't know which. When you go back and you look
at her original vaccination that she made a big display out of, do you
think they're really going to attack the system with that? No. No,
they are trying to preserve something that is far more important to them than their
own family members. Even this is the problem that we have when we try
to put ourselves in the mindset of these people who are pulling this stuff.
We're running this global depopulation game. You really can't understand their mentality any more
than you can understand the mentality of a mass murder, a serial killer,
somebody like that. You can't put yourself into their mind frame as a sane
person. This is one of the reasons why someone like Ted Bundy was so
successful in deceiving people. He seemed like such a nice man, so intelligent,
so attractive, and yet murdering and raping one woman after the other.
And that was part of it, his ability to trade on our projection of
normalcy onto these people. They're not normal. They don't think like you think.
They have a completely different frame of reference. And so let's talk about
Kate with cancer. And you know, I got to say, the first
thing I thought when I saw this was not about the vaccine. Honestly,
first thing I thought was And so it goes with everyone. It doesn't matter
what your station in life is, it doesn't matter how much money you got.
You know, Bill Clinton will die, he was President's Bill Gates,
Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk. They think they're going to Some of these technocrats
really do think they're going to live forever. But they all really kind of
think they're going to live forever even if they're not doing anything about it.
You know, you got some of these people like great Kurzweil, He's out
there, I'm gonna make a robot. I'm going to go inside the robot.
It's like, okay, fine, what are you? How are you
going to get in that robot? You're going to make a copy of the
electrical signals in your brain? Is that you? Or is that a copy
of you? What is that? That's not even you? These people are
so foolish. They don't understand there's a god. They certainly don't understand the
difference between body, soul, and spirit. They had that conversation with Sultan
is Fine, who was running for president as this thing he created called the
Transhumanist Party. It was really a publicity tour for his idea of transhumanism and
the book that he wrote. But you know, I obliged and talked to
him about what he thinks human nature is because the villains in his book were
the villains were Christians. They were terrorists, kind of like American Carol of
the Nun getting on the on the bus and pulling the cross out of a
of a grenade and blowing up everybody on the bus, that kind of absurdity,
you know. That was Sultanison's take on Christianity. Actually had one of
the key characters. I can't remember if it's a protagonist or the antagonist was
named Night. So anyway, it was an interesting interview, but that was
years ago. But what I'm saying is that these people who are transhumanists,
they think they're going to live forever, but they don't even know what they
are. Well, what is going What am I going to pass on?
I don't know what it is? No, the reality is is that we're
all going to die, and it's tragic for those who are left behind.
But for those who die, if they die in the Lord, it is
the best thing that can happen to them. It's just a transition. It's
a difficult transition. It's a difficult transition, no doubt about it. And
we all dread that transition. Even if we have a confident expectation that to
die is to be present with the Lord, we still dread that and rightfully
so. Death is not a good thing. Death is a punishment. Death
is bad. That's why Christ came to destroy death. And we'll talk more
about that even though we've got some churches who are trying to run the other
way from the resurrection on Easter. Resurrection Sunday is what we call it.
They don't want to use that term. It's just too off putting to talk
to people about the blood. Yeah, you know, that's the thing.
From the very beginning in Genesis, God gives Adam and Eve animal skins.
It's based on the death of an animal. It's based on blood because sin
is a serious thing. You know, what they did was we look at
it, it's like, well, what's the big deal. Nobody got hurt,
what's the big deal? They ate some fruit. Well, it was
a cosmic rebellion against God. And so the punishment for that is death.
And so, you know it is when you look at an animal that has
died, no matter what it is, you don't have to be pete.
You still feel something for the animal that has dyed. You don't think anything
about cutting down a plant, right and eating a plant. It's very different.
And the life is in the blood, as Leveticus tells us, an
emblem of life and death. And so this is the end that we all
come to, regardless of our station in life. Regardless of how rich we
are, how pretty we are, how young we are, even if we
got young children, this type of thing can happen to any of us.
That was my first thought of it. But then, of course the vaccine.
She said, yesterday I received my first dose of COVID nineteen vaccine at
London's Science Museum. This back of twenty twenty one. Here we are just
under three years later. I'm hugely grateful to everyone who is playing a part
in the rollout. Thank you for everything that you are doing. That they
forget to give her the sugar water that Alex was talking about. You know,
it's just sugar water. Come on, you can take sugar water.
You can do it for the team, right, do it. Do it
for Trump, do it for the crown, do it for this, do
it for that. Don't worry about the fact that hasn't been tested, don't
worry about the fact that this is brand new. As a matter of fact,
I'm I'm not going to cover it today, but there's a whistle bowl
from Pfizer. He recorded a statement that was as you know, he's a
new hire. They're talking about the vaccine. The lady upfront he's recording it
talking about you know, well, this mRNA stuff, it's not new,
It's been around for a while. More Dinner has been doing this for over
ten years, she said, And I talked about that all was blue in
the face. Do you realize this has been out there for ten years?
Do you realize that they've never had a product to prove because it's so dangerous.
Do you realize they've never had anything work? Do you realize that Moderna
was a big pump and dump stock scam? They tell everybody, We've got
a miracle cure for cancer, whatever you know, pick your disease, we
got a miracle cure for It's a miracle. And then guess what. It
doesn't do anything, So like grim does ever or something kills you, it
doesn't do anything to help. And that was the game they played for ten
years until Trump came along and Fauci. Trump and Fauci made them gazillionaires.
Okay, so they say at the time, this three years ago. They
said that William, her husband contracted COVID nineteen last year in twenty twenty,
also got his first dose of vaccine there earlier this month. Wait a minute,
does William not know anything about natural immunity. This is another thing that
I talked about. Talla was blue in the face, this whole thing about
well, you know, yes, even people who have been sick with this,
and we say this is you know, you had this severe respiratory illness,
you had to a positive PCR test, But we're still we're going to
say that you had COVID, But then we're going to say that you don't
have immunity to it. Well, that's not the way the immune system works.
If the immune system, your immune system is so busted that it can't
respond to something like that, then you die. If it overwhelms your immune
system. If your immune system is healthy enough to fight it off, your
immune system will also Remember that's the way God designed it. Isn't it amazing
what God has done? I mean to stop and think about that. The
amazing ability of your body. These you know, single cell organisms or whatever,
I assume they're single cell showed my ignorance in biology. But you know,
the immune system can identify things and then can kill them and remember them
and pass on that memory to other cells as they continually replace each other.
Isn't that amazing? Don't tell me that intelligence is not inherent in everything in
our lives, everything in our bodies is all intelligent design. That's one of
the most amazing things I think. And that's called natural immunity. And so
if William was infected with COVID nineteen and he survived, he has immunity and
he has it for life, just like with measles, and it's absurd for
him to take a vaccine. Is the purpose of a vaccine. A vaccine
is there to train your body to present you with some facsimile of the disease.
This is the theory. Presents you with a fac simile of the disease
so that your body can mount a defense and then remember it. But he's
already had the real thing, and his body has already successfully defended it,
and his body will remember it. So it was stupidity, virtual virtue signaling,
whatever you want to call it. But you know, when we look
at all of this, are we seeing an increase in cancer? Why?
Yes, we are? Was that predicted? Yes, at the very beginning.
You had doctor Ryan Cole, pathologist who looked at people who had been
vaccinated and he said, there, it's killing their body's immune system. The
killer tea cells. People have been vaccinated, have way fewer killer tea cells
than normal, and that's key in your body's defense against cancer. And so
he said in the spring of twenty twenty, over a year before Kate and
William got their royal injections, he said, you're going to see a massive
increase in the frequency of cancer and the severity and rapidity of cancer. Well,
that was predictable, wasn't it, when you kill the T cells.
And so the question is, you know, we now have a situation where
autism absolutely unheard of. As I've said before, when I first heard of
autism in the early two thousands, there's a family that we knew, they
had a child who had a bit of it, and it's like, what
is that I've never heard of that never heard of it? Just like biocarditis
and paracarditis and from both side of penia, all these other things that now
become part of our vocabulary. Why is that? Why are they so common?
Now? What changed the vaccines? The vaccines made these conditions ubiquitous,
whether it's autism or heart attacks for young people, or maybe turbo cancer.
Now we're going to see one out of every thirty people getting autism. Now
we're going to see maybe one out of every thirty young people getting cancer that
advances at a very rapid rate. Are we going to see one out of
every thirty kids die from heart attacks at a very early age, and all
this stuff just becomes normalized, or response by the system is to say,
well, let's let's let's start doing uh EKGs for kids who are going to
participate in sports. It's like, what that's your response? And you're gonna
still keep vaccinating the kids and then we'll give them EKGs and maybe we'll be
able to identify the problem before they die suddenly. They will never fix the
problem because they're owned by the pharmaceutical companies who will never repent of their murders.
Never, And so it's at the time that well, we don't know
which one they're going to get. They will be offered either the Pfizer or
Moderna vaccine. That is the royal family you know what was his name,
William, William and Kate. They'll get one either Fiser Moderna, but it's
not known which that either of the Cambridges. Cambridges received and so this was
in September of last year and it was from the Guardian big cheerleader of the
pandemic, big cheerleader of all the mcguffins, whether it's a climate mcguffin or
the pandemic and vaccine mcguffin. The Guardian is always a big cheerleader of this
stuff. And they just can't imagine why cancer cases and people under the age
of fifty worldwide are up nearly eighty percent. Now you look at this,
This is in three decades. This is one of the things that they're doing.
They know that this is exploding. So what do they do, Well,
they go back three decades to look at it. Oh, well,
so this is something that is not the vaccine has been going on for three
decades. Yeah, there's other things that are happening as well. But you
notice that they cut this thing off at twenty nineteen. They cut it off
before the vaccines. Experts are still in the early stages of trying to understand
the reasons. Is it poor diet? Does it look to you like the
Princess Kate is eating twinkies? Now I'll call the tobacco use. I don't
see her standing outside smoking a cigarette outside of Buckingham Palace, do you.
I don't Boguart that the or alcohol, physical inactivity. She seems to be
pretty good shape. Obesity definitely not obese. So are these the problems with
her? It couldn't possibly be an experimental genetic code injection that kills killer T
cells. Get it now, that's we'll rule that out. Yeah, and
we'll go from nineteen ninety to twenty nineteen, so we don't want to include
the shot. We'll tell people this is already happening before we put the shots
out, and it may already been happening. We need to take a look
at how it is spiked afterwards. And I've talked about that many times as
well. This is the way they cover it up though, you see,
Well, let's talk about the fact we had a thirty year trend before this
and then it explodes over three year period. And the key thing about the
cancer is that doesn't kill you as quickly as some of the people just dropped
dead after they got the shot. We'd never seen that before. That was
one of the ways of these poisoners. We are pharmaceutical companies. That's one
of the ways that these poisoners were able to get away with it killing you
gradually, you know, like garsenic an old lace. So yeah, let's
not look at the last two or three years. Let's kind of normalize this
and get everybody again. For some reasons, just everything in our environment don't
know what it is. Cancer is increasing, So yeah, it just exploded
the last couple of years. But don't look at the genetic code injection.
I'm sure it can't be that. So this So that was in September.
Now, after this was released, you had the Telegraph in the UK do
this story again move people away from the idea that it could be the vaccine
as a Princes Whales reveals diagnosis doctor's worn of mysterious cancer epidemic of younger people.
Yeah, yeah, it's not the job. No, the job was
the pandemic. The job was the bioweapon. And they don't want you to
see that subtitle. Researchers don't understand why, just can't figure this out.
Got a smoking gun right there in their lap, but the makers of the
gun don't want them to talk about it. A significant increase in under forty
five presented with cancer typically seen in older patients, and this early onset of
cancer, and this increase in cancer is abdominal cancer, the same kind of
cancer that she presumably has, since they haven't been specific about what kind of
cancer she had, but you know, she which just said that she was
having an abdominal surgery. Then they come back and say, well, we
found cancer, so nominal cancer might be a reasonable guess. Many of these
people who are getting cancer at an early age are fit outwardly healthy, prompting
a scramble among scientists to establish what could be causing the drind I just can't
imagine. And so they'd had a twenty percent increase from nineteen ninety three to
twenty nineteen. Notice the same thing. They stop it at twenty nineteen,
and they don't want to talk about what comes after that. We've had a
lot of people who are not mainstream media, who are not the Telegraph,
who are not Guardian, who are telling us how cancer has exploded in the
last three years. So whether they do they go back and they look at
well, yeah, there's this baseline thing that's happening out there, because we
got a lot of things that can give people cancer in our environment, you
know, from the things that we're doing to our body, the lack of
exercise, the poor food, food that is laced with all kinds of garbage,
emf All these different types of things be factors, especially together. But
the one thing they don't want you to see is this worldwide depopulation shot by
Trump. These cancers include those that come under the umbrella term abdominal. When
I started as a cancer surgeon twenty years ago, you rarely saw any younger
patients. But now I see them regularly, he said. When they turn
up. They're shocked. These the people under the age of forty five,
because often they haven't had any symptoms and because of their age and they're not
thinking about cancer. It's a huge thing to get your head round at that
age. And of course many of them have young children. They said,
my thoughts with Kate and her family, they must have hit them like a
bus. Oh that's right. You know, none of us has promised tomorrow
we might be hit with cancer or we might literally be hit with a bus.
So that was the first thing I thought about with it. Some scientists
believe the cause may be partly genetic, might be genetic code injection. Who
knows, but we won't talk about that. But someone who wills doctor Vernon
Coleman, he was somebody who is a physician. He's an older commentator in
the UK and has some good insights. He's very very calm delivery since he's
quite a bit older. But he wrote this. He said, conspiracies,
cancer, chemotherapy and Kate. He said, sadly, Princess Kate eye cancer.
We wish her a speedy and complete recovery. Just why they needed to
keep the truth secret for so long is a mystery, though there may be
an explanation which I will discuss in a moment, and I think he is
spot on as to why they kept this withheld. He says, I was
puzzled by the phrase preventative chemotherapy. I think the explanation is that the word
preventative is rather superfluous and being used to emphasize the fact that Kate's condition is
not terribly serious. In other words, and I going to tell you that
she's in phase one, two, three or four. They're kind of using
preventative to put out whether it's sure or not, the idea that they got
it at an early stage. However, he says, this doesn't completely explain
why she's having chemo therapy because there are risks. In a moment, I'll
explain why I'm surprised so he talks about chemotherapy again. He is a physician
previously, but he says now about the conspiracy aspect and why it was really
strange that they delayed this for so long and allowed so many of these conspiracies
to go od. And you've seen the backlash. All these people were saying,
Oh, well, I think you know she's been divorced or abducted or
killed or this or that, or aliens got or whatever. All these wild
speculations that aren't going on for the last few weeks. I didn't cover it
because, frankly, I don't really care about celebrities. I don't really care
about what happens with the Royal family or Taylor Swift or her boyfriend or any
of this stuff. But I did think that it was rather odd the number
and how the intensity of all these conspiracy theories. Was this something that the
government was ginning up? Did they want this to run wild? Well,
that's basically what doctor cole says. Vernon cole He said, was it too
sorry Coleman Coleman is his name, Vernon Coleman, But he says the Royal
family has allowed conspiracy theories to abound. Kate is dead you know, and
didn't get a picture of her walking barefoot across the zebra crossing at Abbey Road.
