Hullo and welcome too. Transmission acts. I am your host, Nate Allen,
and this is the second recording the date December thirty first, twenty twenty
three. For those of you who listened to the previous transmission, we are
going to continue to shed light on the Mandela effect. For those of you
who have not, please go back and listen so that you will understand the
referenced material. Now moving forward. A transmission is a signal sent from one
person or place to another, and it is my hope that this signal provide
you a beacon to tune to to find what it is that was meant to
find you. You have found this frequency. It is not in error,
so stay tuned and most importantly, be ready. What truth that you are
a slave near like everyone else you, you were born into bondage, born
into a prison that you cannot smell or taste or touch, a prison for
your mind. What if I told you that everything you know is about that
your entire life has been a mere illusion, carefully constructed to deceive you.
What if I told you that there is a world beyond this one, a
world where humanity fights for its survival against machines. Would you believe me.
No, I don't believe it. It's not possible. Unfortunately, no one
can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.
This is your last chance. I'm offering you a choice. If the
Blue Wheel the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever
you want to believe. Take the Red Bill. You stay in Wonderland,
and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes? Do you recognize that?
Does that sound familiar? When I first heard that, I could remember
the speech. This was Morpheus's speech to Neo. I heard this and knew
it. But this speech was never actually in the movie, and the movie
was the Matrix. Do you remember that speech somehow? When Ai was asked
about quoting the Matrix, that was the recording that was produced. Now,
how would AI know if that speech wasn't real? This has happened many time
with Ai. AI confirms suspicions of many a victim of the Mandela effect,
from movie quotes to commercials. It is confirming, if anything, that something
strange is happening, as it often confirms the memory of the person affected by
the Mendela effect. Some who do not understand AI will say that it is
just being programmed by humans whose memories are fallible. But even if the world's
smartest technology doesn't sway you, how about one of the most important books of
antiquity that is still the best selling book of all time today. Remember when
I said in the first transmission that changes to reality are happening in real time.
While researchers into the Mandela effect are noticing that the Bible itself has been
and is being altered, and not just edited, not just translated incorrectly,
but changed supernaturally. And researchers are also noticing that the King James version is
being affected the most. But some examples, like the one I'm about to
give you, are in every single version translation and copy. Exodus thirty four
fourteen, it reads, for thou shalt worship no other God, for the
Lord whose name is jealous is a jealous God. Now, for those of
you like me who have been raised on the Bible, do you remember Exodus
thirty four fourteen When I learned that chapter that verse in context, it was
referring to the fact that God wanted only your love worship, an adoration that
there was no other God to be placed before God. Himself, that God
wants your love and devotion, and that you should not worship any other God,
and that there is no other God. That is how it is explained.
But was his name ever jealous? Some remember yahweh Yehovah, God just
simply God, But was it ever jealous? Many many people, including myself,
never ever remembered his name ever being jealous. In the first transmission,
also, I made clear that the Mandela effect produced a feeling of doubt,
confusion, bewilderment. This one verse has caused that feeling in many a researcher.
This is one of thousands of examples throughout one of the most believed in
and read texts in the entire world. Supernaturally altering texts that are associated directly
with belief is very similar to deconstructing an ornate, beautiful building by chipping away
at its base from the inside out. At first, you notice very little.
The building still stands, still looks the same, still holds together,
and it remains. But over time the architecture holding everything together can no longer
do its job, and by the time you notice the structural damage from the
outside, it's too late. The human mind is very similar, and language
provides a similar structure for a belief. I present it to you a clip
created by artificial intelligence, and that clip was mistakenly quoted from the movie The
Matrix, well before The Matrix was ever a movie. How often did you
hear the term matrix? I found that the term was coined in eighteen fifty
by a Jewish mathematician named James Joseph. It has been noted that he invented
the term. But then, if that is true true, why does that
term show up five times in the King James version of the Bible. Here
are a couple of examples. And remember what I am telling you about structure,
light, and hope. If this book is being bombarded by confusion and
doubt, well let's look at these examples. Just a couple. Exodus thirteen
twelve, that thou shalt set apart unto the Lord, all that openeth the
matrix. And again Exodus thirty four nineteen, All that openeth the matrix is
mine. Now this surprised many many people that stumbled upon this. One such
person is Katrina L. Martin. She has authored books on the subject,
and her research and contribution to this cannot be overstated enough. Now you may
not believe everything that she says, may have different opinions, but her research,
like I said, cannot be overstated if you simply look at just her
research on this subject matter. She has hours worth of material on her website
Bible dash Changes dot com, and you can also follow her on her YouTube
channel e y A censored that's e y A c E N s O R
E D. She has formed quite the community. I definitely recommend becoming a
part of her remnant list to keep updated on current alterations. With all that
being said, I will present a few more examples of the biblical Mandela effect.
Let's see what you think. Let's look at Luke nineteen twenty seven.
It reads, but those enemies of mine who did not want me to be
king over them, bring them here and kill them in front of me.
Other versions say slay them in front of me. But is this the Jesus?
You remember? This is Jesus. Read it in context, out of
context, however you'd like to read it. Let me read that again,
But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them,
bring them here and kill them in front of me. Would the Jesus
that told you to turn the other cheek, would that Jesus be the same
Jesus that would say bring them here and kill them in front of me.
Those examples are obvious, they stand out. They are examples that hit you
as soon as you read them. And there are subtle examples, but alterations
and changes all the same, like adding the letter K. Researchers have noticed
that words ending in C in the Bible happen to be getting an addition,
an additional K that should never have been there. Scholars the world over used
to use the Bible as an example, as a literary example, a grammatical
example, and now you can find spelling errors, grammatical errors running amok in
the Bible. But this particular subtlety adding the letter K, like in Matthew
one nine public as you know, spelled p u b lic in the Bible.
In Matthew one nine is spelled p u b lic K. In Titus
three ten heretics there it is again adding K to heretic Acts eight three.
Havoc adds a K at the end of Havoc. I'll get more into that
in the next transmission. But there are also subtle changes in spelling that almost
seem to mock the reader's intelligence. For example, in Genesis three one,
now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which the Lord
God had made. And he said unto the woman, yea hath God said,
yea, shall not eat of every tree of the garden. When being
read that, you cannot hear the subtle change. It is a letter.
It is the letter in the word subtle. Now the serpent was more subtle.
But the spelling in this text reads s U B T I L.
Why the misspelling of subtle. These subtle changes, coupled with the obvious changes,
are blatant. The more you sit down and read the word, I
phrase it in that way because scripture is called the word. Not only is
that the case, but the word in the Bible, the meaning is paramount.
Here is John one to explain that further. The Gospel, according to
John chapter one, in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was
with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning
with God. All things were made by Him, and without him was not
anything made. That was made. In him was life, and the life
was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness. The darkness
comprehended it not the darkness comprehended it not? What didn't the darkness comprehend the
word? Structure, frequency, light, the truth? The Word was God.
The darkness must be at odds with the word. If the dark doesn't
comprehend the light the word, then will those in the light not comprehend the
dark? The chaos? If the Mandela effect is not only affecting an alter
in reality, but also is seemingly altering the word, then what is the
word? If not reality itself? What becomes of belief in the word?
If the word is altered, is the word actually affected? Or is this
phenomenon just altering text? And who would want these changes in the kind of
man and in the belief of God to be altered? Stay tuned for the
next transmission, as I choose to shed even more light, to go deeper
down the rabbit hole on the potentially malignant Mandela Effect. May the new year
bring protection for the truth within you, and may you most importantly be ready