Attention. You're listening to the Tod Huff Radio show, America's home for conservative
not Bitter Talk radio. The advised the content of this program has been documented
to prevents and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean to
the rights. Here's your Conservative but not Bitter host, Todd Huff. Greeting's
my friends, and thank you so much for tuning in to America's home or
conservative not Bitter Talk. I am your host, You ever so beloved.
Tod Huff. Email Todd at tot huffshow dot com and can also text us
through one seven two one zero twenty eight thirty if you want to join the
conversation of what we're going to be jumping into today, which includes a lot,
a whole lot, and it's going to remain this way for some time.
And that's okay. You are in good hands here at the Tod Huff
Show. By the way, I'll tell you, you know, with this
program airs of course on the radio, it airs as a podcast and also
we record it in studio and you can watch it on our website, tot
huffshow dot com. You can watch it on Rumble. We don't put it
to YouTube. Because YouTube will just take it down because you know YouTube.
But I have Oz asked me, She's like, you're wearing that time,
Agam, I'm wearing this. She's like, you want to wear that hoodie?
I got a hoodie on it, I said, Oz, I wear
official tot huff Show merchandise on this. I don't have it on today.
I just have like a tire on that happens to be a gold Adidas hoodie.
Apparently doesn't make the mark for Oz. Anyway, it's good to be
here, thank you for joining us. And you know, a couple of
things I want to make sure we get to today. Number one, I
want to talk about this Trump trial in New York, the trial pertaining to
his real estate valuation loans. Letitia James, who by the way, by
the way, the idea that Leticia James the attorney general here in the case,
the idea, the idea that she is not politically motivated to stop Trump.
I mean, folks, there is documented evidence of this woman out there
talking about stopping Trump. I mean, I've got it somewhere in the stack
of stuff, or in the transition column between me finding it and putting it
in the stack of stuff. It's out there somewhere. I might play that
someone's taking the time to put some clips of her together. But the idea
that this is not a political witch hunt is I mean, at least at
least to some degree. I'm going to say one hundred percent. But for
someone who doesn't see the problem here, they are the problem. For the
American who is watching all of this transpire, my friends, and is not
bothered by this, they are by definition the problem in the equation. And
if you who've tuned in here today are one of those folks, I hope
that you listen, and I hope that you just are fair minded about it,
turn off that hate button for Trump just the moment you've tuned into the
right place. We're conservative not bitter. I do not I do not hate
the people that listen to this program. I don't hate anybody out there that
might tune into this program, that I might encounter on the streets and so
forth. We are, in fact conservative not bitter. And that, by
the way, that's apparently something that's in vogue to say if you're a politician
today. But they get it wrong. We had a politician say that on
Stay Bannoned the other Day Representative Birchett from the Knoxville area in Tennessee, where
we happened to broadcast. Ironically, sure he didn't hear it there or anything.
Anyhow. It's all in good fun. But if you're going to say,
you gotta say it the right way. It's conservative, not bitter.
Right, We're conservative, not bitter. It's not conservative but not bitter.
That's just missing the whole point here anyway. But there's two things we want
to talk about. One is the Trump trial. The other is the leaked
manifesto. And it looks like, I don't know did Stephen Crowder and release
this Initially, I've seen his name associated with some of this. Someone has
gotten this to someone. I think it might have been Stephen Crowder. And
this thing has been confirmed, this manifesto, which should be problematic and really
one of the main problems in both the trial and in the leaking of this
Nashville shure. This is the Nashville shooter that went to the Christian school months
ago, that shot innocent children and faculty and staff. They're killing I think
the number was six. I think it was six people that were killed in
that tragic shooting. The manifesto the list of if you want to say reasons
as though these things are reasonable, But the thinking or the feeling or the
emotion behind the shooter and why she went into the school and fired the weapon
killing children in faculty is in this manifesto. It's been released. Now,
you might say, why weren't we given that manifesto earlier. That manifesto has
been referenced for some time. They've had it for some time, but it's
not been released. It's now been leaked, and the authenticity of that manifesto
has been confirmed by a local media outlet in Nashville, Tennessee. So let's
those are the two things I want to get to. So we're going to
put that on the burner. I want to start with the Trump trial.
Trump testified on Monday at his trial. Again this trial, Letitia James tells
us she tries to convince us that the reason that she brought this case was
because Trump was acting fraudulently. Trump was, as she claims, dramatically overvaluing
his real estate property, especially mar A Lago, others as well, when
he would go to leverage that to get loans from financial institutions. So she
says, Trump is basically defrauding these financial institutions, these lenders, these banks
by telling them that his real estate is worth substantially more than she. Well,
I shouldn't say she. Then the court, who, by the way,
is being run by another rabbit anti Trumper, this judge in the case.