Kate and William are getting divorced. Kate has been captured by owning all
the rest of this stuff aliens. Could it possibly just possibly be? Says
Vernon Coleman. So the conspirators who control the media allowed this nonsense to continue
and the conspiracy theories to become ever more absurd, in order to give themselves
an excuse to clamp down on all so called conspiracy theory. In other words,
if you say that she was vaccinated and that's what this is all,
you're starting with that stuff again. Leave her alone. We've had enough of
this stuff. You guys have been making up all kinds of stories about her
while she's suffering with a cancer diagnosis, and we remained silent. We didn't
want to shut this thing down. She could have spoken at any point in
time, somebody from the royal family could have spent but they let this stuff
run wild. Why is that again? Do you think that even if a
family member comes down with cancer because of this vaccine, even if they understood
that, do you think that they would go public with it? I don't
think so. And I think I think he's onto this doctor Vernon Coleman.
I think he got it exactly right. They let this run for a very
long time so they could shut down any talk about a connection between her cancer
and not just her cancer, the cancer. Are so many people around the
world in a similar situation being tied to this heinous poison that Trump created and
brags about to this day. So let's them crack down on all conspiracy theories,
maybe even to arrest anyone promoting anything that could be described as a conspiracy
theory, to shut down any criticism of the vaccine. He says, it
will be easy for the government to make disapproving noises about the conspiracy theories about
Kate which abounded on the internet. Yeah, put out something like if I
were to cut this out, for example, tylot Trump killed Princess Kate,
I'd be the figure remaining places where I am. I guess they might even
kick me off of rumble, because I would be calling Trump a murderer,
you know, but he is. He is a murderer. He is a
murderer. By the way, I'll say that again. Trump is a murderer.
One of the biggest mass murderers we've ever had, and yet you've got
people falling down literally worshiping this guy at his feet. People call themselves Christians
worshiping this guy, people who are so called Christian leaders. And of course
these are Christian leaders who have big organizations where they make a lot of money.
They have TV programs and all the rest of this stuff. It's a
big business for them. They know which side of the bread they get buttered
on. That's why they're worshiping Trump. They're worshiping the almighty dollar that he
represents to them, the audience of suckers that they can rope in it.
But then he takes on chemotherapy. And this is important as well. Again,
Doctor Vernon Coleman a scary, staggering truth about the chemotherapy fraud. He
said, patients who are diagnosed with cancer find themselves in a state of shock.
And yet while in a state of shock, they find themselves needing to
make a number of vital decisions very quickly. One of the big questions is
often this should I have chemotherapy? Chemotherapy might improve a patient's chances of survival
by three to five percent, though that modest figure is usually over generous.
For example, then suggests the chemotherapy offers breast cancer patients and uplift and survival
of a little more than two point five percent. This is down in the
noise, folks. This is like, well, it's almost as bad as
what Fautu did. The rim does of air. It doesn't make any difference.
As a matter of fact, we had more people die with it and
didn't get it. But you know, if you survive, you get better
thirty percent faster, And that's his new standard of care. Never never approved
a drug on that kind of basis. Ever, you always had to show
something, even if it was only two and a half percent, you had
to show something. You say, when you consider the chemotherapy can kill that
it does terrible damage to healthy cells into the immune system. It's difficult to
see the value of taking chemotherapy. As a matter of fact, he says,
chemotherapy can kill us. What killed my father? My dad went in
he had cancer, they gave him his first dose of chemotherapy, went into
a coma and died, never came out of it. It did something to
his immune system as well. It had a heart valve done prior to that
heart surgery and they brought in a whole bunch of doctors and interns anything said,
this is very rare, We've never seen this before, and this is
a very interesting case. Look at how this infection around his heart valve and
all the rest of this stuff is an intellectual curiosity of them. But they
killed my father with chemotherapy. The chances are that the doctors looking after you,
especially the specialists on coologists and hospitals, will recommend chemotherapy. They may
push hard to get you to accept their recommendation. Doctor Rnan Coleman says it
is important to remember that drug companies exist to make money, and so do
hospitals, and so do doctors. For the most part, it's a few
few, that few doctors that are honest don't know about the hospitals, not
vouch in for any of them. They exist to make money and they will
do whatever is necessary to further this aim. They lie, they cheat with
scary regularity. Yeah, I like the CIA, like Pompeo's it. Yeah,
And to West Point, they told us we don't lie, we don't
cheat, we don't steal, we don't tolerate people do. Then I went
to the CIA, and we lie, We cheat, we steal, we
kill people, assassinate people, and we have classes on all of that stuff.
So the the pharmaceutical companies lie cheat with scary regularity. They have no
interest in helping patients or saving lives. Remember that the sole purpose of the
drug companies is to make money, whatever the human cost might be. They
will happily suppress potentially life saving information if doing so increases their profits. It
is my belief that by lying themselves with drug companies, cancer charities have become
corrupt, and so of the doctors, and so of the hospitals as well.
These in the UK, you know, the hospitals are run by the
government there, obviously they're corrupt. But years before this happened back in May
of twenty eighteen, and you can look it up. Look it up.
It was reported widely, actually by a lot of different media outlets, although
nobody really kind of focused on it. I thought it was pretty amazing that
Goldman Sachs was lecturing the pharmaceutical industry because Gilead, the makers of rem dezevir,
had come up with an actual cure to one form of hepatitis, and
they said, look at this. They made twelve billion dollars the first year,
but then it dropped off. It made like one or two the next
billion the next year. Yes, that's just not acceptable, and then it
went down from there. They said, that's not our business model. Our
business model is not curing disease. Our business model is to treat chronic conditions.
In other words, we don't want the condition to go away, treat
it. And folks, this is what happens when you look at a lot
of the pro life organizations out there. They don't want abortion to fully go
away, and they certainly don't want it to go away as a national issue.
That's why they're pushing for this renationalization of abortion laws, and that's why
you got a lot of Republican and Democrat politicians pushing for it as well.
They don't want this issue to go away. And when it comes to guns,
same type of thing, and you'll find pro life organizations. You'll find
some organizations like the NRA constantly selling people out on different issues. As they
sold us out on the Trump bump stock thing. The NRA did not gun
owners of America. They understood the precedent that was being set, and not
every pro life organization is like that. Either right, And of course,
you know, they could have a difference of opinion with me as to whether
or not they want to try to nationalize this. But I believe that this
point of nationalizing it and and these other things that they do, and the
cheerleading of this by some of these organizations, they want to be perceived as
having an impact, but they don't want the problem to go away. And
that's the way that it is with the pharmaceutical companies, that's the way it
is with the banks. It was Goldman Sacks that was talking. It was
a Goldman Sacks analyst that was talking about this to the financial press, and
it's it was covered by market Watch and Bloomberg and all these other places,
but it really wasn't picked up by people who were talking about the vaccine stuff
that much. I mean, I talked about it, but I don't know
anybody else that was talking about at the time, and which really surprised me
because I thought, this is really a smoking gun. They're acknowledging publicly what
we've always said about them, and what doctor Vernon Coleman was saying. They'll
lie, they'll cheat, they'll steal, they don't want you to get well.
They're not looking for cures. They want to keep you as an ongoing
patient. They want to manage this, but not cure it. And then
hopefully, as you're taking this medicine, it'll start to create some new conditions
that they can also give you some more medication for. And I've seen that
and over and over again with older people, my parents' generation. Now I'm
seeing it with my generation. Somebody starts taking a drug for particular condition.
Now of a sudden, you know, they got so many pills. I
got to get a special box to remember when. Yeah, have I taken
this one today? I can't even remember. Little No advice is given to
patients about how they themselves might reduce the risk of their cancer returning, says
doctor Coleman. The implication is that it's chemotherapy are nothing. So, for
example, doctors are unlikely to tell breast cancer patients that they should avoid dairy
foods, although the evidence that they should is very strong, and so he
says, how many women with breast cancer realize that their survival chances might be
better if they took daily aspirin and avoided dairy products, and if they accepted
chemotherapy, well, that would be informed consent. We don't want that that
get in the way of our profits. Doctors don't tell them that because they
have as a profession been bought by the pharmaceutical industry. He's absolutely right about
that. As a matter of fact. Let me just I didn't write down
the name of the thing. I'll have to bring it back. But it
was, you know, just just recently. I mentioned it briefly on the
program. I was having some heart rhythmia and so they had me wear a
monitor for a while and they said I got aphib So they said, well,
you know when your heart gets into this, you know, aphib mode,
and it feels really weird. It feels like it's flopping around and everything,
and you know, so they said, when that happens, it has
a propensity to create blood clots, so you're at risk for stroke. So
we got a drug here for you. It's like, well, no,
I don't know about these blood dinners. My dad was on war Friend.
I know about that. I'm gonna oh, no, this is much better
than Warfriend. This is something new. If I remember the name of the
drug, it was Eloquist or something like that. But it's made by Pfiser.
I saw that, and it's like, oh, wait a minute,
wait a minute, Uh, let me look this up and uh, just
like this. You know, the best case they can make is maybe one
or two percent, you know, and the statistical noise that you get better.
But the and of course you don't see this when you look up side
effects unless you look at the comments and people start telling you what happened to
them and what happened to their family, horror stories about that stuff. I
was like, no, I'm not taking oh. And then the other thing
about it was the how expensive it was incredibly expensive. So again Pfiser,
Pviiser, exactly what you would expect, a drug that has no efficacy,
that is extremely low in safety, and cost a fortune, and they get
all the doctors and everything. That's their new standard care and they come out
with us after somebody knows about a drug that's been out for a while and
word gets out and stay away from warfarin. After word gets out about that,
No, that's the old stuff. We got a brand new drug which
may be even worse, but they don't have the word of mouth has not
gotten out about that, of course, and the FDA does not do anything
to test anything. Of course, so they run that scam over and over
again. But I had someone tell me about a natural thing that a lot
of people have started to take because they're concerned about the blood issues with these
jabs. And I thought I wrote it down, but I don't see it
here, and I wanted to give you that name, so I'll look it
up and i'll give it to you. But that is actually something is based
on Eastern medicine, Chinese medicine. They would ground up earthworms. They didn't
know what the active ingredients were, but they could see that was very effective
for certain things, and so they had some scientists who analyze it and they
isolated a particular substance in the earthworms. It's unique to them, and that's
what they have with this, and it's got a good safety profile and it
has a better efficacy than this other stuff. So that's what I'm taking.
I meant to write it down to give you the name of it, but
I forgot. So it is. There are things that are out there,
but it's important to take a look to try to find them. On rock
Fan, Eric, thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that.
Thank you. And on Rumble, Freagan says doctors are pure filth.
My GP fifteen years discontinued service because I refused a jab. It took me
a year to find a new one. Who says, get jabbed or get
out. Doctors are blocking my access to healthcare, coercing me with their poison
and kill shots. Scum of the earth. Yeah, that seems to have
taken over the profession because they kicked the good people out. It's kind of
like the military as well. They're kicking all the good people out of the
institutions. That's why we need to form our new institutions. And so it
is. I know that you know, there are a lot of good doctors
and nurses who refuse to take the jab, refuse to give to other people.
They're now out of the hospital system as well. The problem is in
terms of trying to organize them into a system where you can provide healthcare.
So we're going to take a quick break and then we're going to and we'll
be right back. So stay with us. You're listening to the David Knight
Show. Interested in a curated list of the finest classical music, find it
now at apsradio dot com. All Right, studying admission widely used HPV vaccine
is linked to four four different autoimmune disorders. Study comparing nearly two million vaccinated
and unvaccinated adolescent girls over ten year period found that the girls are vaccinated with
a HPV vaccine quadrivalent HPV vaccine were four point four times more likely than unvaccinated
counterparts to develop rheumatoid arthritis. Who would have thought he had another immune disease.
And remember it was a Republican governor, Texas Governor Rick Perry, who
more than a decade ago, it is probably about fifteen years now, as
Texas governor, he tried to mandate HPV vaccines for Texas school kids, you
know, just like Trump got to get the shots really going around and all
the rest of this stuff. Yeah, let's make everybody, make everybody take
it. And that was a first. We'd never had anybody, not in
any Democrat state, even suggests that everyone needs to get you know, something
like that in order to be able to go to school. It was an
outrage and people pushed back on it. Remember they sold it to you.
As a Republican, we had the vaccine industry in nineteen eighty six. Match
she used Reagan to get the immunity for childhood vaccines, a legal immunity for
the pharmaceutical companies. He pushed to get that through with George W. Bush.
Is all part of the nine to eleven Homeland Security Patriot Act fraud.
They did began the simulations actually even two months before nine to eleven, but
he also put out the prep Act giving the vaccine company's legal immunity as we've
seen, even worse than the nineteen eighty six Act, worse from the standpoint
of people who've been injured by these greedy killers. And then go to Rick
Perry right after that, and I tried to get him to start the ball
rolling. And then we had Trump, who was supposedly was a vaccine skeptic.
Oh, they got to get the MMR shot really going around really bad.
By the way, when he was doing that, it was a former
aid of his, former aid of Rick Perry had gone to work for MRK
who was pushing the HPV vaccine. And they were not the only ones.
GSK glaxosmith Klein also had an HPV vaccine that was developed by Monsef Slowey.
Does that name sound familiar to you? That was the guy that was working
right underneath Fauci. Vauchu was in charge of Operation warp Speed. Fauci had
always been working with Monsef Slowey. The two of them were very very close,
and so before Monsef Slowe went to Moderna, he was at Glaxosmith client
head of vaccinations and vaccines that type of thing, and the in Factuy were
very close. The two of them had come up together with a vaccine for
one of these other flu variants that they said was horrendous. That was pandemics.
They proved in Scandinavian countries. After about a year they said it's causing
narcolepsy, catalepsy and kids. They took it off the market. That was
Fauci and Monsf Slowey, that was when he was at GSK. But he
also had an HPV vaccine that was there. So all these people pushing this
stuff, same stuff, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, of course,
UNICEF, World Bank, they all kicked in nearly six hundred million dollars to
expand global vaccination screening and treatment in multiple countries, including in Central and South
America. You know, it's all ways the usual suspects doing this kind of
stuff. They were also behind all this HPV things. Japan is waking up
to this stuff. Japan already threw away. They had a couple of different
batches. The first one was one point two million. I think the second
batch was a million. They started seeing black stuff in these vials V I
L E. S and they said, and it interacted with magnet. So
what's that? What is it? You know, when you got your vaccine
there and it yeah, I guess it wasn't frozen enough or whatever. And
they start getting these black particulars to start forming that interact with magnet, and
so the Japanese just threw away twice. They threw away over a million of
these jabs. Now they're saying we need to suspend mRNA vaccines. Now it's
not everybody, it's not the government has not made this official yet, but
there's a lot of people calling for this in Japan, saying we need to
suspend the mRNA vaccines because they're contaminating our blood banks, people who need transfusions
and that type of thing. It's also the Japanese who noticed the biodistribution of
this mr Anda stuff was concentrating in certain areas of the body. Of course,
it concentrates on the spleen because that's the job of the spleen, is
that takes stuff out. But after that it's in reproductive organs the most.
And so they wrote papers about that, and then when that was reported by
a Canadian doctor, they kicked him out. You know, that's the that's
where the real corruption is is in these organizations that you know, the hospitals
that are beholden to the government and the medical associations that are beholden to the
government and are their handmaids. Receiving blood transfusions from a trump shot vaccinated individual
could pose a medical risk to unvaccinated recipients, such as Numerous adverse events are
being reported around among vaccinated people around the world. According to recent study from
Japan, many nations are reported that mRNA vaccine usage has resulted in quote post
vaccination thrombosis and subsequent cardiovascular damage. In addition, a variety of adverse events
resulting from genetic vaccines now being reported worldwide. This includes a wide range of
diseases related to blood and blood vessels. Here's why I wrote that down.
Here's the mystery thing that I was talking about before. The secret ingredient from
ground earthworms there, don't worry. They've isolated it and all of sorts,
so you're not actually taking in the earthworms. But you know, it is
kind of interesting when you look at Chinese medicine. They have a different way
of doing some things. Our daughter had been diagnosed at birth she had hydrocephalus,
which is water on the brain swollen up really big. They thought that
it might have affected her in an adverse way, so they did not put
her up for adoption, and we were wondering what happened. Had they put
a stint in. Because of the United States, they put a stint in,
and then that creates another kind of a problem, especially when you get
to ad lescens and the child starts to grow very rapidly, that stint becomes
a big issue. To try to take the water out. Well, in
China, what they did was to get the water out they gave her a
particular drug or substance or something like that. It was an anti diuretic and
it perched out the extra liquid. And so anyway, but here's the thing
that keep talking around. It's loom broken a's l u mb r k i
na s lumb r ok i nase don't trust my pronunciation. But anyway,
that's a natural alternative to the blood clot stuff, so you don't have to
get the incredibly expensive, dangerous, and ineffective Pfizer equivalent. Speaking of that,
the FDA has settled their ivermectin case. Remember they put the stuff up.
Just stop it, y'all, this is horse medication. Well, of
course what they were sending you was horse excrement. Was what they were selling
you bow mine excrement as well. So that's what we need to stop,
folks, is the FDA. The FDA is what needs to be stopped.
The FDA at a removed a page that said should I take ivermectin to prevent
or to treat COVID nineteen? No, So they remove that page, but
now within twenty one days, because of a lawsuit from several doctors, within
twenty one days, the FDA will remove another page titled why you should not
use ivermectin to treat or to prevent COVID nineteen or other respiratory illnesses. Frankly,
and they also removed their tweet You're not a horse, You're not a
cow. Seriously, y'all, stop it. Well, here's the thing,
the FDA. The FDA is not a regulator. They're not concerned about safety,
they're not concerned about efficacy. Seriously, y'all in Congress, stop the
FDA. Stop them. They don't do anything. They're anti safety. It's
ridiculous. I'll show you one of the ridiculous things that's been in places for
about forty years that they just decided they would get rid of in a moment
here that had absolutely nothing to do with safety. They must have been coming
after one particular company. Must have got somebody in the FDA really mad.
Anyway, the FDA loses its war on ivermectin and agrees to remove all social
media posts and consumer directives regarding ivermectin and COVID, including its most point popular
tweet and FDA history that was put out by doctor Mary Tally Bowden, one
of the doctors who sued them, doctor who has an honest doctor who has
taken a lot of hits over this stuff, a lot of hits. This
landmark case says an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor patient relationship.
And this is what this is all about. The FDA is not there
to tell doctors what they can or cannot do as a matter of fact,
as they point out, you know, this is off label use, which
is very common. The FDA approved this for a particular parasite, but we've
had you know, it's not uncommon. It's very common practice as a matter
of fact, to have something that is FDA approved because part of that approval,
that approval has two parts and has safety and it has efficacy, and
so the safety profile is well understood, has been used for several decades.
The question is whether or not it is effective for what you were using it
off label for. But doctors have always done off label prescriptions because if it's
safe, why not try it? You know, if the people know what
the safety prof's, if it's reasonably safe, we'll give it a try see
if it works. And that was all that was happening here. But it
showed the mcguffin you have to have one solution, because that one solution was
what this whole political exercise is really about. The FDA interfered in the practice
of medicine with their irresponsible language and posts about ivermectin. We will never know
how many lives were affected because patients were denied access to life saving treatment because
their doctor was quote just following the FDA. An FDA spokesperson said, the
FDA is not admitted any violation of law or any wrongdoing. The FDA disagrees
with the plaintiff's allegations that the agency exceeded its authority by issuing state it's challenged
in the lawsuit, and it stands by its authority to communicate with a public
regardless of the product that regulates. But the reason they're doing this, folks,
is because they don't want to have trial. A trial with evidence would
show that they knew. A trial with evidence would show their emails going back
and forth, the fraud that was involved, and a trial would show,
as we have shown here on this show for years, what really happened when
ivermectin was used versus their jobs. You use their jobs, you kill people,
use iramictin, people with respiratory diseases got healed. And they don't want
that that would all come out in a trial, so they can just say,
all right, well we'll take the stuff down. We don't want to
have a trial. Forget about it. Ivermectin was approved by the FDA in
nineteen ninety six to treat several conditions, including a tropical disease caused by a
parasitic worm. And so they said in the US, it's very common for
doctor to prescribe medicine off labels. I just said, they didn't want people
to know this works better, didn't want them to know that it's safer,
and they certainly didn't want them to know that it was much much cheaper,
because this is all about money. This is about killing people for money,
and it's about intruding into the doctor patient relationship. It's not about them actually
doing any due diligence about safety or any the rest of this stuff. They
don't do that. But yet after twenty years, they have finally deregulated frozen
cherry pie. This is from Reason magazine. Is who they regulated, very
strictly frozen cherry pie, not any other kind of pie, not apple pie,
and not unfrozen apple not unfrozen cherry pie, but frozen cherry pie.
So I say they must have had some kind of an axe to grind.
Somebody in the FDA had an axe to grind with somebody who was making frozen
cherry pie came to them. I don't know missus Smith, as she's still
around anywhere. Twenty years of lobbying they implemented. Actually, the frozen cherry
pies regulations are actually implemented in nineteen seventy one. I don't know why they
say twenty years. I guess twenty years people have been fighting this, but
the stuff has been around for fifty three years. So they mandated how many
cherries needed to be in a frozen cherry pie twenty five percent by weight,
and how blemished these cherries were permitted to be. Only fifteen percent of them
were allowed to be blemished in order to be in these pies. Reasons said,
what made these regulations even more unusual, even taking into account the reams
of FDA regulations that exist because of these regulations applied only to cherry pies,
and specifically only two frozen cherry pies. Fresh cherry pies did not have to
meet these towns. Frozen apple pies did not have to beat these standards.
Only these pies did. And again, like I said, it's in a
bad day with somebody that made rosen cherry pies vindictive, useless, dangerous agency
the FDA, where they're talking about food or about drugs, and of course
the two things are related. Right, Let your food be your medicine,
but not in this way. Chick fil A is going to start allowing antibiotics
in his chicken, So you don't want that kind of medicine in your food.
Right. As a matter of fact, we're going to talk to Senator
in Nicely here in Tennessee. I never knew about the arsenic stuff going into
chickens. He's a farmer and he was freaked out when he found out about
it. But he can't get it. The big chicken producing companies own the
legislators. And you know, he's put in a couple of bills to try
to stop this, and they get shut down, and they try to intimidate
him as well, stop doing They don't want people to know they're putting ours
thinking, why do they put our snake in chickens? Well, it makes
the chickens gain weight. They gain weight. If they kept doing it long
enough, the arsenic would kill the chickens. But they kill the chickens before
the arsenic does. But meanwhile it makes them put on a lot of weight.
And then you eat the chicken, and you eat the arsenicke and Sidered
Nicely said, I won't eat chicken from a restaurant anywhere anymore. But then
there's also the antibotics, and now chick fil aces they're going to allow the
antibiotics as well. So the on Rock fan, Gregory, thank you very
much for the tip. Appreciate it. So just keep on spreading the truth
until the sleepers are awake and alert. Well, we'll try. Sometimes I
feel like I'm talking to dead men when just all the stuff that we know
about, all this, you know, it just keeps coming back around,
and people pretend that it doesn't exist. People haven't heard it, they don't
listen to it. Yeah, I just see people hurt by these vaccines,
hurt by the lockdowns. And I got a story here, but a woman
who is still four years later, still wearing a mask, and she hasn't
seen her grandkids in four years, and she said about them, they're little
German monsters. I said, at the very beginning of this, when everybody
was so paranoid, they're washing their hands everywhere. They're afraid to touch a
hose, to fill up their car with gasoline or whatever. Somebody else before
me might have touched this and all the rest of this stuff. I said,
we've turned into an OCD America and it was all over the world.
That is the power of propaganda. But the important thing is how powerful the
truth is. Just one little bit of truth. People see the truth,
even though they're shouting the propaganda on a on a loop with a megaphone and
all these other channels. If you see the truth for some people, it's
going to resonate. We'll be right back. Elvis the Beetle and the Sweet
Sounds of Motown. Find them on the Oldies channel at APS radio dot com.
Day you're listening to the David Knight Show. I mentioned this briefly on
Friday, the very fact that Peter Navarro went to prison and the same day
that he reported prison for not showing up for subpoena to Congress. Hunter Biden
doesn't show up for subpoena to Congress. He walks. This is this is
what is getting people activated. It isn't over principle, it's over persecution.
The people are being activated. And as I said, you know it is
when you look at what Peter Navarro is going to prison for. He should
be going to jail for life for ventilators, for killing people of ventilators and
the rest of this stuff that he did as part as his lockdown crew of
President Trump. The entire Trump administration from twenty twenty ought to go to jail
for the rest of their lives. And the same thing is true of the
Biden people. But we get caught up on these side issues. You're gonna
send them to jail because they don't obey a subpoena from Congress. I don't
care about that. Do you care about that? And of course it is
this dual system, the fact that they ignore it. It gets everybody so
angry. What we should be focused on are things like this Trump floating a
national ban on abortion after fifteen weeks of pregnancy. And as one person talked
about it, said, trying to nail Trump on an issue, trying to
figure out where he is on an issue is like trying to nail jello to
a wall, because they'll never give you a straight answer about anything. And
of course nobody knows if he's got any principles or not, except we kind
of do know what this lawyer told us. I thought about it over the
weekend. We don't know what's going to happen today, because today is the
deadline of Latitia James supposedly going to move to take some of his property.
She made some preparations about that in the past, and you had and I
talked about this is lawyer Alena Haba had boasted. I wonder where she'd get
this idea. He boasted that Trump had the money. And then Trump told
her he didn't have the money. So he sent Elena in to go before
the judges and the appeal courts and say it's impossible to get this kind of
money. And look, I'm not supporting what this case is. Again,
nobody was defrauded and it's absolute total, no crime, but they want a
half a billion dollars. I get that part of it. But look at
the other side of it. Okay, So the Republicans will focus on that
there's no crime, it's all political persecution, you ges, they're right about
that. The Democrats will focus on the aspect that, you know, look
at what a boasting fraud Trump is. And they're right about that of course
as well. And that's a real character issue that we should be concerned about.
But the but after having her go out and boast that, you know,
they mess with the wrong guy. He's got plenty of this money.
Then he has her going around on appeal to these judges trying to appeal the
judgment, saying I don't have it. And then over the weekend he says,
thanks to hard work and skill and luck, I happen to have a
half a billion dollars in cash, I can pay this stuff. They thought
they had me that type of thing. It's like what And as people are
looking at this, one analyst said, well, Lucy, you're going to
have some splaining to do. You're going to have to go that she Elena
Habbatt is going to have to go to the judge who's going to ask her
about this. So were you lying to me about this? I mean somebody
here is lying, okay, and who's who are the lies coming from?
And they're being told to the court Now they're not happy about not going to
be happy about that type of thing. But then again the question is does
he really have the money? Who knows? And see that comes back to
the essence of this case, which is not something that he ought to be
shouldn't be a criminal offense, but people should be offended by somebody who has
no character or integrity and is going to lie to them one way or the
other. I wouldn't want to do business with Donald Trump, and I certainly
don't want to have him as president because of his lack of integrity. And
so the interesting thing about all this is that they brought him up for charges
saying that he was an habitual liar and constantly misrepresented his financial status, and
here he is verifying all that. That is a stupidity that goes beyond what
the lawyers were saying, because the lawyers were saying, wait a minute,
Jesus are going to have to explain whether he has the money or doesn't because
he's But this now validates the essence of that trial. And again I'm not
saying is justified as to make that a crime. He didn't defraud anybody,
paid everybody everything that they wanted to be paid. But it does define him
and define his character, doesn't it. So we'll see what happens today.
Now some people are saying they don't have a constitutional case. It's going to
be very difficult for her to repossess those properties because they're encumbered by loans and
by other things like that. So it isn't just oh, well, I'm
just going to go in and change the locks. Maybe he could do the
squatter thing. He's got a big family. He'd go around squad on all
these properties. You can't evictimy. I mean, I wouldn't put it past
him, quite frankly. You put Millennia in one and Baron in another one,
and Eric and anyway. But it's not going to be a simple thing.
Neither of these things is probably going to happen today. But it'll be
interesting to see what happens. And we'll talk about this as it develops.
But the key thing is you can't nail him to the wall on any political
principles either. You can't nail him to the wall on something as objective as
his bank account. He'll lie about that. He gloated I was able to
kill Rob Wade a year ago. He said that without me, there would
be no six weeks, ten weeks, fifteen weeks, or whatever is finally
agreed to. Without me, the pro life movement would have just kept losing.