So you've got a rabbit anti Trump, I mean, just someone who
Trump lives in Letitia James's head rent free twenty four to seven. The same
is true with this judge, and so you have this trial. It's a
match made in heaven. It just so happens to be. I mean,
just think about this, by the way, just think about this. I
don't know when these the date of the first allegation of when Trump supposedly has
used inflated numbers of the value of mar A Lago, for example, I
don't know the first date that she's claiming that. But it just so happens
to a line up perfectly to begin this trial, to put Trump on stand
literally one calendar year from election day. Just the irony of iron, Just
what a coincidence. This has nothing to do with politics. We're supposed to
believe, this has nothing to do with anything besides Letitia James seeking justice for
the people of New York and so that's what we're supposed to believe. Of
course, it's it's complete craziness to believe. Then in the past, what
is it four or five six months that either all of these indictments have come
out, this trial has begun. You know. It just so happens to
be that the people running both the prose prosecutorial side of this case, of
all these cases, are people that hate Trump. The judges in most cases
hate Trump. We should not factor into anything, but of course we would
be fooling ourselves to believe that it doesn't. So the claim is that Trump
inflated his value of real estate, in particular the value of mar A Lago,
in order to get more money or better rates or what have you from
these financial institutions. Now it's interesting. It's interesting, you know, for
those of you who own homes or for those of you who are familiar with
real estate in general, there's an appraised value of real estate and there is
an assessed value of real estate. And that's where part of this discussion comes
into play. By the way, I don't know if you've ever read in
his book what's the book called Oz The Art of the Deal. In Trump's
book The Art of the Deal, he actually writes the story of how he
bought Mara a Lago and it's actually pretty fascinating, pretty fascinating. So someone
would make an offer for Maro a Lago. They would be going through the
process of buying mar A Lago, and inevitably the deal would fall through.
Trump was consistently bidding on the property. And so I'm just gonna give round.
This has been a long time ago, but this is in the book
The Art of the Deals. You've not read this. Trump would make an
offer, and the you know, the the folks selling the property would take
another offer because that offer would be worth more. And then inevitably this happened
multiple times, the deal would fall through. These are big deals, right
there. These are not deals that you can just waltz into as a first
time home buyer or some such thing. Someone who can only put five percent
down with no credit or whatever the case may be. And so you've got
this scenario where you've got a big deal. You've got people who banks think
have the goods, but they can't deliver when it comes time to close.
And so every time that would happen Trump would lower his offer. So let's
just say I don't remember the numbers, but let's just say the first time
he offered twenty million, and the deal that the seller took before Trump bought
the proper instead of taking Trump's, that deal would fall through. So Trump
would resent his offer and submit another offer, and it would be for less
money. So say it goes from twenty million, I'm picking random numbers.
Don't get stuck on the numbers. He would then offer fifteen million. This
went back and forth several times until finally, finally the seller decided to take
Trump's offer and it was substantially less than his first offer, and Trump was
able to secure mar A Lago. And I remember reading in the book.
Wasn't even planning to talk about this until I was talking about mar A Lago.
But I remember reading in the book that I believe Trump said, there
is the value of the furniture at this property is worth what we paid for
the entire property. So Trump has purchased that property. He has owned the
property. By the way, through the testimony of what we heard, Trump
owns that property free and clear. There's no there's no mortgage or anything against
it. It's his according to what I'm understanding anyway. So the entire question
is when Trump submitted financials to these lending institutions banks, was he giving wildly
inflated numbers? Now, this is not as cut and dry as I think
the average American would like it to be. Trump mar A Lago. Mar
A Lago is a property that is my friend's. It's not comparable to a
whole lot, right, I mean, mar A Lago is a very unique
property. It is a beautiful property, a massive property, the building,
the estate, it's on the water. Remember when hurricanes come, the left
to pray, which is ironic because they don't believe in God, but they
pray to the universe, the same universe they screamed at when Trump was president.