Thank you, President Trump, he writes to himself, and he puts
Trump in all upper case. The screaming ego of Trump very much like Kanye
West. He's not talking about last week, the satanic ego, me me
me, me me, I I I am the greatest right. And so
after positioning himself as an anti abortion champion, Trump shifted four months later to
talk about bringing a national consensus. I think both sides are going to like
me. Last month, word leaked that he would seek a national band.
His campaign called the New York Times report fake news, But then Republican Senator
Lindsey Graham an ally to the former president a politician who just like Pfizer's willing
to kill people for you know, these politicians willing to kill babies, They're
willing to rip them apart for their political good. Lindsay Graham said Trump is
warming up to sixteen weeks. On Tuesday, Trump mentioned fifteen weeks in an
interview. His ping ponging on abortion is just one instance of how the former
president has an articulated, day decisive stance on a critical political issue. He
won't even stake a decisive position on his bank balance. But of course that's
really smart. People say, oh, that's good. It's good to be
a liar, a schemer, a man of no integrity. That's good.
And that's the dangerous thing about this. That's why I talk about it.
Look, we don't have a good choice for president. We didn't have a
good choice even when the primaries were going. We didn't have it with a
bigger field. We didn't have a good choice. And you can't really have
any influence as to what happens with the president. They're completely owned by the
establishment. We've seen that over and over again. We saw that in Trump's
first urn. So it's not about getting a good president there to fix it.
It's about getting people to wake up to the fact we've got to stop
thinking inside that box they put us in. They put us in this presidential
election ballot box, and we got to get out of that box with our
thinking and think about how we are going to short circuit these plans, which
are the same for both the Democrats and Republicans on the key existential issues,
and we got to think about how we're going to work around that, work
against that, instead of thinking, well, if we could just get a
guy in there who would do everything he says and do all the things that
I think need to be done, then we could win this thing. Well,
how long would that last if they had we happen, Yeah, one
term maybe or somebody like that would not be allowed to finish a term.
They'd be finished by the CIA. But we need to think outside of that.
And when you look at what is happening with Trump and this back and
forth about whether he has the money or he doesn't have the money, and
boasting about that, and boasting about how he saved abortion and then trying to
throw it to the side, it's an albatross around our neck type of thing.
He had a former lawyer who knows him pretty well, Elena Hobba is
starting to know him by this point in time, I think, and Ty
Cobb said, he's a deeply wounded narcissist and capable of acting except out of
his own perceived self interest or out of revenge. And so when you see
him making these boasting, stupid statements in the middle of a legal process,
subverting the arguments that his lawyers are making at exactly at the same time,
what you're seeing here as somebody who is a deeply wounded narcissist capable of acting
except out of his own perceived self interest, and his perceived self interest can
be wrong because he's blinded by his narcissism to what his real self interest is.
The narcissism is changing what he perceives to be his self interest, but
the revenge is always there. And as I say, what do we say
about somebody who is willing to negotiate to which number of weeks or what age
we're going to chop babies up, take living babies and rip them to pieces
for his own political purposes. You think somebody like that might give us all
a poisonous jab. Yeah. Yeah. If he'll rip babies apart to please
voters or political constituency or the press, or to have people say nice things
about him, he'll kill you two. This is not a projection. We've
lived through this, and yet people won't accept that. Even after the presidential
primary, voters have little visibility on Trump's Pacific agendas on abortion, on the
Israel Gaza war, on Ukraine, on social security, among other issues.
And by the way, if he does take a position on any of these
things, he'll immediately hedges bets with something that's completely different. Oh it's forty
chests. No, he's just a line pivoting person without any principles. It's
not clever, it's not good, it's not leadership. This is a lack
of character and integrity. You can't trust him to keep a position even when
he nails it down, build a wall. Okay, right, we saw
this with Trump, I mean, not with Trump. With Bush. George
H. W. Bush, remember he had run against Ronald Reagan. He
said cutting taxes is voodoo economics. As everybody figured when he ran for president
after two terms as vice president that he would raise taxes. So he wanted
to assure everybody he wasn't going to raise taxes. They read my lips,
no new taxes. Everybody it was alive, remembers that pledge. And then
when he became president, he was pushing the biggest tax increase we had ever
had, and rush Limbaugh came out against him. Rush Limbaugh even had a
little comedy skit for radio where they have a George H. W. Bush
impersonator and he you hear him running with the footsteps and then going up to
the top of the White House to see which way the weather vane is turning
and coming down. Oh, it was devastating satire. And so George H.
W. Bush invited rush Limbaugh to the White House, met him at
the door, carried his bags in, he slept in the Lincoln bedroom.
He came back the following Monday, and said this is great, and he
never criticized him again. It was almost like they did a brain transplant on
him. It was a removed his spine, I think, is what they
did right there, from no longer occasional cortex, no cortex at all,
really, that half of the brain was died behind the back, and they
removed his spine as well. But he just became a Republican shill after that
point. Prior to that, he had been independent, you know, and
he would criticize this stuff. So you're not going to see any real solutions
to these issues. If he gives you a real solution, he's not going
to stick to it. Like I said about medical stuff. The first time
around, Obamacare was a big issue. They had a policy paper that was
excellent. It had a dozen different points. It was about giving people the
ability to have choice, giving them the purchasing power to have choice, restructuring
our system to make it more accountable, all the rest of the stuff.
Trump never mentioned that. It was up on his website. As soon as
he won, they took that down. He never said anything about it.
He never did anything about Obamacare. He never did anything about the border either.
The only thing he did about the border was when he locked it down
with COVID. That's the only thing he ever did. So Trump tells Ramaswami,
no for VP. Hey leaves the cabinet door open. There's a medicine
cabinet, so Ramaswami, the pharmaceutical guy, can get some stuff out or
put some stuff in. I don't know. Well for Ramaswami had already said
no, no to cash for Trump. But Trump does not fund his his
his runs for office either twenty sixteen, twenty twenty. He didn't fund it.
He waited for the little guys to do it. And that's what Ramaswami
said in that interview. I played it for you that clip when it happened.
He said, well, he doesn't. He needs the money of the
little people out there. All of you little people are write checks to this
guy, so they might put him in his homeland security. And you know,
Ramaswami does have some experience with this. He was part of the Republican
Lockdown Committee under Governor Dwine in Ohio and Dwine was one of the worst governors
during that period of time, and Ramaswami got in. He pitched a surveillance
and tracking program that he wanted to run, So yeah, he'd be the
guy for homeland security, I guess, because it's all about surveilling and tracking
US. Homeland security is not keep the homeland secure. We're gonna leave the
border open, We're gonna get involved in foreign wars everywhere, but we want
to make sure that everybody that lives here, all Americans, are under constant
surveillance. So yeah, Ramaswamy would be your guy for that. Maybe he
even gave the idea of the million dollar lottery to Dwine. I don't know
where that came from. That was a pretty insidious thing, and of course
it really was a lottery. Depending on which lot a vaccine you got,
it would vary anywhere from three to one hundred. I think the units were
micrograms, and I don't recall exactly, but it varied from three to hundred,
very by factor of thirty three. So some people got a dosage that
was thirty three times more than other people did. Because see, this is
a big experiment, and everybody who took it was a labrat, and one
of the things that you would do if you were testing the drug, which
they skipped. That's what Trump is so proud of skipping the testing. If
you were actually to do a test, you would be testing to see what
dosage, assuming that it worked, assuming that it was safe. You would
want to know. Too little dosage and it doesn't work, too much dosage
in anything becomes dangerous. So anyway, he may not pay the bond.
He may just instead let her try to seize it because it's going to be
encumbered with all kinds of red tape. There's going to be appeals that they
can make on that aspect of it. It's going to We're not going to
see a resolution of this for quite some time, but we're all going to
see a lot of back and forth lies. We're going to see a lot
of talk about being a victim and and how everybody needs to help him because
he's under attack. We'll be right back. If you like the Eagles,
that doesn't the cars and Huey Lewis in the news, they say the Hot
You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download our app or listen
now at APS radio dot com. Is ahan listening to the David Night Show
on Rumble Stealth Patriot, Thank you for the tip? All right? Is
Chick fil A? The Flowers in the Attic Chicken Company. I don't know
that reference flowers in the attic. Travis doesn't either, so give us another
comment there. Follow up. Definitely stay away from the cookies, he says.
I don't know, but it does remind me of arsenic and old lace.
Anyway. I also want to say thank you to people who have contributed
on Zel. I've let this list grow from the beginning of the month,
and I just want to thank people. I won't do all of the list
here, but I'll split it up into a couple of these. So here
we are about the midpoint, and so I want to thank and a lot
of these names we see over and over again, very faithful contributors and supporters,
and I can't tell you how much I appreciate it. Thank you so
much. Gretchen C, Michael L. William W. Rogelio, J,
Aaron G. Kevin H, Mary M, Jeremy M, Jeffrey B.
David R. Matthew M. Mitchell, M, Kelly K. Gregory,
I, Yakov R. Let's see Felicia H. Michael P, Sean S.
Maurice W. Jeffrey C, Adam D. Brandon M. Kimberly M.
And Benjamin P. And we'll leave it at that. There's a few
more that we'll get to next time we come back in, but thank you
so much for your supporting and on Rumble Freegan, thank you as well for
the tip stay six feet apart, limit gatherings to six people, get jabbed
and assume your position six feet under. Yeah, there's your six six six
here if ever there was one. Right on rumble k A f B.
Thank you very much for the tip, and they thank me, but thank
you for doing that. Let's talk a little bit more about character and the
importance is that. You know, I actually got a couple of different people's
take on character. I just we can't emphasize how important that is have character
in the leadership. But again, was anybody that we had in the race,
Democrat or Republican, would you label any of them as somebody of character?
I wouldn't. And I'm not saying that somebody has to be perfect,
but you know, when they tell you one thing and do another, when
they don't care about ripping babies apart and many other yardsticks of character that we
could have, I think it's a very concerning thing. But it's also beyond
even that. With a lot of these people like Trump, like Biden,
for example. And I think the real issue is when we have people who
hold them up as examples, who idolize them. That is the most dangerous
thing to our society. It's one thing to have somebody that's there and you
hold your nose and you vote for them as a lesser of two evils,
but you acknowledge other evil. But when you hold them up as an idol,
as a paragon, as a savior, as a messiah, which we
are seeing this kind of language being used out there, When you do that,
that is very damaging to our society, very damaging self. Patriot clarify
as flowers in the attic and flowers in the attict. The mother was poisoning
the children with arsenic and sugar cookies. Okay, there we go. I
didn't know. I didn't remember that one, thank you. That's why I
said stay away from this, from the cookies. But when we look at
how Christianity is being perceived right now, I think it's very important for us
to understand how we are being perceived. You know, we got some churches
that are a big church in North Carolina, says well, you know,
Freester We're not going to use the term Jesus or cavalry or resurrection or blood
or anything. And we don't want to turn people off. You know,
it turns people off cheering for some who is obviously got ethical issues, integrity
issues and other things like that. But they will look at anything they can
to try to pretend that, you know, we are a problem. They're
accusing in Fresno, California. They're accusing an after school Christian thing of luring
kids in by offering them pizza. Isn't that interesting? You know, we
have these full on groomers and pedophiles. It's not pizzagate for them to groom
kids at school, is it. But if you just offer somebody pizza as
a just as a hospitality thing typically you know, you got people together,
you're going to give them something to eat or drink. Oh you're bribing them?
Are they that easily bribed? But this is from a listener Junk Food
Science, and they have a website Junkfoodscience dot weeble dot com, and they
have put in a very detailed expos about what's going on with the abortion pills.
Discovering the truth of abortion pills is a comprehence of examination of the scientific
evidence that the FDA has used in each of its approval and regulatory actions on
the RU for eighty six, the abortion pill, a physto prone or whatever.
I just call it Mephistopheles. The project began after hearing of organized efforts
to have research exposing the harms of abortion retracted and discredited removed from medical research
databases. This comprehensive review of the evidence uncovered that the FDA has never had
any science to support its approval of RU forty six to the abortion pill,
or any of its regulatory actions of the abortion pill to protect patient safety for
the past quarter century. We're talking about women's health here. We're not talking
about the baby. We're talking about protecting the health of women. What does
this pill do to the women who take it? They don't care if they're
lucky. I guess they figured they could kill the baby and the mother to
worry about it in the future. Stunning Lee, Not a single study the
FDA used has complied with long standing federal requirements for scientific evidence. This paper
uncovered a massive web of heavily funded vested interests, troubling agendas grounded on eugenics
and population control. These organized and well funded interests have concertedly worked to control
public information, medical research, education, and public policies. There's a lot
of disinformation out there about the Supreme Court case Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine versus the
FDA and Danco LAB that is scheduled to be heard on March the twenty sixth.
The paper concludes with an overview of what's at stake in this important case,
which begins tomorrow. This case won't stop chemical or abortions, or abortions
surgical abortions, but it will step back the most dangerous of the FDA's scientifically
unsupported actions from twenty sixteen to date, actions that removed the safety protections for
the young mothers and allows the FDA to hide the adverse events and the risks
from the public. This court case will be critical for any state or locality
hoping to ban and eradicate abortions from their communities. Texans and other states with
anti abortion statutes wrongly believe that this case doesn't affect them. Since twenty twenty
one, the FDA has also allowed mail order and telehealth pill mills, many
of them foreign, to bypass state regulations. Abortion pills are being mailed to
every state in the country with no restrictions and no oversight for the safety of
the young mothers. As we've talked about with this, one of the reasons
that you are always have to have an exam is because this is not to
be used beyond a certain stage, beyond a certain size, and that is
going to vary even if the mother knows exactly the age of the baby,
which is not certain. It's the size that matters, and that's why an
exam is necessary, and that's why it can have severe complications for a mother
to abort a baby past a certain point. And that's why these pill mills,
many of them foreign, as well as all this male order abortion is
so dangerous for women. These people who talk about this, they don't care
anymore about women's health than they do about choice. These are the same people
who told you to wear masks, stay locked inside, take your jab,
all the rest of the stuff. They didn't care about your choice, your
body, your choice, and they don't care about the bodies or the health
of these women. They just want to kill babies and if the mother goes,
so be it better. Because they don't have to worry about our having
any babies in the future. So I hope everyone will read this comprehensive scientific
review. It's an overwhelming amount of information, but abortion is a life changing,
life ending choice. This is from Sandy, and I'll tell you the
website again is Junk Food Science dot weeble dot com, so you can go
there and you can find that the PDF. It's very extensive. So I
wanted to address those, you know, what people had sent me. But
again from what we were talking about in the last segment, the characteristics of
a good leader. You know, we are so conditioned by the Marxists who
want to eradicate our history, eradicate our culture, our values and everything.