Ah, Universe, Now let's universe, please please send the hurricane directly
tomorrow. Lago. I remember these tweets. I remember these comments back in
whatever hurricane was coming towards Florida. I don't know, a year or two
ago. This is These are the same people. I mean, this guy
lives rent free in so many people's heads, it's incredible. They want this
guy to suffer, They want this guy to pay, They need this guy
to feel pain, hurricanes, jail, financial ruin, losing elections, whatever
they can to make. Just think about living your life that way. By
the way, how pathetic that is. I don't live my life that way
with Biden. Biden's a lunatic. Biden's completely unqualified for office. You need
to know about that. This country cannot be made great again with people like
Biden in office. So I come in here to talk about it not because
I want Biden to suffer. I want that and I like for Biden to
well repent of some of this stuff, all of this stuff. But I
would say that about anybody as a Christian turned from the wicked ways and follow
the ways of Almighty God. But all that aside, I don't delight in
someone else's suffering. I just I'm too busy. I don't care. I
don't need someone else to hurt to make me feel better. What is that?
That is a mental illness, that's a sickness, that's a evil of
the heart. It's just a mess, is what that is. But that's
how the left is. And so so between praying for hurricanes to hit and
for financial calamity and for prison sentences for Trump, they have found a couple
of people, the prosecutor in the name of Letitia James judge down there in
that case to put on this show trial. Now I say show trial,
but cameras are not allowed in this courtroom, which is interesting and there's obvious
reasons for that and which we'll talk about next segment. But the whole premise
here is to say Trump inflated numbers to defraud these financial institutions. The problem
is the problem is is that mar A Lago is worth substantially more than it's
assessed value. We'll talk about that at the assessed versus a praise value.
And we'll also talk about the cameras in the courtroom situation, or the lack
thereof. And there's a reason for all this stuff. There's a reason for
all this stuff. Timeouts in order, though, my friends, timeouts in
order I want to talk about this. I still want to talk about this
manifesto from the Nashville shooter as well, and of course other things happening in
the news that we might touch on as we bob and weave between these complex
issues. But you, my friends, are in good hands today as you've
tuned into America's soil for conservative not better talk. I am your host,
the one, the only, the beloved Todd Huff back in just a minute.
Welcome back to my friends. So let's talk about this assessed versus appraised
value. Now, if you own a property, you know this. If
you're familiar with real estate, you know this. If there are property taxes
where you are, then there are people called assessors, and these are people
that work for the government, and what they do is they try to determine
a value of your home for tax purposes. Now, in the state that
I'm in, the great state of Indiana, there's been a lot of changes
in recent years pertaining to assessed value and capping property tax is they're not supposed
to change more than x percent per year or some such thing. There's limits,
And assessed value is for practical purposes, a tax valuation sort of system.
Assessed value and appraised value are not the same thing. In fact,
it's widely known. In fact, you'll hear experts say this. It's widely
understood that assessed value is often, in fact, I would say, usually
less than the appraised value. So what's the appraised value? The appraised value
is what someone who determines the actual market value of real estate would actually say
that something is worth. This might be done during the purchase or selling of
a home. An appraiser comes in to say and banks often do this right.
Banks will say, hey, we just we're lending you know, Tommy
and Betty, what is it a couple hundred thousand dollars to buy this house.
I just want to make sure, mister appraiser that we're not giving her
more money, giving this couple more money to buy this house than the house
is really worth. So go in there and try to determine the actual value
of the home. Now, I'm going to say, as someone who is
a free market capitalist, like we want these things to fit in nice,
neat little boxes. But ultimately what makes something worth something is when a buyer
and a seller agree on the value. And that's important. Now, the
government doesn't like to think about it like that. They want to say,
this is how much this is worth, This is how much that is worth,
This is how much you should pay people. This is all we're going
to manage all this stuff. You guys, get out of the business.
Free market, sit to the side. The real bosses are coming in to
tell you what everything's worth. And while there obviously can be some degree of
there can be some sort of agreement as to what, in general the value
of something is. But candidly, my friends, if you really think about
it, nothing if I'm not going to sell, if I don't sell something
and someone offers me, say someone offers me a million dollars for a piece
of property. Let's say the property the appraise value is two hundred thousand,
and I say, I'm not selling it for a million because it's just worth
I don't want to sell it for that. It's not worth that exchange to
me. You can make a case. I'm just pointing out, like,
this is not as black and white as people want it to be. And
I understand that there are people who do this for a living, and I
understand that there are comps, meaning that they try to find a comparable piece
of property, which good luck finding a comparable piece of property tomorrow. Log
and they try to extrapolate, well, this house was this many square feet,
this is how many acres they had, this is the access to the
water, this is the value of the community, this is this, this
is that whatever. And I'm not saying that there's no value in that.
I'm just simply saying it's not as cut and dry as people would have you
to believe. And so Trump is out here. What they valued mar A
Lago? Do? I almost say? I think it was eight seventeen or
eighteen million dollars is what the court says mar A Lago is worth. And
I've seen reports that there have been I'm gonna use air quotes, siginfold air
quotes behind the microphone here comparable properties in the area, which, again,
good luck finding a true comp for mar A Lago. It's such a unique
property, it's such a valuable property. It's such a one of a kind
sort of thing. It's really gonna be hard to determine an absolute you know,
this is what this property is worth sort of thing. Have you ever
watched I don't watch this, but I'm familiar with it. I don't even
know if this show is still on Antiques Road Show? You ever seen this?
You go in there, you take something that you found in your attic
or you bought it a yard sale, and you give it to someone who
understands the value of certain types of items, and you bring them a piece
of art, for example, that you that your family doesn't didn't know was
painted by some world famous artists, and then the painting is valued at five
million dollars or whatever, or behind your picture you've got a one of the
copies of the Declaration of Independence. I've seen people that have bought some of
this sort of stuff at garage sales and that sort of thing. You know
what I mean? You know what I mean by the way, I did
see real quick. Did you see the pawn shop tell what it's called a
pawn shop in Florida that someone was clearing out items and they brought in what
they thought was like a decorative Halloweens skull and it turned out to be a
real human skull. Osjuicy. Yeah, it was sitting in the display case
and some biologist or someone that was used to working with the human body came
in and said, you've got yourself an actual human skull there. Anyway,
the point is is that you have that, you'll have someone assess it or
appraise the value. I should say, someone who says, at auction,
this painting that you found buried in boxes of rubble up in the attic that
you didn't know you had. This painting at auction would bring somewhere between five
hundred thousand and one point two million or five hundred thousand and seven hundred and
fifty thousand. You see, there's a range because, my friends, it
is largely subjective. And the rarer something is, the more unique something is,
the less comparable it is to anything else. It becomes harder and harder
to determine a fixed value, and the courts are using assessed value. The
courts are ignoring other large number semi comparable valued properties in the quote unquote area.
In fact, I've seen some I want to say, one of them
sold for like three hundred million dollars. That's a quote unquote comparable. Trump
says it's fifty Their value of his property is fifty to one hundred times off,
and I mean, I tend to think that he's probably right by the
way Trump's done this his whole life. Trump Trump are allegedly because we don't
reportedly, I should say, because we don't let cameras in this courtroom,
which I did. Want to talk about that, and reporters if you're not
part of them. Oz shared shared with me a citizen journalist who was actually
kind of reporting on this, and I trust this lady's reporting infinitely more than
what I'm being fed by the media. And she's talking about the side show
that this is. She's talking about how the court is actually the aggressor.
She's not even a Trump fan necessarily, but she's talking about how the court
is the ones that are treating Trump inappropriately. They're the ones that are screaming
at Trump. And of course the headlines where Trump was leveling threats and everything
else against good old Letitia James, who's over there just innocently trying to do
her job. Give me a break, anyway, So you got all these
shenanigans going on in the courtroom. Trump's done this his whole life. The
court doesn't have a clue. The Trump hates court. Trump the Trump.
The court won't let cameras in the courtroom because of course they've got to maintain
the integrity of what's happening in their court. Dare I suggest, my friends,
if they don't want you seeing it, they want to have they're paid
shills where they're not necessarily on the courts payroll, but they're politically aligned with
these jokers, these professional deceivers in the media. They want those folks to
tell you, oh, we've got into been a journalists here, they're gonna
tell you what they saw. I bet they do. And then people like
true citizen journalists are forced into the overflow room where they have to watch it
on camera. They can't even watch it closed circuit television. They can't even
watch it in the courtroom because they're not apparently the ones that are that they
know, can be controlled and to advance the narrative. This is a show
trial. It's a show trial that they don't want you to see. It's
a show trial that they want their shills in the media to interpret and tell
you what they saw. Don't believe any of it. I'm telling folks,
I have zero faith in these people. I know, Oh it's time to
take a break, and we're gonna do that, But I want to talk
about cameras in the courtroom when we get back or lack thereof time out.
My friends, you're listening here to conservative not better talk. I am your
host, the one, the only beloved tat huff back in a minute.
I'm backing my friends. You know someone who personally knows that this host,
yours truly is ever so lovable and easy? What's Oz? Of course OZ
knows this, but someone else that knows this is Crispin Cruise at Sales Arbiter.