They're going around tearing down statues, tearing down the reputations of men. And
of course we know that George Washington all this stuff I cannot tell lie I
chop down the churche. We know these are fables that were there, But
we also know that everyone talked about George Washington's character, and George Washington wrote
a great deal about the importance of virtue him did he practice that perfectly?
I'm sure he didn't. Nobody practices their principles perfectly. But it's what they
aspire to, what values they communicate to the people that they lead, and
other things like that, those are of paramount importance, even if that person
may have some failures, because we all do have failures. Nevertheless, those
values, that character, that integrity needs to be there and a leader,
and even secular organizations understand this. Even secular organizations understand this about getting a
CEO or leader of an organization very very important. How much more so when
you have somebody in position of power like the presidency, power of life and
death, power of war and peace, power of the purse, the power
to lock us down and kill us with injections. Do you think you ought
to have some characters? Should you be concerned about that? Now, presidential
politics is not a solution, but you need to view it as a control
tactic. They want you in this presidential ballot box. They want your head
in there. They want all you're concerned about the presidential ballot because you're not
going to do anything to affect that. Nothing. Nothing. As I've said
before, it's one of the reasons why with third party politics, so it
would always force us to compete in the presidential race to retain ballid access because
they knew we weren't going to be able to get a big, big enough
you know, ten percent or whatever to retain ballid access, so we would
have to, you know, like sisyphus, we would have to keep rolling
the rock up the hill every four years, you know, to get ballid
access. So it was a there was a way to misdirect people away from
races where we we could have actually had a chance to get somebody elected,
but all of our resources went into presidential politics. That's why I say,
when you do this and you understand that they control this presidential race, from
ballid access to debate access, to how the votes are are taken, how
they're tabulated, how they're reported, there's fraud and every one of these steps.
And of course Trump added a whole new level with a vote by mail
stuff that was him. And so you know, the presidential politics is not
going to be a solution. You just need to understand that this is what
they're doing to try to control us. And yet people jump into this.
We see people out there saying God gave us Trump. That's a quote from
some of these people who are you know, they identify themselves as evangelicals.
They're really taking that term and dragging it through the mud. And it's not
just the mainstream media that's doing it. It's the people who are saying this
kind of stuff and using that kind of label for themselves. As George Barnes
said, I asked people they self identified as evangelicals. It's like, well,
what do you believe? What do you do in your life? Did
you read the Bible? Do you do this? No? No, no.
Anybody can call themselves anything they want to, but there is a very
special reason why they are vilifying that term. It used to mean people who
were focused on spreading the good news. That's what evangelical means, right,
it means it was like vangelical, like an angel will be a messenger or
whatever. It was. A good message was what originally came from translated into
English, kind of transliterated if you will. But this is from Reuters.
This is really a battle between good and evil, said evangelical TV preacher Hank
Koonerman says, of a slew of criminal charges facing Donald Trump, there's something
on President Trump trusts that the enemy fears, and it's called the anointing,
and then putting out this idea that he's supernatural, that he's God's chosen.
Yeah, God has chosen him. And since that, you know, anybody
that's there, good or bad, has been chosen by God. He doesn't
play dice with the universe. Even alber Einstein understood that. A question is
is he being chosen for blessing or for cursing. There's no intermediate position.
It's either blessing or a curse. So I guess it depends on your perspective
whether you think that being locked down, poisoned, shots sent out everywhere ever,
you think that's a blessing or is that a curse? He would not
be present if God did not want him to be present, I can guarantee
you that. But that doesn't really mean anything for these people. And yet
to talk about things like this in the phrase of anointing and all the rest
of this stuff that these people are doing again, it is a game of
thrones, and the game that these people are running is a game of audience.
It's a drifting game. They're just trying to bankrupt him. They're trying
to take everything that he's got. Where are these people when the poor people
around them were having their cars and homes stolen with civil asset for for true,
where were they when the irs went in and took everything from somebody and
never gave them due process, no presumption, innocences, not even a trolley,
Just take everything. Then you've got to sue them to try to get
your stuff back. Where are they? This has been happening to everybody,
everybody, and they don't care about a single person except for Trump. And
nobody's talking about reforming any of those other things either. They care if Trump
gets people walking through his house, but they don't care if a swat team
flash uses flash bang grenades and throws them into a kid's crib. Do they
they care about that kind of stuff? No knock swat team raids. Nah,
we don't care. But you guys came in and arrested the politician.
You put him in handcuffs, and you had the TV people. That's reprehensible,
absolutely as reprehensible. But it's nothing compared to what they tolerate and ignore.
It's been going on for thirty forty fifty years of this war on drugs.
It just keeps getting worse. They're trying to put him in prison.
Said this guy who the let's see This is somebody who identifies himself as a
prophet Lance Wallno, where's Wall know, I don't know where's Walo? Where's
his prophecies? I bet he's another one of these Trump prophets, like Julie
Green, has told us a stream of one lie after the other. These
people are as bad as al Gore, except al Gore doesn't claim that God
told him. He claims a scientist told him, and he treats the scientists
as God. But these people are even worse than my book. Somebody who
went on the Jim Baker Show to say that, oh yeah, you can
trust Jim Baker too, right. I don't know. Maybe he's cleaned up
his act. I don't know, but it wasn't act. It wasn't act.
Maybe he's maybe he's had to come to Jesus moment in prison. I
don't know. Scary thing is that God and his sovereignty is looking to give
us a leader. And he's going to give us a leader that befits us.
I think that's already in the books because it's going to be Trump or
Biden. So yeah, God has already got that taken care of. He's
going to give us somebody that's a perfect reflection of us in many different ways.
So characteristics of a good leader twelve characteristics of a good leader. And
this is really about just an organization. How do you get an organization to
work well? You know, for example, if you had Trump elected as
president, how would he actually go about making the swamp better? Right?
How would he reform it? How would he reduce its size? How would
he actually manage this stuff? Well, he would have to have character to
get this to happen. We need good leaders to help guide us and to
make essential decisions right. And this is important at all levels. But think
about what it does to us and to our children when we idolize bad men.
Again. You know, we've got all these presidents who, you know,
we find out later on they had these secret assignations or affairs or whatever
you want, adultery, but they had the decency to hide it instead of
flaunting it shamelessly like this guy. And I said this about Trump. I
said, the first person is not part of LGBT, that is proud of
their sin, that parades it in public. That's Donald Trump, one of
the first to pride parades for heterosexuals. I guess. So if we idolize
people have no integrity. That is a big deal. So one of the
twelve essential leadership qualities. Well, listen to these. I'll just run through
and I won't elaborate on them, but just listen to this and see if
you think that it applies to Trump. A self awareness. Now we're not
talking about narcissism. Just are you aware of your flaws of your humanity?
Number two? Respect? Respect for what, respect for others, Respect for
the Constitution? Yeah, respect you Compassion yeah? Vision yeah, vision?
Do you have some idea of what it is that you actually want. For
example, somebody sent me this. There's President Trump. It's a meme says,
if I could save my election without allowing an abortions, I would do
it. And if I could save it by allowing all abortions, I would
do it. And if I could save it by allowing some would also do
that. Okay, So you know that's that's what we're talking about with Trump.
That's his vision. What is his vision? I don't know. Can
he communicate it or do we get these mixed messages? This flip flopping,
a learning agility? Is he quick to pick up on things wealth they slight
him? He's quick to pick on it, pick up on it like mc
and anny. She didn't report one of his poll numbers. Remember how he
went off on her. Oh boy, collaboration. Does he work well with
others? Influence, integrity, courage, gratitude, resilience. Does that describe
Donald Trump to you? How many of these does he have? You know,
we all know that Biden doesn't have him either, right, I mean
that's not a That's the key thing is I talk about this not to elevate
Biden. That's the people who are caught up in this Trump thing. Well,
who do you want for present? It's like, I don't want to
none of the above, But I just trying to get them to understand not
to put all their hope in the office of presidency because we have hopeless candidates
there. First instance, I've seen so many great leaders ruin their opportunity because
of a moral failing. Sometimes it has been a ruinous vice of committing moral
indiscretions. Oh, sometimes it's embezzling money or committing corrupt political practices millions of
dollars if anyway. More often than not, however, it has been the
lesser evils that simply undermine people's confidence in your work. But these guys,
both Biden and Trump, picked these big ticket items. You know, they
mark that off millions in terms of payoff from people, whether it's Ukraine or
pharmaceutical companies. Years ago, I was a dean working with a man who
had an inability to control his temper. He would get angry with him,
off in his circumstances, and in the midst of anger, he would lash
out on his social media network, No this is somebody else at those around
him. In one telling scene, he completely destroyed his opportunity when he blew
up at his board of directors and said derogatory and destructive things about them that
forever undermined their ability to trust him. Is this the perfect description of Trump?
Virtually everybody who ever worked for this guy cannot stand him and opposes him.
Many of them have even left the Republican Party. Many of them have
even jumped in as Democrats to oppose him. These are the people who know
him best. Shortly thereafter he was fired from his position. He never worked
again in this line of work. It wasn't a deadly vice that did him
in, but it was the inability to exercise emotional intelligence. That ruined his
opportunity as Trump burned down a lot of bridges to a lot of things to
actually get anything done. During this episode, I couldn't help but think about
how each of us has an area of vulnerability that often prevents us from realizing
our full potential. Don't just project this onto somebody else, think about it
in your own life as well. I've seen issues, you know, personality
issues affect all of us, all of us. I've often seen young promising
executives dereled by the most pernicious character flaws. These events have had little to
do with these executives competence and everything to do with their lack of character.
And the reason I mentioned this is not to you know, it's not this
holier than thou type of thing. Like I said, we all have these
issues. But the question is why are people elevating somebody who obviously has no
integrity, no vision, and no self control or self awareness, can't control
his temper, does it in public over and over again. His mo going
back to his first wife was to not just have a divorce, which is
very common in our society, but it was to mock her ruthlessly, mock
her as he cheated on her and divorced her. Peter Drucker amplifies the importance
of integrity by noting that the greatest test of our integrity and character is a
way that we treat other people. How does Trump treat people? We've never
ever I mean when he first began and he started throwing smears and slander at
people, and you know, lies that he would tell about people as well,
Everybody's like, whoa, whoa. But now it isn't about that person
at all. It really reflects now on Trump himself because everybody sees the pattern
behavior. They know that he's just trying to hurt somebody that used to work
for him. He has no loyalty to anyone, no loyalty to any principles.
Drucker says, management may forgive a man a great deal. Again,
we're talking about just running the pragmatic aspects of running an organization. He says.
Management may forgive a man a great deal, and may forgive incompetence or
ignorance, in security, or even bad manners, but they will not forgive
his lack of integrity. And he goes on to emphasize that one's lack of
integrity is so serious that if it is discovered, it should immediately disqualify one
from a position of leadership. You see, if Trump wins, his lack
of integrity, his personal character flaws we've seen displayed are going to keep him
from getting anything accomplished. If he even really cares to get anything accomplished.
His only accomplishment that he cares about is getting himself elected, getting his name
up there on those buildings. He doesn't care if they go bankrupt. He
doesn't care if he's got to sign a note for six hundred and seventy five
million dollars at fourteen percent interests. He wants his name on those casinos that
are there. Peter Trucker believed the moral tone for the entire organization starts at
the top. And that's one of the things that the president does. These
presidents, whether you're talking about Biden or Trump, set the moral tone for
the nation. It's not George Washington's moral tone, is it. He believed
that the behavior of your senior executives fundamentally sets the tone for your organization.
He said, our people decisions must demonstrate that we will be unwavering and insisting
that leaders at all levels of the organization must have basic integrity that can be
trusted and relied upon. Moral failings are so catastrophic they undermine the very trust
that is at the heart of leadership. So we should keep this in mind.
And yet, because the system we're talking about presidential elections, national elections
in general, even state elections, especially the big offices like governor, the
people are already chosen for you. You don't have a choice. It begins
with ballot access, and by keeping that restricted, by putting the political parties
in charge of that, they make sure that we don't have a choice that's
going to have integrity, the importance of a character and leadership. When we
talk about leadership development, the focus is often on people skills or communication skills,
on vision or intelligence or business acumen. Right, what is Trump pushed
out? Well, I'm very intelligent, I've got real successful businesses. Look
at how much money I've made and all the rest of the stuff. Look
at how i can communicate with people. I'm a celebrity, and I've got
this vision of a wall even if he doesn't deliver that vision. But he
doesn't deliver it because he's not a man of good character. And of course
it goes without saying Biden and Hunter and Joe are not no no character,
they're either. So what makes someone trustworthy? Well, it's our article has
seven points there six They do what they say they'll do. You know any
politicians like that, not at the national level, really Massy Thomas Massey.
Maybe their behavior is reliable because over time they have shown consistent behavior and responses
to similar situations. They're truthful, deeply honest. They make well considered choices
by being opened to counsel and perspectives of others. They're brave, and what
they always do is right, even when it is hard. They look out
for the common good rather than just serving their own desires. This is what
we need to be looking for in leaders. You don't have anybody like that
running for president. You have probably nobody liked that running for Congress in your
area either, maybe not as governor. So look elsewhere. Look for people
like this at the local level. But always hold this up as a standard,
because if we lose this standard, then this is like soultiness and talking
about living by lines. This is one of the biggest lies we can tell
ourselves that character doesn't matter, that integrity doesn't matter. In our leadership.
Oh it does. That is a road to hell on earth. If we
reject the idea of integrity and character, and if there is no integrity or
character on the ballot, then we have to look elsewhere for our solutions.
Look outside of politics, or look locally at politics, or whatever you need
to do, but understand that character and integrity is not on the menu for
a president. This is a good example here life site news. Stories of
truly virtuous women are essential to the raising of our daughters. You can't win
a culture war if you don't have any culture. You can't win if you
don't have a vision, a vision of beauty and of truth and of morality.
I often think of this. Travis taught himself how to read by reading
Ga Hinty books. We tried to get them started on phonics at an early
age, and he really didn't like that. It's too much, too dry
and everything. So I said, well, let's just I'll read to him
a lot. So I read to him a lot. He like the story.