Crispin helps our sales team with advertising sales. He's been a huge blessing
to this program. He's been a huge blessing to our sales team. And
he coaches. He coaches the sales team. Is it's not just training.
There's lots of good training. Crispin provides good training, but it's more than
the training. It is the coaching. It is the how do I apply
the training In this particular instance, Crispin helps your sales team. You're a
sales manager, if you're a business owner, if you're someone who's in charge
of sales or cares about sales at a company, and you need your salespeople
to be better at selling the right way, by the way. That's the
other thing. There's no tricks or gimmicks or you know, manipulation. It's
it's learning how to sell, how to deal with people, how to communicate,
answer questions, all that sort of stuff. Coaching, training, all
of that stuff in the trenches with the sales team. If you need that,
if you need to see an increase in production, if you need to
see your sales cycles shortened. Boy, that is a tongue twister. If
you want to see your sales team scaled so that you can grow to that
next level that you're trying to get the company, I encourage you to reach
out to my friend Crispin Cruise at sales arbiter dot com. That's sales arbiter
dot com. Sure to tell Crispin you heard about him here on the Todd
Hff Show. And I'm sure he has some stories behind the scene stories for
you as well. So I've been referencing this citizen journalist that Oz cannect Well.
Oz told me, hey, look at she's she's going to the courtroom
New York. She's reporting on this. She's a citizen journalist. I think
Oz told me she's this particular individual. She lived in California. She moved
because she learned California as a No, she still lives there, Okay,
I thought ozad told me she moved. Now Oz is very unhappy with me
for getting that part wrong. So she still lives there, realizing she's in
a full blown communist state, but she's reporting. She she's I think she's
been awakened to what's going on around her. As many people have in the
past past few years. And so she's gone to New York City to watch
this this trial, and I want to read some of what was on that
she was reporting. I want to just read some of what she posted yesterday.
And her her name is so I don't house and habit. That's the
Instagram OZ loves Instagram. What's her name, Jessica Kraus, House and habit.
That's the if you want to follow she puts this stuff. I don't
even know what you call these things Instagram stories. So they fade away or
vanish or whatever. Here's what it says. Despite the hate, she writes,
it's cutthroat at court today. This was on Monday. All these bitter
biden stands. These are blinded fans of the of a particular person cult of
personality, I guess, are desperate and aggressive, trying, dying to catch
a glimpse of a guy they despise. We talked about that a little bit
earlier. She said it's the equivalent of her waking up at dawn and standing
in the freezing cold to see Megan Markle out of book signing. Admittedly,
she writes, it's hard for me to understand the barking Biden stands because they're
all wearing masks. The guy next to me says he hopes to see Trump
muzzled and shackled like Hannibal Lecter. Folks. Again, these folks, it's
not enough for these folks to see what. It's not about justice. It
is about inflicting pain on Trump, hurt him. Oh they are so they
are so riddled with I mean, so many negative emotions. I think some
of it's jealousy, some of its bitterness, some of its rage, some
of it is I mean, I think for some of them, in the
circles that they walk, this is expected. This is like a virtue signal
to the group. I hate Trump worse than you hate Trump. No way,
man, I hate him worse than you. When I was in Mom's
basement yesterday, eating some orange wedges and slamming back some caprice sun, I
came up with this reason to hate Trump. Oh yeah, well, I
think I want to seem shackled up like Hannibal Lecter anyway, she continues.
A retired retired attorney in the mix is here out of legal interest says he
was a big Fanly she's just talking about RFK s or I don't want to
that's not relevant to what I want to talk about anyway, she says,
basically, the Biden liberals will stand in very long lines to literally hate on
everyone. So then she writes this, they cut off public access to today's
hearing, meaning only media outlets, And she writes with agenda she's spot on
with that are are in there funneling out information. So so it just so
happened that there got to be too many journalists. So they said, let's
get the official journalists quote unquote official journalists from the official outlets. Let's throw
them in the courtroom. Everyone else can go into this overflow watching area.
You just go into this room and you're gonna watch it on the closed circuit
television. So she writes again, she says, we are she's a citizen
journal She's not in that crowd of people that are professional deceivers. Right,
so we're in overflow watching the live feed. Keep in mind there's no jury,
which is true, this is not a jury trial, and there's no
public access. Of course, we know how all know how this is going
to end here, right, no cameras are allowed. Measure taken today to
ensure that Trump's testimony is translated through the mainstream through well, she writes MSN,
but through the mainstream media. They don't want they don't want you hearing
it. They don't And I've read she's shared. I can't go into all
this because of time, but she's shared some things as to what was happening.