His mother son did too, but he grabbed started out with Jay Hinty
books. This is an author from the Victorian period in England, and he
would write historical novels, and he would always have as the protagonist. It'd
be a young boy on the cusp of manhood, and he would usually have
a girl that he was interested in as well, but he would be there
as major historical events were happening. The first one we did was j Hinties
for the Temple. You'll see that all the homeschooling things, because it's about
the destruction of Jerusalem in seventy a d. The Roman emperor who's there,
the Jewish leaders and all, and so you got this the character who is
kind of there in the middle of all of that, and he's going back
and forth and he's having interactions with people on both sides. And that's the
way Ja Hinty tells the story of history. The story for the Temple was
taken mostly from Josephus's writings, and some of it quoted verbatim. No copyright
on that, by the way, even Ai could go in and skin Joseph's.
It's about two thousand years old, so copyright has expired unless you get
some knock on the door from some Roman censor try and take it down anyway.
The but then there would also be this story and what struck me as
I read these stories of the kids, was that even the bad guys in
the story had a lot of character in integrity. There are certain things that
they would not do. They had a moral standard that they would not violate.
We don't have that anywhere sold to us by Hollywood or the people who
give us our stories or give our children the stories. The stories that they
feed our children. Even the protagonists are getting progressively more evil and more demented
and arranged, and they have no standards except whatever works right, anything you
want to say about Jay Hinty. But it was a great series, and
I was surprised because it was a pretty high vocabulary level, and Travis thought
himself how to read using that because he was really motivated, and every one
of these stories was the same, and it was truly. That was the
thing that stuck out to me the most was how everybody, even the bad
guys, the bad guys had more character and integrity than the good guys do
in our modern stories. The only one I can remember where the bad guys
were pretty much just despicably evil is the one about the Reign of Terror,
where it was happening in France at the time. Oh yeah, yeah,
but to be fair, Robespear doesn't really show what much. He's just kind
of off in the wings doing you know, whatever it was did. Yeah,
well, j Hinty, especially the people you know in Victorian England,
they knew just how evil the French Revolution was and they weren't cutting them any's
they were. You know, that was pretty accurate, I think, And
my point being is that not that these people were not evil, but that
Jay Hinty would not typically portray them as evil as they were because what he
was trying to do was to sell the idea character was the most important thing
for them to see, and he wanted them to see it, even to
some degree and the bad guys. Disney, on the other hand, has
a very effective way to form the characters of children, especially girls, says
Life Site News, through their characters. And now they're even focusing on the
villains. And you see that all through Hollywood. You know, we do
Batman's not dark enough. We've got to have movies about the Joker. And
so they point out little girls are attracted to goodness and beauty, but you
know, the same thing as true of boys as well. It isn't just
a girl thing. As a matter of fact, we should. Everybody wants
to see that. We should be able to own entertainment because we have truth
and beauty on our side and we want to elevate those things. And people
really do like things that are uplifting instead of this negative stuff. You even
see it in Hollywood, for example. Hollywood and still does to some degree.
They've been rejected a lot of evil into their characters and other things like
that, but they still as dark as the movies are. They want to
have them have a happy ending. Always want to have a Hollywood ending,
and they will focus group test this stuff to see if it's got a happy
ending. A good example of that was Brazil with Terry Gilliam. You did
not have a happy ending. Studios were not happy, so they fought with
him. They wouldn't release it. He released it, I think it was
in LA to some film critics and got them to review it as a way
of getting around there embargo. They were saying, you're not going to release
this unless you make these changes. And then they actually did put together a
Love Conquers All version of Brazil and they put that out as well. But
you know, they want to have a happy ending. They've got a pacing,
they've got a certain rhythm and a flow and a story arc that they
pretty much do in every one of their movies because they know that people want
to have a happy ending. Even if you got something like Terminator, you
want to have a hero who's going to come in there and save the day
and he's going to get rid of the AI robots that are destroying the earth.
That is predictive programming, but part of that is the fact that people
want to have a happy ending. So this news article here from Desiree News
just slightly off topic. But recently a very famous mangaka died named a Kirator
Yama. He's the guy who created dragon Ball and Dragonball Z. And some
people derive dragon Ball as being a little simplistic, but I think one of
the reasons it has such staying power and people love it so much that the
main character, Goku just wants to do the right thing. He's truly just
a hero. He just wants to protect everyone on Earth and all of his
friends, and he just wants to get stronger to do that. Yeah,
it's a simplistic premise, but he's a hero. He's not some questionable morally
gray, I don't know if I'm doing No, he's going to do the
right thing. Yeah, yeah, that's right. It's that's simplistic kind of
stuff. When I was reading comic books in preschool, you know, I
mean it was That's the way the comic books at that time were. Wasn't
this complex, psychotic, conflicted person you know, that is there all the
time? He had really clear and wrong. Kids want to have that.
It gives them. They want those kinds of guidelines, but it's also good
for society as well, and it's good for us as individuals. The desire
A News says, are religious people happier? They said, The science is
pretty clear. They've had a lot of double blind studies on this. And
it's not just happiness really. You know what we understand, and I've talked
about this before, happiness depends on what happens to you. It depends on
your circumstances. And you may not be in good circumstances. You know,
hopefully you are, but good circumstances don't typically last that long for us in
this life. So it's having a joy and a peace when the circumstances are
not good. That's why we talk about joy instead of happiness. But they
talk about happiness. They ask people, you know, if they were happy
if they were religious or if they were non religious, and are you happy?
So that's something that is subjective, and yet an Oxford University Press book
summarize the research on the subject, for example, comes in at almost nine
hundred pages just listing the different studies on this and the analysis The Handbook of
Religion and Health three hundred and twenty six articles on a relationship between health and
measures of religiosity and subjective well being, happiness or life satisfaction. They found
seventy nine percent of those studies reported that religious people were happier. Only one
percent of the studies showed they were less happy, heavily skewed to that one
direction. Finding a relationship between happiness and religiosity is so established that many research
papers take it as a given starting point. So when you look at this
and it's not again we look at it, it's more of a relationship than
it is things that we do. I mean, even when somebody's got a
whole list of things that they need to do to appease God or whatever that's
they're still looking at that in a sense as a relationship, and so it
really is when we talk about peace, it really is about being contented with
what you have, being having a confident expectation about what comes after life,
what's next in life, or being grateful for what you have. You know,
we've seen studies showing that people who have a great deal of gratitude are
happier because they're focusing on what's in the glass rather than what is not in
the glass. And so I think what is happening here is they're looking at
people who have religious beliefs. They're not focused so much on what they feel
like they need, you know, they're looking at something else. But even
these megachurches now and many other churches that are being run like a business,
they're selling something. They're not really giving people peace, peace with God,
peace of mind, contentment with what they have. It is really surprising to
look at this. Let me pull this up here. This is a megachurch
in North Carolina and this person is giving an interview and she has head of
digital media for this big church. This's a church that's got more than twenty
five thousand members attending at multiple locations across the state. And so in this
interview, the guy asked her, what are you going to do for Easter?
I'd love to hear about, Like what are you specifically tackling for Easter
right now? Like, Okay, this is going to be a bigger service
for most churches. What are some of the things that you have to get
your you know, ducks in a real as it were, in respect to
Easter. For us, the most important thing on Easter is inviting people to
church. Eastern Christmas are the only two Sundays of the year that are actually
wrapped around a particular passage in the Bible. Right, A lot of most
of our other Sundays are whatever the pastor wants to preach on, you know,
any particular thing or whatever. But but Eastern Christmas are both around particular
biblical events, and so this particular biblical event of Easter is tied directly to
our mission. And so that's so important to us. And so when I
think about how I'm going to talk about Easter, I'm thinking about talking to
people far from God. So because that's a thing that matters most to us.
And so I'm not going to say the word Calvary, not going to
say the word resurrection, I'm not going to say the blood of Jesus ah
right, I'm not going to say any of these words that make someone feel
like an outsider. This is really important, an important guiding principle for how
we develop language is anyone can be a part of our church. It might
not be for everyone, everyone might not like it, but anyone can come.
You don't have to understand what we're you know, any fancy language.
There's not any prerequisite to be able to come here. Well, yeah,
there is a prerequisite. Actually, it is a cavalry Christ, the Crucifixion,
and the resurrection. Those are the prerequisites for anything that a church does.
Now, if you've got a business that you're marketing to people and you
don't want to offend them, well that's a completely different thing. But there
are some particulars there. How are they going to know any of this stuff
unless somebody tells him? How will they believe unless they have been told.
You're not going to tell them. You're going to run away from this stuff
because you think somebody might be triggered or offended. This is what has happened.
This is a good example, and I think this is really an example
of what meathead Rob Reiner is trying to do with his documentary in Christian Nationalism.
That's why I said, you know, when John MacArthur talks about Christian
nationalism, he's thinking about theological arguments has had with some of these people over
eschatology or other things a couple of decades ago. That's not what's happening now.
These people are trying to make us ashamed to talk about Jesus, and
they're trying to make us ashamed of our religion and ashamed of the idea that
there is such a thing as absolute truth. She's an example of that,
and she hasn't even been criticized yet. You know, John MacArthur doesn't have
a problem going on Larry King and saying this is what I believe, end
of story, you know, So I don't think he really even sees that.
It's not anything that wouldever really phase him. But he's not this digital
communications person like that. And I think all of our beliefs really need to
be about that. We need to think about what are the important things in
life and what we believe about those things, and we need to be convinced
enough that we're willing to stand on that. And if we don't. Our
society is headed down the tubes faster than you can imagine, and that's what
we see right now. And we see it heading down the tubes because of
that very attitude about everything, about everything. So she's there at a church
called Elevation Church, pastored by Stephen Ferdick, twenty five thousand people across the
North Carolina. She said, it's vitally important that people feel super chill when
they get an invitation to attend the church's Easter services. I mean, it's
the church as I go to. We don't even use the term Easter.
We talk about resurrection. Sunday, She didn't want to use the term resurrection.
I think everybody pretty much knows what resurrection is. I mean, they've
even used it over and over again in horror films, you know, back
to the old Frankenstein movies. You know, other people go in and exhoom
the bodies so that they, you know, the doctors could experiment on them
and do autopsies and stuff like that and learn anatomy. They call them resurrectionists.
I think everybody knows what that is about. Anyway, She said,
how we talk to someone who is not steep in that tradition. Well,
here's how you talk to people. You just you declare what is true.
The gospel is a declaration, it's not a debate. You say what's true.
And if God has opened up somebody's heart and mind and ears and eyes
to this, they'll understand that. Or they'll ask some more questions and absolutely
answer questions. But any kind of terminology that is there that they don't understand,
they can always ask this person on Protestea says Elevation Church seems to think
the words like resurrection are dirty and offensive. What sort of marketing ploy?
That's it a marketing ploy? What kind of marketing ploy are they using to
get people to attend services? You know, these people who do this kind
of stuff think that the people are communicating with aren't going to see them as
condescending. They think that people are not going to see that this is a
marketing ploy. But people see through all that. It's pretty transparent. So
here's one of the promotions that they put out for Easter. Hop on down
Elevation Church for a Wicked Easter Egg stravaganza. Pastor Steve will deliver a three
point sermon on why we shouldn't pull all put all of our eggs in one
basket and he'll be wearing a bugs bunny costume. Plus you'll get your bunny
worship on with our gen Z Worship band runners up in the twenty twenty two
Regional American Idol Audition. Wow, let's go for some amateur entertainment. You
want to see a guy wearing a bunny costume? Okay, I wonder if
it's that pink bunny costume that they had the kid and a Christmas Story wearing
Ralphie or you go the other extreme. This is also from the same church.
It's Megadeath Sunday at Elphatian Church, sixty minutes of blood curdling mayhem the
Crucifixion set to heavy metal soundtrack performed on stage by our in house Thespians.
Not that there's anything wrong with that. They said, guaranteed to scare the
hell out of you. A nursery is provided. So anyway, this protesting
has said, I'm sorry, this is not protesting. This is Todd Starns
comment. He says, an invitation at church doesn't have to be a theological
dissertation or some sort of bait and switch. It also doesn't have to be
sensational entertainment. Either, it's not what it's about. You know, we
just are entertaining ourselves to death, aren't we? Can we not take anything
seriously? Why not just be honest and upfront with people, let them know
what Easter is really about, why it's important for them to hear the message.
I mean, at some point, says Todd Starns, Elevation Church does
present the gospel message to their unchurched visitors. Right. At some point,
non Christians are told about the resurrection of Christ. Right, and we are
not sure. Actually, we're asking questions here does that really happen? There?
And at some point the visitors are made aware that the blood of Jesus
was the price that was paid for our sins. Right? If not,
Elevation Church Easter service is nothing more than a self help sermon accented with snazzy
graphics and a Soso cover band. Yeah, it's like joel Oustein worked for
him. He's got an even bicker church. He's got over thirty thousand.
Last I looked, maybe we should start calling this week. We could have
this be a category, could call it ostinism or maybe paula Whitish. Yeah,
though your sins being a scarlet, they can be whitish kind of.
Now, these people are not about getting rid of sin. They're not about
understanding what it takes to make peace with God and the price that is paid.
And that's one of the things that is different about Christianity and Christianity.
It is God who came in the form of man to pay the price so
that he could have mercy and justice. He cannot look the other way.
There has to be justice. But he took the penalty on himself. And
so that's the key thing with all the stuff that they want to run away
from, with their fun and games and with their business. But probably quoting
Isaiah would be a little bit too offensive for somebody. Anyway, a person's
name is NICKI sure she is the digital content director. As one person said,
when Christianity came to Rome, it manifested as a government. When it
came to Europe, became a culture. When it came to America, it
became a business with people like digital content directors. Importantly, in a disclaimer,
the guy who did the interview, he says it's important that evolution of
elevation absolutely emphasizes the resurrection of Christ. And an Easter service, and they
use that word and while the guy is standing there in a bunny costume,
I guess just it's just clownish. The question is, you know, are
you in this life? Do you really understand what is happening? Is I
began talking about Kate Middleton. One guy said, when you when you preach
the people, he says, you preach as a dying man talking to other
dying people. Is that you think that's what's happening when this guy's putting on
a bunny costume. Is that the attitude that he's got there, is this
something they take seriously? Are you playing with your sin? Are you fighting
your sin? That's the issue that the people need to look at. And
so DeSantis has put in a settlement with the LGBT lobby on the don't say
gay law as they characterize it. See, the election is over, now
we can drop the pretense here, allowing LGBT influencers within Florida school systems to
continue virtually unencumbered in their efforts to indoctrinate public school children there. The state
of Florida reached the settlement last week with a pro LGBT group called Equality Florida.
They're not about equality, they're about superiority. Other plaintiffs in a case
challenging the Parental Rights and Education Act enacted in twenty twenty two, when he's
thinking about running for president. The settlement allows LGBT promoting safe space stickers,
discussions about sexual orientation and gender identity in the classroom as long as they're not
part of formal instruction. Again, this goes back to fight about why are
you teaching my kids about any sexual stuff? Here I mentioned going back to
the late eighties early nineties, you had a guy who got in trouble.
He got arrested, run in jail because he went there to take his kid
out of a sex education class. She was eight years old. He said,
she doesn't need to be in this. I'll teach her about this when
it's age appropriate for her. It's not. I don't want her. They
said, no, she's going to be in it. So he went to
that day to take her out of school. They arrested in for trespassing.
They said, when you drop your kid off, you have this is what
the judge said, you've abandoned them to the state, and loco parentis we
will operate in place of the parent. And so the question is, why
is anybody dropping their kid off at a school that determines that they're going to
talk to them about sex. Do you want strangers talking to your kid about
sex? Would you if you went to we went to some kind of an
entertainment venue, you're going to the movies, or you're going to some kind
of a ballgame or something, and you've got some adult there that wants to
start talking to your kid about sex or talking to your kid about what they
do sexually. What would you do with that? Well, it's okay,
isn't it. If it's done by teachers in a school when you're not around,
it's just fine, isn't it. This law now and this agreement that
Desanta says he's no longer sanctimonious, I guess he is d sanctimonious. He's
d sanctified. It also explicitly permits student cross dressing, same school sex dances,
reading assignments, assignments and school plays with LGBT themes, LGBT anti bullying
instruction. By the way, you know, what about that racial bullying that
was going on, you know the fight where that white girl was up on
and a black girl who's much bigger than her banged her head repeatedly into the
concrete extent. She's still in a coma, may not survive. Her parents,
the parents of the person who beat that girl, maybe to death.
Her parents said, she's the victim. She's the victim. Can never be
a white person who's a victim. And all this stuff about bullying. As
I've said many times, bullying has always been there. There's nothing unique about
this. And you get a bunch of kids together like chickens, they'll find
the weakest one and they'll just peck on them. Right, Bullying is always
there for any reason. Groups like the CFC interpret this as code for LGBT
and doctrination, and it is on campus. Extracurricular activities such as the Gay
Straight Alliances are notorious for indoctrinating and sexualizing school children. As a matter of
fact, you know the guy Sam Britton who had the bald head and lipstick
and all that you know, and was going around stealing suitcases from women at
the airport, Well, he was also in a group called the Trevor Project,
and where he would hang out they would counsel LGBT kids and high school
and junior high school and things like that. I mean, it's just a
way for them for pedophiles to groom kids. That's all that is. The
agreement inverts the purpose of the statute. The settlement draws a false equivalency between
destructive LGBT lifestyle choices and traditional heterosexual relationships and families, and between transgenderism and
biology based understanding of sex, said an organization. Talking about the organization's the
Christian Family Coalition of Florida. They said that in a statement to Life Site
News, Rhonda Santis' office describe the details as a major win after signing the
agreement, that that's the law that he put into place and then ran for
president on That's why I say we never had any people of integrity from the
very beginning. But while all that is happening, you have a teacher who
decides to pray before school begins, and all hell breaks though. This is
one of these things where meet you at the pole. It's not anything I
was ever involved with. It happened after long after I was out of school.
But they would have Christians pray at the flagpole or something before school starts.
And this is in Texas. The American Center for Law and Justice has
gone to Federal court in Houston on behalf an employee of the Katie Independent School
District. So this is the free exercise religion by a person who is a
school employee. That's not allowed, but grooming and sexualization of the children is
allowed, encouraged, demanded, mandated. The federal court filing explains of the
district violated and continues to violate her rights to religious expression by prohibiting her from
praying when students might be present, even if that prayer occurs off the clock,
off the clock. But porn is good, and we need to get
more porn to the kids in school. Every year, millions of people gather
at school flag poles to pray before the school begins, says the ACLJ.
They're very proud to stand in support of see you at the Poll, a
prayer rally for students and participating adults to lift up their schools in prayer.
Our client has prayed at the poll every year on behalf of her students.
This year, she had gathered with two friends and fellow teachers to pray at
the school flag pole. The school principal called these teachers into his office,
then told them they could not pray at the poll or in the presence of
students, because if they did so, students may see and join in.
Wouldn't it be interesting if they applied that standard to sexual content. You can't
show people pictures of what you do as adults, and you can't talk to
them about what you do as adults, because you know, if you did
that kind of thing, the students might want to join in us Precisely why
these people are doing it, you know, he told them that it was
against the law for them to pray publicly where students could see them, and
then pointed to a school policy. Those school policy is not the law that
prohibited teachers from praying in the presence of students. What do we do if
there was a law like that. You know, what if the government said
you can't pray in public, or let's say, what if the government said
you can't meet in public because there's this mysterious virus going around that you don't
see anybody sick with. What would we do in the case of that,
Or even if it was a virus that was going around that was real and
you see people dropping life lise and they say, well, everybody's sick.
You can't go, you can't have a church service here. Well, what
should we do? I said at the time when this was being locked down,
I said we should do what did Daniel do? Well? When they
told Daniel he couldn't pray, way he do. He went up into his
room, He opened up the windows so that everybody could see, and he
prayed there on the balcony, right there the window, so that everybody could
see what he was doing. He flaunted it to them. We need to
engage in that kind of civil disovenience. That's a good example that Daniel did.
There. No, you can't tell me anything about this. And yet
we had a lot of people who put the pinwheels on their heads, so
to speak, and did whatever the government told him to do. This is
the free exercise of religion. This is not about establishing a religion. If
you establish a religion, what you're telling people is that they must do this,
They must attend, they must pay money to this church or whatever.
The people who found this country knew exactly what that was about. That's what
they had left England for and that's what they were afraid the federal government was
going to do. Because all these different states at the time had established religions,
but even if you didn't attend, you still had to pay the established
religion of the government schools that even if we don't attend, we still got
to pay. That needs to be taken down for the same reasons you took
down the establishment of religion, Because the schools are there to establish a religion.
Whether it's secular, humanism, Marxism, racism, whatever it has sex,
it's there for that purpose. The acl J explained that the constitution quote
protects the rights of religious employees to pray even publicly. They do not somehow
lose their constitutional rights just by being a government employee. And this is the
whole issue with the military mandates as well. A lot of the people military
people say, well, you're you signed the military, so you've got to
take orders. I signed up to support the constitution, and you know,
if supporting the constitution means that I disobey orders, I'm going to support the
constitution. And this, folks, is why they were moving duty honor country
at West Point for the same reason. And they put out these mandates and
kick people who put duty on our country in the constitution ahead of unlawful unconstitutional
orders. The school was centered demand letter giving instructions to stop infringing on their
First Amendment rights responded, but then abruptly doubled down on its position. It
continues to insist that teachers or other employees can read or pray religious materials during
a time when students are not present, be eventally only at that point in
time. So, finally, like I said before, yeah, but porn
is okay, right, porn for kids is being labeled as decency. You
see, prayer is bad, porn is good. Now here's the equation.
School is bad. Democrats and Wednesday are pushing their decency agenda so that children
will have access to pornographic materials in libraries. This is in Maryland, and
this guy that' said blowing whistle on it's with the Maryland Family Institute, he
said. The term or well in has overused a modern political discourse. That's
because the authoritarian regime of George Orwell's classic dystopian novel is an easy comparison for
whatever thing the speaker wants to argue against an a political debate. But sometimes
the comparison is truly deserved, like when politicians seek to quell political discourse by
torturing language itself to suit their ends. And he said, this is what's
happening with their decentcy agenda. A Democrat with the Maryland Legislature and the House
of Delegates has a decent Sea agenda. Oh that sounds good, right,
So I'm not asking for Marylanders to believe in what I believe in or compromise
their values. We know that we will never agree on everything. We shouldn't,
said the person with the Family organization. But they said, this is
about respect, said the Democrat. But the actual contents of the agenda a
little bit different, such as Freedom to Read Act hidden among other non discrimination
schemes, would simply take away the abilities of libraries to get state funding to
regulate or to restrict access to pornographic materials. I'm not exaggerating. Anyone paying
attention to debates about the content of public school libraries over the past several years,
including all the allegations of book banning, is familiar with the caliber of
smut that the radical progressives are trying to foist on our kids. The new
Decency Plan literally guarantees access to indecent materials. Well, this is what they
always do. Isn't it. They turn the language inside out upside down because
it is a perverted society that we have established here will be right back.
Whether you're feeling like the blues or bluegrass. ATS radio has you covered.
Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at a PS radio dot
com. If you're listening to the David Knight Show. Let's talk a little
bit about squatters, because we do have a solution for this. But I've
had a lot of readers who have contacted me. This listener says, well,
our government mandate citizens to house illegal aliens. It's starting to look that
way as a matter of fact. It's a workforce housing and community land trust
and it's a way to move against private property. As I've said before,
we got a pressure from the bottom in terms of people who are acting as
squatters. We also have pressure from the top with these private equity firms that
are coming in workforce housing, community land trusts. All a means to an
end to private property. And so the listener rights, will our government,
under the crises so called of illegal immigration, for humanitarian manipulative reasoning, mandate
the citizens of the US open their homes to house illegals. This reminds me
of the movie Doctor Schovago. Yeah, because this is all Marxism, isn't
It talked about that many times? You know, Doctor Shwago comes back.
There's a doctor from wealthy family. They have a big house and there's a
whole bunch of people living there and they're just waiting for him to step over
the line verbally or with a gesture or something like that so they can throw
him in prison. And they've relegated his family to a corner of the attic.
He knows their game. He's very obsequious to them, I think,
but it's a lot of pressure and they just come out, you know,
No, this is for the we've just commandeered this. As I said many
times before that as a kid, when I saw that, I completely missed
the love story stuff just went over my head, the adulterous affair and all
the rest of the stuff which annoyed my parents. But it was a communism
that I saw there. I was like, whoa that? So you pick
up on different things where the Communists took of a rush of the mandated private
houses be proportioned into smaller living quarters for multiple numbers of people. To occupy
for you know, equity or in the recent past and Europe, older people
kicked out of their long held places of residence to house newly arrived illegal immigrants.
Also recent houses recently, houses that are owned by citizens in the US
not occupied due to house being empty sale or rent, now vulnerable to anyone,
including illegal aliens, to come in. That's why I said, you
know, we have to I think the term squatter is probably the best term
that we could have. They don't you know, ap and these language police
have different things that they're pushing. I think maybe that's the best term we
could have. This was sent to me by handy Ems out of Atlanta.
He said, here's another story about the homeowner arrested in their own home.
This one, though it's in Atlanta. Remember before we had New York.
A lot of people look at I say, oh, it's just New York.
New York is crazy, and it is crazy. But as I mentioned
before, I goa tree. One of his employees had a situation with us
in Texas. Here's one in Georgia. It isn't exactly the Swater kind of
theft, he says, but notice that in this case, the rightful homeowner
was also arrested. Ironically, they say it made us feel like squatters.
He said, to my knowledge, squatters are treated far better than this man
who actually owned the house. So again they're elderly, he said, this
is pretty close. I could drive there in a half hour, forty five
minutes or so from where he lives. And this story, this is a
couple they're forced out of their home after somebody stole it from them. Now
this is not somebody physically occupying it as a squatter. This is something where
based on their age there's seventy seven. Perhaps they had probably paid off this
home loan and somebody then took out a loan on it, because if it
was encumbered with another loan, probably somebody would have noticed that when they're filling
out the paperwork. But I think he found this old couple who had paid
off their mortgage and I didn't have a mortgage on the house, and they
filed paperwork there used that to take out alone. And so they had a
local TV reporter who investigated this. So they'd lived in the house for more
than twenty years. But when the reporter got there, all their belongings were
outside on the yard and She said, it made us feel like we were
squatters. They just tossed my stuff out like it was trash. A man
used fraudulent documents to take over her property, and her husband was arrested for
refusing to leave. She said, I don't know how this is possible.
How does this happen? She said she and her husband began getting letters in
the mail saying that taken out. Oh, it was wrong. It was
a second mortgage. They did already have a mortgage. She was able to
do this second mortgage because I guess, you know, the first first mortgage
company, they're already secured in their position. But they said there was something
about a second mortgage, which they said they never took out. We don't
have a mortgage like that. By Tuesday, a man told them that he
was the owner and had purchased the home from foreclosure. It's too easy to
forge a deed and to record it, she said. It's a big problem
nowadays because of the fact that e filing and the e recording of deeds is
so easy. It's very easy to record forged deeds. Again, if you
bought a house recently, you know, you do everything. They send you
stuff by mail, you know, you don't have to even have a closing
in person anymore. They can do it well, e documents and things like
that. Another example. Why you know you can have you can have fraud
with anything. It's just that when you have the digital world, it makes
the fraud so much easier to accomplish. It really does. That's what concerns
me about cryptocurrency. Notaries are not checking identification on these documents they said,
to verify this, and there's no place for them to contest this. They
said, there's no people's court for challenging a wrongful foreclosure or for challenging a
forged deed. That is the fundamental problem. And her husband was still in
jail when they got there. Even if a homeowner can prove that they've been
the victim of this type of fraud, a judge can still order them to
move out and still order them to pay. Isn't that amazing? Even if
you prove fraud, a judge could still do this. This is why it's
so concerning now that we have Wall Street casting such a lustful eye on single
family homes. What is really going to be the result to this? One
listener wrote me and says, well, they're going to control the price.
That's going to be the bottom line on us. And that is really true.
They will control the price. That's what happens when that's the purpose of
them trying to get a consolidation, a monopoly. You know, when you
have fewer of them and they're very big, they can control the price.
Just take a look at what is happening with usery laws that have long since
been removed on are the banking services? You know, now that we have
fewer banks, do they pay you any interest? Now? Do they charge
you extraordinary amounts on credit cards and all the rest of the stuff. This
is what is going to happen as these same ruthless companies get the majority of
the vast majority, and they're almost at the tipping point right now. Forty
four percent of the homes, as I pointed out last week, forty four
percent of the homes that were sold were bought by these private equity firms.
And that's more than double what people were pointing and they said, well,
you know, right now it's about you know, sixteen twenty percent or whatever.
It's going to be at sixty percent in a few years. But it's
already double what those people were saying it's going to go over the fifty sixty
percent thing much much sooner. So I had a listener who sent this said,
since the housing crisis, this is really exploded, and so here's some
pros and cons that think about. He says, first of all, it's
going to be increased rental supply. That's a pro. He says, here
he's got three pros and a couple of cons. And increased rental supply,
well, that would be a pro. I think if you wanted to rent,
But not everybody wants to rent, and most people realize that with renting
you never get any equity in anything. It's not a Renting is the way
that the person who owns the stuff and rents things out. That's the way
they get really wealthy. That's why the renter economy is what they want to
impose on everybody for everything, whether you're talking about a home, or you're
talking about your car, even when you're talking about software, they all want
the renter model. They don't even want you to own DVDs, they want
you to rent them, streaming them all the time, or CDs music.