Actually, I am going to read a couple more of these. We
cannot read the live or excuse me, record the live feed, she writes,
taking notes to share at lunch break. Camera at the time was focused
on Trump's an empty chair that awaited Trump. That was before he took the
stand. She talks about him coming in. He's not smiling. They just
let us so when he went to the stand, she said, there were
roughly ten cameras that went and they took pictures. They let that happen to
get him, get that, to get that. But we can't let you
hear what he says. We can't have any of the testimony. We just
need the image. We just need the equivalent of the mugshot. Trump takes
the stand, she writes, announces his full name after being sworn in,
lists his residence upon beach. They're diving straight into his assets and a trust
he established after he said he won. Oh boy, And then of course
Trump's being Trump. She says, he's now telling a story about George Washington
having two desks and how it relates to conflict of interest, talking about his
son Don Junior, Eric Trump praising them, He points out that he's taking
shots from fifteen different sides from democcratic Trump haters. That's of course true.
Now. Trump is then scolded for offering quote narratives to his answers, told
to stick to answering open ended questions, no speeches, the court told him,
just answers, or maybe it was the attorney's so they didn't like Trump's
answers. No, no narrative, just answer the question right. And look,
I understand, I understand the court. I understand that the prosecutors are
going to object, and the judge can rule and say, look, you're
you're providing way more than an answer to the question. But the court also
cannot force the testimony of a witness. The court cannot also say, in
a case like this that is entirely that is based largely in the subjective value
of real estate, that no one else can compare anything to Trump has to
be able to give context. Trump has to be able to give quote unquote
some form of what they would call the narrative. You can't. You have
to give the witness the ability to truly answer the question. They're playing games
with Trump, and ultimately they're playing games with you, my friends, I've
got to take a time out. Sit tight, you're listening any conservative not
better talk? I am your host, tot huff back in a minute,
walking back to my friends. I'm not sure I'm gonna be able to get
to this manifesto. In fact, I'm almost certain that I can't, now
that I looked and see what we have remaining, because I folks, this
whole situation, and I guess I guess I will say this the manifesto,
So I guess I can merge the two heres. We're talking about Trump's case,
what's happening in the courtroom, the narrative, the intent, the deception,
the just the way that this is being handed by governing authorities. Now,
the media is the media. We know who they are, but we
also know who the government is. Right, both of these groups are part
of the seven pillars of propaganda. They don't want you knowing the truth.
They want to influence you and push you in a certain direction to cause you
to come to a certain conclusion, and that conclusion is that Trump is a
danger. That conclusion is that Biden or anyone besides Trump, but whoever the
Democrat is, is the answer to America's ills. The problem, of course,
is that we have witnessed and lived what a Democrat running this country looks
like. Today's modern Democrat party run by the extreme, godless, radical left.
We've seen what that looks like. People have understood that the answer is
not to continue in this nonsense. The answer is to change course and go
back to Trump. More and more people are awakening to this reality. Now,
I will say I will say that the way that they want to control
the messaging coming out of the of that courtroom is very similar to the way
they want to control the messaging coming out of the Nashville school shooter case,
where this individual went to a Christian school in Nashville, Tennessee, shot and
killed students and faculty. Wrote a manifesto explaining the again, the rationale,
I don't like to use the word rationale, but the thinking, the motivation,
and it's amazing, really, it's amazing. To know that what appears
to have motivated this shooter is the leftist narrative, the leftist narrative that is
being pushed on people, that is causing people to be turned into I mean
again, it's not the sole cause of it. The narrative can't make people
do things, but it can certainly be part of that fuel and part of
that accelerant process. So that manifesto, which I can't get into, it
shares some damning things. It sounds like a leftists. I mean, it
sounds like the leftist playbook, the way that she writes about Christians and so
forth, Whites and so forth. Anyway, I'm just out of time.
It's all about deception, though, my friends, and about advancing the political
narrative. Back here in just a minute, welcome back to my friends.
Again. It is about controlling the messaging. It's about trolling the narrative.
It's also about putting Trump in prison if they can't. Now, this particular
case is not you know, doesn't carry with it that that particular consequence,
but that it's it's again, it's about hurting him, it's about getting even
it's about whatever they can do. But it's ultimately about protecting what they've created
here. They will not seed an inch of ground politically in this country without
one heck of a fight. We've got to be prepared to engage and to
fight back, my friends, SDG