Everything is about making sure that you don't own anything so I don't know that
having an increased supply of rental stuff is necessarily a good thing. Professional management
homes are typically managed by professional property management companies. But again, the even
before the Trump lockdown, you were starting to get a concentration of this stuff,
and now after the lockdown, it has accelerated it. And if you
have a limited number of people owning this property, we know that with lack
of competition, what they're going to do, they're not going to be managing
it all that well. And then access to capital, he says, is
a pro Private equity firms have significant financial resources to purchase and renovate properties on
a large scale. Well that's assuming that that's what they want to do.
But then of course they will also set the price, and if there's a
few of them, they're going to set the price pretty high. That's the
reason they want to consolidate. That's the reason why you have all these billionaires,
from David Rockefeller up to Peter Til saying competition is a sin. Peter
Til didn't use that word because he doesn't have any concept of sin. David
Rockefeller, you know, is a nominal Christian or whatever you know, living
in America, at that point in time. People understand that vocabulary, whether
they were Christian or not. But Peter til doesn't use that exact phrase,
but it means the same thing. You know, the greatest evil is competition.
They say, so they need to consolidate everything. On the con side,
you got reduced home ownership properties. And that's a big con h because
the big, the truly big con as we all know, and they've been
upfront about it, is that you will own nothing, that you'll rent everything
from them, and then they will be able to increase the rental rates.
That's a number two negative. And then the impact on the community. Some
critics argue that the prevalence of investor owned rental homes can change the character and
the stability of neighborhoods traditionally dominated by owner occupied housing. Oh absolutely, take
a look at housing projects with welfare and does anybody ever fix those up?
No, if they do anything, the kids will destroy it, put graffiti
all over it. That's not the case with you know, growing up in
Tampa, you could see the difference there. There were a lot of old
neighborhoods that right after I left graduated and got married and moved away and they
came back. They had a mayor there in Tampa, Sandy Friedman. They
called her Sandlot Friedman because she was going in and confiscating single family detached homes.
They were very poor homes. They didn't you know. They were very
small, and the people were poor. They'd had them for a long time.
But you would come in and say, well, your grass is not
mowed mode properly, so we're going to hit you with fines and let these
finds rack up, or come in and say, well, I see some
you need to repaint that house. And if you don't repaint that house,
I'm going to start giving you a fifty dollars a fine, a fifty dollars
a day fine or something like that. And before long these people couldn't afford
it, and they would confiscate their house for a very small fine, small
compared to the value of the house. But these people, these neighborhoods were
much much nicer than you would see in a government housing project because they would
keep it up as well as they could. They might not be able to
put a new coat of paint on it, but they would keep it clean.
They keep the yard clean, and it was a completely different prospect.
But today all of the governments want to make sure that we don't have a
taken anything, that all the stakeholders are going to be this small group of
people out there. It's so bad that bab one Bee's even picked up on
it. A new squat BnB service to help squatters find the perfect home to
take over. That's their take. Bad one Bees take on all this.
Far too often squatters take over a new home without knowing the quality of amenities
provided or the difficulties dealing with the host, said squat BnB CEO. Our
service allows squatters to read reviews from other squatters who have stated a property and
to see honest feedback about what each home has to offer. We have millions
of homes on our site ready for immediate squatting, and the best part is
it's absolutely free. Squat BnB will allow squatters to write reviews and to post
photos from any home that they have stayed in, as well as leaving a
rating for the owner of a home. Sadly, some homeowners can be difficult
to communicate with on issues such as utilities, are not wanting to give up
their beds for the squatters. Owners can leave reviews about the people squatting on
their home that other hosts will be able to read. Squatters who consistently achieve
good rankings will be highlighted as super squats, which helps them to get access
to luxury properties. Michigan is offering homeowners five hundred dollars a month to house
newcomers, newcomers. See, that's what we said. This is where this
is happening. A couple of these articles talking about that and calling them newcomers.
I guess I don't call them illegal aliens or foreign citizens here illegally,
or undocumented migrants or migrants or and certainly not newcomers. Call them squatters,
because that is the perfect metaphor for what this is all about. The program
in Michigan is called the Newcomer Rental Subsidy. I mean it might as well
be squat BMB. It will provide shelter outside of state shelters for refugees quote
unquote, these people are not refugees. They're not fighting political persecution. As
a matter of fact, the Biden administration, we just opened up the borders
for so called refugees, tried to deport real refugees. The Christian Home School
family Germans who fled Germany because they're going to rest the parents and take the
kids away because they're homeschooling and the kids out of a religious conviction. They've
been left alone for ten fifteen years, and the Biden administration just last year
tried to deport them. They really were refugees, but they were the wrong
kind of refugees. Well, what do we do about this? Turns out
that there is a solution to this. You can outsquat the squatters. And
there's a guy in his name is Flash Shelton, that is evidently the real
name, and he has an organization where he helps people, and he was
interviewed by Varney on Fox News, and he has a squatter solution. Listen
to what he did at his mother's home to get rid of squatters. Swatters
took over my mom's house when after my dad passed away, we were trying
to sell the home. I called local law enforcement and as soon as they
saw that there was furniture in the house, they said that I had a
water situation and they had basically no jurisdiction and they couldn't do anything. So
I, you know, I dissected the laws over a weekend. I basically
figured out that until there's civil action, the squatters didn't have any rights,
So if I could switch places with them, become the squatter myself, I
would assume those squatter rights, and just in case they had a fake lease,
like I hear some do, I had my mom device, you know,
write me up a lease. We got to notarize. I packed up
my drove up there and past out the joint around four am. I waited
about eight eight thirty in the morning, three cars pulled out of the driveway
and I made entrance to the house. I put up cameras, waited for
them to come back, and they didn't have at lease, so that never
came into play. But when they came back, I just laid it out
for him, told him that it was all locked up cameras and the only
way they would get back in the house is if they broke in on camera
and I would prosecute. And I told him they had a day to get
their stuff out or the furniture was not theirs anymore. But you couldn't have
gotten them out unless they had left in their three cars in the morning.
You couldn't bang on the door walk in and tell her to get out.
You couldn't do that, could you. No, the law would prevent me
from physically removing them. However, being that I wasn't the homeowner, I
had more rights as a tenant. I would actually more rights than them.
So if if they were there, then I would have just entered the home
with a lease in hand. I would have just shown them the lease.
I would have walked past them and said, you know, I don't know
what you're doing, but I'm moving in. This is my house now,
And I probably would have just done anything and everything I could to make it
miserable for them so that they left on their own. Are you running a
service? Are you running a service now helping all the paint get squats out?
Yeah. So more importantly to that is I'm trying to change the laws.
That's my number one focus, so in helping others right now, since
you know, I feel bad I can't help everyone, but if we can
change the squadron laws, I feel like that's the way I can help everyone.
So every time I help someone, rather it's a you know, I
do zoom consultations. I ask people to make a donation to the cause,
and when I can physically, you know, go out and help them.
Yes, it is. It is something I am doing to help people now
as many as I personally possibly can. Yeah, United Handyman's Association. His
name is Flash Shelton. But isn't that interesting? He worked it out,
he says, So the so the government hates people who own things. Right,
So if I'm a tenant and I've got a lease that puts me in
a superior position to these people and I can get them out of there,
isn't that amazing that we have a government that allows squatters to take your property,
But we also have a government that will use swat teams without a warrant
to break into your home. I mean, you realize how the government has
been weaponized against us and against all principles, don't you? It truly is
amazing. Well again, you know, whether we're talking about squatters or we're
talking about swatters, swatters are good. Squatters are good to So just do
a no knock raid or a no knock and just take over the house either
way with a swatter or squatter. Our government is setting on us. We're
gonna take a quick break and we're gonna come right back. Stay with us.
Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best
channels anywhere from country to blues, classic hits to news. APS Radio curates
incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com.
You know, world of deceit. Telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, welcome back, and I
want to thank Jenleal mcguffin. Thank you very much. I appreciate that.
It's very kind and generous. On Rockfan, the tip it says, thank
you Dave for staying in the fight, keeping us informed with missed information.
Your sense of humor makes it fun. This only is a drop in the
gas tank. Well, thank you very much though I appreciate that, but
hopefully it helps. It's been a while since I've contributed, so here's a
step towards catching up. God bless you and your family for your active service.
Well, thank you very much. And also on rock Fan, thank
you Gregory Walter, and I want to thank just finish up with the Zell
people from March. This is let me continue and I read the name before
because it's somebody that has contributed twice this month, two of them as a
matter of fact, Gretchen C, William R. David M. Just An
F. Alexander W. Manny D, Jennifer J, Jeffrey C. Kenneth
C. Gregory, I, Kimberly M, Brian P. Jared You,
Scott L. Manny D again and Kyle H and Raymond G. Thank you
all of you. I really do appreciate that so much, and all of
us do in the family. Thank you. And I just want to say,
doesn't cost anything. If you like the broadcast, you really would appreciate
that and help people to find the broadcast. And I just remind people.
I know we didn't get into financial issues too much except in a tangential way.
But again, you know, having something that is that is physical,
that is private, that secures your financial transactional privacy is gold and silver people,
if you want to, as Gerald Clinty said on Friday, he says,
I use gold and silver. He says, I have a little bit
of gambling money that I put into crypto. That's kind of the way I
see it. It's like a stock market or something like that. It's very
volatile. But gold, even though we see the price change, is very
slow moving and progressive and is what you're really seeing is valuation and the value
of the dollar. That's what changes. Gold is pretty much keeping its value.
So that movement around there that you see really is the Fiat currency and
the arbitrary feeling about Fiat on any given day. So if you want to
try to prepare for that, Tony Ardban is a great way to his wise.
Wolf Gold is great way to buy gold and silver. He can handle
transactions of any size. He can help you with an IRA with a rollover.
You can also help you to gradually accumulate it in a small amount each
month, and you get to take advantage of the group buy there with wolf
Pack. So again David Knight Gold will take you to Tony Arteman's Wise Wolf
Gold. We got just a little bit of time left and I wanted to
talk a little bit about money before we leave. And of course we've also
got the red flag loss, which I did not get to today, but
we've just had MARYK. Garland announced that he wants to have a national red
flag on. Everybody is angry as they can be as the Biden administration,
and they should be. But you do understand this is another Trump precedent,
a precedent Trump he was the one who said we're going to take the guns
and do the due process later. And I said, well, you know,
if you set things up like that, and if you do gun control
by executive order with a bump stock, and of course Trump also did a
pistol ban, a pistol brace band, should say you do that kind of
stuff by executive order. Immediately La La Harris picked up on it, said
yeah, I'm going to do that as well. I become president. I'm
going to give them a hundred days to enact my gun control agenda. If
they don't do it, I'll do it myself, just as Trump just did,
and just as Trump did with the red flag laws. Now Biden is
doing it as well. It helps if you've got somebody who's got principle,
but the way that you defeat these things is at the state level. So
that's all I'm going to say about the red flag stuff today. But when
we're looking at money, understand that there is a relentless push to go cashless,
a relentless push to go into CBDC, and that more than the value
of gold or silver at any given moment relative to the dollar, is a
thing that motivates me on this. Australia's Bank West has announced that they will
go completely cashless this year this year. It is a subsidiary of one of
the biggest banks in Australia, that is Commonwealth Bank. Bank West is the
subsidiary. They're already making great shifts to accommodate a cashless society, and earlier
this month the bank announced that they would be closing the remainder of their branches
and focusing strictly on digital. They said this transition of Bank West to a
digital bank will result in the closure of forty five Bank West branches by October
of this year. Another fifteen branches will be converted to locations of Commonwealth Bank.
Bank West says their decision rests in that quote, ninety seven percent of
all Bank West transactions are now completed digitally and fewer than two percent of customers
visit the branch regularly. They added that the average number of over the counter
transactions are thirty per day and fifteen in regional Western Australia. This is why
Catherine Austin fits so we've got to set aside today Cash Friday. She said,
make sure you use cash. If you don't use it you're going to
lose it. And we've seen this. This is Austra we saw it happen
and I think it was Finland, was one of the Scandinavian countries. I
think it was Finland. They said, well, look, nobody is using
cash anymore, so we're just going to shut it down, just this extra
thing. And why do we have ATMs all the rest of the stuff if
people are not going to be using cash and so, you know, the
convenience just being able to take out a plastic card and swipe it. If
we don't get the cash and use cash, then they will. It'll make
it very easy for them to take it away. And again, cash is
anonymous unlike anything else cash or gold or something like that that's physical. None
of these other things are going to have that kind of anonymity, and so
we need to try to force ourselves to do that. Dave Ramsey is always
against using credit cards, and we would have people on to talk about,
you know, not going into debt, not going into credit cards. They
really hated the plastic card stuff. And I remember he had a physician on
who said, yeah, you know, I don't struggle with this as much
as somebody else or the smaller income would. But he goes, I force
myself to use cash, even when I get gasoline, force myself to go
in and hand them cash and then go back and get the change and all
the rest of stuff, because he said, I don't want to get in
the habit of running stuff up on a credit card. And when you have
a certain amount of cash and you force yourself with a discipline of just using
that cash, that instinctively is going to limit what you can buy. Well,
I just don't have the money for whereas if you got the plastic you
can continue to imcrew debt. So it's a smart thing from a budgetary standpoint
point, from a way to control your expenditures to have that, but it's
vitally important for us to maintain that anonymity. By the way, this ridiculous
bill that was passed by the House, you know, they put it out
in the dead of night, like two thirty in the morning, one thousand
pages, one point two trillion dollars and additional spending. And by the way,
that's an addition to the one trillion dollars that's added every hundred days because
of debt. Interest on the debt, I mean the way that they're going
into debt is just just unbelievable. But that bill that funded all this stuff
and went right through the House, and of course over the weekend we had
some House members pushed back against that. That only went through after they removed
a censorship anti censorship thing and an anti CBDC thing. That shows how important
those are. That's even more important to them to be able to spend their
one point two trillion dollars on all their special projects without any oversight or accountability
is to make sure they keep censorship. There, no anti censorship, no
anti CBDC, and it's in the Senate. Thank you for joining us.
The David Night Show is a critical thinking super spreader. If you've been exposed
to logic by listening to The David Night Show, please do your part and
try not to spread it. Financial support, or simply tell the others about
the show causes this dangerous information to spread. Father people have to trust me,
I mean, trust the science. Wear you mask, take your vaccine,
don't ask questions using free speech to free minds. It's the David Night
Show. Mm hmm.